ReportWire

Tag: Journalism

  • Phoenix New Times inks new partnership to boost our membership program

    Phoenix New Times inks new partnership to boost our membership program

    [ad_1]

    Good journalism isn’t cheap to produce, so the support of Phoenix New Times members matters now more than ever to help sustain our work.

    That’s why we’ve been focused on building our membership program, hiring a membership manager, adding perks and hosting member-only events.

    Now, we’re pleased to announce a new partnership with News Revenue Hub, a nonprofit organization that helps news organizations like us raise money, build community support and avoid paywalls. They are pros at developing membership platforms that raise money and serve our readers, allowing us to concentrate on reporting the news you’ve relied on us to deliver since 1970.

    “We’re excited to add Voice Media Group’s publications in Denver, Phoenix, Dallas and Miami to our growing cohort of for-profit publishers this year,” said Abbey Gingras, News Revenue Hub’s consulting services director.

    The new partnership will help enhance our membership program, according to Lily Black, who joined New Times as membership manager in June.

    “I am looking forward to growing alongside News Revenue Hub’s clientele base of local publications that are supported by local communities,” Blake said. “This partnership presents a unique opportunity for us to enhance our program’s offerings and elevate our commitment to serving our loyal readers and members with even greater dedication and impact. Together, we can build a stronger, more vibrant network that enriches our local journalism landscape.”

    The new partnership aligns with New Times’ mission to remain independent and free of paywalls, ensuring that our stories continue to reach all readers across the Valley regardless of financial status.

    “We don’t believe the answer to more revenue is piling on more website ads,” says Chelsey Dequaine-Jerabek, editorial director for Voice Media Group, which owns New Times. “We believe that journalism thrives from diversified revenue streams. We believe in the power of community. And we believe that our readers’ support has the power to make a prominent impact.”

    Thanks to the partnership, readers will experience a revamped membership platform that explains our membership program and its benefits and makes it easier to financially support our journalism.

    We are calling on our readers to support New Times by contributing any amount to support our newsroom. Join our community of members, and we’ll put whatever money you contribute toward producing high-quality local journalism. We know you work hard for your money, and you can rest assured we’ll work hard for you, covering the Valley as only we can.

    Mark your calendar for our upcoming member event

    While we’re asking for your support, we’re giving back, too. In December, we toasted our members with a happy hour event that featured mixing and mingling with our editorial staff and a Q&A with veteran food critic Dominic Armato.

    Join us again on June 8 at Four Peaks Brewing Co. in Tempe, one of the best bars in the Valley. From 6 to 8 p.m., you can meet our editorial staff, grab a drink and enjoy a performance by a local band. If you’re not already a member, sign up now to be the first to get all the details about this upcoming event.

    As we’re ramping up our membership program, we’re also preparing our coverage plans for what promises to be a wild election season (keep an eye on our election topic page for the latest coverage). So we could use your support now more than ever.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Hennie

    Source link

  • History Happenings: March 2, 2024

    History Happenings: March 2, 2024

    [ad_1]

    The newspaper’s “Heraldings” column was a potpourri of city news. Included on this day in 1888 was news that the Newburyport Car Company received an order for open cars from Brockton. Plans to build another steamer for service on the river remained undecided, though likely. And some new horses for the N&A Railroad would arrive this day.

    — Museum of Old Newbury

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • It was a ‘Night to Shine’ at Beverly church

    It was a ‘Night to Shine’ at Beverly church

    [ad_1]

    BEVERLY — North Shore Community Baptist Church in Beverly hosted Night to Shine 2024, sponsored by the Tim Tebow Foundation, on Feb. 9.

    Almost 80 guests and their parents and caregivers attended the event, a prom-like experience centered on “God’s love and celebrating people with special needs,” according to a press release from the church. The event was held in-person by host churches around the world simultaneously on Feb. 9.

    The evening at North Shore Community Baptist Church began with guests walking the red carpet complete with an enthusiastic welcome from a friendly crowd and paparazzi. Once inside, guests received a corsage or boutonniere as well as the royal treatment at hair, makeup and shoeshine stations.

    The festivities continued with limousine rides, a catered dinner, karaoke and dancing. Every special guest had the honor of being crowned king or queen of the prom.

    Nearly 260 volunteers from area churches, Gordon College, Gordon-Conwell Seminary, Joni and Friends, and the community worked together to make the evening memorable, organizers said.

    This was the 10th anniversary of Night to Shine. The event has provided over a half a million guest experiences through hundreds of churches from 56 different countries.

    As sponsor, the Tim Tebow Foundation provides each host church with the official Night to Shine Planning Manual, personalized guidance from a foundation staff member, the opportunity to apply for a financial grant, and access to planning sources.

    [ad_2]

    By News Staff

    Source link

  • Special Town Meeting set for March 11; public meeting Feb. 14

    Special Town Meeting set for March 11; public meeting Feb. 14

    [ad_1]

    ANDOVER — The Select Board has set March 11 for a resident petitioned Special Town Meeting.

    The meeting was called after a group of residents filed a petition in an effort to stop the paving of a rail trail next to Haggetts Pond.

    Town officials say the goal of the paving project is to create an accessible trail, but opposition has grown from many in the community, including abutters, who worry about the project’s impact on the environment.

    A joint meeting of municipal boards and committees including the Select Board, Finance Committee, School Committee, Conservation Commission, Commission on Disability, Planning Board and Commission on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion has will be held Wednesday, Feb. 14, 7 p.m., at Wood Hill Middle School Auditorium, 11 Cross St., to discuss three articles included in the warrant set for the March 11 Special Town Meeting.

    During a Select Board meeting Feb. 12, one resident criticized officials for setting the meeting on Valentines Day; voicing his disapproval in a poem.

    According to the Feb. 14 meeting’s agenda, all seven groups will consider taking a position on the articles.

    The petitioners and other opponents of the project worry about potential impacts of the trail including on the town’s water supply, trees and the natural beauty of the location. Haggetts Pond also serves as the town’s water supply.

    Town officials, including the Director of Conservation Bob Douglas, have said paving the path will not harm the town’s water supply.

    The three articles seek to block the project through changes to Andover’s bylaw. Andover’s legal counsel Doug Heim said he will release a memo on the legality of the articles later this week.

    The town is planning on paving a roughly 1.6 mile stretch of trail, which lies adjacent to Haggetts Pond. The project would be funded by a state grant and American Rescue Plan funds.

    The project has most recently been under the scrutiny of the Conservation Commission which enforces laws related to the wetlands.

    This will be the second Special Town Meeting in the last six months. The most recent Special Town Meeting was a mix of resident- and town-petitioned articles and chiefly dealt with proposed new high school project.

    In order to follow state law, the Select Board must hold Special Town Meetings within 45 days after petitions have been submitted, said Select Board chair Melissa Danisch.

    [ad_2]

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Think the news industry was struggling already? The dawn of 2024 is offering few good tidings

    Think the news industry was struggling already? The dawn of 2024 is offering few good tidings

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — On Friday, the National Press Club is offering solace — and a free meal — by giving recently laid-off journalists tacos in recognition of a brutal stretch that seems to offer bad news daily for an already struggling industry.

    For anyone who works in the news media, the list is intimidating — and unremitting.

    The news website The Messenger folded on Wednesday after being in operation since only last May, abruptly putting some 300 journalists out of work. The Los Angeles Times laid off more than 100 journalists in recent weeks, Business Insider and Time magazine announced staff cuts, Sports Illustrated is struggling to survive, the Washington Post is completing buyouts to more than 200 staffers. The Post reported Thursday that The Wall Street Journal was laying off roughly 20 people in its Washington bureau; there was no immediate comment from a Journal representative. Pitchfork announced it was no longer a freestanding music site, after digital publications BuzzFeed News and Jezebel disappeared last year.

    And journalists at the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, New York Daily News and the Conde Nast magazine company have all conducted walkouts to protest how management was dealing with business problems.

    Seeing all the damage is what led to the Washington-based National Press Club to open its weekly Taco Night to laid-off colleagues and offer a one-month free membership to people who need a networking opportunity.

    “It’s very important when people have lost their jobs to know that they have some support behind them,” said Didier Saugy, the club’s executive director.

    The news business has been in a free fall for the past two decades, starting when much of its advertising moved online to opportunistic tech companies. Advertising is still a huge part of the problem, although there are more complex reasons and circumstances unique to individual outlets that also play a part.

    The situation is dire at larger, more national organizations and in smaller communities. A Northwestern University study released in November estimated the United States has lost one-third of its newspapers and two-thirds of its newspaper journalism jobs since 2005.

    The nation loses 2.5 newspapers per week — a pace that is accelerating, the study found. Through the end of November, the employment firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas estimated 2,681 journalism jobs were lost in 2023, and that tally has increased by hundreds since.

    One industry observer, Jeff Jarvis, wondered on his Buzzmachine website this week: “Is it time to give up on old news?”

    “There’s an inevitability to what is happening,” Jarvis, author of “The Gutenberg Parenthesis: The Age of Print and its Lessons for the Age of the Internet,” said in an interview. “Publications have been trying to preserve their old ways and their old models, and it is time for them to realize that it’s not working and now it’s too late.”

    While there have been some successes in news outlets shifting their business to paid digital subscriptions — most spectacularly at The New York Times — failures are much more numerous. Even The Washington Post, whose subscriptions boomed during the Trump administration, has seen a falloff, leading its management to acknowledge that it was too optimistic in expansion plans and needed to cut costs.

    Optimism created by billionaire owners at the Post, with Jeff Bezos, and Los Angeles Times, with Patrick Soon-Shiong, has faded as it became apparent they didn’t have magic fixes. With COVID and the Hollywood strike constricting the advertising market, the Los Angeles Times estimated it was losing between $30 million and $40 million a year.

    Philanthropy has offered a boost to some news organizations, including The Associated Press. The MacArthur Foundation and Knight Foundation last year pledged $500 million to seed solutions in the news industry, but such efforts can’t match the scale of the problem, Jarvis said.

    “The industry,” he said, “leaps from false messiah to false messiah.”

    Tech companies are also backing away from news, said Aileen Gallagher, a Syracuse University journalism professor. Through its AI-powered search generative experience, Google is much less frequently directing users to individual news sites, she said.

    Publishers have also complained of losing significant business with Facebook much less frequently featuring news articles that bring people to news sites. Twitter, now X, was once like a second home to journalists, but that’s become much less the case since Elon Musk’s purchase of the site.

    “What the news companies may have finally woken up to is that nothing good will come from accepting the scraps that social platforms and search platforms will give the news business,” Gallagher said.

    The 2020 election proved a boon for many news outlets, but there are questions about whether the public will have as much interest in following political news this year.

    Some of the troubled outlets also have unique issues that contributed to their problems. Sports Illustrated sent layoff notices to employees after the company that publishes its content lost its license to do so. The Messenger’s failure angered observers because its business plan — a centrist website that tried to appeal to many instead of a tightly-defined audience — was an uphill battle to start.

    “It was business malpractice and human cruelty at an epic scale,” Jim VandeHei, co-founder of Axios and Politico, told the Puck newsletter. “Anyone who knew anything about the economics of media knew it would die quickly, spectacularly and sadly.”

    That sadness is apparent in messages left on social media by laid-off journalists from The Messenger and elsewhere.

    “I was laid off from my political writing job back in August and haven’t been able to find another one since,” wrote Tara Dublin, author of “The Sound of Settling: A Rock and Roll Love Story,” on X. “I am terrified about the future of journalism and how anyone is going to be able to trust any news source.”

    Steve Reilly, an investigative reporter at The Messenger who saw his job disappear this week, wrote: “If you’ve been affected by recent journalism layoffs at the Messenger or elsewhere, please know that it is not your fault. It has nothing to do with you or your work.”

    Jarvis, who also teaches journalism, said he doesn’t pretend to know the answers. He said there needs to be an attitude change from searching for a way to monetize content to seeing journalism as a service to the community.

    “We need journalists in society, and we will find a way to fill that need,” he said. “I’m optimistic in the long run. But in the short run, it’s going to be ugly.”

    ___

    David Bauder covers media for The Associated Press. Follow him at http://twitter.com/dbauder



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Charles Osgood, CBS News veteran and longtime

    Charles Osgood, CBS News veteran and longtime

    [ad_1]

    Charles Osgood, CBS News veteran and longtime “Sunday Morning” host, dies at 91 – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Charles Osgood, who spent 45 years with CBS News, including 22 as the host of “Sunday Morning,” died at his home in New Jersey on Tuesday. He was 91. “Sunday Morning” host Jane Pauley looks back at his incredible life and legacy.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ruth Ashton Taylor, trailblazing TV journalist, dies at 101

    Ruth Ashton Taylor, trailblazing TV journalist, dies at 101

    [ad_1]

    Ruth Ashton Taylor, the first female television newscaster in Los Angeles and one of the first in the country, died Thursday in Northern California, her family announced. She was 101.

    A Los Angeles-area native, Taylor trailblazed a 50-year career in journalism, during which she interviewed the likes of Albert Einstein and J. Robert Oppenheimer, worked with industry icons including Edward R. Murrow and earned a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

    “She was certainly that woman out there doing something that none of us saw other women doing at the time,” Susan Conklin, one of Taylor’s daughters, said in an interview with The Times.

    Taylor was born in Long Beach in 1922 and graduated from Long Beach Polytechnic High School and Scripps College in Claremont before heading east to attend Columbia University for graduate school.

    Almost immediately after graduating from Columbia, Taylor was hired to join a CBS documentary team led by Murrow, Conklin said.

    Despite being in her early 20s at the time, Taylor proved to be a fearless reporter.

    “She was trying to do a piece on the peacetime uses of nuclear energy and she went and she found Dr. Einstein,” Conklin said.

    Taylor had been attempting to contact Einstein for some time before she traveled unannounced to Princeton University, where he was working.

    Taylor happened upon Einstein as he was walking down a hill.

    She introduced herself.

    “He said, ‘Ah! The broadcasting lady,’” Taylor recalled in a set of interviews done for the Washington Press Club Foundation.

    Taylor returned to Los Angeles in 1951 and was hired as the West Coast’s first female television reporter at KNXT, now KCBS.

    She left journalism for a short time in the late 1950s before returning to KNXT in 1962, where she spent the rest of her career before retiring in 1989.

    Taylor covered an array of topics during her career, and hosted a variety of segments and shows.

    During one fire, Taylor recalled, a Los Angeles County fire chief said, “This is the first time I’ve ever been interviewed on a fire line by a woman.”

    “But not the last,” Taylor replied.

    After officially retiring from KCBS, Taylor continued to work on retainer for the broadcaster into the 1990s.

    Among the honors she received in acknowledgment of her decades-long career was a Lifetime Achievement Emmy.

    Despite Taylor’s demanding work schedule, Conklin said her mother was always there for her family.

    “Work was really important to her,” Conklin said. “She worked hard, but I never felt like she forgot she had kids. We still came first for her.”

    “She just showed up as a mom … and then showed up as a grandmother and showed up as a great-grandmother,” Conklin added.

    Taylor is survived by her daughters Susan, Sadie and Laurel Conklin, her stepson John Taylor, a grandson and granddaughter-in-law and a great-grandson.

    [ad_2]

    Christian Martinez

    Source link

  • Oregon newspaper forced to lay off entire staff after discovering that an employee embezzled funds

    Oregon newspaper forced to lay off entire staff after discovering that an employee embezzled funds

    [ad_1]

    An Oregon weekly newspaper has had to lay off its entire staff and halt print after 40 years because its funds were embezzled by a former employee, its editor said, in a devastating blow to a publication that serves as an important source of information in a community that, like many others nationwide, is struggling with growing gaps in local news coverage.

    About a week before Christmas, the Eugene Weekly found inaccuracies in its bookkeeping, editor Camilla Mortensen said. It discovered that a former employee who was “heavily involved” with the paper’s finances had used its bank account to pay themselves $90,000 since at least 2022, she said.

    The paper also became aware of at least $100,000 in unpaid bills — including to the paper’s printer — stretching back several months, she said.

    Additionally, multiple employees, including Mortensen, realized that money from their paychecks that was supposed to be going into retirement accounts was never deposited.

    Oregon Weekly Newspaper Embezzlement
    A Eugene Weekly newspaper distributor box stands outside its office in Eugene, Ore. on Dec. 29, 2023. 

    Todd Cooper via AP


    When the paper realized it couldn’t make the next payroll, it was forced to lay off all of its 10 staff members and stop its print edition, Mortensen said. The alternative weekly, founded in 1982, printed 30,000 copies each week to distribute for free in Eugene, the third-largest city in the state and home to the University of Oregon.

    “To lay off a whole family’s income three days before Christmas is the absolute worst,” Mortensen said, expressing her sense of devastation. “It was not on my radar that anything like this could have happened or was happening.”

    The suspected employee had worked for the paper for about four years and has since been fired, Mortensen said.

    The Eugene police department’s financial crimes unit is investigating, and the paper’s owners have hired forensic accountants to piece together what happened, she said.

    Brent Walth, a journalism professor at the University of Oregon, said he was concerned about the loss of a paper that has had “an outsized impact in filling the widening gaps in news coverage” in Eugene. He described the paper as an independent watchdog and a compassionate voice for the community, citing its obituaries of homeless people as an example of how the paper has helped put a human face on some of the city’s biggest issues.

    He also noted how the paper has made “an enormous difference” for journalism students seeking internships or launching their career. He said there were feature and investigative stories that “the community would not have had if not for the weekly’s commitment to make sure that journalism students have a place to publish in a professional outlet.”

    A tidal wave of closures of local news outlets across the country in recent decades has left many Americans without access to vital information about their local governments and communities and has contributed to increasing polarization, said Tim Gleason, the former dean of the University of Oregon’s journalism school.

    “The loss of local news across the country is profound,” he said. “Instead of having the healthy kind of community connections that local journalism helps create, we’re losing that and becoming communities of strangers. And the result of that is that we fall into these partisan camps.”

    An average of 2.5 newspapers closed per week in the U.S. in 2023, according to researchers at Northwestern University. Over 200 counties have no local news outlet at all, they found, and more than half of all U.S. counties have either no local news source or only one remaining outlet, typically a weekly newspaper.

    Despite being officially unemployed, Eugene Weekly staff have continued to work without pay to help update the website and figure out next steps, said Todd Cooper, the paper’s art director. He described his colleagues as dedicated, creative, hardworking people.

    “This paper is definitely an integral part of the community, and we really want to bring it back and bounce back bigger and better if we can,” he said.

    The paper has launched a fundraising effort that included the creation of a GoFundMe page. As of Friday afternoon — just one day after the paper announced its financial troubles — the GoFundMe had raised more than $11,000.

    Now that the former employee suspected of embezzlement has been fired, “we have a lot of hope that this paper is going to come back and be self-sustaining and go forward,” he said.

    “Hell, it’ll hopefully last another 40 years.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “A Slippery Slope”: NYPD Is Relocating Reporters From Police HQ to a Trailer

    “A Slippery Slope”: NYPD Is Relocating Reporters From Police HQ to a Trailer

    [ad_1]

    The New York Police Department is yet again trying to shuffle the reporters who cover them—this time to a trailer outside their headquarters. For years, reporters have worked inside police headquarters at 1 Police Plaza, in a section of the building referred to as “the Shack.” There, you’ll find a warren of individual offices occupied by several news organizations—the New York Post, Newsday, The New York Times, CBS, Gothamist/WNYC, and The New York Daily News—and, on a crowded day, about a half dozen reporters dispersed among them. Rumors that Deputy Commissioner of Public Information Tarik Sheppard—the NYPD’s chief spokesperson—wanted to relocate reporters, purportedly to make more space for NYPD units, have been circulating for months. But on Monday, the idea seemed to become a reality, when two reporters who happened to be at HQ that day got an informal tour of their new digs. They were told they’d be moving the following Monday.

    Reporters’ objections to the move are not a matter of comfort. The Shack itself is “pretty disgusting,” as one police reporter noted. “It’s not the Ritz.” But having a desk inside police headquarters has offered crucial access to key players that some fear will be cut off in the move outside. “The concern is: Is this a good faith attempt to make more space for whoever they need to make more space for? Or is this a slippery slope, where we’re going to be eventually pushed out altogether from this area?” said a second police reporter. Sheppard, I’m told, has previously mentioned to reporters that he doesn’t get a fair shake from the tabloids. The move to the trailer comes “against a backdrop of complaints about the coverage of crime,” one veteran crime reporter said, which has “raised everybody’s antenna.” A third police reporter added: “Everybody feels it’s somewhat troublesome, like this is a punitive thing for negative coverage—particularly tabloid coverage.”

    The rollout of the move has been a major source of frustration among police reporters, who say that DCPI has not provided an official briefing to the group. Reporters who weren’t in on Monday didn’t realize a tour was even taking place. “There’s been no direct communication with all of us at the same time about what’s happening,” said the first police reporter. The line of reasoning for the move, they added, “has been all over the place.” Whether the move actually happens, or starts to happen, on Monday is somewhat unclear, as a third police reporter told me that DCPI has pulled back on Monday due to logistical matters.

    In a statement, a DCPI spokesperson said the move will begin “early next week” and disputed the idea that reporters are in the dark about the transition. “Sheppard previously met and spoke with representatives from each media outlet that occupies the existing press area inside Police Headquarters and explained that the move is simply to accommodate additional outlets that have asked to cover the NYPD in the same manner,” the spokesperson said, adding that the new location is “much larger, contains private conference rooms and bathrooms,” and is “located literally feet from the building, still very much inside the secure perimeter of One Police Plaza.” (One of the reporters I spoke to admitted the trailer was “way better” than they expected. It resembles a “semi-permanent module attached to HQ. We’d still be able to go in and out, our badges would work from what I’m told,” they said, adding, “but again, we still don’t have anything official from DCPI.”)

    The DCPI spokesperson also disputed the idea that the move is in any way a response to negative coverage. “Change is sometimes difficult for people, we understand. But this is hardly punitive by any stretch of the imagination. This is a planned move—in the works since the start of the current administration—toward greater NYPD transparency, to allow more access to more reporters from more media outlets that desire to cover the police department on an increasing basis.”

    It’s not the first time that the future of the Shack, which has been at 1 Police Plaza since the building was erected in the 1970s, has hung in the balance. Other commissioners have tried to evict reporters, such as in 2009, under Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly. The removal of the press offices seemed so assured that The Times wrote an entire obituary for the hub, only for department officials to backtrack on the eviction. A few months later, reporters were relocated down the hall to what is the current Shack. “Over the years, as papers and the news media sort of contracted, people in the Shack diminished,” said the veteran crime reporter. “Outlets that had four or five reporters were down to two or one; some were no longer there.”

    Lawyers representing the various media organizations with offices in police HQ have been communicating with each other in light of the impending move, according to several reporters. “What can they really do? It’s the NYPD’s property,” the second police reporter noted. The media lawyers’ role in this is more to “show resistance,” said the third police reporter, “so that the next move is not out on the street.”

    “Reporters should be in a newsroom collaborating with their fellow reporters, or they should be in a statehouse, in city hall, in police departments,” said the first police reporter. “Meeting and greeting and talking to people and getting the buzz. Isolating people like this is just another way of siloing the public—and that’s who we are, we’re representatives of the public. I think that they forget that.”

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • “People Are Disgusted”: Why Washington Post Staff Walked Out

    “People Are Disgusted”: Why Washington Post Staff Walked Out

    [ad_1]

    The Guild is asking for 4% raises a year for three years, while the company is offering 2.25% for the first year of the contract, and 2% the next two years. “We deserve a contract that has job security protections and that respects seniority and the value of the employees who have given multiple decades of their lives to this company,” said Kaplan. “We deserve a buyout process that is fair and truly voluntary, and that is not deceptively a worse deal than the company claims it is. And most of all we just deserve to be dealt with fairly by our employer.”

    “We respect the rights of our Guild-covered colleagues to engage in this planned one-day strike. We will make sure our readers and customers are as unaffected as possible,” a Post spokesperson said in a statement. “The Post’s goal remains the same as it has from the start of our negotiations: to reach an agreement with the Guild that meets the needs of our employees and the needs of our business.”

    With hundreds of staffers pledging support for the walkout earlier this week, a second Post staffer said “it’s going to be noticeable,” but questioned “whether it’s going to be effective.” In some cases, entire departments, such as the Metro and investigative teams, committed to walking out, Post reporter Marissa Lang said, as did “colleagues on the commercial side, and in the print plant,” who walked off their jobs in the early hours of Thursday morning. “A walkout of 750 people touches every part of the Washington Post organization,” said Lang. Earlier this week, Post Guild released an open letter asking readers to “respect our walkout by not crossing the picket line,” meaning “do not engage with any Washington Post content.” If you did read the Post on Thursday, though, you may have noticed some stories—like one about a new crime center in DC to the paper’s own coverage of its labor protest —had a general byline: “By Washington Post Staff.” Either reporters had their names stripped off stories, or the generically bylined pieces were written by editors.

    Staffers I spoke to had mixed feelings about how much this action will really do. “I think people are genuinely impressed by how this young contention of leaders has revived the union, and doubled its membership,” said a third Post staffer. But “a lot of the same people are disappointed to see that they’re acting out in this way that doesn’t seem to be connected to any real prospect of progress on pay of jobs.” I’m told that there was internal second-guessing on Thursday among reporters who’d agreed to walk out but were now wondering, among other things, what would come next. Some high-profile staffers signed onto the strike out of fear of being publicly called out if they didn’t participate, according to a Post staffer. A piece in Semafor did just that to two top New York Times reporters, Peter Baker and Michael Shear, last year when the two opted out of the Gray Lady union’s walkout—an article, the Post staffer said, that had been circulating in recent days.

    Asked about the Guild’s plan following the strike, Lang said they would “extend another one-day invitation to the company to sit down with us and meaningfully bargain over the terms of our contract. If they refuse and continue to engage in some of the behavior we’ve seen, we’re prepared to continue to pressure them,” she said.

    The Post Guild’s decision to walk off the job amid lagging contract negotiations comes nearly one year to the day that the Times’s unionized staffers rallied outside the newspaper’s headquarters in their own historic act of protest. Several months later, the Times’s bitter labor fight came to an end as the staff union and company agreed to a contract. In August, Axios reported that members of the Times union briefed staffers from the Post union as the Post considered a walkout of its own.

    There are distinctions between the staff appeals at the two papers. Part of the Times union’s rallying call last year was tied to the company having increased compensation for some top officers and increased its dividend payout to shareholders. The Post’s walkout, on the other hand, comes as the company has admitted it’s been operating on faulty financial projections and is buying out—or, potentially, laying off—about 10% of its workforce. While one Post staffer acknowledged its New York–based rival is on firmer financial footing these days, they also pointed out the Times is “not owned by the second richest guy in the world.”

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • How Jessica Lessin’s The Information Has Survived a Decade of Media Tumult

    How Jessica Lessin’s The Information Has Survived a Decade of Media Tumult

    [ad_1]

    The OpenAI saga was, in many ways, a perfect story for The Information. Reporters at the influential tech site spent the week of Thanksgiving obsessively chronicling the chaos inside the company behind ChatGPT, after its board of directors abruptly ousted its CEO Sam Altman. Five days later, Altman, the generative AI poster boy, was reinstated. By then, The Information had published 17 exclusive news articles on the company that had been picked up hundreds of times by other news outlets. “His firing was announced, and then everyone on my team was sending me all these tweets, where people were saying, ‘Oh, if The Information gets the scoop on this, I’ll subscribe,’ or ‘I really hope my Information subscription’s worth the money,’” editor in chief Jessica Lessin recalls. “And so it really felt like game on.” Lessin—who has followed Altman from the start, writing the first extensive profile on him back in 2005—supported her team throughout the week by, among other things, “reporting in bathrooms while serving my friendsgiving” and at the ENT doctor with her four-year-old.

    The small-but-mighty Silicon Valley publication, which turns 10 this week, has spent the past decade rolling out ad-free scoops and analysis to a targeted audience willing to cough up $399 a year for total access. Back in 2013, when Lessin left The Wall Street Journal to start her company, it was generally accepted that “legacy media was where serious journalism was. And then there were a couple of upstarts trying to do new things, but trying to fuel it with venture capital and ad dollars,” she says, adding, “Those businesses have evaporated.” But The Information, fueled by subscriptions, has survived and seemingly paved the way for a new cohort of outlets offering niche industry reporting at a premium price, from Puck to Punchbowl News. Today, more outlets, like Axios and Politico, are also offering B2B subscription products along with their free content.

    “There were a number of media start-ups around that moment, and she was very unconventional—that she was doing paid subscriptions and was not that interested in social,” says Ben Smith, a former editor in chief of BuzzFeed News, who last year founded Semafor, one of the start-ups in which Lessin has invested. “It kind of pains me to say it, but obviously, she’s been totally vindicated, and most of her competitors are no longer around.” Those former competitors include BuzzFeed News, the Pulitzer Prize–winning online news site that shut down in April. There was also Recode, a brand Vox retired in March; Quartz, which is still around but has changed hands multiple times over the years, most recently to G/O Media; and Vice, which, the Times, while reporting that the company had filed for bankruptcy in May, referred to as a “decayed digital colossus.” Lessin was ahead of her time with the business model she adopted and the story she wanted to own. “She’d come out of The Wall Street Journal, and there was a sense that The Information was applying the kind of East Coast financial reporting rigor to an ecosystem that the East Coast publications didn’t really seem to understand very well,” says Smith. Longtime subscriber Roelof Botha, the head of Sequoia Capital and former CFO of PayPal, agrees, noting that when Lessin started The Information, “The conventional wisdom at the time was, Oh, you’re not going to build a successful subscription-only business at that price point. Who knows if the market is big enough for people who are deeply passionate about technology news of the sorts that they would cover?” He adds, “She was on the right side of history.”

    “There is no CEO of any company of significance that was not paying attention to OpenAI over the past week,” Lessin tells me. “I think that was a fundamental bet we took 10 years ago—that you cannot be ahead or even keep up in business without immersing yourself in what’s happening in these companies and technologies.”

    Today, per Lessin, The Information has 475,000 active readers (i.e., paid subscribers and unpaid newsletter subscribers). According to Lessin, they expect to be profitable this year. The company will grow its overall revenue by 30% year over year in 2023. They’ve been disciplined when it comes to growth, with only 65 full-time employees working across offices in San Francisco, New York, and Hong Kong, as well as remotely. Lessin is focused on growing The Information’s presence in Asia; they currently have three people assigned to the Hong Kong bureau and two hires in the works. Lessin, meanwhile, traveled with US commerce secretary Gina Raimondo to China in August—a trip she later recapped during a special event for subscribers.

    She’s also focused on building out The Information’s finance coverage, especially following their coverage of the Silicon Valley Bank crisis earlier this year. That was a “real eye-opener for me,” says Lessin, both in terms of how they were serving their audience—“a lot of subscribers said we saved them a lot of money,” she notes—and that they could compete on the finance beat, which she says has “led to a host of coverage around the banking sector overall.” Legacy media outlets like the Times, the Journal, and Bloomberg, says Lessin, are “going to be around forever,” but “they’re not as relevant” in “my world, and I think in business,” because of the size of the audience they aim to serve. “That model really limits how indispensable you can be, especially to a certain class of reader,” says Lessin.

    Among that targeted class is Jeff Bezos. “I read it all the time and have been a subscriber for years,” the Amazon founder told me in an email. “Jessica has done a terrific job. Always insightful on tech.” Another longtime subscriber is Netflix cofounder Reed Hastings. “Check it every day,” he tells me, noting that he’s “thrilled from a business-model standpoint that she’s succeeded”—he is, after all, “a subscriber guy”—but “as a reader, what I care about is the thoughtfulness. She curates amazing reporters, and the pieces, from my perspective, are written in-depth, as opposed to clickbaity. Probably subscription is the key to that because then they don’t get paid on clicks,” says Hastings. “People care enough about the stories to continue to renew.”

    Lessin maintains full ownership of the company and says she has no plans to sell. “I’m in this for the long term,” she says, a view that she says has been key to the site’s success. “You need the talent, you need the right business model, and kind of that alignment that we’re not going to go chase the latest fancy revenue thing,” she says. “Over the course of the 10 years, I’ve seen every legacy publication build a Snapchat team, and then a TikTok team, and then a video team. We built none of those teams and instead hired journalists or paid our journalists what they were worth. It’s a different formula, and it takes a lot of patience.”

    It’s worth noting that Lessin used her own money—“less than $1 million,” she previously said—to start The Information. Her father is a partner at the private equity giant TPG, and her husband, the tech entrepreneur Sam Lessin, won big on Facebook stock he received when Harvard pal Mark Zuckerberg bought his start-up in 2010. And there’s a perception that Lessin has worked to distance herself from—that she’s too close to the people she covers. Her personal relationship with Zuckerberg, for one, has come under scrutiny. “You learn to have dinner with people one night and then edit a tough but true piece about them the next day,” Lessin says, when I asked about the dynamic. “That’s what we do time and time again.”

    “Finding the truth and telling people why it matters is a fabulous business. It’s just really hard.” That’s why, she suggests, others haven’t been able to figure it out in the same way. “They don’t want to sit in a closet during Thanksgiving taking source calls,” she tells me.

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Paste Magazine acquires Jezebel, plans to relaunch it just a month after it was shut down by G/O Media

    Paste Magazine acquires Jezebel, plans to relaunch it just a month after it was shut down by G/O Media

    [ad_1]

    Despite being shuttered, it appears feminist publication Jezebel will live to see another day.

    The site’s former parent company, G/O Media, announced earlier this month it was shutting down Jezebel and laying off its staff due to financial constraints. G/O Media CEO Jim Spanfeller added that despite the interest of 24 potential buyers, the company was ultimately unable to find one for the publication. That is, until now.

    Paste Magazine announced Wednesday that it will be acquiring the beloved women-focused publication and relaunching it soon.

    “We’re thrilled to announce that Paste Magazine has acquired and will shortly be reviving Jezebel, the influential media platform known for its fearless, female-empowering content,” the magazine said in an article published to its site. “When we heard that the iconic site had been shuttered, we moved quickly to try and save it.”

    Jackson told the Associated Press that Paste moved quickly to secure an all-cash deal to purchase Jezebel, and that the site would resume publishing as soon as this week. He also said former Jezebel staffers would be given priority in the hiring process.

    “Our mission has always been to provide insightful, thought-provoking content that resonates with a diverse audience,” Paste founder and editor-in-chief Josh Jackson said in Paste’s announcement. “Jezebel’s unique voice and commitment to storytelling make it a perfect addition to our portfolio.”

    Jezebel was originally launched in 2007 by Gawker Media, and was known for reporting and commentary on hot-button cultural issues affecting women, covering topics ranging from politics, entertainment, beauty and fashion, women’s health, women in the public eye and more. It became part of the G/O Media portfolio in 2019.

    Paste Magazine said it is committed to “preserving Jezebel’s editorial independence and maintaining its distinctive voice” in the relaunch.

    “This collaboration will offer audiences an even richer and more comprehensive perspective on culture, entertainment, and the world at large,” Paste wrote.

    Paste also announced its acquisition of politics site Splinter, which was closed down by G/O Media in 2019. Paste said it hopes to relaunch the site in time to cover the 2024 presidential election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jeff Zucker’s Abu Dhabi-backed fund just agreed a loan deal that would let it take over venerable London newspaper the Telegraph and Spectator magazine

    Jeff Zucker’s Abu Dhabi-backed fund just agreed a loan deal that would let it take over venerable London newspaper the Telegraph and Spectator magazine

    [ad_1]

    RedBird IMI has agreed a loan package with the Barclay family that would let it take control of the Telegraph newspaper and Spectator magazine, a prospect that’s sparked concern among Conservative lawmakers because of the fund’s ties to Abu Dhabi.

    The media investment vehicle, which is a joint venture between RedBird Capital Partners and the United Arab Emirates-based International Media Investments, said in a statement Monday that it had agreed to lend the Barclay family £600 million ($750 million), secured against the politically influential titles. 

    “Under the terms of this agreement, RedBird IMI has an option to convert the loan secured against the Telegraph and Spectator into equity, and intends to exercise this option at an early opportunity,” the investment vehicle said in a statement.

    Lloyds Banking Group Plc seized the Telegraph titles along with the Spectator magazine from the Barclay family in June to claw back debts, removing Barclay family members from their director positions and placing the businesses in receivership. The RedBird IMI loan will help the Barclay family to pay off the debt owed to Lloyds.

    Separately, IMI will lend a further £600 million secured against other Barclay family businesses and commercial interests. IMI is a private investment vehicle for Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, according to a spokesman for RedBird IMI, whose statement emphasized IMI’s involvement would be passive.

    “Following transfer of ownership, RedBird Capital alone will take over management and operational responsibility for the titles under the leadership of RedBird IMI Chief Executive Jeff Zucker,” the statement said, referring to the former president of CNN. “International Media Investments will be a passive investor only.”

    Still, RedBird IMI’s statement will likely heighten concern among Conservative lawmakers, who are pushing the UK government to scrutinize the UAE’s involvement. Lawmakers have described any possible influence of the UAE royal family over the Telegraph as “a risk to our national security,” citing its record on press freedom and position on Israel.

    The prospect of foreign influence on the title has already raised concerns among senior ministers including Kemi Badenoch and Tom Tugendhat, Bloomberg News reported Saturday.

    “Any transfer of ownership will of course be subject to regulatory review,” RedBird IMI said in its statement, which pledged to maintain the existing editorial team of the publications. “We will continue to cooperate fully with the government and the regulator.”

    Even before that, UK Culture Secretary Luzy Frazer could issue a so-called Public Interest Intervention Notice. That would launch a study of the deal by British regulators. She could also freeze the transaction while that happens, if she chooses. The antitrust watchdog – the CMA – and media regulator Ofcom will report findings on antitrust and media issues respectively, to inform Frazer’s final decision, which could see her clear the deal, block it, or impose conditions.

    Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up before it launches Nov. 29.

    [ad_2]

    Thomas Seal, Bloomberg

    Source link

  • 12 Journalists Killed This Week In Israel-Hamas War, Totaling 36 Deaths

    12 Journalists Killed This Week In Israel-Hamas War, Totaling 36 Deaths

    [ad_1]

    At least 12 journalists were killed in the past eight days in the Israel-Hamas war, ticking the death toll for media workers covering the conflict up to 36.

    Hamas, a militant group based in Gaza, unleashed a surprise attack on Israel on Oct. 7. In retaliation, Israel launched airstrikes at the territory and declared war. An estimated 10,000-plus people — 9,000 in Gaza and the West Bank and 1,400 in Israel — have been killed, along with journalists who have been covering the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the overall war.

    The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that as of Friday, 31 Palestinian journalists, four Israeli journalists and one Lebanese journalist have been killed since the war broke out on Oct. 7. CPJ also reported several other journalists injured, missing or arrested, and reported censorship, threats, assaults, cyberattacks and the killing of journalists’ family members.

    “CPJ emphasizes that journalists are civilians doing important work during times of crisis and must not be targeted by warring parties,” Sherif Mansour, CPJ’s Middle East and North Africa program coordinator, said in a statement.

    “Journalists across the region are making great sacrifices to cover this heart-breaking conflict. Those in Gaza, in particular, have paid, and continue to pay, an unprecedented toll and face exponential threats. Many have lost colleagues, families, and media facilities, and have fled seeking safety when there is no safe haven or exit.”

    The Israel Defense Forces told Reuters on Oct. 27 that it could not guarantee journalists’ safety in Gaza.

    Among the journalists killed this week were Palestinian journalist Yasser Abu Namous, who worked for the media organization Al-Sahel, and Nazmi Al-Nadim, who worked for Palestine TV. Both were killed by airstrikes at their respective families’ homes in Gaza on Oct. 27 and Oct. 30.

    Al-Nadim’s family died with him, the fate of other journalists and their families this week as well.

    On Nov. 2, journalist and correspondent for Palestinian TV Mohammad Abu Hattab was killed along with 11 members of his family in an Israeli airstrike at their home in the Gaza Strip.

    Shortly after Abu Hattab was killed, his colleague Salman Al-Bashir appeared on the channel.

    “Our colleague Mohammad Abu Hattab was standing here only 30 minutes ago, and now he left us, along with his wife, his brother, and many members of his family are now victims here inside the hospital,” Al-Bashir said, according to CNN.

    Al-Bashir also delivered emotional words about the dangerous realities facing journalists covering the war.

    “We can’t bear this anymore. We are exhausted, we are here victims and martyrs awaiting our deaths, we are dying one after the other, and no one cares about us or the large-scale catastrophe and the crime in Gaza,” he said on air.

    “No protection, no international protection at all, no immunity to anything, this protection gear does not protect us … These are just slogans that we are wearing, it doesn’t protect any journalist at all.”

    As Al-Bashir spoke, he took off his helmet and protective press gear.

    “We are victims, live on air,” he said, his voice cracking. “We are victims awaiting our turn to be killed. Mohammad was here half an hour ago [reporting]. Now he lies dead with his family in this same hospital.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3 Ways to Attract Media Coverage | Entrepreneur

    3 Ways to Attract Media Coverage | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    You’re press-worthy. How do you feel when you read that? If your initial reaction is to shrink back and question it, you’re certainly not alone.

    Many companies (especially small to midsize companies) question if their story is really worth media coverage — and this is the biggest thing holding them back from that coverage.

    Because they don’t truly feel worthy of press, they don’t reach out to the media, or they give up after a few pitches go unanswered. Or, they try PR for a few months off and on but never commit to it fully enough to develop an effective long-term strategy for their company’s visibility. They act as though a journalist would be doing them a favor by featuring them rather than realizing the value they can offer by contributing to that journalist’s content.

    The truth is, these companies are — and you are — worthy of incredible, widespread press. And once you truly embrace that, how you show up for the media will dramatically change.

    Thousands of experts are interviewed every single day, not because they have a magic secret for getting press but because they do two simple things: showcase their expertise and tell an unforgettable story.

    Speak to a journalist, and you’ll realize they’re not looking for someone with thousands of social media followers or award-winning books. They just want someone to share serviceable expert tips or tell a good story because those two things are of the highest value to their readers.

    Here’s the good news: Expertise and a good story are two things practically every business owner has.

    How to pinpoint your expertise and story

    You are an industry insider for your niche — and your knowledge is extremely valuable to journalists and their audiences.

    Think about the questions customers ask you most often: How do you answer them, and what knowledge do you share? What unique perspective do you have? What industry trends have you noticed, either anecdotally or through your collected data? This becomes your high-value expertise. Through the media, readers and viewers can learn directly from an insider pro (that’s you!).

    Your expertise provides an immense amount of value for them and credibility for your brand. It also makes that audience more likely to turn to you when they have a usage occasion for your product or service.

    There’s also a special story about how you got to where you are now. You may not know what it is yet, but you don’t have to write it from scratch. You simply have to uncover it.

    Start by telling your story frequently to your customers, friends and family. Pay attention to what makes their eyes glisten, and their ears perk up. Usually, these are elements of your journey you haven’t thought much about — but that stands out to others. This is what you should lean into when sharing your background with the media.

    Because journalists are looking to educate and tell a good story, they’re grateful when they find sources who can help them do that.

    Related: 5 Things Journalists Wish You Knew About Getting Press Coverage for Your Company

    Being ready for press vs. being worthy of press

    Almost every company is worthy of the press, but not all companies are ready for the press.

    Being ready for press involves having the budget for a long-term media strategy that can grow over time, creating a collection of branded photography to share with the media and updating your website so it’s ready for journalists (say, by having up-to-date Press Room and About pages).

    Once you’ve honed in on why you’re worthy of press, make sure you have these “ready for press” elements prepared to increase your chances of landing coverage.

    Related: 5 Key Things You Need Before Launching a PR Campaign

    Three ways to show up for the media

    1. Make your story and expertise ultra-visible. Upon skimming your company’s website or social media channels briefly, it should be immediately clear what knowledge you can share and what makes your mission and story unique. Work on polishing this until it’s concise and easy to grasp — and avoid long, winding narratives. Make sure your story is present in messaging and visuals on your homepage, About page and Press Room page.

    Related: 5 Ways Companies Can Create Content That’s Actually Helpful

    2. Start sharing your story and expertise on your owned channels. Even if journalists aren’t knocking on your door quite yet, you still have the opportunity to share what they’re looking for (and catch their attention in doing so!). Use your social media platforms as an opportunity to be a thought leader and share your story and expertise there consistently.

    Plus, key players in your company should be prepared to share content on their personal accounts as well. CEOs and other executives have a powerful opportunity to leverage social media to share expertise and tell your brand story to your clients, customers and employees. In doing so, they position themselves as valuable media spokespeople.

    3. Set up a profile on Qwoted and actively use it. Qwoted.com has a free offering that allows you to set up a profile as an expert and pitch to relevant news outlets. Just like setting up a press page on your website, this is an impactful way to show that you’re ready for press (and worthy of it!).

    [ad_2]

    Kelsey Kloss

    Source link

  • Inside the ‘New York Times’ Debate Over Its Gaza Hospital Bombing Coverage

    Inside the ‘New York Times’ Debate Over Its Gaza Hospital Bombing Coverage

    [ad_1]

    A series of Slack messages obtained by Vanity Fair shows there was immediate concern inside The New York Times over the paper’s presentation of the Gaza hospital bombing story. But senior editors appear to have dismissed suggestions from an international editor, along with a junior reporter stationed in Israel who has been contributing to the paper’s coverage of the war, that the paper hedge in its framing of events.

    Several news organizations are facing scrutiny for early coverage of the explosion, including the Times, which issued a rare editors’ note Monday admitting that the paper “relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified” in its early coverage of the blast. These internal messages provide a window into the Times’ decision-making process and reveal how some journalists urged caution in the early moments of an unfolding tragedy.

    On the afternoon of October 17—shortly after the Times published its first version of the story, with the headline, “Israeli Strike Kills Hundreds in Hospital, Palestinian Officials Say”—a senior news editor tagged two senior editors on the Live team and wrote, “I think we can be a bit more direct in the lead: At least 500 people were killed on Tuesday by an Israel airstrike at a hospital in Gaza City, the Palestinian authorities said.”

    One of the tagged Live editors replied, “You don’t want to hedge it?”

    A junior reporter for the Times who has been covering the conflict for the paper from Jerusalem chimed in: “Better to hedge.”

    The senior news editor replied, “We’re attributing.”

    The exchange took place in a Times Slack channel called #israel-briefings, which hundreds of journalists have access to. Vanity Fair is withholding the names of the Times staff involved at this time. The Times declined to comment on the Slack messages.

    A few minutes later, a senior editor on the International desk wrote in the same Slack channel, “The [headline] on the [home page] goes way too far.”

    A second senior news editor asked, “How is it different than the blog hed,” referring to a headline in the paper’s live-blog format. “They both say Israeli strike kills, per Palestinians.”

    “I think we can’t just hang the attribution of something so big on one source without having tried to verify it,” the International editor said. “And then slap it across the top of the [home page]. Putting the attribution at the end doesn’t give us cover, if we’ve been burned and we’re wrong.”

    Then a second senior editor on the Live team replied to the International editor, asking them to confer with a senior Standards editor. “This was discussed with a bunch of people,” that second senior editor on the Live team noted.

    As NiemanLab’s Joshua Benton reported, the “Israeli Strike” language was not removed from the top headline until 4:01 p.m.

    On Monday, nearly a week after the hospital bombing and Slack messages in question, the Times published the editors’ note, which was notably the first since executive editor Joe Kahn took the helm 16 months ago. “Given the sensitive nature of the news during a widening conflict, and the prominent promotion it received, Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation, and been more explicit about what information could be verified,” it read.

    Kahn also addressed the note on Monday in an interview with Lulu Garcia-Navarro on one of the Times’ own podcasts, The Headlines: War Briefing. “What I think we needed to reflect on a bit was not necessarily the news-gathering process, as it plays out all the time, but when a certain piece of information is verified or valuable enough to put into that very, very top headline—what I refer to as the banner headline—and to get the extra promotion and attention that that kind of headline would get,” Kahn said.

    “Given Hamas’s role in this story, given that it had just attacked and murdered hundreds of Israelis, one thing that I’ve been trying to understand is it would have been easier to err on the side of caution,” Garcia-Navarro said. “I mean, this wasn’t a scoop by the Times. If there was any question whatsoever of who was responsible, wouldn’t it have been easier to sort of be very forthcoming with the audience about that and lean into the ongoing ambiguity, given the significance and the stakes of this? Why didn’t the Times do that?”

    Kahn said they published an editors’ note “to reflect on exactly that.” Asked about his personal involvement in the decision to publish the headline, Kahn said, “We were all aware, and we discussed the developments in that hospital bombing or blast. The actual words in the headline were debated by a team of people who routinely work out the wording. I wasn’t directly involved in that, but I was watching very closely on the coverage.”

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Video of Arab protester confronting CNN reporter goes viral: “Puppet”

    Video of Arab protester confronting CNN reporter goes viral: “Puppet”

    [ad_1]

    Video showing a pro-Palestinian protester call CNN reporter Clarissa Ward “a puppet” over the network’s coverage of the war between Israel and Hamas has gone viral on social media.

    On October 7, Hamas led the deadliest Palestinian militant attack on Israel in history. Israel subsequently launched its heaviest ever airstrikes on Gaza, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declaring that his country is at war and cutting off supplies of food, fuel, electricity and medicine to Gaza. The war marks a significant escalation in the decades-long conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

    American media is facing renewed scrutiny over its coverage of the conflict, with supporters of the Palestinians making the case that much of the reporting has been too dismissive of their perspective on the matter.

    Ward, CNN’s chief international correspondent who has been reporting from Israel amid the conflict, was pressed about the network’s coverage of it during a protest. Video of the confrontation has gone viral on social media, receiving hundreds of thousands of views on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, on Friday.

    Protesters are seen at the Rafah Crossing in North Sinai, Egypt, on Wednesday. A protester at the Rafah Crossing confronted CNN’s Clarissa Ward about U.S. media’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas war in a video that went viral on social media Friday.
    Mahmoud Khaled/Getty Images

    In the video, a protester, who has not been publicly identified, is seen asking Ward if CNN is “covering” the pro-Palestinian point of view. The confrontation occurred during a protest at Rafah Crossing, the point connecting Egypt to the Gaza Strip.

    “Where is your condemnation? Where is your channel covering this? Cover this. Say the truth. I understand you’re an employee. You’re just a puppet. You’re just a mouthpiece. Come talk to me like a human being. Come talk to me like a human being,” she said.

    Ward then approaches the protester, who continued to voice her concerns about the media’s coverage.

    “I understand you speak for your government. I understand you represent your government. That being said, you are a country that claims free speech. Your ‘democracy’ is what led to Hamas. And now, we are watching an occupation. We are watching the results of your silence, of your misrepresentation,” she said.

    The protester told Ward that pro-Palestinian voices “need to be heard as well,” accusing U.S. media of the “dehumanization of Arabs.”

    Newsweek reached out to CNN for comment via email.

    CNN’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict has divided viewers, with some saying that it has been biased toward Israel. Others, however, have praised the network for what they view as balanced reporting on the matter.

    Many on X voiced agreement with the protester’s comments.

    “This young Egyptian woman, confronts @cnn’s @clarissaward and speaks for so many of us, expressing her frustration and rage as this main stream media outlets continue to pedal Israeli propaganda and obfuscate the reality of what is happening. This is ethnic cleansing in broad daylight in front of our eyes. This is a genocide. That is not an overstatement,” posted X user @ASE.

    “This brave Egyptian woman confronting CNN’s Clarissa Ward, calling out mainstream media outlets for repeating Israeli lies, whitewashing Israeli crimes and dehumanizing Palestinians in Gaza,” posted @sahouraxo.

    Others, defended CNN’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas war.

    On Friday, CNN ran headlines that highlighted concerns human rights advocates have had about Palestinians living in Gaza, including an article titled, “Gaza conditions worsen amid warnings that shortages could ‘kill many, many people.’”

    “Seeing a lot of pro-Palestinian people talking about how bias CNN’s coverage is in favor of Israel. I have no idea what they are talking about. CNN is cutting it down the middle. Just because CNN has sources that disagree with someone’s preformulated views does not mean bias,” posted X user Brian Bridgeforth.

    Richard Grennell, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Germany and acting director of National Intelligence under former President Donald Trump, defended Ward against those criticisms.

    “BS. Total BS. You blame America for the people of Gaza having a terrorist organization as a government?!? Lots of Arabs, Jews and Christians live together peacefully in Jerusalem. Americans are tired of paying for this perpetual chaos because your governments steal and terrorize. Fix your own government first. We have to protect our people,” he posted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • While the news industry struggles, college students are supplying some memorable journalism

    While the news industry struggles, college students are supplying some memorable journalism

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Within the past year, young journalists have produced investigations that led to the resignation of Stanford University’s president, the firing of Northwestern University’s football coach, and a school shooting graphic so striking that it led a veteran newsman to say, “I’ve never seen a better front page.”

    All while making sure to get their homework in on time.

    A news industry that has been shedding jobs as long as they’ve been alive, and the risk of harassment when their work strikes nerves hasn’t dimmed the enthusiasm of many college students — often unpaid — who are keeping the flame alive with noteworthy journalism.

    “At the end of the day, journalism is a public good, and it attracts people who want to do service for others,” said Theo Baker, a Stanford University sophomore whose stories about faulty scientific research prompted a university investigation and eventual resignation of Stanford’s president, Marc Tessier-Lavigne.

    Baker’s work, as a freshman, earned him a George Polk Award in journalism, the first time Polk had ever honored work in an independent, student-run newspaper.

    The Daily Northwestern’s explosive interview this summer with a former football player about alleged hazing was key to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who is suing for wrongful termination.

    The Columbia Daily Spectator in New York conducted a months-long probe that found toxic working conditions within the university’s public safety department. The Harvard Crimson tracked the money in an investigation into stolen funds at the Harvard Undergraduate Foreign Policy Initiative.

    Students nationally are holding people in power accountable, said Jackie Alexander, incoming president of the College Media Association and director of student media at the University of Alabama-Birmingham.

    “They are unafraid,” Alexander said. “They are digging deep. They are really living up to the values and principles of being journalists while also being full-time students.”

    Charles Whitaker, dean of Northwestern’s Medill journalism school, admitted to being a little worried when he heard about the story that the Daily Northwestern was working on. Yet staff members were thorough and professional, taking care to corroborate the stories they heard, he said.

    “I was incredibly proud of what the students did,” Whitaker said.

    At Stanford, Baker’s story about Tessier-Levigne was only one aspect of the complex investigations he conducted about the world of academic research, winning him impressive acclaim.

    Yet when you ask how his year has been, he says it’s been hell, adding an expletive for emphasis.

    He’s been called out of class to learn of threatened legal action. Another nasty lawsuit threat came on the day after Christmas. Professors would pull him aside to say they were impressed by his work, but were afraid to be seen in public with him. One memorable post on a campus social media discussion about him said, “journalists are a cancer on society.”

    Baker said he was harassed — including angry, middle-of-the-night phone calls — although, incredibly, it wasn’t his first time. He said he was threatened even before college because he’s the son of two prominent journalists, Peter Baker of The New York Times and Susan Glasser of The New Yorker.

    With growing reports of student journalists being doxxed, ostracized on campus and otherwise harassed, the College Media Association is looking into ways to help them, Alexander said.

    “Being a journalist is like being under a microscope,” Baker said.

    Like most of her fellow University of North Carolina students, Emmy Martin spent a few terrifying hours in lockdown on Aug. 28 after a graduate student shot and killed his faculty adviser in a campus building and was on the loose before being apprehended. She was in a library and, as editor in chief of The Daily Tar Heel, spent part of her time reporting.

    Martin wondered, later that night, how to cover the story on the newspaper’s front page. She contemplated running a blank front page, or an all-black cover, until she scrolled through her text messages at 1 a.m.

    It was a stream of texts wondering about her well-being, which she found out the next day was similar to what her friends received. She collected many of them, and decided to make the front page a block of messages that traveled from student to student:

    “Are you safe? Where are you? Are you alone? Guys I’m so fucking scared. Hey — come on sweetheart — I need to hear from you. Can you hear any gunshots? Please stay safe. Barricade the door or if you think you can run and get to a place that can lock do so. My teacher is acting like nothing is happening and I’m lowkey freaking out…”

    Even President Joe Biden later commented on the cover, a dramatic glimpse into the minds of Generation Lockdown. “I’ve never seen a better front page,” veteran editor and Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin said on social media. “And neither have you.”

    “We didn’t create the cover to make a national statement,” Martin said. “We wanted to make a historical record of how everyone on the UNC campus felt that day.”

    The experience, she said, “reminded me of how journalism matters in more ways than just getting information to the public.”

    Also impressed was Raul Reis, dean of the Hussman journalism school at North Carolina. He’s sure to keep the achievement in mind when he’s recruiting prospective students in a tough marketplace.

    “We have some very honest conversations with parents,” Reis said. “Even if their son or daughter wants to go into journalism they are concerned that it’s a dying industry. I tell them it’s the opposite. It’s a thriving industry.”

    There’s always a need for highly skilled individuals who are able to communicate, he said.

    Almost in spite of the industry’s troubles, Whitaker said there’s been a strong interest in journalism schools over the past several years; many young people saw Trump-era attacks on the profession as a call to action. Students aren’t just interested in shining a light on problems, but in finding solutions.

    Traffic to the Medill’s website increased by 40 percent after The Daily Northwestern’s hazing articles. People wanted to know more about the school teaching the young journalists, Whitaker said.

    “Good journalism programs need good student newspapers,” he said. “They really demonstrate the things that are being taught in the classroom in a practical way.”

    With local news outlets suffering, college newspapers are also covering more than campuses. The Daily Tar Heel covers the surrounding town of Chapel Hill, too. The Columbia Daily Spectator reports on the Manhattan neighborhoods of Morningside Heights, West Harlem and the Upper West Side. The University of Texas at Austin supplies students to cover state government for news outlets across Texas.

    “So many people think of student journalists as students first,” Martin said. “But in a lot of ways student journalists are just journalists. Just younger.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • While the news industry struggles, college students are supplying some memorable journalism

    While the news industry struggles, college students are supplying some memorable journalism

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Within the past year, young journalists have produced investigations that led to the resignation of Stanford University’s president, the firing of Northwestern University’s football coach, and a school shooting graphic so striking that it led a veteran newsman to say, “I’ve never seen a better front page.”

    All while making sure to get their homework in on time.

    A news industry that has been shedding jobs as long as they’ve been alive, and the risk of harassment when their work strikes nerves hasn’t dimmed the enthusiasm of many college students — often unpaid — who are keeping the flame alive with noteworthy journalism.

    “At the end of the day, journalism is a public good, and it attracts people who want to do service for others,” said Theo Baker, a Stanford University sophomore whose stories about faulty scientific research prompted a university investigation and eventual resignation of Stanford’s president, Marc Tessier-Lavigne.

    Baker’s work, as a freshman, earned him a George Polk Award in journalism, the first time Polk had ever honored work in an independent, student-run newspaper.

    The Daily Northwestern’s explosive interview this summer with a former football player about alleged hazing was key to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who is suing for wrongful termination.

    The Columbia Daily Spectator in New York conducted a months-long probe that found toxic working conditions within the university’s public safety department. The Harvard Crimson tracked the money in an investigation into stolen funds at the Harvard Undergraduate Foreign Policy Initiative.

    Students nationally are holding people in power accountable, said Jackie Alexander, incoming president of the College Media Association and director of student media at the University of Alabama-Birmingham.

    “They are unafraid,” Alexander said. “They are digging deep. They are really living up to the values and principles of being journalists while also being full-time students.”

    Charles Whitaker, dean of Northwestern’s Medill journalism school, admitted to being a little worried when he heard about the story that the Daily Northwestern was working on. Yet staff members were thorough and professional, taking care to corroborate the stories they heard, he said.

    “I was incredibly proud of what the students did,” Whitaker said.

    At Stanford, Baker’s story about Tessier-Levigne was only one aspect of the complex investigations he conducted about the world of academic research, winning him impressive acclaim.

    Yet when you ask how his year has been, he says it’s been hell, adding an expletive for emphasis.

    He’s been called out of class to learn of threatened legal action. Another nasty lawsuit threat came on the day after Christmas. Professors would pull him aside to say they were impressed by his work, but were afraid to be seen in public with him. One memorable post on a campus social media discussion about him said, “journalists are a cancer on society.”

    Baker said he was harassed — including angry, middle-of-the-night phone calls — although, incredibly, it wasn’t his first time. He said he was threatened even before college because he’s the son of two prominent journalists, Peter Baker of The New York Times and Susan Glasser of the New Yorker.

    With growing reports of student journalists being doxxed, ostracized on campus and otherwise harassed, the Campus Media Association is looking into ways to help them, Alexander said.

    “Being a journalist is like being under a microscope,” Baker said.

    Like most of her fellow University of North Carolina students, Emmy Martin spent a few terrifying hours in lockdown on Aug. 28 after a graduate student shot and killed his faculty adviser in a campus building and was on the loose before being apprehended. She was in a library and, as editor in chief of the Daily Tar Heel, spent part of her time reporting.

    Martin wondered, later that night, how to cover the story on the newspaper’s front page. She contemplated running a blank front page, or an all-black cover, until she scrolled through her text messages at 1 a.m.

    It was a stream of texts wondering about her well-being, which she found out the next day was similar to what her friends received. She collected many of them, and decided to make the front page a block of messages that traveled from student to student:

    “Are you safe? Where are you? Are you alone? Guys I’m so fucking scared. Hey — come on sweetheart — I need to hear from you. Can you hear any gunshots? Please stay safe. Barricade the door or if you think you can run and get to a place that can lock do so. My teacher is acting like nothing is happening and I’m lowkey freaking out…”

    Even President Joe Biden later commented on the cover, a dramatic glimpse into the minds of Generation Lockdown. “I’ve never seen a better front page,” veteran editor and Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin said on social media. “And neither have you.”

    “We didn’t create the cover to make a national statement,” Martin said. “We wanted to make a historical record of how everyone on the UNC campus felt that day.”

    The experience, she said, “reminded me of how journalism matters in more ways than just getting information to the public.”

    Also impressed was Raul Reis, dean of the Hussman journalism school at North Carolina. He’s sure to keep the achievement in mind when he’s recruiting prospective students in a tough marketplace.

    “We have some very honest conversations with parents,” Reis said. “Even if their son or daughter wants to go into journalism they are concerned that it’s a dying industry. I tell them it’s the opposite. It’s a thriving industry.”

    There’s always a need for highly skilled individuals who are able to communicate, he said.

    Almost in spite of the industry’s troubles, Whitaker said there’s been a strong interest in journalism schools over the past several years; many young people saw Trump-era attacks on the profession as a call to action. Students aren’t just interested in shedding light on problems, but in finding solutions.

    Traffic to the Medill’s website increased by 40 percent after The Daily Northwestern’s hazing articles. People wanted to know more about the school teaching the young journalists, Whitaker said.

    “Good journalism programs need good student newspapers,” he said. “They really demonstrate the things that are being taught in the classroom in a practical way.”

    With local news outlets suffering, college newspapers are also covering more than campuses. The Daily Tar Heel covers the surrounding town of Chapel Hill, too. The Columbia Daily Spectator reports on the Manhattan neighborhoods of Morningside Heights, West Harlem and the Upper West Side. The University of Texas at Austin supplies students to cover state government for news outlets across Texas.

    “So many people think of student journalists as students first,” Martin said. “But in a lot of ways student journalists are just journalists. Just younger.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Washington Post Announces Plans To Cut 240 Jobs Through Buyouts

    Washington Post Announces Plans To Cut 240 Jobs Through Buyouts

    [ad_1]

    The Washington Post announced on Tuesday that it will be cutting 240 jobs by offering voluntary buyouts to its staff.

    In an email sent to employees on Tuesday, interim CEO Patty Stonesifer explained that the Post had been “overly optimistic” about its subscription, traffic and advertising projections over the past two years, the news outlet said.

    “The urgent need to invest in our top growth priorities brought us to the difficult conclusion that we need to adjust our cost structure now,” Stonesifer said in the email, according to the Post.

    The company decided to opt for voluntary buyouts, which will be offered for specific jobs and departments, as a way to avoid potential layoffs. The email did not specify which positions and departments would be offered buyouts, NPR reported. More details about the buyout will reportedly be provided during a staff meeting scheduled for Wednesday at 10 a.m.

    “To be clear, we designed this program to reduce our workforce by approximately 240 employees in the hopes of averting more difficult actions such as layoffs – a situation we are united in trying to avoid,” Stonesifer wrote.

    The Post currently has a total of 2,500 employees, and nearly 1,000 of them work in the newsroom, The New York Times reported, so the buyouts will affect about 10% of the company’s workforce. In January, the Post laid off 20 staffers and eliminated its Sunday magazine because of declining advertising revenue and readership.

    The media industry has faced a record number of layoffs this year, according to Axios, with at least 17,436 job cuts announced by June. News outlets such as Vox Media, NPR and the Los Angeles Times announced plans to significantly reduce their workforces in 2023, while BuzzFeed, HuffPost’s parent company, shut down its entire news division this year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link