ReportWire

Category: Fact Checking

Fact Checking | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.

  • Was Aliya Rahman arrested while attending Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech?

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    Aliya Rahman, a disabled U.S. citizen whom immigration agents previously dragged out of a car while she was on her way to a medical appointment, was arrested while attending President Donald Trump’s Feb. 24, 2026, State of the Union as a guest of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.

    Rating:

    Context

    U.S. Capitol Police said in a statement that officers arrested Rahman for “demonstrating” and refusing to sit down upon request. Rahman and her legal counsel said she was standing in silence and disputed law enforcement’s claims that she illegally disrupted the State of the Union address.

    Some posts also claimed law enforcement officers injured Rahman during the arrest. A spokesperson for Rahman’s legal team said Rahman “was taken to the hospital for examination after being roughly handled by arresting Capitol Police officers” and received lidocaine for pain relief “since her shoulders were already injured from a previous assault by federal law enforcement in Minneapolis in January.” It was not possible to verify or disprove these allegations.

    On Feb. 25, 2026, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., alleged on social media that U.S. Capitol Police arrested her guest, Aliya Rahman, at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address. Rahman is a disabled U.S. citizen who made headlines a month prior after federal immigration officers dragged her from her car in Minneapolis while she was reportedly trying to get to a doctor’s appointment. 

    Omar said Rahman “stood up silently in the gallery during the president’s speech for a short period of time, part of which other guests were also standing. For that, she was forcibly removed, despite warning officers about her injured shoulders and ultimately charged with ‘Unlawful Conduct.’” 

    “The heavy-handed response to a peaceful guest sends a chilling message about the state of our democracy,” Omar wrote in an X post. “I am calling for a full explanation of why this arrest occurred.”

    Posts spreading Omar’s allegations spread on social media, including via Facebook (screenshotted), Reddit and Threads. Snopes readers searched our website for information on whether Rahman was arrested. 

    U.S. Capitol Police and Rahman’s legal counsel both confirmed via email that the agency’s officers arrested Rahman. As such, we have rated this claim as true. 

    The statement from U.S. Capitol Police said law enforcement arrested Rahman for failing to abide by the event’s rules against demonstrating: 

    All State of the Union tickets clearly explain that demonstrating is prohibited. At approximately 10:07 p.m., a person in the House Gallery started demonstrating during the State of the Union Address. The guest was told to sit down, but refused to obey our lawful orders. It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional Buildings, so 43-year-old Aliya M. Rahman of Minneapolis, MN, was arrested for D.C. Code §10-503.16 – Unlawful Conduct, Disruption of Congress.

    In an emailed statement, Rahman’s lead attorney, Alexa Van Brunt of the MacArthur Justice Center, said Rahman was “targeted.” 

    There is nothing unlawful about standing in silence and this is a blatant abuse of power. She was not disruptive or disrespectful. She was not holding a sign, making gestures, or wearing protest gear,” said Van Brunt’s statement, which we received from Jasmine Razeghi, a spokesperson for the MacArthur Justice Center. 

    Van Brunt said Rahman was released just before 4 a.m. the day after her arrest. 

    U.S. Capitol Police did not immediately return an inquiry as to whether any footage exists of the arrest, and we found no evidence of such footage published by reputable news outlets. As such, we cannot confirm what, exactly, Rahman was doing at the time of her arrest. Credible pictures of the arrest from photojournalism database Getty Images do not show her holding any signage. Other people stood at various points of Trump’s State of the Union address — and not just to clap (see the woman in red at 18:38 and 1:11:24 for examples). 

    Some online posts also claimed the officers injured Rahman. While Omar said Rahman was “taken to George Washington University Hospital for treatment,” Omar did not allege that Rahman experienced any injuries. Razeghi said in an email that Rahman went to the hospital “for examination after being roughly handled by arresting Capitol Police officers.” 

    She received lidocaine for pain relief since her shoulders were already injured from a previous assault by federal law enforcement in Minneapolis in January,” Razeghi wrote. 

    Razeghi declined to share Rahman’s medical records, stating that she would like to keep them “private at this time.” This meant that we cannot independently fact-check whether Rahman was injured or the extent of any potential injuries. 

    Rahman identified herself as a disabled person with autism and a traumatic brain injury during her Feb. 3 testimony (transcript) to Congress about her Jan. 13 encounter with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. 

    The incident in Rahman’s words 

    In a Feb. 25 interview with reporter Amy Goodman for progressive news program “Democracy Now!,” Rahman said that prior to her arrest, she stood up “at the moment that I heard this man say some of the most racist things I have heard come out of any leader’s mouth about the people of my city, and continue to trash talk my state of Minnesota and glorify [the Department of Homeland Security], the people who did this to me and who are being allowed to roam free on the streets.” (see 3:49). 

    Rahman also described the incident during her interview in detail, starting at 2:09

    I was not just removed and arrested. I was removed so physically, that two other attendees upstairs attempted to intervene in officers pulling on my shoulders after I told them I have a torn rotator cuff tendon and multiple cartilage tears in both of my shoulders. That is what happened in the audio you just played. That is why I cannot lift my arms normally. 

    Two women in the gallery — and thank you to the woman in the white shirt with the red writing who said, ‘I need you to take your hands off of her and just let her walk with her cane.’ 

    They did not do that and only when their own sergeant intervened in a back stairwell of that building to say, ‘Stop. We need to get her medical care and a wheelchair,’ did they stop tugging on me while, again, I was saying ‘disabled.’ 

    Amy, would you like to know why I was removed and arrested? The sergeant of arms told me it’s because I was standing up. Silently. No buttons, no facial expressions, no gestures, no signs. Not one sound. Standing up. 

    There are only two things you can do at the State of the Union and they are sit down and stand up. All kinds of people were standing up all night. Me too. 

    The full interview is available below.

    [ad_2]

    Rae Deng

    Source link

  • Trump said he’s pro legal immigration, his policies don’t

    [ad_1]

    During the State of the Union, President Donald Trump lauded his administration’s success in reducing the number of people trying to illegally cross the U.S. southern border as he assured that he is in favor of legal immigration.

    “In the past nine months, zero illegal aliens have been admitted to the United States,” Trump said Feb 24. “But we will always allow people to come in legally, people that will love our country and will work hard to maintain our country.”

    But Trump’s words about allowing legal immigration don’t line up with his actions.

    During the first year of his second term, Trump has terminated programs that let people legally live in the U.S., limited legal ways to get here, barred people from certain countries from entering the U.S. and paused processing of certain applications for visas and immigration statuses for legal permanent residency.

    Immigrants living in the U.S. legally have also been wrapped up in Trump’s mass deportation efforts. Spouses of U.S. citizens have been arrested while attending mandatory interviews to be granted permanent residency. People seeking legal status also have been detained during routine Immigration and Customs Enforcement check-ins and court appearances. 

    The administration’s actions “will lead to the largest restriction in legal immigration—setting aside 2020—since the 1920s,” David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote in December. Bier cited 2020 when the global COVID-19 pandemic restricted migration.

    Here’s a sampling of how the Trump administration has restricted legal immigration.

    Ended temporary programs for people legally in the U.S.

    Former President Joe Biden had significantly expanded the use of humanitarian parole, a way that people can come into the U.S. legally to temporarily live and work. Trump revoked the two programs that let people receive humanitarian parole and stripped the protections from people who entered that way.

    As part of this, he ended the CBP One app that let people make appointments at official ports of entry to begin requesting asylum and canceled 30,000 pending appointments. Under U.S. law, people are allowed to apply for asylum if they fear persecution in their home countries. To apply, people must be on U.S. soil.  

    The Department of Homeland Security has also tried to end several countries’ Temporary Protected Status, which allows people from certain countries experiencing war, environmental disasters and epidemics to temporarily live and work in the U.S. Several terminations are being challenged in court and are paused while the cases are pending.

    A federal judge on Feb. 2 temporarily blocked TPS termination for Haiti saying it “seems substantially likely” that the administration decided to terminate TPS “because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants.”

    Ending humanitarian parole and TPS could affect about 2.5 million people currently legally in the U.S., Bier wrote.

    Implemented travel bans, stopped processing applications for people from certain countries

    As he did during his first term, Trump has implemented a travel ban on several countries including Haiti, Afghanistan and Somalia. The ban restricts people from 19 countries from getting temporary visas, such as for tourism and education, and restricts people from seven of the countries from staying permanently for work.

    “Over the next three years, 400,000 legal immigrants and nearly 1 million tourists, business travelers, international students, foreign workers, and other temporary visitors will face this ban,” according to a Cato Institute analysis.

    Alongside the travel ban, the State Department on Jan. 21 paused issuing non-tourist visas for people from 75 countries. And U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has paused processing immigration applications from 39 countries, including for asylum, permanent residency and citizenship.

    Nearly half of the world’s countries, more than 90, have some form of immigration restriction.

    Dismantled U.S. refugee program

    One of the limited ways people can legally migrate to the U.S. is through the refugee program. 

    Refugees, as defined by U.S. law, are people outside of the U.S. who fled their home countries because of persecution related to race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. 

    Trump has nearly entirely halted the U.S. refugee program. On his first day in office, he enacted an indefinite pause on refugee resettlement. In the weeks that followed, he canceled travel for people who had already been granted the status. 

    From February 2025 to October 2025, the Trump administration resettled 506 refugees, a majority of whom were white South Africans, according to the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. Trump has repeated the unfounded claim that white South Africans are the target of a genocide. 

    Trump set the fiscal year 2026 refugee resettlement cap at 7,500, a record low.  In fiscal year 2024, Biden’s last year in office, the U.S. resettled 100,000 refugees. ​

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Media News Daily: Top Stories for 02/27/2026

    [ad_1]

    This page hosts daily news stories about the media, social media, and the journalism industry. Get the latest Hirings and Firings, Media Transactions, Controversies, Censorship…

    The post Media News Daily: Top Stories for 02/27/2026 appeared first on Media Bias/Fact Check.

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Watch out for alleged video of US women’s hockey captain Hilary Knight declining White House invite

    [ad_1]

    In February 2026, a video circulating on social media sites such as Instagram and TikTok claimed to show U.S. women’s ice hockey team captain Hilary Knight declining an invitation to the White House from U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Knight’s supposed response spread widely, and Snopes readers wrote in asking if the video was real. We found it was generated with artificial intelligence, and have rated this claim as a fake.

    In the video, Knight supposedly claimed the team’s refusal was about more than scheduling conflicts (the reason reportedly given by the team for declining). “It’s about not accepting that the gold medal we earned with blood and sweat is being used as a tool for politicians to avoid trouble,” the voice, supposedly Knight’s, said.

    But there were several discrepancies between that video and a Feb. 25 interview Knight gave “SportsCenter”. In the social media video, Knight spoke with strange pauses (or a lack thereof) and inflections that were not present in her interview on SportsCenter. The voices in the two videos also simply did not sound the same. This, and the poor overdubbing that was supposed to convince viewers that Knight was actually speaking the words, cemented the conclusion that the social media video was constructed with AI tools. 

    The video appeared after the end of the 2026 Milan Cortina Olympics. During the Winter Games, both the U.S. men’s and women’s hockey teams beat Canada 2-1 in overtime to win the gold medal. After the men’s victory, the team was videoed celebrating the win in their locker room with FBI Director Kash Patel, who called Trump.

    During the phone call, Trump invited the men’s team to the White House and to his State of the Union address on Feb. 24, but warned he would “have to” bring the women’s team too, adding he would “probably would be impeached” if he did not, to laughter from the men’s team. 

    The video left a sour taste in some mouths, and people waited to see whether the women’s team would respond and accept the invitation. They declined, according to ESPN, with a statement saying the team was “sincerely grateful for the invitation” but could not attend due to scheduling conflicts.

    In Knight’s real SportsCenter interview, she called the president’s words a “distasteful joke” that resulted in the women’s on-ice victories being overshadowed. “We’re really focused on celebrating all great things that have come out of the Olympics,” she said. 

    [ad_2]

    Jack Izzo

    Source link

  • Did Bondi say feds will visit households that watched ‘Jeopardy!’ over State of the Union?

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    A day after the February 2026 State of the Union address, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department will visit each household that watched “Jeopardy!” instead of President Donald Trump’s speech.

    Rating:

    A rumor that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Department of Justice would visit each household that watched the long-running trivia show “Jeopardy!” instead of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech spread online in late February 2026.

    For example, a post to Threads (archived) featured an image of Bondi speaking at a White House podium with a Fox New chyron that said: BONDI: “WE WILL VISIT EACH HOUSE WE KNOW WATCHED ‘JEOPARDY’ INSTEAD OF THE STATE OF THE UNION.

    (Threads user @ednawalker7)

    Snopes readers searched the site to find out whether Bondi really made that statement.

    However, Bondi did not say this. It originated from the Facebook page of James Schlarmann, a satirist and comedian. The Schlarmann’s original Facebook post and the Threads post above — which includes the watermark he includes on his satirical images — so we have rated this claim as labeled satire.

    Schlarmann posted the image with the quote to Facebook (archived) the day after Trump’s State of the Union address. The about page of Schlarmann’s Facebook profile included the description “comedian and poltical satirist.”

    Snopes sent Schlarmann a message requesting comment. Schlarmann responded by confirming he created the image, saying that “anyone who made the wise choice to watch [“Jeopardy!” host] Ken Jennings instead of Donald Trump can rest easy…for now.”

    Searches for the quote on Google, DuckDuckGo, Bing and Yahoo found no credible evidence that Bondi said the government would visit the homes of people who watched “Jeopardy!” over the State of the Union. If the U.S. Attorney General really declared government officials will go to people’s homes because they didn’t watch the president’s speech, major news outlets such as The Associated Press and Reuters would have covered it. There was no reporting on Bondi saying such a thing on Fox News’ website, even though the image included a Fox News logo.

    The screenshot of Bondi used in the post was from a Feb. 6, 2026, news conference, during which Bondi spoke of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the arrest of a third suspect in the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi, Libya, that took place in 2012. Everyone in the screenshot is wearing the same clothing they wore during that news conference.

    Snopes has previously debunked other rumors that originated from satirical Schlarmann posts people believed to be real, including a February 2026 post using the same image that claimed Bondi ordered people to stop sending ‘coupons for Depends’ to White House and a January 2026 post that claimed she said “Jesus Christ would never have stormed a church” in protest of its leaders.

    Let us note here: Whether you agree with something being described as satire or parody is a matter of opinion. Snopes is in the business of facts. We label these rumors based on creators’ description of them. Your call on whether you agree. 

    [ad_2]

    Emery Winter

    Source link

  • Videos falsely claim Nancy Guthrie’s body was found in pond near Catalina Foothills

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    Videos published prior to Feb. 26, 2026, accurately reported Arizona police recovered the body of Nancy Guthrie in a pond near the Catalina Foothills community.

    Rating:

    In late February 2026, online users shared videos reporting Arizona police located the body of Nancy Guthrie — the mother of “Today” TV host Savannah Guthrie — floating in a pond in the Tucson-area Catalina Foothills community. Snopes received reader mail asking about the rumor.

    After Nancy Guthrie’s family reported her missing on Feb. 1, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department announced she was believed to have been kidnapped, abducted or otherwise taken against her will. 

    In short, this rumor was false. Numerous videos, documented later in this article, featured a news-anchor-style voice resembling vocals generated with artificial intelligence, as well as fake news report clips displaying dated, recycled footage of police recovering human remains during unrelated investigations. As of this writing, officials had not located Guthrie.

    Snopes contacted the Pima County Sheriff’s Department to ask for a statement officially confirming the false nature of the videos and will update this article if we receive further information.

    Debunking the false videos

    On Feb. 22, a user managing the Sean Pilant YouTube channel (archived) posted a “breaking news” video (archived) with no visible broadcaster or network identifiers. The clip’s title read, “Nancy Guthrie’s body was found floating in a pond near Catalina Foothills. #arizona #nancyguthrie.”

    (Sean Pilant/YouTube)

    The video featured footage unrelated to Guthrie’s disappearance, including — at the 4-second mark — officers with uniforms identifying their locale as Hennepin County, Minnesota. A reverse image search found the clip’s very next shot showed a scene from the aftermath of a deadly New Year’s Day fire in Switzerland.

    The audio narration, resembling AI-generated, news-anchor-style voices Snopes has previously reported about, contained the following false story:

    The body of Nancy Guthrie was found floating in a pond near Catalina Foothills. On Saturday, police received a report of a floating body discovered in an abandoned pond near Sabino Canyon. The body was identified as that of long missing Nancy Guthrie, found just 2 miles from her residential community. Police investigations revealed numerous dragged footprints near the water’s edge. These tracks extended to the shoreline, distinctly different from ordinary walking patterns and appearing to show signs of struggle and forceful movement. Police preliminarily speculate that Nancy may have been forcibly brought to this location and engaged in a violent struggle with the suspect. The body’s state of decomposition indicates it may have been floating in the water for over a week. Further examination of the remains is currently underway. Meanwhile, investigators stated they are tracing clues related to Nancy’s activities prior to her disappearance.

    On the following day, TikTok user @caterpillar136588 posted a video (archived) containing the same audio narration but with different visuals. The 11-second mark showed numerous officers near water, matching footage (archived) from an unrelated matter recently occurring in Lake Michigan.

    Also on Feb. 23, a user managing the Sassy Paws Facebook page shared a video (archived) containing the same narration with different footage. The beginning of the clip showed officials handling a blue tarp near a body of water. That footage matched (archived) a scene from earlier in February, where officials in an Atlanta suburb recovered the body believed to be rapper Lil Jon’s son, Nathan Smith, known as D.J. Young Slade.

    On Feb. 24, a user managing the News 401 Facebook page posted a video (archived), again with the same audio narration and different visuals. The 40-second mark of the clip showed men in a boat at night. That same footage appeared in a Chicago TV affiliate’s video (archived) from July 2025.

    A previous post from the Empowering Change Now Facebook page displayed a similar rumor showing a still photo of men appearing to carry a body wrapped in a blue bag or tarp. That picture originated from (archived) an unrelated June 2025 investigation in Portugal.

    We privately messaged all of the aforementioned users (with the exception of the YouTube user, whos account did not provide a contact method) to ask about their promotion of false content. We will update this story if we receive more details.

    For further reading, we previously reported on false allegations about Savannah Guthrie’s husband, Michael Feldman, being connected to the federal case files on the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Sources

    Billeaud, Jacques, and Sejal Govindarao. “Authorities Believe ‘Today’ Show Host Savannah Guthrie’s Mother Was Taken against Her Will.” The Associated Press, 2 Feb. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/savannah-guthrie-mother-missing-arizona-tucson-6c7b78d17d7b647c64f71f64ecaecf8b.

    “Body Believed to Be Lil Jon’s Son D.J. Young Is Found in Pond near Atlanta.” The Associated Press, 6 Feb. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/lil-jon-music-artist-pond-georgia-9293200dd9936bffe5359c85314fa5dd.

    “Body Found in Lake Michigan on South Side, Chicago Police Say.” YouTube, ABC 7 Chicago, 21 Feb. 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTSDD99FP0o.

    “BREAKING: There Appears to Be Some Activity near Baldwin Drive and Mayfield Road Where #LilJon ‘s Son #DJYoungSlade Was Last Seen.” Facebook, 6 Feb. 2026, https://www.facebook.com/kiss1041fm/posts/breaking-there-appears-to-be-some-activity-near-baldwin-drive-and-mayfield-road-/1327513332739601/.

    McClean, Denis. “Swiss Ski Resort Fire: ‘I’Ll Never Forget the Screams, the Smell, the Looks of Pure Fear.’” The Irish Times, 2 Jan. 2026, https://www.irishtimes.com/world/europe/2026/01/02/swiss-ski-resort-fire-ill-never-forget-the-screams-the-smell-the-looks-of-pure-fear/.

    “Search Underway on Fox River in St. Charles.” YouTube, 30 July 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUDAxSS0Fkc.

    Shapiro, Emily. “Nancy Guthrie Abduction: The Full Timeline.” ABC News, 24 Feb. 2026, https://abcnews.com/US/nancy-guthrie-abduction-timeline-mysterious-disappearance-savannah-guthries/story?id=129848673.

    Tetzlaff-Deas, Benedict, and Robert Harries. “Madeleine McCann Detectives ‘Sample Clothes and Bones Found during Search.’” Wales Online, 10 June 2025, https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-sample-clothes-31830035.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Liles

    Source link

  • Audio of Epstein survivor’s account of the Clintons is AI

    [ad_1]

    A viral audio clip claims to reveal a victim’s testimony of abuse by former President Bill Clinton and his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on an island owned by sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    This audio clip is not real. It was generated with artificial intelligence.

    Hillary Clinton testified Feb. 26 before the House Oversight Committee as part of a probe into Epstein. Bill Clinton is expected to testify Feb. 27. Neither Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing or charged with a crime in connection to Epstein’s offenses.

    A Feb. 24 TikTok shows an image of Epstein with Bill Clinton and plays an audio clip of what the post calls a “survivor.”

    “You want the truth about who spent the most time on that island? Fine, I’ll give it to you straight, no filter. The former president. You know exactly which one. Yeah, Clinton. The survivors still call him number one,” the narrator said.

    Other Instagram and Facebook users also shared the audio clip. One post claimed it was the voice of Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre, who died in April 2025. 

    In her Feb. 26 opening statement before the House Oversight Committee, Hillary Clinton said, “I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes or offices.”

    Detection models, experts say the audio is AI-generated

    We traced the audio to The People’s Voice, a frequent source of misinformation. It published a video in November that it said included a “newly leaked recording” from Giuffre. 

    The People’s Voice also recently published an AI-generated audio of a supposed “whistleblower” talking about television host Ellen DeGeneres, claiming the Epstein files exposed her as a cannibal. We rated that claim Pants on Fire.

    We used the DeepFake-O-Meter, developed by the University at Buffalo Media Forensics Lab, to analyze the audio clip about the Clintons. Results from four out of five detection models showed it was likely AI-generated.

    When we uploaded the audio clip to the AI speech classifier from ElevenLabs — a company that specializes in AI audio generation — it said, “it’s very likely that this audio was generated with ElevenLabs.”

    We also asked multiple experts to analyze the audio, and they said it was AI-generated. V.S. Subrahmanian, a Northwestern University computer science professor, and Marco Postiglione, a postdoctoral researcher who works with him, used 83 deepfake detection algorithms to analyze the audio. Sixty-seven found the audio was more likely to be fake than real.

    Subrahmanian and Postiglione also pointed to other signs of AI generation, including that the narrative seems “structured like written prose rather than spontaneous speech.”

    Siwei Lyu, a University at Buffalo computer science and engineering professor, said the audio included a 13-second segment without audible breath intakes. “Each sentence also ends with an abrupt cut to silence rather than fading out naturally, missing the subtle room tone and vocal decay you’d expect from a genuine recording,” he said.

    The voice’s pitch and delivery are also flat, said Hafiz Malik, University of Michigan – Dearborn electrical and computer engineering professor. He said it’s not likely for a human to speak for two minutes at the same rate without taking any pauses, like the voice in the audio clip does.

    The audio clip includes claims about the Clintons’ actions on Epstein’s island, Little Saint James in the U.S. Virgin Islands, including physical and verbal abuse of Epstein victims. 

    We found no verified reports of such anecdotes from Giuffre or other Epstein victims about the Clintons.  

    Did Giuffre say something about the Clintons?

    Giuffre’s memoir, “Nobody’s Girl,” published posthumously in 2025, mentioned that she was present when Epstein hosted Bill Clinton and former Vice President Al Gore for dinner on separate occasions. She also talked about a time in 2022 when Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane, but Giuffre didn’t go with them. She noted that Clinton has said the trip was a humanitarian mission.

    Giuffre also referred to a 2011 article that said she “had never been ‘lent out’” to the former president, referring to Bill Clinton. 

    The book doesn’t mention Hillary Clinton.

    We found no evidence that audio from Giuffre was released after her death. On April 29, 2025, her family released a photo of one of Giuffre’s handwritten journal entries where she said she stood with survivors and encouraged them to fight for their rights. 

    This audio clip that posts say is an Epstein victim talking about abuse by the Clintons is fake. We rate it Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why we don’t know how long until Iran has bomb material

    [ad_1]

    As President Donald Trump considers a military strike on Iran, his envoy Steve Witkoff said Iran is on track to quickly have material needed to produce a nuclear bomb.

    “They are probably a week away from having industrial grade bomb making material, and that’s really dangerous,” Witkoff told Fox News’ Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, Feb. 21. 

    Trump said Feb. 19 he was giving Iran 10 days to reach a deal on Iran’s nuclear program. The Trump administration has amassed military power, including ships and aircraft, in the region for potential military action.

    Witkoff and Iranian negotiators met Feb. 26 in Geneva, Switzerland, to continue talks that began earlier in the month. 

    In June 2025, Trump said the U.S. strikes that month had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program when it hit three sites, a comment he repeated during his Feb. 24 State of the Union address. But in November, the White House used softer language, saying Operation Midnight Hammer “significantly degraded Iran’s nuclear program.”

    When PolitiFact asked the White House to square Trump’s remarks about obliteration with Witkoff’s comment about Iran being a week away from having bomb making material, the White House referred us to press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s Feb. 24 remarks.

    Leavitt said the June operation “did in fact obliterate Iran’s nuclear facilities,” however, “That does not mean that Iran may never try again to establish a nuclear program.” 

    Witkoff’s comments portray the status of Iran’s nuclear program as settled. It isn’t. There is still a lot of uncertainty, including about the extent of the program’s destruction, its supply of uranium and Iran’s desire to pursue enrichment.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency, which tracks Iran’s nuclear program, has been unable to access the sites the U.S. bombed. In 2018, Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, which had allowed monitoring of the country’s nuclear program. This means experts lack confirmed, independent information about the status of Iran’s efforts.

    What are the obstacles for Iran to produce a nuclear bomb?

    Enriching uranium is the first step in building a nuclear bomb, which also requires a delivery vehicle such as a ballistic missile. Centrifuges are the machines used to enrich uranium.

    Brendan Green, a University of Cincinnati associate professor and expert on nuclear strategy, said Witkoff is operating under the assumption that Iran’s enriched uranium was not destroyed by Operation Midnight Hammer. Iran would also need a sufficient number of centrifuges to enrich uranium.

    “Public information about both of these key premises is totally sparse,” Green said in an email. “I think that a one week estimate is reasonable IF the preconditions of having the uranium and the centrifuges are met. I do not know if those have been met.”

    Before June, Iran had accumulated a significant amount of highly enriched uranium, said Michael Singh, a managing director at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 

    Using the centrifuges Iran operated in the past, it would take just a few days to enrich one bomb’s worth of that highly enriched uranium to “weapons-grade.” 

    “This is likely where Witkoff’s one-week timeline comes from,” Singh said.

    However, experts don’t know how much of that highly enriched uranium Iran has access to because most was likely buried under rubble.

    Singh said as far as he knows, Iran is not currently operating any centrifuges and thus cannot further enrich uranium. 

    “However, we can be relatively sure that Iran has centrifuges hidden somewhere that likely were not struck in the June attacks,” Singh said. The International Atomic Energy Agency has limited visibility into Iran’s centrifuge production activities.

    Joseph Rodgers, an expert on nuclear issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said satellite imagery suggests that two of the three sites the U.S. struck in June have resumed operations. 

    “These strikes, coupled with Israeli targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and Israeli strikes on the Arak reactor, dealt a significant blow to Iran’s nuclear enterprise,” Rodgers said. The Arak reactor is a heavy water reactor in Iran. 

    Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said it would take Iran years to fully rebuild the enrichment plants hit in June and “most likely take months — not a week — for Iran to enrich small amounts of uranium to bomb-grade … and to process it into enough metal for a single weapon.”

    David Albright, a former United Nations weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security, which analyzes nuclear issues, told The Wall Street Journal Iran’s program has stalled.

    “Viewing the satellite imagery and monitoring the Iranian nuclear sites, we don’t see any evidence that they are trying to reconstitute their nuclear-weapons program,” Albright said. “They are essentially on hold.”

    Politicians and experts have predicted timelines about Iran’s nuclear program for decades 

    In 1992, Benjamin Netanyahu, then a member of Israel’s Knesset, said Iran was three to five years from producing a nuclear weapon.

    In 2022, during the Biden administration, a State Department official estimated that Iran needed as little as one week to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear weapon. A May 2025 Defense Intelligence Agency assessment gave a similar timeframe.

    Shawn Rostker, a research analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, said he is skeptical of Witkoff’s “week away” statement.

    “While Iran has enriched uranium beyond what is needed for civilian purposes, any precise breakout timeline is murky and highly assumption-based, and we don’t have high confidence in estimates like that right now,” Rostker said. “The more important issue is not arguing over speculative timelines, but urgently pursuing serious diplomacy to reduce risks and keep this crisis from spiraling further.”

    RELATED: Ask PolitiFact: What was the Iran nuclear deal and why did Trump drop out?

    RELATED: Ask PolitiFact: Was Iran ‘weeks away’ from having a nuclear weapon, as Trump said?

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FL Supreme Court doesn’t review legislative ballot measures

    [ad_1]

    After a contentious debate with Democrats, Florida House Republicans passed their version of a property tax overhaul that would eliminate non-school property taxes for Floridians’ primary residences. 

    As the House neared a vote on the proposed amendment Feb. 19, Rep. Toby Overdorf, R-Palm City, dismissed legislators’ concerns that the tax cut would strip local governments of money for services, saying municipalities’ budgets have increased sharply over the last several years.

    Then he turned to Florida’s ballot amendment approval process.

    “What we pass today will eventually go, hopefully, to the Supreme Court,” Overdorf said on the statehouse floor. “And they will review that language and then it goes to the voters. The voters will make that choice.”

    The tax proposal is a legislative ballot measure that will require voters to weigh in. The Florida Supreme Court doesn’t automatically review that type of proposal.

    The state Supreme Court typically reviews citizen-led initiatives before they go to voters, not ones passed by the Legislature. In this case, the court would review the proposal’s language only if anyone files a lawsuit challenging it. Given the controversial nature of the property tax proposal, experts believe it is likely to face legal challenges.

    University of Central Florida political science professor Aubrey Jewett found that from 1978 to 2019 the Florida Supreme Court removed eight legislative proposals from the ballot in reviews spurred by lawsuits. In each case, the court declared the amendments or their ballot summaries confusing, misleading or incomplete.

    Overdorf told PolitiFact he was referring to the possibility of a lawsuit, saying that his use of the word “hopefully” was meant toward the measure passing the Legislature. The Senate has not taken up the measure and is working on its own property tax proposal with Gov. Ron DeSantis, who floated the possibility of a special session later in the year to get it done. 

    “I have to be conservative as I go through this process, and the measure is subject to review if somebody challenges the ballot language,” Overdorf told PolitiFact in a phone interview. “According to the statutes, anyone that disagrees with the language and files an action, which they have to do within 30 days, that would have to be reviewed by the court and it takes precedence of any other action by the court.”

    The different ways Florida handles ballot measures

    There are five ways an amendment can be placed on Florida’s election ballots: citizen-led initiative petition, legislative proposal, constitutional revision commission, taxation and budget reform commission and a constitutional convention. At least 60% of voters must approve of a measure for it to become a Florida law. 

    Florida has never had a constitutional convention, but it has utilized the four other methods over the years to put ballot measures before voters. 

    For citizen-led initiatives, “after a certain percentage of required signatures is reached, a supreme court review of the amendment is officially requested, and the court must agree that the initiative covers only one subject and that the ballot summary is not confusing or deceptive,” Jewett said. “If the court finds that it fails either of those tests, then it will not go on the ballot.”

    Florida’s Republican lawmakers have taken steps to make it harder for ballot initiative backers to get measures approved. 

    In 2020, they passed a bill raising the number of signatures initiatives need to spur review by the state’s highest court, increasing it from 10% to 25% of the total signatures required to get on the ballot. The law also raised the requirement for signatures to be collected in at least half of the state’s congressional districts, instead of one-fourth of them.

    DeSantis signed another law in 2025 that requires petition circulators to be Florida residents and U.S. citizens, prohibits felons who haven’t had their voting rights restored from circulating petitions and requires all circulators to register with the Florida Division of Elections. (Petition circulators gather signatures for ballot initiatives.) The state can now levy a $50,000 fine against an organization that allows ineligible people to handle petitions, per violation.

    The tougher restrictions can be seen in real time: DeSantis’ administration recently announced that no citizen initiatives made the November 2026 ballot. Legislative proposals, meanwhile, must pass as a joint resolution by a three-fifths vote in both the House and Senate, and are not subject to a governor’s veto. 

    Since Republicans currently have the supermajority, any measure the party wants to put on the ballot has a good chance of getting there. Once passed, barring a lawsuit, the proposals typically go straight to the ballot.

    “The legislative majority typically resents having its legislative proposals removed or revoked and believes the Florida Supreme Court should not interfere with its ability to place constitutional changes before the voters,” Jewett wrote in his book, “Politics in Florida.” “In several cases, the legislature has simply rewritten its proposal and put the issue back before the voters.” 

    For example, when the Florida Supreme Court removed a 2007 proposal to reduce property taxes and increase exemptions, the Legislature called a special session and got the rewritten proposal back on the ballot, where it passed easily.

    The court, which now has six conservative DeSantis-appointees, has not removed any legislative proposals from the ballot in 2020, 2022 or 2024.

    RELATED: Florida’s Amendment 4 on abortion is short. Does a lack of definitions mean no rules? 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fake image of Carney with US, Canadian women’s hockey teams praised as ‘class act’

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    An image from February 2026 authentically depicts Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney with the U.S. and Canadian women’s Olympic hockey teams following the U.S. team’s Olympic win.

    Rating:

    On Feb. 19, 2026, the U.S. women’s Olympic hockey team beat Canada in a 2-1 game, winning gold and prompting an invitation from U.S. President Donald Trump to attend his State of the Union address on Feb. 24.

    The women’s hockey team declined the invitation, citing scheduling conflicts, in a move many read as an intentional distancing. Amid this speculation, an image circulated online purportedly showing Canada’s prime minister alongside both the U.S. and Canadian women’s hockey teams. 

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has invited both teams to his office for a photo op. He felt bad for the American women’s team not going to the White House,” one caption on a Threads post (archived) that received more than 115,000 likes, as of this writing.

    https://www.threads.com/@ric.berg/post/DVJJ726jxoM

    The image also spread on Facebook, Reddit and X. Many in the comments appeared to believe the image was authentic, with some praising Carney’s apparent extending of an olive branch to the U.S. team as a “class act.”

    It’s unclear where the image originated, but it’s not real. There is no evidence Carney extended such an invitation to either team, and the image shows clear signs of artificial intelligence generation. As a result, we’ve rated the image fake.

    One player’s jersey, for example, misspells “Canada,” instead reading “CAANADA.” The Canadian maple leaf on one player’s shirt appears blunted and out of place with other leaves on the players’ jerseys. These kinds of visual discrepancies are common features of images that were generated using AI. 

    Another player’s fingers are misshapen, while another’s thumb appeared warped and reduced. Rings on another player’s hand also appear one-dimensional, as seen below:

    (Snopes Illustration)

    A general Google search for evidence that Carney hosted both teams returned results about related news items or primarily related to the fake image spread by various social media accounts, none of which had credibility. If a major world leader had appeared at such a meeting, credible news media outlets would have reported the events.

    (Google)

    A search for images related to the keyword “hockey” on the official image archive for the prime minister’s office returned only one result that was unrelated to the image depicting Carney with the women’s teams.

    The man in the image additionally did not match the real Carney’s appearance, as compared to an authentic photo taken in 2020 (available on Wikimedia Commons).

    (Wikimedia Commons)

    Official images of the U.S. and Canadian women’s Olympic hockey teams also indicate the players in the image that circulated online were inaccurately pictured, meaning they did not resemble the real players at all. Several players in the AI image appeared to have unnaturally similar faces. 

    While Snopes does not exclusively rely on AI-detection software tools such as Hive because they are not always reliable, we do supplement our reporting with its results. Hive determined the image of Carney with the U.S. and Canadian teams was 100% AI-generated.

    This wasn’t the first claim about the Canadian prime minister we’ve investigated. For more, see our collection of Carney-related rumors.

    Sources

    ‘Donald J. Trump: “Congratulations to Our Great U.S.A. Ice Hockey Team. THEY WON THE GOLD. WOW!…’ Trump’s Truth, https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/36858. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    Hockey, U. S. A. ‘GOLDEN: U.S. Women Clinch Olympic Gold With 2-1 Overtime Win Over Canada’. Team USA Hockey, 19 Feb. 2026, https://teamusa.usahockey.com/news_article/show/1355939-golden-u-s-women-clinch-olympic-gold-with-2-1-overtime-win-over-canada.

    ‘Photos’. Prime Minister of Canada, https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/photos. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    Search Media – Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=mark+carney+2026&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    ‘United States Wins 3rd Olympic Gold in Women’s Hockey, Beating Canada 2-1 on Megan Keller’s OT Goal’. AP News, 19 Feb. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/us-canada-womens-hockey-olympic-final-141b5904352673676656cbe2a1c253e5.

    ‘US Women’s Gold Medal-Winning Team Declines Invitation from Trump to Attend State of Union Address’. AP News, 23 Feb. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/trump-state-of-union-womens-hockey-gold-medal-2311fcc12756a72d8733f0f8c12116f8.

    [ad_2]

    Taija PerryCook

    Source link

  • Media News Daily: Top Stories for 02/26/2026

    [ad_1]

    This page hosts daily news stories about the media, social media, and the journalism industry. Get the latest Hirings and Firings, Media Transactions, Controversies, Censorship…

    The post Media News Daily: Top Stories for 02/26/2026 appeared first on Media Bias/Fact Check.

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • 7 fake images of Melania Trump we’ve fact-checked

    [ad_1]

    Christensen, Laerke. ‘Did Melania and Barron Trump Open “free Hospital” for Homeless People?’ Snopes, 5 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/melania-and-barron-trump-hospital/.

    Evon, Dan. ‘Melania Trump, Ivanka Trump Wearing Transparent Shirts’. Snopes, 2 Dec. 2016, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/melania-trump-ivanka-trump-wearing-transparent-shirts/.

    Evon, Dan. ‘No, This Pic Doesn’t Show a Shirtless Hunter Biden with Melania Trump’. Snopes, 11 July 2022, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/hunter-biden-melania-trump-photo/.

    Ibrahim, Nur. ‘Investigating Alleged Photo of Melania Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell and Unidentified Girls’. Snopes, 7 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//news/2026/02/07/melania-trump-ghislaine-maxwell-girls-photo/.

    Ibrahim, Nur. ‘Image of Melania Trump Pole Dancing for Epstein Isn’t Real. Here’s the Proof’. Snopes, 23 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/melania-trump-pole-dancing-epstein/.

    Liles, Jordan. ‘Image Claiming to Show Melania Trump Kissing Epstein on Cheek Isn’t Real’. Snopes, 1 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/melania-kiss-epstein-photo/.

    Wrona, Aleksandra. ‘Bogus Story Claims Trumps Volunteered at Pennsylvania Orphanage on New Year’s Day’. Snopes, 11 Jan. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/donald-melania-trump-orphanage/.

    [ad_2]

    Taija PerryCook

    Source link

  • MBFC’s Daily Vetted Fact Checks for 02/26/2026

    [ad_1]

    Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International…

    The post MBFC’s Daily Vetted Fact Checks for 02/26/2026 appeared first on Media Bias/Fact Check.

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Posts claim Kash Patel’s flight to Milan cost taxpayers $400K. That estimate seems a little high

    [ad_1]

    • Social media users claimed FBI Director Kash Patel’s trip to Italy, during which he was pictured celebrating the U.S. men’s national hockey team winning Olympic gold, cost taxpayers $400,000.
    • Given his position as FBI director, Patel is required to travel via private jet for security and communications reasons. Therefore, his trip was paid for with taxpayer money.
    • When a U.S. government official uses a private jet for personal reasons because they are required to do so, they are expected to reimburse the government for an amount equal to a publicly available fare between the two cities. It is unclear whether Patel reimbursed or plans to reimburse the government for the trip to Italy.
    • Why Patel was in Italy was unclear — the FBI claimed Patel was there on business and the trip was planned months ago.
    • The alleged $400,000 figure was high, but it was unclear how much additional money was spent while Patel was in Italy. A more reasonable estimate for the flight would be somewhere between $60,000 and $80,000, based on a 2013 government report detailing how much the plane costs to fly. 

    On Feb. 22, 2026, in the last event of the Milan Cortina Winter Olympics, the U.S. men’s national hockey team beat Canada 2-1 in overtime to win the country’s first gold medal in the event since the “Miracle on Ice” team in 1980. 

    But as videos of the men’s team celebrating their victory began appearing online, many people noticed they featured an unexpected guest — FBI Director Kash Patel. Footage showed Patel drinking a beer inside the locker room with the team before calling President Donald Trump so he could speak to the players. (Snopes separately fact-checked a claim about Trump’s remarks during that phone call).

    Social media users then claimed the FBI director flew to Milan to watch the men’s hockey final on the taxpayer’s dime, alleging the trip cost approximately $400,000. Snopes readers searched the site looking to see whether this figure was accurate. 

    Patel’s trip to Milan was indeed paid for with taxpayer money. FBI directors have been required to travel on a private jet due to “security and communications needs” since 2011, according to the Government Accountability Office, an independent, nonpartisan organization that works for Congress, providing information about government spending.

    However, exactly why Patel was in Milan in the first place and how much his trip cost is subject for debate. The flight cost less than $400,000, based on previous information about how expensive the plane is to fly, though there was no information about how much taxpayer money was spent while Patel was in Italy.

    In numerous X posts, FBI spokesman Ben Williamson attacked reporters from news media outlets CBS News and MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) for alleging Patel was in Milan for the game, saying the trip “was planned months ago” and included meetings with Italian law enforcement and security officials and the U.S. ambassador to Italy.

    Patel also took to X to defend his actions, saying he “was extremely humbled when my friends, the newly minted Gold Medal winners on Team USA, invited me into the locker room to celebrate this historic moment with the boys.” The FBI director is well known for being a hockey fan, according to The New York Times, and plays the game himself. 

    https://x.com/Kash_Patel/status/2025736412125855918

    Snopes contacted the FBI for comment on this story. We had not heard back at time of publication but we will update this article if we receive a reply.

    The private jet

    The Office of Management and Budget maintains a memo explaining how government officials may use private jets. For instance, the government uses private planes when the “mission requirements” (an agency doing what it is designated to do) call for it (Page 2, Section 5B). The other major category of private flights is “required use travel,” for when “the government aircraft is required because of bona fide communications or security needs of the agency or exceptional scheduling requirements” (Page 2, Section 5D).

    Officials required to use private planes include the attorney general and FBI director, according to the summary page of the 2013 GAO report.

    When a government plane flies because of required use, according to the OMB memo, the relevant official must refund the government the coach fare available to the general public for travel between the two locations (Page 5, Section 9B):

    (i) For a wholly personal or political trip, the full coach fare for the trip;

    (ii) For an official trip during which the employee engages in political activities, the appropriate share of the full coach fare for the entire trip;

    (iii) For an official trip during which the employee flies to one or more locations for personal reasons, the excess of the full coach fare of all flights taken by the employee on the trip over the full coach fare of the flights that would have been taken by the employee had there been no personal activities on the trip.

    It is unclear whether Patel reimbursed or plans to reimburse the government for any parts of the trip to Italy. As noted above, the FBI had not replied to our request for comment.

    In sum, because Patel is required to fly privately due to security concerns, he is supposed to reimburse the government some money when he uses the plane for personal reasons. In this case, the amount of reimbursement would likely depend on Patel’s other activities during his trip to Italy.

    Estimating a cost

    In this case, according to MS NOW, Patel flew to Milan using the FBI’s Gulfstream jet. The 2013 GAO report estimated that one “15-hour international flight” on the Gulfstream V aircraft cost $75,440 in 2010 — about $112,500 in 2026, adjusted for inflation. According to CBS News, Patel flew from Joint Base Andrews to an Air Force Base in Italy, a roughly nine-hour flight.

    MS NOW estimated Patel’s Milan trip cost “as much as $75,000,” under the assumption that the jet cost taxpayers about $5,000 per flight hour to operate. The Democratic Party claimed the trip cost “approximately $100,000” without providing evidence. 

    Based on the GAO report and MS NOW’s numbers, somewhere between $60,000 and $80,000 is a reasonable ballpark estimate of the cost, given that several factors, such as the cost of aviation fuel and the salaries of pilots, could not be independently established. (If a 15-hour flight, adjusted for inflation, costs roughly $112,500, then a nine-hour flight would seemingly cost about $67,500. However, this assumes the costs have a linear relationship with the length of the flight.)

    Perceived hypocrisy

    Patel’s use of the private jet is further complicated by his own past words — MSNBC compiled multiple instances in which Patel criticized his predecessor, Christopher Wray, for using a private jet.

    Only two FBI directors have ever been fired — but one of them, William Sessions, was dismissed by then-President Bill Clinton over ethical concerns, including improperly using the FBI’s private jet to visit family.

    According to The New York Times and CBS News, Patel has flown to Inverness, Scotland, for a golf trip; to San Angelo, Texas, for a hunting trip with Republican donor Bubba Saulsbury; and to State College, Pennsylvania, to see his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, sing the national anthem at a Penn State wrestling match, all at taxpayer expense.

    Congressional Democrats have sent a letter to the GAO calling for an investigation into how Patel has used the private jet, and another to Patel to reprimand him.

    In the days following the trip to Italy, Sen. Dick Durbin, the highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said whistleblowers told him Patel’s use of the private jet had directly impeded the FBI investigation into the fatal shooting of conservative pundit Charlie Kirk in September 2025.

    Sources

    About the Ranking Member | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/ranking. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    Athletic, The. “USA Men’s Hockey Beats Canada for Olympic Gold Medal on Hughes Goal in Overtime: Live Updates and Reaction.” The Athletic, 22 Feb. 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/live-blogs/usa-vs-canada-live-score-mens-hockey-gold-medal-winter-olympics/YAt2q3XnJreD/.

    Begley, Sarah. ‘James Comey Is the Second FBI Director to Be Fired. Here’s What Happened the Other Time’. TIME, 10 May 2017, https://time.com/4773774/fired-fbi-director-william-sessons/.

    Beitsch, Rebecca. “Durbin Whistleblowers Accuse Patel of Jet Usage, Decision-Making That Hindered FBI Responses.” The Hill, 24 Feb. 2026, https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5753195-whistleblower-allege-fbi-jet-misuse/.

    Carmeli, Jared. “Shot/Chaser: Kash Patel Criticizes Government Funded Trips Then Charges Taxpayers ~$100,000 For Private Jet to Milan.” Democrats, 23 Feb. 2026, https://democrats.org/news/shot-chaser-kash-patel-criticizes-government-funded-trips-then-charges-taxpayers-100000-for-private-jet-to-milan/.

    decades, Scott MacFarlane Justice Correspondent Scott MacFarlane is CBS News’ Justice correspondent He has covered Washington for two, et al. Democrats Begin Congressional Probe of Kash Patel’s Use of FBI Gulfstream Jet – CBS News. 1 Dec. 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-probe-fbi-director-kash-patel-fbi-gulfstream-jet/.

    Durbin Reveals New Whistleblower Information For Investigation Into Kash Patel Joyriding To The Olympics | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/dem/releases/durbin-reveals-new-whistleblower-information-for-investigation-into-kash-patel-joyriding-to-the-olympics.

    “FBI Director Invites Fresh Scrutiny over Travels with Appearance at US Men’s Hockey Team Celebration.” Opb, https://www.opb.org/article/2026/02/24/fbi-director-invites-fresh-scrutiny-over-travels-with-appearance-at-us-men-s-hockey-team-celebration/. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    Feuer, Alan, et al. “F.B.I. Director Celebrates Hockey Victory as Bureau Stares Down Crises.” The New York Times, 22 Feb. 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/22/us/politics/fbi-director-patel-olympics-mar-a-lago.html.

    Flight Time from Washington, DC to Milan, Italy. https://www.travelmath.com/flying-time/from/Washington,+DC/to/Milan,+Italy. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    Galli, Cindy. “Kash Patel Heads to Milan for the Olympics — on the FBI Jet.” MS NOW, 19 Feb. 2026, https://www.ms.now/news/kash-patel-headed-to-milan-for-the-olympics-on-the-fbi-jet.

    Hardinges, Laerke Christensen, Nick. ‘Video Shows Trump Saying He’d “have to” Bring Women’s Hockey Team to White House’. Snopes, 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/us-hockey-trump-white-house/.

    Hawken, Robbie. Kash Patel Goes Viral for Hockey Celebration | CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/23/politics/video/kash-patel-goes-viral-for-hockey-celebration-vrtc. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    ‘How Long Does It Take to Fly from Washington D.C. to Milan?’ Air Miles Calculator, https://www.airmilescalculator.com/flight-time/iad-to-mxp/.

    “How Much Did Kash Patel’s Olympics Trip To Italy Cost Taxpayers? Viral Video Of FBI Director Partying Raises Questions.” Times Now, 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/how-much-did-kash-patel-olympics-trip-to-italy-cost-taxpayers-viral-video-of-fbi-director-partying-with-us-mens-hockey-team-raises-questions-article-153679199.

    Iorfida, Chris. “FBI Flights, Taxpayer Dollars: Why Director Kash Patel’s Travels Are Drawing Scrutiny.” CBC News, 24 Feb. 2026. CBC.ca, https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/fbi-plane-patel-9.7103617.

    Kamlager-Dove, Raskin Demand FBI Director Kash Patel Reimburse Taxpayers, Produce Records After Using Government Jet for Personal Flights, Lavish Vacations, and Date Nights | Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove. 1 Dec. 2025, http://kamlager-dove.house.gov/media/press-releases/kamlager-dove-raskin-demand-fbi-director-kash-patel-reimburse-taxpayers.

    Mastrangelo, Dominick, and Rebecca Beitsch. “Patel Sparks Outrage Partying with Team USA as MAGA Cheers Him On.” The Hill, 23 Feb. 2026, https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5750666-kash-patel-team-usa-backlash/.

    ‘Men’s Ice Hockey at Winter Olympics: All Winners – Complete List’. Olympics.Com, https://www.olympics.com/en/milano-cortina-2026/news/mens-ice-hockey-winter-olympics-all-winners-complete-list.

    “MSNBC Hits Keystone Kash With a Supercut of Him Trashing His Predecessor’s Jet Use.” The Daily Beast, 3 Nov. 2025, https://www.thedailybeast.com/msnbc-hits-keystone-kash-patel-with-a-supercut-of-him-trashing-his-predecessors-jet-use/.

    News, A. B. C. “Why President Clinton Fired Then-FBI Director William Sessions in July 1993.” ABC News, https://abcnews.com/Politics/president-clinton-fired-fbi-director-william-sessions-july/story?id=47323746. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.

    News, Sarah N. Lynch Senior Justice Department Reporter Sarah N. Lynch is the senior Justice Department reporter for CBS, et al. FBI Director Kash Patel Takes Agency Jet to Italy, Plans to Attend Olympic Hockey Games, Sources Say – CBS News. 20 Feb. 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-director-kash-patel-ice-hockey-flies-agency-jet-to-olympic-hockey-finals-italy/.

    Perez, Evan. “Kash Patel’s Use of the FBI Jet Sparks Outrage. Here’s Why He Couldn’t Travel to the Olympics Any Other Way | CNN Politics.” CNN, 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/24/politics/kash-patel-fbi-jet-use-explained.

    ‘Schedule & Results’. Olympics.Com, https://www.olympics.com/en/milano-cortina-2026/schedule.

    Wickman, Kase. “The Other ‘Bubba’ in the News: Boondoggle Ranch’s Bubba Saulsbury, GOP Donor and Texas Oil Scion.” Vanity Fair, 20 Nov. 2025, https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/bubba-saulsbury-boondoggle-ranch-donald-trump-epstein.

    ‘William S. Sessions, November 2, 1987 – July 19, 1993’. FBI, https://www.fbi.gov/history/directors/william-s-sessions.

    [ad_2]

    Jack Izzo

    Source link

  • Fact-checking Spanberger on $1,700 Trump tariff cost

    [ad_1]

    In his State of the Union address, President Donald Trump said his tariffs are “saving our country.”

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, delivering the Democratic response, said the opposite.

    “Since this president took office last year, his reckless trade policies have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs,” Spanberger said Feb. 24.

    We’ve fact-checked other Democrats’ estimates about how much Trump’s tariffs are costing American families. Spanberger’s $1,700 figure is roughly in line with multiple estimates by groups that study the tariffs’ effect. These groups, which represent diverse political ideologies, used different metrics to calculate the tariffs’ cost to American households.

    The Supreme Court recently ruled that Trump cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to levy tariffs on his own, as he had been doing. Trump reinstated a global 15% tariff after the decision, using other laws. 

    When contacted for comment, Spanberger’s office cited a study from the Democrats on Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, estimating that the average household has paid about $1,745 in tariff costs from February 2025 to January. 

    Economists say tariff impacts are mostly passed on to consumers, similar to taxes. But because consumers don’t spend as much on imports, tariffs don’t affect all purchases equally. 

    Other groups provided estimates:

    • The Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, estimated that, in 2025, Trump tariffs contributed to an average tax increase of $1,000 per household.

    • The Yale Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research center, estimated in November and January an average income loss of about $1,700, based on consumer prices. Using another measure based on spending relative to a household’s income, the group estimated the median cost at $1,400 per household.

    • The National Taxpayers Union, a center-right advocacy organization, estimated in August 2025 that Trump’s tariffs would cost households an average of $2,048 each year if left in place. 

    These estimates measured the impact of tariffs that were in place before the Supreme Court struck them down.

    Some groups measured how much tariffs would cost families after Trump tweaked his tariffs following the Supreme Court ruling. The Tax Foundation predicted that new tariffs on items such as lumber, steel and cars will increase taxes by $400 per household in 2026. Other tariffs, which are temporary and up to 15% on imported goods, could also add another $200 to $600 in taxes, for a total of $600 to $1,000 in tax increases in 2026. 

    The Yale Budget Lab made two estimates after the Supreme Court ruling. The first, based on consumer price increases, found that a household would lose $800 on average in the short run if certain tariffs expired, or $1,300 if those temporary tariffs are extended. 

    The second measured how much families spend in relation to their income. It calculated that average annual household costs from tariffs range from around $400 to $1,800, and would increase to around $700 to $3,000, if some tariffs were extended.

    Our ruling

    Spanberger said Trump’s tariff policies “have forced American families to pay more than $1,700 each in tariff costs.”

    Spanberger referred to a study that showed households have paid an average of $1,745 in tariff costs from February 2025 to January. 

    Three other groups came up with four estimates. Three of their estimates came in roughly the same or within $350 of Spanberger’s estimate. The fourth was lower than Spanberger’s figure.

    The statement is accurate but needs additional information. We rate it Mostly True.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ad falsely claims Sam Page slammed Trump’s immigration plan

    [ad_1]

    A new advertisement misleadingly accuses a Republican North Carolina legislative candidate of criticizing President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. 

    The video ad, paid for by the NC True Conservatives political action committee, is meant to sway Guilford and Rockingham county voters in North Carolina’s 26th Senate District to vote for state Sen. Phil Berger over his GOP primary challenger, Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page.

    The ad accurately points out that Trump endorsed Berger, the state’s Senate leader since 2011, partly because of Berger’s support for Trump’s immigration policies. The ad then claims Page “got busted calling Trump’s plan unrealistic.”

    Here’s a transcript of the ad:

    Trump: “Seal the border. Stop the invasion, and send Joe Biden’s illegal aliens the hell back home.”

    Narrator: “Phil Berger backs President Trump’s plan to stop illegal immigration. That’s why President Trump backs Phil Berger. And Sam Page? He got busted calling Trump’s plan unrealistic.”

    Page, in what the ad labels a “leaked video” clip: “It is unrealistic to assume that 12 to 14 million people will just leave the United States.” 

    Narrator: “Sam Page — wrong on Trump, wrong on immigration, wrong for us.”

    Page has been a Trump ally for years, and the ad doesn’t provide any context for Page’s remarks, which were made in 2012. That’s years before Trump filed to run for president the first time — and even longer before Trump had articulated his immigration enforcement plan. The ad also deceptively edited Page’s complete comments.

    Page’s full comments

    Page pointed PolitiFact to a YouTube video posted Oct. 12, 2012 showing Page speaking at a lectern. 

    In it, Page said the federal government needs to do more to secure the U.S.-Mexico border, such as hiring more Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel. “Therefore, the National Sheriffs’ Association recommends the following,” Page can be heard saying. 

    “We’re asking for additional ICE agents, Border Patrol agents,” Page said. “We’re also asking for continued increased funding for our 287(g) and ‘Secure Community’ program.”

    He continued: “On the pathway to legal employment and legal status, the National Sheriffs’ Association does, at this point and time, strongly oppose outright amnesty for those individuals currently here illegally. Amnesty does not work. However, it is unrealistic to assume that 12 to 14 million people will just leave the United States if asked. A plausible solution must be developed. And that’s what I’m saying tonight.”

    Page then encouraged people to watch a documentary on illegal immigration and to call their representatives in Congress to demand a more secure border. 

    Page said he was reading from a 2011 National Sheriffs’ Association position paper on comprehensive immigration reform. 

    The association’s position paper read: “When granted in 1986, [amnesty] did little to stop the flow of illegal individuals from coming across the border and, in fact, contributed to thousands of fraudulent applications for amnesty. History cannot repeat itself. However, it is unrealistic to assume that 12 to 20 million people will just leave the United States if asked. A plausible solution must be developed.”

    When PolitiFact presented this information to NC True Conservatives, group spokesman Lawrence Shaheen said Page’s comments reflect the candidate’s personal beliefs. Shaheen cited a segment of the video when Page says, “And that’s what I’m saying tonight” — as well as an Oct. 8, 2012, Winston-Salem Journal article that read in part:

    The goal, Page said, is to motivate people to lobby members of Congress to do something about illegal immigration. Asked what he thinks should be done, Page said he supports comprehensive immigration reform — legislation that would deal with the estimated 11 million to 14 million noncitizens in the U.S. without authorization.

    Mass deportations, Page said, would not be an effective way to deal with the issue.

    “In the U.S., you can’t just deport 14 million people. There is going to have to be some type of fix for the long term.”

    Page told PolitiFact that he didn’t recall his conversation with a Winston-Salem Journal reporter, but said he was likely attempting to relay the position of the association. After Page campaign attorneys sent a cease-and-desist letter to Shaheen, lawyers for NC True Conservatives responded to the Page campaign citing the same news article and 2012 video. The group declined to take down the ad.

    Page support for Trump

    Page told PolitiFact that his support for that plan is evident through his backing of Trump and tougher immigration policies through the years. 

    In 2015, Page testified before a Congressional committee on immigration and border security. In a prepared statement, Page expressed support for legislation that would deport undocumented minors to their home countries so long as they wouldn’t face persecution there or face the risk of trafficking. 

    Page says he co-founded “Sheriffs for Trump” in 2016, when Trump promised to deport every immigrant living in the U.S. illegally, then estimated to be 11 million people. In September 2016, Page told The New York Times: “I believe we need to remove all criminal offenders that are in this country illegally.” In January 2017, Page told WXII-TV that he supported Trump’s plan to build a wall on the southern U.S. border and crack down on illegal immigration. The next month, Page was one of several sheriffs to visit Trump at the White House and praise his agenda. 

    Page helped lead Trump’s 2020 campaign in North Carolina, and in recent years supported local legislation that would require North Carolina sheriffs to cooperate with federal immigration officers. 

    Page supported Trump again in 2024, when Trump vowed to carry out the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history.” The One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by Trump last year provided hundreds of billions of dollars in new Immigration and Customs Enforcement funding to help Trump achieve his goal. Page congratulated Trump for signing the legislation, describing it on X as a “major achievement and bold step forward.”

    When Trump endorsed Berger in the race in December, the president said Page had been a longtime supporter and described him as an “outstanding” person. 

    Page also referred PolitiFact to an article by The Assembly, which described him this way: “No North Carolina law enforcement official has cheered President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration agenda as much as Rockingham County’s cowboy hat-wearing sheriff, Sam Page.” 

    Trump’s immigration plan

    The Trump administration has asked immigrants to leave on their own, calling it self-deportation. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced in January that an estimated 2.2 million people had self-deported during the first year of Trump’s second term in office. That number is under scrutiny, however, because the Trump administration hasn’t released monthly detailed deportation data.

    But the Trump administration’s aggressive enforcement plan shows it isn’t relying solely on self-deportation. 

    DHS is offering a $2,600 stipend to each immigrant who self-deports and reports it on a government app. The offer comes with a warning: Those who don’t self-deport will be “arrested, deported, and they will never be able to return to the United States.” To execute that plan, Trump’s administration is investing billions of dollars to hire immigration agents to conduct what it touts as the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”

    Our ruling

    A NC True Conservatives ad claims that Page “got busted calling Trump’s [immigration] plan unrealistic.”

    The group cited comments Page made about immigration in 2012, years before Trump ran for president. He was repeating a portion of the National Sheriffs’ Association’s position paper at the time, and Page says he was reading them to an audience. He was not commenting on Trump’s immigration plan at all.

    Page has been an ardent supporter of Trump’s for years — even after the president’s vows to conduct large-scale deportations. We rate the ad’s claim False. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unpacking claims former Norwegian PM attempted suicide over Epstein ties

    [ad_1]

    • Claims that Norway’s former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland attempted suicide spread in February 2026, after he was charged for gross corruption over his ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 
    • The rumor stemmed from a report by iNyheter, a news outlet known for its right-wing bias. iNyheter cited a “rock-solid source” in its report and suggested Norway’s mainstream press covered up the news of Jagland’s attempted suicide.
    • It is true that Jagland’s name appears thousands of times in the so-called Epstein files. Jagland’s attorney confirmed he was hospitalized as a result of stress following the probe into his relationship with Epstein, but he denied the former prime minister had tried to end his life. Snopes is seeking further clarification.

    In February 2026, after Norway’s former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland was charged on suspicion of corruption over his ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a rumor spread that he had been hospitalized following a suicide attempt. 

    American conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones, whose claims Snopes has repeatedly debunked, relayed the claim on X, referring to Jagland as “Mr. Human Rights” (archived):

    The rumor that the former prime minister tried to commit suicide also spread on Facebook and Bluesky.

    While one report in Norway made this claim, Jagland’s attorney denied it was true, though he stayed vague on the reason for his client’s hospitalization. For this reason, we have not rated the claim. We have reached out to the lawyer seeking more details on Jagland’s condition and we will update this report should he respond.

    It is true that Jagland’s name appeared thousands of times in the files related to Epstein’s case, which the U.S. Department of Justice published on its website. Meanwhile, news of Jagland’s indictment as a result of the publication of the files has been widely reported, which Jagland’s attorney Anders Brosveet confirmed in a statement on the website of Elden Advokafirma, the firm where he works, on Feb. 12, 2026:

    The Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime (Økokrim) is currently conducting searches of Thorbjørn Jagland’s residence and recreational properties. This was expected and is a standard part of an investigation of this nature.

    As an automatic consequence of the search, Jagland now formally has the status of a suspect. This does not represent any real change in the substance of the case, but is a legal consequence of the investigative methods used by the police.

    The claim that Jagland attempted suicide stems from a Feb. 24, 2026, report by iNyheter, a news site in Norway that Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism said was “known for right-wing critique of immigrant policy and mainstream media,” citing a “rock-solid source.” The report said Jagland, a member of the center-left Labour Party, had been hospitalized the week of Feb. 16, after he was charged with aggravated corruption. The report claimed various editors who are members of the Association of Norwegian Editors, which expects its members to follow a code of ethics, had agreed not to publish the story that Jagland had tried to commit suicide. 

    A Google News search revealed the rumor spread across the English-speaking world, relayed by less-than-reputable news outlets. 

    Meanwhile, another statement, dated Feb. 24, on Elden’s website confirmed Jagland was hospitalized but denied it was because he had attempted to harm himself: “We encourage editorial teams not to contribute to further dissemination of the incorrect allegation of a suicide attempt.”

    It said Jagland had “been admitted to hospital due to the strain arising in the wake of this case, and that he is receiving long-term follow-up within the healthcare system.”

    The statement quoted Brosveet as saying that while he had informed the media of Jagland’s health situation, “no agreement was made with either the Editors’ Association or individual media outlets.”

    We have contacted Brosveet to ask whether Jagland was still in the hospital as of this writing and to confirm the date he was charged.

    If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health, suicide or substance use crisis or emotional distress, reach out 24/7 to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (formerly known as the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline) by dialing or texting 988 or using chat services at 988lifeline.org to connect to a trained crisis counselor.

    [ad_2]

    Anna Rascouët-Paz

    Source link

  • Why Rep. Al Green held ‘apes’ sign protesting Trump at 2026 State of the Union

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    A post on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account in February 2026 depicted former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama as apes.

    Rating:

    Context

    A short clip of Barack and Michelle Obama depicted as apes briefly appeared during another, unrelated video on Trump’s Truth Social profile. The clip of the Obamas came from a longer video that portrayed Trump as king of the jungle and various Democratic politicians as other animals. A White House spokesperson said a staffer, not the president, posted the video “erroneously.” Snopes could not independently verify this.

    On Feb. 24 2026, as U.S. President Donald Trump entered the House of Representatives chamber to deliver his State of the Union speech, Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, unfurled a sign reading “Black people aren’t apes.”

    The White House’s livestream (archived) of the event caught the moment as other representatives greeted and applauded the president.

    After unfurling his sign, Green was ejected from the House chamber. (Green also was ejected (archived) from the chamber the year before, when he heckled Trump during the president’s address to a joint session of Congress.) Green later told Reuters (archived) the sign was a reference to a video the president’s Truth Social account posted and deleted earlier in the month.

    The video in question started by showing a graph that claimed to track vote counts for Trump and former President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election but switched to a two-second clip that showed the Obamas’ faces on two apes‘ bodies as “The Lion Sleeps Tonight” played in the background.

    Comparing Black people to primates is an age-old racist insult that implies Black people are less-developed humans. The baseless argument that Black people are less developed or less evolved than white Europeans has historically been used to justify enslavement of Black people and colonialism of countries with majority-Black populations.

    Claims that Trump posted the video showing the Obamas as primates first circulated on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived) and Bluesky (archived) in early February. A number of Snopes readers emailed us at the time to ask whether the video was truly shared on Trump’s account. Readers emailed again after the State of the Union address, asking about the context for Green’s sign.

    At the time of this writing, someone had removed the video depicting the Obamas as apes from Trump’s Truth Social page. It still appeared on Trump’s Truth, a public archive of the president’s posts. A White House official told Snopes a staffer posted the video “erroneously.” Snopes could not yet independently verify this claim.

    Ultimately, Trump’s Truth Social page truly did post the video.

    Before the removal of the post from Truth Social, we asked the White House whether the person who posted the video knew it also included the clip of the Obamas. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replied in a written statement: 

    This is from an internet meme video depicting President Trump as the King of the Jungle and Democrats as characters from the Lion King. Please stop the fake outrage and report on something today that actually matters to the American public.

    At that time, Leavitt did not reply to a question about whether anyone would remove the video. 

    Inspecting the video

    According to a post (archived) by the X user @xerias_x, the clip of the Obamas came from one of that account’s videos. The user wrote, “Last night President Trump posted a video where one of my old clips appears at the very end. You won’t believe which one.”

    The user then posted (archived) a 53-second version of the same clip that started by showing the Obamas as apes and also included various other Democratic politicians portrayed as a variety of other animals bowing to Trump, whom the video depicted as a lion.

    It was not possible to determine why the video on Trump’s Truth Social profile, which otherwise appeared to show an excerpt from a documentary about alleged fraud in the 2020 presidential election, contained the clip of the Obamas.

    Online searches revealed an identical (archived) video to the one Trump posted that someone uploaded to YouTube around a month before Trump’s Feb. 5, 2026, post. The YouTube video also included the short clip of the Obamas.

    2020 election fraud claims

    Reverse image searches did not reveal the source of the apparent documentary footage. That footage featured Col. Phil Waldron, an Army veteran who reportedly circulated a “detailed and extreme” plan to overturn the 2020 election on Capitol Hill. 

    Waldron has featured in a number of documentaries since 2020. He is a proponent of a baseless theory that foreign powers hacked or otherwise influenced voting machines from the company Dominion Voting Systems and swung the 2020 election in Biden’s favor. In the apparent documentary clip featured in Trump’s Truth Social post, Waldron claimed machines in several states “stopped counting” at the same time and, when counting resumed, showed vote totals “that favored Joe Biden.”

    Trump’s reposting of Waldron’s theory suggested that the president has not forgotten his 2020 loss. In January 2026, the FBI raided an elections office in Georgia seeking records related to the 2020 election. Trump narrowly lost the state in 2020.

    During a speech (archived) in Davos, Switzerland, days before the raid in Georgia, Trump called the 2020 election “rigged” and said “people will soon be prosecuted for what they did.”

    Snopes has previously reported extensively on claims related to the 2020 election.

    Sources

    Broadwater, Luke, and Alan Feuer. ‘Jan. 6 Panel Subpoenas Retired Colonel Who Shared Plan to Overturn Election’. The New York Times, 16 Dec. 2021, https://archive.ph/i6s0h.

    BRUMBACK, KATE. ‘Search Warrant FBI Served at Elections Office near Atlanta Seeks Records Tied to the 2020 Elections’. AP News, 28 Jan. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/fbi-georgia-elections-office-fulton-county-28e736037521b17197760d2394f0ab43.

    Election Results. https://results.sos.ga.gov/results/public/Georgia/elections/2020NovGen. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.

    Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees | CISA. 12 Nov. 2020, https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election-infrastructure.

    ‘Phil Waldron’. IMDb, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12120339/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.

    Sanchez, Julian. ‘Voting Machine Conspiracy Theories Harm U.S. Cybersecurity’. Cato Institute, 20 Nov. 2020, https://www.cato.org/blog/voting-machine-conspiracy-theories-harm-us-cybersecurity.

    Sheikh, Suheir, and Richard Cowan. ‘US Representative Al Green Says He Confronted Trump over Obama Video’. Reuters, 25 Feb. 2026, https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-rep-al-green-escorted-house-chamber-during-trump-speech-2026-02-25/.

    ‘The Ape Insult: A Short History of a Racist Idea’. Find an Expert : The University of Melbourne, https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/news/3043-the-ape-insult–a-short-history-of-a-racist-idea. Accessed 6 Feb. 2026.

    The White House. ‘President Donald J. Trump’s 2026 State of the Union Address’. YouTube, 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.youtube.com/live/eWrZQBgpY7I?t=596s. 

    Wu, Nicholas. ‘Democratic Rep. Al Green Ejected from Trump Address’. Politico, 4 Mar. 2025, https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/04/al-green-ejected-trump-address-00212734.

    [ad_2]

    Laerke Christensen

    Source link

  • FactChecking Trump’s State of the Union Address

    [ad_1]

    Summary In the first State of the Union address of his second term, President Donald Trump proclaimed that “our nation is back, bigger, better, richer…

    The post FactChecking Trump’s State of the Union Address appeared first on Media Bias/Fact Check.

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Epstein files don’t reveal Leonardo DiCaprio ate 70 pounds of ‘child meat’

    [ad_1]

    Claim:

    Documents released on Jan. 30, 2026, relating to the case of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, revealed that actor Leonardo DiCaprio ate more than 70 pounds of “child meat” and discussed a cannibalism diet in emails with filmmaker Woody Allen.

    Rating:

    In February 2026, a rumor circulated online that documents related to the case of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein proved that actor Leonardo DiCaprio consumed “over 70 pounds” of “child meat” and discussed a cannibal diet in emails with filmmaker Woody Allen. Social media users framed the allegation as emerging from a batch of Epstein files the Department of Justice shared on Jan. 30, 2026.

    For example, one Feb. 21 Facebook post read (archived): “New Epstein files reveal that Leonardo DiCaprio ate over 70 pounds of ‘child meat’ as part of a cannibalism diet. The files expose DiCaprio swapping emails with Woody Allen where he brags about being a full-blown cannibal.”

    Versions of the claim also spread on X, Instagram and other platforms.

    In short, although the DOJ’s Jan. 30 document release includes references to DiCaprio, nothing in the materials supports claims that he was involved in cannibalism or ate “child meat.” One example of the actor featuring in the files is an email mentioning both DiCaprio and filmmaker Woody Allen, but it was not written by either man and does not show them exchanging messages with each other, let alone “bragging” about cannibalism. While the files do contain references to cannibalism and ritualistic sacrifice, they are not linked to DiCaprio. 

    Because the rumor’s central allegations are not supported by the content of the released files or any credible evidence, we rated the claim false. 

    Origin of rumor

    A website called The People’s Voice — a rebranded version of NewsPunch, a website with a long history of publishing false information — appeared to be the source of the cannibalism allegation. On Feb. 20, the site published an article titled, “Epstein Files Reveal Leonardo DiCaprio Ate 70 Pounds of Child Meat on ‘Cannibal Diet.’”

    The story claims that “coded language” in the newly released files reveals a “cannibal operation” involving DiCaprio and others. It asserts that the files contain references to “jerky,” “cream cheese baby” and other supposed food-related code words. The article also alleges that DiCaprio swapped emails with Allen about being on a “cannibal diet.” (Snopes has previously examined claims about references to “jerky” in the Epstein files and found no evidence they referred to cannibalism.)

    The People’s Voice article does not provide verifiable citations to specific DOJ documents demonstrating that DiCaprio consumed “70 pounds” of anything or that he exchanged cannibalism-related emails with Allen. Rather, it presents sensational interpretations of unrelated excerpts. In the body of the article, it claims: “Epstein files reveal DiCaprio helped Epstein eat through 70 pounds of child meat in a two-week period.” However, no document identifier or page number is provided to substantiate that statement.

    The article also mentions a separate rumor that Epstein ordered sulfuric acid to dissolve human remains as part of a “child-trafficking-to-consumption pipeline.” Snopes previously investigated that claim and found that while sulfuric acid purchases were documented in the Epstein files, there is no evidence it was used to dissolve human remains.

    In addition to the written article, the article links to a video clip showing conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones claiming there was a “huge email list” showing DiCaprio and Allen discussing cannibalism and a “human” meat diet. Jones did not display any emails or document identifiers to support the allegation and the clip provided no verifiable sourcing that would allow viewers to confirm that such an exchange existed.

    Where DiCaprio’s name appears in files

    A review of the DOJ’s released materials shows that DiCaprio’s name appears in several places, but not in connection with cannibalism.

    One file, labeled “EFTA00821172,” includes a message reading: “when are you in new york, do you think leo dicaprio would want to have dinner with woody.” The email was not written by DiCaprio or Allen and does not show them corresponding with each other. It solely references the possibility of a dinner and was sent by an email address owned by Epstein.

    (www.justice.gov)

    Another email from the DOJ release references DiCaprio indirectly through his longtime representative. It also contains no suggestion of any criminal conduct. In that message, a person wrote: “Ask aroung about Ken Sunshine…very calm cool guy. Reps Leo diCaprio for years and much more serious institutions and people. I can call him for you whenever you want. This misinformation will escalate….xoxo Peg.”

    In a 2020 FBI interview summary with an unnamed individual, DiCaprio’s name appeared in a passage reading: “EPSTEIN told [REDACTED] that he had an island and his friends were actors, including LEONARDO DICAPRIO.” This reflects an allegation that Epstein name-dropped actors when speaking to a third party. It does not show DiCaprio communicating with Epstein or participating in any crimes.

    Other mentions of DiCaprio in the DOJ documents are equally unrelated to any criminal allegations and appear as media or event references, such as an item titled, “Exclusive! Django Unchained Teaser Trailer Premiere,” and an invitation for a private screening of a film featuring DiCaprio.

    All in all, the actor did not author any of the cited documents or emails and none of them showed him communicating in his own words. Rather, they contain third-party references to him, typically in the context of celebrity name-dropping, networking outreach or entertainment coverage. The documents that mention DiCaprio do not describe cannibalism or “child meat,” and they provide no evidence tying him to such conduct.

    Snopes has also investigated a claim that the DOJ’s January 2026 Epstein document release references cannibalism and accuses Epstein or his inner circle of engaging in “ritualistic sacrifice.” We confirmed that certain documents contain such allegations, including unverified claims from a purported FBI interview, but the records themselves indicate those accusations were not supported by corroborating evidence. We also debunked a separate false rumor that the DOJ documents contain evidence that comedian Ellen DeGeneres is a cannibal.

    [ad_2]

    Aleksandra Wrona

    Source link