ReportWire

Tag: Greg Abbott

  • Uhhh, Does Texas Governor Greg Abbott Know We Can Hear Him?

    Uhhh, Does Texas Governor Greg Abbott Know We Can Hear Him?

    [ad_1]

    Most people would think shooting and killing other humans is a very serious matter and not something that we want to do under any circumstance. And I would hope that we would hold our elected officials to an even higher standard. Though apparently, that’s ideal thinking. Texas Governor Abbott is once again proving why he’s totally cruel and honestly unfit for office.

    Republicans use migrants as a political prop to stoke fear all the time, as a way to push their political agenda. We know this. But Abbott has been particularly egregious on this issue, coming from a border state. His latest comments show just how disturbing his views really are. On a podcast with National Rifle Association spokesperson Dana Loesch, Abbott said his administration has been using “every tool” to limit migration into Texas.

    “The only thing that we’re not doing,” he went on to say, “is we’re not shooting people who come across the border, because of course the Biden administration would charge us with murder.” Um … WHAT?

    So I am glad that Biden, painted here as some kind of killjoy, and the potential for charges is holding back a sitting governor’s desire to shoot people en masse but … does Abbott know that we can hear him? Or maybe he doesn’t genuinely see anything wrong with this. Fortunately, there is still a Democratic party in the state, and they quickly condemned his remarks. The chair of the party gave a blistering statement, saying, “Time and time again, Greg Abbott and Texas Republicans have made it abundantly clear they have no morality or humanity.”

    Republicans are constantly trying to convince American voters that migrants pose a direct threat to them and their safety. This is fear-mongering and it’s straight-forwardly false. Stanford economist Ran Abramitzky recently revealed substantial research on the crime myths associated with immigrants. One of the most important overarching findings refutes the right-wing talking point that immigration causes crime spikes. That hasn’t been true in this country for 140 years. Oops!

    Abramitzky’s study also found that in today’s America, immigrants are 30 percent less likely to be incarcerated than American-born white people—a.k.a. Republicans’ favorite kind of person. An important note is that the rates have increased since 2005 for Mexican and Central American immigrants, BUT that is mostly attributed to census data, including detentions as part of overall crime and incarceration stats.

    Either way, Abbott’s disgusting rhetoric cannot be overstated. Democrats sometimes say “cruelty is the point” when they refer to Trump and his policies and we have to extend that to most Republicans at this point. They don’t want to focus on policies that have the highest positive utility, they want to drive wedges between Americans that are stoked in hate because they are counting on the worst within the American, not the best. And that is a real shame.

    (via HuffPost, featured image: Jonathan Bachman/Getty Images)

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Autumn Alston

    Source link

  • Texas National Guard Seizes Control Of Park In Eagle Pass, Prohibits Federal Border Patrol Agents From Entering

    Texas National Guard Seizes Control Of Park In Eagle Pass, Prohibits Federal Border Patrol Agents From Entering

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Screenshot: Griff Jenkins X Video

    Earlier this week, the Texas National Guard took control of Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, a city property where mass illegal crossings have been occurring.

    They are restricting Border Patrol from accessing the area, claiming that federal agents “perpetuate illegal crossings.”

    Two US officials confirmed the move to CBS News, which reported that Border Patrol agents had “used the park in recent weeks to hold migrants in an outdoor staging area before they are transported for further processing, including last month, when illegal crossings soared to record levels.”

    “They are denying entry to Border Patrol agents to conduct our duties,” one official told the network, adding that they are not sure “what authority (Texas officials) have over the federal government.”

    RELATED: Governor Abbott Slams ‘Unbelievable’ Video Of Border Patrol Opening Gate For Illegal Immigrants

    Texas National Guard Blocking Border Patrol

    The Texas Military Department has confirmed that the National Guard has deployed armed soldiers and vehicles to block federal government access to the park in Eagle Pass.

    Texas informed federal officials that no Border Patrol agents would be allowed to enter Shelby Park in any operational capacity.

    Fox News reporter Griff Jenkins posted a video showing BP agents being prevented from entering the area.

    “The current posture is to prepare for future illegal immigrant surges and to restrict access to organizations that perpetuate illegal immigrant crossings in the park and greater Eagle Pass area,” a statement from the Texas Military Department reads.

    They’re accusing the federal government of aiding and abetting illegal immigrants from entering the country.

    The Joe Biden administration is responsible for a record-breaking surge at the border even as they insist that “our approach…is working” and that the “border is secure.”

    It’s clear the Texas National Guard disagrees with that assertion, taking matters into its own hands.

    This Isn’t The First Clash Between Texas And The Feds

    This isn’t the first time the Texas National Guard got into a dispute with Biden’s Border Patrol agents, and it likely won’t be the last.

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott was furious after seeing video of Border Patrol agents opening a gate at the southern border and allowing dozens of illegal immigrants into the country after Texas National Guard officers had locked it shut.

    The incident took place in August of 2022.

    Abbott described the footage as “unbelievable.”

    In May of 2023, stunning video footage showed a United States Army soldier reportedly opening a gate and allowing a large crowd of illegal immigrants across the border onto private property in Texas.

    That incident took place in the same location in Eagle Pass, Texas.

    The Political Insider recently covered social media videos showing a sea of illegal immigrants numbering in the thousands waiting to be “processed” in Eagle Pass.

    There were 302,000 encounters along the southwest border in December, marking the highest monthly total ever recorded as Biden’s border crisis rages on.

    Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Accuses Former Attorney General Bill Barr Of Covering Up His ‘Suicide’

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox News, Breitbart, and many more.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • Mayor Eric Adams sues 17 charter bus companies for $700 million for transporting asylum seekers to NYC

    Mayor Eric Adams sues 17 charter bus companies for $700 million for transporting asylum seekers to NYC

    [ad_1]

    Mayor Adams sues 17 charter bus companies for $700 million for bringing asylum seekers to NYC


    Mayor Adams sues 17 charter bus companies for $700 million for bringing asylum seekers to NYC

    00:57

    NEW YORK — In a stunning and unexpected move to stop Texas Gov. Greg Abbott from shipping busloads of asylum seekers to New York City, Mayor Eric Adams has filed a lawsuit against 17 charter bus companies used by the Lone Star State.

    He wants the bus companies to reimburse the city for the hundreds of millions of dollars it’s cost to shelter them.

    Just call it the Empire State strikes back, with a bold counter punch to Abbott.

    “New York City has and will always do our part to manage this humanitarian crisis, but we cannot bear the cost of reckless political ploys from the state of Texas, alone,” Adams said.

    READ MOREMayor Eric Adams exploring idea of using NYPD to stop Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s ploy of busing asylum seekers to N.J.

    The mayor sued the bus companies who, since the spring of 2022, have been used by Abbott to ship asylum seekers to New York, with officials showing them maps, giving them bar-coded bracelets with their destinations clearly marked, and then checked by drivers to make sure they land in the city.

    The suit seeks $708 million to compensate the city for the cost of shelter, food and health care.

    “These companies have violated state law by not paying the cost of caring for these migrants,” Adams said.

    READ MOREHundreds of asylum seekers pass through New Jersey train stations, Gov. Murphy says

    The suit charges the companies with “bad faith” conduct and violating New York social service law by dumping the asylum seekers in New York City without providing a means of support.

    “Gov. Abbott’s continued use of migrants as political pawns is not only chaotic and inhumane, but makes clear he puts politics over people,” Adams said.

    The last straw for the mayor was apparently Abbott’s decision to send buses to New Jersey train stations connecting to New York City to thwart an executive order limiting the days and and hours busloads of asylum seekers could arrive here.

    READ MOREGov. Phil Murphy targets Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Congress over asylum seeker crisis developing in New Jersey

    Adams is also seeking to build a regional coalition to stop Abbott.

    “I communicated with the governor of New Jersey last night. We also spoke with the governor of Connecticut. We’ve got to continue to reach out to our colleagues in the region,” Adams said.

    Adams and Abbott have been engaged in an intense game of Texas Hold ‘Em poker over the asylum seeker crisis. It remains to be seen if the suit will force Abbott to throw in his chips.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DOJ Sues Texas Over Law That Would Let Police Arrest Migrants Who Enter U.S. Illegally

    DOJ Sues Texas Over Law That Would Let Police Arrest Migrants Who Enter U.S. Illegally

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Justice Department on Wednesday sued Texas over a new law that would allow police to arrest migrants who enter the U.S. illegally, taking Republican Gov. Greg Abbott to court again over his escalating response to border crossers arriving from Mexico.

    The lawsuit draws Texas into another clash over immigration at a time when New York and Chicago are pushing back on buses and planes carrying migrants sent by Abbott to Democrat-led cities nationwide. Texas is also fighting separate court battles to keep razor wire on the border and a floating barrier in the Rio Grande.

    But a law Abbott signed last month poses a broader and bigger challenge to the U.S. government’s authority over immigration. In addition to allowing police anywhere in Texas to arrest migrants on charges of illegal entry, local judges could also order migrants to leave the country.

    The law is set to take effect in March.

    The lawsuit was filed in Austin. Civil rights organizations and officials in El Paso County, Texas, filed a lawsuit last month that similarly described the new law as unconstitutional overreach.

    FILE – Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks at a news conference in Austin, Texas on June 8, 2021. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)

    The Justice Department sent Abbott a letter last week threatening legal action unless Texas reversed course. In response, Abbott posted on X that the Biden administration “not only refuses to enforce current U.S. immigration laws, they now want to stop Texas from enforcing laws against illegal immigration.”

    On Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson and about 60 fellow Republicans visited the Texas border city of Eagle Pass, which has been the center of Abbott’s $10 billion border initiative known as Operation Lone Star. Johnson suggested he could use a looming government funding deadline as further leverage for hard-line border policies.

    President Joe Biden has expressed willingness to make policy compromises because the number of migrants crossing the border is an increasing challenge for his 2024 reelection campaign. Johnson praised Abbott, who was not in Eagle Pass, and slammed the lawsuits that seek to undo Texas’ aggressive border measures.

    “It’s absolute insanity,” Johnson said.

    Illegal crossings along the southern U.S. border topped 10,000 on several days in December, a number that U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Commissioner Troy Miller called “unprecedented.” U.S. authorities closed cargo rail crossings in Eagle Pass and El Paso for five days last month, calling it a response to a large number of migrants riding freight trains through Mexico to the border.

    Authorities this week also resumed full operations at a bridge in Eagle Pass and other crossings in San Diego and Arizona that had been temporarily closed.

    Legal experts and opponents say Texas’ new law is the most far-reaching attempt by a state to police immigration since a 2010 Arizona law that was partially struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Under the Texas law, migrants could either agree to a Texas judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted on misdemeanor charges of illegal entry. Migrants who don’t leave could face arrest again under more serious felony charges.

    Those ordered to leave would be sent to ports of entry along the border with Mexico, even if they are not Mexican citizens. The law can be enforced anywhere in Texas but some places are off-limits, including schools and churches.

    For more than two years, Texas has run a smaller-scale operation on the border to arrest migrants on misdemeanor charges of trespassing. Although that was also intended to stem illegal crossings, there is little indication that it has done so.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says Texas governor creating “chaos” with migrant transport

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says Texas governor creating “chaos” with migrant transport

    [ad_1]

    Mayors Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Mike Johnston of Denver, who have pushed the Biden administration for more help in dealing with the influx of migrants, join “Face the Nation” to discuss how immigration is affecting their communities. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is “determined to continue to sow seeds of chaos” with migrant transport to their cities.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump to campaign at U.S.-Mexico border as he zeroes in on hardline immigration promises

    Trump to campaign at U.S.-Mexico border as he zeroes in on hardline immigration promises

    [ad_1]

    McAllen, Texas — Former President Donald Trump on Sunday is bringing his 2024 presidential campaign to the U.S.-Mexico border, where he is expected to tout the dramatic immigration restrictions he has vowed to enact if voters send him back to the White House.

    Trump, the frontrunner to win the Republican presidential nomination, will be hosted by Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, another fierce critic of President Biden’s immigration and border policies. The campaign event will take place in Edinburg, a small city in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, one of the busiest sectors for unlawful border crossings, and a region where Republicans have made inroads with its predominantly Hispanic communities in recent years.

    In recent weeks, Trump has escalated his harsh rhetoric on immigration and the scope of his promises on the issue, which some of his advisers believe partially catapulted him to victory over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016. In one recent interview, he claimed that migrants were “poisoning the blood of our country.”

    During his presidency, Trump staged a crackdown on illegal and legal immigration, taking unprecedented actions to cut immigrant admissions, restrict access to the asylum system, build hundreds of miles of border wall and end temporary deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, including those who arrived in the U.S. as children.

    But Trump has promised to take his hardline immigration agenda further if he’s elected in 2024, pledging to carry out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history, expand his travel bans, deny birthright citizenship to the American-born children of unauthorized immigrants, and reject legal immigrants with political beliefs he disagrees with. Trump has also refused to rule out reviving his infamous migrant family separation policy, which he discontinued in 2018 after widespread public outcry.

    Abbott, who has not yet endorsed a presidential candidate, has also made immigration a top issue during his governorship, turning Texas into the chief adversary to Mr. Biden’s migration and border measures. 

    Since Mr. Biden took office, Abbott has ordered state officials to fortify the banks of the Rio Grande with razor wire and river barriers, directed Texas troopers to arrest migrant adults on trespassing charges, and authorized the state to bus tens of thousands of migrants to Democratic-led cities, mainly New York City and Chicago.

    Abbott is also soon expected to sign what would be the harshest state immigration law in modern American history. The measure, known as SB4, will empower state law enforcement officials to arrest migrants on new illegal entry criminal charges, and allow state judges to issue deportation orders to suspected violators. 

    After it passed the Texas legislature earlier this month, the bill was denounced as draconian and unconstitutional by the Mexican government, Democratic lawmakers and the American Civil Liberties Union, which has promised to challenge the measure. SB4 will almost certainly also trigger another legal clash with the Biden administration, as immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility. 

    In recent days, Mr. Biden’s reelection campaign has seized on Trump’s 2024 immigration promises, casting them as radical and cruel in a public messaging campaign it hopes will galvanize Latinos to vote against the former president. 

    “Trump has been unapologetically open about the extreme, inhumane and fundamentally un-American policies that he would enact if he found his way back into the Oval Office,” Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Mr. Biden’s campaign manager, said on a press call on Saturday ahead of Trump’s visit to the Texas border.

    Biden faces his own political challenges on immigration, one of his worst-polling issues. His administration has been under growing pressure from Republicans and many Democrats to limit the entry of migrants along the southern border, where migrant apprehensions have reached record levels over the past three years.  

    In a recent statement, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said the former president is gaining more support among Latinos and other minority voters because “they know he is the only one who can secure the border,” faulting Mr. Biden for the record spike in migrant crossings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    [ad_1]

    While it’s common knowledge that citizens have very little influence on elected officials, The Onion asked U.S. politicians how their constituents feel about a ceasefire in Gaza, and this is what they said.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A cease what? I’ve never heard that word in my life.”

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents routinely vote in favor of having blood on our hands.”

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Does AIPAC count as a constituent?”

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Am I a politician? Gee, that’s flattering.”

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “One more word about a ceasefire, and I’m ordering Israel to bomb south Brooklyn.”

    Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Oh, while I’m at work the nanny is the one who looks after the constituents.”

    Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents know I have been calling for a cease-ceasefire since day one.”

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Representatives are public servants. That means it’s my job to listen to what my constituents have to say, internalize it, and then do whatever I want.”

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have genuinely not thought about another human being since 1998.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “When I got elected in 2014, my campaign pitch was ‘You wanna see a dead body?’”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents…constituents… Oh, you mean the blurred shapes I sometimes see before meetups with donors?”

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Hmm… What is this ‘feel’?”

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My Illinois colleague Dick Durbin, who called for a ceasefire, obviously has different constituents than I do.”

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I don’t know. I can’t hear frequencies coming out of the mouths of people who make below $400k.”

    Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “They elected me to kill people, so that’s what I’m gonna do.”

    Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have but one constituent, and their name is Lockheed Martin.”

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I know what they want. I just think they are stupid and don’t respect them. Make sense?”

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A ceasefire is a sacred bond between one man and one woman. Anything else is a sin.”

    Former President Barack Obama

    Former President Barack Obama

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “No constituents anymore, motherfuckers! You people can’t goddamn touch me! I can say whatever the hell I want. Fuck all of you!”

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My term doesn’t expire until 2068.”

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents? Oh, do you mean money? The money says to burn it to the ground.”

    Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I assume all my constituents were also given a full ride by the Federalist Society.”

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “We often think about others so much that we forget to think about our own feelings. The question is, do I want a ceasefire?”

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Most of my constituents are guns, and they love firing. It’s the equivalent of orgasm to them.”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. Now, his family is suing Texas officials.

    A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. Now, his family is suing Texas officials.

    [ad_1]

    CROWN Act empowering more people to express themselves with natural hair


    CROWN Act empowering more people to express themselves with natural hair

    02:36

    The family of Darryl George, a Black high school student in Texas, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit on Saturday against Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton over George’s ongoing suspension by his school district for his hairstyle.

    George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, has been serving an in-school suspension since Aug. 31 at the Houston-area school. School officials say his dreadlocks fall below his eyebrows and ear lobes and violate the district’s dress code.

    Education Hair Discrimination
    In this photo provided by Darresha George, her son Darryl George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas, sits for a photo showing his locs, at the family’s home.

    Darresha George via AP


    George’s mother, Darresha George, and the family’s attorney deny the teenager’s hairstyle violates the dress code, saying his hair is neatly tied in twisted dreadlocks on top of his head.

    The lawsuit accuses Abbott and Paxton of failing to enforce the CROWN Act, a new state law outlawing racial discrimination based on hairstyles. Darryl George’s supporters allege the ongoing suspension by the Barbers Hill Independent School District violates the law, which took effect Sept. 1.

    How can there be racial discrimination based on hairstyles?

    The lawsuit alleges Abbott and Paxton, in their official duties, have failed to protect Darryl George’s constitutional rights against discrimination and against violations of his freedom of speech and expression. Darryl George “should be permitted to wear his hair in the manner in which he wears it … because the so-called neutral grooming policy has no close association with learning or safety and when applied, disproportionately impacts Black males,” according to the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit, filed in Houston federal court by Darryl George’s mother, is the latest legal action taken related to the suspension.

    On Tuesday, Darresha George and her attorney filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency, alleging Darryl George is being harassed and mistreated by school district officials over his hair and that his in-school suspension is in violation of the CROWN Act.

    They allege that during his suspension, Darryl George is forced to sit for eight hours on a stool and that he’s being denied the hot free lunch he’s qualified to receive. The agency is investigating the complaint.

    Darresha George said she was recently hospitalized after a series of panic and anxiety attacks brought on from stress related to her son’s suspension.

    On Wednesday, the school district filed its own lawsuit in state court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act.

    Barbers Hill Superintendent Greg Poole has said he believes the dress code is legal and that it teaches students to conform as a sacrifice benefiting everyone.

    The school district said it would not enhance the current punishment against Darryl George while it waits for a ruling on its lawsuit.

    What is the CROWN Act?

    The CROWN Act, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots. Texas is one of 24 states that have enacted a version of the act.

    A federal version of it passed in the U.S. House last year, but was not successful in the Senate.

    Darryl George’s school previously clashed with two other Black male students over the dress code.

    Barbers Hill officials told cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford they had to cut their dreadlocks in 2020. The two students’ families sued the school district in May 2020, and a federal judge later ruled the district’s hair policy was discriminatory. Their case, which garnered national attention and remains pending, helped spur Texas lawmakers to approve the state’s CROWN Act law. Both students initially withdrew from the school, with Bradford returning after the judge’s ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Black Student’s Family Sues Texas’ Governor And AG Over His Suspension For His Hairstyle

    A Black Student’s Family Sues Texas’ Governor And AG Over His Suspension For His Hairstyle

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON (AP) — The family of a Black high school student in Texas on Saturday filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state’s governor and attorney general over his ongoing suspension by his school district for his hairstyle.

    Darryl George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, has been serving an in-school suspension since Aug. 31 at the Houston-area school. School officials say his dreadlocks fall below his eyebrows and ear lobes and violate the district’s dress code.

    George’s mother, Darresha George, and the family’s attorney deny the teenager’s hairstyle violates the dress code, saying his hair is neatly tied in twisted dreadlocks on top of his head.

    The lawsuit accuses Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton of failing to enforce the CROWN Act, a new state law outlawing racial discrimination based on hairstyles. Darryl George’s supporters allege the ongoing suspension by the Barbers Hill Independent School District violates the law, which took effect Sept. 1.

    The lawsuit alleges Abbott and Paxton, in their official duties, have failed to protect Darryl George’s constitutional rights against discrimination and against violations of his freedom of speech and expression. Darryl George “should be permitted to wear his hair in the manner in which he wears it … because the so-called neutral grooming policy has no close association with learning or safety and when applied, disproportionately impacts Black males,” according to the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit, filed in Houston federal court by Darryl George’s mother, is the latest legal action taken related to the suspension.

    On Tuesday, Darresha George and her attorney filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency, alleging Darryl George is being harassed and mistreated by school district officials over his hair and that his in-school suspension is in violation of the CROWN Act.

    They allege that during his suspension, Darryl George is forced to sit for eight hours on a stool and that he’s being denied the hot free lunch he’s qualified to receive. The agency is investigating the complaint.

    Darresha George said she was recently hospitalized after a series of panic and anxiety attacks brought on from stress related to her son’s suspension.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Influx of migrants overwhelms Texas border communities

    Influx of migrants overwhelms Texas border communities

    [ad_1]

    Influx of migrants overwhelms Texas border communities – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Migrant crossings at the southern border have nearly doubled from a few months ago. CBS News national correspondent Manuel Bojorquez has more from El Paso.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal judge blocks Texas law requiring I.D. to enter pornography websites

    Federal judge blocks Texas law requiring I.D. to enter pornography websites

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge has struck down a Texas law requiring age verification and health warnings to view pornographic websites and blocked the state attorney general’s office from enforcing it.

    In a ruling Thursday, U.S. District Judge David Ezra agreed with claims that House Bill 1181, which was signed into law by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in June, violates free speech rights and is overbroad and vague.

    The state attorney general’s office, which is defending the law, immediately filed notice of appeal to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

    The lawsuit was filed August 4 by the Free Speech Coalition, a trade association for the adult entertainment industry and a person identified as Jane Doe and described as an adult entertainer on various adult sites, including Pornhub.

    “Government can log and track that access”

    Judge Ezra also said the law, which was to take effect Friday, raises privacy concerns because a permissible age verification is using a traceable government-issued identification and the government has access to and is not required to delete the data.

    “People will be particularly concerned about accessing controversial speech when the state government can log and track that access,” Ezra wrote. “By verifying information through government identification, the law will allow the government to peer into the most intimate and personal aspects of people’s lives.”

    Ezra said Texas has a legitimate goal of protecting children from online sexual material, but noted other measures, including blocking and filtering software, exist.

    “These methods are more effective and less restrictive in terms of protecting minors from adult content,” Ezra wrote.


    Montana’s TikTok ban and school book bans raise First Amendment concerns

    04:07

    Judge: No evidence pornography is addictive

    The judge also found the law unconstitutionally compels speech by requiring adult sites to post health warnings they dispute — that pornography is addictive, impairs mental development and increases the demand for prostitution, child exploitation and child sexual abuse images.

    “The disclosures state scientific findings as a matter of fact, when in reality, they range from heavily contested to unsupported by the evidence,” Ezra wrote.

    The Texas law is one of several similar age verification laws passed in other states, including Arkansas, Mississippi, Utah and Louisiana.

    The Texas law carried fines of up to $10,000 per violation that could be raised to up to $250,000 per violation by a minor.

    The Utah law was upheld by a federal judge who last month rejected a lawsuit challenging it.

    Arkansas’ law, which would have required parental consent for children to create new social media accounts, was struck down by a federal judge Thursday and a lawsuit challenging the Louisiana law is pending.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3-year-old migrant girl dies while on bus to Chicago

    3-year-old migrant girl dies while on bus to Chicago

    [ad_1]

    3-year-old migrant girl dies while on bus to Chicago – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A 3-year-old girl died while traveling aboard a bus from Texas to Chicago with a group of asylum seekers, officials said. An investigation into the death is underway.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3-Year-Old Dies Riding One Of Abbott’s Migrant Buses

    3-Year-Old Dies Riding One Of Abbott’s Migrant Buses

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A 3-year-old child riding one of Texas’ migrant buses died while on the way to Chicago, officials said Friday, the first time the state has announced a death since it began shuttling thousands of migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border last year.

    Texas authorities confirmed a child’s death in a statement Friday but did not say where the child was from or why they became ill. The Illinois Department of Public Health said the child was 3 years old and died Thursday in Marion County, in the southern part of that state.

    “Every loss of life is a tragedy,” the Texas Division of Emergency Management said in a statement. “Once the child presented with health concerns, the bus pulled over and security personnel on board called 9-1-1 for emergency attention.”

    The child received treatment from paramedics and later died at a hospital, according to the agency. The bus departed from the Texas border city of Brownsville. State officials said all passengers had their temperature taken and were asked if they had any medical conditions.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks after signing one of several Public Safety bills at the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas, Tuesday, June 6, 2023. Texas has bused more than 30,000 migrants to Democratic-controlled cities across the U.S. since last year as part of Abbott’s crackdown at the border.

    Spokespersons for Texas’ emergency management agency did not immediately respond to questions seeking additional details Friday.

    Illinois officials said in a statement they were working with health officials, state police and federal authorities “to the fullest extent possible to get answers in this tragic situation.”

    Texas has bused more than 30,000 migrants to Democratic-controlled cities across the U.S. since last year as part of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s sprawling border mission known as Operation Lone Star. Besides Chicago, buses have also been sent to Washington, New York, Philadelphia, Denver and Los Angeles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal judge orders Texas to remove floating barriers aimed at deterring migrants on Rio Grande | CNN Politics

    Federal judge orders Texas to remove floating barriers aimed at deterring migrants on Rio Grande | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    A federal judge ordered Texas to remove floating barriers in the Rio Grande and barred the state from building new or placing additional buoys in the river, according to a Wednesday court filing, marking a victory for the Biden administration.

    Judge David Alan Ezra ordered Texas to take down the barriers by September 15 at its own expense.

    The border buoys have been a hot button immigration issue since they were deployed in the Rio Grande as part of Gov. Greg Abbott’s border security initiative known as Operation Lone Star. The Justice Department had sued the state of Texas in July claiming that the buoys were installed unlawfully and asking the judge to force the state to remove them.

    In the lawsuit, filed in US District Court in the Western District of Texas, the Justice Department alleged that Texas and Abbott violated the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act by building a structure in US water without permission from United States Army Corps of Engineers and sought an injunction to bar Texas from building additional barriers in the river. The Republican governor, meanwhile, has argued the buoys are intended to deter migrants from crossing into the state from Mexico.

    Texas swiftly appealed the judge’s order.

    “This ruling is incorrect and will be overturned on appeal. We will continue to utilize every strategy to secure the border, including deploying Texas National Guard soldiers and Department of Public Safety troopers and installing strategic barriers,” Abbott’s office said in a statement, adding that the state “is prepared to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

    Ezra wrote Wednesday that Abbott needed permission to install the barriers, as dictated by law.

    “Governor Abbott announced that he was not ‘asking for permission’ for Operation Lone Star, the anti-immigration program under which Texas constructed the floating barrier. Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation’s navigable waters,” the judge wrote in his ruling.

    Ezra also found Texas’ self-defense argument – that the barriers have been placed in the face of invasion – “unconvincing.”

    “This argument fails because (1) the RHA has already balanced policy interests and determined that the nation’s interest in free navigation of its waterways is supreme to unauthorized state action, and (2) whether Texas’s claim of ‘invasion’ is legitimate is a non-justiciable political question demonstrably committed to the federal political branches,” he wrote.

    CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.

    Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said in a statement following the order that the Justice Department is “pleased that the court ruled that the barrier was unlawful and irreparably harms diplomatic relations, public safety, navigation, and the operations of federal agency officials in and around the Rio Grande. “

    The Justice Department had brought the lawsuit after Abbott said he would not order the removal of the floating barriers from the Rio Grande, in defiance of the department’s request days before.

    Ezra heard arguments in the case last month, during which the Justice Department focused on its claim that the barriers violated federal law, but also on the buoys’ role in fraying relations with Mexico – which has voiced concern with the “inhumane” barriers and claimed they reside in part on the country’s territory.

    Texas, meanwhile, maintained it had constitutional authority to deploy the floating barriers. Ezra at times requested that the state’s attorneys focus on the buoys and not dive into other issues like fentanyl and overall illegal immigration on the US southern border.

    The state is facing another lawsuit over the barriers, brought in early July by the owner of a Texas canoe and kayaking company operating on the Rio Grande.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. Greg Abbott Says He’ll Defy DOJ Orders On His Floating Border Wall

    Gov. Greg Abbott Says He’ll Defy DOJ Orders On His Floating Border Wall

    [ad_1]

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) sent a letter to the Biden administration Monday declaring his plans to continue using a floating wall along the state’s southern border, even after the Justice Department warned him last week that it plans to sue him for deploying the barricade.

    “Texas will see you in court, Mr. President,” the governor wrote, saying it’s within his constitutional rights to respond to the “unprecedented crisis of illegal immigration” that he says is caused by President Joe Biden’s border policies.

    “The fact is, if you would just enforce the immigration laws Congress already has on the books, America would not be suffering from your record-breaking level of illegal immigration,” Abbott continued, defending the miles of buoy barricades he oversaw going up in the Rio Grande earlier this month.

    Workers take a break from deploying large buoys to be used as a border barrier along the banks of the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, on July 12.

    While U.S. border officials have been stopping a record high number of migrants in recent years, there’s been a lull in crossings for months. Experts say that’s likely because potential migrants are waiting to see what happens with U.S. border policy, and because more migrants are taking advantage of new legal pathways for seeking asylum from violence, political instability and corruption in their home countries.

    In his letter, Abbott said his floating barricade is essential to protecting both migrants and U.S. citizens.

    “If you truly care about human life, you must begin enforcing federal immigration laws,” he said. “By doing so, you can help me stop migrants from wagering their lives in the waters of the Rio Grande River. You can also help me save Texans, and indeed all Americans, from deadly drugs like fentanyl, cartel violence, and the horrors of human trafficking.”

    In reality, recent data shows nearly 90% of convicted fentanyl traffickers were U.S. citizens, and just 0.02% of migrants arrested for illegal crossings had any fentanyl on them.

    Abbott’s letter is a response to a notice the DOJ sent him last week disclosing that it plans to sue Texas for the deployment of an “unlawful construction of a floating barrier in the Rio Grande River” that may impede on the federal government’s duties. The department cited the Rivers and Harbors Act.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Justice Dept. will sue Gov. Abbott if Texas doesn’t remove floating barrier in Rio Grande

    Justice Dept. will sue Gov. Abbott if Texas doesn’t remove floating barrier in Rio Grande

    [ad_1]

    Justice Dept. will sue Gov. Abbott if Texas doesn’t remove floating barrier in Rio Grande – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott came under fire for approving a floating barrier along the Rio Grande to limit border crossings. While Abbott defended the measure as falling within the state’s “sovereign authority,” critics said migrants could get stuck underneath the barrier and drown. Skyler Henry has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rep. Tony Gonzales, who represents 800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border, calls border tactics

    Rep. Tony Gonzales, who represents 800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border, calls border tactics

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Tony Gonzales, whose Texas district includes 800 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border, said the tactics used to deter illegal migration are “not acceptable,” but stopped short of criticizing Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

    Abbott has implemented floating barriers in the middle of the Rio Grande, as well as razor wire, to deter migrants from entering the U.S.  

    In an internal complaint, a Texas state trooper raised concerns about the tactics, saying it put migrants, including young children, at risk of drowning and serious injury. The trooper also claimed Texas officials had been directed to withhold water and push them back into the river. In one instance, the trooper said he and his team rescued a woman who was stuck in the razor wire and having a miscarriage. 

    “The border crisis has been anything but humane. I think you’re seeing the governor do everything he possibly can just to secure the border,” Gonzales, a Republican, told “Face the Nation” on Sunday. 

    “I don’t think the buoys are the problem,” he said, noting that migrants were drowning long before the floating barriers were put in place. “The reality is the buoy is only a very small, little portion of the river.” 

    When pressed on whether it was acceptable that migrants were being harmed by such measures, Gonzales said, “This is not acceptable. It’s not acceptable and it hasn’t been acceptable for two years.” 

    The Biden administration has threatened to sue Texas if the barriers are not removed, saying it violates federal law and creates “serious risks” to public safety and the environment. But Abbott appeared unlikely to back down. 

    “We will see you win court, Mr. President,” the governor tweeted on Friday. 

    Gonzales called on Congress to step up and offer solutions. 

    “I don’t want to see one person step one foot in the water and more or less have us talk about the discussion of some of these these inhumane situations that they’re put in,” he said. 

    “We can’t just wait on the president to solve things. We can’t wait for governors to try and fix it themselves,” Gonzales said. “Congress has a role to play in this.” 

    Gonzales recently introduced the HIRE Act to make it easier for migrants to obtain temporary work visas to address the workforce shortage. He said the Biden administration is “doing very little, if nothing to focus on legal immigration,” and he said he would “much rather” see a plan to deal with legal pathways than a focus on illegal entry to the U.S. 

    “What do we do with the millions of people that are already here? What do we do with the millions of people that are coming here illegally? How do we prevent them from taking these dangerous trucks? One of those options is through work visas,” he said. 

    But Gonzales wouldn’t say if he had confirmation from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy if the bill would ever be up for a vote on the House floor. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Trooper Emailed Boss To Warn Of ‘Inhumane’ Razor Wire ‘Traps’ At Border: Report

    Texas Trooper Emailed Boss To Warn Of ‘Inhumane’ Razor Wire ‘Traps’ At Border: Report

    [ad_1]

    An officer working at Texas’ southern border with Mexico emailed his superior expressing deep concerns that efforts to prevent migrants from crossing into the U.S. had “stepped over a line into the inhumane” earlier this month, according to a shocking account published by the San Antonio Express-News.

    The unnamed trooper, who works for Texas’ Department of Public Safety, described troubling orders to prevent asylum seekers from crossing the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, in recent months. State officials have drawn sharp criticism after deploying miles of floating barricades covered in razor wire on the river, an initiative the officer likened to “traps” meant to snare migrants.

    The email details multiple troubling incidents in which migrants were caught or injured by the razor wire.

    In one instance, a 19-year-old woman “in obvious pain” was found stuck in the wire before she was cut free. Medical officials determined she was pregnant and having a miscarriage. At another point, troopers treated a man with a “significant laceration” on his leg that he sustained while trying to free his child from a “trap in the water” covered in razor wire.

    The email also details a moment on June 25 when a shift officer ordered troopers to push a large group of people — including small children and babies that were nursing — back into the Rio Grande “to go to Mexico.” Troopers on site resisted the order after they expressed concern the exhausted migrants could drown, and they were later ordered to tell the group to go back to Mexico before leaving the site.

    The trooper also alluded to an order to prevent officers from providing water to migrants, although Texas officials have denied any such mandate exists.

    “Due to the extreme heat, the order to not give people water needs to be immediately reversed as well,” the trooper wrote, suggesting a series of policy changes to protect migrants’ safety. The officer later added: “I believe we have stepped over a line into the inhumane.”

    HuffPost has reached out to Texas’ DPS for comment on the report.

    Migrants trying to enter the U.S. from Mexico approach the site where workers are assembling large buoys to be used as a barrier along the banks of the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, on July 11.

    Eric Gay/Associated Press

    Travis Considine, a spokesperson for the Department of Public Safety, told the Express-News that the agency was aware of the email and that its director, Steven McCraw, called for an audit last Saturday into lowering risk for migrants. McCraw also sent another email to troopers saying the wire, a key feature of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s (R) border measures, was meant to deter smuggling, “not to injure migrants.”

    “The smugglers care not if the migrants are injured, but we do, and we must take all necessary measures to mitigate the risk to them including injuries from trying to cross over the concertina wire, drownings and dehydration,” the message said.

    Abbott has taken dramatic steps to prevent migrants from crossing the state’s border with Mexico, lambasting President Joe Biden for failing to do enough to stop a surge of crossings. The governor also has dropped off thousands of migrants in cities across the nation, mainly in states led by Democratic officials, in an act that human rights groups have blasted as inhumane.

    The report brought swift condemnation from Democrats. Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) called the razor wire barriers “death traps” on Twitter, saying he had urged the Biden administration to intervene “for the sake of human rights.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mexico files border boundaries complaint over Texas’ floating barrier plan on Rio Grande

    Mexico files border boundaries complaint over Texas’ floating barrier plan on Rio Grande

    [ad_1]

    MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico’s top diplomat said Friday her country has sent a diplomatic note to the U.S. government expressing concern that Texas’ deployment of floating barriers on the Rio Grande may violate 1944 and 1970 treaties on boundaries and water.

    Foreign Relations Secretary Alicia Bárcena said Mexico will send an inspection team to the Rio Grande to see whether any of the barrier extends into Mexico’s side of the border river.

    She also complained about U.S. efforts to put up barbed wire on a low-lying island in the river near Eagle Pass, Texas.

    Mexico’s veteran political chameleon, Porfirio Muñoz Ledo, has died at the age of 89. His family did not give a cause of death, but he had been in ill health for some time.

    Texas has started rolling out what is set to become a new floating barrier on the Rio Grande. The state’s move on Friday is the latest escalation of Republican Gov.

    What this means for many of Tijuana’s 2 million inhabitants is enduring frequent loss of water, having to pay for expensive trucked-in water, and living with uncertainty.

    The drug cartel violence that citizen self-defense leader Hipolito Mora gave his life fighting against has flared anew just one day after he was buried.

    Bárcena said that if the buoys impede the flow of water, it would violate the treaties, which requires the river remain unobstructed. Mexico has already asked that the barriers be removed.

    Texas began rolling out the new floating barrier on the Rio Grande in early July. It is part of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s multibillion-dollar effort to secure the U.S. border with Mexico, which already has included busing migrants to liberal states and authorizing the National Guard to make arrests.

    Migrant advocates have voiced concerns about drowning risks from the buoys and environmentalists questioned the impact on the river.

    Once installed, the above-river parts of the system and the webbing they’re connected with will cover 1,000 feet (305 meter) of the middle of the Rio Grande, with anchors in the riverbed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. Greg Abbott Is Sued For His TikTok Ban on College Campuses

    Gov. Greg Abbott Is Sued For His TikTok Ban on College Campuses

    [ad_1]

    A group of Texas professors filed a lawsuit Thursday against Gov. Greg Abbott (R), alleging that his ban on TikTok at Texas public universities violates the First Amendment and prevents professors from conducting their TikTok-related research.

    “Banning public university faculty from studying and teaching with TikTok is not a sensible or constitutional response to concerns about data-collection and disinformation,” Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said in a statement. “Texas must pursue its objectives with tools that don’t impose such a heavy burden on First Amendment rights. Privacy legislation would be a good place to start.”

    The lawsuit was filed by the Knight Institute on behalf the Coalition for Independent Technology Research, which is a nonprofit that was founded in 2022 “to advance, defend, and sustain the right to study the impact of technology on society.”

    Texas banned TikTok in December because of “security risks associated with the use of TikTok,” Abbott said in a news release.

    According to the lawsuit, the TikTok ban is “unconstitutional” and “seriously impeding” college faculty from completing any TikTok-related research “that would illuminate or counter the data-collection and disinformation-related practices that the ban is ostensibly meant to address.”

    The ban has forced Jacqueline Vickery, an associate professor in the Department of Media Arts at the University of North Texas, to change her research, which focuses on how “young people use social media for informal learning, activism, and self-expression,” as well as change the way she teaches, according to the lawsuit.

    Abbott’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    At least 35 states have banned TikTok on state devices and networks, according to the Knight Institute. Montana became the first state to ban TikTok on all personal devices operating within the state.

    “Texas’s TikTok ban is an assault on academic freedom, which is the lifeblood of every university and a central concern of the First Amendment,” Ramya Krishnan, a senior staff attorney at the Knight Institute, said in a statement. “The court should make clear that Texas can’t shut down an important avenue of teaching and research at its public universities when there are far less intrusive measures that would secure its aims.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link