People gathered outside of the Texas Capitol on Feb. 23, calling for a special session on data center expansion in Texas.
Eleanor Dearman
Attendees of a Monday protest want Texas to Gov. Greg Abbott to call a special session to address the effects of data centers on the state.
About 40 people — including visitors from the Paluxy Valley and a slate of speakers — rallied outside the Capitol on Monday, asking for the special session as data centers pop up across Texas. In North Texas and across the state, people have sounded the alarm over existing and planned sites, raising concerns over noise, water use and possible environmental impacts.
Attendees stood outside in front of the Austin building, holding signs in opposition of data centers. One read “you can’t drink data.” Another advocated for the protection of farmland. “Say no to data centers,” declared a sign, accompanied by a drawing of a microphone.
Only Texas Gov. Greg Abbott can call the Legislature into special session. The next regularly scheduled legislative session starts on Jan. 12.
“Our star filled skies will be gone,” said Brian Crawford, a retired Lockheed Martin employee who shares a fence line with a planned the Comanche Circle data center project. “Our quiet nights of only hearing wildlife will be gone. Our two lane farm-to-market roads will be incredibly dangerous.”
Crawford, whose property is in Somerville County, was representing Protect the Paluxy Valley Inc. as a speaker at the event. He said Abbott should take a “sober look” at the impact data centers and power plants on the state.
The governor should convene a special session where lawmakers could issue an immediate “statewide moratorium or rural industrialization” so that the effects of such projects can be analyzed, Crawford said. Legislators should also consider letting counties regulate industrial development to protect citizens, he said.
“My message is that we need a special session, and we need it now,” said Joanne Carcamo, a co-founder of the Paluxy Valley group who attended the protest. “We cannot wait. This is an invasion of rural Texas. This is an invasion in Hood County.”
Hood County commissioners recently rejected a proposal to put a six-month moratorium on industrial development, which would have given officials time to study the impact of data centers. Residents have raised concerns about the centers encroaching on their rural lifestyles.
Ahead of the vote, Hood county commissioners received a letter from Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican, that said the moratorium would have violated state law. The letter was also addressed to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
The proposal is expected to be reconsidered on Tuesday, following the approval of a moratorium on “green energy” projects in northeast Texas’ Van Zandt County.
There are multiple planned projects in the Hood County area. Among them is a 2,600-acre data center complex called Comanche Circle that has gotten pushback from ranchers, landowners and conservationists near Glen Rose.
A $10 billion data center is also planned in southeast Fort Worth, though it hit a speed bump earlier this month when zoning requests for the project were put on pause as the city awaits a report on data centers from city staff.
Senate District 22 Republican candidate Rena Schroeder was among the speakers at the Monday protest. A campaign staff member helped organize the event in her capacity as an individual. The Senate district includes part of Tarrant County. Speakers from Round Rock and Waco area groups also addressed attendees.
“Our way of life in Texas is being torn apart by these data centers,” said Gary Oldham with Protect Round Rock. “Whether we’re in the suburbs, a small farm, a large working ranch, or even in the middle of Fort Worth or Houston, they’re impacting us all.”
In a statement, a spokesperson for Abbott didn’t address whether Abbott would consider a data center related special session.
“Texas leads the nation in strategically and methodically attracting tech investments that create jobs and drive innovation,” spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said. “Governor Abbott was proud to sign Senate Bill 6 into law to support long-term grid planning, protect ratepayers from transmission costs, and ensure system reliability. Governor Abbott will continue to work with the Legislature to ensure Texas remains the nation’s leader in innovation while ensuring sustainable growth.”
He noted that governments and groundwater conservation districts have existing tools to regulate water usage, and that the Public Utility Commission has been tasked with studying how much water data centers use and what it’s used for.
A spokesperson for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick didn’t immediately return an email seeking comment.
“Data centers have become an issue of national security,” Speaker Dustin Burrows said in a written statement. “The Texas House is committed to working to balance private property rights and economic growth while ensuring responsible planning that protects our communities. Given the statewide and long-term impacts of this issue, I look forward to engaging with members throughout the interim and next session.”
Staff Writers Elizabeth Campbell and Emily Holshousercontributed to this report.
This story was originally published February 23, 2026 at 4:51 PM.
Eleanor (Elly) Dearman is a Texas politics and government reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. She’s based in Austin, covering the Legislature and its impact on North Texas. She grew up in Denton and has been a reporter for more than six years. Support my work with a digital subscription
Kindergarten teacher Luz Botello teaches the pronunciations of letters to her class at Annie Webb Blanton Elementary School in Dallas on Oct. 22, 2024.
Chris Torres
ctorres@star-telegram.com
The percentage of students in Tarrant County entering kindergarten who are considered to be “kindergarten ready” is slightly higher than their statewide peers. But education experts and state leaders say this metric needs improvement to set up children for success in their academic careers.
Enrollment and access to a quality pre-K or child care program before kindergarten is a major factor in kindergarten readiness. Texas serves the highest number of pre-K students in the country, but an April 2024 report from the National Institute for Early Education Research shows the state has lagged in updating its quality standards and per-student funding for years. Investment is needed to cover costs of running a quality program, pre-K teachers should be paid the same as their K-12 peers and access should be expanded through partnerships with private child care providers, according to the institute.
In 2025, Texas lawmakers expanded public pre-K eligibility to children of school teachers and included pre-K students in the state’s voucher-like program that will allow them to attend private early childhood education programs with public funding. Because the state’s early learning system is still fragmented with multiple agencies overseeing these programs, state leaders are looking for solutions to improve performane.
Texas’ latest data on kindergarten readiness rates was recently released for the 2024-25 school year, reflecting the percentage of students who are considered to be prepared for kindergarten when they first enroll in the grade at the beginning of the school year. Children who attend a pre-K program are twice as likely to be kindergarten ready, which then sets the tone for reaching future academic milestones such as third-grade reading proficiency, according to education nonprofit The Commit Partnership. Students who read on grade level by third grade are more likely to receive a high school diploma.
In Tarrant County, 52% of students were considered to be kindergarten ready while 51% met this metric statewide in the 2024-25 school year.
The top performing local districts, in order, were Mansfield, Grapevine-Colleyville and Carroll ISDs with 69%, 68% and 67% of students identified as kindergarten ready, respectively. The lowest performing districts included Burleson ISD with 33% of students meeting this standard, followed by 34% of students in Azle ISD and 39% of students in both Fort Worth and Godley ISDs.
The release of this data comes forward as Gov. Gregg Abbott launches the Governor’s Task Force on Early Childhood Education and Care, which is focusing on better coordination across different state agencies to improve early learning outcomes, including kindergarten readiness. The task force will make legislative and budget recommendations by December 2026 ahead of the 2027 legislative session.
“The goal is to evaluate child care and early learning programs across all state agencies. We must put an end to the endless bureaucracy, the unclear standards of care, and the inflated costs that make it difficult for parents to get the early childhood care and education that they need for their children,” Abbott said in a statement announcing the task force.
Lauren McKenzie, director of early childhood-to-12th-grade policy at The Commit Partnership, said school districts have the option to administer different assessments that focus on early literacy skills when calculating kindergarten readiness. In general, too many Texas children are entering kindergarten without the foundation they need to thrive in school, she said.
“It really is a measure of what happens before they actually get to kindergarten, before they enter school,” McKenzie said. “Some of the great work that the governor’s task force is kind of tasked with thinking about (is) what happens in early childhood before a child enters school (and) what key experiences really help set them up to be kindergarten ready.”
Leila Santillán, chief operating officer of the Fort Worth Education Partnership, said a closer look at the state data reiterates the value of students attending an early childhood education program ahead of kindergarten. It’s important to look at the nuances within the kindergarten readiness data that show the differences in performance for those who attended a pre-K program compared to those who didn’t attend one, even though they were eligible to do so.
Josiah Hall, 16, a junior at Ben Barber Innovation Academy, helps pre-K student Saint Bishop write his name while interning at Jandrucko Early Learners Academy on Thursday, Nov. 6, 2025. Amanda McCoy amccoy@star-telegram.com
Traditional state pre-K programs are available to 3- and 4-year-olds who meet certain criteria, such as those who are unable to speak or comprehend English; those who are eligible for the national school lunch program; or those who have a parent in the U.S. armed forces.
“School systems with significant differences between those two rates are demonstrating that their early childhood programs are significantly advancing students’ academic readiness,” Santillán said.
“For example, in Everman ISD, 53% of students are ‘kindergarten ready’ overall, and for students who were eligible and attended pre-K, their readiness rate was 31% higher than for those who were eligible but did not attend pre-K. Of note, Everman ISD is 95% economically disadvantaged,” she added.
Tarrant County’s high-performing districts
Mansfield ISD’s Director of Early Childhood Ashton Oliver attributed the district’s success in kindergarten readiness rates to its professional learning communities for pre-K, in addition to the district’s unique pre-K curriculum. The curriculum consists of 16 experiential learning classes that immerse students in different themed environments such as space, wonderland and the tropics. The most immersive version of this curriculum is based at Jandrucko Early Learners Academy, which won the 2025 H-E-B Excellence in Education Award for an early childhood facility.
“They’re learning through the way that they naturally — as a 4- or 5-year-old — wants to learn. So they’re very engaged in the learning. We’re able to master some of those skills, especially phonological awareness,” Oliver said.
Grapevine-Colleyville ISD officials said their program’s focus on providing a strong initial layer of instruction to all students, its support system tailored specifically to pre-K teachers and its high expectations for students are among the drivers of its kindergarten readiness rate. More than half of the district’s kindergartners also attended its pre-K program.
Harper Hargrove, 17, a senior at Mansfield High School helps pre-K students sound out words while interning at Jandrucko Early Learners Academy on Thursday, Nov. 6, 2025. Amanda McCoy amccoy@star-telegram.com
“We have specific outcomes that are identified based on our student groups and specifically for our pre-K program,” said Shiela Shiver, chief academic officer for Grapevine-Colleyville ISD. “We’re very clear around why we’re here and what our goals are with our kids and that kindergarten readiness for the pre-K program.”
Director of Early Childhood and Teacher Development Kristi Brown said teaching self-regulation is also vital to making sure students are ready to learn the academics.
“Our principals are very much bought into the concept and the return on the investment of early childhood,” Brown said. “ We just have support from every angle. We have coaching support for our teachers that are early childhood specific… it is particular for them and what they need to help our students be successful.”
Carroll ISD, which had the third-highest overall kindergarten readiness rate in Tarrant, did not respond to a request for comment as of Friday .
Tarrant County’s low-performing districts
Officials with Burleson, Azle, Fort Worth and Godley ISDs shared statements underscoring the difference in performance for students who attended pre-K compared to those who didn’t. Local districts acknowledged the value of kindergarten readiness and the impact of pre-K attendance while highlighting academic growth seen by students once they’re enrolled in kindergarten. Districts consider the metric as a baseline, as the assessments are given at the beginning of the kindergarten school year.
Deputy Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction Mohammed Choudhury with Fort Worth ISD, the largest district in Tarrant County, said students with previous early learning experiences “are achieving kindergarten readiness rates comparable to those seen in more affluent districts in the region — such as Aledo and others — that serve significantly smaller percentages of economically disadvantaged students.”
The district operates one of the largest universal pre-K programs statewide, serving “a significantly higher proportion of students from historically underserved backgrounds,” he said. Fort Worth ISD ramped up its pre-K enrollment efforts earlier this year to reach more families.
Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker talks with pre-kindergarten student Mateo during the first day of school at T.A. Sims Elementary School on Monday, August 14, 2023, in Fort Worth. Amanda McCoy amccoy@star-telegram.com
“While 38.8% of all kindergarten students were identified as kindergarten ready, 51.2% of students who attended public pre-K for 80 or more days were kindergarten ready in Fort Worth ISD. That positive impact is consistent across every student group and shows meaningful gains for students we are most focused on supporting,” Choudhury said.
Across all student demographics, students enrolled in public pre-K outperformed their peers in kindergarten readiness, Choudhury noted. Black and African American students who attended pre-K performed 10 percentage points higher; Hispanic and Latino students were ahead by 14 percentage points; economically disadvantaged students were ahead by 13 percentage points; emergent bilingual students were ahead by 17 percentage points; and students receiving special education services were ahead by 6 percentage points.
“These results reinforce the importance of both access to pre-K and consistent attendance. As we continue improving instructional quality across a student’s entire K–12 experience, we have made targeted investments in strengthening our pre-K model, which is grounded in evidence-based practices and high-quality instructional materials aligned to our district’s instructional framework.”
Burleson ISD officials described kindergarten readiness assessments as “screening tools used to identify where students are with basic literacy when they step foot into a school for the first time.” The district administers its assessment to students within the first three weeks of school to take advantage of more instructional days that would catch up students who aren’t considered kindergarten ready. The state requires an assessment to be given within the first 60 days of school.
Officials pointed to growth data shown by its kindergartners on the MAP assessment, or the national Measures of Academic Progress.
Students and parents rush to the first class of the first day of school at M.H. Moore Elementary School on Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2024. Amanda McCoy amccoy@star-telegram.com
“We believe this early identification and targeted instruction is why the same class of kindergarten students who came to us showing as only 33% kindergarten ready at the start of the year tested at the 68th percentile nationwide, using MAP data … by the middle of that year. Our current kindergarten students continue this trend and are scoring in the 71st percentile nationwide by the middle of this year,” Burleson ISD officials said.
Burleson ISD officials also underscored differences in the state’s kindergarten readiness assessments that evaluate components of early literacy, apply benchmarks and define kindergarten readiness differently. Burleson ISD uses mCLASS, which looks at skills such as letter naming, word reading and nonsense word fluencies.
Azle ISD officials said the rate is “not an indicator of the district’s instruction” except when a student has participated in the district’s pre-K program. The district highlighted its academic growth that’s seen by the time students reach third grade.
“Kindergarten students may enter the district at lower readiness levels; however data from the Texas Academic Performance Report demonstrates our elementary teachers’ instruction contributes significant academic growth by the time these students reach third grade,” officials said. “The true impact of Azle ISD’s educational programs is revealed by the time these students reach the third grade, where they consistently demonstrate exceptional academic growth because of our strong and dedicated teaching staff.”
In 2025, 82% of Azle ISD third-graders approached grade level in reading, while 52% met grade level, “matching state and regional performance.” The percentage of students meeting grade level increased by two percentage points from the previous year. The percentage of third-graders mastering grade level performance in reading increased from 18% in 2024 to 21% in 2025, according to officials.
Parents and children attend a Zero to Five class on Wednesday, at M.H. Moore Elementary School in Fort Worth. The free Fort Worth ISD program provides educational classes to prepare parents and their children for pre-K and a classroom environment. Amanda McCoy amccoy@star-telegram.com
Godley ISD officials said “only a portion” of the district’s kindergarten students attend pre-K beforehand. The district offers full-day pre-K for eligible students and tuition-based pre-K for other families who don’t meet state criteria. Once enrolled in kindergarten, assessment data shows “significant student growth from the beginning to the end of the school year,” officials said.
“The district continues to explore ways to increase the percentage of children attending Godley ISD pre-kindergarten,” officials said. “Once students enter kindergarten, Godley ISD uses a structured, research-based approach focused on phonemic awareness and phonics. Teachers use mCLASS data to identify skill gaps, provide daily targeted intervention, and monitor progress through weekly assessments.”
“In addition to academics, kindergarten classrooms emphasize language development through frequent interaction and questioning, fine motor skill development through hands-on activities, and clear expectations that support learning and behavior,” Godley ISD officials added.
What parents can do to prepare their kids
To cultivate a child’s kindergarten readiness, also known as school readiness, early childhood development experts recommend parents and guardians be mindful of all areas of their child’s development: physical, emotional, social, cultural, language and cognitive.
The following are practices parents can implement, according to the National Association for the Education of Young Children and Dan Gartrell, a professor emeritus of early childhood education at Bemidji State University.
“The best predictor of children’s success in school and life is a brain that develops in healthy ways, as a result of their attachments with their family, and especially their parents,” Gartrell says.
Talk to your child every day in a “contact talk” during a shared moment of bath time, changing diapers, taking a walk or riding in the car, for example. Stay present in the conversation to listen, encourage and support your child. This builds health attachment between parents and their children while developing the child’s skills in language, socializing, thinking and self-esteem.
Recognize your child’s reasoning skills are still growing. These skills — which include understanding complex situations, hearing others’ viewpoints and staying on task — start to develop at about age 3. Understanding that young children think differently than adults is important in helping them make connections that build their brain, rather than fact-checking them. For example, if a preschool child looks outside the car window at night and says the moon is following, the parent does not need to correct the child at that age but can rather lean into the child’s perspective by saying, “I wonder where it’s going.”
View conflicts as mistaken behaviors instead of misbehaviors. Young children are still learning what are proper and improper behaviors. “One way to think about a mistake is as an error in judgment that may cause or contribute to a conflict. Like all of us, children make mistakes. Young children make more of them because they are beginners in the learning process.”
Aim to teach rather than punish when children experience strong conflicts. Infliction of pain and suffering as a consequence for a person’s actions impedes health brain development through the release of stress hormones, research shows. Consistent stress reactions can lead to a child feeling threatened in a nonthreatening situation, which can cause them to turn to fight-or-flight behavior. “A cycle of stress, acting out, punishment, and more stress, starting early in childhood, can cause problems for an individual throughout life.”
Conflicts have consequences: teach, don’t punish. Parents should show their child another way to behave and show their emotions in a healthy manner when conflict erupts. “The consequence for a child is to understand the adult’s expectation that he or she learn a better way to behave.” Time away from the situation to cool off can help calm young and older family members before they discuss the issues behind the conflicts.
Talk with, not at, your child in a guidance talk. Parents should act as a firm but friendly leader with their children while showing that you are working with them rather than against them during a conflict. “Discuss what your child could have done instead, what can be done differently next time, and how your child could help the other person feel better.”
Discuss and work through repeating problems in family meetings. The goal of these meetings is to show that differences can be addressed in a civil manner through a team effort. “Family meetings are not always popular, but when an adult emphasizes mutual respect as a guideline, the meetings can reduce, prevent, and resolve strong emotional issues, even with young children.”
Remember parents, guardians and adults make mistakes. It’s important for parents and caregivers to forgive themselves and learn from the experience when they make errors. “Note, however, when a family member makes a lot of mistakes, has lots of conflicts — consider this a plea for help. Sometimes families need help from outside. This is OK.”
Lina Ruiz covers early childhood education in Tarrant County and North Texas for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. A University of Florida graduate, she previously wrote about local government in South Florida for TCPalm and Treasure Coast Newspapers.
Governor Greg Abbott has formally rejected a renewed legislative push to legalize commercial Texas casinos, stating that he remains unconvinced of the benefits such an expansion would bring to the state. In a recent statement addressing the issue, Abbott made it clear that he is not currently prepared to support a constitutional amendment that would allow for the development of destination resorts and casino gambling.
The governor cited several concerns as the primary reasons for his opposition, including potential impacts on state culture and risks associated with gambling addiction. He specifically mentioned recent red flags involving sports wagering and the integrity of athletic events as factors that have caused him to take a step back and evaluate the situation. Abbott emphasized that the state should not move forward with any proposal that could prove harmful to the residents of Texas or its established business environment.
This stance creates a significant obstacle for proponents of Texas casinos, who have spent years lobbying for the right to build high-end gaming facilities in major metropolitan areas like Dallas and Houston. Under current state law, expanding the gaming footprint requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate, followed by approval from a majority of voters in a general election. Without the full endorsement of the governor, achieving the necessary supermajority in the Republican-controlled legislature is viewed by analysts as nearly impossible.
Supporters of the expansion have long argued that legalizing Texas casinos would capture billions of dollars in revenue that currently flows across state lines to Oklahoma, Louisiana, and New Mexico. They contend that destination resorts would create thousands of local jobs and generate substantial tax revenue without the need for additional tax increases. However, the governor noted that the Texas economy is already performing at a high level with a robust budget surplus, reducing the urgency for new revenue streams derived from gaming.
The rejection effectively stalls the momentum for the gaming industry in the upcoming legislative cycle. While some lawmakers continue to file bills to put the issue on the ballot, the lack of support from the highest office in the state means the current prohibition on commercial casinos is unlikely to change before 2027.
Teacher Carolyn Galloway plays with Eric, 2, at the Center for Transforming Lives Arlington Child Development Center on March 28.
Amanda McCoy
amccoy@star-telegram.com
Tarrant County child care providers could see delays in subsidy payments from the state after Trump administration officials announced tighter restrictions on child care funding, placing providers in a tough financial position.
Local providers who enroll qualifying low-income families with child care scholarships, which offset tuition costs, were notified on Monday of a potential delay in Administration of Children and Families funding after federal officials announced a requirement that all U.S. states must have “a justification and a receipt or photo evidence” to receive it moving forward. The additional red tape from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services comes amid fraud allegations at Minnesota child care centers.
Tarrant County officials who disburse this ACF funding told providers it’s unclear how long delays might be.
“We are working with (the Texas Workforce Commission) to get access to (Child Care and Development Fund) funds as quickly as possible for the next payment cycle (Jan. 12-25). Our goal is to minimize any impact this new federal requirement may cause,” Child Care Management Services program director Rita Morris said in the Monday notice to providers.
More than 400 statewide providers discussed the development on Monday in a Zoom call organized by the Texas Licensed Child Care Association. Tim Kaminski, president of the association, encouraged providers to contact their representatives about what the ripple effects would be to their businesses if funding is delayed. Providers were also encouraged to make their voices heard at the next workforce board meeting in their region, which is the network of local offices that receive the subsidy funding from the Texas Workforce Commission that’s then distributed to providers.
Awaiting the release of more information, questions were raised about whether reserves existed to cushion providers if federal funding delays became a reality. Providers also wondered how state officials would follow federal requirements of providing “photo evidence” with almost 150,000 children being served statewide on a daily basis.
“This has been a knee-jerk reaction by the federal government to a situation in one state,” Kaminski told providers. “You can’t cut off our knees and expect that we’re going to stay open. We can’t subsidize the subsidy program, and we’ve been doing that for too many years. So contact your reps, contact your senators.”
⭐ Our editors also recommend:
Tarrant County providers that operate multiple child care programs, including Child Care Associates and the Center for Transforming Lives, said they’re waiting on additional guidance from state officials.
Gov. Abbott announces investigation in Texas
Gov. Greg Abbott also announced on Monday that he’s directing state agencies, the Texas Workforce Commission and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, to investigate potential child care funding fraud. In a letter informing agency leaders of the probe, he noted “strong anti-fraud processes” were already instilled, including routine audits and in-person site visits, but more can be done to protect children and taxpayers. The state’s percentage of “improper payment rates” is 0.43%, Abbott said.
“Recently, the Trump Administration and independent journalists have uncovered potential systematic fraud in subsidized child care systems in states like Minnesota,” Abbott said in a statement. “Such fraud will never be tolerated in Texas. Today, I directed Texas state agencies to take proactive steps to prevent, detect, and eliminate misuse of taxpayer funds to protect the integrity of Texas’ Child Care Services Program.”
Lina Ruiz covers early childhood education in Tarrant County and North Texas for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. A University of Florida graduate, she previously wrote about local government in South Florida for TCPalm and Treasure Coast Newspapers.
A group of Muslim and interfaith leaders are urging Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, to reverse his proclamation designating the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as a “foreign terrorist organization.”
Texas’s designation is state-level only. It does not carry the legal force of a federal Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) listing, which only the U.S. State Department can issue. Abbott’s proclamation, therefore, does not trigger federal terrorism penalties or authorities.
The leaders of several Muslim groups held a news conference on Tuesday to denounce the governor’s proclamation, which also labeled CAIR as a “a transnational criminal organization.”
The groups called on the governor to retract his labeling of the civil rights group, calling it defamatory, destructive and dangerous, according to Fox 4.
Muslim and interfaith leaders are urging Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to reverse his proclamation designating CAIR as a terrorist organization.(Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
This comes after CAIR filed a lawsuit against Texas over the governor’s declaration, arguing that it violates both the U.S. Constitution and state law.
CAIR argues the order violates its First Amendment rights and due-process protections, and that Texas overstepped its authority because terrorism designations fall under federal, not state, jurisdiction.
“The governor is attempting to punish the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization simply because he disagrees with its protected First Amendment rights to criticize a foreign state that is conducting genocide. This is not only contrary to the United States Constitution, but finds no support in any Texas law,” Mustaffa Carroll, the executive director for CAIR Dallas Fort Worth, said at the news conference on Tuesday.
“You know that CAIR has condemned Hamas attacks. You know that CAIR has spent 31 years fighting terrorism and bigotry. You know that the terrorism boogeyman you invoke is nothing more than a tired, formulated playbook to stoke fear of Muslims,” Marium Uddin of the Muslim Legal Defense Fund said on Tuesday.
CAIR filed a lawsuit against Texas over the governor’s declaration, arguing that it violates both the U.S. Constitution and state law.(Ron Jenkins/Getty Images)
Leaders from other faiths, including Jewish voices, also spoke out against Abbott’s label.
“We stand steadfast in solidarity with our comrades in CAIR and in unwavering support in their lawsuit against Abbott’s false and unconstitutional proclamation,” Jewish Voice for Peace’s Deborah Armintor said.
State Rep. Terry Meza, a Democrat, added that the governor’s words “are not just wrong, they’re dangerous. Making comments like this is dangerous to our Muslim community.”
Based on overwhelming evidence that Republican lawmakers intended to racially gerrymander Congressional redistricting maps — because they said as much during public testimony early in the process — University of Houston law professor David Froomkin said he believes a district judge’s order to block the maps should stand.
“They said it was about race before they said it was about politics,” Froomkin said Monday.
But the maps approved by the state legislature in August, intended to flip five seats in favor of Republicans, will remain in place temporarily, per a Supreme Court ruling on November 21.
The decision, handed down by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, is a short-term pause while the high court decides which map Texas should use as a court battle over its legality plays out. The ruling came three days after a panel of district judges led by Donald Trump appointee Jeffrey Brown ruled on November 18 that Texas couldn’t use the maps approved in August, citing substantial evidence of racial gerrymandering.
Alito’s decision adds yet another layer of confusion for candidates and voters in the upcoming March 2026 primaries, for which the filing deadline is December 8. Froomkin said Monday that “we shouldn’t read too much into” Alito’s temporary stay.
“That is likely to be reconsidered by the entire Supreme Court in the coming weeks,” he said. “I imagine they will be sensitive to the December 8 filing deadline. I think there’s a strong chance that the district court decision will stand and that candidates certainly should stay the course for now.”
Six of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican presidents.
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the mid-decade redistricting effort after he received a letter suggesting he do so from the U.S. Department of Justice. Republican legislators at first said they needed to redraw the maps to fix racial gerrymandering that occurred in 2021. When confronted with federal court testimony showing that Republicans referred to the ’21 maps as “race-blind,” the GOP changed its tune.
Froomkin said they were given bad legal advice.
“This is a relatively easy case in that there was a fairly explicit racial gerrymander here,” he said. “The story here is really a story of the careless, sloppy lawyering that we have come to expect from this administration. This decision could have been easily avoided if Republicans had consulted good lawyers [at the onset] rather than shooting from the hip.”
Abbott appealed the district judges’ decision to the Supreme Court and said in a press release last week that the maps approved by the legislature over the summer were drawn to “better reflect Texas’ conservative voting preferences — and for no other reason.”
As it stands today with the temporary stay in place, Congressman Al Green, a Democrat from Houston, no longer lives in District 9, an area he’s represented for 20 years. He now lives in District 18. Green filed for the District 18 seat earlier this month, but if Brown’s ruling stands, Green goes back to District 9. He’s one of several candidates in limbo pending a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The Congressional District 18 seat has been vacant since former Rep. Sylvester Turner died in March. Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee and former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards are in a January 31 runoff to fill Turner’s unexpired term. The special election runoff will be governed by the maps that were in place when Turner was elected in 2024.
Froomkin said back in August, after Texas Republicans pushed through their map, that “the premise underlying this redistricting plan was that there was a racial problem with the prior map that needed to be corrected.”
The professor said Monday that even though the Republicans walked back the messaging that they were redistricting to correct a racial gerrymander, the damage was already done.
“It’s quite rare for the state to announce that it has a racial objective behind a redistricting plan,” he said. “In fact, announcing that the objective of a redistricting plan is to reallocate political power on the basis of race is exactly what a state is not supposed to do.”
“Even if, by some incredible coincidence, the mapmakers achieved the very result that they had been encouraged to reach by the DOJ without relying on racial demographic data, the fact that state officials characterized the plan’s goals in racial terms is itself a sufficient reason to invalidate the plan as a racial gerrymander,” he added.
The opinion handed down last week from Brown, a district judge from Galveston, offered scathing remarks toward the Trump administration for micromanaging a state’s redistricting process and chastised Governor Abbott and the elected Republicans for doing Trump’s bidding.
“To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map,” Brown said in his opinion. “But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map.”
The Brown ruling was a blow to Republicans who were hoping that the new maps would yield control of 30 of the state’s 38 congressional districts and protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House. Alito’s “pause” issued a few days later didn’t garner much response from either political party, as it appears they’re waiting to see what happens next, Froomkin said.
“I think that Judge Brown’s opinion for the district court was very careful, methodical and well-grounded in existing law and precedent. I would also observe that I really don’t think the Supreme Court has strong grounds to overrule the district court because the main issues are factual issues.”
A Texas A&M committee ruled that the university’s decision to fire a professor after a student was removed from class for objecting to a children’s literature lesson on gender identity was unjustified.
A video recorded earlier this year by a female student showed her asking Melissa McCoul, a senior lecturer in the English department, if teaching gender ideology is legal, pointing to President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at removing the subject from higher education.
The internal committee ruled that the university failed to follow proper procedures and did not prove there was good cause to terminate McCoul. The committee unanimously voted this week that “the summary dismissal of Dr. McCoul was not justified.”
The university said in a statement that interim President Tommy Williams has received the committee’s nonbinding recommendation and will make a decision after reviewing it.
The internal committee ruled that the university failed to follow proper procedures and did not prove there was good cause to terminate the professor.(AP)
McCoul’s lawyer, Amanda Reichek, said the dispute is likely to end up in court because the university appears to want to continue fighting, and the interim president is facing similar political pressure.
“Dr. McCoul asserts that the flimsy reasons proffered by A&M for her termination are a pretext for the University’s true motivation: capitulation to Governor Abbott’s demands,” Reichek said in a statement.
Gov. Greg Abbott and other Republicans had called for her firing after watching the video.
“Fire the professor who acted contrary to Texas law,” the governor wrote on X in September.
The video led to public criticism of university president Mark Welsh, who later resigned, although he did not offer a reason and never mentioned the video in his resignation announcement.
Gov. Greg Abbott and other Republicans had called for the professor’s firing after watching the video.(Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images)
State Rep. Brian Harrison said in a statement to Fox News Digital at the time that the “liberal president of Texas A&M must be fired and all DEI and LGBTQ indoctrination defunded.”
The opening of the video posted by Harrison on social media showed a slide titled “Gender Unicorn” that noted different gender identities and expressions.
Students in the class told The Texas Tribune that they were discussing a book called “Jude Saves the World,” which is about a middle school student who comes out as nonbinary. Several other books included in the course also touched on LGBTQ+ issues.
After a back-and-forth dispute about the legality of teaching the lessons on gender identity, McCoul asked the student to leave the class. Harrison also posted other recordings of the student’s meeting with Welsh that showed the then-university president defending McCoul’s instruction.
President Donald Trump signed executive orders seeking to root out instruction on gender identity in higher education.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Welsh said when McCoul was fired that he learned she had continued teaching content in a children’s literature course “that did not align with any reasonable expectation of standard curriculum for the course.” He also said the course content did not match its catalog descriptions.
“If we allow different course content to be taught from what is advertised, we let our students down. When it comes to our academic offerings, we must keep our word to our students and to the state of Texas,” he said in September, noting that leaders in the College of Arts and Sciences were found to have approved plans to continue teaching course content that was not consistent with the course’s published description.
Earlier this month, the Texas A&M Regents issued a new policy stating that no academic course “will advocate race or gender ideology, or topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity” unless approved in advance by a campus president.
Fox News Digital reached out to Texas A&M for comment.
A prominent Muslim advocacy organization is taking Texas to court, arguing that Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to brand it a “foreign terrorist organization” tramples both the U.S. Constitution and state law.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin chapters filed a federal lawsuit Thursday seeking to overturn Abbott’s proclamation issued earlier in the week.
“This attempt to punish the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization simply because Governor Abbott disagrees with its views is not only contrary to the United States Constitution, but finds no support in any Texas law,” the group said in its lawsuit.
Founded in 1994, CAIR operates 25 chapters nationwide, including a small Texas staff of eight employees and two contractors, according to the filing.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin chapters asked a federal judge to strike down the declaration from the governor.(Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
“CAIR-Texas and the Texas Muslim community are standing up for our constitutional rights by directly confronting Greg Abbott’s lawless attack on our civil rights,” CAIR-Texas said in a statement. “We are not and will not be intimidated by smear campaigns launched by Israel First politicians like Mr. Abbott. Mr. Abbott is defaming us and other American Muslims because we are effective advocates for justice here and abroad. We plan to continue exercising our constitutional rights, defending civil rights, and speaking truth to power, whether in defense of free speech, religious freedom and racial equality here in Texas or in defense of human rights abroad.”
Abbott’s order extended the “terrorist” label to the Muslim Brotherhood, even though federal authorities have never classified either group that way.
The governor’s decree also bars CAIR from purchasing land in the Lone Star State under a new statute aimed at curbing purchases tied to “foreign adversaries.”
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s proclamation states that CAIR is blocked from purchasing land in the Lone Star State.(Antranik Tavitian/Reuters)
The group’s filing contends Abbott relied on “inflammatory statements with no basis in fact,” selectively citing remarks by affiliates to paint CAIR as sympathetic to terrorism.
“The lawsuit we have filed today is our first step towards defeating Governor Abbott again so that our nation protects free speech and due process for all Americans,” CAIR Litigation Director and General Counsel Lena Masri said in a statement. “No civil rights organizations are safe if a governor can baselessly and unilaterally declare any of them terrorist groups, ban them from buying land, and threaten them with closure. We have beaten Greg Abbott’s attacks on the First Amendment before, and God willing, we will do it again now.”
The Muslim Legal Fund of America also said it is “proud to defend the constitutional rights of CAIR-Texas and the right of all Texans to engage in free speech and uphold civil rights without facing lawless and defamatory attacks by Greg Abbott.”
“Mr. Abbott’s unconstitutional proclamation undermines the very foundational notions of due process that our system depends upon and it must not stand,” said Muslim Legal Fund of America attorney Charlie Swift. “For the sake of our nation’s basic freedoms, Greg Abbott’s latest attack on the American people must be defeated.”
CAIR accused the governor of relying on “inflammatory statements that have no basis in fact.”(Ron Jenkins/Getty Images)
Earlier this year, Texas Republicans sought to stop a Muslim-centered planned community around one of the state’s largest mosques near Dallas.
Abbott and other Republican state officials opened investigations into the development linked to the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC), claiming the group is attempting to create a Muslim-exclusive community that would implement Islamic law.
The redrawn map sparked a nationwide redistricting battle and is part of President Trump’s efforts to preserve a Republican majority in the House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections.
The Tuesday ruling came in a 2-1 vote by a three-judge panel. It dealt a blow to Republicans while Democrats celebrated it.
That’s because under the newly drawn map approved by Republicans, who stood to gain five congressional seats in Texas, the Democrats were facing a game of political musical chairs — some were set to retire or primary each other. Now, that may not have to happen.
“Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map,” which is illegal, the two federal judges who voted to block the map said in the ruling.
They also cited a U.S. Department of Justice letter to Gov. Greg Abbott from July about four coalition districts made up of Blacks and Latinos that include the 33rd Congressional District in North Texas, represented by Democrat Marc Veasey.
“DOJ threatened legal action if Texas didn’t immediately dismantle and redraw these districts, a threat based on their racial makeup. Notably, the DOJ letter targeted only majority non-white districts,” the judges’ ruling said. “Any mention of majority white districts, which DOJ presumably would have also targeted if its aims were partisan rather than racial, was conspicuously absent.”
There was no initial word on what the third judge on the panel said in dissenting.
Abbott slams judge’s “erroneous” decision
In a statement Tuesday, Abbott slammed the judges’ decision, calling it “clearly erroneous” and saying it “undermines the authority the U.S. Constitution assigns to the Texas Legislature by imposing a different map by judicial edict. The State of Texas will swiftly appeal to the United States Supreme Court.”
The state filed its appeal to the highest court late Tuesday afternoon.
CBS News Texas spoke with Democratic members of Congress from North Texas who praised the ruling.
“I totally agree with the court,” said Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Farmers Branch. “You know, what the Republicans and Greg Abbott did in Texas, to seeking to disenfranchise voters of color was egregious, and the court clearly agreed with that. This opinion is sharp, and it is clear, and it is concise.”
Veasey, whose district covers Fort Worth, said, “I feel like we’re on good legal grounds here. So, I feel confident, but, you know, I’m going to be again cautiously optimistic in watching what the Supreme Court says.”
“I’ve always made it clear that this was racial, and I know that some people want to run away from the race element, but the law protects it. We know that our Constitution recognizes and protects it,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas.
Texas Republicans criticize judges’ decision
CBS News Texas also spoke with Republicans Tuesday night who called the judges’ decision wrong and said they are putting their faith in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Aaron Reitz, a GOP candidate for Texas attorney general, said, “My view is similar to Gov. Abbott’s and Attorney General Paxton, who have criticized the decision because, in fact, race was not used to draw these lines. Only politics was used, which is the appropriate standard.”
Another candidate for attorney general, State Senator Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston, said it was a partisan map.
“Quite simply, this is a partisan map that draws more Republican seats and that’s why we’re going to win,” said Middleton. “That is why we’re going to be victorious in this appeal before the Supreme Court.”
As a result of the ruling, Rep. Johnson and Rep. Veasey said they will run for re-election in the districts they represent now.
Crockett she said she still hasn’t decided whether to run for re-election in her district in Dallas or if she is going to run statewide for U.S. Senate. She said she is waiting for polling to come back and that she hopes to make a decision by Thanksgiving.
The key, Crockett said, is if the polling shows she can beat a Republican candidate in the general election next November.
“At the end of the day, if the numbers are strong that I am our best shot, then it’s bigger than my district, it’s bigger than the state of Texas,” said Crockett. “This is about the country because we know if we can change the Senate map in this country, then that’s where we start to get wins.”
Crockett said the only way she or another Democrat can win is if they attract new voters, people who haven’t gone to the polls before, and not simply by attracting Republicans who cross the political aisle.
Editor’s Note: The Muslim Legal Fund of America and the CAIR Legal Defense Fund announced Thursday that they have filed a federal lawsuit against Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton to block enforcement of Abbott’s “unconstitutional and defamatory” November 18 proclamation, which they say falsely declared the Texas chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations a “foreign terrorist organization” and threatened various civil penalties against the civil rights organization if it continues to serve the people of Texas.
Original story:
Being Muslim doesn’t make one a terrorist, but that didn’t stop Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott from condemning two prominent civil rights groups this week, prompting an immediate response from one that the allegations are defamatory and have no basis in law or fact.
Abbott issued a proclamation on Tuesday designating the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. This designation authorizes heightened enforcement against both groups and their affiliates and prohibits them from purchasing or acquiring land in Texas, according to a press release.
The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have “long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world,’” Abbott said in a statement.
“The actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment are unacceptable,” he said. “These radical extremists are not welcome in our state and are now prohibited from acquiring any real property interest in Texas.”
It’s an unusual move on Abbott’s part, since, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, only the U.S. secretary of state can officially designate foreign terrorist organizations following consultation with the attorney general and treasury secretary.
The impact of the action by Abbott is limited to Texas law enforcement and authorizes the state attorney general to sue organizations deemed affiliated with CAIR or the Muslim Brotherhood, the Guardian reported this week.
In his proclamation, Abbott referenced comments by Muslim Brotherhood founders that supported “fighting of the non-believers.” The governor also cited that Hamas, a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, orchestrated a 2023 terrorist attack in Israel in which nearly 400 people were killed.
Abbott said he targeted CAIR because the organization was named in 2007 as having ties to the Holy Land Foundation, a group that was shut down for sending millions of dollars to Hamas. CAIR has denied the allegations and was not indicted.
Habiba Noor, a lecturer at Trinity University, told the Texas Tribune this week that Abbott is using an “Islamophobic toolbox” to rehash conspiracy theories in an effort to criminalize Muslims. One such conspiracy theory, the lecturer said, is that CAIR is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
CAIR, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, responded by saying in a letter that Abbott didn’t have the authority to unilaterally declare Americans or American institutions terrorist groups.
CAIR Texas said its civil rights work would continue undeterred. A spokesperson for CAIR Houston did not immediately respond to voicemails and emails seeking comment on Wednesday.
“Greg Abbott is an Israel First politician who has spent months stoking anti-Muslim hysteria to smear American Muslims critical of the Israeli government,” CAIR National said in a statement. “Mr. Abbott has once again shown that his top priority is advancing anti-Muslim bigotry, not serving the people of Texas. His latest publicity stunt has no basis in fact or law, nor can it stop our civil rights work.”
At press time, the Muslim Brotherhood had not issued a response to Abbott’s proclamation. In 2015, the group was banned in Egypt, where it was founded, and declared a terrorist organization. The Muslim Brotherhood supports charitable causes and has said that its aim is the establishment of a state ruled by Sharia law.
Sharia is an Islamic legal and moral code that serves as a path for Muslims to live according to God’s will, as derived from the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.
And that’s a problem for Abbott, who, one day after designating the Muslim groups as terrorists, called for an investigation into “possible criminal violations by Sharia tribunals masquerading as legal courts and … purporting to enforce Sharia law” in Collin and Dallas counties.
Texas Republicans, including Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, have attempted for months to thwart the construction of a 400-acre Muslim community called EPIC City near Plano, calling it a “Sharia compound.”
Abbott signed a bill into law in September prohibiting “residential property developments like EPIC City from creating Sharia compounds and defrauding and discriminating against Texans.” No evidence has been produced that the organizers of EPIC City, which would include 1,000 residential units, a school and a mosque, intended to operate under Sharia law.
The project appears to be on hold because of numerous legal challenges and state investigations.
Harris County commissioners Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia and Lesley Briones jumped into the fray late Tuesday evening, issuing a statement that Abbott’s proclamation against the Muslim organizations “is a reckless action that fuels fear and runs contrary to Harris County’s success as the country’s most diverse metro area. It also has no basis in the law.”
“Harris County has thrived as a welcoming place for all. People come here from around the world,” the three Democratic commissioners said in a joint statement. “Not only do we contribute to their success, but they contribute to ours. We all work together to build a safe, prosperous community. The governor’s rhetoric fractures community trust and undermines the safety and cohesion that government is meant to protect.”
Numerous elected officials from Houston and Harris County attended a Muslim celebration to break fast at the end of Ramadan this year. Credit: Daniel J. Cohen
Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee, who is competing in a January runoff election to fill the unexpired term of the late Sylvester Turner in U.S. Congressional District 18, said Abbott’s announcement was discriminatory and unconstitutional.
“He’s putting entire communities at risk by spreading fear instead of facts,” Menefee said in a statement. “Governor Abbott is again breaking down the trust we need to keep our neighborhoods stable. I denounce his decision and call on him to reverse it.”
In its response to Abbott, CAIR National said that the governor’s office has spent months stoking anti-Muslim hysteria to smear American Muslims critical of the Israeli government. The organization said it plans to continue opposing all forms of bigotry, speaking out against injustice and defending the Constitution’s guarantees of free speech.
CAIR has previously taken legal action against the state, most recently last year in defense of anti-genocide protesters at the University of Houston and University of Texas at Dallas.
“We have successfully sued you three different times for shredding the First Amendment for the benefit of the Israeli government, and we are ready to do so again if you attempt to turn this publicity stunt into actual policy,” the statement reads, in a direct message to Abbott.
As President Donald Trump laid it out to reporters this summer, the plan was simple.
Republicans, the president said, were “entitled” to five more conservative-leaning U.S. House seats in Texas and additional ones in other red states. The president broke with more than a century of political tradition in directing the GOP to redraw those maps in the middle of the decade to avoid losing control of Congress in next year’s midterms.
Four months later, Trump’s audacious ask looks anything but simple. After a federal court panel struck down Republicans’ new map in Texas on Tuesday, the entire exercise holds the potential to net Democrats more winnable seats in the House instead.
“Trump may have let the genie out of the bottle,” said UCLA law professor Rick Hasen, “but he may not get the wish he’d hoped for.”
Trump’s plan is to bolster his party’s narrow House margin to protect Republicans from losing control of the chamber in next year’s elections. Normally, the president’s party loses seats in the midterms. But his involvement in redistricting is instead becoming an illustration of the limits of presidential power.
Gov. Greg Abbott announces his re-election campaign for Texas governor in Houston, Sunday, Nov. 9, 2025. (Jason Fochtman/Houston Chronicle via AP)
Gov. Greg Abbott announces his re-election campaign for Texas governor in Houston, Sunday, Nov. 9, 2025. (Jason Fochtman/Houston Chronicle via AP)
Playing with fire
To hold Republicans’ grip on power in Washington, Trump is relying on a complex political process.
Redrawing maps is a decentralized effort that involves navigating a tangle of legal rules. It also involves a tricky political calculus because the legislators who hold the power to draw maps often want to protect themselves, business interests or local communities more than ruthlessly help their party.
And when one party moves aggressively to draw lines to help itself win elections — also known as gerrymandering — it runs the risk of pushing its rival party to do the same.
That’s what Trump ended up doing, spurring California voters to replace their map drawn by a nonpartisan commission with one drawn by Democrats to gain five seats. If successful, the move would cancel out the action taken by Texas Republicans. California voters approved that map earlier this month, and if a Republican lawsuit fails to block it, that map giving Democrats more winnable seats will remain in effect even if Texas’ remains stalled.
“Donald Trump and Greg Abbott played with fire, got burned — and democracy won,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, posted on X after the Texas ruling, mentioning his Republican counterpart in Texas along with the president.
Rep. Kevin Kiley, a Republican whose northern California district would be redrawn under the state’s new map, agreed.
“It could very well come out as a net loss for Republicans, honestly when you look at the map, or at the very least, it could end up being a wash,” Kiley said. “But it’s something that never should have happened. It was ill-conceived from the start.”
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a rally with Harris County Democrats at the IBEW local 716 union hall in Houston, on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Karen Warren)
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a rally with Harris County Democrats at the IBEW local 716 union hall in Houston, on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Karen Warren)
For Trump, a mix of wins and losses
There’s no guarantee that Tuesday’s ruling on the Texas map will stand. Many lower courts have blocked Trump’s initiatives, only for the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court to put those rulings on hold. Texas Republicans immediately appealed Tuesday’s decision to the high court, too.
Even before Tuesday, Trump’s push for mid-decade redistricting was not playing out as neatly as he had hoped, though he had scored some apparent wins. North Carolina Republicans potentially created another conservative-leaning seat in that battleground state, while Missouri Republicans redrew their congressional map at Trump’s urging to eliminate one Democratic seat. The Missouri plan faces lawsuits and a possible referendum that would force a statewide vote on the matter.
Trump’s push has faltered elsewhere. Republicans in Kansas balked at trying to eliminate the state’s lone swing seat, held by a Democratic congresswoman. Indiana Republicans also refused to redraw their map to eliminate their two Democratic-leaning congressional seats.
After Trump attacked the main Indiana holdout, state Sen. Greg Goode, on social media, he was the victim of a swatting call over the weekend that led to sheriff’s deputies coming to his house.
Trump’s push could have a boomerang effect on Republicans
The bulk of redistricting normally happens once every 10 years, following the release of new population estimates from the U.S. Census. That requires state lawmakers to adjust their legislative lines to make sure every district has roughly the same population. It also opens the door to gerrymandering maps to make it harder for the party out of power to win legislative seats.
Inevitably, redistricting leads to litigation, which can drag on for years and spur mid-decade, court-mandated revisions.
Republicans stood to benefit from these after the last cycle in 2021 because they won state supreme court elections in North Carolina and Ohio in 2022. But some litigation hasn’t gone the GOP’s way. A judge in Utah earlier this month required the state to make one of its four congressional seats Democratic-leaning.
Trump broke with modern political practice by urging a wholesale, mid-decade redraw in red states.
Democrats were in a bad position to respond to Trump’s gambit because more states they control have lines drawn by independent commissions rather than by partisan lawmakers, the legacy of government reform efforts.
But with Newsom’s push to let Democrats draw California’s lines successful, the party is looking to replicate it elsewhere.
Next up may be Virginia, where Democrats recaptured the governor’s office this month and expanded their margins in the Legislature. A Democratic candidate for governor in Colorado has called for a similar measure there. Republicans currently hold 9 of the 19 House seats in those two states.
Overall, Republicans have more to lose if redistricting becomes a purely partisan activity nationally and voters in blue states ditch their nonpartisan commissions to let their preferred party maximize its margins. In the last complete redistricting cycle in 2021, commissions drew 95 House seats that Democrats would have otherwise drawn, and only 13 that Republicans would have drawn.
The State Capitol is seen in Austin, Texas, on June 1, 2021. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
The State Capitol is seen in Austin, Texas, on June 1, 2021. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
Gerrymandering’s unintended consequences
On Tuesday, Republicans were reappraising Trump’s championing of redistricting hardball.
“I think if you look at the basis of this, there was no member of the delegation that was asked our opinion,” Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas told reporters.
Incumbents usually don’t like the idea of radically redrawing districts. It can lead to what political experts call a “dummymander” — spreading the opposing party’s voters so broadly that they end up endangering your own incumbents in a year, like 2026, that is expected to be bad for the party in power.
Incumbents also don’t like losing voters who have supported them or getting wholly new communities drawn into their districts, said Jonathan Cervas, who teaches redistricting at Carnegie Mellon University and has drawn new maps for courts. Democratic lawmakers in Illinois and Maryland have so far resisted mid-decade redraws to pad their majorities in their states, joining their GOP counterparts in Indiana and Kansas.
Cervas said that’s why it was striking to watch Trump push Republicans to dive into mid-decade redistricting.
“The idea they’d go along to get along is basically crazy,” he said.
___
Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti and Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.
A panel of three federal judges ruled Tuesday that Texas can’t use the congressional redistricting maps approved in August — citing substantial evidence of racial gerrymandering — thwarting President Donald Trump’s plan to maintain a Republican majority in Washington.
The decision was hailed as a victory by Texas Democrats but political experts said it creates mass chaos and, “If you’re a candidate, you’re in a pickle.”
“It’s confusing for candidates, it’s confusing for voters, it’s confusing for the whole political system,” said University of Houston political science professor Brandon Rottinghaus.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who ordered the redistricting effort after he received a letter suggesting he do so from Trump’s Department of Justice, issued a statement following the ruling, saying he would swiftly appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The Legislature redrew our congressional maps to better reflect Texas’ conservative voting preferences — and for no other reason,” Abbott said. “Any claim that these maps are discriminatory is absurd and unsupported by the testimony offered during 10 days of hearings. This ruling is clearly erroneous and undermines the authority the U.S. Constitution assigns to the Texas Legislature by imposing a different map by judicial edict.”
It throws a wrench in the plans of some candidates who have already filed to seek office under the assumption that the new maps would hold. That includes longtime U.S. Rep. Al Green, D-Houston, who was drawn out of District 9 and announced recently he would run instead for District 18.
Immediately after the redistricting map was approved in August, Texas Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, filed for Congress in Green’s District 9, presumably assuming that he could win a congressional district that favored GOP voters.
So what happens to the 2026 midterms? Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, ordered Tuesday that the 2026 Congressional election “shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021.”
Candidates who need to change their plans will have to do so quickly. The filing deadline is December 8. “It’s really all up to the Supreme Court now,” Rottinghaus said.
The U.S. Supreme Court is also deliberating a redistricting case out of Louisiana that could result in weakening the Voting Rights Act, the professor pointed out.
“If the Supreme Court says the Voting Rights Act doesn’t exist anymore, then this will go away,” he said. “It’s hard to know what they will do, but they’ve been hinting at that. The court has to make that determination.”
The Supreme Court can take as long as it wants to make a decision on Texas’ redistricting maps but it will likely be pressured by Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton to make an emergency ruling before the December filing deadline, said Nancy Sims, a UH political science lecturer.
“To me, it won’t be solved until the filing deadline,” Sims said. “It’s just chaos. It’s massively chaotic. It’s really challenging for the candidates to know what to do. If you’re Al Green or Briscoe Cain, you’re in a pickle, and your donors are in a pickle. It’s a wait-and-see for a couple of weeks, with a holiday in the middle.”
Green, Cain, and Austin Democrats Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett — whose congressional districts were essentially merged together under the new map — and several other candidates are in a holding pattern, Rottinghaus added, as they wait to see what the Supreme Court does before they change their filing paperwork.
Congressional District 18 candidates Christian Menefee and Amanda Edwards, who are facing off in a January 31 runoff, are unaffected since that election is a special-called contest to fill the unexpired term of the late former U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner. But it does produce uncertainty around who the runoff winner faces in the primary and when that election will be.
Menefee said in a statement Tuesday that the federal judge panel “confirmed what we already knew: this Trump-backed map was intentionally drawn to silence Black and Brown voters.”
“I hope the [Supreme] Court stands on the side of the Constitution and protects voters of color instead of letting politicians gut democracy in broad daylight. This moment will define what democracy means in 2025,” he said.
The Supreme Court could delay the primary to May while they’re litigating the map, Rottinghaus said. They’ve done it before.
“That’s why Ted Cruz is the junior senator from Texas,” he said. “In 2012, they pushed the primary off from March to the May deadline. Ted Cruz was way behind but a few months later, he was neck and neck. That pushed it to a runoff and he got the win.”
The three judges who voted to block the maps approved in August — Brown; Judge David Guaderrama, a Barack Obama appointee; and Judge Jerry Smith, a Ronald Reagan appointee — offered scathing remarks in their ruling toward not just Trump but Abbott and Texas Republicans.
“The justices were very unhappy with Trump’s political involvement in this,” Rottinghaus said. “They basically implied that because the president asked for this to happen, it sullied the whole process in a partisan way that is a prima facie outcome that this is all racially gerrymandered.”
“They’re very vocal about how the Trump administration is being unfair and misleading when it comes to the arguments they have made,” he added. “You have to read this as a full-on rebuke of Donald Trump. They also slap the Legislature and Greg Abbott around a little bit, basically saying that they did what Trump wanted, which is bad enough, but there are also all these mistakes they made procedurally. The outcomes are definitely gerrymandered by race. They’re very critical.”
Brown said in his ruling that “the public perception of this case is that it’s about politics.”
“To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map,” the ruling states.
Tuesday’s decision a huge blow to Republicans who were hoping that the new maps would yield control of 30 of the state’s 38 congressional districts and protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House, Sims said.
“It’s common for a president to lose the midterms,” she said. “The reason they went to this extreme with the mid-decade redistricting in the first place was to help try to shore up the House for the president and the Republican Party. The margins are so thin currently and the way to remedy that was to draw more Republican seats, and that’s what they set out to do. Texas was first in line with our hands up, saying, Yes, sir.”
WASHINGTON — A federal court on Tuesday blocked Texas from moving forward with its new congressional map, hastily drawn in hopes of netting up to five additional Republican seats and securing the U.S. House for the GOP in next year’s midterm elections.
The ruling is a major political blow to the Trump administration, which set off a redistricting arms race throughout the country earlier this year by encouraging Texas lawmakers to redraw the state’s congressional district boundaries mid-decade — an extraordinary move bucking traditional practice.
The three-judge federal court panel in El Paso said in a 2-1 decision that “substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map,” ordering the state to revert to the maps it had drawn in 2021.
Texas’ Republican governor, Greg Abbott, who at Trump’s behest directed GOP state lawmakers to proceed with the plan, vowed on Tuesday that the state would appeal the ruling all the way to the Supreme Court.
Californians responded to Texas’ attempted move by voting on Nov. 4 to approve a new, temporary congressional map for the state, giving Democrats the opportunity to pick up five new seats.
Initially, the proposal pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, known as Prop. 50, had trigger language that would have conditioned new California maps going into effect based on whether Texas approved its new congressional districts.
But that language was stripped out last minute, raising the possibility that Democrats enter the 2026 midterm election with a distinct advantage. The language was removed because Texas had already passed its redistricting plan, making the trigger no longer needed, said Democratic redistricting expert Paul Mitchell, who drew the maps for Prop. 50.
“Our legislature eliminated the trigger because Texas had already triggered it,” Mitchell said Tuesday.
Newsom celebrated the ruling in a statement to The Times, which he also posted on the social media site X.
“Donald Trump and Greg Abbott played with fire, got burned — and democracy won,” Newsom said. “This ruling is a win for Texas, and for every American who fights for free and fair elections.”
An aide to former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican who led an effort in California to enshrine nonpartisan districting practices, suggested that California’s effort could face problems going forward after it was sold to the public as a response to Texas.
“The title of the proposition said it was a response to Texas, and the voter guide mentioned Texas 13 times, so I’d imagine you will find voters who feel misled that if Texas’ gerrymander doesn’t happen, California’s still does,” said Daniel Ketchell, a spokesperson for Schwarzenegger.
The new Texas redistricting plan appears to have been instigated by a letter from Assistant Atty. Gen. for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon, who threatened Texas with legal action over three “coalition districts” that she argued were unconstitutional.
Coalition districts feature multiple minority communities, none of which comprises the majority. The newly configured districts passed by Texas redrew all three, potentially “cracking” racially diverse communities while preserving white-majority districts, legal scholars said.
“I think the decision was both very smart and very careful in following the law,” Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, said of the 160-page opinion.
“These are judges who took the law seriously,” Levitt said, “and also judges who were — rightly — absolutely furious at DOJ for a letter starting the whole charade, where the legal ‘reasoning’ wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on.”
While the Supreme Court’s rulings on redistricting have been sporadic, the justices have generally ruled that purely political redistricting is legal, but that racial gerrymandering is not — a more difficult line to draw in southern states where racial and political lines overlap.
In 2023, addressing a redistricting fight in Alabama over Black voter representation, the high court ruled in Allen vs. Milligan that discriminating against minority voters in gerrymandering is unconstitutional, ordering the Southern state to create a second minority-majority district.
The Justice Department is also suing California to attempt to block the use of its new maps in next year’s elections.
J. Morgan Kousser, a Caltech professor who recently testified in the ongoing case over Texas’ 2021 redistricting effort, said the potential downfall of Texas’ new map was an ironic twist for a president whose strategic goal was to give himself a leg up in the midterms.
He blamed Tuesday’s court decision — written by a Trump appointee — on the president’s gutting of legal talent at the Justice Department, arguing its legal strategy was flawed from the start.
“The California gerrymander is likely fixed in stone, because there is no evidence of ‘racial predominance’ in the California action, especially compared to the plentiful evidence of racial motives quoted carefully by the district court in Texas,” Kousser said, “and the opinion of the Texas district court is so meticulous and persuasive that the Supreme Court majority will have difficulty overturning it.”
“Purging the DOJ left no one to warn the Trump appointees that what they were about to do would likely boomerang,” Kousser added. “This is the law of unintended consequences run riot.”
Times staff writers Melody Gutierrez and Seema Mehta contributed to this report.
Gov. Greg Abbott gives remarks with former President Donald Trump in Edinburg at the South Texas International airport in November 2023.
Michael Gonzalez
Getty Images
Gov. Greg Abbott and other Texas Republican leaders learned an important, and perhaps costly, lesson Tuesday when a federal court stopped the state from using a new map of congressional districts for next year’s elections: If you’re going to a partisan knife fight, you’d better bring your most useful blade.
And at the risk of mixing metaphors, the Trump Justice Department isn’t exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.
The court ruled Tuesday that Texas cannot use the map legislators approved in a special session for next year’s midterm elections. The state must stick with current districts, which were enacted in 2021. Republicans, prodded by President Donald Trump, sought to make five more of the state’s 38 U.S. House districts more likely to elect a Republican. The party fears that without them, it will have difficulty holding control of Congress for the final two years of Trump’s term.
So, the politics were always clear. What’s telling is the rationale that the court laid out. A coalition of minority-rights groups argued, in suing the state over the map, that it deliberately targeted the voting strength of racial minorities, chiefly Black and Hispanic voters. Two of three federal judges empaneled to hear the case agreed.
Gov. Abbott’s unusual call for mid-decade redistricting
They noted that Abbott’s initial stated reason for calling lawmakers back to draw a new map — highly unusual in the middle of a decade — was a hand-slap from the Justice Department over districts that might violate a recent court ruling.
The law is complicated here but, essentially, a federal appeals court ruled in a different Texas case that states cannot be required to create “coalition districts.” Those are maps under which more than one racial or ethnic minority group, acting in concert, can determine a winner.
Opponents of Texas’ mid-decade redistricting plan rally at the Texas Capitol on Aug. 20, 2025. Eleanor Dearman
But the ruling didn’t say states couldn’t choose on their own to create such districts. Think of the difference between eating your broccoli because Mom said so or having it because you like it or think it’s good for you.
Texas devoured the broccoli. Tuesday’s ruling found, quite logically, that the state’s consideration of race probably went overboard.
The court’s 160-page ruling is a breathtaking slap at Trump’s Justice Department. It’s hard to determine what the department wanted, the judges said, because its letter to Texas officials “contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.” Lawyers working for Attorney General Ken Paxton described the DOJ guidance as “ ‘legally unsound, baseless, erroneous, ham-fisted and a mess.’ ”
Supreme Court allows redistricting for partisan gain
At the same time, to explain the redraw, Republicans often pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision that federal courts cannot step in when states change maps expressly for partisan intent. So, two paths were available to justify what Trump was asking for. Texas and the Justice Department picked the wrong one.
Politically, it could go down as a backfire worthy of a 1974 El Camino.
California and other Democratic-dominated states used Texas’ step as a reason to do their own — on a partisan basis. Those will probably stand, while Abbott’s new map is, at best, on life support.
Texas will appeal quickly, and the case probably goes directly to the Supreme Court. The justices could delay the primaries currently set for March and ultimately allow the new map. If they don’t, it just got considerably harder for Republicans to keep the House majority — the exact opposite of what Trump was asking for.
If the court does act and primaries must be delayed, there could be all sorts of unforeseen political consequences. The last time it happened, in 2012, primaries were just after Memorial Day, with runoffs at the end of July. That’s a recipe for low voter turnout, which, along with more time to campaign, helped an upstart conservative beat the sitting lieutenant governor and, against great odds, ultimately win a U.S. Senate seat.
Longer-term, there could be an epic fight over the rules for redistricting. Right now, the playing field is a mess. States can be dinged for not considering race enough, lest too few Black and Hispanic candidates win elections. But they can’t take race into account too much, or they get reprimanded like Texas did Tuesday.
If Democratic states can draw maps that eliminate Republican districts but red states can’t act in kind, the GOP won’t stand for that very long. Redistricting is a never-ending arms race. Eventually, Republicans could seek to finally end the Voting Rights Act and let the constitutional chips fall where they may.
That’s a long way down the road, though. Today, Texas Republicans should consider why their leaders bungled this so badly — particularly when Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Attorney General Ken Paxton love to brag about how easy it is for them to get Trump on the phone.
Do you have an opinion on this topic? Tell us!
We love to hear from Texans with opinions on the news — and to publish those views in the Opinion section.
• Letters should be no more than 150 words.
• Writers should submit letters only once every 30 days.
• Include your name, address (including city of residence), phone number and email address, so we can contact you if we have questions.
Please note: Letters will be edited for style and clarity. Publication is not guaranteed. The best letters are focused on one topic.
This story was originally published November 18, 2025 at 2:36 PM.
Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Ryan J. Rusak is opinion editor of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. He grew up in Benbrook and is a TCU graduate. He spent more than 15 years as a political journalist, overseeing coverage of four presidential elections and several sessions of the Texas Legislature. He writes about Fort Worth/Tarrant County politics and government, along with Texas and national politics, education, social and cultural issues, and occasionally sports, music and pop culture. Rusak, who lives in east Fort Worth, was recently named Star Opinion Writer of the Year for 2024 by Texas Managing Editors, a news industry group.
Former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards and Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee won’t get a holiday break from the campaign trail.
Gov. Greg Abbott announced Monday that a runoff election to fill the late U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner’s unexpired term in Congressional District 18 will be held on January 31.
Menefee earned 21,979 votes, or 28.89 percent, in the November 4 election, and Edwards got 19,440 votes, or 25.55 percent. In order to win outright, one candidate must get more than 50 percent of the vote. In a crowded race with 16 candidates, a runoff was expected.
Both top vote-getters are Black attorneys who ran as Democrats. Both have speculated that Abbott wasn’t in a hurry to fill the District 18 seat because it would add a blue vote in Congress, and President Donald Trump has been desperately trying to maintain his Republican majority.
Democrats Amanda Edwards and Christian Menefee will face off in a January 31 runoff election for Congressional District 18. Credit: Screenshots
Immediately after the November 4 election, both candidates urged Abbott to call the runoff promptly to avoid voter confusion and further delay.
“For far too long, the people of Texas’ 18th Congressional District have paid taxes, faced rising costs and watched Congress make critical decisions, all without anyone fighting for them in Washington,” Edwards said in a November 10 statement. “That’s unacceptable. I’m calling on the governor to stop playing political games with this seat and to finally place people over politics by scheduling this special election runoff.”
Despite the Republican-led redistricting effort that was approved by the Texas Legislature over the summer, voters who cast ballots in the 2024 Congressional District 18 Race when Turner was elected were able to do so in the November 4 election and can also vote in the runoff.
“This district is known for having a powerful voice, and right now that voice matters more than ever,” Menefee said recently when asked about the confusion among CD 18 residents. “Republican leaders are doing everything they can to dilute the voting power of the people, from changing maps to making it more confusing to vote, all in an effort to silence our communities.”
“But every single vote cast in this election pushes back against that,” he added. “Every single vote says we’re still here, we’re still fighting, and we’re ready to stand up for democracy.”
The winner of the runoff will serve until Turner’s term expires at the end of 2026. Another election will be held next year for a full two-year term, and longtime Congressman Al Green, who was redistricted out of his District 9 seat, has filed to run in 2026.
Fans of the Buddy Holly crosswalk in his hometown of Lubbock, Texas, with a painted depiction of the rock and roll legend’s iconic glasses, will soon have to say goodbye to it. That’ll be a day that will possibly make them cry.
Over the summer, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced stricter enforcement of a 2013 rule of the Federal Highway Administration that said any art in crosswalks – apart from certain patterns in earth tones – degraded pedestrian safety.
In July, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sent letters to governors across the country informing them that federal road funding would be at risk if states, counties and cities were not in compliance.
This photo provided by City of Lubbock on Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, shows the Buddy Holly Crosswalk in Lubbock, Texas.
City of Lubbock via AP
“Roads are for safety, not political messages or artwork,” Duffy’s statement said.
Last month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott issued a directive to the Texas Department of Transportation, ordering the agency to “ensure counties and cities are in compliance with roadway safety.”
“Texans expect their taxpayer dollars to be used wisely, not advance political agendas on Texas roadways,” Abbott said in a statement.
Lubbock’s crosswalk was first installed in 2020 and is near the Buddy Holly Center, a downtown museum with exhibits honoring Lubbock’s most famous native son.
This photo provided by City of Lubbock on Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, shows the Buddy Holly Crosswalk in Lubbock, Texas. (City of Lubbock via AP)
AP
“It’s such a tasteful cross section and people like it. But what do you do?” said City Council Member Christy Martinez-Garcia, who was among those questioning why it had to go.
Lubbock received a letter from the Texas Department of Transportation with “some harsh wording” that threatened the possible loss of state or federal funding for road projects if such artwork was not removed, David Bragg, Lubbock’s interim division director of public works, told council members on Tuesday.
“This was very broad letter. I don’t think it was intended to go after, say, the Buddy Holly glasses. Unfortunately, it did,” Bragg said.
Mayor Mark McBrayer said the city had no choice but to comply.
“Probably everybody here got some communication from people wanting that not to be the case,” McBrayer said. “But I don’t really feel like we have the wherewithal to do anything about that without trying to litigate it and I don’t think there’s any appetite here anyway.” Bragg said the removal will happen during normal maintenance next year.
Holly was born and raised in Lubbock, located in northwest Texas. He decided to play rock and roll music after seeing Elvis Presley perform in 1955. His best known songs include “That’ll Be the Day,” ”Rave On” and ” Peggy Sue.”
Holly was only 22 when he died in a Feb. 3, 1959, plane crash near Clear Lake, Iowa, that also killed Ritchie Valens and J.P. “Big Bopper” Richardson. The three rockers’ deaths were immortalized in Don McLean’s 1971 song “American Pie,” and became known as “the day the music died.”
President Donald Trump issued a “Complete and Total” endorsement of Lone Star State Gov. Greg Abbott on Tuesday.
Abbott, a Republican, launched his reelection campaign at an event in Houston on Sunday.
In a Truth Social post on Tuesday evening, Trump called Abbott “an exceptional Governor and man,” declaring, “HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!”
“Greg Abbott is the strong and highly respected Governor of Texas, a State I love and WON BIG three times, including with 6.4 Million Votes in 2024 (The most Votes in History, BY FAR)!” Trump wrote.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has said his working relationship with President Donald Trump is based on their shared belief in public safety.(Shelby Tauber/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
He credited Abbott’s leadership for the successful passage of the Texas mid-decade redistricting bill that will potentially give Republicans an additional five congressional seats in the 2026 Midterm Elections.
“Thanks to Greg’s bold and effective Leadership, the wonderful people of Texas will have the opportunity to elect 5 new MAGA Republicans in the 2026 Midterm Elections with the passage of their new, fair, and much improved, Congressional Map — A BIG WIN for Republicans in The Lone Star State, and across the Country! ” wrote Trump.
The president went on to tout many of Abbott’s priorities, saying, “As Governor, Greg is also fighting tirelessly to Champion Texas Values, Grow the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Support our Amazing Farmers and Ranchers, Advance MADE IN THE U.S.A., Unleash American Energy Dominance, Promote School Choice, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, Ensure LAW AND ORDER, Protect our Brave Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment.”
“Greg Abbott has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election,” he concluded.
EAGLE PASS, TEXAS – February 29: Former president Donald Trump speaks during a visit to Eagle Pass, Tex. on Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024. Trump is joined by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. ((Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images))
Abbott responded to the endorsement by calling it an “honor.”
“Together, we’ve worked to secure our border and defend the values that keep Texas strong. President Trump has always been a champion for Texas,” wrote Abbott, adding, “I look forward to our ongoing work to build a stronger, safer, more prosperous Texas and America.”
Abbott is seeking a fourth term in the Lone Star State. At his campaign launch on Sunday, Abbott outlined a sweeping property tax reform plan, addressing what has become one of the state’s most pressing, hot-button issues.
“It’s time to drive a stake through the heart of local property tax hikes for good,” Abbott said. “We are going to turn the tables on local taxing authorities, put the power with the people, and put an end to out-of-control property taxes in Texas.”
Despite much speculation of Texas turning purple or even blue in recent years, Abbott has won each of his three previous elections by decisive margins. In 2022, he defeated the once-rising star, former Rep. Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke by over ten percentage points.
Gov. Greg Abbott laughs upon arrival during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas(Brandon Bell/Getty Images))
In an interview with Fox News Digital in October, Abbott, whose National Guard troops were deployed in support of Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Chicago, revealed the “substantive reason” why he has such a good working relationship with the president: “We both believe in the rule of law.”
“President Trump and I have a good, long-standing, working relationship, and there’s a substantive reason behind that. We both believe in the rule of law. We both believe in public safety. We both believed in securing the borders,” he explained.
Abbott said that he and President Donald Trump are “operating very closely aligned in ensuring that our country’s going to be safe.”
Abbott emphasized that the Trump administration shares a common vision with Texas, making them apt partners.
Gov. Greg Abbott, R-Texas, during the Republican National Convention (RNC) at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee on July 17, 2024.(David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“What Texas is trying to do is the same thing the United States is trying to do. And that is very simply, carrying out the functions of the federal government. One of them is immigration enforcement, and another is public safety. The National Guard from Texas [is] not there to police the city of Chicago or any other place. They are there to ensure the safety and security of the ability of federal officials to fulfill their constitutional duty to enforce the laws of the United States.”
Though he gave no indication of what other collaborations Texas might undertake with the Trump administration in the future, he said that Texas remains ready for whatever is needed.
“No one can accurately predict exactly what’s going to happen in the future. What I can predict is how Texas will respond. And that is, whenever the country is in time of need, Texans will step up and help out any way we possibly can.”
Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced on Sunday evening that he is running for a fourth term as governor of the Lone Star State.
Earlier in the week, Abbott said he would make a special announcement from Houston on Sunday, outlining his vision for the future of the state.
Abbott said it was in Houston that he rebuilt his life after the accident that left him paralyzed.
“I learned that our lives don’t have to be determined or defined by how we’re challenged,” Abbott said. “We get to define our lives by how we respond to those challenges. It is a trademark resilience that we Texans have.”
“As Texans, we will defend this state with every fiber of our being,” Abbott continued. “We will protect what we built, we will finish what we started. We will lead Texas into its glorious future! And that’s why tonight, I’m here to announce I am running for reelection as your governor for the great state of Texas.”
He touted the state’s economy, the 8th largest in the world, and said Texas is “number one” in electricity generation.
Abbott also claimed the Texas economy is “growing twice as fast as the United States’ economy.”
Abbott unveils property tax reform plan
As part of his announcement, Abbott also outlined a sweeping property tax reform plan to “rein in skyrocketing appraisals.”
He said on Sunday that voters should have the power to decide on eliminating school property taxes and that any future property tax hikes should require two-thirds voter approval.
“It’s time to drive a stake through the heart of local property tax hikes for good,” Abbott said. “We are going to turn the tables on local taxing authorities, put the power with the people, and put an end to out-of-control property taxes in Texas.”
He is currently the second-longest serving governor of Texas, behind former Gov. Rick Perry, who served for 14 years.
Trump endorses Abbott’s run for 4th term
In a post on Truth Social, President Trump endorsed Abbott’s run for a fourth term as Texas’ governor.
“Greg Abbott is the strong and highly respected Governor of Texas, a State I love and WON BIG three times, including with 6.4 Million Votes in 2024 (The most Votes in History, BY FAR)! … As Governor, Greg is also fighting tirelessly to Champion Texas Values, Grow the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Support our Amazing Farmers and Ranchers, Advance MADE IN THE U.S.A., Unleash American Energy Dominance, Promote School Choice, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, Ensure LAW AND ORDER, Protect our Brave Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment. Greg Abbott has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election. He is an exceptional Governor and man — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!”
Gov. Abbott’s time in office
Abbott was first elected as governor of Texas in 2014, sworn into office on Jan. 20, 2015. Prior to that, he served as the state’s Attorney General from 2002 to 2015.
During the 2015 Legislative session, Abbott signed the “campus carry” and “open carry” bills into law, allowing licensed individuals to carry concealed handguns on public college campuses and openly in public areas, respectively.
In May 2021, he signed the Texas Heartbeat Act (SB 8), which bans most abortions after cardiac activity is detected, about six weeks.
He also launched Operation Lone Star in 2021, a multi-agency collaboration between the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Texas Military Department, including the deployment of state troopers, National Guard personnel, and other resources for border security.
Students are drilled for tests instead of inspired to learn. This isn’t education — it’s demoralization.
Getty Images
Demoralized
I’m the parent of two recent Houston ISD graduates who lived through the state takeover of the district. I hoped it would bring positive change. I couldn’t have been more wrong.
Under Superintendent Mike Miles, Houston children are drilled for tests instead of inspired to learn. Students deliberately answer questions wrong to avoid “team centers,” where success means more worksheets. This isn’t education — it’s demoralization.
I urge Fort Worth ISD to fight the state takeover. Protect your schools, your teachers and your students’ futures.
– Heather Golden,Houston
Priced out
When I was a kid, it was possible to return enough soda bottles or mow enough lawns to pay for a ticket to see the Rangers play. Now that I’m retired, I’ll never enjoy another game because of the high ticket and concession prices. Had I known the cost of going to the State Fair this year, I would have stayed longer last year.
It’s sad that so many normal folks can’t afford to enjoy what used to be the little things in life.
– Ray Flenniken,Fort Worth
Clean it up
Guest commentary author Matthew Kandrach is wrong: Coal isn’t the answer to lowering energy costs, period. (Oct. 31, “Electric bills are rising fast. Here’s how coal plants can help”) Coal power is more expensive than ever because of the high cost of maintaining aging plants, rising fuel prices and environmental cleanup requirements.
Renewable energy such as wind and solar is now the cheapest source of new electricity. Once generation is built and connected to the electrical grid and battery storage facilities, renewables have no fuel costs and protect consumers from global price spikes, while also creating local jobs and, most important, not contributing further environmental damage. If we want affordable, reliable energy for the future, we should invest in clean, renewable power — not return to outdated, costly, dirty coal.
– Andrea Christgau,Keller
Wrong choice
I always read the Star-Telegram Editorial Board’s endorsements for elections, and I generally trust and agree with the information you provide. However, your choice of John Huffman for the Texas Senate was surprising. (Oct. 19, C6, “Star-Telegram endorsement: Tarrant election to fill state Senate seat”)
Perhaps the intent was to draw a distinction between two Republicans, Huffman and Leigh Wambsganss, but you could instead endorse the Democrat, Taylor Rehmet. He is an up-and-coming leader, who is enthusiastically trying to represent unions and working people.
Huffman’s campaign literature says he will defend schools against extreme “woke” indoctrination, ban so-called “critical race theory” and protect women and girls by keeping men out of their sports. I think it’s way past time for the Star-Telegram to call out these candidates who have nothing to offer except this kind of inflammatory nonsense.
– Penny Baxter,North Richland Hills
Power grabs
We have a constitutional amendment election Tuesday. This Texas Legislature doesn’t need another victory for its power grabs and poor spending decisions. Vote against all 17 amendments. That would send a strong message that we are sick of Gov. Greg Abbott and his cronies.
– Robert Adams,Fort Worth
Our fault
For the last 80 years, Congress has steadily ceded its constitutional powers to the presidency. If an autocracy is pending, we have done this to ourselves. I do not care if our next senators and representatives from Texas are Democrats, Republicans or independents. I want to elect candidates who will claw back from the executive those powers that rightfully belong to Congress and make it again a co-equal branch of government.
Aren’t school board elections supposed to be nonpartisan?
That’s the question some Cypress-Fairbanks ISD residents asked when they got postcards in their mailboxes on Thursday featuring a photo of conservative Christian activist and Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk, who was murdered last month at a Utah college campus.
“Keep crazy out of our schools!” the mailer states above the following bullet points:
Nationwide violence has escalated on the left, to the point of political assassinations.
It is the result of the leftist and Marxist takeover of our schools.
It is years and years of indoctrinating our kids to accept and normalize radical ideas.
If you wouldn’t vote for a Democrat at state and national elections, why do it locally?
It’s an advertisement for incumbent Natalie Blasingame, former board member George Edwards Jr. and retired CFISD administrator Radele Walker, “the only candidates in this race endorsed by the Harris County GOP.”
This mailer was distributed to Cy-Fair ISD voters this week. Credit: Screenshot
The mailpiece was paid for by the CyFair4Liberty Political Action Committee, led by Bill Ely.
Ely did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday mornin, nor did the slate of Republican candidates.
But those supporting challengers Lesley Guilmart, Cleveland Lane Jr. and Kendra Camarena, all of whom have voted in a Democratic primary but are identifying themselves as a “pro-public education” slate, had plenty to say.
“What does Charlie Kirk have to do with a school board election and why are they implying their opponents have something to do with it?” said Odus Evbagharu, a Cy-Fair ISD graduate and Democratic candidate for Texas House of Representatives.
The mailer also stirred some strong feelings in hardcore Republicans.
A former Harris County Republican Party precinct chair said in a text message to the Houston Press, “This is a new low. How can they desecrate Charlie Kirk and his image/memory? It is disparaging and insulting. I am literally feeling the same feelings I felt when I heard of [Kirk’s] assassination. This is inhumane and insensitive. Have they no morals or ethical boundaries?”
This mailer was distributed to Cy-Fair ISD voters this week. Credit: Screenshot
A post in the Facebook group CFISD Parents for Librarians had more than three dozen comments early Friday morning.
“Teachers are not the enemy and to equate them as such and that they are the result of ‘nationwide violence’ is absolutely INSANE,” wrote Ashley Buckner, who posted photos of the mailer.
One commenter added, “That sure is a great use of the fear propaganda technique and a testimonial by putting Charlie Kirk on there. If I was still teaching, I would be saving this one as one of the mailers for the kids to analyze when teaching propaganda techniques.”
Another commenter pointed out that school boards are supposed to be nonpartisan. “Why do they keep using our children and teachers as the frontlines in their political war?” she asked.
The Cy-Fair ISD board has been under fire since a conservative Christian majority led by Blasingame began last year supporting book bans, removing chapters from textbooks and trying to get chaplains installed at district campuses, which critics say blur the lines of separation of church and state.
In addition to the GOP-endorsed candidates and the pro-public education candidates, board president Scott Henry is also seeking re-election, running for Position 6 against Blasingame and Lane. Henry is backed by trustees Todd LeCompte, Justin Ray and Lucas Scanlon. Elecia Jones is running for Position 7 against Camarena and Walker.
The Harris County GOP endorsed the three candidates before the filing period ended and days prior to the publication of a Houston Pressstory in which Blasingame admitted she’d secretly recorded members of the community, prompting a board policy change that prohibits trustees from taping conversations with community members, district administrators and other trustees without the knowledge of all involved parties.
A GOP precinct chair proposed a resolution last month to revoke Blasingame’s endorsement, alleging the trustee brought shame upon the district, but rescinded the motion when she determined she didn’t have enough support from party officials for it to go through.
Earlier this week, Cy-Fair Republicans welcomed Gov. Greg Abbott and Senators Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, and Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, to a Cypress barbecue restaurant. At the event, Abbott said he wanted to turn Harris County “dark red.” Blasingame, Edwards and Walker attended the event, and Blasingame posted on Facebook on the day of the visit that a “YUGE endorsement announcement” would be forthcoming.
Abbott didn’t endorse any of the school board candidates but said his top two priorities are to win re-election in November 2026 and to win Harris County — and he’s willing to spend most of the $90 million in his coffers to do so.
Early voting continues through October 31. Election Day is November 4.