ReportWire

Tag: Greg Abbott

  • Texas National Guard members arrive in Illinois; sources say troops could begin assignments Wednesday

    [ad_1]

    Members of the Texas National Guard have begun arriving at a U.S. Army Reserve facility in Chicago’s far southwestern suburbs, where they’re expected to participate in training before they are sent on their assignments to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and facilities.

    On Tuesday afternoon, CBS News Chicago crews spotted National Guard troops dressed in camouflage with Texas National Guard patches walking around the U.S. Army Reserve Training Center in Elwood, near Joliet, about 50 miles southwest of Chicago. 

    Several trailers have been set up as temporary living quarters. Several soldiers were seen moving in with bags of belongings; some holding rifles and carrying folding chairs, possibly for meetings or other trainings. Fencing was also put up around the facility late Tuesday.

    Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Richard Hayes was the highest-ranking member of the Illinois National Guard. In his 30-plus-year career, he said he’s never seen a National Guard from a different state federalized and then sent to another state.    

    “This is novel. It doesn’t mean it’s necessarily illegal, it’s just different,” he said. “As far as the soldiers are concerned, the Illinois National Guard, even the Texas National Guard, they don’t get a say in whether they go or not go. It’s not a political organization, they’re just here to do what they’re being asked to do.”

    State Representative Larry Walsh Jr. said he got word late Monday that the Elwood site would be the home base for the troops.

    “This is a lot of political theater,” he said. “There’s a whole communication disconnect between the federal and local governments.”

    If federalized, the National Guard would take their orders from the federal government and not the state.

    “If the courts later say it’s not proper or not legal, then they’ll stand down,” Hayes said.

    “I would ask the federal government and the administration, come on… let’s just start working as adults,” Walsh Jr. said. 

    Roughly 200 members of the Texas National Guard will deploy to Chicago this week, sources familiar with the operation told CBS News.

    Members of the Texas National Guard are expected to begin their assignments in Chicago as soon as Wednesday, after receiving an operational brief, ahead of a federal court hearing on Thursday on a lawsuit filed by the state of Illinois and city of Chicago, which are seeking to block the troop deployment.

    Military personnel in uniform, with the Texas National Guard patch on, are seen at the U.S. Army Reserve Center, Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2025, in Elwood, Ill., a suburb of Chicago.

    Erin Hooley / AP


    State and local leaders said they have largely been left in the dark about the troop deployment and given no details on the troops’ mission.

    Will County Executive Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant, a Democrat, said her office was not notified by the Trump administration about the National Guard deployment in Elwood, including how many troops were being stationed there or how long the operation would last.

    “The arrival of the National Guard by the Trump Administration is an aggressive overreach. Our federal government moving armed troops into our community should be alarming to everyone,” she said in a statement. “I will be coordinating with local leaders to make sure we are doing everything in our power to protect the rights of our residents and the safety of everyone. Hopefully, the federal court hearing on Thursday will end this attack on our community.”

    The Illinois National Guard has also been ordered to report for training on Tuesday, although it’s unclear if they’ll also be stationed in Elwood.

    The Trump administration has said members of the National Guard will be assigned to the protection of federal facilities and federal law enforcement personnel, including the ICE facility in the west Chicago suburb of Broadview, and in downtown Chicago. 

    On Monday evening, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott posted a photo to X with a caption reading, “The elite Texas National Guard. Ever ready. Deploying now.” The photo shows Texas National Guard members boarding a plane.

    On Sunday evening, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said President Trump had ordered National Guard members from Texas to be deployed to Illinois.

    In a statement, Pritzker said 400 members of the Texas National Guard will be deployed to Illinois, Oregon, and other locations within the U.S.

    As members of the Texas National Guard were arriving in Illinois, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson – who has vehemently opposed the deployment – was asked about their mission.

    “There is a process that the National Guard goes through before they’re actually released into the streets of Chicago or anywhere,” he said. “But what’s really disturbing about all of this is that the National Guard, they have no policing authority or any policing powers. It’s not what they’re trained to do.”

    While a West Coast federal judge approved a temporary restraining order blocking Texas National Guard troops from deploying to Portland, Oregon, a federal judge in Chicago declined to immediately grant a similar request on Monday to halt the deployment in Illinois. The judge has scheduled a hearing for Thursday to rule on the request to block the deployment.

    On Sunday, a memo obtained by CBS News from the Pentagon called for hundreds of National Guard troops to be sent to Illinois. Pritzker on Saturday said that the Trump administration intended to federalize 300 Illinois National Guard members after he was offered an ultimatum on troop deployment. The ultimatum by the Trump administration, according to Pritzker, was “call up your troops, or we will.”

    The Illinois National Guard members were not expected to be ready to deploy prior to Thursday’s court hearing, sources said. Those personnel will undergo additional training, including civil disturbance training in the coming days, and be assigned necessary protective equipment.     

    “Bringing in Texas National Guard is really a vast overreach of the federal government here,” former Illinois National Guard Adj. Gen. William Enyart said.  

    Enyart said that without roots in Chicago and a nuanced understanding of the area, troops from another state would be at a severe disadvantage. 

    “To bring in someone from 1,000 miles away, who doesn’t have any of those contacts, who doesn’t have any of that network developed, is absolutely a hazard to public safety,” he said.

    Pritzker has repeatedly declined to call up the guard during the period of increased immigration enforcement, which the federal government has dubbed “Operation Midway Blitz.” Pritzker has also accused the Trump administration, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Customs and Border Protection Commander Gregory Bovino of intentionally sowing chaos in order to justify the deployment.

    The Illinois Attorney General’s team and Chicago city attorneys will be back in federal court this coming Thursday in an effort to stop the mobilization of troops.

    Meanwhile, attorneys for the Village of Broadview, home of an ICE processing center that has drawn heated protests and confrontations, were to appear in front of a judge on Tuesday to argue for the removal of a fence the federal government put up outside an ICE facility on Beach Street in Broadview.

    They said the federal government did not get a permit for the fence and that it is illegal to block a public street. The judge in the case said they would rule on the village’s bid to take down the fence in the next couple of days.

    Broadview Mayor Katrina Thompson could also see legal action soon regarding a protest curfew she enacted Monday night. She said village resources cannot keep up with repeated demonstrations outside the ICE processing center, so she is limiting gatherings there to be between the hours of 9 a.m. and 6 p.m.

    “Let me be clear, I will always support the First Amendment and right of people to peacefully protest,” Thompson said Monday. “But as mayor, I must also balance the right with the safety and well-being of Broadview residents and the businesses.”

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Is Happening With Trump’s National Guard Takeovers?

    [ad_1]

    Federal agents, including members of the Department of Homeland Security, Border Patrol, and the police, attempt to keep protesters back outside a downtown U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Portland, Oregon, on October 5.
    Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

    Donald Trump has made exerting federal power over the states a hallmark of his second term, attempting a takeover of Washington, D.C., and vowing to deploy the National Guard into the streets of American cities as he sees fit. But the president took another unprecedented move over the weekend as he green-lit the deployment of guardsmen from other states to Illinois and Oregon in stark defiance of their leaders and a court order.

    Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker announced on Sunday that Trump had ordered 400 members of the Texas National Guard to Illinois, Oregon, and other locations in what he deemed “Trump’s Invasion.” The Democratic governor noted on social media that no government officials called him directly to discuss the deployment. “I call on Governor Abbott to immediately withdraw any support for this decision and refuse to coordinate. There is no reason a President should send military troops into a sovereign state without their knowledge, consent, or cooperation,” he wrote.

    Texas governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, confirmed that he gave his full authorization to the Trump administration to call up his state’s guardsmen to “ensure safety for federal officials.” But his state was not the only one.

    The Trump administration moved to send 300 members of the California National Guard to Portland, Oregon, prompting a legal challenge from California governor Gavin Newsom. “We’re suing Donald Trump. His deployment of the California National Guard to Oregon isn’t about crime. It’s about power. He is using our military as political pawns to build up his own ego. It’s appalling. It’s un-American. And it must stop,” he wrote on social media.

    The president’s move to utilize troops from California and Texas appeared to be an attempt to circumvent a decision from a federal judge on Saturday that temporarily blocked Trump from deploying the National Guard in Portland, a city that he has described as “war ravaged” and “under siege” from domestic terrorists. Per the Associated Press, Trump intended to federalize 200 Oregon National Guardsmen to protect federal buildings in the city following consistent protests at the city’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility. But U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, determined that conditions in the city did not justify such a deployment. “The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts,” she wrote in her decision, per the AP.

    Trump’s attempt to involve other states over the weekend prompted an emergency hearing from Immergut late on Sunday evening. The New York Times reports that the judge declared that the president’s move to utilize the California and Texas National Guards was “ in direct contravention” of her initial order. Immergut expanded her initial ruling to bar the “relocation, federalization or deployment of members of the National Guard of any state or the District of Columbia in the state of Oregon.”

    The Trump administration had already filed an appeal against Immergut’s Saturday ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. But federal officials have denounced the judge’s decision in vitriolic terms, signaling a likely prolonged fight on this issue. “Today’s judicial ruling is one of the most egregious and thunderous violations of constitutional order we have ever seen — and is yet the latest example of unceasing efforts to nullify the 2024 election by fiat,” deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller posted online.

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt denounced Immergut’s rulings during a Monday briefing, calling them”untethered in reality and in the law.” When pressed by reporters who said Portland officials have pushed back on Trump’s characterization of the city’s conditions, Leavitt suggested they must have spoken to “partisan Democrat officials.”

    As the White House continues to defend its actions, another challenge to the federal government’s tactics emerged on Monday. The Illinois attorney general’s office, in conjunction with the city of Chicago, filed a lawsuit challenging the administration’s deployment of the Texas guardsmen as well as the attempted federalization of the Illinois National Guard in the city. “The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president’s favor,” the filing read. A hearing in the matter has been scheduled for Monday afternoon.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Nia Prater

    Source link

  • Houston Advocate Says Immigrants Are In The Civil Rights Fight of Their Lives – Houston Press

    [ad_1]

    Cesar Espinosa has been championing civil rights for immigrants for more than two decades, and the battle is becoming increasingly more dangerous under President Donald Trump’s aggressive approach to deportation, the FIEL Houston leader said this week. 

    “I believe to my core that this is the civil rights fight of our time,” Espinosa said. “Just like other people before us gave it their all to make sure that their community was respected, that is what we are willing to do for our immigrant community. Unfortunately, there is some worry about myself and our families, but at the end of the day, I’m fighting for a bigger cause and we’re fighting to make sure other people don’t have to suffer.” 

    Undeterred by a federal government shutdown announced Wednesday morning, it appears Texas and U.S. leaders are more committed than ever to deporting undocumented individuals, whether or not they have violent criminal histories. 

    Tension geared toward Immigration and Customs Enforcement has mounted since President Trump took office in January and tasked officers with removing what he refers to as “illegal aliens” from their job sites and immigration court rather than detaining them as they cross the border. 

    Trump has hailed the effort as an initiative to deport violent criminals from the United States, but Espinosa says the government’s approach is heavy-handed and has prompted the immigrant-led FIEL Houston to ramp up its efforts. Last year the organization received one or two calls a month for legal assistance; now they’re getting 15 to 20 calls a day, he said. 

    College students have had their visas revoked and people have been placed under ICE holds for minor driving infractions, and in one case, fishing without a license. Houstonians have reported that they are uncomfortable reporting domestic violence situations, even though their lives may be in danger, for fear of being deported. 

    “We’re seeing it in real life,” Espinosa said. “Just last week, we had a woman who was suffering from schizophrenia. [Her family] called the police to try to get help for this woman, and she was just deported, with no regard for her mental health. She had no criminal convictions. She should have been taken to a hospital.”

    More than 70 percent of the people being detained have no criminal record, Espinosa said, citing statistics from Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a nonprofit research organization that compiles government data on immigration. 

    More than 70 percent of the people being detained by ICE have no previous criminal history, according to the nonprofit research organization Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. Credit: Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse
    More than 13,000 people are currently detained in ICE facilities in Texas, according to the nonprofit research organization Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. Credit: Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse

    A majority of Harris County residents surveyed earlier this year said they generally support the deportation of undocumented violent criminals, but thousands gathered in June to protest Trump’s immigration policies at a No Kings rally at Houston City Hall. More than 2,000 No Kings protests are scheduled across the country on October 18. 

    Shooting at Dallas ICE Facility

    Two detainees at an ICE facility in Dallas were killed on September 24 when 29-year-old Joshua Jahn allegedly opened fire from the roof of a building, striking people in a van at the facility’s sally port entrance area. A third detainee was released from the hospital on Thursday and returned to ICE custody. Authorities said Jahn then turned the gun on himself and died at the scene. 

    Officials at the time said Jahn fired “indiscriminately,” and left behind handwritten notes indicating he “hoped his actions would give ICE agents real terror of being gunned down.” 

    Jahn was a white U.S. citizen who “likely acted alone” and “indicated he did not expect to survive the attack,” authorities said at a press conference after the incident, adding that the alleged shooter did not appear to be affiliated with any political group. 

    The Dallas Morning News reported that Jahn was registered as an Independent in Oklahoma. The suspect’s brother told NBC News that Jahn was not interested in politics and had not voiced opposition to ICE. 

    That brings up the issue of media accountability, said Harris County Democratic Party precinct chair, blogger and radio host Egberto Willies

    “Mainstream media has long served as a guardrail for establishment interests,” Willies wrote on his Substack blog, Egberto Off the Record, the day of the ICE shooting in Dallas. “When stories of political violence emerge, this machinery filters which facts amplify, which narratives dominate, and which doubts swirl in public discourse.”

    “In this case, early reporting emphasized whether the shooter was left or right, rather than centering [on] victims or demanding complete transparency,” Gillies said. “They omitted details — such as weapon type and race — in the initial framing, knowing that such omissions would direct the viewer’s assumptions.” 

    FBI Director Kash Patel said after the Dallas shooting that the “initial review of the evidence shows an ideological motive behind this attack.”

    Trump wrote on social media after the Dallas incident: “This violence is the result of the Radical Left Democrats constantly demonizing Law Enforcement, calling for ICE to be demolished, and comparing ICE Officers to Nazis.” 

    The divisive rhetoric only deepens the negative feelings that people have toward institutions and agencies, Espinosa said. “As things play out in such a public manner, with social media, of people getting arrested, assaulted, beaten up, kids getting pushed to the ground, it’s going to cement ill feelings toward the government from a lot of people,” he said. 

    “We want to say that something’s got to give and we have to find common ground, but unfortunately, this administration is not making it easy to do so,” he added. 

    The detainees who died in the Dallas shooting were not violent criminals, their family members told CNN. However, El Salvadoran national Norlan Guzman-Fuentes, 37, had prior arrests for battery, improper exhibit of a firearm or dangerous weapon, criminal mischief, driving while intoxicated, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. 

    Miguel Angel Garcia-Hernandez, a 32-year-old Mexican immigrant, had lived in the United States since he was 13 years old. He was arrested for suspicion of driving under the influence in August and was later detained by immigration authorities. A CNN report said Garcia-Hernandez had previous convictions for “giving fictitious information, evading arrest, driving while intoxicated, and fleeing police.”

    Cesar Espinosa rallies a crowd at a May protest in Houston. Credit: FIEL Houston

    Espinosa said FIEL Houston does not condone violence and the organization’s leaders are worried that “politics has become so volatile that people on all sides of the aisle are turning to acts of violence to make their voices heard.”

    “We have to emphasize that the victims of this shooting ended up being immigrants,” he said. “At the end of the day there are more questions, still, than there are answers. Why were they detained? Should they have been detained? We don’t believe that should be the case, but we need to know more.” 

    The politically driven narratives about the shooter have added to confusion and neglected to address gun control and mental health issues, Espinosa added. 

    “The constant in all of this is people with mental health issues who have access to guns,” he said. “Yet we as a society and as a country refuse to address that. Whether it’s immigration or politics, anybody can be a victim to one of these scenarios.”

    Dallas City Councilman Adam Bazaldua said after the ICE shooting that the country is “spiraling into a place where hate and violence are becoming the answer far too often.”

    “We are all witnessing terror each and every day, and we know that our immigrant neighbors are bearing the brunt of it,” he said. “I’m seeing some of our political leaders rush to exploit this tragedy for political gain instead of acknowledging the pain and fear it represents.” 

    “I want to be abundantly clear: Here in Dallas — and across this country — immigrants are our friends, our neighbors, our colleagues, and our family,” the councilman added. “At a time when our communities are desperate for healing, leadership, and real solutions, we are instead met with more division and finger-pointing. We cannot continue down this path of hate and violence.”

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced Wednesday a joint task force between state and local law enforcement that will crack down on violent crimes committed by repeat offenders throughout the Houston area. Credit: Office of the Governor

    Hours after the Dallas shooting, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said, “We will not let this cowardly attack impede our efforts to secure the border, enforce immigration law, and ensure law and order. The Texas Department of Public Safety and Texas National Guard will continue our work with the Department of Homeland Security and ICE to arrest, detain, and deport any individuals in this country illegally — without interruption.” 

    Abbott held a press conference in Houston on Wednesday, announcing the addition of state police to focus on repeat violent offenders. Neither Houston Mayor John Whitmire nor Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez was there, and those in attendance said the governor, a Republican, bashed Democratic judges for not being tough on crime. 

    Neil Aquino, founder of the Houston Democracy Project, said it was clear that “these additional state police are more resources for ICE as they terrorize the Latino working and laboring class and are more resources for Trump to enforce the suspension of civil liberties.” 

    Espinosa spoke to the Houston Press prior to Abbott’s press conference but said he expected it would result in more people getting turned over to ICE.

    “The Trump administration has made it very clear that because ICE is funded by the Department of Defense that they will not back down in terms of escalating their deportation machine,” he said. “In fact, the opposite has happened. When everybody is worrying about what’s next for our country, they have kept their focus on going after hard-working immigrant people.” 

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • 22 people found dead in Houston-area bayous this year

    [ad_1]



    22 people found dead in Houston-area bayous this year – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    Officials say six bodies have been found in Houston’s bayous in just two weeks. Records show at least 22 bodies found in Houston bayous so far this year. CBS News national reporter Karen Hua has more details.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • ACLU, other groups sue to block Texas’ DEI ban on K-12 public schools

    [ad_1]

    The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and a group of LGBTQ+ and student rights organizations are suing to block a new state law that would ban diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in K-12 public schools.

    In a lawsuit filed last month in federal court, attorneys from the ACLU of Texas and Transgender Law Center argued that Senate Bill 12 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Equal Access Act. Gov. Greg Abbott signed the legislation last June, and it will go into effect Sept. 1 alongside an array of other transformative laws for public education in Texas.

    “Senate Bill 12 is a blatant attempt to erase students’ identities and silence the stories that make Texas strong,” said Brian Klosterboer, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas. “Every student — no matter their race, gender, or background — deserves to feel seen, safe, and supported in school.”

    [Texas’ DEI bans: What to know about the term and the debate]

    Supporters of SB 12 say DEI programs use class time and public funds to promote political agendas, while opponents believe banning those initiatives will disproportionately harm marginalized students by removing spaces where they can find support.

    Here’s what you need to know about the effort to block the law.

    What the ban would do: Authored by Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, SB 12 prohibits public school districts from considering race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation in hiring decisions. The ban also bars schools from offering DEI training and programs, such as policies designed to reduce discrimination based on race or gender identity, except for when required by federal law.

    The law requires families to give written permission before their children can join any school club, and prohibits school groups created to support LGBTQIA+ students. Parents will be able to file complaints if they believe their schools are not complying with the DEI ban, and the law requires school districts to discipline employees who knowingly take part in DEI-related activities.

    Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Allen, said SB 12 builds on a 2021 state law barring public schools from teaching critical race theory, an academic discipline that explores how race and racism have influenced the country’s legal and institutional systems. While critical race theory is not taught in Texas public schools, the term has become a shorthand used by conservatives who believe the way some schools teach children about race is politically biased.

    DEI advocates say initiatives that promote diversity provide support for marginalized communities in workforce development and higher education, while critics say DEI practices give preference to people based on their race and ethnicity rather than on merit.

    What the lawsuit says: Attorneys from the ACLU and the Transgender Law Center are suing Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath and three school districts on behalf of a teacher, a student and her parent. They’re also representing the Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network and Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, two organizations that say they would be harmed by the ban. The ACLU amended the complaint in September, adding as plaintiffs the Texas American Federation of Teachers, another student and his parent.

    The suit calls SB 12 an “overzealous” attempt to ban DEI in public schools and argues that it censors constitutionally protected speech and restricts students’ freedom of association. It’s also vague and overly broad, the suit says.

    “S.B. 12 seeks to erase students’ identities and make it impossible for teachers, parents, and volunteers to tell the truth about the history and diversity of our state,” said Cameron Samuels, executive director at Students Engaged in Advancing Texas. “The law also guts vital support systems for Black, Brown, Indigenous, Asian, and LGBTQIA+ students and educators.”

    As part of the lawsuit, the Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network claims SB 12 singles out the organization by explicitly restricting student clubs based on “sexual orientation or gender identity,” language the group uses to describe the student organizations it sponsors at schools. That restriction harms the freedom of speech of the group and its members, the suit says. The Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network has chapters in Texas at more than a dozen school districts, according to the filing.

    Lawsuits against similar laws have had mixed results in the past.

    Because of SB 12’s ban on discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in classrooms, opponents have compared it to Florida’s “don’t say gay” law, which attracted widespread media attention in 2022 due to its far-reaching impacts in public schools. Civil rights lawyers sued to block it, saying the law violated free speech and the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. But a federal judge dismissed the case and said the plaintiffs had no legal standing and had failed to prove harm from the law. The attorneys ultimately agreed to a settlement with Florida education officials that clarified the law to allow discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in classrooms only if it’s not part of instruction.

    The Texas Education Agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The broader push against DEI: The DEI ban on K-12 schools comes two years after the Texas Legislature passed a similar ban for the state’s higher education institutions. Senate Bill 17 requires public universities to close their diversity offices, ban DEI training and restrict hiring departments from asking for diversity statements, or essays in which a job candidate expresses their commitment to promoting diversity in the workplace.

    [Texas’ DEI debate centers on a disagreement about whether programs perpetuate or prevent discrimination]

    Creighton, who also authored that bill, has warned higher education leaders that they could lose millions of dollars in state funding if they fail to comply with the law. Earlier this year, Abbott threatened Texas A&M University President Mark Welsh III’s job after claims spread online that Texas A&M was sending students and staffers to a conference that limited participation to people who are Black, Hispanic or Native American.

    At the national level, President Donald Trump has ordered all federal agencies to end “equity-related” practices and asked contractors to certify they do not promote DEI efforts. Trump also told schools and universities they would lose federal money if they do not eliminate diversity practices.

    Over the last five years, Texas and other Republican-led states have also taken other steps to abolish and ban DEI efforts in public education and the workforce. Similar to Trump, Abbott issued an executive order in January mandating that Texas agencies end all forms of DEI practices.

    “We must always reject race-based favoritism or discrimination and allow people to advance based on talent and merit,” Abbott said.

    Disclosure: ACLU Texas and Texas A&M University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.


    More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year’s lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of “CNN NewsNight”; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today!

    TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Turning Point USA Chapters Mourn Charlie Kirk’s Death

    [ad_1]

    Irony abounded in the life — and death — of Charlie Kirk.

    A small group of college students, including women, gathered on the University of Houston campus last week to mourn Kirk’s death. The conservative Christian activist was known for his political debates on university campuses, even though he believed college was a “scam,” and supported young women prioritizing marriage over higher education.

    Kirk mobilized youth to vote for a national leader, President Donald Trump, who was in his late 70s at the time of the 2024 election. And he was an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment right to bear arms, before he died September 10 by gun violence.

    Kirk, 31, was fatally shot while speaking at Utah Valley University. He founded Turning Point USA, a conservative movement that condemns “woke” DEI hiring practices, civil rights for transgender individuals, and abortion. He was known for his college campus tours at which he debated students with whom he disagreed. A TikTok page for his podcast, “The Charlie Kirk Show,” has almost 9 million followers.

    UH student David Cantu said he found Kirk on social media and wanted to join the movement. “He made a big impact on our youth,” Cantu said. “I think he would want us to continue on what he started. Even though he can’t finish it, we can continue on.”

    In addition to last week’s vigil at the University of Houston campus, a community-wide prayer service was held Sunday evening at Discovery Green in downtown Houston, hosted by the Republican consulting group Red State Solutions.

    But a lot of people didn’t like Charlie Kirk, and his death created a stir, with some on the progressive, or liberal, side implying that the activist created a hostile environment that led to his demise. Despite this, many Democratic leaders, including Houston and Harris County officials, condemned gun violence and the actions of Kirk’s suspected shooter, 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson, who was apprehended Friday.

    Journalist and Howard University professor Stacey Patton said last week she was on Charlie Kirk’s “hit list,” a database of educators that Turning Point USA believes “discriminate against conservative students, promote anti-American values and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom.”

    “His so-called ‘Professor Watchlist,’ run under the umbrella of Turning Point USA, is nothing more than a digital hit list for academics who dare to speak truth to power,” Patton wrote on Facebook. “I landed there in 2024 after writing commentary that inflamed the MAGA faithful. And once my name went up, the harassment machine roared to life.”

    The professor said some educators received death threats; others lost their jobs or left universities because of the harassment. She said Kirk “demonized LGBTQ people, mocked gun violence survivors, spewed racism, and pushed policies that shorten lives.”

    “And now, in the wake of his shooting, there’s all this national outpouring of mourning, moments of silence, yellow prayer hands, and tributes painting him as a civil debater,” Patton said. “But the truth is that Kirk and his foot soldiers spent years terrorizing educators, trying to silence us with harassment and fear.”

    Kirk supporters called the shooting a political assassination and characterized the conservative leader as a martyr who died spreading the teachings of Jesus in civil, respectful debate. Several people shared stories of how their children admired Kirk and young boys wore coats and ties to middle school in Kirk’s honor on the day after his death.

    click to enlarge

    Students and Charlie Kirk supporters planted flags outside the Memorial Student Center on September 11.

    Photo by April Towery

    Trump said Kirk would receive a Presidential Medal of Freedom and ordered flags lowered through the weekend. The President took the same action in August following a school shooting in Minnesota, but didn’t order flags lowered when Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, was assassinated in June, prompting critics to say Trump was engaging in “selective patriotism.”

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott offered his condolences and called for prayer for Kirk’s family.

    “Charlie’s voice was a beacon for millions of young Americans searching for truth, courage, and conviction,” Abbott said in a statement. “This senseless act of violence has no place in America. Our prayers are with Charlie’s family and his loved ones, especially the two young children he leaves behind. Texas stands with them in mourning and in honoring Charlie’s enduring legacy.”

    A quote from Kirk in April 2023 saying that he supported the right to bear arms was widely shared on social media.

    “I think it’s worth it,” Kirk said in a social media post more than two years ago. “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”

    The University of Houston has a student chapter of Turning Point USA with about 20 active members. On the day of Kirk’s death, however, UH chapter president Jordyn Hackner said her phone was flooded with calls from people who wanted to join or offer assistance.

    “Yesterday was a really tough day,” Hackner, a sophomore, told a reporter before the vigil in Kirk’s honor. Students said they’d been instructed by Turning Point USA not to speak to the media about the circumstances surrounding Kirk’s death, but many spoke openly about his legacy and wept during the vigil.

    “I didn’t have the honor to meet Charlie or show him what our chapter looks like but we hope to pass on his legacy,” Hackner said as she broke down in tears.

    Texas Youth Summit founder Christian Collins led the group in prayer. The annual Texas Youth Summit is set for September 19 and 20 in The Woodlands and will feature Collins, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt, all Republicans, as speakers.

    Collins said Kirk was silenced by a shooter who was afraid of the truth. Kirk’s ideas weren’t outrageous, Collins said. He believed in two genders: man and woman. He probably would have become president one day, Collins added.

    “They took his life because millions of young people were listening to him,” Collins said. “I would say there was nobody who did more with young people in the history of our nation, especially with the Republican Party, than Charlie Kirk. He’s the reason, I think, that President Trump won the 2024 election. It’s because young men loved Charlie Kirk and they looked up to him. That’s their hero.”

    click to enlarge

    Christian Collins, founder of Texas Youth Summit, spoke to students at the University of Houston campus last week. Also pictured is UH student David Cantu.

    Photo by April Towery

    Past president of the UH Turning Point chapter Lauren Corrales broke down in tears as she described meeting Kirk and praying with him.

    Although college campus tours were his battleground, Kirk and his wife Erika made an appearance earlier this year at a Young Women’s Leadership Summit in Dallas, covered by the New York Times. Deemed “Trump World rock stars,” by the Times, the Kirks advised about 3,000 young women at the conference on finding a husband and raising Christian children.

    “I must have missed it in Matthew — which is, Go forth and become CEO of a shoe company,” Kirk reportedly told the audience. He asked attendees whether their “daily purpose for being” was finding a husband and instructed the room that “every hand should go up.”

    click to enlarge

    University of Houston students prepared a memorial for Charlie Kirk on September 11.

    Photo by April Towery

    Some in attendance were surprised by the appearance of Texas Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, a graduate of UH and a leadership consultant and former educator, at the conference where women were told to stay home and have babies. Shortly after the gathering, Angela Paxton filed for divorce from her husband, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

    At the September 11 memorial event on UH campus, Collins encouraged the college students to keep speaking out on what they believe in.

    “Conservatives are sometimes divided, but everyone in the conservative movement respected Charlie Kirk,” Collins said. “When there is a terrorist attack, people tend to curl up in a ball and cry. What Charlie Kirk would want is for us to keep fighting the good fight.”

    “We are in a war in this country. It is a spiritual and political war, and it is a cultural war,” he added. “We have to win. We need crusaders for truth. We need leaders who are not afraid. We cannot live in fear. We have to fight back.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • Gov. Abbott Awards $7.9M In Grants To Gulf Coast Veteran Service Groups

    [ad_1]

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced that 38 veteran service organizations across Southeast Texas will receive more than $7.9 million in state grants.

    The funding will provide services to over 5,200 veterans and their families across 13 counties.

    “In Texas, we will always stand with the brave men and women who selflessly fought for the freedom and liberties we enjoy today,” Abbott said in a news release. “This over $7.9 million in grants will provide crucial services and financial support for our veterans and their families in the Gulf Coast and Houston so they can lead successful lives in our great state.”

    The Texas Veterans Commission (TVC) administers the Funds for Veterans’ Assistance (FVA) grants as part of its statewide tour. Commissioner Kevin Barber, a TVC vice chair and Army veteran, presented the awards at Easter Seals of Greater Houston.

    “The Gulf Coast is home to one of the highest concentrations of veterans not only in Texas, but the country, and it is our responsibility as their state advocates to link them to local resources,” Barber said. “I sincerely thank each of our award recipients for serving our veterans.”

    Major recipients include Harris County, which received $695,000 for financial assistance and peer support services. The United States Veterans Initiative secured $650,000 for financial assistance and clinical counseling programs.

    Several organizations received $350,000 each, including Family Service Center of Houston, Houston Habitat for Humanity, and the PTSD Foundation of America. The grants fund services ranging from emergency aid to legal help and mental health counseling.

    Fort Bend County will use its $200,000 allocation for counseling and financial assistance. Montgomery County received $305,000 to support its Veterans Treatment Court and provide direct financial aid to veterans.

    Since May, Texas has distributed a record $46.3 million through more than 200 grants to 175 organizations. These programs are projected to serve nearly 40,000 veterans, dependents, and surviving spouses.

    The FVA program has awarded more than $359 million through over 1,600 grants since 2009. Funding comes from Texas Lottery games dedicated to veteran support, along with donations from vehicle registrations and hunting and fishing licenses.

    Veterans seeking assistance can find local organizations and contact information at tvc.texas.gov/fund. The grants support five categories: General Assistance, Housing for Texas Heroes, Veterans Mental Health, Veterans Treatment Courts, and Veteran County Service Officers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas lawmakers pass bill that curbs mailing of abortion pills into the state

    [ad_1]




































    Texas bill targets abortion pill shipments



    New Texas bill would allow lawsuits over shipping abortion pills

    04:11

    The Texas state Senate passed a bill Wednesday that would allow private citizens to sue physicians and distributors who mail abortion pills into the state. The measure now goes to Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who is expected to sign it into law.

    The legislation, which was approved with an 18-9 vote, also prohibits the manufacturing of abortion drugs in Texas.

    It would be the first law of its kind in the country and is part of the ongoing effort by abortion foes to fight the broad use of the pills, which women turn to for the majority of abortions in the U.S.  

    The measure includes manufacturers, digital networks and delivery companies among those who could be sued.

    Winning plaintiffs would receive as much as $100,000 in damages. 

    Hospitals and pregnant women would not be subject to any suits under the legislation.

    Existing Texas law lets citizens sue providers or anyone who helps someone obtain an abortion. But it doesn’t specifically target providers from outside Texas who send the pills — a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol — by mail.

    Texas has a strict abortion ban in place that has narrow exceptions related to the life and health of the mother. The new legislation allows the provision and use of abortion drugs for medical emergencies such as ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages.

    A report released by the Society of Family Planning in May 2024 found that about 8,000 women a month were obtaining abortion medications through the mail in 14 states where the procedure is restricted.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton previously sued a New York doctor who provided abortion drugs to a Lone Star State resident, but shield laws in states with more permissive abortion laws protect parties prescribing abortion pills — making for messy legal battles.

    The new Texas bill is sure to spark a new round of legal battles over whether laws from one state can be enforced in other states.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bill overhauling disaster emergency response misses final approval in Texas Senate

    [ad_1]

    Efforts to overhaul local emergency response to disasters failed after the Texas Senate concluded its business early Thursday without taking up a bill that would have mandated new training and licensing requirements.

    Senate Bill 2 would have created license requirements for local emergency coordinators, initiated registration requirements for disaster volunteers and established a mass-casualty disaster training program for certain justices of the peace. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who leads the upper chamber, did not state on the Senate floor why the bill was not taken up before the chamber adjourned Thursday morning.

    SB 2 was one of several bills aimed at remedying problems made evident during the July 4 floods, in which more than 130 people were killed and dozens of homes and businesses were destroyed. The Legislature passed House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1 on Wednesday night, which would create new requirements and restrictions for camps operating in or near floodplains. SB 2 had already received initial approval from the Senate in August, but underwent changes in the House that the two chambers disagreed on.

    Representatives in the House added amendments that allowed counties to be reimbursed by the state comptroller’s office for helicopter use during certain disasters and give emergency coordinators more input on proposals for transmission lines built in floodplains. Lawmakers from both chambers needed to agree on a new, final version, or have the Senate agree to the House changes before the bill could be sent to Gov. Greg Abbott for signing.

    With both chambers adjourned, Abbott would have to call a third special session for any of the proposals in SB 2 to be heard again. Abbott has not given any immediate indication as to whether a third special session would occur.


    More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year’s lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of “CNN NewsNight”; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today!

    TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Legislature approves stiff penalties, fundraising limits for lawmakers who leave state to block bills

    [ad_1]

    Texas Republican lawmakers on Wednesday evening adopted a package of sharper penalties and new fundraising restrictions for members who leave the state to freeze legislative action, in a bid to deter future standoffs like what ensued when House Democrats absconded last month to delay passage of a new congressional map.

    The array of new punishments includes a proposal to severely curtail how much lawmakers can fundraise should they leave Texas to deny their chamber the headcount required to conduct business. Under House Bill 18, absent members and their legislative caucuses will be prohibited from accepting daily political contributions beyond their per diem allocation — currently $221 a day, as set by the Texas Ethics Commission — and barred from spending any campaign cash on travel, food or lodging related to their out-of-state trip.

    The measure passed the lower chamber Tuesday and was whisked through the Senate and on to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk late just after midnight Thursday.

    Meanwhile, the Texas House also adopted new rules Wednesday that impose a handful of harsher punishments for lawmakers who break quorum, including erasing two years of legislative seniority for each day lawmakers are absent, starting after they miss three consecutive days of legislative business. The changes also include higher daily fines for lawmakers who flee the state and a new provision stripping them of committee leadership appointments.

    The new rules are largely symbolic and aimed squarely at future quorum breaks, as Democrats have returned from their August protest against congressional redistricting. And the Legislature already passed the reconfigured map — ordered by President Donald Trump to secure the GOP more seats in the U.S. House — which was recently signed into law by Abbott and now faces legal challenges.

    House members adopt rules anew at the beginning of each regular session on odd-numbered years. After Democrats left the state to delay a package of GOP voting restrictions in 2021, the House held off on updating the rules until 2023, by which time tensions had mellowed out.

    House GOP hardliners for weeks urged state leaders to castigate Democrats for what they characterize as an abandonment of their duties, though the state Constitution permits quorum breaks.

    “I think these penalties are reasonable,” Rep. Cody Vasut of Angleton, the rules package author, said Wednesday night. “I think they are strong to help deter a future quorum break.”

    The calls for retribution were answered in short order. After Democrats returned and the House approved the new district lines, Abbott — who decides which topics can be considered during special sessions — expanded his agenda, giving lawmakers permission to enact the stiffer penalties.

    Such legislation was needed, Abbott said at the time, “to ensure that rogue lawmakers cannot hijack the important business of Texans.”

    On the House floor this week, Republican Rep. Matt Shaheen of Plano, the author of the fundraising restriction bill, argued that current law creates a financial incentive for members to protest with their absence, pointing to fundraising efforts touting the Democrats’ departure.

    Democrats cast the penalties — particularly the new House rules — as vindictive and unnecessarily punitive.

    In opposition speeches, they noted the “outside influences” — nodding to Vasut’s wording — that nudged the GOP into mid-decade redistricting. Some struck a defiant tone, arguing that voters could kick them out of office at the polls if they disapproved of their quorum breaking.

    “When politicians change the rules of the game, it’s because they know they’re losing,” Houston Rep. Gene Wu, the House Democratic Caucus leader, said in a statement. “By breaking quorum, we exposed the corrupt deal between Trump and Abbott to rig Texas’ congressional maps, and turned it into a national movement.”

    The fundraising clampdown sailed through the GOP-dominated Senate, though some Republicans who supported the measure said it would not solve the issue at hand, bemoaning that it stopped short of the upper chamber’s more aggressive approach of barring lawmakers from fundraising altogether during special sessions. That moratorium is already in place for the Legislature’s 140-day regular sessions that take place every other year.

    During a Senate committee hearing Wednesday, Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, noted that quorum breaks generally do not happen on the spur of the moment and instead are preceded by weeks of chatter and planning, during which it will still be legal for lawmakers to raise money. Hall ultimately voted to advance the measure as part of a 9-1 committee vote.


    More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year’s lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of “CNN NewsNight”; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today!

    TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas redistricting maps are racially biased, civil rights advocates claim in lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Civil rights advocates on Tuesday filed a lawsuit to overturn a redistricting map expected to favor Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections, saying it weakens the electoral influence of Black voters.

    The NAACP and the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law filed the lawsuit in Texas.

    They accuse Texas legislative leaders of engaging in gerrymandering to prevent Black voters from electing candidates of their choice.

    “The state of Texas is only 40% white, but white voters control over 73% of the state’s congressional seats,” Derrick Johnson, President and CEO of the NAACP, said in a statement. “It’s quite obvious that Texas’s effort to redistrict mid-decade, before next year’s midterm elections, is racially motivated. The state’s intent here is to reduce the members of Congress who represent Black communities, and that, in and of itself, is unconstitutional.”

    Since the Voting Rights Act was adopted, the state of Texas has been found to have discriminated against Black and/or Brown citizens after every cycle of redistricting, according to the NAACP.

    Accusations of racism dominate Texas debate over redistricting

    Democrats and Republicans accused each other of racism during their debate last week in the Texas House over the new congressional maps.

    Last Monday, the Texas House established a quorum for the first time in two weeks after Democrats left the state to block the new maps. That set the stage for the bill to come to the House floor. Democrats accused Republicans of violating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. 

    The Justice Department says on its website that section two of the Voting Rights Act prohibits “discrimination in voting applies nationwide to any voting standard, practice, or procedure that results in the denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.” Republicans insisted they followed this law. 

    “Once again, Republicans continue to make power grabs on the back of Black and brown communities,” said Rep. Venton Jones, D-Dallas. “We fought for one of the most important issues we have as Texans, and that’s our right to vote. We’re going to still continue to fight. We’re going to take this to the courts.”

    Rep. Katrina Pierson, R-Rockwall, who is Black and represents a majority white district, rejected Democrats’ accusations during an interview with CBS News Texas. 

    “It’s victimization all day, every day,” said Pierson. “There’s no account for values, and that’s what’s most important. People of Texas have spoken in the last several cycles. Minority voters are turning Republican, and that is how this map is drawn. It’s perfectly legal. Of course, they are going to take us to court, but we will win.”

    After eight hours of debate last Wednesday, the House approved the new maps by an 88-52 margin along party lines. 

    Representative Ann Johnson, D-Houston, scolded Republicans. 

    “This is about racism, and if you can’t hear it from them, then hear it from me as a white woman and a daughter of a man of privilege. To stand here as a 50-year-old woman and know that we’re going back in time. So, let’s talk about cowardice and cheats,” she said.  

    Pierson fired back at Democrats. 

    “The racist rhetoric is old. It is seriously stale and long overplayed. News flash: Democrats do not own minorities in Texas. Republicans are the majority, so it’s not the people of Texas who are racist. It is you,” said Pierson. 

    Texas redistricting map approved amid political tensions

    Texas lawmakers approved the map Saturday, creating five new districts favoring Republicans. The move came after President Donald Trump requested it.  

    “The five new Republican majority-leaning seats we believe for all the right reasons, legal reasons, and the right reasons politically that our state deserves those additional five seats because this state has changed dramatically,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick recently said to CBS News Texas

    The effort by President Trump and Texas’ Republican-majority Legislature that prompted state Democrats to hold a two-week walkout also kicked off a redistricting effort in California, with other Democrat-led states hinting that they may follow suit. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and California Democratic state lawmakers are moving forward with a November special election to put a new congressional map before the voters that could help Democrats gain five seats. California Republican lawmakers say they are suing to stop that from happening. 

    Republican Sen. Phil King, the Texas measure’s sponsor, previously denied accusations alleging that the redrawn districts violate the Voting Rights Act by diluting voters’ influence based on race.

    “I had two goals in mind: That all maps would be legal and would be better for Republican congressional candidates in Texas,” he said.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who has not yet signed the map into law, has predicted it will survive any court challenges. Abbott also has predicted other Republican-led states will make similar moves seeking new seats for the GOP in Congress.

    Texas Democrats have said that once Abbott signs the bill into law, they will file a lawsuit against the state.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Republicans take victory lap after redistricting vote, Democrats vow to fight back

    [ad_1]

    Texas Republicans took a victory lap after an early morning vote Saturday that sought to give their party an edge during the 2026 midterms. Democrats in Texas plan to challenge the legality of the new congressional map, saying it dilutes the power of minorities. Willie James Inman has the details.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Senate set to vote on GOP redistricting plan that sparked weeks-long House standoff

    [ad_1]

    The Texas Senate began its session Friday morning debating a controversial GOP redistricting bill that triggered a weeks-long House standoff.

    The Republican-backed proposal, which passed the House in an 88-52 party-line vote on Wednesday, aims to redraw the state’s congressional map and produce five new GOP-leaning districts.

    The Texas Senate Committee on Redistricting advanced the bill Thursday with a vote along party lines.

    It’s unclear whether the Democrats in the Texas Senate will try to delay the vote by breaking quorum themselves. When a similar redistricting bill passed the Senate during the first special session, all but two Democrats walked out of the chamber in protest. If all 11 Democrats are absent, Republicans would be one senator shy of a quorum.

    Once approved by the Republican majority in the full Senate, the bill will head to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk for his signature. 

    Democrats have vowed to challenge the legality of the new map in court, arguing it undermines fair representation and dilutes minority voting power.

    California launches counter-redistricting plan

    The Texas redistricting plan has sparked a nationwide fight over political boundaries.

    Earlier this year, President Trump asked Abbott to call a special session so lawmakers could create additional Republican districts, the New York Times reported. The unusual mid-decade redistricting was meant to help the GOP retain its narrow majority in the House of Representatives after the 2026 midterm elections. 

    The president’s party almost always loses seats in Congress in the midterms, according to historical data. Democrats gained 41 House seats and the majority in 2018, Mr. Trump’s first term, and Republicans picked up 9 seats to claim the majority in 2022, during President Biden’s term.

    Texas House Democrats fled the state for two weeks do deny a mandatory quorum in the House, killing the the first special session and visiting blue states to drum up support. They returned earlier this week, allowing the votes to proceed.

    During that time, California Gov. Gavin Newsom joined the fight, introducing a new congressional map to flip five of California’s seats from Republican to Democratic. Voters will need to approve the plan in a special election called for the fall.

    Newsom said the move was necessary to “fight fire with fire” and prevent what he called a Trump-backed attempt to rig the 2026 midterm elections.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • When the White House calls, do state lawmakers listen?

    [ad_1]

    On the eve of the Texas House voting on a new congressional map, President Donald Trump ordered his “Republican friends” in the state legislature to get it to Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk “ASAP.”

    They’re taking heed — the state House passed the map on Wednesday and the state Senate is expected to do so this evening, just days after Democrats ended their out-of-state protest and returned to Austin — clearing the way for passage by the end of the week. Trump’s direct message to Texas Republicans is the president applying his standard pressure campaign playbook that has worked on Capitol Hill to a new audience: state lawmakers.

    When Trump wants something, he’ll often directly ask for it himself. And the president really wants to see GOP states take up mid-decade redistricting to carve out more Republican seats.

    Texas Republicans, including Abbott, initially didn’t want to take on the gambit. But the White House forced their hand, setting off a redistricting arms race across the country that Republicans are well-positioned to win. Should states like Indiana, Missouri and Florida move forward with mid-decade mapmaking, Republicans could pick up as many as 10 new seats ahead of the midterms, and it’s unclear at this point if any Democratic-led states beyond California will jump in to blunt the GOP advantages.

    Indiana is the latest target of the White House’s political operation, and Trump’s allies are even making the unusual consideration of backing primaries to Indiana state lawmakers who won’t accept the mission — an unusually direct involvement from a president in a state legislature. Some Indiana Republicans have expressed public resistance to falling in line — like state Rep. Ed Clere, who told POLITICO that “under no circumstances will I vote for a new map.”

    Clere, a longtime member from Southern Indiana, said he doesn’t want to see emergency special sessions called unnecessarily, and he believes too many procedural and legal hurdles stand in the way. “What Texas and California are doing is simply wrong for America,” he said. “It is the political equivalent of the cold war concept of MAD — mutually assured destruction. Indiana needs to take the high road.”

    Democrats are mostly powerless to respond to the White House’s intrusion into state legislatures. “I cannot recall another time that this has happened,” said Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which works to elect Democrats to state legislatures. “At the core here, the president is pressuring these lawmakers to change the maps, because that is the only way that Republicans can win.”

    Indiana Gov. Mike Braun has put the onus on the legislature to take up redistricting. While legislative leaders have not revealed their plans, the pressure campaign is working on the congressional delegation, which one by one has come forward in support. And state lawmakers have been summoned to a White House meeting Aug. 26, according to invitations reviewed by POLITICO, where redistricting will likely be top of the agenda.

    Another state that is surely on the White House’s radar: Ohio, which — unlike the handful of states choosing to remake their maps — is required under state law to redraw its map ahead of 2026. The White House may apply similar pressure to Buckeye Republicans to go for a maximalist approach, as Republicans there debate whether to carve out two or three seats during their process.

    “You have to appreciate the hands-on engagement,” said Indiana Republican strategist Marty Obst, who predicted that Indiana will convene a special session on redistricting. “If [state lawmakers] know that the White House is active, and they know for the president himself this is a top priority, it’s going to be very hard for them not to carry that out.”

    Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal judge blocks Texas law requiring Ten Commandments displayed in public school classrooms

    [ad_1]

    A federal district court in Texas temporarily blocked a new state law on Wednesday that would have required public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom.

    U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery issued a preliminary injunction in Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, ruling that Texas Senate Bill 10, set to take effect Sept. 1, likely violates both the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.

    The lawsuit was originally filed in late June by several families after Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 10 into law. Parents argued the measure intruded on their rights to guide their children’s religious education and forced religious mandates in public classrooms.

    The ruling halts school districts from implementing the measure, which mandated a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom.

    Federal judge in Texas cites First Amendment concerns

    In his decision, Biery wrote that requiring the displays could amount to unconstitutional religious coercion, pressuring students into religious observance and suppressing their own beliefs.

    “[T]he displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State’s favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school,” Biery stated.

    Plaintiffs and ACLU advocates welcome decision

    The plaintiffs included Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious families with children in Texas public schools. They were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and pro bono counsel from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

    Plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan called the decision a win for parents’ rights: “Children’s religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools.”

    Heather L. Weaver, senior counsel for the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, said the ruling protects inclusivity in schools. “Public schools are not Sunday schools,” Weaver said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump urges Texas Republicans to swiftly pass redistricting maps while Newsom, California Dems counter

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Major votes are on tap this week in the Texas and California legislatures in the high-stakes battle between Republicans and Democrats over congressional redistricting ahead of next year’s midterm elections.

    In Austin, Texas, the GOP-dominated state House of Representatives on Wednesday resumes meeting amid a second straight special session called by conservative Republican Gov. Greg Abbott.

    At the top of their to-do list as they return to work is passing a GOP-crafted redistricting map that would create up to five Republican-leaning congressional districts at the expense of currently Democrat-controlled seats. Republicans currently control 25 of the state’s 38 U.S. House seats. 

    “Please pass this Map, ASAP. THANK YOU TEXAS,” President  Donald Trump wrote in a social media post on Monday.

    REDISTRICTING BATTLE: FLEEING TEXAS DEMOCRATS RETURN HOME

    Texas Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows strikes the gavel as the House calls a Special Session with a quorum, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo – Eric Gay)

    The Republican push in Texas, which comes at Trump’s urging, is part of a broader effort by the GOP across the country to pad their razor-thin House majority to keep control of the chamber in the 2026 midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.

    Trump and his political team are aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House, when Democrats stormed back to grab the House majority in the 2018 midterm elections.

    Republicans in red state Texas enjoy a supermajority in the legislature and the state Senate passed the new congressional maps last week, during the first special legislative session.

    TEXAS HOUSE SPEAKER VOWS RUNAWAY DEMS WILL BE ARRESTED IF THEY TRY TO SNEAK HOME OVER WEEKEND

    But dozens of Texas Democratic state representatives fled the state to prevent a quorum in the Texas House, effectively preventing Abbott and Republicans from moving forward with new maps. 

    Many of the Democrats who had fled the state returned on Monday, and made it to the state capitol building as the House reconvened. They were cheered by supporters as they arrived.

    Supporters for the returning Texas democrats chant as members enter the house at the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025.

    Supporters for the returning Texas democrats chant as members enter the house at the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Stephen Spillman))

    But with Republicans outnumbering Democrats 88-62 in the state House, the new maps are expected to pass when lawmakers return on Wednesday.

    “Let me also be clear about where we go from here. We are done waiting, and we have quorum. Now is the time for action,” Republican Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said on Monday.

    During the walkout, Abbott and Republican state attorney general Ken Paxton sued to try and remove some of the absent Democratic lawmakers from office. Meanwhile, GOP Sen. John Cornyn worked to get the FBI’s help in tracking down the AWOL lawmakers. And Burrows issued civil arrest warrants and also pledged to fine the lawmakers $500 per day.

    The fleeing Democrats, who set up camp in the blue states of Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, late last week signaled that they would return to Texas after the adjournment of the first special session, and after Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other top California Democrats unveiled their playbook to counter the push by Trump and Republicans to enact rare – but not unheard of – mid-decade congressional redistricting.

    The end of the walkout by the Democrats will lead to the passage of the new maps, but Texas Democrats vow they’ll fight the new state maps in court and say the moves by California are allowing them to pass “the baton.”

    CALIFORNIA UNVEILS NEW CONGRESSONAL MAPS TO WIPE OUT FIVE GOP-CONTROLLED SEATS AND COUNTER TRUMP

    While the Republican push in Texas to upend the current congressional maps doesn’t face constitutional constraints, Newsom’s path in California is much more complicated.

    The governor is moving to hold a special election this year, to obtain voter approval to undo the constitutional amendments that created the non-partisan redistricting commission. A two-thirds majority vote in the Democrat-dominated California legislature would be needed to hold the referendum.

    Democrats in Sacramento on Monday unveiled a bill to move forward with the referendum.

    California Democratic state lawmakers push congressional redistricting plan

    California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas announces a legislative package to advance a partisan effort to redraw California congressional map at a press conference on Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, in Sacramento, Calif (AP Photo/Tran Nguyen)

    “California and Californians have been uniquely targeted by the Trump Administration, and we are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power — pursuing more extreme and unpopular policies,” Newsom said Monday in a statement.

    The Democrat-dominated legislature is expected to approve the referendum on Thursday. The maps the Democrats unveiled late last week,  would create up to five more left-leaning congressional districts at the expense of the Republican minority in heavily blue California.

    “Here we are in open and plain sight before one vote is cast in the 2026 midterm election and here [Trump] is once again trying to rig the system,” Newsom charged on Thursday.

    Last week’s appearance by Newsom, who is considered a likely contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, also served as a fundraising kickoff to raise massive amounts of campaign cash needed to sell the redistricting push statewide in California. 

    Gavin Newsom speaks

    Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California speaks during a congressional redistricting event on Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.  (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli )

    The non-partisan redistricting commission, created over 15 years ago, remains popular with most Californians, according to public opinion polling.

    That’s why Newsom and California Democratic lawmakers are promising not to scrap the commission entirely, but rather replace it temporarily by the legislature for the next three election cycles.

    But Republican former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who represented a congressional district in California’s Central Valley for 17 years, argued in an appearance on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” that “when you think about how they drew these lines, there wasn’t one hearing. There is no debate. There’s no input. Even the legislature in California doesn’t have input. The DCCC is just ending it. That is why we need to stop Newsom’s power grab.”

    McCarthy, who is helping to lead the GOP fundraising effort to counter Newsom and California Democrats leading up to the likely referendum this fall, said that “November 4th will be the election that people could actually have a say,” as he pointed to polls showing strong support for the current non-partisan redistricting commission.

    A handful of California Republican state lawmakers on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in the state Supreme Court to stop the proposed redistricting reform.

    And the push to temporarily replace the commission is also being opposed by other high-profile Republicans. Among the most visible is former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the last Republican elected governor in Democrat-dominated California.

    Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger opposes moves in his home state of California and in Texas to implement mid-decade congressional redistricting

    Hollywood movie star and former Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California opposes the push to temporarily replace the Golden State’s non-partisan redistricting commission. (Tristar Media/WireImage)

    The longtime Hollywood action star says he’s mobilizing to oppose the push by Newsom to temporarily scrap the state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission.

    “I’m getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,” Schwarzenegger wrote in a social media post Friday, which included a photo of the former professional bodybuilding champion lifting weights.

    Schwarzenegger, who rose to worldwide fame as the star of the film “The Terminator” four decades ago, wore a T-shirt in the photo that said “terminate gerrymandering.”

    Schwarzenegger spokesperson Daniel Ketchell told Politico earlier this month that “he calls gerrymandering evil, and he means that. He thinks it’s truly evil for politicians to take power from people.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    “He’s opposed to what Texas is doing, and he’s opposed to the idea that California would race to the bottom to do the same thing,” Ketchell added.

    Schwarzenegger, during his tenure as governor, had a starring role in the passage of constitutional amendments in California in 2008 and 2010 that took the power to draw state legislative and congressional districts away from politicians and placed it in the hands of an independent commission.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas House Democrats return to Austin as Republicans resume redistricting effort

    [ad_1]

    The Texas House of Representatives gaveled in at noon Monday with Democratic members present, marking an official end to the quorum break that froze the Legislature for two weeks.

    Most of the House Democratic Caucus left the state earlier this month, denying the Republican majority the required attendance to conduct business. House rules require 100 members to be present; Republicans hold 88 seats.

    The Democratic quorum break was triggered by a Republican push to redraw the state’s U.S. House district maps that would net the GOP up to five more seats in the 2026 midterm elections. Last week, the absent lawmakers had signaled they were ready to return to Austin after Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ended a first special session and Democrats in California moved forward with a plan to respond.

    “Our return allows us to build the legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court, take our message to communities across the state and country, and inspire legislators across the country how to fight these undemocratic redistricting schemes in their own statehouses,” state Rep. Gene Wu, the Democratic leader, said in a statement issued Monday morning.

    As the House returned to business, the redistricting proposal and dozens of other bills were referred to their respective committees. The redistricting committee is expected to meet on Tuesday. The Senate’s redistricting committee passed the proposed maps along party lines on Sunday evening. 

    Redistricting fight spreads

    Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans’ narrow U.S. House majority to avoid losing control of the chamber, and with it, prospects for Trump’s conservative agenda in the later part of his term.

    It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census.

    In response to the efforts in Texas, California Democrats are also moving ahead with their own reshaping of congressional districts to counteract Texas, putting in motion a potentially widening and unusually timed redistricting battle nationwide.

    Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task.

    The nation’s two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties.

    Impact on midterm elections

    On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control.

    Texas’ maps would aim to give the GOP five more winnable seats.

    California Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — on Friday unveiled a proposal that could give Democrats there an additional five U.S. House seats. But any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Texas Democrats’ Remote Resistance

    [ad_1]

    When it came time for Mihaela Plesa, the vice-chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, to decide whether to flee the state with dozens of her fellow Democratic legislators, earlier this month, she felt torn. On the one hand, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, had proposed a radical plan to redraw the state’s congressional maps to favor Republicans. By leaving the state, Plesa and her colleagues could deprive the Texas House of the two-thirds quorum required to approve the maneuver. On the other hand, Plesa wondered how she would explain a step that could undercut the appeals to bipartisanship that had helped her win election in a politically divided district anchored in Plano, a Dallas suburb. She also was skeptical that escaping the state was a winning tactic. Any success in denying Republicans a quorum would almost certainly be temporary.

    As Plesa waffled, her husband put on the song “Should I Stay or Should I Go,” by the Clash. It was a joke, and they laughed, but one lyric resonated: “If I go, there will be trouble / And if I stay, it will be double.”

    Plesa went. That’s how she found herself at a union hall in a Chicago suburb the other day, standing in front of a large Lone Star flag, and attacking Abbott’s tactics as a “power grab.” The Governor’s move, undertaken at Donald Trump’s behest, was a clear ploy to help Republicans preserve their narrow majority in the House by increasing the likelihood of the Party capturing five additional congressional seats in the 2026 midterms. The redistricting was made even more controversial by the fact that it was happening long before the next census. “This is not just about Texas or Texans,” Plesa said in front of a battery of television cameras. “This is about the pillars of democracy as we know it.”

    More than fifty Democratic legislators decamped on August 3rd in what is known as a quorum break. (The tactic was first used in Texas in 1870 by thirteen state senators who objected to a Radical Republican plan to create a state militia and increase the governor’s powers in a time of lawlessness and anti-Black violence.) What started as an attempt to pressure Abbott into withdrawing the redistricting plan has since become a mission with all the subtlety of Paul Revere’s ride, as the Texas lawmakers shout a warning to all who will listen. “We’re no longer on the path to authoritarianism. We are there,” Representative Gina Hinojosa told me after flying from Chicago to Sacramento to meet with Gavin Newsom, the California governor, and other prominent Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi. “The only way that we have any hope of getting out of this is if every freedom-loving American does everything in their power to push back.”

    The plan was to stay out of Texas until August 19th, when Abbott’s thirty-day special session was scheduled to end. Plesa had packed a large suitcase, a smaller carry-on, and a work bag that included her cords and chargers; she’d brought contact numbers for constituent services and professional clothes for being in the public eye. She also had made sure to bring an intricately etched Romanian gold coin that once belonged to her grandmother, who had emigrated from Bucharest as Nicolae Ceauşescu consolidated one-party rule. To Plesa, recent moves by Abbott and Trump echoed stories that she had heard while growing up, and the coin telegraphed her grandmother’s spirit, helping to keep her grounded. “She was a little bit of a rabble-rouser and a rule-breaker,” Plesa said, “and she always told me, ‘Don’t make yourself smaller or softer for the world.’ ”

    The majority of the Texas Democrats had flown by charter plane to Illinois, and were bused to a conference center in St. Charles, about forty miles west of downtown Chicago, but Plesa had flown commercial to Albany, where she and several colleagues met with Kathy Hochul, New York’s Democratic governor. Plesa quickly discovered that the exodus was big news. She spoke at a press conference, seated beside Hochul, and appeared on several cable and network television shows. As a self-described “small-town politician out of Dallas,” she found it surreal. “I mean, people had heard of us,” she said. After she met the Reverend Al Sharpton and appeared on his radio show, she thought, “Oh, my God, this is insane.”

    Plesa then joined her colleagues in Illinois. She arrived late on August 5th and fell into her bed at the hotel where many of the Texas legislators were staying, only to wake early the next morning to a bomb threat that forced the evacuation of the building. “I always knew this was serious,” she said later, “but I never thought, Wow, my life is actually going to be in danger.” It was the first of two bomb threats, amid other forms of intimidation and harassment.

    Despite being away from home, the Texas Democrats say they have been working harder than ever. Plesa’s days have been dominated by media appearances and strategy sessions, twice-a-day remote meetings with her four staff members back in Texas, and conferences with two sets of attorneys, who offered advice when the Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit to declare thirteen Democratic seats vacant, including Plesa’s. Gene Wu, a Houston representative who chairs the Democratic caucus, pointed to the circles under his eyes and told me that he is sleeping no more than four hours a night. “Every five seconds, there’s either a crisis or another interview,” he said. “Everyone’s very, very tired.” He noted that the legislators are paid just seventy-two hundred dollars a year—“pre-tax,” he added—and “if they’re not at home, they’re not making money.”

    From the beginning, as Abbott criticized the departed Democrats as “derelict,” Plesa realized that she needed to make calls to constituents, to let them know “that I haven’t abandoned them.” She described what she was doing and why, telling her precinct chairs that Abbott had wrongly made redistricting his top priority after a call from Trump. Her pitch: “Are we working for the people of Texas or are we working for Donald Trump? We had nine hearings on redistricting. We had two on flooding. That tells you the priorities.” She pointed to the limited national attention given to the 2023 redistricting effort in North Carolina, which, in a narrowly divided state, turned a U.S. House of Representatives delegation of seven Republicans and seven Democrats into a G.O.P. majority of ten seats to four, enough to give control of the House to the Republicans. (Opponents are contesting the G.O.P. move in federal court.) “It’s like that famous quote—you know, ‘First they came for this group, and I said nothing,’ ” she told me.

    At the press conference at the union hall, Wu opened by laying out the latest developments: John Cornyn, the Republican U.S. senator from Texas, had announced that the F.B.I. would help locate the Democrats, and Paxton, who will challenge Cornyn in next year’s primary, had declared that he would seek their arrest. Wu called the moves “laughable.” Plesa pointed to Vice-President J. D. Vance’s trip to Indiana, where he lobbied Republicans to redistrict, and she noted the counterattack in Democratic-run states, such as an effort by Newsom to create new maps likely to produce five Democratic seats in California. (A few days later, Newsom confirmed that he will ask voters in a November special election to abandon the current maps for the next three congressional elections. “We cannot unilaterally disarm,” he said.)

    To demonstrate that the fight had grown beyond Texas, the lawmakers then directed their media audience to two large screens that showed a live stream of a press conference in California, where Newsom, Pelosi, and the Democratic leadership of the state legislature had just met with a half-dozen Texas lawmakers. Representative Ann Johnson, the first Texan to speak, warned of “the danger that is coming” by appeasing Trump, and drew a comparison that Plesa had also been making to reporters. “You-all remember,” Johnson said, “that Trump called Georgia and said, ‘Boys, I need eleven thousand votes.’ To their credit, those Republicans said, ‘No, we’re not doing that. That crosses a line.’ When Trump called Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Republicans and said, ‘Boys, I need you to steal five seats,’ they said, ‘Does July work for you?’ ”

    [ad_2]

    Peter Slevin

    Source link

  • Robert Roberson Does Not Appear Before House Committee on Monday

    Robert Roberson Does Not Appear Before House Committee on Monday

    [ad_1]

    At the start of Monday’s House committee on criminal jurisprudence hearing, state Rep. Joe Moody of El Paso said there was an “impressive” list of witnesses that would speak before the committee, but that Robert Roberson would not be one of them. Moody and Plano Rep. Jeff Leach issued the subpoena that many have called “unprecedented” shortly before Roberson was scheduled to be executed in Huntsville on Thursday night…

    [ad_2]

    Kelly Dearmore

    Source link

  • Wisconsin to vote on constitutional amendment barring noncitizens from voting

    Wisconsin to vote on constitutional amendment barring noncitizens from voting

    [ad_1]

    Voters in swing state Wisconsin will have another choice to make after casting their ballots for president in November — whether to explicitly bar foreign nationals from voting.

    At the bottom of the ballot is a statewide referendum authored by Republican legislators asking for permission to amend the state constitution to clearly prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in any election held in the state.

    Part of a GOP push across the country, the move was spurred by municipalities in a handful of states letting noncitizens vote in local elections. North Dakota, Alabama, Florida, Colorado, Ohio and Louisiana have all adopted the measure in recent years and it’s on the ballot in eight others, including Wisconsin, Iowa, Kentucky and Missouri.

    Republicans argue they’re trying to protect election integrity as immigrants pour over the southern border. Democrats and other opponents say the amendment has no practical effect — no Wisconsin municipalities allow noncitizens to vote — and is instead designed to draw conservatives to the polls and stoke anger against foreigners in the United States.

    “There is no problem with noncitizens voting,” said Jeff Mandell, an attorney with Law Forward, a nonprofit organization that advocates for voter rights. “It is the very definition of a solution in search of a problem.”

    According to the Pew Research Center, over 25 million people living in the U.S. in 2020 were not U.S. citizens. This included approximately 12 million permanent residents, as well as 2 million temporary residents visiting the U.S. as students, tourists, foreign workers and foreign officials. Pew’s figure also included approximately 11 million migrants living in the U.S. illegally.

    A 1996 federal law already makes it illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections.

    No state constitutions explicitly allow noncitizens to vote and many states have laws prohibiting them from voting in statewide races. State data also indicates voting by noncitizens is rare, although Republicans have highlighted voter registration reviews that turned up potential noncitizens.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said in August that over 6,500 potential noncitizens had been removed from the state’s voter rolls since 2021. Ohio Secretary of State Frank La Rose also said in August that he referred 138 apparent noncitizens found to have voted in a recent election for prosecution. And Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen has said that 3,251 people previously identified as noncitizens by the federal government have been deactivated on the state’s voter registration rolls.

    Multiple municipalities in California, Maryland and Vermont as well as the District of Columbia allow noncitizens to vote in some local elections such as school board and city council races. Republicans fear more jurisdictions could follow.

    Wisconsin’s constitution currently states that every U.S. citizen is a valid elector. The amendment would revise that language to say that only U.S. citizens can vote.

    State Rep. Tyler August, the amendment’s chief Assembly sponsor, said Wisconsin Republicans want to make “crystal clear” that foreign nationals can’t vote in the state.

    “While (the state constitution) says every U.S. citizen can vote, we want to make sure that can’t be interpreted to mean every U.S. citizen plus all these other folks,” August said. He acknowledged that noncitizens voting in other states drove the amendment.

    But August rejected arguments that the amendment discriminates against foreign nationals and is designed to draw conservatives to the polls — predicting that Republicans will still turn out “in droves” for former President Donald Trump.

    “It’s very clear,” August said. “If someone comes here legally and goes through the process and they’re granted U.S. citizenship, they’ll be able to vote. It’s got nothing to do with race or immigration.”

    An aide for Republican state Sen. Julian Bradley of New Berlin, the amendment’s chief sponsor, referred questions about it to August.

    Wisconsin constitutional amendments must pass two consecutive legislative sessions and a statewide referendum before they can take effect. Republican lawmakers passed the measure in 2022 and again last year without a single Democratic vote either time. Democratic Gov. Tony Evers has no role in approving constitutional amendments.

    Wisconsin Ethics Commission records show the only organization to register in favor of the amendment this session is Wisconsin Family Action, a conservative group that says it works to defend marriage, the family and religious liberty. Multiple organizations have registered in opposition, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the League of Women Voters.

    More than 30 organizations have also signaled opposition, including Law Forward, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities and immigrant rights group Voces de la Frontera. The groups in a September news release called the amendment a power grab that fosters discrimination and could lead to more anti-immigrant measures.

    “Not only is this statewide ballot question intentionally confusing, but it will create real harm,” the coalition said. “The proposed change in voter eligibility from ‘every’ citizen to ‘only’ citizens diminishes all of our voting rights. We urge Wisconsinites to vote no to preserve the constitutional guarantee that protects our freedom to vote from further infringement.”

    [ad_2]

    CBS Minnesota

    Source link