ReportWire

Tag: Charlie Kirk

  • Erika Kirk To Sit Down With Fox News’ Jesse Watters For First TV Interview Since Husband’s Assassination

    Fox News is expected to announce that Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk and new CEO of Turning Point USA, will sit down with Jesse Watters for her first TV interview since her husband’s assassination.

    The interview will air on at 8 p.m. on Nov. 5 on Jesse Watters Primetime. Kirk will discuss a range of topics, including the timeline of what happened the day her husband was killed and the future of Turning Point USA.

    Before the interview, Watters will go with Kirk to Turning Point USA’s Arizona headquarters and This Is The Turning Point tour stop at the University of Mississippi in Oxford on Oct. 29. Jesse Watters Primetime will be live on the Ole Miss campus for the event, with Kirk introducing Vice President JD Vance, who will debate and take student questions through the night. The full event will be streamed live on Fox Nation, followed by the premiere of a documentary series on Nov. 7 featuring behind-the-scenes footage with Kirk.

    Ted Johnson

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk Photos Included in a Cy-Fair ISD Candidates Mailer – Houston Press

    Aren’t school board elections supposed to be nonpartisan?

    That’s the question some Cypress-Fairbanks ISD residents asked when they got postcards in their mailboxes on Thursday featuring a photo of conservative Christian activist and Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk, who was murdered last month at a Utah college campus.

    “Keep crazy out of our schools!” the mailer states above the following bullet points:

    • Nationwide violence has escalated on the left, to the point of political assassinations.
    • It is the result of the leftist and Marxist takeover of our schools.
    • It is years and years of indoctrinating our kids to accept and normalize radical ideas. 
    • If you wouldn’t vote for a Democrat at state and national elections, why do it locally? 

    It’s an advertisement for incumbent Natalie Blasingame, former board member George Edwards Jr. and retired CFISD administrator Radele Walker, “the only candidates in this race endorsed by the Harris County GOP.” 

    This mailer was distributed to Cy-Fair ISD voters this week. Credit: Screenshot

    The mailpiece was paid for by the CyFair4Liberty Political Action Committee, led by Bill Ely. 

    Ely did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday mornin, nor did the slate of Republican candidates. 

    But those supporting challengers Lesley Guilmart, Cleveland Lane Jr. and Kendra Camarena, all of whom have voted in a Democratic primary but are identifying themselves as a “pro-public education” slate, had plenty to say. 

    “What does Charlie Kirk have to do with a school board election and why are they implying their opponents have something to do with it?” said Odus Evbagharu, a Cy-Fair ISD graduate and Democratic candidate for Texas House of Representatives. 

    The mailer also stirred some strong feelings in hardcore Republicans. 

    A former Harris County Republican Party precinct chair said in a text message to the Houston Press, “This is a new low. How can they desecrate Charlie Kirk and his image/memory? It is disparaging and insulting. I am literally feeling the same feelings I felt when I heard of [Kirk’s] assassination. This is inhumane and insensitive. Have they no morals or ethical boundaries?” 

    This mailer was distributed to Cy-Fair ISD voters this week. Credit: Screenshot

    A post in the Facebook group CFISD Parents for Librarians had more than three dozen comments early Friday morning. 

    “Teachers are not the enemy and to equate them as such and that they are the result of ‘nationwide violence’ is absolutely INSANE,” wrote Ashley Buckner, who posted photos of the mailer. 

    One commenter added, “That sure is a great use of the fear propaganda technique and a testimonial by putting Charlie Kirk on there. If I was still teaching, I would be saving this one as one of the mailers for the kids to analyze when teaching propaganda techniques.” 

    Another commenter pointed out that school boards are supposed to be nonpartisan. “Why do they keep using our children and teachers as the frontlines in their political war?” she asked.

    The Cy-Fair ISD board has been under fire since a conservative Christian majority led by Blasingame began last year supporting book bans, removing chapters from textbooks and trying to get chaplains installed at district campuses, which critics say blur the lines of separation of church and state. 

    In addition to the GOP-endorsed candidates and the pro-public education candidates, board president Scott Henry is also seeking re-election, running for Position 6 against Blasingame and Lane. Henry is backed by trustees Todd LeCompte, Justin Ray and Lucas Scanlon. Elecia Jones is running for Position 7 against Camarena and Walker. 

    The Harris County GOP endorsed the three candidates before the filing period ended and days prior to the publication of a Houston Press story in which Blasingame admitted she’d secretly recorded members of the community, prompting a board policy change that prohibits trustees from taping conversations with community members, district administrators and other trustees without the knowledge of all involved parties. 

    A GOP precinct chair proposed a resolution last month to revoke Blasingame’s endorsement, alleging the trustee brought shame upon the district, but rescinded the motion when she determined she didn’t have enough support from party officials for it to go through.  

    Earlier this week, Cy-Fair Republicans welcomed Gov. Greg Abbott and Senators Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, and Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, to a Cypress barbecue restaurant. At the event, Abbott said he wanted to turn Harris County “dark red.” Blasingame, Edwards and Walker attended the event, and Blasingame posted on Facebook on the day of the visit that a “YUGE endorsement announcement” would be forthcoming. 

    Abbott didn’t endorse any of the school board candidates but said his top two priorities are to win re-election in November 2026 and to win Harris County — and he’s willing to spend most of the $90 million in his coffers to do so. 

    Early voting continues through October 31. Election Day is November 4. 

    April Towery

    Source link

  • Vance blames left for political violence, omits long trends

    Following the September assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have shaped their political agenda by blaming the left for political violence.

    “Political violence, it’s just a statistical fact that it’s a bigger problem on the left,” Vance said while guest-hosting The Charlie Kirk Show podcast Oct. 15 in the aftermath of Kirk’s killing. About a minute later, he added, “Right now that violent impulse is a bigger problem on the left than the right.”

    A Vance spokesperson did not answer our questions. When referring to left-wing violence, a White House spokesperson recently pointed to a Sept. 28 Axios article about a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a nonprofit policy research organization.

    The study found that “2025 marks the first time in more than 30 years that left-wing terrorist attacks outnumber those from the violent far right.” The study also showed that for the 30 years before 2025, right-wing attacks had outpaced left-wing attacks.

    “The rise in left-wing attacks merits increased attention, but the fall in right-wing attacks is probably temporary, and it too requires a government response,” the study’s authors wrote.

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    Vance’s statement oversimplified political violence and drew from part of one study of a six-month period. The federal government has no single, official definition of “political violence” and ascribing ideologies such as left-wing and right-wing is sometimes complicated. There is no agreed upon number of left- or right-wing politically violent attacks. 

    Research before 2025 largely points to higher levels of right-wing violence over longer periods of time. 

    Trump has used the administration’s statements about rising left-wing violence to designate antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, and administration officials also said they will investigate what they call left-wing groups that fund violence.

    Although political violence is a small subset of violent crime in the U.S., it “has a disproportionate impact because even rare incidents can amplify fear, influence policy and deepen societal polarization,” University of Dayton sociology professors Arthur Jipson and Paul J. Becker wrote in September after Kirk’s assassination.

    In an email interview with PolitiFact, Becker said the report in question, “indicates there MAY be a shift occurring from the Right being more violent but 5 vs. 1 incidents in 6 months isn’t enough to completely erase years of data and reports from multiple sources showing the opposite or to dictate new policies.” 

    Study examined three decades of political violence 

    The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a national security and defense think tank, published a September report examining 750 terrorist attacks and plots in the U.S. between 1994 and July 4, 2025.

    The report defined terrorism as the use or threat of violence “with the intent to achieve political goals by creating a broad psychological impact.” 

    The authors wrote that it is difficult to pinpoint some perpetrators’ ideologies, which in some cases are more of what former FBI director Christopher Wray called a “salad bar of ideologies.” For example, Thomas Crooks, who attempted to assassinate Trump in 2024, searched the internet more than 60 times for Trump and then-President Joe Biden in the month before the attack. 

    The full CSIS report gave a more complete picture of politically motivated violence:

    • Left-wing violence has risen from low levels since 2016. “It has risen from very low levels and remains much lower than historical levels of violence carried out by right-wing and jihadist attackers.”

    • Right-wing attacks sharply declined in 2025, perhaps because right-wing extremist grievances such as opposition to abortion, hostility to immigration and suspicion of government agencies are “embraced by President Trump and his administration.” The report quotes Enrique Tarrio, the former Proud Boys leader pardoned by Trump, who said, “Honestly, what do we have to complain about these days?”

    • Left-wing attacks have been less deadly than right-wing attacks. In the past decade, left-wing attacks have killed 13 victims, compared with 112 for right-wing attackers. The report cited several reasons, including that left-wing attackers often choose targets that are protected such as government or law enforcement facilities, and target specific individuals. 

    • The number of incidents by the left is small. A graphic in the report showing the rise in left-wing attacks in 2025 as of July 4 is visually striking. It is based on a small number of incidents: four attacks and one disrupted plot. 

    Studies have not uniformly agreed on some attackers’ ideological classifications. The libertarian Cato Institute categorized the person charged in the shooting deaths of two Israeli embassy staffers in May 2025 as left-wing, while the CSIS study described the motivation as “ethnonationalist.” (Ethnonationalism is a political ideology based on heritage, such as ethnic identity, which can create clashes with other groups.) The Cato study counted only deaths while the CSIS analysis was not limited to deaths.

    “While Vance’s statement has a factual anchor for that limited timespan, it selectively emphasizes one short-term slice rather than the broader trend,” Jipson, of the University of Dayton, told PolitiFact. “In that sense, it can be misleading: It may give the impression that left-wing violence is generally now more dangerous or prevalent, which is not borne out by the longer view of the data.” 

    A photo of Trump is seen at a growing memorial for Charlie Kirk outside Timpanogos Regional Hospital after Kirk was shot and killed Sept. 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. (AP)

    The Cato analysis, published after Kirk’s death, said 3,597 people were killed in politically motivated U.S. terrorist attacks from Jan. 1, 1975, through Sept. 10, 2025.

    Cato found right-wing attacks were more common than left-wing. This research has been highlighted by some House Democrats.

    Cato wrote that during that time period, terrorists inspired by Islamist ideology were responsible for 87% of people killed in attacks on U.S. soil, while right-wing attackers accounted for 11% and left-wing terrorists accounted for about 2%. Excluding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks showed right-wing attackers were responsible for a majority of deaths. Measuring homicides since 2020 also showed a larger number by the right than the left.

    Our ruling

    Vance said, “Political violence, it’s just a statistical fact that it’s a bigger problem on the left.” 

    Vance did not point to a source, but a White House spokesperson separately cited an article about a study that examined political violence from 1994 to July 4, 2025. It found in the first six months of 2025, left-wing terrorist attacks outnumbered those by the right. It is based on a small number of incidents: four attacks and one disrupted plot. 

    The study also showed that for 30 years before 2025, right-wing attacks had outpaced left-wing attacks.

    The study detailed that left-wing “remains much lower than historical levels of violence carried out by right-wing and jihadist attackers.” Research before 2025 largely points to higher levels of right-wing violence over longer periods of time.

    The statement contains an element of truth because left-wing violence rose in the first six months of 2025. However, it ignores that right-wing violence was higher for a much longer period of time. We rate this statement Mostly False.

    Chief Correspondent Louis Jacobson contributed to this fact-check.

    RELATED: Nihilistic violent extremism: What the FBI term means and why experts warn against overuse

    RELATED: ‘Rough road ahead’: Charlie Kirk’s assassination highlights the rise in US political violence

     

    Source link

  • Former professor sues Auburn employees over firing tied to post on Charlie Kirk’s death

    A former educator at Auburn University and the University of Alabama is suing several school leaders over her firing, which she says occurred due to a statement she made on social media regarding the assassination of conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.Candice Hale, formerly a lecturer in Auburn’s College of Liberal Arts, argues her comments about Kirk’s death were constitutionally protected speech on matters of public concern and that the university’s decision to fire her was a violation of her First Amendment rights.”Such retaliation cuts to the heart of democratic principles, where open discourse and the free exchange of ideas are essential to the preservation of liberty and justice,” the complaint reads.The statement that allegedly led to Hale’s firing was posted to Facebook on Sept. 11, the day after Kirk was killed.On Sept. 17, Auburn University released a statement announcing the termination of employees who had made “social media posts that were hurtful, insensitive and completely at odds with Auburn’s values of respect, integrity and responsibility in violation of our Code of Conduct.”While Kirk’s death was not mentioned in the statement, U.S. Senator and former Auburn football coach Tommy Tuberville attributed the move to comments about the assassination.”Thank you, @AuburnU, for taking action and FIRING these sick people who mocked the assassination of Charlie Kirk,” Tuberville posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, Wednesday. “They have NO PLACE in our state’s public education system.”That same day, Hale alleges that she was asked to join an online meeting with Scott Forehand, Director of Compliance, Investigations, and Security at Auburn University, and Chris Hardman, a Behavioral Threat Assessment Coordinator.Hale says she was asked several questions regarding her post, including:”How students who were in the University’s Turning Point USA chapter would feel about her comments.””How she would interact with white male students if they identified themselves with Kirk’s views.””If she had access to firearms or had any intent to harm anyone in the Turning Point USA chapter at Auburn.”Hale said that, following the meeting, Forehand and Hardman found her not to be a threat to the safety of those on campus.However, two days later, Hale was requested for another meeting, this time with Tami Poe, Senior Manager of Human Resources in the Dean’s Office, and Jason Hicks, Dean of the College of Liberal Arts. Ahead of the meeting, Hale was told that she was being placed on paid leave and would not be allowed to contact her students. On Sept. 22, Hale alleges she was told by Poe that she could not have legal counsel during the meeting. Hale joined the second online meeting the next day and was told they planned to fire her and offered her a severance agreement.Poe, Hicks, Forehand, Hardman and Auburn President Christopher Roberts are all named in the suit, which seeks both monetary compensation and job reinstatement, along with measures to prevent future retaliation.Hale said she is also pursuing legal action against leadership at the University of Alabama, where she was employed in an adjunct position and allegedly fired for her comments on Kirk’s death as well.”Both institutions have tried to silence my voice,” she said in a Facebook post Thursday. “I reject these efforts. I remain steadfast in defending my right to speak truth to power and to challenge white supremacy, misogyny, and injustice — especially within academic spaces.”

    A former educator at Auburn University and the University of Alabama is suing several school leaders over her firing, which she says occurred due to a statement she made on social media regarding the assassination of conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.

    Candice Hale, formerly a lecturer in Auburn’s College of Liberal Arts, argues her comments about Kirk’s death were constitutionally protected speech on matters of public concern and that the university’s decision to fire her was a violation of her First Amendment rights.

    “Such retaliation cuts to the heart of democratic principles, where open discourse and the free exchange of ideas are essential to the preservation of liberty and justice,” the complaint reads.

    The statement that allegedly led to Hale’s firing was posted to Facebook on Sept. 11, the day after Kirk was killed.

    On Sept. 17, Auburn University released a statement announcing the termination of employees who had made “social media posts that were hurtful, insensitive and completely at odds with Auburn’s values of respect, integrity and responsibility in violation of our Code of Conduct.”

    While Kirk’s death was not mentioned in the statement, U.S. Senator and former Auburn football coach Tommy Tuberville attributed the move to comments about the assassination.

    “Thank you, @AuburnU, for taking action and FIRING these sick people who mocked the assassination of Charlie Kirk,” Tuberville posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, Wednesday. “They have NO PLACE in our state’s public education system.”

    That same day, Hale alleges that she was asked to join an online meeting with Scott Forehand, Director of Compliance, Investigations, and Security at Auburn University, and Chris Hardman, a Behavioral Threat Assessment Coordinator.

    Hale says she was asked several questions regarding her post, including:

    • “How students who were in the University’s Turning Point USA chapter would feel about her comments.”
    • “How she would interact with white male students if they identified themselves with Kirk’s views.”
    • “If she had access to firearms or had any intent to harm anyone in the Turning Point USA chapter at Auburn.”

    Hale said that, following the meeting, Forehand and Hardman found her not to be a threat to the safety of those on campus.

    However, two days later, Hale was requested for another meeting, this time with Tami Poe, Senior Manager of Human Resources in the Dean’s Office, and Jason Hicks, Dean of the College of Liberal Arts. Ahead of the meeting, Hale was told that she was being placed on paid leave and would not be allowed to contact her students.

    On Sept. 22, Hale alleges she was told by Poe that she could not have legal counsel during the meeting. Hale joined the second online meeting the next day and was told they planned to fire her and offered her a severance agreement.

    Poe, Hicks, Forehand, Hardman and Auburn President Christopher Roberts are all named in the suit, which seeks both monetary compensation and job reinstatement, along with measures to prevent future retaliation.

    Hale said she is also pursuing legal action against leadership at the University of Alabama, where she was employed in an adjunct position and allegedly fired for her comments on Kirk’s death as well.

    “Both institutions have tried to silence my voice,” she said in a Facebook post Thursday. “I reject these efforts. I remain steadfast in defending my right to speak truth to power and to challenge white supremacy, misogyny, and injustice — especially within academic spaces.”

    Source link

  • Illinois State University teacher’s assistant flips Turning Point USA table, tears down flyers: ‘Jesus did it’

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    An Illinois State University faculty member was arrested after he was accused of flipping a Turning Point USA student group’s table and tearing down promotional flyers on campus last week.

    Derek Lopez, a 27-year-old graduate student and teaching assistant at the university, was captured on camera speaking to a man standing near the table set up by students in the conservative group to promote political comedian Alex Stein’s upcoming event at the institution, before he then tossed the table, video shows.

    “Well, you know, Jesus did it, so you know I gotta do it, right?” Lopez told the man before he was seen flipping the table over.

    TURNING POINT LEADER DEMANDS REPERCUSSIONS FOR UCHICAGO PROFESSOR ARRESTED AT ANTI-ICE RALLY

    An Illinois State University faculty member was arrested after he was accused of flipping a Turning Point USA table on campus. (Alex Wroblewski / Getty Images)

    “Thanks guys, have a great day,” he later sneers as he waves and leaves the area.

    Lopez also allegedly disrupted a second informational table hosted by a student group, according to Illinois State University Police.

    He was arrested on Friday and faces charges for disorderly conduct and criminal damage to property. Police said the case is pending and may be grounds for additional charges and university disciplinary action.

    Illinois State University Police car

    Derek Lopez, 27, faces charges of disorderly conduct and criminal damage to property. (Illinois State University Police)

    “We are committed to protecting the First Amendment rights as well as safety of everyone in our campus community,” Police Chief Aaron Woodruff said in a statement.

    “We encourage all members of our community to learn more about free speech rights and responsibilities at Illinois State University, including constructive ways to respond when encountering speech they may disagree with,” the statement continued.

    TURNING POINT USA DRAWS 2,000 AT FIRST TOUR EVENT SINCE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION

    Arizonans mourn Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk

    Turning Point USA was co-founded by conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was murdered during an event at Utah Valley University last month. (Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Turning Point USA was co-founded by conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was murdered during an event at Utah Valley University last month.

    Source link

  • State Dept Revokes 6 Visas Over Charlie Kirk Posts

    Following the state department’s review of their social media accounts, six foreigners have had their visas revoked for allegedly making light of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

    Charlie Kirk, a conservative figure, was killed on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University on behalf of his organization Turning Point USA. As President Trump was posthumously awarding Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the announcement of visa revocation was made by the State Department. 

    Kirk was revered by Trump as a “Great American Hero” and even a “martyr” for freedom. As such, the Trump administration has targeted people for comments about Kirk. Although these individuals are from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Paraguay and South Africa, the names and types of visas these individuals had are yet to be revealed.

    Nhlamulo Baloyi, a South African national, has come forward to confirm that the State Department revoked his visa that was supposed to expire in 2032. This took place after uploading a post that said “Charlie Kirk won’t be remembered as a hero” and suggesting that his followers were a “movement of white nationalist trailer trash.”

    Baloyi says that “this goes against all the values that one has known about America”, contending that the revocation of his visa is a free speech violation. He mentions that he condemns political violence and that his post was simply intended to shed light on some of the double standards surrounding race.

    The State Department has commented in a post on X that “The United States has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans”. These actions, an effort to silence criticism of the passed political figure. 

    Many companies and institutions have fired, suspended, and otherwise disciplined people for making social media posts regarding Kirk’s death. David Axelrod, former advisor to Barack Obama, argues, posting on X, that “U.S. revokes visas for 6 foreigners for derisive posthumous comments about Charlie Kirk–who was ironically, a self-styled champion of free speech!”

    Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said they “will defend our borders, our culture, and our citizens by enforcing our immigration laws”. Other top officials, such as Vice President JD Vance, have encouraged people to call out any offensive language about Kirk they may find online.

    Amaya Arnic

    Source link

  • Music executive speaks out after visa revoked over Charlie Kirk post

    A South African music executive whose visa was revoked over his post about late conservative activist Charlie Kirk told Newsweek he believes the revocation was a “gross violation” of freedom of speech.

    Why It Matters

    The U.S. State Department announced on Tuesday that the visas of several individuals accused of celebrating Kirk’s assassination were revoked. The announcement intensified debate about the limits of free speech, as well as whether the government can limit immigration based on speech and expression.

    Kirk, the co-founder of the conservative student organization Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during his American Comeback Tour event at Utah Valley University on September 10. Police later arrested suspect Tyler Robinson. The 22-year-old has been charged with aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, two counts of obstruction of justice, two counts of witness tampering, and commission of a violent offense in the presence of a child.

    What To Know

    Nota Baloyi, a South African music executive, was among those who lost their visas for their Kirk-related posts. He said he believes the decision to revoke his visa violated his free speech rights.

    “It was a gross violation of the virtues that America espouses to the world as defenders of the free world and the paragons of virtue when it comes to free speech,” Baloyi told Newsweek on Wednesday.

    The State Department announced this visa would be revoked in a post on X, in which the department said the United States “has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans.”

    The thread included a screenshot of a post made by Baloyi, though it removed identifying information.

    The post read: “Neanderthals can’t have their cake & eat it… This weekend they went openly anti-black racist & now they’re hurt that the racist rally ended in attempted martyrdom? Charlie Kirk won’t be remembered as a hero. He was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash!”

    Baloyi told Newsweek he initially found out about the revocation on October 9 and was at first concerned, as the email notifying him didn’t mention the post.

    “I was concerned that it might have something that maybe I had done wrong during my trip in the U.S. that led to its termination,” he said. The State Department’s announcement that the revocation was because of his Kirk post was something of a “relief,” because it was a “rather innocuous reason.”

    Baloyi said his last trip to the U.S. was due to a threat on his life.

    He said he travels to the U.S. on a B1/B2 visa for work purposes but was not in the country when he learned of the revocation. He plans to reapply for the visa and wants to persuade the State Department to change its mind.

    In a post on X, Baloyi apologized “to all those that felt my post was insensitive & ill-timed in any context.” He deleted the original post and said he condemns political violence.

    “I’m an advocate for free speech much like Charlie Kirk was famous for & as a Christian with conservative leanings, I am a supporter of President Trump,” he wrote, adding that he does “not always agree with either Charlie Kirk nor Donald Trump,” which is why he disagrees with this decision.

    What People Are Saying

    Representative Ben Cline, a Virginia Republican, on X: “Being in the United States on a visa is a privilege, not a right. The cancellation of a visa or green card falls within the executive discretion of @SecRubio. Those who celebrate or incite violence have NO place in our country.”

    Conservative attorney Mike Davis, on X: “Foreigners who celebrate the assassination of an American have no business being in America. They can go to hell. In the meantime, they can go home.”

    Journalist Billy Binion, on X: “Asking without snark: Does anyone think the federal government would be deporting people for making gross comments about a leftist? The answer isn’t hard to figure out, which tells you what you need to know.”

    Gregg Nunziata, a conservative lawyer and former Department of Justice official, on X: “Making visas conditional on speech is a bad look for our country and ultimately harmful to the national interest.”

    What Happens Next

    The decision to revoke these visas reflects the ongoing efforts to scrutinize immigrants and visa holders based on factors such as their speech.

    Source link

  • After Libs of TikTok ‘Misinformation,’ Saint Ignatius Explains School Policy Prohibits TPUSA Chapter – Cleveland Scene

    The post on October 12 was just as inflammatory as others over the past month.

    “BREAKING,” Libs of TikTok, the right-wing account and alleged news source, wrote on Twitter/X. “St. Ignatius High School in Cleveland, Ohio is reportedly refusing to allow students to open up a TPUSA chapter.”

    The point was clear, as the comments showed: Followers were to bombard Ignatius with emails and phone calls in a internet-driven pressure campaign.

    TPUSA is short for Turning Point USA, the advocacy group for conservative Christians activist Charlie Kirk started when he was 18. According to its website, there are “800+” TPUSA chapters at high schools throughout the country, including locally in Conneaut, Green and Salem.

    Since Kirk’s murder on Sept. 10 in Orem, Utah, a trove of conspiracies behind his death and finger-pointing has led to national firestorms over questions of free speech. Kirk’s supporters and political allies (including JD Vance) have emboldened and encouraged their followers to report comments made by anyone who they feel have disprespected Kirk to employers

    In a similar vein, any institution not fully embracing TPUSA has come under fire, regardless of the facts.

    On Tuesday, Saint Ignatius President Rev. Raymond Guiao decried the Libs of TikTok post, writing in a letter to alumni that a “denial” wasn’t even necessary in the first place.

    “Unfortunately, misinformation suggesting the school ‘denied’ a student group has circulated on social media and in the news,” he said. It was “necessary to provide the facts around this student’s inquiry proactively.”

    “Saint Ignatius has always maintained an apolitical position in line with the Cleveland Diocese and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops,” Guiao wrote. “The school does not endorse political parties or movements, nor do we permit student clubs affiliated with outside organizations.”

    Guiao did not return a request for comment by Tuesday evening.

    Saint Ignatius currently has two conservative clubs: its Christian Action Team and its Conservative Caucus of Informed Ignatians. Clubs at the school are created internally and monitored by an assigned advisor, its website reads.

    The denial or the lack of denial doesn’t seem to matter to TPUSA and its adherents. Ohio has dozens of chapters, mostly at its universities, including chapters at Kent State, Baldwin Wallace and John Carroll.

    Its members are heading to Phoenix in December, when the organization plans to host its first AmericaFest, a four-day conservative backpatting-a-thon that features the likes of Glenn Beck, Jesse Waters and Tucker Carlson.

    The goal is to continue to expand where it can.

    “We will honor [Kirk’s] legacy by pressing forward—not slowing down, not surrendering,” it reads. “This is not a time to preserve what was built. This is the time to fight harder, grow faster, and unleash the true power of the grassroots machine Charlie created.”

    Subscribe to Cleveland Scene newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    Mark Oprea

    Source link

  • Trump administration revokes 6 visas over comments about Charlie Kirk

    The State Department said Tuesday it has revoked the visas of six people for making incendiary social media comments about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

    The six people — none of whom were named — hailed from Argentina, South Africa, Mexico, Brazil, Germany and Paraguay, the department said in a series of X posts. Some of them made comments that suggested Kirk deserved to be killed.

    “The United States has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans,” the State Department wrote on X. “The State Department continues to identify visa holders who celebrated the heinous assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

    The State Department did not specify whether any of the people are currently in the U.S. or what types of visas they held. CBS News has reached out to the department for further information.

    A day after Kirk was killed on a Utah college campus, a top State Department official vowed to take “appropriate action” against any visa-holders who praise or make light of Kirk’s death — and invited people to send in any concerning posts that they see. 

    Days later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, “visa revocations are under way.”

    Kirk was shot and killed on Sept. 10 while speaking to students at Utah Valley University for an event put on by Turning Point USA, a group he co-founded. Authorities said the gunman shot Kirk using a rifle from the roof of a nearby campus building. 

    Following a two-day manhunt, a 22-year-old Utah man identified as Tyler Robinson was arrested in the killing. State prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder. 

    The revocations are part of a wider crackdown on comments that mock or celebrate Kirk’s death. The Pentagon and the Secret Service have sidelined service members or agents who wrote negative social media posts about Kirk, and Vice President JD Vance has encouraged people to call the employers of anybody who celebrates Kirk’s killing.

    The Trump administration has sought to revoke visas in other circumstances, too. It is pushing to deport several international students who are linked to campus protests against Israel’s war in the Gaza Strip, accusing them of antisemitic rhetoric — which the students have denied. And it revoked Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s visa last month for encouraging U.S. troops to disobey President Trump’s orders during a protest in New York.

    The government’s legal power to deny or revoke visas on speech grounds is an unresolved question, Eugene Volokh, a UCLA professor emeritus of law who has written extensively about the First Amendment, told CBS News last month. The Supreme Court has ruled that the government has broad latitude to refuse to admit people into the country, but whether federal officials can deport people who are already in the U.S. due to their speech is less clear.

    Volokh said noncitizens “have the same First Amendment protections against, say, criminal punishment or civil liability as citizens do.”

    “But when it comes to the question of deportation or exclusion from the country in the first place, the rules turn out to be unsettled,” he said.

    Source link

  • Trump posthumously awards Charlie Kirk Presidential Medal of Freedom: Photos

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Source link

  • Inside Charlie Kirk’s Medal of Freedom event

    President Trump posthumously awarded Charlie Kirk with the nation’s highest civilian honor Tuesday, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. In the White House Rose Garden, the president presented the award to Kirk’s wife, Erika Kirk, on what would have been Kirk’s 32nd birthday. Eric Cortellessa, senior political correspondent for TIME, joins CBS News to discuss.

    Source link

  • Battle Ground School Teacher Still On Leave After Fasly Accused of Calling Charlie Kirk Nazi – KXL

    BATTLE GROUND, Wash. — Social Studies teacher Amanda Gonzales remains on administrative leave after a student said they heard her call late conservative activist Charlie Kirk a Nazi.  That student has since admitted they made that up.

    During Monday’s Battle Ground School Board meeting a number of teachers and parents showed up in support of Gonzales.

    Superintendent Shelley Whitten spoke at the meeting bascially saying this was a personnel process and there was nothing they coudl discuss publicly.

    More about:

    Brett Reckamp

    Source link

  • Ohio Republicans Want Public Schools to Teach Positive Impacts of Christianity on History – Cleveland Scene

    A pair of Ohio Republican lawmakers want public schools and public universities to teach positive impacts of Christianity on American history. No other religion is mentioned in the bill. 

    Republican state Reps. Gary Click and Mike Dovilla recently introduced Ohio House Bill 486, also known as the Charlie Kirk American Heritage Act. Kirk, a political activist who founded Turning Point USA and often spoke about his Christian faith, was killed while speaking at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10. 

    The bill does not create a new law but clarifies the law, Click said during Tuesday’s House Education Committee meeting. 

    “What it does is it removes the invisible shackles that often hinder a full transparency in the teaching of American history,” he said during his sponsor testimony. “We are not inviting instructors to teach doctrine or to proselytize … we’re simply affirming what is already in the law that exists.”

    “The United States stands alone in history, in the history of nations, through the overwhelming influence of Christianity on our founding,” Click claimed.

    The religions of America’s Founding Fathers had wide variation but most were Protestant. Many came from the Anglican, Presbyterian, and Congregationalist churches, with some Quakers, Lutherans, and Dutch Reformed, and some Catholics.

    A significant minority of the founders were Unitarians or Deists, believing in a supreme creator but not in divine intervention. This included Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine.

    With the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses as the first and second clauses in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution stands as history’s most notable document establishing religious freedom in a nation at its founding.

    Click said he has talked to teachers who are afraid to mention Christianity’s influence on history. 

    “If we teach it, we’re going to be accused of proselytizing, and we’re going to be accused of trying to convert people to Christianity,” Click said is something he has heard from teachers. He stressed his bill is permissive, not a requirement. 

    “This legislation allows Ohio’s educators, when teaching American history, to include instruction on the positive influence of religion — particularly Christianity — on the development of our nation’s ideals, its civic institutions, and its culture,” Dovilla said. “This is not about rewriting history. It is about restoring honesty and depth to the way we teach it.”

    The bill outlines several examples that could be taught including the history of the pilgrims, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the religious influence on the U.S. Constitution, Benjamin Franklin’s call for prayer at the constitutional convention, the separation of church and state, the role of the Ten Commandments “in shaping American law,” the Civil Rights movement, and the impact of evangelist Billy Graham, among others, according to the bill’s language. 

    State Rep. Beryl Brown Piccolantonio, D-Gahanna, pointed out how the bill only mentions Christianity. 

    “The reason it focuses directly on Christianity is because those are the complaints that I have received personally, is that people don’t feel comfortable teaching that,” Click said. “And quite honestly, it is Christianity that was the predominant religion that our nation was established.” 

    ALCU of Ohio Legislative Director Gary Daniels said the bill is unnecessary, arguing teachers and professors are already allowed to teach about religion in the context of American history. 

    “The intentions are, quite obviously, to go beyond all of that which is constitutionally permitted and essentially encourage school staff and university staff to propagandize students,” he said. 

    Baby Olivia Act 

    State Rep. Melanie Miller, R–Ashland, testified in support of her new bill that would require Ohio public schools to show a video about fetal development to students starting in the third grade.

    Ohio House Bill 485 would require showing the three-minute Meet Baby Olivia video and an ultrasound video at least three minutes long. The Baby Olivia video is produced by Live Action, which advocates against abortion. 

    “The miracle of life is not something that can be easily explained,” Miller said during her testimony. “By equipping students with the resources and knowledge about the remarkable stages of life, we can promote informed discussion grounded in science and respect for human biology.” 

    Planned Parenthood calls the “Baby Olivia” video “inaccurate, misleading, and manipulative.” 

    CROWN Act

    Ohio state Reps. Juanita Brent, D-Cleveland, and Jamie Callender, R-Concord, spoke in favor of their bill that would ban discrimination against natural hair in public K-12 schools

    House Bill 415 is also known as the CROWN Act, which stands for Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair. 

    The bipartisan bill prohibits discrimination against someone’s hair texture and protective hair styles such as braids, locs, twists and afros under Ohio’s Civil Rights Laws. 

    “We know that hair discrimination is still alive and well,” Brent said. “We’ve had situations where … a young lady went to school and she had to get sent home because she had some Afro puffs.”

    “We want to make sure our kids are not removed from school. We want to make sure that unnecessary disciplinary actions are not occurring to our kids. We want to make sure that kids feel seen.”

    This is the fourth legislative session in a row Brent has introduced the CROWN Act. The bill passed the Ohio House in the last General Assembly, but only had sponsor testimony in the Ohio Senate.

    “We were rushing to get it out of committee, to get it on the floor as we approached the last days of session, and it just didn’t make it across the finish line,” Callender said. 

    Twenty-seven states and Washington D.C., have already enacted the CROWN Act. A handful of Ohio cities — including Columbus, Akron, Cleveland Heights, Cleveland Heights, and Cincinnati — have already enacted the CROWN Act at the local level. 

    “By passing this bill, we affirm that diversity in our schools should be celebrated, not punished,” Brent said. “Our children deserve to feel safe, seen and valued for who they are.” 

    Originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. Republished here with permission.

    Megan Henry, Ohio Capital Journal

    Source link

  • Florida bill would punish colleges that don’t rename roads after Charlie Kirk – Orlando Weekly

    A House Republican on Tuesday filed a proposal that would redesignate a road at each Florida state university and college to honor conservative leader Charlie Kirk, who was murdered last month in Utah.

    Rep. Kevin Steele, R-Dade City, filed the bill (HB 113) for consideration during the legislative session that will start in January. The bill would specify a road at each of the state’s 12 universities and 28 colleges that would be named after Kirk.

    As examples, Chieftain Way at Florida State University and Stadium Road at the University of Florida would each be redesignated as Charlie James Kirk Road, while FGCU Boulevard at Florida Gulf Coast University would be redesignated as Charlie James Kirk Boulevard.

    Money would be withheld from schools that didn’t go along with the changes, under the bill.

    Kirk, who helped found and lead the organization Turning Point USA, was shot Sept. 10 during an appearance at Utah Valley University.

    News Service of Florida

    Source link

  • Ex-Wake Forest trainer sues congressman over claims she was fired for Kirk posts

    Pat Harrigan pictured in stock footage posted on his campaign website.

    Pat Harrigan pictured in stock footage posted on his campaign website.

    Pat Harrigan for Congress

    A former Wake Forest athletic trainer who worked with the women’s soccer team is suing North Carolina Congressman Pat Harrigan, saying he falsely claimed she was fired for posting about Charlie Kirk’s assassination last month.

    Republican Rep. Harrigan claimed on social media that Bridget Sullivan was fired after he called the university and touted it as a personal victory, posting on X: “I’m happy to report that after I contacted @WakeForest, Bridget has been FIRED for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination.”

    But Sullivan was not fired, according to the lawsuit filed in Forsyth County Superior Court.

    In her complaint, Sullivan said she exercised her 1st Amendment right of free speech when she posted on her private personal social media account: “He had it coming, he had it coming… this audio is all I have to say about that.”

    She posted the text on a black screen on Sept. 11, the day after Kirk’s death. In the post, she referenced a song that is not audible in a screenshot of her social media. The next day, LibsofTikTok, a popular conservative social media account, posted a screenshot of the post along with Sullivan’s Wake Forest biography and photo.

    Harrigan then responded to that post, saying: “Contacted @WakeForest regarding these reports… Anything less than firing her is an endorsement of it.”

    According to the lawsuit, by Sept. 13, a Wake Forest University representative contacted Sullivan to “discuss the situation and safety measures” for her. Then the university police department “instituted additional security measures for both Sullivan and the women’s soccer game taking place that day.”

    The next day, a Sunday, Wake Forest and Sullivan continued to talk about “safety concerns” and “mutually agreed that it would be best to part ways,” according to the lawsuit.

    Last month, Wake Forest University confirmed to several news outlets that Sullivan “no longer” was at the school and declined to comment further on the situation.

    But Harrigan then posted about her departure. Harrigan’s post generated extensive news coverage, Sullivan said.

    “Wake Forest University did not fire or terminate” Sullivan, she wrote in the lawsuit. “No Wake Forest representative issued such a statement to (Harrigan), to the school at large, to the press, or to the public. Such a statement was and is false.”

    “(Harrigan’s) statement was a false representation of fact,” the lawsuit says. “Wake Forest University did not fire (Sullivan), nor did Wake Forest issue any such statement. Nevertheless, (Harrigan’s) false, defamatory statement about (Sullivan’s) profession and reputation remains forever online.”

    Sullivan says Harrigan harmed her personal and professional reputation, and exposed her to ridicule, hatred, contempt, and safety threats. She is suing for libel and punitive damages.

    Harrigan’s office did not respond for request for comment before publication of this article.

    Harrigan is a first-term congressman representing North Carolina’s 10th Congressional District, which includes parts of Winston-Salem.

    This story was originally published October 6, 2025 at 6:26 PM.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Julia Coin

    The Charlotte Observer

    Julia Coin covers courts, legal issues, police and public safety around Charlotte and is part of the Pulitzer-finalist team that covered Tropical Storm Helene in North Carolina. As the Observer’s breaking news reporter, she unveiled how fentanyl infiltrated local schools. Michigan-born and Florida-raised, she studied journalism at the University of Florida, where she covered statewide legislation, sexual assault on campus and Hurricane Ian in her hometown of Sanibel Island.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    Julia Coin

    Source link

  • FWC biologist sues after she was fired a over Charlie Kirk post – Orlando Weekly



    Credit: via Shutterstock

    A biologist has filed a federal lawsuit challenging her firing by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission because of a post on a personal social-media account after the murder of conservative leader Charlie Kirk.

    Brittney Brown, who worked for the commission studying shorebirds and seabirds in the area of Tyndall Air Force Base in the Panhandle, alleges in the lawsuit that her firing on Sept. 15 — five days after Kirk was shot during an appearance at a Utah university — violated her First Amendment rights.

    “In the wake of the killing of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, many individuals and groups posted visceral reactions to social media that covered a range of perspectives and beliefs,” said the lawsuit, filed by attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Florida and longtime First Amendment lawyer Gary Edinger. “Most people on social media almost certainly encountered speech they found despicable, no matter where they fall on the political spectrum. That is the nature of a democracy where free speech is protected. And just as political violence has no place in a just society, the unbridled trampling of constitutional protections has no place either.”

    The lawsuit said Brown was fired after reposting on her Instagram account a post from an account called “@whalefact.” The post said, “the whales are deeply saddened to learn of the shooting of charlie kirk, haha just kidding, they care exactly as much as charlie kirk cared about children being shot in their classrooms, which is to say, not at all,” according to the lawsuit.

    Libs of TikTok, a conservative social-media account, shared a screenshot of Brown’s repost on Sept. 14 and called for her firing, according to the lawsuit. She was fired the next day.

    The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission said in a Sept. 15 post on X that it had been “made aware of a deeply troubling incident involving an FWC employee who shared a social media post that made light of the assassination of Mr. Kirk. The comments and actions of this individual are not in line with the FWC, our values, or our mission. We have a zero-tolerance policy towards the promotion of violence and hate, and we will not stand for such behavior. Upon learning of the social media post, FWC leadership took swift action, terminating the individual,” according to a copy of the commission post included in the lawsuit.

    But the lawsuit, filed in U.S. district court in Tallahassee, said Brown made the repost while on vacation on a “purely private” Instagram account. The lawsuit names as defendants commission Executive Director Roger Young and Melissa Tucker, a division director described as Brown’s “ultimate supervisor.”

    “Plaintiff’s political statement does not condone Mr. Kirk’s killing; nor does it call for further violence,” the lawsuit said. “Mr. Kirk was a public figure widely known for his controversial political views, and his death is a matter of public concern.”

    The lawsuit alleged, “Instead of supporting plaintiff’s First Amendment rights, and those of other dissenting individuals, defendants rushed to capitulate to the Libs of TikTok heckler’s veto and make a political example of Brown.”

    Kirk, who led the conservative group Turning Point USA, was assassinated during an appearance at Utah Valley University.

    Brown worked for the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for about seven years, according to the lawsuit. A copy of her Sept. 15 termination letter included in the lawsuit indicated she had an “Other Personal Services” position, a classification that does not include some of the protections that other employees receive.


    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook Bluesky | Or sign up for our RSS Feed


    The case alleges she she presented a certificate to a student that said he was the most likely to ‘become a dictator’

    The lawsuit said she was fired after reposting on her Instagram account a post from an account called ‘@whalefact’

    ‘Once again, we are told our work is essential, but our livelihoods are treated as expendable,’ said one Orlando International Airport TSA officer





    Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida
    Source link
  • Greg Laurie Will Host Harvest Crusade Event at Utah Valley University After Charlie Kirk Tragedy

    Greg Laurie to hold special, one-night Harvest Crusade event called, “Hope for America” Sunday, November 16, 2025 at site of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

    Pastor and evangelist Greg Laurie has announced an upcoming Harvest Crusade called “Hope for America” at Utah Valley University (UVU) on Sunday, November 16, 2025. The one-night event aims to bring hope directly to a community reeling from the September 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent Christian leader.

    “We’re going to go to that place of darkness, and we’re going to turn on the radiant light of Jesus Christ and proclaim the gospel that Charlie believed,” Laurie said. “What was meant for evil will be turned to good.”

    For over 35 years, Harvest Crusades with Greg Laurie have served as a unique and effective approach to evangelism, spanning the United States, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Since 1990, more than six million people have attended Harvest Crusades in person, and an additional five million have participated online. Cumulatively, more than 1 million individuals have made professions of faith in Jesus Christ through the Harvest Crusades and their other outreaches. Each crusade combines worship, preaching and community engagement to share the gospel with diverse audiences.

    For two years, Harvest Ministries has been collaborating with 150 local churches in the Salt Lake City metropolitan area to bring a Harvest Crusade to their community. Following the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, these church partners requested plans be accelerated. “They said, ‘Our community is devastated, and we need the hope that only Jesus can bring,’” Laurie shared. The event will be prepared and executed in just six weeks.

    Harvest Ministries is also partnering with major media outlets to encourage global participation. The Harvest Crusade will also be livestreamed at harvest.org, YouTube, Facebook, and on the Harvest+ app, available on all app platforms, allowing viewers worldwide to participate in real-time.

    In preparation, Harvest Ministries launched a prayer initiative called the “3:20 Prayer Calendar,” inspired by Ephesians 3:20 which says God “is able, through his mighty power at work within us, to accomplish infinitely more than we might ask or think.” Participants are encouraged to pray each day at 3:20 AM/PM leading up to the Harvest Crusade for the event’s success.

    “We’re asking God to do something big,” Laurie said.

    To receive further news about the Harvest Crusade: Hope for America, go to harvest.org.

    Information for churches that want to get involved with the Harvest Crusade can go to this link.

    A complete media kit, including shareable assets for Harvest Crusade: Hope for America, can be found at this link.

    About Harvest Ministries with Greg Laurie

    Greg Laurie is the founder of the Harvest Crusades and senior pastor of Harvest Church, with campuses located in California and Hawaii. He is a renowned evangelist, bestselling author and inspiration for the 2023 “Jesus Revolution” film. He leads the Harvest Crusades, large-scale evangelistic events that share the gospel with thousands in stadiums worldwide.

    For inquiries, email media@harvest.org or contact Harvest Ministries at https://harvest.org/contact-us/.

    Source: Harvest Ministries with Greg Laurie

    Source link

  • Prosecutors plan to ‘dirty up’ Kirk suspect Tyler Robinson to sway jury toward death penalty: fmr US atty

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Tyler Robinson’s motive for why he allegedly assassinated TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk may be more important during the sentencing phase as prosecutors will try to “dirty up” the suspect in hopes that jurors return a death sentence, according to a former assistant U.S. attorney.

    Robinson is accused of assassinating Kirk during a TPUSA event on Sept. 10 at Utah Valley Univerisity in Orem, Utah, officials said. He’s been charged with aggravated murder, two counts of obstruction of justice and felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, two counts of witness tampering and commission of a violent offense in the presence of a child.

    Officials claim Robinson allegedly said he killed Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred,” adding that “some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

    Court documents indicate that Robinson texted his roommate, Lance Twiggs, asking him to “look under my keyboard.”

    SUSPECTED CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSIN TYLER ROBINSON’S DEFENSE TEAM DELAYS KEY DECISION BEFORE CASE CAN PROCEED

    A crowd watches as Charlie Kirk appears at Utah Valley University on Sept.10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. Booking photos for Tyler Robinson, 22, the suspect in the Utah assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images and Washington Co. Sheriff’s Office)

    “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m going to take it,” read a note photographed by Robinson’s roommate, according to authorities.

    “You weren’t the one who did it right????” the roommate allegedly wrote to Robinson.

    “I am, I’m sorry,” Robinson said, according to the court documents.

    “It’s going to dirty up Robinson. The jurors are not going to like him because not only is there no legal justification for what he did, but there’s really no moral one whatsoever.”

    — Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Neama Rahmani

    CHARLIE KIRK’S ALLEGED ASSASSIN RETURNS TO COURT — WITHOUT SHOWING HIS FACE

    Charlie Kirk in October 2024.

    Charlie Kirk was a conservative activist who led Turning Point USA. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)

    While prosecutors are still piecing together a motive, Utah Gov. Spencer said Kirk’s death was a “political assassination.” He said that one of the bullets allegedly used by Robinson had an engraving that read “Hey fascist, catch.”

    “I think that speaks for itself,” Cox said during a news conference.

    Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital that prosecutors are going to rely on this evidence more during the penalty phase in order to convince jurors to hand down a death sentence for Robinson.

    CHARLIE KIRK’S ALLEGED ASSASSIN HELD ‘LEFTIST IDEOLOGY’ BUT MOTIVE STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION: UTAH GOVERNOR

    Charlie Kirk looks into the crowd at a Utah event.

    Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University on Sept.10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking at his “American Comeback Tour” when he was shot in the neck and killed. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

    “The Utah County prosecutor is going to try to put Robinson to death and the motive for the killing is going to be something that is key evidence in the case. It’s going to dirty up Robinson,” Rahmani said.

    Robinson will only face the death sentence if 12 out of 12 jurors agree he should be killed for his alleged crimes, which only makes it more important for prosecutors to outline a clear, detailed motive, Rahmani said.

    “To the extent that the prosecution has to get 12 out of 12 jurors to return that death sentence. The motive for the crime will be an important reason why the prosecution may get there,” he said. “So when jurors are weighing the death penalty, the reason why someone killed another human being, if it was for political reasons, that’s certainly an aggravated factor.”

    “Even one or two jurors could save Tyler Robinson’s life. And just from a pure numbers perspective, there are some people that have a difficult time looking another human being in the eye and giving them lethal injection or the firing squad,” Rahmani added. “The other possibility, of course, is they try to defend the case in the guilt phase. It’s going to be very hard to defend, but they’ll have to argue some sort of radicalization.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Law enforcement at site of Charlie Kirk shooting

    Law enforcement officials work near the crime scene where political activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on Sept. 11, 2025.  (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)

    While Robinson’s attorney, Kathryn Nester, hasn’t yet responded to prosecutors’ claims on why their client killed Kirk, she said during a Monday court hearing that the defense is reserving the right to call for a preliminary hearing, where prosecutors would be forced to disclose evidence and allow for cross-examination before the case proceeds.

    Robinson is due back in court on Oct. 30.

    Source link

  • What does the name Department of War say about American priorities? | Opinion

    Our country has generally worked to help create a more peaceful world.

    Our country has generally worked to help create a more peaceful world.

    Sipa USA

    Different focus

    With the name change from the Department of Defense to the Department of War, the United States is now promoting and declaring that war is acceptable. This goes against what we honor and recognize in the world. We are accepting the killing of our fellow human beings.

    Why don’t we instead change the name to the Department of Peace? This would promote conflict resolution through negotiation. It would emphasize that all conflicts can have a nonviolent resolution where all parties express their needs and ensures those needs are met.

    We have generally worked to help create a more peaceful world. Why do we now want to tell the world that war is a priority? Working together with respect, dignity and kindness would help create a better world.

    – Leonard Ellis, Arlington

    Animal cruelty

    It is shocking that there is a Texas school with so little supervision that a teacher could feed live kittens to a snake and let children know about it. (Oct. 1, 6A, “North Texas teacher apologizes for feeding live kitten to snake in classroom”) That teacher should not only be fired, she should also be barred from teaching. She should receive a financial penalty and jail time.

    – Frankie Andrew, Willow Park

    Ultimate sacrifice

    In his Oct. 1 column, Bradford William Davis wrote that President Donald Trump aims to silence his opponents. (11A, “Jimmy Kimmel is back on ABC, but Trump still threatens free speech”) Everyone seems to forget that the Biden administration pressured social media to silence and ban people who questioned the origins of COVID-19 or the effectiveness of the vaccine. Military members lost their jobs for refusing the vaccine.

    Jimmy Kimmel’s show was preempted because of his egregious lie about Charlie Kirk’s assassin. Kimmel did not give those opposing his political views a voice on his show, unlike Kirk, who encouraged dialogue with people who disagreed with him. It is heartbreaking that so many on the left are outraged by Kimmel’s suspension but are unable to feel the same over a young man who paid the ultimate sacrifice for his freedom of speech.

    – Gena Himes, Fort Worth

    Partisan respect

    President Donald Trump’s governing imbalance is demonstrated by his failure to respectfully respond when Minnesota legislator Melissa Hortman and her husband were assassinated. Flags were not flown at half staff. He did not attend the memorial service.

    Compare those abhorrent governing decisions with Trump’s overflowing respect and adulation for Charlie Kirk. He and several government officials flew to Arizona to attend a five-hour memorial service, where Trump spoke profusely about Kirk and hailed him as a martyr.

    How can Americans be expected to move past the hatred and animosity for opposing political perspectives when the president governs by playing sides?

    – Brent Neuenfeldt, Fort Worth

    Source link

  • Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson’s defense could cost Utah taxpayers ‘eight figures’: Experts

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Utah taxpayers are on the hook for Charlie Kirk‘s alleged assassin’s defense team, which has the potential to reach eight figures, criminal defense attorneys told Fox News Digital.

    After the shooting on Sept. 10 at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Kirk was taken to a hospital in critical condition, where he died, officials said. Tyler Robinson was charged with aggravated murder, two counts of obstruction of justice and felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, two counts of witness tampering and commission of a violent offense in the presence of a child.

    Kathryn Nester, a former federal public defender with more than 30 years of experience, was appointed to be Robinson’s attorney on Wednesday, according to a Utah County spokesperson. While the Utah County Commission approved $1 million in initial staffing additions to go towards the prosecution and defense team in Robinson’s case, local attorneys told Fox News Digital that they expect the total amount spent defending the murder suspect to be much higher.

    CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION: TIMELINE OF UTAH CAMPUS SHOOTING DETAILS ATTACK, MANHUNT FOR SUSPECT

    Tyler Robinson is accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. (Tess Crowley/The Deseret News via AP; Utah Gov. Spencer Cox)

    “This action fulfills the commission’s constitutional responsibility to ensure that individuals accused of a crime — who cannot afford legal representation — are provided with a qualified defense,” the Utah County Commission said in a news release.

    Utah defense attorney Greg Skordas appeared on behalf of Utah County on Sept. 16 and was helping the county find a lawyer for Robinson. He told Fox News Digital there are specific requirements for an attorney appointed to Robinson since it’s a death penalty case.

    “They have to be what’s called death qualified. I know that’s weird, but we have a rule in Utah called Rule 8, which says in order to be court-appointed on a death penalty case, you have to accomplish certain things. In other words, you’ve done so many criminal cases. You’ve gone to trial on murder cases. You’ve taken classes in death penalty representation,” Skordas said.

    While there’s a contract in place that touches finances, Skordas said there’s “no ceiling” on it.

    Criminal defense attorney Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital that if Robinson is handed the death penalty by a Utah jury, the potential amount spent on his defense could be “north of $10 million” because of the appeals process.

    EX-US ATTORNEY WARNS PROSECUTORS COULD FACE MANY HURDLES IN CASE AGAINST CHARLIE KIRK’S ALLEGED KILLER

    Charlie Kirk speaks to the audience just before he was shot

    Charlie Kirk speaks before he is assassinated during Turning Point’s visit to Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2025. (Tess Crowley/The Deseret News via AP)

    “I think when we’re all said and done, this will cost the state much more than $500,000. We’re talking about seven or even eight figures,” Rahmani said. “But if Tyler Robinson is sentenced to death, and he has to go through the mandatory Utah state and federal appeals, we’re talking about millions of dollars, potentially even north of $10 million.”

    Rahmani said the number spent by Utah taxpayers will be less if jurors don’t return a death sentence, but would still be in the millions.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Charlie Kirk in October 2024.

    Charlie Kirk was a conservative activist who led Turning Point USA. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)

    Skye Lazaro, a Utah-based criminal defense attorney, told Fox News Digital the case will cost Utah taxpayers “at least a couple million dollars” to pay for Robinson’s defense, but that’s if a jury doesn’t hand down a death sentence. That number would be much higher if a death sentence is given to Robinson because of the appeals process, Lazaro said.

    “I don’t even know how you’d put a dollar amount on that,” Lazaro said, adding that the $10 million figure given by Rahmani isn’t “off base.”

    Source link