ReportWire

Tag: Charlie Kirk

  • Attorneys for Tyler Robinson trying to disqualify prosecutor in Charlie Kirk murder case

    [ad_1]


    Attorneys for Tyler Robinson trying to disqualify prosecutor in Charlie Kirk murder case – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Lawyers for the man accused of killing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk are trying to disqualify one of the prosecutors on the case. CBS News reporter Andres Gutierrez has more.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk’s accused killer asks judge to disqualify prosecutors because attorney’s child was at event where Kirk was shot

    [ad_1]

    The 22-year-old Utah man charged with killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk is due back in court Friday as his attorneys seek to disqualify prosecutors in the case over an alleged conflict of interest.

    Tyler Robinson is charged with aggravated murder in Kirk’s Sept.10 shooting on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, just a few miles north of the Provo courthouse. Prosecutors with the Utah County Attorney’s Office plan to seek the death penalty if Robinson is convicted. Robinson has not yet entered a plea.

    An 18-year-old child of a deputy county attorney attended the campus event where Kirk was shot. The child, whose name was redacted from court filings, later texted with their father in the Utah County Attorney’s Office to describe the chaotic events around the shooting, the filings from prosecutors and defense lawyers state.

    Defense attorneys say that personal relationship is a conflict of interest that “raises serious concerns about past and future prosecutorial decision-making in this case,” according to court documents. They also argue that the “rush” to seek the death penalty against Robinson is evidence of “strong emotional reactions” by the prosecution and merits the disqualification of the entire team.

    Tyler Robinson appears in court for a hearing in Provo, Utah, on Dec. 11, 2025. Robinson is charged with murder in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk.

    Pool


    Several thousand people attended the outdoor rally where Kirk, a co-founder of Turning Point USA who helped mobilize young people to vote for President Trump, was shot as he took questions from the audience. The child of the deputy county attorney did not see the shooting, according to an affidavit submitted by prosecutors.

    “While the second person in line was speaking with Charlie, I was looking around the crowd when I heard a loud sound, like a pop. Someone yelled ‘he’s been shot,’” the child stated in the affidavit.

    The child later texted a family group chat to say “CHARLIE GOT SHOT.” In the aftermath of the shooting, the child did not miss classes or other activities and reported no lasting trauma “aside from being scared at the time,” the affidavit said.

    Prosecutors have asked District Judge Tony Graf to deny the disqualification request.

    “Under these circumstances, there is virtually no risk, let alone a significant risk, that it would arouse such emotions in any father-prosecutor as to render him unable to fairly prosecute the case,” Utah County Attorney Jeffrey Gray said in a filing.

    Gray also said the child was “neither a material witness nor a victim in the case” and that “nearly everything” the person knows about the actual homicide is mere hearsay.

    The Associated Press left email and telephone messages for Robinson’s defense attorney, Kathryn Nester.

    Prosecutors have said text messages and DNA evidence connect Robinson to the killing. Robinson reportedly texted his romantic partner that he targeted Kirk because he had “had enough of his hatred.”

    At recent hearings, Robinson’s legal team has pushed to limit media access in the high-profile case. Graf has prohibited media from publishing photos, videos and live broadcasts that show Robinson’s restraints to help protect his presumption of innocence before a trial.

    The judge has not ruled on a suggestion by the defense to ban cameras in the courtroom.

    Prosecutors are expected to lay out their case against Robinson at a preliminary hearing scheduled to begin May 18.

    Last month, Kirk’s widow Erika, who now leads Turning Point USA, joined CBS News for a town hall where she explained the “game-time decision” of publicly forgiving the man charged with her husband’s murder.

    “I forgive him because it’s what Christ did and is what Charlie would do,” she said in her eulogy at her husband’s memorial service.

    When asked if she had any words for his accused killer, she said: “Nothing. I have nothing to say to you. Nothing.”

    She added that there’s a difference between forgiving someone and still wanting justice. “We serve a just God, and I rest easy in knowing that. He’s sovereign, but he’s just. And so let the Lord handle that.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘WHO DID THIS’: Woman notices Barnes & Noble has a Charlie Kirk section with a right-wing grift description. It’s not the only location

    [ad_1]

    Barnes & Noble may be a battleground for an unforeseen landscape: politics. Or at least, that was the impression one woman got when she walked into her local store, only to find a particularly charged, curated selection of right-wing adjacent books waiting for her.

    Liliana (@lillyestie) was browsing Barnes & Noble when one table with a selection of books made her stop in her tracks. The book display had typical Barnes & Noble signage, saying “give the gift of stories” at the top. But as her eyes panned down, she saw that those stories at that display all shared one idea.

    Charlie Kirk’s 2020 publication, “Right Wing Revolution,” was in front of her, alongside a biography of Kirk by Rick Morris and one of Kirk’s other books, “Stop, In the Name of God.”

    Unsettlingly, the table also had a sign with a particularly pointed message. The sign read, “The United States of America has long been the lone beacon of freedom and sensibility in a chaotic world. Now, she is under threat from a lethal ideology that seeks to humiliate and erase anyone who does not bow at its altar. The threat in question? Wokeism.”

    She then noticed another section dedicated to Trump’s presidency, which she quickly panned over.

    Despite her humorous description saying that the displays “[definitely] killed the vibe” in her video, which has garnered over 880,000 views, many commenters expressed concern. Are Barnes & Noble stores across the country putting out signs that call “wokeism” a threat to America? Does this store reflect the values of the company?

    Why does Barnes & Noble have specific sections dedicated to Charlie Kirk?

    Barnes & Noble’s individual store managers seem to have the power when it comes to book displays.

    As a bookstore, Barnes & Noble has carried titles from across the political spectrum. That is partially because publishers often determined what books would land on shelves, not the stores themselves. Previously, decisions came from those publishers and the bookstore’s New York corporate line, so stores simply carried what performed and what made sense from a business perspective.

    With the introduction of new CEO James Daunt in 2019, however, stores moved to a “hyperlocal” focus, which allows individual managers to display books that appeal to local interest.

    These individual managers receive books that fit their market. For instance, a more rural Barnes & Noble may carry significantly more books that match its general demographic. A bookstore in a left-leaning area may ultimately carry more books that appeal to that demographic’s interests.

    For that reason, not all Barnes & Noble stores have moved toward dedicating a display to Charlie Kirk. Nor have they posted long political messaging on their displays.

    Are all Barnes & Noble stores carrying right-wing books choosing to do so?

    It leads to the question: Are individual managers making all of the decisions related to what books end up inside their stores? The simple answer is no, not necessarily. The decision about which books to sell is not made purely by in-store managers. Rather, Barnes & Noble’s corporate team still dictates many of the books that end up in stores.

    Managers are in charge of how books are displayed and what is pushed to new customers, as well as some of the books offered at their location.

    Many commenters have noticed a recent increase in right-oriented books in some Barnes & Noble stores. Alongside that, however, there have also been silent protests from store managers and employees. Take, for instance, one commenter’s local Barnes & Noble, which placed books discussing fascism right next to publications discussing Trump’s presidency.

    While this is not the same as creating an entirely new, curated section dedicated to Kirk, it does speak to the power of book placement. It is possible that some stores that receive these books carry the titles but do not necessarily agree with having them.

    Wait, was Barnes & Noble ever truly ‘left leaning’?

    Surprisingly, many right-wing figures consider Barnes & Noble stores to be left-leaning, despite the fact that the bookstore doesn’t necessarily ascribe to any specific affiliation. Corporate Barnes & Noble made the switch to Bluesky, but the company hasn’t made any definitive political statements. 

    Articles have expressed the idea that some Barnes & Noble stores are carrying books dedicated to one political ideology over another. But, these articles echoed that many stores, like a location in Dartmouth, were too left-leaning, carrying selections like White Fear over publications from the right. 

    One writer for Hot Air, a right-leaning publication, described ‘liberal censorship’ from a Georgetown store. The author, Mark Judge, issued a complaint that the store would not carry his book, “The Devil’s Triangle: Mark Judge vs the New American Stasi.” He also issued complaints that the New York Times and Washington Post would not review his book. 

    Ultimately, though, the power rests on individual Barnes & Noble locations to send whatever messaging they choose to. It’s also up to individual customers to determine whether they want to engage in the store’s messaging. That means that some of these locations may end up with displays that reflect right-wing values, while others may not. 

    @lillyestie like def killing the vibe ? #barnesandnoble #bn ♬ original sound – kirsten_ssss

    The Mary Sue reached out to Barnes & Noble’s corporate email as well as Liliana via TikTok direct message for comment.

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Rachel Thomas

    Rachel Thomas

    Rachel Joy Thomas is a music journalist, freelance writer, and hopeful author who resides in Los Angeles, CA. You can email her at [email protected].

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Thomas

    Source link

  • GTA Online Players Keep Making Charlie Kirk Assassination Missions

    [ad_1]

    Rockstar Games seems to be playing cat-and-mouse with some Grand Theft Auto Online players who are using newly added tools to recreate the assassination of Charlie Kirk in the extremely popular online open-world crime simulator.

    In September of last year, right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck and killed during a public appearance at a college in Utah. In the weeks that followed, many people, including Jimmy Kimmel, found themselves in trouble for commenting or joking about it. Some even lost their jobs. Then, in December, right before the new year, Rockstar added a mission creator to GTA Online, letting players make their own solo missions. And it didn’t take long for some creators to start recreating Kirk’s killing in GTA Online, leading to an ongoing situation where it seems Rockstar is trying (and failing) to stop these assassination-themed missions from spreading.

    On January 12, the Twitter account GTA 6Info posted a clip of what appears to be a user-created GTA Online mission called “We Are Charlie Kirk” that features the player being tasked with killing a man standing outside behind various props in a location that looks like a college campus. Once the man is killed, the mission is completed. GTA 6Info also claimed in the tweet that because of this mission, Rockstar Games has now added “Charlie Kirk” to GTA Online’s profanity filter. The tweet went viral, but it’s unclear if Rockstar did, in fact, add Kirk’s name to any such filter and if that particular mission is the reason.

    Kotaku has contacted Rockstar Games for more information.

    ©Rockstar Games / Kotaku

    However, while Kotaku can’t confirm the specific claim in that tweet, it can verify that if you try to search for “Charlie Kirk” on the official custom jobs site for GTA Online, you’ll be greeted with an error regardless of which platform you pick. This also happens if you try to search for a slur or other vulgar term blocked by Rockstar. You can still search for Charlie or Kirk separately, and doing so will reveal that previously shared Kirk-themed maps, like the one from that viral video, seem to have been removed from GTA Online sometime between December 10, when the mission creator tool was added to the game, and today. Players appear to be using “Charlie Pink” or mashing his first and last names together to try and get around what appear to be Rockstar’s attempt to make it much harder to find and share these missions.

    The question now is whether Rockstar Games will continue to play cat-and-mouse with creators trying to build and share recreations of Kirk’s murder.  And if so, for how long will this trend continue in the live-service game? If I know the internet, Rockstar has a hard job ahead of it, especially as rumors of a banned topic spread online and entice more creators to try their luck at getting around any possible filters. We saw something like this happen in NBA 2K26 last year, with players using the in-game creator tools to create bloody characters referencing the killing.

    [ad_2]

    Zack Zwiezen

    Source link

  • Texas Teacher Union sues TEA over investigations into Charlie Kirk posts

    [ad_1]

    A union representing educators across Texas is suing the Texas Education Agency and its commissioner as the state investigates complaints about educators’ comments on the assignation of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

    Texas AFT announced the federal lawsuit on Tuesday after Commissioner Mike Morath said in a September letter said that the agency would investigate teachers who posted or shared “reprehensible and inappropriate content” after Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was shot while speaking at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10.

    The investigations “unleashed a wave of retaliation and disciplinary actions against teachers” for posts made outside the classroom, according to the lawsuit. It argues that in doing so, teachers had their freedom of speech rights violated.

    “Somewhere and somehow, our state’s leaders lost their way,” Texas AFT President Zeph Capo said in a statement. “A few well-placed Texas politicians and bureaucrats think it is good for their careers to trample on educators’ free speech rights. They decided scoring a few cheap points was worth the unfair discipline, the doxxing, and the death threats targeted at Texas teachers. Meanwhile, educators and their families are afraid that they’ll lose everything: their livelihoods, their reputations, and their very purpose for being, which is to impart critical thinking.

    ⭐ Our editors also recommend:

    A spokesperson for the Texas Education Agency on said the agency cannot comment on outstanding legal matters.

    Of 354 complaints received, 95 remain open and are still being reviewed and investigated, the spokesperson said in an email.

    The other complaints have been closed after review, and no sanctions have been issued by the State Board for Educator Certification, the spokesperson said. The board “oversees all aspects of the preparation, certification, and standards of conduct of public school educators,” according to its website.

    Each complaint doesn’t represent an individual educator. For instance, some educators received multiple complaints and some complaints were general commentary, the spokesperson said.

    The lawsuit states that “Texas AFT members have been placed on administrative leave, reprimanded, and even in some cases terminated for expressing their views.”

    The spokesperson said any “employment actions” referenced were made by individual school systems.

    A list of districts where employees received complaints was not immediately available. The Star-Telegram has requested the information through an open records request.

    The lawsuit references four unnamed teachers in the Houston and San Antonio areas.

    In the September letter, Morath said some educators had made posts that may violate the Educators’ Code of Ethics.

    “While the exercise of free speech is a fundamental right we are all blessed to share, it does not give carte blanche authority to celebrate or sow violence against those that share differing beliefs and perspectives,” Morath said.

    The lawsuit states that comments from AFT Texas members did not “sow, encourage, or incite violence in any way.”

    The union is asking that the court block the Texas Education Agency retract its policy about posts in the aftermath of Kirk’s death and issue a new one. The agency should also end all related investigations.

    AFT Texas held a Tuesday news conference in Austin following the lawsuit announcement. AFT National President Randi Weingarten said the group and its Texas chapter denounces violence, including Kirk’s assassination.

    Morath’s actions were “a transparent effort to smear and shame educators,” Weingarten said.

    “To divide our communities and deny our kids the opportunities to learn and thrive,” she continued. “They were a state-sponsored attack on teachers because of what these educators were saying not in classrooms, but privately in their own social media pages, as human beings trying to themselves deal with what they had just seen.”

    Eleanor Dearman

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Eleanor (Elly) Dearman is a Texas politics and government reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. She’s based in Austin, covering the Legislature and its impact on North Texas. She grew up in Denton and has been a reporter for more than six years.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Eleanor Dearman

    Source link

  • Transcript from October closed hearing for Charlie Kirk murder suspect released by Utah court

    [ad_1]

    A Utah judge on Monday ordered the release of a transcript from a closed-door hearing in October over whether the man charged with killing Charlie Kirk must be shackled during court proceedings. 

    State District Judge Tony Graf said public transparency was “foundational” to the judicial system before ordering the release of details from the Oct. 24 closed hearing. Attorneys for media outlets, including The Associated Press, had argued for access because they said it was also the first time defense attorneys suggested a ban on cameras in the courtroom.

    Prosecutors have charged Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem. They plan to seek the death penalty. Robinson has not yet entered a plea.

    In a 97-page transcript released later Monday, attorneys for Robinson argued that widespread videos and photos of him shackled and in jail clothing could create bias against him among potential jurors. Defense attorney Richard Novak said prohibiting cameras would be “very easy” for the court to enforce and could help curb visual prejudice.

    “We’re not litigating this case in the press,” Novak said during the Oct. 24 hearing.

    The transcript contained limited redactions to remove discussions of security protocols in the closely watched case. Graf also ordered the release of an audio recording of the hearing, again with redactions.

    Robinson was not present in court Monday and appeared via audio feed from the Utah County Jail.

    Graf has not ruled on the defense’s suggestion to ban cameras, but he has implemented other limitations.

    Days after the closed-door hearing, Graf ruled that Robinson could wear civilian clothes in pretrial hearings but must also wear restraints to ensure the safety of court staff and Robinson himself. Utah court rules require defendants who are in custody to be restrained or supervised at all times unless otherwise ordered.

    Graf also prohibited media outlets from publishing photos, videos and live broadcasts that show Robinson’s restraints to help protect his presumption of innocence before a trial.

    The judge briefly stopped a media livestream of a hearing earlier this month and ordered the camera be moved after Robinson’s attorneys said the stream showed the defendant’s shackles. Graf said he would terminate future broadcasts if there were further violations.

    Lawyers for the media wrote in recent filings that an open court “safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process” while fostering public confidence in judicial proceedings. Criminal cases in the U.S. have long been open to the public, which the attorneys argued is proof that trials can be conducted fairly without restricting reporters.

    In a separate ruling Monday, Graf denied a request from attorneys for the media who sought to intervene in the case. The judge said members of the press do not need to be formal parties in the proceedings to access court records. 

    Still, Graf said the involved publications must be notified of future requests to close hearings or restrict access to court filings.

    Prosecutors are expected to lay out their case against Robinson at a preliminary hearing scheduled to begin May 18.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP coalescing behind Vance as Trump privately dismisses third-term run

    [ad_1]

    When Charlie Kirk was killed by an assassin this fall, Republican leaders credited the organization he founded for enabling President Trump’s return to power.

    Now that organization is mobilizing behind Vice President JD Vance.

    Uninterested in a competitive Republican primary in 2028, Turning Point USA plans to deploy representatives across Iowa’s 99 counties in the coming months to build the campaign infrastructure it believes could deliver Vance, a Midwesterner from nearby Ohio, a decisive victory, potentially short-circuiting a fractious GOP race, insiders said.

    It is the latest move in a quiet effort by some in Trump’s orbit to clear the field of viable competitors. Earlier this month, Marco Rubio, the secretary of State previously floated by Trump as a possible contender, appeared to take himself out of the running.

    “If Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him,” Rubio told Vanity Fair.

    After Kirk’s widow, Erika, endorsed Vance on stage at Turning Point USA’s annual conference in Arizona last week, a straw poll of attendees found that 84% would support Vance in the coming primaries. Yet, wider public polling offers a different picture.

    A CNN poll conducted in early December found that Vance held a plurality of Republican support for 2028, at 22%, with all other potential candidates, such as Rubio and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, registering in single digits.

    The remaining 64% told pollsters they had “no one specific in mind,” reflecting an open field with plenty of room for other figures to gain ground.

    While a recent Gallup poll found that 91% of Republicans approve of Vance’s job performance as vice president — an encouraging number entering a partisan primary — only 39% of Americans across party lines view him positively in the role, setting Vance up for potential challenges should he win the nomination.

    Potential presidential candidates on both sides of the political aisle are expected to assess their chances over the next year, before primary season officially kicks off, after the midterm elections in November.

    Closing out the Turning Point USA conference, Vance called for party unity amid escalating conflicts among right-wing influencers over the acceptability of racism and antisemitism within Republican politics.

    “President Trump did not build the greatest coalition in politics by running his supporters through endless, self-defeating purity tests,” Vance said. “Every American is invited. We don’t care if you’re white or Black, rich or poor, young or old, rural or urban, controversial or a little bit boring, or somewhere in between.”

    Charlie Kirk, he added, “trusted all of you to make your own judgment. And we have far more important work to do than canceling each other.”

    Vance’s remarks drew criticism from some on the right for appearing to tolerate bigotry within the party. The vice president himself has been subjected to racist rhetoric, with Nick Fuentes — a far-right podcaster who has praised Adolf Hitler — repeatedly directing attacks at Vance’s wife and children over their Indian ancestry.

    “Let me be clear — anyone who attacks my wife, whether their name is Jen Psaki or Nick Fuentes, can eat s—,” Vance said in an interview last week, referring to President Biden’s former press secretary. “That’s my official policy as vice president of the United States.”

    In the same interview, Vance praised Tucker Carlson, another far-right podcaster who has defended Fuentes on free speech grounds, as a “friend of mine,” noting that he supported Vance as Trump’s vice presidential pick in 2024.

    Trump has floated Vance as his potential successor multiple times without ever explicitly endorsing his nomination, calling him “very capable” and the “most likely” choice for the party.

    “He’s the vice president,” Trump said in August. “Certainly he’s doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point.”

    Several of Trump’s most ardent supporters have pushed the president to seek a third term in 2028, despite a provision of the Constitution, in the 22nd Amendment, barring him from doing so.

    Trump himself has said the Constitution appears clear on the matter. But Steve Bannon, an architect of Trump’s historic 2016 campaign and one of his first White House strategists, continues to advocate a path forward for another run, reportedly disparaging Vance as “not tough enough” to lead the party to victory.

    “He knows he can’t run again,” Susie Wiles, the president’s White House chief of staff, told Vanity Fair in a recent profile of her. “It’s pretty unequivocal.”

    Trump, who will be 82 when he is slated to leave office, has told Wiles he understands a third term isn’t possible “a couple times,” she added.

    Alan Dershowitz, a prominent constitutional law professor and a lawyer to Trump during his Senate impeachment trial, recently presented Trump with a road map to a third term in an Oval Office meeting, which he will publish in a new book slated for release next year.

    Even he came away from their meeting believing Trump would pass on another bid.

    “That is my conclusion based on what he has said in public,” Dershowitz told The Times.

    “He has said in the past,” he added, “that it’s too cute.”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • Megyn Kelly Talks Ben Shapiro’s “Betrayal” and the MAGA Reckoning at AmericaFest

    [ad_1]

    Megyn Kelly had no idea that Ben Shapiro planned to go after her. When he launched into a scathing broadside against what he called “charlatans” and “grifters” in the conservative movement on the first night of Turning Point’s annual conference last week, his pointed inclusion of Kelly shocked the commentator who has long considered Shapiro a friend.

    “I was flabbergasted,” she told me, soon after stepping off the same stage, where her searing response to Shapiro was rapturously received by the crowd. “I thought, ‘Who do you think you are?’”

    When more than 90,000 people gathered at a stadium in Arizona for Charlie Kirk’s funeral in September, speakers at the pyrotechnic-infused revival predicted a new dawn for conservative politics. The coalition, unified in its support for President Donald Trump and its horror at Kirk’s killing, was in harmony. “This is new territory for the Republican Party,” Turning Point COO Tyler Bowyer said at the time. “The fusion of Christ in our politics is changing the culture. It’s unifying everyone. This is our civil-rights movement.”

    Just a few months later, at Turning Point’s AmericaFest gathering in Phoenix, that unity collapsed into an internecine feud between rival factions vying to define Kirk’s legacy and steer the future of right-wing politics.

    Moments after Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, opened the conference with a speech calling her late husband a “peacemaker” and urging an end to the squabbling, Shapiro issued a blistering jeremiad that recalled William F. Buckley Jr.’s attempted excommunication of the far right. “The conservative movement is in serious danger,” Shapiro said, “from charlatans who claim to speak in the name of principle but actually traffic in conspiracism and dishonesty, who offer nothing but bile and despair.”

    He denounced Candace Owens—a podcaster he once employed at The Daily Wire, the media company he co-founded—who has emerged as the chief purveyor of conspiracy theories about Kirk’s murder. Her videos investigating the killing, infused with all the drama of a true-crime documentary, have been viewed millions of times.

    Shapiro extended his criticism to those he said have “refused to condemn Candace’s truly vicious attacks,” naming Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Steve Bannon. A few hours later on the same stage, Carlson fired back. “To hear calls for like, de-platforming and denouncing people at a Charlie Kirk event, I’m like, what?” Carlson said, with an air of annoyed confusion. “I mean, this kind of was the whole point of Charlie Kirk’s public life, and I think that he died for it.”

    [ad_2]

    Aidan McLaughlin

    Source link

  • Conservatives need to embrace ‘fusion’ of populism, top leader says, calling AmFest scenes are ‘encouraging’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The future of the conservative movement rests on the ability of candidates and activists to embrace the best tenets of populism while addressing issues that are uncomfortable in “establishment Washington,” the leader of one of America’s oldest conservative policy groups told Fox News Digital.

    Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, in Phoenix for the first AmericaFest following the murder of Charlie Kirk, said that despite a wave of recent losses for conservatives, there is great hope for the future. The event was packed with thousands of conservatives from around the nation.

    I was expecting to be really encouraged, and I am,” Roberts said of people he has engaged with at AmericaFest. “There’s a lot of passion and encouragement in that room. And I think we have to keep in mind, moving on to a second point, that you have to ignore sort of the naysayers and the doomsayers about conservative politicians losing the midterms.”

    He said that despite bad press and wipeouts for the right in Virginia, New Jersey, Florida and Pennsylvania, conservatives “ought to be more optimistic” after what he called a great first year of the Trump-Vance administration and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., working together.

    VIVEK RAMASWAMY CRITICIZES POCKETS OF ‘ONLINE RIGHT’ FIXATED ON HERITAGE IN TURNING POINT ADDRESS

    Heritage Foundation president Dr. Kevin Roberts. (Tom Williams/CQ Getty Images)

    “What we’ve got to do for 2026 is articulate to the American people — starting with this crowd here at AmFest — what those policy priorities need to be; not just for the short term but for the long term and Heritage certainly is in the middle of that conversation.”

    To keep conservatism at the fore in 2026, given recent setbacks, conservatives must run on an “aspirational vision” he said was lacking in several 2025 races – while noting Jack Ciattarelli’s failed bid for governor of New Jersey bid as one of the better-run campaigns.

    Looking to the new year, Roberts said Heritage is interested in seeing policymakers asking those uncomfortable questions inside the Beltway, like what the future of the American family looks like, whether the workplace is one where Americans earn dignity and not just a paycheck, and more directly, “what it means to be an American.”

    TIM SCOTT TELLS MAGA VOTERS TRUMP ‘IS ON THE BALLOT’ AS GOP FIGHTS TO GROW SENATE MAJORITY IN 2026

    “[That’s] to say something, of course, that establishment Washington doesn’t like to talk about,” he said.

    “What’s the future, not just of immigration policy, but how can we assimilate the highest percentage of foreign-born population we’ve had in modern American history? This is important for all of us if in fact we’re going to have a healthy society,” he said.

    “The bottom line is this, if establishment Washington talks about just sort of sidebar issues in this campaign, then the midterms are going to be a disaster. “

    WHY 2026 SHOULD TERRIFY REPUBLICANS AFTER TENNESSEE SPECIAL ELECTION

    “They, to state the obvious, have to talk about what the American people are asking, and they actually have to offer policy solutions where I happen to think Heritage has some good things to say.”

    In 2028, Trump will be term-limited and a new conservative leader will have to rise.

    The best way for conservatives to move forward, he said, is to embrace a “good fusion of the best elements of populism.”

    SETTING THE STAGE: WHAT THE 2025 ELECTIONS SIGNAL FOR NEXT YEAR’S MIDTERM SHOWDOWNS

    “Namely, exercising popular will over longstanding conservative principles like diminishing the size of the administrative state, but also making sure that we’re sustaining our longstanding, conservative principles,” Roberts said.

    “Whoever the standard-bearers are for conservatism in 2028, 2032, 2036, their policy ideas are going to sound a lot like Trump’s, but of course they are going to bring their own imprint into that.”

    “Those of us who focus on ideas and policy for a living need to do our jobs zealously well to keep offering not just the long-standing policy ideas, but some innovative ones as well,” he added.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Looking ahead to Heritage’s work in 2026, Roberts said the think tank will focus on family, the future of free enterprise, national security, and citizenship.

    “And then we’re also focused, especially on the side of our enterprise that works on advocacy and campaigns, “Heritage Action [For America]“, what those particular places are where we can tell that story to the American people. And hopefully, people running for office will take those issues and run with them,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest, the Epstein Files Landed with a Thud

    [ad_1]

    Not so long ago, the release of thousands of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, replete with embarrassing photos of Bill Clinton and other celebrities, would have set a TPUSA conference ablaze.

    We are in a different time now. Most of AmericaFest, an annual gathering of the right thrown by the conservative youth group founded by Charlie Kirk, received the latest release of a trove of Epstein files with outright indifference.

    “I didn’t see the new release,” said one attendee wearing a red MAGA hat. “The Friday before Christmas and no one cared,” joked another. “Oh, they did?” responded a third. When I explained the new revelations, they were dismissive. “Whoever died on Epstein island, who was taken advantage of, there’s more people in your neighborhood Planned Parenthood being put to death,” said one.

    On Friday, Donald Trump’s Justice Department released more than 13,000 documents relating to investigations into Epstein, the notorious financier and sex criminal who died by suicide while awaiting trial for trafficking minors in 2019. The partial release, which was compelled by an order from Congress, was heavily redacted. It included a conspicuous number of photos of Clinton, with little sight of Trump, leading critics to accuse the administration of selective release and redaction. Epstein’s victims quickly expressed their fury over what they said was an inadequate disclosure.

    Trump is mentioned in the dump. One document, which has been previously reported, details an alleged interaction between a child who accused Epstein of abuse and Trump. The girl, who is not identified, claimed that in 1994, when she was 14, Epstein brought her to Mar-a-Lago. “This is a good one, right?” Epstein told Trump when he introduced the two, according to the girl. Trump, she said, smiled and nodded in agreement.

    The headliners at the TPUSA conference, held in Phoenix, Arizona this week, made no mention of the new documents. The only reference to the late sex criminal came Thursday night, when Ben Shapiro, in a diatribe against Steve Bannon, pointed out that he served as “a PR agent for Jeffrey Epstein.”

    Eric Bolling, the conservative commentator and longtime Trump ally, told me the Trump base was tuning out of the Epstein story because “trust has been exhausted.”

    “One side stopped trusting institutions a long time ago and the other keeps waiting for them to deliver,” he said. “Transparency was promised for years. What people got was a slow drip of useless distractions. Without trust and accountability, even explosive disclosures fall flat.”

    [ad_2]

    Aidan McLaughlin

    Source link

  • Erika Kirk endorses JD Vance for president

    [ad_1]

    During her opening remarks at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest conference, Erika Kirk,  CEO of the influential conservative organization, endorsed Vice President JD Vance for president in 2028.

    “We are going to get my husband’s friend, JD Vance, elected 48 in the most resounding way possible,” the widow of Charlie Kirk, the slain co-founder of Turning Point USA, said as the crowd erupted in applause.

    Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk, widow of late right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk, speaks at the organization’s annual AmericaFest conference in Phoenix on Dec. 18, 2025.

    Olivier Touron / AFP via Getty Images


    Vance has not publicly indicated whether he intends to run for president but is widely expected to make a decision after the 2026 midterm elections. Still , an early endorsement from a powerful conservative group that helped galvanize young voters in 2024 for the Trump-Vance ticket underscores his growing stature within the movement and would carry significant influence in a future GOP presidential primary field.

    The vice president is scheduled to address the annual conference of thousands of conservatives on Sunday.

    Turning Point USA’s annual youth conference is being held in Phoenix.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump, Patel posts cause confusion amid crime investigations

    [ad_1]

    In a weekend punctuated by tragic events, President Donald Trump quickly shared what he knew, even if his information ultimately proved to be wrong.

    On Dec. 13, after a gunman opened fire at Brown University, killing two and injuring nine before evading capture, Trump posted on Truth Social that “the FBI is on the scene. The suspect is in custody.” But about 20 minutes later, Trump posted an update: “The Brown University Police reversed their previous statement — The suspect is NOT in custody.”

    At the time, members of the Brown community in Providence, Rhode Island, were sheltering in place and seeking guidance on safety. A Brown student pushed back on the president’s assertion: “I am at brown university they have not confirmed a shooter in custody please do not believe trump and stay inside.”

    Emergency personnel gather on Waterman Street at Brown University in Providence, R.I., on Saturday, Dec. 13, 2025, during the investigation of a shooting. (AP)

    On Dec. 15, the morning after Hollywood director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were discovered slain in their home, Trump posted on Truth Social that the killing was “reportedly due to the anger (Rob Reiner) caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME.”

    Soon after, police arrested the couple’s son, Nick, on suspicion of murder. Nick Reiner has spoken in the past about his struggles with drug addiction and homelessness. Police said nothing about motive and did not mention the director’s political ideology.

    A police officer blocks off a street near Rob Reiner’s residence Sunday, Dec. 14, 2025, in the Brentwood section of Los Angeles. (AP)

    Trump’s posts echoed those of other senior government officials who similarly took post-first, confirm-the-facts-later approaches to recent, high-profile breaking news.

    • A few hours after conservative advocate Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Utah on Sept. 10, FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X that the suspect “is now in custody.” But less than two hours later, Patel, a Trump appointee, posted that the suspect had been released after interrogation. The man eventually charged with murdering Kirk was not arrested until more than 24 hours later.

    • About 45 minutes after an assailant shot two West Virginia National Guard members on patrol in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 26, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey posted on X that one Guard member had died. Ten minutes later, he posted that both had died. About 20 minutes after that, he backtracked, citing “conflicting reports.” One Guard member ultimately died, but one has survived.

    Fast-moving investigations often zig and zag in unexpected ways, especially when the suspect is not immediately arrested, as was the case in all but the Washington, D.C., shooting.

    Law enforcement is trained to work carefully and under chaotic conditions to minimize further harm to bystanders and the public when investigations are still unfolding. That’s why law enforcement investigators historically speak through formal media briefings, where they can parcel out confirmed information and tamp down speculation.

    But in a social media-driven age that rewards being first over being accurate, government officials like Trump and Patel are supplanting the traditional filters of formal press events, feeding online speculation. The result is a media environment awash with confusion and claims, some of them that prove to be wrong.

    “Occasionally, news outlets have published background leaks from law enforcement that turned out to be false and then had to walk them back,” said Mark Feldstein, a University of Maryland journalism professor and former investigative correspondent for outlets including ABC News. “Never that I know of has the president of the United States or the director of the FBI attached his name publicly to information about a pending criminal case that turned out to be so wildly inaccurate.”

    Feldstein said the sharing of such information “undermines confidence in the individual and institutions putting out the inaccurate information, especially in such high-profile cases that attract so much attention.”

    Juliette Kayyem, who worked in Homeland Security during the Obama administration, said there is no public safety reason for the FBI director to tweet before an indictment. 

    “The FBI director is the bridge between a nonpublic investigation and disclosure of a successful investigation,” she said. “There is no need to hear from the FBI director between those two points. Stop tweeting.”

    Luke Hunt, a former FBI agent who is now a University of Alabama philosophy professor, said posts by the nation’s FBI director are especially concerning.

    “The FBI director — unlike the president — is not supposed to be a politician,” Hunt said in an email. “We historically do not expect rash, impulsive statements from our top law enforcement officials. We expect a patient search for evidence leading to truth. But now I think we are starting to view the FBI director’s posts similar to the president’s. We take what he says with a grain of salt because we have come to expect the posts to be steeped in impatience and political expedience.”

    Trump’s tack is not new for him, at least. In 2020, during his first term, Trump tweeted a baseless conspiracy theory that a 75-year-old man in Buffalo who had been recorded being pushed to the ground during a protest was actually a plant by anti-fascist demonstrators.

    Democrats have also shared information prematurely. In 2021, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Mayor Dean Trantalis, a Democrat, called a car crash during nearby Wilton Manors’ gay pride parade a “terrorist attack against the LGBT community.” Police later said the crash was an accident, and Trantalis, the city’s first openly gay mayor, said he regretted calling it a terrorist attack but said he felt terrorized by the event.

    Sometimes officials scoop the investigators on the scene by sharing initial bits of information that are ultimately supported by other evidence. Even this poses risks.

    Hours after a shooter fired on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Dallas on Sept. 24, killing two and injuring one before killing himself, Patel posted an image of five ammunition shells on X, one of which was labeled with the text “ANTI ICE.”

    Patel wrote that “while the investigation is ongoing, an initial review of the evidence shows an idealogical (sic) motive behind this attack.” His disclosure came shortly after a local press conference in which the casing messages were not mentioned. 

    Although other evidence ultimately supported that motive, Patel veered from the norm when he released raw evidence so early in the investigation — something experts say carries risks.

    When government officials prematurely release unconfirmed or inaccurate information, their actions can complicate subsequent prosecutions by providing jurors with alternate suspects and introducing reasonable doubt. They can expose the government and media outlets to legal risks, including payouts to people wrongly accused.

    The most famous example is Richard Jewell, an early suspect in the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing. Jewell “was intimately cleared but suffered damages until the government announced his innocence,” said Stanley Brand, a distinguished fellow in law and government at Penn State Dickinson Law School. Then-Attorney General Janet Reno publicly apologized, and Jewell secured settlements from multiple media outlets who had reported on him in connection to the bombing. 

    As law enforcement officials investigating the Brown shooting questioned someone they called a “person of interest,” some media outlets reported the person’s name, often citing unnamed law enforcement sources. After the person was released and the investigation went in a different direction, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha told reporters during a press conference that “what is really unfortunate is that this person’s name was leaked to the public. It’s hard to put that back in the bottle.”

    Kash Patel speaks at a news conference, Friday, Sept. 12, 2025, in Orem, Utah, as Utah department of public safety commissioner Beau Mason, left, and Utah Gov. Spencer Cox listen. (AP)

    Days after Kirk’s assassination, Patel told “Fox and Friends” that he had no regrets over his decision to release information about a suspect even though it quickly proved incorrect.

    “I was being transparent with working with the public on our findings as I had them,” he said. “I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did, and he was released,” Patel said.

    “Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment, sure,” Patel said. “But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not. I was telling the world what the FBI was doing as we were doing, and I’m continuing to do that.”

    PolitiFact News Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Erika Kirk Is Having a Private Summit With Conspiracy Peddler Candace Owens

    [ad_1]

    For the past week, Erika Kirk has been on a media tour to promote the final book by her late husband, Charlie Kirk—a press blitz that has included no fewer than six appearances on Fox News television and radio shows, as well as a high-profile town hall with CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss. But despite the press attention, the Turning Point USA founder’s death is still being overshadowed by conspiracy theories spread by independent conservative pundit Candace Owens. Erika Kirk herself addressed those theories in her conversation with Weiss. “Stop. That’s it,” Kirk said. “That’s all I have to say. Stop.”

    Kirk, the new CEO of Turning Point, did not mention Owens by name during her talk with Weiss. But on Sunday night, she changed tactics. In a post on X, Kirk announced that she planned to speak with Owens. “Candace Owens and I are meeting for a private, in-person discussion on Monday, December 15,” Kirk wrote. “@RealCandaceO and I have agreed that public discussions, livestreams, and tweets are on hold until after this meeting. I look forward to a productive conversation.”

    This tête-à-tête comes more than a month after Owens began pushing outlandish theories about Charlie Kirk’s killing. In the weeks after the assassination, she said that she had a sense of “doom” about “an underground that has emerged at schools,” which she claimed communicates through messages about bees and is represented by a “Polish communist underground symbol” and the Utah state flag. Because the podcaster is just asking questions, it’s hard to parse exactly what she thinks happened, but she recently alleged that the French and Israeli governments stood to gain from Charlie’s death—and she thinks they are coming after her too. (Owens is currently being sued by France’s president, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife, Brigitte, over her long-running claims that the first lady is transgender.) She has even named a specific French brigade.

    Owens has made some of these allegations in declarative sentences, without even a hint of hedging. “French foreign legionnaires were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination,” she wrote on X. “They were not the only ones, but they were involved.” On a Thursday livestream, she added that nothing “feels right to me about…the way that some of [Charlie’s] employees and friends have been behaving since that assassination,” though she exempted his widow from that criticism.

    Though Owens seems to be increasingly detached from reality, her theories continue to have sway in the broader right-wing ecosystem. She currently has 5.68 million subscribers to her YouTube channel, and her most recent broadcast about Charlie Kirk’s killing, titled “UH-OH! Erika Kirk Goes Off On ‘Conspiracy Theorists,’” has netted 2.7 million views since streaming on December 10. During that episode, Owens compared Erika Kirk to Meghan Markle, a hated figure in right-wing media. “We are dealing with the subject of Erika Kirk and what transpired immediately following Charlie’s assassination,” Owens said. “This is going to be read as Meghan Markle syndrome—where you want privacy when you want it, but you want publicity whenever you want it. And that just doesn’t work.”

    [ad_2]

    Erin Vanderhoof

    Source link

  • 7 highlights from Erika Kirk’s CBS News town hall

    [ad_1]

    Charlie Kirk transformed the American right through his nonprofit Turning Point USA before he was assassinated at an on-campus event in Utah three months ago. This week, his widow Erika, who now leads Turning Point, joined CBS News for a town hall where she reflected on grief, defended her husband’s controversial comments and explained the “game-time decision” of publicly forgiving the man accused in her husband’s murder.

    The conversation, moderated by CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss, is the first of many planned CBS News town halls and debates. Invited guests who joined the conversation included Utah Valley University student Hunter Kozak, who was the last person to speak to Charlie Kirk, and Robert Milgrim, the father of Israeli Embassy staffer Sarah Milgrim, who was shot and killed in May.

    Here are the highlights:

    Erika Kirk’s message to people who sought to justify assassination: “Tell that to my 3-year-old daughter”

    Erika Kirk said anyone who sought to justify her husband’s assassination is “sick” and said the internet has dehumanized people.

    “He’s a human being. You think he deserved that? Tell that to my 3-year-old daughter.”

    She continued: “You want to watch in high-res the video of my husband being murdered, and laugh, and say he deserves it? There’s something very sick in your soul, and I’m praying that God saves you.”

    Erika Kirk: Charlie never incited violence

    Charlie Kirk was known for his debates with college students, inviting them to step up to a microphone and “prove me wrong.” 

    Erika Kirk said her husband encouraged people of different political beliefs and backgrounds to come to the front of the line, saying, “‘I’ll put my mic down. Tell me why you believe that. That’s interesting. I never thought of that. But have you thought of this?’”

    A recent poll by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and College Pulse found that 91% of undergraduates believe “words can be violence.” But Erika Kirk said her husband never incited violence: “He never once said, ‘Go after them because they’re saying X, Y, Z and they deserve to die.’He gave them a microphone. He didn’t take away a moment for them to speak back. He gave them a microphone. And what’d they do? They gave him a bullet in the neck. Totally different.”

    She says her husband believed having conversations could save the world, referencing his new book, “Stop, in the Name of God: Why Honoring the Sabbath Will Transform Your Life,” which emphasizes that you can’t communicate effectively with someone if you’re not at peace with yourself.

    Erika Kirk: Charlie shouldn’t be “deteriorated” to “out-of-context” clips

    Erika Kirk says some of her late husband’s controversial comments, shared widely in the wake of his assassination, lacked context and that he should not “be deteriorated” to a few sentences.

    Weiss asked Erika Kirk about some of those much-shared comments: that some gun deaths are “worth it” to protect the Second Amendment; that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a mistake; and that if he sees a Black pilot, he’s “going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified,” while acknowledging “that’s not who I am, that’s not what I believe.”

    Erika Kirk said she’d love for people to watch the full clips instead of taking comments out of context.

    “Charlie didn’t care what skin color you were. He didn’t care what religion you were. He loved excellence,” she said, adding that “his favorite word was ‘earn’… He loved knowing that people worked hard to earn what they got.”

    She said she didn’t know the context of the “gun deaths” quote but said, “There’s a lot more there than just that one little sentence.”

    “My husband is not to be deteriorated to two sentences,” she said. “He’s not. He is a thought leader, and he was brilliant of a man. So that’s fine if you want to take words out of his mouth or out of context without the whole thing in perspective, but that’s the problem.”

    The last student to talk to Charlie Kirk asks: Will you condemn President Trump’s rhetoric?

    Kozak was the last person to debate Charlie Kirk before he was shot. Since that day, Kozak — a self-professed liberal — has continued to call for civil political discourse. “I think that one of the few things that we can agree on is this necessity for a conversation. I think that we need to remember that we still have to live with each other. That these are still our neighbors,” he told “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley after the shooting.

    He attended the CBS News town hall, where he again took the microphone — this time, to ask Erika Kirk a question: “Will you condemn the violent rhetoric of Donald Trump, the most powerful and influential person on earth?”

    Kozak specifically referenced President Trump accusing six Democratic lawmakers of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and then reposting, “HANG THEM, GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD!” Top Democrats called for Mr. Trump to be “condemned forcefully” over the social media remarks.

    Erika Kirk didn’t mention Mr. Trump by name in her response, saying the issue is “so much deeper than one person” and that it “starts at the home.”

    She urged parents to “look in the mirror” and reflect on how they’re raising their children.

    “You can choose to have evil in your heart or you can choose to have light,” she said. “What you consume and what you absorb from the outside world will manifest itself.”

    Weiss asked: “Do you think our political leaders have a responsibility to turn the temperature down right now?”

    “Well, I think everyone has a responsibility to do that, and I’m doing my part,” Erika Kirk replied. “I’m not in control of other people.”

    Dad of Israeli Embassy staffer killed in shooting asks: Will you condemn antisemitism?

    Robert Milgrim, whose daughter Sarah was one of two victims of the Capitol Jewish Museum shooting in Washington, D.C., asked Erika Kirk: “Will you here condemn the individuals spreading that hate and speak out clearly enough against antisemitism so we can prevent another tragedy?”

    “Hate is hate. It’s evil,” said Erika Kirk, adding that she and Charlie Kirk have always been “very clear on our stance” on Israel and the Jewish people. 

    She said: “What healing factor comes out of hating Jewish people? What healing factor comes out of hating Christians? What healing factor comes out? Hate in general. Nothing. Nothing. Charlie always would say very clearly, Jew hate was brain rot. He would always say it.”

    Antisemitic incidents have increased nearly 900% in the U.S. over the past 10 years, according to a recent Anti-Defamation League audit.

    Erika Kirk’s one-word message for Candace Owens

    Weiss asked Erika Kirk about Candace Owens, a former Turning Point USA employee and onetime friend of Charlie Kirk, who has recently been peddling conspiracy theories about his assassination. Owens has also made unfounded fraud allegations about the nonprofit — the Treasury Department last week confirmed that none of the tax-exempt entities Erika Kirk runs are under investigation by the IRS.

    What does Erika Kirk want to say to Owens and others making these unfounded claims?

    “Stop. That’s it. That’s all I have to say. Stop.”

    The “game-time decision” to forgive

    Erika Kirk stunned millions when she proclaimed at her husband’s memorial service that she forgave her husband’s accused killer.

    “I forgive him because it’s what Christ did and is what Charlie would do,” she said in her powerful eulogy.

    She told Weiss that the moment was a “game-time decision” because she’d never say something she didn’t mean.

    “But am I gonna take that moment to say, ‘Rally the troops, burn the city down, march in the streets?’ Or am I gonna take that moment and unleash something like we talked about, even greater, more powerful and say, ‘It’s a revival.’ And let that unleash, and let the Lord use it in ways that no one else could’ve ever imagined.”

    Erika Kirk said she’s not forgetting or condoning, but rather “releasing myself from the enemy’s hands where he could have a foothold in me.”

    When asked if she had any words for his accused killer, she said: “Nothing. I have nothing to say to you. Nothing.”

    She added that there’s a difference between forgiving someone and still wanting justice. “We serve a just God, and I rest easy in knowing that. He’s sovereign, but he’s just. And so let the Lord handle that.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Erika Kirk talks faith and grief, fields question from last person to speak to Charlie: Watch the CBS News town hall

    [ad_1]


    Three months after her husband, Charlie Kirk, was assassinated, Erika Kirk opened up about life, loss, the state of political discourse and more in a one-hour town hall event moderated by Bari Weiss, CBS News’ editor-in-chief. The special was broadcast on Saturday night on the CBS television network and will stream later on Paramount+ and CBS News 24/7.

    The event, filmed before a studio audience, featured Kirk fielding questions from young evangelicals, prominent religious leaders, and figures across the political spectrum. The conversation will also focus on our country’s political divide — and how we can find our way out.

    Erika Kirk is the chairman and CEO of the Turning Point USA. The organization was founded by her late husband, a conservative political activist who was shot and killed on Sept. 10, 2025, while speaking before a crowd on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.

    “Like so many people around the world, I will never forget the moment that Erika Kirk forgave her husband’s killer,” said Weiss. “I am eager to speak to her — and thrilled to be doing so in front of a group of Americans who I know will elevate the conversation.”

    The town hall was recorded in New York before an invited audience.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS News Presents: A Town Hall with Erika Kirk

    [ad_1]



    Watch CBS News



    Erika Kirk opens up about life, loss and political discourse after her husband Charlie’s assassination. Watch the town hall, moderated by Bari Weiss.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Indiana Republicans Defied Trump and Bomb Threats to Stop Pro-GOP Redistricting

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Kaiti Sullivan/Bloomberg/Getty Images

    Indiana Republicans defied bomb threats, swatting incidents, and a pressure campaign led by President Donald Trump when on Thursday they voted down a bill to make an all-GOP congressional delegation. In contrast to an easy approval in the state house, 21 Republicans joined ten Democrats in the state senate to sink the plan to wipe out two Democratic U.S. House districts.

    The campaign lasted four months and included Trump and J.D. Vance, both of whom had repeated personal meetings with gerrymander-shy Republican lawmakers, along with House Speaker Mike Johnson, Governor Mike Braun, Indiana senator Jim Banks, and a host of national conservative groups. As Politico explained, Charlie Kirk even spent the last weeks of his life threatening primaries for Republicans who opposed the effort.

    Now Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, is among many MAGA allies threatening vengeance in primaries for those who dared defy Trump’s orders to help rig the midterms. And Democrats nationally will be happy with the diverted GOP time, energy, and money devoted to Hoosier bloodletting, along with the continued presence in Congress of Indiana Democrats Andre Carson and Frank Mrvan.

    Trump’s effort to make Republican-controlled states redraw their congressional maps to give the GOP enough seats to withstand a potential Democratic wave has been hit or miss. Last week, the Supreme Court gave Trump a big win by overruling lower-court judges and putting back into place a Texas congressional map designed to give Republicans as many as five new House seats. He experienced earlier setbacks in Kansas and Ohio, whose Republicans also declined to wipe out Democratic districts, while Democrats successfully retaliated with a ballot initiative in California that is likely to cancel out or exceed Texas’s GOP gains.

    It’s getting late in the day for any further pre-midterm gerrymandering. Florida Republicans will give it a try despite constitutional barriers, and Virginia Democrats seem likely to counter. But overall, the GOP bid to insulate itself from the wrath of voters in November 2026 is losing momentum. Perhaps Republicans and their leader should focus a bit more on making themselves more popular than they have appeared to be in virtually every 2025 vote.

    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk murder suspect appears in court as judge weighs degree of media access

    [ad_1]

    The 22-year-old Utah man charged with killing Charlie Kirk made his first in-person court appearance Thursday as his lawyers pushed to further limit media access in the high-profile criminal case.

    A Utah judge is weighing the public’s right to know details in Tyler Robinson’s case against his attorneys’ concerns that the swarm of media attention could interfere with his right to a fair trial.

    Robinson’s legal team and the Utah County Sheriff’s Office have asked Judge Tony Graf to ban cameras in the courtroom. Graf was also asked to clarify specifics of a previous order pertaining to publicity surrounding the case.

    That order, in part, prohibited witnesses in the case from issuing “extrajudicial statements,” and required that lawyers for both the defense and prosecution inform witnesses about the order. But the state argued the term witness was too vague, noting there were some 3,000 potential lay witnesses. Graf clarified on Thursday that it refers to “all witnesses that are part of the prosecution and defense teams.”

    “This includes any witness, including lay witnesses, whom the prosecution or defense has a good faith belief will be called to testify at a hearing or trial,” Graf said.

    Graf said he would announce further rulings on Dec. 29.

    Prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, just a few miles north of the Provo courthouse. They plan to seek the death penalty.

    Robinson arrived in court with restraints on his wrists and ankles and wearing a dress shirt, tie and slacks. He smiled at family members sitting in the front row of the courtroom, where his mother teared up and wiped her eyes with a tissue. Robinson’s father and brother sat next to her. A coalition of national and local news organizations is fighting to preserve media access in the case.

    Tyler Robinson appears in court for a hearing in Provo, Utah, on Dec. 11, 2025. Robinson is charged with murder in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk.

    Pool


    The judge has already made allowances to protect Robinson’s presumption of innocence before a trial, agreeing that the case has drawn “extraordinary” public attention. In a closed hearing on Oct. 24, he ruled that Robinson will be allowed to wear regular clothes at all pretrial hearings but must be physically restrained due to security concerns. 

    Graf also prohibited the media from filming or photographing Robinson’s restraints after his attorneys argued widespread images of him shackled and in jail clothing could prejudice future jurors.

    The first part of Thursday’s hearing was closed to the press and public as they discussed issues from the Oct. 24 hearing, but when the open portion of the hearing began, attorneys for Robinson and the state noted the camera inside the courtroom had broadcast images of Robinson in shackles — and also broadcast private remarks from the defense’s counsel and filmed the lawyers’ documents and computers — violating the judge’s order. Robinson’s attorneys asked for the remainder of the hearing not to be broadcast, but Graf instead opted to relocate the camera to avoid further problems.

    Michael Judd, an attorney for the media coalition, has urged Graf to let the news organizations weigh in on any future requests for closed hearings or other limitations.

    The media presence at the hearings is already limited, with judges often designating one photographer and one videographer to document a hearing and share their images with other news organizations. Additional journalists can typically attend to listen and take notes, as can members of the public.

    Judd wrote in recent filings that an open court “safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process” while fostering public confidence in judicial proceedings. Criminal cases in the U.S. have long been open to the public, which he argued is proof that trials can be conducted fairly without restricting reporters as they work to keep the public informed.

    Robinson’s legal team says his pretrial publicity reaches as far as the White House, with President Trump announcing soon after Robinson’s arrest: “With a high degree of certainty, we have him,” and “I hope he gets the death penalty.”

    Attorney Kathy Nester has raised concerns that digitally altered versions of Robinson’s initial court photo have spread widely, creating misinformation about the case. Some altered images show Robinson crying or having an outburst in court, which did not happen.

    Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has called for full transparency, saying, “We deserve to have cameras in there.” Her husband was an ally of Mr. Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism. Erika Kirk now leads the organization he founded, Turning Point USA.

    In a town hall moderated by CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss, airing Saturday, Erika Kirk talked about the rise of political violence and the conspiracy theories that swirled around her husband’s death. She also had a message for people who sought to justify the assassination: “You’re sick.”

    “He’s a human being,” Kirk said in the town hall. “You think he deserved that? Tell that to my 3-year-old daughter.”

    She continued: “You want to watch in high-res the video of my husband being murdered, and laugh, and say he deserves it? There’s something very sick in your soul, and I’m praying that God saves you,” she said. 

    The one-hour town hall event will be broadcast on Saturday, Dec. 13, at 8 p.m. ET/PT on the CBS television network and will stream later on Paramount+ and CBS News 24/7.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawyers for suspect in Charlie Kirk assassination push to limit media access in case

    [ad_1]

    Lawyers for suspect in Charlie Kirk assassination push to limit media access in case

    The murder of Charlie Kirk is an American tragedy. Charlie Kirk was murdered while engaging in one of our most sacred and cherished American rites. The bedrock of our democratic republic, the free exchange of ideas in *** search for truth, understanding and *** more perfect union. It is also an offense against the state. And to the peace and enjoyment of the people of Utah and of all those who visit here. But Charlie Kirk’s murder also strikes *** more personal and intimate chord. Charlie Kirk was first and foremost *** husband and *** father to two beautiful young children. He was *** son, he was *** brother and *** friend. Like all murders, the senseless and needless taking of Charlie Kirk’s life. Has shattered the lives of those he loved and those who loved him. To Charlie’s wife Erica, his two young children, his parents, his family. And his friends, I express my sincere condolences and offer my heartfelt prayers on your behalf. I also want to express my concern for everyone. Who was at Charlie’s Turning Point USA event at the university or University of Utah Valley University and all who have been impacted by this tragedy. As county attorney, I am charged with bringing justice to those who offend our laws. I am charged. With bringing justice for those who harm, for those who are harmed, I am charged with bringing justice for Charlie Kirk. I am committed to these aims. I take this responsibility seriously. Today, after reviewing the evidence that law enforcement has collected thus far, I am filing *** criminal information charging Tyler James Robinson, age 22, with the following crimes. Count one aggravated murder, *** capital offense for intentionally or knowingly causing the death of Charlie Kirk under circumstances that created *** great risk of death to others. Count 2 felony discharge of *** firearm causing serious bodily injury, *** first degree felony. The state is further alleging aggravating factors on counts 1 and 2 because the defendant is believed to have targeted Charlie Kirk based on Charlie Kirk’s political expression and did so knowing that children were present and would witness the homicide. The state is also charging defendant with count 3, obstruction of justice, *** second degree felony. For moving and concealing the rifle used in the shooting. Count 4, obstruction of justice, *** 3rd degree. *** 2nd degree felony for disposing the clothing he wore during the shooting. Count 5 witness tampering, *** 3rd degree felony for directing his roommate to delete his incriminating texts. Count 6 witness tampering, *** 3rd degree felony for directing his roommate to stay silent if police questioned him. And count 7 commission of *** violent offense in the presence of *** child, *** class *** misdemeanor for committing homicide, knowing that children were present and may have seen or heard the murder and did so based on Charlie Kirk’s political expression. Also, following the press conference, I am filing *** notice of intent to seek the death penalty. I do not take this decision lightly, and it is *** decision I have made independently. As county attorney based solely on the available evidence and circumstances and nature of the crime. Because we are seeking the death penalty, the defendant will continue to be held without bail in the Utah County jail. Turning to the 10 page. Information. These are the allegations. On September 10th, 2025 at approximately 12:23 p.m., Charlie Kirk was shot and killed while speaking to *** large crowd on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Police found the suspected murder weapon, *** bolt action 30 06 rifle nearby. Over the next approximately 33 hours. Police conducted *** manhunt manhunt for the shooter until the evening of September 11th, 2025 when Tyler James Robinson surrendered to police at the Washington County Sheriff’s Office. DNA consistent with Robinson was found on the rifle’s trigger. After shooting Mister Kirk, Robinson hid the gun, discarded the clothing he wore when he fired the rifle, and told his roommate to delete incriminating text messages and not talk to police. Children were present at the time of the shooting. The shooting. Turning Point USA, *** nonprofit organization founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk, organized *** public outdoor event to be held at noon on September 10, 2025 at UVU. The event was the first in *** series of similar events to be held at college campuses nationwide. Mister Kirk is *** well known conservative activist famous for these type of events where he discusses various political issues and debates with audience members. His events and comments have garnered *** significant number of supporters and drawn the ire of many who disagree with his political views. The event at UVU was announced far in advance and garnered significant publicity and interest. Consequently, several 100 people attended. Mr. Kirk was interacting with the crowd before the event officially got under way. Then at approximately noon Mister Kirk seated himself under *** portable canopy behind *** table and microphone. He began speaking to the crowd and fielding questions from attendees, *** format Mister Kirk commonly used at his events. Mister Kirk allowed his questionnaers to approach *** microphone positioned directly in front of him. Mr. Kirk’s team members were very close to him on his right and left as well as some behind his canopy and others at various close locations near him. The large crowd surrendered surrounded Mr. Kirk on three sides. Temporary metal fencing separated attendees from Mr. Kirk by only *** matter of feet. Directly above and behind Mr. Kirk was the UVU Hall of Flags, an indoor walkway spanning several 100 ft with floor to ceiling glass windows which overlooked the plaza where Mr. Kirk was seated. People were in the walkway at the time of the shooting. Approximately 15 minutes into the event, Mr. Kirk was answering *** question about mass shootings by transgender individuals when *** gunshot rang out. The bullet struck Mr. Kirk in the neck. He slumped to the ground almost immediately. The bullet’s tra trajectory passed closely to several other individuals beside Mister Kirk, including the questioner who was standing directly in front of Mister Kirk. Children were visible near Mister Kirk’s stage when he was shot. Mr. Kirk was rushed to *** nearby hospital where he was declared deceased. The medical examiner’s report is still pending. So UVU surveillance. So at the moment of the shot, *** UVU police officer was watching the crowd from an elevated vantage point. As soon as he heard the shot, he began to scan the area for threats. Believing the shot came from *** rifle because of its sound, he looked for potential sniper positions. He noted *** roof area approximately 160 yards away from Mr. Kirk as *** potential shooting position and rushed there to look for evidence. The suspected shooting position is adjacent to an open publicly accessible walkway. To access the suspected location, *** person must climb over *** railing and then drop to the roof only slightly below. The UV officer climbed over the railing and down onto the roof. He then walked to the suspected shooting position and confirmed *** clear shooting corridor between the position and Mister Kirk’s seat. He also noticed markings in the gravel rooftop consistent with *** sniper having lain on the on the roof, impressions in the gravel potentially left by the elbows. Knees and feet of *** person in *** prone shooting position. Police reviewed surveillance from the camera covering the roof and discovered that it recorded an individual dressed in dark clothing cross the railing from the public walkway and drop onto the roof at approximately 12:15 p.m. Although the individual moved out of the camera’s view for *** short time, the camera again captured the individual running across the roof and then low crawling to the area the UBU officer recognized as where the suspected sniper had dropped into *** pro prone shooting position. After *** short time, which matches the known time of the shot, the individual arose and ran across the roof to the northeast. This discovery led to an intensive review of UBU surveillance recordings to attempt to track and identify the suspect. Surveillance revealed the following at approximately 11:51 a.m. The suspect entered campus from the north. He is seen wearing *** black shirt with an American flag in the center, *** dark baseball cap, and large sunglasses. Throughout the surveillance, the suspect keeps his head down and rarely raises his head enough to get *** clear image of his face. As he proceeds across the campus, he is seen walking with an unusual gait. The suspect walks with very little bending in his right leg, consistent with *** rifle being hidden in his pants. This unusual gait continues until the suspect is seen crossing the railway off the open walkway and onto the roof where he leaves the camera’s view. *** camera later captures the suspect as he runs across the roof to the suspected shooting position. Immediately after the shot was fired, *** camera captures the suspect running across the roof carrying an item whose shape is consistent with *** rifle. The suspect is then seen climbing down from the roof. He appears to drop the item he was carrying as he hits the ground in *** controlled fall. He then picks up the item and runs toward the northeast end of campus. Expanded crime scene investigation. Law enforcement officers followed the suspect’s escape path to the northeast end of campus where they believed the suspect left campus and entered *** wooded area. In that wooded area, investigators found *** bolt action rifle wrapped in *** towel. The rifle contained one spent round. And 3 unspent rounds. This is consistent with the facts officers observed at the time of and immediately after the shootings. No shell casings were found on the roof, suggesting *** bolt action rather than an auto loading weapon, and only *** single round was fired. Each round in the rifle contained an etched inscription as follows. The fired cartridge. Was etched no ices bulge. Ow oh what’s this? The second cartridge. That was that was again not spent the last three were not spent, were not fired. The second hey fascist catch with arrows symbols. The 3rd cartridge, oh, Bella Chow, Bella Chow, Bella Chowchow chow. The fourth cartridge, if you read this, you are gay, LMAO. The rifle, ammunition rounds, and towel were sent for forensic processing. DNA consistent with with defendant was found on the trigger. Other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel. Law enforcement was unable to immediately locate the shooter, so they published photos of the shooter from the UVU surveillance cameras and asked for the public’s help to identify him. Meanwhile, law enforcement continued to try to identify the shooter through other means. The Washington County investigation. On the evening of September 11, 2025 as law enforcement continued their investigation, Tyler James Robinson went to the Washington County Sheriff’s office with his parents and *** family friend to turn himself in. Robinson’s mother stated that the following to police on September 11th, 2025, the day after the shooting, Robinson’s mother saw the photo of the shooter in the news and thought the shooter looked like her son. Robinson’s mother called her son. And asked him where he was. He said he was at home sick. And that he had also been at home, homesick on September 10th. Robinson’s mother expressed concern to her husband that the suspect shooter looked like Robinson. Robinson’s father agreed. Robinson’s mother explained that over the last year or so Robinson had become more political. And had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans rights oriented, she stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, *** biological male who was transitioning genders. This resulted in several discussions with family members, but especially between Robinson and his father who have very different political views. In one conversation before the shooting, Robinson mentioned that Charlie Kirk would be holding an event at UVU, which Robert Robinson said was *** stupid venue for the event. Robinson accused Kirk of spreading hate. Robinson’s father reported that when his wife showed him the surveillance image of the suspected shooter in the news, he agreed that it looked like their son. He also believed that the rifle that police suspected the shooter used matched *** rifle that was given to his son as *** gift. As *** result, Robinson’s father contacted his son and asked him to send *** photo of the rifle. Robinson did not respond. However, Robinson’s father spoke on the phone with Robinson. Robinson implied that he planned to take his own life. Robinson’s parents were able to convince him to meet at their home. As they discussed the situation, Robinson implied that he was the shooter and stated that he couldn’t go to jail and just wanted to end it. When asked why he did it, Robinson explained there is too much evil, and the guy referring to Charlie Kirk spreads too much hate. They talked about Robinson turning himself in and convinced Robinson, Robinson to speak with *** family friend who is *** retired deputy sheriff. At Robinson at Robinson’s father’s request, the family friend met with Robinson and his parents and convinced Robinson to turn himself in. The family friend spoke to police and reported telling Robinson that it would be best if he brought all evidence with him to the sheriff’s office to avoid police having to search his parents’ home. The friend also asked Robinson if he had any clothes that were related to what he did. Robinson replied that he had disposed of the clothes in different areas. The roommate. Police interviewed Robinson’s roommate, *** biological male who was was involved in *** romantic relationship with Robinson. The roommate told police that the roommate received messages from Robinson about the shooting and and he did provide those messages to police. On September 10, 2025, the roommate received *** text message from Robinson which said, Drop what you’re doing, look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found *** note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it. Police found *** photograph of this note. The following exchange text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You’re joking, right, Robinson. I am still OK, my love, but am stuck in Oam for *** little while longer yet. Shouldn’t be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still, to be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren’t the one who did it, right? Robinson, I am, I am, I’m sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson. No, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It’s quiet almost enough to get out, but there’s one vehicle lingering roommate why Robinson, why did I do it? Roommate, yeah. Robinson, I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it, roommate, how long have you been planning this, Robinson? *** bit over *** week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is *** squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t want to chance it. Robinson again, I’m wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back Grandpa’s rifle. ID if it’s had *** serial number, but it wouldn’t trace to me. I worry about Princes. I had to leave it in *** bush where I changed outfits, didn’t have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don’t find Princes. How the F will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in *** towel. Remember how I was engraving bullets? The ffing messages are mostly *** big meme. If I see notice bulge UWU on Fox News, I might have *** stroke all right. I’m gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I’d say Grandpa’s gun does just fine IDK. I think that was *** 2 2K dollar scope. Wink wink. Um Robinson, Robinson again, delete this exchange. Again, Robinson, my dad wants photos of the rifle. He says Grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released *** photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He’s calling me RN, not answering Robinson. Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard maga. Robinson, I’m gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is *** deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love that came from Robinson, roommate. I’m much more worried about you, Robinson, don’t talk to the media, please don’t take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for *** lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robinson’s residence, police executed *** search warrant on Robinson’s residence. During that search, police discovered *** shell casing with etchings like the etchings found on the shells in the rifle near UVU. Police also found several target boards with bullet holes in Robinson’s home. Now, as I stated in the beginning when I read those allegations, these are allegations. And like the evidence set forth in this statement, those allegations, what you’ve heard from the media. Even from state and federal officials has not been tested in the crucible of *** jury trial. I understand the public’s desire to know the facts. My own family members have pressed me for information. Why are we reluctant to share the details of the investigation itself and comment on the case? Because I want to ensure *** fair and impartial trial. I became *** prosecutor because of my love for the ideals of this great country. And the principles embedded in our Constitution. The free exchange of ideas and opinions is critical to this great American experiment, but so too are the protections afforded to the accused found in the 5th and 6th Amendments, the right against self-incrimination. The right to *** speedy and public trial, the right to the effective assistance of counsel, the right to confront one’s accusers, and the right to compel the attendance of witnesses. And perhaps most importantly under our Constitution, the accused is presumed innocent until we, the state, prove to an impartial jury of defendant’s peers his guilt beyond *** reasonable doubt. That jury cannot rely on our allegations. On what they hear in the news or on what they hear from *** public official. The jury is the sole trier of fact. And they will ultimately determine those facts based on evidence *** trial judge has has determined is admissible. Again, as prosecutors, we bear the burden to prove guilt beyond *** reasonable doubt. But no, but make no mistake, we welcome this burden. I’d like to now introduce my team my team who will be charged with prosecuting the case. This is *** veteran and expert team of some of the state’s best trial attorneys. Chad Gruander, who is, uh, my one of my two chief deputies. Ryan McBride and David Sturgill, uh, on the far right there, um, and, and those two were very much involved in preparing search warrants, did *** phenomenal job, worked day and night to, to see that accomplished well after he was, uh, Robinson was, uh, taken into custody. Also Lauren Hunt, she is one of our special victims prosecutors. And Chris Ballard. My second chief deputy who will be handling motions. I’m gonna explain just the the procedural steps um we’re not ***. *** grand jury, we don’t have *** grand jury system like the federal courts do. It’s it’s *** preliminary hearing system. So the arrest and filing of the criminal information are merely the first steps in the criminal justice process. Today at 3 p.m. the defendant will appear before *** judge in the Utah Fourth District Court for his first appearance to be informed of these charges and to ensure that he has an attorney to represent him. The hearing will be brief. The judge will conduct that first appearance virtually via Webex. This is not unusual in the 4th district. All felony first appearances for defendants who are in custody are held virtually. *** link to that hearing is available for media on the Utah State court’s X account at Utah State courts. Now following defendant’s first appearance, he will be entitled to *** preliminary hearing. At that hearing, the state will be required to show probable cause that defendant committed the crimes. The purpose of the preliminary hearing is not to determine guilt. But simply to assure the court that the prosecution has enough evidence to proceed to trial. If *** judge finds probable cause and binds the case over for trial, an arraignment hearing will be held. At that hearing, *** judge will again inform defendant of the charges against him and require him to enter *** plea to each charge. The next step, the next step following the arraignment is an opportunity for the parties to file any relevant motions and then ultimately the trial itself. This case has generated *** tremendous amount of interest across our nation and even the world. The public’s desire for information is is understandable, but it bears reiterating that this case will be tried in *** court of law consistent with our Constitution, not the court of public opinion. Thus we will only discuss with the press, uh, discuss the case with the press occasionally. Uh, it’s, it will not be *** day to day or even week to week uh occurrence, and but we will only do so in *** manner as not to jeopardize the fair trial process. Before I conclude, I want to express my appreciation for the tireless work of our local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. They have an extremely difficult, dangerous, and often, often thankless job. I’m proud to acknowledge the exceptional work they do every day, and particularly their work on this case. It was truly *** marvel to witness. Their skilled work and dedication have brought us to this point. I’m also grateful for the leadership demonstrated by Bo Mason, the commissioner of the Utah Department of Public Safety, FBI Special Agent in charger Rob Bowles. Utah County Sheriff Mike Smith. Our local police chiefs and Felice John Vitti, the acting US attorney for the District of Utah, I’m also grateful for the support of our governor Spencer Cox and our attorney General Derek Brown, who is standing behind me today and has offered his support and resources as we proceed to trial. Finally, I want to thank our Utah County commissioners Amelia Powers Gardiner, Brandon Gordon, and Skyler Beltran. They too have pledged to assist with the resources needed to successfully prosecute this case. I will now take *** few questions for ladies and gentlemen, just just really fast if you could identify yourself and what that may have known about this shooting. They are still looking into it’s an undergoing investigation. So is that *** possibility? They haven’t ruled that out, Sir Ed Lavandera with CNN. The text message is the exchange with the roommate, can you, uh, kind of give us *** sense of did that happen over several hours? Did that happen before, um I, I don’t have that information. I know acknowledging that you made this decision to independently, did you hear it on the Trump administration or Governor Cox’s as you were working on this? Um, I talked to officials from both administrations, but I was not pressured to make *** decision. I, I understood their feelings on it because it was in the news, but we didn’t really discuss that. Do you have any indication that transgender issues play *** role in the motivations. I, I’m gonna stick to what I just stated in my public, uh, in my, in our information. I, I think that is pretty much set forth there. Fox News just asking, are you planning to file charges against anyone else in connection. Again, we don’t have any information at this point of additional uh suspects, but I know that uh. Our our law enforcement agencies are continuing to follow leads that you are or that other people, *** number of people are being investigated and interrogated, so it seems that there are people who like me. Yeah, I’m not, I’m not I, I can’t comment on that. I’m not aware of all their investigation. I just know that, uh, these agencies are continuing to investigate this case and follow all leads. how does this possibly interface with any. Um, that’s up to the feds. They have different charges and they’re reviewing the evidence and after they review the evidence and the law they could file charges, but I’m not privy to exactly what they’re looking at the BBC *** lot about text messages with the roommate. The governor previously said the roommate is cooperating, but could we see charges against the room again, I’m not prepared to answer that question. It’s going to, is it unusual to cite *** political motivation? It’s, it’s part of our code and so we charge that. Ultimately *** judge will determine that. At trial and cooperation has he spoken at all has been cooperate? Again, I’m not going to comment on that. I am not aware of that information that’s again still under investigation. I I am not going to comment on that. I’m not going to comment on that. Your team has been circumspect, very measured in what they out that hampered. Well, as attorneys we typically like to control that information to preserve an impartial, uh, jury and, and *** fair trial. Excuse me, uh, I don’t have that information. Can you tell us more about what the family may have said in interviews? Um, what the family said is, is what I, uh, provided. Do you guys, uh, do you anticipate that the defense will try to get this trial moved out of Utah County and how will you? That from where that the defense will be from Utah County. Uh, I, I, I couldn’t predict what they’re gonna do. You say this suggest that the timing of the shot and the question that was asked about mass shootings transgender, is that more than coincidence? Um, that will be for *** jury to decide. Again, I’m not gonna comment on the evidence. Again, I’m not gonna comment on other than the facts that I or or the evidence that we’ve gathered so far in the conference. Jeopardize his right to *** fair trial. Uh, I don’t believe so. This is part of *** public document that we have to file, um, as we file *** criminal information. We have to file *** probable cause statement. That’s *** public document and so we’re comfortable with that. I’m not going to comment on that either. I, I can’t share any more than what I’ve already said. Do you have any evidence that he went to practice or to the shooting that’s insight, the evidence that I’m willing to share is what I just read in our statement, and it’s in the in the information we’re gonna have to cut it off there. OK, you just, did you consult Erica Kirk about seeking the death penalty? Um, I’m not going to comment on that. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.

    Lawyers for the 22-year-old Utah man charged with killing Charlie Kirk are due in court Thursday as they push to further limit media access in the high-profile criminal case.A Utah judge is weighing the public’s right to know details in Tyler Robinson’s case against his attorneys’ concerns that the swarm of media attention could interfere with his right to a fair trial.Robinson’s legal team and the Utah County Sheriff’s Office have asked Judge Tony Graf to ban cameras in the courtroom.Prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, just a few miles north of the Provo courthouse. They plan to seek the death penalty.Robinson was expected to appear in person Thursday after making previous court appearances via video or audio feed from jail, according to a transport order.A coalition of national and local news organizations, including The Associated Press, is fighting to preserve media access in the case.Graf has already made allowances to protect Robinson’s presumption of innocence before a trial, agreeing that the case has drawn “extraordinary” public attention.Graf held a closed hearing on Oct. 24 in which attorneys discussed Robinson’s courtroom attire and security protocols. Under a subsequent ruling by the judge, Robinson is allowed to wear street clothes in court during his pretrial hearings but must be physically restrained due to security concerns. Graf also prohibited media from filming or photographing Robinson’s restraints after his attorneys argued widespread images of him shackled and in jail clothing could prejudice future jurors.Michael Judd, an attorney for the media coalition, has urged Graf to let the news organizations weigh in on any future requests for closed hearings or other limitations.The media presence at Utah hearings is already limited, with judges often designating one photographer and one videographer to document a hearing and share their images with other news organizations. Additional journalists can typically attend to listen and take notes, as can members of the public.Judd wrote in recent filings that an open court “safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process” while fostering public confidence in judicial proceedings. Criminal cases in the U.S. have long been open to the public, which he argued is proof that trials can be conducted fairly without restricting reporters as they work to keep the public informed.Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has called for full transparency, saying, “We deserve to have cameras in there.” Her husband was an ally of President Donald Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism.Robinson’s legal team says his pretrial publicity reaches as far as the White House, with Trump announcing soon after Robinson’s arrest, “With a high degree of certainty, we have him,” and “I hope he gets the death penalty.”Attorney Kathy Nester has raised concern that digitally altered versions of Robinson’s initial court photo have spread widely, creating misinformation about the case. Some altered images show Robinson crying or having an outburst in court, which did not happen.

    Lawyers for the 22-year-old Utah man charged with killing Charlie Kirk are due in court Thursday as they push to further limit media access in the high-profile criminal case.

    A Utah judge is weighing the public’s right to know details in Tyler Robinson’s case against his attorneys’ concerns that the swarm of media attention could interfere with his right to a fair trial.

    Robinson’s legal team and the Utah County Sheriff’s Office have asked Judge Tony Graf to ban cameras in the courtroom.

    Prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 shooting of the conservative activist on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, just a few miles north of the Provo courthouse. They plan to seek the death penalty.

    Robinson was expected to appear in person Thursday after making previous court appearances via video or audio feed from jail, according to a transport order.

    A coalition of national and local news organizations, including The Associated Press, is fighting to preserve media access in the case.

    Graf has already made allowances to protect Robinson’s presumption of innocence before a trial, agreeing that the case has drawn “extraordinary” public attention.

    Graf held a closed hearing on Oct. 24 in which attorneys discussed Robinson’s courtroom attire and security protocols. Under a subsequent ruling by the judge, Robinson is allowed to wear street clothes in court during his pretrial hearings but must be physically restrained due to security concerns. Graf also prohibited media from filming or photographing Robinson’s restraints after his attorneys argued widespread images of him shackled and in jail clothing could prejudice future jurors.

    Michael Judd, an attorney for the media coalition, has urged Graf to let the news organizations weigh in on any future requests for closed hearings or other limitations.

    The media presence at Utah hearings is already limited, with judges often designating one photographer and one videographer to document a hearing and share their images with other news organizations. Additional journalists can typically attend to listen and take notes, as can members of the public.

    Judd wrote in recent filings that an open court “safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process” while fostering public confidence in judicial proceedings. Criminal cases in the U.S. have long been open to the public, which he argued is proof that trials can be conducted fairly without restricting reporters as they work to keep the public informed.

    Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has called for full transparency, saying, “We deserve to have cameras in there.” Her husband was an ally of President Donald Trump who worked to steer young voters toward conservatism.

    Robinson’s legal team says his pretrial publicity reaches as far as the White House, with Trump announcing soon after Robinson’s arrest, “With a high degree of certainty, we have him,” and “I hope he gets the death penalty.”

    Attorney Kathy Nester has raised concern that digitally altered versions of Robinson’s initial court photo have spread widely, creating misinformation about the case. Some altered images show Robinson crying or having an outburst in court, which did not happen.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump awards medals to the Kennedy Center honorees in an Oval Office ceremony

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Saturday presented the 2025 Kennedy Center honorees with their medals during a ceremony in the Oval Office, hailing the slate of artists he was deeply involved in choosing as “perhaps the most accomplished and renowned class” ever assembled.

    This year’s recipients are actor Sylvester Stallone, singers Gloria Gaynor and George Strait, the rock band Kiss and actor-singer Michael Crawford.

    Trump said they are a group of “incredible people” who represent the “very best in American arts and culture” and that, “I know most of them and I’ve been a fan of all of them.”

    “This is a group of icons whose work and accomplishments have inspired, uplifted and unified millions and millions of Americans,” said a tuxedo-clad Trump. “This is perhaps the most accomplished and renowned class of Kennedy Center Honorees ever assembled.”

    Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center

    Trump ignored the Kennedy Center and its premier awards program during his first term as president. But the Republican has instituted a series of changes since returning to office in January, most notably ousting its board of trustees and replacing them with GOP supporters who voted him in as chairman of the board.

    Trump also has criticized the center’s programming and its physical appearance, and has vowed to overhaul both.

    The president placed around each honoree’s neck a new medal that was designed, created and donated by jeweler Tiffany & Co., according to the Kennedy Center and Trump.

    It’s a gold disc etched on one side with the Kennedy Center’s image and rainbow colors. The honoree’s name appears on the reverse side with the date of the ceremony. The medallion hangs from a navy blue ribbon and replaces a large rainbow ribbon decorated with three gold plates that rested on the honoree’s shoulders and chest and had been used since the first honors program in 1978.

    Trump honors the honorees

    Strait, wearing a cowboy hat, was first to receive his medal. When the country singer started to take off the hat, Trump said, “If you want to leave it on, you can. I think we can get it through.” But Strait took it off.

    The president said Crawford was a “great star of Broadway” for his lead role in the long-running “Phantom of the Opera.” Of Gaynor, he said, “We have the disco queen, and she was indeed, and nobody did it like Gloria Gaynor.”

    Trump was effusive about his friend Stallone, calling him a “wonderful” and “spectacular” person and “one of the true, great movie stars” and “one of the great legends.”

    Kiss is an “incredible rock band,” he said.

    Songs by honorees Gaynor and Kiss played in the Rose Garden just outside the Oval Office as members of the White House press corps waited nearby for Trump to begin the ceremony.

    The president said in August that he was “about 98% involved” in choosing the 2025 honorees when he personally announced them at the Kennedy Center, the first slate chosen under his leadership. The honorees traditionally had been announced by press release.

    It was unclear how they were chosen. Before Trump, it fell to a bipartisan selection committee.

    “These are among the greatest artists, actors and performers of their generation. The greatest that we’ve seen,” Trump said. “We can hardly imagine the country music phenomena without its king of country, or American disco without its first lady, or Broadway without its phantom — and that was a phantom, let me tell you — or rock and roll without its hottest band in the world, and that’s what they are, or Hollywood without one of its greatest visionaries.”

    “Each of you has made an indelible mark on American life and together you have defined entire genres and set new standards for the performing arts,” Trump said.

    Trump also attended an annual State Department dinner for the honorees on Saturday. In years past, the honorees received their medallions there but Trump moved that to the White House.

    Trump said during pre-dinner remarks that the honorees are more than celebrities.

    “It gives me tremendous pleasure to congratulate them once again and say thank you for your incredible career,” he said. “Thank you for gracing us with this wisdom and just genius that you have.”

    Trump to host the Kennedy Center Honors

    Meanwhile, the glitzy Kennedy Center Honors program and its series of tribute speeches and performances for each recipient is set to be taped on Sunday at the performing arts center for broadcast later in December on CBS and Paramount+. Trump is to attend the program for the first time as president, accompanied by his wife, first lady Melania Trump.

    The president said in August that he had agreed to host the show. At dinner Saturday, he said he was doing so “at the request of a certain television network.” Trump predicted that the broadcast would garner its highest ratings ever as a result. No president has ever been the host.

    At the White House, Trump said he looked forward to Sunday’s celebration.

    “It’s going to be something that I believe, and I’m going to make a prediction: This will be the highest-rated show that they’ve ever done and they’ve gotten some pretty good ratings, but there’s nothing like what’s going to happen tomorrow night,” Trump said.

    The president also swiped at late-night TV show host Jimmy Kimmel, whose program was briefly suspended earlier this year by ABC following criticism of his comments related to the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September.

    Kimmel and Trump are sharp critics of each other, with the president regularly deriding Kimmel’s talent as a host. Kimmel has hosted the Primetime Emmy Awards and the Academy Award multiple times.

    Trump said he should be able to outdo Kimmel.

    “I’ve watched some of the people that host. Jimmy Kimmel was horrible,” Trump said. “If I can’t beat out Jimmy Kimmel in terms of talent, then I don’t think I should be president.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link