ReportWire

Tag: wholesale

  • This Barbie ‘holy grail’ doll is on sale for $25,000 — but one rare Barbie collectible could fetch $1 million

    This Barbie ‘holy grail’ doll is on sale for $25,000 — but one rare Barbie collectible could fetch $1 million

    [ad_1]

    With the release this weekend of the new “Barbie” movie starring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling, there’s growing attention being paid to the world of Barbie collectibles. As in the hundreds of dolls that have been released over the years, to say nothing of such accessories as Barbie outfits and furniture.

    But there’s one collectible above all — the holy grail of Barbies, if you will. We’re referring to Barbie No. 1, the first doll ever released by Mattel to bear the Barbie name, dating from 1959.

    Barbie fanatics speak of it in reverent terms. “I lost sleep over this doll,” one collector said in a YouTube
    GOOGL,
    +0.69%

    GOOG,
    +0.65%

    video that documented the arrival and unboxing of a Barbie No. 1.

    Needless to say, collectors will pay a pretty penny for a Barbie No. 1. Prices can easily reach $10,000-plus, according to Barbie experts. The original doll sold for about $3, but there’s a Barbie No. 1 doll on eBay
    EBAY,
    -1.02%

    currently going for $25,000.

    But before you plunk down five figures for an investment-grade doll, we figured you might want to know a little more about this one-of-a-kind Barbie. Here goes:

    What makes the ‘Holy Grail’ Barbie so special?

    Obviously, it’s all about being the first of its kind, not unlike a baseball player’s rookie card (the 1952 Mickey Mantle card is often considered the holy grail of sports collectibles, though that can sell for millions of dollars). It’s also about rarity. Experts say around 300,000 to 350,000 of those debut Barbies were sold in 1959, but the number of Barbie No. 1s that survived throughout the years — dolls are sold as toys, after all, not necessarily collectibles — is considerably less.

    (Mattel
    MAT,
    -0.42%

    reportedly now releases about 60 million Barbies annually, but the company didn’t respond to a MarketWatch request for comment and information.)

    There’s also something to be said for No. 1’s distinct look, marked by what veteran Barbie appraiser Dr. Lori Verderame describes as its “deep profile” with a protruding nose and high forehead. It’s a design very much inspired by the German-made Bild Lilli dolls that intrigued Barbie creator Ruth Handler.

    Are there any really rare examples of the original Barbie?

    Red-headed Barbie No. 1s are known to exist. Marl Davidson, a Barbie dealer based in Bradenton, Fla., says she once sold one for $50,000, and perhaps the holiest of holy grails is a salesman’s Barbie sample case dating from the doll’s early years. Davidson says she believes only two or three are around. And one surfaced? “It could go for $1 million,” she says.

    And what makes some Barbie No. 1s more valuable than others?

    As with almost any collectible category, it’s all about condition. Barbie buyers are looking for a No. 1 that’s as close to mint condition as possible, with all the original items — namely, the box, black stand, sunglasses, shoes, brochure and zebra-striped swimsuit. (There are also outfits and accessories dating from Barbie’s early years, but these were sold separately; Verderame says a popular outfit from this period can sell for $150 to $200.)

    Ironically, if the Barbie has stayed in the original box, it may affect the condition — Verderame explains that the packaging is acidic so it can “damage the piece over time,” but she says collectors still “want it in the box.”

    Then, there’s the hair color. The original Barbie came in both blonde and brunette versions. Verderame says the blondes are generally more sought after since that’s what most people think of as the Barbie classic. But Davidson says brunettes can actually have value since there were fewer made of them. Then again, she says, the collectors “who can afford it will have one of everything.”

    How can you tell if a first-edition 1959 Barbie is a fake?

    There are various elements that will signify an original Barbie — most notably, a marking on the doll’s, um, right buttock (this also applies to later Barbies, though). Also look for holes in the feet and what the Doll Reference site describes as “tight curly bangs,” among other identifiers. It’s worth keeping in mind that you might find an original No. 1 doll, but with other parts that are not original — say, a replacement stand.

    What’s the current market for the original Barbie?

    It’s soaring because of the movie, Verderame says. She notes that Barbie No. 1s that went for $10,000 as recently as three months ago are now selling in the $15,000-$25,000 range. Verderame anticipates the market will cool off after the fervor for the Warner Bros.
    WBD,
    -1.37%

    film dies down. But Davidson remains bullish on Barbie’s longer-term prospects because of the doll’s iconic appeal: “The price can only go up,” she says.

    Are there any affordable alternatives to a first-edition Barbie?

    Davidson says collectors can also consider Barbie No. 3 as a collectible. It’s a very early model, but it has a far more approachable price — Davidson says collectors can find one between $1,000 and $3,000.

    If you want something way more affordable that still has potential to appreciate, Verderame says to consider iconic Barbies from the 1990s and 2000s that are currently selling for between $50 and $150.

    But if you insist on a Barbie No. 1, Davidson says you can always buy one in lesser condition for a lesser price. Still, even a bald Barbie No. 1 won’t come cheap, she warns. “It’s going to go for a couple of grand,” she says.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Recession? White House sees ‘momentum’ that will keep U.S. out of one.

    Recession? White House sees ‘momentum’ that will keep U.S. out of one.

    [ad_1]

    Recent economic data indicates the U.S. isn’t in a recession, a top White House economist said Tuesday, as he cited what he called momentum to keep the country out of one.

    Jared Bernstein, the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, told a Washington Post event that indicators like employment and retail sales “are certainly not flashing anything close to recession.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘I was outraged’: Our restaurant bill was $35 each, but our friend wanted to pay $22 for a gluten-free dish. Who’s right?

    ‘I was outraged’: Our restaurant bill was $35 each, but our friend wanted to pay $22 for a gluten-free dish. Who’s right?

    [ad_1]

    Dear Quentin,

    I went for dinner with six friends last weekend, and we each ordered entrees and desserts, and some side orders. One of our group only eats gluten-free food, so he ordered two starters. We split the bill, and it worked out at $36 each. But our gluten-free friend cried foul, and asked for a separate check to pay $22 for his gluten-free dish. I was outraged — and almost felt physically sick. I kicked my husband under the table, and said under my breath, “Can you believe that?’

    Can you believe it? Do you think he should have just paid the $35 instead of asking for a separate check? Adding insult to injury, he left the waiter a $10 tip. Why not just pay $35 like everyone else? I told my husband I was never going for dinner with him again. Don’t you think he should have just paid $35 like everyone else? It was a big crowd. If everyone did that, you’d need a forensic accountant to figure out how many breadsticks someone ate. 

    We otherwise had a nice evening, and it was a bring-your-own-bottle restaurant. I work as a teacher and my husband works in tech. We own a home together and have three kids. Our gluten-free friend is a freelance consultant, and is divorced with two kids. He had a very privileged upbringing. I worked hard for everything I have. I’m not saying any of us are rich, but when we go out to eat, we like to share and share alike, and split the bill down the middle. 

    When did eating out become so full of these cringeworthy moments?

    Equal Bill Splitter

    Dear Equal,

    I’m sorry to say that the most cringeworthy moment here happened when you kicked your husband under the table. I’m not a big fan of under-table communication in a group, and while we could debate the pros and cons of asking for a separate check for a $13 difference, I don’t think there’s much of a gray area when it comes to calling someone out at the dinner table, especially when your eye-rolling and disapproval could be picked up by the other guests.

    As far as your friend is concerned, $13 is a lot of money to pay when you did not eat all the food that was ordered by the table. Maybe it doesn’t seem like it to you or anyone reading this column, but your friend is divorced with two kids, and works as a freelancer — so let’s assume his income is not always stable. Could he have just split it down the middle and paid $35 and another 15% or 20% for a tip? Sure. But he has good financial boundaries. I applaud him.

    The real issue here may go back to your respective upbringings, and could explain your dramatic — and I would argue disproportionate reaction — to your friend asking for a separate $22 check. You’ve worked hard, and maybe your friend had an easier start in life, but that doesn’t mean he’s not entitled to pay for what he ate, and watch every dollar. Divorce is like a recession. You can end up struggling to get back on your financial feet for years.

    Perhaps your friend had always intended to pay $22 for his gluten-free dish, and tip the server 50%, or perhaps he has a well-trained side eye and caught your reaction to his paying for his own order, and he decided to pay closer to what everyone else had paid. But ordering separate checks, I suspect, will become more common as prices continue to rise, even at a slower pace, and people feel uncertain about spending money in restaurants. 

    You believe in equality of bill splitting. I suggest you apply that equality to all dinner guests, regardless of upbringing and dietary restrictions, and allow them to make their own choices about what they pay for at dinner. People often have problems — financial or otherwise — that we are not aware of, so try to leave space for that. And if your friend did see your eye-rolling and under-the-table antics? I’d like to think he made space for your behavior too.

    Readers write to me with all sorts of dilemmas. 

    By emailing your questions, you agree to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch. By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Co., the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

    The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

    More from Quentin Fottrell:

    I had a date with a great guy. I didn’t drink, but his wine added $36 to our bill. We split the check evenly. Should I have spoken up?

    ‘I’m living paycheck to paycheck and I feel drained’: My fiancé said he would pay half of the mortgage. Guess what happened next?

    ‘We live in purgatory’: My wife has a multimillion-dollar trust fund, but my mother-in-law controls it. We earn $400,000 and spend beyond our means.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • H&M to Launch in Brazil During 2025

    H&M to Launch in Brazil During 2025

    [ad_1]

    By Dominic Chopping

    STOCKHOLM–Sweden’s Hennes & Mauritz Monday announced plans to launch physical and online stores in Brazil during 2025.

    The fashion retailer said it will initially enter major cities in southeast Brazil with a view to further increase its presence across the country over time.

    In Latin America, H&M is currently present in Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, and Costa Rica, and it said that with a population of over 210 million in Brazil there is considerable potential for expansion.

    To support the initiative H&M said it is partnering with Dorben Group, a Latin American luxury and fashion retail partner.

    Write to Dominic Chopping at dominic.chopping@wsj.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s how many Diet Cokes you’d have to drink daily to get too much aspartame

    Here’s how many Diet Cokes you’d have to drink daily to get too much aspartame

    [ad_1]

    A leading global health body has declared that the artificial sweetener aspartame, commonly used as an ingredient in diet soda, chewing gum and vitamins, may cause cancer.

    But the World Health Organization’s report late Thursday also noted that people would have to be exposed to extreme amounts of aspartame — whether through diet, occupational exposure or other means — to be at risk.

    So how much aspartame is too much?

    It’s safe to consume up to 40 milligrams of aspartame per kilogram, or 2.2 pounds, of body weight per day, a WHO and Food and Agriculture Organizations joint committee of experts on food additives said. So, a person who weighs 154 pounds would need to drink nine to 14 cans of, say, Diet Pepsi or Diet Coke per day to exceed that level, assuming there are 200 to 300 milligrams of aspartame in each can.

    “We’re not advising consumers to stop consuming [aspartame] altogether,” said WHO’s nutrition director, Dr. Francesco Branca. “We’re just advising a bit of moderation.”

    The Food and Drug Administration has an even higher daily aspartame-exposure limit: 50 milligrams per kilo of body weight.

    Even heavy aspartame users — Donald Trump, the former U.S. president, for example, drank a reported 12 cans of Diet Coke a day in his White House years — would struggle to consume that much of the sweetener in an average day.

    But consumers should also note that a food being labeled “safe” is not equivalent to its being healthy. There has been plenty of research to suggest that sipping too many sweetened beverages, including diet drinks with artificial sweeteners, may be linked to health problems and elevated risk of death.

    Aspartame is used in products that millions of people use every day, including Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, Pepsi Zero Sugar and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, the Mars Wrigley chewing gum Extra and some Snapple drinks, as well as some protein drinks, among thousands of others, by the Calorie Control Council’s count.

    Aspartame was developed beginning in the mid-1960s by Skokie, Ill.–based G.D. Searle & Co., now a Pfizer
    PFE,
    +0.72%

    subsidiary, which branded the sweetener NutraSweet. It secured ultimate FDA approval, after initial hiccups, for use in dry goods and then in carbonated soft drinks in 1981 and 1983, according to the Calorie Control Council.

    The organization that this week labeled aspartame possibly carcinogenic was the World Health Organization’s cancer-research arm, the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The IARC said its aspartame declaration is based on “limited evidence” of cancer in humans, specifically a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma.

    What should consumers do with this aspartame news? “At least when it comes to beverages, our message is your best choice is to drink water or an unsweetened beverage,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which previously nominated aspartame for IARC review.

    More aspartame news on MarketWatch:

    What is aspartame, and is it bad for you? Here’s what health experts say

    Aspartame is possibly carcinogenic, according to WHO’s cancer-research agency

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s how many Diet Cokes you’d have to drink daily to get too much aspartame

    Here’s how many Diet Cokes you’d have to drink daily to get too much aspartame

    [ad_1]

    A leading global health body has declared that the artificial sweetener aspartame, commonly used as an ingredient in diet soda, chewing gum and vitamins, may cause cancer.

    But the World Health Organization’s report late Thursday also noted that people would have to be exposed to extreme amounts of aspartame — whether through diet, occupational exposure or other means — to be at risk.

    So how much aspartame is too much?

    It’s safe to consume up to 40 milligrams of aspartame per kilogram, or 2.2 pounds, of body weight per day, a WHO and Food and Agriculture Organizations joint committee of experts on food additives said. So, a person who weighs 154 pounds would need to drink nine to 14 cans of, say, Diet Pepsi or Diet Coke per day to exceed that level, assuming there are 200 to 300 milligrams of aspartame in each can.

    “We’re not advising consumers to stop consuming [aspartame] altogether,” said WHO’s nutrition director, Dr. Francesco Branca. “We’re just advising a bit of moderation.”

    The Food and Drug Administration has an even higher daily aspartame-exposure limit: 50 milligrams per kilo of body weight.

    Even heavy aspartame users — Donald Trump, the former U.S. president, for example, drank a reported 12 cans of Diet Coke a day in his White House years — would struggle to consume that much of the sweetener in an average day.

    But consumers should also note that a food being labeled “safe” is not equivalent to its being healthy. There has been plenty of research to suggest that sipping too many sweetened beverages, including diet drinks with artificial sweeteners, may be linked to health problems and elevated risk of death.

    Aspartame is used in products that millions of people use every day, including Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, Pepsi Zero Sugar and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, the Mars Wrigley chewing gum Extra and some Snapple drinks, as well as some protein drinks, among thousands of others, by the Calorie Control Council’s count.

    Aspartame was developed beginning in the mid-1960s by Skokie, Ill.–based G.D. Searle & Co., now a Pfizer
    PFE,
    +0.72%

    subsidiary, which branded the sweetener NutraSweet. It secured ultimate FDA approval, after initial hiccups, for use in dry goods and then in carbonated soft drinks in 1981 and 1983, according to the Calorie Control Council.

    The organization that this week labeled aspartame possibly carcinogenic was the World Health Organization’s cancer-research arm, the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The IARC said its aspartame declaration is based on “limited evidence” of cancer in humans, specifically a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma.

    What should consumers do with this aspartame news? “At least when it comes to beverages, our message is your best choice is to drink water or an unsweetened beverage,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which previously nominated aspartame for IARC review.

    More aspartame news on MarketWatch:

    What is aspartame, and is it bad for you? Here’s what health experts say

    Aspartame is possibly carcinogenic, according to WHO’s cancer-research agency

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. consumer sentiment soars in July to highest level since September 2021

    U.S. consumer sentiment soars in July to highest level since September 2021

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The University of Michigan’s gauge of consumer sentiment rose to a preliminary July reading of 72.6 from a June reading of 64.4. It is the largest gain since December 2005. Sentiment is at its highest level since September 2021.

    Economists polled by the Wall Street Journal had expected a June reading of 65.5.

    However, Americans’ expectations for overall inflation over the next year rose to 3.4% in July from 3.3% in the prior month. Expectations for inflation over the next 5 years ticked up to 3.1% from 3% in June.

    Key details: According to the UMich report, a gauge of consumers’ views on current conditions jumped to 77.5 in July from 69 in the prior month, while a barometer of their expectations rose to 69.4 from 61.5.

    Big picture: Sentiment is improving as gasoline prices have held steady this summer. Low unemployment is also playing a role.

    What are they saying? “The good news is that sentiment has roughly retraced half of its fall from pre-pandemic levels. For most Americans, a modest gain in income is expected. Still, durable goods buying conditions remain far off their recent levels. The rise in confidence seems restrained, and clouds concern about the forecasted economic downturn which continues to linger,” said Scott Murray, economist at Nationwide, in a note to clients.

    Market reaction: Stocks
    DJIA,
    +0.33%

    SPX,
    +0.10%

    opened higher on Friday while the yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.805%

    rose to 3.81%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As food prices rise in June, analysts warn of a ‘tipping point’ for Americans

    As food prices rise in June, analysts warn of a ‘tipping point’ for Americans

    [ad_1]

    Food prices grew at a slower pace in June, but economists remain concerned that prices will reach a level where consumers will make dramatic changes in their behavior.

    Food prices rose 3% in June compared to a year ago, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. After a year of price hikes, consumers continued to see food prices rise, but at a slower rate.

    Grocery prices were 5.7% higher in June compared to a year ago, and dining out was 7.7% more expensive. That’s significantly lower than the 13.5% peak inflation for grocery prices last August and the 8.8% peak inflation for dining out.

    “Overall, there continues to be a similar narrative of extended upward pressure on food prices as we try to discern whether this stress has led to a tipping point where consumers are struggling to buy the foods that they want,” said Jayson Lusk, the head and distinguished professor of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University.

    Reported food insecurity across households of different income levels reached 17% in June, the highest level since March 2022, according to the monthly Consumer Food Insights Report from Purdue University. Although it didn’t deviate too much from the normal range — food insecurity hovered at 14% two months ago — Lusk said the increase is concerning given the amount of pressure on more financially vulnerable consumers. 

    Reported food insecurity across households of different income levels reached 17% in June, the highest level since March 2022, according to Purdue University.

    The pandemic-era expansion of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ended in March, meaning SNAP recipients are now receiving $90 less on average every month, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive policy think tank based in Washington, D.C. 

    The recent rise in food insecurity could be a lag from households adjusting to the policy change, Lusk said. On average, consumers are spending about $120 per week on groceries and $70 per week on dining out or takeout, the report found. 

    Middle-income households earning $50,000 to $100,000 a year and low-income households earning less than $50,000 a year cut weekly spending on groceries and dining out by about $10 a week, Purdue found. The average weekly grocery expenditure for low-income households was $103 in June; for middle-income households, it was $118. Households earning more than $100,000 a year spent $141 a week on groceries in June.

    Around 47% of low-income households — those earning less than $50,000 a year — said they relied on SNAP benefits in May, up from roughly 40% in February, according to a recent Morning Consult report.

    For low-income households, rising food insecurity is often coupled with juggling bills such as utilities and rent, which has also led to rising eviction rates in recent months, according to Propel, an app that aims to help low-income Americans improve their financial health. Propel surveys SNAP users on insecurity around food, finance and their housing situation. 

    Nearly half of the survey respondents said they cannot afford the food they want. “We were unable to pay bills because we had to buy food. We’re about to lose our home,” a South Carolina user named Anna told the Propel survey. 

    The share of surveyed households that paid their utilities late rose 11% from May to June, and only 27% of respondents paid their utility bills on time and in full, according to Propel’s June survey.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Next Challengers Joining Nvidia in the AI Chip Revolution

    The Next Challengers Joining Nvidia in the AI Chip Revolution

    [ad_1]

    What to Read Next

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Used Car Prices Drop By a Record. Carvana Stock Is Up, a Lot.

    Used Car Prices Drop By a Record. Carvana Stock Is Up, a Lot.

    [ad_1]

    Used Car Prices Drop By a Record. Carvana Stock Is Up, a Lot.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Amazon clicks with shoppers — on Prime Day or any day

    Why Amazon clicks with shoppers — on Prime Day or any day

    [ad_1]

    Some time ago, I was standing in the vitamin aisle of my local pharmacy, struggling to locate a specific bottle of pills that my doctor had recommended. It was seemingly nowhere to be found. And based on my experience at this particular store, I knew that even if I was able to track down an employee for help, I wasn’t likely to receive much in the way of assistance.

    Then, a solution to my dilemma suddenly dawned on me: Amazon
    AMZN,
    -2.17%

    ! I looked up said bottle, found it within almost no time and ordered it. By the next day, it had arrived. And it probably cost me a couple of dollars less than what I would have spent at the pharmacy — if I had ever located it there.

    Of course, you don’t need to be in search of a hard-to-find item to appreciate the wonders of the online retail giant that Jeff Bezos founded from his garage in 1994. Millions of us are likely to be on the site this week for Amazon’s annual Prime Day event running July 11 and 12 this year, which is a sales extravaganza that one bargain-mad colleague likened to “basically my Super Bowl.” To take advantage of the deals, you’ll naturally have to be an Amazon Prime member, which carries an annual fee of $139. But it’s not like that’s a small number of folks: Amazon says there are now more than 200 million such members worldwide.

    Read more: 5 hacks to get the best deals on Amazon Prime Day — and other summer sales

    And: What not to buy on Amazon Prime Day — and why discounts may be even bigger this year

    I’ve been one of those Prime people for years — if nothing else, for the free two-day shipping it offers. But even before I signed on for Prime, I ordered plenty from Amazon. My purchases over the past decade have ranged from a super-hot horseradish to a pair of armrest slipcovers to a folding exercise bike. Actually, I ordered the three items I just mentioned during the first couple of months of the pandemic, when Amazon became a kind of lifeline given the health risks of shopping in person. But if I go back in time, I find countless purchases for books (Amazon’s original specialty), clothes and margarita mix (there’s a brand I like that I often can’t find at the supermarket).

    At this point, Amazon isn’t just a company. It’s an institution woven into the fabric of our lives.

    And yet, I know there are plenty of people, including some of my friends and relatives, who boycott Amazon. They point to the oft-cited criticisms of the company, such as the treatment of its workers (in 2019, the company’s employees were injured on the job far more than the national average in the warehousing and storage sector) to the broader notion that online retailers hurt the brick-and-mortar stores that have been a traditional bedrock of our communities.

    Criticizing Amazon has become almost a sport unto itself. There are books devoted to the subject, such as Alex MacGillis’ “Fulfillment: Winning and Losing in One-Click America” (ironically, I purchased my copy of it on Amazon). Heck, there’s even a whole Wikipedia page detailing the criticisms.

    I get the issues that many people have. And it’s not like Amazon doesn’t recognize them, either: The company has acknowledged the injury situation, for example, but has also pledged to cut incidents in half by 2025, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    When I reached out to Amazon for this column and cited the various criticisms made of the company, Amazon responded with a statement that, among other things, said it works “hard to be a good neighbor…with communities across the country” and that it creates “good jobs with competitive pay and benefits, including health care from the first day, up to 20 weeks paid parental leave, and full college tuition.” Amazon also cited some of its philanthropic initiatives, including its Amazon Housing Equity Fund, a $2 billion program to build or preserve affordable homes.

    All of this is what you expect from a giant corporation trying to defend itself. I’m not going to get into the weeds about the particular criticisms and whether Amazon makes a successful case for itself or not. But I will say that people vote with their wallets. And they’re reelecting Amazon on a daily, if not hourly, basis with all their purchases.

    People vote with their wallets. And they’re reelecting Amazon on a daily, if not hourly, basis with all their purchases.

    Ultimately, Amazon is about convenience combined with competitive pricing — a formula that’s hard to beat. It launched the era of online retailing, and it has mastered the art of it to this day. When I hear people bemoan the fates of all those brick-and-mortar stores, I admit to thinking to myself, “OK, but do you still want your mail delivered by the Pony Express?” Or, “Do you still want to do your shopping at ye olde general store?”

    The point is that we evolve as a society and new forms of commerce and communication take over. Yes, there are prices to be paid for that. I admit to missing some of the brick-and-mortar stores and chains that were part of my youth — I’m 59 years old, and remember spending practically entire days in neighborhood bookshops long gone. For that matter, I don’t condone bad behavior by large multinational companies; though, like I said, I’ll let others debate some of the specifics regarding Amazon.

    But let’s face it: At this point, Amazon isn’t just a company. It’s an institution woven into the fabric of our lives — and for good reason, I’d argue. I don’t care about shopping on Prime Day, though I know there are a few deals to be had. Mostly, I just increasingly rely on Amazon to make my life easier by selling me any number of things I need on a daily basis, including household staples (yes, you can buy toilet paper on Amazon — the company even sells its own brand). And that’s to say nothing of the services the company offers, including its Prime Video streaming (you can thank Amazon for the truly marvelous — and Emmy-winning — “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” series, for example).  

    Could someone come along and invent a better version of Amazon, one that might not be as widely criticized? Perhaps, but that’s probably years, if not centuries, down the road. In the meanwhile, we have the Amazon that we have. Now, let me see if I’m out of toilet paper…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    [ad_1]

    The goal of many (or most) savers and long-term investors is to achieve financial independence. The combination of building up a nest egg, paying down debt and eventually receiving Social Security payments or another source of retirement income might put you in a comfortable position, but even people who have worked together to achieve financial independence may disagree on what to do after their careers end.

    Quentin Fottrell — the Moneyist — heard from one couple who are facing a quandary. They have been financially responsible, but as they near retirement, the wife wishes to be very careful with their combined investment portfolio, while the husband wants to begin spending a significant portion of it. They both make reasonable arguments. Here’s what they should do.

    From the Help Me Retire column: My 57-year-old husband works three shifts and is burned out. Can he retire?

    You have to get there first

    A behavioral study finds a correlation between having one specific type of conversation and taking action to build wealth.


    Getty Images

    Doing this even once might help encourage you or someone you know to begin saving and investing for the long term.

    The ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks may not remain at the top

    Salesforce is among the companies passing a Goldman Sachs screen for growth of sales and earnings.


    Getty Images

    Even an index that includes hundreds of stocks can be heavily concentrated. Large technology-oriented companies have led this year’s 16% rebound for the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.29%
    ,
    following last year’s 18% decline (both with dividends reinvested). But the index is weighted by market capitalization, which means the “Magnificent Seven” — Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.59%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.19%
    ,
    two common share classes of Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.52%

    GOOG,
    -0.65%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.11%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.95%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.76%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -0.50%

    — make up 27.9% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    -0.25%
    .

    In the Need to Know column, Barbara Kollmeyer lists companies that might turn out to be among the next Magnificent Seven, based on a Goldman Sachs screen.

    Getting back to the current Magnificent Seven, you may be surprised to see which of the stocks is cheapest — by far — per one commonly used valuation metric.

    Related: Top investment newsletters aren’t bullish on tech, Tesla or Meta Platforms. Here’s what they do like.

    A thrill ride for EV makers

    An electric Rivian R1S.


    Rivian

    There has been a lot of news in the electric-vehicle space this week. Here are lists of coverage organized by topic.

    Rising unit sales among EV makers:

    Legacy automakers report sales increases, including a tremendous increase in EV unit sales for Ford
    F,

    :

    Reaction from analysts and investors:

    In other news, Mullen Automotive Inc.
    MULN,
    -12.97%

    has started to deliver electric vehicles. Further developments for the company this week included the announcement of a stock-buyback plan and possible action against naked short sellers.

    A changing job market

    The employment numbers for June from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the lowest level of job creation since late 2020. Then again, the demand for labor in the U.S. remains high, despite the Federal Reserve’s efforts to slow economic growth.

    If you are looking to make a career change, what does all this mean to you? Andrew Keshner points to a development in the employment market that may have you thinking twice about jumping ship.

    Threads and Twitter

    Meta’s Threads app has signed up as many as 50 million users in its first two days of operation, some reports say.


    AFP via Getty Images

    Meta rolled out its new Threads service on Wednesday to compete directly with Twitter and has already signed up 50 million users, according to some reports.

    Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino was quick to respond.

    More reaction:

    Consumer spending may spike

    U.S. shoppers have been taking it slow during a period of high inflation, but the overall economy has been stronger than expected even as the Federal Reserve continues tightening its monetary policy.

    The coming flurry of July sales events at Amazon, Walmart Inc.
    WMT,
    -2.30%

    and Target Corp.
    TGT,
    -0.60%

    could signal a turnaround for consumers, as James Rogers reports.

    Financial crime

    Lukas I. Alpert writes the Financial Crime column. Have you ever wondered how you might steal a lot of cash from a company that is likely to have rather tight accounting controls in place? This week Alpert explains how the manager of an Amazon warehouse managed to scale the heights of criminal achievement to collect $10 million — and a 16-year jail sentence.

    Also read: Silver dealer ordered to pay $146 million in case of 500,000 missing coins

    Want more from MarketWatch? Sign up for this and other newsletters to get the latest news and advice on personal finance and investing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘This is the best possible jobs report’ — economists react to June employment data

    ‘This is the best possible jobs report’ — economists react to June employment data

    [ad_1]

    The June jobs report on Friday showed the U.S. economy gained 209,000 jobs last month, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.6% from 3.7%.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected an addition of 240,000 jobs and an unemployment rate of 3.6%.

    See: Jobs report shows 209,000 gain in June — smallest increase since end of 2020

    Below are some initial reactions from economists and other analysts, including their views on what the jobs report means for the Federal Reserve as the central bank considers how to proceed with interest-rate hikes. The main U.S. stock indexes
    SPX,
    -0.29%

    DJIA,
    -0.55%

    COMP,
    -0.13%

    traded mixed following the data on nonfarm payrolls, also called NFP.

    • “This is actually a great number. This is a number that is something we can sustain. We can’t sustain adding 300,000, 400,000, 500,000 jobs a month. We need to see it slow. It’s doing exactly what it needs. If we’re going to have a soft landing, this is what it looks like. So I don’t think that we should make too much of this number being bad. But I do think that the Fed train is rolling toward another rate hike, but I wouldn’t put my money on a second one yet.” — Betsey Stevenson, economics professor at the University of Michigan and a former Obama White House economist, in a CNBC interview

    Related: July Fed rate hike remains largely priced in, expectations for September or November hike soften somewhat

    • “In a sense, this is the best possible jobs report, then, threading the needle between too strong and too weak. People should be happy to see decent job growth and decent wage growth. The Fed can take pleasure in slowing momentum and wage growth stabilizing rather than rising, while bond traders can breathe a sigh of relief there is no sign of the strength picked up by ADP yesterday. It is win, win, win.” — Chris Low, chief economist at FHN Financial, in a note

    • “The 209,000 rise in non-farm payrolls in June was the weakest gain since December 2020 and suggests labor market conditions are finally beginning to ease more markedly. That said, it is unlikely to stop the Fed from hiking rates again later this month, particularly when the downward trend in wage growth appears to be stalling.” — Andrew Hunter, deputy chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a note

    • “Overall, the cooling in hiring is a welcome development, but the pace is still above growth in the working-age population, and combined with continued wage pressures and the drop in the unemployment rate, this leaves the Fed on track to hike rates by 25 [basis points] in both July and September.” — Katherine Judge, senior economist at CIBC, in a note

    • “Black unemployment went up to 6.0% for June, and is a statistically significant change from 5.0% in March. So while the employment rate is historically high, there is still room for growth. (As always when we’re talking about historical exclusion & discrimination).” — Kate Bahn, economist and research director at WorkRise, which is affiliated with the Urban Institute, in a tweet

    • “The markets maybe made too much of the ADP number, as that has shown to be not always exactly a great indicator. … The labor market is cooling, but marginally. Most importantly, though, the average hourly earnings number suggests still some firming in that space, and that’s where the Fed has been primarily focused. So for me, this is maybe a little lighter, but not a dramatic change in terms outlook and expectations.” — Roger Ferguson, former Fed vice chair, in a CNBC interview

    Now read: Part-time work surged in June as hours cut back, U.S. jobs report says

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Casino Receives Offers to Strengthen Capital Base

    Casino Receives Offers to Strengthen Capital Base

    [ad_1]

    By Mauro Orru

    Casino Guichard-Perrachon said it has received two proposals to strengthen its capital base, a day after the group warned it could default on part of its debt.

    The French grocer said Tuesday that one proposal came from EP Global Commerce and Fimalac, and the second from 3F Holding. Casino said it would analyze the two proposals and put them to creditors on Wednesday, when it expects to disclose details of the offers.

    Casino has for months been grappling with high debt and has entered talks with creditors to ensure it has enough funding available. Last week, the group said it was seeking to raise at least 900 million euros ($982.2 million) to deliver its midterm targets.

    “Casino’s governance bodies will not take any decision relating to such proposals until they have been presented and discussed with the creditors under the aegis of the conciliators,” the group said in a statement.

    On Monday, the company said it had fully drawn its revolving credit line at the end of June, with the ratio of gross secured debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization after lease payments expected to exceed a cap that is closely watched by investors.

    The company warned it could be in default under its revolving credit line by the end of August, “which would result in a cross-default in respect of a part of its financial debt at the level of its operating subsidiaries.”

    Write to Mauro Orru at mauro.orru@wsj.com; @MauroOrru94

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sainsbury’s Backs FY24 View

    Sainsbury’s Backs FY24 View

    [ad_1]

    J. Sainsbury sees same-store sales rise 9.8% in first quarter, backs 2024 view

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Casino Shares Plunge After Warning of Potential Debt Default

    Casino Shares Plunge After Warning of Potential Debt Default

    [ad_1]

    By Mauro Orru

    Shares of Casino Guichard-Perrachon slumped in early Monday trading after the French grocer said it could default on part of its debt.

    At 0750 GMT, Casino shares traded 15% lower at EUR3.45.

    The group said that with its revolving credit line be fully drawn at the end of June, the ratio of gross secured debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization after lease payments is expected to exceed a cap that is closely watched by investors.

    The company said it could be in default under its revolving credit line by the end of August, “which would result in a cross-default in respect of a part of its financial debt at the level of its operating subsidiaries.”

    Casino has for months been grappling with high debt and entered talks with creditors to ensure it has enough funding available. Last week, the group said it was seeking to raise at least 900 million euros ($982.2 million) to deliver its midterm targets.

    Write to Mauro Orru at mauro.orru@wsj.com; @MauroOrru94

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Like choosy shoppers at a retail store, IPO investors are demanding discounts and displaying price sensitivity

    Like choosy shoppers at a retail store, IPO investors are demanding discounts and displaying price sensitivity

    [ad_1]

    IPO investors, much like retail shoppers in recent years’ inflationary environment, are demanding clear discounts and demonstrating sensitivity to price and valuations, according to Renaissance Capital.

    The provider of IPO exchange-traded funds and institutional research said that’s a positive — even if tech unicorns in the pipeline would prefer it were not the case.

    “Quality consumer names are working,” said Matthew Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance, listing Kenvue, Cava Group Inc., Gen Restaurant Group Inc. and Savers Value Village Inc. as examples of recent new issues that enjoyed strong debuts.

    Kenvue
    KVUE,
    +1.65%
    ,
    the former consumer arm of Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.87%

    and parent of household-name products such as Tylenol and Band-Aid, raised $3.8 billion in its May IPO at a valuation of $41.08 billion, making it the biggest deal of the year to date.

    Cava Group
    CAVA,
    -5.93%
    ,
    the loss-making Mediterranean-style fast-casual restaurant group, raised $317 million in its mid-June deal at a valuation of $2.5 billion. The stock popped more than 99% on its first day of trade.

    For more: Cava Group CFO is confident restaurant chain will be profitable — but she won’t say when

    Gen Restaurant Group
    GENK,
    +13.95%

    is a profitable Korean barbecue chain that made its debut Wednesday with a more than 50% pop in early trade.

    “But broadly investors are still demanding clear discounts to public peers, especially if they take issue with certain aspects of a deal. So it’s good to see that valuation sensitivity,” said Kennedy.

    Savers Value Village
    SVV,
    +3.45%

    went public Thursday with some fanfare, closing 27% above its $18 issue price. The company is the biggest for-profit thrift-store chain in North America, with 317 stores that operate under multiple names.

    The company is profitable, with net income of $11.9 million in the quarter through April 2, after a loss of $10.2 million in the same period a year earlier. For all of 2022, it had net income of $84.7 million, up from $83.4 million in 2021.

    Revenue for the quarter came to $327.5 million, down from $345.7 million in the year-ago period. Revenue totaled $1.4 billion for 2022, up from $1.2 billion in 2021.

    See: Money-losing food chain Cava showed IPO success. Is it finally time for some tech deals?

    Two other deals that made their debut on Thursday fared less well, however.

    Texas-based Kodiak Gas Services Inc. 
    KGS,
    +3.44%

     and Fidelis Insurance Holdings Ltd. closed lower after pricing below their estimated ranges and making other accommodations to get their deals through.

    Bermuda-based Fidelis, a reinsurer, downsized its deal to 15 million shares from a previous expectation that it would offer 17 million. The initial public offering was priced at $14 a share, below the proposed $16-to-$19 range.

    Maker of oil- and gas-production equipment Kodiak opened almost 3% below its issue price of $16, which was well below its proposed price range of $19 to $22.

    Fidelis has an unusual structure, in that it uses a third party for origination, underwriting and claims management, said Kennedy.

    “We think insurance investors wanted a discount for a company that didn’t own the underwriting group,” he said. “It has an experienced management team, though, so now they’ll just need to execute.”

    Kodiak, meanwhile, carries substantial debt and will need to undertake significant capital spendig in the coming years, just as gas prices have fallen back.

    It’s also worth noting that the last big oil and gas IPO, Atlas, “is slightly below its offer price,” Kennedy said.

    Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
    AESI,
    -2.75%

    went public in March at an issue price of $18 a share. The stock was last quoted at $17.52.

    Still, Renaissance is expecting a gradual reopening of the IPO market in the second half, said Kennedy, who noted that the IPO ETF
    IPO,
    +1.38%

    has gained about 30% in to date in 2023, outperforming the S&P 500’s
    SPX,
    +1.23%

    14% gain.

    To date, there have been 52 IPOs this year, up 33% from the same time last year, when the market was effectively frozen. Almost $9 billion in proceeds have been raised, up 115% from last year but well below levels seen in frothier times.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nike profit misses expectations, as ‘higher markdowns’ endure amid weaker demand

    Nike profit misses expectations, as ‘higher markdowns’ endure amid weaker demand

    [ad_1]

    Nike Inc. on Thursday reported fourth-quarter profit that came up short of Wall Street’s expectations, with price cuts weighing on results amid weaker demand for sneakers and clothing.

    Nike
    NKE,
    +0.30%

    reported fourth-quarter net income of $1.03 billion, or 66 cents a share, down from $1.44 billion, or 90 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. Revenue rose 5% to $12.83 billion, compared with $12.23 billion in the prior-year quarter.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Nike to report adjusted earnings of 68 cents a share, on $12.58 billion in sales.

    Nike said gross margins slipped 140 basis points to 43.6%, dragged by “higher product input costs and elevated freight and logistics costs, higher markdowns and continued unfavorable changes in net foreign currency exchange rates.”

    Shares were up 0.3% after hours on Thursday.

    Heading into the earnings, Wall Street had questions about Nike’s stockpiles of unsold shoes and clothing, and what it might take to clear them, as consumers still find themselves stretching their budgets to buy more essential goods like groceries.

    Nike’s broader plans to sell more shoes and clothes directly — either through its own e-commerce platform or its own physical stores. But recent plans to start selling again in Macy’s Inc.
    M,
    +3.35%

    and Designer Brands Inc.’s
    DBI,
    +4.01%

    DSW shoe stores have raised questions over whether the athletic-gear maker is rethinking that strategy. Analysts were also focused on demand in China, whose re-opening from COVID-19 shutdowns remains in flux.

    Shares of Nike have risen 9.6% over the past 12 months. By comparison, the S&P 500 Index
    SPX,
    +0.45%

    has risen 15% over that period.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Does Nike have too many sneakers? Its financial results could tell us whether shoes will get cheaper.

    Does Nike have too many sneakers? Its financial results could tell us whether shoes will get cheaper.

    [ad_1]

    Are stores getting more desperate to sell sneakers? Fourth-quarter results from Nike Inc. on Thursday will probably provide part of the answer.

    Even as its some of its basketball shoes still put up double-digit sales gains — like those named after NBA icons LeBron James, Luka Doncic and Giannis Antetokounmpo — the athletic-gear maker, like its rivals, has faced weaker consumer demand overall. With customers forced to spend more money on necessities over the past year, they’ve had less to spend on new shoes.

    In March, Nike
    NKE,
    +0.19%

    executives said that the demand backdrop remained “promotional” — one in which anyone selling sneakers and clothing was cutting prices more aggressively to attract customers. But ahead of Thursday’s results, some analysts also wondered whether the stalling demand has forced bigger changes to the way management thinks about its broader turn away from retailers — a core piece of its sales strategy.

    Nike over recent years has embarked on a plan to rely less on shoe retailers for sales and more on sales made directly to customers through its own stores and online. But recently, it decided to start selling clothing again at Macy’s
    M,
    +3.58%

    and shoes again at DSW, the shoe-store chain run by Designer Brands Inc.
    DBI,
    +4.32%

    — this after ending partnerships with both retailers over the past two years.

    The return to traditional retail has raised questions about whether Nike is looking to more aggressively clear product it’s had trouble selling, and whether management is re-evaluating the company’s go-it-alone sales strategy overall.

    “The big question on our minds heading into [Nike’s] quarter is what is going on with the [direct-to-consumer] pivot?” Quo Vadis analyst John Zolidis said in a note on Monday. “Reopening Macy’s and DSW seems odd in context of previous dismissive statements about undifferentiated retail.”

    He continued: “Further, neither of these retailers has a customer that correlates strongly with [Nike’s] highest-value segments. The easiest explanation is that [Nike] overestimated the dollars it could recapture from closed wholesale accounts and now has too much inventory it needs to clear.”

    What to expect

    Earnings: Analysts polled by FactSet expect Nike to earn 68 cents a share, down from 90 cents in the same quarter a year ago. Contributors to Estimize — a crowdsourcing platform that gathers estimates from Wall Street analysts as well as buy-side analysts, fund managers, company executives, academics and others — expect earnings per share of 75 cents.

    Revenue: Analysts polled by FactSet expect $12.58 billion in sales for Nike. Forecasts from Estimize call for sales of $12.72 billion.

    Stock price: Nike’s stock is only up 1.3% over the past 12 months. Shares got hit in September, after company executives warned of further price-cutting from rivals due to weaker demand. The stock rebounded later but gave up some gains in May. The stock was up 2% on Monday.

    What analysts are saying

    Nike in March said demand for product sold at full pricing remained solid. Still, sneaker chain Foot Locker Inc.
    FL,
    +2.09%

    recently cut its outlook. Lots of Vans shoes are running at a discount, one analyst said last month, as the skater-centric brand competes with casual fare from the likes of Adidas
    ADS,
    +0.61%

    and others.

    Other analysts were also wondering about Nike’s return to Macy’s and DSW. But not everyone believed the move was a sign of deeper problems.

    “Investors are worried that this is a reversal in Nike’s shift from wholesale to [direct-to-consumer], but we don’t think the strategy is broken,” BofA analyst Lorraine Hutchinson said in a research note on Wednesday. “We expect to hear an explanation of these moves on the [conference] call rather than an about-face on its focus on reducing undifferentiated wholesale.”

    Still, the company faced concerns about sales abroad. Zolidis also said markets were increasingly worried about growth in China, whose recovery from pandemic lockdowns has stumbled.

    “Our recent conversations with companies in China suggest that trends are mixed,” Zolidis said. “The consumer is more value oriented, and job uncertainty is higher.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ozempic and other weight-loss drugs boost pharmacy sales at Rite Aid

    Ozempic and other weight-loss drugs boost pharmacy sales at Rite Aid

    [ad_1]

    Rite Aid Corp. said Thursday that its fiscal first-quarter pharmacy sales got a boost from a new class of drug.

    Pharmacy sales, which rose 3.4% from a year ago, were boosted by higher sales of Ozempic and other GLP-1 receptor agonists, which are used to treat Type 2 diabetes and obesity.

    The higher sales did not translate into profit, however.

    “As the cost of these drugs is also high, the impact of the increase in volume of these drugs on our gross profit dollars is minimal,” Rite Aid Chief Financial Officer Matthew Schroeder told analysts on the company’s earnings call, according to a FactSet transcript.

    Still, the company
    RAD,
    +2.96%

    cheered investors by raising its full-year revenue guidance due to the sales bump from Ozempic and other high-dollar GLP-1 drugs. It now expects revenue of $22.6 billion to $23 billion, ahead of the FactSet consensus of $22.3 billion.

    Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, which are made by Novo Nordisk
    NOVO.B,
    +0.17%

    NOVO.B,
    +0.17%
    ,
    and Mounjaro, which is made by Eli Lilly & Co.
    LLY,
    +1.34%
    ,
    have become so popular in the U.S. that supplies have at times run short and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been forced to warn patients against using knockoff versions.

    The drugs are administered by injection and mimic the effects of GLP-1, a gut hormone that can help control blood-sugar levels and reduce appetite. GLP stands for glucagon-like peptide.

    Ozempic, Rybelsus and Mounjaro have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of Type 2 diabetes, while Wegovy is approved for people with obesity and for certain people with excess weight combined with weight-related medical problems. 

    Last year, more than 5 million prescriptions for Ozempic, Mounjaro, Rybelsus or Wegovy were written for weight management, up from 230,000 in 2019, according to data and analytics firm Komodo Health.

    Obesity drugs could be a $54 billion market by 2030, up from $2.4 billion in 2022, Morgan Stanley said in a report last year. Reports of people who take GLP-1 drugs seeing improvements in addictive behaviors such as smoking and drinking have lately amplified interest in the medications.  

    For more, read: The dark side of the weight-loss-drug craze: eating disorders, medication shortages, dangerous knockoffs

    Drug companies, including Lilly and Pfizer Inc.
    PFE,
    -0.32%
    ,
    are now working to develop treatments in the form of pills that could be more convenient alternatives to the injectables.

    See now: Weight-loss drugs in development aim to replace injections with pills

    Rite Aid’s overall numbers surprised on the upside, as its loss was narrower than expected and revenue beat the consensus estimate.

    For more, see: Rite Aid’s stock soars 7.5% after company surprises with earnings that are less bad than feared

    Eleanor Laise contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link