ReportWire

Tag: titanic

  • Submarine Exploring Titanic Wreckage Goes Missing, Launching Search

    Submarine Exploring Titanic Wreckage Goes Missing, Launching Search

    [ad_1]

    A search is reportedly underway for a submarine that vanished while possibly transporting tourists to the Titanic wreckage at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.

    The Boston Coastguard confirmed to the BBC and CBS News on Monday that search efforts were ongoing off the coast of southeast Canada.

    Lt. Jordan Hart of the U.S. Coast Guard told CBS that they were “currently undergoing a search and rescue operation.”

    The U.S. Coast Guard did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment.

    It’s not clear how many people, if any, were on board the submarine or who was operating it.

    OceanGate Expeditions announced last year that it would be offering tourist trips to the wreckage starting this year, with eight-day expeditions costing around $250,000.

    Its website states that an expedition was currently underway and scheduled to end Tuesday. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The RMS Titanic sank in 1912 after striking an iceberg during its maiden voyage, killing more than 1,500 passengers and crew. Its wreckage — located about 2.5 miles below the ocean surface and 350 nautical miles off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada — wasn’t found until 1985.

    This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Full 3D Scan Reveals Titanic Completely Ruined

    Full 3D Scan Reveals Titanic Completely Ruined

    [ad_1]

    SAINT PETER PORT, UK—Indicating that the passenger liner was unlikely to ever sail again, a full 3D scan conducted by deepwater seabed mapping company Magellan revealed Friday that the Titanic was completely ruined. “Unfortunately, after several exhaustive high-resolution, 360-degree scans of the famous ship, it’s clear that the Titanic is absolutely trashed,” said Magellan director Richard Parkinson, whose submersibles had yielded evidence that there was extensive structural damage to the bow and stern that would affect the ill-fated vessel’s seaworthiness. “The rust on the surface was not as superficial as we expected, and it appears to have penetrated deep into the hull. We were hoping we could get away with installing a new engine and updating the paint job, but the damage seems too great. That’s not even to mention that the boat is full of skeletons.” At press time, the completely totaled Titanic was sold for scrap.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Family’s NYC Real Estate Legacy Endures, 111 Years After Disaster

    Family’s NYC Real Estate Legacy Endures, 111 Years After Disaster

    [ad_1]

    On this date in 1912, one of the richest men in the world dined sumptuously aboard the White Star line’s newest and proudest ocean-going vessel on its maiden voyage across the Atlantic. Later that evening, he would guide his young wife Madeline to lifeboat No. 4 and be told he could not join her until all women were safely aboard. He would later be glimpsed on the ship’s starboard bridge wing, speaking with another passenger.

    This was the last anyone saw of John Jacob Astor IV until his remains were plucked from the icy Atlantic waters a full week later, one of just 333 bodies recovered of the more than 1,500 lives lost in the April 15, 1912 sinking of the Titanic.

    This 111th anniversary of the catastrophe is as apropos a moment as any to reflect on the rich New York City real estate legacy of the Astor family, a legacy that remains a civic treasure to this day. The Astor name lives on in a number of honored New York City settings, not least of which are Astor Place, the crossroad between the East and West Village, and Astoria, Queens, a bastion of international culture and public green space nestled between Long Island City and Sunnyside across the East River.

    The Astor

    Also bearing the Astor name are myriad New York City buildings that harken to the city’s gilded age. Near the top of that list is no less a plum than the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, built by William Waldorf Astor, great grandson of John Jacob Astor I.

    Another is The Apthorp, built by William between 1905 and 1908 to occupy an entire city block bordered by Broadway, 79th Street, West End Avenue and 78th Street.

    The building was operated by the Astor family for decades until its 1950 sale. It now is a New York City-designated landmark listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

    Yet another notable example is The Astor. Situated on Manhattan’s Upper West Side at 235 West 75th Street, The Astor was commissioned by William in 1901.

    Designed by busy New York City architects Clinton and Russell, the original structure featured two southern towers. A third tower, designed in 1914 by Peabody, Wilson & Brown, completed within a year and similar in appearance to the original towers, was designed to be four stories taller to allow for spacious penthouses. These were targeted at well-heeled New Yorkers then descending on the Upper West Side, who were predicted to flock to the building for its location on Broadway between 75th and 76th, and its proximity to the city’s original subway line and Central Park.

    New listings

    The Astor introduced new listings this past autumn, the first new inventory in the iconic building in two years. Restored and upgraded for today’s most discerning purchasers, the residences feature the kind of luxuries first-class passengers aboard the Titanic would have savored, had they entered a time tunnel directly to 2023.

    Included are formal entry foyers, herringbone-patterned wood floors, wood-burning fireplaces, up-to-date kitchens featuring top-of-the-line appliance packages and bathrooms offering soaking tubs and radiant heated floors.

    “It’s rare to find a home in Manhattan that features both historic architecture and contemporary interiors with modern upgrades, especially one that caters to today’s active lifestyles.” says Douglas Elliman’s Kyle Egan, who along with Randall Dolland and Michael Kafka is overseeing building sales.

    “The Astor provides this ideal combination in one of the city’s most sought-after neighborhoods. Discerning buyers in today’s market are looking for a unique product that can’t be found elsewhere. The Astor speaks to those looking for a beautiful, inviting, spacious home, and a special piece of New York history.”

    It appears exactly 111 years after the Titanic’s sinking, the cache of the real estate associated with its most famous passenger continues ascending.

    [ad_2]

    Jeffrey Steele, Contributor

    Source link

  • Could Jack Have Fit on the Door? Watch James Cameron Settle the Debate Once and For All

    Could Jack Have Fit on the Door? Watch James Cameron Settle the Debate Once and For All

    [ad_1]

    For a single reason, James Cameron‘s Titanic has long been the subject of criticism: Why didn’t Jack just stay on the door with Rose so they both could live? After being the subject of jokes in the media and just in casual conversation, Cameron decided to put together his own myth-busting session to put the question to rest, once and for all — assembling a pair of stunt people, a door, and freezing cold water, to see what would have happened to the doomed lovers in a variety of scenarios.

    There are a number of variables to be considered here, and that’s why the experiment isn’t as simple as just saying he could or couldn’t fit. Even if he were to stay afloat, their combined weight could change how Rose was able to balance, further endangering her life. If most of her vital organs became submerged, the amount of time she’d be conscious and alive before rescue would be reduced. Obviously, the water where the Titanic crashed was extremely cold, meaning that drowning wasn’t the only potential risk.

    The experiment consisted of multiple rounds, where a few different variables were tweaked. In the first test, it was realized that “Jack and Rose are able to get on the raft, but now they’re both submerged in dangerous levels of freezing water.” For the last test, Jack was given a lifejacket, but the actors standing in for Jack and Rose were also made to do all of the strenuous physical activity that the duo engaged in before making it onto the door.

    “Out of the water, [his body’s] violent shaking was helping him, Projecting it out, he could’ve made it pretty long. Like, hours. He’s stabilized, He got into a place where if we projected that out, he just might’ve made it until the lifeboat got there. Jack might’ve lived, but there’s a lot of variables. I think his thought process was, ‘I’m not going to do one thing that jeopardized her,’ and that’s 100 percent in character.”

    You can see a first look at the experiment from Titanic: 25 Years Later With James Cameron, as well as Cameron giving an explanation below.

    Here’s more of the experiment as well:

    Things That Only Happen in the Movies

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • James Cameron ‘Proves’ Jack Couldn’t Have Survived Titanic Sinking

    James Cameron ‘Proves’ Jack Couldn’t Have Survived Titanic Sinking

    [ad_1]

    Titanic director James Cameron says he commissioned a scientific study that proves Leonardo DiCaprio’s character could not have survived the “floating door” scene with Kate Winslet’s Rose, a response to angry fans saying the makeshift raft could hold them both. What do you think?

    “Then how is Leonardo DiCaprio still alive?”

    Sonny Meldal • Assistant Mail Carrier

    “I think I’ll wait until this study is peer-reviewed to form an opinion.”

    Diego Johnsen • General Screener

    “Now prove that the ship couldn’t have survived.”

    Katherine Huang • Bubble Wrap Designer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • James Cameron Wants to End Debate over Jack’s Death in ‘Titanic’

    James Cameron Wants to End Debate over Jack’s Death in ‘Titanic’

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Since James Cameron’s Titanic premiered 25 years ago, one scene has been the subject of a sometimes heated debate: the demise of Leonardo DiCaprio’s floppy-haired ingenue, Jack Dawson.


    CBS Photo Archive | Getty Images

    In general, fans of the actor and movie obsessives have always contended that Jack didn’t have to die — he could have easily fit on the floating door that saved his love interest, Kate Winslet’s unhappy heiress, Rose DeWitt Bukater. The debate remains so potent that Cameron, who also wrote the screenplay, wants to put it to rest.

    In an interview for the premiere of Avatar: The Way of Water, published by the Toronto Sun, Cameron indicated he’s putting arguments over Jack’s death to rest with an upcoming documentary. “We have done a scientific study to put this whole thing to rest and drive a stake through its heart once and for all,” he said.

    Cameron continued:

    “We have since done a thorough forensic analysis with a hypothermia expert who reproduced the raft from the movie and we’re going to do a little special on it that comes out in February. We took two stunt people who were the same body mass of Kate and Leo and we put sensors all over them and inside them and we put them in ice water and we tested to see whether they could have survived through a variety of methods and the answer was, there was no way they both could have survived. Only one could survive.”

    Asked if he regretted killing off DiCaprio‘s character, Cameron said no, adding that Jack “needed to die.”

    Cameron said Titanic is “a movie about love and sacrifice and mortality. The love is measured by the sacrifice.”

    The Sun reported that Titanic would hit theaters again next February. The National Geographic Nat Geo cable network will broadcast Cameron’s documentary making his case for killing Jack.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Huff

    Source link

  • New Horizons’ Alan Stern Talks About How His Titanic Trip Compares To Space Travel

    New Horizons’ Alan Stern Talks About How His Titanic Trip Compares To Space Travel

    [ad_1]

    Planetary scientist Alan Stern said he wasn’t prepared for the “intersections” his oceanic expedition to the Titanic made with his career, which includes his time leading NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt.

    Stern, who spoke to HuffPost last week, revealed the parallels he discovered between the oceanic journey he made through OceanGate Expeditions ― a company that offers trips to the Titanic’s resting place in the Atlantic Ocean ― and exploration of space.

    The scientist joined OceanGate Expeditions, which is offering $250,000 expeditions for people to see the famed ship roughly 12,500 feet below the ocean surface, on its “Titan” submersible as a mission specialist and scientific expert (such experts don’t pay fares to join the expeditions).

    A number of Stern’s contributions to the mission ― in addition to offering his planetary knowledge ― included collecting water column samples, aiding with ocean bottom sampling and providing assistance with communication to a team on the surface during the descent.

    “It has some parallels both to current and to far-future space exploration, like the exploration of ocean worlds in the outer solar system,” Stern told HuffPost. “And it didn’t all gel for me until I really made the journey and was on our way steaming back north to Canada to come back to dock.”

    Noting that fewer people have been to the Titanic’s resting place than to space, Stern reflected in journal entries he wrote in July about the ship’s tragic end and how stories about its remains are “lost in time.”

    Stern, who is set to join Virgin Galactic’s suborbital research trip next year, told HuffPost that submersibles have many of the same systems as spacecraft ― including an environmental life-support system, a communication system and a power system ― but that there are “vast” technological differences, as well.

    One example, he noted, was the inability to use radio aboard the submersible.

    “So you communicate with an acoustic modem, something like out of the ’80s… and it’s really just text messaging back and forth, and there’s a long time delay. … And if I send a message to the surface, it takes 30 seconds to get up there.”

    A look at the Titanic’s portside anchor. Stern told HuffPost that submersibles have many of the same systems as spacecraft but there are also “vast” technological differences.

    Stern recalled helping OceanGate’s chief submersible pilot Stockton Rush, the founder and CEO of the company, during the final descent and compared him to astronaut Neil Armstrong “doing the landing” as he ― in the “Buzz Aldrin” role ― called off readings from the range-finding sonar.

    Rush founded OceanGate in 2009, and the company has since embarked on expeditions to San Francisco’s Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, the wreck of the Andrea Doria and the Titanic, with the company kicking off its expeditions to the Titanic in 2021.

    The expeditions to the Titanic, a luxury liner that sank in 1921, causing the loss of more than 1,500 lives, are part of a longitudinal study that has several goals, the company said, such as determining how long people will be able to recognize the Titanic, mapping the ocean floor around the ship, researching the ship as an artificial reef and providing maritime archaeologists with images and footage from dives.

    He noted that Rush asked to tell him when they could see the bottom of the ocean during their descent this summer, however, there were challenges on their journey to the Titanic, such as a reliance on sonar and spotlights to find the wreckage.

    “We know exactly where the Titanic is because of GPS and buoys. We know where it is precisely, and we know where the submersible is on the ship at the surface because of GPS,” Stern said. “But in between there are currents. And as you’re descending, you’re at the mercy of the currents.”

    Stern added that currents can vary with your depth, so while best estimates are made on how far the submersible will drift in its descent, he said, you can typically end up hundreds of meters from where you intended to be.

    Once his team reached the bottom of the ocean, they waited for clouds of sediment to settle, turned on sonar to spot the ship and drove to the Titanic. But they didn’t see it until they “were literally 20 meters from it,” he said.

    “So that’s very interesting because in spaceflight, we’re able to navigate to these incredible precisions, even after traveling across the solar system to Pluto, for example,” Stern said.

    “And it’s just different technologies, and in many ways harder, but also limited by budgets, you know. So I found it fascinating, and lots of parallels.”

    A look at the bow of the Titanic. Stern noted that “very little" of the ocean is explored in the way that people have explored Earth’s land surface.
    A look at the bow of the Titanic. Stern noted that “very little” of the ocean is explored in the way that people have explored Earth’s land surface.

    In a press release, Stern said that private-sector entities like OceanGate Expeditions mark the early days of an “unparalleled era” of deep ocean exploration.

    He told HuffPost that “very little” of the enormous area of the Earth’s oceans has been explored in the way that people have explored Earth’s land surfaces.

    “When I was a kid, no one knew where the Titanic was. They know that was still in the future for Bob Ballard to find,” Stern said, referring to the 1985 discovery.

    “And then when he went down there, the thought that people could go there relatively routinely wasn’t even a thing that you would think about. It was such a feat. And still today it’s very rare.

    “Of course, spaceflight is exploding in terms of human access, and so is the oceangoing stuff. And I saw great parallels in that. And I think that there [are] going to be some very interesting parallels in terms of the economic development of the oceans for the good of the world.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Everything You Need To Know About Celine Dion’s Stiff Person’s Syndrome

    Everything You Need To Know About Celine Dion’s Stiff Person’s Syndrome

    [ad_1]

    Beloved French balladeer, Celine Dion, announced in an emotional video today that she’s been diagnosed with Stiff-Person Syndrome and will be unable to embark on her European tour in February.


    Despite suffering from muscle spasms for years, Celine Dion continued to perform any chance she was given. Dion – widely known as “The Priestess of Pop” – performed over 808 concert shows and 1,141 residency shows from 1990-2020.

    This rare neurological condition affects about one in a million people. Her diagnosis causes Dion to experience muscle spasms that affect her bodily functions as well as her vocal cords. Dion admits her diagnosis has made it so she cannot walk or sing like she used to, and is, therefore, unable to give her typical groundbreaking performances. And if you know anything about Celine Dion, it’s that she won’t give anything less than 100%.

    Stiff-Person’s Syndrome’s symptoms include stiffening of the torso and limbs, long episodes of muscle spasms, and difficulty walking. The muscle spasms Dion experiences can be triggered by environmental factors such as loud noises or emotional stress.

    “All I know is singing…it’s what I’ve done all my life. And it’s what I love to do the most.”

    Dion herself and fans alike remain hopeful that she’s on the road to recovery. And she’s reassured everyone that she has a great team of doctors working with her. One thing that’s abundantly clear: she’s doing everything she can to get back on the road and do what she loves most.

    Thanks to Celine, we have the emblematic Titanic anthem, “My Heart Will Go On” and countless other ballads. We’re hoping for her recovery and will be listening to every Celine Dion album in her honor.

    Related Articles Around the Web

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • How Leonardo DiCaprio Almost Lost Out on Playing Jack In ‘Titanic’—Twice

    How Leonardo DiCaprio Almost Lost Out on Playing Jack In ‘Titanic’—Twice

    [ad_1]

    One of the most iconic shots in the past three decades of film is Leonardo DiCaprio, in tux and tails, standing atop a grand staircase in front of a clock in Titanic, turning and extending his hand to Rose, played by Kate Winslet. That shot almost didn’t happen, because according to director James Cameron, DiCaprio nearly talked himself out of the movie. Twice. 

    In an interview with GQ ahead of the release of Avatar: The Way of Water, Cameron continued his hit parade of comments and anecdotes, this time reminiscing about the making of the hit 1997 movie, and casting DiCaprio as Jack in particular. According to Cameron, DiCaprio was a hit in his audition, “charmed everybody, myself included.” That’s not to mention the accountants and various other random staff who made their way into the audition room to get a glimpse of the actor. Then came the chemistry read with Winslet. When Cameron took him to read with his eventual romantic co-star, the first of several on-screen pairings for the duo, DiCaprio balked.

    “He said, ‘you mean I’m reading?’” Cameron recalls. “And I said yeah, he said oh, I don’t read. I said, ‘well,’ I shook his hand, I said, ‘thanks for coming by.’ And he said, ‘wait, you mean if I don’t read, I don’t get the part? Just like that?’”

    Yep, just like that. 

    “I said, ‘oh yeah, come on, this is like a giant movie that’s going to take two years of my life, and you’ll be gone doing five other things while I’m doing post-production and all the model work and everything, so I’m not gonna fuck it up by making the wrong decision in casting, so you’re gonna read or you’re not gonna get the part,’” Cameron says. That did the trick—Leo read. 

    “He comes in and he’s like every ounce of his entire being is just so negative, right up until I said action, and then he turned into Jack and Kate just lit up and they went into this whole thing and played the scene. Dark clouds had opened up and a ray of sun came down and lit up Jack. I’m like, alright, he’s the guy.” Crisis averted, or so Cameron thought. 

    A few weeks later, DiCaprio got in touch with Cameron and told him he thought Jack should have “some affliction or some problem or some traumatic thing from the past,” which Cameron took as a sign that maybe the young DiCaprio wasn’t actually the right guy for the role. 

    “I said, ‘You’ve done all these great characters that all have a problem, whether it’s addiction or whatever it is, I said you’ve gotta learn how to hold the center and not have all that stuff. This isn’t Richard III. When you can do what Jimmy Stewart or Gregory Peck did, they just fucking stood there. They didn’t have a limp or a lisp or whatever, then you’ll be ready for this, but I’m thinking you’re not ready, because what I’m talking about is actually much harder. Those things are easier, those are props, those are crutches, what I’m talking about is much harder and you’re probably not quite ready for it.’ 

    DiCaprio powered through after Cameron’s tough love pep talk.

    “The second I said that, it clicked for him that this was a really hard, challenging film for him, and this was my mistake: I hadn’t sufficiently laid out the challenge for him,” Cameron says.

    And that, it would appear, is how you win a Best Director Oscar, as Cameron did for Titanic. Scene. 

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Can ‘Avatar: The Way of Water’ Be as Good as James Cameron’s Interviews About It?

    Can ‘Avatar: The Way of Water’ Be as Good as James Cameron’s Interviews About It?

    [ad_1]

    Avatar: The Way of Water opens in theaters in less than a month, and almost nobody has seen it. That’s a real rarity this time of year, when awards contenders with December release dates like Babylon or Glass Onion screen widely for critics on both coasts in order to make it in for awards consideration. Much like its 2009 predecessor, the Avatar sequel is set to open at nearly the last possible moment to be eligible for this year’s awards race, only bolstered by the air of secrecy  that surrounds it. 

    But you do have to make sure people know your movie exists, so without big promotional screenings or much more than some trailers, The Way of Water has one more secret weapon: its director, James Cameron. Across a string of interviews this fall, from promoting the theatrical rerelease of Avatar in September to an expansive GQ profile this week, Cameron has dropped a string of one-liners (“Whitewater rafting? Fuck that”), sarcastic retorts (“Oh, I don’t know, maybe that it looks good? Come on!”), and grandstanding statements (“I think this movie is going to make all the fucking money”) that are frankly awe-inspiring. For someone who nearly didn’t make the first Avatar movie because he was “having too much fun” doing underwater exploration, Cameron has returned to the movie publicity machine with relish—and, seemingly, entirely on his own terms. 

    It’s not just his absence of self-doubt (“I don’t think I’m hardwired with that”) or well-earned confidence in his success (Titanic paid for [this building], so I get to do this,” as he told a group of Fox executives). It’s the sense that all this maniacal hard work and faith in creatures called Na’vi will be in the service of something truly spectacular. Cameron’s confidence is clearly infectious, both for the actors he works with (the story of Kate Winslet learning to hold her breath for seven and a half minutes is already famous) and the audience eager to line up to see what marvel he’s created next. For all the skepticism that’s emerged around Avatar in the years since its historic box office run, Cameron is entirely clear-eyed—and correct—about what made it so huge: “I think anybody that’s seen the movie knows why; it’s a fucking gigantic adventure that’s an all-consuming emotional experience that leaves you wrung out by the end of the movie. And it was groundbreaking visually, and it still holds up today. So I don’t think I need a theory.”

    Below, a few more recent highlights from Cameron’s glorious press tour, from recounting old disputes with another underwater explorer to a shot fired at Marvel and DC. Avatar: The Way of Water will be in theaters on December 16, which means we hopefully have many, many more weeks of Cameron interviews to enjoy between now and then. 

    On exploring the wreck of the Titanic, as recounted by explorer Victor Vescovo:  “I said, ‘I watched Titanic at the Titanic.’ And he actually replied: ‘Yeah, but I made Titanic at the Titanic.’ ”

    On just how much money The Way of Water has to make: “How expensive? ‘Very fucking,’ according to Cameron, who told [GQ] he’d informed the studio that the film represented ‘the worst business case in movie history.’ In order to be profitable, he’d said, ‘you have to be the third or fourth highest-grossing film in history. That’s your threshold. That’s your break even.’”

    On his New Zealand farm: “I’ve never really checked this out, but I’m told we’re the biggest supplier of organic brassicas in New Zealand, which is a niche of a niche, granted.”

    On his dreams:  “I have my own private streaming service that’s better than any of that shit out there. And it runs every night for free.”

    On his uneven gait: “I remember my first wife, when we were just first dating, she said, ‘Walk ahead of me on the sidewalk.’ And I said, ‘Why?’ She said, ‘I want to study your walk.’ And I turned around and I said, ‘Why?’ She said, ‘Well, I think I can correct it.’ Fuck you!”

    On working with Ron Howard on the visual effects for Apollo 13: “I’m like, ‘I’m a total asshole compared to Ron Howard.’”

    On the hat he used to wear on set that stood for “head motherfucker in charge”: “I would either wear that hat on the first day of a new shoot, or I would wear my T-shirt that says ‘Time becomes meaningless in the face of creativity.’ Just to shake up the studio a little bit. I don’t think I [wore] the HMFIC hat on the new Avatar. This is the kinder, gentler me. This is the mellow, Zen nice guy, sensitive to everybody’s needs and emotional requirements. No microaggressions here. Which is usually good for about the first two weeks.”

    On superhero movies:  “I also want to do the thing that other people aren’t doing. When I look at these big, spectacular films—I’m looking at you, Marvel and DC—it doesn’t matter how old the characters are, they all act like they’re in college. They have relationships, but they really don’t. They never hang up their spurs because of their kids.”

    [ad_2]

    Katey Rich

    Source link