ReportWire

Tag: streaming

  • “Love is Blind”: Why Netflix’s Livestream Failed

    “Love is Blind”: Why Netflix’s Livestream Failed

    Netflix-and-chill became Netflix-and-vent on Sunday night when millions of Love Is Blind fans were left waiting for more than an hour for the reality dating show’s live reunion. Now the streamer is providing some answers about what went wrong. 

    “We had just a bug that we introduced, actually when we implemented some changes to try and improve live streaming performance after the last live broadcast,” co-CEO Greg Peters said Tuesday afternoon during a Q&A for investors. “We just didn’t see this bug in internal testing because it only became apparent once we put multiple systems interacting with each other under the load of millions of people trying to watch Love Is Blind.” 

    Netflix’s explanation might not satisfy those fans who were eagerly refreshing their Netflix apps but the good news, at least for the streamer, is that 6.5 million people have watched the special so far. Some viewers were able to tune in on Sunday night (albeit much later than planned), while others had to wait until Netflix re-uploaded the reunion on Monday afternoon.

    According to Peters, Netflix does have the infrastructure to handle live streaming. “We’ll learn from it and we’ll get better” he said. That’s good, because co-CEO Ted Sarandos has plans for more live programming in the future. “We want to use live when it makes sense creatively, when it helps the content itself,” he said during the same Q&A. “A reunion show that’s going to generate news and buzz—it really does play better live when people can enjoy it together.” Sarandos added that some unscripted shows will have live components going forward: “I do think, sometimes, those results-oriented shows do play out a little bit better on live and they do generate a lot of conversation.” 

    Netflix’s first live stream was the March 4 Chris Rock special, Selective Outrage. From a technical standpoint, it went off without a hitch—though Rock made headlines for flubbing his highly anticipated Will Smith joke. In early April, the streamer revealed that its next big live event would be the Love Is Blind reunion. The reality series, in which couples “date” without actually seeing their prospective life partners, has become a pandemic-era hit for Netflix. The series’ fourth season has consistently charted in the Top 10 for Netflix, racking up more than 157 million hours viewed since its March 24 premiere. 

    The live Love Is Blind reunion was scheduled to take place just two days after the finale dropped on Netflix, increasing the anticipation for the special, in which the couples dished on their relationship statuses and behind-the-scenes drama. When the live stream didn’t start on time, many fans—including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—sounded off on social media. “We’re really sorry to have disappointed so many people,” Peters said Tuesday. “We didn’t meet the standard that we expect of ourselves to serve our members.”

    Natalie Jarvey

    Source link

  • Boarding Platform 9 ¾ – Once Again

    Boarding Platform 9 ¾ – Once Again

    The Wizarding World is coming back to life — I don’t think it ever died — but it will be returning in the form of a decade-long TV series.

    Before we get into my thoughts on that… a brief Harry Potter generational overview:


    Harry Potter is a cultural phenomenon. Just about every human on the planet has seen each of the movies at least once or — like me — rewatches Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (2001) every Christmas. At this point, it’s tough to find a person who hasn’t entered this magical world.

    The instant anything new within the Wizarding World is announced, I hop online to get the tea. I followed the Hogwarts syllabus in Fantastic Beasts. After reading Quidditch Through the Ages, I know Quidditch through and through. And The Tale of the Three Brothers — in The Tales of Beedle the Bard — is a storybook I wish I had as a kid.

    To me, Harry Potter is not merely a children’s story but a mystical journey that had me waiting — and I’m still waiting! — for my Hogwarts School Of Witchcraft And Wizardry acceptance letter.

    As I said, I patiently wait for anything that will draw me back to the world of wands, pranks, and curses. Then arrived Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the story of Albus Severus Potter and his Hogwarts Journey. It was my first true disappointment in the series.

    University teams play quidditch, the game of Harry Potter books fame
    Photo by: Sergei Bachlakov / Shutterstock

    But there’s far more to this than books, plays, and movies. People can actually visit classic locations, swill ButterBeer at a Harry Potter-themed Park, and even celebrate Harry Potter-themed birthdays or weddings. There are rare moments when magic isn’t present in some form or the other. And soon enough, Hogwarts Legacy launched. I practiced using the PlayStation in anticipation of this immersive, role-playing game set in the world first introduced in the Harry Potter books.

    For anyone who hasn’t played the game — Spoiler Alert! — it’s set in Hogwarts. But it takes place in a whole different era — pre-he who must not be named. It revolves around the idea of ancient magic and the Goblin Rebellion. A completely original story that we haven’t heard yet and that makes it thrilling!

    Now comes Warner Bros. Discovery’s announcement that they’re collaborating with Max — formally HBO Max— on a fresh TV series based on the original 7 books.

    “This new Max Original series will dive deep into each of the iconic books that fans have continued to enjoy for all of these years,” Casey Bloys — Chairman and CEO, HBO & Max Content — said about the project. Bloys assures fans it will be “a faithful adaptation.”

    Now, here’s my question … I’m a faithful Harry Potter fan… but do we really need to reboot the books for the small screen?

    The final film premiered a little over a decade ago. And the 8 movies in total take 20+ hours to view. Sure, portions of the books were edited out, but don’t most film adaptations lose something in translation?

    “Max’s commitment to preserving the integrity of my books is important to me, and I’m looking forward to being part of this new adaptation which will allow for a degree of depth and detail only afforded by a long-form television series,” said Rowling in a statement.

    British Actors and Cast Members Rupert Grint (l) Emma Watson (c) and Daniel Radcliffe (r) Arrive at the World Premiere of ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’ Held on Trafalgar Square in Central London Britain 07 July 2011
    Photo by: Daniel Deme/EPA/Shutterstock

    Wouldn’t it be better to create a show around a fresh story that links to the Wizarding World? There’s a reason why Star Wars hasn’t been remade. Instead, we got shows like Andor and Mandalorian, that showcased other characters. We got the Rings Of Power which was all about how the rings were created and the rise of Sauron — not merely one more version of that magnificent trilogy. Game of Thrones — at the time a worldwide cultural phenomenon — produced such an unsatisfying final season that no one’s interested in a remake. Instead, we got House of The Dragon, a prequel about when the Targaryens ruled.

    There’s so much out there that can be done with the Magical world… A show about Voldemort’s rise to power and the first time the wizards fought against the Dark Lord. Or the various Goblin Rebellions or the four founders of Hogwarts. So why does Max want to bring back the original story? There’ll be no twists or turns — we all know how it ends. And 10 years is a loooooong time commitment.

    Perhaps it’s purely a cash-squeezing venture for the younger generation to watch different actors take on the roles. Although the original movies are available to stream and the books can be re-read, and the games can be played at any time. But to me, Daniel Radcliff, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint will always be Harry, Hermione, and Ron. That doesn’t mean I — and millions of others — won’t give Warner Bros. Discovery’s Harry Potter series a chance.

    Nitanti Alur

    Source link

  • HBO Max To Relaunch as ‘Max’ and Integrate Discovery Content | Entrepreneur

    HBO Max To Relaunch as ‘Max’ and Integrate Discovery Content | Entrepreneur

    HBO Max is nixing the HBO and relaunching simply as Max, Warner Bros. Discovery announced on Wednesday at a press event. The service will officially launch on May 23, 2023.

    “This new brand signals an important change from two narrower products, HBO Max and Discovery+, to our broader content offering and consumer proposition,” said Warner Bros. Discovery president and CEO of global streaming and games, JB Perrette, at the press event. “While each product offered something for some people, Max will have a broad array of quality choices for everybody.”

    HBO Max subscribers will have their accounts updated to the new service in May with the option of adjusting their subscription. The cost of Max will remain at $16 a month (the current cost of HBO Max’s ad-free subscription), but will also have other tier options ranging from Max Ad Lite ($9.99 a month), Max Ad Free ($15.99), and Max Ultimate Ad Free ($19.99 a month).

    The Max Ultimate Ad Free option is new. Unlike the other two subscriptions, which include access to two concurrent streams and 1080p resolution, Max Ultimate Ad Free includes access to four concurrent streams and up to 4K UHD resolution.

    Related: Warner Bros. Inflated HBO Max Subscriber Numbers Ahead of Discovery Merger, Lawsuit Alleges

    In regard to the rebrand and name change, Perrette noted that it wants to expand its viewership to “kids and families.”

    “We all love HBO. And it’s a brand that has been built over five decades to be the edgy, groundbreaking trendsetter in entertainment for adults,” she said at the event. “But it’s not exactly where parents would most eagerly drop off their kids.”

    Max will offer the same HBO originals such as “The White Lotus” and “Euphoria” as well as familiar collections such as the DC Universe and Harry Potter. However, the new service will also incorporate Discovery’s slate of shows ranging from true crime and food programming to reality favorites like “90 Day Fiance.”

    Prior to the official announcement, Julia Alexander, director of strategy at research firm Parrot Analytics, told The New York Times that the merger would likely increase user engagement by incorporating more variety apart from HBO’s series-driven content.

    “You’re opening HBO Max once a week and might not open it up for the rest of the week,” Alexander told the outlet. “They want you to open it two, three or four times a week. Unscripted programming creates that increased engagement.”

    Madeline Garfinkle

    Source link

  • Spring into the Season with Kidoodle.TV’s Top 10 ‘Hoppy Easter’ List for Families

    Spring into the Season with Kidoodle.TV’s Top 10 ‘Hoppy Easter’ List for Families

    Leading Safe Streaming™ service offers a slate of fun shows for kids and their parents that highlight the joy of the season

    Kidoodle.TV, owned by A Parent Media Co. Inc. (APMC), is celebrating the start of Spring with the release of its Top 10 Hoppy Easter list, a guide to help parents and children gather together and enjoy family-focused shows that highlight Easter and usher in a season of renewal and new beginnings. Spring is a time when families get to slow down, take a break and look forward to the start of new adventures.

    “Kidoodle.TV is all about families, and we look forward to these times of the year when families can unwind by settling down together and taking in some lighthearted entertainment that helps them kick off the season and its new beginnings,” said Brenda Bisner, Chief Content Officer at APMC. “Shows like ‘Guess How Much I Love You’ are perfect for parents and kids to watch while snuggling together, while ‘Easter Bunny Hop’ and ‘Sunny Bunnies’ will get everyone moving, laughing and having fun.”

    Kidoodle.TV’s Hoppy Easter Top 10 includes:

    1. Guess How Much I Love You – The Adventures of Little Nutbrown Hare: The beloved little bunny of the best-selling children’s book explores his world and learns about friendship, sharing, caring, and responsibility. This animated preschool series is the first adaptation of the book that has sold more than 30 million copies worldwide.
    2. Lellobee City Farm: Easter Bunny Hop: In this high-energy episode of Lellobee City Farm, a fun, music-based show for preschoolers, Bunny Bun-Buns wants to bake his favorite thing – a carrot cake – and gathers his friends to hop around the farm and collect the ingredients as they play, sing, help each other, and learn.
    3. Sunny Bunnies: In short, 3.5-minute episodes, five colorful bunnies (Turbo, Big Boo, Iris, Shiny and Hopper) visit from the Sun and pop up in places like a park, circus or a stage and have mischievous adventures where they learn to solve problems. Now with more than 150 episodes, Sunny Bunnies has aired in over 160 countries.
    4. True and the Rainbow Kingdom: Spring Compilation: Fearless heroine True and her best friend, Bartleby the Cat, plant flowers and have adventures with their friends in the Rainbow Kingdom.
    5. Where’s Chicky: Easter Island: Chicky and Bekky come across some strange stone statues that have all the same scary look until the last one with a familiar appearance.
    6. Learn with Blippi: Learn Colors on an Easter Egg Hunt: The zany entertainer and educator Blippi – described by Parents website as “Mr. Rogers, Elmo, and Dr. Seuss all rolled into one” – sets aside science experiments to teach about colors via an Easter egg hunt in this episode of Learn With Blippi. 
    7. Hip Hop Harry: Easter Egg Hunt: Hip Hop Harry invites you to sing along with him and learn how much fun it is to go on an Easter egg hunt with friends and family.
    8. ChuChu TV Surprise Eggs: In these learning videos, Mr. Harlo, ChuChu, ChaCha and the kids open “eggs” one by one and sing and dance their way to learning everything from counting, nursery rhymes, animals, and the solar system.
    9. Paw Patrol Pup Tales: Pups Save a Magic Trick: In this episode of kids’ favorite PAW Patrol, the pups save the day when the Adventure Bay Easter Festival is overrun by wild bunnies after a magic trick goes awry.
    10. Counting with Paula: Easter Egg Factory: In this learning video, Mr. Candy Cane Man and friends count the various things they need to build an Easter Egg Factory for Mr. Easter Bunny by picking suitable blocks and helping the bakers with a special decoration for the entrance of the factory.

    Kidoodle.TV is available in more than 160 countries and territories and is accessible on more than 1,000 devices. Kidoodle.TV is the winner of the Mom’s Choice Award, Parent Tested, Parent Approved Award, Best Mobile App Award, and Stevie Award (Family & Kids category), and is a recipient of the kidSAFE+ COPPA Seal.

    Join the Kidoodle.TV Safe Streaming™ family on Kidoodle.TV, or download the app and start watching for free today.

    About APMC and Kidoodle.TV

    A Parent Media Co. Inc. is a family-based media and technology company focused on providing innovative solutions to consumers and brands, including Kidoodle.TV®, Glitch+™, and Safe Exchange™. Kidoodle.TV is a Safe Streaming™ service committed to providing children with a safe alternative to stream their favorite TV shows and movies. Available in over 160 countries and territories on thousands of connected devices, Kidoodle.TV provides peace of mind with every show* vetted by caring people committed to Safe and Free Streaming for Kids™. Kidoodle.TV is available on iOS, Android, Apple TV, Fire TV, LG, Samsung, VIDAA-enabled Hisense TVs, Chromecast, Roku, Vizio SmartCast Amazon, Jio, Xfinity X1, Connected TVs, HTML5 Web, and many other streaming media devices, including Miko 3. Kidoodle.TV is certified by the kidSAFE® Seal Program and is the proud recipient of the Mom’s Choice Award®, a Stevie® Award, platinum winner of the Best Mobile App Award, and Parents’ Picks Award – Best Elementary Products. Visit www.kidoodle.tv to learn more.

    *Content availability varies by location.

    Facebook: facebook.com/KidoodleTV

    Twitter: twitter.com/kidoodleTV

    Instagram: instagram.com/kidoodletv

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/kidoodletv

    Source: Kidoodle.TV

    Source link

  • Here’s proof that there’s just too much music being made. WAY too much. – National | Globalnews.ca

    Here’s proof that there’s just too much music being made. WAY too much. – National | Globalnews.ca

    In the old days of physical music formats — CDs, vinyl, tapes — a collection was considered big if you had more than 100 of anything. Completists and obsessives might have upwards of a thousand or so records. If this sounds like you, I’ll bet that you knew the title of every song you owned and were familiar with each album on the shelf.

    Record stores were wondrous places, too. The biggest ones — think Sam the Record Man on Yonge Street in Toronto or any of the HMV superstores in major cities around the world — might stock 100,000 titles or more. A full browse of the shelves took days.

    Read more:

    Plagiarism wars put rhythm and beats under the legal microscope

    Then came the internet and the illegal filing-sharing that began in the late 1990s. People went nuts, accumulating as much free music as they could. Others began ripping their CDs to digital files where they lived alongside purchased downloads from storefronts like iTunes. Hard drives were filled to capacity with thousands and thousands of songs. A buddy of mine purchased a super-sized iPod Classic just so he could say that he carried 40,000 songs in his pocket.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Very impressive. But then came the era of streaming platforms (Digital Service Providers or DSPs) like Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, and all the others. Suddenly, artists didn’t need a record label to get their music out to the world. For a very modest fee (or free for new artists), companies like TuneCore, DistroKid, CD Baby, and United Masters will see that any musician anywhere on the planet is uploaded to all the libraries used by the world’s music streamers. Hit “enter” and a song is available globally.

    Music distribution had been democratized. Artists were in charge of their own destinies and not beholden to some record company. Great, right?

    Well, hang on sunshine. What we have now is too much music. WAY too much. Let’s look at some numbers.

    Luminate, a company that tracks worldwide consumption of music and follows the habits of music fans, looked at new ISRCs coming into the system. An International Standard Recording Code is assigned to every song that gets released. Think of it as a Dewey Decimal System for books in a library. Better yet, it’s more like the ISBN code assigned to each and every book that gets published. Or you can think of it as the song equivalent of a social insurance number.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Luminate published data early this month that shows somewhere around 98,500 ISRCs are uploaded to DSPs each day. In 2022, a total of 34.1 million songs/ISRCs were uploaded. Today we have the equivalent of a jukebox that holds 196 million songs and videos. And the number keeps climbing every second.

    And it’s not the major labels. The same scan of the data showed that only four per cent of daily uploads — 3,940 songs, which is still a lot — come from the big three record labels, Universal, Sony, and Warner. That’s way too much for the music consumer to even begin to process and for the majors to properly market and promote. But it pales in comparison to what’s uploaded by indie labels and DIY musicians. That’s another 90,000 songs. Daily. Music Business Worldwide points out that for every song released by one of the Big Three, 24 come from other sources.

    What happens to all these songs? In the case of about 20 per cent of them (39.2 million tracks or roughly one for each living person in Canada) nothing. Nothing at all. They’re completely lost and never heard by anyone, ever.

    Another interesting stat: A full third of the 196 million new audio and video tracks were created during the pandemic. If we back up one more year, we see that half of all the music available today was created since 2020. Musicians obviously took COVID-19 lockdowns as an opportunity to write songs. And even though things have returned to normal, that firehose of DIY uploads shows zero signs of slowing down.

    Story continues below advertisement


    Click to play video: 'AI music DJ supports surgeons in operating room'


    AI music DJ supports surgeons in operating room


    Well, so what? There are a couple of issues.

    First, with so much choice out there, it’s tempting to default to listening to songs and artists you already know. Sorting through new music is just too overwhelming. Could this skew overall listening to older songs rather than new ones? Maybe.

    Second, there’s an environmental component to all this. Digital files take up space on servers. Servers require electricity. A lot of it. What’s the point of DSPs spending money on electricity to harbour songs that no one listens to? There are some suggestions that if your song doesn’t attract X plays over a certain number, it should be expunged from the global jukebox. Either that or you’ll be asked to pay a storage fee until such time your song takes off. I’ve seen discussions about what to do with these “junk” songs that are nothing more than flotsam and jetsam in the ocean of music available.

    Story continues below advertisement

    I’ll throw a third point in here just for fun. With artificial intelligence now being used to create even more music, uploads to the DSPs will soon be much higher. Maybe exponentially higher.

    Read more:

    Music generated by artificial intelligence is coming to the radio sooner than you think

    If you’re a musician, none of this is encouraging. How is your music supposed to rise above all this noise that just keeps getting louder every day? Beats me. If you’re a curator of playlists, be it for Spotify or a radio station, what does your future look like? No clue, but it’s going to be overwhelming.

    Want to sample some of that 20 per cent of the music universe that’s never been heard by anyone? If you have a Spotify account, use it to sign into Forgotify and get a stream of unheard songs, tracks with ZERO streams. You may be there for a while.

    Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for Global News.

    Subscribe to Alan’s Ongoing History of New Music Podcast now on Apple Podcast or Google Play

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    Alan Cross

    Source link

  • Here’s the Cost-Saving Secret to the Future of Advertising | Entrepreneur

    Here’s the Cost-Saving Secret to the Future of Advertising | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Traditional TV still has its viewers, but — unless you missed the memo circulating for the last decade — you’re probably aware that streaming is the current reigning champ of entertainment. New over-the-top TV (OTT) (a.k.a streaming TV ads or STV ads) options are officially outpacing traditional TV viewership (34.8% vs. 34.4%).

    That means more people are tuning into Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Netflix, YouTube and other internet-based options instead of cable. It’s a no-brainer for entrepreneurs: Incorporating streaming TV into your advertising strategy is a powerful tool to reach your audience at scale.

    But OTT advertising’s biggest selling point? Cost.

    Sure, you can gamble and drop $7 million into a single Super Bowl ad like The Farmer’s Dog, which won USA Today‘s 35th Ad Meter. You could even throw similar amounts at designated marketing area (DMA) tactics or out-of-home ads (e.g., billboards, live events). But it’s not imperative. By pairing first-party retailer data with solid, creative video content delivered on TV streaming platforms, you can laser focus whatever budget you have for a powerful impact.

    Related: A Media Exec on How Brands Can Leverage OTT and FAST for Marketing Success: ‘It’s More Lean In Than Lean Back’

    The easiest way to win out

    Before putting all your chips on the table, make sure you understand this fundamental concept: There’s your own first-party data, and then there’s first-party retailer data. The initial category covers only the information you’ve collected about your customers through their interactions with your brand — think email addresses, age demographics, website traffic or purchase history. Retailer first-party data covers similar territories for another seller’s customers.

    Both are powerful. But larger retailers — say, Amazon, Walmart or Target — usually work with far more people over larger geographical regions. Their information gives you a richer picture of the current market and trends while still answering precise marketing questions. It’s the ideal secret weapon to expand your business through deliberate target marketing.

    With that straight, imagine you’re a luxury brand like Louis Vuitton. Your average selling price is five times more than the category average (yes, really), so good luck getting a ton of sales with generalized marketing. Instead of throwing spaghetti at the wall to see if it sticks, the better option would be to target women ages 18-54 who are in-market and have purchased multiple handbags in the past six months with an average household income five times that of the rest of America (think places like Newport Beach, California).

    Agencies can assume this targeted approach in the OTT arena using first-party retailer data to ensure your ads appear in target-appropriate shows in specific locations. Now, stop pretending you’re Louis Vuitton. Pretend you’re you. Imagine you own a gym with three locations — think about how useful this could be for reaching your audience.

    Related: Where Entrepreneurs Can Innovate in the Streaming Service Space

    The beginner’s guide to streaming ads

    Your first rule of thumb should be to know your audience. If you’re a direct-to-consumer business, your own website analytics data can help you define your target consumer. Plus, this little tool, Google Analytics, is free and makes it easy to understand, present and leverage the data you already have.

    Once you have a detailed picture of your audience, you need creative assets. Contrary to Apple’s ads that say you can generate high-quality videos on your smartphone, remember never to settle for generic content. You have to go for the emotional jugular — design something innovative that’s memorable and resonates with the specific viewers you aim to reach. Let’s not forget that you’ll be on TV screens across America; your production needs to be spectacular. After all, if you’re entering people’s homes, you must bring value.

    The next step is to know what success looks like. Unlike traditional media, sales are not the core key performance indicator (KPI) for OTT advertising. Your core KPI? Searches for your brand on Google and websites like Amazon (assuming you sell there), which Google Keyword Planner can help you see. You’re looking at whether the search volume for your branded keywords is growing.

    Think bigger. What if you used QR codes? You can easily see how many people clicked them. If you’re clever, you can create a custom landing page on your site with a promotion or deal to make your OTT spend impactful. Now you can track sales from an ad served on a TV!

    Related: 10 QR Code Generator Features That You Can Use For Free

    Coming soon to a screen near you

    Once upon a time, you advertised in a non-specific DMA and hoped your sales would go up. Again, we’re seeing a mindblowing breakthrough: We can leverage QR codes, marketing cloud clean rooms, retailer data and your website data to determine if your ad converted into a sale.

    And the future promises bigger and better methods. Imagine if OTT advertising could connect to other platforms and combine ad solutions, too. A car fan can’t get enough Fast and Furious movies? Let’s say they head over to Freevee to get their fix. The streaming platform puts a QR code up for — you guessed it — custom wheels. Then, they head over to IMDb to jog their brain about who’s in the film, where they also see an ad for those same wheels. No matter the device, you will reach them with the same ad. It could even extend to virtual (VR) or augmented realities (AR) that allow the consumer to put the wheels on a picture of their car.

    This setup illustrates how technology is transforming the customer journey and the advertiser’s ability to measure success. It’s easy to remove all the barriers to purchase for your customers and use different platforms together in a cohesive strategy to sell a product.

    Stream your way to success

    In the prehistoric age of retail and TV, advertisers had to cast a wide, expensive net to get ads in front of people. It was tough to see the fruit of their efforts. The new world of retailer data combined with OTT advertising is fundamentally different because it doesn’t require a mammoth-sized budget and can hone in on exactly who you want to reach.

    You have an incredible opportunity to advertise more efficiently and creatively than ever. Will you take it?

    Joshua Kreitzer

    Source link

  • New on Netflix: The Best Movies and TV Shows Coming (and Leaving) in April 2023

    New on Netflix: The Best Movies and TV Shows Coming (and Leaving) in April 2023

    Puss in Boots

    Shark Tale

    Shrek Forever After

    Smokey and the Bandit

    Smokey and the Bandit II

    Spider-Man

    Spider-Man 2

    Spider-Man 3

    Thomas & Friends: The Mystery of Lookout Mountain

    Zombieland

    Weathering (NETFLIX FILM)

    April 2

    War Sailor: Limited Series (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 3

    Magic Mixies: Season 1

    Surviving R. Kelly Part III: The Final Chapter: Season 1

    April 4

    My Name Is Mo’Nique (NETFLIX COMEDY)

    The Signing (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 5

    Lewis Capaldi: How I’m Feeling Now

    April 6

    BEEF (NETFLIX SERIES)

    The Last Stand

    April 7

    Chupa (NETFLIX FILM)

    Holy Spider

    Kings of Mulberry Street: Let Love Reign (NETFLIX FILM)

    Oh Belinda (NETFLIX FILM)

    Thicker Than Water (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Transatlantic (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 8

    Hunger (NETFLIX FILM)

    April 10

    CoComelon: Season 8 (NETFLIX FAMILY)

    April 11

    All American: Homecoming Season 2

    Leanne Morgan: I’m Every Woman (NETFLIX COMEDY)

    April 12

    American Manhunt: The Boston Marathon Bombing (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY)

    CELESTE BARBER Fine, thanks (NETFLIX COMEDY)

    Operation: Nation (NETFLIX FILM)

    Smother-in-Law: Season 2 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 13

    The Boss Baby: Back in the Crib: Season 2 (NETFLIX FAMILY)

    Florida Man (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Obsession (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 14

    Phenomena (NETFLIX FILM)

    Queenmaker (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Queens on the Run (NETFLIX FILM)

    Seven Kings Must Die (NETFLIX FILM)

    April 15

    Doctor Cha (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Time Trap

    April 16

    The Best Man Holiday

    The Mustang

    The Nutty Boy Part 2 (NETFLIX FAMILY)

    April 17

    Oggy Oggy: Season 2 (NETFLIX FAMILY)

    April 18

    Better Call Saul: Season 6

    How to Get Rich (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY)

    Longest Third Date (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY)

    April 19

    Chimp Empire (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY)

    Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: Once & Always (NETFLIX FILM)

    April 20

    The Diplomat (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Tooth Pari: When Love Bites (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 21

    A Tourist’s Guide to love (NETFLIX FILM)

    Chokehold (NETFLIX FILM)

    Indian Matchmaking: Season 3 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    One More Time (NETFLIX FILM)

    Rough Diamonds (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 22

    Ada Twist, Scientist: Season 4 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 25

    The Hateful Eight 

    The Hateful Eight: Extended Version: Season 1

    John Mulaney: Baby J (NETFLIX COMEDY)

    April 26

    The Good Bad Mother (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Kiss, Kiss! (NETFLIX FILM)

    Love After Music (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Workin’ Moms: Season 7 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 27

    Firefly Lane: Season 2 Part 2 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    The Matchmaker (NETFLIX FILM)

    The Nurse (NETFLIX SERIES)

    Sharkdog: Season 3 (NETFLIX FAMILY)

    Sweet Tooth: Season 2 (NETFLIX SERIES)

    April 28

    AKA (NETFLIX FILM)

    InuYasha: Season 6

    King of Collectibles: The Goldin Touch (NETFLIX SERIES)

    What’s leaving Netflix in April 2023:

    Consider this last call for the comforts afforded by Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, the 2017 documentary Bill Nye: Science Guy, and—in a major loss for the streamer’s are-you-still-watching binge model—all seven seasons of Fox’s New Girl. Less than a year after the platform reportedly put out feelers for its own New Girl-type original, the beloved sitcom will now live on Hulu and Peacock. 

    April 1

    Turbo Fast: Seasons 1-3

    April 3

    What Lies Below

    April 7

    Hush

    April 9

    New Girl: Seasons 1-7

    April 11

    Married at First Sight: Season 10

    April 12

    The Baker and the Beauty: Season 1

    April 18

    Cuckoo: Seasons 1-5

    April 20

    The Mr. Peabody and Sherman Show: Seasons 1-4

    April 23

    We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks

    April 24

    Bill Nye: Science Guy

    April 25

    The IT Crowd: Series 1-5

    April 27

    Señora Acero: Seasons 1-5

    April 28

    Ash vs. Evil Dead: Seasons 1-3

    April 30

    Den of Thieves

    Empire State

    Leap Year

    Road to Perdition

    Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Is the Party Over for Peak TV?

    Is the Party Over for Peak TV?

    Lately, America’s biggest entertainment conglomerates have participated in a sometimes agita-inducing quarterly ritual of revealing their latest financial results to the Wall Street community. Their performances have been mixed. Disney—once again led by smooth-talking CEO Bob Iger—said it lost subscribers at Disney+ for the first time during the last three months of 2022, as its streaming division totaled more than $1 billion in losses, and prepared to lay off 7,000 people in a broader effort to slash costs. Warner Bros. Discovery, whose one-year anniversary is approaching, fared slightly better, reporting small gains at HBO Max, where aggressive efforts to rein in spending last year led to smaller streaming losses. “We took bold, decisive action over the last 10 months, and the bulk of our restructuring is behind us,” CEO David Zaslav assured investors. Netflix, meanwhile, reported that efforts to stanch last year’s subscriber nosedive, which spooked the entire industry, has been working. Projecting confidence as the company’s stock recovers from the great plunge of 2022, co-CEO Ted Sarandos promised, “It’s an enormous amount of growth ahead.”

    Executives’ once jubilant tones that prevailed over the early days of the streaming wars, however, have been notably absent from these carefully choreographed announcements. In this latest installment of Inside the Hive, Vanity Fair senior media correspondent Joe Pompeo and Hollywood correspondent Natalie Jarvey talk what comes post–Hollywood’s peak TV era (which may very well have actually peaked last year with a head-spinning total of nearly 600 scripted series). As an ominous New York Times headline suggested at the end of 2022: “Streaming’s Golden Age Is Suddenly Dimming.“

    There are certainly signs that the sun is setting on the golden age of streaming. For the last few years, media companies invested billions to try and catch up with super-spending Netflix. But the streaming pioneer’s rough 2022 prompted every player with a competitive service to question whether it’s actually worth chasing subscriber growth at all costs. FX chairman John Landgraf, who calculates how many series Hollywood unleashes each year, recently predicted that the number of shows will start to fall in 2023 as companies pull back on their content budgets.

    The cutbacks have led to a confusing few months for viewers who, until recently, have enjoyed the spoils of the streaming wars. Buzzy shows like Westworld and Super Pumped are being pulled from streaming services. Netflix is cracking down on password sharing. And it’s more complicated than ever to figure out which streamer you need to pay for to watch a hit series like, say, Yellowstone. The uncertainty in Hollywood is also creating anxiety for the people who make all this entertainment. TV writers, already frustrated that streaming has shaken up how they get paid, are worried that fewer shows will mean fewer jobs, and as a May 1 deadline for their union contract looms, some are agitating for a strike that could shut down much of Hollywood.

    It’s all enough to wonder: Is the streaming party over? Listen to the episode and let us know what you think.

    Natalie Jarvey, Joe Pompeo

    Source link

  • Oscars 2023: Yes, Some Awards Movies Flopped, but Art Matters

    Oscars 2023: Yes, Some Awards Movies Flopped, but Art Matters

    First there was Tár, then The Fabelmans, then She Said. Empire of Light followed soon after. They were all big fall festival movies, aimed squarely at awards attention—and they all failed to ignite at the box office. Some did well in large cities for a couple of weeks, then faltered in wider release. Others never got off the ground at all, hobbled by weak marketing campaigns and a hard-to-diagnose lack of interest. For years, it has been a locus of worry within the industry: this growing chasm between box office triumphs and the movies deemed, by some anyway, to be the best of the year.

    This year will see hits like Everything Everywhere All at Once, Top Gun: Maverick, and Avatar: The Way of Water jockeying for awards. But long gone are the days when nearly every film nominated for best picture at the Oscars had a solid financial résumé. In 2022, the situation began to look truly existentially dire. Entertainment outside the home has, apparently, become an unjustified hassle for all but the loudest, biggest spectaculars, like Marvel movies and nefariously ticketed Taylor Swift concerts.

    The box office failure of so many niche films suggests a disheartening sea change in culture, one greeted breathlessly—perhaps even gleefully—by some in the industry’s commentariat class. Maybe, as those pundits suggest, we should stop wringing our hands about this shift and face the couch-bound future with a kind of tech optimism. The thinking seems to be that these artier movies will still be made, they’ll just be relegated to streaming, where potential audiences won’t have to risk quite so much money—or be forced to suffer any time outside of the house. I’m not sure that prognosis is the most clear-sighted, though. It seems more likely that studios, looking at their earnings reports, will gradually stop making these films at all.

    Which would be a loss for everyone. The studios would forsake whatever value acclaim (and, yes, awards) confers on their company. Artists would lose the opportunity to, well, be artists on the scale that best fits their vision. Audiences would be denied intellectually, emotionally, even politically challenging work. Even those who would skip these movies no matter where they’re playing will eventually suffer; styles, modes, and techniques that first develop in smaller films do trickle their way up to the blockbusters.

    The most immediate challenge in preserving the fall movie tradition is convincing the megacorporations who own a large swath of the industry that there is something to gain with loss-leader filmmaking, as was the calculation of the studios of old. I’m sure some filmmakers and film lovers of tomorrow have been inspired by Marvel movies, but how many more might be hooked by films they feel they’ve discovered, that open their minds to nascent passions of which they were previously unaware? The bracing social commentary of Tár, the poignant artistic memoir of The Fabelmans, the righteous empathy of Women Talking, the graceful humanity of Empire of Light—and the even more underwatched but still worthy projects from directors not named Spielberg or Mendes.

    Maybe the most effective appeal would be to simple self-regard: Hollywood loves celebrating itself, reveling in its own mythos. What will that identity be in the future, though, if studios have reduced their output to boilerplate franchise movies whose identities have blurred into one indistinct mass? Perhaps studio executives could persuade Wall Street and shareholders that an aura of magic and majesty, maintained year after year by the stuff that supposedly nobody cares about, is necessary for survival of the business. Box office returns are nice—as are perks and bonuses and dividends—but can you really put a price on legacy?

    Richard Lawson

    Source link

  • HBO Sues Paramount, MTV Over ‘South Park’ Rights | Entrepreneur

    HBO Sues Paramount, MTV Over ‘South Park’ Rights | Entrepreneur

    According to Variety, streaming platform HBO Max has argued in a new lawsuit that Paramount Global, via its streaming platform Paramount+, has violated a contract that gave the former exclusive streaming rights to “South Park.”

    “Defendants engaged in a simple and obvious artifice of mischaracterizing the content to avoid obligations” of the contract, the suit says.

    HBO Max is owned by Warner Bros. Discovery.

    The lawsuit was filed Friday in New York. The complaint says that HBO Max gained the exclusive rights to stream new episodes of “South Park” and its old “library” of past episodes after an “extremely competitive” bidding process.

    But, in violation of that contract, the suit claims, Paramount+ made a deal with the show’s creators for spinoff movies and other spinoff media with MTV in an “illicit scheme.” The latter streamer also said it paid for a certain number of episodes and did not receive them.

    “South Park” airs on Comedy Central (owned by Paramount) and is one of the longest-running TV shows ever, as Bloomberg noted. It follows the adventures of a group of four boys who run around making jokes in the eponymous Colorado small town.

    HBO claims it paid “more than half a billion dollars” for the rights to stream it exclusively.

    “Exclusivity was so important to Warner/HBO that when SPDS asked Warner/HBO whether it would consider sharing the rights to South Park with CBS All Access or another Paramount streamer, Warner/HBO rejected the proposition as a ‘non-starter,’” the lawsuit said.

    SPDS is South Park Digital Studios, a media company that produces “South Park” as well as has done titles like “The Book of Mormon.”

    “We believe these claims are without merit and look forward to demonstrating so through the legal process,” Paramount said, per Variety.

    Gabrielle Bienasz

    Source link

  • How Richard Rushfield’s The Ankler Took on Hollywood

    How Richard Rushfield’s The Ankler Took on Hollywood

    Netflix is far from a death spiral, but one of the biggest media stories of 2022 turned out to be the company’s stunning subscriber stumble. The streamer lost almost half its stock value and came to be seen as a potential acquisition target. I asked Rushfield if he felt vindicated. “I wanna jump up and down,” he said, “and yell ‘I told you so’ every day.”

    Rushfield, 54, grew up in Pacific Palisades and attended Santa Monica’s prestigious Crossroads School, where he overlapped with future hotshots like Matthew Greenfield, Jay Sures, Brett Morgen, Jason Blumenthal, Maya Rudolph, and Jack Black. Rushfield’s younger sister, the TV writer Alexandra Rushfield, was friends at Crossroads with Jenni Konner, who went on to showrun HBO’s Girls with Lena Dunham. At Hampshire College in Western Massachusetts, Rushfield frequented punk shows—X, Sonic Youth, Nirvana, Henry Rollins (he saw Black Flag in high school)—and wrote a decidedly gothy senior thesis about Jacques-Louis David’s paintings from the French Revolution (Marat bleeding to death in a bathtub, etc.). After graduating, he followed the grunge-era playbook of loafing around without a plan. Then he landed an entry-level gig with the ’92 Clinton campaign, sharing a small cigarette-smoke-filled office with Noah Shachtman, now editor in chief of Rolling Stone. “Even when we were kids, he was a figure from a different era,” Shachtman recalls. “I felt like he had stepped out of a Raymond Chandler novel.”

    After working as a field organizer for several other Democratic campaigns, Rushfield pursued a writing career. His first byline, a front-of-book item for Los Angeles magazine, highlighted a stand-up comedy show featuring rising stars like David Cross, Bob Odenkirk, Patton Oswalt, Margaret Cho, and Janeane Garofalo. (He became friends with a lot of these folks.) “I think it ran two sentences and I got $25,” Rushfield recalls. In 1998, he and his friend Adam Leff conceived a Spy-inspired trend-forecasting charticle, “The Intelligence Report,” which caught the eye of Graydon Carter. He gave them a contract with this magazine, where the column appeared several times a year until 2010. (Rushfield has also written a few features for Vanity Fair.) By the mid-2000s, Rushfield was working as a web editor at the Los Angeles Times, where a print higher-up once told him the only reason people wanted the online versions of articles was so they could print them out to read in the bathtub. He embraced the web, where he ended up spending the majority of his professional life. In 2009, Rushfield left the Times to become West Coast editor of Gawker. He then wrote a book about American Idol and did tours of BuzzFeed, Yahoo, and, finally, HitFix, where he was editor in chief before the site was acquired in 2016. “The second half of my career was working on every website, essentially,” he told me.

    The Ankler almost didn’t happen. After HitFix, Rushfield was accepted to the USC Rossier School of Education to pursue a graduate degree in teaching. Around the same time, inspired by the success of The Information, Jessica Lessin’s subscription-powered tech-news publication, he started sending an email digest to a small group of friends, who started showing it to their friends, who then forwarded it to their friends. Before he knew it, he had an impressive distribution list. “It started getting passed around very quickly to the executive class,” Rushfield told me. He decided against USC Rossier and put his eggs in The Ankler instead. “It took me time to get up the guts to put down a paywall, but I made that leap.”

    Rushfield first met Min at the Golden Globes about a decade ago, “stuck at the kids’ table in the back,” Min joked. A former People and InStyle reporter and editor who became a mid-aughts media star as the editor in chief of Us Weekly, Min was in the midst of her celebrated reinvention of The Hollywood Reporter, which she ran until 2017. In 2021, as Min recovered from a brief stint at the train wreck that was Quibi, she and Rushfield started talking. “The Ankler had come to my attention because people were forwarding it to me, pretty senior people in the industry,” she recalls. “My thoughts were that entertainment was undergoing these crazy upheavals, both culturally and in the business model, and nobody was really owning that conversation.” They made it official with a New York Times piece shortly before Christmas and entered the Y Combinator program several months later. “In Silicon Valley terms,” Min said, “Richard would be ‘the product.’ ”

    The Ankler is no stranger to courtship. Penske Media, whose near-monopoly on major entertainment titles includes THR, Variety, Deadline, Billboard, and Rolling Stone, made a number of overtures up until several weeks before Rushfield and Min announced their business relationship. (Variety put an offer on the table in 2019 to add The Ankler to its newsletter lineup; later, Penske Media boss Jay Penske pursued an acquisition.) Additionally, Puck had conversations with Rushfield prior to its own launch. Min and Rushfield later explored partnerships with Axios and Lessin, an early Ankler booster who’d welcomed Rushfield into The Information’s inaugural accelerator program. Ankler Media’s decision to remain independent—albeit with investors—and to continue publishing on Substack, where they’re part of a growing crop of full-fledged publications, reflected a desire to “control our own destiny,” as Min put it.

    What does The Ankler’s destiny look like? Min envisions “a universe of bundled subscriptions” and a push into international markets. “The story of streaming is that it hit the ceiling in the United States before it was supposed to,” she said. “So everyone’s saying, ‘Let’s try to make money somewhere else,’ aggressively looking toward markets like Japan, India, Latin America, and that’s a great story.” When I asked for a pie-in-the-sky target of paid subscribers, she didn’t flinch: “a hundred thousand.” If they manage to get there—that’s a lot of paying subscribers!—it won’t have been easy. “I think they’re off to a tremendous start, but the road ahead is hard,” said Lessin, one of Ankler Media’s investors. “It’s a really difficult, long path.”

    In early 2018, Lessin hosted Rushfield and the other members of The Information’s first accelerator class at her home in San Francisco. Over dinner, she asked her guests to describe their five-year aspirations. When it was Rushfield’s turn, he said, “What drew me to newsletters was the chance to really write something meaningful and to be able to do your best work. If, five years from now, I could be doing that on a stable basis, I’ll be thrilled.”

    Here we are, five years later. I called Rushfield late one night while wrapping up this piece and read back his quote from Lessin’s soiree. “I couldn’t believe I was getting away with speaking so honestly and freely about this industry back then,” he said. “I still can’t believe I’m getting away with it.”

    HAIR, CHECHEL JOSON (MIN); MAKEUP, TAYLOR BABAIAN; GROOMING, STACY SKINNER; TAILOR, HASMIK KOURINIAN. SET DESIGN, BETTE ADAMS. PRODUCED ON LOCATION BY PRODUCTION SQUAD. FOR DETAILS, GO TO VF.COM/CREDITS.

    Joe Pompeo

    Source link

  • How to Livestream the 2023 Grammys

    How to Livestream the 2023 Grammys

    It’s not every day that Beyoncé gets to make history, but that could be in the cards when the 2023 Grammys, where she leads all nominations with nine, premiere. Bey already broke records last fall, when her recognition for Renaissance officially made her the most-nominated artist of all time and tied with her husband, Jay-Z, thanks to a massive 88 nods each. Following just behind the Carters are Kendrick Lamar with eight nominations, and Adele and Brandi Carlile with seven nods apiece. 

    Fresh off his Daily Show departureTrevor Noah is hosting for the third year in a row with a Grammys that’s introducing five new categories. They include songwriter of the year, non-classical; Best Alternative Music Performance; Best Americana Performance; best score soundtrack for video games and other interactive media; and best spoken word poetry album. (The full list of nominations can be found here.

    “It’s going to be the most star-studded room the Grammys has been for many, many years,” the show’s executive producer Ben Winston told The Hollywood Reporter. Here’s how to watch it all happen. 

    How to Watch the Grammys

    The 2023 Grammys air live on Sunday, February 5, on CBS and Paramount+. This year’s telecast will also be available to stream online at cbs.com, through the CBS app, or via the Recording Academy’s social channels. Streaming options for those without a cable login include Hulu + Live TVYouTube TVDirectTV StreamSling TV, and FuboTV, many of which have free-trial periods. 

    Who Is Performing at the Grammys?

    The performer lineup is filled with buzzy performers, including Harry Styles, Lizzo, Bad Bunny, Mary J. Blige, Steve Lacy, Luke Combs, Carlile, and Sam Smith with Kim Petras. This year’s slate of presenters is just as star-studded with first lady Jill Biden, Dwayne Johnson, Cardi B, Olivia Rodrigo, Billy Crystal, James Corden, Shania Twain, and Viola Davis tapped to present various honors. (Davis will achieve EGOT status if she wins best audio book, narration, and storytelling recording for her memoir, Finding Me, after Emmy, Oscar, and Tony victories.) 

    To celebrate the 50th anniversary of hip-hop, artists including Missy Elliott, Public Enemy, Grandmaster Flash, Queen Latifah, Lil Wayne, RUN-DMC, and more will unite for a performance introduced by previous Grammys host LL Cool J and produced by Questlove.

    There will also be a tribute to three major musicians who died in 2022—country icon Loretta Lynn, Fleetwood Mac’s Christine McVie, and Migos member Takeoff. Kacey Musgraves is set to honor Lynn with a performance of “Coal Miner’s Daughter;” Sheryl Crow, Mick Fleetwood, and Bonnie Raitt will perform “Songbird” for McVie; and Quavo is singing “Without You” featuring worship music group Maverick City Music for his nephew, Takeoff. 

    It’s unclear whether or not Beyoncé will perform—or even attend—the ceremony. But if she were to pick up at least four awards, she’d beat the record held by late conductor Georg Solti for most Grammy wins of all time with 31. “I can think of few artists who are more deserving of holding that title and that position,” Noah told THR. “And without disrespecting any of the previous holders of that title in any way, it is safe to say that Beyoncé has truly done more than many to shape not just music, but pop culture, the perception of Black women, Black people in general, connecting the diaspora in the way she creates her music, defining dance moves. I mean, she’s left an indelible impression,” he said. Noah also added, “It’s wonderful that Beyoncé gets her flowers.”

    When Do the Grammys Start?

    The 65th annual Grammy Awards begin at 8 p.m. E.T./5 p.m. P.T. on Sunday, February 5. Festivities will take place at what was formerly known as the Staples Center—rebranded as the Crypto.com Arena in December 2021—in Los Angeles. 

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • “It’s Expensive to Look This Good”: ‘Gossip Girl’ Creator Josh Safran on the End

    “It’s Expensive to Look This Good”: ‘Gossip Girl’ Creator Josh Safran on the End

    On Thursday, HBO Max’s Gossip Girl was officially banished from the Met Steps when Warner Bros. Discovery announced that it was not moving forward with the series for a third season. The news has taken the internet by storm, as fans mourn the end of the series. “I know that people love this season,” Gossip Girl creator, showrunner, and executive producer exclusively tells Vanity Fair. “I feel the love.”

    In his first interview since the news broke, Safran chats with VF and breaks down the danger of reboots, whether he thinks Gossip Girl will find another streaming home, and what season three would have had in store for his Upper East siders.  

    Vanity Fair: I’m sorry to hear about Gossip Girl’s cancellation. I was loving this season. 

    Josh Safran: Everyone is. It’s hard. All I get is constant feedback from how great people are feeling. So it’s rough. 

    How are you taking the news? How are you processing this? 

    Unfortunately it was to be expected in a way because of what’s happening at all streamers these days. Things are just going different ways than we all would hope. That Golden Age is coming to an end. 

    Also, this show is incredibly expensive. “It takes a lot of money to look this good,” [laughs]. And so it really would’ve had to have gotten House of the Dragon numbers or Last of Us numbers and there just aren’t shows like Gossip Girl that get those numbers. I mean, who even knows what anyone’s numbers are? I just know that a show like Gossip Girl isn’t going to get House of the Dragon or Last of Us numbers.

    It felt like Gossip Girl was resonating with its core audience. I’m already seeing on social media that people are really distraught about the cancellation. Do you think HBO Max’s decision to cancel Gossip Girl has something to do with Warner Bros.’ recent merger with Discovery? 

    I think you’re looking at a lot of cancellations at this particular network, but [also] every network, every streamer. In the rush to announce themselves, they spent money—which is great for us. I’m very grateful for that. Over time there is debt, and that’s why we’re seeing a wave of cancellation. So sure, I’m sure the merger had something to do with it, but also we are very expensive. Even if there hadn’t been a merger, who knows? I don’t know numbers, I can’t speak to that. I know that people love this season. I feel the love, I definitely get more reactions on social media than any other show I’ve ever worked on. 

    All we can do is have made a great show. We’re really proud of this season. I’m also proud of season one, but I think that the saddest thing about what’s happening these days in the marketplace is that the whole point of TV was to create characters and worlds that could grow and deepen as they went on. That’s becoming less and less likely for the majority of shows, and that sucks. 

    Have you talked to the cast and crew?

    Yeah, of course. Honestly  the one silver lining in all of this if this is the end—which I believe that it is—is that we are going out on the high. Nobody is going through the motions on a season five or six being like, ‘How much more of the same stuff can I do.’ Weirdly, we all love each other. We love working together. It was an incredible experience. So there’s no sadness or unhappiness or negative memories. I mean, we truly went out not only on a high, but, like, in Rome having the best time of our lives. 

    Did you say Rome?

    Yes, in Rome. We finished shooting the season in Rome. So even that ended in the best place you could be: gorgeous, glamorous Rome with everybody. 

    We’ve talked about how it took a little while for the world to catch up to the new Gossip Girl. How do you feel about the ending to this version of Gossip Girl in comparison to the original Gossip Girl, which had six seasons, but ended in a somewhat weird way?

    Chris Murphy

    Source link

  • The 25 Best Shows on Netflix to Watch Right Now

    The 25 Best Shows on Netflix to Watch Right Now

    We’ve all been overwhelmed by streaming TV choices, only to give up and watch something you’ve already seen. But this curated list of the best shows on Netflix is here to narrow down your choices and help you figure out exactly which titles you want to sample next. 

    Every high school has its legendary scandals, notorious pranks, and perennial screw-ups. Not every high school has them chronicled in an elaborate docu-series with lavish production values. In this extremely straight-faced mockumentary that’s also one of the best comedies on Netflix, Hanover High senior Dylan Maxwell (Jimmy Tatro) is assumed to have vandalized 27 faculty members’ cars by spray-painting phallic images on them, and gets expelled for it. When he maintains his innocence, classmates Peter Maldonado (Tyler Alvarez) and Sam Ecklund (Griffin Gluck) decide to film their own investigation. Season 2 takes them to another state, and another equally juvenile high school “crime.”

    Content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Following her work as a writer on Breaking BadMoira Walley-Beckett took a wild right turn: she adapted Lucy Maud Montgomery’s 1908 young adult novel into this family drama series. Matthew (R.H. Thomson) and Marilla (Geraldine James)—middle-aged, unmarried siblings living together on their family farm—arrange to adopt an orphan boy to help work the property. Matthew is not quite sure what to do when the orphan who arrives at the train station is Anne (Amybeth McNulty), a wildly imaginative girl. Fortunately, they eventually figure out how to be a family.

    Content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    In 1929 Germany, Gereon Rath (Volker Bruch) is a World War I veteran now working as a police inspector in Cologne. His assignment to unravel an extortion ring in Berlin is complicated by his use of morphine to dull his painful memories of the war; however, his efforts are soon aided by Lotte Ritter (Liv Lisa Fries), a sometime sex worker at one of the city’s hottest cabarets. Run, Lola, Run director Tom Tykwer is among the creative forces behind the show that debuted in 2017 but remains among the best shows on Netflix right now.

    Source link

  • TIDAL’s New Tool Allows Subscribers to DJ for Their Friends and Followers – EDM.com

    TIDAL’s New Tool Allows Subscribers to DJ for Their Friends and Followers – EDM.com

    TIDAL is flipping the switch on consumers, allowing them to create mixes and mashups to kickstart their careers as DJs. 

    TIDAL, a digital service provider known for their high-fidelity audio, is testing out a new featured called “DJ” for subscribers signed up for their HiFi Plus plan. In its current state, iOS users are the only ones able to create mixes with the “DJ” tool, but Android users can tune in and listen.

    With “DJ,” HiFI Plus subscribers are able to create a set and share it for friends and followers, who can tune in and listen to the mix in real-time, just like a live radio broadcast or podcast.

    Lennon Cihak

    Source link

  • The 65 Best Christmas Movies of All Time

    The 65 Best Christmas Movies of All Time

    Every Hallmark or Lifetime Christmas movie leading lady has, in some ways, been following Barbara Stanwyck’s lead as a woman finding domestic bliss beneath her career woman exterior in a film that charms, despite its dated ideas about femininity. 

    Meet Me In St. Louis (1944)

    Meet Me In St. Louis

    United Archives/Getty Images

    There’s a scene in 2005’s The Family Stone where characters get emotional watching Judy Garland croon “Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas” in this film. Their tears are justifiable, given the sweeping sadness at the center of her performance in a happy-go-lucky big-budget musical. 

    Holiday Inn (1942)

    Holiday Inn

    Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images

    Who wouldn’t want to spend their holidays tucking in with a classic big-screen musical starring Bing Crosby and Fred Astaire, particularly when Irving Berlin’s “White Christmas” is being sung on film for the first time?

    The Shop Around the Corner (1940)

    The Shop Around the Corner

    Archive Photos/Getty Images

    Before Nora Ephron dreamed up 1998’s You’ve Got Mail, there was Ernst Lubitsch’s The Shop Around the Corner starring a pre-It’s a Wonderful Life Jimmy Stewart and Margaret Sullivan as feuding shop employees. As luck would have it, the pair’s real-life tensions shield the fact that they’re secret pen pals!

    All products featured on Vanity Fair are independently selected by our editors. However, when you buy something through our retail links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

    Tara Ariano, Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • This Drama About Friendship Is A Top Show On Netflix Right Now

    This Drama About Friendship Is A Top Show On Netflix Right Now

    “Wednesday” is the most popular show on Netflix, according to the streaming service’s public ranking system.

    In this latest installment in the “Addams Family” franchise, Jenna Ortega stars as Wednesday, daughter of Morticia and Gomez Addams (played by Catherine Zeta-Jones and Luis Guzmán). The new horror comedy premiered on Netflix Nov. 23 and takes the spooky titular heroine to boarding school, where she must solve a murder mystery.

    The second most popular show of the moment is “Firefly Lane,” an adaptation of Kristin Hannah’s bestselling novel. Starring Sarah Chalke and Katherine Heigl, the drama depicts the bond between two friends from their teen years into their 40s. The first part of the second season was released on Dec. 2, with part two set to come out in 2023.

    In third place is the new cooking competition show “Snack vs. Chef,” which debuted on Nov. 30. Twelve chefs compete for a $50,000 prize in a series of challenges that involve recreating iconic snack foods and inventing their own.

    And true crime fans are clearly tuning into “Crime Scene: The Texas Killing Fields.” This new addition to the “Crime Scene” docuseries, which explores the unsolved murders of four women in Texas in the ’80s and ’90s, is also trending on the streaming service.

    Read on for the full top 10 list, and if you want to stay informed about everything joining Netflix each week, subscribe to the Streamline newsletter.

    Source link

  • Here Are the Best Spotify Wrapped Memes of 2022 – EDM.com

    Here Are the Best Spotify Wrapped Memes of 2022 – EDM.com

    It’s Spotify Wrapped season, that wonderful time of the year when a multi-billion dollar corporation tricks its users into running a global marketing campaign for free. 

    With quirky graphics, completely made-up genres and plenty of opportunities to publically shame your friends, it’s tough to refrain from sharing your top songs and artists of the year and flexing your greatness—or cringiness.

    In honor of this brazen display of data harvesting, we’ve compiled the best Spotify Wrapped memes of 2022.

    Obliterating your parents’ computer for a YouTube rip of a song was so worth it

    Nick Yopko

    Source link

  • A Track Sung By an AI Voice Has Eclipsed 100 Million Streams – EDM.com

    A Track Sung By an AI Voice Has Eclipsed 100 Million Streams – EDM.com

    While artists work hard to produce new music for fans and increase their streaming numbers, an A.I. has effortlessly recorded a song that eclipsed 100 million streams.

    According to a report by Music Business Worldwide, Chinese streaming giant Tencent Music Entertainment (TME) has recorded and released over 1,000 new songs that feature AI-generated vocals mimicking the human voice. One track in particular, titled “Today,” has become the first song with an AI voice to surpass the nine-digit milestone. That led to just under $350,000 in streaming revenue, per MBW.

    Mikala Lugen

    Source link

  • Disney Hit With Antitrust Suit Over Live-Streaming Cost

    Disney Hit With Antitrust Suit Over Live-Streaming Cost

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Disney may face an antitrust lawsuit in a case that targets it for its dual role as a distributor and a content supplier.

    Disney owns ESPN and Hulu, the second-largest US streamer. THR reports that the class action petition alleges that the way Disney manages its streaming businesses amounts to an arrangement giving the House of Mouse a chance to do anticompetitive negotiations with its competition, leading to higher live streaming costs in general.

    YouTube TV subscribers filed the suit Friday in the Central District of California US District Court. It outlines their contention that Disney’s grip on the market lets it establish a “price floor” that is higher than it would normally be and notes that Disney’s live-streaming pay TV contracts require competing services to bundle ESPN in with cheap packages, limiting rival companies from putting together their own choices and leaving ESPN out if they want.

    Remove Disney’s insistence on ESPN and competing streamers will be able to offer a wider variety of small bundles combining a limited choice of live TV viewing.

    THR details how even if the lawsuit is new, complaining about Disney’s stranglehold isn’t:

    Cable TV providers have long criticized Disney’s affiliate fees to broadcast ESPN and its sister networks as part of a cable package. It’s widely regarded that such fees were the primary driver of basic cable price hikes in the last decade. In 2015, ESPN’s affiliate fee was as much as four times as expensive as the fee to broadcast TNT, which had the second highest fee behind ESPN.

    The suit has been filed on behalf of several million YouTube TV subscribers. Read the full filing at THR.

    Steve Huff

    Source link