ReportWire

Tag: Small-business Banking

  • Transactions: FIs invest in credit decision platforms | Bank Automation News

    Transactions: FIs invest in credit decision platforms | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Gather Federal Credit Union has selected credit underwriting platform Zest AI to reduce fraudulent activity during the loan origination and decisioning process.  AI-driven Zest Protect can help financial institutions fight identity fraud and identify fake documents during the loan procedure, Adam Kleinman, head of strategy and client success at Zest AI, told Bank Automation News. […]

    [ad_2]

    Vaidik Trivedi

    Source link

  • U.S. Bank readies AI-driven cash forecasting tool | Bank Automation News

    U.S. Bank readies AI-driven cash forecasting tool | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Bank is developing AI-driven solutions for its business clients, with its latest efforts targeting the launch of an AI-driven cash-forecasting tool.  Major financial institutions like Bank of America, Citizens Bank and PNC Bank have already deployed cash-forecasting solutions. The $669 billion bank is working with cloud-based fintech Kyriba on the tool, which will help […]

    [ad_2]

    Vaidik Trivedi

    Source link

  • Banks, fintechs tackle the complexity of KYB with AI and other tech

    Banks, fintechs tackle the complexity of KYB with AI and other tech

    [ad_1]

    Small-business formation is booming. So are opportunities for fintechs targeting financial institutions that bank these entities to break into the business verification space.

    Know-your-business, or KYB, refers to the regulatory requirement for industries such as banking to verify the ownership and legitimacy of a company and assess the risks it poses, both during onboarding and on an ongoing basis. It is related to rules on know-your-customer, or KYC, which focuses on individuals.

    Alex Johnson noticed a flurry of startups tackling this problem as he monitored fundraising announcements for fintechs.

    “There have been an unusual number of U.S.-based fintech startups that have raised money specifically around solving a KYB issue,” said Johnson, author of the Fintech Takes newsletter, including Baselayer, Ballerine, Coris, TrueBiz, Parcha, Accend and Greenlite. It could indicate a “groupthink” mentality in fintech, when “different people become obsessed with the same idea,” he said. But it also suggests there is a gap in the market where existing solutions aren’t cutting it.

    There are numerous reasons why the KYB space is hot right now — and why banks are eager for more automated solutions to ensure companies are legitimate and not shells, to understand who the beneficial owners are and to screen for sanctions and adverse media. There were more than 430,000 business applications in the U.S. in June, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau — about double the number of applications ten years ago. “It’s never been easier to set up a digital storefront,” said Danny Hakimian, CEO and founder of TrueBiz, which automates the process of investigating a business’s web presence.

    KYB is also a highly manual process.

    “There has been a huge push to get the KYC process in general more efficient, inclusive of KYB, because it’s a massive drain on bank spend,” said Spencer Schulten, executive director and U.S. head of financial crimes compliance for Capco. “Non-U.S. customers from higher-risk jurisdictions are seeking access to U.S. banks at a higher rate than I’ve seen in some time.” At the same time, compliance budgets are not growing to keep up with the demand, meaning fewer people have less time to do a greater amount of work.

    The complexity of KYB is also becoming easier to solve.

    “State business registries weren’t online 15 years ago, so you couldn’t build a direct API integration to pull data from them before,” said Johnson.

    ‘We do a lot of Googling’

    First Internet Bank in Fishers, Indiana, and Nbkc bank in Leawood, Kansas, both use fraud and compliance management platform Alloy and business identity platform Middesk in tandem for KYB checks. But each is exploring other technologies to aid in their processes.

    Anne Sharkey, chief risk officer at the $5.3 billion-asset First Internet, has spent the last couple of weeks with a vendor testing ways to improve customer due diligence for small businesses using artificial intelligence.

    Normally, “we do a lot of Googling,” she said. “Do they have a website? Does the website work? Does it represent what the business says it does? Are there negative reviews out there about the company or owners?”

    She sees potential in AI for flagging negative reviews, or a business model that First Internet does not want to bank (for instance, one relating to marijuana), or a nonfunctioning website, which could indicate the company is fraudulent.

    “It still takes human intervention but making the process more efficient allows you to hone in on something that may look irregular, rather than getting buried in the detail and missing something right in front of you,” said Sharkey.

    While Nbkc uses Middesk to retrieve Secretary of State data, not all states make this information available to the public. That means business owners need to upload such documents manually for an Nbkc employee to review. The $1.2 billion-asset bank is testing a homegrown system it built using Optical Character Recognition, or OCR, to extract the data it needs for its records and to review for certain signs of fraud or red flags, such as handwritten information or manipulated documents.

    Nbkc had explored using a vendor, “but we weren’t sold on any in particular,” either because of pricing or functionality, said Brian Fellows, director of risk management at Nbkc. The bank will debut the technology this month.

    The hope is that it will pare down the work for bank employees and reduce costs.

    “Most of the time if [businesses] apply with us and we take a day or two to approve them, they’ve gone to another bank to open an account,” said Fellows.

    He has explored using other startups to fill gaps in the bank’s current KYB process, but so far hasn’t found a combination that beats his current setup and that would justify the price of layering on more solutions.

    What sets KYB fintechs apart

    In his survey of the landscape, Johnson has wondered what distinguishes the slate of startups he has tracked from each other and from legacy providers.

    “Why does the market need 12 of you?” he said.

    Hakimian thinks there is room for venture-scale companies that focus on different angles to emerge in this space rather than a winner-takes-all. TrueBiz is not an end-to-end provider.

    “Business entity verification is multifaceted and complex,” he said.

    The 3-year-old TrueBiz scours a business’s website, social media, online reviews and more. Clients can use its API to retrieve a report analyzing hundreds of data points to construct a picture of the business’s owner and employees, the types of product it offers, its reputation, likelihood of fraud and more, in under 30 seconds, according to Hakimian. TrueBiz’s configurable decision modeling layer also indicates whether further due diligence is needed. Its clients tend to be acquiring banks in the U.S. and global fintechs offering merchant services.

    Others say they are the rare or sole provider of certain capabilities. 

    Baselayer is another entrant to the KYB space. The nearly 2-year-old company purchased a wealth of government and court data, including Secretary of State filings, IRS identification numbers, sanctions data, state and federal tax liens, lawsuits and bankruptcy information. When a client — which includes banks, payment companies, lenders and fintechs — submits a name and address of a company it wants to investigate before onboarding, Baselayer’s AI-driven agent retrieves relevant information profiling a business’s identity along with a rating to indicate the risk level this business poses.

    Baselayer tracks the “pulls” on a particular business’s information, as if a lender was pulling an individual’s credit report. Numerous pulls may be a sign of synthetic identity fraud, where criminals obtain personally identifiable information on different individuals and entities, and reformulate them into multiple fraudulent applications across banks. Baselayer also tracks the businesses and their repayment performance throughout its network to enhance risk profiling.

    Co-founder and CEO Jonathan Awad says his is one of a handful of companies in the market that have purchased Secretary of State data, and that his is the only one tracking pulls on the entire profile of a business.

    “Our solution is focused on the timeframe from when you get an application to every check you need to get through for Customer Identification Program or underwriting purposes,” said Awad.

    [ad_2]

    Miriam Cross

    Source link

  • U.S. Bank’s SMB fintech strategy | Bank Automation News

    U.S. Bank’s SMB fintech strategy | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Bank is looking to fintechs to provide back-office management for its small-business clients.  The $669 billion bank listens to feedback from business clients to understand what they are looking for and whether to develop solutions in house or team with a third party, Shruti Patel, chief product officer for business banking, told Bank Automation […]

    [ad_2]

    Vaidik Trivedi

    Source link

  • U.S. Bank deploying AI for SMBs | Bank Automation News

    U.S. Bank deploying AI for SMBs | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Bank is working on AI-driven solutions for its small and medium-sized business clients to improve their operations.  “By no means is it as easy as just deploying AI into the ecosystem without taking into consideration some of the challenges it comes with,” Shruti Patel, chief product officer for business banking, told Bank Automation News. […]

    [ad_2]

    Vaidik Trivedi

    Source link

  • SBA’s newly licensed nonbank lenders will focus on growth

    SBA’s newly licensed nonbank lenders will focus on growth

    [ad_1]

    Isabel Guzman, administrator of the Small Business Administration, speaks during a National Small Business Week event in the Rose Garden of the White House in May. She has advocated for expanding participation in her agency’s flagship 7(a) program as a way to reach groups that often struggle to obtain credit.

    Ting Shen/Bloomberg

    Following a selection process that lasted nearly seven months, the Small Business Administration has licensed three new small-business lending companies. The move came despite continuing objections from lawmakers as well as groups representing banks and credit unions. 

    Small-business lending companies, known as SBLCs, are nondepository lenders authorized to participate in the agency’s flagship 7(a) lending program, otherwise dominated by banks and credit unions. SBLC participation had been capped at 14 companies since 1982, so the new licensees announced Wednesday brought the total to 17. SBA ended the moratorium in a rule finalized in April. 

    The new SBLCs are: Arkansas Capital Corp., a community development financial institution; McKinley Alaska Growth Capital, an alternative lending firm that is also a CDFI; and the fintech Funding Circle. All three have expressed a desire to expand their 7(a) operations nationwide. 

    Already a prominent small-business lender, Funding Circle lobbied hard for an end to the SBLC moratorium, then sought aggressively to secure one of the three available licenses. It plans a measured 7(a) rollout with a focus on making quality loans, rather than on quantity. “It will take time to ramp up, but it’s important that we get it right from the first loan through full scale,” Ryan Metcalf, the company’s head of public affairs, said Thursday. 

    Denver-based Funding Circle’s ultimate ambitions are writ large. “Our goal is to be the No. 1 SBA lender for loans under $500,000,” Metcalf said. To that end, it has hired Kaustubh Joshi, a high-ranking Goldman Sachs executive, to drive its strategy of partnering with community banks and credit unions, which Funding Circle sees as a fertile source of referrals. Of the more than 9,000 community banks and credit unions currently operating, fewer than 1,500 participated in the 7(a) program during the just completed 2023 fiscal year.

    “If you’re a small- or medium-size institution, how do you keep up?” Metcalf said. “You could make a costly decision to build your own platform, or buy one, or you could partner with Funding Circle and leverage our embedded platform, which we believe is more efficient and cost-effective.” 

    Arkansas Capital in Fayetteville and the Anchorage-based McKinley Alaska Growth Capital are also eyeing growth opportunities. “Arkansas Capital has bolstered regional economic development, but now with this SBLC license, we can widen our SBA 7(a) footprint as well, expanding our services to rural and poverty-stricken areas in the South to start,” CEO Sam Walls said Wednesday in a press release issued by the SBA.

    “Our business model thrives on local collaboration and creative partnerships, and with this SBLC license, we will be able to offer our services to even more underserved markets outside of Alaska,” McKinley Alaska President Logan Birch said in the press release. “Our experienced, hands-on team of SBA lenders looks forward to helping support the next generation of entrepreneurs.”

    Trade groups representing banks and credit unions are still pinning their hopes on a bill introduced this summer by Senate Small Business Committee Chairman Ben Cardin, D-Maryland, and Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, the committee’s ranking Republican, that would strictly limit additional SBLC participation in 7(a).  “It’s still very much a live effort,” Steve Keen, senior vice president of congressional relations at the Independent Community Bankers of America, said Friday in an interview. “This is not a dead bill. It’s still very much alive. Hopefully, we’ll have some results that you can see publicly sooner rather than later.”

    “What we are calling for specifically is to issue no more [SBLC licenses],” Keen added. 

    SBA Administrator Isabel Guzman has advocated wider participation in 7(a) as a tool to boost small-dollar lending, as well as access to capital by disadvantaged groups. “The Biden-Harris administration remains committed to filling capital market gaps, and the expansion of the SBA’s SBLC program after more than forty years is a monumental step forward in this crucial effort,” Guzman said in the press release.

    Banks and credit unions fear the policy will result in more defaults and fraud. They have often pointed to fraud that occurred during the Paycheck Protection Program — which was administered by the SBA — as a reason to limit involvement by nonbank and fintech lenders in the 7(a) program.

    “SBA rule changes that lift the moratorium on the number of institutions that can lend under the 7(a) program while loosening underwriting standards will undermine the program and unintentionally harm the very borrowers the SBA is trying to aid,” ICBA President and CEO Rebeca Romero Rainey said Friday in a statement.

    [ad_2]

    John Reosti

    Source link

  • Big banks like Bank of America and TD capitalize on SBA loan growth

    Big banks like Bank of America and TD capitalize on SBA loan growth

    [ad_1]

    Bank of America has made 1,000 loans totaling $394.2 million through the Small Business Administration 7(a) program so far in fiscal 2023. It is aiming to increase that to $1 billion of 7(a) loan volume for the next fiscal year, which starts Oct. 1.

    Stephanie Keith/Bloomberg

    With a week remaining in the Small Business Administration’s 2023 fiscal year, Bank of America has notched sizable increases in 7(a) loans and loan volume. Steve Turner, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based money center’s national SBA executive, is determined to see the momentum carry over into fiscal 2024.

    Bank of America has produced 1,000 7(a) loans totaling $394.2 million so far in fiscal 2023, up from 505 loans for $201.1 million in fiscal 2022. For fiscal 2024, which starts Oct. 1, Turner is setting his sights on $1 billion of 7(a) loan volume. 

    It’s a lofty goal. Though about 1,500 lenders made 7(a) loans in fiscal 2023, only three — Huntington Bancshares, Live Oak Bank and NewtekOne — have reached $1 billion in originations.

    “Every day, every week, every month we’re continuing to invest in this business to grow it,” Turner said in an interview. 

    Turner, who took over as head of SBA lending in January 2022, said Bank of America has added staff and overhauled its SBA lending process. The most important upgrade may have come from reaching out to the company’s thousands of small-business bankers to ensure SBA lending is at the top of their minds. “Educating that army of bankers out there has helped us capture more business,” Turner said.  

    Turner’s ultimate goal is for Bank of America to become the nation’s largest 7(a) lender. “If we’re going to be in SBA, we want to be the best,” Turner said. “There’s so much more we can do. We don’t even have 2% market share.”

    But the megabank is likely to face stiff competition. Indeed, Huntington Bancshares in Columbus, Ohio, is not standing pat and is poised to retain its title as the No. 1 lender in 7(a) by number of loans for a sixth straight year. Through Sept. 21, Huntington originated a bank-record 6,875 7(a) loans, nearly 3,300 more than its closest rival, TD Bank. Huntington’s 7(a) dollar volume also surpassed $1 billion for the first time, at $1.3 billion. 

    AB-SBA-092223.jpeg

    The $10.8 billion-asset Live Oak, based in Wilmington, North Carolina, remains the nation’s largest 7(a) lender by dollar volume, with originations totaling $1.7 billion through Sept. 21. The 7(a) program, SBA’s flagship, offers guarantees ranging from 50% to 85% on loans originated by participating lenders. Since the end of 2019, SBA has approved more than 195,000 7(a) loans totaling $110 billion. 

    While its branch footprint focuses on the Midwest, the $189 billion-asset Huntington has evolved into a national SBA lender, in large part by following its business customers as they’ve expanded, according to Brant Standridge, the company’s senior executive vice president for consumer and regional banking. Wider geography notwithstanding, Huntington’s SBA business model continues to emphasize the advice and support its hundreds of small-business bankers provide borrowers.

    “We’ve taken this exact model on the road,” SBA Director Maggie Ference said in an interview. “As we head into [markets] where we don’t have that same brand presence, we’re still seeing the small-business applicants really take on that entire relationship with us…We’re not simply making loans and moving on.”

    At the same time, Huntington is investing in technology to accelerate decision making. “In the non-SBA space, where we can move a little faster, we’re on a path that in the next 12 months we’ll decision 70% of business banking applications in under four hours,” Standridge said. “Over the next couple of years, we’ll be able to fund those loans the next day, so decision the same day, fund next day.”

    Huntington is working to extend the same capabilities to SBA lending. “We’re making significant investments in the digital space that provide the ease of doing business,” Ference said. 

    “We believe we can continue to improve the cycle time and the customer experience in SBA and stay ahead of the game,” Standridge said. 

    Program-wide, SBA is reporting 53,619 7(a) loans through Sept. 21 for $25.4 billion. The dollar volume is relatively level with fiscal 2022 but total 7(a) loans are up 12%, with much of the added volume being generated by the program’s biggest lenders. The dollar-volume share captured by the 10 biggest 7(a) lenders totals 29% so far in fiscal 2023, up from 26% from fiscal 2022. The consolidation trend becomes even starker by number of loans, with the top 10 accounting for 43% of loan volume. 

    The 7(a) program has been top-heavy for years, despite efforts by SBA to boost participation, James Ballentine, retired executive vice president for congressional relations and political affairs at the American Bankers Association and a former associate deputy administrator at SBA, said in an interview. “It’s not unusual in the SBA program that the top 10 or 15 lenders dominate the marketplace both in loan volume and number of loans as well, that’s been historical.”

    “From SBA’s perspective, they want as many lenders involved in the program making as many loans as possible,” Ballentine added. 

    In a statement to American Banker, SBA highlighted several areas of “notable progress” as fiscal 2023 comes to an end, including increases in the number of loans under $150,000, as well as loans to Black, Latino and women business owners, though “significant work remains to be done,” it added.

    In a press release Thursday, Administrator Isabella Casillas Guzman noted Black businesses have received just under 4,400 loans in fiscal 2023, about 7.5% of total loans and double the share from 2017. “Black businesses are helping to power a nationwide small business boom that is creating jobs, advancing equity in communities across America, and uplifting our economy,” Guzman said in the press release.

    Still, in fiscal 2023, the story has largely been about big, established lenders adding to their 7(a) market shares.   

    TD in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, the American arm of the Toronto-based TD Bank Group, was able to move into the ranks of the top-10 7(a) lenders in fiscal 2023 from the No. 14 slot in 2022. TD has originated 3,586 loans for $440 million thus far in fiscal 2023 compared to 2,043 loans for $243.5 million in fiscal 2022. 

    According to Head of SBA Lending Tom Pretty, the $374.3 billion-asset TD has increased the number of small-business specialists on its SBA team. Another primary driver behind TD’s 7(a) gains was its decision to increase the threshold for loan scoring by $100,000 to $250,000. “In previous years, we used to score up to $150,000 and underwrite everything after that,” Pretty said. 

    “We’ve had a lot of success with [the increased scoring threshold],” Pretty said. “It speaks to TD’s goals. If we can do the right thing for our colleagues, do the right thing for our communities and do the right thing for our customers, everything else is going to be successful from there. This fits right into the middle of that vein. It makes things simpler for our colleagues, we’re able to help more customers, and obviously the more we empower small business the better it is for our communities.”

    At $122,700, TD’s average loan size is among the lowest of any large-scale 7(a) lenders. “We feel it’s really important to serve the entire SBA community, not just focus on the big loans,” Pretty said. “We feel like by helping with these small loans, getting more specialists, raising the [scoring threshold], it really helps impact our customers and ultimately our communities.”  

    To be sure, not all of the institutions that have produced big 7(a) gains in fiscal 2023 are industry giants on the scale of Bank of America, TD and Huntington. The $1.1 billion-asset BayFirst Financial in St. Petersburg, Florida, has originated 2,526 7(a) loans for $455.9 billion, up from 974 loans and $328.1 million a year ago.  

    The $4.9 billion-asset First Internet Bancorp in Fishers, Indiana, has doubled both its 7(a) loan originations and dollar volume, recording 327 loans for $426.5 million compared to 158 loans for $158.8 million in fiscal 2022.

    According to President and Chief Operating Officer Nicole Lorch, First Internet entered the SBA lending business in November 2019 by acquiring First Colorado National Bank’s small-business lending portfolio. A few months later, when the pandemic hit, First Internet made a critical decision to keep its new SBA team focused on their core duties. “We used other commercial lenders to make Paycheck Protection Program loans,” Lorch said. “That first year helped us get a foothold in the industry. Over time, we’ve continued to add tremendous talent to the organization.”

    While First Internet’s current SBA team is keeping up with its current, increased volume, the company will likely add staff as it “leans in” to its SBA strategy, Lorch said. “We will obviously have to add people in servicing, because the portfolio has gotten so big,” Lorch said. 

    “It’s been a tremendous four years,” Lorch added. “I can confidently say we have exceeded my expectations.”

    [ad_2]

    John Reosti

    Source link

  • Redlining to remediation

    Redlining to remediation

    [ad_1]

    The Jefferson Avenue commercial district in Buffalo, New York, is anchored by a supermarket. 

    There are dozens of other businesses and services along the 12-block corridor — a couple of bank branches, a library, a coffee shop, gas stations, a small plaza with a dollar store and a primary care clinic and a business incubator for entrepreneurs of color. 

    But Tops Friendly Markets, the only grocery store on Buffalo’s vast East Side, is the center of activity. More than just a place to buy food, pick up medications and use an ATM, the store is a communal gathering space in a predominantly Black neighborhood that, for generations, has been segregated, isolated and disenfranchised from the wealthier — and whiter — parts of the city. 

    Which explains how it came to be the site of a mass shooting on a spring day in May of last year. On that Saturday, a gunman, who lived 200 miles away in another part of the state, drove to Jefferson Avenue and went into Tops, and in just a few minutes killed 10 people, injured three and inflicted mass trauma across the community.

    It is a scenario that has sadly, and repeatedly, played out in other parts of the country that have experienced mass shootings. But this one came with a twist: The gunman’s intention was to kill as many Black people as possible. 

    To achieve that, he specifically targeted a ZIP code with one of the highest percentages of Black residents in New York state. All 10 who died that day were Black. 

    “The mere fact that someone can research, ‘Where will the greatest number of Black people be … on a Saturday morning,’ that’s not by chance,” said Franchelle Parker, a community organizer and executive director of Open Buffalo, a nonprofit focused on racial, economic and ecological justice. “That’s not a mistake. It’s a community that’s been deeply segregated for decades.” 

    The day of the shooting, Parker, who grew up in nearby Niagara Falls, was driving to Tops, where she planned to buy a donut and an unsweetened iced tea before heading into the Open Buffalo office, which is located a block away from Tops. The mother of two had intended to complete the mundane task of cleaning up her desk — “old coffee cups and stuff” — after a busy week. 

    AB0723_CS-Spread-DSCF0100.jpg
    Franchelle Parker, executive director of Open Buffalo, stands in front of a mural that was created after the May 14, 2022, shooting at Tops Friendly Markets in Buffalo, New York.

    Joed Viera

    She saw the news on Twitter and didn’t know if she should keep driving to Jefferson Avenue or turn around and go back home. She eventually picked the latter. 

    When she showed up the next day, there were thousands of people grieving in the streets. “The only way that I could explain my feeling, it was almost like watching an old war movie when a bomb had gone off and someone’s in, like, shell shock. That’s how it felt,” said Parker, vividly recounting the community’s collective trauma in a meeting room tucked inside of Open Buffalo’s second-story office on Jefferson Avenue. 

    Almost immediately following the May 14, 2022, massacre, which was the second-deadliest mass shooting in the United States last year, conversations locally and nationally turned to the harsh realities of the East Side and how long-standing factors that affect the daily life of residents — racism, poverty and inequity — made the community an ideal target for a white supremacist. 

    Now, more than a year after the tragedy, there is growing concern that not enough is being done fast enough to begin to dismantle those factors. And amid those conversations, there are mounting calls for the banking industry — whose historical policies and practices helped cement the racial segregation and disinvestment that ultimately shaped the East Side — to leverage its collective power and influence to band together in an effort to create systemic change. 

    The ideas about how banks should support the East Side and better embed themselves in the neighborhood vary by people and organizations. But the basic argument is the same: Banks, in their role as financiers and because of the industry’s history of lending discrimination, are obligated to bring forth economic prosperity in disinvested communities like the East Side.

    I know banks are often looked upon sort of like a panacea, but I don’t particularly see it that way. I think others have a role to play in all of this.

    Chiwuike Owunwanne, corporate responsibility officer at KeyBank

    “Banks have been very good at providing charitable contributions to the Black community. They get an ‘A’ for that,” said The Rev. George Nicholas, an East Side pastor who is also CEO of the Buffalo Center for Health Equity, a four-year-old enterprise focused on racial, geographic and economic health disparities. “But doing the things that banks can do in terms of being a catalyst for revitalization and investment in this community, they have not done that.” 

    To be sure, banks’ ability to reverse the course of the community isn’t guaranteed — and there is no formula to determine how much accountability they should hold to fix deeply entrenched problems like racism. Several Buffalo-area bankers said that while the Tops shooting heightened the urgency to help the East Side, the industry itself cannot be the sole driver of change. 

    “There are a lot of institutions … that can certainly play a part in reversing the challenges that we see today,” said Chiwuike “Chi-Chi” Owunwanne, a corporate responsibility officer at KeyBank, the second-largest bank by deposits in Buffalo. “I know banks are often looked upon sort of like a panacea, but I don’t particularly see it that way. I think others have a role to play in all of this.” 

    Buffalo NY Residential Security Map (1).jpeg
    This federal underwriting map from 1937 shows how redlining worked. Neighborhoods that were predominantly minority were given the lowest ratings, which were color coded red.

    Residential Security Map Buffalo N.Y. City Survey File. Record Group 195. National Archives II College Park MD. Image courtesy of Carl Nightingale.

    A long history of segregation

    How the East Side — and the Tops store on Jefferson Avenue — became the destination for a racially motivated mass murderer is a story about racism, segregation and disinvestment. 

    Even as it bears the nickname “the city of good neighbors,” Buffalo has long been one of the most racially segregated cities in the United States. Of the 114,965 residents who live on the East Side, 59% are Black, according to data from the 2021 U.S. Census American Community Survey. The percentage is even higher in the 14208 ZIP code, where the Tops store is located. In that ZIP code, among 11,029 total residents, nearly 76% are Black, the census data shows. 

    The city’s path toward racial segregation started in the early 20th century when a small number of job-seeking Black Americans migrated north to Buffalo, a former steel and auto manufacturing hub at the far northwestern end of New York state. Initially, they moved into the same neighborhoods as many of the city’s poorer immigrants and lived just east of what is today the city’s downtown district. As the number of Blacks arriving in Buffalo swelled in the 1940s, they were increasingly confronted with various housing challenges, including racist zoning laws and restrictive deed covenants that kept them from buying homes in more affluent white areas. 

    Black Buffalonians also faced housing discrimination in the form of redlining, the practice of restricting the flow of capital into minority communities. In 1933, as the Great Depression roiled the economy, a temporary federal agency known as the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation used government bonds to buy out and refinance mortgages of properties that were facing or already in foreclosure. The point was to try to stabilize the nation’s real estate market. 

    Chiwuike-Owunwanne_DSCF9978.jpg
    “I know banks are often looked upon sort of like a panacea, but I don’t particularly see it that way. I think others have a role to play in all of this,” said Chiwuike Owunwanne, a corporate responsibility officer at KeyBank.

    Joed Viera

    As part of its program, HOLC created maps of American cities, including Buffalo, that used a color coding scheme — green, blue, yellow and red — to convey the perceived riskiness of making loans in certain neighborhoods. Green was considered minimally risky; other areas that were largely populated by immigrant, Black or Latino residents were labeled red and thus determined to be “hazardous.” 

    “The goal was to free up mortgage capital by going to cities and giving banks a way to unload mortgages, so they could turn around and make more mortgage loans,” said Jason Richardson, senior director of research at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, an association of more than 750 community-based organizations that advocates for fair lending. “It was kind of a radical concept and it has evolved over the decades into our modern mortgage finance system.” 

    The Federal Housing Administration, which was established as a permanent agency in 1934, used similar methods to map urban areas and labeled neighborhoods from “A” to “D,” with “A” considered to be the most financially stable and “D” considered the least. Neighborhoods that were largely Black, even relatively stable ones, were put in the “D” category. 

    The result was that banks, which wanted to be able to sell mortgage loans to the FHA, were largely dissuaded from making loans in “risky” areas. And Buffalo’s East Side, where the majority of Blacks were settling, was deemed risky. Unable to get loans, Blacks couldn’t buy homes, start businesses or build equity. At the same time, large industrial factories on the East Side were closing or moving away, limiting job opportunities and contributing to rising poverty levels.

    “Today what we’re left with is the residue of this process where we’ve enshrined … a pattern of economic segregation that favors neighborhoods that had fewer Black people in them and generally ignores neighborhoods that had African Americans living in them,” Richardson said. 

    Case in point: Research by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition shows that three-quarters of neighborhoods that were once redlined are low- to moderate-income neighborhoods today, and two-thirds of them are majority minority communities.

    Adding to the division between Blacks and whites in Buffalo was the construction of a highway called the Kensington Expressway. Built during the 1960s, the below-grade, limited-access highway proved to be a speedy way for suburban workers to get to their downtown jobs. But its construction cut off the already-segregated East Side even more from other parts of the city, displacing residents, devaluing houses and destroying neighborhoods and small businesses. 

    As a result of those factors and more, many Black residents have become “trapped” on the East Side, according to Dr. Henry Louis Taylor Jr., a professor of urban and regional planning at the University at Buffalo. In 1987, Taylor founded the UB Center for Urban Studies, a research, neighborhood planning and community development institute that works on eliminating inequality in cities and metropolitan regions. In September 2021, eight months before the Tops shooting, the Center for Urban Studies published a report that compared the state of Black Buffalo in 1990 to present-day conditions. The conclusion: Nothing had changed for Blacks over 31 years. 

    As of 2019, the Black unemployment rate was 11%, the average household income was $42,000 and about 35% of Blacks had incomes that fell below the poverty line, the report said. It also noted that just 32% of Blacks own their homes and that most Blacks in the area live on the East Side. 

    “Those figures remain virtually unchanged while the actual, physical conditions that existed inside of the community worsened,” Taylor told American Banker in an interview in his sun-filled office at the center, located on the University at Buffalo’s city campus. “When we looked upstream to see what was causing it, it was clear: It was systemic, structural racism.” 

    BankonWheels_DSCF0152.jpg
    Last fall, BankOnBuffalo launched a mobile bank on wheels truck that’s stationed on the East Side every Wednesday. Michael Noah, president of BankOnBuffalo, said that the shooting at Tops Friendly Markets “cemented the point that this is a place we need to be, to be able to be part of these communities and this community specifically, and be able to build this community up.”

    Joed Viera

    Banks’ moral obligations

    As the East Side struggled over the decades with rampant poverty, dilapidated housing, vacant lots and disintegrating infrastructure, banks kept a physical presence in the community, albeit a shrinking one. In mid-2000, there were at least 20 bank branches scattered across the East Side, but by mid-2022, the number had fallen to around 14, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s deposit market share data. The 14 include four new branches that have opened since early 2019 — Northwest Bank, KeyBank, Evans Bank and BankOnBuffalo. 

    The first two branches, operated by Northwest in Columbus, Ohio, and KeyBank, the banking subsidiary of KeyCorp in Cleveland, were requirements of community benefits agreements negotiated between each bank and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. In both cases, Northwest and KeyBank agreed to open an office in an underserved community. 

    Evans Bank opened its first East Side branch in the fall of 2021. The office is located in the basement of an $84 million affordable senior housing building that was financed by Evans, a $2.1 billion-asset community bank headquartered south of Buffalo in Angola, New York. 

    Banks have been very good at providing charitable contributions to the Black community. They get an ‘A’ for that. But doing the things that banks can do in terms of being a catalyst for revitalization and investment in this community, they have not done that.

    The Rev. George Nicholas, an East Side pastor who is also CEO of the Buffalo Center for Health Equity

    On the community and economic development front, banks have had varying levels of participation. Buffalo-based M&T Bank, which holds a whopping 64% of all deposits in the Buffalo market and is one of the largest private employers in the region, has made consistent investments in the East Side by supporting Westminster Community Charter School, a kindergarten through eighth-grade school, and the Buffalo Promise Neighborhood, a nonprofit organization focused on improving access to education in the city’s 14215 ZIP code. 

    Currently, Buffalo Promise Neighborhood operates four schools. In addition to Westminster, it runs Highgate Heights Elementary, also K-8, as well as two academies that serve children ages six weeks through pre-kindergarten. Twelve M&T employees are dedicated to the program, according to the Buffalo Promise Neighborhood website. The bank has invested $31.5 million into the program since its 2010 launch, a spokesperson said.

    Other banks are making contributions in other ways. In addition to the Jefferson Avenue branch and as part of its community benefits plan, Northwest Bank, a $14.2 billion-asset bank, supports a financial education center through a partnership with Belmont Housing Resources of Western New York. Meanwhile, the $198 billion-asset KeyBank gave $30 million for bridge and construction financing for Northland Workforce Training Center, a $100 million redevelopment project at a former manufacturing complex on the East Side that was partially funded by the state.

    BankOnBuffalo’s East Side branch is located inside the center, which offers KeyBank training in advanced manufacturing and clean energy technology careers. A subsidiary of $5.6 billion-asset CNB Financial in Clearfield, Pennsylvania, BankOnBuffalo’s office opened a month after the shooting. The timing was coincidental, but important, said Michael Noah, president of BankOnBuffalo. 

    “I think it just cemented the point that this is a place we need to be, to be able to be part of these communities and this community specifically, and be able to build this community up,” Noah said.

    In terms of public-private collaboration, some banks have been involved in a deeper way. In 2019, New York state, which had already been pouring $1 billion into Buffalo to help revitalize the economy, announced a $65 million economic development fund for the East Side. The initiative is focused on stabilizing neighborhoods, increasing homeownership, redeveloping commercial corridors including Jefferson Avenue, improving historical assets, expanding workforce training and development and supporting small businesses and entrepreneurship. 

    In conjunction with the funding, a public-private partnership called East Side Avenues was created to provide capital and organizational support to the projects happening along four East Side commercial corridors. Six banks — Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America, the second-largest bank in the nation with $2.5 trillion of assets; M&T, which has $203 billion of assets; KeyBank; Warsaw, New York-based Five Star Bank, which has about $6 billion of assets; Northwest and Evans — are among the 14 private and philanthropic organizations that pledged a combined $8.4 million to pay for five years’ worth of operational support, governance and finance, fundraising and technical assistance to support the nonprofits doing the work. 

    Laura Quebral, director of the University at Buffalo Regional Institute, which is managing East Side Avenues, said the banks were the first corporations to step up to the request for help, and since then have provided loans and other products and education to keep the program moving. 

    Their participation “is a signal to the community that banks cared and were invested and were willing to collaborate around something,” Quebral said. “Being at the table was so meaningful.” 

    Richard Hamister is Northwest’s New York regional president and former co-chair of East Side Avenues. Hamister, who is based in Buffalo, said banks are a “community asset” that have a responsibility to lift up all communities, including those where conditions have arisen that allow it to be a target of racism like the East Side. 

    “We operate under federal charters, so we have an obligation to the community to not only provide products and services they need but also support when you go through a tragedy like that,” Hamister said. “We also have a moral obligation to try to help when things are broken … and to do what we can. We can’t fix everything, but we’ve got to fix our piece and try to help where we can.” 

    Allison-Dehonney_DSCF9898.jpg
    Allison Dehonney, founder of Buffalo Go Green, distributes strawberries at the Delavan-Grider Farmers’ Market. For a second year, KeyBank is sponsoring the event in the East Side as an attempt to help fill the food desert there. The community’s only grocery store, Tops Friendly Markets, was the site of the mass shooting last year.

    Joed Viera

    In the wake of a tragedy

    After the massacre, there was a flurry of activity within banks and other organizations, local and out-of-town, to respond to the immediate needs of East Side residents. With the community’s only supermarket closed indefinitely, much of the response centered around food collection and distribution. Three of M&T’s five East Side branches, including the Jefferson Avenue branch across the street from Tops, became food distribution sites for weeks after the shooting. On two consecutive Fridays, Northwest provided around 200 free lunches to the community, using a neighborhood caterer who is also the bank’s customer. And BankOnBuffalo collected employee donations that amounted to more than 20 boxes of toiletries and other items that were distributed to a nonprofit. 

    At the same time, M&T, KeyBank and other banks began financial donations to organizations that could support the immediate needs of the community. KeyBank provided a van that delivered food and took people to nearby grocery stores. Providence, Rhode Island-based Citizens Financial Group, whose ATM inside Tops was inaccessible during the store’s temporary closure, installed a fee-free ATM near a community center located about a half-mile north of Tops, and later put a permanent ATM inside the center that remains there today. And M&T rolled out a short-term loan program to provide capital to East Side small-business owners. 

    One of the funds that benefited from banks’ support was the Buffalo Together Community Response Fund, which has raised $6.2 million to address the long-term needs of the East Side. 

    Bank of America and Evans Bank each donated $100,000 to the fund, whose list of major sponsors includes four other banks — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, M&T and KeyBank. Thomas Beauford Jr., a former banker who is co-chair of the response fund, said banks, by and large, directed their resources into organizations where the dollars would have an immediate impact. 

    “Banks said, ‘Hey, you know … it doesn’t make sense for us to try to build something right now. … We will fund you in the work you’re doing,’” said Beauford, who has been president and CEO of the Buffalo Urban League since the fall of 2020. “I would say banks showed up in a big way.” 

    Fourteen months later, banks say they are committed to playing a positive role on the East Side. For the second year, KeyBank is sponsoring a farmers’ market on the East Side, an attempt to help fill the food desert in the community. Last fall, BankOnBuffalo launched a mobile “bank on wheels” truck that’s stationed on the East Side every Wednesday. The 34-foot-long truck, which is staffed by two people and includes an ATM and a printer to make debit cards, was in the works before the shooting, and will eventually make four stops per week around the Buffalo area. 

    Evans has partnered with the city of Buffalo to construct seven market-rate single family homes on vacant lots on the East Side. The relationship with the city is an example of how banks can pair up with other entities to create something meaningful and lasting, more than they might be able to do on their own, said Evans President and CEO David Nasca. 

    The bank has “picked areas” where it can use its resources to make a difference, Nasca said. 

    “I don’t think the root causes can be ameliorated” by banks alone, he said. “We can’t just grant money. It has to be within our construct of a financial institution that invests and supports the public-private partnership. … All the oars [need to be] pulling together or this doesn’t work.” 

    KeyBank-Image-322665605.jpg
    KeyBank is currently being accused of redlining by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. Buffalo is one of several cities where the bank’s mortgage lending “effectively wall[ed] out Black neighborhoods,” especially parts of the East Side, according to a 2022 report from the group.

    Bloomberg News

    ‘Little or no engagement with minorities’

    All of these efforts are, of course, welcomed by the community, but there is still criticism that banks haven’t done enough to make up for their past contributions to segregating the city. And perhaps more importantly, some of that criticism centers on banks failing to do their most basic function in society — provide credit. 

    In 2021, the New York State Department of Financial Services issued a report about redlining in Buffalo. The regulator looked at banks and nonbank lenders and found that loans made to minorities in the Buffalo metro area made up 9.74% of total loans in Buffalo. Overall, Black residents comprise about 33% of Buffalo’s total population of more than 276,000, census data shows. 

    The department said its investigation showed the lower percentage was not due to “excessive denials of loan applications based on race or ethnicity,” but rather that “these companies had little or no engagement with minorities and generally made scant effort to do so.” 

    “The unsurprising result of this has been that few minority customers or individuals seeking homes in majority-minority neighborhoods have made loan applications … in the first instance.” 

    Furthermore, accusations of redlining persist today, even though the practice of discriminating in housing based on race was outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968. 

    In 2014, Evans was accused of redlining by the New York State Attorney General, which said the community bank was specifically avoiding making mortgage loans on the East Side. The bank, which at the time had $874 million of assets, agreed to pay $825,000 to settle the case, but Nasca maintains that the charges were unfounded. He points to the fact that the bank never had a fair lending or fair housing violation, no specific incidents were ever claimed and that the bank’s Community Reinvestment Act exam never found evidence of discriminatory or illegal credit practices. 

    The bank has a greater presence on the East Side today, but that’s because it has grown in size, not because it is trying to make up for previous accusations of redlining, he said. 

    “Ten years ago, our involvement [on the East Side] certainly wasn’t what you’re seeing today,” Nasca said. “We were looking to participate more, but we were participating within our means and our reach. As we have grown, we have built more resources to be able to do more.” 

    Shortly after accusations were made against Evans, Five Star Bank, the banking arm of Financial Institutions in Warsaw, New York, was also accused of redlining by the state Attorney General. Five Star, which has been growing its presence in the Buffalo market for several years, wound up settling the charges for $900,000 and agreeing to open two branches in the city of Rochester. 

    KeyBank is currently being accused of redlining by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. In a 2022 report, the group said that KeyBank is engaging in systemic redlining by making very few home purchase loans in certain neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black. Buffalo is one of several cities where the bank’s mortgage lending “effectively wall[ed] out Black neighborhoods,” especially parts of the East Side, the report said. 

    KeyBank denied the allegations. In March, the coalition asked regulators to investigate the bank’s mortgage lending practices. 

    Beyond providing more credit, some community members believe that banks should be playing a larger role in addressing other needs on the East Side. And the list of needs runs the gamut from more grocery stores to safe, affordable housing to infrastructure improvements such as street and sidewalk repairs. 

    Alexander Wright is founder of the African Heritage Food Co-op, an initiative launched in 2016 to address the dearth of grocery store options on the East Side, where he grew up. Wright said that while banks’ philanthropic efforts are important, banks in general “need to be in a place of remediation” to fix underlying issues that the industry, as a whole, helped create. (After publication of this story, Wright left his job as CEO of the African Heritage Food Co-Op.)

    Aside from charitable donations, banks should be finding more ways to work directly with East Side business owners and entrepreneurs, helping them with capital-building support along the way, Wright said. One place to start would be technical assistance by way of bank volunteers. 

    “Banks are always looking to volunteer. ‘Hey, want to come out and paint a fence? Want to come out and do a garden?’” Wright said. “No. Come out here and help Keshia with bookkeeping. Come out here and do QuickBooks classes for folks. Bring out tax experts. Because these are things that befuddle a lot of small businesses. Who is your marketing person? Bring that person out here. Because those are the things that are going to build the business to self-sufficiency. 

    “Anything short of the capacity-building … that will allow folks to rise to the occasion and be self-sufficient I think is almost a waste,” Wright added. “We don’t need them to lead the plan. What we need them to do is be in the community and [be] hearing the plan and supporting it.” 

    Franchelle-Parker_DSCF0085.jpg
    Franchelle Parker, a community organizer and executive director of Open Buffalo.

    Joed Viera

    Parker, of Open Buffalo, has similar thoughts about the role that banks should play. One day, soon after the massacre, an ATM appeared down the street from Tops, next to the library that sits across the street from Parker’s office. Soon after the ATM was installed, Parker began fielding questions from area residents who were skeptical of the machine and wanted to know if it was legitimate. But Parker didn’t have any information to share with them. “There was no outreach. There was no community engagement. So I’m like, ‘Let me investigate,’” she said. “I think that’s a symptom of how investment is done in Black communities, even though it may be well-intentioned.” 

    As it turns out, the temporary ATM belonged to JPMorgan Chase. The megabank has had a commercial banking presence in Buffalo for years, but it didn’t operate a retail branch in the region until last year. Today it has four branches in operation and plans to open another two by the end of the year, a spokesperson said. 

    After the Tops shooting, the governor’s office reached out to Chase asking if the bank could help in some way, the spokesperson said in response to the skepticism. The spokesperson said that while the Chase retail brand is new to the Buffalo region, the company has been active in the market for decades by way of commercial banking, private banking, credit card lending, home lending and other businesses. 

    In addition to the ATM, the bank provided funding to local organizations including FeedMore Western New York, which distributes food throughout the region. 

    “We are committed to continuing our support for Buffalo and helping the community increase access to opportunities that build wealth and economic empowerment,” the spokesperson said in an email.

    In the year since the massacre, there has been some progress by banks in terms of their interest in listening to the East Side community and learning about its needs, said Nicholas. But he hasn’t felt an air of urgency from the banking community to tackle the issues right now. 

    “I do experience banks being a little more open to figuring out what their role is, but it’s slow. It’s slow,” said Nicholas. The senior pastor of the Lincoln Memorial United Methodist Church, located about a mile north from Tops, Nicholas is part of a 13-member local advisory committee for the New York arm of Local Initiatives Support Coalition, or LISC. The group is focused on mobilizing resources, including banks, to address affordable housing in Western New York, specifically in the inner city, as well as training minority developers and connecting them to potential investors, Nicholas said. 

    Of the 13 members, seven are from banks — one each from M&T, Bank of America, BankOnBuffalo, Evans and KeyBank, and two members from Citizens Financial Group. One of the priorities of LISC NY is health equity, and the fact that banks are becoming more engaged in looking at health disparities is promising, Nicholas said. Still, they have more work to do, he said.

    Deja-Griffin_DSCF0244.jpg
    Deja Griffin, an associate at BankOnBuffalo, sets up inside the institution’s bank on wheels. The 34-footlong truck, which is staffed by two people and includes an ATM and a printer to make debit cards, will eventually make four stops per week around the Buffalo area.

    Joed Viera

    “I need them to think more on how to strengthen and build the economy on the East Side and provide leadership around that, not only to provide charitable things, but using sound business and banking and community development principles to say, ‘OK, if we’re going to invest in this community, these are the types of things that need to happen in this community,’ and then encourage their partners and other people they work with … to come fully in on the East Side.” 

    Some bankers agree with the community activists. 

    “Putting a branch in is great. Having a bank on wheels is great,” said Noah of BankOnBuffalo. “But if you’re not embedded in the community, listening to the community and trying to improve it, you’re not creating that wealth and creating a better lifestyle for everyone.” 

    What could make a substantial difference in terms of banks’ impact on the community is a combination of collaboration and leadership, said Taylor. He supports the idea of banks leading the charge on the creation of a comprehensive redevelopment and reinvestment plan for the East Side, and then investing accordingly and collaboratively through their charitable foundations. 

    “All of them have these foundations,” Taylor said. “You can either spend that money in a strategic and intentional way designed to develop a community for the existing population, or you can spend that money alone in piecemeal, siloed, sectorial fashion that will look good on an annual report, but won’t generate transformational and generational changes inside a community.” 

    Banks might be incentivized to work together because it could mean two things for them, according to Taylor: First, they’d have an opportunity to spend money in a way that would have maximum impact on the East Side, and second, if done right, the city and the banks could become a model of the way to create high levels of diversity, equity and inclusion in an urban area. 

    “If you prove how to do that, all that does is open up other markets of consumption all over the country because people want to figure out how to do that same thing,” Taylor said. 

    Some of that is already happening, at least on a bank-by-bank case, said KeyBank’s Owunwanne. Through the KeyBank Foundation, the company is able to leverage different relationships that connect nonprofits to other entities and corporations that can provide help. 

    “I see this as an opportunity for us to make not just incremental changes, but monumental changes … as part of a larger group,” Owunwanne said “Again, I say that not to absolve the bank of any responsibility, but just as a larger group.” 

    Downstairs from Parker’s office, Golden Cup Coffee, a roastery and cafe run by a husband and wife team, and some other Jefferson Avenue businesses are trying to build up a business association for existing and potential Jefferson-area businesses. Parker imagined what the group could accomplish if one of the banks could provide someone on a part-time basis to facilitate conversations, provide administrative support and coordinate marketing efforts. 

    “In the grand scheme of things, when we’re talking about a multimillion dollar [bank], a part-time employee specifically dedicated to relationship-building and building out coalitions, it sounds like a small thing,” Parker said. “But that’s transformational.”

    Kevin Wack contributed to this story

    [ad_2]

    Allissa Kline

    Source link

  • Lawmakers urge SBA to delay new rules that could let fintechs into 7(a)

    Lawmakers urge SBA to delay new rules that could let fintechs into 7(a)

    [ad_1]

    “It is clear [SBA] Administrator [Isabela Casillas] Guzman (pictured) is dedicated to the notion of spurring lending to underserved communities, and people of color,” an SBA loan servicer says.  “This may be a noble notion, but where do lenders making a prudent credit decision come into play?”

    Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg

    Following the departure of a pivotal Small Business Administration official, lawmakers from both parties are calling on the agency to suspend implementation of controversial rules that could let fintech lenders make 7(a) loans.

    Associate Administrator Patrick Kelley — who had headed SBA’s Office of Capital Access since March 2021 and has been overseeing adoption of the changes — left the SBA May 11. The leadership of the House and Senate Small Business committees wrote SBA Administrator Isabela Casillas Guzman Wednesday, urging her to “pause”  the two new rules until Kelley’s successor is installed.

    Kelley’s exit, which appeared to catch lawmakers off guard, “leaves a void in leadership at a time when such leadership will be key,” Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Maryland, Sen. Joni Ernst, D-Iowa, Rep. Roger Williams, R-Texas, and Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., wrote.

    SBA had not responded to a request for comment at deadline Thursday.

    The SBA in April finalized the rules, which overhauled lending standards and ended a 40-year cap on the number of nondepository small-business lending companies at 14. Typically, publication of a final rule by an agency signals an end to debate and the start of moves by government and private-sector players to convert what had been proposals into operational reality. That has not been the case with SBA’s rules governing nondepository SBLCs and affiliation. For the past month, lawmakers, along with advocates for banks and credit unions, have urged SBA to delay putting the rules into practice.

    Those pleas grew stronger this week as Tony Wilkinson, longtime president and CEO of the National Association of Government Guaranteed Lenders, called on lawmakers to “act quickly to reverse these rule changes through a bipartisan legislative approach” in testimony Wednesday before the House Small Business Committee.

    “Otherwise, SBA is inviting in the exact kind of behavior and risk that could erode the 7(a) loan program’s performance and reputation, and even harm the very borrowers they are intending to help,” Wilkinson added.

    Critics of the new rules, including Wilkinson, believe they will inject more risk and ultimately a higher level of loan losses into 7(a) lending. More losses could result in the need for a subsidy from Congress. Currently, fees paid by lenders and borrowers are more than sufficient to cover 7(a)’s credit costs.

    Critics have also focused on numerous reports, from SBA’s inspector general and from a House select subcommittee, that pointed to fintech lenders as the source of a significant amount of the fraud uncovered in the Paycheck Protection Program. For their part, SBA and advocates for fintechs argue that PPP bad actors have been identified and blocked from future 7(a) participation and that the nondepository lenders that are interested in SBA have technology policies and procedures in place to combat fraud.   

    Testifying at the same hearing on behalf of the Independent Community Bankers of America, Alice Frasier, president and CEO of the $792 million-asset Potomac Bancshares in Charles Town, West Virginia, said the rules, which she claimed were “rushed through the process without input by Congress or the industry,” would undermine SBA’s stated purpose of boosting capital access to underserved groups. Rather than calling for a legislative fix, Frazier suggested SBA should “hit the pause button” and convene a working group of current 7(a) lenders to brainstorm new ways of reaching “the smallest businesses and entrepreneurs.”

    Republican lawmakers have emerged as some of the toughest critics of the rules. At a House Small Business Committee hearing last week, Kelley engaged in contentious exchanges with Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo., and Rep. Tony Meuser, R-Pa. However, Democrats, too, have questioned the wisdom of the course the SBA has set. Velazquez said she was “especially concerned” by the agency’s ending the moratorium and permitting more nondepository lenders into 7(a).

    “We will be doing a disservice to American small-business owners by moving forward with changes that weaken and destabilize a highly successful program that has helped millions of entrepreneurs,” Velazquez said during the hearing last week. 

    “I’ve heard from financial institutions again and again just how concerned they are about the implementation of these rules,” Rep. Hillary Scholten, D-Mich, said.

    For Velazquez and colleagues on both sides of the aisle in the House and Senate, adding small business lending companies — many of which could be fintechs — is a particular concern because SBA has traditionally said it lacked capacity to underwrite large numbers of nondepository lenders. Indeed, that was the reason the cap was put in place in January 1982.

    SBA’s ultimate aim in proposing the new rules is improving access to capital for underserved groups. Agency officials have said SBLCs are more likely than banks to make small-dollar loans of $150,000 or less, whose number has declined in recent years, Kelley testified last week. But banking advocates, including Wilkinson, have noted small-dollar loans have increased significantly in the current fiscal year.

    “The numbers don’t show the market failure SBA describes,” Ami Kassar, CEO of Multifunding LLC, a Philadelphia-based loan brokerage and consulting firm, said Wednesday in testimony before the House Small Business Committee.

    In addition to canceling the longstanding moratorium, the rules also did away with a number of underwriting  guidelines, including a requirement for a loan authorization document detailing loan terms and conditions. The new affiliation rule pared back the number of credit criteria that lenders — including nondepository SBLCs — are required to consider from nine to three. The affiliation rule also stated that lenders could use their standards for similarly sized conventional loans in underwriting 7(a) credits. According to Wilkinson, SBA has described this policy as allowing lenders to “do what you do.”

    “This is not streamlining,” Wilkinson said Wednesday. “Every principle included in the now-deleted list of underwriting criteria was put there to address a specific concern. … I believe that removing these guardrails could create a race to the bottom in terms of the conditions that individual lenders will impose on individual loans.”

    In an email to American Banker, Arne Monson, president of Holtmeyer and Monson, an SBA servicing firm based in Memphis, stated that few if any of his clients support the new rules. “They think this proposal is not well thought through,” Monson wrote. “It is clear Administrator Guzman is dedicated to the notion of spurring lending to underserved communities, and people of color.  This may be a noble notion, but where do lenders making a prudent credit decision come into play?”

    In a statement Wednesday, the American Bankers Association warned the new rules “may negatively impact the performance of loans made under the 7(a) program, threaten the integrity of the program, and lead to increased borrower and lender fees.” 

    [ad_2]

    John Reosti

    Source link

  • JPMorgan chooses Vestwell’s tech for small-business 401(k) services

    JPMorgan chooses Vestwell’s tech for small-business 401(k) services

    [ad_1]

    Vestwell, a digital recordkeeper for 401(k)s and savings plans, has forged a partnership with JPMorgan Chase.

    JPMorgan Asset Management will be using Vestwell‘s technology to run its Everyday 401(k) program for small businesses, the companies announced on Thursday. 

    “Enhancing our offering by coupling a modern technology platform with an assigned client success professional, like Vestwell, will enable us to quickly and efficiently meet the increasing demand [as the retirement industry grows],” said Steve Rubino, head of retirement at JPMorgan Asset Management. 

    Vestwell has also formed partnerships with several banks including Morgan Stanley at Work, the workplace solutions arm of Morgan Stanley; Wells Fargo; and RBC Clearing and Custody.

    Aaron Schumm, founder and CEO of Vestwell, has formed several partnerships with large banks.

    However, “this new partnership with JPMorgan showcases the flexibility in creating access to workplace savings programs through thousands of bank branches and digital distribution solutions to reach a significantly larger audience of small businesses across the country,” said Aaron Schumm, founder and CEO of Vestwell, via email. 

    As JPMorgan expands its recordkeeping options in the small plan market, “Vestwell’s recordkeeping technology helps JPMorgan provide its small business clients with a user-friendly and streamlined solution, including small businesses that require the use of TPA [third party administrator] involvement,” Schumm said.

    Wealth managers are focusing on small-business retirement plans “for both offensive and defensive purposes,” said Andrew Besheer, the director of Aite-Novarica Group’s wealth management practice, via email. “Vestwell has partnered with a number of well-known wealth managers to deliver their retirement plan platform, but JPMorgan Chase is certainly one of the biggest names on their list. For JPMorgan, this gives them a great platform to allow their advisors to offer a service that aligns strongly with their small and midsize business banking relationships. This should extend wealth management into those relationships, creating uplift for that business as well as enhancing stickiness for the banking relationships.”

    Vestwell was one of American Banker’s Best Places to Work in Fintech in 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Miriam Cross

    Source link

  • America’s Multi-Trillion Dollar Banking Problem | Entrepreneur

    America’s Multi-Trillion Dollar Banking Problem | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    If you’re reading this, you’ve probably come across some of the recent turmoil within the United States banking system. Most notably, we’ve seen the collapse of several notable banking institutions, which include the likes of Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank.

    To date, the overwhelming majority of the blame for these recent failures has been assigned to the excessive risk and volatility associated with the emerging cryptocurrency (crypto) industry and early-stage companies when in all actuality, the primary driver of these failures stems from an age-old flaw of our banking system. Specifically, the bank failures of today were somewhat predestined, given bank runs are a known, well-understood threat to the health of any fractional reserve banking system.

    Now, more than ever, is the time for the American people to fight to lessen our archaic banking system. After all, we’re the ones who suffer the most, not the ultra-wealthy.

    Related: Why the American Dream is Dead

    What is a fractional reserve banking system?

    In the simplest of terms, a fractional reserve banking system allows banking institutions to lend out a certain percentage of the customer deposits that sit on the bank’s balance sheet. The reason why a bank might do this is simple: free money. For a nominal interest rate due back to its depositors, banks are able to borrow funds and generate substantial returns from a myriad of investments. You might ask what regulations are in place to ensure that your money is there should you choose to initiate a withdrawal, so let’s go through a quick history lesson.

    In 1913, the Federal Reserve Act set out to accomplish a couple of key items:

    1. Creation of the Federal Reserve Banks (in aggregate, the Federal Reserve System)
    2. Set minimum reserve requirements for banks (set at 13%, 10% or 7%, depending on the type of institution)

    Fast forward to mid-century, and minimum reserve requirements increased marginally (up to 17.5% for certain banks) before settling within the 8-10% range from the 1970s to the 2010s. Most recently, in 2020, reserve requirements were abolished and replaced with the Interest on Reserve Balances (IORB) system, where banks were paid interest for funds that sat on their balance sheet, incentivizing them to lend fewer customer deposits. Crazy, right?

    In case you’re wondering how much interest banks were paid for sitting on customer deposits, it was 0.15% (or 15bps) from 2020 until early 2022, when the Federal Reserve started to hike rates. See where I’m going with this? In a world where shareholders are in constant search of yield, the opportunity cost of sitting on reserves when the S&P 500 (or even real estate) pays high single-digit returns on an annual basis incentivizes risk-taking, which benefits the nation’s elite at the expense of deposits (everyday Americans).

    Related: You Might Not Know That You’re a High-Risk Customer for Mainstream Banks

    What you’ve been told

    One important item to note is that fractional reserve banking systems don’t solely benefit banking institutions. In fact, fractional reserve banking is one of the biggest drivers of economic growth — businesses can scale and produce more products while consumers can more easily access capital. Credit cards, mortgages, auto loans and small business loans are all made possible by the reshuffling of customer deposits. It’s genuinely one of the greatest innovations of modern finance; however, it doesn’t come without its risks. Unfortunately, many of those risks aren’t well known to the general public.

    More likely than not, you’ve been told to ‘rest assured’ that the banking system is ‘fine.’ More likely than not, you’ve been told that the biggest risk to the United States financial system is the crypto industry. More likely than not, you’ve been told that decentralized frameworks are breeding grounds for fraudulent activity when in all actuality, it’s the centralized nature of our banking system that enforces the need for consistent over-regulation due to incentives that always seem to be misaligned.

    Fractional reserve banking is a key pillar that brought us into the 21st century, but with how much the economy has grown over the past century, we must start to migrate to new banking frameworks. In particular, frameworks that better mitigate excessive risk-taking and function whether or not the general public trusts it.

    Related: Bank Problems = Bearish Thumb on Stock Market Scale

    What you need to hear

    Banks are centralized organizations with the sole mission of increasing profits, and within centralized infrastructures, checks and balances are often put aside in exchange for speed and efficiency. Shareholders pressure banks to produce profits while banks pressure regulators and lawmakers for looser regulation which forces an infinitely small subset of people to make some tough decisions that impact the well-being of the common person who, by the way, knows very little about what happens to their money as soon as they deposit a paycheck.

    For this system to work, the common person must put immense trust in the powers that be to good actors. Should depositors at scale initiate withdrawals, banks are at risk of not having enough funds to process requests. And because there’s minimal visibility in a bank’s position at any given time, Americans are forced to blindly trust that their money will be there when they need it.

    Crypto and, more specifically, self-custody solves this problem as your assets truly become your assets when you custody them yourself. Decentralized ecosystems completely eliminate the risk of a bank run but also eliminate the most efficient financing that a bank could ever get. And I already know what you might be thinking: “What about credit cards and mortgages?” Decentralized finance, or ‘DeFi’ for short, ushers in a new paradigm where these types of transactions can be facilitated through smart contract logic that is auditable and public.

    The threat the crypto industry poses to the traditional financial system is palpable. Because of that, we’ve been, nefariously, sold the narrative that crypto enables fraud when in reality, it’s hard to commit a financial crime in crypto frameworks because every event is public and lives on the blockchain.

    Moreover, the media often fixates on the financial crime that does occur within the crypto industry, as evidenced by the fixation and coverage of the Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX fraud cases. Ironically, traditional banks have cases outstanding that dwarf the financial fraud that has occurred within the crypto industry. Moreover, it’s because of centralization and opacity that lives within the traditional banking system that allows for implicative decisions to be made, which in turn, hurts those who partake in the system.

    Conclusion

    Now, more than ever, it is time to be skeptical about the ways in which we live our daily lives. For the longest time, we’ve been forced to assume the risks that come with traditional finance because of a lack of better financial systems. And as with any major structural change, friction and great resistance is to be expected. After all, despite being a multi-trillion dollar problem on our hands, the United States financial system is also a trillion-dollar market opportunity that could shrink materially should crypto and other decentralized frameworks be implemented. TLDR: traditional finance won’t go down without a fight.

    That said, it’s on us to protect ourselves, and the first step we can take toward financial freedom is education – do your best to learn more about what’s at stake while raising awareness among those around you. If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.

    [ad_2]

    Solo Ceesay

    Source link

  • Fintechs tout ways to invest business clients’ cash above FDIC limits

    Fintechs tout ways to invest business clients’ cash above FDIC limits

    [ad_1]

    Businesses that want to safely stash sums of cash above Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. limits have options that don’t involve juggling multiple accounts at multiple banks.

    They can invest directly in government money market funds or Treasury bills. They can inquire about programs within their bank, such as deposit networks and reciprocal arrangements engineered by IntraFi and the like, or automatic sweeps of amounts exceeding $250,000 into money market mutual funds.

    Or they can turn to fintechs that offer a tech-forward version or combination of the above.

    The disconnect between the size of accounts that enterprises typically maintain and deposit insurance levels has existed for a long time, said Brian Graham, a partner at Klaros Group. But the three days between Silicon Valley Bank’s failure and the FDIC’s assurance that it would cover uninsured deposits jolted people into action.

    “There has been a lot of scurrying around in the last several weeks as these organizations figure out what they want to do,” said Graham in a March interview.

    Fintechs such as Meow or Vesto, and business-oriented neobanks such as Brex and Mercury, have mechanisms that let business customers invest idle cash in Treasuries or money market funds. Some companies began turning to Meow and Vesto well before the recent bank collapses, particularly for easy investing in low-risk, high-yield instruments. As such, the reasons they have to stay are likely to persist even if the FDIC elevates levels of deposit insurance for businesses.

    “The fintechs are moving faster” than banks, said Graham. “They are piecing things together to come up with solutions that they expect will appeal to customers, and they are not wed to a single set of tools.”

    The safety of each investment product varies.

    “There are lots of flavors of money market mutual funds and lots of flavors of government securities,” said Graham. “U.S. Treasury is a different credit risk than some local sewer authority in a muni bond.”

    Mercantile, which partners with organizations to create custom branded cards, has been holding excess cash at Vesto the past six-plus months. Vesto defines itself as a cash management platform for venture capital-backed startups and mid-market businesses. It builds customized portfolios for its customers according to their risk tolerance, liquidity needs and more, typically investing in Treasury bills, money market funds, corporate bonds and certificates of deposit. The back-end custodian is BNY Mellon Pershing.

    “With the market changing and Treasuries being a little more interesting, we wanted something that was very easy to use and exposes us to a high-yield Treasury option without endangering cash at hand,” said Samuel Poirier, CEO and founder of Mercantile. “Vesto understood the need to take cash out on a monthly basis to fund the company.”

    He chose Vesto, which launched in 2022, because of its simplicity and its understanding that companies such as his will withdraw funds on a regular basis. He only invests in U.S. Treasuries through Vesto.

    Benjamin Döpfner, founder and CEO at Vesto, says he has seen an influx of new customers since SVB collapsed. 

    “There has been a desire to diversify their holdings and cash,” he said. “We found a lot of companies have almost all their cash sitting in one bank account.” He says his customers choose Vesto to find a secure home for their cash and to earn high yields.

    “Oftentimes founders and CEOs don’t have the capital markets experience to do this themselves,” said Döpfner.

    Döpfner describes the company’s investment style as “incredibly conservative.”

    “We take the viewpoint that safety and liquidity are priority number one and yield is priority thereafter when managing corporate cash,” he said. “We only work with highly liquid ‘ultra-low risk’ investment products like U.S. Treasuries.”

    Stocktwits, a social network for traders, began investing in Treasury bills through Meow well before SVB and Signature Bank collapsed in March. Meow is a banking platform that lets businesses purchase Treasury bills using partner registered investment advisors and broker-dealers.

    “As the Fed started to raise rates, we saw an inverse yield curve, so it made sense to put some of the firm’s capital to work in addition to diversifying credit risk,” said Philip Picariello, vice president of finance and operations at Stocktwits.

    He considers the firm’s capital as being divided among three buckets: immediate liquidity for payroll and accounts payable, near term liquidity to fund product development and core capital. Like Poirier, he wanted to earn yield in a low-risk way.

    “When I started digging into Meow I liked the team and the way they built it,” said Picariello. “I was sold on the fact that BNY Mellon Pershing is in the back end. It’s very seamless to move money over, allocate it, and ladder it out.” Stocktwits uses an insured deposit sweep program at its bank to protect funds that should stay liquid in the near term. He allocates the rest to Treasuries through Meow based on what the company needs in the next month, three months or six months.

    As suggested by Stocktwits’ strategy, these accounts are not meant to hold operating cash.

    “When you want to get your money, it takes some time,” said Graham. The success of this strategy “depends on your ability to look ahead and know when you need the cash.”

    Picariello is not concerned.

    “If a corporate treasurer or chief financial officer has a good handle on upcoming liabilities, you should never have to worry about it taking a day or two to get your money,” said Picariello.

    Döpfner said almost all the investment products his company works with are highly liquid, and customers can usually access their cash within one to two business days. Brandon Arvanaghi, CEO of Meow, said in a March interview that it would take customers one to two business days to receive their funds after selling their T-bills.

    Business-oriented neobanks have developed their own products they hope will entice customers to park large amounts there instead of at regular banks. Brex has increased its deposit insurance from $1 million to $6 million since SVB’s failure by using a sweep network. Customers can choose to store funds above that limit in a BNY Mellon money market fund. Mercury has increased the amount of cash it can protect per customer to $5 million in a product called Vault. Deposits exceeding $5 million are placed in a money market fund that is almost entirely invested in U.S. government-backed securities.

    Brex and Mercury touted thousands of new customers since the bank failures in March, although it’s an open question as to how many they will keep over the long term. Döpfner of Vesto and Arvanaghi of Meow also report a wave of new customers in the wake of those disasters.

    “These kinds of alternatives tend to be really effective if you know you won’t need the money for X period of time and you’ll get a heads up when you need it,” said Graham.

    [ad_2]

    Miriam Cross

    Source link

  • Community bank, loan marketplace pilot transaction-based underwriting

    Community bank, loan marketplace pilot transaction-based underwriting

    [ad_1]

    Texas National Bank has been strategizing how to tackle social issues in the Rio Grande Valley. 

    One example is its no-fee small-dollar loan, built with bank and credit union technology provider Velocity Solutions and meant to counter the abundance of payday lenders operating in the bank’s communities. The interest rate will hover just under 18% and the product is expected to launch within days.

    Another initiative is a pilot project with Lendio to deploy transaction-based underwriting for small-business loans. Although Lendio is better known for its business loan marketplace, where it sources borrowers and solicits offers from its network of bank and nonbank lenders, it is testing alternative underwriting capabilities with Texas National, which is based in Mercedes.

    “We realized through years of experience that fintech lenders have gotten really sophisticated at quickly analyzing borrower applications, generating decisions and often using transaction data as a way of evaluating the borrower rather than relying so heavily on income statements and credit scores,” said Philip Taliaferro, general manager and senior vice president of software as a service at Lendio.

    The goals are reflective of other small banks and minority depository institutions: to learn how to lower costs, increase efficiency and improve the customer experience using technology, in this case with small-business loans. Taliaferro and Rey Garcia, executive vice president of Texas National, will discuss their pilot on June 12 at American Banker’s Digital Banking Conference.

    “When we see the fintech world taking over the banking world, it keeps me up at night,” said Joe Quiroga, president of the $679 million-asset Texas National. “This was our small attempt to say, we’ve got to innovate and keep up with it; we might not develop the next best product but we will learn a lot,” such as which algorithms or automated processes can take over more efficiently from human analysis.

    “We don’t have huge expectations for growth, but we have huge expectations for learning,” he continued.

    Such experiments with alternative data may also trigger the question of how viable alternative transaction-based underwriting is compared to traditional credit scores.

    Texas National’s largely immigrant customer base frequently operate in cash, and do not borrow often, which means creditworthiness may not be reflected in their credit scores.

    “What got us excited about this product is how we can be socially mindful and create this responsible solution to allow small-business owners that primarily operate in cash to get credit,” said Garcia. “This tool that analyzes alternative data lets us improve the speed and accuracy with which we make decisions.”

    Lendio’s technology will mine customer deposit data from the bank’s core system, run it through algorithms and classify the transactions. It will tabulate the results in its model, detect factors such as revenue over the last 30 days, or number of days where funds dropped below a certain threshold, and pre-qualify customers for a loan.

    Taliaferro cites two reports: one from the Bank for International Settlements in 2022 that studied two lenders that used alternative data and found they predicted future loan performance more accurately than the traditional approach to credit scoring, particularly in areas with high unemployment; another co-written by New York University associate professor of finance Sabrina Howell, which found that process automation boosts lending to Black-owned businesses.

    “If I rely exclusively on traditional credit scoring and traditional underwriting models I am more likely to exclude the type of borrower I should be more focused on supporting,” said Taliaferro.

    Texas National is starting slow. Currently it is restricting the pilot to existing customers, because the bank has a rich history of their transactions and wants to test the solution with well-known customers of the bank before opening it to a larger market.

    “We put on tighter risk limits so we can monitor performance, measure progress, and evaluate potential issues that come up, then iterate from that,” said Garcia. “We’re trying to be mindful about how much we are lending until we’re more comfortable.”

    Although Texas National is its first pilot customer, Lendio is also piloting transaction-based underwriting with a large regional bank and another community development financial institution.

    Transaction data has not reached the mainstream with underwriting among traditional banks.

    “I’m willing to argue that statistically speaking, it won’t result in better loan repayment because historical transaction data is very difficult to utilize to extrapolate future transaction data,” said Mitch Wein, head of community banking and credit unions at Aite-Novarica. There are some businesses where transaction data may be more predictive than other types, he believes, for instance a business with fixed and steady contracts underpinning its revenue.

    However, nontraditional data can augment credit score underwriting to potentially give users better outcomes in certain segments of lending, said Wein. “If you can collect that data in a usable repository, in a consistent way, and tune the algorithms effectively, you can get that outcome, which is a win for the banks.”

    Texas National is currently using credit scores in addition to transaction-based data. The bank says it will continue to assess the underwriting evaluation process as the product evolves.

    “Over time we will see the importance of alternative data continue to increase,” said Wein, “as there is more data being generated and because of capabilities like artificial intelligence and more advanced machine learning, [which means we] will be able to more deeply evaluate the quality of that data for algorithmic purposes.”

    [ad_2]

    Miriam Cross

    Source link

  • ‘Looking into an abyss’: For many lenders, PPP still a source of pride

    ‘Looking into an abyss’: For many lenders, PPP still a source of pride

    [ad_1]

    The Paycheck Protection Program opened for business on April 3, 2020.

    Not long after, the Small Business Administration’s E-Tran loan processing program crashed. SBA approved about 52,000 loans in fiscal year 2019 under its flagship 7(a) loan guarantee program, 60,000 the year before. As big as those numbers seem, they would be quickly dwarfed by PPP.

    Jovita Carranza, who served as SBA’s administrator from January 2020 to January 2021, called 2020 the most extraordinary year in the agency’s history. In that single year, SBA “approved more loans…than it has in all of the years combined since the agency was founded in 1953,” Carranza wrote in SBA’s 2020 Agency Financial Report.

    Even so, pushing loans through a sluggish, crash-prone E-Tran would be a perennial problem for the program’s lenders.

    For Solomon Lax, CEO of Jersey City-based Revenued, they were the source of one of his most enduring PPP memories. “The most vivid moment was when 5,000 applications hit the system in 10 minutes and the application portal went down,” Lax said. “It was an all-hands-on- deck moment for the company.”

    Of course, Revenued, which worked as a partner with Cross River Bank in Fort Lee, New Jersey, managed to get its loans through, as did hundreds of other banks and credit unions that participated in the $800 billion program.

    For them, despite controversies that have severely tarnished the program’s reputation in recent months, the PPP experience remains a high point, a time when the industry rallied to support the businesses and communities it serves.

    “It is still a source of pride as we positively impacted thousands upon thousands of business owners and the communities they operate in,” Jim Fliss, national SBA manager at Cleveland-based KeyCorp, said. “While PPP is not common office conversation these days, I trust that all who were involved doing the work derive strength from meeting a large challenge head-on.”

    A very big deal

    It seems safe to include the Paycheck Protection Program within the ranks of the financial services industry’s biggest endeavors in recent years, perhaps among the biggest ever. PPP was intended to support employers and allow them to continue paying employees, especially where coronavirus had forced shutdowns. It came at a time of unprecedented dislocation.

    The U.S. gross domestic product plummeted 31% during the second quarter of 2020, giving an indication of the veritable body blow the pandemic delivered to the economy. PPP offered businesses with 500 or few employees fully forgivable loans, provided at least 60% of the proceeds were spent on employee compensation, occupancy, safety equipment, business software and other eligible expenses.

    By the time PPP started lending on April 3, the Trump administration had declared a state of emergency and implemented an international travel ban covering more than two dozen countries. Cruise lines halted travel and states and local governments had begun issuing a series of shutdown orders covering schools, theaters, dine-in restaurants, gyms, barber shops and salons, and a host of other businesses. Unemployment, which measured 3.5% at the start of 2020, began rising in March and peaked at 14.7% — a level not seen since before World War II — in April, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

    “Our economy basically shut down,” said Lloyd Doaman, executive director of Carver Community Development Corp., a subset of New York-based Carver Bancorp.

    ABM0423_Cover Story_for online.jpg

    Congress tapped the Treasury Department and SBA to co-administer PPP. Lawmakers implemented PPP as part of 7(a), which had been guaranteeing loans to small businesses since SBA’s creation in 1953. While SBA had acted as a direct lender in its early years, 7(a) had long since evolved into a public-private partnership. Lenders, primarily banks and credit unions, made the loans.

    SBA was an obvious choice to manage PPP, given 7(a)’s existing infrastructure, but the move placed banks and credit unions in the path of a hurricane. Congress appropriated $349 billion for PPP loans. It was an enormous number considering 7(a), SBA’s largest lending program, had never handled more than $25.8 billion of loan volume in a single year.

    Around the clock

    As PPP got up and running, it was clear almost instantly that it wouldn’t take long to dole out the mountain of cash. Most institutions were overwhelmed with applications as soon as they opened their online portals.

    At JPMorgan Chase, more than 75,000 prospective borrowers filled out an online form seeking basic application data the first hour it was online.

    PPP lenders, nevertheless, distributed the program’s massive initial outlay in just 16 days. Congress provided a fresh $310 billion appropriation to restart the program in May, as well as another $284 billion in January 2021.

    Things were never quite as frenzied as during the program’s opening phase in April 2020. The waves of borrowers, combined with E-Tran’s operational woes, forced participating lenders to radically expand working hours. In essence, an industry once joked about for keeping for lax “bankers hours” lurched suddenly to around-the-clock operations.

    At many community banks and credit unions, it took the entire staff, from those at the lowest rungs on the ladder to senior managers and CEOs to cope.

    “We were working well into the weekends, working late at night,” the $713 million-asset Carver’s Doaman said. CEO Michael Pugh “even rolled up his sleeves. He was working with clients one-on-one. He helped get them to the finish line.”

    “People found another gear,” said Ben Parkey, Dallas market president at the $1.1 billion-asset Texas Security Bank in Dallas. “It was inspiring to watch how everyone leaned on each other…We saw individuals grow and develop in a very short period of time out of necessity.”

    Due to the pandemic’s rapid onset, PPP never went through the normal legislative and regulatory process most new programs do. It was established without an extended public comment or rulemaking period. Many of the rules and procedures that governed it were disclosed after the program started, then oftentimes adjusted.

    “It was a challenging program to take on,” said Ken Michalac, commercial lending manager at the $2.6 billion-asset Lake Trust Credit Union in Brighton, Michigan. “Details were rolled out in an unexpected way, so we had to quickly learn not only how to get the funds to business owners, but also to develop a process for taking in applications.”

    The uncertainty created another pressure point for lenders, since frequent changes and additions created widespread confusion.

    “What we found was that a lot of our clients needed additional support,” Doaman said. “They needed someone to work closely with them to demystify the process, to help them calculate what their payroll numbers would be, what the final loan amount would be, to just pull together all the documents that they needed.”

    The same was true even for bigger banks. At the $190 billion-asset Key, “we received multiple weeks of inquiries — early to late — from countless business owners and our employees on how to best navigate” PPP, Fliss said. “Teams across the bank mobilized at warp speed to setup a new PPP infrastructure, processes and technology.”

    Despite well-documented flaws, there remains little doubt, at least in the minds of the bankers and credit union lenders who participated, that PPP was worthwhile. To them, PPP succeeded in achieving its core aim of funneling emergency cash to small businesses reeling from the pandemic, saving millions of jobs in the process.

    Ben Parkey.png

    Most economists agree PPP preserved jobs, though estimates of the number saved vary. A study published in the spring 2022 issue of the Journal of Economic Perspectives concluded PPP preserved about 2.97 million jobs per week in the spring of 2020.

    Nationally, unemployment fell to 11% in June 2020 and was under 7% by the end of the year. GDP, which had declined at a record-setting pace in the second quarter, rebounded to grow at a sizzling 33% pace between July and September 2020.

    “PPP mostly worked, despite its flaws,” Keith Leggett, a retired American Bankers Association economist, said. “We were looking into the economic abyss and the program provided a lifeline to main street businesses.

    Carver believes its 420 PPP loans helped preserve 5,000 jobs, according to Doaman. Nic Bustle, chief lending officer at U.S. Century Bank in Miami, estimated his institution’s PPP lending saved as many as 17,500 jobs.

    “The PPP program, despite its shortcomings, was a lifeline. We felt it was a Dunkirk moment for small business and that everyone we ferried to the other side wasn’t going to make it otherwise,” said Lax, referring to the small coastal town in France where hundreds of thousands of allied forces were evacuated during World War II. “There was real desperation in the voices of the small business owners who had their entire livelihood going to zero before their eyes.”

    Changes made

    In addition to the 1% interest on their PPP portfolios, banks were paid fees by the government for each loan they made, 5% on credits smaller than $350,000, 3% on those between $350,000 and $2 million, and 1% on deals larger than $2 million.

    For PPP lenders, those fees generated substantial income. Northeast Bank in Portland, Maine originated $2 billion in PPP loans on its own and purchased another $11 billion on the secondary market, generating more than $100 million in fee revenue. The $2.8 billion-asset Northeast used its PPP capital to significantly expand its national commercial real estate lending business.

    For many banks, though, PPP’s most lasting impact has been the boost it gave to commercial and small-business banking. Case in point: Carver built on its PPP momentum by launching a microloan program.

    “We gained some really dynamic relationships and great success stories,” Doaman said. “It’s been pretty effective at helping many of the small businesses continue to pivot and stabilize their operations.”

    Texas Security made $264 million in PPP loans in 2020 and 2021. The bank’s loan portfolio, which totaled $403 million at the end of 2019, had grown to $817 million on Dec. 31, 2022 — due in large part to new relationships forged during the pandemic, Parkey said. 

    PPP “provided us with the perfect stage to demonstrate our ability to roll up our sleeves and show off our work ethic,” Parkey said. “So many of the PPP clients that didn’t have accounts with us before PPP are now full TSB clients.”

    Lake Trust Credit Union, too, was able to expand small-business lending, according to Michalak, who said the institution’s PPP clients demonstrated a preference for interacting with people, rather than applying online.

    “We were able to show how our hands-on approach to business lending was much more effective,” he said. “Members we work with showed their appreciation for the additional hand-holding that was available to them during that very uncertain time.”

    [ad_2]

    John Reosti

    Source link

  • How to Choose a Credit Card for Your Startup | Entrepreneur

    How to Choose a Credit Card for Your Startup | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Even if you’ve raised a lot of money for your startup and have plenty of cash in your bank account, to fulfill many of the day-to-day bureaucracy of operating your business, you’ll need a credit card.

    A business credit card is a credit card designed for business use, typically offered to business owners, entrepreneurs and small business owners.

    These cards are separate from personal credit cards, and there are several reasons why you might prefer a business credit card over a personal credit card. Using a business credit card can help you keep your business expenses separate from your personal expenses. This makes it easier to track your business expenses for accounting and tax purposes, and can also help you avoid co-mingling funds, which can be a problem if you’re audited by the IRS.

    Related: Do You Need a Business Checking Account for Your Startup? It Depends on These 8 Factors.

    Also, business credit cards often have higher credit limits than personal credit cards, which can be helpful if you need to make large purchases for your business. Lastly, many business credit cards allow you to issue employee cards and set spending limits on those cards. This can help you control your employees’ spending and ensure that they only use the card for business-related expenses.

    Business credit cards are issued by banks and other financial institutions, and the terms and requirements for obtaining one will vary depending on the issuer. Different business credit cards have different benefits that you’ll want to consider before deciding which card is right for you.

    Low or no annual fee

    Although cards with hefty annual fees tend to provide more benefits, you still need to offset the annual fee with your card rewards.

    Fortunately, there are some excellent business cards that have a low or no annual fee. You’ll need to assess whether it is worthwhile paying an annual fee for your new card.

    Low fees

    In addition to an annual fee, you may face transaction fees, interest charges, cash balance fees and other expenses. With the wrong card, any rewards you earn will quickly disappear to cover your fees.

    You should be aware of all the potential fees before you sign up for your new business credit card. If the card offers good rewards, you may decide that it is worth paying more in fees, but you need to think about how the card will perform in the long term.

    Bookkeeping tools

    Many business cards provide account management tools, which can be a massive benefit when you want to remain organized at tax time.

    If there are particular features that could simplify your business admin or that are compatible with your existing business software, this can be a great advantage for you.

    Credit reporting

    One of the priorities of your startup for the long term must be to build its credit history. As credit history is established, it will open new avenues of credit for your business.

    So, you need to ensure that your new business credit card will report to the major credit bureaus.

    Employee cards

    As the owners of a startup, you’ll have plenty of things to take care of. This means that you won’t want the hassle of needing to handle every business purchase.

    If your new card allows employee cards, you can empower your team to pay for items and eliminate the need to deal with expense reimbursements. This will also help you to keep better track of all your business spending.

    Responsive support team

    As a startup, you are likely to be anticipating fast growth and have unpredictable spending. Whether you need to increase your credit limit or require certain features, you will need to be confident that the support team will be on hand to help.

    Travel features

    If you need to travel for your business, you should look for a card that has travel features. From no foreign transaction fees to airport perks, there are some excellent card benefits around.

    Bear in mind that if you plan on traveling internationally, you may want to choose a card that has broad merchant acceptance, such as Mastercard or Visa. If you’re not sure whether to choose cash back or a travel card, calculate expected monthly rewards to understand which is better, or just apply for two cards if it’s possible.

    Solid dashboard

    Finally, to effectively manage your credit card account, you need access to a clean dashboard and a smooth-running app. If you are dealing with time-sensitive issues such as payments, you’ll find it frustrating to try to deal with a clunky app or a dashboard that is not intuitive.

    It is well worth checking online credit card reviews as well as the reviews for the credit card app to see if there are any red flag issues that could highlight potential problems.

    What you’ll need to apply for a business credit card

    As a startup, you may be unfamiliar with what you need when applying for a business credit card. So, here we’ll break down what you will need to have on hand to support your application.

    While the requirements for different credit cards can vary from issuer to issuer, the commonly requested information includes:

    • Your tax ID number: If you don’t have a tax ID for your new business, and many entrepreneurs do not, you can usually use your personal Social Security number.
    • Your business name: If you have a legal name for your business, you can use it on your application. If you are a consultant, freelancer or other operation without a business name, you can use your own name.
    • Your legal entity: This is part of the application where you will need to identify how the business is organized. Most small businesses and startups in the U.S. don’t have a formal legal structure as they operate as sole proprietorships, where the individual owner essentially is the business. You can still apply for a business credit card as a sole proprietor, but if you are a partnership or have another type of legal business structure, use this on the application.
    • Business address details: If your business has a separate address, phone number and email address from your personal details, you will need to provide them. If you don’t have a separate business line or business location, you can use your personal details.
    • The business start date: This is fairly straightforward, but you need to be accurate and use the date that you formed your startup.
    • Business revenue: The revenue is the amount of money your startup brings in, which is different from your profit. As a startup, you may not have yet received any revenue, but you can put $0 on the application.
    • Type of industry: This is different from the business structure and the bank or credit card issuer needs to know what industry or niche you work in.
    • Interested parties: Finally, you need to provide details on any individuals who own 25% or more of your business. If your business does have co-owners or interested parties, you should have their names, addresses, Social Security Numbers and dates of birth as the issuer may request them.

    As with a personal credit card, shopping around for the right product is well worth the time. So, before you make a decision about a credit card for your startup, be sure to check all the available options.

    How to determine eligibility for a business credit card?

    To determine eligibility for a business credit card, the following factors are typically considered:

    1. Business and personal credit score: Your business credit score is one of the most important factors in determining your eligibility for a business credit card. A higher credit score will generally make it easier to qualify for a card. Although a personal credit score is not the most important factor in determining eligibility for a business credit card, it may be considered if your business does not have a credit history.
    2. Business income: Your business income is also considered when determining your eligibility for a business credit card. Lenders will typically want to see that your business generates enough income to cover the credit card payments.
    3. Business history: The length of time your business has been in operation, as well as its financial history, will also be considered when determining your eligibility. A business with a longer history and a positive financial track record will generally have an easier time qualifying for a business credit card.
    4. Business type: Some credit cards are tailored to specific types of businesses and may require certain qualifications to be met.

    It’s also important to note that different credit card issuers have different requirements and standards for approving business credit card applications, so it’s always best to check with the lender for more specific information.

    [ad_2]

    Baruch Mann (Silvermann)

    Source link

  • Illinois officials unveil proposals to widen regulatory powers

    Illinois officials unveil proposals to widen regulatory powers

    [ad_1]

    Illinois financial regulators argue that three legislative proposals introduced this month are necessary to protect consumers and small-business borrowers from unscrupulous companies.

    John Zich/Bloomberg

    Financial regulators in Illinois have unveiled a sweeping legislative package that’s intended to enhance consumer protections while also creating a regulatory framework for digital-asset firms.

    The measures draw on numerous ideas that have been enacted in recent years by Democratic lawmakers in New York and California, as well as by congressional Democrats. 

    One bill would require digital-asset exchanges and related businesses to obtain a license to operate in Illinois. Another proposal would create new disclosure requirements for providers of small-business financing. And a third bill would expand the authority of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, which officials said will help the agency to target bad actors.

    “You can’t scroll through your phone these days without seeing a headline about the latest tech scam or cryptocurrency collapse wiping out someone’s savings,” David DeCarlo, the state agency’s regulatory innovation officer, said Tuesday in a press release.

    In addition to boosting consumer protections, the bills would force less-regulated financial companies to compete on more equal regulatory footing with Illinois banks and credit unions, state officials argue.

    Still, the legislative proposals drew a mixed response Wednesday from the Illinois Bankers Association.

    Ben Jackson, the trade group’s executive vice president for government relations, offered positive comments about the proposal for licensing of digital-asset businesses that do business in Illinois.

    That proposal is modeled on the so-called BitLicense requirement that New York state regulators enacted in 2015. Similar legislation was introduced two years ago in Illinois, but it failed to get across the finish line, despite support from the Illinois Bankers Association.

    Jackson was more critical of the other two measures, which would require more disclosure in connection with small-business financing and expand state regulators’ consumer protection authority.

    The former bill draws from small-business financing disclosure laws that were passed in recent years in California and New York.

    The latter measure would allow the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation to adopt rules in connection with so-called unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices. That language is modeled on legal authority that Congress granted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau more than a decade ago over the banking industry’s opposition.

    Jackson expressed general support for adding protections from predatory lenders, but he likened the Illinois proposals to trying to kill a gnat with a sledgehammer. “It’s overkill,” he said.

    He also expressed disappointment that the Illinois regulators did not collaborate more with industry groups in developing the legislation.

    “I think that this package of bills shows a departure from that collaborative relationship that we’ve had in the past,” he said. “And I’m very hopeful that we can rectify that and move forward together.”

    The Illinois Credit Union League is reviewing specific pieces of legislation that have the state agency’s backing, according to a spokesperson for the trade group who declined to comment further.

    During an interview Tuesday, state officials indicated that financial industry groups will likely support some parts of the legislative package and oppose other parts.

    “We’re having conversations with them, like we do with all different stakeholders,” said Chase Rehwinkel, state banking director at the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. “I don’t think we’re at a point yet where we know exactly where they’re going to stand at the end of the day.”

    Illinois officials argued that the legislative proposals are necessary to protect both consumers and small-business borrowers from unscrupulous companies.

    “The Small Business Truth in Lending Act will help make small-business owners aware of the terms they’re signing up for when they take out a loan,” Christopher Slaby, a spokesman for the department, said in an email.

    “These kinds of basic disclosures are made available to consumers under existing federal law, and small-business owners deserve similar protections,” Slaby added. “It’s an approach that’s working for small-business owners in California and New York, and we can do the same for our small businesses in Illinois.”

    All three measures were introduced this month by Democratic lawmakers. If they pass both the Illinois House and Senate, they will go to the desk of Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker.

    “We’re pretty optimistic that we’re in good shape to get through here,” Rehwinkel said.

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Wack

    Source link