Anderson Cooper and Michael Strahan each made it clear that they hadn’t compromised with the demands of Buckingham Palace ― or its lawyers ― over recent interviews with Prince Harry.
After Cooper’s interview with the Duke of Sussex aired on CBS’s “60 Minutes” Sunday evening, the journalist spoke about his communications with King Charles’ team.
“We reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment,” Cooper said in a now-viral clip, now viewed over 1.3 million times on Twitter.
“Its representatives demanded that before considering responding, ‘60 Minutes’ provide them with our report prior to airing it tonight, which is something we never do,” Cooper said.
Strahan issued a similar statement after his sit-down with Harry aired on “Good Morning America” Monday. He revealed that palace lawyers contacted ABC while the interview aired that morning.
“We received a response from the law firm representing Buckingham Palace this morning, while we were on the air, saying that the palace needed to ‘consider exactly what is said in the interview, in the context in which it appears’ and asked that we supply them immediately with a copy of the entire interview, which we do not do as a news organization, as a matter of our policy,” Strahan said.
HuffPost reached out to ITV’s Tom Bradby, whose interview with Harry aired Sunday, to see if the palace also placed demands on the interviewer in order to comment.
A source close to the network told HuffPost on Monday that the palace was not shown the program before it aired. The source added that the palace was “given details of its content and offered the opportunity to respond, but declined to do so on the basis of not having seen the film.”
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.
Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace, which represents Prince William and his family, previously asked to see clips before commenting on claims made in Netflix’s recent “Harry & Meghan” docuseries.
A royal source told HuffPost that Netflix made no attempt to contact members of the royal household, but a CNN journalist later revealed that a third-party production company had reached out for comment.
The production company, Story Syndicate, later told Buzzfeed News that the Prince and Princess of Wales’ communication secretary had requested to see footage from the series.
More revelations from Prince Harry’s “Spare” memoir and media tour:
“If we can get to the point of reconciliation, that will have a ripple effect across the world,” Harry told “Good Morning America” co-anchor Michael Strahan in a new interview about his memoir “Spare.” “I genuinely believe that, and that’s kind of what is pushing me. And if that doesn’t happen, then that’s very sad.”
In the wake of their departure, Harry told Strahan he does not believe the details he shares in “Spare” can make things any worse with his family.
Michael Strahan interviews Prince Harry in Los Angeles Jan. 3, 2023.
Richard Harbaugh/ABC
“I have thought about it long and hard,” Harry said. “And as far as I see it, the divide couldn’t be greater before this book.”
William, ‘beloved brother and arch nemesis’
To the outside world Harry, 38, and William, 40, always appeared close, seemingly bonded by the death of their mother Princess Diana when Harry was just 12 and William was 15.
Harry told Strahan that privately, there was more to the brothers’ story. In his memoir, Harry refers to William as his “beloved brother and arch nemesis” and recalls verbal and even physical disputes between them.
“There has always been this competition between us weirdly,” Harry said. “Again, I think it really plays into, or is played, by the heir/spare.”
Prince William and brother Prince Harry attend the Beaufort Polo Club, June 22, 2002, in Tetbury, England.
Tim Graham/Getty Images
When asked whether he thought William was jealous of his position as the spare, Harry said yes.
“But I have more freedom than he does, right?” Harry said. “So his life is planned out for him. I have more flexibility to be able to choose the life that I wanted.”
Harry said that while the typical path for the spare is to sit “in the monarch’s shadow,” he wanted to carve a different path.
As Harry moved further down that path and eventually married Meghan, he claims William broke a longstanding “pact” between the brothers to not let their offices fight or brief the press against each other.
In “Spare,” Harry claims members of the royal institution fed stories to the press and refused to set the record straight on false reports, especially about Meghan, thereby shifting the negative spotlight on her in order to protect other royals.
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Prince Harry leave after attending the Grenfell Tower National Memorial Service at St Paul’s Cathedral on Dec. 14, 2017 in London.
Pool/Getty Images, FILE
“The people that he employed broke that,” Harry said of his self-described pact with William. “But again, within the family, it’s hard because you are led to believe that if you don’t play the game, that you will be destroyed. And again, I’m the one who’s proving that that is true, right? Chose not to play the game, but they’re trying to destroy me.”
Watch Michael Strahan’s interview with Prince Harry on Monday, Jan. 9, at 7 a.m. EST on “Good Morning America” and the special, “Prince Harry: In His Own Words | Michael Strahan Reporting” at 8:30 p.m. EST on ABC News Live.
In one example, Harry claims palace officials failed to correct tabloid stories alleging Meghan made William’s wife Kate, the Princess of Wales, cry in the run-up to the Sussexes’ 2018 wedding. Harry writes in “Spare,” and Meghan has said in a previous interview, that it was Kate who upset Meghan and later apologized.
“[The press] pitched the Waleses, which Kate and William are now, against the Sussexes, me and my wife. They always pitched us against each other,” Harry said. “They pitched Kate and Meghan against each other.”
PHOTO: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge stand on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, July 10, 2018 in London.
Anwar Hussein/WireImage via Getty Images, FILE
When asked whether press reports of Kate and Meghan fighting disrupted the women’s relationship, Harry replied, “Without question.”
“If you read [the press coverage], it very much feeds into how you function, operate, and behave. Without question,” Harry said. “But the moment you don’t read it, you can live a truly authentic life.”
Harry said he believes the British press continues to try to “drive a wedge” between him and William, but hopes that he can reconcile with his brother.
“I hope that we will be joined at the hip again,” he said. “Because, you know, if there’s something that will terrify the British press more than anything, it’s William and I being aligned.”
Harry said he “without question” shoulders some of the responsibility for the breakdown of his relationship with William. But he added, “What people don’t know is the efforts that I’ve gone to [in order] to resolve this privately, both with my brother and with my father.”
Prince William and Prince Harry look at a statue they commissioned of their mother Diana in the Sunken Garden at Kensington Palace, on what would have been her 60th birthday, July 1, 2021, in London.
WPA Pool/Getty Images
Neither Kensington Palace — William and Kate’s office — nor Buckingham Palace, the office of Charles and Camilla, the Queen Consort, have commented on the claims Harry makes in “Spare.”
ABC News reached out to Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace for response to Harry’s remarks in our interview. Kensington Palace declined to comment and Buckingham Palace has yet to respond.
Harry describes how his and Meghan’s hope for a different royal life collapsed
According to Harry, intense press coverage and security concerns played a large part in his and Meghan’s quest to carve out different royal roles for themselves that would allow them to split their time between Canada and the U.K. while still serving the monarchy.
When the proposal was brought to the royal family, Harry said there was “zero compromise.” He added that an agreed-upon 12-month transition period completely fell apart when his own family’s security was pulled.
“I was stunned that my family would allow security to be taken away, especially at the most vulnerable point for us,” said Harry, who was living with Meghan and their son Archie in Vancouver Island, Canada, at the time. “And maybe they didn’t understand the concerns that I had. I mean, I listed them. I laid them out.”
When asked whether he thought his family didn’t understand his security concerns, or didn’t care, Harry replied, “I think probably a little bit of both.”
Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge watch the RAF flypast on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, as members of the Royal Family attend events to mark the centenary of the RAF, July 10, 2018 in London, England.
Chris Jackson/Getty Images, FILE
Harry expressed that neither he nor Meghan wanted to leave their senior royal roles, saying, “We were based in Windsor. That was where we genuinely thought we were going to spend the rest of our lives.”
Describing his and Meghan’s ideal life, he said they wanted to continue to represent the monarchy but to do so mainly outside of the U.K. so that their work wouldn’t go through what he called “the filter of the tabloids.”
“We were trying to find a different way to work, but for one reason or another, despite the fact that it already exists within the family, we weren’t allowed to do things slightly differently,” Harry said. “To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy, but to be financially independent, to remove the supposed public interest, which the tabloids had used repeatedly to invade every single element of our life.”
A return to the U.K. and a working royal role?
Though Harry’s memoir “Spare,” rips open his view of the royal institution and his family, he said he thinks telling his story what is needed to make peace.
“I don’t think that we can ever have peace with my family unless the truth is out there,” he told Strahan. “There’s a lot that I can forgive, but there needs to be conversations in order for reconciliation, and part of that has to be accountability.”
Michael Strahan interviews Prince Harry in Los Angeles Jan. 3, 2023
ABC News
Harry said he also hopes to have a candid, private conversation with family members.
“I just hope that there’s a way that we can have a conversation that is trusted within that conversation that isn’t then spilled to the British press,” he said. “That’s where I am.”
When describing how he chose the personal, behind-the-scenes details he shares in “Spare,” Harry said he thought more about the family he has created with Meghan.
“As [with] everybody who has a large family, a family that you’ve been born into, there becomes a point when the family that you’ve created … becomes the priority over the family that you were born into,” said Harry, who wed Meghan in 2018. “So, not to say it wasn’t hard. It was very hard. But that was my thinking and the process in which I went through.”
Catherine, Princess of Wales, Prince William, Prince of Wales, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex on the long Walk at Windsor Castle arrive to view flowers and tributes to HM Queen Elizabeth on Sept. 10, 2022 in Windsor, England.
Chris Jackson/Getty Images
According to Harry, the queen never told him she was angry with him for wanting to change his royal role, but he believes she was “sad” his situation had reached that point.
“I had many, many conversations with her both in the U.K. over the years and in the run-up to the point of this change, so it was never a surprise to anybody, least of all her,” Harry said. “She knew what was going on. She knew how hard it was. I don’t know whether she was in a position to be able to change it.”
When asked whether he saw himself, Meghan and their children ever returning to the U.K. and becoming working royals again, Harry said he doesn’t think so.
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex attend the 2022 Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Gala at New York Hilton on Dec. 6, 2022, in New York.
Mike Coppola/Getty Images for Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Gala
“Even if there was an agreement or an arrangement between me and my family, there is that third party that is going to do everything they can to make sure that that isn’t possible,” Harry said, referring to the British press. “Not stopping us from necessarily going back, but making it unsurvivable, and that’s really sad because that is essentially breaking the relationship between us.”
He added, “If there was something in the future where we can continue to support the Commonwealth, then that’s of course on the table, but there’s so much that needs to happen between now and then, and so much that can happen.”
Harry says he’s speaking out to help protect other generations of royals
The Duke of Sussex said he “genuinely” believes the British monarchy should continue, and that there is a place for it in the 21st century as long as it modernizes.
“I think the same process that I went through regarding my own unconscious bias would be hugely beneficial to them,” he said. “It’s not racism, but unconscious bias if not confronted, if not acknowledged, if not learned and grown from, that can then move into racism. And the way that I understand it is that we all want to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem.”
Harry said the royals missed a “huge missed opportunity” in modernizing the monarchy through what Meghan represented as a biracial woman.
“It’s what she said to me from right from the beginning, representation,” Harry said of his wife. “And I, as a privileged white man, didn’t really understand what she was talking about.”
With his memoir, Harry said a large part of his drive to speak out stems from a hope to “change the media landscape” in the U.K., giving less status to tabloid newspapers.
“In this instance, the most popular, most read and therefore most influential newspapers in our country are tabloids,” he said. “That affects the country. That affects the construct of the country.”
Cover of the book ‘Spare’ by Prince Harry.
Random House
Harry described also wanting to more specifically change what he described as a “codependency” between U.K. tabloids and the royal family.
“There are some people, especially in the U.K., who have been led to believe that because you are a member of the royal family, somehow everyone owns you or has a stake in you,” he said. “And that’s a message that has been purely pushed out by the British tabloids, and it creates real problems within that family and that relationship.”
Harry added, “Of course, there has to be some sort of relationship, but where it’s got to now is incredibly unhealthy.”
Believing that the monarchy should continue, Harry said he hopes his efforts can help his own two children as well as current and future generations of royals.
“I also worry about other young kids within that family if this continues,” he said, referring to the royal family. “Because who’s to say that someone else doesn’t fill my shoes and that their partner, whether it’s a husband or a wife or boyfriend or a girlfriend, doesn’t get treated exactly the same as Meghan did?”
Watch Michael Strahan’s interview with Prince Harry on Monday, Jan. 9, at 7 a.m. EST on “Good Morning America” and the special, “Prince Harry: In His Own Words | Michael Strahan Reporting” at 8:30 p.m. EST on ABC News Live.
Prince Harry claimed that his brother Prince William and sister-in-law Kate Middleton urged him to wear the Nazi uniform he infamously donned for a 2005 costume party and “howled with laughter” when they saw him dressed up.
The accusation is reportedly detailed in Harry’s upcoming memoir, “Spare,” according to Page Six. Harry wrote that he couldn’t decide between a normal pilot uniform and that of a Nazi, the outlet reported, leading the young prince to call his brother for help.
“I phoned Willy and Kate, asked what they thought. Nazi uniform, they said,” wrote Harry.
When he tried on the uniform for them, he wrote, “They both howled. Worse than Willy’s leotard outfit! Way more ridiculous! Which, again, was the point.”
Harry was 20 when he attended the “Native and Colonial”-themed costume party. Tabloid photos showed him with a red swastika-emblazoned armband on his biceps. His brother was dressed as a lion.
All I wanted to do was make it right,” he continued. “I sat down and spoke to the chief rabbi in London, which had a profound impact on me. I went to Berlin and spoke to a Holocaust survivor.”
Photos of Prince Harry wearing a Nazi costume spread around the globe like wildfire.
JIM WATSON via Getty Images
Royal historian Robert Lacey, in his 2020 book “Battle of Brothers,” said the costume incident signaled the start of Harry and William’s falling out.
“Harry chose his costume in conjunction with his elder brother — the future King William V, then 22, who had laughed all the way back to Highgrove (Charles’ country home) with the younger sibling he was supposedly mentoring — and then onwards to the party together,” Lacey wrote, per Page Six.
“For the first time, their relationship really suffered and they barely spoke,” a former aide told Lacey. “Harry resented the fact that William got away so lightly.”
King Charles delivered his first Christmas speech as monarch on Sunday, three months after the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II.
The king spoke of the late queen in his speech, who died in September.
“I’m standing here in this exquisite chapel of St George, at Windsor Castle, so close to where my beloved mother, the late queen, is laid to rest with my dear father,” the sovereign said. “I am reminded of the deeply touching letters, cards, and messages which so many of you have sent my wife and myself and I cannot thank you enough for the love and sympathy you have shown our whole family.”
“Christmas is a particularly poignant time for all of us who have lost loved ones,” he added. “We feel their absence at every familiar turn of the season and remember them in each cherished tradition.”
Earlier in the day, the king and Queen Camilla joined Prince William and Kate Middleton and their three children ― Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis ― and other members of the royal family for the Christmas Day morning service at Sandringham Church.
Princess Charlotte, the Princess of Wales, Camilla, Queen Consort, Prince Louis, Prince George, King Charles III and Prince William attend the Christmas Day service at Sandringham Church on Dec. 25.
Samir Hussein via Getty Images
It was the first time that little Louis has made an appearance with his parents for the occasion.
The king’s speech was recorded at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle on Dec. 13 ― just after the first three episodes of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Netflix docuseries, “Harry & Meghan,” were released.
Neither Buckingham nor Kensington Palace responded to the claims made in the series.
Queen Elizabeth II pictured at her final Christmas broadcast in the White Drawing Room at Windsor Castle on Dec. 23, 2021, in Windsor, England.
The palaces are preparing for another round of allegations, as the Duke of Sussex’s memoir, “Spare,” will arrive on Jan. 10, 2023 ― nearly three years after Harry and Meghan announced they were stepping back as senior working members of the royal family.
The duke said in a statement about the memoir in July 2021 that he is writing his book “not as the prince I was born but as the man I have become.”
“I’ve worn many hats over the years, both literally and figuratively, and my hope is that in telling my story—the highs and lows, the mistakes, the lessons learned—I can help show that no matter where we come from, we have more in common than we think,” Harry said.
He added that he’s “excited for people to read a firsthand account of my life that’s accurate and wholly truthful.”
A meeting between the late Queen Elizabeth’s lady in waiting and a Black charity boss was “filled with warmth and understanding”, Buckingham Palace has said after the royal household became embroiled in a race row.
Lady Susan Hussey, 83, who asked Ngozi Fulani repeatedly where she “really came from” during a palace reception last month, has apologised in person to the executive, Buckingham Palace has said.
Fulani, who is British and founder of the charity Sistah Space, expressed shock at her treatment by Lady Susan and said she had suffered “horrific abuse” on social media in the aftermath.
Buckingham Palace said in a statement the two women had met on Friday morning at the palace.
It said: “At this meeting, filled with warmth and understanding, Lady Susan offered her sincere apologies for the comments that were made and the distress they caused to Ms Fulani.
“Lady Susan has pledged to deepen her awareness of the sensitivities involved and is grateful for the opportunity to learn more about the issues in this area.
“Ms Fulani, who has unfairly received the most appalling torrent of abuse on social media and elsewhere, has accepted this apology and appreciates that no malice was intended.”
Lady Susan, who is also the Prince of Wales’s godmother, resigned from the household and apologized after she repeatedly challenged Fulani when she said she was British at the Queen Consort’s reception highlighting violence against women and girls.
Describing how Lady Susan also touched her hair during the incident, Fulani told ITV’s “Good Morning Britain:” “I was stood next to two other women – Black women – and she (Lady Susan) just made a beeline for me, and she took my locks and moved it out of the way so that she could see my name badge.
“That’s a no-no. I wouldn’t put my hands in someone’s hair, and culturally it’s not appropriate.”
‘Tis the season for family gatherings, festive markets, cookie exchanges — and wondering exactly how those very well-off royals spend the holidays.
As it turns out, the House of Windsor had more than their share of quirky and downright unusual Christmas traditions that will leave you scratching your head. From gut-busting gag gifts and garlic bans to proper teacup etiquette and a rather shocking before-and-after dinner weigh-in (yes, really!), we’ve uncovered some of the most bizarre “holiday commandments” the royal family followed under the reign of Queen Elizabeth II.
Thou shalt… attend the annual holiday luncheon
A week before Christmas, Queen Elizabeth would host an annual luncheon at Buckingham Palace for her entire extended family — an exclusive guest list that typically totals more than 50 people.
Story continues below advertisement
Although she delivered fancy invites well in advance, woe betide anyone who declined the generous offer to spend the afternoon balancing their tea cups while mingling with a slew of faces only seen once a year. Little else is known about the top-secret event (no photography was allowed), leaving royal watchers and the British tabloids speculating about what actually went on behind those gilded gates.
If you thought prepping a Christmas turkey for your holiday feast was stressful, how do you think the royal cooks feel? Christmas week at Sandringham House, on the grounds of what is now King Charles’ Norfolk estate, is an absolute must-attend — although the rare exception is sometimes granted.
Story continues below advertisement
Once upon a time, close family wouldn’t be allowed to spend Christmas away from Sandringham. Just ask Diana, Princess of Wales, who never got to spend the big day with her Spencer clan. In recent years, however, the queen allowed for some wiggle room, letting Prince William and Duchess Kate visit the Middleton family in 2014.
Set aside any preconceived notions you might have as to the types of presents the Royal Family buy one another during the holidays. As it turns out, it’s all about a good gag. On Christmas Eve, the Windsors lay out their gifts on a table and exchange them over piping hot cups of tea.
The theme? Cheap, cheerful and full-out hilarious.
Story continues below advertisement
That’s right — as a way to cut loose and avoid flaunting their wealth, the Royal Family buys each other gag gifts instead of expensive items. A few years back, Kate famously bought the then-single Harry a “Grow Your Own Girlfriend” kit while the prince allegedly bought his beloved granny a shower cap with “Ain’t Life a B*tch” printed across the top.
Oh, to have been a fly on the wall when the queen opened that gift.
It’s something of an annual tradition for the Norfolk locals to line the streets leading to St. Mary Magdalene church on the Sandringham estate to catch a glimpse of the Royal Family as they walk to attend the Christmas morning service.
Story continues below advertisement
The Windsor clan — minus the little kiddos — walks the entire way, greeting royal watchers along the path, with the exception of the queen, who would arrive promptly at the church door via car.
The 2017 service, in particular, was a biggie for royal fans since it was the first time the not-yet-a-duchess Meghan curtsied to the queen in public. Naturally, it was dissected by news outlets for days afterward. A few things the former actor needed to remember: curtsies should never graze the floor; you simply put one leg behind the other, allow for a gentle bend at the knees and bow your head slightly. (Markle nailed it, for the record.)
This shouldn’t really come as a surprise, but it still needs to be said: there’s no lounging around in PJs — not even on Christmas morning. (Our sympathies go out to the little ones — George, Charlotte and Louis.) The entire family is expected to be dressed and ready for all the Christmas Day festivities, from the morning church service to the formal evening dinner. Modesty first, while still being fashionable.
This is not a joke, friends. According to royal expert and Majesty editor-in-chief, Ingrid Stewart, every Royal Family member is weighed before and after their Christmas dinner. (We’ll give you a moment to let that sink in.) It’s apparently a tradition that dates back to the early 1900s during the reign of King Edward VII who, as a way of determining whether or not his guests had been sufficiently fed, asked them all to step on the scale.
Given the fact that the Windsors enjoy three huge meals throughout Christmas Day, the scale seems more than a little excessive. Some traditions just don’t age well.
The queen was highly fluent in French and preferred for it to be used during all formal dinner occasions. That meant, the Christmas dinner menu was supposedly printed in French, as well. No word on whether Kate or Meghan were familiar with the language when they spent their first Christmas with the royals.
We’ve all got those foods or seasonings we simply can’t stand, be it due to taste or texture. Queen Elizabeth, however, had one intense dislike that also happened to be a common cooking ingredient: garlic. As former royal chef John Higgins told the National Post in 2016, “they’re missing out on garlic because, at Buckingham Palace, you don’t cook with garlic. I suppose, in case you get the ‘royal burp.’” The real reason, according to reports? The queen hated the smell.
One of the great things about being a queen is that, when it comes to meals, you set the pace. During meals, when Queen Elizabeth had taken her last bite, she reportedly would quietly put down her fork and everyone else would have to follow her lead, whether or not they were actually done with their food. We imagine this must have been a struggle for the majority of her guests.
When at the table, napkins must be folded in half at all times to avoid unsightly stains and food bits. Royals are expected to gently wipe their mouths and hands inside the fold of their napkins. To do otherwise would risk dirty clothes — gasp! — and gross napkins coloured in a variety of less-than-appetizing food stains. Out of sight, out of mind.
Story continues below advertisement
Thou shalt not… play Monopoly
During the holiday break, the royals would enjoy rousing games of charades. Queen Elizabeth loved it so much that no one else would be allowed to retire from the room until she was done playing. But there’s one game, in particular, that was strictly prohibited — Monopoly.
Yes, that board game where you collect real estate and “get out of jail free” cards. The reason? In the past, it’s gotten too competitive and heated so the queen had it banished. What we want to know is who the guilty party was.
Thou shalt… use utensils properly
The majority of us commoners don’t typically spend time dwelling on how we cut into our food during a meal, but the royals take their dining etiquette very, very seriously. Regardless of whether you’re right-handed or left-handed, knives must be held with your right and forks with your left (with the tines facing down, of course). It doesn’t end there: once you’ve cut off a piece of food, it must be balanced on the back of the fork, instead of poked through with the tines.
Entrances are an important factor in the Windsor family hierarchy, and the Orders of Precedence pecking order is nailed down to an exact science. The procession, naturally, used to begin with the queen and would continue in order of those next in line to the throne. For example, prior to his death in April 2021, Prince Philip never entered a room alongside his wife — he always trailed behind her by a few paces during all public and formal events.
Now, King Charles will be the head of the pack.
Thou shalt… drink tea correctly
Yes, there’s a correct way to hold a teacup and saucer — and, yes, that means you’ve probably been doing it wrong. As etiquette expert Myka Meier told People, a royal is expected to use their thumb and index finger to hold the top of the handle, with the middle finger gently supporting the bottom of the cup. Keep those pinkies tucked in! In addition, the women have an extra rule to abide by — one must sip from the exact same spot to avoid lipstick stains around the rim.
Thou shalt not… take down Christmas decor until February
Although most of Queen Elizabeth’s guests would start to leave Sandringham House after Boxing Day, the queen reportedly continued with the festive feels until the second week of February. Although this might seem odd to some, there’s actually a really poignant reason behind the queen’s desire to keep the tree and tinsel up for an extra month and a half.
Her father, King George VI, passed away on Feb. 6, 1952, and it was her way of remembering him during the holiday season before she would head back to London for the year.
Royals ‘happy to lie’ to protect William, Prince Harry claims in new trailer
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at the Mountbatten Music Festival on March 7, 2020 in London.
Photo: Simon Dawson – WPA Pool/Getty Images
Meghan Markle‘s royal fashion has been a global phenomenon — she’s been said to give brands a “Markle Sparkle” by wearing them, and there are sites and columns across the internet tracking her every sartorial move. (Hi.) It began when she and Prince Harry first went public and started making official appearances together, and has continued to this day.
In the first half of the Netflix docuseries “Harry & Meghan,” the Duchess of Sussex explained that she intentionally kept her wardrobe more muted at the beginning. “Most of the time that I was in the U.K., I rarely wore color,” she said of her mostly-neutral palette. “There was thought in that… It also was just so I could blend in. I’m not trying to stand out here. There’s no version of me joining this family and trying to not do everything I could do to fit in. I don’t want to embarrass the family.”
However, something changed after the the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced they’d be stepping back as senior royals almost three years ago.
In episode five of “Harry & Meghan” — released on Dec. 15 Markle — recalls how her style shifted when the couple returned to the U.K. in March 2020 to make their final official appearances as working members of the royal family and to clear out their residence. She wore a lot of color, intentionally.
Scroll to Continue
“That last week…it was bittersweet,” she said. “Until that last week in the U.K., I rarely wore color. I never wanted to upstage or ruffle any feathers, so I just tried to blend in.”
During the “Royal Farewell Tour,” though, Markle swapped out the beiges and whites for brighter hues: turquoise blue, scarlet red, emerald green — the joy, optimism and promise of a new chapter translating across her wardrobe.
“I wore a lot of color that week,” she said in the docuseries. “Just felt like, ‘Well, let’s just look like a rainbow.’” (For added effect, the Rolling Stones’ “She’s a Rainbow” played as images of her past outfits flashed on screen.)
The Duke added: “It was our opportunity to go out with a bang.”
The final three episodes of the series are set to drop on Thursday, with their contents teased in a new clip that dropped on Monday.
In it, Harry is seen celebrating on what he calls a “freedom flight” – presumably as he and Meghan left the U.K. for the U.S. – before he calls out “institutional gaslighting.”
“I wonder what would have happened to us had we not got out when we did,” he begins.
Harry is then heard saying: “They were happy to lie to protect my brother. They were never willing to tell the truth to protect us.”
Meghan also says: “I wasn’t being thrown to the wolves, I was being fed to the wolves.”
The trailer highlights the couple’s new beginnings in the U.S., with Meghan noting how the move had given them “a chance to create that home that we had always wanted.”
“I’ve always felt that this was a fight worth fighting for,” Harry adds.
Prince William, the Prince of Wales.
Max Mumby/Indigo via Getty Images
The “unprecedented and in-depth” docuseries, directed by Oscar-nominated Liz Garbus, was billed as a Netflix global event, with Harry and Meghan sharing “the other side of their high-profile love story.”
Netflix and the royal family later clashed over whether the institution had been contacted for comment on the series, as a statement that opens the show claims.
A royal source told HuffPost that Netflix made no attempt to contact members of the royal household, Kensington Palace or Buckingham Palace.
However, a Netflix source insisted to HuffPost that both King Charles and Prince William’s offices were contacted and were given time to respond ahead of the docuseries release.
The first three episodes of Harry & Meghan are available on Netflix now, with the final three dropping on Thursday.
It has nothing to do with what the royal couple is planning to reveal during the much-anticipated docuseries, however. Instead, Netflix, as well as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are being accused of using “misleading” stock footage and photos in the two teasers.
The trailers each paint a picture of the relentless intrusion the prince and his wife faced at the hands of the press after their 2018 wedding — a factor they say led to their decision to step back as working members of the Royal Family and move to California to pursue a more private life on their own terms.
Public has mixed reactions to ‘Harry and Meghan’ Netflix series
According to the BBC, at least three of the images used in the trailers are believed to have been taken from events that had nothing to do with Harry and Meghan. As well, there have been accusations of deceptive cropping of at least one photo and using a video to create an illusion of press intrusion when, if fact, the photographer who captured the footage was invited and known to the couple.
Neither the couple nor Netflix has publicly addressed or commented on these recent accusations.
U.K. newspaper The Sun first reported that an image used in the first trailer, showing a large group of photographers with long camera lenses presumably shooting a royal event, was actually from the movie premiere of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part Two in 2011, long before Harry and Meghan met.
Story continues below advertisement
This photo, taken at a 2011 movie premiere, is shown in the ‘Harry & Meghan’ trailer, but had nothing to do with the couple.
Netflix / TNI Images
Harry delivers a line in the trailer, right before the image flashes on screen: “I had to do everything I could to protect my family,” he says, giving the impression that it was a group of photographers taking photos in a royal context.
A photographer from The Sun, Doug Seeburg, is seen in the photo and told the publication that no royals were at the event that day.
“In the Netflix trailer, it’s implied the photographers, including me, were trying to get a shot of the royal couple — but that’s nonsense,” Seeburg said.
Robert Jobson tweeted an image featured in the trailer, which shows a photographer taking a picture of the Duke and Duchess from above.
This photograph used by @Netflix and Harry and Meghan to suggest intrusion by the press is a complete travesty. It was taken from a accredited pool at Archbishop Tutu’s residence in Cape Town. Only 3 people were in the accredited position. H & M agreed the position. I was there. pic.twitter.com/nvjznlloLF
“This photograph used by @Netflix and Harry and Meghan to suggest intrusion by the press is a complete travesty,” he wrote. “H & M agreed the position. I was there.”
Buzzfeed also points out that a short clip of footage meant to highlight the couple’s contentious relationship with the media is actually stock video of Donald Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, getting into a vehicle to be transported to prison on May 6, 2019.
As well, the outlet reports that another clip of footage from the second trailer, meant to illustrate paparazzi harassing the couple, was actually taken when former model Katie Price attended a U.K. court to be sentenced for drunk driving in 2021. Over the footage, Harry can be heard in voiceover saying, “I was terrified. I didn’t want history to repeat itself.”
Twitter user @Urban_Pictures also pointed out that the Price footage had been flipped horizontally.
Following accusations of fake footage in the first trailer, the NEW trailer for the @netflix Harry & Meghan documentary appears to use footage of @KatiePrice leaving Crawley Magistrates Court to suggest a mob of paparazzi hounding H&M. #HarryandMeghanonNetflixpic.twitter.com/NFKCedWnK5
Finally, a photo that appears to show Harry and Markle relegated to the fringes of the Royal Family has been cropped to support Harry’s accusation of a “hierarchy of the family,” the Telegraph reports.
The cropped photo, taken during the Trooping the Colour in 2019 where much of the extended Royal Family appeared on the balcony of Buckingham Palace to watch the RAF flypast, shows Prince William and Kate Middleton in the centre of the photograph.
However, the newspaper noticed, the arrangement of the family that day is not as it appears in the Netflix trailer. Rather, Queen Elizabeth II at was the centre of the original photograph and Harry and Meghan were actually standing closer to her than William and Kate.
The Netflix crop appears above and the actual photograph as it was taken appears below.
Netflix / Getty Images
In the aftermath of all of these accusations, it’s certain that royal watchers will be closely dissecting and scrutinizing all of the footage included in the Harry & Meghan documentary when it begins streaming on Netflix Dec. 8.
“It turns your stomach. Why do that? Are they trying to pretend crowds and crowds of people are coming to watch them? What are they saying?” she told the publication, adding it’s very likely Harry and Meghan were given a chance to review the trailers before they were released.
‘Harry & Meghan’ trailer
“They complain about the press manipulating things and not saying the truth and here they are doing exactly that. It’s very foolish,” Levin added. “They are risking their whole reputation. They must assume that we are all fools and we would not dare check on the pictures they have got because they have put them there.”
Royal expert Ingrid Seward defended the couple, saying they may not have realized the images were from events that did not include them. She did concede that using misleading imagery “weakens Harry’s comment about protecting his family.”
Story continues below advertisement
Netflix promises “the series explores the clandestine days of their early courtship and the challenges that led to them feeling forced to step back from their full-time roles in the institution.”
“With commentary from friends and family, most of whom have never spoken publicly before about what they witnessed, and historians who discuss the state of the British Commonwealth today and the Royal Family’s relationship with the press, the series does more than illuminate one couple’s love story, it paints a picture of our world and how we treat each other.”
Queen Elizabeth death: Princes William and Harry greet well-wishers outside Windsor Castle
Annie recently spoke exclusively to The Sun about her relationship with DodiCredit: Louis Wood
3
The former model claims he was ‘incredibly loving and sweet’ – but there must have been an overlap between her and Princess DianaCredit: Jerry Hinkle
3
This comes ahead of Channel 5’s new documentary, Dodi: Last Days Of A PlayboyCredit: Getty
Who is Annie Cardone?
Annie is originally from Rainham in East London.
We don’t know much about her childhood, however, in a recent interview she said: “Having suffered a violent and abusive childhood and subsequent relationships I realized I had to go back to the past to make sense of the present when I hit rock bottom during menopause.”
She was scouted as a model in her early 20s and later moved into public relations.
Speaking of her career, Annie said: “I think I was the only one of my friends who wasn’t a Trust Fund kid.
READ MORE ON DIANA & DODI
“I was the only one having to get up at 6 am and go to work.”
How did Annie meet Dodi Al-Fayed and what has she said about their relationship?
Annie first met Dodi in the summer of 1996 at London’s most decadent late-night haunt, Tramp nightclub.
“Dodi had moves. He surprised me because he looked like a wet blanket.
“He wasn’t a great conversationalist or raconteur. He was very shy.”
Talking about their relationship, she added: “He was incredibly tactile, loving and sweet. It was very passionate and intense.”
The pair dated for a year before Annie called it off.
Dodi then died in the car crash with Princess Diana, just months after he and Annie had separated.
Annie claimed there was “definitely an overlap” with her and Diana dating Dodi, who was known for his wild living and womanising.
Speaking about Diana, she said: “We were both very, very lucky to have been on the receiving end of that. Not many women were.”
Annie clearly recalls their last interaction: “When I last saw him, he was begging for another chance. He was crying. He was sobbing.
“He was telling me he loved me and it was incredibly hard to see him like that. I still get choked about it.
“If I’d given him another chance, would things have been different? Would history have changed?
“That’s a burden of responsibility that I feel I have.”
Where is Annie Cardone now?
The former model, now 57 and living in Canterbury, Kent, has turned her hand to writing.
Her first book, ‘Menopause WTH’ was published in September 2022 and shares her experience.
Annie suffered from both insomnia and sleep psychosis before doctors diagnosed her as menopausal.
She was recommended to try Hormonal Replacement Therapy, but unfortunately, this only made her aggressive and agitated.
On her website, it states: “Having studied women’s health and hormones for the past 10 years and having gone through a very tough journey that almost claimed her life, Annie is in a strong position to help educate and enlighten other women, allowing them to get back in charge of their lives.
“This book takes the confusion and stigma out of ageing and menopause by breaking down the impact our hormones have on our health and offers solutions that can bring sanity back to our lives and our loved ones.”
ONE of Dodi Fayed’s former lovers has told how she ditched him when she feared he was cheating on her with Princess Diana – and now agonises over whether her move played a role in their deaths.
Ex-model Annie Cardone said: “One decision I made in that moment, in early summer 1997, right before they went public . . .
7
Ex-model Annie Cardone, one of Dodi Fayed’s former lovers, has told how she now agonises over whether her dumping him played a role in his death alongside Princess DianaCredit: Jerry Hinkle
7
Annie told The Sun about her life with Dodi, whose death aged 42 in a Paris car crash with Diana came just months after he and Annie split upCredit: AP
7
Ex-model Annie, pictured now, has told how she ditched Dodi when she feared he was cheating on her with Princess Diana – and now agonises over the decisionCredit: Louis Wood
“If I’d given him another chance, would things have been different? Would history have changed?
“That’s a burden of responsibility that I feel I have.”
She added: “When I last saw him, he was begging for another chance. He was crying. He was sobbing.
“He was telling me he loved me and it was incredibly hard to see him like that. I still get choked about it.”
Now 57 and living in Canterbury, Kent, she recalled: “He was incredibly tactile, loving and sweet. It was very passionate and intense.”
Annie claimed there was “definitely an overlap” with her and Diana dating playboy Dodi, who was known for his wild living and womanising.
She admitted she was initially “annoyed” when she discovered he was dating Diana — who she believes knew nothing about her — but said she is now pleased she was able to experience Dodi’s devoted love.
Of Diana, she said: “We were both very, very lucky to have been on the receiving end of that. Not many women were.”
Cocaine brick
Annie, now an author whose latest book is Menopause WTH!, spoke to The Sun ahead of Channel 5 documentary, Dodi: Last Days Of A Playboy.
The programme, in which she features, lifts the lid on Dodi’s life, from his early days in his native Egypt, to dealing with his parents’ divorce at a young age, building a career in Hollywood as a film producer and going on to date the most famous woman in the world.
Five-times-married Annie, who was scouted as a model in her early 20s, said she met Dodi in the summer of 1996 at London’s most decadent late-night haunt, Tramp nightclub.
Annie, who by then had quit modelling for public relations, recalled how he asked her friend if she would dance with him but she declined.
She said: “It was midnight and I didn’t want to be there.”
But Dodi overheard her reply and Annie said: “I remember his little face. It’s like someone had sold his dog. I felt bad for him.”
Annie recalled: “Dodi had moves. He surprised me because he looked like a wet blanket.”
She added: “He wasn’t a great conversationalist or raconteur. He was very shy.”
The first night she stayed at Dodi’s Park Lane apartment felt like a scene from the film An Officer And A Gentleman, according to Annie.
Dodi — who had attended Sandhurst, the British Army’s top officer training academy — had filled it with “beautiful military uniforms” and he held her hand as she walked down the stairs.
In the current series of Netflix drama The Crown, Dodi is seen snorting cocaine and making love to his latest girlfriend on a private jet paid for by his dad, but Annie said the reality was far less glamorous for her.
She recalls: “We would go to Harry’s Bar, he’d have the truffles, then we’d go to Tramp and go back to his place with a bunch of losers.
“I’d try and get an early night because I had to get up in the morning.
“He’d come to bed a bit later.
“We’d have a bit of hanky panky for a few hours. I’d get up at 6am and have to borrow one of his Ralph Lauren polo sweaters to wear on the walk of shame to work.”
She added sarcastically: “So yeah, it was really glamorous.”
Annie was a fan of the hit Netflix series but stopped watching before it focused on her ex’s famous relationship with Princess Diana, played by Elizabeth Debicki.
She said: “I don’t trust The Crown to have done an accurate portrayal and it’ll just annoy me.”
Annie said she decided to break off her romance with Dodi, which lasted almost a year, because she had a hunch there was another woman.
7
Annie said she discovered her ex was dating Diana when she saw pictures of them in St Tropez on the French Riviera — including the famous ‘kiss’ photoCredit: Jason Fraser
7
As the son of billionaire former Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed, Dodi had private jets and yachts at his disposalCredit: Alpha Photo Press Agency
7
Diana and Dodi relax on a speedboat during a break in St Tropez in the South of France shortly before their deaths in 1997Credit: Rex Features
She said she first suspected something was up when a trip they had planned to the US for Christmas 1996 with Bruce Willis and Demi Moore — who film producer Dodi worked with on the 1995 movie The Scarlet Letter — was cancelled.
Annie said: “We had plans to go to Colorado to spend time with Bruce and Demi. We were all set to go and we were both excited about it.
Absolutely destroyed
“The trip didn’t happen and we had words about it.”
She recalled how Dodi suddenly “changed” and “went quiet”. She added: “Obviously I knew. You can read the temperature.”
Dodi had first met Diana at a polo match in 1989, but they did not get together until his dad invited her to stay at his mansion in St Tropez in July 1997. Annie said she discovered her ex was dating Diana when she saw the pictures of them in the luxurious resort on the French Riviera — including the famous “kiss” photo.
But she believes they got together “quite a long time” before things were made public.
When she heard the news she admitted: “I was a little annoyed.”
As well as Annie, the new film hears from those closest to Dodi including British former Royal Military Police officer Lee Sansum, one of the Fayed family’s personal bodyguards, and Dodi’s personal butler of seven years, René Delorm, who lived with him and travelled the world with him.
Peter Riva, who knew Dodi from his time at an elite Swiss boarding school, also claims in the documentary he once saw Dodi carrying a “brick” of cocaine at the notorious Studio 54 nightclub in New York.
When the news came out that the Princess was dating Dodi, Annie said his wild past led her to predict a bad outcome for the relationship.
She said: “There was a sense of foreboding. I knew he was going to get crucified. Everyone she was with was going to get absolutely destroyed.
“He had a lot to hide, unfortunately. I had this real fear. And I just actually said to a friend, ‘This is not going to end well’.”
In the 90s, well-connected Annie lived a jet-set lifestyle. She was pals with the late socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson and former Miss UK Kirsty Bertarelli, who last year became Britain’s richest divorcee with a £400million settlement after splitting from her billionaire husband, Swiss biotech tycoon Ernesto Bertarelli.
Annie said: “I think I was the only one of my friends who wasn’t a Trust Fund kid. I was the only one having to get up at 6am and go to work.”
And she said ditching Dodi was a “turning point” in her life.
Annie said: “I wasn’t at all in the spotlight, but a lot of my friends like Tara Palmer-Tomkinson were, and I saw them spiralling out of control.”
She added: “It was a turning point to leave behind a lifestyle that I wasn’t enjoying. And I made the decision to live a calmer and peaceful, quieter life.”
Single Annie — who was once married to entrepreneur Gary Cardone, whose brother Grant was in US reality TV series Undercover Billionaire — said she and Dodi were not a great match — but he and Diana were.
After seeing the CCTV footage of the pair in the lift at the Ritz Hotel in Paris on that fateful night in August 1997 just before they were killed, she said she could see he was “absolutely besotted” with Diana.
While he was alive, divorced Dodi — who was married to model Suzanne Gregard for eight months in the 1980s — reportedly dated a string of famous models and actresses, including Julia Roberts, Brooke Shields and Winona Ryder.
American model Kelly Fisher was reportedly engaged to Dodi before Diana. When paparazzi photographs revealed the Princess looking cosy with Dodi on a yacht, Kelly was so outraged she sued her fiance.
Despite his playboy reputation, Annie insisted he would have stayed faithful to Diana, had they both lived.
Annie, who also runs a dog rescue Facebook group, said: “I think they would have had children, had a family, because their goals and purposes were aligned.
“I do believe, if there was The One, then Diana was his one.”
Dodi: Last Days Of A Playboy is on Channel 5 Wednesday at 9pm.
John Oliver took on the British monarchy on Sunday night ― and more specifically, why they even exist at all at this point.
And he wasn’t afraid to get personal, referring to King Charles as “a man whose face answers the question: What if two cousins had a kid?”
Oliver used the start of Charles’ reign as a chance to reevaluate the entire royal family, which is raking in big money – including a $100 million sovereign grant paid by taxpayers each year ― as ordinary Britons struggle with rising prices.
“The royal family’s wealth ― unlike its gene pool ― is massive,” Oliver said, calling them “a freeloading multimillionaire family exempt from paying most taxes.”
Over the course of a blunt segment lasting nearly half an hour, Oliver explained the history of the family, the ugly origins of the family’s “massive” wealth and how little they’ve done to atone for that past.
“They’ve continued working hard to be perceived as a mere symbol, while never taking responsibility for what that symbol excused,” he said. “All while ignoring calls for true apologies and reparations to those who suffered tremendously because of what was done in their name.”
Oliver noted that most Brits are fine keeping the royal family in place, but said even those who support them should be aware of the history.
“You don’t have to hate the royal family personally,” Oliver said near the conclusion, but then suggested: “I mean, Google ‘Prince Philip racism’ or ‘Prince Andrew everything’ and see where you land.”
Check out the full segment from HBO’s “Last Week Tonight” below:
IN 1992, Princess Diana had some of her most intimate and private thoughts shared with the world through a tape recording.
The publication of the tapes was a high point of media attention which surrounded the marriage, separation and divorce of the Prince and Princess of Wales.
1
Princess Diana’s private phone conversation with James Gilbey hit front page media in the 1990sCredit: Getty
What was Squidgygate and what happened?
Squidgygate refers to the pre-1990 telephone conversations between Diana, Princess of Wales and a close friend, James Gilbey
The two had known each other for a decade, long before Diana had met Prince Charles.
By the end of the 80s, the two were introduced, and Diana’s royal dream had long faded.
Her marriage to Prince Charles was on the rocks and since 1986 she had been having an affair with her riding instructor, James Hewitt.
What happened between James Gilbey and Diana remains a mystery, but their tapes confirmed a definite intimacy between the two.
On New Year’s Eve in 1989, Gilbey had called Diana using the cell phone in his car, according to the Independent.
Read More on Princess Diana
Several times during the conversation he called her by his affectionate nickname for her, “Squidgy.”
He also referred to her as “Squidge” or simply “darling.”
Then on August 23, 1992, The Sun published the transcript of the phone call which was the front-page revelation of the existence of the tape recording.
The tape revealed Diana exposing the Royal Family to ridicule and confirming the desperate state of her marriage to Prince Charles.
Still to this day, there are mysteries surrounding how the conversation got into the hands of the media.
One suggestion was that the call had been recorded directly from Diana’s phone and rebroadcast for someone to discover.
When did Diana and King Charles divorce?
The couple famously split in 1992 and finalised their divorce in 1996.
After Prince Harry’s birth in September 1984, the couple were said to be sleeping in separate bedrooms, and by 1986 took separate holidays.
Charles is alleged to have told his friends “how awful incompatibility is”, and by mid-1986, he is said to have rekindled his affair with Camilla.
WINDSOR Castle is one of the nation’s most iconic buildings, but it was once ravaged by flames after a fire broke out in 1992.
The incident destroyed 115 rooms and took five years to restore and is said to have “devastated” the Queen.
5
In 1992, Windsor Castle suffered a devastating fire, which caused millions of pounds of damageCredit: AP
5
Queen Elizabeth II inspects the fire damage at Windsor Castle, the day after it when up in flamesCredit: PA:Press Association
What caused the fire at Windsor Castle?
On November 20, 1992, a faulty spotlight in Queen Victoria’s Private Chapel at Windsor Castle set alight to a curtain next to the altar.
Just minutes later, the fire started spreading around the historic castle, including into St George’s Hall next door.
The fire was spotted at 11.30am and within three hours a team of 225 firefighters from seven counties were tackling the outbreak.
This involved using 36 pumps and discharging 1.5million gallons of water.
No one lost their life in the blaze, although six people suffered minor injuries.
How much of Windsor Castle was destroyed?
The fire destroyed 115 rooms, including nine State Rooms.
Thankfully, due to rewiring and other works being in progress at the time, most of the artworks and valuables had previously been moved into storage.
Prince Andrew, who unlike the Queen and Prince Philip was there at the time, organised a human chain to bring out treasures that were still in place.
They managed to save all but two pieces: A rosewood sideboard and a huge 1798 painting of George III by Sir William Beechey.
One corner of the castle — fortress of the monarchy for almost 1,000 years — had been nearly reduced to smouldering rubble.
Over the next few years the castle was restored, and the project cost £36.5 million.
Initially the work was due to be footed by the taxpayer, as Windsor Castle is owned by the Government and not the Royal Family.
However, after outcry the Queen paid 70 per cent of the restoration work and opened parts of Buckingham Palace to the public to generate income.
The official completion date was 20 November 1997, five years to the day after the outbreak of the fire.
This also corresponded with the 50th wedding anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh.
What did The Queen say about the fire at Windsor Castle?
The Queen was initially informed of the tragic news via a telephone call from Prince Andrew and was said to be devastated.
The next afternoon, she surveyed the damage, a small shocked figure in a hooded mackintosh.
Four days later, on November 24, in a speech at Guildhall marking her 40th anniversary of her accession, she referred to 1992 as her ‘Annus Horribilis’.
She said: “1992 is not a year on which I shall look back with undiluted pleasure.
“In the words of one of my more sympathetic correspondents, it has turned out to be an ‘Annus Horribilis’.”
5
Fire damage at St George’s Hall, Windsor CastleCredit: Getty
5
Interior view of Windsor Castle showing the restoration work after it was damagedCredit: Getty
5
The morning after the fire which severely damaged large sections of Windsor CastleCredit: PA
INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA: In this image released on May 2, Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex, speaks … [+] onstage during Global Citizen VAX LIVE: The Concert To Reunite The World at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. Global Citizen VAX LIVE: The Concert To Reunite The World will be broadcast on May 8, 2021. (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images for Global Citizen VAX LIVE)
Getty Images for Global Citizen VAX LIVE
The first rumors that Harry might be wanting to tone down some of his recollections in his $20-million as-told-to autobiography, Spare, surfaced in the publishing lunchrooms of Manhattan last summer, which is to say, after Harry returned from the rather grand but toned down April funeral of his grandfather, Prince Philip. It was at that funeral in Windsor that Harry came face to face with his immediate family and his larger, extended family, seeing many of them for the first time since the announcement of his upcoming book, and since he and Meghan Markle sat for their extended televised sit-down with Oprah Winfrey in the CBS /global broadcasting event in March 2021.
His grandfather’s funeral — that of a rather grand and blustery old-school patriarch — would ordinarily be an occasion for the Windsors to come together to celebrate a long, well-lived life. But the event was the opposite of that for the prince. He soldiered through it, and, though he was seen speaking with them, not a lot of his family really knew what they should do with him. There was a distinct distance and a chill that most of them kept. Kate made a notable effort to include him, and Harry and his brother walked up the hill together. But what Harry confronted, two years after moving to Canada and thence to the States, was that his strivings in Hollywood, on television, on podcasts, in speeches and in print, had had an effect back home.
The title of the his upcoming book is simple, quite blunt, and carries gravitas precisely because it deftly exploits the old rhymed cliche “an heir and a spare,” the British polity’s wry gift to the language, rooted in Cockney rhyming-slang, in assessment of their monarch’s breeding duties to ensure the stability of succession. Suffice it to say, Charles and Diana gave Britain an exact fulfillment of the cliche’s requirements. Prince Harry would likely have himself joked about and/or been robustly teased with the designation across decades, at Eton, at Sandhurst, in the Army, wherever his crew of blokes would have wanted to rag him.
But whether or not he came up with the idea of using it in this instance, the act of taking on the cutting derogation as his book title is Harry’s own move. It’s a bold one, and it dovetails nicely with what we know of the straight-spoken combat chopper pilot and his two tours in Afghanistan. The prince’s use of the word opens a cosmos of connotations, bringing weaponly swagger as well as going straight into Harry’s role as an outsider in the monarchy. There’s power in that level of ownership; this usage shows Prince Harry recognizes it. Not least, it makes deft literary and enormous marketing sense. You want a tome on a royal family from an outsider who gives his book a title like that. There could be no better or simpler flag to get the browsing masses to ask themselves this book-buying question: What could lie between the covers of that?
Seven thousand miles east of Montecito, California, the proud use of the word as a derogatory noun — along with a few other words describing the book’s narrative in the promotional jacket copy, notably, the participle “unflinching” — will have caused some concern in Buckingham Palace. To say that King Charles, Prince William, and/or their senior courtiers have been “dreading” the book is arguably an overstatement, with the possible exception of those courtiers whose direct mandates include spinning webs of positivity around any negative anecdotal flotsam coming off the book’s reviews or its drop date of January 10. Those courtiers would be well within their rights to dread the first few weeks of the British press playing hacky-sack with the thing. But the regent Charles, and the lone heir in the cliche that the book’s title so eloquently evokes, William, have a kingdom to run and with it, more productive things to do than worry about how they’re being portrayed by Harry. Harry’s given Charles, particularly, a couple of good solid years of practice. Charles can take it.
That’s not to say that the book won’t have impact. Spare will make an enormous splash, first, across America and the 54 countries of the Commonwealth, and secondly on the Continent, some of whose royal families are related to the Windsors, and whose people still look to the British royals as the preeminent noble family in Europe. Harry is particularly beloved on the Continent for his Invictus Games in service of disabled military veterans, the next installment of which will be held in Düsseldorf, Germany, a few short months after his book drops.
Ergo, the coverage will be global, and varied. We can look forward to much of the same breathless television coverage that attends Prince Harry and Meghan Markle whatever they do or wherever they go, both pro and con. Some of Prince Harry’s and Meghan Markle’s more vocal detractors in England — such as Fox broadcaster Piers Morgan, who was fired by his former network, ITV, for not publicly apologizing for expressing his opinions about Meghan Markle on air, when in fact his opinions were one big reason for his and his program’s immense popularity — will be quick off the mark, both on air and in print. More sympathetic interlocutors will be scheduled by Harry and his hardworking phalanx of publicists with certain outlets. Certainly, with Oprah Winfrey and CBS This Morning’s Gayle King being friends with the couple, those bookings will be widely awaited. This is not to mention the robust advertising campaign that the publisher will be engineering.
The point is that, no matter the platform and no matter the slant — whether it is Harry himself making an appearance on at a book-signing, Piers Morgan exploding on talkTV about Harry’s take on certain royal family events, or Tina Brown creatively doubling down upon and/or having to eat her words that the book would “never see the light of day” — Spare will be Topic A for weeks.
The security around the Spare manuscript, in whatever format, has been admirably and understandably tight thus far. Eventually, actual review copies will have to be sent out, presumably with some architecture of an embargo. With an embargo or without, at that review-copy moment, the cat’s out of the bag on Fleet Street. Some sort of leak will occur. Somebody — and there are a thousands of somebodies on both sides of the Atlantic who can be classified as parties whose commercial interests would mean that they’d be highly interested in a peek at an advance copy of Spare — will get a leak. It can be digital, it can be in manuscript form, it can be incomplete, or it can be read and simply chatted about over drinks. And that leak, in whatever form, will find its way to the people who care about it the most, namely, Fleet Street. Whether that happens this month or next will matter to Harry and his publisher, which is why security is tight, but its date of occurrence doesn’t materially affect what happens when the dam is eventually breached, which will be that the British press will kick into high gear and begin parsing Harry’s every adjective about his family. The appetite will be especially great among those actors who have axes to grind, such as the Daily Mail, or any of the publishers whom Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have sued and/or personally blacklisted from any kind of cooperation.
First serial rights, meaning, the publication of a serious extract from the book rather than quotes and/or opinions of it, can have been retained by Harry and team or can reside with the publisher. It can be assumed that they will be spectacularly sold, but it also can be that, in this special instance, they remain unexercized in favor of making the January 10 splash all that much bigger. Usually, first serial are considered, a way to recoup part of an advance, and as good advertisement for the book. But it’s unclear whether first serial would work for any periodical trying to bring a chunk of it out.
Most significantly, the production and news-stand (read: sales) time is getting short between now and January 10 for a monthly, or even for a weekly, to wade in with presumably big cash for a piece of the Spare action. That (theoretical) excerpt would have to be in the teeth of production (fact checking, copy editing and art) now, for a monthly to recoup any sales. For a weekly, the latest they would want to put it into production would be by early December. Time would be capable of performing what they call “crashing” the story into print somewhat later than that, but not many others could do it. It’s not outside the realm of possibility for anybody to do it of course, given the manpower, and it would only be entertaining if they did, but for a monthly, the editors would really have to be on their toes. It’s possible that a bright and tidy excerpt could go to one of Prince Harry’s and Meghan Markle’s few friends in print journalism. Edward Enninful, editor of British Vogue, springs to mind.
Whether first serial rights are exercised or not, it seems Harry’s book will debut on two very different stages at once. The first stage will be rather more serious, involving book review pages, critics, and that possible serialization. That will be international, but its starting point will be in New York, seat of Penguin Random House US and of many of the best periodicals in the English-speaking world. The second, far louder stage will be the book’s minute, generally hostile dissection in the UK, where Fleet Street will instantly put it through the food processor and then probe the resulting puree for any possible inaccuracy, exaggeration and/or insult to the Crown, the Queen, Charles, or William made by Harry.
For his part, Harry’s dad is a busy king. Charles has shown a remarkably fleet turn of foot since the day after his mother’s death on September 8, blasting out to seal the official transfer of the crown before the parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland, England, and the Welsh Senedd. During all that, he seamlessly led the nation in mourning from Balmoral down to Buckingham Palace and on to Westminster, where Elizabeth lay in state. Those stages of the cross included not just the grand military sendoff procession from Balmoral, in Scotland, but the Vigil of the Princes both in Scotland and in London, as well as the reception of Commonwealth and world leaders.
At each turn Charles gave short, graceful speeches, open about his own grief, taking the time to thank everyone for their moving tributes to his mother. In short, he led. It was what he was brought up to do.
GALLIPOLI, TURKEY – APRIL 25: Prince Harry chats with Prince Charles, Prince of Wales during a visit … [+] to The Nek, a narrow stretch of ridge in the Anzac battlefield on the Gallipoli Peninsula, as part of commemorations marking the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli on April 25, 2015 in Gallipoli,Turkey. Turkish and Allied powers representatives, as well as family members of those who served, are commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Gallipoli campaign with ceremonies at memorials across the Gallipoli Peninsula. The Gallipoli land campaign, in which a combined Allied force of British, French, Australian, New Zealand and Indian troops sought to occupy the Gallipoli Peninsula and the strategic Dardanelles Strait during World War I, began on April 25, 1915 against Turkish forces of the Ottoman Empire. The Allies, unable to advance more than a few kilometers, withdrew after eight months. The campaign cost the Allies approximately 50,000 killed and up to 200,000 wounded, the Ottomans approximately 85,000 killed and 160,000 wounded. (Photo by Niall Carson-Pool/Getty Images)
Getty Images
He’s limning his mother still, making the Commonwealth and parliamentary rounds, ushering Liz Truss out the door of 10 Downing and welcoming Rishi Sunak in, full of old-fashioned get-up-and-go. Nothing gets in his way. In shaping his team, he’s quietly drawing his younger siblings Edward and Anne into the day-to-day core family team in the absence of Harry. In the ultra-traditional latter-day Greek stage play that the British Royal Family present when they publicly appear, Charles’ has been a performance that perfectly communicated the thousand-year monarchy’s one basic message: Continuity. It’s going to be a fun, fit, no-nonsense reign. He lets nothing get in his way.
Not so Charles III’s younger son. Though Harry’s been back to England and to his family since he left for his “vacation” in western Canada in 2019, perhaps his most remarkable accomplishment is his thorough alienation of himself from his family, beginning with his father and brother. Harry was caught somewhat flat-footed down in London by his grandmother’s death in early September. He had refused an invitation from her to Balmoral; this was to be a charity trip for him and for Meghan Markle, including a pop over to Germany to check on Invictus preparations for next year.
When he got the summons to Balmoral, he was late getting in the air, and his grandmother died while he was en route. A lot of things both big and small shifted for Harry as his father assumed the kingship. Over the next days of the family vigils and the funeral, Harry’s “otherness” shone through, exactly as it did at his grandfather’s funeral last year. Yes, he walked with them behind Elizabeth’s caisson down the Mall. But he was faced with the fact that, in his absence, his home and his family had changed forever.
Judi Dench has criticized Netflix for not adding a disclaimer to the popular series The Crown,which she claimed is “cruelly unjust” in its portrayal of the British Royal Family.
In an open letter to The Times UK, the Oscar-winning actress wrote that the “fictionalised drama” presents “an inaccurate and hurtful account of history.”
The Crown follows the life and reign of Queen Elizabeth II, who died in September at the age of 96, having served 70 years on the throne. In the upcoming fifth season, the queen (now played by Imelda Staunton) approaches the 40th anniversary of her ascension to the throne amid troubling years for the Royal Family in the 1990s.
Story continues below advertisement
“Indeed, the closer the drama comes to our present times, the more freely it seems willing to blur the lines between historical accuracy and crude sensationalism,” wrote Dench, 87.
Fact or Fiction: Misinformation on Queen Elizabeth II can cause emotional, political shakeup, experts say
While also praising the Netflix original as “brilliant,” Dench echoed grievances made by former British Prime Minister John Major.
Major, represented as a character on Season 5 of The Crown, told The Mail on Sunday the series was “a barrel-load of malicious nonsense.”
“Sir John has not co-operated in any way with The Crown. Nor has he ever been approached by them to fact-check any script material in this or any other series,” read a statement from his office.
In the latest season of The Crown, Major (played by Jonny Lee Miller), is seen talking to Prince Charles (now King Charles) about the queen possibly abdicating.
Story continues below advertisement
“The Crown has always been presented as a drama based on historical events,” responded a Netflix spokesperson. “Series five is a fictional dramatisation, imagining what could have happened behind closed doors during a significant decade for the Royal Family – one that has already been scrutinised and well-documented by journalists, biographers and historians.”
In her open letter, Dench wrote that Major is “not alone in his concerns.”
“I fear that a significant number of viewers, particularly overseas, may take (The Crown‘s) version of history as being wholly true,” she wrote.
Dench insisted there should be a disclaimer at the beginning of every episode, despite the streaming giant’s earlier claims that they have no plan, and see no need, to add such a warning.
“No one is a greater believer in artistic freedom than I, but this cannot go unchallenged,” Dench wrote.
“The time has come for Netflix to reconsider – for the sake of a family and a nation so recently bereaved, as a mark of respect to a sovereign who served her people so dutifully for 70 years, and to preserve its reputation in the eyes of its British subscribers,” she concluded.
Dench previously played Queen Elizabeth I in Shakespeare in Love (for which she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress). She also portrayed Queen Victoria in Victoria & Abdul in 2017 and Mrs. Brown in 1997.
Season 5 of The Crown premieres on Netflix on Nov. 9. The series recently paused production “out of respect” following the queen’s death.
Queen Elizabeth II’s son Charles is Britain’s new kingCredit: Alamy
And the royal cypher ERII can be seen on passports, post boxes and police uniforms.
As Britain comes to terms with the loss and moves from the Elizabethan era into the “Carolean” — from Carolus, the Latin for Charles — we explain how this will impact the day-to-day trappings of our lives.
MONEY
THERE are 4.5billion bank notes — worth £80billion — and 29billion coins in circulation bearing the Queen’s head.
They will remain legal tender but be gradually phased out for a design chosen by the new king.
8
There are 29billion coins in circulation bearing the Queen’s headCredit: Alamy
8
Charles’ image will face left due to a 17th-century tradition that the direction must alternate for each new monarch
While the Queen’s image faces to the right, her son’s will face left due to a 17th-century tradition that the direction must alternate for each new monarch.
The Queen’s picture did not appear on notes until 1960, eight years after her ascension to the throne so it may take a while for Charles III tender to be minted.
Other nations where the Queen is head of state will phase out their money.
The Stock Exchange will close on the day of the funeral if it is declared a bank holiday.
ROYAL FLAGS
THE Queen’s personal flag — featuring a gold E with the royal crown and roses on a blue background — will no longer be used.
The Royal Standard, with English, Scottish and Irish symbols, will change if Charles adds a Welsh element. The current one was in use before Wales had its own flag.
PASSPORTS
BRITONS will still be able to use their current passports for travel — even though they are issued on behalf of Her Majesty.
The wording inside the front cover will be changed to His Majesty in all new passports which are issued, meaning the old ones will disappear over time.
STAMPS
STAMPS with the Queen’s head will remain valid until the end of January 2023, the Royal Mail has said.
In the meantime new ones will no longer be produced and designs featuring King Charles will be commissioned.
8
Stamps with the Queen’s head will remain valid until the end of January 2023Credit: Getty
8
In the meantime new ones will no longer be produced and designs featuring King Charles will be commissioned
The postal service also said the release of any special stamps, which already carry the Queen, will still go ahead but may be delayed.
When Elizabeth took the throne in 1952 a series of stamps called the Wilding Issues, featuring portraits taken by photographer Dorothy Wilding, were released within a couple of weeks of King George VI’s death.
They were used until 1971 when decimal currency was introduced.
POLICE AND MILITARY
THE Queen’s royal cypher — or monogram — on government buildings, military uniforms and police helmets will be changed.
It is likely King Charles will use CR or CRIII as his unique cypher. Her Majesty’s Armed Forces, Passport Office and Prison Service will become His Majesty’s.
ROYAL WARRANTS
GETTING a royal warrant — a seal of approval — is a big deal in business.
About 800 companies, such as Cadbury and Boots, were granted ones by the Queen.
But they will lose the right to use the royal coat of arms unless King Charles renews permission.
POST BOXES
DURING the Queen’s reign, Royal Mail marked its post boxes with ERII, which stands for Elizabeth Regina II.
This will now most likely be CRIII — Charles Rex III — but it will take a long time to replace the 115,000 boxes dotted around the UK.
Royal Mail has said post boxes already in production or due to be installed will retain the Queen’s insignia.
8
During the Queen’s reign, Royal Mail marked its post boxes with ERIICredit: Getty – Contributor
8
It stands for Elizabeth Regina IICredit: Alamy
8
This will now most likely be CRIII — Charles Rex III — but it will take a long time to replace the 115,000 boxes dotted around the UK
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. & WINDSOR, England, September 9, 2022 (Newswire.com)
– U.S. Polo Assn., the official brand of the United States Polo Association (USPA), in conjunction with the USPA and its licensing partner in the United Kingdom, Brand Machine Group (BMG), offer our deepest condolences to the entire Royal Family on the tremendous loss of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
Her Majesty The Queen lived a life of extraordinary public service and has been an iconic and illuminating figure not just in the United Kingdom but around the world. She will be remembered globally with great affection and respect for her sense of duty and commitment to her role for more than 70 years.
“U.S. Polo Assn. has been extremely fortunate to have worked with The Palace in supporting the Royal Family with their philanthropic efforts over the years,” said J. Michael Prince, President and CEO of USPA Global Licensing. “Partnering with both The Duke of Cambridge, HRH Prince William and The Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry to carry on the Queen’s philanthropic legacy through the spirit of polo has been, and will continue to be an honor and a privilege.”
The sport of polo has been part of the Royal Family’s history dating back many generations.
“The USPA is saddened to learn of the passing of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and we extend our most sincere condolences to The Royal Family,” notes Stewart Armstrong, Chairman of the United States Polo Association (USPA). “Her Majesty’s impact is both far reaching and immense. It has always been an honor to partner with The Palace on its philanthropic mission, through polo tournaments in the U.K. and the U.S., which benefit so many deserving charities.”
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was just 25 years old when she inherited the throne. She was 27 when she had her coronation ceremony, with 27 million people tuning in to the momentous occasion justin the U.K.
“Alongside the people of the U.K. and the Commonwealth, Brand Machine Group mourns the death of Her Majesty The Queen,” added Boo Jalil, CEO of U.K.-based Brand Machine Group (BMG). “Her leadership and sacrifice to duty has been unprecedented, and we thank her for her more than 70 years of service to our country.”
###
For Further Information, Contact:
Stacey Kovalsky – Senior Director, Global Communications, USPA Global Licensing Phone +001.561.790.8036 – Email: skovalsky@uspagl.com
A DNA test taken by Polly in 2004 confirmed the Earl was her father, but he denied taking the test until four years later when he admitted the truth.
His son with Melanie Cable-Alexander, Jasper William Oliver, was born on April 30, 1998.
5
Photographer Lord Snowdon was married to Princess Margaret for 18 yearsCredit: Times Newspapers Ltd
What was Lord Snowdon famous for?
Other than being married to the Queen’s only sibling, Lord Snowdon was known for his famous photos and portraits.
Educated at Eton and Cambridge, Armstrong-Jones halted plans to be an architect, choosing to become a photographer instead.
5
Lord Snowdon with a copy of his book Snowdon On StageCredit: PA:Press Association
He did that for more than 50 years, with some of his most famous work including photographs of the Royal Family at work and play, iconic images of his ex-wife Princess Margaret and the late Diana, Princess of Wales.
He was one of the first on the scene after the Aberfan disaster in 1966.
The Queen later acknowledged that she “got it wrong” when she sent Lord Snowdon there rather than visiting herself.
Lord Snowdon pictured with Queen Elizabeth IICredit: PA:Press Association
When and how did Princess Margaret die?
Princess Margaret died in 2002, aged 71, at the start of her sister’s Golden Jubilee year.
It has been rumoured she married Lord Snowdon on the “rebound” from her forbidden relationship with married Group Captain Peter Townsend.
Her lengthy romance with Roddy Llewellyn, a landscape gardener 18 years her junior, began after meeting him in Mustique.
5
Princess Margaret and Mr Anthony Armstrong-Jones at The Royal Lodge, Windsor, following their engagementCredit: Times Newspapers Ltd
The Caribbean island became the legendary scene of some wild parties hosted by the Princess, something that caused a rift between her and Lord Snowdon.
She died just seven weeks after the Queen Mother following years of illness and disability.
The royal had smoked since she was 15 years old and had to have part of her left lung removed like her father King George VI.
She died in 2002 after suffering a final stroke, with a funeral held on the 50th anniversary of her father’s death.
Lord Snowdon, Princess Margaret’s former husband, has died aged 86