ReportWire

Tag: risk

  • What Does The Year Of The Fire Horse Hold

    [ad_1]

    What does the year of the Fire Horse hold for love, money and career? Discover how this powerful zodiac sign signals bold change, high energy and unexpected opportunity.

    Every year, millions of people check the Chinese zodiac the way others check their horoscope, wondering if the cosmos plans to hand them a trophy or a lesson. When the Year of the Fire Horse arrives, it does not tiptoe in politely. It kicks the door open, rearranges the furniture, and asks if you are ready to run. What does the year of the Fire Horse hold for you?

    In the Chinese zodiac, the Horse symbolizes movement, independence, charisma and raw energy. Add the Fire element and you turn that galloping force into a blaze. Fire amplifies everything it touches. It fuels ambition, heightens emotions and accelerates change. If the standard Horse year is a spirited sprint, the Year of the Fire Horse is a full-throttle charge.

    RELATED: Why Anxiety Feels Worse Than Ever

    Historically, Fire Horse years are associated with intensity and transformation. The last one, 1966, coincided with dramatic global cultural shifts. That does not mean history repeats itself on schedule, but it does hint at a pattern. Fire Horse energy favors bold decisions over cautious committee meetings. It rewards risk-takers, entrepreneurs and people willing to pivot quickly.

    For careers and business, the Year of the Fire Horse often favors innovation. Stagnant projects may suddenly feel unbearable. Professionals who have quietly plotted their next move may finally leap. Markets can feel volatile, but volatility also creates opportunity. Industries tied to technology, media, travel and entertainment often resonate with Horse energy because they thrive on motion and visibility.

    Financially, this is not typically a year for timid savings strategies alone. The Fire Horse encourages calculated risk, not reckless gambling. There is a difference, and yes, the universe expects you to know it. Investments aligning with emerging trends may outperform, while outdated models struggle to keep pace.

    In relationships, the Fire Horse can be passionate and impulsive. Romance may feel cinematic, with dramatic declarations and whirlwind connections. The flip side is tempers can flare just as quickly. Communication becomes essential. The Fire element heightens emotion, so thoughtful words matter more than usual. For couples, this can be a year of reigniting excitement or confronting issues which have been simmering beneath the surface.

    On a personal level, the Year of the Fire Horse favors self-expression. Creative projects, personal reinventions and physical movement all align with its energy. Travel plans may materialize unexpectedly. Many people feel an urge to break routine, whether it means changing careers, relocating or finally starting the side project they have been talking about for years.

    RELATED: Is CBD Next On The Fed’s Hit List

    However, there is a cautionary note. Fire burns. Burnout is a real risk during a Fire Horse year. The same drive fueling achievement can also exhaust. Rest, reflection and moderation are not signs of weakness. They are survival skills.

    Ultimately, what does the Year of the Fire Horse hold? Momentum. Change. Opportunity wrapped in adrenaline. It is a year rewarding courage and punishing complacency. If you have been waiting for a cosmic nudge, this is more like a cosmic shove. The question is not whether the energy will move. It is whether you are willing and able to move with it.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Johns

    Source link

  • How Lindsey Vonn can compete with a ruptured ACL

    [ad_1]

    Lindsey Vonn wiped out in a downhill race on Jan. 30. She got up limping, then was airlifted from the course. The diagnosis: a ruptured ACL — a season-ending injury for most.But the three-time Olympic medalist announced on Tuesday she would go on to compete in her fifth Games.On Friday, she completed her downhill training run without issue at the Tofane Alpine Skiing Centre ahead of Sunday’s medal event in Cortina d’Ampezzo.Video above: U.S. Skiers talk about Lindsey Vonn competing in Italy Olympics despite torn ACLFor anyone who’s hobbled off the field, it’s hard not to ask: How?“It is a big deal to tear your ACL,” said Lindsey Lepley, an associate professor of athletic training at the University of Michigan. “And doing anything while being ACL-deficient is a big deal.”Vonn, 41, who is set to be the oldest Alpine skier to race at a Winter Olympics, has an extensive history of knee injuries and surgeries, including two prior ACL injuries. Dr. Martin Roche, a surgeon at the Hospital for Special Surgery, says Vonn’s first injuries date back to the beginning of her professional career in the 2000s.She’s had problems with both knees, but her left was the “stronger” one, according to Roche, who performed a partial knee replacement on the Olympian’s right knee in 2024. After Friday’s crash, her left knee is now injured — a new turn in Vonn’s long injury saga.What is the ACL and why is it important?The ACL — also known as the anterior cruciate ligament — is a ligament that connects the bones of the knee, stabilizing the joint and preventing one bone from sliding in front of the other.“The knee is not a joint that is completely stable,” Dr. Anthony Petrosini, an orthopedic surgeon at Hackensack Meridian Health, said. “The ligaments play a great role in keeping the knee in position.”Petrosini, who has torn his own ACL, says the structure is easily injured because it has a hefty responsibility in controlling the knee’s rotational stability. It’s the most common knee injury, affecting more than 200,000 people per year in the United States.Weight-bearing and high-speed activities, particularly those involving sudden twists and stops, place the greatest burden on the ACL.And skiing fits that bill. It’s among the highest-risk sports for ACL injuries. Vonn’s sex and prior injuries further increase that risk.When injured, the ACL can be partially torn, also known as a tear, or fully separated, referred to as a rupture. The terms are frequently used interchangeably, as Vonn did on Tuesday.What happens when the ACL is injured?A jolt of pain is felt when the ACL is first injured. Some people also feel a pop or instability in the knee. Fluid then accumulates in the joint, causing swelling and stiffness. The inflammatory response can also cause a locking sensation and reduced range of motion.For many, that means trouble standing on the injured knee and continued pain.The structures above the knee also feel the pain. Lepley studies how muscles of the upper leg shut down after a knee injury — a process called muscle inhibition.“It’s sort of this unique forgetfulness that happens between the brain and the muscle,” Lepley said.The injury also travels up to the brain, triggering a fear response. “People are going to have fear of re‑injury,” Lepley explained, noting the psychological component can cause someone to change movement patterns.That’s why, Lepley says, Vonn was likely performing box jumps after the injury. “They’re sort of testing that fear,” Lepley said, noting the exercises can also help fight off muscle inhibition. “If you can’t jump and stabilize yourself on solid ground, that’s a good indication that somebody has too much hesitation.”In a video posted on Instagram on Thursday, a day before her completed training run, Vonn squats with weights, lunges from side to side and does fast kicks against a ball.How to treat an injured ACLOnce the ACL is torn, it doesn’t regenerate in the same way that bone does. “Unfortunately, we’re not like lizards,” Lepley said.Most people undergo surgery to reconstruct the ligament, and nearly all athletes get the procedure after the injury, according to Roche.While a surgical approach doesn’t speed up recovery time, it can stabilize the knee, reduce the risk of further injury and allow for return to high-demanding activities like skiing. Some data suggests surgery can also reduce the risk of osteoarthritis — a common long-term concern after ACL injury — though the evidence is conflicting.Regardless of whether someone has surgery, months of rehab are standard. Those who don’t opt for surgery stick to pain control and rehab, learning to live without a functioning ACL.Vonn said on Tuesday that surgery “hasn’t been discussed.”“It’s not really on my radar screen right now. The Olympics are the only thing that I’m thinking about,” she said. “We’re doing everything to make sure I am making smart and safe decisions.”Has anyone ever skied on an injured ACL?Yes, some of Vonn’s teammates said they’ve done it. Other skiers, like Slovakian Veronika Velez-Zuzulová have done it, too. And Vonn says she’s done it before.“It’s possible,” Roche said. But other parts of the leg need to compensate.“When that ligament is gone, your muscles have to step up to help stabilize the joint,” Lepley said.All the experts CNN spoke with emphasized that an immediate return to competition is far from the norm — and not recommended. Far more often, athletes do the opposite. Hitting the slopes would expose Vonn to substantial risk of further injury.Plus, there was more to her injury. She also reported bone bruising and meniscal damage, both common companions to ACL injuries. These additional injuries raise the risk further, making her return to racing even more dangerous. The good news, though, is that Vonn didn’t report any significant bone fractures, Roche said.Roche, who knows Vonn’s medical history well, says it comes down to the athlete.“She knows her body better than anyone,” Roche said. “She’ll be able to determine if she can overcome any injury to her knee quickly or if it’s going to set her back.”What to watch for when Vonn returns for fresh powderVonn is set to begin racing on Sunday.“I don’t think she’s going to be able to perform at 100%,” Lepley said. “But I think she’s going to be able to make the best of a bad situation.”Parts of the course that put more stress on one knee could be especially risky. Lepley says the Olympian might lack symmetry as she compensates.The biggest concern is Vonn’s meniscus, which acts as a shock absorber and helps the knee move smoothly. Without a functioning ACL, the structure is more vulnerable and, if injured, it’s notoriously difficult to heal.At the finish line, three things will matter most, Lepley says: a medical exam to check for any additional damage, close monitoring of pain and swelling and a renewed focus on restoring normal motion and walking. And if her knees are on her side, a medal.“She’s in good hands,” Petrosini said. “To be able to pull off what she’s attempting is really remarkable.”

    Lindsey Vonn wiped out in a downhill race on Jan. 30. She got up limping, then was airlifted from the course. The diagnosis: a ruptured ACL — a season-ending injury for most.

    But the three-time Olympic medalist announced on Tuesday she would go on to compete in her fifth Games.

    On Friday, she completed her downhill training run without issue at the Tofane Alpine Skiing Centre ahead of Sunday’s medal event in Cortina d’Ampezzo.

    Video above: U.S. Skiers talk about Lindsey Vonn competing in Italy Olympics despite torn ACL

    For anyone who’s hobbled off the field, it’s hard not to ask: How?

    “It is a big deal to tear your ACL,” said Lindsey Lepley, an associate professor of athletic training at the University of Michigan. “And doing anything while being ACL-deficient is a big deal.”

    Vonn, 41, who is set to be the oldest Alpine skier to race at a Winter Olympics, has an extensive history of knee injuries and surgeries, including two prior ACL injuries. Dr. Martin Roche, a surgeon at the Hospital for Special Surgery, says Vonn’s first injuries date back to the beginning of her professional career in the 2000s.

    She’s had problems with both knees, but her left was the “stronger” one, according to Roche, who performed a partial knee replacement on the Olympian’s right knee in 2024. After Friday’s crash, her left knee is now injured — a new turn in Vonn’s long injury saga.

    What is the ACL and why is it important?

    The ACL — also known as the anterior cruciate ligament — is a ligament that connects the bones of the knee, stabilizing the joint and preventing one bone from sliding in front of the other.

    “The knee is not a joint that is completely stable,” Dr. Anthony Petrosini, an orthopedic surgeon at Hackensack Meridian Health, said. “The ligaments play a great role in keeping the knee in position.”

    Petrosini, who has torn his own ACL, says the structure is easily injured because it has a hefty responsibility in controlling the knee’s rotational stability. It’s the most common knee injury, affecting more than 200,000 people per year in the United States.

    Weight-bearing and high-speed activities, particularly those involving sudden twists and stops, place the greatest burden on the ACL.

    And skiing fits that bill. It’s among the highest-risk sports for ACL injuries. Vonn’s sex and prior injuries further increase that risk.

    When injured, the ACL can be partially torn, also known as a tear, or fully separated, referred to as a rupture. The terms are frequently used interchangeably, as Vonn did on Tuesday.

    What happens when the ACL is injured?

    A jolt of pain is felt when the ACL is first injured. Some people also feel a pop or instability in the knee. Fluid then accumulates in the joint, causing swelling and stiffness. The inflammatory response can also cause a locking sensation and reduced range of motion.

    For many, that means trouble standing on the injured knee and continued pain.

    The structures above the knee also feel the pain. Lepley studies how muscles of the upper leg shut down after a knee injury — a process called muscle inhibition.

    “It’s sort of this unique forgetfulness that happens between the brain and the muscle,” Lepley said.

    The injury also travels up to the brain, triggering a fear response. “People are going to have fear of re‑injury,” Lepley explained, noting the psychological component can cause someone to change movement patterns.

    That’s why, Lepley says, Vonn was likely performing box jumps after the injury. “They’re sort of testing that fear,” Lepley said, noting the exercises can also help fight off muscle inhibition. “If you can’t jump and stabilize yourself on solid ground, that’s a good indication that somebody has too much hesitation.”

    In a video posted on Instagram on Thursday, a day before her completed training run, Vonn squats with weights, lunges from side to side and does fast kicks against a ball.

    How to treat an injured ACL

    Once the ACL is torn, it doesn’t regenerate in the same way that bone does. “Unfortunately, we’re not like lizards,” Lepley said.

    Most people undergo surgery to reconstruct the ligament, and nearly all athletes get the procedure after the injury, according to Roche.

    While a surgical approach doesn’t speed up recovery time, it can stabilize the knee, reduce the risk of further injury and allow for return to high-demanding activities like skiing. Some data suggests surgery can also reduce the risk of osteoarthritis — a common long-term concern after ACL injury — though the evidence is conflicting.

    Regardless of whether someone has surgery, months of rehab are standard. Those who don’t opt for surgery stick to pain control and rehab, learning to live without a functioning ACL.

    Vonn said on Tuesday that surgery “hasn’t been discussed.”

    “It’s not really on my radar screen right now. The Olympics are the only thing that I’m thinking about,” she said. “We’re doing everything to make sure I am making smart and safe decisions.”

    Has anyone ever skied on an injured ACL?

    Yes, some of Vonn’s teammates said they’ve done it. Other skiers, like Slovakian Veronika Velez-Zuzulová have done it, too. And Vonn says she’s done it before.

    “It’s possible,” Roche said. But other parts of the leg need to compensate.

    “When that ligament is gone, your muscles have to step up to help stabilize the joint,” Lepley said.

    All the experts CNN spoke with emphasized that an immediate return to competition is far from the norm — and not recommended. Far more often, athletes do the opposite. Hitting the slopes would expose Vonn to substantial risk of further injury.

    Plus, there was more to her injury. She also reported bone bruising and meniscal damage, both common companions to ACL injuries. These additional injuries raise the risk further, making her return to racing even more dangerous. The good news, though, is that Vonn didn’t report any significant bone fractures, Roche said.

    Roche, who knows Vonn’s medical history well, says it comes down to the athlete.

    “She knows her body better than anyone,” Roche said. “She’ll be able to determine if she can overcome any injury to her knee quickly or if it’s going to set her back.”

    What to watch for when Vonn returns for fresh powder

    Vonn is set to begin racing on Sunday.

    “I don’t think she’s going to be able to perform at 100%,” Lepley said. “But I think she’s going to be able to make the best of a bad situation.”

    Parts of the course that put more stress on one knee could be especially risky. Lepley says the Olympian might lack symmetry as she compensates.

    The biggest concern is Vonn’s meniscus, which acts as a shock absorber and helps the knee move smoothly. Without a functioning ACL, the structure is more vulnerable and, if injured, it’s notoriously difficult to heal.

    At the finish line, three things will matter most, Lepley says: a medical exam to check for any additional damage, close monitoring of pain and swelling and a renewed focus on restoring normal motion and walking. And if her knees are on her side, a medal.

    “She’s in good hands,” Petrosini said. “To be able to pull off what she’s attempting is really remarkable.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Analysts warn that Iran crisis carries potential nuclear risks

    [ad_1]

    In the wake of spiraling tensions between the United States and Iran over Tehran’s violent crackdown on protests, analysts warn that the internal upheaval affecting the Iranian theocracy could carry nuclear proliferation risks.While in recent days U.S. President Donald Trump seemed to have backed away from a military strike on Iran, he called Saturday for an end to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s nearly 40-year reign in Iran. Trump’s comments came in response to Khamenei branding Trump a “criminal” for supporting protesters in Iran, and blamed demonstrators for causing thousands of deaths.Meanwhile, a U.S. aircraft carrier, which days earlier had been in the South China Sea, passed Singapore overnight to enter the Strait of Malacca — putting it on a route that could bring it to the Middle East.With those dangers, analysts warn Iran’s nuclear material could be at risk as well.Nuclear material could fall into the wrong handsDavid Albright, a former nuclear weapons inspector in Iraq and founder of the nonprofit Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, said that in a scenario of internal chaos in Iran, the government could “lose the ability to protect its nuclear assets.”He said that Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile “would be the most worrisome,” adding that there is a possibility that someone could steal some of this material.There are historical precedents for such a scenario.Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, highly enriched uranium and plutonium suitable for building nuclear bombs went missing due to eroded security and weakened protection of these assets.So far, Iran has maintained control of its sites, even after the U.S. bombed them in the 12-day war in June that Israel launched against the Islamic Republic.Iran maintains a stockpile of 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Vienna-based U.N. nuclear watchdog.The agency said in a report last November that it has not been able to verify the status and location of this highly enriched uranium stockpile since the war in June.The agency said in November that therefore it had lost “continuity of knowledge in relation to the previously declared inventories of nuclear material in Iran” at facilities affected by the war.A diplomat close to the IAEA confirmed Monday that the agency had still not received any information from Iran on the status or whereabouts of the highly enriched uranium stockpile. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity in line with diplomatic protocol.Albright said that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium would fit in around 18 to 20 cylinders that are designed for transport, weighing around 50 kilograms (110 pounds) each when full. “Two people can easily carry it,” he said of each container.Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Washington-based Arms Control Association, said that there is a risk that the stockpile “could be diverted either to a covert program or stolen by a faction of the government or the military that wanted to retain the option of weaponization.”She said that this risk increases as the Iranian government feels threatened or gets destabilized.Some of the nuclear material could get smuggled out of Iran or sold to non-state actors in the event of internal chaos or potential government collapse, Davenport said.“The risk is real but it is difficult to assess, given the unknowns regarding the status of the materials and the whereabouts,” she stressed.Possibility of Iran building a nuclear bombBoth Davenport and Albright pointed out that there is also a theoretical possibility of making nuclear bombs with Iran’s 60% enriched uranium. Tehran has insisted for years its program is peaceful.However, a weapon made directly from 60% enriched uranium rather than the usual 90% purity requires more nuclear material, which makes it “much bigger and bulkier and probably not well suited to delivery” on a missile, said Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence analyst and now deputy vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative.He added that such a device could still be “blown up in the desert,” for example.Brewer said that the possibility that the current government in Iran goes down that road should not be “totally dismissed,” but he underlined that most information suggests that the highly enriched uranium “remains buried in a tunnel as a result of the U.S. strikes and is probably not easily accessible to the regime; at least not with some major risk of detection and another strike by the U.S. or Israel.”He added that recent events “have also shown that the Supreme Leader has a very high bar for any decision to weaponize.”Nuclear power reactor could be a targetIn the case of internal chaos, Iran’s nuclear power reactor in Bushehr — Iran’s only commercial nuclear power plant some 465 miles south of Tehran — could also get sabotaged or targeted with the aim of causing havoc or making a political point, Albright said. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran.So far, there has been no sign of Iran losing command and control of its security forces.Albright pointed to the attack by the African National Congress’s armed wing on South Africa’s Koeberg Nuclear Power Station near Cape Town, as the country went through increased anti-apartheid resistance in 1982. The act of sabotage caused significant damage but resulted in no nuclear fallout.“If the Bushehr reactor has a major accident, the winds would carry the fallout within 12 to 15 hours to the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Oman,” Albright said.

    In the wake of spiraling tensions between the United States and Iran over Tehran’s violent crackdown on protests, analysts warn that the internal upheaval affecting the Iranian theocracy could carry nuclear proliferation risks.

    While in recent days U.S. President Donald Trump seemed to have backed away from a military strike on Iran, he called Saturday for an end to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s nearly 40-year reign in Iran. Trump’s comments came in response to Khamenei branding Trump a “criminal” for supporting protesters in Iran, and blamed demonstrators for causing thousands of deaths.

    Meanwhile, a U.S. aircraft carrier, which days earlier had been in the South China Sea, passed Singapore overnight to enter the Strait of Malacca — putting it on a route that could bring it to the Middle East.

    With those dangers, analysts warn Iran’s nuclear material could be at risk as well.

    Nuclear material could fall into the wrong hands

    David Albright, a former nuclear weapons inspector in Iraq and founder of the nonprofit Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, said that in a scenario of internal chaos in Iran, the government could “lose the ability to protect its nuclear assets.”

    He said that Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile “would be the most worrisome,” adding that there is a possibility that someone could steal some of this material.

    There are historical precedents for such a scenario.

    Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, highly enriched uranium and plutonium suitable for building nuclear bombs went missing due to eroded security and weakened protection of these assets.

    So far, Iran has maintained control of its sites, even after the U.S. bombed them in the 12-day war in June that Israel launched against the Islamic Republic.

    Iran maintains a stockpile of 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Vienna-based U.N. nuclear watchdog.

    The agency said in a report last November that it has not been able to verify the status and location of this highly enriched uranium stockpile since the war in June.

    The agency said in November that therefore it had lost “continuity of knowledge in relation to the previously declared inventories of nuclear material in Iran” at facilities affected by the war.

    A diplomat close to the IAEA confirmed Monday that the agency had still not received any information from Iran on the status or whereabouts of the highly enriched uranium stockpile. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity in line with diplomatic protocol.

    Albright said that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium would fit in around 18 to 20 cylinders that are designed for transport, weighing around 50 kilograms (110 pounds) each when full. “Two people can easily carry it,” he said of each container.

    Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Washington-based Arms Control Association, said that there is a risk that the stockpile “could be diverted either to a covert program or stolen by a faction of the government or the military that wanted to retain the option of weaponization.”

    She said that this risk increases as the Iranian government feels threatened or gets destabilized.

    Some of the nuclear material could get smuggled out of Iran or sold to non-state actors in the event of internal chaos or potential government collapse, Davenport said.

    “The risk is real but it is difficult to assess, given the unknowns regarding the status of the materials and the whereabouts,” she stressed.

    Possibility of Iran building a nuclear bomb

    Both Davenport and Albright pointed out that there is also a theoretical possibility of making nuclear bombs with Iran’s 60% enriched uranium. Tehran has insisted for years its program is peaceful.

    However, a weapon made directly from 60% enriched uranium rather than the usual 90% purity requires more nuclear material, which makes it “much bigger and bulkier and probably not well suited to delivery” on a missile, said Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence analyst and now deputy vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative.

    He added that such a device could still be “blown up in the desert,” for example.

    Brewer said that the possibility that the current government in Iran goes down that road should not be “totally dismissed,” but he underlined that most information suggests that the highly enriched uranium “remains buried in a tunnel as a result of the U.S. strikes and is probably not easily accessible to the regime; at least not with some major risk of detection and another strike by the U.S. or Israel.”

    He added that recent events “have also shown that the Supreme Leader has a very high bar for any decision to weaponize.”

    Nuclear power reactor could be a target

    In the case of internal chaos, Iran’s nuclear power reactor in Bushehr — Iran’s only commercial nuclear power plant some 465 miles south of Tehran — could also get sabotaged or targeted with the aim of causing havoc or making a political point, Albright said. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran.

    So far, there has been no sign of Iran losing command and control of its security forces.

    Albright pointed to the attack by the African National Congress’s armed wing on South Africa’s Koeberg Nuclear Power Station near Cape Town, as the country went through increased anti-apartheid resistance in 1982. The act of sabotage caused significant damage but resulted in no nuclear fallout.

    “If the Bushehr reactor has a major accident, the winds would carry the fallout within 12 to 15 hours to the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Oman,” Albright said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New research bolsters evidence that Tylenol doesn’t raise the risk of autism despite Trump’s claims

    [ad_1]

    A new review of studies has found that taking Tylenol during pregnancy doesn’t increase the risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disabilities — adding to the growing body of research refuting claims made by the Trump administration.President Donald Trump last year promoted unproven ties between the painkiller and autism, telling pregnant women: “Don’t take Tylenol.”Related video above — Stop Overpaying for Meds: Smart Ways to Cut Prescription CostsThe latest research review, published Friday in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women’s Health, looked at 43 studies and concluded that the most rigorous ones, such as those that compare siblings, provide strong evidence that taking the drug commonly known as paracetamol outside of the U.S. does not cause autism, ADHD or intellectual disabilities.It’s “safe to use in pregnancy,” said lead author Dr. Asma Khalil. “It remains … the first line of treatment that we would recommend if the pregnant woman has pain or fever.”While some studies have raised the possibility of a link between autism risk and using Tylenol, also known as acetaminophen, during pregnancy, more haven’t found a connection.A review published last year in BMJ said existing evidence doesn’t clearly link the drug’s use during pregnancy with autism or ADHD in offspring. A study published the previous year in the Journal of the American Medical Association also found it wasn’t associated with children’s risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disability in an analysis looking at siblings.But the White House has focused on research supporting a link.One of the papers cited on its web page, published in BMC Environmental Health last year, analyzed results from 46 previous studies and found that they supported evidence of an association between Tylenol exposure during pregnancy and increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders. Researchers noted that the drug is still important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, but said steps should be taken to limit its use.Some health experts have raised concerns about that review and the way Trump administration officials portrayed it, pointing out that only a fraction of the studies focus on autism and that an association doesn’t prove cause and effect. Khalil, a fetal medicine specialist at St. George’s Hospital, London, said that review included some studies that were small and some that were prone to bias.The senior author of that review was Dr. Andrea Baccarelli, dean of the faculty at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who noted in the paper that he served as an expert witness for plaintiffs in a case involving potential links between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Baccarelli did not respond to an email seeking comment on his study.Overall, Khalil said, research cited in the public debate showing small associations between acetaminophen and autism is vulnerable to confounding factors. For example, a pregnant woman might take Tylenol for fevers, and fever during pregnancy may raise the risk for autism. Research can also be affected by “recall bias,” such as when the mother of an autistic child doesn’t accurately remember how much of the drug she used during pregnancy after the fact, Khalil said.When researchers prioritize the most rigorous study approaches – such as comparing siblings to account for the influence of things like genetics – “the association is not seen,” she said.Genetics are the biggest risk factor for autism, experts say. Other risks include the age of the child’s father, preterm birth and whether the mother had health problems during pregnancy.In a commentary published with the latest review, a group of researchers who weren’t involved — from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado and elsewhere —cautioned that discouraging the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy could lead to inadequate pain or fever control. And that may hurt the baby as well as the mother. Untreated fever and infection in a pregnant woman poses “well-established risks to fetal survival and neurodevelopment,” they said.The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    A new review of studies has found that taking Tylenol during pregnancy doesn’t increase the risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disabilities — adding to the growing body of research refuting claims made by the Trump administration.

    President Donald Trump last year promoted unproven ties between the painkiller and autism, telling pregnant women: “Don’t take Tylenol.”

    Related video above — Stop Overpaying for Meds: Smart Ways to Cut Prescription Costs

    The latest research review, published Friday in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women’s Health, looked at 43 studies and concluded that the most rigorous ones, such as those that compare siblings, provide strong evidence that taking the drug commonly known as paracetamol outside of the U.S. does not cause autism, ADHD or intellectual disabilities.

    It’s “safe to use in pregnancy,” said lead author Dr. Asma Khalil. “It remains … the first line of treatment that we would recommend if the pregnant woman has pain or fever.”

    While some studies have raised the possibility of a link between autism risk and using Tylenol, also known as acetaminophen, during pregnancy, more haven’t found a connection.

    A review published last year in BMJ said existing evidence doesn’t clearly link the drug’s use during pregnancy with autism or ADHD in offspring. A study published the previous year in the Journal of the American Medical Association also found it wasn’t associated with children’s risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disability in an analysis looking at siblings.

    But the White House has focused on research supporting a link.

    One of the papers cited on its web page, published in BMC Environmental Health last year, analyzed results from 46 previous studies and found that they supported evidence of an association between Tylenol exposure during pregnancy and increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders. Researchers noted that the drug is still important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, but said steps should be taken to limit its use.

    Some health experts have raised concerns about that review and the way Trump administration officials portrayed it, pointing out that only a fraction of the studies focus on autism and that an association doesn’t prove cause and effect. Khalil, a fetal medicine specialist at St. George’s Hospital, London, said that review included some studies that were small and some that were prone to bias.

    The senior author of that review was Dr. Andrea Baccarelli, dean of the faculty at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who noted in the paper that he served as an expert witness for plaintiffs in a case involving potential links between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Baccarelli did not respond to an email seeking comment on his study.

    Overall, Khalil said, research cited in the public debate showing small associations between acetaminophen and autism is vulnerable to confounding factors. For example, a pregnant woman might take Tylenol for fevers, and fever during pregnancy may raise the risk for autism. Research can also be affected by “recall bias,” such as when the mother of an autistic child doesn’t accurately remember how much of the drug she used during pregnancy after the fact, Khalil said.

    When researchers prioritize the most rigorous study approaches – such as comparing siblings to account for the influence of things like genetics – “the association is not seen,” she said.

    Genetics are the biggest risk factor for autism, experts say. Other risks include the age of the child’s father, preterm birth and whether the mother had health problems during pregnancy.

    In a commentary published with the latest review, a group of researchers who weren’t involved — from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado and elsewhere —cautioned that discouraging the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy could lead to inadequate pain or fever control. And that may hurt the baby as well as the mother. Untreated fever and infection in a pregnant woman poses “well-established risks to fetal survival and neurodevelopment,” they said.


    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How AI could have prevented 700Credit’s data breach

    [ad_1]

    Data breaches made headlines in 2025 in health care, manufacturing, technology, retail and financial services but AI can play a role in preventing them.  In 2025, data breach costs in financial services reached $5.56 million, according to DeepStrike’s recent “Data breach statistics 2025: Costs, causes, trends and insights” report. The report also offered these causes behind breaches:  Stolen credentials;  Phishing;  Exploitation;  Supply chain compromise;  Ransomware; and  Shadow AI.  […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • What the Trump administration’s hepatitis B vaccine rollback means for California

    [ad_1]

    For most American infants, the hepatitis B shot comes just before their first bath, in the blur of pokes, prods and pictures that attend a 21st century hospital delivery.

    But as of this week, thousands of newborns across the U.S. will no longer receive the initial inoculation for hepatitis B — the first in a litany of childhood vaccinations and the top defense against one of the world’s deadliest cancers.

    On Dec. 5, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s powerful vaccine advisory panel voted to nix the decades-old birth-dose recommendation.

    The change was pushed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his “Make America Healthy Again” movement, which has long sought to rewrite the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule and unwind state immunization requirements for kindergarten.

    California officials have vowed to keep the state’s current guidelines in place, but the federal changes could threaten vaccine coverage by some insurers and public benefits programs, along with broader reverberations.

    “It’s a gateway,” said Jessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious disease epidemiologist in Los Angeles. “It’s not just hepatitis B — it’s chipping away at the entire schedule.”

    Democratic-led states and blue-chip insurance companies have scrambled to shore up access. California joined Hawaii, Oregon and Washington in forming the West Coast Health Alliance to maintain uniform public policy on vaccines in the face of official “mis- and dis-information.”

    “Universal hepatitis B vaccinations at birth save lives, and walking away from this science is reckless,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “The Trump administration’s ideological politics continue to drive increasingly high costs — for parents, for newborns, and for our entire public-health system.”

    The issue is also already tied up in court.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court sent a lawsuit over New York’s vaccine rules back to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for review, signaling skepticism about the stringent shots-for-school requirements pioneered in California. On Friday, public health officials in Florida appeared poised to ax their schools’ hepatitis B immunization requirement, along with shots for chickenpox, a dozen strains of bacterial pneumonia and the longtime leading cause of deadly meningitis.

    Boosters of the hep B change said it replaces impersonal prescriptions with “shared clinical decision-making” about whether and how to vaccinate, while preserving the more stringent recommendation for children of infected mothers and those whose status is unknown.

    Critics say families were always free to decline the vaccine, as about 20% did nationwide in 2020, according to data published by the CDC. It’s the only shot on the schedule that children on Medicaid receive at the same rate as those with private insurance.

    Rather than improve informed consent, critics say the CDC committee’s decision and the splashy public fight leading up to it have depressed vaccination rates, even among children of infected mothers.

    “Hepatitis B is the most vulnerable vaccine in the schedule,” said Dr. Chari Cohen, president of the Hepatitis B Foundation. “The message we’re hearing from pediatricians and gynecologists is parents are making it clear that they don’t want their baby to get the birth dose, they don’t want their baby to get the vaccine.”

    Much of that vulnerability has to do with timing: The first dose is given within hours of birth, while symptoms of the disease might not show up for decades.

    “The whole Day One thing really messes with people,” Rivera said. “They think, ‘This is my perfect fresh baby and I don’t want to put anything inside of them.’ ”

    U.S. surgeon general nominee Casey Means called the universal birth dose recommendation “absolute insanity,” saying in a post on X last year that it should “make every American pause and question the healthcare system’s mandates.”

    “The disease is transmitted through needles and sex exclusively,” she said. “There is no benefit to the baby or the wider population for a child to get this vaccine who is not at risk for sexual or IV transmission. There is only risk.”

    In fact, at least half of transmission occurs from mother to child, typically at birth. A smaller percentage of babies get the disease by sharing food, nail clippers or other common household items with their fathers, grandparents or day-care teachers. Because infections are often asymptomatic, most don’t know they have the virus, and at least 15% of pregnant women in the U.S. aren’t tested for the disease, experts said.

    Infants who contract hepatitis B are overwhelmingly likely to develop chronic hepatitis, leading to liver cancer or cirrhosis in midlife. The vaccine, by contrast, is far less likely than those for flu or chickenpox to cause even minor reactions, such as fever.

    “We’ve given 50 billion doses of the hepatitis B vaccine and we’ve not seen signals that make us concerned,” said Dr. Su Wang, medical director of Viral Hepatitis Programs and the Center for Asian Health at the Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center in New Jersey, who lives with the disease.

    Still, “sex and drugs” remains a popular talking point, not only with Kennedy allies in Washington and Atlanta, but among many prominent Los Angeles pediatricians.

    “It sets up on Day One this mentality of, ‘I don’t necessarily agree with this, so what else do I not agree with?’” said Dr. Joel Warsh, a Studio City pediatrician and MAHA luminary, whose recent book “Between a Shot and a Hard Place” is aimed at vaccine-hesitant families.

    Hepatitis B also disproportionately affects immigrant communities, further stigmatizing an illness that first entered the mainstream consciousness as an early proxy for HIV infection in the 1980s, before it was fully understood.

    At the committee meeting last week, member Dr. Evelyn Griffin called illegal immigration the “elephant in the room” in the birth dose debate.

    The move comes as post-pandemic wellness culture has supercharged vaccine hesitancy, expanding objections from a long-debunked link between the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism to a more generalized, equally false belief that “healthy” children who eat whole foods and play outside are unlikely to get sick from vaccine-preventable diseases and, if they do, can be treated with “natural” remedies such as beef tallow and cod liver oil.

    “It’s about your quality of life, it’s about what you put in your body, it’s about your wellness journey — we have debunked this before,” Rivera said. “This is eugenics.”

    Across Southern California, pediatricians, preschool teachers and public health experts say they’ve seen a surge in families seeking to prune certain shots from the schedule and many delay others based on “individualized risk.” The trend has spawned a cottage industry of e-books, Zoom workshops by “vaccine friendly” doctors offering alternative schedules, bespoke inoculations and post-vaccine detox regimens.

    CDC data show state exemptions for kindergarten vaccines have surged since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, with about 5% of schoolchildren in Georgia, Florida and Ohio, more than 6% in Pennsylvania and nearly 7% in Michigan waved out of the requirement last year.

    In Alaska and Arizona, those numbers topped 9%. In Idaho, 1 in 6 kindergartners are exempt.

    California is one of four states — alongside New York, Connecticut and Maine — with no religious or personal-belief exemptions for school vaccines.

    It is also among at least 20 states that have committed to keep the hepatitis B birth dose for babies on public insurance, which covers about half of American children. It is not clear whether the revised recommendation will affect government coverage of the vaccine in other states.

    Experts warn that the success of the birth-dose reversal over near-universal objection from the medical establishment puts the entire pediatric vaccination schedule up for grabs, and threatens the school-based rules that enforce it.

    Ongoing measles outbreaks in Texas and elsewhere that have killed three and sickened close to 2,000 show the risks of rolling back requirements, experts said.

    Hepatitis is not nearly as contagious as measles, which can linger in the air for about two hours. But it’s still fairly easy to pick up, and devastating to those who contract it, experts said.

    “These decisions happening today are going to have terrible residual effects later,” said Rivera, the L.A. epidemiologist. “I can’t imagine being a new mom having to navigate this.”

    [ad_2]

    Sonja Sharp

    Source link

  • Man living with cancer goes door-to-door in effort to keep research going

    [ad_1]

    SIGNATURES TO PUSH LAWMAKERS TO DO SOMETHING TO GET THAT MONEY BACK. DOCTOR PETER BRIDGMAN IS SPENDING HIS HOLIDAYS GOING DOOR-TO- DOOR CHATTING WITH HIS NEIGHBORS. HE’S THANKFUL FOR THE CANCER TREATMENTS THAT ARE KEEPING HIM ALIVE. THE 72-YEAR-OLD FORMER NEUROLOGIST WAS DIAGNOSED IN 2013 WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA – A BONE MARROW CANCER – TREATABLE WITH INFUSION THERAPIES. HE’S DOING WELL…BUT WORRIES ABOUT THE DAY HE MIGHT NEED MORE ADVANCED TREATMENT OPTIONS CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT AT THE “NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH” – AND THE “NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE.” THE AGENCIES ARE FORCED TO CUT BILLIONS OF DOLLARS NOW THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP’S BUDGET HAS PASSED. “NIH AND THE NCI EXPECTED SMALL CUTS LIKE FIVE OR TEN PERCENT, BUT THEY WERE COMPLETELY FLOORED BY THE 37-PERCENT CUT TO THE NCI.” “ACTIVE RESEARCH IS GOING ON AND THAT MIGHT BE CURTAILED. SO, BY THE TIME I NEED IT, IT MAY NOT BE THERE FOR ME.” SO, HE’S ASKING HIS NEIGHBORS TO SIGN AN ON-LINE PETITION CALLING FOR FUNDS TO BE RESTORED TO PREVIOUS LEVELS. “IN ORDER TO SAVE LIVES, WE HAVE TO RESTORE FUNDING TO CLOSE TO WHAT IT WAS BEFORE. IF WE LET THE FUNDING BOUNCE UP AND DOWN, RESEARCHERS WILL GO TO OTHER COUNTRIES. THEY’LL GO TO THE EUROPEAN UNION. THEY’LL GO TO CHINA. AND WE’LL LOSE ALL OF THAT. IT WOULD TAKE DECADES TO BUILD IT BACK. SO, THAT’S THE RISK. THAT’S THE SERIOUS RISK.” HIS NEIGHBOR, JOHN AUBLE WAS HAPPY TO SIGN. WAS HAPPY TO SIGN. “OVERALL, I THINK CANCER IN UNDER FUNDED SO EVERY TIME WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO IS WILLING TO PUT IN THE TIME THAT HE DOES – IT’S REALLY TOUCHING. WE NEED MORE PETERS.” IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ABOUT THE PETITION – YOU CAN VISIT WWW.FIGHTCANCER.ORG “NEXT TUESDAY AFTERNOON DR. BRIDGMAN AND OTHERS FROM THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY WILL HAND DELIVER THOSE PETITION SIGNATURES TO SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS HERE AT HER PORTLAND OFFICE. AND THEY WAIT FOR CONGRESS TO RECONVENE AND HOPE THAT RESEARCH FUNDI

    Man living with cancer goes door-to-door in effort to keep federal research going

    Updated: 12:13 PM PST Nov 29, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Dr. Peter Bridgman, a retired neurologist who has cancer, is a man on a mission to get funding restored for federal agencies that are conducting cancer research.Bridgman, 72, was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013. Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow cancer that is treatable with infusion therapies.The Yarmouth resident said he is doing well and is thankful for the treatments that are keeping him alive, but he is concerned about the future of cancer research.Advanced cancer treatment options are under development at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), but the federal agencies face funding cuts in the billions.”NIH and the NCI expected small cuts like five or 10 percent, but they were completely floored by the 37 percent cut to the NCI,” Bridgman said. “Active research is going on and that might be curtailed. So by the time I need it, it may not be there for me.”Bridgman is now going door-to-door and asking his neighbors to sign an online petition calling for NIH and NCI funds to be restored to previous levels.”In order to save lives, we have to restore funding to close to what it was before. If we let the funding bounce up and down, researchers will go to other countries. They’ll go to the European Union. They’ll go to China, and we’ll lose all of that,” Bridgman said. “It would take decades to build it back, so that’s the risk. That’s the serious risk.”John Auble, one of Bridgman’s neighbors, said he was happy to sign the petition.”Overall, I think cancer is underfunded. So every time we have somebody who is willing to put in the time that he does, it’s really touching,” Auble said. “We need more Peters.”People who are interested in learning more about the petition can visit fightcancer.org.On Tuesday, Dec. 2, Bridgman and others from the American Cancer Society will hand deliver the petition signatures they have collected to U.S. Sen. Susan Collins’ office in Portland. They will then wait for Congress to reconvene and hope that research funding will be restored.

    Dr. Peter Bridgman, a retired neurologist who has cancer, is a man on a mission to get funding restored for federal agencies that are conducting cancer research.

    Bridgman, 72, was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013. Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow cancer that is treatable with infusion therapies.

    The Yarmouth resident said he is doing well and is thankful for the treatments that are keeping him alive, but he is concerned about the future of cancer research.

    Advanced cancer treatment options are under development at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), but the federal agencies face funding cuts in the billions.

    “NIH and the NCI expected small cuts like five or 10 percent, but they were completely floored by the 37 percent cut to the NCI,” Bridgman said. “Active research is going on and that might be curtailed. So by the time I need it, it may not be there for me.”

    Bridgman is now going door-to-door and asking his neighbors to sign an online petition calling for NIH and NCI funds to be restored to previous levels.

    “In order to save lives, we have to restore funding to close to what it was before. If we let the funding bounce up and down, researchers will go to other countries. They’ll go to the European Union. They’ll go to China, and we’ll lose all of that,” Bridgman said. “It would take decades to build it back, so that’s the risk. That’s the serious risk.”

    John Auble, one of Bridgman’s neighbors, said he was happy to sign the petition.

    “Overall, I think cancer is underfunded. So every time we have somebody who is willing to put in the time that he does, it’s really touching,” Auble said. “We need more Peters.”

    People who are interested in learning more about the petition can visit fightcancer.org.

    On Tuesday, Dec. 2, Bridgman and others from the American Cancer Society will hand deliver the petition signatures they have collected to U.S. Sen. Susan Collins’ office in Portland. They will then wait for Congress to reconvene and hope that research funding will be restored.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fenergo names Hishaam Caramanli as president, COO

    [ad_1]

    Fenergo, a global provider of AI-powered client lifecycle management and financial crime compliance technology, has named Hishaam Caramanli as president and chief operating officer, effective immediately. Caramanli will report to Chief Executive Marc Murphy and oversee product, engineering and customer operations, according to today’s Fenergo release. He will focus on advancing client-centered product strategy and […]

    [ad_2]

    FinAi News, AI-assisted

    Source link

  • Obstructive sleep apnea may be linked to microbleeds in the brain

    [ad_1]

    Maybe you know you snore like a bear, but you don’t feel much urgency to look into it. Or maybe you have been told to wear a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machine for sleep apnea, but it is just so cumbersome.A new study shows that it is important to take obstructive sleep apnea seriously now –– it could impact your risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease later.Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea is associated with a greater risk for new microbleeds in the brain, according to the study.”Cerebral microbleeds are a common finding in the aging brain,” said Dr. Jonathan Graff-Radford, professor of neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. He was not involved in the research.Microbleeds increase with age, and people who have them have a slightly higher risk of future strokes and faster cognitive decline, Graff-Radford said. “Anything that increases microbleeds is relevant to brain aging,” he added.More evidence you need to treat sleep apneaObstructive sleep apnea is a condition in which a blockage of airways by weak, heavy or relaxed soft tissues disrupts breathing during sleep. The condition is different from central sleep apnea, in which the brain occasionally skips telling the body to breathe.There are a few ways to treat obstructive sleep apnea, including relying on oral devices that keep the throat open during sleep, regularly using a CPAP or similar machine, and having surgeries.The study has a strong methodology and should stress the importance of screening for sleep apnea to clinicians and treatment to patients, said Dr. Rudy Tanzi, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He was not involved in the research.”Don’t ignore it. Do something about it,” he said. “It’s not just the immediate risk for down the road for bleeds, but also later down the road for Alzheimer’s disease as well.”Not addressing obstructive sleep apnea is a double whammy, Tanzi said. Not getting enough good-quality sleep –– which can be hard to do when your breathing is impaired during the night –– has been associated with brain aging, but the microbleeds that could result may increase the risk for dementia down the line.The study, which was published in the journal JAMA Network Open Tuesday, is observational, which means that it can only establish that obstructive sleep apnea and microbleeds are associated, not that one definitively causes the other. Further studies will need to examine if treating sleep apnea can prevent microbleeds.Know the signsWhen is it time to ask your doctor about obstructive sleep apnea?Loud, frequent snoring is a good indicator, Tanzi said. If your partner notices pauses in your breathing while you sleep or gasping and choking, that’s another sign you should look into sleep apnea.Problems during the day can be a good indicator, too. Sleepiness, trouble concentrating, irritability and increased hunger are signs you may not be getting quality sleep and that it may be time to get assessed for sleep apnea.Night sweats might also be a sign of sleep apnea, as research has shown that about 30% of people with obstructive sleep apnea have reported night sweats.Waking up at least two times in the night, teeth grinding, and morning headaches might also indicate a problem.The latest study “urges (people) to take it more seriously, because the damage that can come from obstructive sleep apnea can definitely be more severe than you think,” Tanzi said.

    Maybe you know you snore like a bear, but you don’t feel much urgency to look into it. Or maybe you have been told to wear a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machine for sleep apnea, but it is just so cumbersome.

    A new study shows that it is important to take obstructive sleep apnea seriously now –– it could impact your risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease later.

    Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea is associated with a greater risk for new microbleeds in the brain, according to the study.

    “Cerebral microbleeds are a common finding in the aging brain,” said Dr. Jonathan Graff-Radford, professor of neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. He was not involved in the research.

    Microbleeds increase with age, and people who have them have a slightly higher risk of future strokes and faster cognitive decline, Graff-Radford said. “Anything that increases microbleeds is relevant to brain aging,” he added.

    More evidence you need to treat sleep apnea

    Obstructive sleep apnea is a condition in which a blockage of airways by weak, heavy or relaxed soft tissues disrupts breathing during sleep. The condition is different from central sleep apnea, in which the brain occasionally skips telling the body to breathe.

    There are a few ways to treat obstructive sleep apnea, including relying on oral devices that keep the throat open during sleep, regularly using a CPAP or similar machine, and having surgeries.

    The study has a strong methodology and should stress the importance of screening for sleep apnea to clinicians and treatment to patients, said Dr. Rudy Tanzi, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He was not involved in the research.

    “Don’t ignore it. Do something about it,” he said. “It’s not just the immediate risk for down the road for bleeds, but also later down the road for Alzheimer’s disease as well.”

    Not addressing obstructive sleep apnea is a double whammy, Tanzi said. Not getting enough good-quality sleep –– which can be hard to do when your breathing is impaired during the night –– has been associated with brain aging, but the microbleeds that could result may increase the risk for dementia down the line.

    The study, which was published in the journal JAMA Network Open Tuesday, is observational, which means that it can only establish that obstructive sleep apnea and microbleeds are associated, not that one definitively causes the other. Further studies will need to examine if treating sleep apnea can prevent microbleeds.

    Know the signs

    When is it time to ask your doctor about obstructive sleep apnea?

    Loud, frequent snoring is a good indicator, Tanzi said. If your partner notices pauses in your breathing while you sleep or gasping and choking, that’s another sign you should look into sleep apnea.

    Problems during the day can be a good indicator, too. Sleepiness, trouble concentrating, irritability and increased hunger are signs you may not be getting quality sleep and that it may be time to get assessed for sleep apnea.

    Night sweats might also be a sign of sleep apnea, as research has shown that about 30% of people with obstructive sleep apnea have reported night sweats.

    Waking up at least two times in the night, teeth grinding, and morning headaches might also indicate a problem.

    The latest study “urges (people) to take it more seriously, because the damage that can come from obstructive sleep apnea can definitely be more severe than you think,” Tanzi said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ecological Threat Report 2025: Extreme Wet-Dry Seasons Emerge as Critical Conflict Catalyst

    [ad_1]

    Approximately 2 billion people – one quarter of humanity – now live in regions experiencing moderate to severe increases in seasonality

    New research from the Institute for Economics & Peace reveals that changing rainfall patterns are significantly amplifying conflict risks worldwide. The 2025 Ecological Threat Report (ETR), released today, finds conflict death rates are substantially higher in areas where rainfall is concentrating into fewer months, compared to regions where rain is spreading more evenly throughout the year.

    Key Findings

    • On average in areas where wet and dry seasons are becoming more extreme, there are four times as many conflict deaths as areas where it has decreased.

    • In 2024, natural hazards triggered 45 million short-term internal displacements across 163 countries, the highest figure since at least 2008.

    • Western Brazil, including parts of the Amazon, has recorded some of the world’s sharpest increases in ecological threat levels. Temperatures have risen at twice the global rate, triggering drought and wildfires.

    • Sub-Saharan Africa faces the world’s most severe ecological pressures, with Niger registering the worst ETR score.

    • Central and Western Europe recorded substantial overall improvements, in part representing a return to normalcy following Europe’s unusually dry climatic conditions in 2019.

    • Despite fears of looming water wars, there have been no interstate conflicts fought exclusively over water in the modern era. In the second half of the 20th century, at least 157 international freshwater treaties have been signed, offering models for interstate cooperation.

    • This cooperative approach to water somewhat mirrors nuclear deterrence since the Second World War. In both cases, the very threat of catastrophic destruction has created pragmatic cooperation. The destruction of water supply can lead to societal collapse.

    Approximately 2 billion people – one quarter of humanity – now live in regions experiencing moderate to severe increases in seasonality. This is where wet seasons are becoming shorter and more intense, while dry seasons are longer and drier. These changes are disrupting agricultural calendars and heightening uncertainty for billions of people who rely on seasonal rains for food and livelihoods.

    The Ecological Threat Report, produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace, covers 3,125 sub-national areas in 172 countries and territories representing more than 99% of the world’s population. Between 2019 and 2024, ETR scores deteriorated in 96 countries and improved in 74.

    Sub-Saharan Africa Approaching Multiple Critical Tipping Points

    In sub-Saharan Africa, conflict risk rises sharply when seasonality combines with rapid population growth. Unpredictable rains trigger agricultural stress. When coupled with demographic pressure, competition over land, water and food intensifies. In regions with weak governance and unresolved grievances, this combination proves combustible.

    The Karamoja Cluster in East Africa illustrates this pattern. While total rainfall remains relatively stable, its timing has become less predictable, amplifying both drought and flood hazards, leading to increased conflict. With only 2% of cultivated land irrigated compared to a global average of 20%, East African communities remain highly vulnerable to these shocks. Since 2019, increased rainfall seasonality has coincided with a resurgence of pastoralist violence after years of relative peace.

    “Rainfall seasonality is becoming a powerful conflict catalyst,”said Steve Killelea AM, Founder & Executive Chairman of the Institute for Economics & Peace.“Where rains are increasingly concentrated into fewer months, conflict deaths rise sharply. In sub-Saharan Africa, rapid population growth amplifies this effect, turning unpredictable seasons into competition for land, water and food. The issue isn’t water scarcity – it’s our failure to capture and distribute it. Only 2% of Sub-Saharan African farmland is irrigated, compared to 20% globally.”

    Water Inequality and the Infrastructure Gap

    The world’s renewable freshwater supply is finite and increasingly unevenly distributed. There are 295 subnational areas facing very high water risk and another 780 with high risk, affecting nearly 1.9 billion people.

    High-income countries have reduced per capita water use by roughly one-third since 2000 through efficiency gains and slower population growth, while many low-income nations face rising total withdrawals and falling per capita availability as populations outpace supply.

    Sub-Saharan Africa highlights this imbalance. Per capita water use has dropped from 113 cubic metres in 2000 to just 89 in 2022 – less than one-fifth of the global average. The result is mounting pressure on limited water sources and intensifying competition among farms, industries and households, heightening the risk of conflict.

    The failure to capture and distribute water is most acute in sub-Saharan Africa, which has the lowest irrigation rates in the world. To irrigate 34 million hectares would require only 6% of the region’s annual renewable water resources.

    Steve Killelea said: “COP30 must prioritise investment in climate-resilient water systems as a foundation for sustainability and peace. Just as nuclear treaties reduced the risk of annihilation, international cooperation on water can reduce the risk of ecological collapse. Both demonstrate that survival depends less on dominance, than on shared responsibility.”

    Interstate Water Cooperation

    Popular narratives have warned of looming “water wars”, especially in transboundary river and lake basins. The ETR finds this is not the case. While disputes over shared rivers do occur, no interstate wars have been fought over water in the modern era. This makes the lessons of successful interstate water cooperation even more important. In an era of increasing conflict, understanding why interstate cooperation has been so successful can provide a blueprint for avoiding future conflicts.

    Even in tense basins such as the Indus River – shared by India and Pakistan – water-sharing has continued despite repeated episodes of conflict, political confrontations and military tension. Water agreements, by necessity, encourage nations to think beyond immediate political grievances toward long-term survival and shared benefit.

    Regional Analysis

    Sub-Saharan Africa faces the world’s most severe ecological pressures. However, some southern and eastern African countries, including Lesotho, Rwanda, Eritrea and Eswatini, have improved their ETR scores. More favourable rainfall patterns in these countries resulted in marked reductions in water risk over the past five years.

    In contrast, northwest Africa has seen the steepest deterioration in ETR scores over the same period, led by Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria, where persistent drought and rising temperatures have reversed the unusually favourable conditions of 2019.

    Central and Western Europe recorded notable improvements, marking a return to normal following the extreme dryness of 2019.

    Source: Institute for Economics & Peace

    Related Media

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First West Nile virus death confirmed in L.A. County, as studies show that drought conditions may increase risk

    [ad_1]

    The first recorded death from West Nile virus this year in L.A. County was confirmed Friday by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

    The individual, whose details have been kept anonymous, was hospitalized in the San Fernando Valley for neurological illness caused by the mosquito-borne virus. In Southern California, October is the middle of mosquito season.

    Across Los Angeles County, 14 West Nile virus infections have been documented in 2025; half have been in the San Fernando Valley.

    L.A. has had an average of 58 West Nile infections per year since 2020, with an average of one death per year, according to data from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

    West Nile virus affects around 2,000 Americans a year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Viral infection can a number of symptoms, with mild illness symptoms consisting of fever, headache, body aches, vomiting, rash or diarrhea, the CDC says.

    A more severe and concerning case can cause neck stiffness, stupor, disorientation, tremors, convulsions, muscle weakness, vision loss, numbness, or paralysis. Officials warn that the effects of severe illness could be permanent or result in death.

    In some cases, infection does not cause symptoms.

    The California Public Health Department notes that there are a number of species within the Culex mosquito genus, which is a primary carrier of the virus, found throughout Los Angeles County.

    The San Fernando Valley area recently suffered from water outages and has, over the last 12 months, consistently experienced below-average rainfall and drought conditions.

    In a 2025 study from the National Institutes of Health, research showed that droughts raised risk factors for West Nile virus. Data from more than 50,000 traps revealed that while drought conditions reduced overall mosquito populations and standing bodies of water, it consolidated the infected mosquitos and birds, which also carry the disease, around limited water sources. The result is faster transmission rate among the smaller populations, which go on to infect humans. In the San Fernando Valley, where drought conditions are expect to continue through a dry La Niña season, the reduced water sources may lead to higher infection rates.

    To avoid contracting West Nile virus, the CDC recommends reducing outside activities during the daytime, when mosquitos are most active. Officials also say that emptying or replacing containers of standing water (where mosquitos tend to breed), installing window screens, and wearing protective skin coverings or using insect repellent when outside can also reduce exposure.

    [ad_2]

    Katerina Portela

    Source link

  • 4 Smart Risk-Taking Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Know

    [ad_1]

    Business is about taking risks, but not every risk is smart. The difference between calculated gambles that make you successful and foolish bets that destroy your business is all about sticking to certain principles. Throughout the years, I have seen many entrepreneurs win or lose because of how they approach risk. If you want to change the way you look at and take risks in your own business, here are four tenets to live by inspired by my colleague, Karen Firestone, co-founder and Chair Emerita of Aureus Asset Management. 

    1. Correctly size up your risks. 

    When a new opportunity comes up, you need to ask yourself: Is this risk right-sized for my current situation? Right sizing means calibrating the potential downside of your risk relative to how much you can afford to lose. In other words, a startup should never have all its eggs in one product launch, just like a portfolio manager should not allocate 50 percent of a fund to their “best idea ever.” 

    Perhaps you’re an entrepreneur in real estate looking to buy your first office space for your growing company. You’ve been saving and planning for this moment for years, and the space you fell in love with initially was out of budget. However, now that your company has grown, that place is finally “the right size.” Ignore the warning signs and invest in that property, and you could end up paying too much in lease payments to be sustainable. You made the risk larger than your company could handle. 

    Right sizing risk applies to hiring decisions, marketing budgets, investment in infrastructure, product launches, and more. You want to bet enough to make progress but not so much that one move could be a knockout punch to your business. 

    2. Master your timing. 

    Timing is everything. I don’t care how good an idea is, if the timing is off, you will fail. Opening a beach resort in hurricane season is a terrible decision. Launching a luxury product or service during an economic downturn is another example. Successful entrepreneurs know how to time their decisions by paying close attention to market cycles, seasonal fluctuations in demand, and competitive activity. That doesn’t mean you should wait around until everything lines up perfectly because it never will. Instead, it means knowing when you have momentum or a tailwind behind you and when you don’t. 

    Perfect timing is rare, but good timing is out there all the time. Learning to spot it is one of the most important risk-taking skills you can develop. Sometimes, the right move is simply to make a decision faster than others. 

    3. Leverage knowledge and experience. 

    Don’t take risks in areas where you don’t have fundamental expertise. It sounds simple but believe me that entrepreneurs make this mistake repeatedly. Tempting opportunities come in all shapes and sizes in all different areas, and it’s easy for you to get seduced by the potential. 

    Say you are a small software company looking to expand into hardware. You should absolutely leverage experts and hire smart people who know what they are doing. Go to the established players in hardware and partner with them. Your doctor does not look up surgical procedures during an operation because she has read about it before. Instead, she knows what she is doing because she has done it many times before. Set that bar for yourself. 

    4. Stay skeptical of guarantees. 

    Mistakes that come with taking risks are easy to make when you let go of healthy skepticism. If someone promises you a sure thing, guaranteed returns, or a “can’t-miss” opportunity, be on the alert for a scam. Spreadsheets are a wonderful thing, but in reality, spreadsheets are just highly educated guesses and throughout time, they never turn out perfectly. 

    If someone is selling you a “sure thing” or a “best idea I ever heard,” then do yourself a favor and walk away until you have sufficient time to do your due diligence. No opportunity is guaranteed. Successful entrepreneurs always question assumptions, stress-test projections, and plan for the worst. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Peter Economy

    Source link

  • A whopping 72% of S&P 500 companies disclosed AI as a ‘material risk’ on their 10-Ks this year | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    AI is everywhere these days—and that means so is AI risk.

    Among S&P 500 companies, 72% mentioned AI as a material risk on their Form 10-Ks this year, the Conference Board found, up from 58% last year and 12% in 2023. The shift is reflective of how AI use within business has matured from the experimental to the widespread, the organization wrote in a report. (The Conference Board’s report defines “AI” broadly, including not only LLMs but also robotics, automation, machine learning, and other types of AI.)

    The companies most likely to disclose AI risk were those in “frontline adopter” industries, such as the financehealthcare, industrial, IT, and consumer discretionary sectors.

    S&P companies were most concerned about the reputational risks of AI, the Conference Board reported; 38% of them disclosed potential reputational threats from AI on their 10-Ks. Forty-five companies mentioned “implementation and adoption” risks, such as overpromising on AI projects or AI not meeting expectations, while 42 stated that consumer-facing AI was a risk. Other reputational risks companies mentioned included privacy and data risks, hallucinations, competitive threats, and issues with bias and fairness.

    One in five S&P companies mentioned AI-related threats to cybersecurity as a risk on annual filings. While 40 companies simply stated that cybersecurity in general was a risk, 18 called out third party or vendor risks, and 17 said data breaches were a risk.

    Companies also foresaw potential compliance risks from AI. Forty-one listed “evolving regulation and uncertainty” as a risk area, and some specifically referred to the EU AI Act, which has steep penalties for noncompliance.

    This report was originally published by CFO Brew.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Courtney Vien, CFO Brew

    Source link

  • New risk network supports fight against AI-powered fraud

    [ad_1]

    As AI improves it is opening the door for better risk mitigation — but also for increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes as bad actors use the tech to create synthetic identities, clone voices, automate schemes and falsify images.  Fraud within financial services is expected to rise 153% to $58.3 billion by 2030, up from $23 billion […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • New risk network supports fight against AI-powered fraud

    [ad_1]

    As AI improves, it is opening the door for better risk mitigation — but also for increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes as bad actors use the tech to create synthetic identities, clone voices, automate schemes and falsify images.  Fraud within financial services is expected to rise 153% to $58.3 billion by 2030, up from $23 billion […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • New risk network supports fight against AI-powered fraud – FinAi News

    [ad_1]

    As AI improves, it is opening the door for better risk mitigation — but also for increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes as bad actors use the tech to create synthetic identities, clone voices, automate schemes and falsify images.  Fraud within financial services is expected to rise 153% to $58.3 billion by 2030, up from $23 billion […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • POCs are key when applying AI, experts say

    [ad_1]

    Financial institutions big and small are exploring AI, but before diving headfirst into the technology, they are learning from proofs of concept.  Florida-based Ocean Bank, for one, is midway through an AI proof of concept (POC) addressing some of its biggest pain points alert volume and investigation time, Alex Sardinas, vice president and regulatory risk […]

    The post POCs are key when applying AI, experts say appeared first on Bank Automation News.

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • POCs are key when applying AI, experts say

    [ad_1]

    Financial institutions big and small are exploring AI, but before diving headfirst into the technology, they are learning from proofs of concept.  Florida-based Ocean Bank, for one, is midway through an AI proof of concept (POC) addressing some of its biggest pain points alert volume and investigation time, Alex Sardinas, vice president and regulatory risk […]

    The post POCs are key when applying AI, experts say appeared first on Bank Automation News.

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • POCs are key when applying AI, experts say – FinAi News

    [ad_1]

    Financial institutions big and small are exploring AI, but before diving headfirst into the technology, they are learning from proofs of concept.  Florida-based Ocean Bank, for one, is midway through an AI proof of concept (POC) addressing some of its biggest pain points alert volume and investigation time, Alex Sardinas, vice president and regulatory risk […]

    The post POCs are key when applying AI, experts say appeared first on FinAi News.

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • FDA urges child-resistant packaging for nicotine pouches

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is urging nicotine pouch manufacturers to use child-resistant packaging on their products. This comes as a rise in nicotine pouch exposure cases has been reported among young children – with some causing nicotine poisoning.In an announcement Tuesday, the FDA called on manufacturers to use child-resistant packaging to reduce the risk of these “accidental” and “harmful” exposures.”I am concerned about rising reports of nicotine exposures in young children caused by nicotine pouches,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said in the announcement. “The fruity flavors and bright, colorful designs of nicotine pouch products could resemble candy and seem attractive to children. Manufacturers should consider what steps they can take to prevent accidental exposures and ingestion.”The FDA noted in its announcement that it has authorized 20 nicotine pouch products, all of which use child-resistant packaging. The FDA gave marketing authorization to certain nicotine pouches for the first time in January.”ZYN is the only nicotine pouch authorized by the FDA as appropriate to protect public health. In making that conclusion the agency noted that ZYN’s packaging is designed to be child resistant – and has been since its launch 11 years ago,” Philip Morris International, which owns nicotine pouch brand Zyn, said in a statement Tuesday.But several brands of pouches on the market have not received FDA authorization, and not all have child-resistant packaging.The FDA urged manufacturers to contact the agency if they have a pending premarket application for a nicotine pouch product and intend to incorporate child-resistant packaging or other measures to mitigate the risk of accidental exposure to children.Nicotine pouches are small packets, filled with a powder made of nicotine, flavorings and other ingredients, that users can tuck between their lip and gum, where the nicotine is absorbed through mucous membranes.From April 2022 through March 2025, the number of reported nicotine pouch exposure cases reported to U.S. Poison Centers steadily climbed, according to the FDA, and about 72% were in children younger than 5.The FDA warned in its announcement that the concentrated nicotine in these products can be harmful or potentially fatal to young children, even in small amounts. In young children, ingestion of doses as low as 1 to 4 milligrams of nicotine has been associated with “toxic effects,” according to the FDA.Symptoms of nicotine poisoning can include abdominal cramps, confusion, seizures, loss of consciousness, headache and vomiting.The FDA offered information for consumers in its announcement on how to properly store nicotine pouches and prevent accidental exposure to children.”Parents and caregivers should safely store all nicotine products, including pouches, in secure locations away from children in original packaging and seek immediate medical attention if accidental ingestion occurs,” the agency said. And if anyone of any age eats a nicotine pouch, accidental or not, the best first step is to immediately call Poison Control at 1-800-222-1222.”The recent rise in accidental exposure to nicotine pouches is deeply troubling, especially when it involves our youngest and most at risk,” Kathy Crosby, CEO and president at the Truth Initiative, a nonprofit focused on preventing youth and young adult nicotine addiction, said in a statement.”To help safeguard young people from the preventable harms of these products, it’s critical for manufacturers to prioritize child-resistant packaging and that the FDA consider risks of accidental exposure and packaging safety when reviewing new products,” Crosby said. “The FDA can also immediately reduce the likelihood of accidental exposure by ensuring that only authorized products are on store shelves.”Nicotine pouches have become the second most-used nicotine product among young people, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.A report released Thursday by the Truth Initiative says that oral nicotine pouch use among high school students has nearly doubled, increasing from 1.3% in 2023 to 2.4% in 2024.Still, the overall user base remains small. Just 0.5% of Americans use nicotine pouches, compared with 9% who smoke cigarettes and 3% who vape or use e-cigarettes, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is urging nicotine pouch manufacturers to use child-resistant packaging on their products. This comes as a rise in nicotine pouch exposure cases has been reported among young children – with some causing nicotine poisoning.

    In an announcement Tuesday, the FDA called on manufacturers to use child-resistant packaging to reduce the risk of these “accidental” and “harmful” exposures.

    “I am concerned about rising reports of nicotine exposures in young children caused by nicotine pouches,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said in the announcement. “The fruity flavors and bright, colorful designs of nicotine pouch products could resemble candy and seem attractive to children. Manufacturers should consider what steps they can take to prevent accidental exposures and ingestion.”

    The FDA noted in its announcement that it has authorized 20 nicotine pouch products, all of which use child-resistant packaging. The FDA gave marketing authorization to certain nicotine pouches for the first time in January.

    ZYN is the only nicotine pouch authorized by the FDA as appropriate to protect public health. In making that conclusion the agency noted that ZYN’s packaging is designed to be child resistant – and has been since its launch 11 years ago,” Philip Morris International, which owns nicotine pouch brand Zyn, said in a statement Tuesday.

    But several brands of pouches on the market have not received FDA authorization, and not all have child-resistant packaging.

    The FDA urged manufacturers to contact the agency if they have a pending premarket application for a nicotine pouch product and intend to incorporate child-resistant packaging or other measures to mitigate the risk of accidental exposure to children.

    Nicotine pouches are small packets, filled with a powder made of nicotine, flavorings and other ingredients, that users can tuck between their lip and gum, where the nicotine is absorbed through mucous membranes.

    From April 2022 through March 2025, the number of reported nicotine pouch exposure cases reported to U.S. Poison Centers steadily climbed, according to the FDA, and about 72% were in children younger than 5.

    The FDA warned in its announcement that the concentrated nicotine in these products can be harmful or potentially fatal to young children, even in small amounts. In young children, ingestion of doses as low as 1 to 4 milligrams of nicotine has been associated with “toxic effects,” according to the FDA.

    Symptoms of nicotine poisoning can include abdominal cramps, confusion, seizures, loss of consciousness, headache and vomiting.

    The FDA offered information for consumers in its announcement on how to properly store nicotine pouches and prevent accidental exposure to children.

    “Parents and caregivers should safely store all nicotine products, including pouches, in secure locations away from children in original packaging and seek immediate medical attention if accidental ingestion occurs,” the agency said. And if anyone of any age eats a nicotine pouch, accidental or not, the best first step is to immediately call Poison Control at 1-800-222-1222.

    “The recent rise in accidental exposure to nicotine pouches is deeply troubling, especially when it involves our youngest and most at risk,” Kathy Crosby, CEO and president at the Truth Initiative, a nonprofit focused on preventing youth and young adult nicotine addiction, said in a statement.

    “To help safeguard young people from the preventable harms of these products, it’s critical for manufacturers to prioritize child-resistant packaging and that the FDA consider risks of accidental exposure and packaging safety when reviewing new products,” Crosby said. “The FDA can also immediately reduce the likelihood of accidental exposure by ensuring that only authorized products are on store shelves.”

    Nicotine pouches have become the second most-used nicotine product among young people, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    A report released Thursday by the Truth Initiative says that oral nicotine pouch use among high school students has nearly doubled, increasing from 1.3% in 2023 to 2.4% in 2024.

    Still, the overall user base remains small. Just 0.5% of Americans use nicotine pouches, compared with 9% who smoke cigarettes and 3% who vape or use e-cigarettes, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

    [ad_2]

    Source link