ReportWire

Tag: Rail Transport

  • MBTA to run buses on part of Rockport line most weekends this winter

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — MBTA commuter rail trains will not service North Station most weekends between Jan. 1 and the end of April, with shuttle buses set to run between Swampscott and North Station on the Newburyport/Rockport line, officials said.

    Trains will continue to travel between Rockport and Swampscott, and between Newburyport and Swampscott, said Keolis Commuter Services, the company that operates the commuter rail for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm{@42= 3FD6D H:== D6CG:46 (@?56C=2?5 7@C 2 q=F6 {:?6 4@??64E:@?[ z6@=:D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>FE6C C2:= H:== ?@E CF? EC2:?D 2E }@CE9 $E2E:@? @? y2?] b 2?5 c[ y2?] `f 2?5 `g[ y2?] ac 2?5 ad[ y2?] b` 2?5 u63] `[ u63] ag 2?5 |2C49 `[ |2C49 f 2?5 g[ |2C49 a` 2?5 aa[ |2C49 ag 2?5 ah[ pAC:= “ 2?5 `a[ 2?5 pAC:= acaf]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 4=@DFC6D H:== 2==@H H@C<6CD E@ >@56C?:K6 E96 D:8?2= DJDE6> 2E %@H6C p ;FDE @FED:56 @7 }@CE9 $E2E:@?[ H9:49 4@?EC@=D 2== EC2:? >@G6>6?ED :?E@ 2?5 @FE @7 E96 DE2E:@?[ z6@=:D D2:5] %9:D H@C< H:== 2=D@ AC6A2C6 7@C E96 C6A=246>6?E @7 E96 }@CE9 $E2E:@? 5C2H3C:586D 😕 E96 4@>:?8 J62CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 H@C< H:== 2=D@ >62?D[ E92E @? E96D6 52E6D[ ~C2?86 {:?6 DF3H2J D6CG:46 H:== C6A=246 C68F=2C EC2:? D6CG:46 36EH66? }@CE9 $E2E:@? 2?5 ~2< vC@G6 @? E96 w2G6C9:== {:?6[ D9FEE=6 3FD6D H:== CF? 36EH66? }@CE9 $E2E:@? 2?5 p?56CD@?^(@3FC? $E2E:@? :?DE625 @7 EC2:?D @? E96 {@H6== {:?6[ 2?5 E92E r@>>FE6C #2:= EC2:?D H:== 36 C6A=2465 3J #65 {:?6 E@ vC66? {:?6 D6CG:46 @? E96 u:E493FC8 {:?6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By News Staff

    Source link

  • Woman rescued after train, car collide

    [ad_1]

    ANDOVER — A woman was pulled out of her car after it was hit by a freight train Thursday at the railroad crossing at Pearson Street.

    [ad_2]

    By Angelina Berube | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Warnings, fines coming soon for MBTA fare evaders

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Scofflaws take notice: The MBTA announced Thursday it will launch a renewed effort to collect subway fares with written warnings and fines of up to $150 early next month.

    A wide-ranging transportation bond law in January 2021 spurred the restructuring of fare evasion penalties, and the T has not issued a warning or citation for the offense since at least that year, according to its annual reports. The T put 16 “fare engagement representatives” to work around the subway system starting in October and saw fare collection increases of up to as 35% at stations where the representatives were on-site.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm$E2CE:?8 $6AE] g[ E9@D6 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D H:== 368:? :DDF:?8 7@C>2= H2C?:?8D 2?5 4:E2E:@?D E@ C:56CD H9@ ECJ E@ 3@2C5 H:E9@FE 92G:?8 >256 2 A2J>6?E 2E 2 72C6 82E6 @C 3@I[ E96 % 2??@F?465 %9FCD52J] %96 DE2?52C5 @?6H2J DF3H2J 72C6 @? E96 |q%p 😀 Sa]c_[ @C S`]`_ 7@C A2CE:4:A2?ED 😕 E96 C65F465 72C6 AC@8C2>D E96 % @776CD]k^Am

    kAmp== 7:CDE @776?D6D H:== =625 E@ 2 7@C>2= HC:EE6? H2C?:?8[ 2?5 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6D H:E9:? 2 E9C66J62C A6C:@5 H:== 36 AF?:D965 H:E9 7:?6D @7 Sd_ W7:CDE[ D64@?5 2?5 E9:C5 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6DX @C S`__ W7@FCE9 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6 2?5 36J@?5X]k^Am

    kAmQpD H6 4@?E:?F6 E@ :>AC@G6 D6CG:46 7C6BF6?4J 24C@DD 2== >@56D[ H6 92G6 >F49 >@C6 E@ 5@[ 2?5 H6 C6=J @? 6249 C:56C E@ A2J E96:C 72C6 2?5 DFAA@CE 4@?E:?F65 D6CG:46 :>AC@G6>6?ED] *@FC 72C6D 2C6 6DD6?E:2= E@ 56=:G6C:?8 E96 =6G6=D @7 D6CG:46 J@F 6IA64E 2?5 96=A FD 36EE6C DFAA@CE J@FC 4@>>F?:EJ[Q |q%p v6?6C2= |2?286C !9:= t?8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmQ%@ @FC C:56CD H9@ A2J 7@C 6249 2?5 6G6CJ EC:A[ E92?< J@FP u@C E9@D6 H9@ >2J ?665 DFAA@CE H:E9 A2J>6?E[ A=62D6 C6249 @FE E@ FD 23@FE E96 C65F465 72C6 @AA@CEF?:E:6D H6 @776C 24C@DD 2== >@56D]Qk^Am

    kAmu:?6D 2C6 9:896C 7@C 42D6D @7 7C2F5F=6?E >:DFD6 @7 2 C65F465 72C6 A2DD] p7E6C 2? :?:E:2= H2C?:?8[ E9@D6 @776?D6D H:== 42CCJ Sfd 7:?6D 7@C E96 7:CDE[ D64@?5 2?5 E9:C5 :?DE2?46D 2?5 S`d_ 7:?6D 7@C 7@FCE9 2?5 DF3D6BF6?E @442D:@?D]k^Am

    kAmw6C6VD 9@H :?E6C24E:@?D H:E9 72C6 4964< 286?ED 2C6 6IA64E65 E@ 8@[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %ik^Am

    kAmu2C6 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D H:== QG:DF2==J 4964< 72C6D 2D E96J @3D6CG6 C:56CD 6?E6C:?8 72C6 82E6D 2?5 3@2C5:?8 G69:4=6D]Qk^Am

    kAmx7 2 C:56C 92D ?@E A2:5 E96 72C6[ E96 % H@C<6C H:== 2D< E96> E@ 5@ D@]k^Am

    kAmx7 E96 C:56C 49@@D6D ?@E E@ A2J E96 72C6[ QDE277 H:== 2D< 7@C J@FC xs E@ C64@C5 2 HC:EE6? H2C?:?8 H:E9@FE 2 7:?6 @C :DDF6 2 4:E2E:@? H:E9 2 7:?6Q @C H:== >2?F2==J 6?E6C E96 C:56CVD :?7@C>2E:@? @? 2? |q%p:DDF65 56G:46 :7 E96 C:56C 5@6D ?@E AC6D6?E 2? xs]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C 2 C:56C 😀 :DDF65 2 H2C?:?8 @C 2 4:E2E:@?[ E96J 2C6 7C66 E@ 4@?E:?F6 @? E96:C ;@FC?6J]k^Am

    kAm#:56CD H9@ C67FD6 E@ A2J E96 72C6 @C AC@G:56 xs :?7@C>2E:@? H:== 36 2D<65 E@ =62G6 E96 DE2E:@? @C G69:4=6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Man struck, killed by train

    Man struck, killed by train

    [ad_1]

    BEVERLY — A man was struck and killed by a train in Beverly on Wednesday night, marking the second North Shore train death in 10 days.

    MBTA Transit Police said the man was “intentionally trespassing” on the right of way when he was struck by an MBTA Commuter Rail train near Prides Crossing at about 8:25 p.m. The train was an inbound train on the Gloucester branch.

    Transit Police said the man was pronounced dead as a result of his injuries. The agency said foul play is not suspected.

    “On behalf of the TDP and the entire MBTA organization we express our sincere condolences to the decedent’s family and friends,” Transit Police Superintendent Richard Sullivan said.

    The incident happened just 10 days after a Beverly man was struck by a commuter train on tracks on the Salem-Beverly line.

    The Essex District Attorney’s office identified the man, Christopher Thigpen, who died July 21 after being struck about noon by a southbound rail train as he walked across the bridge between Beverly and Salem.

    This story will be updated at gloucestertimes.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Why stock-market investors will remain at mercy of shifting rate-cut expectations after wobbly start to 2024

    Why stock-market investors will remain at mercy of shifting rate-cut expectations after wobbly start to 2024

    [ad_1]

    Stock investors have gotten off to a wobbly start to the new year, hobbled by shifting expectations on the timing and extent of Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts in 2024.

    All three major U.S. stock indexes snapped a nine-week winning streak on Friday, after unexpectedly strong December job gains prompted traders to briefly pull back on the chances of a March rate cut. The S&P 500
    SPX
    and Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    also failed to stage a Santa Claus Rally from the five final trading days of 2023 through the first two sessions of 2024, as questions grew about the market’s multiple rate-cuts view.

    It all adds up to a glimpse of what might be in store for investors in the year ahead. Already, the so-called “January effect,” or theory that stocks tend to rise by more now than any other month, could be put to the test by headwinds that include stalling progress on inflation. Inflation’s downward trend in recent months had given traders and investors hope that as many as six or seven quarter-percentage-point rate cuts from the Federal Reserve could be delivered in 2024, starting in March.

    Over the first handful of days in the new year, however, reality has started to sink in. For one thing, multiple rate cuts tend to be more commonly associated with recessions and not soft landings for the economy.

    Moreover, the idea that the Fed could follow through with as many rate cuts as envisioned by traders would significantly increase the probability that policymakers lose their battle against inflation, according to Mike Sanders, head of fixed income at Wisconsin-based Madison Investments, which manages $23 billion in assets. That’s because six or more rate cuts would loosen financial conditions by too much, and boost the risk of another bout of inflation that forces officials to hike again, he said.

    Minutes of the Fed’s Dec. 12-13 meeting show that policymakers were uncertain about their forecasts for rate cuts this year and failed to rule out the possibility of further rate hikes. Nonetheless, fed funds futures traders continued to cling to expectations for a big decline in borrowing costs, with the greatest likelihood now coalescing around five or six quarter-point rate cuts that total 125 or 150 basis points of easing by year-end. That’s roughly twice as much as what policymakers penciled in last month, when they voted to keep interest rates at a 22-year high of 5.25% to 5.5%.

    Source: CME FedWatch Tool, as of Jan. 5.

    Uncertainty over the path of U.S. interest rates could leave investors flat-footed once again, and damp the optimism that sent all three major stock indexes in 2023 to their best annual performances of the prior two to three years. In November, analysts at Deutsche Bank AG
    DB,
    +0.81%

    counted seven times since 2021 in which markets expected the Fed to make a dovish pivot, only to be wrong.

    Sources: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank. Chart is as of Nov. 20, 2023.

    Financial markets have been operating with “sky-high expectations” for 2024 rate cuts, but the only way to substantiate six cuts this year is with an “abrupt and sharp downturn in the economy,” said Todd Thompson, managing director and portfolio co-manager at Reams Asset Management in Indianapolis, which oversees $27 billion.

    Heading into 2024, euphoria over the prospect of lower borrowing costs produced what Thompson calls “an alarming, everything rally,” which he says leaves equities and high-yield corporate debt vulnerable to pullbacks between now and the next six months. Beyond that period, however, “the trend is likely to be lower rates as the economy finally succumbs to tightening conditions at the same time inflation continues to recede.”

    The coming week brings the next major U.S. inflation update, with December’s consumer price index report released on Thursday. The annual headline rate of inflation from CPI has slowed to 3.1% in November from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022. In addition, the core rate from the Fed’s favorite inflation gauge, known as the PCE, has eased to 3.2% year-on-year in November from a 4.2% annual rate in July.

    The Fed needs to keep interest rates higher because of all the uncertainty around inflation’s most likely path forward, and the U.S. labor market “won’t degrade fast enough in the first quarter to justify a first rate cut in March,” according to Sanders of Madison Investments.

    Rate-cut expectations are “going to be the issue for 2024, and a lot of it is going to be revolving around inflation getting back to that 2% target,” Sanders said via phone. “We think somewhere between 75 and 125 basis points of rate cuts make sense, and that the first move is more of a June-type of event. We don’t think it makes sense to have a March rate cut unless the labor market falls off a cliff.”

    History shows that Treasury yields tend to fall in the months leading up to the first rate cut of a Fed easing cycle. However, that isn’t happening right now. Yields on government debt have been on an upward trend since the end of December, with 2-
    BX:TMUBMUSD02Y,
    10-
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y,
    and 30-year yields
    BX:TMUBMUSD30Y
    ending Friday at their highest levels in more than two to three weeks.

    See also: What history says about stocks and the bond market ahead of a first Fed rate cut

    While financial markets generally tend to be efficient processors of information, they “haven’t been very accurate in terms of pricing in rate cuts” this time, said Lawrence Gillum, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based chief fixed-income strategist for broker-dealer for LPL Financial. He said the big risk for 2024 is if financial conditions ease too much and the Fed declares victory on inflation too soon, which could reignite price pressures in a manner reminiscent of the 1970s period under former Fed Chairman Arthur Burns.

    “We think rate-cut expectations have gone too far too fast, and that the backup in yields we are seeing right now is the market acknowledging that maybe rate cuts are not going to be as aggressive as what was priced in,” Gillum said via phone.

    December’s CPI report on Thursday is the data highlight of the week ahead.

    On Monday, consumer-credit data for November is set to be released, followed the next day by trade-deficit figures for the same month.

    Wednesday brings the wholesale-inventories report for November and remarks by New York Fed President John Williams.

    Initial weekly jobless claims are released on Thursday. On Friday, the producer price index for December comes out.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why this Treasury market trade continues to draw scrutiny

    Why this Treasury market trade continues to draw scrutiny

    [ad_1]

    Inside the $26 trillion Treasury market, perhaps the deepest and most liquid place for government debt in the world, a particular trade continues to draw scrutiny ahead of year-end. It’s the “basis trade,” a way of profiting on the differences in prices between Treasurys and Treasury futures. While such differences can be relatively tiny, one’s potential profit or loss can be exponentially magnified when leverage is involved.In a nutshell, the basis trade takes an arbitrage approach: It involves borrowing from the repo market for leverage and financing, and then taking a short Treasury futures position and a long Treasury…

    Master your money.

    Subscribe to MarketWatch.

    Get this article and all of MarketWatch.

    Access from any device. Anywhere. Anytime.


    Subscribe Now

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alphabet, Heico, Bluebird Bio, Plug Power, UBS, FedEx, and More Stock Market Movers

    Alphabet, Heico, Bluebird Bio, Plug Power, UBS, FedEx, and More Stock Market Movers

    [ad_1]

    Stock futures traded flat Tuesday, a day after the S&P 500 finished up 0.5% and moved closer to its all-time. The broad market index stands just 1.2% below its record of 4,796.56 reached in early January 2022.

    Continue reading this article with a Barron’s subscription.

    View Options

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    [ad_1]

    The stock market always overreacts, and this year it seems as if investors believe dividend stocks have become toxic. But a look at yields on quality dividend stocks relative to the market underlines what may be an excellent opportunity for long-term investors to pursue growth with an income stream that builds up over the years.

    The current environment, in which you can get a yield of more than 5% yield on your cash at a bank or lock in a yield of 4.57% on a10-year U.S. Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    or close to 5% on a 20-year Treasury bond
    BX:TMUBMUSD20Y
    seems to have made some investors forget two things: A stock’s dividend payout can rise over the long term, and so can it is price.

    It is never fun to see your portfolio underperform during a broad market swing. And people have a tendency to prefer jumping on a trend hoping to keep riding it, rather than taking advantage of opportunities brought about by price declines. We may be at such a moment for quality dividend stocks, based on their yields relative to that of the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX.

    Drew Justman of Madison Funds explained during an interview with MarketWatch how he and John Brown, who co-manage the Madison Dividend Income Fund, BHBFX MDMIX and the new Madison Dividend Value ETF
    DIVL,
    use relative dividend yields as part of their screening process for stocks. He said he has never seen such yields, when compared with that of the broad market, during 20 years of work as a securities analyst and portfolio manager.

    Dividend stocks are down

    Before diving in, we can illustrate the market’s current loathing of dividend stocks by comparing the performance of the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD,
    which tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, with that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY.
    Let’s look at a total return chart (with dividends reinvested) starting at the end of 2021, since the Federal Reserve started its cycle of interest rate increases in March 2022:


    FactSet

    The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index is made up of “high-dividend-yielding stocks in the U.S. with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers, based on financial ratios,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

    The end results for the two ETFs from the end of 2021 through Tuesday are similar. But you can see how the performance pattern has been different, with the dividend stocks holding up well during the stock market’s reaction to the Fed’s move last year, but trailing the market’s recovery as yields on CDs and bonds have become so much more attractive this year. Let’s break down the performance since the end of 2021, this time bringing in the Madison Dividend Income Fund’s Class Y and Class I shares:

    Fund

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    14.9%

    -18.2%

    -6.0%

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    -3.8%

    -3.2%

    -6.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class Y

    -4.7%

    -5.4%

    -9.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class I

    -4.7%

    -5.3%

    -9.7%

    Source: FactSet

    Dividend stocks held up well during 2022, as the S&P 500 fell more than 18%. But they have been left behind during this year’s rally.

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund was established in 1986. The Class Y shares have annual expenses of 0.91% of assets under management and are rated three stars (out of five) within Morningstar’s “Large Value” fund category. The Class I shares have only been available since 2020. They have a lower expense ratio of 0.81% and are distributed through investment advisers or through platforms such as Schwab, which charges a $50 fee to buy Class I shares.

    The opportunity — high relative yields

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund holds 40 stocks. Justman explained that when he and Brown select stocks for the fund their investible universe begins with the components of the Russell 1000 Index
    RUT,
    which is made up of the largest 1,000 companies by market capitalization listed on U.S. exchanges. Their first cut narrows the list to about 225 stocks with dividend yields of at least 1.1 times that of the index.

    The Madison team calculates a stock’s relative dividend yield by dividing its yield by that of the S&P 500. Let’s do that for the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD
    (because it tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index) to illustrate the opportunity that Justman highlighted:

    Index or ETF

    Dividend yield

    5-year Avg. yield 

    10-year Avg. yield 

    15-year Avg. yield 

    Relative yield

    5-year Avg. relative yield 

    10-year Avg. relative yield 

    15-year Avg. relative yield 

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    3.99%

    3.41%

    3.20%

    3.16%

    2.6

    2.1

    1.8

    1.6

    S&P 500

    1.55%

    1.62%

    1.79%

    1.92%

    Source: FactSet

    The Schwab U.S. Equity ETF’s relative yield is 2.6 — that is, its dividend yield is 2.6 times that of the S&P 500, which is much higher than the long-term averages going back 15 years. If we went back 20 years, the average relative yield would be 1.7.

    Examples of high-quality stocks with high relative dividend yields

    After narrowing down the Russell 1000 to about 225 stocks with relative dividend yields of at least 1.1, Justman and Brown cut further to about 80 companies with a long history of raising dividends and with strong balance sheets, before moving further through a deeper analysis to arrive at a portfolio of about 40 stocks.

    When asked about oil companies and others that pay fixed quarterly dividends plus variable dividends, he said, “We try to reach out to the company and get an estimate of special dividends and try to factor that in.” Two examples of companies held by the fund that pay variable dividends are ConocoPhillips
    COP,
    -0.29%

    and EOG Resources Inc.
    EOG,
    +0.52%
    .

    Since the balance-sheet requirement is subjective “almost all fund holdings are investment-grade rated,” Justman said. That refers to credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings. He went further, saying about 80% of the fund’s holdings were rated “A-minus or better.” BBB- is the lowest investment-grade rating from S&P. Fidelity breaks down the credit agencies’ ratings hierarchy.

    Justman named nine stocks held by the fund as good examples of quality companies with high relative yields to the S&P 500:

    Company

    Ticker

    Dividend yield

    Relative yield

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    2.04%

    1.3

    31%

    -23%

    1%

    Home Depot, Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    2.79%

    1.8

    -3%

    -22%

    -25%

    Lowe’s Cos., Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    2.17%

    1.4

    3%

    -21%

    -19%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    4.24%

    2.7

    -3%

    -10%

    -13%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.89%

    3.8

    -22%

    -19%

    -37%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    3.62%

    2.3

    1%

    -23%

    -22%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    3.30%

    2.1

    -3%

    -10%

    -12%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    4.17%

    2.7

    -8%

    -16%

    -23%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    2.52%

    1.6

    2%

    -16%

    -15%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, fund or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Now let’s see how these companies have grown their dividend payouts over the past five years. Leaving the companies in the same order, here are compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for dividends.

    Before showing this next set of data, let’s work through one example among the nine stocks:

    • If you had purchased shares of Home Depot Inc.
      HD,
      -0.39%

      five years ago, you would have paid $193.70 a share if you went in at the close on Oct. 10, 2018. At that time, the company’s quarterly dividend was $1.03 cents a share, for an annual dividend rate of $4.12, which made for a then-current yield of 2.13%.

    • If you had held your shares of Home Depot for five years through Tuesday, your quarterly dividend would have increased to $2.09 a share, for a current annual payout of $8.36. The company’s dividend has increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.2% over the past five years. In comparison, the S&P 500’s weighted dividend rate has increased at a CAGR of 6.24% over the past five years, according to FactSet.

    • That annual payout rate of $8.36 would make for a current dividend yield of 2.79% for a new investor who went in at Tuesday’s closing price of $299.22. But if you had not reinvested, the dividend yield on your five-year-old shares (based on what you would have paid for them) would be 4.32%. And your share price would have risen 54%. And if you had reinvested your dividends, your total return for the five years would have been 75%, slightly ahead of the 74% return for the S&P 500 SPX during that period.

    Home Depot hasn’t been the best dividend grower among the nine stocks named by Justman, but it is a good example of how an investor can build income over the long term, while also enjoying capital appreciation.

    Here’s the dividend CAGR comparison for the nine stocks:

    Company

    Ticker

    Five-year dividend CAGR

    Dividend yield on shares purchased five years ago

    Dividend yield five years ago

    Current dividend yield

    Five-year price change

    Five-year total return

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    9.46%

    2.44%

    1.55%

    2.04%

    20%

    42%

    Home Depot Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    15.20%

    4.32%

    2.13%

    2.79%

    54%

    75%

    Lowe’s Cos, Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    18.04%

    4.14%

    1.81%

    2.17%

    91%

    109%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    23.16%

    7.62%

    2.69%

    4.24%

    80%

    108%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.34%

    3.60%

    2.78%

    5.89%

    -39%

    -26%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    6.65%

    2.90%

    2.10%

    3.62%

    -20%

    -9%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    11.04%

    5.24%

    3.10%

    3.30%

    59%

    82%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    12.23%

    5.56%

    3.12%

    4.17%

    33%

    56%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    10.20%

    3.37%

    2.07%

    2.52%

    34%

    49%

    Source: FactSet

    This isn’t to say that Justman and Brown have held all of these stocks over the past five years. In fact, Lowe’s Cos.
    LOW,
    +0.27%

    was added to the portfolio this year, as was United Parcel Service Inc.
    UPS,
    -0.16%
    .
    But for most of these companies, dividends have compounded at relatively high rates.

    When asked to name an example of a stock the fund had sold, Justman said he and Brown decided to part ways with Verizon Communications Inc.
    VZ,
    -0.94%

    last year, “as we became concerned about its fundamental competitive position in its industry.”

    Summing up the scene for dividend stocks, Justman said, “It seems this year the market is treating dividend stocks as fixed-income instruments. We think that is a short-term issue and that this is a great opportunity.”

    Don’t miss: How to tell if it is worth avoiding taxes with a municipal-bond ETF

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1970s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, Deutsche Bank warns

    1970s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, Deutsche Bank warns

    [ad_1]

    A major Wall Street bank is warning about the risk that inflation expectations could become unanchored in a fashion similar to the 1970s stagflation era.

    Weekend attacks on Israel by Hamas illustrate how geopolitical risks can suddenly return — adding to the surprise shocks of the current decade, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said macro strategist Henry Allen and research analyst Cassidy Ainsworth-Grace of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    -1.40%
    .

    Read: Questions emerge over how Israeli intelligence missed Hamas attack

    Oil prices settled more than 4% higher on Monday as traders weighed the impact of the war in the Middle East on crude supplies. The spike in energy prices is adding to the growing list of similarities to the 1970s era — which also includes consistently above-target inflation across major economies and repeated optimism about how quickly it would fall; strikes by workers; and even increasing chances that this winter will be dominated by the El Niño weather pattern, similar to what took place in 1971 and which is historically tied to higher commodity prices, according to Deutsche Bank.

    Inflation remains above central banks’ targets in every G-7 country — the U.S., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. How long it will remain high is one of the most important questions facing financial markets, and a destabilization of expectations would make it even harder for policy makers to restore price stability.

    “So given inflation is still above its pre-pandemic levels, it is important not to get complacent about its path,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote in a note released on Monday. “After all, if there is another shock and inflation remains above target into a third or even a fourth year, it is increasingly difficult to imagine that long-term expectations will repeatedly stay lower than actual inflation.”

    History indicates that the last mile of inflation is often the hardest. One of the key lessons of the 1970s was that inflation failed to return to previous levels after the first oil shock of 1973 and U.S. recession of 1973-1975, and went even higher following a second oil shock in 1979. Now that inflation has been above target for the last two years, “a fresh inflationary spike could well lead expectations to become unanchored,” according to the Deutsche Bank note.


    Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

    For now, the public’s inflation expectations, as measured by a New York Fed survey of consumers in August, remain largely stable, though still above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

    The current period differs from the 1970s era in a number of ways, the Deutsche Bank team also points out. Long-term inflation expectations remain “impressively” well-anchored, commodity prices have fallen substantially from their peaks over the past 12 to 18 months, and supply-chain disruptions that emerged during the pandemic have “broadly healed.” In addition, the U.S. is less energy intensive than in the past and less susceptible to damage from a 1970s-style energy shock.

    Even so, “it is vitally important to avoid complacency,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote. “Indeed, with the benefit of hindsight, one of the mistakes of the 1970s was that policy was eased up too early, which contributed to a resurgence in inflation.”

    Risk-off sentiment prevailed in financial markets during the early part of Monday, before stocks turned higher during the New York afternoon. All three major U.S. stock indexes
    DJIA

    SPX

    COMP
    finished higher in a volatile session. Trading in U.S. government-debt futures reflected greater demand and gold rallied as a flight to safety took hold. The cash market for Treasurys was closed for Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1970’s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, bank warns

    1970’s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, bank warns

    [ad_1]

    A major Wall Street bank is warning about the risk that inflation expectations could become unanchored in a fashion similar to the 1970s stagflation era.

    Weekend attacks on Israel by Hamas illustrate how geopolitical risks can suddenly return — adding to the surprise shocks of the current decade, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said macro strategist Henry Allen and research analyst Cassidy Ainsworth-Grace of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    -1.45%
    .

    Read: Questions emerge over how Israeli intelligence missed Hamas attack

    Oil prices jumped by more than 4% on Monday as traders weighed the impact of the war in the Middle East on crude supplies. The spike in energy is adding to the growing list of similarities to the 1970s era — which also includes consistently above-target inflation across major economies and repeated optimism about how quickly it would fall; strikes by workers; and even increasing chances that this winter will be dominated by the El Niño weather pattern, similar to what took place in 1971 and which is historically tied to higher commodity prices, according to Deutsche Bank.

    Inflation remains above central banks’ targets in every Group-of-7 country — the U.S., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. How long it will remain high is one of the most important questions facing financial markets, and a destabilization of expectations would make it even harder for policy makers to restore price stability.

    “So given inflation is still above its pre-pandemic levels, it is important not to get complacent about its path,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote in a note released on Monday. “After all, if there is another shock and inflation remains above target into a third or even a fourth year, it is increasingly difficult to imagine that long-term expectations will repeatedly stay lower than actual inflation.”

    History indicates that the last mile of inflation is often the hardest. One of the key lessons of the 1970s was that inflation failed to return to previous levels after the first oil shock of 1973 and U.S. recession of 1973-1975, and went even higher following a second oil shock in 1979. Now that inflation has been above target for the last two years, “a fresh inflationary spike could well lead expectations to become unanchored,” according to the Deutsche Bank note.


    Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

    For now, the public’s inflation expectations, as measured by a New York Fed survey of consumers in August, remain largely stable, though still above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

    The current period differs from the 1970s era in a number of ways, the Deutsche Bank team also points out. Long-term inflation expectations remain “impressively” well-anchored, commodity prices have fallen substantially from their peaks over the past 12 to 18 months, and supply-chain disruptions that emerged during the pandemic have “broadly healed.” In addition, the U.S. is less energy intensive than in the past and less susceptible to damage from a 1970s-style energy shock.

    Even so, “it is vitally important to avoid complacency,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote. “Indeed, with the benefit of hindsight, one of the mistakes of the 1970s was that policy was eased up too early, which contributed to a resurgence in inflation.”

    Risk-off sentiment prevailed in financial markets on Monday, with all three major U.S. stock indexes
    DJIA

    SPX

    COMP
    down in New York afternoon trading. Trading in U.S. government-debt futures reflected greater demand and gold rallied as a flight to safety took hold. The cash market for Treasurys was closed for Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FedEx, Klaviyo, KB Home, CrowdStrike, and More Stock Market Movers

    FedEx, Klaviyo, KB Home, CrowdStrike, and More Stock Market Movers

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints
    • Print Article
    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Wall Street’s most AI-enthusiastic bank delivers machine-generated research notes

    Wall Street’s most AI-enthusiastic bank delivers machine-generated research notes

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co., the largest U.S. bank, has been wading into artificial intelligence to a greater extent than its rivals and is now producing a series of research notes that are AI-generated.

    The move represents something of a step forward in an area that’s been seen as ripe for disruption — investment research — at a time when the AI revolution is taking hold on Wall Street. At JPMorgan, AI is being used to create short summaries of human-produced reports and to link those reports inside the firm’s Cross Asset Spotlight.

    Questions remain over how far machine-generated research can go in replacing humans, and regulations on it are still in the early stages — putting pressure on Wall Street banks to be completely transparent about how their research is being put together. Research reports are generally subject to rules from Finra, or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which require that a qualified registered principal approves a report prior to distribution to the public. Banks may also include legal or compliance approvals as part of their process. Through a spokeswoman, JPMorgan
    JPM,
    -0.23%

    declined to comment for this article.

    In a disclaimer attached to JPMorgan’s Cross Asset Spotlight note, primary authors Thomas Salopek and Federico Manicardi cited the large amount of content that investors need to sift through in constantly-moving markets as part of the reason that AI is being used. Salopek and Manicardi said they can produce an AI-generated summary of the most relevant and recent analyst reports on a particular topic or event — as they did on Tuesday with a focus on earnings, China, the soft-landing scenario, and AI’s impact on U.S. interest rates.

    “What seems to be going on here is that they’re using an AI-based system to build a summary publication of existing human-generated reports that are already out there,” said Michael Wagner, co-founder and chief operating officer of Omnia Family Wealth, a multifamily office based in Miami, which oversees more than $2.5 billion and is already using AI to assist with its client conversations.

    “It certainly is still relatively unusual, but I think analyst jobs are safe for now,” Wagner said in an email to MarketWatch. “It’s an interesting development that shows how AI-driven automation could impact labor markets. If relatively repetitive ‘knowledge work’ can be automated in this fashion, banks and law firms may not need as many lower-level employees as they do today.”

    New York-based JPMorgan has been leading Wall Street’s shift toward AI in a number of different ways. From February through April, the bank advertised more than 3,600 jobs globally that are all related to AI, according to Bloomberg. In May, it filed a patent application for its own software, known as IndexGPT, which can be used for analyzing and selecting securities for its clients. And JPMorgan has also created a tool that scans speeches by Federal Reserve officials to detect policy shifts and potential trading signals.

    WSJ: Pro Take: JPMorgan’s Fedspeak Evaluator Is Unsure About This Week’s Rate Decision

    Rivals of JPMorgan haven’t gone quite as far. Representatives of BofA Securities
    BAC,
    +1.06%
    ,
    Citi
    C,
    -0.64%
    ,
    and Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    +0.66%

    said their organizations haven’t produced any AI-generated research notes.

    Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    +0.96%

    has written about the economic and market impacts of AI, but hasn’t used the technology to write text for its research yet, according to economist Joseph Briggs and chief global strategist Praveen Korapaty. Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    +0.25%

    declined to comment through a spokeswoman.

    As of Friday afternoon, U.S. stocks
    DJIA,
    +0.20%

    SPX,
    +0.25%

    COMP,
    +0.06%

    were heading higher as investors prepared for a major rebalancing of the Nasdaq-100 index and the expiration of trillions of dollars of stock option contracts. Meanwhile, Treasury yields were mixed ahead of next week’s policy announcement by the Federal Reserve.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla, Nvidia, Spirit Aerosystems, KB Home, Accenture, and More Market Movers

    Tesla, Nvidia, Spirit Aerosystems, KB Home, Accenture, and More Market Movers

    [ad_1]

    Stock futures were falling following three straight days of losses for Wall Street. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell again will be delivering testimony before Congress. His comments on Wednesday that the central bank likely would be raising rates further this year pushed markets lower.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank to settle Jeffrey Epstein suit for $75 million: report

    Deutsche Bank to settle Jeffrey Epstein suit for $75 million: report

    [ad_1]

    Deutsche Bank AG will pay $75 million to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit claiming it aided Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday night.

    The suit was filed by lawyers on behalf of an anonymous victim and others who accused the financier, who died by suicide in federal lockup in 2019, of sexual abuse and trafficking. The suit claimed Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    +1.92%

    ignored red flags and did business with Epstein for five years despite knowing he was using the money from his accounts to further his sex trafficking.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • East Palestine derailment: Norfolk Southern sued by Justice Department and EPA

    East Palestine derailment: Norfolk Southern sued by Justice Department and EPA

    [ad_1]

    The Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency have filed a complaint against Norfolk Southern Corp. for unlawful discharge of pollutants and hazardous substances in the Feb. 3 train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.

    The complaint seeks penalties and injunctive relief for the unlawful discharge of pollutants, oil and hazardous substances under the Clean Water Act, according to statements released by the Justice Department and the EPA. The Justice Department and EPA are also seeking a declaratory judgment on liability for past and future costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

    Norfolk Southern’s
    NSC,
    +1.51%

    stock has fallen 16.8% since the derailment near the Ohio-Pennsylvania border. The stock is up 0.3% Friday.

    Related: Norfolk Southern will do ‘everything it takes’ for East Palestine, CEO tells senators

    “When a Norfolk Southern train derailed last month in East Palestine, Ohio, it released toxins into the air, soil, and water, endangering the health and safety of people in surrounding communities,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement. “With this complaint, the Justice Department and the EPA are acting to pursue justice for the residents of East Palestine and ensure that Norfolk Southern carries the financial burden for the harm it has caused and continues to inflict on the community.” 

    In a separate statement, EPA Administrator Michael Regan said: “No community should have to go through what East Palestine residents have faced. With today’s action, we are once more delivering on our commitment to ensure Norfolk Southern cleans up the mess they made and pays for the damage they have inflicted as we work to ensure this community can feel safe at home again.”

    Norfolk Southern has created a website, nsmakingitright.com, to track its progress in cleaning up the site.

    “Our job right now is to make progress every day cleaning up the site, assisting residents whose lives were impacted by the derailment, and investing in the future of East Palestine and the surrounding areas,” a spokesperson for Norfolk Southern told MarketWatch. “We are working with urgency, at the direction of the U.S. EPA, and making daily progress. That remains our focus and we’ll keep working until we make it right.”

    Related: Norfolk Southern sued by Ohio over ‘entirely avoidable’ East Palestine derailment

    More than 9.4 million gallons of affected water have been recovered and transported off-site for final disposal, according to Norfolk Southern, along with 12,904 tons of waste soil that has been removed for proper disposal.

    The company has also flushed 5,200 feet of affected waterways and sampled more than 275 private drinking water wells, according to nsmakingitright.com.

    The suit from the Justice Department and the EPA comes just two weeks after Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a 58-count civil lawsuit against Norfolk Southern over the derailment in East Palestine.

    Now read: Here are the chemicals spilled near Philly as U.S. drinking-water safety is top of mind

    No one was killed or injured in the Ohio derailment, but the incident has been described as a “PR nightmare” for Norfolk Southern and the rail industry. The derailed cars included 11 tank cars carrying hazardous materials that subsequently ignited, damaging an additional 12 railcars, according to the National Transportation Safety Board, and setting off concerns about the impact on air and water quality and dangers to health in the region.

    Earlier this month, Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw was grilled by senators when he provided testimony on the disaster before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    While safety was the primary focus of the hearing, Shaw was also pressed on Norfolk Southern’s stock buybacks and the company’s use of precision scheduled railroading, which focuses on the movement of individual train cars rather than whole trains.

    Related: Train derailment in Minnesota thrusts rail safety back into the spotlight

    In his testimony, Shaw vowed to do “everything it takes” for the community affected by the derailment.

    Rail safety was thrust into the spotlight again this week with the derailment of a BNSF train carrying ethanol and corn syrup in Minnesota early Thursday. 

    Everstream Analytics, a supply-chain analytics company, has been researching train derailments involving Class I rail carriers between 2018 and 2023. A Class I carrier is defined as any carrier earning annual revenue greater than $943.9 million, according to the U.S. government’s Surface Transportation Board. Data show that derailments across rail companies increased considerably in the U.S. between 2021 and 2022, according to Everstream Analytics.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why the worst banking mess since 2008 isn’t freaking out stock-market investors — yet

    Why the worst banking mess since 2008 isn’t freaking out stock-market investors — yet

    [ad_1]

    Judging by the major indexes, it will take more than the Federal Reserve raising interest rates in the midst of the worst banking mess since the 2008 financial crisis for stock-market investors to lose their cool.

    “Investors are broadly assuming that regulators are going to step in and ringfence the sector if need be, and that’s what keeps it from spilling over to the broader market,” said Anastasia Amoroso, chief investment strategist at iCapital, in a phone interview.

    There’s also a second reason. Investors see the banking woes forcing the Fed to pause the rate-hike cycle or even begin cutting as early as June, she noted. An end to the yearlong rise in rates will remove a source of pressure on stock-market valuations.

    But gains last week, which came amid volatile trading, aren’t sending an all-clear signal, stock-market analysts and investors said.

    Banking worries haven’t gone away after the failure of three U.S. institutions earlier this month and UBS Group AG’s
    UBS,
    -0.94%

    UBSG,
    -3.55%

    agreement to acquire troubled Swiss rival Credit Suisse
    CS,
    -1.23%

    CSGN,
    -5.19%

    in a merger forced by regulators. Jitters were on display Friday when shares of German financial giant Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    -3.11%

    DBK,
    -8.53%

    got drubbed.

    It’s the fear of runs on U.S. regional banks that still keep investors up at night. Markets might face a test Monday if investors react to Federal Reserve data released after Friday’s closing bell showed deposits at small U.S. banks dropped by a record $119 billion in the weekly period ended Wednesday, March 15, following Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse the preceding Friday.

    That sensitivity to deposits was on display last week. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was blamed for a late Wednesday selloff that saw the Dow end over 500 points lower after she told lawmakers that her department hadn’t considered or discussed a blanket guarantee for deposits. On Thursday, she told House lawmakers that, “we would be prepared to take additional actions if warranted.”

    Deposits are “the epicenter of the crisis of confidence” in U.S. banks, said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco, in a phone interview. Anything that suggests there won’t be full protection for deposits is bound to worry investors in a charged environment.

    See: Is the deposit insurance system broken? 9 things you need to know.

    Cascading runs on regional banks would stoke fears of further bank failures and the potential for a full-blown financial crisis, but short of that, pressure on deposits also underline fears the U.S. economy is headed for a credit crunch.

    Speaking of a credit crunch. Deposits across banks have been under pressure after the Federal Reserve began aggressively raising interest rates roughly a year ago. Since then, deposits at all domestic banks have fallen by $663 billion, or 3.9%, as money flowed into money-market funds and bonds, noted Paul Ashworth, chief North American economist at Capital Economics, in a Friday note.

    “Unless banks are willing to jack up their deposit rates to prevent that flight, they will eventually have to rein in the size of their loan portfolios, with the resulting squeeze on economic activity another reason to expect a recession is coming soon,” he wrote.

    Related: Bank of America identifies the next bubble and says investors should sell stocks rather than buy them after the last rate increase

    Meanwhile, activity in U.S. capital markets has largely dried up since Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse on March 10, noted Torsten Slok, chief global economist at Apollo Global Management, in a recent note.


    Apollo Global Management

    There was virtually no investment-grade or high-yield debt issuance and no initial public offerings on U.S. exchanges, while merger and acquisition activity since then represents completed deals that were initiated before SVB’s collapse, he said (see chart above).

    “The longer capital markets are closed, and the longer funding spreads for banks remain elevated, the more negative the impact will be on the broader economy,” Slok wrote. 

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.41%

    rose 1.2% last week, ending a back-to-back run of declines. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.56%

    rose 1.4%, recouping the large-cap benchmark’s March losses to turn flat on the month. The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.31%

    saw a 1.7% weekly rise, leaving the tech-heavy index up 3.2% for the month to date.

    Regional bank stocks showed some signs of stability, but have yet to begin a meaningful recovery from steep March losses. The SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
    KRE,
    +3.03%

    eked out a 0.2% weekly gain but remains down 29.3% in March. KRE’s plunge has taken it back to levels last seen in November 2020.

    Look beneath the surface, and the stock market appears “bifurcated,” said Austin Graff, chief investment officer and founder of Opal Capital.

    Much of the resilience in the broader market is attributable to gains for megacap technology stocks, which have enjoyed a flight-to-safety role, he said in a phone interview.

    The megacap tech-heavy Nasdaq-100
    NDX,
    +0.30%

    was up 6% in March through Friday’s close, according to FactSet, while regional bank shares dragged on the small-cap Russell 2000
    RUT,
    +0.85%
    ,
    down 8.5% over the same stretch.

    For investors, “the expectation should be for continued volatility because we do have less money flowing through the economy,” Graff said. There’s more pain to be felt in highly levered parts of the economy that weren’t prepared for the speed and scope of the Fed’s aggressive rate increases, including areas like commercial real estate that are also struggling with the work-from-home phenomenon.

    Graff has been buying companies in traditionally defensive sectors, such as utilities, consumer staples and healthcare, that are expected to be resilient during economic downturns.

    Read: ‘Some losses’ in commercial real estate and Treasurys may still need to work ‘through the banking sector,’ says Fed’s Kashkari

    Invesco’s Hooper said it makes sense for tactical allocators to position defensively right now.

    “But I think there has to be a recognition that if the banking issues that we’re seeing do appear to be resolved and the Fed has paused, we are likely to see a market regime shift…to a more risk-on environment,” she said. That would favor “overweight” positions in equities, including cyclical and small-cap stocks as well as moving further out on the risk spectrum on fixed income.

    The problem, she said, is the well-known difficulty in timing the market.

    Amoroso at iCapital said a “barbell” approach would allow investors to “get paid while they wait” by taking advantage of decent yields in cash, short- and long-term Treasurys, corporate bonds and private credit, while at the same time using dollar-cost averaging to take advantage of opportunities where valuations have been reset to the downside.

    “It doesn’t feel great for investors, but the reality is that we’re likely trapped in a narrow range for the S&P for a while,” Amoroso said, “until either growth breaks to the downside or inflation breaks to the downside.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks end higher, S&P 500 books back-to-back weekly gains despite bank jitters spurred by Deutsche Bank

    U.S. stocks end higher, S&P 500 books back-to-back weekly gains despite bank jitters spurred by Deutsche Bank

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks finished Friday higher, despite a jump in the cost of Deutsche Bank’s credit-default swaps helping to reignite banking-sector worries. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite each booked weekly gains.

    How stocks traded
    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average
      DJIA,
      +0.41%

      rose 132.28 points, or 0.4%, to close at 32,237.53.

    • The S&P 500
      SPX,
      +0.56%

      gained 22.27 points, or 0.6%, to finish at 3,970.99.

    • The Nasdaq Composite
      COMP,
      +0.31%

      added 36.56 points, or 0.3%, to end at 11,823.96.

    For the week, the Dow gained 1.2%, while the S&P 500 rose 1.4% and the Nasdaq advanced 1.7%, according to FactSet data. The Dow snapped two straight weeks of losses, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq each booked back-to-back weekly gains.

    What drove markets

    U.S. stocks ended modestly higher Friday to notch weekly gains even as worries over the banking system lingered.

    Bank concerns have cast a “heavy cloud over the market,” with investors worried about “weak links,” said Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment strategist at BMO Wealth Management, in a phone interview Friday. Ma said he expects investors will be looking to sell, potentially into any rallies, “until some of these clouds are lifted.”

    Shares of Germany’s Deutsche Bank AG
    DBK,
    -8.53%

    DB,
    -3.11%

    dropped Friday, after the cost of insuring the bank against a credit default jumped. The bank’s credit-default swaps had risen to the highest level since late 2018, according to a Reuters report Friday.

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced Friday she called an unscheduled meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight Council or FSOC which was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to help the government combat threats to financial stability. The FSOC issued a short statement after the market closed Friday saying that “while some institutions have come under stress, the U.S. banking system remains sound and resilient”.

    “Clearly, somebody thinks there are some concerns there,” said Randy Frederick, managing director of trading and derivatives at Charles Schwab. The problems facing European banks stem back to the era of negative interest rates, which set banks up for large losses on their bond holdings, he said.

    The selloff in Deutsche Bank shares weighed on banks in the U.S. and Europe, as banking-sector fears reemerged. Shares of UBS Group
    UBS,
    -0.94%
    ,
    which recently agreed to buy rival Credit Suisse Group, fell Friday.

    Other major European lenders, including Italy’s UniCredit S.p.A
    UCG,
    -4.06%

    and Spain’s Banco Santander SA
    SAN,
    -3.00%
    ,
    also saw their shares sink.

    “The thing that’s important to know about financials is there probably are banks that have problems, but there are others that don’t,” Frederick told MarketWatch during a phone interview. “People need to do some research.”

    The S&P 500’s financial sector fell 0.1% Friday, according to FactSet data.

    While banking-sector woes have hammered the financial sector this month, the outperformance of megacap technology stocks and other sectors have helped prop up the broader U.S. equities market. So far this month, the S&P 500 index is up less than 0.1%, FactSet data show.

    Concerns about the fragility of the banking sector have been percolating following a year of the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes. On Wednesday, the Fed announced that it hiked its policy rate by a quarter point to a range of 4.75% to 5% while projecting it could deliver one more 25 basis-point hike in 2023.

    In his first comments since the rapid collapse of Silicon Valley Bank two weeks ago, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said Friday the latest drop in Treasury yields could help cushion some of the stress facing the banking sector.

    Yields on the 2-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    3.779%

    and 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.376%

    each fell Friday in their third straight week of declines, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Two-year yields slid to 3.777% on Friday, the lowest level since September based on 3 p.m. Eastern time levels, while 10-year Treasury yields dropped to 3.379%, their lowest rate since January.

    Read: ‘Red alert recession signals.’ Gundlach expects the Fed to cut rates substantially ‘soon.’

    In U.S. economic data, a report Friday on sales of durable goods showed orders fell 1% in February, largely because of waning demand for passenger planes and new cars. Meanwhile, the S&P Global Flash U.S. services-sector index rose to an 11-month high of 53.8 in March.

    The role of regional banks in the U.S. economy is “huge,” said Sandi Bragar, chief client officer at wealth management firm Aspiriant, in a phone interview Friday. Bragar said she worries that recent regional bank failures will result in a pullback in lending that leads to slower economic growth and potentially a recession.

    “Our stance has been to be very diversified and we have been remaining on the defensive side of things,” she said.

    Within equities, that has meant holding “high-quality companies” that should be resilient in “poor economic times,” including stocks in areas such as healthcare, information technology and consumer staples, said Bragar.

    Companies in focus

    –Steve Goldstein contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank shares slump in latest sign of bank worries

    Deutsche Bank shares slump in latest sign of bank worries

    [ad_1]

    Deutsche Bank shares slumped on Friday, putting the health of another globally systemic important bank in the spotlight heading into the weekend.

    The German lender’s shares
    DBK,
    -8.53%

    fell 10% in Frankfurt trade, and the Euro Stoxx bank index
    SX7E,
    -4.61%

    fell 5%.

    Deutsche Bank’s 5-year credit-default swaps widened on Thursday, in what Reuters reported was the largest one-day rise in its history. And on Friday, they widened again.

    It should be noted that Deutsche Bank’s 5-year credit-default swap, which was 215 on Friday, is nowhere near the peak for Credit Suisse, which was 1,194, according to S&P Global data. The higher the value of the CDS, the more likely the market sees the issuer defaulting.

    Deutsche Bank’s AT1 bonds have tumbled in value after Switzerland wiped out Credit Suisse’s
    CSGN,
    -5.19%

    securities in the deal for it to be taken over by UBS
    UBSG,
    -3.55%
    .

    The Invesco AT1 Capital Bond UCITS ETF
    AT1,
    -1.97%
    ,
    which invests in these convertible bonds, has dropped 18% this month as investors lose faith in the securities. European and other banking regulators across the globe have insisted they will not follow Switzerland’s precedent, and first let bank equity fall to zero before wiping out the convertible securities in the event of a failure.

    “It is doubtful that banks will be able to issue new AT1 anytime soon, increasing the likelihood of outstanding AT1 notes being extended. We consider that the recent events in the banking sector have resulted in substantially increased uncertainty, which is likely to continue to be reflected as substantial short-term volatility in credit markets,” said analysts at ING.

    UBS
    UBS,
    -0.94%

    also is feeling the stress in a deal that the banks say might not complete this year. UBS shares dropped 6%.

    Related: Analysts say UBS will face revenue pressure before it can cut Credit Suisse costs.

    Analysts also noted that a foreign institution tapped a Fed facility for $60 billion, according to data released by the U.S. central bank on Thursday. The Fed does not identify the counterparties. Major central banks do have access to swap lines for dollar borrowing from the Fed, meaning that either it was an institution that does not have that capability, or it was one that wanted to do so anonymously.

    Furthermore, Bloomberg News reported the U.S. government was investigating banks including Credit Suisse and UBS for allegedly helping Russians evade U.S. sanctions.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s why UBS’s deal to buy Credit Suisse matters to U.S. investors

    Here’s why UBS’s deal to buy Credit Suisse matters to U.S. investors

    [ad_1]

    Thousands of miles away from U.S. shores last Wednesday, a headline began working its way across Europe, then Wall Street, sparking fresh panic as it dawned on investors that they may be facing yet another banking crisis.

    Shares of Credit Suisse
    CS,
    -6.94%

    CSGN,
    -8.01%

    would eventually sink 25% last week to a fresh record low, unable to find footing days after the head of top shareholder Saudi National Bank said they won’t invest any more in the bank. By Sunday, the struggling Swiss bank had a new owner, leaving investors to wonder if at least one chapter in a current roller coaster of global banking stress can be closed.

    Swiss authorities steered rival UBS AG
    UBS,
    -5.50%

    to an all-stock deal worth 3 billion francs ($3.25 billion), or 0.76 francs per share, a not-so-slight discount to the 1.86 franc close on Friday of Credit Suisse. So important was the agreement, it was announced by Switzerland’s President Alain Berset, with both banks and the chairman of the Swiss National Bank on either side of him.

    “With the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS, a solution has been found to secure financial stability and protect the Swiss economy in this exceptional situation,” the SNB said in a statement.

    The Swiss National Bank said either Swiss bank can borrow up to 100 billion francs in a liquidity assistance loan, and Credit Suisse will get a liquidity assistance loan of up to 100 billion francs, backed by a federal default guarantee. The U.S. Federal Reserve had worked with its Swiss counterpart on the deal as well.

    “We welcome the announcements by the Swiss authorities today to support financial stability. The capital and liquidity positions of the U.S. banking system are strong, and the U.S. financial system is resilient,” said a statement Sunday by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

    European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde also praised Swiss authorities for “restoring orderly market conditions and ensuring financial stability,” while reiterating the “resilience” of the euro-area banking sector. She said the ECB stands ready to provide liquidity if needed.

    Her comment comes days after the the ECB pulled the trigger Thursday on a 50-basis-point rate hike, as it warned “inflation is projected to remain too high for too long.”

    The deal for Credit Suisse comes in the wake of stress on the U.S. banking sector, triggered by the collapse of Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, all within the space of a week.

    “Virtually everyone at this high-level Swiss press conference — government officials, regulator, central bank governor, and executives of the two banks — blamed the US banking sector turmoil for being the catalyst for the financial turmoil in #Switzerland,” tweeted Mohamed A. El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, of the press conference Sunday with Swiss authorities to announce the deal.

    And for U.S. investors who have had quite enough anxiety lately, a logical question would be to ask if the deal that brings together the two Swiss banking giants will now remove one layer of stress from global markets, and hence Wall Street.

    For that reason, many will be watching how Asian and U.S. equity futures trade later on Sunday, as well as Europe’s opening reaction on Monday.

    The Credit Suisse news may only go so far to assuage investors, with some raising an eyebrow over Powell and Yellen’s Sunday statement about the Swiss deal. “Seriously, if everyone truly believed the ‘The capital and liquidity positions of the U.S. banking system are strong, and the U.S. financial system is resilient’ … Would they have to tell us? Are these words enough?” said Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research, on Twitter. “Or do investors want to see Warren Buffett writing checks to regional banks in the next two hours (before Asia opens)?”

    Fox News and other media outlets reported over the weekend that the Berkshire Hathaway
    BRK.A,
    -2.76%

    BRK.B,
    -2.81%

    chairman and CEO had been talking to President Joe Biden’s administration in recent days over possible investments in the battered regional bank sector, and offering his advice.

    The billionaire investor was responsible for a capital injection to Bank of America
    BAC,
    -3.97%

    in 2011 as its shares tumbled due to subprime mortgages, as well as $5 billion to Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -3.67%

    amid the 2008 financial crisis.

    Some had said ahead of the deal last week that global-market stability depended on the Swiss first getting their house in order.

    “I don’t think there are any direct consequences for U.S. investors, but it’s extremely negative for sentiment if a major Swiss bank fails, hot on the heels of SVB/SBNY,” Simon Ree, the founder of Tao of Trading options academy school and author of the book by the same name, told MarketWatch last week.

    “The market will be (temporarily) wondering who’s next. It could start to have the optics of a global banking crisis, rather than an idiosyncratic failure of a niche U.S. regional bank,” said Ree.

    Credit Suisse’s troubles came amid a revamp and five straight money-losing quarters, following a painful legacy that included billions worth of exposure to the collapsed Archegos family office and $10 billion worth of funds tied to Greensil Capital it had to freeze.

    Read: In its delayed annual report, Credit Suisse admitted to financial control weaknesses

    “The SNB and the Swiss government are fully aware that the failure of Credit Suisse or even any losses by deposit holders would destroy Switzerland’s reputation as a financial center,” said Otavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, a management consulting firm focused on global capital markets, in a note to clients last week.

    The bank’s plummeting stock price and soaring bond yields was “mimicking Silicon Valley Bank’s recent collapse in a frightening way. In terms of the outflow of deposits, Credit Suisse’s position looks even worse,” said Marenzi.

    Over there?

    As far as some are concerned, the market may have more stress ahead of it.

    “The SVB failure highlights the potential for other skeletons to be hidden in closets and the market will spend the next few weeks/months hunting them out. Even just the extreme volatility we’ve seen on bond markets the last five days renders any attempt to ascribe a value to other asset classes redundant,” said Ree.

    Plus: Here’s what’s really protecting your bank deposits

    His view is shared by many analysts, who in part point to increasing uncertainty around how the Federal Reserve will react going forward as it tries to balance market and economic risks. Some now see full percentage rate cuts by year-end, amid banking stress.

    Samantha LaDuc, the founder of LaDucTrading.com who specializes in timing major market inflections, said she stands by her advice (that she shared with MarketWatch in February) that investors are being “paid to wait,” by staying in cash.

    Read: Looking for a place for your cash? Grab these 5% CDs while you still can.

    “I have been literally recommending and tweeting to clients that we are PAID TO WAIT in T-bills at 5% until [the] bond market can figure out if we have recession or not. All that happened last week pulled forward recession risk,” she told MarketWatch.

    Prior to the SVB crisis, she had been recommending clients short reflation trades, such as banks
    XLF,
    -3.22%

    KRE,
    -5.99%
    ,
    energy
    XLE,
    -1.57%

    and metals and mining
    XME,
    -0.78%

    COPX,
    +0.63%

    SLX,
    -1.96%
    ,
    and has been saying she sees “unattractive risk-reward for either stocks or bonds.”

    Opimas’ Marenzi said the threat to Wall Street from Credit Suisse was simple:

    “You mean what do American investors who do not own any non-American stocks and do not own a passport and could not find Switzerland on a map and who think that anyone who speaks any language other than English is a bit weird have to worry about? Not a lot, other than the contagion spreading back into the US banking system and causing a meltdown,” he told MarketWatch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dow suffers worst week since June as U.S. stocks end sharply lower after employment report, banking sector fears

    Dow suffers worst week since June as U.S. stocks end sharply lower after employment report, banking sector fears

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks ended sharply lower Friday as investors parsed mixed signals from the February jobs report amid ongoing concerns about contagion in the banking sector from the troubles at Silicon Valley Bank.

    How stocks traded
    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average
      DJIA,
      -1.07%

      dropped 345.22 points, or 1.1%, to close at 31,909.64, its fourth straight day of declines for its longest losing streak since December.

    • The S&P 500
      SPX,
      -1.45%

      fell 56.73 points, or 1.4%, to finish at 3,861.59.

    • Nasdaq Composite
      COMP,
      -1.76%

      sank 199.47 points, or 1.8%, to end at 11,138.89.

    For the week, the Dow sank 4.4%, S&P 500 dropped 4.5% and the Nasdaq shed 4.7%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Dow booked its worst week since June, the S&P 500 saw its biggest weekly percentage decline since September, and the Nasdaq had its biggest percentage slide since November.

    What drove markets

    U.S. stocks slumped amid investor concerns about the banking sector after the closure of Silicon Valley Bank by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and in the wake of the monthly employment report released Friday.

    In a sign of investor anxiety, the CBOE Volatility Index
    VIX,
    +9.69%

    was up Friday afternoon at almost 25, after jumping Thursday, according to FactSet data, last check.

    “Bears came out of hibernation this week after waking up to a warning shot from the banking space,” said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist for LPL Financial, in emailed comments Friday, pointing to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.

    Silicon Valley Bank was closed Friday by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed receiver, with the bank becoming the first FDIC-backed institution to fail this year.

    Read: Bank ETFs fall amid concerns over SVB and ‘crack’ in financial system after rate hikes

    The SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
    KRE,
    -4.39%

    was down more than 4% Friday afternoon, FactSet data show, while shares of Bank of America Corp.
    BAC,
    -0.88%

    closed 0.9% lower, Citigroup Inc.
    C,
    -0.53%

    slid 0.5% and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    JPM,
    +2.54%

    rose 2.5%.

    Worries over the banking sector are “probably overshadowing” the positive aspects of the employment report, said Karim El Nokali, investment strategist at Schroders, in a phone interview Friday.

    The U.S. employment report for February showed the labor market continued to grow at a robust pace last month, with the U.S. economy adding 311,000 jobs, more than the 225,000 that economists polled by the Wall Street Journal had expected.

    But “if you dig a little deeper” into the report, average hourly earnings came in “a little lighter than expected” while labor-force participation ticked up, which are positive developments from an inflation standpoint, said El Nokali.

    Average hourly wages grew by 0.2%, a slower rate than the 0.3% rate economists had expected. It was also less than the 0.3% increase in January. The unemployment rate ticked higher to 3.6%, helped by an increase in the labor-force participation rate.

    “On the margin,” said El Nokali, the employment report was “positive for the equity market.” He said it would “probably argue more” for the Federal Reserve to raise its benchmark rate by 25 basis points at its policy meeting later this month, as opposed to a 50-basis-point hike that investors had been fearing leading up to the employment data.

    See: Jobs report shows strong 311,000 gain in February, puts pressure on Fed for bigger rate hike

    Fed Chair Jerome Powell said earlier this week that the “totality” of jobs and inflation data would determine whether the central bank would go back to raising its policy interest rate by another 50 basis points at its meeting later in March.

    After climbing earlier in the week, odds of a 50-basis-point rate hike by the Fed have moderated over the past 24 hours. Traders now see a 62% chance of the central bank raising its benchmark rate by 25 basis points, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.

    Meanwhile, Treasury yields sank Friday.

    The yield on the 2-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    4.594%

    dropped 31.4 basis points to 4.586%, while the 10-year Treasury yields fell 22.8 basis points to 3.694%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Treasury yield curve remains massively inverted, which has contributed to banks’ woes.

    Companies in focus

    —Steve Goldstein contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link