ReportWire

Tag: Packaging

  • Your Fast-Food Burger May Soon Come Wrapped in Seaweed

    Your Fast-Food Burger May Soon Come Wrapped in Seaweed

    [ad_1]

    Most fast-food burgers and chicken sandwiches come wrapped in grease-resistant packaging that is terrible for the .

    But researchers at Flinders University in , along with a German biomaterials company, one • fıve, are developing next-generation biopolymer coating materials made of seaweed that could solve packaging pollution.

    Grease-resistant paper is often coated with plastic and other environmentally harmful chemicals, such as polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). But the new paper prototype, which takes extracts from certain seaweed, helps prevent food from sticking to the paper while also serving up an environmentally circular solution to the problem.

    “We are able to reduce harmful plastic pollution with this product, and we are also using feedstock that is environmentally regenerative,” said Claire Gusko, Co-Founder of one • fıve.

    Many in the fast-food industry are aware of the chemicals in their packaging.

    Earlier this year, Restaurant Brands International, which owns , and , announced plans to roll out sustainable packaging by 2025.

    Still no word on whether the Whopper will come wrapped in seaweed packaging.

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Small

    Source link

  • Nantucket Spider Partners With Rainforest Trust to Help Protect Rainforests

    Nantucket Spider Partners With Rainforest Trust to Help Protect Rainforests

    [ad_1]

    Nantucket Spider is pushing the bug repellent and the home goods industry forward with its recent sustainability and transparency efforts. After announcing its Plastic-Free by 2025 initiative and its commitment to transparency this year, the company has now also committed to giving 2% of the proceeds of each item it sells online to Rainforest Trust’s Conservation Action Fund.

    Press Release


    Oct 18, 2022 15:00 EDT

    Nantucket Spider, a leader in the natural outdoor and home goods space, has committed to donating 2% of the proceeds of each item it sells online to support rainforest and endangered species habitat conservation with Rainforest Trust’s Conservation Action Fund. The fund is used to support and protect endangered species, threatened rainforests and other tropical ecosystems around the world. Rainforest Trust is one of the world’s most effective conservation charities with over 40 million acres of rainforest protected to date. 

    Nantucket Spider has been a leading innovator in the natural insect repellent market for nearly 10 years, with sustainability and transparency at the forefront of their business. More recently, the company has expanded into the zero-waste cleaning product space, adding an innovative plastic-free line of natural cleaning products and laundry detergent under the product line name “Nantucket Footprint.” 

    “We are mindful that the most humble creatures with the smallest footprints are impacted every day by the choices we all make.” – Nancy Jack, CEO and Co-Founder

    Earlier this year, the company announced its Plastic-Free by 2025 initiative. Already packaged and sent to customers in biodegradable bags, their bug repellents will be packaged in aluminum bottles starting this year, reducing plastic use and improving recyclability. This past summer, Nantucket Spider announced that they have become a fully remote company, thereby reducing their internal greenhouse gas emissions to zero. They are also working with their trade partners to further reduce emissions with sourcing.

    Sustainability, Packaging & Ingredients: 

    Nantucket Spider’s products are all made with the lowest toxicity ingredient choices on the market and are packaged in recycled, recyclable, compostable and/or biodegradable packaging. Their latest line of cleaning products, Nantucket Footprint, are packaged without water and without plastic. 

    Nantucket Spider’s Mission 

    The company’s mission is to create natural products using the highest-quality ingredients, the lowest toxicity, and the least amount of waste possible. 

    “We are committed to leaving the planet better than we found it for the future of the environment and for the future of our children. Subsequent generations should live in a safe, environmentally stable world, and we know that we can play a part in what that world looks like.” – Nancy Jack, CEO and Co-Founder

    Join the conversation:

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nantucketspider 

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Nantucketspider

    Source: Nantucket Spider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meet the 10 biggest megadonors for the 2022 midterm elections

    Meet the 10 biggest megadonors for the 2022 midterm elections

    [ad_1]

    With four weeks until Election Day, congressional candidates are on track to break midterm fundraising records, having raised nearly $2.5 billion so far this cycle. That’s already 70% more than what was raised during the 2014 cycle and just $200 million shy of the total raised during the full 2018 cycle.

    This cycle has also seen record-shattering outside spending, topping $1 billion through the beginning of October, according to an OpenSecrets estimate.

    The increase in spending and fundraising is due in large part to the involvement of millionaire and billionaire megadonors who have sought to influence the outcome of an election in which both chambers of Congress are in play.

    “When megadonors pump millions of dollars into super PACs, they get to help call the shots,” said Michael Beckel, research director at Issue One, a nonpartisan political reform organization. “Massive spending from a megadonor can influence what issues are talked about on the campaign trail and in Congress.”

    Super PACs are independent political action committees that can raise unlimited sums of money but are not allowed to coordinate with a candidate or campaign. Due to contribution limits, such as those restricting individuals’ candidate contributions to $2,900 per election per candidate, most megadonor spending goes to super PACs.

    More context: These are the basics of campaign finance in 2020 — in two handy charts

    A MarketWatch analysis of Federal Election Commission data through the end of September shows that these 10 business moguls and philanthropists are the biggest federal-level donors this cycle.

    Read: These 3 races could determine whether Democrats or Republicans control the Senate in 2023

    And see: If this seat flips red, Republicans will have ‘probably won a relatively comfortable House majority’

    Top federal-level megadonors this cycle
    Rank

    Contributor

    Total Contributions

    For Republicans

    For Democrats

    Nonpartisan/Bipartisan

    1

    George Soros

    $128,782,000

    $0

    $128,782,000

    $0

    2

    Ken Griffin

    $50,955,800

    $50,955,800

    $0

    $0

    3

    Richard Uihlein

    $49,117,000

    $49,117,000

    $0

    $0

    4

    Sam Bankman-Fried

    $39,931,000

    $201,000

    $37,725,000

    $2,005,000

    5

    Jeff Yass

    $32,754,000

    $32,754,000

    $0

    $0

    6

    Peter Thiel

    $30,189,000

    $30,189,000

    $0

    $0

    7

    Fred Eychaner

    $22,343,000

    $0

    $22,343,000

    $0

    8

    Stephen Schwarzman

    $21,870,000

    $21,865,000

    $0

    $5,000

    9

    Larry Ellison

    $21,003,000

    $21,003,000

    $0

    $0

    10

    Ryan Salame

    $18,932,000

    $17,432,000

    $0

    $1,500,000

    Totals:

    $415,877,000

    $223,517,000

    $188,850,000

    $3,510,000

    Source: MarketWatch analysis of FEC data as of Sept. 30, 2022
    Note: Partisan breakdown includes non-party affiliated PACs with over 95% of their spending benefitting one party, data has been rounded to the nearest thousand

    Big spending by itself doesn’t automatically mean winning. There have been notable instances of the financially strongest candidates losing (such as crypto-backed House candidate Carrick Flynn earlier this year and billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s self-financed presidential bid) — but money can certainly help put a candidate on the right track.

    “Money alone doesn’t guarantee electoral success, but every candidate prefers to be the one with more money to spend,” Beckel said. He added: “Outside spending on behalf of a candidate isn’t a silver bullet that’s going to guarantee electoral success. But it goes a long way to boosting somebody’s name recognition, and to presenting them as a viable candidate — somebody who has the resources to run a competitive campaign.”

    Information about the spending by the top 10 donors this cycle has been compiled from MarketWatch’s analysis of FEC data and filings, super PAC websites and previously reported comments. Read on to find out who are the top 10 biggest donors this cycle.

    10. Ryan Salame — $19 million

    Ryan Salame, the co-CEO of FTX Digital Markets, a subsidiary of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, founded a hybrid PAC earlier this year called American Dream Federal Action. The vast majority ($15 million) of the $19 million Salame has spent this cycle has gone into bankrolling the PAC, which has spent $2.4 million in independent expenditures supporting Illinois Republican Rep. Rodney Davis, $2 million supporting Republican Senate candidate Katie Britt from Alabama, and $1.2 million each supporting Arkansas GOP Sen. John Boozman and Brad Finstad, a GOP congressional candidate in Minnesota.

    On its website, the PAC describes itself as “organization dedicated to electing forward-looking candidates — those who want to protect America’s long term economic and national security by advancing smart policy decisions now.” A representative for Salame didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    9. Lawrence Ellison — $21 million

    The co-founder of Oracle
    ORCL,
    +0.26%

    has similarly bankrolled a PAC this election cycle — giving a total $20 million to Opportunity Matters Fund Inc. The super PAC has largely held onto its funds so far, recent FEC records show, having $17 million cash on hand as of the end of August. Of the independent expenditures it has made this cycle, it spent the most on Georgia Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker ($1.3 million), Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson ($1.3 million) and North Carolina Senate candidate and current Republican Rep. Ted Budd ($1.1 million). A representative for Ellison didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    8. Stephen Schwarzman — $22 million

    Billionaire Stephen Schwarzman, the CEO of private-equity giant Blackstone
    BX,
    -2.41%
    ,
    is the eighth biggest donor at the federal level this cycle. In March, Schwarzman gave $10 million to both the Senate Leadership Fund and Congressional Leadership Fund, super PACs aimed at obtaining a Republican majority in the Senate and House, respectively. A representative for Schwarzman didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    7. Fred Eychaner — $22 million

    Fred Eychaner has also contributed $22 million so far this cycle, but unlike most of the spending on this list, his has been directed toward Democratic causes. The chairman of Chicago-based Newsweb Corporation has given $9 million to the House Majority PAC and $8 million to the Senate Majority PAC, as well as just under $1.5 million to the Democratic National Committee and several hundred thousands to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. A representative for Eychaner didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    6. Peter Thiel — $30 million

    Venture capitalist Peter Thiel was heavily involved in backing Ohio Republican J.D. Vance’s primary bid, giving $15 million in the spring to the Vance-aligned Protect Ohio Values PAC.

    The massive primary investment was “historic” and record-setting, according to Beckel, who added that Thiel’s involvement in the Ohio Senate primary could mark “a new chapter of how mega donors are choosing to play in politics.”

    “I think it’s become clear for a lot of megadonors that there are high stakes to a lot of primaries, and by spending in the primary, where there is typically lower turnout than in say, a statewide general election, they can get a lot of bang for their buck by investing in a primary election,” Beckel added.

    Thiel has indicated that he doesn’t intend to put any more money toward Vance’s bid as he reportedly believes the Ohio candidate is on track to win, and instead will focus his funding on Arizona Republican Blake Masters’ bid to oust Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly in the final weeks leading up to the midterm election.

    Thiel, known for his roles in PayPal
    PYPL,
    -1.69%
    ,
    Palantir
    PLTR,
    -0.25%

    and Facebook
    META,
    -3.92%
    ,
    has also given a total $15 million to the Masters-aligned PAC, Saving Arizona, with his most recent contribution in July. Both Vance and Masters are venture capitalists, but Masters has worked with Thiel. He served as chief operating officer of Thiel Capital and president of the Thiel Foundation, and he co-authored a book on startups with Thiel in 2014. A representative for Thiel didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    5. Jeff Yass — $33 million

    Options trader Jeff Yass, who founded trading firm Susquehanna International Group, has contributed about $33 million on a federal level this cycle. Yass has given $15 million to the School Freedom Fund, or the equivalent of 97% of the PAC’s total fundraising. The group focuses on the issue of school choice, and its website states that some bureaucrats “hindered the development and education of our youth through school closures, mask mandates, critical race theory, and more.”

    Aside from the School Freedom Fund, Yass’ other biggest contributions are to the conservative Club for Action ($6.5 million), Kentucky Freedom ($5 million), Protect Freedom ($2 million) and Crypto Freedom ($1.9 million). A representative for Yass didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    4. Sam Bankman-Fried — $40 million

    Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder and CEO of FTX, is the main funder behind Protect Our Future PAC, giving it $27 million of the $28 million it raised this cycle. 

    The organization says on its website that it focuses on promoting Democratic candidates championing pandemic preparedness and prevention “so this is the last time in our lifetime, and our children’s lifetimes, that we will face the devastation that has gripped communities across the U.S. since 2020.”

    The group spent more than $10 million supporting Democrat Carrick Flynn’s House bid in Oregon. Flynn lost his primary in May by 18 points despite his massive outside spending advantage. In addition to Flynn, the group has made over $1 million in independent expenditures each supporting Democratic congressional candidates Lucy McBath, a current representative from Georgia; Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Adam Hollier of Michigan, Valerie Foushee of North Carolina and Shontel Brown, a current representative from Ohio.

    Most of the other $10 million Bankman-Fried spent this cycle has gone to the House Majority PAC ($6 million) and the crypto PAC GMI ($2 million).

    While the vast majority of his spending has supported Democratic candidates and causes, Bankman-Fried does not classify himself as an exclusively Democratic donor — for instance he gave $105,000 to the Alabama Conservatives Fund in June and $45,000 to the NRCC in July. 

    He told Politico in August that he is “legitimately worried about doing things that will make people view me as partisan when it’s not how I feel … because I think it both misses what I’m trying to do and makes it harder for me to act constructively.” A representative for the FTX boss didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    3. Richard Uihlein — $49 million

    Richard Uihlein is the founder of the shipping and business supply company Uline, and is a longtime conservative donor. This cycle has seen nearly $50 million in political spending by him, with just over half of it going to Club for Growth Action. Uihlein has also given about $14 million to Restoration PAC, an organization that says it is “dedicated to strengthening the foundations that made America the greatest nation in the world: God, family, education, and community.”

    Uihlein’s next largest contributions are to the conservative Team PAC ($2.5 million) and the Arkansas Patriots Fund ($2.2 million), which earlier this year made ad buys favoring Republican Sen. John Boozman’s primary opponent. A representative for Uihlein didn’t respond to a request for comment.

    2. Ken Griffin — $51 million

    With $51 million in federal-level political spending, Ken Griffin, CEO of hedge fund Citadel, is the second most prolific donor this cycle.

    The biggest beneficiaries are the Republican-aligned Congressional Leadership Fund with $18.5 million in contributions, the Senate Leadership Fund with $10 million and Honor Pennsylvania, a super PAC that backed Republican Dave McCormick’s Senate bid. McCormick lost in the primary to Mehmet Oz by less than a thousand votes. 

    While Griffin spent about $64 million during the last cycle, his $51 million figure this year marks by far the most he has spent during a midterm cycle. During the 2018 cycle, his contributions totaled less than $8 million.

    A spokesperson for Griffin told MarketWatch that Griffin “supports leaders who are committed to protecting the American Dream and pursuing policies that will create a better future for the United States.”

    “The right policies will focus on creating rewarding jobs, prioritizing public safety, and investing in a strong national defense,” his spokesperson said. “Preserving the American Dream will require that every child is well educated, can access great healthcare, and has the opportunity to succeed.”

    1. George Soros — $129 million

    Not one donor comes close to matching the sum that billionaire philanthropist George Soros has contributed this cycle: $129 million. However, much of that money hasn’t actually been put to work this cycle.

    The majority of those on this list have focused their funding on Republican causes, but Soros’ money has gone to Democratic groups — specifically Democracy PAC II, whose $125 million in contributions comprises 99% of its fundraising. The super PAC spent more than $80 million on Democratic groups and candidates during the 2020 election.

    A representative for Soros pointed MarketWatch to a Politico article from January, in which Soros said the $125 million is aimed at supporting pro-democracy “causes and candidates, regardless of political party” who are invested in “strengthening the infrastructure of American democracy: voting rights and civic participation, civil rights and liberties, and the rule of law” and called his contribution a “long-term investment” that will  support political work beyond this year.

    So far this cycle, Democracy PAC has spent very little and holds $113 million in available cash. Contributions the PAC has made this cycle include $5 million to the Senate Majority PAC, $2.5 million to One Georgia and $1 million to both Care in Action and House Majority PAC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tasmanian Pure Vodka® (TPV®) Earns Double Gold Medal at The Fifty Best Imported Vodka Tasting

    Tasmanian Pure Vodka® (TPV®) Earns Double Gold Medal at The Fifty Best Imported Vodka Tasting

    [ad_1]

    Press Release


    Oct 10, 2022

    Tasmanian Pure Vodka® is pleased to announce that it was awarded a Double Gold medal for best imported vodka at this year’s The Fifty Best 2022 tasting. 

    Using professional criteria, the pre-qualified panel of judges blind-tasted hundreds of imported vodkas and rated them individually on a 1-5 point scoring system with 5 — or Gold — being the highest. After tallying the scores, medals were awarded based on the judges’ professional impressions of the products evaluated.

    “We are pleased to have received this honorable recognition by The Fifty Best,” said Joseph Orrico, principal and founder of Tasmanian Pure Vodka ®. “As a growing brand headquartered in the U.S. whose ingredients and distinction derives from the natural and untainted Tasmanian landscape, we strive to appeal to the taste and likings of vodka connoisseurs who share our passion for unrivaled taste and purity. We are thrilled and grateful to have achieved this award.”

    About Tasmanian Pure Vodka®

    Tasmanian Pure Vodka® (TPV®) is derived from 30 Million Years of Craft™. Its small-batch, premium recipe is produced from the purest water and air of Tasmania, Australia, and is rolling out across the United States. The premium vodka’s core ingredient, water, is supplied by Tasmanian Mountain Waters, the purest on the planet, which runs through a series of 300 limestone caves to the point of extraction. TPV™’s mission is to transform nature’s purest water into vodka in its most natural form.

    For more information, contact info@tpvodka.com.

    About The Fifty Best

    TheFiftyBest.com is a digital guide to wines & spirits, featuring rated listings resulting from proprietary blind tastings as judged by wine/spirits journalists, spirits professionals, wine/spirit retailers, mixologists, spirits consultants and connoisseurs. The Fifty Best achieves the highest standards of spirits evaluations by adhering to strict tasting rules and rigorous methodology.

    Source: Tasmanian Pure Vodka

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 tumbled between 20% and 30% in September

    These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 tumbled between 20% and 30% in September

    [ad_1]

    Stocks declined again on Friday, closing out September with large losses across the board as the rally from the June lows partway through August faded into memory.

    The S&P 500
    SPX,
    -1.51%

    fell 1.5% on Friday. The benchmark index slumped 9.3% for September, leading to a 2022 loss of 24.8%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -1.71%

    gave up 1.7% on Friday, for a September decline of 8.8%. The Dow has now fallen 20.9% for 2022. The Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    -1.51%

    pulled back 1.5% on Friday for a September drop of 10.5% and a year-to-date plunge of 32.4%. (All price changes in this article exclude dividends.)

    Below is a list of stocks in the S&P 500 that fell the most during September.

    It was the worst September performance for U.S. stocks since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data. William Watts looked back to see what poor performance during September may portend for October.

    Real estate leads the sector bloodbath

    All sectors of the S&P 500 were down during September, including five that fell by double digits:

    S&P 500 sector

    Sept. 30 price change

    September price change

    2022 price change

    Real Estate

    1.0%

    -13.6%

    -30.4%

    Communication Services

    -1.7%

    -12.2%

    -39.4%

    Information Technology

    -1.9%

    -12.0%

    -31.9%

    Utilities

    -2.0%

    -11.5%

    -8.6%

    Industrials

    -1.3%

    -10.6%

    -21.7%

    Energy

    -0.9%

    -9.7%

    30.7%

    Materials

    -0.3%

    -9.6%

    -24.9%

    Consumer Staples

    -1.8%

    -8.3%

    -13.5%

    Consumer Discretionary

    -1.8%

    -8.1%

    -30.3%

    Financials

    -1.1%

    -7.9%

    -22.4%

    Health Care

    -1.4%

    -2.7%

    -14.1%

    S&P 500

    -1.5%

    -9.3%

    -24.8%

    Source: FactSet

    Worst performers in the S&P 500 in September
    Company

    Ticker

    Sept. 30 price change

    September price change

    2022 price change

    Decline from 52-week intraday high

    Date of 52-week intraday high

    FedEx Corp.

    FDX,
    -2.52%
    -2.5%

    -29.6%

    -42.6%

    -44.4%

    01/05/2022

    V.F. Corp.

    VFC,
    -2.73%
    -2.7%

    -27.8%

    -59.2%

    -62.1%

    11/16/2021

    Lumen Technologies Inc.

    LUMN,
    -1.36%
    -1.4%

    -26.9%

    -42.0%

    -49.8%

    11/05/2021

    Ford Motor Co.

    F,
    -2.35%
    -2.4%

    -26.5%

    -46.1%

    -56.7%

    01/13/2022

    Charter Communications Inc. Class A

    CHTR,
    -2.96%
    -3.0%

    -26.5%

    -53.5%

    -59.8%

    10/07/2021

    Adobe Inc.

    ADBE,
    -1.10%
    -1.1%

    -26.3%

    -51.5%

    -60.7%

    11/22/2021

    Carnival Corp.

    CCL,
    -23.25%
    -23.3%

    -25.7%

    -65.1%

    -73.5%

    10/01/2021

    CarMax Inc.

    KMX,
    +1.32%
    1.3%

    -25.4%

    -49.3%

    -57.7%

    11/08/2021

    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    AMD,
    -1.22%
    -1.2%

    -25.3%

    -56.0%

    -61.5%

    11/30/2021

    Caesars Entertainment Inc.

    CZR,
    -0.49%
    -0.5%

    -25.2%

    -65.5%

    -73.1%

    10/01/2021

    Boeing Co.

    BA,
    -3.39%
    -3.4%

    -24.4%

    -39.9%

    -48.2%

    11/15/2021

    WestRock Co.

    WRK,
    -1.56%
    -1.6%

    -23.9%

    -30.4%

    -43.6%

    05/05/2022

    International Paper Co.

    IP,
    -1.22%
    -1.2%

    -23.8%

    -32.5%

    -44.0%

    10/13/2021

    Western Digital Corp.

    WDC,
    +1.15%
    1.1%

    -23.0%

    -50.1%

    -53.1%

    01/05/2022

    Newell Brands Inc.

    NWL,
    -0.57%
    -0.6%

    -22.2%

    -36.4%

    -47.5%

    02/16/2022

    Eastman Chemical Co.

    EMN,
    +0.34%
    0.3%

    -21.9%

    -41.2%

    -45.1%

    01/19/2022

    Nike Inc. Class B

    NKE,
    -12.81%
    -12.8%

    -21.9%

    -50.1%

    -53.6%

    11/05/2021

    Seagate Technology Holdings PLC

    STX,
    -2.11%
    -2.1%

    -20.5%

    -52.9%

    -54.8%

    01/05/2022

    PVH Corp.

    PVH,
    -3.55%
    -3.6%

    -20.4%

    -58.0%

    -64.3%

    11/05/2021

    Dish Network Corp. Class A

    DISH,
    -2.19%
    -2.2%

    -20.3%

    -57.4%

    -70.1%

    10/04/2021

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, including developments that led to their share-price declines.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    FedEx Corp.
    FDX,
    -2.52%

    tops the list because of investors’ harsh reaction to the company’s sales and profit warning on Sept. 16. Claudia Assis and Greg Robb explained the implications of FedEx’s warning for the broad economy.

    Shares of Carnival Corp.
    CCL,
    -23.25%

    fell 23% on Friday (for a September decline of 26%) after the cruise giant again reported sales and earnings below what analysts had expected, even though it reported increasing its capacity usage to 92%.

    Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -12.81%

    was down 13% on Friday for a September decline of 22%, after the company warned that discounting to clear inventory would continue to affect its earnings performance. Here’s how analysts reacted.

    Adobe Inc.
    ADBE,
    -1.10%

    made the list because of investors’ doubt about its dilutive $20 billion deal to acquire Figma.

    The bulk of CarMax’s
    KMX,
    +1.32%

    drop for the month came on Sept. 29, after the used-car dealer missed sales and earnings estimates and indicated that consumers were beginning to resist high prices.

    Don’t miss: Dividend yields on preferred stocks have soared. This is how to pick the best ones for your portfolio.

    [ad_2]

    Source link