ReportWire

Tag: Nancy Meyers

  • Penélope Cruz, Kieran Culkin, Jude Law, Emma Mackey & Owen Wilson In Final Talks For Nancy Meyers Movie At Warner Bros

    Nancy Meyers‘ next untiled feature is officially moving forward at Warner Bros after the studio took it in turnaround from Netflix back in 2023. It’s Meyers first time behind the camera in 11 years; her last movie being Warner Bros. Anne Hathaway and Robert De Niro comedy The Intern.

    The previous iteration had Oscar winner Penélope Cruz and Owen Wilson attached, and they’ll remain aboard with Oscar winner Kieran Culkin, Jude Law and Emma Mackey in talks to join. The studio has set a Christmas Day 2027 theatrical release for the pic which Meyers also penned.

    The logline remains under wraps with anything that’s been previously out there, untrue.

    Producers are Meyers and Ilona Herzberg with Diana Pokorny executive producing.

    The latest Meyers movie was previously set at Netflix with in addition to Wilson and Cruz, Scarlett Johansson and Michael Fassbender in talks. The pricetag was between $130M-$150M with $80M for above-the-line costs. Netflix couldn’t do it. We hear that Warner Bros is making the movie at a significantly lower cost than the project was conceived at. Two days after Netflix pulled the plug in mid-March 2023, the project moved over to Warners where they’ve been passionate about mounting the project. At one point, Adam Driver was kicking the tires before he committed to Michael Mann’s Heat 2.

    The CAA, Untitled and Kuranda repped Cruz won Best Supporting Actress at the Oscars for Woody Allen’s Vicky Cristina Barcelona and received three additional Oscar nominations for Volver, Nine, and Parallel Mothers. Her recent film credits include Ferrari, directed by Michael Mann, and she next stars in the upcoming Warner Bros. release The Bride!, directed by Maggie Gyllenhaal.

    The WME and Brookside Artist Management repped Culkin won an Oscar, BAFTA and Golden Globe in the supporting actor category for his turn in Searchlight’s A Real Pain last year as well as an Emmy and Golden Globe for HBO’s Succession. Film credits include Igby Goes Down, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and Steven Soderbergh’s No Sudden Move for HBO Max.

    Tony and Golden Globe award nominee Jude won a BAFTA Award and received an Academy Award nomination for The Talented Mr. Ripley and earned an additional Oscar® nomination for Cold Mountain. His extensive film credits include The Order, Sherlock Holmes, and the Netflix series Black Rabbit. The actor is represented by CAA, Julian Belfrage Associates, Jackoway Austen, and Pippa Beng.

    Mackey recently starred in James L. Brooks’ 20th Century Studios dramedy, Ella McCay. She is best known for her breakout role as Maeve Wiley in Netflix’s Sex Education, as well as portraying Emily Brontë in Warner Bros’ film Emily. Her upcoming projects include A24’s film Peaked directed by and starring Molly Gordon, and Greta Gerwig’s forthcoming Narnia adaptation for Netflix. The actress is repped by CAA, Johnson Shapiro Slewett & Kole, and Ziffren Brittenham.

    Wilson was nominated for an Original Screenplay Oscar for co-penning Wes Anderson’s The Royal Tenenbaums. He is the star of the Meet the Parents franchise and it’s upcoming sequel, Focker In-Law. He stars on Apple TV’s Stick series and Disney+/Marvel Studios’ Loki. Other pic credits include Anderson’s The French Dispatch, Bottle Rocket, The Grand Budapest Hotel, Life Aquatic, and Royal Tennebaums to name a few. He is repped by UTA and Hirsch Wallerstein Hayum Matlof + Fishman LLP.  

    Currently, there are no other wide entries on Christmas Day 2027, but the Meyers movie will bow in the wake of Warner Bros/New Line’s The Hunt for Golum movie and Disney/Marvel Studios’ Avengers: Secret Wars on Dec. 17.

    Anthonypauldalessandro

    Source link

  • Diane Keaton Was a Genre Unto Herself

    By the time I reached the fourth grade, Diane Keaton had already cemented herself as my preferred romantic heroine. Snow White and The Sound of Music’s Maria von Trapp paled in comparison to Erica Barry, the 50-something divorced playwright at the center of Nancy Meyers’s Something’s Gotta Give (2003)—coincidentally, one of the four DVDs my now 80-year-old grammy owned in the pre-streaming era.

    Even in my prepubescent state (or perhaps because of it), something about Keaton’s version of falling in love in the movies resonated. Maybe it was the way she so openly resented Jack Nicholson’s aging playboy, Harry. While laid up in her Hamptons home after a heart attack, Harry asks Erica, “What’s with the turtlenecks?” She curtly replies: “I like ’em. I’ve always liked ’em, and I’m just a turtleneck kind of gal,” flippantly waving her hands in a way that’s always stuck with me. He then wants to know if she ever gets hot—and all that implies. “No,” Keaton’s character snaps, dismissively adding, “Not lately.” But there is also a hint of possibility—something Erica allows herself to express in the play she’s writing, but not the life she’s living.

    Later in the film, the shedding of that same article of clothing signifies Erica’s sexual reawakening. “Cut it off,” she tells Harry, handing him a pair of scissors so he can slice open the beige turtleneck from navel to neck. With each inch of skin revealed, she breathes a little easier. “Erica, you are a woman to love,” Nicholson’s character rasps. And so was the woman who played her. “Diane Keaton, arguably the most covered up person in the history of clothes, is also a transparent woman,” as Meryl Streep once put it. “There’s nobody who stands more exposed, more undefended, and just willing to show herself inside and out than Diane.”

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Keanu Reeves Pays Tribute to Diane Keaton: “She Was a Very Special Artist and Person”

    Keanu Reeves is remembering Something’s Gotta Give co-star Diane Keaton following the news of her death on Saturday.

    While premiering his new film Good Fortune in New York, Reeves reflected on their time together, telling The Hollywood Reporter, “I had the wonderful opportunity to work with her and she was a very special artist and person. Very unique and just what a wonderful artist.”

    The two starred together in Nancy Meyers‘ 2003 rom-com, with Keaton’s playwright Erica Barry juggling the affections of both a charming young doctor (Reeves) and a wealthy record company owner (Jack Nicholson). Keaton was nominated for an Oscar for the role, and the pair also reunited as presenters at the 2020 Academy Awards.

    Reeves’ comments come just a few hours after Meyers took to social media for her own tribute, writing on Instagram after the outpouring of reactions, “As a movie lover, I’m with you all — we have lost a giant. A brilliant actress who time and again laid herself bare to tell our stories. As a woman, I lost a friend of almost 40 years — at times over those years, she felt like a sister because we shared so many truly memorable experiences. As a filmmaker, I’ve lost a connection with an actress that one can only dream of.”

    The filmmaker also specifically referenced Something’s Gotta Give in her post, remembering, “When I needed her to cry in scene after scene in Something’s Gotta Give, she went at it hard and then somehow made it funny. And I remember she would sometimes spin in a kind of goofy circle before a take to purposely get herself off balance or whatever she needed to shed so she could be in the moment.”

    “She was fearless, she was like nobody ever, she was born to be a movie star, her laugh could make your day and for me, knowing her and working with her — changed my life,” Meyers continued. “Thank you Di. I’ll miss you forever.”

    AMC Theatres is also bringing back Annie Hall and Something’s Gotta Give to 100 cinemas across the U.S. in Keaton’s honor.

    Kirsten Chuba

    Source link

  • Jude Law Would Revive Mr. Napkin Head for ‘The Holiday’ Series on One Condition

    Jude Law seduced more than a few viewers in the Christmas rom-com The Holiday. Released in 2006, the film starred Law as Graham, a widower and father of two little girls who gradually falls in love with Amanda, a recently separated Californian played by Cameron Diaz. Last month, fans of the romantic comedy that has become a holiday classic learned that the feature film would be adapted into a mini-series. The AppleTV+ project follows the original synopsis. Namely: the story of two young women, one British and one American, who swap homes for the festive season—and not without surprises, as they each end up finding true love during their journey.

    In an interview with Today to promote his new Netflix series Black Rabbit, Law spoke about the return of the cult film. A project he didn’t know existed until the original director, Nancy Meyers, told him about it. “You know, I’ve heard of it. I don’t know anything about it. Nothing, except that I don’t think I’m part of it. I don’t know,” he said. “I think Nancy wrote to me and asked, ‘Have you heard of it?’ literally.”

    So when asked if he’d be up for starring in the miniseries, Law had just one condition: that the director of the iconic rom-com be at the helm of the project. “Nancy Meyers would have to be involved [for me to accept],” he said. “She’s the one who gave the film its magic back in the day.” A pretty simple condition to meet, don’t you think? Well, far from it, since Meyers discovered the Apple TV+ project like millions of other Internet users—that is, on social media. It was in an Instagram story that the filmmaker shared her astonishment at the project’s announcement last August. “First news. Imagine my surprise when I opened Instagram and this was the first publication I saw,” she wrote.

    In addition to the romance between Law and Diaz under the gray skies of the UK, The Holiday followed the adventures of Iris (Kate Winslet), a British journalist staying in Los Angeles who falls for Miles (Jack Black), a music composer. So, while Law doesn’t appear to be reprising his role in this Apple TV+ adaptation, it remains to be seen who will step into the shoes of his character Graham. Last month, casting began for the lead roles, formerly played by Diaz and Winslet. According to Deadline, the project should receive the green light once the stars align.

    Originally published in Vanity Fair France.

    Olivia Batoul

    Source link

  • From ‘Sex and the City’ to ‘Summer I Turned Pretty’: Why Paris Is Rarely Ever a Good Idea for Romantic Heroines

    Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Boy meets girl, girl seeks adventure in Paris, then girl’s complicated feelings for said boy ultimately taint her ability to actually enjoy the city of love. That scenario factors into the plot of both The Summer I Turned Pretty’s final season and the newly released Netflix rom-com The Wrong Paris—although this time, our heroines, played by Lola Tung and Miranda Cosgrove respectively, make it to Paris—and get to stay, at least for a while.

    On The Summer I Turned Pretty, Belly defers her acceptance to study abroad in Paris for premature marriage with Jeremiah (Gavin Casalegno). She then comes to her senses, calling off the wedding and moving overseas, where she fights through homesickness and language barriers to build a nice little life for herself. Of course, that independence will soon be interrupted by Belly’s ex Conrad (Christopher Briney), seen buying a plane ticket to Paris in the show’s penultimate episode. But at least she was given the opportunity to test out both versions of her future before making a choice.

    That’s also true of The Wrong Paris, a silly rom-com about a Bachelor-esque reality dating show that contestants are led to believe will be filmed in Paris, France, only to learn it’s actually Paris, Texas—population 25,000. Our heroine, Cosgrove’s Dawn, takes the twist in stride, vowing to compete on the show—not for love, but some prize money to fund studying at a Paris art school. “I don’t hate this,” she says of her hometown, “I just hate that this is the only thing I’ve ever known.” Then a cowboy named Trey (Pierson Fode—also, has anyone ever actually met a cowboy named Trey?) and his comically sculpted abs waltz in. “You ain’t gonna find no man like me in Paris,” he drawls, to which she replies: “Yeah, that’s the point.” Surprise, surprise, Dawn and Trey do fall in love and later strike a bicontinental compromise—she’ll finish school, then presumably come back to Texas.

    Hepburn and Astaire, near 30 years in age between them, leave Paris as husband-and-wife in Funny Face.LMPC/Getty Images

    Paris has long been a place for lovers onscreen. Casablanca (1942) famously ends with Humphrey Bogart’s Rick telling Ingrid Bergman’s Ilsa that they’ll always have their time in Paris, even if they can’t end up together. The European city has gotten in the way of a whole lot of love affairs ever since. Perhaps no one was more familiar with this than poor Audrey Hepburn, who starred in six films set in the City of Light throughout the 1950s and ’60s, most of which end with the idea that her lovelorn character would presumably rather return to the United States with a man twice her age than walk along the Seine solo. (Case in point: Hepburn choosing Bogart in 1954’s Sabrina—a frequent reference on The Summer I Turned Pretty, and then Fred Astaire in 1957’s Funny Face—which has been repeatedly mentioned on Netflix’s Emily in Paris.)

    Somewhere along the way, Paris became the go-to plot device standing in between a single woman and her love interest. The city represented female independence and agency—a culturally rich alternative to the happily ever after established in fairy tales.

    On ’90s to early aughts TV, Paris became a surefire tactic for injecting drama into long-running “will they or won’t they?” couples. Shannen Doherty’s Brenda flees her dramatic on-again-off-again dynamic with Luke Perry’s Dylan on Beverly Hills, 90210 for a summer study-abroad program. Sarah Jessica Parker’s beret-clad Carrie Bradshaw now famously hurls a McDonald’s “le Big Mac” upon learning that “Big is moving to Paris,” in Sex and the City season two. Then her own Parisian journey with Frenchman Aleksandr Petrovsky (Mikhail Baryshnikov) is cut short in the series finale once Big (Chris Noth) shows up to bring her back home. On another hotly anticipated final episode, Jennifer Aniston’s Rachel Green considers moving overseas with her toddler-aged daughter for a fresh start working at Louis Vuitton after years of across-the-hall pining for David Schwimmer’s Ross. But these flights of fancy don’t last long—a brief layover on the way to domesticated bliss right back where they started.

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Netflix Breaks Up With Nancy Meyers

    Netflix Breaks Up With Nancy Meyers

    People who love love—and, yes, perfectly appointed kitchens—have a new reason to be heartbroken. Netflix will not be making a romantic comedy with Nancy Meyers after a disagreement over the budget, a source familiar with the situation confirms for Vanity Fair

    Meyers hadn’t made a new film in nearly a decade when Netflix announced last spring that it had said yes to a new project from the writer-director behind The Holiday, It’s Complicated, and other movies. The new film was to be a star-studded, semi-autobiographical story about a filmmaking couple who reunite on a set after breaking up. (Meyers was married to writer-producer Charles Shyer for 19 years and made several of her most beloved films with him, including Father of the Bride and The Parent Trap.) Among the stars reportedly circling the project were Scarlett JohanssonPenélope CruzMichael Fassbender, and Owen Wilson

    But in early March, Puck’s Matt Belloni reported that, after Netflix greenlit the movie at $130 million, Meyers’ team circled back and asked for $150 million. On Tuesday afternoon, The Hollywood Reporter and Deadline reported that the project was dead at Netflix. Both budgets are particularly high for a romcom, especially now that many of them bypass theaters and go straight to streaming. And Netflix, like much of Hollywood, has been cutting costs to satisfy investors. A spokeswoman for the streamer declined to comment. A representative for Meyers has not yet respond to a request. 

    The film, which Deadline reports was titled Paris Paramount, would have been the first Meyers project since 2015’s The Intern, starring Anne Hathaway and Robert De Niro. She was most active when romcoms were generally sure things at the box office. Something’s Gotta Give, with Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton, grossed $265 million worldwide in 2003, and Meryl Streep’s pristine Santa Barbara kitchen in It’s Complicated helped the film rake in $219 million in 2009. Even The Intern managed to make $195 million. 

    Though times have changed, the cult of Meyers has remained strong, especially among a generation too young to have seen her films in theaters. She has more than 250,000 followers on Instagram, where she regularly posts nostalgic set photos and shows off her own beautifully decorated home. And Keaton’s style in Something’s Gotta Give even inspired a trend on TikTok known as the “coastal grandmother aesthetic.” 

    Fans eagerly anticipating more Meyers’ interior design inspiration will need to wait and see if another studio or streamer will swoop in and make her latest film. 

    Natalie Jarvey

    Source link

  • Your Place or Mine Pulls From The Holiday and A Lot Like Love For a Banal Effect

    Your Place or Mine Pulls From The Holiday and A Lot Like Love For a Banal Effect

    It seems telling that the intro to Aline Brosh McKenna’s latest rom-com, Your Place or Mine, is set in the 00s. Namely, 2003. We’re hit over the head with this (along with so many other things) “time period,” not just with a title card that says: “it’s 2003,” but with the additional “cutesy” explanation of the year via, “how can we tell?” followed by arrows that point to accessories worn by the characters the viewer is introduced to, including “trucker hat,” “flat-ironed hair,” “wallet chain,” “pointless earring,” “so many layered shirts” and “wonderbra®”. And yet, for all this “attention to detail,” the song echoing in Debbie’s apartment, “The Sweet Escape” by Gwen Stefani featuring Akon, didn’t actually come out until 2006.

    In any case, it’s “telling” that Brosh McKenna would set the movie at the start of the 00s because this feels like the type of cut-and-paste script she might have actually written in the early 00s, before securing clout with 2004’s Laws of Attraction (before that, her only credit was 1999’s forgettable Three to Tango starring Neve Campbell and Matthew Perry). After that, The Devil Wears Prada assured her place in the rom-com hall of fame, only to be further cemented by 27 Dresses and Morning Glory. Things took a dive with I Don’t Know How She Does It and We Bought a Zoo, but there was the promise of Brosh McKenna’s rejuvenation and renaissance in Cruella.

    Which is why for Your Place or Mine to follow that up and mark Brosh McKenna’s directorial debut almost leads one to believe that the movie is a script she had lying around in a drawer from back in the day that she nipped and tucked for a quick paycheck. At least, that’s the preferable thing to believe as we watch the predictable plot, which so overtly pulls from Nancy Meyers’ The Holiday and another Ashton Kutcher-starring movie from, quelle coincidence, the 00s called A Lot Like Love.

    Just as it is in the latter rom-com, Debbie Dunn (Reese Witherspoon) and Peter Coleman (Kutcher) are two best friends who have sex when they first meet and then devolve into the friend zone, where both are ostensibly “comfortable,” but each one has also long known that there’s a lingering attraction, they just have to repress it deep, deep down until the “appropriate” moment comes (i.e., end of Act Two). At the beginning of the movie, Brosh McKenna tries to “pull a fast one” on the audience with a “trick” split screen intended to make the viewer believe Debbie and Peter are in the same bed together twenty years later as Debbie looks into his eyes and wishes him a happy birthday.

    But no, there’s someone else in Peter’s bed as the camera pans over to his girlfriend du moment, Becca (Vella Lovell, a beloved Crazy Ex-Girlfriend alum), asking if he wants coffee. The split screen then becomes pronounced as the captions “Los Angeles” and “New York” provide the geographical context, both locations themselves being a tired cliché in rom-coms about “making a choice” (see also: Friends With Benefits—not to be confused with No Strings Attached, a similarly-premised movie also starring Kutcher). But Your Place or Mine appears designed almost deliberately to be one long, drawn-out cliché.

    What’s more, considering how self-aware Brosh McKenna is re: the genre, and how meta she was able to get with Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (co-created with Rachel Bloom, who appears in the movie as Scarlet), Your Place or Mine comes across almost like a knowing taunt on her part. As though to say, “Yeah, this is my genre, watch me dance circles around how easy it is to write one.” Easy to write, sure. Easy to differentiate from all the rest? Not so much. And Your Place or Mine thusly falls easily down the drain of other generic rom-coms fit for the Hallmark Channel.

    The only thing to set this one apart from such comparable schlock is that two higher-tier (read: higher cost) actors happen to be in the lead roles. But that does little to salvage what is an unapologetic “by the numbers” rom-com, complete with a requisite dramatic airport reunion in the third act. Then, of course, there’s Debbie’s initial assurance that her heart is made of stone, and that any energy that might be funneled into the search for romance has to go into caring for her only, highly-allergic-to-just-about-everything son, Jack (Wesley Kimmel, yes, Jimmy Kimmel’s nephew—because Hollywood nepotism). So who could possibly melt that “stone” but Peter? A man who himself declares that he’s an “unknowable piece of shit,” which is what he told Debbie after they first hooked up, offering it as a warning and a very viable reason not to pursue anything further with him.

    But now, twenty years later, Peter is very known to Debbie. Needless to say, no one knows him better than she does. And obviously, both of them have sold out on the lofty dreams they had when they first met, with Debbie wanting to be a book editor and, oh how perfect, Peter wanting to be a writer. In the present, Debbie has settled for “accountant” while Peter has veered into the nebulous “businessman” role—sure to mention that he makes a lot of money, without ever actually saying what he does. It’s on-brand for how vague “business” is and how undeserving of the salaries the people who work in it are. Plus, it’s important for the surrogate father figure in Jack’s life to be flush with cash as he swoops in to watch over Debbie’s precious spawn when her ex-husband’s girlfriend, Scarlet (Bloom), backs out of the “gig” after securing an acting job in Vancouver. Just one of many convenient and overt plot devices hurtling us down the path toward Debbie and Peter’s inevitable conclusion: happily ever after.

    In between, there will be one or two “snafus” at best, including Debbie catching the eye of a highly eligible bachelor named Theo Martin (Jesse Williams), who, well look at that, happens to be an Important Editor at Debbie’s favorite publishing house, Duncan Press (which might as well be called Duncan Hines). Even more “coincidental” still: Peter has a perfectly-polished manuscript in tangible form that Debbie can just hand right over to Theo, apparently taking solicitations if the person presenting them also has a snatch he might be interested in. And yes, it goes without saying that Debbie’s bold move is going to make Peter upset about offering up a “very personal work” without his consent. But, “luckily” (read: lazily), the outcome of the book’s publication is never shown later on.  

    While Debbie is gallivanting around neurotically in New York with one of Peter’s exes, Minka (Zoë Chao), intended as “comic relief” as opposed to all-out annoyance, back in L.A., there is the inexplicable presence of Steve Zahn, who, one supposes is playing a character named Zen (much downgraded from Mark Mossbacher in The White Lotus). Although he declares himself to be another rich man, he essentially lives in Debbie’s backyard “gardening” a.k.a. lending the requisite “zany” flair, as that’s just about all the “comedy” Brosh McKenna can muster for the script. With the romance element, too, being a bit lacking.

    Indeed, the one-note thud this entire production lands with is the only thing that makes it truly “standout.” That is to say, a shining beacon of banality, complete with the closing title cards, “And they lived happily ever after” and “just kidding marriage is hard but they had a good life.” Hopefully one filled with as few clunkers in the movie viewing realm as this attempt at teaching Rom-Com 101 to screenwriting students.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • M3GAN Is Ultimately A Techno-Horror Version of Baby Boom and Raising Helen

    M3GAN Is Ultimately A Techno-Horror Version of Baby Boom and Raising Helen

    Although the automatic correlation to make with M3GAN is that it’s a mere pale imitation of the Child’s Play movies (particularly the 2019 one), at the core of the story is “the Baby Boom narrative.” Directed by Gerard Johnstone and written by Akela Cooper, M3GAN wields the same Nancy Meyers trope established in this seminal 1987 film from her oeuvre. One that screenwriters Jack Amiel and Michael Begler would also emulate in the 2004 Garry Marshall-directed film, Raising Helen. In Baby Boom, the career woman at the center of the story who suddenly gets an unexpected child plopped in her lap is J. C. Wiatt (Diane Keaton). As a high-powered management consultant, this is the last thing she could possibly want or need. The same goes for her investment banker boyfriend, Steven Buchner (Harold Ramis), who has as little interest in the burden of a child as J. C. (deemed, offensively, “the Tiger Lady” at her workplace—because any successful woman would be given such a belittling nickname, no?).

    The “bequest” of the child, named Elizabeth, came from a distant cousin. And, as such, J. C. feels no real sense of obligation or guilt about giving her up… at first. Naturally, as this is a Charles Shyer-Nancy Meyers movie, J. C. finds herself growing quickly attached to Elizabeth despite her lack of maternal aptitude, as well as the upheaval this baby is causing in J. C.’s professional life. Not to mention her romantic one, for when she tells Steven she wants to keep the baby (“Papa Don’t Preach”-style), he essentially says, “Fuck that, I’m out.” Nonetheless, it’s an “amicable” split and J. C. goes about the grueling task of balancing the dual roles of mother and supposedly indispensable employee, which is something women have been expected to manage ever since “equality” became “a thing.” A “rock n’ roll, deal with it” attitude foisted upon women by the men who aren’t expected to perform any such feat (except in “comedic” 80s movies like Mr. Mom and Three Men and a Baby).

    Well, J. C. isn’t quite “dealing with it”—not in the way her boss, Fritz Curtis (Sam Wanamaker), finds satisfactory anyway. The same goes for David Lin (Ronny Chieng), the boss of star roboticist/toymaker Gemma (Allison Williams) in M3GAN (a.k.a. Model 3 Generative Android). Except David’s dissatisfaction is expressed before the arrival of an unwanted and unexpected child in Gemma’s life: her niece, Cady (Violet McGraw). While she’s supposed to be perfecting a new prototype for Perpetual Petz (sort of like a Giga Pets concept meets a Furby aesthetic, but far more sinister), she has instead been working on a more advanced project in the form of Megan, an AI-powered doll that blows up right in her face (literally) when she’s caught by David running tests on it with her coworkers and collaborators, Tess (Jen Van Epps) and Cole (Brian Jordan Alvarez). Having secretly spent one hundred thousand dollars of company money to work on it, Gemma drops further down the workplace shit list when her now-deceased sister leaves her only child in Gemma’s care right at this time.

    Indeed, just as it was in Raising Helen, Cady’s parents die in a car crash. In such a way, mind you, that gives one cause to believe that their stupidity in not putting chains on their tires might have been Darwinism at work, if you catch one’s drift. At least in Lindsay (Felicity Huffman) and Paul Davis’ (Sean O’Bryan) case, it wasn’t their fault they were mowed down by another car (minding their own business when another vehicle jumped the center divide and crashed into them). In Cady’s parents’ case, it definitely was, as they chose to remain at a standstill in a snowstorm without pulling over to the side of the road. Cady, who was in the backseat trying to take her seatbelt off to save her Perpetual Pet, remains unscathed. And yes, her unhealthy attachment to an inanimate object is far more disturbing than the one Helen Harris’ (Kate Hudson) youngest niece, Sarah (Abigail Breslin), has to a hippo stuffed animal (named, what else, Hippo). In truth, her clinginess to this simple, “analog” hippo smacks of a far simpler time, when AI wasn’t a factor in the manufacture of “toys.” Now merely tech devices in disguise. That Gemma was the one who gifted the Perpetual Pet (which, as mentioned, she designed herself for Funki, the Seattle-based toy company where she works) to Cady not only indicates that she had no idea how annoying it would be to a parent subjected to it, but also serves as a foreshadowing of the Frankenstein to come. For that’s what Megan is: a monstrous creature of Gemma’s own making.

    And yet, she might not ever have continued focusing on the project were it not for the unwitting urging of Cady, who sees another prototype named Bruce from Gemma’s college-era robotics days and regards its capabilities in awe. When Gemma explains that advanced toys like these are impossible to market because of how expensive they would retail, Cady off-handedly notes, “If I had a toy like that, I don’t think I would ever need another one.” Bring on the “determined” scene of Gemma magically being able to finish her creation anew (no explanation as to where she suddenly got all the “extra” supplies to do it). And voilà, Megan. An Olsen twin-looking creep (though Johnstone stated she was meant to be modeled after a combination of Grace Kelly, Kim Novak, Audrey Hepburn and Peggy Lipton). But Cady seems to like her. Mainly because she’s far more interested in paying attention to Cady than Gemma is—still set in her “selfish” (i.e., liberated) ways to the point where we’re given a scene of Gemma and Cady sitting across the table from one another with the latter totally desperate to be noticed by her aunt as she concentrates on some work through her phone—a total inverse of the dynamic we’ve become accustomed to seeing between parent and child. Or “guardian” and child. But it is Megan who swiftly takes over the role of caretaker for Gemma, who really can’t be bothered. Sure, she had the chance to foist Cady onto her grandparents in Florida (Helen’s nieces and nephew also have grandparents in Florida, theirs in Miami as opposed to Jacksonville), but perhaps we’re supposed to believe something like guilt was too powerful of an emotion for her to do such a thing. So yeah, Megan turns out to be a great unpaid nanny to pick up the slack where Gemma can’t (read: doesn’t want to).

    It is Tess who is the one to point out to Gemma that, if Megan is doing all the parenting, what are the moral implications of this “toy”? What’s the purpose of being a parent at all if you’re just going to have “someone else” do the job for you? Here, the same old guilt trip is reinstated for women who would dare to think they could “have it all.” But, as usual, they must eventually choose. Granted, at least in M3GAN, some sign of “progress” has been shown in that Gemma’s boss seems totally uninterested in Gemma’s new status as “Mom,” so much as the dollar signs the kid is providing by becoming a test subject with Megan, “pairing” with her (like any device does), as it were, so that Gemma can collect as much data as possible before rolling out the product to the public. In contrast, the bosses in Baby Boom and Raising Helen are utterly vexed by the plight of juggling motherhood with work. For, just as J. C. is expected to magically make her situation “work,” so is Helen, with no understanding from her Miranda Priestly-esque boss, Dominique (Helen Mirren). The Dominique in Dominique Modeling Agency where Helen serves as her assistant a.k.a. right-hand woman. A role that has become increasingly difficult to uphold with three kids to consider. Dominique is especially horrified when Helen dares to bring the trio to a fashion show, sucking all the glamor out of the front row. When Helen subsequently causes one of the agency’s top models, Martina (Amber Valletta), to get her face covered in permanent marker by the kids at Sarah’s school, it’s the final straw for Dominique. She cannot fucking deal with this children bullshit anymore. That’s how Gemma herself feels, a sentiment that eventually extends to Megan as she becomes just another “child” to concern herself over—what with Megan interpreting Gemma’s instruction to “protect Cady” as license to kill whoever she deems a threat.

    With the “doll” having transmuted into a serial killer, Gemma accepts that such a “toy” (slated to sell for ten thousand dollars a pop) can’t be released. But her revelations are too little, too late, with David in full-tilt launch party mode and Cady so addicted to her “best friend” that she acts like a heroin addict in withdrawal when Gemma takes Megan away from her to try “troubleshooting.” Having been so focused on not wanting Cady to be sad (therefore, not feel anything at all) by distracting her with Megan, when Cady tells her she needs the “doll” back because she doesn’t feel so awful when Megan’s around, Gemma has the epiphany, “You’re supposed to feel this way. The worst thing that could have happened to you happened.” As it did for the Davis children in Raising Helen. By the same token, these children losing their parents is also the worst thing that could have happened to the free-spirited, independent woman forced to take them on. At one moment in Raising Helen, she demands of her potential love interest, “Pastor Dan” (John Corbett), “Do you have any idea what this has done to my life?” Pastor Dan retorts, “Do you have any idea what it’s done to theirs?” Because no, there is not supposed to be any empathy for the woman in such a scenario who, for all intents and purposes, gets fucked over with this responsibility, but instead for the children who end up “stuck” with her.

    Raising Helen is the only film of the three that wants us to briefly believe that Helen might have actually come to her senses and embraced who she is as a person by forking the children over to her more responsible sister, Jenny (Joan Cusack). Afterward, Dominique “joyfully” (or as much joy as the plastic surgery will allow her to express) welcomes Helen back, noting, “Ibsen wrote, ‘Not all women are meant to be mothers.’” And yet, in Movie World, of course they are. That’s the message that always gets reiterated: no woman is so “heartless” a.k.a. career-oriented that she wouldn’t soon realize that the “reward” of having a child far outweighs any sense of gratification she might have gotten in her job. Even someone as overtly single-minded and self-oriented as Gemma.

    This, too, is why, upon briefly going back to her old life toward the end of Raising Helen’s third act, Helen suddenly fathoms that it doesn’t “fit” her anymore. So we cue the scene of her half-heartedly clubbing while looking completely empty inside before she begs Jenny to let her have the kids back. Similarly, Gemma dips out on the launch David has been planning so that she can keep Cady separated from Megan and reestablish herself as the “dominant force” that Cady should be attaching to in the wake of her parents’ death—not some killer robot. A forced attachment that conveniently comes just in time for Gemma to be spared from getting passed over by Cady in favor of a non-human.

    Now that she’s fully committed to motherhood with no AI help, perhaps we can try to naively believe that Gemma will be able to carry on with her work as before, even getting plenty of useful tips on successful toymaking from an actual child. But, in the end, she’ll sacrifice in the same manner as J. C. and Helen, all while telling herself that this “job” is far more important and worthwhile. Thus, the filmic method for brainwashing the last “holdouts” against motherhood continues. Even in something as ostensibly un-romantic-comedy as M3GAN—for there are now more “covert” ways to sell motherhood to single, job-loving women in techno-horror-comedy.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Kate Winslet And Cameron Diaz In ‘The Holiday’ Sequel? Director Nancy Meyers Says ‘Not True’

    Kate Winslet And Cameron Diaz In ‘The Holiday’ Sequel? Director Nancy Meyers Says ‘Not True’

    By Becca Longmire.

    Director Nancy Meyers has responded to rumours that a sequel to “The Holiday” is on its way.

    The beloved 2006 flick saw Kate Winslet’s Iris and Cameron Diaz’s Amanda swap houses. Winslet’s character ended up dating Jack Black’s Miles after they met in Los Angeles, and Diaz’s got together with Jude Law’s Graham in a country village near London, U.K.

    The Sun claimed that a follow-up was now in the works 17 years later, with the main characters all signing up.

    However, Meyers wrote on Instagram alongside a grab of a story about the rumours: “So many DM’s about this – sorry but it’s not true. ❤️”


    READ MORE:
    Kate Winslet Says She ‘Couldn’t Stop Crying’ At Emotional Reunion With Leonardo DiCaprio

    The Sun claimed a source had told them: “The plan is to start filming next year. The main talent are all signed up.”

    An insider added: “The plan is to start rolling on scenes next year, primarily in the U.K. and in Europe, but the main talent are all signed up and on board.”


    READ MORE:
    Kate Winslet Holds On To James Cameron As Pair Reunite At ‘Avatar: The Way Of Water’ Photocall

    “It’s one of the most successful movies of its kind and still enjoyed every year by millions of fans around the world – it makes perfect sense to revisit those characters and find out what became of their lives after they hooked up.

    “It’ll be funny, poignant, and heartwarming – just what everyone wants for Christmas.”

    Click to View Gallery

    Stars Get Into The Holiday Spirit




    Becca Longmire

    Source link