ReportWire

Tag: Monetary policy

  • Inside the G20’s scramble to get consensus on the war in Ukraine

    Inside the G20’s scramble to get consensus on the war in Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    NEW DELHI — A last-minute agreement on the Ukraine portion of the G20’s summit statement kept the entire document from the trash heap — but it took dropping a reference to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine to do it.

    All the members of the group of top world economies spent weeks in fierce negotiations over every element of the 35-page communiqué. The greatest sticking point was what to say about the war raging in Eastern Europe, not least because Russia, a member of the bloc, would oppose condemnations of Moscow and shows of support for Kyiv.

    What ultimately led to an agreement in the dark, early hours of Saturday morning was new language drafted by officials from India, the host nation, and delegates from Brazil and South Africa. 

    Russia, which spent weeks offering alternatives that wouldn’t leave it isolated in the G20 club, relented after key developing countries presented the formulation: All countries should “refrain from action against the territorial integrity and sovereignty or political independence of any state.” That phrasing was not included in the G20’s Bali declaration nearly a year ago.

    But the final text was also acceptable to the Kremlin because it didn’t “deplore” or condemn “the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine” as the Bali statement did. Language about there being a “war in Ukraine,” without specifically blaming Moscow for the conflict, is in both the Bali and the New Delhi declarations. “There were different views and assessments of the situation,” the new communiqué reads.

    In effect, the G20 dropped its accusations against Russia in order to maintain unity on broader concepts of war and peace —concepts that were not so explicitly endorsed last November in Bali. 

    “The fact that we have consensus around the document was far from clear until the very last moment,” explained a senior EU official who, like four others from the Biden administration and European governments, was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic dealings.

    The G20, as a grouping, is geared toward issues of global economics and finance, not international conflict. But Western leaders, and U.S. President Joe Biden in particular, have leveraged multilateral gatherings since Russia invaded Ukraine 18 months ago to show they stand united with Kyiv. 

    Text on monetary policy was finalized well before presidents, princes and prime ministers descended on the Indian capital for this weekend’s summit. But the Ukraine section was being worked on well into Saturday morning, mere hours before official proceedings began.

    Russia, represented in New Delhi by its foreign minister, not President Vladimir Putin, repeatedly demurred when iteration after iteration of the text sided more firmly with Ukraine. Moscow proposed competing language, the senior EU official said, including an entire section railing against Western-imposed sanctions that have complicated the Kremlin’s procurement of military materials.

    India, as the host, shuttled Russian objections to officials from other G20 members, and sent their responses back to Moscow’s delegation. 

    In the end, so-called “sherpas” from the BRICS consortium’s three democratic countries settled on an idea: The communiqué should borrow language and principles from the United Nations Charter, which states that no country can seize territory from another using force. Russia, as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, should have no objection to it, they reasoned.

    British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak publicly called the final language on Ukraine a “good and strong outcome” | Dan Kitwood/Getty Images 

    Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister who was deeply involved in the final negotiations, said the Kremlin could live with that language. Western nations were satisfied because the language genuinely reflected the overwhelming sentiment within the G20. 

    A senior U.S. official insisted that the New Delhi version is far superior to the Bali statement because of that reflection, noting that Russia would never sign anything that directly accused it of illegally capturing land. 

    Jon Finer, Biden’s deputy national security adviser, noted that the G20 leaders endorsed the Bali language last year and have supported U.N. resolutions.

    “The joint statement issued yesterday builds on that to send an unprecedented and unified statement,” Finer told reporters. Biden is working to rally nations around the world against Russian aggression, he said. “This statement is a major step forward in this effort.”

    U.K. officials, meanwhile, argued that in referring to the U.N.’s resolution against the invasion of Ukraine, the Bali communiqué didn’t directly condemn Russia’s aggression but instead indirectly referenced the fact that some countries had “deplored” it. “By achieving consensus in New Delhi, the G20 has forced Putin to commit to cessation of attacks on infrastructure, to withdrawal of troops, and to the return of territory,” a U.K. official said. 

    British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak publicly called the final language on Ukraine a “good and strong outcome.” 

    But others expressed their reservations. “Of course, if it was a document written by the EU alone, then this would probably look different, but then this would not be a consensus document,” the senior EU official said. 

    Kyiv had a much harsher reaction. “​​Ukraine is grateful to its partners who tried to include strong wording in the text,” Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oleg Nikolenko wrote on social media. “At the same time, the G20 has nothing to be proud of in the part about Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.” 

    Officials from the G20, from India to Western nations, professed satisfaction with the joint declaration. They insisted that they achieved what they could in New Delhi in terms of being more pointed in their view of the war, even if the document had to drop the “aggression” reference about Russia. 

    According to a second U.S. official: “The focus was different for this one.”

    [ad_2]

    Alexander Ward, Eleni Courea and Suzanne Lynch

    Source link

  • C3.ai, GameStop, UiPath, ChargePoint, Yext, BlackBerry, and More Stock Market Movers

    C3.ai, GameStop, UiPath, ChargePoint, Yext, BlackBerry, and More Stock Market Movers

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints

    • Print Article

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How the U.S. housing market got stuck in the ’80s

    How the U.S. housing market got stuck in the ’80s

    [ad_1]

    The Federal Reserve’s inflation fight has been particularly brutal for anyone not already a U.S. homeowner before interest rates and mortgage rates rose to 15-year highs.

    With mortgage rates around 7.2% to kick off the post–Labor Day period, the difference between the rates on a new 30-year home loan and on all outstanding U.S. mortgage debt (see chart) has not been so wide since the 1980s.

    It’s the 1980s again in the U.S. housing market.


    Glenmede, FactSet

    “Generally, climbing interest rates curb demand and cause housing prices to fall,” Glenmede’s investment strategy team wrote, in a Tuesday client note, but not this time.

    Instead, U.S. homes remain in critically low supply after more than a decade of underbuilding, and with most homeowners who already refinanced at low pre-pandemic rates being “reluctant to leave their homes,” wrote Jason Pride, chief of investment strategy and research, and his Glenmede team.

    Also, while homes prices have come off their prepandemic highs, they still were fetching $416,000 in the second quarter, based on median sales prices, above $358,700 in the fourth quarter of 2020, according to U.S. Census and HUD data.

    “Until the supply gap is filled by new construction, home prices and building activity are unlikely to decline as meaningfully as they normally would given the headwind from rising rates,” the Glenmede team said.

    Read: Housing affordability is now at its worst level since 1984, Black Knight says

    The Glenmede team, however, does expect more pressure on consumers in the coming months, particularly as student-loan payments resume in October and if the Fed keeps interest rates high for a while, as increasingly expected. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y,
    which underpins the U.S. economy, was back on the climb at 4.26% Tuesday.

    Meanwhile, shares of home-vacation rental platform Airbnb Inc.
    ABNB,
    +7.23%

    rose 7.2% on Tuesday, after the Labor Day weekend, and 66.4% higher on the year so far, according to FactSet.

    Don’t miss: New York City cracks down on Airbnb and other short-term-rental listings

    Shares of Invitation Homes Inc.
    INVH,
    -0.91%
    ,
    which grew out of the last decade’s home-loan foreclosure crisis to become a single-family-rental giant, were up 14.3% on the year, according to FactSet.

    Dallas Tanner, CEO of Invitation Homes, said he expected “the rising costs and the burden of homeownership” to continue to benefit his company, in a July earnings call. The company recently bought a portfolio of about 1,900 homes and has been snapping up newly constructed homes. Companies can borrow on Wall Street at much lower rates than individuals.

    Stocks closed lower Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    off 0.5%, and the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    0.4% lower and the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP
    down 0.1%, according to FactSet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As U.S. stock-market investors celebrate soft economic data, is bad news becoming bad news again on Wall Street?

    As U.S. stock-market investors celebrate soft economic data, is bad news becoming bad news again on Wall Street?

    [ad_1]

    With second-quarter earnings season now largely behind the market, stock investors have been focusing on the latest economic data. 

    They have, for the most part, been reacting positively to “bad economic news,” or any data that may point to an economic slowdown. 

    It’s been almost nine months since the trend emerged, as softening economic data and lower inflation may mean the Federal Reserve can stop raising interest rates, said Chris Fasciano, portfolio manager at Commonwealth Financial Network.

    Traders in federal-funds futures, as of Friday, are pricing in an over 90% chance that the Fed will hold its policy interest rate unchanged at its September meeting, and a roughly 35% likelihood that the U.S. central bank will raise interest rates by 25 basis points in November. 

    Read: The Fed’s monetary policy has lost some of its potency and interest rates may need to rise much higher as a result, economist says

    U.S. stocks closed the week higher ahead of the Labor Day holiday weekend, after data released Friday indicated a cooling labor market, though there was speculation that a “mirage” concerning the conclusion of summertime jobs may have factored. The U.S. created 187,000 new jobs in August, while the unemployment rate jumped to 3.8% from 3.5%.

    The data support the narrative of a gradual slowdown in the labor market, but there are no signs that the economy is weakening significantly, according to Richard Flax, chief investment officer at Moneyfarm.

    Also read: ‘Near perfect’ jobs report has traders expecting Fed to be done hiking rates this year

    “The economic data has not been bad. It is just softening. If you saw really bad economic data, that wouldn’t be taken particularly positively,” Flax said. 

    Meanwhile, “what we’re experiencing is a rolling recession,” said Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group. “Recession activity actually goes from sector to sector, but it doesn’t translate into this big broad-based decline.”

    However, if investors see a significant decline in the housing and labor markets, that could change the narrative, Cox noted. 

    Read: Fed rate hikes can end now that U.S. job gains are the size of an economy like Australia’s, says BlackRock

    To break the cycle in which bad economic news is good news for stocks, economic data have to be much worse than now, indicating more damage from high interest rates, noted Flax. 

    The trend may also reverse if there is a “meaningful downgrade” of corporate earnings expectations, said Flax. “I think you need to see it when macro data translates into weakened profitability.”

    Investors should also be alert of the possibility that inflation may accelerate again, according to David Merrell, founder and managing member at TBH Advisors. 

    Data showed that the personal consumption expenditures price index rose a mild 0.2% in July, but the yearly inflation rate crept up to 3.3% from 3%, the government said Thursday.

    “Inflation overall has been trending down nicely. But if it starts to kick back up, that could mean bad news becomes bad news now,” said Merrell. 

    If investors start to treat bad economic news as bad news for the stock market, it could put pressure on the 2023 stock-market rally, with the S&P 500
    SPX
    up 17.6% since the start of the year and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    up 34%.

    In the past week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    climbed 1.4%, the S&P 500 advanced 2.5% and the Nasdaq gained 3.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The S&P 500 posted its biggest weekly gain since the week ending June 16.

    This week, investors will be expecting data on the July U.S. international trade deficit and the ISM services sector activity for August on Tuesday, weekly initial jobless benefit claims data on Thursday, and the July wholesale inventories data on Friday. They will also tune into the speeches of a number of Fed speakers, looking for clues on whether the central bank is ready to be done with its rates hikes.

    Economic calendar: On this week’s economic-data docket are the Fed Beige Book, factory orders, unemployment claims and more

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fed’s Powell leaves investors with a cloud of uncertainty. Why the U.S. stock market faces a difficult week ahead.

    Fed’s Powell leaves investors with a cloud of uncertainty. Why the U.S. stock market faces a difficult week ahead.

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. stock market recovered from a three-week losing streak this week, though release of Nvidia’s earnings and a speech by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium provided some volatility, but the artificial intelligence boom offset rising bond yields.

    Next week, the July personal consumption expenditure index, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, and the latest monthly employment report will offer another trial for the markets as investors assess whether stocks can defend their recent gains under the “cloudy skies” of uncertainty over the economic outlook. 

    On Friday, Fed Chair Powell said the central bank is prepared to raise interest rates further until policymakers are confident that inflation is on a convincing path toward the Fed’s 2% target, but he admitted they remain unsure of whether more rate hikes are needed as the economy may not have felt the full effect yet of the monetary tightening over the past year and a half.

    “Powell is in this position where he’s trying to summit one of the Grand Tetons and he doesn’t do that without pausing and catching his breath,” said Johan Grahn, head ETF market strategist at Allianz Investment Management. Grahn thinks the Federal Open Market Committee is debating whether they have reached the “summit,” or one of the “peaks,” or are at a “false summit” in their endeavors to curb inflation through interest-rate hikes and demand moderation.

    “Powell needs these ‘data clouds’ to give him a sign so that they know if the work is done, and I don’t believe that he will know that between now and September,” Grahn said. 

    Powell’s heavily anticipated address at the Kansas City Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming came days after Nvidia
    NVDA,
    -2.43%
    ,
    the chip maker at the forefront of an industry-wide AI frenzy, delivered blowout earnings that surpassed Wall Street’s estimates, thanks largely to a boom in revenue from generative AI. However, both events were largely in line with expectations eliciting yawns from a sleepy August Wall Street, said market analysts.  

    U.S. stocks finished the week mostly higher with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    down 0.5%, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    gained 0.8% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    climbed 2.3% for the week, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    See: Hot U.S. economy pushes real yields to around 15-year highs after Powell’s Jackson Hole speech

    However, the biggest event for markets is always the next one. 

    With the second-quarter earnings reporting season coming to an end, major economic data in coming days will provide some guidance on the resilience of the U.S. economy and whether the Fed will raise interest rates further at its September 19-20 policy meeting. 

    “There’s a dearth of corporate news that’s really going to move the markets, which means traders and investors are going to focus their attention on the macro components,” said Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial. 

    Next week, the markets will get the latest reports on the jobs market, including the July Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) due out on Tuesday, followed by August ADP’s National Employment Report on Wednesday. The Labor Department’s August nonfarm payrolls report will center stage on Friday. 

    The U.S. economy is expected to add 175,000 new jobs in August, down from 187,000 in the prior month, economists polled by the Dow Jones estimate. The percentage of jobless Americans seeking work is forecast to remain unchanged at 3.5% from the previous month. The central bank in June predicted unemployment would climb to 4.1% by the end of 2023, compared with 4.5% in March’s prediction, according to the quarterly Summary of Economic Projections.

    Meanwhile, the Bureau of Economic Analysis on Thursday will release its Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index — the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge — for July. 

    Annual U.S. inflation in July is forecast to creep back up to 3.3% year-over-year from 3% in the prior month, while consumer prices are expected to rise another mild 0.2% for the month. The so-called “core” PCE is also expected to tick up slightly to 4.2% from 4.1% in June, according to Wall Street analysts polled by Dow Jones. The core rate omits volatile food and energy costs and is viewed by the Fed as a better predictor of future inflation trends. 

    Powell, during his speech at Jackson Hole, pointed to the core PCE as his focus. “The lower monthly readings for core inflation in June and July were welcome, but two months of good data are only the beginning of what it will take to build confidence that inflation is moving down sustainably toward our goal,” Powell said. 

    Investors need the “Goldilocks scenario” where economic growth is slowing, but not falling off a cliff, which would suggest that the Fed is closer to being done raising interest rates, Saglimbene told MarketWatch in a phone interview on Friday. “Any stronger than expected economic data, such as hotter-than-expected PCE inflation and employment report, may be greeted by the market as negative.”

    While the July PCE report will be the “linchpin” for the September policy meeting, the data would have to skew significantly away from expectations in order for policymakers to take “one more step up this proverbial mountain,” said Grahn. 

    However, the assessment of the precise level of monetary policy restraint is complicated by uncertainty about the duration of the lags with which monetary tightening affects economic activity and inflation, Powell said on Friday, noting “the wide range of estimates” of these lags suggests that there may be “significant further drag” in the pipeline.

    “The lag effect, in my opinion, overshadows the concern that two months of good inflation readings is not a trend,” Grahn told MarketWatch via phone on Friday. “The lag effect is starting to work its way into the economy, but it’s not reasonable to believe it will show the full impact in the next four weeks, so I would expect a meeting in September with a decision to nothing.”

    Overall the U.S. stock market has slumped this month as August once again lives up to its dismal reputation for stocks. The S&P 500 has lost nearly 4% so far this month, on course for its biggest monthly loss of 2023, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 3.4% and the Nasdaq Composite has dropped 5.3% month-to-date, according to Dow Jones Market Data. 

    These pullbacks are seen as a sharp contrast to the AI-driven rally earlier this year when the Nasdaq Composite had its best first-half performance since 1983, as investors hoped the Fed might be able to back off its inflation battle more quickly than markets have expected.

    However, recent strong economic data has raised concern that the Fed will keep its benchmark lending rates higher for longer than anticipated, which triggered a jump in longer-dated Treasury yields.

    The 10-year Treasury note yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    rose to its highest level since November 2007 on Monday, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Elsewhere, a slowdown in China’s economy after emerging from COVID-19 lockdowns, the lingering debt troubles in its real-estate sector and the uncertainty of Beijing’s policy support are also feeding into broader unease in the U.S. financial markets. 

    See: Global investors expect China to deliver a massive fiscal stimulus. Here’s why it may never arrive.

    August is historically not the best month for the U.S. stock market. Investors came into August of 2023 with five straight months of gains for the S&P 500 index and the Nasdaq Composite, so there was an “excuse” for investors to take profits on megacap technology companies which are trading at “rich valuations,” Saglimbene said.

    The weekly AAII Investor Sentiment Survey shows bullish sentiment decreased and is below average for the second consecutive week in the seven days to Wednesday. In the most recent survey, only 32.3% of respondents had a bullish outlook for the stock market, which is below the historical average of 37.5%.

    However, historical data shows that September may not look much better than August as September is traditionally the weakest month for U.S. stocks. The S&P 500 and the Dow industrials each has lost an average of 1.1% in September dating back to 1928 and 1896, respectively, according to Dow Jones Market Data. 

    See: Here are the odds that the stock market will crash

    Moreover, there’s still a concern that the Fed is going to raise interest rates again and may slow the economy more than expected, which may end up causing a recession in 2024, said Saglimbene.

    “I don’t think traders are ready to step into the market and buy based on these declines, but I do think if we see more pressure in September while macro conditions are holding up, you’re going to have more investors step in and start buying, and that could be more supportive [for stocks] in the back half of this year when seasonality trends get better.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jackson Hole recap: Fed rate hikes likely on hold for ‘several meetings’

    Jackson Hole recap: Fed rate hikes likely on hold for ‘several meetings’

    [ad_1]

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell set a high bar for additional interest-rate hikes, economists said Sunday in their commentary on all the talk at the U.S. central bank’s summer retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyo.

    Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist for JPMorgan Chase, said that the Fed chair certainly did not give a clear signal that more tightening was coming soon. He noted that Powell stressed the Fed would “proceed carefully” and balance the risks of tightening too much or too little.

    “We remain comfortable in our view that the FOMC will stay on hold for the next several meetings,” Feroli said.

    Read: Powell unsure of need to raise interest rates further

    The caveat to this forecast is if inflation surprises to the upside or the labor market does not continue to soften.

    Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon, said that Powell’s speech seemed hawkish to some, particularly because the Fed chair made threats to hike again.

    But Shepherdson said he thought the Fed “is likely done.”

    “Behind the caveats, Mr. Powell’s speech fundamentally was optimistic, though cautious,” Shepherdson said.

    Boston Fed President Susan Collins also emphasized patience in an interview with MarketWatch on the sidelines of the Jackson Hole summit.

    Read: Fed has earned the right to take its time, Collins says

    Other regional Fed officials who spoke “hinted that further action may be needed, but also observed that inflation is moving in the right direction and that the surge in yields would help cool down the economy,” said Krishna Guha, vice chairman of Evercore ISI, in a note to clients.

    Traders in derivative markets expect a rate hike in November, but it is a close call, with the odds just above 50%.

    The Monday following Jackson Hole has historically been an active one in the markets, across asset classes.

    The 10-year Treasury yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    ended last week just above 4.2%.

    Read: Market Snapshot on Powell’s stance

    The first test of the careful and patient Fed will come this coming Friday, when the government will release the August employment report.

    Economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal expect the U.S. economy added 165,000 jobs in the month. That would be the weakest job growth since December 2020.

    In his speech on Friday, Powell emphasized that evidence that the labor market was not softening could “call for a monetary policy response.”

    Economists at Deutsche Bank think an upside surprise in the employment data could provide enough discomfort for the Fed, and raise expectations for further tightening.

    Other top global central bankers spoke at Jackson Hole, including European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, Bank of Japan Gov. Kazuo Ueda and Bank of England Deputy Governor Ben Broadbent.

    Guha of Evercore said he detected a careful effort by the officials not to surprise markets.

    The exception to this rule might have been Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel, who said in a television interview that it was too early for the ECB to think about a rate-hike pause.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell hints at more bad news for borrowers | CNN Business

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell hints at more bad news for borrowers | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    Washington, DC
    CNN
     — 

    Additional interest rate hikes are still on the table and rates could remain elevated for longer than expected, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Friday.

    Delivering a highly anticipated speech at the Kansas City Fed’s annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Powell again stressed that the Fed will pay close attention to economic growth and the state of the labor market when making policy decisions.

    “Although inflation has moved down from its peak — a welcome development — it remains too high,” Powell said. “We are prepared to raise rates further if appropriate, and intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we are confident that inflation is moving sustainably down toward our objective.”

    The Fed chief’s annual presentation at the symposium, which has become a major event in the world of central banking, typically hints at what to expect from monetary policy in the coming months.

    Powell’s speech wasn’t a full-throated call for more rate hikes, but rather a balanced assessment of inflation’s evolution over the past year and the possible risks to the progress the Fed wants to see. He made it clear the central bank is retaining the option of more hikes, if necessary, and that what Fed officials ultimately decide will depend on data.

    US stocks opened higher before Powell’s speech, tumbled in late morning trading and then rose again.

    The Fed raised its benchmark lending rate by a quarter point in July to a range of 5.25-5.5%, the highest level in 22 years, following a pause in June. Minutes from the Fed’s July meeting showed that officials were concerned about the economy’s surprising strength keeping upward pressure on prices, suggesting more rate hikes if necessary. Some officials have said in recent speeches that the Fed can afford to keep rates steady, underscoring the intense debate among officials on what the Fed should do next.

    Financial markets still see an overwhelming chance the the Fed will decide to hold rates steady at its September meeting, according to the CME FedWatch tool, given that inflationary pressures have continued to wane.

    Here are some key takeaways from Powell’s speech.

    Chair Powell said there is still a risk that inflation won’t come down to the Fed’s 2% target as the central bank faces the proverbial last mile in its battle with higher prices.

    “Additional evidence of persistently above-trend growth could put further progress on inflation at risk and could warrant further tightening of monetary policy,” Powell said.

    Concerns over the economy running too hot for the Fed’s comfort only recently emerged.

    Economic growth in the second quarter picked up from the prior three-month period and the Atlanta Fed is currently estimating growth will accelerate even more in the third quarter.

    That could be a problem for the Fed, since the central bank’s primary mechanism for fighting inflation is by cooling the economy through tweaking the benchmark lending rate.

    Generally, if demand is red hot, employers will want to hire to meet that demand. But many firms continue to have difficulty hiring, according to business surveys from groups such as the National Federation of Independent Business. In theory, that could prompt wage increases in order to secure talent — and those higher costs could then be passed on to consumers.

    “if you’re a policymaker, you’re looking at the level of output relative to your estimate of what’s sustainable for maximum employment and 2% inflation,” William English, finance professor at Yale University who worked at the Fed’s Board of Governors from 2010 to 2015, told CNN. “So what does that mean for monetary policy? That may mean that they need rates to be higher for longer than they thought to get the economy on to that desirable trajectory, but there are a lot of questions around that force, and a lot of uncertainty.”

    Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester is one of the Fed officials backing a more aggressive stance on fighting inflation.

    “We’ve come come a long way, but we don’t want to be satisfied, because inflation remains too high — and we need to see more evidence to be assured that it’s coming down in a sustainable way and in a timely way,” Mester said in an interview with CNBC after Powell’s remarks.

    Meanwhile, some other officials think there will eventually be enough restraint on the economy and that more hikes could cause unnecessary economic damage. The lagged effects of rate hikes on the broader economy are a key uncertainty for officials, since it’s not clear when exactly those effects will fully take hold. Research suggests it takes at least a year.

    “We are in a restrictive stance in my view, and we’re putting pressure on the economy to slow inflation,” Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker told Bloomberg in an interview Friday after Powell’s speech. “What I’m hearing — and I’ve been around my district all summer talking to people — is ‘you’ve done a lot very quickly.’”

    Powell pointed to the steady progress on inflation in the past year: The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge — the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index — rose 3% in June from a year earlier, down from the 3.8% rise in May. The Commerce Department officially releases July PCE figures next week, though Powell already previewed that report in his speech. He said the Fed’s favorite inflation measure rose 3.3% in the 12 months ended in July.

    The Consumer Price Index, another closely watched inflation measure, rose 3.2% in July, a faster pace than the 3% in June, though underlying price pressures continued to decelerate that month.

    In his speech Friday, Powell stood firmly by the Fed’s current 2% inflation target, which was formalized in 2012 — at least for now. The Fed is set to review its policy framework around 2025, which could be an opportunity to establish a new inflation target.

    Harvard economist Jason Furman said in an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal this week that the central bank should aim for a different inflation goal, which could be something slightly higher than 2% or even a range of between 2% and 3%.

    For now, Powell has made it clear he is sticking with the stated inflation target.

    Still, inflation’s progress has hyped up not only American consumers and businesses, but also some Fed officials.

    Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee reiterated to CNBC Friday that he still sees “a path to a soft landing,” a scenario in which inflation falls down to target without a spike in unemployment or a recession.

    Powell also weighed in on an ongoing debate among economists about whether the “neutral rate of interest,” also known as r*, is higher since the economy is still on strong footing despite the Fed’s aggressive pace of rate hikes.

    In theory, the neutral rate is when real interest rates neither restrict nor stimulate growth. The Fed chair said higher interest rates are likely pulling on the economy’s reins, implying that r* might not be structurally higher, though he said it’s an unobservable concept.

    “We see the current stance of policy as restrictive, putting downward pressure on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. But we cannot identify with certainty the neutral rate of interest, and thus there is always uncertainty about the precise level of monetary policy restraint,” Powell said.

    Either way, while the Fed chief hinted that more rate hikes might be coming down the pike, there’s no guarantee either way.

    The Fed paused its historic inflation fight for the first time in June, mostly based on uncertainty over how the spring’s bank stresses would affect lending. The central bank could decide to pause again in September over uncertainty as it waits for more data.

    “We think that the Fed is more likely to take a wait-and-see approach with the data and try to understand a little bit more about why the labor market is remaining so strong, even despite the inflationary experience that we’ve had and the higher interest rates in the economy,” Sinead Colton Grant, head of investor solutions at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, told CNN in an interview.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks end higher after Fed Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole remarks, S&P 500 snaps 3-week losing streak

    U.S. stocks end higher after Fed Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole remarks, S&P 500 snaps 3-week losing streak

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks ended higher Friday after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell warned the central bank may need to raise interest rates even higher to temper a strong U.S. economy and quell inflation, while assuring investors that monetary policy would proceed cautiously.

    How stock indexes traded

    For the week, the Dow fell 0.4%, the S&P 500 gained 0.8% and the Nasdaq climbed 2.3%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Dow booked back-to-back weekly losses, while the S&P 500 and technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite each…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why this abstract concept could rattle stocks when Powell speaks at Jackson Hole

    Why this abstract concept could rattle stocks when Powell speaks at Jackson Hole

    [ad_1]

    There’s one big, but theoretical, concept that has the potential to shake up the stock market the most on Friday, when Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is scheduled to deliver a speech at an annual symposium held in Jackson Hole, Wyo.

    It has to do with the neutral rate of interest. That’s the level of real short-term interest rates that’s expected to prevail when the U.S. economy is at full strength and inflation is stable. The real neutral rate — known alternatively as r* or r-star— is estimated to be around 0.5%, after subtracting the Fed’s 2% inflation target from policy makers’ latest forecasts for where the fed funds rates is likely to be in the long run. And that neutral rate may be moving higher, given how the economy is performing right now.

    Read: Jackson Hole meeting: When is Jerome Powell’s speech? What investors need to know.

    Settling on the right theoretical level for the neutral rate matters because the U.S. economy appears to be accelerating, even after the Fed has hiked rates by more than five full percentage points to a 22-year high of 5.25%-5.5%. The world’s largest economy grew at a solid 2% pace in the first quarter, followed by a 2.4% pace for the second quarter. Now, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model is forecasting a third-quarter growth rate of 5.8% for real gross domestic product — a number that’s drawn plenty of skeptics, but underscores just how well the economy seems to be doing.

    See: R-Star Is the New Buzzword. Listen for It at Jackson Hole.

    “The notion of a higher r-star or neutral rate has crept its way into the marketplace and has been a hot topic lately,” said Thomas Urano, co-chief investment officer at fixed-income money manager Sage Advisory in Austin, Texas, which oversaw $23 billion as of July. “The market is trying to digest where the Fed views this neutral rate and is looking to get a little more clarity as Powell speaks in Jackson Hole.”

    If the neutral rate is higher than previously thought, that means policy makers might need to hike the fed-funds rate target even further, in addition to holding borrowing costs higher for longer and delaying the timing of their first rate cut.

    Traders and investors are well aware that the Fed is likely to keep interest rates higher for longer, and they’ve pushed out their expectations about the timing of the first rate cut next year, according to Dan Eye, chief investment officer for Pennsylvania-based Fort Pitt Capital Group, which manages $4.9 billion in assets.

    However, the market is not yet fully positioned for the Fed to put rate hikes back on the table, Eye said via phone on Wednesday.

    Dow industrials
    DJIA,
    the S&P 500
    SPX,
    and Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    are respectively up so far this year by 4.1%, 15.6%, and 31.3% as investors and traders hold out hope for a soft- or no-landing scenario in which the U.S. economy can emerge relatively unscathed as inflation keeps falling.

    As of Wednesday afternoon, all three major stock indexes were higher, led by a 1.8% advance in the Nasdaq Composite as investors await a fiscal second-quarter earnings announcement from chip maker Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +2.84%

    that’s due after the close.

    Any remarks by Powell on Friday that can be interpreted as suggesting that more rate hikes are likely to come will produce volatility and “a downdraft in stocks,” Eye said. The best possible outcome for stock investors would be if Powell “stresses data dependency and says that policy makers will continue to consider the cumulative impact of rate hikes that have been done already.”

    The theme of the Kansas City Fed’s Jackson Hole symposium, being held Thursday-Saturday, is “Structural Shifts in the Global Economy,” a topic that’s led to the growing expectation that Powell will address where he and the Fed currently see the neutral rate.

    In the run-up to Friday’s Jackson Hole speech, the Treasury market has already priced in a scenario of better-than-expected U.S. economic growth, with 10- and 30-year yields reaching multiyear highs on Monday and last week. Though both yields pulled back on Tuesday and Wednesday, they could bounce back again if investors sell off long-dated government debt in response to Powell’s remarks, investors said.

    The recent rise in yields has been blamed, in part, for August’s decline in U.S. stocks, with the S&P 500 down more than 3% so far this month.

    “Powell has to sound hawkish, he cannot afford not to do so” because “any signal that the hiking cycle is done will probably lead to such a bullish response in risk assets that it will loosen broader financial conditions,” said strategist Rikkert Scholten at Rotterdam-based Robeco, which oversees $194 billion.

    Still, Robeco’s investment team also expects the Fed chairman to stress data dependence as a way of “credibly” keeping his options open.

    Brad Conger, deputy chief investment officer at Hirtle Callaghan & Co. in West Conshohocken, Penn., which manages $18.5 billion in assets, said he believes the Fed is near the end of its rate-hiking cycle, which began in March 2022.

    Nevertheless, “any discussion about a higher natural rate of interest due to the shifting structure of the economy would set off a bout of uncertainty,” he said. Natural rate is the phrase used to describe where the neutral rate may settle over the longer run.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nvidia, Lowe’s, Dollar Tree, and More to Watch

    Nvidia, Lowe’s, Dollar Tree, and More to Watch

    [ad_1]

    The majority of second-quarter earnings season is over, with a handful of major technology and retail names left to report this week. Economists will be focused on any news from an annual gathering of monetary policy thinkers and practitioners in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Treasury market returns are negative again. Why this time for bonds looks different than 2022.

    Treasury market returns are negative again. Why this time for bonds looks different than 2022.

    [ad_1]

    Yearly returns in the Treasury market slipped into negative territory this week as the market sold off on signs that the Federal Reserve may need to keep rates high for a while to contain inflation.

    While negative returns might stir bad memories of last year’s shocking losses for bonds, stocks and nearly everything else, investors holding Treasury debt issued at 2023’s higher yields might want to sit back and take stock.

    “This is the top thing we hear,” said Ryan Murphy, director of fixed-income business development at Capital Group, of evaporating returns in what’s been a tough August. “You saw the worst bond market in 40 years last year. Investors, they are tired, and feel beaten up.”

    Murphy’s message to clients is this: “In bonds, you earn the money over time.” And those dwindling bond returns since January? “Approach it with a deep breath, and know this is going to work out in the end.”

    Capital Group’s laid-back style and lack of “a star CEO” earned it recognition by Institutional Investor in March as “a new bond leader” without a king, in large part because it attracted $100 billion in funds over the past five years, or twice the total of its peers.

    Recent volatility in interest rates again zapped yearly gains in many bond funds, as Fed officials continued to warn that a roaring labor market and robust spending could keep inflation from receding to the central bank’s 2% annual target.

    The spike in long-term bond yields makes older, lower-yielding securities look comparatively less attractive. That’s reflected in the yearly return on a key Bloomberg U.S. government bond and note index, which turned negative for the first time since March (see chart), when several regional banks failed, stoking fears of a broader banking crisis.

    Returns on U.S. government bonds turn negative for the year.


    FactSet

    However, a look back at August 2022 shows the 10-year Treasury yield starting around 2.6%, according to FactSet.

    By contrast, Treasury bill yields
    BX:TMUBMUSD06M
    neared 5.5% on Thursday, or “north of anything we’ve seen over the past 15 years,” Murphy said. And for investors looking to lock in longer-term yields, the 10-year Treasury rate
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    touched 4.307% on Thursday, its highest level since November 2007, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    See: How BlackRock’s Rick Rieder is steering his active fixed-income ETF as bond funds struggle

    “It’s becoming more expensive for the government and companies to finance debt because of the rapid climb in rates,” Murphy said of the drag of higher long-term interest rates.

    On the flip side, it’s also been one of the best stretches for lenders and bond investors in terms of getting paid to act as creditors since the 2007-2008 global financial crisis, but without a U.S. recession — or at least not yet.

    What’s also different from last year is that the Fed already jacked up interest rates to a 22-year high of 5.25%-5.5% in July, and has signaled it’s likely nearly finished with hikes in this cycle.

    Record cash on the sidelines

    Murphy pointed to a mountain of cash on the sidelines, in the form of assets in money-market funds, as another potential stabilizer for markets.

    Assets in money-market funds hit a record $5.57 trillion for the week ending Wednesday, according to data from the Investment Company Institute.

    “What’s really interesting is that there’s been two bursts of investors going into money-market funds. There was a big shift right at the onset of COVID, and another burst over the past 12-18 months since the beginning of the rate-hiking cycle,” Murphy said.

    Looking back to 2008, he pointed to a similar buildup in money-market assets, and a roughly $1.1 trillion wall of cash subsequently leaving the sector, as financial assets began to recover in the wake of the financial crisis.

    “What we did see, while not all of it, was a healthy amount went back into fixed-income in the following years,” Murphy said.

    Stocks closed lower Thursday and were headed for another week of losses, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    2.3% lower on the week so far, the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    down 2.1% and the Nasdaq Composite Index off 2.4%, according to FactSet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK Inflation Rate Fell in July, But Core Rate Held Steady

    UK Inflation Rate Fell in July, But Core Rate Held Steady

    [ad_1]

    The U.K.’s inflation rate fell a little more than expected in July, though with the key core rate holding steady, the pressure remains on the Bank of England as it considers another interest-rate hike next month.

    Consumer prices were 6.8% higher in July than the same month a year earlier, easing from the 7.9% increase recorded in June, the Office for National Statistics said Wednesday.

    Economists…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Builder confidence falls for the first time in 2023, despite strong U.S. home-buying demand

    Builder confidence falls for the first time in 2023, despite strong U.S. home-buying demand

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: Builder confidence waned in August as the 30-year mortgage rate surged, dampening U.S. home-buying interest.

    Despite a persistent shortage of homes on the market for resale, builders have lost confidence in the late summer amid declining customer traffic from higher mortgage rates, as well as challenges in the construction process.

    Mortgage…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia hikes interest rates by 3.5 percentage points

    Russia hikes interest rates by 3.5 percentage points

    [ad_1]

    Responding to a rapidly deteriorating ruble, the Bank of Russia hiked its key interest rate on Tuesday by 3.5 percentage points to 12%.

    The Bank of Russia said steady growth in domestic demand was surpassing the capacity to expand output.

    At the same time, elevated demand for imports has impacted the ruble.

    “Consequently,…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hate to spoil the party but there’s a new risk in town — a ‘no landing’ economy

    Hate to spoil the party but there’s a new risk in town — a ‘no landing’ economy

    [ad_1]

    For the last 18 months, all you’ve heard from the markets is that the U.S. economy is three months away from a recession. Now, the popular analysis is that that inflation is on a smooth glidepath down and the economy will never have a downturn again.

    Worries about a recession have evaporated, and all the talk is about a “soft landing,” with the Federal Reserve not having to hike interest rates more than once more, at most.

    But behind the scenes, in some economic circles, there is growing concern about another risk for the economy, dubbed a “no landing” scenario.

    What does “no landing” mean? Essentially it’s marked by economic growth that’s too strong to allow inflation to fall all the way to 2%, where the Federal Reserve aims for it to be, and therefore an economy that will need more Fed rate hikes, according to Chris Low, chief economist at FHN Financial.

    So instead of the U.S. central bank starting to cut rates early next year, there may be more rate hikes in store.

    “There is still considerable work to do before the inflation beast is fully tamed,” Low said.

    Former Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida described the risk in crystal-clear terms. “If the Fed finds itself  in March 2024 with an unemployment rate of 4% and an inflation rate of 4% with some of that temporary good news behind them, they are in a very tough spot,” Clarida said in a recent interview with Bloomberg News.

    “It is a risk. It is not the base case. But if I was still there [at the Fed], I would be assessing it,” he added.

    So why does this matter? Why would the Fed be in such a tough spot? Two words: presidential election.

    A Fed that is dedicated to bringing inflation down might have to slam the brakes on the economy forcefully to get the job done. That gets tough during an election year, especially one that already seems poised to be filled with acrimony.

    “The Fed does not play politics with monetary policy. The FOMC will do what is right for the economy, election year or not. Nevertheless, FOMC participants are already sensitive to triggering a recession. Doing it in an overt way when Congress, a third of the Senate, and the White House are up for grabs would be reckless,” Low said.

    Andrew Levin, professor of economics at Dartmouth College and a former top Fed staffer, said “raising interest rates sharply in the midst of an election cycle could be a delicate matter. Even the vaunted inflation fighter, Paul Volcker [the Fed’s chairman from 1979 to 1987], decided to ease off the brakes midway through the 1980 presidential campaign.”

    Ray Fair, a Yale economics professor, thinks that, whether or not the Fed successfully lowers consumer-price inflation to the vicinity of 2% will be what really matters for the 2024 presidential election. If inflation does not go gently and the Fed is still fighting next year, it would likely be negative for President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party, he said.

    See: Inflation could rebound later this year. And that might be a good thing.

    To avoid hiking rates next year, the Fed, in Low’s view, will raise interest rates to 6% by the end of this year. That is an out-of-consensus call. Financial markets think the Fed is done hiking with its benchmark policy interest rate in a range of 5.25% to 5.5%.

    Many economist and the financial markets are talking more about prospective Fed rate cuts in early 2024 than any more hikes.

    Asked during a recent radio interview if he thought a “no landing” scenario was taking shape, Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker replied: “I don’t think so.”

    Harker said the economy was likely on track to return to the low-interest-rate and low-inflation environment of 2012-19.

    “I think about this a lot, and I asked myself what’s different fundamentally about the U.S. economy now then the way it was before the pandemic,” Harker said. He concluded that there wasn’t much difference.

    The big trend Harker mentioned was demographics, with baby boomers still moving in large numbers into retirement. “I don’t think we have to stay in a high-inflation regime. I think we can get back to where we were,” he said.

    Steve Blitz, chief U.S. economist at research firm GlobalData.TSLombard, said he puts the probability of a “no landing” scenario at about 35%.

    Blitz added it was a common mistake for economists, policy makers, traders and journalists “to presume that the expansion to come is going to look like the expansion that was.”

    “At least in the United States, that was never the case,” he added.

    Blitz said that if the U.S. economy were growing at a rate below 2% with an inflation rate higher than 3%, the Fed would have to raise the policy rate to about 6.5%. But if the economy is humming along with 3% growth and inflation over 3%, that would be a trickier spot. “Does the Fed really want to slow that down?” he asked.

    See: The U.S. economy is aiming for a three-peat: 2% GDP growth

    The range of possible outcomes for the economy remains wide. Some economists still believe that a recession early next is the most likely outcome.

    Other economists, like Michelle Meyer, chief U.S. economist at Mastercard, think the economy will continue to grow, with inflation coming down. Meyer described that outcome as “a soft landing with bumps.”

    Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Santander U.S., said he thinks the U.S. economy will “muddle through” next year with subpar growth in the range of 1% for several quarters and inflation slowing gradually.

    “Obviously, that optimism melts away if we’re back to readings of 0.4% and 0.5% on core CPI in three months or six months,” Stanley said.

    Economic calendar: See what’s on the U.S. economic-data docket in the coming week

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Wall Street’s Top Recession Gauge Is Saying Now

    What Wall Street’s Top Recession Gauge Is Saying Now

    [ad_1]

    Wall Street is growing confident the U.S. can avoid a recession. But one key market indicator is still sending seemingly bleak signals.

    Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Emerging markets are oversold, Abrdn CEO says

    Emerging markets are oversold, Abrdn CEO says

    [ad_1]

    Stephen Bird, CEO of Abrdn, discusses the outlook for global markets and monetary policy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why China has few good options to boost its faltering economy | CNN Business

    Why China has few good options to boost its faltering economy | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    Hong Kong
    CNN
     — 

    Every few days for the past several weeks, a parade of Chinese leaders and policymakers have publicly vowed to do more to boost the sputtering economy, usually by promising to support the beleaguered private sector.

    Sometimes investors appear to have gained confidence from these pledges, sending shares higher.

    More often though, they’ve ignored the flurry of official messaging, hoping for more tangible stimulus measures that economists and analysts tell CNN are now unlikely to come because China has become too indebted to just pump up the economy like it did 15 years ago, during the global financial crisis.

    “We have had plenty of vague promises already, which don’t amount to a great deal so far,” said Robert Carnell, regional head of research for Asia-Pacific at ING Group.

    Except for some incremental steps to help the property market, currently mired in its worst slump in history, and tweaks to interest rates, there have been few signs of the government providing real money to struggling consumers or businesses.

    “Chinese policymakers appear unlikely to enact any major monetary or fiscal stimulus, likely fearing doing so could exacerbate China’s growing debt risks,” said Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based non-partisan think tank.

    “At most, we can expect meager, mostly-supply side measures ostensibly aimed at, among other things, attracting more private capital and boosting electric vehicle ownership,” he added.

    After a strong start to the year after Covid restrictions were lifted, the world’s second largest economy has lost momentum.

    Since April, a slew of disappointing economic data and population statistics has sparked concern that China may be facing a period of much slower growth and possibly even heading for a future comparable to Japan’s.

    China’s economy barely grew in the April to June months compared with the previous quarter, as an initial burst in economic activity following the end of pandemic restrictions faded. Signs of deflation are becoming more prevalent, sparking concerns that China could enter a prolonged period of stagnation.

    Based on Japan’s experience in the 1990s, there is the risk that China is entering “a liquidity trap,” a scenario in which monetary policy becomes largely ineffective and consumers hold on to their cash rather than spend it, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific for Natixis, a French investment bank.

    “In other words, there is a risk that Chinese corporates and households, pushed by their very negative sentiment about the economic outlook, prefer to disinvest and de-leverage in the light of falling revenue generation.”

    To get the economy back on track, Beijing needs to match its words with action, according to analysts.

    China “conspicuously” refrained from the giant Covid-era support seen in developed economies, according to analysts at the UBS Global Wealth Management. Fiscal stimulus, for instance, amounted to just a third of the aid offered in the United States, with no nationwide cash handouts.

    While this helped China avoid the rampant inflation shock seen elsewhere, disposable household income fell as wages and property asset values simultaneously stalled, they said in a recent research note.

    Interest rate cuts are not enough, unless they are accompanied by fiscal measures to boost demand.

    “A comprehensive policy mix — covering monetary and fiscal stimulus, including infrastructure, property, and consumption, alongside structural reforms,” would be helpful to rebuild confidence, they said.

    China’s economic trajectory is of great concern for global investors and policymakers who are counting on it to drive global expansion. But, Beijing appears to have run out of ammunition.

    Back in 2008, Chinese leaders rolled out a four trillion yuan ($586 billion) fiscal package to minimize the impact of the global financial crisis. It was seen as a success and helped boost Beijing’s domestic and international political standing as well as China’s economic growth, which soared to more than 9% in the second half of 2009.

    But the measures, which were focused on government-led infrastructure projects, also led to an unprecedented credit expansion and massive increase in local government debt, from which the economy is still struggling to recover. In 2012, Beijing said it wouldn’t be doing it again. The costs were just too high.

    China’s debt woes have only deepened during the Covid-19 pandemic, when three years of draconian restrictions and a real estate downturn drained the coffers of local government.

    Analysts estimate China’s outstanding government debts surpassed 123 trillion yuan ($18 trillion) last year. Nearly $10 trillion of that figure is so-called “hidden debt” owed by risky local government financing platforms.

    In June, Zhu Min, a former senior official at the International Monetary Fund who previously served at China’s central bank, was quoted by Bloomberg as telling the Summer Davos forum in Tianjin that he didn’t believe China would unveil massive stimulus, as the nation was already struggling with high debt levels.

    “No [fiscal stimulus] has been announced, which seems to indicate that Chinese policymakers are still wary about a too rapid increase in public debt,” said Garcia-Herrero.

    And even if Beijing were to take action, it would be less effective than in 2008, Garcia-Herrero said.

    “An infrastructure-led fiscal stimulus would need to be much bigger to have the same economic impact,” she said.

    It also implies that, if action is taken, public debt in China would jump well above the current 100% of GDP, which would place the economy “among the most indebted in the world,” she added.

    What’s worse, under President Xi Jinping, Beijing appears to have doubled down on its strategy to strengthen the party’s control over the economy, analysts said.

    A “correct response” to the economic slump would be for Beijing to return to a pro-market reform path and let the private sector play a bigger role, according to Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

    But signs are “limited” that the government is considering that direction, he said.

    According to Singleton, “China’s new economic leadership team has few tools to meaningfully revive growth.”

    “Beijing’s steadfast, albeit unsurprising, refusal to acknowledge the role Xi’s economic mismanagement has played” in exacerbating China’s problems will gravely compound its broader systemic risks, he said.

    The property sector will likely be a drag on growth for years to come, Singleton said, adding that the country’s alarming debt levels and timid consumers domestically and abroad won’t help either.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth’ — economists react to July’s employment report

    ‘The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth’ — economists react to July’s employment report

    [ad_1]

    The July jobs report on Friday showed the U.S. economy gained 187,000 jobs last month, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.5% from 3.6%.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected an addition of 200,000 jobs and unemployment staying at 3.6%.

    See: U.S. adds 187,000 jobs in July

    Below are some initial reactions from economists and other analysts, including their views on what the jobs report means for the Federal Reserve as the central bank considers how to proceed with interest-rate hikes. U.S. stocks
    ES00,
    +0.48%

    SPX
    looked set to trade up modestly following the data on nonfarm payrolls.

    • “The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth, but will continue to fret about the tight labor market. So far, the July employment and CPI reports are a wash for the Fed’s September 20 decision (we expect no change in rates), placing extra pressure on the August releases to add some clarity.” — Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, in a tweet

    • “This month’s slow job growth is a sign the economy is continuing to cool; while a negative in some senses, this is a positive indicator for the Fed and may soon end its interest rate hikes. … Moving forward, we anticipate the unemployment rate will remain low.  We also expect unemployment will rise to its natural long-run rate of 4.5% over the next two years.” — Steve Rick, chief economist at TruStage, previously known as CUNA Mutual Group, in a note

    • “Since bad news is good news these days, Jay Powell will be smiling this morning, if not entirely happy. The below consensus reading in hiring in the July payrolls is the type of labor market softening the Fed is looking for. … But there were some more mixed elements in the report as well. The unemployment rate ticked down a notch to 3.5% and average nominal wages grew 0.4% for the second consecutive month. The Fed will continue to be looking for a broader set of data and will be focused on a further deceleration in prices before throwing in the towel for September.” — Ali Jaffery, economist at CIBC, in a note

    • “The wage data is stronger than the payroll data, suggesting that demand for labor is still robust, and that the slowing pace of hiring is more due to a lack of supply of labor. [Average hourly earnings] rose 0.4% in July, same as May and June. AHE Y/Y was steady at +4.4%. This, combined with the firmer household survey data, should keep the Fed on their toes for another rate hike as soon as next month, but the [consumer price index] data next week will have a big influence in that decision as well.” — Thomas Simons, U.S. economist at Jefferies, in a note

    • “If you were to write the script of what a soft landing looks like, this is it. Payrolls grew a strong +187k, signaling a slower yet still strong — and more sustainable —pace.” — Justin Wolfers, University of Michigan economics professor, in a tweet

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. adds 187,000 jobs in July and points to hiring slowdown. Wages still high

    U.S. adds 187,000 jobs in July and points to hiring slowdown. Wages still high

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The U.S. added a more modest 187,000 new jobs in July, perhaps a sign the economy is cooling enough to drive inflation lower and even stave off further increases in interest rates.

    Employment growth has fallen below 200,000 two months in a row for the first time since the onset of the pandemic in 2020.

    The unemployment rate, meanwhile, dipped to 3.5% from 3.6%, the government said Friday.

    After the report, stocks rose and bond yields fell.

    Senior officials at the Federal Reserve will decide whether to raise interest rates again in September after reviewing a handful of reports on jobs, wages and inflation.

    A sign advertises job openings in Illinois. The economy created 187,000 jobs in July.


    Scott Olson/Getty Images

    Higher rates work to slow inflation by depressing the economy, but they also raise the risk of recession. The Fed is aiming to extinguish high inflation without triggering a downturn — what economists call a “soft landing.”

    The good news? Inflation has slowed a bit faster than expected recently. Yet while the labor market appears to be cooling, a shortage of workers is keeping upward pressure on wages.

    Wages rose 0.4% in July. The increase over the past 12 months was unchanged at 4.4%.

    Fed officials want to see annual wage growth return to pre-pandemic levels of 3% or less.

    The pace of hiring is also faster than the Fed would like. The economy probably only needs to add 100,000 jobs a month to absorb all the people entering the labor force in search of work, Fed officials said.

    Key details: The increase in hiring in July was concentrated in just a handful of areas, mostly health care and social assistance.

    Some 87,000 jobs — or 47% of July’s total — were created by medical providers and social programs.

    Hiring also rose slightly in leisure and hospitality, finance, wholesale and government.

    While the economy is still creating lots of new jobs, fewer industries are hiring. The percentage of firms adding jobs vs. the share reducing them fell close to a record low last month. That’s a sign the labor market is cooling off.

    Hiring in June and May was also weaker than previously reported.

    Job gains in June were reduced to 185,000 from 209,000, marking the smallest increase since the end of 2020.

    The increase in employment in May was cut to 281,000 from 306,000.

    Another sign of a softening labor market: The number of hours people work fell a tick to 34.3 and matched a post-pandemic low. Businesses tend to cut hours before resorting to layoffs when the economy slows.

    The share of people working or looking for work, meanwhile, was unchanged at a post-pandemic high of 62.6%.

    High labor-force participation can also help to reduce inflation. When more people are looking for work, companies don’t have to raise wages as much to obtain labor.

    Big picture: Can the Fed really pull off a soft landing — something it’s only done once or twice since World War Two? Senior officials are increasingly convinced it’s doable.

    The Fed economic staff recently dropped its forecast of a recession and a majority of Wall Street economists now say a downturn is unlikely in the next year.

    The economy still isn’t out of danger, though. The Fed has raised interest rates to the highest level in a few decades and some key parts of the economy are suffering.

    If progress on reducing inflation wanes and rates go even higher, the economy would be more vulnerable to a recession.

    Looking ahead: “Today’s July jobs report is consistent with a soft landing in the U.S. economy,” said chief economist Gus Faucher of PNC Financial Services. “Job growth is gradually slowing to a more sustainable pace.”

    “The July employment report should not change the Fed’s hawkish lean,” said Nationwide Chief Economist Kathy Bostjancic. “But officials will want to see the August employment report and the next two inflation monthly readings before deciding whether they can remain on hold or if further rate hikes are required to cool labor demand and inflationary pressures.”

    Market reaction: The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    and S&P 500
    SPX
    were set to open higher in Friday trades. The yield on the 10-year Treasury BX:TMUBMUSD10Y fell to 4.1%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link