ReportWire

Tag: Microsoft Corp

  • U.S. stocks open higher ahead of Big Tech earnings, central-bank decisions

    U.S. stocks open higher ahead of Big Tech earnings, central-bank decisions

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stock indexes opened higher on Monday, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average looking to extend its 10-session winning streak. Investors are awaiting a batch of earnings reports from megacap growth and technology companies while eying on monetary-policy decisions from the world’s major central banks amid continued signs that inflation is easing. The Dow industrials
    DJIA,
    +0.52%

    rose 88 points, or 0.3%, to 35,319. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.40%

    gained 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.19%

    advanced 0.5%. Corporate results due on Monday include Domino’s Pizza
    DPZ,
    +0.12%
    ,
    Whirlpool
    WHR,
    +0.69%
    ,
    Logitech
    LOGI,
    -0.80%

    and NXP Semiconductors
    NXPI,
    -1.13%
    .
    Alphabet
    GOOGL,
    +1.26%

    and Microsoft
    MSFT,
    +0.39%

    will report their numbers on Tuesday; Meta
    META,
    -0.90%

    on Wednesday; and Intel
    INTC,
    -1.15%

    on Thursday. The Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates by 25 basis points after its policy meeting this week. Policymakers will release a statement announcing their decision Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern, while Fed Chair Jerome Powell will hold a press conference at 2:30 p.m..

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • With Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet earnings hanging on AI, more investors are asking: ‘How are you going to pay for that?’

    With Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet earnings hanging on AI, more investors are asking: ‘How are you going to pay for that?’

    [ad_1]

    Shares of big tech companies have coasted through this year on AI euphoria, but as Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. prepare to report results this week, some investors are starting to ask how much those AI advancements might actually cost.

    Those questions have surfaced after several months during simply saying “AI” on earnings calls appeared to be enough for investors. If the economy sours though — as some expect in the second half of this year or next year — big tech’s AI ambitions could go with it.

    “Given the exorbitant costs associated with the development, hosting and serving of AI products, many investors are concerned about the potential for [fiscal 2024] commentary regarding a material increase,” Jefferies analyst Brent Thill wrote, according to a MarketWatch earnings preview for Microsoft’s
    MSFT,
    -0.89%

    results.

    Microsoft and Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +0.69%

    GOOG,
    +0.65%
    ,
    which both report on Tuesday, have been in heated competition in the world of online search and digital advertisements, as Microsoft leans more on its massive investments in research lab OpenAI to muscle up its own search capabilities. But a Deutsche Bank analyst said that so far, Google appears to have the upper hand in that battle.

    Still, for Microsoft, after a broader pullback in IT spending earlier this year, analysts have found more to like about its cloud-computing business — namely market-share gains, generally-sturdy demand, and whatever ways AI can fit into the equation. Wolfe Research analyst Alex Zukin, in a recent note, said he believed “the focus will turn from what is good enough, to how good can it be,” as Microsoft moves deeper into AI.

    “How good can it be?” might also be a question for Meta
    META,
    -2.73%
    ,
    which reports second-quarter results on Wednesday.

    Shares of the social-media company have more than doubled in value so far this year. JMP analyst Andrew Boone, in a recent note, cited likely improvements in Meta’s digital ad segment, better engagement, and a broader advertising backdrop that “appears to be stable” after a slowdown in spending, Still, there are signs that the initial user attraction to Threads, Meta’s answer to Twitter, has fizzled.

    This week in earnings

    For the week ahead, 166 companies in the S&P 500 index report results, including 12 from the Dow, according to FactSet. Among them are Domino’s Pizza Inc.
    DPZ,
    -0.62%
    ,
    which now plans to deliver pizza via Uber Eats after years of chafing at third-party delivery apps. Industrials General Electric Co.
    GE,
    -0.82%

    and 3M Co.
    MMM,
    +0.04%

    also report, after 3M agreed to pay $10.3 billion to settle accusations it was responsible for so-called “forever chemicals” in drinking water.

    Quick-service restaurant chains Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
    CMG,
    +0.20%

    and McDonald’s Corp.
    MCD,
    -0.51%

    also report, with BofA analysts expecting an “almost normal” quarter for the industry, after spending at chain restaurants grew last month and costs for some ingredients started to ease following two years of supply disruptions. Auto makers General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -1.81%

    and Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    -0.71%

    also report, and while parts shortages that have constrained vehicle production have shown signs of fading, so has electric-vehicle “euphoria.”

    The calls to put on your calendar

    Visa, Mastercard: Earlier this month executives from the big banks said U.S. consumers are generally doing OK despite still-rampant inflation, although perhaps less OK than in prior months. This week credit-card giants Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. report results on Tuesday and Thursday, respectively. The profit, sales and credit-card volume figures from Visa
    V,
    -0.15%

    and Mastercard
    MA,
    -0.14%

    will offer more specifics on consumer spending, as vacations and concerts compete with more expensive and more pressing needs, like groceries and other bills.

    Shares of Visa and Mastercard are up so far this year, but some analysts said there could be more room investors to step in. SVB MoffettNathanson analyst Lisa Ellis recently said shares of both companies were hovering at “unusually attractive” levels.

    The number to watch

    Mattel outlook, and anything ‘Barbie’-related: The “Barbie” movie hit theaters nationwide on Friday. And after an epic marketing campaign, Mattel Inc.’s investors, banking on the film to drive a rebound for the toy maker during the second half of this year, will be zeroed in on the box-office results following the film’s debut on Friday.

    Expectations for the film are huge. And when Mattel
    MAT,
    -0.42%

    reports second-quarter results on Wednesday, executives could offer the first answers to some big questions: Has the film helped revive toy sales? Sales for anything else? Will the “Barbenheimer” effect help or hurt financials?

    The film — directed by Greta Gerwig, written Gerwig and Noah Baumbach, and starring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling — brings together two writers with indie bona fides and two actors with mainstream starpower. Reviews so far have been favorable, and Barbie is already Mattel’s most profitable franchise. But the movie isn’t directly geared toward children, movie theaters have struggled to get back on track after pandemic lockdowns, and toy demand through this year has been weak after ballooning during the pandemic. And some analysts don’t expect “Barbie” to do much for Mattel’s stock.

    Emily Bary and Jon Swartz contributed reporting to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dow posts longest winning streak in nearly 6 years; Nasdaq slumps over 2%

    Dow posts longest winning streak in nearly 6 years; Nasdaq slumps over 2%

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks finished mostly lower Thursday, with the Nasdaq and S&P 500 dragged down by disappointing earnings, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose for a ninth straight day for its longest winning streak in nearly six years.

    How stocks traded

    • The S&P 500
      SPX,
      -0.68%

      fell 30.85 points, or 0.7%, to close at 4,534.87.

    • The Dow
      DJIA,
      +0.47%

      rose 163.97 points, or 0.5%, to finish at 35,225.18. The winning streak is its longest since a nine-day run that ended on Sept. 20, 2017, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    • The Nasdaq Composite
      COMP,
      -2.05%

      ended at 14,063.31, down 294.71 points, or 2.1%.

    What drove markets

    After lagging behind the S&P 500 and Nasdaq for most of the year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has climbed over the past two weeks. The blue-chip gauge is now heading for its longest streak of daily gains since Sept. 20, 2017, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    It’s the latest milestone as value stocks and other lagging sectors of the market appear to be playing “catch up,” said Paul Nolte, senior wealth adviser and market strategist at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, during a phone interview with MarketWatch. Although the Dow’s year-to-date gains are still well behind those of the S&P 500, with the blue-chip gauge up 6.6% since Jan. 1, FactSet data show.

    On Wednesday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq closed at their highest levels in nearly 16 months.

    “We’re finally seeing the rotation to value,” he said. “The Dow is playing catch up with the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq.”

    See: Stock-market bubble trouble? Check out the 3-year view on Nasdaq, S&P 500 returns.

    Technology stocks were lagging following earnings from Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    -8.41%

    released late Wednesday, which showed that revenue fell short. Shares fell 8.4%.

    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -9.74%

    shares fell 9.7% after the electric vehicle maker beat Wall Street expectations for its second quarter but not in the blowout fashion that some market observers were expecting.

    “Netflix missed sales estimates and issued lower-than-expected Q3 guidance, while Tesla’s results showed shrinking profitability with squeeze on margins,” said Henry Allen, strategist at Deutsche Bank.

    Semiconductor shares also took it on the chin, with the PHLX Semiconductor Index
    SOX,
    -3.62%

    falling 3.6%. The drop came after Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. 
    TSM,
    -5.05%

    topped second-quarter earnings expectations but reported margins that contracted, while providing a somewhat downbeat outlook.

    Meanwhile, shares of IBM Corp.
    IBM,
    +2.14%

    and Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +6.07%

    drove the Dow higher after both companies beat earnings expectations.

    Bad news for Netflix seemed to infect other megacap technology names, as Alphabet Inc. Class A
    GOOGL,
    -2.32%

    and Alphabet Inc.
    GOOG,
    -2.65%

    retreated, as did shares of Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -1.01%

    and Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -2.31%

    after the latter hit a record this week.

    Investors also digested earnings from American Airlines Group Inc.
    AAL,
    -6.24%

    and Blackstone Inc.
    BX,
    -0.61%

    which reported before the opening bell. After the close, investors will hear from Capital One Financial Corp.
    COF,
    -2.52%
    ,
    CSX Corp.
    CSX,
    -0.27%

    and First Financial Bancorp
    FFBC,
    -0.54%
    ,
    along with a few others.

    In U.S. economic data, weekly jobless benefit claims data showed the number of Americans applying for first-time unemployment benefits fell to a two-month low. Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Fed’s gauge of manufacturing activity came in at negative 13.5 in July, up from 13.7 during the prior month.

    Existing home sales fell in June, while leading index of economic indicators dropped 0.7% in June, falling for the 15th month in a row.

    Companies in focus

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Investment banking’s coming back

    CNBC Daily Open: Investment banking’s coming back

    [ad_1]

    A man walks by the Bank of America headquarters on July 18, 2023 in New York.

    Eduardo Munoz | View Press | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Market momentum
    All major U.S. indexes
    advanced Tuesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average had its seventh consecutive day of gains as investors digested better-than-expected corporate earnings. Asia-Pacific markets were mixed Wednesday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index slid 1.2%, extending its losses of over 2% yesterday, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 0.78% even as business sentiment in the country fell in July.

    Microsoft 365 + $30
    Microsoft shares popped around 4% to hit an all-time high after the company announced pricing for its new artificial intelligence service. Named Copilot, the service costs an additional $30 per month, on top of the base Microsoft 365 subscription for Office products. Microsoft also announced its Bing Chat can now respond to images.

    Banking boom
    Morgan Stanley’s shares jumped 6.45% after the bank reported better-than-expected second-quarter earnings and revenue. Revenue climbed 2% to $13.46 billion, boosted by a 16% increase in wealth management revenue. Meanwhile, investors pushed Bank of America shares up 4.42% on the bank’s earnings and revenue beat for the second quarter. Both figures were also higher year on year.

    I’m feeling unlucky
    Google is cutting internet access for some employees to reduce the risk of cyberattacks, CNBC has learned. Employees chosen to participate in the new pilot program will only be able to access Google-owned websites, and will also be restricted from administrative permissions like installing software. “Googlers are frequent targets of attacks,” one internal description viewed by CNBC stated.

    [PRO] Predictions for the global market
    The U.S. stock market has rallied this year, but the picture across the world is more varied. CNBC Pro asked 15 market strategists to predict how global stock markets will end the year. Find out which country has the best chance of beating its U.S. counterpart, according to strategists.

    The bottom line

    In another sign the U.S. economy is more resilient than anticipated, banks have had a good showing this earnings season.

    Yes, big banks like JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America are supposed to benefit from the higher interest rates that felled regional banks like Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic.

    But investment banking activity — which slowed as higher rates first kicked in last year — is seeing signs of a revival.

    JPMorgan’s investment banking revenue beat estimates. As Octavio Marenzi, CEO of consultancy Opimas, put it, “investment banking, which has been a problem child over the past year or so, is starting to show signs of life.”

    Indeed, investment banking fees for Bank of America increased 7% to $1.2 billion.

    And while Morgan Stanley didn’t do so well on the investment banking front, CEO James Gorman said he believes “we are very, very close” to the end of rate hikes. That would give the banking sector more stable ground on which to operate and rebuild.

    Regional banks weren’t left out of the surge of optimism in the sector, either. Charles Schwab, which had struggled since the banking turmoil in March, also saw better-than-expected earnings and revenue last quarter. Investors cheered and gave the bank’s shares a 12.57% bump.

    More tellingly, the SPDR Regional Banking ETF added 4.22% to hit $45.73, its best day of gains since June 6, and the most expensive it’s been since early March, prior to the failure of several regional banks.

    Broader indexes closed higher as well. The S&P 500 rose 0.71%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.06% and the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.76%.

    Goldman Sachs reports later today, wrapping up earnings from big banks. Even if Goldman beats estimates, keep in mind that analysts aren’t expecting much from the investment bank for the second quarter because of several of its own missteps.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Investment banking sees signs of life

    CNBC Daily Open: Investment banking sees signs of life

    [ad_1]

    A woman exits the Bank of America headquarters on July 18, 2023 in New York.

    Eduardo Munoz Alvarez | View Press | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Positive market momentum
    All major U.S. indexes
    advanced Tuesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average had its seventh consecutive day of gains as investors digested better-than-expected corporate earnings. European markets traded higher as well. The benchmark Stoxx 600 index added 0.6% as British grocery delivery firm Ocado surged almost 20%.

    Microsoft 365 + $30
    Microsoft shares popped around 4% to hit an all-time high after the company announced pricing for its new artificial intelligence service. Named Copilot, the service costs an additional $30 per month, on top of the base Microsoft 365 subscription for Office products. Microsoft also announced its Bing Chat can now respond to images.

    The other Morgan
    Morgan Stanley’s shares jumped 6.45% after the bank reported better-than-expected second-quarter earnings and revenue. Revenue climbed 2% to $13.46 billion, boosted by a 16% increase in wealth management revenue. Profits declined 13% to $2.18 billion from a year earlier, but investors took comfort in CEO James Gorman’s comments that the upcoming quarter looks “more constructive.”

    Banking on Bank of America
    Investors pushed Bank of America shares up 4.42% on the bank’s earnings and revenue beat for the second quarter. Both figures were also higher year on year. Profit rose 19% to $7.41 billion while revenue increased 11% to $25.33 billion, helped by a 14% jump in net interest income.

    [PRO] Cautious fund managers
    In the past days, we’ve heard about how the S&P 500 may hit a record high this year amid a perpetually postponed recession. But fund managers are still cautious, according to the latest Bank of America Global Fund Manager Survey. This is how managers are allocating their investments, and the assets they are worried about.

    The bottom line

    In another sign the U.S. economy is more resilient than anticipated, banks have had a good showing this earnings season.

    Yes, big banks like JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America are supposed to benefit from the higher interest rates that felled regional banks like Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic.

    But investment banking activity — which slowed as higher rates first kicked in last year — is seeing signs of a revival.

    JPMorgan’s investment banking revenue beat estimates. As Octavio Marenzi, CEO of consultancy Opimas, put it, “investment banking, which has been a problem child over the past year or so, is starting to show signs of life.”

    Indeed, investment banking fees for Bank of America increased 7% to $1.2 billion.

    And while Morgan Stanley didn’t do so well on the investment banking front, CEO James Gorman said he believes “we are very, very close” to the end of rate hikes. That would give the banking sector more stable ground on which to operate and rebuild.

    Regional banks weren’t left out of the surge of optimism in the sector, either. Charles Schwab, which had struggled since the banking turmoil in March, also saw better-than-expected earnings and revenue last quarter. Investors cheered and gave the bank’s shares a 12.57% bump.

    More tellingly, the SPDR Regional Banking ETF added 4.22% to hit $45.73, its best day of gains since June 6, and the most expensive it’s been since early March, prior to the failure of several regional banks.

    Broader indexes closed higher as well. The S&P 500 rose 0.71%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.06% and the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.76%.

    Goldman Sachs reports later today, wrapping up earnings from big banks.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • U.S. stocks finish higher as Dow industrials book longest winning streak since March 2021 after better-than-expected corporate earnings

    U.S. stocks finish higher as Dow industrials book longest winning streak since March 2021 after better-than-expected corporate earnings

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stock indexes ended higher on Tuesday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average settling at the highest level in 15 months after quarterly results from Bank of America Corp.
    BAC,
    +4.42%

    and Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    +6.45%

    bolstered bank stocks, while shares of Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +3.98%

    spiked to its record high, buoying the technology sector. The Dow industrials
    DJIA,
    +1.06%

    advanced 366 points, or 1.1%, to end at 34,951, its highest closing level since April 21, 2022. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.71%

    was up 0.7%, while the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.76%

    jumped 0.8%. Bank of America Corp.’s second-quarter earnings beat Wall Street expectations, sending the megabank’s stock up by more than 4.4% on Tuesday, while Morgan Stanley’s shares rallied 6.5% after its quarterly profit dropped but beat analyst expectations. Exchange-traded funds that buy bank stocks jumped on Tuesday with the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
    KRE,
    +4.22%

    logging its best daily performance since June 6, according to FactSet data.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nothing can keep tech down. Here’s how that affects our thinking about stocks

    Nothing can keep tech down. Here’s how that affects our thinking about stocks

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ChatGPT-maker OpenAI signs deal with AP to license news stories

    ChatGPT-maker OpenAI signs deal with AP to license news stories

    [ad_1]

    ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and The Associated Press said Thursday that they’ve made a deal for the artificial intelligence company to license AP’s archive of news stories.

    “The arrangement sees OpenAI licensing part of AP’s text archive, while AP will leverage OpenAI’s technology and product expertise,” the two organizations said in a joint statement.

    Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has launched an investigation into ChatGPT creator OpenAI and whether the artificial intelligence company violated consumer protection laws by scraping public data and publishing false information through its chatbot.

    Google says it’s rolling out its AI-powered chatbot Bard across Europe and in Brazil, expanding its availability to hundreds of millions more users.

    Elon Musk is finally starting to talk about the artificial intelligence company he founded to compete with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI.

    Ask ChatGPT about comedian Sarah Silverman’s memoir “The Bedwetter” and the artificial intelligence chatbot can come up with a detailed synopsis of every part of the book.

    OpenAI and other technology companies must ingest large troves of written works, such as books, news articles and social media chatter, to improve their AI systems known as large language models. Last year’s release of ChatGPT has sparked a boom in “generative AI” products that can create new passages of text, images and other media.

    The tools have raised concerns about their propensity to spout falsehoods that are hard to notice because of the system’s strong command of the grammar of human languages. They also have raised questions about to what extent news organizations and others whose writing, artwork, music or other work was used to “train” the AI models should be compensated.

    This week, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission told OpenAI it had opened an investigation into whether the company had engaged in unfair or deceptive privacy or data security practices in scraping public data — or caused harm by publishing false information through its chatbot products. The FTC did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the investigation, which The Washington Post was first to report.

    Along with news organizations, book authors have sought compensation for their works being used to train AI systems. More than 4,000 writers — among them Nora Roberts, Margaret Atwood, Louise Erdrich and Jodi Picoult — signed a letter late last month to the CEOs of OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta and other AI developers accusing them of exploitative practices in building chatbots that “mimic and regurgitate” their language, style and ideas. Some novelists and the comedian Sarah Silverman have also sued OpenAI for copyright infringement.

    “We are pleased that OpenAI recognizes that fact-based, nonpartisan news content is essential to this evolving technology, and that they respect the value of our intellectual property,” said a written statement from Kristin Heitmann, AP senior vice president and chief revenue officer. “AP firmly supports a framework that will ensure intellectual property is protected and content creators are fairly compensated for their work.”

    The two companies said they are also examining “potential use cases for generative AI in news products and services,” though didn’t give specifics. OpenAI and AP both “believe in the responsible creation and use of these AI systems,” the statement said.

    OpenAI will have access to AP news stories going back to 1985.

    The AP deal is valuable to a company like OpenAI because it provides a trove of material that it can use for training purposes, and is also a hedge against losing access to material because of lawsuits that have threatened its access to material, said Nick Diakopoulos, a professor of communications studies and computer science at Northwestern University.

    “In order to guard against how the courts may decide, maybe you want to go out and sign licensing deals so you’re guaranteed legal access to the material you’ll need,” Diakopoulos said.

    The AP doesn’t currently use any generative AI in its news stories, but has used other forms of AI for nearly a decade, including to automate corporate earnings reports and recap some sporting events. It also runs a program that helps local news organizations incorporate AI into their operations, and recently launched an AI-powered image archive search.

    The deal’s effects could reach far beyond the AP because of the organization’s size and its deep ties to other news outlets, said news industry analyst Ken Doctor.

    When AP decided to open up its content for free on the internet in the 1990s, it led many newspaper companies to do the same, which “turned out to be a very bad idea” for the news business, Doctor said.

    He said navigating “a new, AI-driven landscape is deeply uncertain” and presents similar risks.

    “The industry is far weaker today. AP is in OK shape. It’s stable. But the newspaper industry around it is really gasping for air,” Doctor said. “On the positive side, AP has the clout to do a deal like this and can work with local publishers to try to assess both the potential and the risk.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer David Bauder contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: For banks, big profits don’t mean stock gains

    CNBC Daily Open: For banks, big profits don’t mean stock gains

    [ad_1]

    A person enters the JPMorgan Chase headquarters in New York, June 30, 2022.

    Andrew Kelly | Reuters

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Lackluster markets
    U.S. stocks
    traded mixed Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average the only major index to rise, though all big indexes ended in the green for the week. Asia-Pacific markets fell Monday. China’s Shanghai Composite retreated around 1.2%, leading losses in the region, after disappointing economic data.

    The Chinese economy slows
    China’s second-quarter gross domestic product grew 6.3% from a year ago, falling short of the 7.3% increase analysts had expected. Moreover, the number looks impressive on a year-on-year basis only because Shanghai was in lockdown this time last year. When tabulated month over month, GDP grew only 0.8%, much slower than the 2.2% increase in the first quarter.

    Caged bird
    Twitter’s experiencing negative cash flow because of an approximately 50% drop in advertising revenue and “heavy debt,” Elon Musk said Saturday morning. Musk, who is Twitter’s CTO and executive chairman, told a BBC reporter in April that the company’s “roughly breakeven” and expected to have positive cash flow within the next quarter.

    Thawing Activision Blizzard deal
    Microsoft’s one step closer to acquiring Activision Blizzard. The U.S. Appeals Court on Friday denied the Federal Trade Commission’s motion to stop the $68.7 billion deal, while Britain’s competition regulator said it would consider Microsoft’s proposals to “restructure the transaction.” Meanwhile, Sony’s signed a 10-year agreement with Microsoft to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on the PlayStation console.

    [PRO] Retail therapy
    China’s economy may be slowing, but the country’s “premium” spenders are still splashing out on goods, according to Bernstein. The private wealth management firm estimates there are 263 million people in that category, who are spending on products from these companies and potentially boosting their shares.

    The bottom line

    Despite big banks posting solid earnings for their second quarter, they didn’t reap rewards in stock markets Friday.

    Citigroup’s earnings and revenue beat expectations. Its shares sank 4.05%. Likewise, Wells Fargo reported better-than-expected earnings and revenue, and raised its guidance for full-year net interest income. Still, market response was muted. Shares of Wells Fargo slipped 0.34%

    Even JPMorgan, the grand dame of U.S. banks, didn’t manage to rouse investor interest. Its net income soared 67% year over year; its stock inched up 0.6%.

    Why aren’t investors more excited about banks?

    The memory of March’s banking turmoil, I think, still lingers. Higher interest rates may benefit big banks because their deposits are relatively sticky compared with those at regional banks — such as the ill-fated Silicon Valley Bank.

    But high rates are also deepening commercial real estate debt, impeding dealmaking and lowering loan demand — all headwinds for banks, regardless of their size. It’s hard, in other words, to muster enthusiasm over banks when rates are still at historically high levels.

    Another reason for the disinterest in the banking sector, I think, is because stocks are essentially promises of future earnings. And there’s nothing new or exciting that banks can do, really, to generate income.

    In fact, I’d argue that banks are supposed to be boring. No one wants the place where they entrust their money to be exciting. The banks that collapsed this year were all, loosely speaking, deviating from boring banking business: Focusing on tech startups, the crypto industry, or — in the case of Credit Suisse — just straightforwardly plagued by scandals.

    It’s maybe not a bad thing, then, that investors aren’t piling into big banks.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Cramer: The Cassandras are wrong about the market (again) — here’s why I’m upbeat

    Cramer: The Cassandras are wrong about the market (again) — here’s why I’m upbeat

    [ad_1]

    Visitors around the ‘Charging Bull’ statue near the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Thursday, June 29, 2023.

    Victor J. Blue | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The boogeymen continue to be fictional, despite endless attempts to drum up fear and hasten the departure of millions of scared investors. I’m calling the endless negative prattle the “Bear Bilge,” the stuff thrown at us that seems so cerebral and intellectual, but just turns out to miss the mark.

    I’m being plenty genteel in that summary. I won’t stay that way.

    You know my thesis by now. There are dozens of commentators who come on-air and posit the “hard landing” scenario for the economy, making it clear that we are indeed on the eve of destruction. These Cassandras are from two camps. The first is made up of negative analysts who dug in their heels and overstayed their welcome. The second group is wealthy hedge fund managers and individuals who see no harm in generating chills simply because they don’t think they are doing so. They regard their fear-mongering as first class advice that can’t possibly have consequences. I get that. If the market crashes they will be lauded for a lifetime. if it percolates, big deal — they didn’t tell you to sell, they just told you not to buy. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: For banks, big profits don’t mean market gains

    CNBC Daily Open: For banks, big profits don’t mean market gains

    [ad_1]

    People walk outside of the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Headquarters on June 12, 2023. in New York.

    Eduardo Munoz Alvarez | View Press | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Lackluster markets
    U.S. stocks
    traded mixed Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average the only major index to rise, though all big indexes ended in the green for the week. European markets closed lower after five positive sessions. The benchmark Stoxx 600 index retreated 0.11%, dragged down by telecom stocks after downbeat news from Nokia and Ericsson.

    Biggest bank gets bigger
    JPMorgan Chase’s second-quarter net income surged 67% to $14.5 billion, or $4.75 per share. When excluding its acquisition of First Republic, earnings were $4.37 per share. Revenue grew 34% to hit $42.4 billion, boosted by a 44% jump in net interest income. All figures beat Wall Street’s estimates — and the bank’s own, causing it to raise its expectations for the full year’s net interest income.

    Caged bird
    Twitter’s experiencing negative cash flow because of an approximately 50% drop in advertising revenue and “heavy debt,” Elon Musk said Saturday morning. Musk, who is Twitter’s CTO and executive chairman, told a BBC reporter in April that the company’s “roughly breakeven” and expected to have positive cash flow within the next quarter.

    Thawing Activision Blizzard deal
    Microsoft’s one step closer to acquiring Activision Blizzard. The U.S. Appeals Court on Friday denied the Federal Trade Commission’s motion to stop the $68.7 billion deal, while Britain’s competition regulator said it would consider Microsoft’s proposals to “restructure the transaction.” Meanwhile, Sony’s signed a 10-year agreement with Microsoft to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on the PlayStation console.

    [PRO] Ripple effects
    A judge in the Southern District of New York ruled Thursday that Ripple’s XRP token is “not necessarily a security on its face.” That’s a win not just for Ripple, a crypto company, but the wider industry. CNBC Pro’s Tanaya Macheel explains what the case means for crypto companies like Coinbase.

    The bottom line

    Despite big banks posting solid earnings for their second quarter, they didn’t reap rewards in stock markets Friday.

    Citigroup’s earnings and revenue beat expectations. Its shares sank 4.05%. Likewise, Wells Fargo reported better-than-expected earnings and revenue, and raised its guidance for full-year net interest income. Still, market response was muted. Shares of Wells Fargo slipped 0.34%

    Even JPMorgan, the grand dame of U.S. banks, didn’t manage to rouse investor interest. Its net income soared 67% year over year; its stock inched up 0.6%.

    Why aren’t investors more excited about banks?

    The memory of March’s banking turmoil, I think, still lingers. Higher interest rates may benefit big banks because their deposits are relatively sticky compared with those at regional banks — such as the ill-fated Silicon Valley Bank.

    But high rates are also deepening commercial real estate debt, impeding dealmaking and lowering loan demand — all headwinds for banks, regardless of their size. It’s hard, in other words, to muster enthusiasm over banks when rates are still at historically high levels.

    Another reason for the disinterest in the banking sector, I think, is because stocks are essentially promises of future earnings. And there’s nothing new or exciting that banks can do, really, to generate income.

    In fact, I’d argue that banks are supposed to be boring. No one wants the place where they entrust their money to be exciting. The banks that collapsed this year were all, loosely speaking, deviating from boring banking business: Focusing on tech startups, the crypto industry, or — in the case of Credit Suisse — just straightforwardly plagued by scandals.

    It’s maybe not a bad thing, then, that investors aren’t piling into big banks.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Microsoft and Sony sign deal to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on PlayStation

    Microsoft and Sony sign deal to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on PlayStation

    [ad_1]

    Game enthusiasts and industry personnel walk between the Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation exhibits at the E3 trade show on June 16, 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

    Christian Petersen | Getty Images

    Sony has signed a binding, 10-year agreement with Microsoft to keep Call of Duty on its PlayStation gaming consoles after closing the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Microsoft said on Sunday.

    “We are pleased to announce that Microsoft and PlayStation have signed a binding agreement to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation following the acquisition of Activision Blizzard,” Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer said on Twitter Sunday.

    related investing news

    CNBC Investing Club

    Activision is the maker of the best-selling Call of Duty lineup. Regulators around the world had expressed significant concern about Microsoft’s power over the gaming market if an Activision acquisition was approved.

    Microsoft is the manufacturer of the Xbox, which competes directly with Sony’s PlayStation, prompting fears that Microsoft would be able to make games “exclusive” to its own consoles and displace Sony from competition.

    The deal does something to ameliorate those concerns, although Microsoft and Sony aren’t disclosing the duration of the agreement. A Microsoft spokesperson noted the deal was in place for the long term. The company has signed similar deals in the past.

    Anti-competitive concerns were shared by the CEO of Sony’s interactive entertainment division, Jim Ryan, as recently as last month. Ryan, whose portfolio includes PlayStation, said that he thought the proposed Activision Blizzard acquisition was not good for competition in videotaped June testimony.

    Microsoft vice chair Brad Smith said on Twitter Sunday that even after a potential deal closes, Microsoft “will remain focused on ensuring that Call of Duty remains available on more platforms and for more consumers than ever before.”

    The acquisition isn’t certain to close, although Microsoft and Activision’s prospects are markedly better after a federal appeals judge prevented the Federal Trade Commission from temporarily blocking the deal. The FTC had sued to stop the deal in San Francisco federal court in July but had failed to convince a judge that the deal would pose a sufficient anti-competitive risk.

    Regulators in the EU signed off on the deal in May. The U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority, which has forced divestitures and blocked prior tech deals, said on Wednesday that it was prepared to negotiate with Microsoft over the terms of the deal.

    The two companies are aiming to complete their transaction by Tuesday, July 18.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal appeals court denies FTC bid to pause Microsoft-Activision deal

    Federal appeals court denies FTC bid to pause Microsoft-Activision deal

    [ad_1]

    A federal appeals court late Friday denied the Federal Trade Commission’s bid to temporarily block Microsoft Corp.’s
    MSFT,
    +0.75%

    $68.7 billion acquisition of videogame publisher Activision Blizzard Inc.
    ATVI,
    +0.59%
    ,
    clearing the path for the biggest gaming deal in the U.S. The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling means only U.K. regulators can stop the closing of the deal before a July 18 deadline. On Tuesday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled against the FTC, which sued to block the deal in December, prompting the FTC’s appeal on Wednesday. “We appreciate the Ninth Circuit’s swift response denying the FTC’s motion to further delay the deal. This brings us another step closer to the finish line in this marathon of global regulatory reviews,” Microsoft President Brad Smith said in a statement. The FTC was not immediately available for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FTC loses appeals court bid to temporarily block Microsoft-Activision deal

    FTC loses appeals court bid to temporarily block Microsoft-Activision deal

    [ad_1]

    Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft

    CNBC

    In a victory for Microsoft, the U.S. Appeals Court for the 9th Circuit late on Friday denied the Federal Trade Commission’s motion to temporarily stop Microsoft from closing its $68.7 billion acquisition of video game publisher Activision Blizzard.

    Microsoft is still working to resolve concerns about the transaction from the United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority. The two companies have been looking to close the deal by July 18.

    “We appreciate the Ninth Circuit’s swift response denying the FTC’s motion to further delay the deal. This brings us another step closer to the finish line in this marathon of global regulatory reviews,” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president and vice chair, said in a statement

    A federal judge in San Francisco, after five days of court hearings, ruled against the FTC on Tuesday, and the federal agency filed its appeal on Wednesday.

    The FTC first sued to block the acquisition last December, then filed for an emergency injunction to block the completion of the deal before it could have an agency administrative law judge take it up. The FTC has argued that the transaction was anti-competitive because Microsoft might make some of its games exclusive to its own Xbox game consoles or diminish the experience of Activision games such as the popular Call of Duty titles on rival services should the deal close. Microsoft has said it would instead make the games more widely available.

    In an emergency motion filed with the 9th Circuit on Thursday, the FTC said the district judge “denied preliminary relief, applying the wrong legal standard: the court effectively required the FTC to prove its full case on the merits with the court as arbiter of the merger’s legality.” The agency requested a temporary injunction while the court considered an appeal of the district court’s conclusion.

    Under the leadership of Lina Khan, the FTC has lost other battles with technology companies, including its effort to stop Meta Platforms from buying virtual reality fitness app startup Within.

    FTC representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK regulator extends deadline for Microsoft-Activision probe by six weeks

    UK regulator extends deadline for Microsoft-Activision probe by six weeks

    [ad_1]

    Activision games “Call of Duty” are pictured in a store in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 18, 2022.

    Carlo Allegri | Reuters

    LONDON — The U.K. competition regulator on Friday said it is extending the deadline for its review of Microsoft‘s takeover of video game publisher of Activision Blizzard by six weeks.

    The extension will give the watchdog more time to review proposals by the two parties to resolve its concerns after it paused a campaign to block the deal.

    related investing news

    CNBC Investing Club

    “The Inquiry Group has decided to extend by six weeks … as it considers that there are special reasons to do so. The revised period will therefore end on 29 August 2023,” the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority said Friday.

    The British regulator has been a stalwart opponent of Microsoft’s $69-billion purchase of Activision Blizzard, inclusively blocking the deal in April over competition concerns in the nascent cloud gaming market.

    The CMA appeared to soften its tone earlier in the week, signaling it was ready to resume discussions with the Redmond tech titan.

    FTC files appeal to pause Microsoft-Activision deal

    “We stand ready to consider any proposals from Microsoft to restructure the transaction in a way that would address the concerns set out in our Final Report,” a CMA spokesperson told CNBC via email on Tuesday.

    The CMA’s concerns have centered on the likelihood of Microsoft making Activision games exclusive to its own platform, as the tech giant sets its sights on the budding cloud gaming market — a technology that will effectively allow users to stream games on remote servers, like Netflix watchers do with a movie.

    Microsoft’s multiple concession offers to the CMA has so far yet to bear fruit. In February, the CMA countered with a notice of potential remedies, which included selling its unit associated with the staple game Call of Duty and divesting some of the Activision Blizzard business.

    The deal has also met with opposition in the U.S., but appeared to gain traction stateside earlier this week after the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California pronounced in favor of the two companies. Since then, the U.S. Federal Trace Commission on Wednesday filed to appeal the decision to deny a request for a preliminary injunction, which would have prevented the transaction’s completion.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FTC files appeal, again seeks to block Microsoft-Activision deal

    FTC files appeal, again seeks to block Microsoft-Activision deal

    [ad_1]

    The Federal Trade Commission on Thursday asked an appeals court to temporarily block Microsoft Corp.’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard Inc. while it challenges a ruling earlier this week green-lighting the deal.

    The FTC on Thursday asked U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to postpone her ruling — which she promptly denied — and also appealed to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco to pause the acquisition “to preserve the status quo” while the case is reviewed, claiming it is likely to succeed in its appeal.

    According to the filing, the FTC claims the judge applied the wrong legal standard to its request for a preliminary injunction, and erred in a number of other matters.

    The deal is set to close in the coming days, and letting it happen will “irreparably harm the public interest and the FTC,” regulators said.

    Also see: GOP blasts FTC Chair Khan as a ‘bully’ after agency’s loss in Microsoft case

    In a response filed with the court, Microsoft said the FTC “failed to carry its burden on independent, fact-based grounds” and “dragged its heels” before appealing.

    “The court has already found that it would be inequitable” to order an injunction that could lead to “the potential scuttling of the merger,” Microsoft said, in asking for the FTC’s request to be denied.

    The FTC has claimed the tie-up of a major videogame platform — Microsoft’s
    MSFT,
    +1.62%

     Xbox — with a major videogame publisher — Activision
    ATVI,
    -0.51%

     makes the wildly popular “Call of Duty,” among other titles — would be harmful to the videogame industry and consumers.

    Microsoft has pledged to keep “Call of Duty” available to Sony’s
    SONY,
    +2.82%

     PlayStation console for 10 years, and will make it available for Nintendo’s 
    7974,
    -0.36%

     Switch and some cloud-gaming platforms.

    In her ruling clearing the deal Tuesday, Corley said the FTC did not show “this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition.”

    Bloomberg News reported late Thursday that Microsoft and Activision are considering giving up some control of their cloud-gaming business in the U.K. to win approval of British regulators, who — if the U.S. appeals court does not act — are the final hurdle to the deal closing on time.

    FTC Chair Lina Khan testified on Capitol Hill on Thursday, where Republican lawmakers assailed her actions and sharply criticized her agency’s court losses in trying to block the Microsoft-Activision deal and Meta’s
    META,
    +1.32%

    acquisition of a virtual-reality gaming company earlier this year.

    Read more: After Microsoft defeat, ‘toothless’ FTC needs to pick better battles if it wants to rein in Big Tech

    Also: FTC’s probe of OpenAI marks key moment in Khan’s push to rein in Big Tech

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FTC will appeal judge’s ruling clearing Microsoft-Activision deal

    FTC will appeal judge’s ruling clearing Microsoft-Activision deal

    [ad_1]

    The Federal Trade Commission late Wednesday filed notice that it will appeal a judge’s ruling this week that gave Microsoft Corp. the green light to proceed with its $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard Inc.

    In a filing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, the FTC is seeking to overturn U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley’s ruling Tuesday, which said the deal would not hurt competition.

    “The District Court’s ruling makes crystal clear that this acquisition is good for both competition and consumers,” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s vice chair and president, said in a statement.” We’re disappointed that the FTC is continuing to pursue what has become a demonstrably weak case, and we will oppose further efforts to delay the ability to move forward.” 

    The FTC has claimed the tie-up of a major videogame platform — Microsoft’s
    MSFT,
    +1.42%

    Xbox — with a major videogame publisher — Activision
    ATVI,
    -1.09%

    makes the wildly popular “Call of Duty,” among other titles — would be harmful to the videogame industry and consumers.

    “The facts haven’t changed,” an Activision spokesperson said Wednesday. “We’re confident the U.S. will remain among the 39 countries where the merger can close. We look forward to reinforcing the strength of our case in court, again.”

    Microsoft has pledged to keep “Call of Duty” available to Sony’s
    SONY,
    +1.78%

    PlayStation console for 10 years, and will make it available for Nintendo’s
    7974,
    +1.63%

    Switch and some cloud-gaming platforms.

    The deal faces a July 18 deadline, and still must gain regulatory approval in the U.K.

    Tuesday’s ruling was yet another antitrust setback for the FTC, which has failed to do much to rein in Big Tech, and one analyst told MarketWatch on Tuesday that the regulators need to do ” a much better job of picking their battles,”

    Read more: After Microsoft defeat, ‘toothless’ FTC needs to pick better battles if it wants to rein in Big Tech

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk launches his new company, xAI

    Elon Musk launches his new company, xAI

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk launches X.Ai. 

    Jonathan Raa | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, and owner of Twitter, on Wednesday announced the debut of a new artificial intelligence company, xAI, with the goal to “understand the true nature of the universe.” According to the company’s website, Musk and his team will share more information in a live Twitter Spaces chat on Friday.

    Team members behind xAI are alumni of DeepMind, OpenAI, Google Research, Microsoft Research, Twitter and Tesla, and have worked on projects including DeepMind’s AlphaCode and OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 chatbots. Musk seems to be positioning xAI to compete with companies like OpenAI, Google and Anthropic, which are behind leading chatbots like ChatGPT, Bard and Claude.

    News of the startup was previously reported by the Financial Times in April, along with reports that Musk had secured thousands of GPU processors from Nvidia in order to power a potential large language model. That same month, Musk shared details of his plans for a new AI tool called “TruthGPT” during a taped interview on Fox News Channel, adding that he feared existing AI companies are prioritizing systems that are “politically correct.”

    One of the AI startup’s advisors will be Dan Hendrycks, executive director of the Center for AI Safety, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that published a letter in May signed by tech leaders claiming that “mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”

    The letter received pushback from many academics and ethicists of the belief that too much focus on AI’s growing power and its future threats distracts from real-life harms that some algorithms cause to marginalized communities right now, rather than in an unspecified future.

    According to Greg Yang, co-founder of xAI, the startup will delve into the “mathematics of deep learning,” a facet of AI, and “develop the ‘theory of everything’ for large neural networks” to take AI “to the next level.”

    Musk reportedly incorporated xAI in Nevada in March. Previously, he had changed the name of Twitter to “X Corp.” in some financial filings, but on xAI’s website, the company notes its separation from X Corp., adding that it will “work closely with X (Twitter), Tesla, and other companies to make progress towards our mission.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    [ad_1]

    Big Tech has gotten too big for Nasdaq’s liking.

    So the exchange has decided to make some changes to the Nasdaq 100 index, its most popular index, according to company representatives, ostensibly to diminish the concentration risk that accompanies having an index that derives more than half of its value from just seven companies.

    Nasdaq announced late last week that the Nasdaq 100
    NDX,
    +1.24%

    will undergo a special rebalancing that will take effect prior to the market open on July 24. It’s only the third time that Nasdaq has announced such an impromptu rejiggering of how much individual stocks contribute to the index. Although Nasdaq can also reconstitute the index regularly every December, and there’s also a mechanism to rebalance every quarter as well.

    In a statement announcing the move, the exchange alluded to the fact that the largest companies in the technology sector have too much sway over the index’s price. Nasdaq said special rebalancing can be implemented “to address overconcentration in the index by redistributing the weights.”

    The rebalancing comes at a critical time. The Nasdaq 100 has risen 40% since the start of 2023, largely thanks to the “Magnificent Seven,” a handful of megacap technology names that have powered much of the U.S. stock market’s rally this year.

    These gains have pushed the index to its highest level since mid-January 2022, meaning that Big Tech has now retraced nearly all of last year’s losses, and might soon be headed for the all-time highs from November 2021.

    As of Thursday, the Magnificent Seven stocks — Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +3.53%
    ,
    Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.90%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.42%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.57%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +0.82%
    ,
    Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +3.70%

    and Alphabet Inc.’s Class A
    GOOGL,
    +1.53%

    and Class C
    GOOG,
    +1.62%

    shares — accounted for 55% of the Nasdaq 100’s market capitalization, while the top five names account for more than 45%.

    According to Nasdaq’s official methodology, the goal is to keep the aggregate weighting of the biggest stocks below 40%. In fact, it’s possible that Tesla Inc. surpassing 4.5% of the index earlier this month triggered the Nasdaq’s rebalancing announcement, according to analysts from UBS Group AG
    UBS,
    +1.87%
    .

    Exactly how it plans to accomplish this isn’t yet known. Nasdaq said the new weighting scheme will be unveiled on Friday, likely after the U.S. market close. But the UBS team has an educated guess.

    “The quarterly reviews would dictate that the aggregate weight to securities exceeding 4.5% be set to 40%. If that’s the approach Nasdaq takes, then we’d expect the weights of Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Tesla to be reduced,” the team said in a note shared with MarketWatch.

    For investors trying to anticipate how this might impact their portfolios, here the answers to a few key questions.

    Could the rebalancing kill the U.S. stock market rally?

    Not likely. Or rather: if the rally in Big Tech does falter, history suggests it won’t be because of the rebalancing.

    Here’s more on that from Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, who discussed the topic in commentary emailed to MarketWatch on Wednesday.

    “…[T]here is the natural inclination to think that the upcoming special reweighting is a sign that large cap disruptive tech is set to roll over because a handful of names have so handily outpaced the rest of its notional peers,” Colas said.

    “History suggests otherwise. The last 2 one-off reweights were in 2011 and 1998. Neither proved to be the end of a Nasdaq 100/tech stock bull market. Not even close, really.”

    More immediately, ETF experts expect trading around the rebalancing will be relatively muted.

    “While it sounds scary, Investors are well positioned — this has been well bantered about,” said David Lutz, head of ETF Trading at Jones Trading, in comments emailed to MarketWatch.

    How could this benefit investors?

    Since megacap technology stocks don’t pay much, if anything, in dividends, the rebalancing could increase the amount of dividends that ETF investors receive each year, according to a team of analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    Since the largest constituents pay a dividend yield well below the index average, the redistribution of weight from them to the rest of the index will result in a “meaningful boost” to the regular payouts received by investors, which will boost the total return of Nasdaq 100-tracking ETFs and mutual funds.

    Will there be any short-term costs associated with the rebalancing?

    There might be. Since the new index weightings will be announced in advance, investors will have plenty of time to front-run the rebalancing trade.

    Still, there are plenty of hedge funds and proprietary trading firms that run strategies explicitly designed to profit from rebalancing. These firms profits have to come from somewhere, and the logical place would be the fund managers of the Invesco QQQ exchange-traded fund
    QQQ,
    +1.26%

    QQQM,
    +1.27%
    .

    “There are prop traders and hedge funds that run the strategy of providing liquidity to indexes with the expectation that they’ll earn profits,” said Roni Israelov, president and CIO at Wealth Manager NDVR, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    “if they are earning profits by providing that liquidity, the expectation is those profits are being paid by investors in those funds.”

    So far at least, markets appear to have taken news of the rebalancing in stride. Megacap technology names tumbled earlier this week, but they’ve since recouped those losses and then some.

    The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.15%
    ,
    another Nasdaq index that isn’t quite as heavily weighted toward Big Tech, rose 1.2% to 13,918.96.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After Microsoft defeat, ‘toothless’ FTC needs to pick better battles if it wants to rein in Big Tech

    After Microsoft defeat, ‘toothless’ FTC needs to pick better battles if it wants to rein in Big Tech

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s defeat as it sought to block Microsoft Corp.’s acquisition of videogame maker Activision Blizzard is yet another setback for an increasingly toothless regulator that needs to pick better battles with Big Tech.

    On Tuesday morning, a federal judge denied the FTC’s injunction that was seeking to block the software giant’s proposed $69 billion acquisition of Activision
    ATVI,
    +10.02%
    ,
    best known for its hit videogame “Call of Duty.” The FTC argued that Microsoft
    MSFT,
    +0.19%

    could withhold “Call of Duty” and other Activision games from rival console platforms such as Sony’s PlayStation, and keep the games on its Xbox only.

    Microsoft, in a show of faith, committed in writing to keep “Call of Duty” on PlayStation on parity with Xbox for 10 years, agreed with Nintendo
    7974,
    +1.10%

    to bring “Call of Duty” to Switch and entered into several pacts to bring Activision content to several cloud gaming services, U.S. District Court Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley noted in her decision.

    “With these 10-year contracts that Microsoft made across the board with so many vendors, Nvidia
    NVDA,
    +0.53%
    ,
    Nintendo and others, 10 years is a really long time, in my opinion,” said Sarah Hindlian-Bowler, an analyst at Macquarie Equity Research, in an interview Tuesday. “It is long enough to cover the arrival and maturity of the cloud gaming market….She understands  that 10 years is a very long long time to make a guarantee of this kind.”

    Also read: Regulators face an antitrust dilemma after Meta launches Threads

    Hindlian-Bowler said that she had been in the minority of Wall Street analysts in not believing the U.S. government would be able to block this deal.

    “The assumption that this somehow decreases the market is going to prove to be wildly incorrect,” she said, adding that she does not believe that the U.K.’s  Competition and Markets Authority will be able to block the deal either.

    The latest upset at the FTC was also not too surprising to other Capitol Hill watchers, especially in the light of other high-profile setbacks by the agency and its once-heralded commissioner, Lina Khan. When she was sworn in as chair of the FTC in mid-2021, Khan was hailed as the sheriff who would rein in Big Tech.

    “It’s hard to say I am surprised by the ruling because Khan has had a fairly unsuccessful track record,” said Owen Tedford, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors. “The regulators are pushing the boundaries, deals that previously would have gone unchallenged have now gone challenged. And they are breaking precedent because Khan and company have expressed a dislike of settlements.”

    The FTC’s attempts to sue Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +1.42%

    have had some defeats so far. In February, a California judge denied the FTC’s attempts to block Meta from buying a virtual-reality startup called Within Unlimited. The FTC’s suit to reverse Meta’s acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram, filed in 2021, is still plodding along.

    Additionally, the FTC recently filed a suit against Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.30%
    ,
    alleging that it is too difficult for consumers to cancel their Prime accounts, and the agency is reportedly also mulling another far-reaching suit against Amazon alleging that the e-commerce giant punishes merchants who do not use its logistics services. One analyst has already made a case that the FTC will lose that fight too.

    “I think that the FTC is in need of some change, in need of some refreshing and in need of doing a much better job of picking their battles,” said Hindlian-Bowler. “This does feel toothless, a lot of the fights they are picking are toothless. And unfortunately, they are missing the real battle. They are missing TikTok, they are missing the real fights where we actually have national security at risk.”

    In February, one of the Republican commissioners on the FTC resigned, and wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal accusing Khan of disregarding the rule of law and due process.

    Compared to the European Union, which has had far more success implementing regulation to rein in Big Tech, the U.S. is still much weaker. “The EU seems to be having somewhat more success, levying big fines, getting these companies to change,” said Beacon’s Tedford. “The EU has passed these bills, but the U.S., despite these efforts, has not gotten there and is not going to get there for the next two years.”

    Money spent by Big Tech to lobby Congress in a huge part of the problem, whereas in Europe, “those lawmakers feel less beholden,” he added.

    More than a century ago, President Teddy Roosevelt, known for his “speak softly and carry a big stick” foreign policy, also used his bully pulpit to bust industrial monopolies.

    If Khan and her staff want to follow his lead and rein in Big Tech, they need to start picking their future battles more carefully — and carry bigger sticks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link