ReportWire

Tag: LGBTQ+

  • The 8th Annual QueerX Awards Complete Winners List

    The 8th Annual QueerX Awards Complete Winners List

    [ad_1]

    Revry’s Awards Presented by Discover on October 11th Included Honorees Trace Lysette, Kylie Minogue and Alex Newell

    Revry, the first global LGBTQ+ streaming service, premiered the 8th annual QueerX Awards on October 11th–National Coming Out Day, honoring influential personalities in culture, entertainment and sports who have impacted the LGBTQ+ community. Presented by Discover, viewers tuned in from around the world to watch Trace Lysette accept the coveted 2023 Visibility Award.

    Hosted by Arisce Wanzer and Dexter Mayfield, the 2023 QueerX Awards celebration includes appearances by Patricia Clarkson, Trixie Mattel, Braunwyn Windham-Burke, Elix, Murray Hill, Biqtch Puddin’, Alex Newell, Vernon François, and Percy Rustomji, host of Revry’s Culture Q.

    The complete list of winners can be found below. 

    • Queer Anthem of the Year – “Padam Padam” – Kylie Minogue
    • Queer Athlete of the Year – Sha’Carri Richardson 
    • Queer TikToker of the Year – @AaronTichenor
    • Queer Fashion Brand of the Year – Wild Fang
    • Ball Moment of The Year – Makaylah Basquiat $10k @ Pride Ball
    • Queer Twitch Streamer of the Year – Biqtch Puddin’
    • Queer Comedian of the Year – Roz Hernandez
    • Drag Artist of the Year – Murray Hill
    • Queer Podcast of the Year – The Bald and the Beautiful (Studio 71) with Trixie Mattel and Katya Zamo
    • Queer Cultural Moment of Year- Alex Newell 1st Non-Binary Person to Win a Tony
    • 2023 Queer Visibility Award – Trace Lysette

    Past honorees and presenters include the likes of Jennifer Lopez, Angelica Ross, Bowen Yang, Michaela Jaé Rodriguez, Patton Oswalt, Dwyane Wade, Erica Wheeler, Mila Jam, Kim Petras, Biqtch Puddin’, DeAndre Upshaw, Kidd Kenn & NextKidz, and Ninel Conde.

    The 2023 QueerX Awards, presented by Discover, premiered on October 11th and are streaming globally and exclusively on Revry. Catch all the excitement for free on Revry’s streaming channels, available on popular platforms like Samsung TV Plus, Roku, VIZIO WatchFree+, Plex, Rakuten TV, Philo, and more.

    Watch the 2023 QueerX Awards on Revry.

    Source: Revry

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Catholic Church’s future on the table as Pope Francis kicks off 2023 Synod with an LGBTQ bombshell

    Catholic Church’s future on the table as Pope Francis kicks off 2023 Synod with an LGBTQ bombshell

    [ad_1]

    Rome — Pope Francis opened a big meeting Wednesday on the future of the Catholic Church, where contentious topics will be discussed. The three-week General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops at the Vatican, sometimes called the Super Bowl of the Catholic Church, has drawn bishops from around the world to discuss hot button issues including whether priests should be allowed to get married, if divorced and remarried Catholics should receive communion, whether women should be allowed to become deacons and how the church will handle matters around the LGBTQ community.

    Even before it kicked off this year’s synod was already historic: It’s the first time that women and laypeople are being allowed to vote — though 80% of participants are still bishops, and thus men. But the biggest bombshell dropped earlier this week, when Francis opened the door for the possibility of Catholic priests blessing same-sex unions.

    His remarks, published Monday, came with caveats: Francis stressed that blessings shouldn’t be seen as elevating same-sex unions to the sacred place of heterosexual marriage, but until now, the church’s position had been that same-sex unions could not be blessed, because “God cannot bless sin.”

    The XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops Is Held At Vatican
    Pope Francis presides at Holy Mass with the new Cardinals and the College of Cardinals for the opening of the General Ordinary Assembly of the Synod of Bishops at St. Peter’s Square, Oct. 4, 2023, in Vatican City.

    Antonio Masiello/Getty


    In his statements — issued in reply to cardinals who had requested clarity on the church’s position on the matter — Francis said, “we cannot be judges who only deny, reject, and exclude.”

    In his opening homily Wednesday for the synod, the pope said that “everyone, everyone, everyone,” must be allowed in.

    LGBTQ organizations welcomed the change in tone, while church conservatives blasted Francis for appearing to dilute Catholic doctrine and sow confusion. 

    Jaime Manson, a women’s rights activist and devout Catholic, said the change opens the church tent for LGBTQ couples like her and her partner of four years.

    “Affirming and embracing everyone only makes the church stronger,” Manson told CBS News. “It is a very slim minority of Catholics who are opposed to same-sex unions.”

    Father Gerald Murray, a conservative priest from Manhattan, disagreed.

    “For the pope to say that priests and bishops can find a way to do this, it’s wrong,” Murray said. “He shouldn’t do it.”

    “The harm is that it contradicts Catholic teaching,” Murray said when asked about the harm in making the tent “bigger for more people.”

    All this, and the synod has only just begun.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic

    How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic

    [ad_1]

    How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Lawmakers across the political spectrum are remembering Sen. Dianne Feinstein as a trailblazer in the nation’s Capitol. But her career began in San Francisco local politics, where she served on the city’s Board of Supervisors — and later as mayor. California State Sen. Scott Wiener joins CBS News to discuss Feinstein’s mayoral legacy.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon to review cases of LGBTQ veterans who were discharged over sexual orientation

    Pentagon to review cases of LGBTQ veterans who were discharged over sexual orientation

    [ad_1]

    Pentagon to review cases of LGBTQ veterans who were discharged over sexual orientation – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Pentagon publicly acknowledged Wednesday that thousands of LGBTQ veterans were unjustly denied an honorable discharge during the “don’t ask, don’t tell” era because of their sexual orientation, and announced it is launching a new process to address the issue by reviewing those cases and potentially having those discharges upgraded to honorable. Jim Axelrod reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Exclusive: Pentagon to review cases of LGBTQ+ veterans denied honorable discharges under “don’t ask, don’t tell”

    Exclusive: Pentagon to review cases of LGBTQ+ veterans denied honorable discharges under “don’t ask, don’t tell”

    [ad_1]

    Thousands of LGBTQ+ veterans who were kicked out of the military because of their sexuality could see their honor restored under a new initiative the Defense Department is set to announce Wednesday, on the 12th anniversary of the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy banning gays and lesbians from openly serving in the military, according to a senior Pentagon official. 

    Before the repeal of the ban, tens of thousands of LGBTQ+ service members were forced out of the military “under other than honorable conditions,” rather than with an honorable discharge.

    As CBS News documented in a nine-month investigation, many LGBTQ+ veterans found that without an honorable discharge, they were deprived of access to the full spectrum of veterans benefits, including VA loan programs, college tuition assistance, health care and some jobs. 

    In a statement commemorating the anniversary of the repeal, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin acknowledged the military fell short in correcting the harms of its past policies against LGBTQ+ service members. 

    “For decades, our LGBTQ+ Service members were forced to hide or were prevented from serving altogether,” Austin said. “Even still, they selflessly put themselves in harm’s way for the good of our country and the American people. Unfortunately, too many of them were discharged from the military based on their sexual orientation — and for many this left them without access to the benefits and services they earned.” 

    Since the ban was lifted, the military has allowed these LGBTQ+ veterans to try to secure an honorable discharge, but CBS News also found in its investigation that the military’s existing process for this is complicated, emotionally taxing and places the burden on the veteran to prove there was discrimination. 

    To help ease that burden, the Defense Department plans to conduct a review of veterans’ records who served under “don’t ask, don’t tell” for a possible recommendation of a discharge upgrade. This means that these veterans would not have to apply for the upgrade themselves, a process that both veterans and experts have said is often unsuccessful without the help of a lawyer. The department is also launching a website Wednesday with resources dedicated to LGBTQ+ veterans who believe they were wrongfully discharged for their sexuality. 

    Once the military completes its initial review of veterans’ records who served during “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the senior Pentagon official told CBS News it plans to begin looking at the records of veterans who served before that policy — by many accounts, a time of even greater discrimination against gay and lesbian service members. 

    “Over the past decade, we’ve tried to make it easier for Service members discharged based on their sexual orientation to obtain corrective relief,” Austin also said in his statement. “While this process can be difficult to navigate, we are working to make it more accessible and efficient.” 

    And he said that in the coming weeks, the military will start outreach campaigns to encourage service members and veterans who believe they suffered an injustice because of “don’t ask, don’t tell” to try to get their military records corrected.

    While the full scope of past discrimination remains unknown due to the opaque nature of military records and the widespread use of cover charges to drum out gay and lesbian troops, figures obtained via Freedom of Information Act and shared with CBS News earlier this year revealed that more than 35,000 service members from 1980 to 2011 “received a discharge or separation because of real or perceived homosexuality, homosexual conduct, sexual perversion, or any other related reason.” According to the most recent data available from the Pentagon, just 1,375 veterans have been granted relief in the form of a discharge upgrade or correction to their record.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • See ‘Bros’ Star Luke Macfarlane Cozy Up To Peter Porte In Hallmark’s New Fall Romance

    See ‘Bros’ Star Luke Macfarlane Cozy Up To Peter Porte In Hallmark’s New Fall Romance

    [ad_1]

    A year after romancing Billy Eichner on the big screen, Luke Macfarlane is ready to warm viewers’ hearts once again with a dreamy new project.

    This weekend, fans can catch the “Bros” actor in the Hallmark Channel’s “Notes of Autumn.” Airing Saturday, the romantic comedy follows Leo (played by Macfarlane), an author who decides to swap homes with musician friend Ellie (Ashley Williams) as he seeks inspiration for a new book.

    While settling into his out-of-town retreat, Leo strikes up a friendship with Matt (Peter Porte), an area resident. Together, the two men discover that something more meaningful between them might be developing, just as Ellie begins to find herself in a similar situation with Leo’s neighbor Sam (Marcus Rosner).

    HuffPost caught a sneak peek at “Notes of Autumn” via the clip below. In it, Leo and Matt realize they’re reluctant to part ways after enjoying an intimate lunch together.

    Watch a clip from “Notes of Autumn”:

    Bart Fisher, Hallmark Media’s vice president of programming, said in an email that the film “celebrates the fall season in a fun, contemporary way and has something for everyone.”

    “The journeys of these characters and the paths their relationships take are handled with tenderness, compassion and explored in meaningful ways,” he added.

    The Hallmark Channel has made visible strides toward diversifying its lineup of original films lately, after facing years of criticism for relying on heterosexual (and overwhelmingly white) stories.

    In 2020, the network unveiled “The Christmas House,” its first holiday-themed offering to include an LGBTQ+ storyline. The TV movie starred “Mean Girls” actor Jonathan Bennett as Brandon Mitchell, a married gay man who is hoping to adopt his first child.

    “Hallmark is absolutely making efforts to create queer content, and I applaud them for that,” said Luke Macfarlane (right, with co-star Peter Porte).

    Allister Foster/Hallmark Media

    Macfarlane’s long professional relationship with the Hallmark Channel has earned him a nickname: “the King of Christmas movies.” And though he’s found success both in mainstream films and in prestige television, he said he’s thrilled to add to his “canon” with the network this year.

    “Hallmark is absolutely making efforts to create queer content, and I applaud them for that,” he told The Hollywood Reporter in a July interview, conducted before the Hollywood actors strike.

    “They’ve been often the butt of jokes about the sort of limited nature of their cast,” added Macfarlane, who came out as gay back in 2008. “But they’ve really changed that, and they’re really continuing to do that. I think they’re doing that not just for the press.”

    He went on to note: “What’s been always fun about the Hallmark movies is how much leeway they give you and the pace. Talk about learning on the job.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2 California School Districts Ban LGBTQ+ Pride Flags

    2 California School Districts Ban LGBTQ+ Pride Flags

    [ad_1]

    Two school districts in California banned the display of LGBTQ+ pride flags this week, amid ongoing efforts by conservatives to crack down on the LGBTQ+ community’s visibility and civil rights.

    In Southern California, the Temecula Valley Unified School District passed a resolution Tuesday banning all flags except U.S. and state flags, in a meeting that drew a large turnout of parents, teachers and students. “Tensions flared at times,” local news outlet KTLA reported.

    Meanwhile, in the San Francisco Bay Area, chaos broke out as the Sunol Glen Unified School District approved a ban on LGBTQ+ pride flags specifically.

    The Mercury News reported that the entire audience was thrown out of the meeting Tuesday night before board members took a vote, passing the resolution 2-1.

    Some people in the Sunol district are now talking about recalling the conservative board members who backed the measure.

    “A lot of average parents are about to learn a lot more about recall,” parent Matthew Sylvester told The Mercury News.

    The Temecula board passed its resolution by a 3-2 vote. The three board members who voted together — Jen Wiersma, Joseph Komrosky and Danny Gonzalez — all received backing from the Inland Empire Family, a conservative Christian political action committee. In recent months, they have whipped up turmoil in the district with antics including a meeting on whether the district should hire an anti-“critical race theory” consultant, as well as launching a ban on discussion of California civil rights icon Harvey Milk.

    The pride flag bans are part of a larger push by conservative activists to focus their political efforts on local school districts — particularly in California, given the hold Democrats have on the state.

    The Los Angeles-area Chino Valley Unified School District landed itself in hot water this summer by requiring teachers to out transgender students to their parents. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit to stop the district. But others have passed similar rules, including Temecula and the nearby Murrieta Valley Unified School District.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I Grew Up In A Homophobic World — Then Everybody In My Life Started Coming Out As Gay

    I Grew Up In A Homophobic World — Then Everybody In My Life Started Coming Out As Gay

    [ad_1]

    That’s the sign that greeted my family when we first moved to Topeka, Kansas, the summer of my 16th birthday.

    SOLDIERS DIE 4 FAG MARRIAGE, read another that was striped red, white and blue.

    Dozens of people stood on the side of the road hoisting bits of cardboard overhead. Confused by their zeal, I watched from the window of our green Ford Taurus.

    “What’s that?” I asked as Mom braked for a red light.

    “Westboro Baptist,” she scowled. “I’ve seen them in the news. They’re even more sickening in person.”

    Careful to avoid eye contact, I scanned the picketers. Kids younger than my 11-year-old brother were pumping signs above their heads.

    “Aren’t we Baptist sometimes?” I asked. Depending on where the military sent us, we were Baptist, Presbyterian, Alliance, Lutheran or non-denominational. Between two countries, four states, and nine houses, we joined whichever local church followed the Bible best.

    When the light turned green, Mom laid on the gas. “We aren’t that kind of Baptist.”

    My brother twisted in his seat and caught sight of a sign. “What’s a fag?” he asked.

    Mom and I exchanged glances in the rearview mirror.

    “It’s a mean name for men who like men,” she said. “The Bible says it’s wrong, but these people take it too far.”

    Love the sinner, not the sin was our condoned alternative — a line of thought more palatable, but just as dangerous in its subtlety.

    Mom and Dad defined my reality. Growing up, I didn’t think to question or escape it. From as early as I can remember, television and toys were carefully vetted to match our evangelical Christian worldview. Mom said Rainbow Brite’s magic was evil. Barbies would give me an eating disorder. For reasons unknown to this day, fantastical blue creatures living in mushrooms somehow made the cut. When Dad said my Cabbage Patch doll walked to the kitchen to eat a hamburger while I napped, I believed him. It was easy to accept the way things were because I didn’t know anything else existed.

    If I had to pinpoint the moment I realized something was off with my family’s line of thought, I’d say it was shortly after our brush with Westboro Baptist. I’d enrolled in public school for the first time in my life, and my teenage brain, with its expanding capacity for critical thinking, couldn’t shake a nagging set of curiosities: What if I had been born in a country where the primary religion was Buddhism? Would I be a good Buddhist instead of a good Christian? If I had been raised in a church like Westboro Baptist, would I be in Topeka’s Gage Park pumping a hate-filled sign over my head?

    From there, my religion eroded in a steady stream of questioning. I didn’t shape-shift into a heathen, careening into alcohol, drugs and sex. As a socially awkward, shy teenage girl, I rebelled in subtler ways. I resisted traditional dating, read books about other religions, and pushed the boundary of my True Love Waits abstinence pledge with my long-distance boyfriend. The further I strayed from Christianity, the more I suspected the world and my place in it was bigger than I’d been told.

    Parallel to my spiritual liberation, my family members experienced a transformation of their own. My parents divorced. My younger brother revealed he was gay. A year later, my mom told me she was in a life partnership with a woman. Nearly a decade after that, just when I thought I’d contended with the ingrained homophobia left over from my evangelical Christian days, I noticed what I then thought to be a disturbing trend.

    Whether in appearance, mannerisms, or both, many of the romantic partners I attracted throughout my life had more feminine traits than typical for the average straight, cisgender man. Some people even mistook them for gay men. Or had I mistaken them as straight? Even in hindsight, I have no answers. Their stories aren’t mine to tell.

    Nor are their limits mine. The rule of three was not lost on me: my brother, my mom, my own partners. How had I missed such obvious, significant parts of the people who were closest to me? And why couldn’t I figure out the sexual identity of the people in my own bed? It would take getting married, a grueling divorce and countless misadventures in dating as a young, single parent before I flipped the mirror onto myself and reflected on the bigger question: my own sexual identity.

    The author with her mom and brother. “We all came out of evangelical Christianity and into our queer identities in our own time,” she writes.

    Two years after my divorce, I did what I thought I’d never do: I went back to church. The spiritual community at the Unitarian Universalist church I found seemed especially suited for former evangelical Christians. They didn’t care whether a person was atheist, agnostic, Buddhist or Catholic. Dedicated to their common search for truth and meaning, they accepted everyone. Even Mom and her partner followed me to the makeshift pews of stackable chairs.

    American paraphernalia dotted the stage the week of Independence Day. You’re a grand old flag. You’re a high-flying flag. The choir burst into a rinky-dink tune.

    “This song reminds me of that boy next door,” I whispered to Mom.

    She was perched in a chair to my left. Back in fifth grade, the boy next door had belted out the same song during his stint in chorus. Back then, rumor had it, he had a crush on me.

    Mom swallowed a laugh. “He was so gay.”

    The smile drained from my face. She got an irreverent kick out of the comment, like the juvenile thrill I savored when I told Dad I joined a church with Buddhists and atheists. Even so, I took her words to heart. Was he so gay? I hadn’t noticed.

    Mom raised me to believe a person’s surface characteristics, like voice and affinity for sports or musical instruments, had nothing to do with their sexual orientation. I was fine being a middle-of-the-road type girl, dating toward the center of the masculine-feminine spectrum. But two years after my marriage had ended with such spectacular speed and force, the refrain hit me like a head-on collision right there in the middle of church.

    My mind spun as the song came to a close. Lesbian? That would be easier. The world would know what that means, and Mom would be so proud. I had never felt sexual attraction toward a woman, but I almost always had a female best friend. Was I gay and didn’t know it yet?

    When you see a pattern in your life, eventually you realize the common denominator is you. Mom didn’t fully realize she was attracted to women until she met her best friend. Some of my exes seemed to still be figuring themselves out in their 30s and 40s. Maybe something more was wanting to be known in me, too.

    Shortly after that Sunday, I decided to take a break from focusing on the emotional and friendship part of dating that came so naturally to me and vowed to pay attention to what turned me on. I started by watching lesbian porn. In hindsight, for a person of my particular makeup, porn was a poor first step. Outside the context of a relationship and zero past experience with any gender other than cis men, this was not my recipe for clarity.

    When a vegetarian woman at a Unitarian barbecue sat next to me on a bench and asked, “So what’s life like for you right now?” I paid attention. She was one of those people who jumped out of her skin and straight into my soul. Our friendship blossomed. I tried to imagine. If she weren’t married. If we weren’t straight. Still nothing. None of my questions yielded answers in the time I allowed them, because I was too scared.

    Opening myself to examining my sexuality was like being 16 and terrified God would call me to be a missionary in a remote part of Africa. I’d heard the sermons. People died out there. Would I really do anything for Jesus? For truth? Wasn’t it enough that I woke up out of my marriage and all the norms that come with being partnered? Accepting nontraditional sexual orientations and gender identities in other people was one thing. Allowing them in myself, if they were there, would be quite another. What dangers and discomforts would I encounter if I lived as anything different than a straight, cisgender woman?

    When faced with a choice to move toward or away from truth, I inevitably choose toward. It may take a while to orient myself to which direction forward lies, but eventually I found the courage to go: from religion to spirituality, from biological family to chosen tribe, from society’s definition of love to the inevitable heartache and confusion of forging my own.

    To love in a new way, I had to get ruthless with myself and my preconceptions. What gender roles had I accepted by default? How vulnerable was I willing to become? How deep into the unknown was I willing to go?

    In the weeks ahead, I quit looking to men for validation and belonging and opened myself to the love of my chosen family: my mom and her partner, her partner’s daughter and her fiancé, my brother and his boyfriend. I allowed myself to be radically at home in a tribe where more of us were united by love than blood and where we cheered each other on in our struggle to be ourselves.

    The author and her life partner on their wedding day.
    The author and her life partner on their wedding day.

    Today, I’m in a life partnership with a person who was present in my journey from the moment I began questioning my sexuality. I’m still learning how to be myself out loud. Bisexual, pansexual, demisexual, gray ace — all of these labels point to pieces of me. Much like no religion has yet to articulate the breadth of my spirituality, no label has yet to define the whole of my sexuality.

    Instead of clinging to my search for answers, I’m learning to embrace the questions. I haven’t exited heteronormativity overnight. It’s been an intense struggle, one that has involved reading memoirs by queer authors and coming out as questioning while planning a wedding with my current partner, who identifies as a straight, cis male.

    Calling myself anything but a straight, cisgender woman may sound heretical. I’m a 43-year-old remarried mother of two. But more and more, I’m claiming the word queer, which by my understanding is radically undefined. As progress, or lack thereof, plays out in our nation’s courts, I’m ready to make it known I’m more than an ally. I see these cages, and I want out — out from the us-versus-them mentality that’s wrecking our political landscape, our most vulnerable kids, and our capacity to love from the fullness of who we are. It’s time to say gay and shout from wherever we are in our personal journeys: We are all so much more.

    Melissa Gopp-Warner is a creative nonfiction writer focusing on human relationships and their intersection with sexual orientation and gender. Her articles and personal essays have appeared in Publishers Weekly, The Banyan Review, The Writer, and elsewhere. While working on her own memoir, she promotes the genre through bimonthly book reviews of diverse authors and life experiences. Learn more at melissagopp.com.

    Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • America’s LGBTQIA+ Community Deeply Concerned About Losing Rights, But Optimistic About the Long-Term Future, New Harris Survey Shows

    America’s LGBTQIA+ Community Deeply Concerned About Losing Rights, But Optimistic About the Long-Term Future, New Harris Survey Shows

    [ad_1]

    Study from The Harris Poll Thought Leadership and Futures Practice finds LGBTQIA+ community, especially younger generations, is committed to pushing back against attacks on rights

    With new laws, court verdicts, and political rhetoric on marriage equality, trans athletes, gender-neutral bathrooms, drag queen shows, and other issues, new research from The Harris Poll Thought Leadership and Futures Practice finds a near-unanimous belief in the LGBTQIA+ community that their rights are in jeopardy. But the research also reveals the extraordinary levels of that community’s political activism – and an unexpected optimism about the long-term future of LGBTQIA+ rights in America.

    The study, “Inclusive Insights: LGBTQIA+ & Advocacy,” is based on a custom survey by The Harris Poll conducted online within the United States from May 26 to June 1 among 1,110 LGBTQIA+ adults aged 18 and over. (LGBTQIA+ is an acronym for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual, and other identities.)

    “You might expect that some people within the LGBTQIA+ community are concerned about their rights, given societal trends and recent events,” said Tim Osiecki, Senior Research Manager at The Harris Poll Thought Leadership and Futures Practice. “And indeed, our research shows that the concern is almost universally shared. It also shows that the community – especially younger members from the Gen Z and Millennial generations – is responding with a broad and significant commitment to efforts to preserve those rights and that they ultimately believe the tide will turn.”  

    A chief finding of the study is that the LGBTQIA+ community is deeply concerned about legislation passed or advancing at the state and federal levels. Respondents were almost unanimous (98%) in their concern that one or more existing rights could be taken away from LGBTQIA+ people. 

    Four out of five (81%) agreed with the statement “With hundreds of anti-LGBTQIA+ bills pending legislation in the U.S., I feel very nervous about my rights as an LGBTQIA+ individual.” Even more (85%) agreed that “There are many groups within the LGBTQIA+ community that often get overlooked or picked on by politicians and lawmakers.”

    Respondents’ top concerns: 

    • Protection against discrimination in schools (87%) 
    • Discrimination protection in the workplace (85%) 
    • Right to access housing (84%) 
    • Right to get married (83%)
    • LGBTQIA+ inclusive education (83%)

    However, the community is far from despairing – LGBTQIA+ people are putting time, energy, creativity, money, and votes into defending their rights. More than nine out of 10 (93%) LGBTQIA+ people reported taking some sort of political action other than voting to defend their rights. 

    The study found that the vast majority (84%) of LGBTQIA+ people vote regularly, with 71% voting in federal elections and 67% in local elections – well above typical nationwide marks of about 52% and 12 to 25%, respectively.  

    Over half (58%) donate money, about a third march or protest (39%), attend political events (32%), or write letters (30%) advocating for their rights. More than one in three (37%) said they have considered running for political office – and that percentage jumps to 60% among transgender respondents.

    The study also found that members of younger generations (Gen Z, Millennials) are more likely to engage in activism than older members of the LGBTQIA+ community – in some areas, twice as likely. For example, 34% of younger LGBTQIA+ people have volunteered or worked on a campaign, compared to 19% of their older counterparts; 29% of younger generations belong to organized groups that engage in political efforts, compared to 13% of older generations.

    The study also closely examined specific issues such as the drag queen bans that have received prominent media coverage. Eight out of 10 respondents said they were concerned about those bans (81%) and feared they could “snowball into lawmakers taking away more and more rights” (80%).

    In addition, the study focused on issues faced by subsets of the LGBTQIA+ community, people who identify as BIPOC or transgender.  

    Almost three-quarters (72%) of queer BIPOC (Black, indigenous, people of color) members said they had trouble finding communities and resources that understand them, and about two-thirds (64%) have to “code switch” or change how they communicate to fit in with the two communities. Almost half (48%) said they have had to relocate to avoid hostile laws or political environments (compared to 40% of queer non-BIPOC members).  

    Possibly reflecting the current political climate, nearly nine out of 10 (87%) trans people agreed with the statement “Our society values humanity in AI and robots more than in trans people.” More than six out of 10 (62%) said they have relocated due to hostile laws or political environments. 

    And yet, even as they hold deep concerns about rhetoric and legislation and devote themselves to political activism to defend their rights, people in the LGBTQIA+ community still hold optimism about the future. A strong majority (84%) agreed with the statement “I am hopeful that things are going to improve on the LGBTQIA+ rights” and about two out of three said that the improvement might be soon, agreeing that “I think it’s likely that things will improve for LGBTQIA+ rights within the next five years.” 

    “It’s clear from this study and our previous work that the country’s LGBTQIA+ community believes that though our society has made progress on these issues, we still need to work to preserve and expand the community’s rights, and that people believe that progress is not only possible but probable,” Osiecki said.

    For more information, please visit The Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice or subscribe to their newsletter, The Next Big Think, for the latest research.

    About Harris Poll Thought Leadership Practice

    Building on 50+ years of experience pulsing societal opinion, we design research that is credible, creative, and culturally relevant. Our practice drives thought leadership and unearthed trends for today’s biggest brands. We are focused on helping our clients get ahead of what is next.

    About Harris Poll  

    The Harris Poll is one of the longest-running surveys in the U.S., tracking public opinion, motivations, and social sentiment since 1963, and is now part of Harris Insights & Analytics, a global consulting and market research firm that delivers social intelligence for transformational times. We work with clients in three primary areas: building 21st-century corporate reputation, crafting brand strategy and performance tracking, and earning organic media through public relations research. Our mission is to provide insights and guidance to help leaders make the best decisions possible. To learn more, please visit www.theharrispoll.com.

    Source: Harris Poll

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Miley Cyrus Thinks This 2009 Photo Makes It So Clear She’s Bisexual

    Miley Cyrus Thinks This 2009 Photo Makes It So Clear She’s Bisexual

    [ad_1]

    Miley Cyrus thinks her old outfits were a clear sign she was part of the LGBTQ+ community.

    Cyrus joked about her 2000s-era fashion giving big bisexual energy in a funny TikTok on Thursday, pointing to an old paparazzi photo with Taylor Swift, Demi Lovato and actor Emily Osment as evidence.

    Looking far more casual than her pals in the 2009 much-memed snapshot, the “Used To Be Young” singer donned layered T-shirts, baggy pants and slouchy silver boots while her buddies all rocked glitzy black party dresses.

    “If you guys didn’t know I was bisexual from this damn picture, I don’t know what’s wrong with you,” Cyrus said, looking into the camera.

    “I mean, hello!” she yelled. “Look at ’em!”

    The “Wrecking Ball” singer remembered being on the way to the Cheesecake Factory after the Grammy Awards, calling the group “some classy ladies.”

    (In an apparent mix-up of oh-so-2000s eateries, the vintage photo actually looks like it was taken at a P.F. Chang’s following the red-carpet premiere of “Hannah Montana: The Movie.”)

    After coming out as pansexual in 2016, Cyrus talked about coming to terms with her feelings in an interview with Variety.

    “My whole life, I didn’t understand my own gender and my own sexuality,” she said. “I always hated the word ‘bisexual,’ because that’s even putting me in a box. I don’t ever think about someone being a boy or someone being a girl.”

    More recently, the pop star told the podcast “Call Her Daddy,” “My identity is related to sex in a much deeper way than my sexuality … I enjoy sexuality more than I enjoy sex.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Telluride Just Unveiled Four Major Best Actor Oscar Contenders—And the Potential to Make History

    Telluride Just Unveiled Four Major Best Actor Oscar Contenders—And the Potential to Make History

    [ad_1]

    It’s common during festival season for a slew of major Oscar candidates to premiere within days, sometimes hours of each other. But I cannot remember a single festival, on a single opening night, unveiling four very legitimate, very deserving lead-acting contenders—in a year where their race was already looking competitive.

    In Telluride, thus far, it’s been all about the men. That may soon change, as Annette Bening’s Nyad premieres later tonight and Emma Stone’s Poor Things—fresh off of red-hot reviews in Venice—makes its way to the Rockies later this weekend. But waiting in line for movies, walking down the street, sitting for big premieres, the chatter I kept hearing about last night and all of Friday centered on four male lead performances. How they’ll navigate pre-established contenders like Leonardo DiCaprio (Killers of the Flower Moon) and Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer), to say nothing of Venice’s breakouts Adam Driver (Ferrari) and, presumably, Bradley Cooper (Maestro), remains to be seen.

    But let’s get into each of these—they deserve a spotlight. My first screening on Thursday evening was for Rustin, the biopic of the unsung Civil Rights Movement icon helmed by George C. Wolfe. The film is conventionally structured and occasionally a little hokey, but the sterling ensemble cast and Wolfe’s deft handling of its intersectional concerns—Bayard Rustin facing discrimination for being both Black and gay, sometimes within his own communities—keeps it afloat. What makes it soar, then, is Colman Domingo. This is the moment many of us who’ve been watching the longtime character actor have been waiting for. His performance is exuberant, filled with the kinds of capital-B Big scenes that awards voters love, but also laced with a subtler conviction throughout, the sort of actorly transformation that doesn’t win make-up and hairstyling teams Oscars, necessarily, but is no less impressive.

    It’s a huge, showy turn in a movie that may not gain major traction elsewhere, an occasional liability when it comes to the Academy. (Recall Danielle Deadwyler’s unforgivable snub last year.) One actor who will not have that problem? Paul Giamatti. The Holdovers, which I caught today after my colleague Rebecca Ford covered the premiere last night, feels like vintage Alexander Payne, a substantive comedy that finds a group of loners coming together for a few hours of hijinks, personal revelation, and tender heartbreak. It’s a feel-good tale with bite and personality, ideal for a slowly evolving Academy membership. Giamatti anchors it with a wildly funny embodiment of That Teacher You Hated In High School, one that turns improbably, bracingly heroic in the moving final act.

    Is it too funny to beat out the seismic dramatic work of folks like Domingo and Murphy? Maybe, since there are more in that latter category too. One new name to add to the conversation that folks may not have been paying much attention to is Andrew Scott. All of Us Strangers appears to be the toast of the fall festivals so far, scoring a clean 100% on Rotten Tomatoes and a rare 98 on Metacritic; these numbers will likely go down, but they’ll remain indicators of enormous critical support, which matters a great deal more to the Oscars than it used to. A queer love story and ghost story rolled into one emotional wallop, the drama is poised to mark Andrew Haigh’s awards breakthrough, having previously directed Charlotte Rampling to her first Oscar nod for 45 Years. Scott’s sensitive, incredibly poignant work as the anchor of Strangers means that, should the film emerge as the broader contender it ought to, he’s firmly in that conversation too—remarkable since it’s his first lead role in a movie.

    Finally, Barry Keoghan is in a very different situation. Saltburn is as far from a weighty tearjerker as you can get—and, it seems, pretty far from a critical darling too. Emerald Fennell’s previous film Promising Young Woman had its detractors as well, and that didn’t hurt when it came to her Oscar win for best original screenplay, but the divide here is even sharper. One hopes that won’t intrude upon the industry’s ability to recognize the astounding physicality and emotional torment that Keoghan taps into. He was nominated for his first Oscar just a few months ago for The Banshees of Inisherin, and this is a whole new level of screen acting. The awards trajectory for Saltburn looks uncertain, but that shouldn’t get in its star’s way.

    [ad_2]

    David Canfield

    Source link

  • Canada warns LGBTQ travelers to U.S. to be cautious of local laws

    Canada warns LGBTQ travelers to U.S. to be cautious of local laws

    [ad_1]

    Canada updated its international travel advisory on Tuesday to warn LGBTQ+ travelers of laws and policies in some U.S. states. 

    The advisory extends to U.S.-bound Canadians who are 2SLGBTQI+ (two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, questioning, intersex and more). 

    The advisory could impact an estimated 1 million LGBTQ+ Canadians.

    While the advisory doesn’t dive into specific U.S. states or policies, a Global Affairs Canada spokesperson pointed to laws passed in the U.S. this year banning drag shows, restricting gender-affirming care and blocking participation in sporting events.

    The American Civil Liberties Union is currently tracking 495 anti-LGBTQ bills in the U.S.

    The Canadian government’s LGBT Travel webpage notes that around the world, travelers can face barriers and risks outside Canada. 

    “Foreign laws and customs related to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) can be very different from those in Canada,” the website says.

    Travel advisories and advice are only issued after a thorough analysis of information sources, including consular trends observed by Canadian diplomats, according to Global Affairs Canada. 

    Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, a former foreign affairs minister, said Tuesday that she supported the update, CBC reported.

    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marching at the 39th Annual Toronto Pride Parade on Sunday June 23, 2019 in Toronto, Canada.
    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marching at the 39th Annual Toronto Pride Parade on Sunday June 23, 2019 in Toronto, Canada.

    George Pimentel/Getty Images


    “Every Canadian government, very much including our government, needs to put at the center of everything we do the interests and the safety of every single Canadian, and of every single group of Canadians,” she said. “That’s what we’re doing now. That’s what we’re always going to do.”

    When asked about Canada’s updated travel advisory, a U.S. State Department spokesperson said: “The United States is committed to promoting tolerance, inclusion, justice, and dignity while helping to advance the equality and human rights of LGBTQI+ persons. We all must continue to do this work with our like-minded partners not only in the United States, not only in Canada, but throughout the world.”

    Within the U.S., the Human Rights Campaign issued its own travel advisory for LGBTQ+ travelers in Florida in recent months. In June, the organization went a step further and declared a “state of emergency” for LGBTQ+ Americans. Alongside the national warning, the organization issued a guidebook to help LGBTQ+ residents and travelers stay safe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iowa Schools Demand Parental Permission If Kids Want To Use Nicknames

    Iowa Schools Demand Parental Permission If Kids Want To Use Nicknames

    [ad_1]

    Back-to-school season feels slightly different this year in Iowa: Some parents are reporting being asked to formally approve their children’s nicknames for use in class as part of Republican lawmakers’ ongoing war against LGBTQ+ topics in education.

    The bizarre requests have come out of a cautious interpretation of a new, vaguely worded state law that purports to advance parental rights, which Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) signed in May.

    The law, known as Senate File 496, includes a section barring teachers from using “a name or pronoun that is different than the name or pronoun assigned to the student in the school district’s registration forms or records” unless a parent has been notified and has approved the change.

    Some schools have determined that this includes nicknames — at least for now, to be safe. Penalties for violating the law include disciplinary action against teachers and superintendents.

    Local news outlets are documenting baffled reactions from parents.

    “My kid started school yesterday, and she came home and she was like, ‘Oh, this weird thing happened,’” West Des Moines parent Bethany Snyder told Iowa News Now last week. According to Snyder, a teacher kept calling one student “Gabriel,” even though he told her that his name was “Gabe.” The teacher told Gabe he needed to have his parents fill out a form, citing the law.

    An Iowa blogger, Nick Covington, shared an image of the form he received from his kids’ school district on social media, refuting an Iowa lawmaker’s attempt to minimize the scope of the legislation. The form Covington shared included space to write alternate names the student may go by.

    Covington and Iowa state Sen. Liz Bennett (D) shared emails to parents that cite the law, saying specifically that it applies to students’ nicknames.

    “Today, Joseph requested that he be called Joe in class. However, because that nickname was not provided in Infinite Campus, we need your permission in order to grant the request,” read the email Bennett tweeted. (Infinite Campus is an online platform that allows parents access to students’ classwork.)

    The email Covington shared read, in part: “To maintain compliance with Iowa law, we ask that you please fill out this form for any student in your household that has a nickname that would be preferred over a legal name provided during registration.”

    Republican state lawmakers who sponsored the bill say it was never meant to apply to nicknames.

    However, educators across the country have reacted with similar caution in the face of other vaguely worded laws, such as in Florida, where Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a bill banning any discussion on gender identity or sexual orientation for certain grade levels. Critics say the lack of clarity is a feature, not a bug — meant to scare educators into strict compliance.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Whoopi Adresses the “Lesbian Vibes” Raven-Symoné Senses In Her

    Whoopi Adresses the “Lesbian Vibes” Raven-Symoné Senses In Her

    [ad_1]

    Whoopi Goldberg isn’t a lesbian, she’s just played one on TV.

    While appearing on Raven-Symoné and wife Miranda Pearman-Maday’s podcast, The Best Podcast Ever with Raven & Miranda, Goldberg took the hosts up on an opportunity to say who, exactly, Whoopi makes whoopie with. In the episode, published Monday, Raven-Symoné told her former The View co-host that “you just kind of gave me lesbian vibes” when they worked together, adding that “I just wanted to be up underneath the titty the whole time.” Cozy, right? “You give me lesbian vibes, you give me, like, stud vibes.”

    The vibes, however, are off.

    “Women have been asking me this for as long as I’ve been around,” Goldberg said. “I am not a lesbian, but I know lots of them, and I’ve played them on television, you know. But I you know, I have always had lesbian friends because they’re just my friends, you know.”

    Goldberg also spoke on the topic of legislation and protests aiming to limit things like drag shows and same-sex marriage. Sure, disagree, don’t like it, whatever, she said—but leave them alone.

    “Even when you know you don’t agree, then don’t go. Don’t engage,” she said. “No one is forcing anyone to go and participate. You don’t dig drag queens, then don’t go to a drag show. You don’t like gay marriage, don’t go to a gay wedding. You are not obligated in this country to do anything you are not comfortable doing. I don’t see why I understand that, and you don’t.”

    And, of course, it wouldn’t be an interview with the 67-year-old Goldberg if toots didn’t come up. Once again, the comedian confirmed, yes, her stage name (real name: Caryn Elaine Johnson, but only her mom, brother, and people who have known her since second grade call her Caryn, she said) is a play on a fart sound.

    “It came from me being a champion farter,” she said. And that, straight from Goldberg’s mouth, is anything but hot air.

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Gretchen Whitmer Is Targeting Red States With A Very Simple Message

    Gretchen Whitmer Is Targeting Red States With A Very Simple Message

    [ad_1]

    Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) has been promoting her state as a place that respects freedom ― as in, the ability to control what happens to your body, who you love, or how you identify yourself.

    Now Whitmer is taking that message directly to some states where those freedoms are under assault.

    Last week, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) launched a digital ad campaign touting the state’s commitment to inclusiveness and personal liberty. Its target is a half-dozen mostly Southern states where Republicans are in charge and have passed laws restricting abortion, LGBTQ+ rights or both.

    MEDC is a public-private partnership that works with the governor’s office to boost in-state business ― in this case, by appealing to high-skilled workers who tend to cherish those personal freedoms, along with the companies that covet those workers as employees.

    But this isn’t just another attempt to lure money and people into the state. This is also part of a broader attempt to mount an aggressive defense of abortion and LGBTQ+ rights by putting them together under the banner of “freedom.”

    And there’s reason to think that appeal can work.

    The MEDC campaign currently features three digital images, including one with two women on a small boat who appear to be a couple. “In Michigan, all are welcome,” a caption says. “Discover the benefits of living in a state that protects your rights.”

    Another image has three young women walking on what looks like a college campus. Its tagline reads, “Enjoy your right to reproductive freedom.”

    Digital images from a new pro-Michigan economic development campaign that promotes the state as welcoming to all, and protective of personal liberty.

    MEDC says it has spent $30,000 on the ads, which the agency described as an “initial buy” with the possibility of more to come. The intended audiences are online readers in Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Tennessee, Texas and South Carolina ― a list that’s hardly random, according to Robert Leddy, Whitmer’s director of communications.

    Leddy told HuffPost that MEDC and the governor’s office picked those states because they satisfied two key criteria. They are competing with Michigan to woo large new employers, and their officials “have taken action to restrict people’s rights, or have legislation currently in the works, or have talked about doing so.”

    Leddy wouldn’t elaborate on which specific efforts Whitmer and her advisers had in mind. But they might have been thinking of initiatives like the new restrictions on drag shows or discussion of sexuality in school ― or the abortion restrictions that have prohibited the practice in some parts of the country.

    Whitmer, working with Michigan’s first Democratic-majority legislature in nearly 50 years, has taken her state in the opposite direction. They have added LGBTQ+ protections to the state’s civil rights statute and formally repealed a near-total abortion ban that had been on the books since 1931 but not enforced while Roe v. Wade was still the law of the land.

    Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan Democrat seen here discussing abortion at a 2022 roundtable discussion in Detroit, has added an economic pitch to her longstanding defense of reproductive rights.
    Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan Democrat seen here discussing abortion at a 2022 roundtable discussion in Detroit, has added an economic pitch to her longstanding defense of reproductive rights.

    Sarah Rice for The Washington Post via Getty Images

    Whitmer has a long, well-chronicled record of defending LGBTQ+ and reproductive rights. But since last year, she has been adding an economic pitch, arguing that “bigotry is bad for business” ― a line, according to Leddy, reflects what she and her advisers have heard from employers.

    “When it comes to very competitive business deals, this may be the tipping point,” Leddy said, “because we are hearing from companies who are saying that, where we are looking, it’s not feasible for the next-generation workforce.”

    It’s hard to know how pervasive such sentiments are. Plenty of managers and executives have their own more conservative views on these issues, and certainly, plenty of workers feel that way too. Plus, it’s not clear ultimately just how much corporations weigh employee preferences anyway ― especially if, say, the states less hospitable to abortion and LGBTQ+ rights also offer lower taxes.

    Still, there’s no question that tight labor markets have employers scrambling to find workers with more skills and education credentials ― who, according to the polls, tend to be the most supportive of abortion and LGBTQ+ rights. Over the last year, surveys have picked up signs that workers, especially women, will choose (or not choose) where to work depending on abortion availability.

    The trend lines in politics seem even clearer. The Republican push to ban abortion has proven spectacularly unpopular, even in relatively conservative states like Kansas and Ohio, where an attempt to block an abortion rights amendment through constitutional amendment failed by double digits.

    Overall, about two-thirds of Americans think abortion should be legal most of the time, according to a July poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

    Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, seen here campaigning in Iowa for the 2024 presidential nomination, made his war on "woke ideology" the foundation of his candidacy. His poll numbers have been plummeting.
    Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, seen here campaigning in Iowa for the 2024 presidential nomination, made his war on “woke ideology” the foundation of his candidacy. His poll numbers have been plummeting.

    Stefani Reynolds via Getty Images

    The polling on LGBTQ+ issues produces a more muddled picture, depending on the specific issue and question wording. But the right’s focus on the visibility and rights of the LGBTQ+ community may have limited appeal, even among Republican voters.

    Just ask Gov. Ron DeSantis, the Florida Republican who made his war on “woke ideology” the foundation of his 2024 presidential candidacy ― and whose campaign now seems to be in deep trouble.

    His poll numbers are in what looks like a freefall, his organization in apparent disarray. Recently he said that he has “moved on” from his infamous fight with Disney, which was over LGBTQ+ rights. And he tries hard not to discuss the six-week abortion ban he signed in the spring.

    Whitmer, by contrast, is eager to talk about these topics ― in her speeches and interviews and when promoting the state as well. Last week she posted on X (formerly known as Twitter) about one of the MEDC digital ads, saying, “I wasn’t kidding when I said bigotry is bad for business. If you live in a state trying to restrict your rights and freedoms, move to Michigan.”

    Whitmer would likely defend reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights regardless of poll numbers, given what she’s said over the years about her views on dignity and personal liberty ― and how much each of those issues means to her personally.

    But Whitmer is also a savvy, careful politician widely thought to have her eyes on higher office someday. And it’s hard to imagine she would be adopting such a clear, visible posture on such a high-profile set of issues if she didn’t think she had the public on her side.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • LGBTQ+ veterans sue Defense Department to have discharges changed

    LGBTQ+ veterans sue Defense Department to have discharges changed

    [ad_1]

    LGBTQ+ veterans sue Defense Department to have discharges changed – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Over the last six months, CBS News has spoken with multiple veterans who were kicked out of the military and denied honorable discharges because of their sexual orientation. After trying, with little success, to get the Pentagon to address this, the vets have now filed a class action lawsuit. CBS News chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod spoke to one of the plaintiffs.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iraq bans the word

    Iraq bans the word

    [ad_1]

    Iraq’s Media and Communications Commission has issued a directive instructing all media and social media platforms in the country to refrain from using the terms “homosexual” or “homosexuality” and instead use “sexual deviancy.”

    The decision, reported widely by Iraq’s state and private news outlets, was made to safeguard societal values and public order, the commission said, noting that the terms “homosexuality, homosexual, and Gender” hold undesirable connotations within Iraqi society.

    IRAQ-SWEDEN-RELIGION-KORAN
    Supporters of Iraqi Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr burn posters depicting an LGBTQ+ flag during a protest in Karbala, Iraq, June 29, 2023, sparked by the burning of a Quran in Sweden.

    MOHAMMED SAWAF/AFP/Getty


    While no specific penalties have been established for noncompliance with the new directive, a government representative indicated that fines could be introduced.

    Iraq’s national penal code does not contain explicit provisions criminalizing homosexuality, though the country’s judiciary authorities often invoke provisions in laws related to the preservation of “public morals” to prosecute people for same-sex acts.

    The legal ambiguity has resulted in discrimination, abuse and even fatal attacks against the LGBTQ community in Iraq.

    Attitudes toward LGBTQ people across the Arab world are shaped by a combination of cultural and religious factors. Islamic texts, including the Quran and the hadiths, the latter of which are a recollection of quotes attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, denounce same-sex relationships.

    Some hadiths advocate for the death penalty in cases of public engagement in homosexual activities.


    Wave of anti-LGBTQ laws passed across country

    07:56

    Many Muslim-majority nations have long resisted efforts to advance LGBTQ rights, including by opposing global initiatives at the United Nations. A coalition of 57 U.N. member states, many of which have Muslim majorities, previously cosponsored a statement opposing LGBTQ rights at the U.N. General Assembly, and in 2016, 51 Muslim-majority states prevented 11 gay and transgender advocacy organizations from participating in a high-level U.N. meeting on combating AIDS.

    The degree of punishment for homosexuality varies from country to country. In seven nations, including Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Mauritania, and the United Arab Emirates, homosexual acts are still punishable by death.

    Afghanistan reintroduced the death penalty for homosexual acts after the Taliban retook control of the country in 2021.

    Even in predominantly Muslim countries where homosexuality is legal, such as Jordan, LGBTQ venues are often targeted and shut down, and patrons are often subjected to violence and hostility.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wayne Brady reveals he is pansexual

    Wayne Brady reveals he is pansexual

    [ad_1]

    Wayne Brady has revealed he is pansexual, meaning he can have sexual, romantic or emotional attractions to someone regardless of their gender. In an interview with People magazine, the comedian and actor described it as “bisexual — with an open mind.”

    Who is Wayne Brady?

    The 51-year-old is known for the sketch comedy show “Whose Line is it Anyway?” and is host of CBS’ “Let’s Make A Deal.” He also hosted his own talk show, “The Wayne Brady Show,” in the early 2000s. 

    Brady told People the first person he opened up to about his pansexuality was his ex-wife, Mandie Taketa. 

    “I just said, ‘Great.’ As I knew coming out would help him be happier,” Taketa told People. Brady and Taketa, 47, share a 20-year-old daughter named Maile. 

    Brady said for him, “pan means being able to be attracted to anyone who identifies as gay, straight, bi, transsexual or non-binary.”

    “Being able to be attracted across the board,” he said. “And, I think, at least for me for right now, that is the proper place. I took pan to mean that not only can I be attracted to any of these people or types physically, but I could be attracted to the person that is there.”

    2022 American Music Awards - Arrivals
    Wayne Brady attends the 2022 American Music Awards at Microsoft Theater on November 20, 2022 in Los Angeles, California.

    Getty Images


    During the interview, Brady said he is in therapy, and that after Robin Williams’ death in 2014, he started being vocal about mental health. 

    He said he “did all the therapy” he could and was treated for love addiction, saying he had been looking for happiness in a “slew of other people.”  

    Brady said he asked himself if he was gay, but said the answer is no. He said he had been attracted to men, but pushed those feelings aside because of how he was raised, and the fear of how his sexuality would be received. 

    “I’ve always had a wonderful community of friends who are in the LGBTQ+ community, people that I’ve grown up with in shows, gays and lesbians, and, later in life, my trans relatives and my niece. I’ve always had that community, but I’ve always felt like a sham because I wasn’t being forthcoming with myself,” he said. 

    At first, Brady thought no one needed to know he was pan. 

    “But that gave me license to still live in the shadows and to be secretive. What does that feel like to actually not be shameful, to not feel like, ‘Oh, I can’t be part of this conversation because I’m lying?’ I had to break that behavior,” he said.

    Now, Brady says he is “a single, open-minded pansexual” who can “be free and open to other people.”

    On Instagram, the comedian shared a comical video of himself lip-syncing to Celine Dion’s “It’s All Coming Back To Me Now.” In the caption, he talked more about the revelation in the People interview. 

    “This shouldn’t shake anyone’s world, but if it bothers you at all, that’s your business: I was so afraid of having my manhood questioned, but screw that,” he writes. “A ‘real man’ in my eyes, isn’t afraid to be honest and happy. From now on, I’ll be over here living my best life! I love you.”

    What does pansexual mean?

    Pansexual people may “form enduring physical, romantic, and/or emotional attractions to any person, regardless of gender identity,” according to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, or GLAAD.  This is one of several terms under the bi+ umbrella, the organization says.

    What is the difference between pansexuality and bisexuality? 

    Bisexual describes “a person who has the potential to be physically, romantically, and/or emotionally attracted to people of more than one gender, not necessarily at the same time, in the same way, or to the same degree,” according to GLAAD. Bisexual people may be attracted to someone that is the same gender as themselves or a different gender as themselves. 

    Pansexuality is one of many sexual orientations under the bi+ umbrella, according to GLAAD. This includes people who may describe themselves as “bisexual, pansexual, polysexual, ominisexual, fluid or queer,” according to GLAAD. 

    People who are bi+ have the “potential to be attracted to more than one gender.”

    Gender and sexuality are not the same. Sexual orientations such as gay, heterosexual and pansexual, describe who we are attracted to. Gender is a personal identity separate from sex or sexuality.

    Sex is usually assigned at birth, based on the appearance of anatomy. While babies are either assigned male or female at birth, there are many other gender identities aside from man and woman. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Noah Schnapp Says He’d Still Be Closeted If Not For ‘Stranger Things’

    Noah Schnapp Says He’d Still Be Closeted If Not For ‘Stranger Things’

    [ad_1]

    Sometimes, art imitates life in a profound way. In a recent Variety cover story, Stranger Things star Noah Schanpp says he believes that he “would still be closeted” if he had never played Will Byers on the smash hit Netflix series. 

    Schnapp has played introverted Will Byers since 2016, when he was just twelve years old. From the onset of the series, there were indications that the character of Will might be gay, with Winona Ryder’s Joyce Byers revealing in the series premiere that other kids call Will “queer,” and that his absentee father had called him an anti-gay slur. At that point, Schnapp “didn’t really think twice about” Will’s sexuality. “I was so young; I barely even knew what that word meant,” he told Variety. “And I don’t even think I knew myself that I was gay.”

    Over the course of the series, Will has come to terms with his sexuality. In a pivotal moment in season 3, Will’s best friend Mike (Finn Wolfhard) says to him, “It’s not my fault that you don’t like girls,” and Will’s major storyline in season 4 follows his his unrequited crush on Mike. In a 2022 Variety interview, Scnapp confirmed that the character of Will Byers was gay—a step that was met with overwhelming support from Stranger Things fans, and was instrumental in helping Schnapp understand his own sexuality.

    “Once I did fully embrace that Will was gay, it was just an exponential speed towards accepting it for myself,” said Schnapp. “I would be in a completely different place if I didn’t have Will to portray, and to embrace and help me accept myself. I think if I never played that character, I probably would still be closeted.”

    Eventually, Schnapp found the courage to come out—first to his twin sister, Chloe, and then to his close family and friends, including his Stranger Things co-star Millie Bobbie Brown. “I kept trying to do it in person with her, and it was too hard,” he said. “So then I just FaceTimed her one day in the middle of a Party City and I was like, ‘Millie, I’m gay.’ And she was like, ‘Oh, Schnapper! You told me finally!’”

    Next, it was time to tell the world. Schnapp came out to the public via an eight second viral TikTok that he shared with his 31 million followers on TikTok. Schnapp said that after posting the TikTok which has received over 14 million likes, he received thousands of messages from friends, family, and fans congratulating him on coming out.  “When I opened my phone at the end of the car ride, it was, like, a thousand texts of hearts and congratulations and rainbow flags,” says Schnapp. “I was crying. I was like, ‘I made it. I’m done. I don’t have to worry.’” 

    Schnapp will reprise his role  for the fifth and final season of Stranger Things. Filming was set to begin this summer, but has been placed on hold due to the SAG strike. But according to Stranger Things co-creator Ross Duffer, Schnapp’s character “really takes center stage again in 5.” “This emotional arc for him is what we feel is going to hopefully tie the whole series together,” Duffer told Variety. “Will is used to being the young one, the introverted one, the one that’s being protected. So part of his journey, it’s not just sexuality — it’s Will coming into his own as a young man.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link

  • Alice Oseman Is “Balancing the Lightness With the Darkness” in ‘Heartstopper’

    Alice Oseman Is “Balancing the Lightness With the Darkness” in ‘Heartstopper’

    [ad_1]

    Where do you go once you’ve reached happily ever after? That was the challenge for Heartstopper creator and executive producer Alice Oseman heading into season two of her syrupy sweet smash-hit Netflix series about young queer love. Season one of Hearstopper, which took the world by storm when it premiered in April of 2022, followed out gay teen Charlie (Joe Locke) as he falls head over heels for popular, seemingly straight rugby player Nick (Kit Connor). By the end of the first season, Nick has discovered his bisexuality, come out to his mother (Olivia Colman), and is completely smitten with Charlie. Now that the two boys were madly in like-like, where was Heartstopper to go?

    “In season two, we get to actually see them being in a real relationship,” says Oseman, Zooming in from Kent, England. “Being happy and excited to be together, and seeing them kind of just get to know each other a bit better and understand each other more.”

    Oseman, who uses she/they pronouns, pulled from her own series of graphic novels to continue Charlie and Nick’s journey. “Their story is very, very similar to volume three of the comics,” she says. While Nick and Charlie are still decidedly in the honeymoon phase of their teenage dream of a romance, season two of Heartstopper also deals with thornier subjects, as Nick deals with the awkwardness of coming out and Charlie grapples with the aftershocks of years of bullying. “Balancing the lightness with the darkness is kind of the core element of writing Heartstopper,” Oseman says.

    Doing this isn’t always easy, especially when your show became a worldwide phenomenon for fans who love to see their favorite characters happy. “Showing these beautiful, adorable, wholesome, lovely moments that Heartstopper is known for while also exploring real issues that real people are dealing with can be really hard,” she says.

    Oseman managed that in part by expanding the purview of the series, spending more time this season with Nick and Charlie’s queer group of besties—Tara (Corinna Brown), Darcy (Kizzy Edgell), Tao (William Gao), Elle (Yasmin Finney), and Isaac (Tobie Donovan). “We have so much more going on for the supporting cast,” Oseman says, excitedly. And it’s true: Cracks begin to show in girlfriends Tara and Darcy’s relationship; Tao and his trans BFF Elle take their friendship to the next level. Even book-loving Isaac gets space to interrogate his own sexuality.

    Within the friend group, almost every letter of the LGBTQ+ spectrum is represented in some way. Oseman, who has previously said that she identifies as asexual and aromantic, says that representation was “definitely intentional” as she “wanted to show a real diverse range of experiences.”

    “Although the show is very focused on Nick and Charlie, I really wanted us to feel that it has this big queer friendship group at its heart,” she continues. “It’s just kind of part of what Heartstopper is: showing all these people with different experiences, but also reassuring you that no matter who you are, you can find joy and love and friendship and happiness and hope, and all that good stuff.”

    Of course, the teenage LGBTQ+ experience is not only good stuff. Following the massive success of season one, 18-year-old Kit Connor tweeted that he felt he was “forced” to come out as bisexual after rabid Heartstopper fans accused him of queerbaiting. At the time, Oseman voiced her support for Connor, replying to his tweet, “You owe nothing to anyone. I’m so proud of you my friend.” (The entire Twitter thread has since been deleted.) When asked about the situation over Zoom, Oseman voices her support for her entire cast, without singling out Connor in particular. “I feel so proud of all of them, because I feel so proud to have a cast who cares so much about the story and are putting themselves out there, being amazing representatives of the queer community and inspiring people,” she says. “They’re so inspiring for so many young people now. I just feel very proud of all of them and protective of all of them, and I want to support whatever they’re doing.”

    Real-world drama aside, this season, Nick, Charlie, and their group of besties get to experience queer romance in the most romantic place of all: Paris, France. Shooting on location in the City of Love “was a big challenge,” says Oseman. “It was really difficult. Filming in a big city in very public places around some very popular cultural landmarks—that’s kind of one of the biggest challenges you could face for making a TV show.”

    Heartstopper shot for nine days in Paris to capture its class-trip episodes, which see the friend group visit iconic Paris landmarks including the Eiffel Tower, Notre Dame, and the Louvre. “It was very intense,” Oseman recalls. “There were a lot of very early mornings. We had two of those mornings where we were up the Eiffel Tower at 7 a.m. as the sun was rising before all the tourists arrived, and we had a small shoot in the Louvre as well.”

    The early mornings were all worth it. “It was really, really magical,” Oseman said. “Although everyone was kind of exhausted and stressed out, I think everyone really treasured that experience, for sure.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link