ReportWire

Tag: Lawsuit

  • CVS sued by nurse who was fired after she refused to prescribe birth control because of her religious beliefs

    CVS sued by nurse who was fired after she refused to prescribe birth control because of her religious beliefs

    [ad_1]

    CVS Health is facing another lawsuit brought by a former employee who claims the pharmacy chain’s decision to fire her after she refused to prescribe birth control to patients violated her religious rights under federal law. J. Robyn Strader, a nurse practitioner and Texas resident, worked at a CVS MinuteClinic for six and a half years, according to the lawsuit, which she filed through her attorney in U.S. district court in Forth Worth on Wednesday.

    The complaint alleges that CVS terminated Strader’s employment illegally, arguing that the company’s decision dismissed protections outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The provision, passed as part of a broader package of landmark legislation in 1964, prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. One section of Title VII specifically notes that “[t]he term ‘religion’ includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.”

    Strader claims in the new lawsuit that her Christian faith prevented her from prescribing contraceptive or abortion-inducing drugs to patients at the CVS where she worked. For the majority of Strader’s tenure there, she says CVS granted her a religious accommodation that allowed her to personally reject patients’ requests for those prescriptions and instead refer them to a colleague or a different MinuteClinic. But, in August 2021, CVS Health revoked a previous policy regarding religious accommodations that ensured all employees’ needs would be met, the suit says.

    “CVS’s new policy is to deny all such religious accommodations without considering the particular circumstances of the employee requesting the accommodation, including to determine whether that employee could be accommodated without undue hardship,” the lawsuit states.

    The lawsuit asserts that the pharmacy could have transferred Strader to a role that would not require her to be in situations where she might have to prescribe birth control, instead of keeping her in an “essential” position where providing religious accommodation directly conflicted with the function of her job. Citing both the Civil Rights Act and another court case that states employers must consider religious accommodation requests on an individual basis, the lawsuit also claims that CVS “failed to engage with her about possible accommodations, and terminated her because of her religious beliefs.”

    CVS Health Results
    A CVS Pharmacy sign stands in Mount Lebanon, Pa., on Monday May 3, 2021.

    Gene J. Puskar / AP


    Strader’s legal complaint is similar to two other suits filed in Kansas and Virginia against CVS Health last year, where former employees alleged that they were unlawfully terminated for refusing to prescribe birth control because of their religious beliefs. In the Virginia complaint, filed last September, the plaintiff, Paige Casey, was represented by the conservative nonprofit legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom.

    Around the time Casey’s lawsuit was filed, Michael DeAngelis, a spokesperson for CVS, told CBS MoneyWatch that the company does try to accommodate employees’ religious beliefs, but providing sexual and reproductive health services to patients is a fundamental part of working at its walk-in clinics.

    “It is not possible … to grant an accommodation that exempts an employee from performing the essential functions of their job,” DeAngelis said in a statement. “We cannot grant exemptions from these essential MinuteClinic functions.”

    CBS News contacted CVS Health for a response to Strader’s lawsuit but did not receive an immediate reply.

    Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark case that in 1973 established federal rights to choose to have an abortion, states across the country have passed their own laws restricting access to the procedure, with at least 13 of them enacting near-total abortion bans. Both CVS and Walgreens, which are the nation’s largest drugstore chains, recently told CBS MoneyWatch that they intend to sell the abortion drug mifepristone after the Food and Drug Administration reversed a ruling that prevented retail pharmacies from dispensing the medication. 

    The FDA’s decision came just days after a Justice Department ruling confirmed that U.S. Postal Service can continue to deliver abortion medication by mail, even in states that have passed restrictions since Roe’s reversal. Although CVS and Walgreens drugstores will not be able to sell mifepristone in states where abortion is banned, the FDA ruling is expected to expand access to a drug that previously was limited to smaller mail-order pharmacies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zara Sues Los Angeles-Based Indie Brand for ‘Serial’ Copyright Infringement

    Zara Sues Los Angeles-Based Indie Brand for ‘Serial’ Copyright Infringement

    [ad_1]

    Another day, another fashion lawsuitChristian Louboutin is coming for AmazonAdidas is taking Thom Browne to court. And now, fast-fashion giant Zara is suing a small Los Angeles-based brand for “serial” copyright violations. Yes, you read that right: Zara is the one suing another entity this time around. 

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • Trader Joe’s sued over alleged lead and cadmium in dark chocolate

    Trader Joe’s sued over alleged lead and cadmium in dark chocolate

    [ad_1]

    Trader Joe’s customers in New York filed two separate class-action lawsuits against the company this week, alleging that the grocery store chain failed to warn customers about heavy metals found in its dark chocolate.

    One lawsuit argues that Trader Joe’s should have known there were traces of cadmium and lead in the chocolate. Instead, Trader Joe’s allegedly decided to “ignore the health of the consuming public in pursuit of profit,” the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York states.

    The lawsuit, filed Wednesday on behalf of New York City resident Tamakia Herd, also alleges Trader Joe’s purposely omitted the heavy metals presence on its chocolate packaging, further deceiving its customers. Herd eats two dark chocolate bars from Trader Joe’s every week, the suit claims.

    Trader Joe’s allegedly knew that, if it disclosed the heavy metal amounts on its labels, customers probably wouldn’t have purchased the chocolate, claims the second lawsuit from Long Island resident Thomas Ferrante. The Ferrante lawsuit, also filed Wednesday, seeks $550 in damages for every time he or other class members bought Trader Joe’s chocolate.

    Trader Joe’s is being sued for unjust enrichment and for violating New York state general business regulations.

    The lawsuits center on Trader Joe’s Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao and Dark Chocolate Lover’s 85% Cacao bars, which were found to contain high levels of lead and cadmium in a Consumer Reports study released in December.

    The California-based grocer didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

    Last month, scientists at Consumer Reports tested the heavy metal content of chocolate bars from Hershey’s, Trader Joe’s and other vendors. CR found cadmium and lead in all 28 brands of chocolate it tested. For 23 of the bars, consuming just an ounce a day would deliver a potentially harmful level of one of the metals for an adult, CR said. Five of the bars tested above those levels for both cadmium and lead.

    Long-term exposure to even small amounts of heavy metals can lead to a slew of issues. In young children, lead exposure can lead to delayed brain development, problems with hearing and speech, a shortened attention span and learning and behavior problems, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cadmium exposure can damage kidneys, lungs and bones, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

    Hershey’s, which is facing its own lawsuit over CR’s findings, deferred to the National Confectioners Association for comment. The trade group previously objected to CR’s use of levels set by California, noting that the state doesn’t set federal food safety standards.

    “The products cited in this study are in compliance with strict quality and safety requirements,” the confectioners association said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch last month. “Food safety and product quality remain our highest priorities and we remain dedicated to being transparent and socially responsible.”

    The confectioners association in August released research showing ways that lead and cadmium in chocolate could be reduced, including having cocoa farmers plant new tree stock.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Late Capitol Officer’s Fiancee Sues Donald Trump And 2 Convicted Rioters

    Late Capitol Officer’s Fiancee Sues Donald Trump And 2 Convicted Rioters

    [ad_1]

    The longtime partner of Brian Sicknick, a U.S. Capitol Police officer who was injured and died after the 2021 insurrection in Washington, has filed suit in federal court against former President Donald Trump and two men who pleaded guilty to attacking Sicknick.

    Sandra Garza, Sicknick’s fiancee, alleges wrongful death, conspiracy to violate civil rights, assault and other claims in the lawsuit filed Thursday.

    The two rioters, Julian Elie Khater and George Pierre Tanios, each pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection. The pair of New Jersey–bred childhood friends went to the Capitol that day with supplies such as bear spray and pepper spray, which Khater deployed in Sicknick’s face from a distance of less than 8 feet, according to court documents.

    Sicknick died on Jan. 7, 2021, after collapsing on Capitol grounds and being rushed to a hospital. A medical examiner said he suffered multiple strokes and died of natural causes. The Capitol Police subsequently said in a statement that the finding “does not change the fact Officer Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol.”

    Matt Kaiser, an attorney for Garza, said that her suit was about accountability. She is seeking at least $10 million in damages from Trump and the two rioters.

    Trump’s refusal to concede that he lost the 2020 presidential election directly led to Khater and Tanios’ participation in the “insurrectionist effort,” the suit said.

    “That attack on the United States Capitol cost U.S. Capitol Officer Brian Sicknick, who was bravely defending the cradle of American Democracy, his life,” it read. The suit went on to cite findings from the House select committee that investigated the Capitol attack, including the criminal referrals it made against Trump.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Must Read: Billie Eilish Lands ‘Vogue’ Video Cover, Independent Designers Brace for Recession

    Must Read: Billie Eilish Lands ‘Vogue’ Video Cover, Independent Designers Brace for Recession

    [ad_1]

    These are the stories making headlines in fashion on Wednesday. 

    Billie Eilish lands Vogue video cover, talks climate
    Vogue’s first-ever video cover star Billie Eilish spoke with eight climate activists, including Quannah Chasinghorse and Wawa Gatheru, on the future of the planet. The innovative video cover is a carousel of conversation, children signing and other aesthetic shots. Directed by Mike Mills, Eilish and the activists spoke about topics like climate anxiety, navigating academia and politics, leading grassroots campaigns and environmental racism. In the cover story, Eilish also reflected on her personal journey with her body, romance and current boyfriend Jesse Rutherford. {Vogue}

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • Stars of 1968’s “Romeo and Juliet” sue for more than $500 million over nude scene shot when they were teens

    Stars of 1968’s “Romeo and Juliet” sue for more than $500 million over nude scene shot when they were teens

    [ad_1]

    The two stars of 1968’s “Romeo and Juliet” sued Paramount Pictures for more than $500 million on Tuesday over a nude scene in the film shot when they were teens.

    Olivia Hussey, then 15 and now 71, and Leonard Whiting, then 16 now 72, filed the suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court alleging sexual abuse, sexual harassment and fraud.

    Director Franco Zeffirelli, who died in 2019, initially told the two that they would wear flesh-colored undergarments in the bedroom scene that comes late in the movie and was shot on the final days of filming, the suit alleges.

    Romeo and Juliet Lawsuit
    “Romeo and Juliette” movie director Franco Zeffirelli, left, actors Olivia Hussey, center, and Leonard Whiting are seen after the Parisian premiere of the film in Paris on Sept. 25, 1968. 

    Eustache Cardenas / AP


    But on the morning of the shoot, Zeffirelli told Whiting, who played Romeo, and Hussey, who played Juliet, that they would wear only body makeup, while still assuring them the camera would be positioned in a way that would not show nudity, according to the suit.

    Yet they were filmed in the nude without their knowledge, in violation of California and federal laws against indecency and the exploitation of children, the suit says.

    Zeffirelli told them they must act in the nude “or the Picture would fail” and their careers would be hurt, the suit said. The actors “believed they had no choice but to act in the nude in body makeup as demanded.”

    Whiting’s bare buttocks and Hussey’s bare breasts are briefly shown during the scene.

    The film, and its theme song, were major hits at the time, and has been shown to generations of high school students studying the Shakespeare play since.

    The court filing says the Hussey and Whiting have suffered emotional damage and mental anguish for decades, and that each had careers that did not reflect the success of the movie.

    It says given that suffering and the revenue brought in by the film since its release, the actors are entitled to damages of more than $500 million.

    An email seeking comment from representatives of Paramount was not immediately returned.

    The lawsuit was filed under a California law temporarily suspending the statute of limitations for child sex abuse, which has led to a host of new lawsuits and the revival of many others that were previously dismissed.

    Hussey defended the scene in a 2018 interview with Variety, which first reported the lawsuit, for the film’s 50th anniversary.

    “Nobody my age had done that before,” she said, adding that Zeffirelli shot it tastefully. “It was needed for the film.”

    The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they have been sexually abused unless they come forward publicly, as Hussey and Whiting have.

    Leonard Whiting,Olivia Hussey
    Leonard Whiting, left, and Olivia Hussey arrive at the screening of “The Producers” at the 2018 TCM Classic Film Festival Opening Night at the TCL Chinese Theatre on April 26, 2018, in Los Angeles. 

    Photo by Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP, File


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS Evening News, January 3, 2023

    CBS Evening News, January 3, 2023

    [ad_1]

    CBS Evening News, January 3, 2023 – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Damar Hamlin in critical condition after cardiac arrest; 4 rescued after Tesla plunges off cliff in California

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 4 rescued after Tesla plunges off cliff in California

    4 rescued after Tesla plunges off cliff in California

    [ad_1]

    4 rescued after Tesla plunges off cliff in California – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The California Highway Patrol is investigating what caused a Tesla to fly off a cliff on the Pacific Coast Highway and nearly land in the ocean. Remarkably, all four people survived the 250-foot drop.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Contract Ratified Between New School and Union Workers

    New Contract Ratified Between New School and Union Workers

    [ad_1]

    Following a strike that ended late last year, part-time faculty union members ratified a new contract with the New School — home of the Parsons School of Design and its prestigious fashion program — with a 97% approval rating on Dec. 31, the university announced.

    Back in mid-November, nearly 1,800 part-time faculty at the New School went on strike, after the university failed to raise wages in pace with inflation. (UAW Local 7902 — the union of academic workers at New School and New York University — had initially asked for a 10% wage increase, against the backdrop of 8.6% inflation; the university offered 3.5% instead, which the union swiftly rejected.) It became the United States’ longest-ever strike by adjunct faculty and prompted angry parents to file a lawsuit against the school.

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • Twitter sued for nonpayment of over $136,000 in rent on its San Francisco office

    Twitter sued for nonpayment of over $136,000 in rent on its San Francisco office

    [ad_1]

    Twitter is being sued for nonpayment of $136,260 in rent on its San Francisco office, according to court papers filed Thursday in San Francisco State Court.

    The landlord of the building, Columbia Reit – 650 California LLC, alerted the social media giant that it would default on its rent if payment was not received by Dec. 21. Twitter currently occupies the 30th floor of the Hartford Building, a skyscraper located on the edge of San Francisco’s Financial District. 

    Twitter signed a seven-year lease for the office space in 2017.

    Since acquiring Twitter for $44 billion in October, its new owner, Elon Musk, has taken drastic measures to cut company costs.

    Twitter did not respond to a request from CBS News for comment.  

    Twitter account of Elon Musk
    The Twitter account of Elon Musk is displayed on a smartphone with a Twitter logo in the background.

    Nathan Stirk / Getty Images


    The platform has allegedly not paid rent on any of its global offices in weeks, including its San Francisco headquarters in the city’s Civic Center, according to reporting by The New York Times.

    The company is also being sued by Private Jet Services Group, LLC, which is alleging that Twitter has refused to pay for two charter flights in October, valued at $197,725. The suit was filed in New Hampshire District Court last month.

    Since Musk took over Twitter earlier this year, he has implemented a number of changes in addition to cost-cutting measures, including laying off half of the workforce and ending enforcement of COVID-19 misinformation rules. Last month, he announced he would step down as CEO when he finds someone to replace him  — a decision that came after conducting a Twitter poll. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Virgin Islands alleges JP Morgan knowingly “turned a blind eye” to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes in federal lawsuit

    U.S. Virgin Islands alleges JP Morgan knowingly “turned a blind eye” to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes in federal lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Jeffrey Epstein accusers sue big banks for enabling and profiting from sex trafficking


    Jeffrey Epstein accusers sue big banks for enabling and profiting from sex trafficking

    00:32

    The attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands filed a lawsuit this week against JP Morgan Chase, alleging that the banking giant benefited from Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sex trafficking enterprise and helped conceal the ongoing exploitation of women and girls at his property on Little St. James.

    The suit, filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, accuses JP Morgan of providing banking services to Epstein even after he became a registered sex offender in the U.S. Virgin Islands following his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution in Palm Beach, Florida. It also accuses the financial institution of failing to comply with federal regulations, including records and reporting requirements that may have flagged Epstein’s crimes to U.S. officials before they eventually came to light, in a deliberate attempt to hide Epstein’s suspicious activities.

    “Financial institutions can connect — or choke — human trafficking networks, and enforcement actions filed and injunctive relief obtained by attorneys general are essential to ensure that enterprises like Epstein’s cannot flourish in the future,” the attorney general wrote in Tuesday’s complaint.

    Epstein, a former financier and the long-time partner of British ex-socialite and convicted criminal Ghislaine Maxwell, died by apparent suicide in August 2019 in his jail cell at New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he was being held without bail while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.

    Epstein allegedly recruited, groomed and sexually abused dozens of women and underaged girls over the course of decades and at multiple properties that he owned across the globe, according to a grand jury’s indictment. Maxwell was convicted last year of several sex trafficking charges connected to Epstein and his crimes, including sex trafficking a minor and transporting a minor for purposes related to criminal sexual activity. She was sentenced this past summer to 20 years in federal prison.

    Denise N. George, the attorney general for the U.S. Virgin Islands, initially brought a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate on Little St. James, one of two private islands that he owned within the territory, and its two co-executors. George announced in early December that the co-executors had agreed to pay $105 million in cash along with half of the proceeds from the sale of Little St. James to the U.S. Virgin Islands for allegedly violating the islands’ laws prohibiting corruption, sex trafficking and sexual servitude.

    GettyImages-590696434.jpg
    Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell attend de Grisogono Sponsors The 2005 Wall Street Concert Series Benefitting Wall Street Rising on March 15, 2005, in New York City.

    Photo by Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images


    In the new lawsuit, George alleges that JP Morgan willingly “turned a blind eye to evidence of human trafficking for more than a decade because of Epstein’s own financial footprint,” and because he consistently brought profitable business deals and clientele to the bank.

    A government investigation into sex trafficking operations at Epstein’s estate on the private island — which he owned from 1998 until his death, and where victims have said in various testimonies that many of his crimes occurred — uncovered evidence that JP Morgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully provided and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the Epstein trafficking enterprise,” the lawsuit alleges.

    “JP Morgan facilitated and concealed wire and cash transactions that raised suspicion of — and were in fact part of — a criminal enterprise whose currency was the sexual servitude of dozens of women and girls in and beyond the Virgin Islands,” the complaint continues. “Human trafficking was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JP Morgan.”

    It goes on to allege that the bank “facilitated, sustained, and concealed the human trafficking network operated by Jeffrey Epstein from his home and base in the Virgin Islands, and financially benefitted from this participation, directly or indirectly, by failing to comply with federal banking regulations.”

    The latest complaint arrived about one month after two of Epstein’s accusers sued both JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank for allegedly making millions of dollars in profits off of their relationships with him and his criminal enterprise.

    JP Morgan has not yet publicly acknowledged the Virgin Islands’ federal lawsuit. CBS News contacted the bank for comment but did not receive an immediate reply.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kari Lake’s lawsuit over defeat in Arizona governor’s race thrown out by judge

    Kari Lake’s lawsuit over defeat in Arizona governor’s race thrown out by judge

    [ad_1]

    A judge has thrown out Republican Kari Lake’s challenge of her defeat in the Arizona governor’s race to Democrat Katie Hobbs, rejecting her claim that problems with ballot printers at some polling places on Election Day were the result of intentional misconduct. 

    In a decision Saturday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson, who was appointed by then-Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, found that the court did not find clear and convincing evidence of the widespread misconduct that Lake had alleged had affected the result of the 2022 general election.

    Following Thompson’s decision, Lake said on Twitter that she would appeal.

    Lake, who lost to Hobbs by just over 17,000 votes, was among the most vocal 2022 Republicans promoting former President Donald Trump’s election lies, which she made the centerpiece of her campaign. While most of the other election deniers around the country conceded after losing their races in November, Lake has not. Instead, she asked the judge to either declare her the winner or order a revote in Maricopa County.

    Lawyers for Lake focused on problems with ballot printers at some polling places in Maricopa County, home to more than 60% of Arizona’s voters. The defective printers produced ballots that were too light to be read by the on-site tabulators at polling places. Lines backed up in some areas amid the confusion.

    County officials say everyone had a chance to vote and all ballots were counted, since ballots affected by the printers were taken to more sophisticated counters at the elections department headquarters. They are in the process of investigating the root cause of the printer problems.

    Kari Lake speaks during a gathering known as America Fest, an event organized by Turning Point USA, in Phoenix, Arizona, December 20, 2022.
    Kari Lake speaks during a gathering known as America Fest, an event organized by Turning Point USA, in Phoenix, Arizona, December 20, 2022.

    Reuters/Jim Urquhart


    Lake’s attorneys also claimed the chain of custody for ballots was broken at an off-site facility, where a contractor scans mail ballots to prepare them for processing. They claim workers at the facility put their own mail ballots into the pile, rather than sending their ballots through normal channels, and also that paperwork documenting the transfer of ballots was missing. The county disputes the claim.

    Lake faced extremely long odds in her challenge, needing to prove not only that misconduct occurred, but also that it was intended to deny her victory and did in fact result in the wrong woman being declared the winner.

    Her attorneys pointed to a witness who examined ballots on behalf of her campaign and discovered 14 ballots that had 19-inch images of the ballot printed on 20-inch paper, meaning the ballots wouldn’t be read by a tabulator. The witness insisted someone changed those printer configurations, a claim disputed by elections officials.

    County officials say the ballot images were slightly smaller as a result of a shrink-to-fit feature being selected on a printer by an employee who was looking for solutions to Election Day issues. They say about 1,200 ballots were affected by turning on the feature and that those ballots were duplicated so that they could be read by a tabulator. Ultimately, these ballots were counted, officials said.

    A person who takes public-opinion polls testified on behalf of Lake, claiming technical problems at polling places had disenfranchised enough voters that it would have changed the outcome of the race in Lake’s favor. But an expert who was called to testify by election officials said there was no evidence to back up the pollster’s claim that 25,000 to 40,000 people who would normally have voted actually didn’t cast ballots as a result of Election Day problems.

    Thompson had previously dismissed eight of the 10 claims Lake raised in her lawsuit. Among those were Lake’s allegation that Hobbs, in her capacity as secretary of state, and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer engaged in censorship by flagging social media posts with election misinformation for possible removal by Twitter. He also dismissed her claims of discrimination against Republicans and that mail-in voting procedures are illegal.

    Hobbs takes office as governor on Jan. 2.

    Earlier on Friday, another judge dismissed Republican Abraham Hamadeh’s challenge of results in his race against Democrat Kris Mayes for Arizona attorney general. The court concluded that Hamadeh, who finished 511 votes behind Mayes and hasn’t conceded the race, didn’t prove the errors in vote counting that he had alleged.

    A court hearing is scheduled for Thursday to present results of recounts in the races for attorney general, state superintendent and for a state legislative seat.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘I Knew What I Was Doing Was Wrong,’ Says FTX Co-Founder

    ‘I Knew What I Was Doing Was Wrong,’ Says FTX Co-Founder

    [ad_1]

    The situation is getting worse for Sam Bankman-Fried, whose crypto empire went bankrupt just days after being at the center of the crypto sphere. 

    The regulators, who are trying to piece together what happened, and especially how the FTX cryptocurrency exchange, which was valued at $32 billion in February, could implode overnight. 

    In addition to FTX, Bankman-Fried, known by the initials SBF, also founded Alameda Research, a hedge fund that also served as a trading platform for cryptocurrencies and other crypto-related financial products for institutional investors.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cowboys owner Jerry Jones ordered to take paternity test

    Cowboys owner Jerry Jones ordered to take paternity test

    [ad_1]

    A judge has ordered Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones to take a paternity test as part of a legal dispute with a 26-year-old woman who claims the billionaire is her biological father.

    A Texas judge issued the order for genetic testing Thursday in a paternity case brought by Alexandra Davis, who previously alleged in a separate lawsuit she was conceived from a relationship Jones had with her mother in the mid-1990s.

    Attorneys for Jones did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday, but said in court filings that they intend to appeal the decision. 

    One of Davis’ lawyers, Andrew Bergman, confirmed the decision, but did not immediately offer any other comment. In March, Davis sued Jones in Dallas County, asking a judge to void a legal agreement she said her mother, Cynthia Davis, reached with Jones two years after she was born. The 1998 settlement allegedly said that Jones would support them financially as long as they didn’t publicly say he was Alexandra’s father — something the married owner of the Cowboys denied.

    Davis dropped that case in April, saying that she would instead seek to prove that Jones is her father. She filed the paternity case that month.

    On Thursday, Associate Judge T. Jones Abendroth wrote that “after careful consideration” she would grant Davis’ motion to have Jones undergo genetic testing.

    The 80-year-old Jones and his wife, Gene, were married in 1963. They have three children, and all have front office roles with the Cowboys. Jerry Jones is the team president and general manager.

    Davis’ original lawsuit claimed that Jones “pursued” Cynthia Davis, who was also married at the time, after they met while she was working for American Airlines out of Little Rock, Arkansas.

    Their settlement allegedly called for Jones to pay Cynthia Davis $375,000 and for Alexandra Davis to receive a “certain monthly, annual and special funding” from a trust until she was 21, as well as lump sum payments when she turned 24, 26 and 28.

    Jones also made headlines recently after news outlets, including North Dakota’s CBS affiliate, reported about a controversial 1957 photo Jones was spotted in that was taken outside a high school where a group of white students appeared to be blocking a group of Black students from entering the school. Jones said he showed up to see what was going on and not to participate in the mob.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Weighted blankets recalled after 2 children die

    Weighted blankets recalled after 2 children die

    [ad_1]

    Weighted blankets recalled after 2 children die – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Target is recalling 204,000 weighted blankets after two children suffocated. The Consumer Product Safety Commission said two girls, ages 4 and 6, died in April after becoming trapped in the cover of a pillow fort blanket.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stalkers use Apple AirTags to track victims, lawsuit claims

    Stalkers use Apple AirTags to track victims, lawsuit claims

    [ad_1]

    Stalkers use Apple AirTags to track victims, lawsuit claims – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    At least two women have filed a class-action lawsuit against Apple, claiming their ex-partners used AirTags to track and stalk them. Lilia Luciano has more details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Now Awaiting Answers on Their Respective Appeals

    Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Now Awaiting Answers on Their Respective Appeals

    [ad_1]

    On November 23, Amber Heard, by way of her latest legal team at Ballard Spahr, filed her brief to appeal the verdict in her ex-husband Johnny Depp’s defamation case against her. After the trial, a six-week public spectacle streamed from a Fairfax County, Virginia, courtroom from April to June, a jury found Heard responsible for three counts of defamation and awarded more than $10 million in damages to Depp. 

    Heard hired a new firm post-trial, and the team is now led by First Amendment stars Jay Ward Brown and David L. Axelrod. The opening brief lays out several grounds for appeal in Judge Penney Azcarate’s proceedings, and these indeed include First Amendment arguments. The Washington Post op-ed that Depp sued Heard over, claiming it had a “devastating” effect on his career, was published in 2018 and written by Heard in coordination with the American Civil Liberties Union; it supported legislative protections for domestic abuse victims. She didn’t use his name in it and described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” The argument is that her op-ed could be considered just that: an opinion. 

    “The trial court also erred in overruling Heard’s demurrer, in which she argued that the challenged statements are non-actionable expressions of opinion and are not reasonably capable of conveying the alleged defamatory implication,” the filing reads (Deadline published the appellate brief in full). “That holding, if allowed to stand, undoubtedly will have a chilling effect on other women who wish to speak about abuse involving powerful men.”

    The appeal also argues that the trial should have never moved forward in the first place. The court in Virginia was not the appropriate forum to hold the trial since the claims had no real connection to the state and neither party had spent any significant time there, it argues. (Depp’s camp successfully previously argued that because The Washington Post was published in Virginia, the case fell within that jurisdiction. The Post was not implicated in the case.) Additionally, the brief states that since a judge in London’s High Court had found more than 10 of Heard’s accusations about Depp’s domestic abuse to be “substantially true,” the American trial should not have had to move forward. (Depp sued the publisher of The Sun in the UK in 2018 for a headline describing him as a “wife-beater,” but was unable to disprove the designation in court and lost. While he sought to appeal, his request was denied.)

    As for the US trial, the brief claims that when it did ultimately go forward, there were issues regarding evidence both admitted and prohibited, as well as Depp’s lack of proof around actual malice and the instructions given to the jury around actual malice. “First, [Depp] did not demonstrate that Heard was aware of and intended to communicate the alleged defamatory implication that he had abused her,” it reads. “Second, he did not establish that Heard knew the alleged implication was false or subjectively entertained serious doubts about its truth. The trial court erred in declining to set aside the jury verdict and enter judgment in Heard’s favor.”

    “The trial court then refused Heard’s proposed jury instruction on the ‘communicative intent’ prong of actual malice,” it continues. “Consequently, the jury instructions were missing a key requirement for establishing a defamation-by-implication claim.” 

    Heard is not the only one appealing the jury’s decisions in the springtime trial. After Heard countersued Depp for $100 million, she won on one of the three counts of defamation. Adam Waldman, a lawyer for Depp at the time, had given a statement to the Daily Mail in 2020 amid Depp’s other defamation case against the publisher of The Sun, saying that Heard’s claims of abuse were a “hoax.” Heard’s team claimed Depp was “vicariously liable” for his representation’s statements, and the jury agreed in that one instance, awarding her $2 million. Depp’s attorneys have already filed to appeal this decision. 

    Both appeals are now under review in Virginia.

    [ad_2]

    Kenzie Bryant

    Source link

  • Indiana judge won’t block probe over 10-year-old’s abortion

    Indiana judge won’t block probe over 10-year-old’s abortion

    [ad_1]

    Indiana’s Republican attorney general may continue to investigate an Indianapolis doctor who spoke publicly about providing an abortion to a 10-year-old rape victim from neighboring Ohio, a judge ruled Friday.

    An attempt to block a probe by Attorney General Todd Rokita’s office was rejected by Marion County Judge Heather Welch. She also ruled Friday in a separate lawsuit that Indiana’s abortion ban adopted in August violates the state’s religious freedom law signed by then-Gov. Mike Pence in 2015. The Indiana abortion ban, however, has been on hold since mid-September as courts consider a challenge from abortion clinic operators who argue the ban violates the state constitution.

    The judge’s ruling on the investigation into Dr. Caitlin Bernard came two days after the attorney general’s office asked the state medical licensing board to discipline Bernard, alleging she violated state law by not reporting the girl’s child abuse to Indiana authorities and broke patient privacy laws by telling a newspaper reporter about the girl’s treatment.

    That account sparked a national political uproar in the weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, with some news outlets and Republican politicians suggesting Bernard fabricated the story. The girl had been unable to get an abortion in Ohio after a more restrictive abortion law took effect there.

    Bernard filed a lawsuit against the state attorney general last month, arguing Rokita’s office was wrongly justifying the investigation with “frivolous” consumer complaints submitted by people with no personal knowledge about the girl’s treatment. Bernard and her lawyers maintain the girl’s abuse had already been reported to Ohio police before the doctor ever saw the child.

    But the judge turned down Bernard’s request for an injunction to block the investigation. Welch ruled the medical licensing board now had jurisdiction over the matter since the attorney general filed the complaint on Wednesday. That complaint asked the state medical licensing board to impose “appropriate disciplinary action” without specifying a proposed penalty. The board, which has the authority to suspend, revoke or place on probation a doctor’s license, said Friday it had received the complaint but that no hearing date had been set.

    Welch, however, found that Rokita wrongly made public comments about investigating Bernard before the complaint was filed. Welch wrote that Rokita’s statements “are clearly unlawful breaches of the licensing investigations statute’s requirement that employees of the Attorney General’s Office maintain confidentiality over pending investigations until they are so referred to prosecution.”

    Bernard’s lawyer, Kathleen DeLaney, criticized Rokita for violating his “duty of confidentiality” and preemptively pushing the case to the medical board, thus “taking it out of the hands of Judge Welch.”

    “We are confident in the record and testimony that we have already developed and look forward to presenting Dr. Bernard’s evidence to the Medical Licensing Board,” DeLaney said.

    The attorney general’s office said the ruling supported protection of patient privacy rights.

    “The doctor and her attorneys initiated this media frenzy from the beginning, and it continues to draw attention to this innocent little girl who is trying to cope with a horrific trauma,” the office said in a statement that did not address the judge’s criticism of Rokita’s public comments on the case.

    Bernard provided abortion drugs to the girl in Indianapolis in late June, as she said doctors determined the girl was unable to have an abortion in neighboring Ohio. That’s because Ohio’s “fetal heartbeat” law had taken effect with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to end women’s constitutional protections for abortion. Such laws ban abortions from the time cardiac activity can be detected in an embryo, which is typically around the sixth week of pregnancy.

    Rokita has kept the investigation going even after a 27-year-old man was charged in Columbus, Ohio, with raping the girl and public records obtained by The Associated Press show Bernard met Indiana’s required three-day reporting period for an abortion performed on a girl younger than 16.

    In Welch’s ruling on the state’s abortion ban, the judge sided with five residents — who hold Jewish, Muslim and spiritual faiths — who argued that the ban would violate their religious rights on when they believe abortion is acceptable.

    “The undisputed evidence establishes that the Plaintiffs do not share the State’s belief that life begins at fertilization or that abortion constitutes the intentional taking of a human life,” Welch wrote. “To the contrary, they have different religious beliefs about when life begins. … Under the law, the Court finds these are sincere religious beliefs.”

    Rokita’s office, which has been defending the abortion ban in court, did not immediately comment on the religious freedom lawsuit ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Uvalde Shooting Victims Seek $27 Billion, Class Action Lawsuit

    Uvalde Shooting Victims Seek $27 Billion, Class Action Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Victims of the Uvalde school shooting that left 21 people dead have filed a lawsuit against local and state police, the city and other school and law enforcement officials seeking $27 billion due to delays in confronting the attacker, court documents show.

    The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Austin on Tuesday, says officials failed to follow active shooter protocol when they waited more than an hour to confront the attacker inside a fourth-grade classroom.

    It seeks class action status and damages for survivors of the May 24 shooting who have sustained “emotional or psychological damages as a result of the defendants’ conduct and omissions on that date.”

    Among those who filed the lawsuit are school staff and representatives of minors who were present at Robb Elementary when a gunman stormed the campus, killing 19 children and two teachers in the deadliest school shooting in the U.S. in nearly a decade.

    Instead of following previous training to stop an active shooter “the conduct of the three hundred and seventy-six (376) law enforcement officials who were on hand for the exhaustively torturous seventy- seven minutes of law enforcement indecision, dysfunction, and harm, fell exceedingly short of their duty bound standards,” the lawsuit claims.

    City of Uvalde officials said they had not been served the paperwork as of Friday and did not comment on pending litigation.

    The Texas Department of Public Safety and the Uvalde Consolidated School District did not respond to requests for comment.

    A group of the survivors also sued Daniel Defense, the company that made the gun used by the shooter, and the store where he bought the gun. That separate lawsuit seeks $6 billion in damages.

    Daniel Defense, based in Black Creek, Georgia, did not respond to a request for comment. In a congressional hearing over the summer, CEO Marty Daniels called the Uvalde shooting and others like it “deeply disturbing” but separated the weapons themselves from the violence, saying America’s mass shootings are local problems to be solved locally.

    Earlier this week, the mother of a child killed in the shooting filed another federal lawsuit against many of the same people and entities.

    Two officers have been fired because of their actions at the scene and others have resigned or been placed on leave. In October, Col. Steve McCraw, the head of the Texas Department of Public Safety, acknowledged mistakes by officers when confronted for the first time by families of the Uvalde victims over false and shifting accounts from law enforcement and lack of transparency in the available information. But McCraw defended his agency, saying they “did not fail” Uvalde.

    [ad_2]

    Source link