ReportWire

Tag: labor

  • Disney Springs Patina Restaurant Group workers seek to organize, ask employer for fair union process

    Disney Springs Patina Restaurant Group workers seek to organize, ask employer for fair union process

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    photo by McKenna Schueler

    Julie Ruiz, an employee of Pizza Ponte at Disney Springs, at the public launch of a new organizing campaign with Unite Here. (April 29, 2024)

    Workers at five nonunion restaurants at Disney Springs in Orlando announced plans to unionize Monday, and are calling on their employer to allow for a fair process, free from unlawful intimidation.

    Unlike the tens of thousands of Disney World employees who have been unionized for decades, the roughly 300 workers at Enzo’s Hideaway, Pizza Ponte, Morimoto Asia, Maria and Enzo’s, and The Edison — all subcontracted restaurants on Disney property — are technically employed by the Patina Restaurant Group, owned by Delaware North.

    These five restaurants, scattered throughout the parks’ dining and shopping district, are currently nonunion, even though two others that are owned by Delaware North at Epcot’s Italy Pavilion — Tutto Italia and Via Napoli — are already unionized.

    Employees of the restaurants at Disney Springs say they feel like “second-class citizens” compared to unionized Disney workers, and say they are denied access to full-time job benefits like paid time off and sick leave despite being expected to have full-time availability.  Wages for workers at these restaurants are also comparatively lower than those negotiated by unions at other restaurants owned and operated by the Walt Disney Co.

    click to enlarge Enzo’s Hideaway is one of five Disney Springs restaurants whose workers plan to unionize. - Photo via Enzo’s Hideaway/Facebook

    Photo via Enzo’s Hideaway/Facebook

    Enzo’s Hideaway is one of five Disney Springs restaurants whose workers plan to unionize.

    Now, they’re organizing with Unite Here Local 737, a labor union that represents roughly 18,000 Disney World employees, to change that.

    “We’re on Disney property,” said Andrea Molineros, a part-time employee at Maria & Enzo’s who also works part-time job as a server at Disney’s Grand Floridian — a union job. “We should be given the same respect and be treated as equals,” said Molineros, a mom of one and a shop steward for her union at the Grand Floridian.

    The announcement of this new organizing drive comes less than a month after Disneyland performers in Anaheim, California, officially filed their own petition to unionize with Actors Equity.

    This move follows in the footsteps of their counterparts in Orlando’s Disney World, where character performers first organized with the Teamsters in the 1980s.

    Altogether, a group of six labor unions, collectively known as the Service Trades Council Union, represent over 40,000 Disney World theme park workers in Orlando, ranging from Disney’s character performers to ride operators, food service workers, housekeepers, lifeguards and more.

    This is a developing post.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • United Auto Workers reaches deal with Daimler Truck, averting potential strike in North Carolina

    United Auto Workers reaches deal with Daimler Truck, averting potential strike in North Carolina

    [ad_1]

    The United Auto Workers union announced it reached a last-minute tentative agreement with truck and bus manufacturer Daimler Truck on Friday evening, averting a potential strike of more than 7,000 workers

    The United Auto Workers union announced it reached a last-minute tentative agreement with truck and bus manufacturer Daimler Truck, averting a potential strike of more than 7,000 workers.

    The union struck a four-year agreement with the German company on Friday evening, just before the expiration of the previous contract, which was enacted six years ago. It covers workers at various plants in North Carolina — where Daimler makes Thomas Built Buses, Freightliner and Western Star trucks — as well as distribution centers in Atlanta and Memphis, Tennessee.

    In an online speech, UAW President Shawn Fain said the new contract includes wage increases of more than 25% over the next four years, including a 10% raise after the deal is ratified. Fain said the deal also includes the end wage tiers at the company, as well as cost-of-living adjustments and “profit sharing for the first time in Daimler history.”

    “When that deadline came closer, the company was suddenly ready to talk,” Fain said. “So tonight, we celebrate.”

    Union members still need to approve the agreement.

    “The UAW members at these locations will now be asked to vote on the new contracts, and we hope to finalize them soon, for the mutual benefit of all parties,” Daimler said in a statement.

    The Daimler deal comes amid a broad campaign by the UAW to organize southern auto assembly plants following lucrative new contracts in a confrontation with Detroit’s automakers. Last week, 73% of those voting at a Volkswagen AG plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, chose to join the UAW. It was the union’s first in a southern assembly plant owned by a foreign automaker.

    Workers at Mercedes factories in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, will vote on UAW representation in May. However, UAW’s efforts have sparked pushback from Republican governors and business leaders in the South.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JetBlue accused of anti-union intimidation tactics at Orlando International Airport

    JetBlue accused of anti-union intimidation tactics at Orlando International Airport

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Orlando International Airport (MCO) Facebook

    Low-cost airline JetBlue has been called out for alleged interference in employees’ organizing efforts, with at least two local members of Congress joining a call from the Congressional Labor Caucus to cut it out.

    Orlando’s U.S. House Rep. Maxwell Frost joined a bipartisan group of 160 members of Congress in penning a letter to JetBlue Wednesday, asking the company to cease “anti-union” tactics alleged by the country’s largest airline workers’ union, and to allow their employees to have a “free and fair choice” to join a union.

    “As is required by law, unionization efforts must be permitted to occur free from interference, whether from supervisors or organizations at-large,” reads a letter led by members of the Congressional Labor Caucus, sent to JetBlue CEO Joanna Geraghty, on Wednesday.

    “It has come to our attention that there have been instances of anti-organizing interference at JetBlue from management,” the letter adds.

    Over the last year, two groups of aviation mechanics and air dispatchers forJetBlue have been organizing with the Transport Workers Union, a labor union that represents over 155,000 workers in the railway, airline, transit, university, and service sectors, including Jet Blue flight attendants.

    According to the union, the workers’ organizing campaigns have faced consistent opposition from JetBlue management, despite provisions of the Railway Labor Act that strictly prohibit employers from interfering with workers’ right to organize and collectively bargain.

    In light of that, a sizable group of Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress have urged JetBlue to adopt what’s known as a union neutrality agreement.

    This would essentially establish a commitment from JetBlue not to interfere with, or attempt to sway employees on matters related to their lawfully protected right to organize.

    “Your commitment to neutrality would ensure that management does not pressure workers into voting against unionization or delaying the election process, and it would signal to workers that supporting an organizing drive would not negatively impact their employment,” the letter from the Congressional members reads.

    Notably, Maxwell Frost is the only Central Florida-area member of Congress who officially signed onto the letter.

    Orlando Weekly reached out to Rep. Darren Soto — also an ally to organized labor — who confirmed in a statement that he similarly supports the union’s efforts “to give JetBlue workers the opportunity to unionize free from intimidation and harassment.”

    However, instead of joining his colleagues, Soto decided to write his own, separate letter to JetBlue yesterday. In this letter, Soto asked the company to please follow the law, while adding that  he “appreciate[s] JetBlue’s continued commitment to and investment in Orlando.”

    According to Transport Workers Union president John Samuelsen, who’s based out of New York, the letter featuring signatures from 155 members of Congress (not including Soto) is a direct response to what Samuelsen describes as a “draconian crackdown” on JetBlue employees’ union drive.

    “They have responded to every single organizing drive with the most anti-trade union, anti-worker aggression of any employer in the country,” Samuelsen told Orlando Weekly, “especially of any employer in the airline industry.”

    And that’s saying something. Delta Airlines is notorious in the labor movement for its yearslong effort to remain the only major U.S. airline without a unionized workforce of flight attendants.

    “They’re worse than Delta,” Samuelsen said.

    Photos posted online Wednesday by the TWU show anti-union flyers and other materials ostensibly posted in employee break rooms, airport lounges, and other spots that workers frequent, including areas at Orlando International Airport (MCO), one of the busiest air hubs in the country.

    “There’s a reason union promises may sound too good to be true — they often are,” one white-and-blue flyer, apparently posted somewhere at MCO, reads. “A union can promise whatever it wants, but can’t guarantee anything,” the flyer adds (which is ironic, since — unlike a union contract — neither can the boss!)

    click to enlarge An anti-union flyer reportedly posted by JetBlue management at MCO. - Transport Workers Union

    Transport Workers Union

    An anti-union flyer reportedly posted by JetBlue management at MCO.

    In some ways, the company’s opposition is unsurprising, since they’ve opposed union drives before. The TWU, for instance, already represents JetBlue flight instructors and JetBlue flight attendants — who voted to unionize with TWU in 2018, despite opposition from the company then, too.

    Back in 2019, The Guardian reported on anti-union messaging that JetBlue had continued to pass along to a separate group of airport operations agents and others who were similarly organizing with the union.

    Over email, for instance, JetBlue CEO Geraghty reportedly urged employees in 2019 to decline to sign a union card, arguing the union would never be able to provide them with the same “accomplishment” that JetBlue has.

    According to an email reviewed by The Guardian, this included things like holiday parties, a new app launch, and bag scanners.

    “Don’t be fooled — the grass is not greener on the other side of the fence and you don’t have to look over that fence to see what unions have done (or failed to do) at other airlines,” Geraghty reportedly wrote.

    When reached for comment Thursday, a spokesperson for JetBlue called TWU’s allegations of anti-union behavior from company management “inaccurate.”

    “After hearing from union organizers, our crewmembers often ask us to share our perspectives so that they can consider multiple points of view and we have a responsibility to participate in the discussion,” an unnamed spokesperson shared over email. “We work very hard to make JetBlue a great place to work, and in many cases, our crewmembers have preferred the direct relationship over unionization.”

    JetBlue also denies any unlawful behavior. “Our track record shows that we fully comply with the law and respect our crewmembers’ right to decide without interference,” the company spokesperson added.

    Samuelsen, however, said that JetBlue employees have told union staffers they’re being intimidated on the job. “JetBlue is in the process of trying to intimidate the living daylights out of every single worker not to sign a card,” he shared.

    “They have responded to every single organizing drive with the most anti-trade union, anti-worker aggression of any employer in the country”

    tweet this

    Job termination, for instance, has been a big concern. According to Samuelsen, the issue of job security is what sparked “renewed interest” in organizing among the airline’s nonunion workforce. This reared its head especially when JetBlue announced plans to acquire Spirit Airlines back in 2022. Such a merger, Samuelsen said, “would destabilize everything.”

    The controversial merger was called off last month, weeks after a federal judge blocked the deal, but Samuelsen says the desire for better job protections and job security that a union can lock down in a contract is unchanged.

    “Workers have stepped up and embraced the moment,” he said. At this point, their campaign — spread across different air hubs throughout the country — is largely being driven by rank-and-file committees of employees at these different sites and full-time staff union organizers who help spread the word on-the-ground.

    Meanwhile, members of the Transport Workers Union at Southwest Airlines this week just ratified a new contract covering more than 21,000 of Southwest’s flight attendants, after a majority rejected a previous deal reached in December that members felt wasn’t up to par.

    According to the union, the deal delivers a 22.3 percent raise for Southwest flight attendants, effective May 1, as well as paid maternal and parental leave, additional pay for work done on the ground (instead of solely on the plane), and pay protections for flight attendants who are injured on the job.

    This post has been updated to clarify that the congressional letter was signed by 160 members of Congress. An earlier version stated 155.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Flight attendants at Southwest Airlines seal deal for 22% pay hikes next month

    Flight attendants at Southwest Airlines seal deal for 22% pay hikes next month

    [ad_1]

    Flight attendants at Southwest Airlines have ratified a contract that includes pay raises totaling more than 33% over four years, as airline workers continue to benefit from the industry’s recovery since the pandemic.

    The Transport Workers Union said Wednesday that members of Local 556 approved the contract by a margin of 81% to 19%. The union’s board rejected a lower offer last summer, and flight attendants voted against a second proposal in December.

    Southwest has about 20,000 flight attendants. They will get raises of more than 22% on May 1 and annual increases of 3% in each of the following three years.

    The union said the contract provides record gains for flight attendants and sets a standard for other flight attendants. Cabin crews at United Airlines and American Airlines, which are represented by other unions, are still negotiating contracts.

    The union said the deal gives Southwest crews the shortest on-duty day and highest pay in the industry, compensation during disruptions like the Southwest meltdown in December 2022, and industry-first paid maternity and parental leave. Workers will also split $364 million in ratification bonuses, according to the union.

    Dallas-based Southwest, the nation’s fourth-biggest airline, said the contract includes changes in scheduling and will help the airline’s operation.

    Pilot unions at Delta, United, American and Southwest approved contracts last year that raised pay by more than one-third over several years. This week, Delta said its flight attendants and other nonunion workers will get 5% raises.

    Subscribe to the CFO Daily newsletter to keep up with the trends, issues, and executives shaping corporate finance. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • New federal rule would bar ‘noncompete’ agreements for most employees

    New federal rule would bar ‘noncompete’ agreements for most employees

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — U.S. companies would no longer be able to bar employees from taking jobs with competitors under a rule approved by a federal agency Tuesday, though the rule is sure to be challenged in court.

    The Federal Trade Commission voted Tuesday 3-2 to ban measures known as noncompete agreements, which bar workers from jumping to or starting competing companies for a prescribed period of time. According to the FTC, 30 million people — roughly one in five workers — are now subject to such restrictions.

    The Biden administration has taken aim at noncompete measures, which are commonly associated with high-level executives at technology and financial companies but in recent years have also ensnared lower-paid workers, such as security guards and sandwich-shop employees. A 2021 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis found that more than one in 10 workers who earn $20 or less an hour are covered by noncompete agreements.

    When it proposed the ban in January 2023, FTC officials asserted that noncompete agreements harm workers by reducing their ability to switch jobs for higher pay, a step that often provides most workers with their biggest pay increases. By reducing overall churn in the job market, the agency argued, the measures also disadvantage workers who aren’t covered by them because fewer jobs become available as fewer people leave their positions. They can also hurt the economy overall by limiting the ability of other businesses to hire needed employees, the FTC said.

    The rule, which doesn’t apply to workers at non-profits, is to take effect in four months unless it is blocked by legal challenges.

    “Noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas and rob the American economy of dynamism,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said. “We heard from employees who, because of noncompetes, were stuck in abusive workplaces.”

    Some doctors, she added, have been prevented from practicing medicine after leaving practices.

    Business groups have criticized the measure as casting too wide a net by blocking nearly all noncompetes. They argue that highly paid executives are often able to win greater pay in return for accepting a noncompete.

    “It’ll represent a sea change,” said Amanda Sonneborn, a partner at King & Spalding in Chicago who represents employers that use noncompetes. “They don’t want somebody to go to a competitor and take their customer list or take their information about their business strategy to that competitor.”

    But Alexander Hertzel-Fernandez, a professor at Columbia University who is a former Biden administration Labor Department official, argued that lower-income workers don’t have the ability to negotiate over such provisions.

    “When they get their job offer,” he said, “it’s really a take-it-or-leave-it-as-a-whole,” he said.

    The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said Tuesday that it will file a lawsuit to block the rule. It accused the FTC of overstepping its authority.

    “Noncompete agreements are either upheld or dismissed under well-established state laws governing their use,” said Suzanne Clark, the chamber’s CEO. “Yet today, three unelected commissioners have unilaterally decided they have the authority to declare what’s a legitimate business decision and what’s not by moving to ban noncompete agreements in all sectors of the economy.”

    Two Republican appointees to the FTC, Melissa Holyoak and Andrew Ferguson, voted against the proposal. They asserted that the agency was exceeding its authority by approving such a sweeping rule.

    Noncompete agreements are banned in three states, including California, and some opponents of noncompetes argue that California’s ban has been a key contributor to that state’s innovative tech economy.

    John Lettieri, CEO of the Economic Innovation Group, a tech-backed think tank, argues that the ability of early innovators to leave one company and start a competitor was key to the development of the semiconductor industry.

    “The birth of so many important foundational companies could not have happened, at least not in the same way or on the same timeline and definitely not in the same place, had it not been for the ability of entrepreneurs to spin out, start their own companies, or go to a better company,” Lettieri said.

    The White House has been stepping up its efforts to protect workers as the presidential campaign heats up. On Tuesday, the Labor Department issued a rule that would guarantee overtime pay for more lower-paid workers. The rule would increase the required minimum salary level to exempt an employee from overtime pay, from about $35,600 currently to nearly $43,900 effective July 1 and $58,700 by Jan. 1, 2025.

    Companies will be required to pay overtime for workers below those thresholds who work more than 40 hours a week.

    “This rule will restore the promise to workers that if you work more than 40 hours in a week, you should be paid more for that time,” said Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Orlando-area union Starbucks workers weigh in on Supreme Court case

    Orlando-area union Starbucks workers weigh in on Supreme Court case

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Supreme Court today is set to hear oral arguments in a legal battle between Starbucks, the multibillion-dollar retail coffee chain that moonlights as a rather aggressive union-buster, and the National Labor Relations Board, the federal agency that oversees private-sector labor relations.

    At the heart of the issue is the federal labor board’s authority to order Starbucks to rehire seven workers at a location in Memphis, Tennessee, that Starbucks is accused of firing in retaliation for organizing a union at their store.

    The so-called “Memphis 7” were fired just days after announcing their intent to unionize with Starbucks Workers United, in what the workers say was a violation of their federally protected right to organize.

    Starbucks, however, has claimed the workers were fired due to violating company policy by reopening a store after hours without consent and allowing journalists into the store.

    The NLRB, an agency that’s been inundated with allegations of unfair labor practices against Starbucks, hasn’t bought into the company’s explanation.

    While an investigation into the firings is ongoing, a federal judge approved a request by the agency to order that the seven workers be reinstated. That was later upheld by an appeals court. Starbucks, however, has disputed the standard that allowed for the labor board to order that the company offer reinstatement to the workers.

    All in all, at least 420 Starbucks locations across the United States, representing over 10,000 workers, have unionized since December 2021, including a single location in the Central Florida region — at the 305 E. Mitchell Hammock Road store in Oviedo.

    Baristas at that store overwhelmingly voted to unionize in June 2022, citing a desire to advocate for higher wages — to keep up with the region’s higher cost of living — in addition to a credit card tipping option and other improvements to working conditions.

    Roy Sistovaris, one of the earliest union activists at the store, previously told us that he and his co-workers were inspired by the Starbucks unionization wave spreading across the country, even early on.

    “I just looked at one of my co-workers, and I was like, what if I just sent them [the union] an email? What if I just did it?” he recalled. “And she was like, ‘Hell yeah, man. Just do it.’ And I was like, man, whatever. So I did.”

    Back then, just 70 Starbucks locations were unionized. Now, the number of unionized locations has more than tripled (with one of the more recent victories being at a Starbucks location in Miami).

    And that’s despite frustrating delays in negotiating an initial union contract (also known as a collective bargaining agreement) that Starbucks has been accused of prolonging in an effort to weaken workers’ support for unionization.

    Clay Blastic, a shift supervisor at the union Starbucks in Oviedo, told Orlando Weekly over text on Tuesday that he hopes the Supreme Court “makes the right decision” in the Memphis case. “But I’m not holding my breath,” he added.

    Blastic also confirmed that — like other unionized stores across the country — workers at the Oviedo Starbucks did finally get their credit card tipping option back last week, after having that option formally rolled out at the store, before being taken away.

    Essentially, this system means if someone wants to tip, they can do so when paying with a credit card, as opposed to only having a cash tipping option.

    Back in May 2022, Starbucks caved to pressure from their employees to roll out a credit card tipping system at their nonunion stores, but claimed that they couldn’t offer this to union stores. Their argument was that such a thing would have to be negotiated through the collective bargaining process (which at that point, they were stalling).

    click to enlarge Courtney Thompson (left) stands on the picket line with fellow Starbucks workers at Central Florida's only unionized Starbucks on March 22, 2023. - photo by McKenna Schueler/Orlando Weekly

    photo by McKenna Schueler/Orlando Weekly

    Courtney Thompson (left) stands on the picket line with fellow Starbucks workers at Central Florida’s only unionized Starbucks on March 22, 2023.

    The National Labor Relations Board filed a complaint last March, alleging that withholding that option from union workers was illegal. A federal judge in September agreed.

    According to the union, Starbucks just last month began (finally) implementing that at stores like Blastic’s (which, per the workers, actually did have that option until management remembered that they were union or something and took it away).

    Blastic is one of the few union Starbucks workers who’s been chosen to represent unionized Florida locations in the collective bargaining process after literally years at this point of both the union and the company pointing fingers at each other over delays. In a text message, he told Orlando Weekly he’s flying up to Washington, D.C., today to kick things off.

    Despite the legal battle, he said he hopes the company’s announced plans to begin bargaining with the union and to roll out credit card tipping at union stores is “a sign of good faith.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Morning sickness? Prenatal check-ups? What to know about new rights for pregnant workers

    Morning sickness? Prenatal check-ups? What to know about new rights for pregnant workers

    [ad_1]

    Pregnant employees have the right to a wide range of accommodations under new federal regulations for enforcing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act that supporters say could change workplace culture for millions of people.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the agency in charge of enforcing the law, adopted an expansive view of conditions related to pregnancy and childbirth in its proposed regulations, including a controversial decision to include abortion, fertility treatment and birth control as medical issues requiring job protections.

    The rules, which were adopted on a 3-2 vote along partisan lines, were published Monday and offer extensive guidelines for addressing more routine difficulties of pregnancy, such as morning sickness, back pain and needing to avoid heavy lifting. Labor advocates say the law will be especially transformative for pregnant women in low-wage jobs, who are often denied simple requests like more bathroom breaks.

    Here’s what to know about the law and the EEOC regulations.

    Congress passed the law with bipartisan support in December 2022 following a decade-long campaign by women’s rights and labor advocates, who argued that the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act did little to guarantee women would receive the accommodations they might need at work.

    The law stated only that pregnant workers should be treated the same as other employees, not that they deserved special consideration. To get their requests met, many pregnant workers therefore needed to demonstrate they had physical limitations covered under the Americans With Disabilities Act, often creating insurmountable hurdles.

    The new law treats pregnancy and related conditions as themselves deserving of “reasonable accommodations” and places the burden on employers to prove “undue hardships” for denying any requests.

    The law applies to employers of at least 15 workers. The EEOC estimates it will cover roughly 1.5 million pregnant workers in any given year. The EEOC regulations published April 15 are set to go into effect in June.

    The EEOC’s 400-page document encompasses a wide array of conditions and relevant advice for employers.

    It states that workers are entitled to unpaid time off for situations such as prenatal appointments, fertility treatments, abortion, miscarriage, postpartum depression and mastitis, an infection that arises from breastfeeding. This includes workers who are not covered by federal family leave laws and those who have not been on the job long enough to accrue time off.

    Workers can ask for flexible working arrangements to deal with morning sickness, such as a later start time, clearance to work from home or permission to carry snacks in workplaces where eating is typically prohibited. If they can’t sit or stand for extended periods due to sciatica, which is common in late pregnancy, they can request a schedule adjustment so their commutes happen during less crowded hours.

    The regulations also allow workers to be exempted from tasks such as climbing ladders or heavy lifting. If those duties are essential to their jobs, they can still request a temporary dispensation, according to the EEOC.

    Employers don’t have to accommodate workers exactly as requested but they must offer reasonable alternatives. They cannot deny a request without clearing a high bar to prove doing so would cause “undue hardships” for the organization’s finances or operations. They cannot force workers to take unpaid leave if a reasonable accommodation is available.

    The EEOC emphasizes that it “should not be complicated or difficult” for pregnant workers to request accommodations. Workers don’t have to make requests in writing, use specific words, cite any laws, or in most cases, provide documentation such as doctors’ notes. Employers must respond quickly and have a conversation about how to reasonably accommodate a worker’s needs.

    Still, legal experts advise both workers and employers to document the process. A Better Balance, the non-profit that spearheaded the 10-year campaign for the law’s passage, advises workers to familiarize themselves with their legal rights and be as specific as possible about their limitations and the changes they they need.

    Workers who believe a request was denied illegally can file a complaint with the EEOC. They have 180 days to do so, though the deadline can be extended in some states.

    The EEOC included abortion among the conditions covered under the law. The rules state, however, that employers are not obligated to cover expenses related to the procedure or to offer health insurance that does.

    The EEOC regulations argue that including abortion is consistent with the agency’s longstanding interpretation of other laws under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, including the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

    But the decision drew condemnation from Republican lawmakers who had championed the law’s passage. The five-member EEOC’s two Republican members voted against the regulations.

    In a statement explaining her dissent, Commissioner Andrea Lucas said the agency broadened the scope of the law “to reach virtually every condition, circumstance, or procedure that relates to any aspect of the female reproductive system” in ways that “cannot reasonably be reconciled with the text” of the law.

    Melissa Losch, a labor and employment attorney at the New Orleans-based firm McGlinchey Stafford, said she expects the regulations to give rise to further litigation. Losch cited the example of a worker living in a state with a restrictive abortion law requesting time off to undergo the procedure in another state. The EEOC rules provide “no good answer” about whether granting such a request would conflict with restrictive state abortion laws, she added.

    On February 27, a federal judge blocked enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act for Texas state employees, a ruling that came in response to a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Paxton argued the law was unconstitutional because it was part of a spending bill that passed in the House without a majority of members present, and the judge ruled in his favor.

    Gedmark, of A Better Balance, said she was optimistic the Biden administration would prevail in its expected appeal of the ruling. In the meantime, federal and private sectors workers in Texas are covered by the law.

    But in her dissenting statement, Lucas warned that if the Texas case or any future lawsuits succeed in overturning the law, the EEOC’s divisive rules have “all but extinguished” the chances of a bipartisan effort to reenact it.

    Employers have been obligated to abide by the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act since it took effect on June 27, 2023, though the EEOC regulations provided guidance on how to do so.

    The law swiftly made a difference to many low-wage workers, according to Gedmark.

    A Better Balance, which operates a helpline, has “heard an overwhelmingly positive experience from workers,” she said. Last summer, the organization worked with some women whose employers stopped resisting requests for accommodations as soon as the law took effect, Gedmark said.

    Some workers reported their employers were still operating under the old legal framework, handing them pages of disability paperwork to fill out in response to requests.

    The EEOC said it received almost 200 complaints alleging violations of the law by the time the fiscal year ended on Sept. 30, 2023.

    Gedmark said the success of the law will depend on enforcement and raising awareness.

    “If workers don’t know about the law and don’t know about their rights, then it really undermines the purpose of the law,” she said.

    ____

    The Associated Press’ women in the workforce and state government coverage receives financial support from Pivotal Ventures. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida lobbyists leaned on pols to get ban on local heat safety and wage laws across the finish line, records show

    Florida lobbyists leaned on pols to get ban on local heat safety and wage laws across the finish line, records show

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Colin Hackley/NSF

    House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, outlined priorities Tuesday for the 2024 legislative session.

    On the final day of Florida’s legislative session, state lawmakers approved one of the most controversial bills of the year, blocking local governments from requiring employers to provide basic heat safety protections for their workers, such as shade,  water breaks, employee monitoring and “appropriate first-aid measures.”

    It also bans cities and counties from regulating employers’ scheduling practices and, effective Sept. 30, 2026, from requiring employers they contract with to pay employees a rate higher than Florida’s minimum wage, which is currently $12 an hour.

    Florida Gov. DeSantis signed the bill into law, with no fanfare or statement, on March 11, after regular business hours. He later rhetorically distanced himself from the bill, telling reporters during a press conference the day after that “it wasn’t anything that was coming from me.”

    Florida’s House Bill 433 — modeled after bills that have failed to pass the Legislature before — almost didn’t make it through both legislative chambers this year, as its Republican bill sponsors added, subtracted and meticulously crafted its language to avoid a political disaster come election time for their Republican colleagues in swing districts. A few of those Republicans ultimately joined Democrats in voting it down.

    But records obtained by Orlando Weekly through a public records request show industry lobbyists scrambled in the final days and weeks of the legislative session to ensure its passage, with a direct connection to the Florida House Speaker’s chief of staff.

    “I haven’t texted you in weeks–HEAT cannot die,” wrote Associated Builders and Contractors lobbyist Carol Bowen in a text message to House Speaker Paul Renner’s chief of staff Allison Carter.

    The text was sent on Thursday, March 7, the night before the final day of session, at 9:10 p.m.

    “The entire business community is in lock step on this. Thank you for your attention to this concern” Bowen added.

    [Editor’s note: Those who have been in Orlando for more than a decade may remember another nasty batch of lobbyist-led text bullying. In 2012, Orange County voters passed a referendum approving paid sick leave, and then-Mayor Teresa Jacobs — now chair of the Orange County School Board — was found to be texting with lobbyists from Darden, Disney and the Florida Chamber of Commerce even during a hearing on the matter, asking for talking points. No spoiler here: They were against it, even down to using some of the same messaging they’re using now.]

    Sponsored by first-term Republican Rep. Tiffany Esposito, HB 433 was a priority of business lobbying groups this session, with backing from the Florida Chamber of Commerce — an influential force among both parties in the state Legislature, representing the interests of business giants like Disney, Publix and U.S. Sugar.

    The Florida Chamber has sought to block local governments from mandating things like paid sick leave, advance notice of one’s work schedule, and wages higher than the state’s minimum wage for literally 20 years.

    Other major lobbying groups — including the Associated Industries of Florida, an organization largely funded by companies like the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), Florida Blue, and TECO Energy this past quarter — were also in “lock step” on Esposito’s bill.

    “Hey…looking for insight on HB 433. Are yall looking to put the wage stuff back on?” asked Associated Industries of Florida lobbyist Adam Basford in a text to Carter, on Tuesday, March 5.

    The “wage stuff” — referring to part of the bill that would dissolve local living wage ordinances in communities like Miami-Dade and St. Petersburg — was cut from the bill by Senate bill sponsor Jay Trumbull (R-Panama City) that day, leaving the bill strictly about preempting local heat safety laws for workers.

    That is, Trumbull’s amended version would solely prevent local governments from doing anything that would guarantee that outdoor workers, such as agricultural and construction workers exposed to Florida heat, would have the right to basic things like water.

    “We obviously would like to see both the heat and the wage stuff get through but a little worried about what the Senate might do,” Basford texted.

    No response from Carter.

    “Can I please talk to you about HB 433?” Basford texted again, after 27 hours with no response.

    The “wage stuff” was ultimately tacked back onto the bill on March 7, ahead of its final passage, along with a ban on local fair workweek laws (also known as “predictive scheduling”) and prevailing wage laws, which essentially require contractors that receive public money from local governments to follow established wage and benefit standards, some of which can be stronger than standards under state law.

    The Chamber argues such mandates create a “patchwork of regulations” that unduly burden business owners. That was their argument, again, literally 20 years ago, and their lobbyists — and political allies — continue to parrot the same talking points today.

    Public records show the Chamber drafted the “wage stuff” language and emailed that to Esposito on Nov. 14, the day after Esposito initially filed it.

    As filed, the bill only targeted laws regulating heat exposure requirements for workers.

    Metadata on the Word document sent by the Chamber also indicates that the Chamber collaborated with the Foundation for Government Accountability, a right-wing think-tank with connections to the governor’s office that has also lobbied for rollbacks to child labor law, anti-union legislation, and tougher eligibility requirements for social safety net programs like Medicaid, food stamps and unemployment assistance.

    Esposito is herself president of SWFL Inc. — a regional chamber of commerce in Southwest Florida — and was first elected to her state House seat in November 2022.

    Last year, she championed a law that similarly preempted local governments from enacting or maintaining local tenant rights ordinances that real estate lobbyists likewise characterized as creating inconsistencies for Florida landlords.

    According to email records, the Florida Chamber increased the stakes the day before the end of session.

    Carolyn Johnson, the Chamber’s chief lobbyist, sent out email blasts to state lawmakers on March 7 urging them to support HB 433, which was broadly opposed by Democrats, organized labor, environmental justice groups like the Sierra Club, and labor-conscious groups like WeCount! and the Farmworker Association of Florida that advocate for immigrant workers.

    Specifically, Johnson (who texted Renner’s chief of staff Carter to “check in” that day) urged lawmakers to support amendments that would, in effect, add the “wage stuff” back in.

    Such changes, Johnson wrote, were “important to the business community” in order to “continue to foster a business-friendly environment that will lead to the state’s continued economic growth.”

    As an added pressure — or incentive — the Chamber added that lawmakers’ votes on the legislation would be double-weighted in their upcoming legislative report cards — or “How They Voted” reports to their members.

    Such reports indicate lawmakers’ support for the Chamber’s priorities, with generally only Republicans making their “Distinguished Advocates” list. (Last year, for instance, the only Democrat to make that list was Orange County’s Sen. Linda Stewart, who’s term-limited from seeking reelection this year.)

    Additionally, campaign finance records show the business lobby used more than just their words to push their members’ priorities.

    Records show the Florida Chamber of Commerce, across its 11 main associated political committees, paid out roughly $1.44 million to the campaign accounts (and PACs) of state legislators and the Republican Party of Florida from Oct. 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024.

    The Associated Industries of Florida similarly pitched in roughly $1.8 million to the campaign accounts, or associated committees, of state legislators and both major parties (with the bulk going to the GOP) in the same time frame across its six active PCs.

    But it wasn’t just the Associated Industries and Chamber vying to get this past the finish line. As Bowen of the ABC of Florida implied, groups representing the restaurant and tourism industries (the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association) and lobbying groups for the home builder and agricultural industries were also in support.

    Several of these groups have historically poured money into (unsuccessfully) blocking efforts to increase Florida’s minimum wage, and are affiliated with national organizations that push for similar anti-worker policies in other state legislatures across the country and on a federal level.

    Opponents of Florida’s House Bill 433 — which can best be described as a preemption measure — have argued the legislation stomps on the powers of local governments and could result in pay cuts for thousands of working Floridians employed by government contractors, such as janitorial workers and airport employees who handle baggage and push passenger wheelchairs.

    That threat is tied to the part of the bill that preempts local living wage laws, which aren’t established in all communities, but have been enacted in places like Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County and St. Petersburg, where Florida’s minimum wage of $12 an hour — or roughly $24,960 annually — isn’t enough for a working adult or family to make rent, let alone live comfortably.

    Rep. Esposito, the GOP House sponsor of the bill, admitted during session that employers could decide to reduce pay — the income that supports Florida’s working families — once this is effective.

    “Could wages go down? Maybe,” she said during the bill’s first committee hearing. “It’s up to the prerogative of the employer.”

    Thanks to a last-minute amendment by Republican Sen. Trumbull, that part of the bill won’t go into effect until Sept. 30, 2026 — the very day that Florida’s minimum wage is officially scheduled to rise to $15 an hour.

    The preemption of workplace heat safety laws will go into effect July 1 — and there’s no mystery where that policy priority came from.

    There is not a single city or county in Florida that currently requires employers to offer basic protections for workers who are exposed to extreme heat on the job.

    But an effort to do so was underway in Miami-Dade County last year, thanks to years of organizing by outdoor laborers, until a vote on whether to approve such a policy was delayed.

     Esposito filed the state preemption bill just a week later, preempting workplace “heat exposure” requirements to the state — meaning no city or county can enact regulations stronger than those under federal or state law.

    As of today, there is no federal or state standard for protecting workers from extreme heat on the job — only federal guidelines, and a risk of being cited by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration for failure to foster a workplace that “is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious harm to employees.”

    That agency, per direction from the Biden administration, is in the process of developing a federal heat safety standard, but that process could take years.

    Efforts in Florida by Democrats to establish a statewide standard have gone nowhere, due to lack of Republican support. Democrats are outnumbered by the GOP in the state Legislature more than two to one.

    The dangers of a failure to act aren’t hypothetical. A 26-year-old man who moved from Mexico to South Florida for work on a sugar cane farm through the federal H-2 Visa program suffered fatal heat-related injuries on the job last September.

    The heat index reached 97 degrees the day he collapsed, according to a federal OSHA investigation. It was just his fourth day on the job.

    The contractor who employed the young man, McNeill Labor Management, didn’t report the 26-year-old’s hospitalization or his death, which is required under law. The contractor faces just $27,655 in proposed penalties, an amount set by federal statute.

    According to federal data, an estimated 36 U.S. workplace deaths related to environmental heat exposure were recorded in 2021, down from 56 deaths in 2020. Even OSHA, however, has admitted that records of heat-related illness and death on the job are likely “vast underestimates.

    For Johana Lopez, a local agricultural worker in Apopka, Florida who has seen coworkers pass out on the job from extreme heat, Esposito’s bill feels “unjust.”

    For the business lobby, the bill “protects small businesses from ‘gotcha’ regulations” and creates “a stable environment where owners can grow their businesses.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Google Fires 28 Workers Who Protested its Contracts With Israel

    Google Fires 28 Workers Who Protested its Contracts With Israel

    [ad_1]

    Google says it terminated 28 employees associated with protests of the company’s $1.2 billion cloud computing contracts with the Israeli government on Wednesday. The firings follow the arrests of nine Google employees for trespassing in the company’s New York and California offices on Tuesday during an hours-long sit-in protest.

    “A small number of employee protesters entered and disrupted a few of our locations,” said a Google spokesperson in an emailed statement to Gizmodo. “We have so far concluded individual investigations that resulted in the termination of employment for 28 employees, and will continue to investigate and take action as needed.”

    Google claims these protests impeded other employees’ work and prevented them from accessing facilities. No Tech for Apartheid tells Gizmodo that 19 of the employees fired on Wednesday did not directly participate in the sit-in protests, but were associated with the movement.

    “This flagrant act of retaliation is a clear indication that Google values its $1.2 billion contract with the genocidal Israeli government and military more than its own workers,” said a No Tech for Apartheid spokesperson in an emailed statement. “Google workers have the right to peacefully protest about terms and conditions of our labor.”

    In a memo sent to all employees on Wednesday, shared by The Verge, Google’s head of global security, Chris Rackow, said “behavior like this has no place in our workplace.” The memo also claims the protestors defaced Google’s property and “made coworkers feel threatened.” Rackow concludes his message by telling employees to “think again” if they expect Google to overlook conduct that violates its policies.

    A Google spokesperson tells Gizmodo the cloud computing contracts at the center of these protests, Project Nimbus, are not directed at highly sensitive military workloads related to weapons or intelligence services. However, Time reported last week that Google provides cloud computing services to the Israeli Ministry of Defense. The report claims the tech giant has recently negotiated a deeper partnership with Israel during the war in Gaza.

    These 28 workers are not the first Google employees to be fired for protesting the company’s contracts with Israel. They join Eddie Hatfield, a Google software-engineer who was fired after disrupting an Israeli tech conference by yelling, “No tech for apartheid!” while a Google executive was speaking.

    There’s some discrepancy over why these workers were fired. Google listed “bullying” and “harassment” as the reasons for the worker firings. However, No Tech for Apartheid allege their protests were peaceful, and claim the workers themselves feel bullied by Google’s response.

    No Tech for Apartheid’s protest represents an increasingly loud voice within Google and Amazon opposing big tech’s cooperation with Israel. The movement’s New York protest gathered over 100 protesters on Tuesday and reportedly dozens more in Sunnyvale, California. The movement claims to have the support of “thousands of colleagues” within Google and Amazon. Organizers say they will continue protesting until the company drops Project Nimbus.

    [ad_2]

    Maxwell Zeff

    Source link

  • Google Fires 28 Workers for Protesting Cloud Deal With Israel

    Google Fires 28 Workers for Protesting Cloud Deal With Israel

    [ad_1]

    Google fired twenty-eight employees Wednesday after they participated in protests against Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion cloud contract with Israel’s government that also includes Amazon.

    Workers at both companies have claimed the deal makes advanced technology available to Israel’s security apparatus that could contribute to the killing or harm of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. The Intercept and Time have reported that Project Nimbus provides services that can be tapped by the Israel Defence Forces.

    The twenty-eight firings, confirmed by Google, come hours after nine employees were detained by police late Tuesday for sit-in protests in the office of Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian in Sunnyvale, California, and a company office in New York. All nine of those workers were fired, in addition to nineteen other protest participants.

    Google spokesperson Anna Kowalczyk said in a statement that the employees were terminated after internal investigation” concluded they were guilty of “physically impeding other employees’ work and preventing them from accessing our facilities.” She added that “after refusing multiple requests to leave the premises, law enforcement was engaged to remove them to ensure office safety.” The Nimbus contract is “not directed” at classified or military work, she said.

    Tuesday’s action against Project Nimbus comes after the reported death toll from the IDF’s offensive on Hamas in Gaza climbed to more than 34,000 Palestinians. The military offensive began after Hamas killed about 1,100 Israelis on October 7.

    The sit-ins at Google were accompanied by protests of more than 100 people—including many Google workers—outside company offices in New York, Sunnyvale, and Seattle. Google’s Kowalczyk characterized the participation by employees as “a small number.”

    Google’s workforce comprises the vast majority of employees of parent Alphabet, which reported a headcount of more than 180,000 at the end of 2023. Several protesters at Google’s New York office told WIRED they have support within the company beyond those who directly participated in Tuesday’s protest.

    Jane Chung, a spokesperson for No Tech for Apartheid—the coalition of tech workers and Muslim- and Jewish-led activist groups MPower Change and Jewish Voice for Peace that organized the protests—says that some workers who were fired were involved in much less provocative action than those who occupied offices.

    Some, she said, had simply attended an outdoor protest and taken a t-shirt handed out by organizers. Others were “flyering outside, standing near the protesters for safety.”

    Zelda Montes, a now-former YouTube software engineer who says they were arrested after occupying Google’s New York office for more than ten hours, accuses the company of breaching US legal protections for workers.

    “It’s so clear that Google is engaging in illegal behavior to deter our labor organizing by retaliating against workers who weren’t arrested,” Montes says. “I’m disappointed at just how evil Google can be, but not surprised—they’re more outraged by employees peacefully sitting in, than at how their technology is murdering people.”

    Kowalczyk of Google said that the Nimbus contract is “not directed” at “workloads relevant to weapons or intelligence services.”

    [ad_2]

    Caroline Haskins

    Source link

  • Disneyland performers file petition to form labor union

    Disneyland performers file petition to form labor union

    [ad_1]

    ANAHEIM, Calif. — Workers who help bring Disneyland’s beloved characters to life said Wednesday they collected enough signatures to support their push for a union.

    A group of 1,700 performers, including those who represent characters and dance in parades at Disney’s Southern California theme parks, said they filed an election petition with the National Labor Relations Board. A vote would likely be held in May or June.

    The workers said they also asked The Walt Disney Co. to recognize their union, which they are calling “Magic United.”

    In a statement Wednesday, Disney officials said: “We support our cast members’ right to a confidential vote that recognizes their individual choices.”

    Most of the more than 35,000 workers at the Disneyland Resort already have unions. Parade and character workers announced their plans to unionize in February to address safety concerns and scheduling, among other issues.

    The union would be formed under Actors’ Equity Association, which already represents theatrical performers at Disney’s Florida theme parks.

    Union membership has been on a decades-long decline in the United States, but organizations have seen growing public support in recent years amid high-profile contract negotiations involving Hollywood studios and Las Vegas hotels. The National Labor Relations Board, which protects workers’ right to organize, reported more than 2,500 filings for union representation during the 2023 fiscal year, which was the highest number in eight years.

    Disney has a major presence in Anaheim, where it operates two theme parks — Disneyland and Disney California Adventure — as well as a shopping and entertainment area called Downtown Disney. Disneyland, the company’s oldest park, was the world’s second-most visited theme park in 2022, hosting 16.8 million people, according to a report by the Themed Entertainment Association and AECOM.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google Workers Detained By Police for Protesting Cloud Contract with Israel

    Google Workers Detained By Police for Protesting Cloud Contract with Israel

    [ad_1]

    Nine Google workers were removed by police from company offices in New York and Sunnyvale, California, late Tuesday after staging an hours-long sit-in protest against a cloud contract with Israel’s government.

    The Sunnyvale protest occupied the office of Thomas Kurian, CEO of Google’s cloud division, at a building close to Google’s main HQ in Silicon Valley for more than 8 hours. The New York protest occupied a common area on the tenth floor of Google’s Chelsea location.

    Videos seen by WIRED showed people who appeared to be Google security staff walking up to protesting workers in two different offices accompanied by local police. In the video from New York, a man who appears to be relaying a message from Google management informs the protesting workers that they have been placed on administrative leave and asks them to take the opportunity to depart peacefully.

    “We will not be leaving,” a protesting worker replies. A man in uniform then introduces the officers as NYPD and delivers a final ultimatum, saying the workers have a last chance to walk out freely. “If not, you can be arrested for trespass,” he says. When the protesters again decline to go, police officers put them in handcuffs.

    WIRED could not independently verify that the four workers in New York and five in Sunnyvale apparently detained by police had been arrested or charged. A person involved in coordinating the protests says the New York workers were arrested with desk appearance tickets, which specify when a person must appear in court. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Tuesday night’s police action came after “dozens” of employees were placed on administrative leave after participating in the day’s sit-in protests but leaving peacefully, the person involved says. Protest rallies also took place outside Google offices in New York, Sunnyvale, and Seattle.

    The action called on Google to drop a $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with the Israeli government known as Project Nimbus that also involves Amazon. Last week Time reported that the contract involves providing direct services to the Israel Defense Forces.

    The detained workers in New York include software engineers Hasan Ibraheem and Zelda Montes. They also include two workers who identified themselves by their first names as Jesús and Mohammed on a speaker-phone call with protesters outside Google’s New York office Tuesday.

    Project Nimbus has been the target of protests by Google and Amazon workers for years. A campaign group called No Tech for Apartheid—which combines tech workers from the two the Muslim and Jewish-led activist groups MPower Change and Jewish Voice for Peace—formed in 2021 after details about the cloud contract became public.

    Google and Amazon workers protested outside company offices in 2022 after The Intercept published documents showing the contract includes AI technology such as video analysis. The protesting tech workers say such capabilities could be used by Israel’s security apparatus to harm Palestinians.

    Israel’s military assault on Gaza, which began after Hamas killed about 1,100 Israelis on October 7, has added new fuel to the internal opposition to Project Nimbus. The Israel Defence Forces have killed more than 34,000 Palestinians since bombing and moving into Gaza last fall.

    Last month, Google cloud software engineer Eddie Hatfield disrupted Google Israel’s managing director at Mind The Tech, a company-sponsored conference focused on the Israeli tech industry. More than 600 other Googlers signed a petition opposing the company’s sponsorship of the conference and after Hatfield was fired three days later Google trust and safety policy employee Vidana Abdel Khalek resigned in protest.

    Google is not the only Silicon Valley giant to see worker activism related to Israel’s war on Hamas. In late March, more than 300 Apple workers signed an open letter that alleged retaliation against workers who have expressed support for Palestinians, and urged company leadership to show public support for Palestinians.

    [ad_2]

    Caroline Haskins

    Source link

  • Southern governors tell autoworkers that voting for a union will put their jobs in jeopardy

    Southern governors tell autoworkers that voting for a union will put their jobs in jeopardy

    [ad_1]

    DETROIT — On the eve of a vote on union representation at Volkswagen’s Tennessee factory, Gov. Bill Lee and some other southern governors are telling workers that voting for a union will put jobs in jeopardy.

    About 4,300 workers at VW’s plant in Chattanooga will start voting Wednesday on representation by the United Auto Workers union. Vote totals are expected to be tabulated Friday night by the National Labor Relations Board.

    The union election is the first test of the UAW’s efforts to organize nonunion auto factories nationwide following its success winning big raises last fall after going on strike against Detroit automakers Ford, General Motors and Jeep maker Stellantis.

    The governors said in a statement Tuesday that they have worked to bring good-paying jobs to their states.

    “We are seeing in the fallout of the Detroit Three strike with those automakers rethinking investments and cutting jobs,” the statement said. “Putting businesses in our states in that position is the last thing we want to do.”

    Lee said in a statement that Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott have signed on to the statement. The offices of Ivey and Reeves confirmed their involvement, and McMaster posted the statement on his website. Messages were left Tuesday seeking comment from Kemp and Abbott.

    The governors said they want to continue to grow manufacturing in their states, but a successful union drive will “stop this growth in its tracks, to the detriment of American workers.”

    The UAW declined comment.

    After a series of strikes against Detroit automakers last year, UAW President Shawn Fain said it would simultaneously target more than a dozen nonunion auto plants including those run by Tesla, Nissan, Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota, Honda, and others.

    The drive covers nearly 150,000 workers at factories largely in the South, where the union thus far has had little success in recruiting new members.

    Earlier this month a majority of workers at a Mercedes-Benz plant near Tuscaloosa, Alabama, filed papers with the NLRB to vote on UAW representation.

    The UAW pacts with Detroit automakers include 25% pay raises by the time the contracts end in April of 2028. With cost-of-living increases, workers will see about 33% in raises for a top assembly wage of $42 per hour, or more than $87,000 per year, plus thousands in annual profit sharing.

    VW said Tuesday that its workers can make over $60,000 per year not including an 8% attendance bonus. The company says it pays above the median household income in the area.

    Volkswagen has said it respects the workers’ right to a democratic process and to determine who should represent their interests. “We will fully support an NLRB vote so every team member has a chance to vote in privacy in this important decision,” the company said.

    Some workers at the VW plant, who make Atlas SUVs and ID.4 electric vehicles, said they want more of a say in schedules, benefits, pay and more.

    The union has come close to representing workers at the VW plant in two previous elections. In 2014 and 2019, workers narrowly rejected a factorywide union under the UAW.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • American Airlines’ pilots union notes mounting safety issues—tools left in wheel wells, items abandoned near parked planes

    American Airlines’ pilots union notes mounting safety issues—tools left in wheel wells, items abandoned near parked planes

    [ad_1]

    The pilots union at American Airlines says there has been “a significant spike” in safety issues at the airline, including fewer routine aircraft inspections and shorter test flights on planes returning from major maintenance work.

    The union also says it has seen incidents in which tools were left in wheel wells and items were left in the sterile area around planes parked at airport gates.

    A spokesman said Monday that union officials have raised their concerns with senior managers at the airline and were encouraged by the company’s response.

    American, which is based in Fort Worth, Texas, said it has an industry-leading safety management system. An airline spokesperson said American is in regular contact with regulators and unions “to further bolster our strong safety record and enhance our ever-evolving safety culture.”

    Dennis Tajer, a pilot and spokesman for the union, said the union spoke recently with senior management, “and management’s initial response to our request was encouraging. We fully intend to do everything we can to assure that American maintains strong margins of safety.”

    The Federal Aviation Administration declined to comment directly on the union’s allegations or whether the agency has increased its oversight of American as a result. In a statement, an FAA spokesperson said airlines required to have systems for identifying potential hazards before they become serious problems.

    The safety committee of the Allied Pilots Association said in an email to members Saturday that the union “has been tracking a significant spike in safety- and maintenance-related problems in our operation.”

    The union said American has increased the time between routine inspections on planes. It also said American has ended overnight maintenance checks unless a plane is written up for special attention or due for scheduled maintenance and now does “abbreviated” test flights on planes returning to service after major maintenance checks or long-term storage.

    The union asked its members to report any safety or maintenance problems.

    “We all understand that aviation accidents are the result of a chain of events — often a series of errors — and catching just one of those errors could prevent a tragedy,” the union said in the email.

    Subscribe to CHRO Daily, our newsletter focusing on helping HR executive navigate the changing needs of the workplace. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • ‘It’s unjust’: Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning local heat safety and wage laws

    ‘It’s unjust’: Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning local heat safety and wage laws

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Ron DeSantis/Twitter

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Thursday quietly signed into law one of the business lobby’s top priorities this year, preempting local governments from passing laws on workplace heat safety measures to protect outdoor workers from heat exhaustion.

    The bill, HB 433, also preempts the regulation of employer scheduling practices to the state, and — effective Sept. 30, 2026 — will strip local “living wage” laws passed in some Florida cities and counties that require their contractors to pay employees a wage that’s higher than the state’s minimum. A earlier version of the bill would have preempted all local mandates affecting the terms and conditions of employment.

    DeSantis signed the bill in its final version Thursday night, after hours, with no statement or fanfare.

    Florida Democrats on Friday criticized the move.

    “Outdoor workers are all around us – working on construction sites, repairing and paving roads, picking fruit and vegetables on farms and more,” said Florida Sen. Victor Torres, D-Orlando, in a statement.

    “They’re just trying to make a living for their families – and instead of putting protections in place to ensure businesses are prioritizing their workers’ health and well-being from record-setting temperatures, we tied the hands of proactive local governments to do so,” Torres continued. “This bill is an attack on our outdoor workers – the rent is too damn high and the sun is too damn hot!”

    Sponsored by Republican Tiffany Esposito, a first-term member of the Florida House, the bill was a priority of the Florida Chamber of Commerce — a deep-pocketed business lobbying group that represents the interests of companies like Publix, AT&T, restaurant chains, and U.S. Sugar, which fork over tens of thousands of dollars to help fund their political operations.

    Records obtained by the investigative newsletter Seeking Rents show the Chamber was also directly involved in drafting the language of the legislation, along with a conservative think-tank that was behind a new law rolling back certain child labor protections.

    The bill was a priority of the Florida Chamber of Commerce — a business lobbying group that represents the interests of companies like Publix, AT&T, restaurant chains, and U.S. Sugar

    tweet this

    Esposito herself, who argued the bill was in the best interest of taxpayers, is herself the president of a regional chamber of commerce in Southwest Florida.

    Thousands of working Floridians could be affected by the preemption of local living wage laws alone, which have been implemented over the years in expensive areas of the state, like St. Petersburg and Miami, in order to lift wages for workers on contracted public projects — like building and road construction — as well as airport workers.

    Local governments in Florida have been barred from requiring private employers to pay above minimum wage for more than 20 years.

    The idea of the so-called “living wage” laws is that if you’re an employer who wants to enter into a government, taxpayer-funded contract, you have to pay your workers at least something closer to a living wage — which, generally, under these laws is somewhere between at least $15 to $20 minimum depending on the city or county.

    Ideally, workers covered by these contracts are locals — friends and neighbors of these communities who contribute to the local economy and who may not be able to live comfortably on less.

    The Chamber of Commerce has been trying to gut these living wage laws in Florida for years, framing wage and benefit mandates as “unnecessary government interference.”

    “Lawmakers in other parts of the country are passing job killing mandates at the local level,” reads a legislative agenda released by the Chamber for the 2024 session. “We need to keep Florida, Florida by allowing employers to flourish free of unnecessary governmental interference and inconsistencies.”

    For workers who benefit from these local laws, however, the new bill could create confusion and inconsistency. It also could result in cuts to pay once that portion of the bill goes into effect on Sept. 30, 2026 — the day Florida’s $15 minimum wage also fully goes into effect.

    The statewide minimum wage is currently $12 an hour, or $7.98 for tipped workers, and will rise $1 each year on Sept. 30 before reaching $15 by Sept. 30, 2026 under a ballot initiative approved by 61% of Florida voters in 2020.

    Rep. Esposito, the GOP House sponsor of the bill, admitted during session that employers could decide to reduce pay — the income that supports Florida’s working families — once this is effective.

    “Could wages go down? Maybe,” she said during the bill’s first committee hearing. “It’s up to the prerogative of the employer.” The chair of that committee cut the public off from providing personal testimony. Dozens had signed up to speak.

    Esposito herself could not say how many workers across the state would be affected by the preemption, which broadly ties the hands of local government leaders. So the full scope of the preemption, while standing to affect thousands of airport workers and other contracted workers in South Florida alone, is still unclear.

    The preemption of heat safety mandates for working Floridians, on the other hand, was a direct attack on a local ordinance being considered in Miami-Dade County last year.

    That ordinance sought to require construction and agriculture companies, specifically, to take steps to protect their employees from heat exhaustion. For instance, ensuring they have access to water and giving them 10-minute, shaded breaks every couple of hours when the heat index is at least 95 degrees.

    Following industry backlash, that ordinance was delayed for a vote last fall until mid-March — after session had already ended and House Bill 433 passed the state legislature. The bill was filed for consideration by lawmakers this year just a week after the vote on that local ordinance was delayed last fall.

    Miami-Dade County was the only municipality in Florida considering such an ordinance, which has been proposed at the state level by Democrats but has failed to garner enough interest from the Republican majority to make much progress.

    As it is, there is no federal or state standard in Florida for heat exposure protections in the workplace. Just a few states — California, Washington, and Oregon — have their own state laws requiring certain workplace heat safety measures.

    Colorado also regulates heat exposure requirements for farmworkers, while Minnesota has heat standards for workers indoors. As any warehouse worker can tell you (we heard this from UPS workers here in Orlando, for instance) — it’s not just those laboring outside who stand to suffer from Florida’s scorching heat.

    And it’s only getting hotter in Florida. Opponents of the bill argued that failing to act on workplace heat safety protections could be costly due to lost productivity. An agricultural worker in Apopka told us the bill is “unjust” and “unfair.”

    “This cruel and shameful action by Governor DeSantis, our Republican-led Legislature, and a small group of powerful industry lobbyists will endanger the lives of our working families and cause preventable deaths,” Oscar Londoño, co-executive director of the immigrant advocacy group WeCount! Shared in an email newsletter on Friday.

    The bill passed the Republican-dominated state legislature on the final day of Florida’s legislative session last month, largely along party lines. Four Republicans joined Florida Democrats in opposing the bill in the state Senate, while four Republicans similarly crossed party lines to vote it down in the Florida House.

    GOP House member Mike Beltran, who voted in opposition to the bill, explained his vote by stating he only opposed the heat safety preemption provision.

    “Due to Florida’s unusually hot climate, the variation thereof throughout the state, and the diverse economy, I believe that local regulation may be appropriate,” he said.

    The preemption on regulating workplace heat exposure and scheduling goes into effect July 1, while the preemption on wage and benefit mandates will go into effect Sept. 30, 2026.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Hollywood Guilds Come Out Strong For “Ethical & Transparent” AI Bill From Adam Schiff  

    Hollywood Guilds Come Out Strong For “Ethical & Transparent” AI Bill From Adam Schiff  

    [ad_1]

    SAG-AFTRA, IATSE the WGA, and even the DGA have united behind a legislative move to put up some new and slightly punitive guardrails around Artificial Intelligence.

    “Everything generated by AI ultimately originates from a human creative source, says Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator, of a new bill proposed today by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA). “That’s why human creative content—intellectual property—must be protected. SAG-AFTRA fully supports the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act, as this legislation is an important step in ensuring technology serves people and not the other way around,” 

    Deep into his race to be California’s new junior Senator, Schiff introduced the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act into the 118th Congress (read it here) Tuesday. If passed by the House and Senate and signed by President Joe Biden, the succinct act would require companies and corporations that use copyrighted works in the training of their generative AI systems training datasets to submit a public notice with the Register of Copyrights.

    In short, before you put that AI created material out there, you’ve got to pull back the veil and reveal where you scooped up the info and datasets from. Now, with its $5,000 civil penalty for violations, the bill doesn’t exactly hit the tech overlords and studios that hard where it counts.

    However, with the fears and harsh realities that AI itself generates among below-the-line workers and creators, the fact is the introduction of the legislation alone sees Schiff tossing some blue meat to his base. In a Senate bid that is his to lose against a Republican challenger he promoted, Schiff, who is commonly known as the Congressman from Hollywood for the number of studios in and around his Burbank district, is putting an issue of vital importance to unions and guild members on the table.

    The use and implications of AI was a very big part of last year’s strikes by the WGA and SAG-AFTRA. Despite the handwringing of those who predicted it would sink any deal, protections around AI for guild members ended up being a major part of the agreements the scribes and the actors came to with the studios and streamers.

    Now with the long anticipated introduction of Schiff’s new bill , leadership is responding again.

    “This bill is an important first step in addressing the unprecedented and unauthorized use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI systems,” states WGA West chief Meredith Stiehm. “Greater transparency and guardrails around AI are necessary to protect writers and other creators.”

    Stiehm’s East Coast partner, WGA East president Lisa Takeuchi Cullen added: “The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act is an important piece of legislation that will ensure companies use this new and rapidly advancing technology in ethical and transparent ways. Given the scope and potential threat of AI, enforceable regulations are urgently needed to keep companies from implementing this technology in the shadows, without people’s consent or knowledge.”

    “The Directors Guild of America commends this commonsense legislation, which is an important first step toward enabling filmmakers to protect their intellectual property from the potential harms caused by generative AI,” says DGA president Lesli Linka Glatter. “We thank Representative Schiff for championing these rights that will protect filmmakers and the entire creative community.”

    In the midst of their own negotiations right now with the AMPTP, in which AI is a distinct priority, IATSE goes straight for the bottom line when it comes to Schiff’s bill.

    “The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees commends Rep. Adam Schiff for introducing the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act,” IATSE president Matt Loeb declares. “Entertainment workers must be fairly compensated when their work is used to train, develop or generate new works by AI systems. This legislation will ensure there is appropriate transparency of generative AI training sets, thereby enabling IATSE workers to enforce their rights.”

    Since the contract agreements that ended the months-long WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes of last year, a number of guild brass have made it very clear that legislative solutions to the unmitigated growth of AI are the next logical step. To that end, SAG-AFTA and others have already been working the halls of Congress to see bills like Schiff’s hit the floor of the GOP controlled House.

    “The threats of AI to workers is a bipartisan issue, both sides know it can hurt their constituents,” one union leader said to Deadline after Schiff’s bill was introduced today. “I’ve heard concerns from almost as many Republican members as I have Democrats,” he added.

    Schiff’s bill follows up on the momentum began by President Biden’s Executive Order on AI from last October and the subsequent three-pillar strategy Vice President Kamala Harris and the administration rolled out late last month.

    On a state level, there are two bills moving through the Assembly in Sacramento that also hope to curb AI’s reach and power, especially in relation to Hollywood.

    Currently in the early stages of the legislative process, the SAG-AFTA backed and MPA opposed AB 2602 would cement protections for performers that digital recreations of them or their work could only be used with permission and compensation. Another bill, AB 1836, would put contextual and creatives limits on the AI or digital use of deceased performers, from a Sidney Poitier to a Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, a Heath Ledger and many more. At its core, AB 1836 would make use of a dead star’s likeness and performance only allowable if the 21st century use is within the context of what the performer actually did when they were alive – – AKA no Jane Wyman and Marilyn tag-team wrestling.

    As Adam Schiff said today of the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act: “This is about respecting creativity in the age of AI and marrying technological progress with fairness.”

    [ad_2]

    Dominic Patten

    Source link

  • Here’s what we know about Uber and Lyft’s planned exit from Minneapolis in May

    Here’s what we know about Uber and Lyft’s planned exit from Minneapolis in May

    [ad_1]

    MINNEAPOLIS — The future of Uber and Lyft in Minneapolis has garnered concern and debate in recent weeks after the City Council voted last month to require that ride-hailing companies pay drivers a higher rate while they are within city limits.

    Uber and Lyft responded by saying they would stop serving the Minneapolis area when the ordinance takes effect May 1, causing the city to weigh the ordinance it passed. The state could also take action, while riders and drivers are left wondering what could come next.

    Here is what we know so far:

    The Minneapolis City Council last month overrode a mayoral veto and passed an ordinance that requires ride-hailing companies to pay drivers a minimum rate of $1.40 per mile and $0.51 per minute — or $5 per ride, whichever is greater — excluding tips, for the time spent transporting passengers in Minneapolis.

    Supporters of the ordinance said the rate would ensure that companies pay drivers the equivalent of the city’s minimum wage of $15.57 per hour.

    Council Member Jamal Osman, who co-authored the ordinance, said in a statement: “Drivers are human beings with families, and they deserve dignified minimum wages like all other workers. … the Minneapolis City Council will not allow the East African community, or any community, to be exploited for cheap labor.”

    Many East African immigrants in the Minneapolis area work as Uber and Lyft drivers and have advocated for the rate increase.

    However, a recent study commissioned by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry found that a lower rate of $0.89 per mile and $0.49 per minute would meet the $15.57 per hour goal.

    Uber and Lyft said they can support the rate from the state’s study. But if the higher rate from the Minneapolis ordinance goes into effect, the companies said they will leave the market May 1.

    Josh Gold, an Uber spokesperson, said the company plans on ending its operations in Minneapolis, St. Paul and the Twin Cities metro area — including the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport.

    The metro area includes more than 3 million people, which is more than half the state’s population.

    CJ Macklin, a Lyft spokesperson, said Lyft will end its operations only in Minneapolis. Lyft will still service the airport, but will not pick up or drop off passengers at any Minneapolis locations.

    Both companies previously pulled out of Austin, Texas, in 2016, after the city pushed for fingerprint-based background checks of drivers as a rider safety measure. The companies returned after the Texas Legislature overrode the local measure and passed a law implementing different rules statewide.

    Minnesota Democratic Gov. Tim Walz said he is “deeply concerned” about the possibility of Uber and Lyft leaving the Minneapolis area.

    Walz said the move would have statewide impact and affect everyone who relies on the service, including people trying to get home safely from bars, people with disabilities, students and others.

    State lawmakers could pass legislation that would supersede the local ordinance. But Walz said the most efficient solution is to ask the Minneapolis City Council to work out a compromise.

    Minneapolis City Council members could vote to change the ordinance, take it back completely or leave it as is.

    Council member Linea Palmisano said she plans to continue voting against it unless it is changed. Palmisano said she has heard from many community members who oppose it, including students, part-time and low-income workers, hospitals and more.

    Palmisano said she has also heard from drivers who do not agree with it and “are now at risk of losing their livelihood.”

    Council member Robin Wonsley, the ordinance’s lead author, said the ordinance’s rate is “the right thing to do.”

    “For far too long, this industry has exploited workers of color and immigrant workers for cheap labor. We have the opportunity and the responsibility to build a rideshare industry that is not based on poverty wages and exploitation,” she said.

    Residents in the Twin Cities metro area are divided — some support the ordinance because it will help marginalized workers, while others oppose it because they don’t want Uber and Lyft to leave.

    Marianna Brown, an Uber driver in her 60s living in a suburb of Minneapolis, supports the ordinance and isn’t worried, saying other ride-hailing companies — and even a local driver-owned co-op — are planning to enter the Minneapolis market. Brown, a Jamaican immigrant, said drivers have been abused by Uber and Lyft for too long.

    Arianna Feldman, 31, of Minneapolis, said she supports the ordinance and has taken close to 2,000 rides on Lyft because she doesn’t drive, has health issues and doesn’t have access to reliable public transit.

    “I think it’s really shameful that these multimillion-dollar companies are holding us hostage like this and punishing communities for demanding a very basic right to get compensated correctly,” she said.

    Jake Clark, 44, of St. Paul, is an Uber and Lyft driver and opposes the ordinance. Clark said he has never earned less than $25 per hour and has earned up to $75 per hour because he prioritizes customer service and strategizes which rides to accept.

    Michael Sack, 34, of Minneapolis, also opposes the ordinance. He has cerebral palsy and serves on the Minneapolis Advisory Committee on People with Disabilities. He urged the City Council and state Legislature to find a way to increase drivers’ pay while keeping ride-hailing services affordable.

    “It is critical to keep the cost of rides down because people with low incomes, which most individuals with impairments have, utilize Uber and Lyft,” he said.

    ___

    Trisha Ahmed is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on under-covered issues. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @TrishaAhmed15

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Yellen calls for level playing field for US workers and firms during China visit

    Yellen calls for level playing field for US workers and firms during China visit

    [ad_1]

    GUANGZHOU, China — U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen called on China on Friday to address manufacturing overcapacity that she said risks causing global economic dislocation, and to create a level playing field for American companies and workers.

    Starting a five-day visit in one of China’s major industrial and export hubs, she raised what the U.S. considers to be unfair Chinese trade practices in talks with senior Chinese officials.

    “The United States seeks a healthy economic relationship with China that benefits both sides,” she said ahead of a meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in the southern city of Guangzhou. “But a healthy relationship must provide a level playing field for firms and workers in both countries.”

    Earlier, she said at an an event hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce in China that there are “Chinese practices that are tilting the playing field away from American workers and firms.”

    He didn’t get into specifics in his remarks before the media but said that both sides “need to properly respond to key concerns of the other side.”

    High on Yellen’s list is the overcapacity issue. Chinese government subsidies and other policy support have encouraged solar panel and EV makers in China to invest in factories, building far more production capacity than the domestic market can absorb.

    The massive scale of production has driven down costs and ignited price wars for green technologies, a boon for consumers and efforts to reduce global dependence on fossil fuels. But Western governments fear that that capacity will flood their markets with low-priced exports, threatening American and European jobs.

    Yellen, the first Cabinet-level official to visit China since President Joe Biden met Chinese leader Xi Jinping last November, told the vice premier and the governor of Guangdong province in separate meetings that it is important for the U.S. and China to have open and direct communication on areas of disagreement.

    “This includes the issue of China’s industrial overcapacity, which the United States and other countries are concerned can cause global spillovers,” she said during her meeting with the governor.

    Guangzhou is the provincial capital of Guangdong, a Chinese manufacturing and export hub that is home to telecom giant Huawei and BYD, China’s largest EV maker. Huawei has been hit hard by U.S. restrictions on semiconductor exports to China and is at the vanguard of Chinese efforts to become self-sufficient and a leader in technology.

    Yellen, who will also visit Beijing on her trip, met with both U.S. and European and Japanese business representatives before her meeting with He.

    “I’ve heard from many American business executives that operating in China can be challenging,” she said at the American Chamber event in an auditorium at a marbled convention center in the Baiyun District of Guangzhou.

    Citing a recent survey by the Chamber that found that a third of American firms in China say they have experienced unfair treatment compared with local competitors, Yellen said the U.S. has seen China “pursue unfair economic practices, including imposing barriers to access for foreign firms and taking coercive actions against American companies.”

    “I strongly believe that this doesn’t only hurt these American firms: Ending these unfair practices would benefit China by improving the business climate here. I intend to raise these issues in meetings this week,” she said in her speech.

    China has pushed back against the overcapacity concerns expressed by both the U.S. and Europe.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said earlier this week that the growth in Chinese EV and solar exports is conducive to green development globally and the result of the international division of labor and market demand.

    He accused the U.S. of interfering with free trade by restricting technology exports to China.

    “As for who is doing non-market manipulation, the fact is for everyone to see,” he said. “The U.S. has not stopped taking measures to contain China’s trade and technology. This is not ‘de-risking,’ rather, it is creating risks.”

    Yellen said at the American Chamber event that “excess capacity is a concern that many countries share — from a range of advanced and developing countries and is not something that’s new.”

    “This is not anti-China policy,” she said. “It’s an effort for us to mitigate the risks from the inevitable global economic dislocation that will result if China doesn’t adjust its policies.”

    Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing — an alliance of businesses and the U.S. Steelworkers union — told The Associated Press ahead of Yellen’s trip that there are low expectations about the Chinese government’s response.

    “One thing that Yellen hopefully can and should say is that the U.S. is prepared to use all the tools that we have available through policy to ensure that China’s industrial overcapacity doesn’t negatively harm our economic and national security interests,” he said.

    The Alliance released a report in February that says the introduction of inexpensive Chinese autos to the American market “could end up being an extinction-level event for the U.S. auto sector.” The U.S. auto sector accounts for 3% of America’s GDP, according to the report.

    Yellen told reporters Wednesday during an Alaska refueling stop en route to Asia that the U.S. “won’t rule out” tariffs to respond to China’s heavily subsidized manufacturing of green energy products.

    ___

    Moritsugu reported from Beijing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon cutting hundreds of jobs in its cloud computing unit AWS

    Amazon cutting hundreds of jobs in its cloud computing unit AWS

    [ad_1]

    Amazon said Wednesday it’s cutting hundreds of jobs in its cloud computing unit AWS as part of a strategic shift.

    The company will trim “a few hundred roles” in the team that overlooks technology for physical stores, a move that comes just a day after Amazon said it was ditching Just Walk Out technology in its U.S. grocery stores.

    In addition to the physical stores technology team, Amazon said it’s cutting “several hundred roles” in the AWS sales, marketing and global service organization. Most of those cuts are related to business changes in AWS training and certification programs as well as sales operations. The tech giant said it was also making cuts elsewhere so it can invest in other business priorities.

    “These decisions are difficult but necessary as we continue to invest, hire, and optimize resources to deliver innovation for our customers,” Amazon spokesperson Duncan Neasham said in a statement.

    The AWS layoffs follow other layoffs that happened at Amazon and its subsidiaries this year. In January, the company cut several hundred positions across its Prime Video and MGM Studios unit. That same month, Twitch, the popular social media platform owned by Amazon, laid off more than 500 jobs in a bid to save on costs. The online audiobook and podcast service Audible also laid off about 5% of its workforce.

    Amazon says it will continue to hire in priority areas. The company currently has thousands of AWS job openings posted online. It says it will try to find internal opportunities for employees whose roles are impacted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link