ReportWire

Tag: labor

  • Microsoft’s World of Warcraft development workers are unionizing

    Microsoft’s World of Warcraft development workers are unionizing

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — More than 500 workers behind the popular video game franchisee “World of Warcraft” are unionizing.

    The game’s development team employees — which include designers, engineers, artists, quality assurance testers and more — are joining the Communications Workers of America, the union announced Wednesday. CWA says Microsoft subsidiary Blizzard Entertainment, World of Warcraft’s publisher, has recognized the union.

    The World of Warcraft Game Makers Guild – CWA Union is the first wall-to-wall union seen at Activision Blizzard and the largest of this kind at a Microsoft-owned studio to date, according to CWA. It also builds on an expansion of organized labor seen among Microsoft video game workers since the tech giant’s $69 billion purchase of Activision Blizzard last year.

    Gaming workers have been able to organize thanks to a “labor neutrality” agreement that took effect with the acquisition. In an unusual arrangement for the industry to help address concerns about the merger made back in 2022, Microsoft pledged to stay neutral if Activision Blizzard workers in the U.S. and Canada seek to organize into a labor union.

    With Wednesday’s World of Warcraft news, alongside other recent organizing efforts, CWA says more than 1,750 video game workers at Microsoft now have representation with the union.

    “What we’ve accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning,” Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst and member of the newly-formed guild said in a statement — noting that the next step is a strong contract. “We know that when workers have a protected voice, it’s a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience.”

    Tom Smith, senior director of organizing at CWA, added that Wednesday’s news “marks a key inflection point” in the broader industrywide efforts to organize video game workers.

    Also on Wenesday, CWA announced that a group of 60 quality assurance workers at Blizzard Entertainment in Austin, Texas, also joined the union and were recognized by Microsoft. These quality assurance workers — who work on franchisees like Diablo and Hearthstone — and World of Warcraft’s development employees both had their unions confirmed by a neutral arbitrator after a majority signed authorization cards or cast support through an online portal, CWA said.

    In a statement to The Associated Press Thursday, a spokesperson for Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft said the company continues “to support our employees’ right to choose how they are represented in the workplace” and will negotiate with the CWA in good faith to work towards a collective bargaining agreement.

    The World of Warcraft workers’ union representation marks a “significant milestone” in a journey that dates back to a 2021 employee walkout at Activision Blizzard’s headquarters, CWA noted Wednesday. That protest was in response to a sweeping sexual harassment and discrimination lawsuit brought forth by California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which was settled following the Microsoft acquisition last year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Airline catering workers threaten to strike as soon as next week without agreement on new contract

    Airline catering workers threaten to strike as soon as next week without agreement on new contract

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — More than 8,000 airline catering workers are threatening to go on strike as soon as next week, adding more uncertainty to summer travel, which has already been disrupted by fallout from a widespread technology outage.

    The workers are employed by Gategourmet, a subsidiary of a Swiss company. They prepare, pack and deliver food and drinks to planes at about 30 U.S. airports.

    Unions representing the workers said Friday they have been negotiating six years for better pay and health insurance. The unions, including Unite Here and the Teamsters, say that only 25% of the workers are in the company’s health plan and, as of January, some were paid as little as $13 an hour.

    Although the catering workers are not employed by airlines, their unions argue that the airlines’ profitability means that subcontractors like Gategourmet should be able to pay their workers better.

    Gategourmet said it has made an “industry-leading offer” that includes wage and health care improvements. The company said the sides “have made progress” in the last few days, but if there is a strike at the early-Tuesday deadline, it will use “workaround options” to ensure minimal disruption to airlines.

    Strikes in the airline industry are rare because of federal law requiring mediators to determine that future negotiations are unlikely to result in a settlement. In this case, the National Mediation Board released the unions from mediation June 29, which started a countdown toward a potential legal strike.

    The two sides were meeting Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Starbucks workers union asks for community support this weekend in fight for a fair contract

    Starbucks workers union asks for community support this weekend in fight for a fair contract

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo by McKenna Schueler/Orlando Weekly

    Courtney Thompson (left) stands on the picket line with fellow Starbucks workers at Central Florida’s only unionized Starbucks on March 22, 2023.

    Unionized Starbucks workers across the country, and right here in the Orlando area, are calling for community support this weekend, asking the public to visit local union stores and wear red to support workers’ fight for a fair union contract.

    “As we continue making progress toward our contracts with the company, union Starbucks workers are asking for your help!” the union wrote on a webpage promoting the event.

    “During Red for Bread Weekend (July 26-29, Friday through Monday), stand in solidarity with us by stopping by your local union shop, wearing something red, grabbing a beverage (or free water) under the name ‘UNION STRONG,’ and sharing some words of encouragement with baristas who are more than RED-dy for a collective bargaining agreement!” the page reads.

    The Orlando metro area, while suffering no shortage of Starbucks locations (in addition to other locally owned favorites like Foxtail, Lineage and Drunken Monkey) currently has just one unionized Starbucks, located at 305 E. Mitchell Hammock Road in Oviedo.

    Workers there, in a historic victory for the region, became the first Starbucks workers in Central Florida to unionize back in 2022, although they have since recently been joined by baristas at another Starbucks location in Tampa. A wave of organizing within the chain first took the U.S. by storm in 2021, when workers at a Starbucks in Buffalo, New York became the first to successfully unionize with the labor union Workers United.

    Since then, more than 470 locations and 10,500 Starbucks workers across 45 states and the District of Columbia have unionized, inspiring workers for other retail and service employers — like Trader Joe’s and Amazon — to apply the same grassroots energy to their own efforts.

    Clay Blastic, a shift supervisor at the union Starbucks in Oviedo, told Orlando Weekly their location has suffered turnover recently (not uncommon in the industry) and that those new to the store — and new to the union — would welcome a show of support.

    “This community has had our back in this long fight from the election to today, and I hope we can continue the work and support as [we] fight in contract negotiations,” Blastic told Orlando Weekly in a text. “They’ve been invaluable in giving us the support to keep going.”

    Baristas at unionized Starbucks locations have been in what has been, in the past, an aggressive fight with their employer — a multibillion-dollar coffee giant — to reach an agreement on a union contract.

    Starbucks has been accused in hundreds of complaints with the federal labor board of committing unfair labor practices — essentially, violations of federal labor law. It has poured hefty resources into lawyers from notoriously anti-union law firms like Littler Mendelson. A number of pro-union workers were allegedly fired by Starbucks for their union activity, while others have reported other forms of retaliation for supporting the union, such as being scheduled fewer hours or facing discipline for wearing pro-union pins on the job — all common tactics of union busters.

    However, the tide shifted in what was considered by both sides to be a major breakthrough this February, when the union and Starbucks agreed to begin talks on a foundational framework for union contracts. Even President Joe Biden weighed in on the announcement, offering his support.

    “Today, I applaud workers and Starbucks for announcing a framework that respects the right to form and join unions. When workers win, we all win,” Biden shared in a post on X.

    Starbucks workers are largely advocating for better scheduling and staffing practices, quality healthcare benefits, a living wage that allows baristas to afford to live in their communities, and a commitment from Starbucks to have workers’ backs when they face harassment from customers.

    According to the union, both parties have held monthly bargaining sessions for contract talks, with more than 400 workers from unionized locations involved. Workers involved are democratically elected by their fellow coworkers to represent them in contract talks as delegates or caucus members, according to the union.

    “Starbucks and Workers United met last week in Dallas, Texas to continue advancing the framework intended to be the foundation of each single-store contract,” the union shared in a statement with Orlando Weekly. “The two days of positive negotiations advanced non-economic measures within that framework. We look forward to continuing negotiations, and our goal remains to reach ratified contracts for partners in represented stores by the end of this year.”

    Blastic, the Starbucks worker at the Oviedo location, told Orlando Weekly they have already heard from a couple of local organizations that plan to show up this weekend to support them, including Central Florida Jobs with Justice and the Orlando chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America — both of which have similarly demonstrated solidarity with the union in the past.

    Readers can make their own pledge to visit their local union Starbucks this weekend here. A map of unionized locations is available on the union’s website.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Video Game Performers Are Going on Strike Over AI

    Video Game Performers Are Going on Strike Over AI

    [ad_1]

    Actors in the video game industry are going on strike. On Thursday, the union representing voice and motion-capture performers announced they would be walking off the job after talks with major video game companies broke down over concerns over AI protections. The work stoppage is set to begin Friday.

    “We’re not going to consent to a contract that allows companies to abuse AI to the detriment of our members,” Fran Drescher, the president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which represents the performers, said in a prepared statement. “Enough is enough. When these companies get serious about offering an agreement our members can live—and work—with, we will be here, ready to negotiate.”

    Several members of SAG-AFTRA are currently at Comic-Con International in San Diego for panels and other appearances. They will still be able to honor their obligations this weekend “given the close proximity” of the strike announcement to the event, which runs through Sunday. “Solidarity,” Dragon Age: The Veilguard voice actor Erika Ishii posted on X. “We’ll be fulfilling contracts at SDCC but afterwards we hold the line.” Last year’s Hollywood strikes greatly reduced the number of performers able to participate in Comic-Con events.

    Tensions over AI between SAG members and major video game companies have been high for months. Negotiations between the two sides began in earnest in October 2022. Members voted to authorize a strike in September of 2023. “Eighteen months of negotiations have shown us that our employers are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation,” Sarah Elmaleh, SAG’s negotiating chair for the Interactive Media Agreement (IMA) that covers video game workers, said in a statement. “We refuse this paradigm—we will not leave any of our members behind, nor will we wait for sufficient protection any longer.”

    In the video game industry, actors regularly lend their voice, likeness, and even movements to projects. Voice acting and motion-capture are a crucial part of game development, even as AI begins to change the way developers create their games. Despite success on other points, video game companies and SAG have been unable to find common ground on AI.

    “We are disappointed the union has chosen to walk away when we are so close to a deal, and we remain prepared to resume negotiations,” Audrey Cooling, a spokesperson for the video game companies involved in the negotiations said in a statement to WIRED. That group includes companies such as Activision, Disney, Electronic Arts, Insomniac Games, Take-Two, and Warner Bros. , among others.

    “We have already found common ground on 24 out of 25 proposals, including historic wage increases and additional safety provisions,” Cooling said. “Our offer is directly responsive to SAG-AFTRA’s concerns and extends meaningful AI protections that include requiring consent and fair compensation to all performers working under the IMA. These terms are among the strongest in the entertainment industry.”

    [ad_2]

    Megan Farokhmanesh

    Source link

  • Denver’s janitors could go on strike for better wages and workloads 

    Denver’s janitors could go on strike for better wages and workloads 

    [ad_1]

    Eva Martinez has worked as a janitor in Denver for the past 30 years, much of that spent cleaning Republic Plaza, the tallest building in Colorado. 

    Before the pandemic, a group of 26 janitors cleaned the building’s 56 floors. Now, that staff is made up of just a dozen people.

    “We’ve just seen our workloads go up tremendously and we feel like we’re just not being respected or treated right,” Martinez said in Spanish through a translator. “We are essential workers. We don’t feel like we’re being treated that way.”

    That’s why Martinez is prepared to go on strike if necessary, alongside fellow members of Service Employees International Union Local 105. The union represents more than 2,400 janitorial workers in Denver. 

    The workers’ current contract expires on Sunday, which means union representatives are spending their days at the negotiating table with a number of companies that employ Denver’s janitors. 

    Maria Hernandez shouts, “Si se puede!” as she casts a vote with other local janitors to unionize, during a Service Employees International Union rally downtown. July 23, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    On Tuesday, union members voted unanimously that they would be willing to strike if the two parties do not reach a deal in time. Approval to strike does not necessarily mean workers will go on strike, but it gives the negotiating team leverage at the bargaining table if the two sides do not reach a deal.

    Tuesday morning, a few dozen janitors with SEIU gathered in downtown Denver to vote and drum up support for workers.

    The mood at 17th Street and California Street was joyous. Workers played music and shouted chants including, “Sí, se puede,” or “Yes you can,” a Spanish labor motto dating back to labor organizing on behalf of farm workers in the 1970s. 

    Surrounding the workers were some of Denver’s tallest buildings, many of which they personally have cleaned for years. Cars driving by honked in support of the janitors as people cast ballots. 

    According to union members, the two of the most important issues are wages and workload, plus concerns of retaliation or job loss if workers do not finish unrealistic workloads. 

    “I personally don’t think with what the companies are talking to us, what they’re offering us, any janitor will be able to live and work in Denver,” Martinez said in Spanish. “What they’re offering us truly is miserable, and that’s why I’m here and I’m standing strong with all my coworkers.”

    At the other side of the bargaining table is a group of employers that provide janitorial services to commercial buildings in Denver.

    John Nesse is a lawyer working on behalf of the employers organized in a group called Denver Maintenance Contractors Association. 

    “Our current agreement includes industry-leading wages and benefits, including health insurance and paid time off,” Nesse said in a statement to Denverite. 

    A group of people in purple shirts stand in front of purple tents on a city sidewalk.
    Service Employees International Union members rally with local janitors as they vote to unionize, at a picket line on California Street downtown. July 23, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    The union’s requests for pay, health care and paid time off increases would “add significant cost” for the employers in a turbulent economy for the commercial real estate industry, Nesse said in the statement.

    Commercial properties have struggled since the pandemic, with office vacancy rates continuing to rise downtown.

    “As we negotiate this contract, the employers are mindful of the economic challenges currently facing the Denver commercial office market,” Nesse wrote. “We are committed to negotiating an agreement in the mutual interest of all parties — including our employees, our customers, and our cleaning companies. We are disappointed that the union is threatening to strike, but we will continue to negotiate in good faith until a new agreement is reached.”

    Cost of living is a big concern for Denver’s janitors, many of whom make minimum wage. 

    Ruben Rivera has faced these challenges working as a janitor in Denver for nearly 20 years.

    “My family is constantly struggling to figure out just the basics,” Rivera said in Spanish through a translator. “We’re constantly having to decide, what can we do? Can we pay the rent? Can we be able to put food on the table?”

    Stephanie Felix-Sowy, president of SEIU Local 105, said that workers feel conditions and affordability have worsened in recent years. 

    A woman in a purple SEIU shirt smiles as she raises one fist and holds a protest over her head with her other hand. She's surrounded by people doing the same.
    Maria Hernandez (center) chants with Service Employees International Union members, as they rally and as local janitors like her vote to unionize. July 23, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    “I always ask my members this in every one of our contracts. ‘Would you refer this position to any of your family or friends?’” Felix-Sowy said. “That has changed over the last four or five years to where now they’re saying ‘No, I tell them to go look for work somewhere else. I used to, but that’s no longer the case.’”

    The advocacy is particularly important to Denver’s Latino community, Felix-Sowy said.

    “Ninety percent of our members are Latina immigrant women, predominantly, majority Spanish speaking,” she said. “Our members feel like they’re part of the fabric of the city. They’re part of the immigrant fabric, but just general fabric of the city, and they take a ton of pride in the fact that they have for decades now held up this industry.”

    As politicians talk about revitalizing downtown, janitors say they’re a crucial part of that goal and that their contract should reflect that.

    Multiple union members and supporters mentioned Mayor Mike Johnston’s State of the City from the day before. The mayor had talked about making downtown vibrant after a pandemic that left many office buildings and streets empty.

    Denver Clerk and Recorder Paul López stopped by Tuesday’s rally. He worked as a janitor in Denver and organized with the union before his election to City Council and later to the Clerk and Recorder’s Office. 

    A woman in a purple SEIU shirt smiles widely as she yells into a megaphone.
    Teresa Noriega yells into a megaphone, rallying with Service Employees International Union members as local janitors vote to unionize at a picket line on California Street downtown. July 23, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    “Yesterday I was sitting on the stage at the State of the City and I heard a lot of talk about downtown,” he said. “I heard a lot of talk about making downtown livable and safe and making it a downtown for all. It starts right here with making sure that janitors that are maintaining downtown and other workers from our community that are building downtown, that they could also afford to live here too.”

    López recalled cleaning concourses at Mile High Stadium in his teens, working 12 hour days without overtime and helping his father finish shifts without pay because the workload was too high. 

    “There’s always a fight not just to maintain the contract that you fought for years, since the eighties actually, but that you move that forward, that those conditions continue to improve” he said.

    Editor’s note: This article was updated with the results of Tuesday’s strike vote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon Prime Day is a major cause of injuries for warehouse workers, Senate review says

    Amazon Prime Day is a major cause of injuries for warehouse workers, Senate review says

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Amazon’s popular Prime Day sales event has been “a major cause of injuries” for warehouse workers who pick and pack customer orders at the e-commerce giant’s facilities across the United States, according to a report released Tuesday by Sen. Bernie Sanders.

    The report, which draws information from a year-long Senate committee investigation into Amazon’s safety practices and relied on internal company data from 2019 and 2020, said peak shopping times – including the holiday shopping period – resulted in the “highest weekly injury rates” for warehouse workers.

    The preliminary report from Sanders’ office was also based on interviews with more than 100 current and former Amazon employees. This year’s two-day Prime Day event started Tuesday.

    In a statement, Sanders said the “incredibly dangerous working conditions at Amazon” highlighted in the report are a “perfect example of the type of corporate greed that the American people are sick and tired of.”

    “Despite making $36 billion in profits last year and providing its CEO with over $275 million in compensation over the past three years, Amazon continues to treat its workers as disposable and with complete contempt for their safety and well-being,” said the Vermont independent, who has been critical of Amazon and supports worker efforts to unionize at the company. “That is unacceptable, and that has got to change.”

    Labor unions and safety experts have long criticized Amazon, alleging the company’s focus on speed and fast deliveries puts workers in danger. In recent years, some states have passed laws aimed at Amazon to curb the use of warehouse productivity quotas, though the company claims it doesn’t employ them.

    According to the Senate report, 45 out of 100 warehouse at Amazon received injuries during the 2019 Prime Day event. The number included minor injuries the company was not required to disclose to the federal government, such as bruises and superficial cuts, but also serious ones such as concussions that should have been reported, it said.

    Amazon disputed the finding.

    “The claims that we systemically underreport injuries, and that our actual injury rates are higher than publicly reported, are false,” Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel said in a prepared statement. “We’re required to report every injury that needs more than basic first aid, and that’s what we do.”

    While Amazon “might make an occasional clerical error,” a six-month federal investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration found “no intentional, willful, or systemic errors” in the company’s reporting, Nantel said.

    The report also alleged that Amazon had a practice of failing to refer workers for outside medical care because doing so could affect whether an injury should be considered “recordable” and referred to OSHA. Even when injuries were serious and might have required extra medical attention, workers often received first aid before being sent back to work instead of to a doctor, it said.

    Amazon has acknowledged in the past that its warehouse injury rates had been higher compared to its peers. Federal safety investigators levied fines against the company in recent years following inspections at some of its warehouses. Some of the inspections arose from referrals made to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which is also investigating worker safety at the company through its civil division.

    Last month, California fined Amazon a total of $5.9 million, accusing the company of violating the state’s Warehouse Quota Law at two facilities.

    A spokesperson for Sanders’ office said the committee relied on 2019 and 2020 workplace injury rate data because that’s what Amazon provided for the inquiry.

    However, Amazon spokesperson Nantel said that the Senate review ignored the progress the company has made since 2019 in reducing its rate of recordable incidents – those which require more care than basic first aid – by 28%. The company also has improved the rate of significant injuries that require an employee to miss at least a day of work by 75%, she said.

    “We’ve cooperated throughout this investigation, including providing thousands of pages of information and documents,” Nantel said. “But unfortunately, this report (which was not shared with us before publishing) ignores our progress and paints a one-sided, false narrative using only a fraction of the information we’ve provided. It draws sweeping and inaccurate conclusions based on unverified anecdotes, and it misrepresents documents that are several years old and contained factual errors and faulty analysis.”

    The report also says Amazon failed to adequately staff its warehouses during peak shopping times, which the company disputed. Amazon said in March that it allocated over $750 million to safety efforts for this year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Shinola Hotel partner responds to ‘baseless’ discrimination lawsuit

    Shinola Hotel partner responds to ‘baseless’ discrimination lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    The Shinola Hotel’s operating partner has responded to a racial discrimination lawsuit filed earlier this month on behalf of a Black Detroit man who claims his resume was ignored until he resubmitted it with the white-sounding name “John Jebrowski.”

    In a statement, Sage Hospitality called the lawsuit “baseless” and touted its diverse workforce.

    “Unfortunately, it is clear that the plaintiff’s attorney is spreading these false allegations through the media in an attempt to intimidate the company and cause reputational and financial harm,” Sage Hospitality Group president Daniel del Olmo said.

    “Here are the facts: since Sage Hospitality took over operations of the Shinola Hotel in November 2023, more than 78% of the new hires self-identify as people of color and 66% of those new hires self-identify as Black or African American,” he continued. “71% of the employees who have been promoted since Sage Hospitality took over operations identify as people of color and 57% of those promoted identify as Black or African American.”

    He added, “Today, almost 75% of our team members are people of color. 60% of those team members are Black. Our diverse workforce is represented on every level of our organization ranging from entry level employees to directors who serve on our executive leadership team.”

    Sage Hospitality notes that a number of the positions that plaintiff Dwight Jackson, 27, applied for were given to other Black applicants.

    “Our preliminary review of the facts reveal significant inconsistencies with the plaintiff’s allegations in this lawsuit,” the statement continues. “Of the four roles for which the plaintiff applied, three of them were filled by Black applicants. Both of the positions the plaintiff applied for using the false name ‘John Jebrowski’ were filled by Black people. It is important to note that all of these positions were filled prior to this lawsuit.”

    The statement continues, “While we can not disclose further details as it relates to this specific matter, we want to assure you, our team members and our community, that discrimination of any kind will never be tolerated. Sage Hospitality has a demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion and is recognized as a national leader in hospitality. We believe that everyone benefits from a diverse and inclusive environment and will continue to foster an inclusive workplace.”

    The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Jackson by Marko Law, PLLC. The firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    According to the lawsuit, Jackson has “extensive” hospitality experience and applied to work at the luxury hotel multiple times between January and April of this year without getting any response.

    After he applied as “John Jebrowski,” he claimed he got a response within a week.

    The lawsuit alleges that the incident is a violation of the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.

    After this article was published, Marko Law provided a statement to Metro Times.

    “The evidence in this case is clear,” the statement reads. “Sage Hospitality hides behind being a ‘diverse’ company on its face. However, evidence suggests the complete opposite when a deeper dive is done. There have been numerous witnesses that have come forward, stating that multiple black employees were terminated from their roles or were not hired because they were not ‘luxury enough.’ Furthermore, when Sage Hospitality hires black employees, they are constantly overlooked for promotions even though they are more qualified. Sage Hospitality simply does enough to look good on paper while hiding the truth from reality. This is a common defense tactic that Marko Law sees in racial discrimination claims, and this case is no different.”

    This article was updated with a statement from Marko Law.

    [ad_2]

    Lee DeVito

    Source link

  • Tesla’s Cheaper Long-Range Model 3 Is Back

    Tesla’s Cheaper Long-Range Model 3 Is Back

    [ad_1]

    Plus: The Ford Capri returns as an EV, Samsung workers are on indefinite labor strike, and the market for anti-obesity drugs is messier than ever.

    [ad_2]

    Boone Ashworth

    Source link

  • No, Project 2025 plan wouldn’t eliminate OSHA, overtime

    No, Project 2025 plan wouldn’t eliminate OSHA, overtime

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden and Democrats have launched a campaign blitz against Project 2025, tying the proposed conservative agenda to former President Donald Trump, who has tried to distance himself from the plan.

    Others social media users have also attacked the plan and how they say it will affect Americans.

    “Fun Fact: Project 2025 eliminates OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) and overtime wages,” a July 7 Threads post said.

    Other social media posts shared one or both of the OSHA and overtime claims.

    The Threads post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Threads, Facebook and Instagram.)

    Project 2025 is a policy platform drafted by more than 100 conservative organizations and led by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative, Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The project is referred to as a “2025 Presidential Transition Project” and outlines a sweeping policy agenda; efforts to hire and train conservatives to execute it; and a plan to create a 180-day playbook for the next administration.

    A Project 2025 spokesperson told PolitiFact in an email that the claims about eliminating OSHA and overtime wages are “completely false”.

    The spokesperson said the plan calls for greater flexibility in overtime pay so that workers, particularly those with families, can have more flexibility in their hours without receiving smaller paychecks, adding that it also calls for greater clarity in overtime rules so that more employers will offer fringe benefits to hourly workers.

    Labor law experts also told PolitiFact that the Project 2025 plan doesn’t eliminate OSHA or overtime, but said some workers could lose overtime protections if the plan’s proposals are enacted.

    (Threads screenshot)

    What does Project 2025 say about OSHA?

    OSHA is a U.S. Labor Department division that sets and enforces safe and healthy working conditions for U.S. employers.

    Jenn Round, the director of Beyond the Bill, a program that advocates for labor standards enforcement, at Rutgers University’s Workplace Justice Lab, said, “I don’t see anything in the plan that calls for the elimination of OSHA. There are provisions that are meant to ‘rein in’ OSHA, as the general policy states.” 

    Edwin Feulner, the Heritage Foundation’s founder, writes in the policy agenda’s afterword about the importance of having conservative political appointees in agencies, saying they “must serve to ‘watch the watchers’ in the departments and agencies they oversee.” 

    “They must rein in agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which the Biden Administration weaponized to attempt to force COVID-19 vaccine mandates on 84 million Americans through their workplaces,” the document states. Feulner also singled out agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Chapter 18 of the plan, which focuses on the Labor Department and related agencies, refers to OSHA in this way: 

    • It proposes that Congress and the Labor Department should “exempt small business, first-time, non-willful violators from fines issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.”

    • The Labor Department should clarify that a home office is not subject to OSHA regulations.

    • Labor agencies should use their discretion under the law to “exempt small entities from regulations where possible.”

    • Focus health and safety inspections on egregious offenders.

    But nowhere does the plan call for eliminating OSHA.

    What does it say about overtime pay?

    The plan also doesn’t call for eliminating overtime wages outright, as the Threads post claimed.

    But some of the plan’s overtime proposals could result in some workers losing overtime protections, experts told PolitiFact.

    Among overtime proposals are for the Labor Department to maintain an overtime threshold “that does not punish businesses in lower-cost regions (e.g., the southeast United States).”

    The overtime threshold is the amount of money executive, administrative or professional employees need to make for an employer to exempt them from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

    The Trump-era threshold is high enough to cover most line workers in lower-cost regions, the plan said.

    In 2019, Trump’s Labor Department finalized a rule that expanded overtime pay eligibility to most salaried workers earning less than about $35,568, which it said made about 1.3 million more workers eligible for overtime pay.

    The Biden administration raised that threshold to $43,888 beginning July 1, and that will rise to $58,656 on Jan. 1, 2025. That would grant overtime eligibility to about 4 million workers, the Labor Department said. The Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning Washington, D.C.-based think tank, put that number at 4.3 million workers.

    It’s unclear how many workers Project 2025’s proposal to return to the Trump-era overtime threshold in some parts of the country would affect, but presumably some would lose the right to overtime wages.

    “This would ostensibly create different overtime thresholds for different parts of the country,” Round said. “It’s hard to say how many of these workers would lose those protections without more specifics on what is considered a lower-cost region.” 

    Other overtime proposals in the 2025 plan include:

    • Congress should enact the Working Families Flexibility Act, which would let private sector workers choose to accumulate paid time off instead of overtime pay.

    • Congress should amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to require employers to pay workers overtime for working on the Sabbath (Sunday in most cases).

    • Congress should clarify that remote workers can get overtime only if they exceed 10 hours of work in a specific day and their total hours for the week exceed 40.

    • Congress should give employers and employees flexibility to calculate the overtime period over a number of weeks, so a worker could choose to work more hours in one week and fewer the next, rather than get overtime pay.

    • Congress should clarify that the “regular rate” for overtime pay is based on the salary paid rather than all benefits provided. 

    Labor law experts told PolitiFact that employers could abuse some proposals framed as giving workers a choice.

    Cornell University senior lecturer Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of Labor Education Research at its School of Industrial and Labor Relations, said that because most workers lack union protections, the Project 2025 proposal “gives the employer enormous coercive power to force workers to take time off” instead of overtime pay.

    Round said that some employers could then “never allow workers to use their banked PTO, effectively eliminating overtime pay.”

    She added that redefining the overtime period to several weeks, as Project 2025 proposes, “would significantly undermine overtime protections.” 

    “The policy effectively dismantles the standard workweek,” she said.

    Our ruling

    A Threads post claimed Project 2025 would eliminate OSHA and overtime wages if enacted. The plan does not outright call to eliminate either of those things, but proposes changes that would affect them.

    Project 2025 calls for lessening restrictions under OSHA and flagged it as one of several federal agencies that need to be reined in, citing Biden’s attempt to use it to enforce COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

    The plan also proposes changing overtime rules, including lowering the threshold for employers to exempt salaried employees in some parts of the country and letting employees choose time off instead of overtime pay. Some experts said lowering the threshold could decrease the number of people eligible for overtime and that some employers could exploit changed overtime rules.

    But Project 2025’s proposals would eliminate neither OSHA nor overtime wages. The claim is False.

    RELATED:

    No, Project 2025 didn’t call for ‘period passports’ for women; claim originated as satire 

    No, Project 2025 doesn’t mention eliminating Social Security and disability benefits 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fact-checking President Joe Biden’s NATO press conference

    Fact-checking President Joe Biden’s NATO press conference

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden defended his ability to serve as president and the Democratic nominee against former President Donald Trump during a July 11 press conference following the NATO summit in Washington, D.C. 

    The press conference — his first in eight months — came amid calls from some congressional Democrats and donors for Biden to drop out of the presidential race after his June 27 debate performance. Biden said he wouldn’t drop out unless his team showed him there was no path for him to win. 

    “No one’s saying that. No poll says that,” Biden said in a whisper.

    Here are the facts on seven of the president’s comments. 

    Says Donald Trump “already told Putin and I quote, ‘Do whatever the hell you want.’ In fact, the day after Putin invaded Ukraine, here’s what he said, ‘It was genius. It was wonderful.’” 

    Biden left out context and was off about when Trump paid Putin the compliment.

    Trump, at a Feb. 10 campaign rally in South Carolina, recalled a conversation with an unnamed leader of a NATO member state who he said asked whether the U.S. would protect the leader’s country if it were attacked by Russia, even if it hadn’t met defense spending targets. Trump said he told the leader, “No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay. You gotta pay your bills.” 

    Trump did praise Russian President Vladimir Putin two days before he invaded Ukraine, not the day after, as Biden said.

    Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. 

    On a Feb. 22, 2022, radio show, Trump was complimentary of Putin’s decision to declare breakaway regions of Ukraine as independent. 

    “I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, ‘This is genius.’ Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent,” Trump said, adding, “Oh, that’s wonderful,” sarcastically.

    “So, Putin is now saying, ‘It’s independent,’ a large section of Ukraine. I said, ‘How smart is that?’ And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. That’s strongest peace force. … We could use that on our southern border,” Trump said. “That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy … I know him very well. Very, very well.”

    “Trump’s calling for a 10% tariff on everything Americans buy, including foods from overseas, vegetables, and other necessities. And economists tell us that that would cost the average American working family another $2,500 a year. It’s a tax of $2,500 a year.”

    Economists say Trump’s proposed 10% tariff on all imported foreign products (not “everything Americans buy”) will cost consumers more money, but Biden’s $2,500 figure is higher than recent estimates.

    How much the tariff will cost consumers is debatable. The American Action Forum, a center-right think tank, estimated June 25 that households would pay from $1,700 to $2,350 more annually. The Peterson Institute of International Economics, another think tank focused on global economic matters, estimated in May that a middle-income household would pay about $1,700 more per year.

    The Center for American Progress, a left-leaning policy research organization, in March estimated cost to consumers at $1,500.

    “I took executive action last month. As a consequence, working with Mexico, border encounters have gone down over 50%. The current level is lower today than when Trump left office.”

    This comparison is misleading. The Department of Homeland Security on June 25 said that illegal immigration encounters at the southern border dropped 40%, to fewer than 2,400 each day, after a June 4 policy largely barred asylum access for people entering the U.S. at the southern border. Since the policy was announced only a few weeks ago, it’s unclear whether the drop in illegal immigration will continue

    In December 2020 and January 2021 — when Trump was still in office — Border Patrol encountered immigrants illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border about 71,000 and 75,000 times, respectively. That’s a daily average of around 2,300 to 2,400 encounters. (Biden was inaugurated Jan. 20, 2021.)

    The latest publicly available data for Biden’s presidency shows 170,000 southwest border encounters in May. That contradicts Biden’s claim that “the current level” is lower than when Trump left the presidency.

    CBS and The New York Times reported that unreleased data shows border encounters dropped to about 83,000 in June. That’s about 50% lower than the public May figures, but still higher than the last months of Trump’s presidency.

    “The UAW just endorsed me.” 

    This needs context. Biden gave the impression this endorsement recently happened. But it came in January, when United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain announced the union’s endorsement of Biden, saying, “Instead of talking trash about our union, Joe Biden stood with us.”

    That endorsement came before Biden’s debate performance sparked concerns about his candidacy, age and fitness for office. We contacted the UAW about the status of its endorsement but received no reply.

    “At least five presidents running or incumbent presidents … had lower numbers than I have now later in the campaign.”

    Biden didn’t specify if he was referring to campaign polling data or job approval ratings. The claim is true when looking at polling data, but wrong for approval ratings. 

    The Biden campaign pointed us to polling data that shows six presidents (either running for the first time or as an incumbent) who fared worse in national polls at a comparable point in their campaigns and won.

    Biden, according to FiveThirtyEight’s national average of polls, trails Trump by 1.9 percentage points as of July 12.

    Six other current or future presidents were trailing their opponents by greater numbers later in their campaigns, according to polling data:

    • Trump trailed Hillary Clinton by seven points in a Real Clear Politics national poll average in October 2016. He defeated Clinton in November.

    • Barack Obama trailed John McCain by 2.9 points in September 2008 and trailed Mitt Romney by 1 point in October 2012, according to Real Clear Politics data. He won both races.

    • George W. Bush trailed John Kerry by 2.5 points in August 2004, according to Real Clear Politics data, but won reelection.

    • Bill Clinton trailed George H.W. Bush by 8 percentage points in 1992 according to Gallup polling data, but won in November.

    • George H.W. Bush trailed Michael Dukakis by 17 points in July 1988, according to Gallup polling data, but won in November.

    • John F. Kennedy trailed Richard Nixon by 6 points in Gallup polling in August 1960 before winning in November.

    Approval ratings for Biden aren’t as promising. His approval rating when he made the claim was 36.8% (and inched up to 37.3% the day after his news conference), according to data from FiveThirtyEight.

    The FiveThirtyEight data goes back to the Harry Truman administration from 1945 to 1953. Only Jimmy Carter (33.9%) and George H.W. Bush (36.7%) had lower approval ratings through the same time as Biden. Carter’s approval rating dipped as low as 32.2% later in his 1980 campaign. George H.W. Bush fell as low as 30.1% late in his 1992 campaign. 

    Both incumbent presidents lost their reelection bids. 

    In the U.S. “more children are killed with, by a bullet than any other cause of death.”

    This is accurate. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that in 2022, the most recent year of non-provisional data, firearms were the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 17. (Researchers generally say they don’t include infants in their analyses because of certain conditions unique to babies.)

    In total, 16,318 children ages 1 to 17 died in 2022. Of those deaths, firearms were the No. 1 cause, causing 2,526 deaths. Motor vehicle traffic crashes, broadly, were the second leading cause of death, causing 2,240 deaths.

    Firearms are not the leading cause of death for each age in that group. Firearm deaths are far more common among older children, according to the CDC data and researchers

    Trump “says he’s gonna do away with the civil service, eliminate the Department of Education.”

    This is largely accurate. In one of his agenda policy videos, Trump promised to close the Department of Education and “to send all education work and needs back to the states.” However, congressional approval is required, so Trump couldn’t do it on his own. 

    Trump has promised to “re-issue my 2020 Executive Order restoring the President’s authority to remove rogue bureaucrats.” More commonly known as Schedule F, this order would reclassify certain federal employees, stripping away protections from being fired or political pressures.

    Of the nearly 2 million federal employees, the vast majority are nonpolitical career officials who carry out their duties regardless of the administration. Currently, these employees cannot be fired for political reasons.

    Trump opening up the ability to fire civil servants without cause doesn’t necessarily “do away” with the service, as Biden said, but it does put many of these jobs in jeopardy. 

    RELATED: Fact-checking Donald Trump on immigration, economy in first postdebate rally in Doral, Florida
     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Samsung Electronics workers announce ‘indefinite’ strike

    Samsung Electronics workers announce ‘indefinite’ strike

    [ad_1]

    SEOUL, South Korea — Unionized workers at Samsung Electronics declared an indefinite strike Wednesday to pressure South Korea’s biggest company to accept their calls for higher pays and other benefits.

    Thousands of members of the National Samsung Electronics Union launched a temporary, three-day strike on Monday. But the union said Wednesday that it was announcing an indefinite strike, accusing the management of being unwilling to negotiate. Samsung Electronics says there have been no disruptions to production.

    “Samsung Electronics will ensure no disruptions occur in the production lines,” a Samsung statement said. “The company remains committed to engaging in good faith negotiations with the union.”

    However, in a statement posted on its website, the union said it has engaged in unspecified disruptions on the company’s production lines to get management to eventually come to the negotiating table if the strikes continue.

    “We are confident of our victory,” the union statement said.

    The union statement didn’t say how many of its members would join the extended strike. It earlier said that 6,540 of its union members had said they would participate in the earlier, three-day strike.

    That would represent only a fraction of Samsung Electronics’ total workforce, estimated at about 267,860 globally. About 120,000 of them are in South Korea.

    Earlier this year, union members and management held rounds of talks on the union’s demand for higher wages and better working conditions, but they failed to reach agreement. In June, some union members collectively used their annual leaves in a one-day walkout that observers said was the first labor strike at Samsung Electronics.

    About 30,000 Samsung workers are reportedly affiliated with the National Samsung Electronics Union, the largest at the company, and some belong to other, smaller unions.

    In 2020, Samsung chief Lee Jae-yong, then vice chairman of the company, said he would stop suppressing employee attempts to organize unions, as he expressed remorse over his alleged involvement in a massive 2016 corruption scandal that removed the country’s president from office.

    The company’s union-busting practices had been criticized by activists for decades, though labor actions at other businesses and in other sectors of the society are common in South Korea.

    Thousands of South Korean medical interns and residents have been on strike since February, protesting a government plan to sharply increase medical school admissions.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Powerful Teachers Union Faces Charges Of ‘Union Busting’ By Its Own Staff

    A Powerful Teachers Union Faces Charges Of ‘Union Busting’ By Its Own Staff

    [ad_1]

    The largest union in the country has locked its own workers out of their jobs after they went on strike for three days, escalating an ugly contract dispute that has already involved the White House.

    Staffers at the National Education Association said they were told not to report to work at the union’s headquarters in Washington on Monday. Last week, the employees went on strike during the NEA’s annual convention in Philadelphia, prompting President Joe Biden to back out of a planned speech.

    The staff union claimed the lockout was retaliation for their Philly walkout, calling it a “dangerous” and “reactionary” move by the NEA. A lockout is a work stoppage initiated by the employer, essentially the opposite of a strike.

    “I cannot imagine it lands well that the nation’s largest union is locking out its staff union,” Robin McLean, the staff union’s president, said in a statement alleging “union busting” by the NEA. “What does that mean for a so-called labor union to treat hardworking people like this?”

    “I cannot imagine it lands well that the nation’s largest union is locking out its staff union.”

    – Robin McLean, president of the NEA staff union

    The two sides are trying to negotiate a new three-year contract addressing wages, health coverage and other benefits. And while it’s not unusual for a labor union to have tense negotiations with its own staff, it’s rare that a labor dispute reaches the point of a lockout.

    An NEA spokesperson said in an email that the union was bargaining in good faith with staffers, and accused those who went on strike of “abandoning” members by disrupting the Philadelphia assembly. The NEA argues that the staffers’ strike was not protected under the law, a point disputed by the staff union.

    “To best protect the interests of our members, the Association, and our staff, we have made the difficult decision to institute a protective lockout,” the spokesperson said.

    The plans for the lockout were first reported by Education Week.

    A demonstrator chants while picketing in support of the National Education Association Staff Organization outside the Pennsylvania Convention Center, July 5, in Philadelphia.

    Matt Slocum via Associated Press

    The NEA represents 3 million teachers, support staff employees and other workers at public schools and colleges across the country. It is a major ally of the Democratic Party, and endorsed Biden’s reelection campaign in April, calling his the “most pro-public education and pro-union administration in modern history.”

    The standoff broke into public view late last week when the White House said Biden would not be speaking in Philadelphia. Biden, who refers to himself as the most pro-union president in history, did not want to cross a picket line called by the staff union.

    The staff union alleges that the NEA is trying to “strongarm” employees into accepting a subpar deal. It recently filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, claiming that managers unilaterally changed their working conditions and retaliated against a staff member.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • President Biden cancels Sunday’s speech at teachers union convention in Philly due to strike

    President Biden cancels Sunday’s speech at teachers union convention in Philly due to strike

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden will not speak as planned at a teachers union convention Sunday in Philadelphia after staff at the National Education Association went on strike and set up picket lines outside the Pennsylvania Convention Center. The organization had been scheduled to conclude its annual conference there this weekend before labor negotiations broke down.

    Biden, who has been a champion of unions, said he would not cross the picket line to appear at the event.

    “The president is still planning to travel to Pennsylvania this weekend,” the Biden campaign said, but it didn’t immediately reveal alternative plans.

    The NEA is the nation’s largest labor union and represents public school teachers, faculty and staffers at colleges and universities, retired educators and college students preparing to become teachers. On Friday, the National Education Association Staff Organization (NEASO) went on strike and filed a pair of complaints with the National Labor Relations Board, which included allegations of wage theft and withholding requested information about NEA’s use of contractors.

    NEA was founded in Philadelphia in 1857 and had anticipated 7,000 delegates would attend this weekend’s conference in the city. The organization said Friday it would continue negotiations with staff to resolve the labor dispute with NEASO, which represents 350 members of NEA’s 3 million member union, the Pennsylvania Capital-Star reported

    Biden’s speech had been planned amid turmoil about his bid for reelection in the aftermath of a poor showing in his first presidential debate against Republican challenger Donald Trump late last month. Democrats have reportedly weighed whether the president should exit the race in favor of another candidate, but the White House so far has insisted Biden is “absolutely not” dropping out of the contest. The Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago from Aug. 19-22.

    On Friday at 8 p.m., ABC News will air Biden’s first TV interview since the debate — a sit down with George Stephanopoulos that will give the president a chance to address the growing concerns about his candidacy.

    Biden last appeared in Philadelphia in May for an event with Vice President Kamala Harris to rally support among Black voters in the city.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Tanenbaum

    Source link

  • Racial discrimination lawsuit filed against Shinola Hotel

    Racial discrimination lawsuit filed against Shinola Hotel

    [ad_1]

    A Black Detroiter has sued the city’s Shinola Hotel for racial discrimination, alleging the luxury hotel responded to his resume only after he reapplied with a white-sounding name.

    The lawsuit was filed Wednesday by Marko Law, PLLC.

    According to the suit, Dwight Jackson, 27, has “extensive work experience in hotel hospitality” and applied to the boutique hotel multiple times between January and April 2024 without ever getting an interview.

    Jackson then reapplied with the same resume, only he changed his name to “John Jebrowski.” Suddenly he got a callback within a week, according to the lawsuit.

    After finally securing an interview for the position, Jackson said he was told he was no longer being considered.

    “What’s in a name? Apparently, a lot if you want employment at the Shinola Hotel,” attorney Jon Marko said in a press release. “Studies show that applicants with black-sounding names are less likely to receive an interview when employers are presented with identical resumes. Mr. Jackson’s situation is case on point.”

    The lawsuit alleges that the incident is a violation of the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.

    Asked for comment, the Shinola Hotel’s operating partner Sage Hospitality responded.

    “We take this allegation very seriously and do not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” the organization said. “We are committed to fostering an inclusive workplace where everyone has the opportunity to succeed and are dedicated to building a diverse workforce that reflects the community.”

    The lawsuit can be found below.

    Update: A statement issued on behalf of the Shinola Hotel was added to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Lee DeVito

    Source link

  • Biden proposes new rule to protect 36 million workers from extreme heat

    Biden proposes new rule to protect 36 million workers from extreme heat

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden on Tuesday proposed a new rule to address excessive heat in the workplace, warning — as tens of millions of people in the U.S. are under heat advisories — that high temperatures are the country’s leading weather-related killer.

    If finalized, the measure would protect an estimated 36 million U.S. workers from injuries related to heat exposure on the job — establishing the first major federal safety standard of its kind. Those affected by excessive heat in the workplace include farmworkers, delivery and construction workers, landscapers and indoor workers in warehouses, factories and kitchens.

    Biden highlighted the proposed rule as one of five steps his Democratic administration is taking to address extreme weather as Hurricane Beryl is already ripping through the Caribbean in an ominous sign for the summer.

    Biden used his remarks at the D.C. Emergency Operations Center to blast those Republican lawmakers who deny the existence of climate change, saying, “It’s not only outrageous, it’s really stupid.” Biden noted that there are human and financial costs from climate change, saying that weather-inflicted damage last year cost the economy $90 billion.

    “More people die from extreme heat than floods, hurricanes and tornadoes combined,” Biden said. “These climate fueled extreme weather events don’t just affect people’s lives. They also cost money. They hurt the economy, and they have a significant negative psychological effect on people.”

    The Democratic president, who’s seeking reelection in part on his environmental record, said that the Federal Emergency Management Agency was also finalizing a rule to factor in possible flooding risks for federal construction projects.

    In addition, FEMA was announcing $1 billion in grants to help communities deal with natural disasters, while the Environmental Protection Agency was releasing a new report on climate change’s impacts. Lastly, Biden said his administration would hold a conference titled “White House Summit on Extreme Heat” in the coming months.

    Despite increased awareness of the risks posed to human health by high temperatures, extreme heat protections — for those routinely exposed to heat index readings above 80 degrees Fahrenheit (27 degrees Celsius) — have lagged.

    “The purpose of this rule is simple,” a senior White House administration official told reporters. “It is to significantly reduce the number of worker-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses suffered by workers who are exposed to excessive heat … while simply doing their jobs.”

    Under the proposed rule, employers would be required to identify heat hazards, develop emergency response plans related to heat illness, and provide training to employees and supervisors on the signs and symptoms of such illnesses. They would also have to establish rest breaks, provide shade and water, and heat acclimatization — or the building of tolerance to higher temperatures — for new workers.

    Penalties for heat-related violations in workplaces would increase significantly, in line with what workplaces are issued for violations of Occupational Safety and Health Administration rules, a senior White House administration official said.

    An estimated 2,300 people in the U.S. died from heat-related illness in 2023. From 1992 to 2022, a total of 986 workers across all industry sectors in the U.S. died from exposure to heat, with construction accounting for about 34% of all occupational heat-related deaths, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. During that time, 334 construction workers died due to heat exposure on the job.

    As the hottest month of the year gets underway, millions of Americans will be at greater risk of heat strokes, dangerous dehydration and heat-related heart stress.

    The Labor Department has been developing a standard for how workplaces deal with heat since 2021. Last year, OSHA held meetings to hear about how the proposed measures could affect small businesses.

    The AFL-CIO union federation praised the measure. “If finalized, this new rule would address some of the most basic needs for workers’ health and safety,” said AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler.

    Heat protection laws in the U.S. have faced steady industry opposition, including from chambers of commerce and other business associations. Many say a blanket mandate would be difficult to implement across such a wide range of industries.

    California, Colorado, Oregon, Minnesota and Washington are the only states with workplace standards for heat exposure. Over the past year, Florida and Texas, led by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Gov. Greg Abbott, both Republicans, passed legislation preventing local governments from requiring heat protections for outdoor workers.

    If finalized, the Biden administration’s rule would override state standards, and states with existing procedures to deal with heat would have to institute measures at least as stringent as the finalized federal rule.

    The OSHA plan was announced as the EPA released a new report on climate change indicators in the U.S. The report, last updated in 2012, highlights data showing the continuing and far-reaching impacts of climate change in the U.S. This year’s report adds heat-related workplace deaths and marine heat waves as climate change indicators.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Matthew Daly and Josh Boak contributed to this report.

    ___

    The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chicago Starts Five-Year Phase-Out of Tipped Minimum Wage

    Chicago Starts Five-Year Phase-Out of Tipped Minimum Wage

    [ad_1]

    Tipped hospitality workers across Chicago are getting a raise on Monday, July 1 as a hotly debated city ordinance goes into effect, increasing the tipped minimum wage from $9.48 per hour to $11.02.

    The result of a historic vote by Chicago’s City Council in October 2023, the ordinance will phase out the city’s tipped minimum wage — essentially, a subminimum wage augmented by tips — growing it by eight percent annually over five years. This will continue until it matches the standard wage, which is also increasing as of Monday from $15.80 per hour to $16.20 for businesses with four or more employees.

    In addition, changes in paid time off have also gone into effect. Employees who work at least 80 hours through a 120-day duration are entitled to five days of paid leave and five days of paid sick leave. The 10 combined days were a compromise from the 15 that was proposed last year.

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has called the efforts his team’s way of “making Chicago the most pro-worker city in the country.” They’re the culmination of work by activists like the progressive group One Fair Wage and officials including Johnson (who made it part of his platform), the wage increases were the subject of much divisive debate last year. In the early years of the pandemic, local hospitality workers began speaking out more loudly than ever about the challenges of relying on tips to get by. Opponents, however, including some members of the Illinois Restaurant Association, countered with fears that the increase in costs for operators would force them to raise prices and thus alienate customers, harming restaurant businesses in the long term.

    Johnson’s 2023 mayoral victory was key, says national labor activist Saru Jayaraman, founder of One Fair Wage. By August, Jayaraman declared that the city’s ordinance was all but passed. But in September, opponents threw a Hail Mary by proposing a new association-backed ordinance that would increase Chicago’s tipped minimum wage to $20.54 per hour — the highest in the nation — in any restaurant that uses the tip credit.

    Within days, however, the sides reached a compromise and the restaurant association dropped its opposition to a revised ordinance that established a $500,000 pool from private funds to help smaller restaurants transition and address the need for unionized restaurants to pay lower wages per worker contracts. This move cleared the way for activists and supporters to declare victory ahead of the city council vote.

    Many across the U.S. are keeping a close eye on Chicago, waiting to see how the ordinance will impact the city’s hospitality industry. Seven states — Alaska, California, Minnesota, Montana, Oregon, and Washington — had long dispensed with a tip credit, and in May 2023, Washington D.C. voted to increase its tipped minimum wage from $5.35 per hour to $10. This year, legislators have proposed raises to the tipped minimum wage in 17 states including Illinois, but no bills have yet passed, according to the Sun-Times.

    [ad_2]

    Naomi Waxman

    Source link

  • ‘Lab-grown’ meat maker hosts Miami tasting party as Florida ban goes into effect

    ‘Lab-grown’ meat maker hosts Miami tasting party as Florida ban goes into effect

    [ad_1]

    MIAMI — As Florida’s ban on “lab-grown” meat is set to go into effect next week, one manufacturer hosted a last hurrah — at least for now — with a cultivated meat-tasting party in Miami.

    California-based Upside Foods hosted dozens of guests Thursday evening at a rooftop reception in the city’s Wynwood neighborhood, known for its street art, breweries, nightclubs and trendy restaurants.

    “This is delicious meat,” Upside Foods CEO and founder Uma Valeti said. “And we just fundamentally believe that people should have a choice to choose what they want to put on their plate.”

    The U.S. approved the sale of what’s now being called “cell-cultivated” or “cell-cultured” meat for the first time in June 2023, allowing Upside Foods and another California company, Good Meat, to sell cultivated chicken.

    Earlier this year, Florida and Alabama banned the sale of cultivated meat and seafood, which is grown from animal cells. Other states and federal lawmakers also are looking to restrict it, arguing the product could hurt farmers and pose a safety risk to the public.

    While Florida cattle ranchers joined Gov. Ron DeSantis when he signed the ban into law in May, Valeti said Florida officials never reached out to his company before passing the legislation.

    “It’s pretty clear to us that the governor and the government have been misinformed,” Valeti said. “And all we’re asking for is a chance to have a direct conversation and say, ‘this is proven science, this is proven safety.’”

    Cultivated products are grown in steel tanks using cells from a living animal, a fertilized egg or a storage bank. The cells are fed with special blends of water, sugar, fats and vitamins. Once they’ve grown, they’re formed into cutlets, nuggets and other shapes.

    Chef Mika Leon, owner of Caja Caliente in Coral Gables, prepared the cultivated chicken for Thursday’s event, which invited members of the South Florida public to get their first, and possibly last, taste of cultivated meat before Florida’s ban begins Monday. Leon served chicken tostadas with avocado, chipotle crema and beet sprouts.

    “When you cook it, it sizzles and cooks just like chicken, which was insane,” Leon said. “And then when you go to eat it, it’s juicy.”

    Reception guest Alexa Arteaga said she could imagine cultivated meat being a more ethical alternative.

    “The texture itself is a little bit different, but the taste was really, really good,” Arteaga said. “Like way better than I was expecting.”

    Another guest, Skyler Myers, agreed about the texture being different when eating a piece of meat by itself but said it just seemed like normal chicken when he ate the tostada.

    “There’s no difference,” Myers said. “I mean, there’s no way you would ever know.”

    Besides the ethical issues surrounding the killing of animals, Valeti said cultivated meat avoids many of the health and environmental problems created by the meat industry, such as deforestation, pollution and the spread of disease. He also noted that the meat his company produces is not coming from a lab but from a facility more closely resembling a brewery or a dairy processing plant.

    “We don’t have any confined animals,” Valeti said. “We just have healthy animal cells that are growing in cultivators.”

    The restrictions come despite cultivated meat and seafood still being too expensive to reach the market in a meaningful way. Two high-end U.S. restaurants briefly added the products to their menus, but it hasn’t been available at any U.S. grocery stores. Companies have been working to bring down costs by scaling up production, but now they’re also trying to respond to bans with petitions and possible legal action.

    Sean Edgett, Upside Foods chief legal officer, said the company went through a yearslong process with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration before receiving approval. He said those federal regulations should supersede any state bans, which he believes are unconstitutional.

    “We’re hopeful that if lawmakers can’t change their mind and turn things around back to an avenue of progress that the courts will step in and make that clear,” Edgett said.

    Backers of the bans say they want to protect farmers and consumers from a product that only has been around for about a decade.

    State Sen. Jay Collins, a Republican who sponsored the Florida bill, noted the legislation doesn’t ban research, just the manufacturing and sale of cultivated meat. Collins said safety was his primary motivator, but he also wants to protect Florida agriculture.

    “Let’s not be in a rush to replace something,” Collins said earlier this year. “It’s a billion-dollar industry. We feed a ton of people across the country with our cattle, beef, pork, poultry and fish industries.”

    Valeti isn’t trying to replace any industry, just give people more options, he said.

    “We want to have multiple choices that feed us,” Valeti said. “Some of those choices are conventional farming. Some of those choices are coming from plant-based foods. And cultivated meat is another solid choice.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Lab-grown’ meat maker hosts Miami tasting party as Florida ban goes into effect

    ‘Lab-grown’ meat maker hosts Miami tasting party as Florida ban goes into effect

    [ad_1]

    MIAMI — As Florida’s ban on “lab-grown” meat is set to go into effect next week, one manufacturer hosted a last hurrah — at least for now — with a cultivated meat-tasting party in Miami.

    California-based Upside Foods hosted dozens of guests Thursday evening at a rooftop reception in the city’s Wynwood neighborhood, known for its street art, breweries, nightclubs and trendy restaurants.

    “This is delicious meat,” Upside Foods CEO and founder Uma Valeti said. “And we just fundamentally believe that people should have a choice to choose what they want to put on their plate.”

    The U.S. approved the sale of what’s now being called “cell-cultivated” or “cell-cultured” meat for the first time in June 2023, allowing Upside Foods and another California company, Good Meat, to sell cultivated chicken.

    Earlier this year, Florida and Alabama banned the sale of cultivated meat and seafood, which is grown from animal cells. Other states and federal lawmakers also are looking to restrict it, arguing the product could hurt farmers and pose a safety risk to the public.

    While Florida cattle ranchers joined Gov. Ron DeSantis when he signed the ban into law in May, Valeti said Florida officials never reached out to his company before passing the legislation.

    “It’s pretty clear to us that the governor and the government have been misinformed,” Valeti said. “And all we’re asking for is a chance to have a direct conversation and say, ‘this is proven science, this is proven safety.’”

    Cultivated products are grown in steel tanks using cells from a living animal, a fertilized egg or a storage bank. The cells are fed with special blends of water, sugar, fats and vitamins. Once they’ve grown, they’re formed into cutlets, nuggets and other shapes.

    Chef Mika Leon, owner of Caja Caliente in Coral Gables, prepared the cultivated chicken for Thursday’s event, which invited members of the South Florida public to get their first, and possibly last, taste of cultivated meat before Florida’s ban begins Monday. Leon served chicken tostadas with avocado, chipotle crema and beet sprouts.

    “When you cook it, it sizzles and cooks just like chicken, which was insane,” Leon said. “And then when you go to eat it, it’s juicy.”

    Reception guest Alexa Arteaga said she could imagine cultivated meat being a more ethical alternative.

    “The texture itself is a little bit different, but the taste was really, really good,” Arteaga said. “Like way better than I was expecting.”

    Another guest, Skyler Myers, agreed about the texture being different when eating a piece of meat by itself but said it just seemed like normal chicken when he ate the tostada.

    “There’s no difference,” Myers said. “I mean, there’s no way you would ever know.”

    Besides the ethical issues surrounding the killing of animals, Valeti said cultivated meat avoids many of the health and environmental problems created by the meat industry, such as deforestation, pollution and the spread of disease. He also noted that the meat his company produces is not coming from a lab but from a facility more closely resembling a brewery or a dairy processing plant.

    “We don’t have any confined animals,” Valeti said. “We just have healthy animal cells that are growing in cultivators.”

    The restrictions come despite cultivated meat and seafood still being too expensive to reach the market in a meaningful way. Two high-end U.S. restaurants briefly added the products to their menus, but it hasn’t been available at any U.S. grocery stores. Companies have been working to bring down costs by scaling up production, but now they’re also trying to respond to bans with petitions and possible legal action.

    Sean Edgett, Upside Foods chief legal officer, said the company went through a yearslong process with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration before receiving approval. He said those federal regulations should supersede any state bans, which he believes are unconstitutional.

    “We’re hopeful that if lawmakers can’t change their mind and turn things around back to an avenue of progress that the courts will step in and make that clear,” Edgett said.

    Backers of the bans say they want to protect farmers and consumers from a product that only has been around for about a decade.

    State Sen. Jay Collins, a Republican who sponsored the Florida bill, noted the legislation doesn’t ban research, just the manufacturing and sale of cultivated meat. Collins said safety was his primary motivator, but he also wants to protect Florida agriculture.

    “Let’s not be in a rush to replace something,” Collins said earlier this year. “It’s a billion-dollar industry. We feed a ton of people across the country with our cattle, beef, pork, poultry and fish industries.”

    Valeti isn’t trying to replace any industry, just give people more options, he said.

    “We want to have multiple choices that feed us,” Valeti said. “Some of those choices are conventional farming. Some of those choices are coming from plant-based foods. And cultivated meat is another solid choice.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As AI gains a workplace foothold, states are trying to make sure workers don’t get left behind

    As AI gains a workplace foothold, states are trying to make sure workers don’t get left behind

    [ad_1]

    HARTFORD, Conn. — With many jobs expected to eventually rely on generative artificial intelligence, states are trying to help workers beef up their tech skills before they become outdated and get outfoxed by machines that are becoming increasingly smarter.

    Connecticut is working to create what proponents believe will be the country’s first Citizens AI Academy, a free online repository of curated classes that users can take to learn basic skills or obtain a certificate needed for employment.

    “This is a rapidly evolving area,” said state Democratic Sen. James Maroney. “So we need to all learn what are the best sources for staying current. How can we update our skills? Who can be trusted sources?”

    Determining what skills are necessary in an AI world can be a challenge for state legislators given the fast-moving nature of the technology and differing opinions about what approach is best.

    Gregory LaBlanc, professor of Finance, Strategy and Law at the Haas School of Business at Berkeley Law School in California, says workers should be taught how to use and manage generative AI rather than how the technology works, partly because computers will soon be better able to perform certain tasks previously performed by humans.

    “What we need is to lean into things that complement AI as opposed to learning to be really bad imitators of AI,” he said. “We need to figure out what is AI not good at and then teach those things. And those things are generally things like creativity, empathy, high level problem solving.”

    He said historically people have not needed to understand technological advancements in order for them to succeed.

    “When when electricity came along, we didn’t tell everybody that they needed to become electrical engineers,” LeBlanc said.

    This year, at least four states — Connecticut, California, Mississippi and Maryland — proposed legislation that attempted to deal with AI in the classroom somehow. They ranged from Connecticut’s planned AI Academy, which was originally included in a wide-ranging AI regulation bill that failed but the concept is still being developed by state education officials, to proposed working groups that examine how AI can be incorporated safely in public schools. Such a bill died in the Mississippi legislature while the others remain in flux.

    One bill in California would require a state working group to consider incorporating AI literacy skills into math, science, history and social science curriculums.

    “AI has the potential to positively impact the way we live, but only if we know how to use it, and use it responsibly,” said the bill’s author, Assemblymember Marc Berman, in a statement. “No matter their future profession, we must ensure that all students understand basic AI principles and applications, that they have the skills to recognize when AI is employed, and are aware of AI’s implications, limitations, and ethical considerations.”

    The bill is backed by the California Chamber of Commerce. CalChamber Policy Advocate Ronak Daylami said in a statement that incorporating information into existing school curricula will “dispel the stigma and mystique of the technology, not only helping students become more discerning and intentional users and consumers of AI, but also better positioning future generations of workers to succeed in an AI-driven workforce and hopefully inspiring the next generation of computer scientists.”

    While Connecticut’s planned AI Academy is expected to offer certificates to people who complete certain skills programs that might be needed for careers, Maroney said the academy will also include the basics, from digital literacy to how to pose questions to a chatbot.

    He said it’s important for people to have the skills to understand, evaluate and effectively interact with AI technologies, whether it’s a chatbot or machines that learn to identify problems and make decisions that mimic human decision-making.

    “Most jobs are going to require some form of literacy,” Maroney said. “I think that if you aren’t learning how to use it, you’ll be at a disadvantage.”

    A September 2023 study released by the job-search company Indeed found all U.S. jobs listed on the platform had skills that could be performed or augmented by generative AI. Nearly 20% of the jobs were considered “highly exposed,” which means the technology is considered good or excellent at 80% or more of the skills that were mentioned in the Indeed job listings.

    Nearly 46% of the jobs on the platform were “moderately exposed,” which means the GenAI can perform 50% to 80% of the skills.

    Maroney said he is concerned how that skills gap — coupled with a lack of access to high-speed internet, computers and smart phones in some underserved communities — will exacerbate the inequity problem.

    A report released in February from McKinsey and Company, a global management consulting firm, projected that generative AI could increase household wealth in the U.S. by nearly $500 billion by 2045, but it would also increase the wealth gap between Black and white households by $43 billion annually.

    Advocates have been working for years to narrow the nation’s digital skills gap, often focusing on the basics of computer literacy and improving access to reliable internet and devices, especially for people living in urban and rural areas. The advent of AI brings additional challenges to that task, said Marvin Venay, chief external affairs and advocacy officer for the Massachusetts-based organization Bring Tech Home.

    “Education must be included in order for this to really take off publicly … in a manner which is going to give people the ability to eliminate their barriers,” he said of AI. “And it has to be able to explain to the most common individual why it is not only a useful tool, but why this tool will be something that can be trusted.”

    Tesha Tramontano-Kelly, executive director of the Connecticut-based group CfAL for Digital Inclusion, said she worries lawmakers are “putting the cart before the horse” when it comes to talking about AI training. Ninety percent of the youths and adults who use her organization’s free digital literacy classes don’t have a computer in the home.

    While Connecticut is considered technologically advanced compared to many other states and nearly every household can get internet service, a recent state digital equity study found only about three-quarters subscribe to broadband. A survey conducted as part of the study found 47% of respondents find it somewhat or very difficult to afford internet service.

    Of residents who reported household income at or below 150% of the federal poverty level, 32% don’t own a computer and 13% don’t own any internet enabled device.

    Tramontano-Kelly said ensuring the internet is accessible and technology equipment is affordable are important first steps.

    “So teaching people about AI is super important. I 100% agree with this,” she said. “But the conversation also needs to be about everything else that goes along with AI.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘We’re fighting for them’: Nurses at local HCA hospitals in Florida organize for safer staffing levels

    ‘We’re fighting for them’: Nurses at local HCA hospitals in Florida organize for safer staffing levels

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Courtesy of National Nurses United

    Registered nurses and community allies rally in support of putting patients over profits at HCA Florida Osceola Hospital in Kissimmee, Florida. June 27, 2024.

    The Hospital Corporation of America,  a for-profit company more widely known as HCA Healthcare, operates dozens of hospitals and medical centers in Florida, including ten hospitals throughout Florida where registered nurses are unionized.

    Nurses at these unionized hospitals — including two within a stone’s throw of Orlando — have been in negotiations for a new union contract with HCA for months, but have struggled to get their employer to address issues they’ve raised about staffing levels and lack of resources to safely and effectively care for patients, according to a nurse Orlando Weekly spoke to.

    HCA Healthcare is one of the largest health systems in the United States, self-reporting over $5.2 billion in profits last year, even as the for-profit operator shuttered medical wards and facilities, including a behavioral health facility in New Port Richey. Across the country, HCA has been plagued by complaints from nurses and other healthcare staff alike over short-staffing, a problem described by one union as an “intentional corporate strategy.”

    Elisabeth Mathieu, a nearly 30-year registered nurse at HCA Osceola Hospital in Kissimmee, represented by the labor union National Nurses United, told Orlando Weekly that they’re fighting for a contract that can protect not only their own safety on the job, but that of the patients they treat at the hospital, too.

    She and other off-the-clock nurses rallied outside of their hospital Thursday morning, while nurses at Sanford’s HCA Lake Monroe rallied to raise awareness of their concerns the day before.

    “At the end of the day, what we are doing is to advocate for them, advocate for our patient,” said Mathieu, who had just gotten off a 12-hour night shift. This advocacy, she said, is “a way for us to be able to have enough staff to give them the best care.”

    “I want them to know we’re fighting for them, and I want them to fight for us by telling HCA: Take care of your nurses,” she added. National Nurses United is a labor union that represents nearly 225,000 registered nurses nationwide, including about 350 nurses at HCA Lake Monroe Hospital and more than 650 nurses at HCA Florida Osceola Hospital in Kissimmee.

    Nurses at both local hospitals — HCA Osceola and HCA Lake Monroe — first voted to unionize in 2010, representing some of the union’s earliest victories in a state where only about 6 percent of the workforce has union representation. Nurses at 17 HCA hospitals across six states, including Florida, are currently in negotiations for new union contracts.

    Mathieu, a local nurse who serves on the bargaining team for her union — and who therefore gets to face off against HCA management in contract talks, face-to-face — has been working at her hospital for nearly 30 years.

    She works 12-hour shifts as a nurse in the emergency department, and although she readily admits that understaffing has been a chronic issue, she believes in recent years, it’s gotten worse.

    Mathieu attributes this, in part, to fewer unit secretaries on staff, who function as a “receptionist for the unit and assists the patient care team while maintaining a clean, organized, and safe environment,” according to an active HCA job listing (not at Mathieu’s hospital).

    This increases nurses’ patient load and spells out less support for nurses, said Mathieu. “We also used to have more CNAs [certified nursing assistants] or more [patient technicians] to help us with patient care,” she added.

    This, she explained, leaves nurses responsible for tasks that patient techs and CNAs are more commonly asked to do, such as taking patients to the bathroom, feeding patients, and repositioning patients in bed.

    Hospital staff, including CNAs, represented by the 1199 Service Employees International Union (SEIU), similarly warned hospital executives of understaffing at HCA Osceola and unsafe conditions during their own contract negotiations at the hospital last year.

    click to enlarge Registered nurses and community allies rally in support of putting patients over profits at HCA Florida Osceola Hospital in Kissimmee, Florida. June 27,  2024. - Courtesy of National Nurses United

    Courtesy of National Nurses United

    Registered nurses and community allies rally in support of putting patients over profits at HCA Florida Osceola Hospital in Kissimmee, Florida. June 27, 2024.

    Heather Cox-Faith, a RN at HCA Lake Monroe Hospital in Sanford, told Orlando Weekly in March that she sees this, too. “It’s burning people out so quick that they’re leaving, or they’re going to other hospitals, or they’re jumping off to an agency and just traveling,” she said.

    Unlike in California or Oregon, there is no universally agreed-upon standard for nurse staffing ratios in Florida, or on a national scale, despite research linking poor staffing levels to worse patient outcomes.

    The difference between having adequate staffing, and not, can literally mean life or death, but the hospital industry has been fighting efforts to establish staffing mandates.

    Legislation filed by Republican (yes, Republican) State Sen. Ileana Garcia in the Florida Legislature this year, which sought to establish basic nurse-patient staffing ratios in hospitals, died without receiving a single hearing from state lawmakers, thereby denying healthcare professionals any opportunity to provide public testimony on the idea.

    While HCA Healthcare is not specifically listed as an organization that registered to lobby on the legislation, disclosure records show the Florida Hospital Association — a trade group representing hospital operators — and the hospital systems BayCare and Advent Health did do so, meaning they were interested (or worried) enough to keep an eye on it.

    While HCA’s profits in recent years have notably dipped, from $6.9 billion in 2021 to $5.2 billion in 2023, this hasn’t stopped the for-profit from spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on political lobbying, campaign contributions and lobbyist compensation.

    click to enlarge Registered nurses rally outside HCA Lake Monroe Hospital in support of improved staffing levels (March 5, 2024) - Photo by McKenna Schueler

    Photo by McKenna Schueler

    Registered nurses rally outside HCA Lake Monroe Hospital in support of improved staffing levels (March 5, 2024)

    According to the News Service of Florida, HCA Healthcare was one of the biggest spenders on lobbying in Florida last year, reporting an estimated $913,000 spent on lobbyist compensation.

    Campaign finance records show, from April through mid-June of this year, a political committee affiliated with HCA received two contributions of $25,000 from both HCA Osceola and Lake Monroe hospitals, in addition to contributions from their other hospitals across the state.

    Today, California and Oregon are the only states with mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios, which nurses say can help reduce burnout, and prevent unnecessary deaths and errors on the job. California’s law first went into effect two decades ago, while Oregon passed their own staffing ratio law just last year.

    Mathieu, at HCA Osceola, said she’s fully aware that HCA “has the means” to address nurses’ concerns about staffing, but says they have refused to offer even a counter to their proposal. Cox-Faith, from HCA Lake Monroe in Sanford, similarly expressed cynicism. “I mean, at this point, we could call all night long and tell them we’re drowning,” she said. “I don’t see them coming in to help us.”

    Mathieu sees high turnover among nurses who come into her hospital, who aren’t aware just yet of what they’re in for. “Nursing is a challenging profession, because you’re not just working with machines.”

    You have to be awake, alert and oriented each second you’re on the job, she said. With staffing levels as they currently are, Mathieu added, nurses have less time to dedicate to training and mentoring new nurses, and often have to take unpaid lunches, or go without, since she said they only get 15 minutes for lunch on paid time.

    “Together, we can fight,” said Matheiu of the organizing efforts by her union. “Because, at the end of the day, we are at the bedside,” she said. “Nurses feel good about standing up together and fighting for what’s right for patients, fighting for what’s right for the co-worker, so all of us together can care for patients in a safer way.”

    “I want them to know we’re fighting for them, and I want them to fight for us by telling HCA: Take care of your nurses”

    tweet this

    Orlando Weekly reached out to HCA Healthcare for comment on nurses’ concerns about staffing, as well as justification for their spending on political activities.

    An HCA Osceola spokesperson shared in a statement that staffing “is safe and appropriate” at the hospital, and that HCA Florida hospitals – including HCA Osceola — have been recognized for “excellence in patient safety” through awards from Healthgrades.

    Healthgrades is an online healthcare resource owned by RVO Health, a company backed by personal finance company Red Ventures and UnitedHealthGroup’s Optum, a health insurance company.

    “We value our nurses and are hopeful we can reach an agreement that is fair and reasonable for both sides,” the hospital spokesperson continued. “Throughout this process, our hospital will continue to put the health and well-being of our patients, caregivers and colleagues first.”

    They did not address Orlando Weekly’s question about political spending.

    Here in Central Florida, nurses’ current contract technically expired May 31, but they got a one-month extension on it that is set to expire at the end of the month. Although healthcare strikes are rare around these parts, nurses organized with National Nurses United haven’t been afraid to strike HCA hospitals elsewhere before, and the possibility that it could happen here, if HCA fails to meet nurses’ demands, isn’t off the table.

    Of course, any strike by nurses organized with the union would require a democratic vote by union members in support of a strike, plus a 10-day notice submitted to HCA and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, under federal law.

    A union spokesperson told Orlando Weekly that what happens next in Central Florida, after the local contract expires July 1, is “for the nurses to decide.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link