ReportWire

Tag: investors

  • Investors drawn to Southern home market as Trump calls for ban on large firms – Houston Agent Magazine

    [ad_1]

    Amid President Trump’s call to ban large investment firms from buying single-family homes, purchases by investors are the highest they’ve been in five years, according to a new report from BatchData.

    The research company used data from The Investor Pulse Report, prepared with business intelligence firm CJ Patrick Company, to track growth trends in investor-owned properties. The data included purchases by small-scale and large investors.

    Investor-led purchases made up 34% of all single-family residential sales in the third quarter of 2025, up 25.5% year over year and 1% from the second quarter.

    Investors currently own 18% of 86 million single-family homes nationwide. One-third of these investor-owned properties are concentrated in just five states — Texas, California, Florida, North Carolina and Georgia.

    North Carolina (25%), Georgia (19%), and Texas (18.2%) surpass the national average for investor ownership.

    But, BatchData researchers point out, there may be more to this trend upon deeper inspection.

    “Two seemingly incongruous trends continue to show themselves,” said BatchData Co-Founder and President Ivo Draginov in a press release “While the percentage of homes purchased by investors rose to a five-year high, the actual number of homes purchased was 23,000 fewer than a year ago. This suggests [that] the higher percentage is due to traditional homeowners retreating from the market rather than overly aggressive investor activity.”

    Notably, small-scale firms own the largest share of investor-held single-family homes. Investors owning one to five properties make up 92% of all investor-owned single-family homes and those with six to 10 properties hold 4%. Investors with over 1,000 properties account for a 2% share.

    [ad_2]

    Elizabeth Kanzeg Rowland

    Source link

  • Investors are buying up Texas’ attached single-family homes – Houston Agent Magazine

    [ad_1]

    As prices cool for attached homes in Texas, real estate investors are taking advantage of the discounts, according to a Cotality analysis.

    Investors accounted for 39.5% of all attached-home sales in 2025, compared to 31.8% for detached homes. That’s much more significant than the national investor share of 30.5% for attached-homes sales.

    And while attached-home prices are declining in Texas, rents are growing: Nationwide, rents increased 1.58% from 2024 to 2025 while prices stayed flat. In Texas, rents increased 2.56% during the same time period while prices dipped 4.03%.

    “The trend is clear,” Cotality analyst Brian Lopez wrote. “Investor behavior is responding directly to where value has emerged fastest. Attached inventory is now priced to move, and capital is moving with it.”

    Lopez called that trend a “yield play”:

    “The purchase price is shrinking while rent is expanding,” he said. “Investors are capitalizing on a unique window to acquire assets at 2022 prices but lease them at 2025 rates. That means stronger yields on new acquisitions and a higher return profile across both short-term cash flow and longer-term upside.”

    Cotality predicts Texas’ attached-home price trend will begin to curb early this year. The company projects 3.2% annual growth through 2030 — making now an ideal time to jump into the market as an investor.

    As rent growth continues to outpace property values, Lopez said, Texas could serve as a model for similar markets elsewhere in the country, including Florida, Arizona and the Carolinas, where attached-home prices are softening as supply catches up with demand and affordability remains strained for prospective first-time buyers.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Marek

    Source link

  • What Happens When an “Infinite-Money Machine” Unravels

    [ad_1]

    The price of bitcoin, which more than doubled last year in a trend that many attributed to the “Trump trade,” obviously played a big role in this alchemy, but there was also another factor—one that did seem a little magical, or insane, depending on your viewpoint. As MicroStrategy expanded its purchases, eventually accumulating more than three per cent of all the bitcoins in existence, its purchases helped drive the price of the digital currency higher. But—and this is the magical bit—its stock price went up even faster than bitcoin did. Toward the end of last year, investors were valuing MicroStrategy at more than two times what its bitcoins were worth, which meant that, for every dollar the company invested in bitcoin, it was creating more than two dollars in value. Some observers labelled Saylor’s bitcoin strategy as an “infinite-money machine,” or an “infinite-money glitch.”

    Whatever you called it, the gap between MicroStrategy’s market value and the value of its bitcoins couldn’t be explained by the company’s non-digital assets, namely its original software businesses. Saylor’s supporters offered two explanations for why MicroStrategy was still a worthy investment. First, the price of Bitcoin could rise a lot further; Saylor claimed that, by 2045, it would reach thirteen million dollars. Second, MicroStrategy had found clever ways to amplify gains for regular shareholders. By issuing preferred stock and debt that could be converted into shares at a later date, and then using the proceeds to buy more bitcoins, MicroStrategy said it could give holders of its common stock “amplified exposure” to the cryptocurrency. Another term for this was leverage—using borrowed money to boost returns. Some skeptics, including the professional short seller Jim Chanos, questioned whether this strategy could last, but his warnings didn’t catch on at the time. This past February, MicroStrategy unveiled its latest financial results, and a rebrand. “Earlier today, we announced that we are now Strategy, a new name that powerfully and succinctly conveys the universal and global appeal of our company.”

    Hubris precedes the fall. After Strategy’s stock peaked above $450 in mid-July, it went into an extended nosedive and ended November trading at $177.18. That wasn’t the only bad news for Saylor and his believers. As Strategy’s stock fell by sixty per cent, the price of bitcoin fell by only twenty-five per cent. This meant that the spread between Strategy’s market capitalization and the value of the bitcoins that it owned was closing. By the end of last month, that premium had all but disappeared, and at one point last week the market value of Strategy dipped below the value of its bitcoins (after accounting for its debt). In the words of a columnist at Bloomberg, Saylor’s infinite money machine was “glitching out.”

    Recognizing the severity of the situation and hoping to reassure investors, Strategy announced that it had built up, by selling even more stock, a “dollar reserve” of $1.4 billion. It could use this to make required dividend payments to holders of its preferred stock over the next twelve months. (Regular shareholders don’t get a dividend.) But it also said that, if its value continued to sink below the value of bitcoin, it might sell some of its coins—a previously unthinkable move for an evangelist like Saylor, who in February of this year tweeted, “Never sell your Bitcoin.” If Strategy was forced to unload some of its bitcoins, that could conceivably send the cryptocurrency, and the firm’s stock, into another dive.

    Strategy is now facing another challenge: the possibility that its stock could be removed from a major stock index, the MSCI Index, which analysts at JPMorgan estimated could lead to outflows of billions of dollars. On a more hopeful note, the price of bitcoin has risen over the past couple of weeks on expectations that the Federal Reserve is about to cut interest rates and pump more money into the financial system. In the past, some analysts noted, there has been a correlation between the Fed’s monetary interventions and rallies in bitcoin. So it seems at least possible that Jerome Powell and his colleagues, who are focussed on preventing a recession, will inadvertently bail out the crypto bros, Saylor included.

    Even if this happens, though, Strategy may well struggle to repeat its earlier success. The market opening that Saylor spotted back in 2020 has been largely filled. Dozens of other public companies, including MARA Holdings, a bitcoin-mining company, and Trump Media & Technology Group have acquired substantial holdings of bitcoin. And, for investors wanting direct exposure to bitcoin through their brokerage accounts, there are now more than a dozen Bitcoin E.T.F.s, including BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, which trades under the symbol IBIT and owns even more coins than Strategy does—around seven hundred and seventy-five thousand coins compared with Strategy’s six hundred and fifty thousand.

    In the crypto world, you can never say never, but for now the longtime skeptics of Strategy have been vindicated. They include Chanos, who said he has made money by shorting the firm’s stock and buying bitcoins in what is known as a paired trade. Last week, he told Sherwood, an in-house news site for the online trading platform Robinhood, “Our core thesis from the beginning—and it’s still our core thesis—is don’t pay more than $1 for something worth $1.” If investors follow this advice, Saylor and Strategy will still benefit from any sustained rebound in Bitcoin. But, alas, they won’t be able to reboot their infinite-money machine. ♦

    [ad_2]

    John Cassidy

    Source link

  • Nvidia CEO says the company is in a no-win situation amid AI-bubble chatter, leaked meeting reveals | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told employees this week that the company has been pushed into a no-win situation by mounting fears of an AI bubble, even as it continues to post blockbuster results, according to audio of an internal all-hands meeting reviewed by Business Insider.

    “The market did not appreciate our incredible quarter,” Huang said on Thursday, less than 24 hours after Nvidia reported another set of record earnings and said it had “visibility” into half a trillion dollars of revenue lined up for the rest of 2025 and 2026.

    Instead of rewarding the beat, investors delivered a shocking reversal that saw shares briefly rising Thursday before turning lower, dragging down the broader AI trade by the end of the session.

    Huang said expectations around Nvidia have become so extreme that Wall Street now sees danger in both directions.

    “If we delivered a bad quarter, it is evidence there’s an AI bubble. If we delivered a great quarter, we are fueling the AI bubble,” he told employees. “If we were off by just a hair, if it looked even a little bit creaky, the whole world would’ve fallen apart.”

    The comments offer a rare glimpse into how the face of the AI boom views the growing backlash to it, and how closely he is watching the market’s whiplash response.

    A blowout quarter that spooked investors

    On paper, Nvidia gave investors about everything they had asked for. The chipmaker reported another surge in sales of its data-center processors, the workhorses that power large AI models (and Nvidia’s revenues), and raised its guidance for the current quarter. It was the kind of performance expected to kick off another six-month rally, investors were saying

    Instead, the stock’s initial jump gave way to a broad selloff. Nvidia climbed as much as 5% early in Thursday’s session before closing down roughly 3%, as traders rotated out of the Big Tech names most closely associated with the AI boom. 

    The reversal extended what has become a bruising stretch for the so-called AI trade. After months of a breathless rally, investors are increasingly anxious that tech giants are spending too aggressively on data centers, GPUs, and networking gear, with no guarantee they can earn enough revenue to get those investments back. Some are also focusing on the complex, debt-heavy financing structures behind the AI infrastructure build-out, with credit markets starting to flash early warning signs.

    Layered on top of that are fresh macro jitters. A shutdown-delayed U.S. jobs report, released the same morning, showed stronger-than-expected hiring in September, but a higher unemployment rate; this conflicting data did little to clarify whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in December.

    Some investors are closely watching different statements from Fed presidents to try to read the tea leaves, but with the earnings season winding down and no obvious catalyst between now and the Fed’s next decision, it appears that many other investors are using the volatility to lock in profits from the year’s earlier rally—and get out of the market.

    “The broader narrative hasn’t broken; it’s simply being tested right now,” Mark Hackett at Nationwide told Bloomberg. “Periods like this often act as a release valve rather than signaling a true trend reversal.” 

    ‘We’re basically holding the planet together

    Inside Nvidia, Huang suggested no one should be surprised that investors are jumpy when so much of the AI story is being projected onto a single company.

    He referenced online memes that jokingly describe Nvidia as the linchpin of the global economy and the only thing standing between the U.S. and recession.

    “Have you guys seen some of them?” he asked employees. “We’re basically holding the planet together—and it’s not untrue.”

    That level of mythos has helped propel Nvidia’s market value into the stratosphere, making it the world’s most valuable public company. But Huang made clear that it has also turned every earnings day into a high-wire act.

    “The expectations are so high that if we miss by just a little bit, people think the whole story is broken,” he said.

    Still, Huang pushed back on the idea that Nvidia is responsible for the frothier parts of the AI trade. The company’s job, he emphasized, is to build the compute infrastructure others need, not to police how the market prices demand.

    Joking about losing $500 billion

    Amid the pressure, Huang kept the meeting light with whistling-past-the-graveyard-esque humor about Nvidia’s wild swings.

    He joked about the “good old days” when the company had a $5 trillion market capitalization, a playful exaggeration of its actual peak valuation—before noting just how much value has evaporated in recent weeks.

    “Nobody in history has ever lost $500 billion in a few weeks,” he said. “You’ve got to be worth a lot to lose $500 billion in a few weeks.”

    Huang told employees he was “delighted” by the quarter and proud of their work, stressing the company’s underlying business remains strong even if markets are punishing them for it.

    [ad_2]

    Eva Roytburg

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs unveils stock market forecast through 2035

    [ad_1]

    Goldman Sachs has quietly dropped a rare stock market forecast, which stretches all the way to 2035, while delivering a twist most U.S. investors won’t love.

    Following a decade that has been defined by tech-fueled gains along with expanding valuations, Goldman feels the next decade will look remarkably different.

    The bank forecasts just a 6.5% annual return for the S&P 500, a stark contrast from the typical double-digit run to which most investors have become accustomed.

    Earnings, and not multiple expansion, will be delivering the bulk of those lofty gains, a shift signaling a more “normal” market environment ahead.

    However, the bigger surprise is where Goldman sees the biggest opportunities. Instead of the usual Silicon Valley-led outperformance, the firm feels the biggest upside will come from places U.S. investors tend to overlook.

    Goldman Sachs expects global stocks to return 7.7% annually through 2035, driven largely by earnings growth.Photo by Aditya Vyas on Unsplash

    Goldman’s point of view is mostly simple.

    The days when pricing multiples would be doing all the heavy lifting are virtually over.

    <em>Long-term S&P 500 trailing returns chart</em>
    Long-term S&P 500 trailing returns chart

    The firm’s 6.5% return prediction only makes sense once we examine the underlying math, which involves steady 6% earnings growth, a mild valuation headwind, and a modest dividend yield.

    It’s a reminder that the next 10 years won’t reward investors for chasing the euphoria but will reward businesses that consistently grow, price smartly, and deliver real results.

    Goldman’s valuation call is blunt.

    The firm believes that today’s P/E levels are “very high relative to history,” which, more importantly, cannot be sustained once the structural tailwinds that were turbocharging margins fade away.

    Their updated model now suggests a fair-value price-to-earnings ratio of 21x by 2035, which points to a gradual pullback from the current 23x ratio.

    Related: Jim Cramer delivers urgent take on the stock market

    Their logic mainly rests on a couple of constraints.

    Firstly, profit margins are already near record highs after jumping from 5% in 1990 to roughly 13% today. That increase was primarily driven by global supply chain efficiencies, as well as decades of declining interest and tax expenses. Goldman feels these tailwinds are unlikely to repeat.

    More Wall Street:

    Secondly, the firm embeds a 4.5% 10-year Treasury yield into its framework, which leaves virtually nothing for valuations to grow from here.

    Hence, the result is mostly a decade that’s defined by earnings, and not a multiple stretch.

    Moreover, Goldman’s call lands at a point when corporate America continues to overdeliver. It has seen back-to-back quarters of broad earnings beats, which shows that the engine is running hotter than most expected.

    • Q2 wasn’t exactly a “Mag 7” mirage, but was more of a full-on earnings upgrade. By August, 66% of the S&P 500 reported, and 82% ended up beating EPS estimates while 79% beat on sales. Blended EPS growth struck even higher at 10.3% year over year, more than 50% the pre-season 2.8% forecast.

    • Q3 kept the momentum going. Two-thirds of businesses have already reported, with 83% beating EPS estimates while 79% topped sales forecasts, comfortably above five- and 10-year averages. The index seems to be on track for 10.7% earnings growth, its fourth straight quarter of double-digit bottom-line gains.

    • Big Tech is carrying the league. In both Q2 and Q3, eight of the S&P’s 11 sectors posted year-over-year earnings growth, while 10 sectors are growing sales, powering a 19- then 20-quarter streak of uninterrupted revenue expansion.

    Goldman’s long-term math makes a simple point for U.S. investors in that the best returns of the next 10 years won’t come from the U.S. at all.

    Though the S&P 500 posts a healthy 6.5% baseline, Goldman highlights Emerging Markets at +10.9%, Asia ex-Japan at +10.3%, and Japan at +8.2%.

    Related: Cathie Wood dumps $30 million in longtime favorite

    EM and Asian markets usually benefit from more robust nominal GDP expansion along with structural reforms, including growing payout ratios, which Goldman expects to lift EM dividend yields from 2.5% to 3.2% by 2035.

    Throw in governance upgrades in areas such as Korea and China, and suddenly these regions feel like compounding machines.

    The real kicker, though, is currency.

    Goldman’s FX strategists believe the U.S. dollar is 15% overvalued, forecasting a decade-long reversal that would lift USD-translated EM returns by 1.7% per year. Historically, dollar-related weakness coincides with foreign-market outperformance.

    Also, there’s earnings power for investors to consider.

    EM EPS growth is spearheaded by China and India, which drives the 10.9% baseline return. Japan’s reforms are expected to drive earnings to 8.2% returns.

    Related: Top analyst revamps S&P 500 target for the rest of the year

    This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Nov 15, 2025, where it first appeared in the Investing section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK Arrests Man Believed to Be Tied to Rory Campbell’s Betting Scheme

    [ad_1]

    The United Kingdom has arrested an individual believed to have ties to a GBP 8 million sports betting scheme. While the man remained unnamed, officials noted that he might have participated in fraud related to the matter.

    The Man Was Released on Bail

    The man in question was described as a 37-year-old man, whose name remained undisclosed for legal reasons. The London Metropolitan Police officials explained that the arrestee is believed to be connected with Rory Campbell’s failed betting fund.

    Officials elaborated that the man in question was arrested on suspicion of fraud by false representation.

    London’s Metropolitan Police added that the man was eventually bailed pending further inquiries.

    Campbell’s Scheme Sought to Multiply Investors’ Money by Making Lucrative Bets

    As mentioned, the man is believed to have had ties to the sports betting syndicate of Rory Campbell, the son of Alastair Campbell, a Tory Blair-era spin doctor. Rory Campbell swayed investors with promises of a robust mathematical model that could give him an edge over other bettors, allowing him to place lucrative bets.

    The scheme attracter many veteran investors, some of whom were no betting slouches either. Campbell senior also backed his son’s initiative. In total, roughly 50 people invested between GBP 10,000 and GBP 500K in the scheme. Overall, Campbell’s syndicate managed to collect GBP 8 million.

    In 2023, however, investors encountered difficulties withdrawing their money even though the fund insisted that they had made an average return of investment of 8% a year. Campbell reassured investors that everything was okay and that they could receive their funds in full by the end of July 2024. However, Campbell later changed that, telling them to expect a return of roughly 50-65%.  

    In December 2024, Campbell claimed that the scheme had collapsed as sportsbooks in Asia had refused to pay out his winnings. Shortly after that, investors reached out to the police. One civil case against the scheme’s mastermind sought to retrieve the GBP 266K plaintiffs had invested, although reports say that it only managed to retrieve a fraction of that money.

    [ad_2]

    Fiona Simmons

    Source link

  • China’s retaliation cements a bitcoin reset

    [ad_1]

    This is The Takeaway from today’s Morning Brief, which you can sign up to receive in your inbox every morning along with:

    Not even Fed Chair Jerome Powell could lift bitcoin out of the red.

    Following historic losses, triggered by escalating trade tensions between the US and China, cryptocurrency investors have tried to regain their footing. But it’s been a rough slog.

    Riding on the winds of a booming stock market and the prevailing sense that more rate cuts will fuel an extended rally, bitcoin recently topped the charts and set itself up for a historically strong October. Even accounting for the sharp losses in recent days, the digital currency is up more than 20% for the year, outpacing the gains of the benchmark S&P 500. But geopolitical tensions highlighted how fragile such asset climbs can be.

    Read more: What is bitcoin, and how does it work?

    After months of an upward spiral with higher peaks, investors now confront a reset of speculative bets.

    The back-and-forth between Washington and Beijing forced a pause across an array of bullish markets, rattled investors, and reminded Wall Street that, far from being a settled matter, tariffs are still in play as a political weapon and a powerful destabilizer. But bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were hit especially hard.

    Part of the plunge in prices has to do with the excitement surrounding crypto investing, which translates to more aggressive wagers using borrowed money. Some investors who wielded leverage on the chance of winning outsized gains were left dangerously exposed when panic selling took hold. A wave of forced liquidations exacerbated the fall.

    Bitcoin shed as much as 5% Tuesday, but pared back the losses as investors reacted to Powell implying that another rate cut is possible at the Fed’s next meeting in two weeks. Still, the weight of unresolved disputes with China, which worsened just before the closing bell, kept investors from doing much even with a bullish catalyst.

    The market-moving influence of a worsening trade conflict makes it harder to declare the sell-off a turning point for crypto or a peak bitcoin moment. If the dispute over critical minerals restrictions leads to a massive escalation in tariffs come Nov. 1, investors — crypto and otherwise — are in for more pain. And bitcoin and its lesser altcoin peers don’t have the corporate earnings to cushion a deteriorating macroeconomic picture.

    But if trade diplomacy succeeds, then stability could be just around the corner. And the next peak ahead of us.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chase Your Dream First-Time Homebuyer Seminar Held At RICE Center

    [ad_1]

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    Real estate agent Jimmy Jones partnered with Chase Bank to host the “Chase Your Dream First-Time Homebuyer Seminar” at the Russell Innovation Center for Entrepreneurs (RICE) on Wednesday, Oct. 8. 

    “Investors look like y’all — they look like everyday people,” said Jones as he opened the seminar. The East Atlanta native was motivated to start the seminar after being a realtor for 13 years, after graduating from Florida A&M University (FAMU). He noticed that most of the people buying homes were first-time buyers. 

    “We don’t want people out here with misinformation,” he said. “So we wanted to provide a chance for people to build their resources and a team to help them buy their first home.”

    Attendees were educated on the steps they could take to own their first home with their current income. The first purchase doesn’t have to be expensive, explained closing partner attorney Karem Maddison of Lueder, Larkin & Hunter.

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    “You don’t have to buy a house in the middle of the city of Atlanta. There are places an hour away from Atlanta, and there are places 45 minutes away that are affordable,” said Maddison. “You can change your entire next generation if you start by figuring out how to purchase a home. That’s why we’re here — because the tools they’re teaching in there will help people get a piece of something every American has a right to own. And if they do that, they can move themselves from one class to another within a few years.”

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    Bryant Thomas, a community leader for Chase Bank, concluded the workshop by informing attendees about how to build credit and what lenders look for when approving a mortgage. “The higher the credit score, the greater the chance you get,” said Thomas. He emphasized how even small, consistent payments on monthly credit card statements build a good rapport — not just for your credit score, but also by showing underwriters that you’re reliable when it comes to lending.

    The event was an opportunity for future homebuyers like Shantelle Williams to understand what steps to take next. “I think the workshop just added on to the dream I already had of owning a home,” said Williams, who moved to Atlanta four years ago for a fresh start. She said the seminar served as a catalyst to “execute” the goal of homeownership she had already written down.

    Jones said he plans to host similar community education events each quarter in the near future.

    [ad_2]

    Tabius McCoy, Report for America Corp Member

    Source link

  • How the government shutdown disrupts critical economic data

    [ad_1]

    The government shutdown that began Wednesday will deprive policymakers and investors of economic data vital to their decision-making at a time of unusual uncertainty about the direction of the U.S. economy.The absence will be felt almost immediately, as the government’s monthly jobs report scheduled for release Friday will likely be delayed. A weekly report on the number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits — a proxy for layoffs that is typically published on Thursdays — will also be postponed.If the shutdown is short-lived, it won’t be very disruptive. But if the release of economic data is delayed for several weeks or longer, it could pose challenges, particularly for the Federal Reserve. The Fed is grappling with where to set a key interest rate at a time of conflicting signals, with inflation running above its 2% target and hiring nearly ground to a halt, driving the unemployment rate higher in August.The Fed typically cuts this rate when unemployment rises, but raises it — or at least leaves it unchanged — when inflation is rising too quickly. It’s possible the Fed will have little new federal economic data to analyze by its next meeting on Oct. 28-29, when it is widely expected to reduce its rate again.“The job market had been a source of real strength in the economy but has been slowing down considerably the past few months,” said Michael Linden, senior policy fellow at the left-leaning Washington Center for Equitable Growth. “It would be very good to know if that slowdown was continuing, accelerating, or reversing.”The Fed cut its rate by a quarter-point earlier this month and signaled it was likely to do so twice more this year. Fed officials said they would keep a close eye on how inflation and unemployment evolve, but that depends on the data being available.A key inflation report is scheduled for Oct. 15 and the government’s monthly retail sales report is slated for release the next day.“We’re in a meeting-by-meeting situation, and we’re going to be looking at the data,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said during a news conference earlier this month.The economic picture has recently gotten cloudier. Despite slower hiring, there are signs that overall economic growth may be picking up. Consumers have stepped up their shopping and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimates the economy likely expanded at a healthy clip in the July-September quarter, after a large gain in the April-June period.A key question for the Fed is whether that growth can revive the job market, which this Friday’s report might have helped illustrate. Economists had forecast another month of weak hiring, with just 50,000 new positions added, according to a survey by FactSet. The unemployment rate was projected to stay at a still-low 4.3%.On Wall Street, investors obsess over the monthly jobs reports, typically issued the first Friday of every month. It’s a crucial indicator of the economy’s health and provides insights into how the Fed might adjust interest rates, which affects the cost of borrowing and influences how investors allocate their money.So far, investors don’t seem fazed by the shutdown. The broad S&P 500 stock index rose slightly Wednesday to an all-time high.Many businesses also rely on government data to gauge how the economy is faring. The Commerce Department’s monthly report on retail sales, for example, is a comprehensive look at the health of U.S. consumers and can influence whether companies make plans to expand or shrink their operations and workforces.For the time being, the Fed, economists, and investors will likely focus more on private data.On Wednesday, the payroll provider ADP issued its monthly employment data, which showed that businesses cut 32,000 jobs in September — a signal the economy is slowing. Still, ADP chief economist Nela Richardson said her firm’s report “was not intended to be a replacement” for government statistics.The ADP data does not capture what’s happening at government agencies, for example — an area of the economy that could be significantly affected by a lengthy shutdown.“Using a portfolio of private sector and government data gives you a better chance of capturing a very complicated economy in a complex world,” she said.The Fed will remain open no matter how long the shutdown lasts, because it funds itself from earnings on the government bonds and other securities it owns. It will continue to provide its monthly snapshots of industrial production, which includes mining, manufacturing, and utility output. The next industrial production report will be released Oct. 17.

    The government shutdown that began Wednesday will deprive policymakers and investors of economic data vital to their decision-making at a time of unusual uncertainty about the direction of the U.S. economy.

    The absence will be felt almost immediately, as the government’s monthly jobs report scheduled for release Friday will likely be delayed. A weekly report on the number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits — a proxy for layoffs that is typically published on Thursdays — will also be postponed.

    If the shutdown is short-lived, it won’t be very disruptive. But if the release of economic data is delayed for several weeks or longer, it could pose challenges, particularly for the Federal Reserve. The Fed is grappling with where to set a key interest rate at a time of conflicting signals, with inflation running above its 2% target and hiring nearly ground to a halt, driving the unemployment rate higher in August.

    The Fed typically cuts this rate when unemployment rises, but raises it — or at least leaves it unchanged — when inflation is rising too quickly. It’s possible the Fed will have little new federal economic data to analyze by its next meeting on Oct. 28-29, when it is widely expected to reduce its rate again.

    “The job market had been a source of real strength in the economy but has been slowing down considerably the past few months,” said Michael Linden, senior policy fellow at the left-leaning Washington Center for Equitable Growth. “It would be very good to know if that slowdown was continuing, accelerating, or reversing.”

    The Fed cut its rate by a quarter-point earlier this month and signaled it was likely to do so twice more this year. Fed officials said they would keep a close eye on how inflation and unemployment evolve, but that depends on the data being available.

    A key inflation report is scheduled for Oct. 15 and the government’s monthly retail sales report is slated for release the next day.

    “We’re in a meeting-by-meeting situation, and we’re going to be looking at the data,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said during a news conference earlier this month.

    The economic picture has recently gotten cloudier. Despite slower hiring, there are signs that overall economic growth may be picking up. Consumers have stepped up their shopping and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimates the economy likely expanded at a healthy clip in the July-September quarter, after a large gain in the April-June period.

    A key question for the Fed is whether that growth can revive the job market, which this Friday’s report might have helped illustrate. Economists had forecast another month of weak hiring, with just 50,000 new positions added, according to a survey by FactSet. The unemployment rate was projected to stay at a still-low 4.3%.

    On Wall Street, investors obsess over the monthly jobs reports, typically issued the first Friday of every month. It’s a crucial indicator of the economy’s health and provides insights into how the Fed might adjust interest rates, which affects the cost of borrowing and influences how investors allocate their money.

    So far, investors don’t seem fazed by the shutdown. The broad S&P 500 stock index rose slightly Wednesday to an all-time high.

    Many businesses also rely on government data to gauge how the economy is faring. The Commerce Department’s monthly report on retail sales, for example, is a comprehensive look at the health of U.S. consumers and can influence whether companies make plans to expand or shrink their operations and workforces.

    For the time being, the Fed, economists, and investors will likely focus more on private data.

    On Wednesday, the payroll provider ADP issued its monthly employment data, which showed that businesses cut 32,000 jobs in September — a signal the economy is slowing. Still, ADP chief economist Nela Richardson said her firm’s report “was not intended to be a replacement” for government statistics.

    The ADP data does not capture what’s happening at government agencies, for example — an area of the economy that could be significantly affected by a lengthy shutdown.

    “Using a portfolio of private sector and government data gives you a better chance of capturing a very complicated economy in a complex world,” she said.

    The Fed will remain open no matter how long the shutdown lasts, because it funds itself from earnings on the government bonds and other securities it owns. It will continue to provide its monthly snapshots of industrial production, which includes mining, manufacturing, and utility output. The next industrial production report will be released Oct. 17.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How the Shutdown Threatens to Disrupt IPO Market Momentum

    [ad_1]

    A U.S. government shutdown threatens to stall the IPO market’s long-awaited comeback, just as strong investor demand and successful debuts had breathed life back into new listings.

    The U.S. government shut down much of its operations on Wednesday as deep partisan divisions prevented Congress and the White House from reaching a funding deal.

    With the Securities and Exchange Commission running only essential functions on a skeleton staff, the agency will stop processing IPO paperwork, leaving companies primed for Wall Street debuts such as actress Jennifer Garner’s baby food company Once Upon a Farm and electric-aircraft maker Beta Technologies in limbo.

    The fall window has been gathering momentum, with a wave of successful debuts, raising hopes that 2025 could be a breakout year for IPOs after high interest rates and volatility stalled the market for nearly three years.

    “A shutdown grinds the SEC to a halt, which means no prospectus reviews, no comments cleared and no green lights for going public,” said Michael Ashley Schulman, partner and CIO at Running Point Capital Advisors.

    “It’s bureaucratic purgatory at the worst possible time, just as the IPO market was beginning to thaw from a deep freeze,” Schulman added.

    U.S. IPOs have raised $52.94 billion from 263 listings as of September 29, the highest since 2021, according to Dealogic. The largest listings of the year included LNG giant Venture Global, buy-now-pay-later lender Klarna , and AI cloud firm CoreWeave.

    In addition to Once Upon a Farm and Beta Technologies, life insurer Ethos Technologies was also among the biggest companies to file for an IPO recently. Representatives for the three companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

    The pipeline for the rest of 2025 and going into 2026 features several other high-profile would-be issuers, including medical supplies giant Medline, SoftBank-backed PayPay, and corporate travel management platform Navan.

    “Already this is shifting timelines back for deals that were on the fence,” said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, a provider of IPO-focused research and ETFs.

    “If it lasts more than a week, the IPO market will grind down to a halt, cutting short the rebound we were expecting.”

    U.S. IPO market rebounds in 2025

    Temporary Setback

    While government shutdowns are typically short-lived, the longest in history — 35 days spanning December 2018 to January 2019 — occurred under President Donald Trump’s previous administration.

    At the time, the IPO market came to a virtual standstill. But a few companies sidestepped the SEC by locking in their IPO prices weeks in advance, allowing them to proceed with listings despite the shutdown.

    While the shutdown lasts, the IPO freeze could ripple across Wall Street, delaying deals for banks and limiting listing fees for exchanges.

    Still, as with 2019, listings are likely to bounce back, said some market watchers. Strong investor demand, hefty inflows into IPO-themed funds and the best after-market performance in years will continue to lure companies to the market, said Lukas Muehlbauer, research analyst at IPO research firm IPOX.

    A weeks-long shutdown could potentially dampen market sentiment and spur volatility, but the fall window was generally the strongest for IPOs and would likely shrug off a shutdown blip, according to Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial.

    “IPO activity should be pretty solid and dominate any near-term hiccups around a shutdown,” Saglimbene added.

    A bar chart showing the US government shutdowns since 1976 and their duration.
    Three of the four longest U.S. government shutdowns happened since 1996.

    Reporting by Manya Saini and Niket Nishant in Bengaluru; editing by Michelle Price and Krishna Chandra Eluri.

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Wall Street indexes climb as investors brush off government shutdown uncertainties

    [ad_1]

    By Sinéad Carew and Niket Nishant

    (Reuters) -Wall Street indexes closed up on Monday with the Nasdaq leading gains as investors bought heavyweight technology stocks and shrugged off the uncertainty of a potential U.S. government shutdown and hawkish remarks from Federal Reserve officials.

    Technology provided the benchmark S&P’s biggest boost as investors bet on growth from artificial intelligence and expectations that the Fed will keep cutting interest rates as it grapples with persistent inflation concerns and labor market uncertainties.

    A major focus for Wall Street this week is a standoff between Republicans and Democrats over funding that has raised the prospect of a government shutdown beginning Wednesday, the first day of the U.S. government’s new fiscal year.

    Even as the Labor Department prepared for a potential delay of its September jobs report in the event of a shutdown, this did not seem to be the key market driver, said Lindsey Bell, chief strategist at 248 Ventures in Charlotte, North Carolina.

    “Investors are clinging to the positives,” Bell said, pointing to rate easing hopes and signs of economic resilience from recent releases including housing market and consumer spending data.

    “The market is not going to shoot to the moon, because this is a risk. But investors can look through the potential for a shutdown, because if it does occur it will likely be resolved quickly and the market can resume focusing on the things that do matter, like earnings, monetary policy and AI investments.”

    While shutdowns have not tended to impact corporate results historically, the imminent threat may have limited gains and kept trading volume light on Monday, according to Burns McKinney, portfolio manager and NFJ Investment Group in Dallas, Texas.

    “The only reason it would truly move markets is if it affects the bottom line. Historically speaking, government shutdowns are brief and they don’t have an impact on profitability so investors tend to be forward-looking,” said McKinney.

    “It’s just like smoke on a racetrack. They just keep the wheels straight, manage through the stress and move forward through the smoke.”

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 68.78 points, or 0.15%, to 46,316.07, the S&P 500 gained 17.51 points, or 0.26%, to 6,661.21 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 107.09 points, or 0.48%, to 22,591.15.

    Investors were also monitoring Fed policymakers’ commentary for any signs of concern over the potential loss of economic visibility should a shutdown materialize.

    Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, among the most hawkish Fed officials and not a voter on policy this year, said on Monday the central bank needed to maintain restrictive monetary policy to cool inflation.

    St. Louis Federal Reserve President Alberto Musalem, a voter on rates this year, said he was open to further interest rate cuts but that the Fed must be cautious and keep rates high enough to continue to lean against inflation, which remains roughly a percentage point above the central bank’s 2% target.

    Traders, however, are pricing in a roughly 89% chance of a 25-basis-point rate cut at the next Fed meeting, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool.

    Among the S&P 500’s 11 major industry sectors, nine advanced. With oil prices falling more than 3%, the energy sector was the biggest laggard, ending down 1.9%. Consumer discretionary was the biggest percentage gainer, adding 0.6%.

    But for index point boosts, technology was the clear leader with big pushes from AI chip leader Nvidia, up 2%, and Microsoft, which added 0.6%.

    Electronic Arts shares rallied 4.5% after the game publisher agreed to be taken private in a $55 billion deal, fueling hopes for broader deal prospects, said Bell of 248 Ventures, who saw the transaction as “confirmation that the M&A market is open.”

    Lam Research shares advanced 2% after Deutsche Bank upgraded the rating on the chip-making equipment firm to “buy” from “hold.”

    AppLovin set a fresh record high before closing up 6.3% at $712.36, also providing one of the biggest lifts for the S&P 500. Morgan Stanley raised the target price on the stock to $750 from $480.

    After U.S. President Donald Trump shared a video on Sunday promoting the health benefits of hemp-derived cannabidiol, U.S.-listed shares of cannabis-related companies rose. Canopy Growth rallied 17% to $1.57 while Cronos Group rose almost 13% to $2.97 and Tilray Brands jumped 60.9% to $1.85.

    Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 1.38-to-1 ratio on the NYSE where there were 337 new highs and 80 new lows. The S&P 500 posted 38 new 52-week highs and six new lows while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 116 new highs and 74 new lows.

    On the Nasdaq, 2,525 stocks rose and 2,118 fell as advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 1.19-to-1 ratio.

    On U.S. exchanges about 17.91 billion shares changed hands compared with the 18.25 billion average from the last 20 sessions.

    (Reporting by Sinéad Carew in New York, Niket Nishant and Sukriti Gupta in Bengaluru; Editing by Sriraj Kalluvila, Shilpi Majumdar and Richard Chang)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump signs executive order saying his TikTok deal is legal

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump has signed an executive order finalizing some of the terms of a deal to bring TikTok’s US business under American control. The new TikTok entity will be owned by a group of US-based investors, while ByteDance will maintain a smaller stake in the new company and keep the app’s algorithm.

    TikTok has faced more than a year of uncertainty about its future in the United States since former President Joe Biden signed a law last year requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a ban. In January, the Supreme Court upheld the law and TikTok briefly went dark just as Trump took office. Trump promptly signed an executive order extending the ban deadline for the app. (He signed off on a fourth extension last week.) Today’s order declares that the plan to split off a US entity from the ByteDance-owned company will meet requirements of the ban.

    The executive order comes after a flurry of interest in TikTok from US companies and investors. Microsoft, Amazon, Perplexity AI, Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian and YouTuber MrBeast were all reportedly among those vying for the business.

    Under the new arrangement, US investors will have a large stake in the US entity. CNBC reported that Oracle, Silver Lake and MGX would be part of a core group of investors that own 45 percent of the business. Trump confirmed Oracle’s involvement, and also mentioned Michael Dell and Rupert Murdoch as investors as part of the deal. ByteDance, TikTok’s current owner, will have a 19.9 percent stake and the rest will go to a group of investors that includes ByteDance’s previous investors. Vice President JD Vance said the new company would be valued at around $14 billion.

    Oracle, which has previously partnered with the company on data security, will continue in its role overseeing the app’s algorithm and security. The fate of the TikTok algorithm has been a major question. Some lawmakers have questioned the decision to license the algorithm from ByteDance. Earlier this week, both the Republican chair and Democratic ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party expressed concerns about any arrangement that doesn’t put the algorithm squarely in American hands.

    Answering questions after Trump signed the order, Vance said to reporters that the deal ensures that US investors will have “control over how the algorithm pushes content toward users.” In reponse to a question about whether the algorithm would prefer MAGA content, Trump lamented that although he would love for the platform to be 100 percent MAGA, it would in fact treat “everyone fairly.” Trump described China as “fully on board” with the deal.

    [ad_2]

    Karissa Bell

    Source link

  • We Built a 7-Figure Business Without a Single Investor — Here’s Why Saying No to VC Was Our Smartest Move | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    You’ve heard this story before: a couple of college kids launch a startup from their dorm room. Surrounded by engineers, finance majors and future founders, venture capital wasn’t just common — it was expected. So when my co-founder and I launched Prepory, our college admissions coaching company, we assumed we’d need funding to be taken seriously.

    We entered a pitch competition and came in second. No check. We reached out to investors. No bites. We had a choice: give up or keep building.

    We kept building.

    What started as a one-person operation helping students in our local community has grown into a seven-figure, global company with nearly 100 team members. We’ve supported over 14,000 students, partnered with school districts and institutions in multiple countries and built one of the most trusted brands in college admissions — all without a single outside investor.

    Here’s why we said no to VC, and why bootstrapping was the smartest decision we never planned to make.

    The pressure to raise

    In elite academic circles, starting a business often goes hand in hand with chasing venture capital. I pictured the high-stakes pitch rooms, the dramatic investor meetings — scenes straight out of The Social Network. But after our early efforts fell flat, we stopped trying to win someone else’s approval and turned our focus inward.

    We obsessed over our product, our client experience and our outcomes — not “scale.”

    One month before our one-year mark, we hit $100,000 in revenue. It wasn’t a headline-grabbing number by Silicon Valley standards, but it proved something more important: we didn’t need permission to grow. We just needed to execute.

    Related: Most Startups Ignore This One Asset That Makes or Breaks Their Success

    What bootstrapping taught us

    In hindsight, bootstrapping didn’t just work — it shaped the business in ways VC money never could.

    Every dollar mattered, which meant we tested fast and paid close attention to what customers wanted. Client feedback shaped everything. We pivoted early on from a B2C model to B2B — realizing that one school contract could bring the same revenue as ten individual clients. That insight wasn’t born from a boardroom; it was born from necessity.

    Bootstrapping also made me a better leader. I didn’t start by managing dozens of people. I started with one, then five, then ten. That kind of slow, intentional growth gave me room to develop as a leader — learning how to listen, communicate clearly and lead with clarity and care. There was no pressure to scale overnight, so we could prioritize culture, values and quality.

    The hidden cost of raising too soon

    VC can be a powerful accelerator — but if you raise too early, it can also be a trap.

    Many founders take funding before they’ve found product-market fit. They shift their focus from solving customer problems to pleasing investors. Instead of building a strong foundation, they’re stuck managing burn rates and expectations. Teams get stretched. Quality suffers.

    We built slowly. That meant we stayed close to our mission and recruited talent who were energized by the opportunity to build something meaningful. Today, we outperform companies twice our size because we’ve built a team that shows up with purpose — and we’ve stayed aligned with what matters most: helping students reach their full potential.

    Related: How to Scale a Business Without Wasting Millions (Or Collapsing Under Your Own Growth)

    Should you bootstrap?

    Ask yourself this: What do you actually need the money for?

    If you’re building a product that truly requires upfront investment — hardware, tech or time-sensitive development — funding may make sense. But if you’re starting a service-based business, you might not need capital to get traction.

    Bootstrapping requires resilience, patience and a tolerance for delayed gratification. But it gives you full ownership of your company, your vision and your decisions. Today, we have the freedom to invest in growth on our own terms.

    People still ask if we’d raise money now. My answer? Not unless we have a strategic reason to. Not because I’m anti-VC, but because we no longer need it.

    Bootstrapping gave us something far more valuable than capital: it taught us how to build a resilient, values-driven, adaptable business. And if we ever decide to raise, we’ll do it from a position of strength — not survival.

    You’ve heard this story before: a couple of college kids launch a startup from their dorm room. Surrounded by engineers, finance majors and future founders, venture capital wasn’t just common — it was expected. So when my co-founder and I launched Prepory, our college admissions coaching company, we assumed we’d need funding to be taken seriously.

    We entered a pitch competition and came in second. No check. We reached out to investors. No bites. We had a choice: give up or keep building.

    We kept building.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Santos

    Source link

  • My Profitable Company Is Worthless to Investors — Here’s Why That Works in My Favor | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Over the past few months, I’ve received a surprising number of emails and even phone calls from private equity firms asking if I’d consider selling my business.

    “Gene,” they all say, “we’ve followed your growth in the technology space and believe we can help you unlock value while preserving your legacy and team. Would you be open to a 20-minute call to discuss mutual opportunities?”

    It’s flattering, sure. And it makes sense. According to Harvard’s Corporate Governance site, private equity exits jumped from $754 billion in 2023 to $902 billion in 2024 — about a 20% increase. Other reports show deal value rising by 50% in the first half of 2024 alone, with strategic acquisitions leading the way.

    Private equity is everywhere — scooping up contractors, manufacturers, distributors and yes, even tech companies like mine.

    Why? Because many business owners are aging out. The average small business owner in the U.S. is over 55, according to the Small Business Administration — and that was back in 2020. So a wave of exits is underway, and investors are eager to buy businesses with strong financials, recurring revenue and growth potential.

    But my business? I don’t think I’m sellable. Not because I wouldn’t entertain an offer — but because once a buyer looks under the hood, they’ll realize the uncomfortable truth: My company has no real value.

    Related: Want to Maximize the Sale Price of Your Business? Start with These 5 Value Drivers

    The balance sheet no one wants

    Let’s start with the basics. My business has no hard assets. No buildings, no equipment, no physical property. Just a bit of cash and accounts receivable.

    Sure, we also have very few liabilities. In fact, most of our “payables” are actually prepaid client deposits — blocks of time that customers purchase in advance. It’s a great way to boost cash flow and reduce risk, but it creates a liability a buyer would need to honor. Not exactly attractive.

    No contracts, no guarantees

    We don’t lock clients into long-term contracts. We’ve never sold maintenance agreements or recurring support plans. Our clients use us when they need us — and leave when they don’t.

    There’s no proprietary process or secret sauce. What we do isn’t complicated. In fact, anyone could learn it online. Our clients hire us not because we’re unique, but because they don’t have the bandwidth to do it themselves.

    So if a private equity firm were to evaluate my company, they’d quickly realize there’s no predictable revenue stream to base a valuation on. No recurring income. No clear multiple to apply. We go project to project, client to client.

    That might work for me. But it doesn’t work for them.

    A team that disappears when I do

    I do have employees. But most of the work is handled by independent contractors. That comes with its own risk — from worker classification issues to a lack of long-term commitment.

    Our setup has always been virtual. We’ve been remote since 2005. No office. No shared culture. No in-person meetings. Everyone works independently, and I check in as needed. It works for us — but it doesn’t scream “scalable organization.”

    The reality? This business doesn’t run without me. I do the selling. I do the marketing. I oversee projects, handle accounting, manage admin and lead the day-to-day. If I were hit by a bus tomorrow, this business would fold within 30 days — with contractors and staff likely splintering off to do their own thing.

    No IP, no exclusivity, no moat

    We implement CRM platforms. It’s a crowded, competitive space. The very vendors we represent are often our biggest competitors. There’s no barrier to entry. Competitors appear regularly — usually cheaper, often younger and sometimes better.

    We don’t have any intellectual property, documented systems or defined processes. Every project is different, and it rarely makes sense to create templates or workflows that won’t apply next time.

    So there’s nothing here to “buy.” No assets. No exclusivity. No edge.

    So, what do I have?

    I have a business that works for me.

    For more than 25 years, it’s paid the bills, put my kids through college and built a retirement plan for my wife and me. It’s also supported dozens of employees and contractors along the way. That’s something I’m proud of.

    My model has always been simple: do the work, bill for it, generate cash, save what you can. Rinse and repeat. And for me, it’s worked beautifully.

    But let’s be honest: this model doesn’t build transferable value. There’s no goodwill. No buyer-ready systems. No brand equity. No enterprise value. Just a highly functional, one-person-driven operation that disappears without me.

    Related: Starting a New Business? Here’s How to Leverage Transferable Skills From Your Prior Careers and Drive Success

    If your business looks like mine

    Don’t be discouraged. But do be realistic.

    You may be generating cash — and that’s great. You may be living well — even better. But unless you’ve intentionally built for scale, structure and succession, your business may not be worth much to anyone else.

    And that’s okay — as long as that’s the plan.

    For me, it is.

    Over the past few months, I’ve received a surprising number of emails and even phone calls from private equity firms asking if I’d consider selling my business.

    “Gene,” they all say, “we’ve followed your growth in the technology space and believe we can help you unlock value while preserving your legacy and team. Would you be open to a 20-minute call to discuss mutual opportunities?”

    It’s flattering, sure. And it makes sense. According to Harvard’s Corporate Governance site, private equity exits jumped from $754 billion in 2023 to $902 billion in 2024 — about a 20% increase. Other reports show deal value rising by 50% in the first half of 2024 alone, with strategic acquisitions leading the way.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    Gene Marks

    Source link

  • Wall St futures slip after tech selloff; earnings, Fed meet in focus

    [ad_1]

    (Reuters) -U.S. stock index futures declined on Wednesday, following a tech selloff on Wall Street, as investors geared up for more retail earnings and a crucial Federal Reserve symposium later this week.

    The tech sector was behind much of the market recovery from the April selloff, but investors have started to take stock of the elevated valuations, sending the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to their worst day in more than two weeks on Tuesday.

    Deepening concerns of government interference with companies, sources said the Trump administration was looking into taking equity stakes in chip companies in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act – just weeks after signing unprecedented revenue-sharing deals with Nvidia and AMD.

    Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices and Intel were marginally lower in premarket trading. Nvidia is expected to report quarterly results on Aug. 27.

    “For now, this looks like a mild and possibly necessary correction after an extremely strong run for this space,” said AJ Bell’s head of financial analysis, Danni Hewson.

    “Nvidia’s quarterly earning next week now look even more crucial than they already were.”

    A slew of earnings from big-box retailers are also in the spotlight now as investors seek a clearer picture on discretionary spending at a time when consumer sentiment has taken a hit from concerns around tariffs pushing up prices in the months ahead.

    Lowe’s declined 1% a day after rival Home Depot missed expectations on quarterly results.

    Estee Lauder fell 4.3%, while Target and TJX Companies were marginally lower ahead of their respective reports. Walmart’s results are due on Thursday.

    At 05:37 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 69 points, or 0.15%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 8.5 points, or 0.13%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 40.25 points, or 0.17%.

    Minutes from the Fed’s July meeting, where interest rates were left unchanged, are expected at 2:00 p.m. ET. It could set the tone before the central bank’s highly anticipated conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, between August 21 and 23.

    Chair Jerome Powell is expected to speak on Friday and his remarks will be scrutinized for any clues on monetary policy, even as investors price in a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September, according to data compiled by LSEG.

    Traders “remain wary that Powell could strike a more hawkish tone, emphasizing tariff-driven inflation risks and pushing back against the degree of easing expected by the market,” said Bas Kooijman, CEO of DHF Capital S.A.

    Remarks from Governor Christopher Waller and Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic are expected later in the day.

    Recent economic data has suggested that the economy is yet to feel the full impact of tariffs and strategists expect the lingering uncertainty to temper market optimism, leaving the benchmark S&P 500 to potentially end the year just below current near-record levels.

    On the trade front, the Commerce Department slapped 50% import levies on more than 400 “derivative” steel and aluminum products.

    Among others, Futu Holdings gained 4.3% after reporting a jump in quarterly revenue.

    (Reporting by Johann M Cherian in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I Was a Founder Before I Became an Investor — Here’s How It Shaped My Investment Strategy | Entrepreneur

    I Was a Founder Before I Became an Investor — Here’s How It Shaped My Investment Strategy | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Before becoming an investor at Bread, I was a startup founder. I know what it’s like to stand before a room full of people, palms sweating, asking them to believe in me. I also know the relentless effort it takes to prove, time and again, that their faith — and their money — will pay off. My journey from founder to funder was shaped by these experiences, and it’s why I approach investing differently.

    As a founder, I benefited most from investors who went beyond providing capital. They mentored me, guided me through difficult decisions and became true partners in my entrepreneurial journey. Now, as an investor, I aspire to offer the same kind of support to the founders I back because it’s something that the startup world has long been missing.

    This founder-to-funder transition isn’t unique to me — I’m seeing a growing number of entrepreneurs take their hard-earned experience and apply it to venture capital. What’s more, there’s an increasing number of former founders taking on strategic consulting roles for young companies. These “founders for hire” aren’t just giving advice from the sidelines; they’re applying years of entrepreneurial experience to help today’s founders plan, execute and grow their businesses.

    Both founders-to-investors and founders-for-hire are transforming how startups are funded and nurtured, and I believe it will have a profound impact on the startup ecosystem for years to come.

    Related: How Saying ‘Yes’ to Every Opportunity Helped My Startup Make $1 Million in the First Year

    A unique perspective

    Successful founder VCs have investment success rates that are 6.5 percentage points higher than professional VCs. This doesn’t surprise me. Founder-turned-investors bring something to the table that isn’t common in the VC world: operational knowledge. They’ve experienced the highs and lows of startup life, understand the challenges of scaling a business, and have a keen eye for identifying promising ventures. Investors with startup experience can relate to founders on a deeper level, offering insights that traditional investors might miss.

    My co-founders and I built our first product company, Density, from the ground up, which has shaped my approach to supporting my portfolio companies. It’s a common misconception that innovation in business is all about technological discovery, when really it’s about solving “boring problems.” I look for founders who are just as excited about their hiring practices, operational processes, and financial planning, as they are about their product development. When you’re excited about the boring things, you build better products and run a more stable business. I wouldn’t know this without the firsthand trial-and-error experience I gained as a founder.

    How experiences shape investment strategies

    If you’re a founder looking to raise capital, here’s why you want to look for an investor with startup experience:

    1. Emphasis on product and market fit: Having built products themselves, a founder-turned-investor is able to quickly assess a startup’s potential to solve real-world problems.
    2. Realistic expectations: They understand the challenges of scaling and are often more patient with growth trajectories.
    3. Focus on fundamentals: They tend to prioritize sustainable business models over hype-driven metrics.
    4. Empathy for founders: They’re more likely to back passionate founders who demonstrate grit and adaptability.

    Investors with startup experience also offer much more than access to capital, often providing founders with access to their network, partnership opportunities and guidance on every part of the business.

    The importance of hands-on involvement

    One of the most significant advantages that a founder-investor brings to the table is a willingness to roll up their sleeves and get involved in portfolio companies. They often want to know the ins and outs of product development at every company they invest in and the operational challenges they’re dealing with.

    Are they struggling to hire the right people? Are they lacking clear processes for project deliverables? Are they conflicted about which product feature to prioritize?

    Whatever the challenge, founder-turned-funders are not afraid to get into the trenches with their portfolio companies. Personally, I’ve spent hours helping founders reshape their visual identity, refine their marketing strategy or even relaunch their product if necessary. In many cases, I am literally in the code with them.

    Investors who’ve started their own companies know how hard it is. They want to provide emotional support and guidance through the intense ups and downs of startup life. By being a sounding board for the founders I work with, I hope to make the journey a little less stressful, which can make achieving success a bit easier.

    Related: What Should You Value More — An Investor’s Money or Their Experience?

    The future of the founder-led startup ecosystem

    Just as founder-led venture capital firms offer early entrepreneurs access to operational guidance, working with a consultant who has started their own company can provide invaluable mentorship opportunities.

    What sets a founder-for-hire apart from a traditional consultant is the depth of their involvement. They’re not just helping startups refine their sales motions or market strategies; they’re actively shaping products, helping find market fit, and even assisting in building out teams. It’s a level of engagement that goes far beyond typical consultant-client relationships. It’s also a flexible way for startups to tap into years of experience without needing to hire someone full-time or give up too much equity.

    Having a founder-consultant on your team is one of the smartest things you can do as an early entrepreneur. The combination of practical experience is invaluable in those first stages of business growth.

    Related: I Shifted From Founder to CEO 20 Years Ago and Never Looked Back — Here’s How to Successfully Make the Leap

    Bridging the gap

    The rise of founder-turned-investors and entrepreneurial consultants is changing the game for both venture capital and startups. By mixing financial knowledge with the real-world experience and hands-on involvement of former founders, these new players offer a unique level of business development and growth potential for young companies.

    For new entrepreneurs, this means a more supportive and understanding investment landscape. And for the startup ecosystem overall, it means a clearer path to success for everyone involved.

    [ad_2]

    Rob Grazioli

    Source link

  • OpenAI reportedly plans to increase ChatGPT’s price to $44 within five years

    OpenAI reportedly plans to increase ChatGPT’s price to $44 within five years

    [ad_1]

    OpenAI is reportedly telling investors that it plans on charging $22 a month to use ChatGPT by the end of the year. The company also plans to aggressively increase the monthly price over the next five years up to $44.

    The documents obtained by shows that OpenAI took in $300 million in revenue this August, and expects to make $3.7 billion in sales by the end of the year. Various expenses such as salaries, rent and operational costs will cause the company to lose $5 billion this year.

    OpenAI is reportedly circulating the documents the NYT reported on as part of a drive to find new investors to prevent or lessen its financial shortfall. Fortunately, OpenAI is raising money on a $150 billion valuation, and a new round of investments could bring in as much as $7 billion.

    OpenAI is also reportedly in the midst of switching from . The business model allows for the removal of any caps on investor returns so they’ll have more room to negotiate for new investors at possibly higher rates.

    [ad_2]

    Danny Gallagher

    Source link

  • Casino Mogul Ira Lubert Donates $10M to Beaver Stadium Renovation

    Casino Mogul Ira Lubert Donates $10M to Beaver Stadium Renovation

    [ad_1]

    Ira Lubert, a prominent Penn State alumnus, trustee, and successful casino owner, has donated $10 million toward ongoing renovations at Beaver Stadium, Penn State’s iconic football field. The university announced the generous gift that will give Lubert and his family naming rights, honoring them through the planned Lubert Family Welcome Center.

    A Centerpiece Project Will Honor the Lubert Name

    The Lubert Family Welcome Center will be one of the signature features in the stadium’s redesign. The ambitious $700 million renovation plan intends to create a better experience for prospective and new students. This gift represents the fourth eight-figure donation for Beaver Stadium’s redesign and elevates the total sum received to $55 million.

    Penn State president Neeli Bendapudi praised the Lubert family’s continuing commitment to the university. Alumnus and Penn State Board of Trustees Chair Ira Lubert has been one of the long-standing contributors to Penn State. His $10 million gift adds to his enduring legacy and relentless pursuit of campus facility improvements.

    (Ira and Pam) are ensuring that new generations of Penn Staters will discover connection, community, and their path to success from their earliest moments on campus.

    Neeli Bendapudi, Penn State president

    A “front door” into the university, the Lubert Family Welcome Center will add approximately 47,000 square feet of event space. It will feature resources to support Penn State’s admissions efforts. The Welcome Center will also double down as a multipurpose event space for large-scale gatherings, addressing the local community and athletic department’s growing needs.

    Lubert’s Casino Is a Walk Away from the Penn State Campus

    Aside from his contribution to Penn State, Ira Lubert is an established figure in the gaming world. He gained significant attention when he won a Category 4 casino license in September 2020 with a winning bid of  $10,000,101. The $123 million project will redevelop the Nittany Mall, just a few miles from Penn State’s main campus, transforming it into a 94,000-square-foot casino.

    Before taking on this new project, Lubert was a partner at Rivers Casino Pittsburgh, giving him the necessary experience to pursue such an ambitious venture. His planned mini-casino will offer 750 slot machines, 30 table games, and a sportsbook for a comprehensive gaming experience. Additional amenities will include a restaurant, bar, and fast-food options.

    The university has decided not to oppose Lubert’s nearby casino development, likely relying on his expertise to create a safe and sustainable gaming venue. His philanthropic and business endeavors continue to leave a lasting impact on Penn State and its surrounding community and will culminate with Beaver Stadium’s grand reopening sometime in 2027.

    [ad_2]

    Deyan Dimitrov

    Source link

  • 67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    [ad_1]

    67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    In a landscape where economic policy and market performance often intersect, a CNBC survey found that investors prefer former President Donald Trump’s potential impact on the stock market.

    The poll, which surveyed 400 investors, traders, and money managers, found that 67% believe Trump would benefit stocks more.

    Don’t Miss:

    CNBC said the sentiment appears to be rooted in historical performance. During Trump’s four-year tenure, the S&P 500 surged 68%, while the Nasdaq saw a 137% climb. In contrast, under Biden’s administration thus far, the same indexes have gained 44% and 34%, respectively.

    However, the investment community is divided on the market’s near-term trajectory. The survey found an even split among respondents; a third anticipate a drop, another third expect gains, while the remaining third see a rangebound market.

    Trending:

    That uncertainty reflects the factors influencing today’s economic landscape. While presidential policies can sway market sentiment, other elements often play a more important role. As Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco, told the New York Times, “Markets are politically agnostic. With good reason: it doesn’t matter.”

    See Also:

    The recent market rally has been largely attributed to investor enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) rather than political developments. CNBC noted that Microsoft emerged as the front-runner in the AI race, with 50% of survey respondents viewing it as best positioned to capitalize on the tech. Surprisingly, Nvidia did not make the top of that list.

    The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions continue to be a factor. Two-thirds of those polled expect the Fed to cut interest rates before year’s end (with many seeing a rate cut as soon as September), a move that could impact the market.

    Interestingly, despite the clear preference for Trump regarding market performance, investors showed concerns about the current state of the major indexes. Eighty percent of respondents admitted feeling uneasy about the heavy concentration of tech stocks in the benchmarks.

    Trending:

    Looking beyond equities, the survey highlighted India as the most attractive overseas market, followed by Japan and Europe. Corporate bonds emerged as the preferred investment vehicle in the absence of stocks.

    As the 2024 election approaches, investors are reminded that while presidential rhetoric often ties market performance to administration policies, the reality is far more nuanced. Historical data shows that markets have generally trended upward regardless of which party occupies the White House.

    Ultimately, as the survey results indicate, while investor sentiment may lean toward Trump for potential market gains, the road ahead for stocks appears as unpredictable as ever.

    Read Next:

    “ACTIVE INVESTORS’ SECRET WEAPON” Supercharge Your Stock Market Game with the #1 “news & everything else” trading tool: Benzinga Pro – Click here to start Your 14-Day Trial Now!

    Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?

    This article 67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map originally appeared on Benzinga.com

    © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Roku Stock Rallied on Friday

    Why Roku Stock Rallied on Friday

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) charged out of the gate Friday, jumping as much as 14.2%. As of 12:34 p.m. ET, the stock was still up 12.3%.

    The catalyst that propelled the streaming video pioneer higher was an upgrade and bullish commentary from a Wall Street analyst.

    A compelling opportunity

    Guggenheim analyst Michael Morris upgraded Roku stock to a buy from neutral (hold) while raising his price target to $75. For investors keeping track at home, that represents potential upside of 21% for investors compared to Thursday’s closing price.

    The analyst believes investors have been missing the forest for the trees but expects that to change when Roku reports its financial results in November. The company has been making progress on multiple fronts. Roku has been increasing the video advertising revenue from its streaming platform, thanks to partnerships with third-party demand-side platforms (DSP), as well as increasing ad sales on its home screen.

    Hitting the nail on the head

    The analyst has clearly done his research. Earlier this month, Roku announced its adoption of The Trade Desk‘s (NASDAQ: TTD) Unified ID 2.0, the company’s widely adopted audience identity platform, which makes it easier for advertisers to reach their target markets. The integration of this technology will be a win-win for both parties, as Roku offers unmatched access to audiences, while The Trade Desk is recognized as the market-leading DSP, according to global consulting firm Frost and Sullivan.

    There’s also the matter of Roku’s valuation. The stock was hit hard during the downturn, as ad revenue dried up. As a result, the stock is still down 85% from its high. Furthermore, the stock is attractively priced, selling for just 2 times forward sales.

    These factors, combined with the ongoing rebound in the advertising market, represent a compelling opportunity for Roku and its investors.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Roku right now?

    Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this:

    The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

    Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $758,227!*

    Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

    See the 10 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of August 22, 2024

    Danny Vena has positions in Roku and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Roku and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Why Roku Stock Rallied on Friday was originally published by The Motley Fool

    [ad_2]

    Source link