ReportWire

Tag: guidance

  • Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) Issues FY 2025 Earnings Guidance

    Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) Issues FY 2025 Earnings Guidance

    [ad_1]

    Medtronic (NYSE:MDTGet Free Report) updated its FY 2025 earnings guidance on Friday. The company provided earnings per share guidance of 5.400-5.500 for the period, compared to the consensus earnings per share estimate of 5.450. The company issued revenue guidance of $33.1 billion-$33.6 billion, compared to the consensus revenue estimate of $33.6 billion.

    Analysts Set New Price Targets

    MDT has been the subject of a number of recent research reports. Needham & Company LLC reissued a hold rating on shares of Medtronic in a research report on Friday. Royal Bank of Canada reissued a sector perform rating and issued a $92.00 price target on shares of Medtronic in a research report on Friday. Mizuho raised their price objective on Medtronic from $95.00 to $98.00 and gave the company a buy rating in a research report on Wednesday, February 21st. UBS Group boosted their target price on Medtronic from $75.00 to $76.00 and gave the stock a sell rating in a report on Friday. Finally, Truist Financial reduced their price target on Medtronic from $90.00 to $88.00 and set a hold rating for the company in a report on Friday. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, five have assigned a hold rating and six have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, Medtronic currently has an average rating of Hold and a consensus price target of $94.45.

    View Our Latest Report on Medtronic

    Medtronic Trading Up 1.1 %

    Shares of MDT stock opened at $82.29 on Friday. The stock has a market capitalization of $109.27 billion, a P/E ratio of 29.92, a P/E/G ratio of 2.68 and a beta of 0.78. The company has a current ratio of 2.03, a quick ratio of 1.71 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.47. The firm’s 50 day moving average is $82.81 and its 200 day moving average is $82.75. Medtronic has a 12-month low of $68.84 and a 12-month high of $91.00.

    Medtronic (NYSE:MDTGet Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, May 23rd. The medical technology company reported $1.46 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.45 by $0.01. The firm had revenue of $8.59 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $8.44 billion. Medtronic had a return on equity of 13.47% and a net margin of 11.36%. The company’s revenue for the quarter was up .5% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period last year, the business posted $1.57 EPS. Research analysts expect that Medtronic will post 5.45 earnings per share for the current year.

    Medtronic Increases Dividend

    The firm also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, July 12th. Stockholders of record on Friday, June 28th will be paid a $0.70 dividend. This represents a $2.80 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 3.40%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, June 28th. This is a boost from Medtronic’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.69. Medtronic’s dividend payout ratio is 100.36%.

    Insider Activity at Medtronic

    In other Medtronic news, EVP Michael Marinaro sold 854 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, April 8th. The shares were sold at an average price of $83.14, for a total value of $71,001.56. Following the transaction, the executive vice president now directly owns 27,925 shares in the company, valued at $2,321,684.50. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. 0.30% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.

    Medtronic Company Profile

    (Get Free Report)

    Medtronic plc develops, manufactures, and sells device-based medical therapies to healthcare systems, physicians, clinicians, and patients worldwide. Its Cardiovascular Portfolio segment offers implantable cardiac pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices; cardiac ablation products; insertable cardiac monitor systems; TYRX products; and remote monitoring and patient-centered software.

    See Also

    Earnings History and Estimates for Medtronic (NYSE:MDT)

    Receive News & Ratings for Medtronic Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Medtronic and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Coroner cites heart defect, extreme heat in boy’s death during P.E.

    Coroner cites heart defect, extreme heat in boy’s death during P.E.

    [ad_1]

    There was an excessive heat warning in Lake Elsinore on the August day when 12-year-old Yahushua Robinson — who had been instructed to run — died during P.E. class.

    Now, a coroner’s report has reportedly found that the boy died of a heart defect, with heat and physical exertion as contributing factors.

    The findings by the Riverside County Coroner’s Bureau were announced soon after the introduction of a Senate bill that would create rules for California schools on what physical activities can be allowed during extreme weather.

    The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department said deputies went to Canyon Lake Middle School around 11 a.m. on Aug. 29 after receiving a report of a minor needing medical aid. The child was hospitalized and later pronounced dead.

    The high temperature in Lake Elsinore that day was 107 degrees.

    The coroner’s report said “significant conditions” contributing to but not related to the cause of death included “presumptive environmental heat exposure and recent physical exertion,” the San Bernardino Sun reported.

    Yahushua had been sprinting with other students and was seen “bending over and grabbing at his chest,” according to a description of video footage written by Deputy Coroner Myranda Montez, the Press-Enterprise reported.

    Yahushua fell and got back up multiple times and was helped by other students and then by an adult, according to the report. At one point, “it appeared Yahushua became unresponsive,” and the teacher carried him into shade off-camera, the outlet reported.

    The official cause of death was “coronary artery anomaly.”

    The Times reached out to the family’s advocate, Christina Laster, for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

    The California Department of Education has no rules on when severe weather should prompt the cancellation or modification of physical education classes. It leaves the decision to local schools and districts, “with the assistance of other local agencies that monitor air quality and weather.”

    “Unhealthy air quality, extreme temperatures, high winds, etc. may present conditions where it is appropriate to modify activity levels or move PE instruction indoors,” the Department of Education says on its website.

    The California Department of Public Health provides guidance on sports and strenuous activities during extreme heat; however, it’s up to schools to implement the guidance.

    Sen. Melissa Hurtado (D-Sanger) has introduced Senate Bill 1248, or Yahushua’s Law, with the aim of bringing uniformity to how California schools respond to extreme weather when it comes to physical activities.

    In a news release, Hurtado said the bill would require the California Department of Education to develop guidelines for school districts to implement during weather patterns that are potentially harmful to students’ health.

    “No student should ever lose their life on campus to extreme weather when we can take steps to protect them by preparing statewide plans to minimize exposure to the most harmful elements of exposure,” Hurtado said. “I commend the family of Yahushua Robinson … for lending their emotional strength and compassion for others in order to help ensure that no other student loses their life this way.”

    [ad_2]

    Karen Garcia, Summer Lin

    Source link

  • Magic Johnson, Shark Tank’s Daymond John and Other Celebrity Entrepreneurs Share Unfiltered Advice | Entrepreneur

    Magic Johnson, Shark Tank’s Daymond John and Other Celebrity Entrepreneurs Share Unfiltered Advice | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Have you ever wanted to reach through the screen to interrupt a TED Talk speaker or raise your hand during a MasterClass course?

    You’re not alone.

    Entrepreneurial education has dipped its hand into the sexy jar of sweet offerings never before experienced by knowledge-desperate entrepreneurs in wait. New offerings weave incredible real-life, story-based content with thought-provoking presentations and platforms harnessing iconic names and faces of the brands we love.

    Many have wondered what the next iteration of offering might provide that hasn’t already been served up to an ever-growing marketplace of need.

    An A-list of celeb entrepreneurs shared behind-the-scenes experiences for attendees at the Wealthflix business conference’s inaugural event in L.A. earlier this summer. The list includes Magic Johnson, Daymond John of Shark Tank, Sprinkles founder Candace Nelson, branding superstar Shaun Neff, Beyoncé’s father and noted music executive Mathew Knowles, former Virgin executive Jason Felts, and Ashlee Simpson-Ross — all mixing classic tales with never-before-heard nuggets of personal experiences not usually touted in business books.

    Related: 8 Important Lessons From Leading Entrepreneurs

    Best practices and lessons from the stars

    The classic fourth wall that marks an actor’s acknowledgment of the audience was shattered by the presenters and for good reason. The celebs shared best practices and lessons learned through stage speeches and sit-down interviews to enhance the learning for audience members. The shared realism of the Magic Johnson’s of the world couldn’t come at a better time.

    The data can no longer be seen as a cute detail at a cocktail party of those already in the catbird seat. The Kaufman Foundation’s research reveals that 100% of net new job creation in the U.S. comes from the world of startups. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shines a different and compelling light, including the staggering statistic that 37% of minority youth are unemployed.

    To meet the moment, Duquan Brown, the former manager of artists like Tyrese Gibson and Busta Rhymes, has put together an experience centered on dismantling outdated educational practices while infusing networking opportunities and behind-the-scenes interviews and conversations that bring entrepreneurs inside the mind of a Magic Johnson or Daymond John. “Thoughtful learning options provide all of us an incredible opportunity to support entrepreneurs and the journeys that define their success,” shares an impassioned Brown.

    Recent labor data illustrates an expanding need, especially for Gen Zers, to find entrepreneurial education. Approximately 70% are considering a permanent stage left exit to start their own companies. Analysts might scoff at the impact of a labor pool representing just over 8% in 2022. How will the naysayers feel in 2025 when that number jumps to 20% and then to 30% by 2030? This generation is marked by a need to feel connected to their work and the stories that constructed their individual horizon lines.

    Unconventional advice

    On the one hand, Magic Johnson, who may be just as well-known for his business triumphs as an NBA Hall of Famer, believes that an entrepreneur’s pitch should be perfect. “When you come into a meeting and pitch your idea, I expect you to have the answers. If you don’t have the answers, how can we establish trust,” exclaims a passionate Johnson. When pushed for clarification, a never-nervous and always-prepared Johnson says, “I eat pressure for breakfast — if I ask you five questions and you can’t meet the moment, then you’re not somebody I want to do business with.” It’s this kind of brass-tacks education that audience members clamor for and why an alternative approach is just as welcomed by entrepreneurs.

    Daymond John started with $40 in his pocket when he founded FUBU, and even back then, he struggled to find his answers in a sea of uncertainty. Fast forward to today, and John works diligently to educate and support those lucky enough to present their business ideas to him. “I am of two minds. If you come to me acting like you know everything and I find that you don’t, we won’t make perfect business partners. Now, if you openly respond to a question saying you’re in front of me because you don’t have the answer, well then I respect that,” says John with the steady, steely-eyed focus we’ve become accustomed to on Shark Tank.

    The semi-structured but moderated conversation allows John to freestyle, sharing that the “hacking” phenomenon plays a significant character in his success story. “I used to hack myself, constantly testing my assumptions against those things that have meaning in my life — kids, family, friends, community.”

    The founder of Sprinkles, Candace Nelson, embraced the family notion of going into the cupcake business with her husband, Charles and celebrating the profoundly successful Sprinkles exit even after 22 years of marriage and counting. “It just works for us. I know that people say never to go into business with family. We understood our roles and allowed each other to grow in those roles,” shares Nelson whose cupcake empire has sold over 75 million cupcakes.

    The challenge for Nelson and countless entrepreneurs comes when success is knocking on the door, and control has to cede if scaling is a realistic option. “I struggled to incorporate others into the business at first. Would they know how to bake my recipes? Could I trust them? I finally relented, and outside of a few hiring learning lessons, it became a huge success.”

    Magic adds, “We [entrepreneurs] shouldn’t be afraid of partnerships. You don’t have to own 100%.” A prescient statement by Magic as news now breaks of Johnson’s ownership stake in the NFL’s Washington Commanders, with Josh Harris, as the sale became official at the reported tune of a record-breaking $6.05 billion.

    Jason Felts, the youngest CEO of a Richard Branson Virgin company, embodies the notion of Johnson and the lesson of Nelson, building KEMPA Home with a family friend and cultural icon, Ashlee Simpson-Ross. “We had been friends for decades. Our families have been friends, and we always shared our thoughts about our careers. I wanted to start KEMPA, and it dawned on me that Ashlee should be a part of this. Now the Creative Director Simpson-Ross is harmonizing her creative and musical muscle to bring “vacation home” with Felts and the KEMPA team.

    Related: From Idea to Successful Exit — 8 Lessons Learned From Building and Selling a Startup

    Entrepreneurial community building

    Like many who shared the stage with her in L.A., Candice Nelson sees collaborating and teaching as essential building blocks for the next generation of business owners. “We’ve launched Pizzana, a chain of Neapolitan pizzerias, and continued to expand our portfolio of investments with CN2 Ventures supporting early-stage businesses.” Pizzana, of course, isn’t just your run-of-the-mill outfit – a collaboration borne out of Sunday night pizza parties with their friends and now business partners, actor Chris O’Donnell and his wife, Caroline.

    Shaun Neff, a branding expert whose little black book of influential business partners reads like a once-in-a-lifetime Hollywood Hills summer bash, remembers the days before collaborating with the likes of Kevin Durant and Kendall Jenner. “I still remember the feeling when somebody would hand me a $10 bill, and I’d reach into my backpack and hand them a t-shirt with my name on it. And, then, to see my merch worn by recognizable and global figures. Unbelievable,” a reflective Neff shares.

    Neff talked about community and brand building throughout his career, shedding light on the confidence level necessary to establish and bring a brand back from the dead. “I remember Sun Bum vividly. I was asked to come in, invest, and turn it around. I didn’t want to do it. I woke up countless times convinced I shouldn’t jump in. I’m glad I did,” smiles Neff. You’d smile, too, if the reported sale to SC Johnson of $400 million is accurate. Neff, though, isn’t celebrating success the way one might think. This self-proclaimed creative junkie hails the opportunity to be selective and creative with projects that align with his life and family. “I just feel blessed.”

    The lessons from the star-studded celeb entrepreneurs were diverse, filled with poignant tales and anecdotes, and steeped in a shared passion for giving back to those on the precipice of success. Johnson delivered a pin-point pass sharing the realities of entrepreneurship even if he is the undisputed champion of optimism. “I don’t want people to think that every deal I’ve been a part of has succeeded because that just isn’t true. We all need to learn from our mistakes and ensure that they [mistakes] don’t happen again.”

    Effortlessly, Magic provides sage advice minus the shine of an over-produced sound bite for an engaged audience to chew on.

    [ad_2]

    Dr. Rod Berger

    Source link

  • How to Filter Good Advice From The Bad | Entrepreneur

    How to Filter Good Advice From The Bad | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    With so much information available, someone could easily think that building a successful startup should be easy. In reality, such an overwhelming amount of advice makes it more challenging. CB Insights found that 70% of upstart tech companies fail within 20 months, which I suspect — may be (in part) — is because they take generic advice and apply it without consideration of their individual circumstances.

    Most startup founders find themselves drowning in a sea of advice that pulls them in every direction. Being a founder is already tough enough, and taking in and adopting so much information makes it easy to get overwhelmed, but that doesn’t mean you can’t succeed on your own terms.

    By acknowledging the fact that they are on their own path and finding their unique “why,” startup founders can filter out the good advice from the fluff on their entrepreneurial journey with confidence and keep their business afloat.

    Focus on the founder

    In a world full of overwhelming advice, startup founders need clarity and guidance tailored to the biggest driver of their business’s success: themselves. We all differ in skill sets, strengths, weaknesses, and past wounds. Every founder is fighting both business and personal battles that intertwine and are impossible to separate.

    Who we are as individuals and why we become entrepreneurs affects everything we do: Our leadership, the people we do business with and employ, how we sell and who we turn to to raise money. Despite the magnitude of information out there to help budding entrepreneurs, unless the advice reflects the unique circumstances of the founder, most of it won’t apply to them. Without this guidance, it would be impossible for a founder to decipher the right advice to apply based on their leadership.

    Related: These 13 Founders Share Their Number 1 Piece of Advice to Help You Set and Achieve Your Business Goals

    Identify the “why”

    To apply the right advice, startup founders first need a deep and clear understanding of their “why” – the real reason they became entrepreneurs in the first place. We can only reach our goals if we know our reasons for setting them, just like we can’t keep a customer happy unless we know what they really want. Everyone has their own path fueled by what they want, but as founders, we need to identify exactly what that path is and what drives us down it. This is not a personal mission statement. This is our unique truth.

    To identify our “why” and the source of our passion, we need to be honest. Remember that any and all “whys” are okay, even if the reason sounds selfish, as long as they’re driving us forward.

    • Did your old job frustrate you and make it unbearable to live with?
    • Do you want to be rich or famous?
    • Are you so passionate about a problem you want to solve that it dominates your thoughts?

    By pinpointing exactly what it was that pushed us to become entrepreneurs, we can let that underlying “why” keep driving us.

    A friend of mine, a founder and amazing CEO, was just starting out and struggling to get in front of the right customers and gain the traction and funding she needed. When I suggested she bring in sales help, she said, “It’s supposed to be founder-led sales for your first 10 customers.” Maybe. But not for her.

    I told her to reflect on her “why” — which she had identified as having the goals of being a great leader, a passionate advocate, and a builder of incredible products — and she realized that the advice about founder sales wasn’t applicable. She started to build her business around her core strengths and hired around her weaknesses. One salesperson, many big customers, and multiple funding rounds later, her company is well-known and growing. Honesty, reflection, and knowledge of her “why” led to her success.

    Related: 6 Business Leaders Reveal the Worst Entrepreneurial Advice They Hear All the Time

    Asking the right questions

    After establishing our “why,” the next steps are an uphill battle. Under the revealing lights of why we began our entrepreneurship, we can feel tempted to hide from the flaws we discover. I know I was. No one likes everything they see when they look in the mirror. But only through these unflinching assessments can we identify our pain points — these will lead us to the advice we need to address them.

    Fortunately, others have been in our shoes and experienced our problems. In fact, most of the questions we face in a startup — how to raise capital or how to stand out in the market — have already been faced before by other founders. Having the knowledge of our “why” as well as an honest reflection of our strengths and weaknesses can help us identify which advice — among a sea of advice — is most applicable to your startup.

    Consider:

    1. The advice giver: Who is the person giving the advice? Does their perspective on entrepreneurship align with yours? Do they face similar personal challenges that impact their company in similar ways?
    2. Personal blocks: Do you have any biases that might hinder your acceptance of the offered advice? If you could ignore that bias, would the advice be helpful?
    3. The relevance: Does the advisor have a similar company going through a similar experience? Is their background and arrival at entrepreneurship similar to yours?

    Related: 7 Tips for Startup Founders From an Entrepreneur Who Turned VC

    Everyone evolves

    A running business is like a living organism: It evolves, just like we do. Mistakes happen and everyone stumbles at some point along the way, but we can get back up, reorient ourselves, and reach our own unique goals. Continue to evaluate your unique journey to find the right advice and keep you oriented toward success. Instead of putting your feet in someone else’s shoeprints, lean into your journey and keep blazing your own trail.

    [ad_2]

    Jonah Midanik

    Source link

  • Fluor (NYSE:FLR) Updates FY23 Earnings Guidance

    Fluor (NYSE:FLR) Updates FY23 Earnings Guidance

    [ad_1]

    Fluor (NYSE:FLRGet Rating) issued an update on its FY23 earnings guidance on Friday morning. The company provided earnings per share guidance of $1.50-$1.90 for the period, compared to the consensus earnings per share estimate of $1.65.

    Fluor Stock Performance

    Fluor stock opened at $27.21 on Monday. The firm’s fifty day moving average price is $30.98 and its 200-day moving average price is $33.05. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.49, a quick ratio of 1.57 and a current ratio of 1.57. The stock has a market cap of $3.84 billion, a P/E ratio of -73.54, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.64 and a beta of 2.27. Fluor has a fifty-two week low of $21.67 and a fifty-two week high of $38.20.

    Fluor (NYSE:FLRGet Rating) last posted its quarterly earnings data on Friday, May 5th. The construction company reported $0.28 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.37 by ($0.09). The company had revenue of $3.75 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $3.53 billion. Fluor had a net margin of 1.06% and a return on equity of 8.49%. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 20.2% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter last year, the business posted $0.16 EPS. On average, equities research analysts expect that Fluor will post 1.69 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

    Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth

    FLR has been the topic of several research reports. Robert W. Baird lowered their price objective on shares of Fluor from $43.00 to $40.00 in a research report on Monday. StockNews.com initiated coverage on shares of Fluor in a research report on Thursday, March 16th. They issued a hold rating on the stock. Finally, Credit Suisse Group lifted their target price on shares of Fluor from $31.00 to $33.00 and gave the stock a neutral rating in a research report on Wednesday, February 22nd. Five analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and two have given a buy rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the company currently has a consensus rating of Hold and a consensus target price of $34.86.

    Insider Buying and Selling

    In other Fluor news, insider James R. Breuer sold 4,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, March 3rd. The shares were sold at an average price of $37.81, for a total value of $151,240.00. Following the transaction, the insider now owns 41,742 shares in the company, valued at $1,578,265.02. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink. 1.40% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

    Hedge Funds Weigh In On Fluor

    A number of hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the company. Alliancebernstein L.P. increased its position in shares of Fluor by 76.0% in the fourth quarter. Alliancebernstein L.P. now owns 3,225,956 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $111,812,000 after acquiring an additional 1,392,572 shares during the period. State of Wyoming bought a new stake in shares of Fluor during the 4th quarter valued at about $113,000. CI Private Wealth LLC bought a new stake in shares of Fluor during the 4th quarter valued at about $514,000. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co NY boosted its stake in shares of Fluor by 3.5% during the 4th quarter. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co NY now owns 8,740 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $303,000 after purchasing an additional 292 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Cerity Partners LLC boosted its stake in shares of Fluor by 12.4% during the 4th quarter. Cerity Partners LLC now owns 17,936 shares of the construction company’s stock valued at $622,000 after purchasing an additional 1,983 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 94.28% of the company’s stock.

    About Fluor

    (Get Rating)

    Fluor Corp. operates as a holding company. The firm engages in the provision of engineering, procurement, construction, fabrication and modularization, operations, maintenance and asset integrity, as well as project management services, on a global basis. It operates through the following segments: Energy & Chemicals, Mining & Industrial, Infrastructure & Power, Diversified Services and Government.

    Featured Stories

    Earnings History and Estimates for Fluor (NYSE:FLR)

    Receive News & Ratings for Fluor Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Fluor and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Entrepreneur | Hybrid Work is Not The Problem — Your Guidelines Are. Here’s Why.

    Entrepreneur | Hybrid Work is Not The Problem — Your Guidelines Are. Here’s Why.

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As companies continue to navigate the new normal of remote and hybrid work, it’s crucial that they establish clear expectations and guidelines for their employees. And unlike Disney and Twitter, it’s very important that they don’t change their minds randomly when the leadership changes.

    However, a recent survey conducted by Mercer found that only a third of organizations have formal rules in place for managing flexible work. Mercer assessed 749 organizations and found that 48% rely on informal and ambiguous guidelines to manage flexible work, 17% are completely hands-off, and only 34% rely on clear and transparent formal rules. This lack of clear communication and expectations can have a serious impact on both retention and recruitment efforts.

    And how effectively do companies communicate about the policies they do have? Fishbowl recently conducted a survey, with about 7,300 professionals surveyed about how well they understand their company’s plan for hybrid work. 50.8% did understand their company’s hybrid work guidelines, but 49.2% did not. Not a good outcome.

    Related: Employers: Productivity Among Your Remote Workers Isn’t A Problem — Your Proximity Bias Is.

    I talk with 5-10 leaders every week on how to create effective hybrid work guidelines. As a highly experienced expert in this field, I can tell you most of them don’t have clear guidelines for their employees. Yet when I ask them about their top concern, most say it’s hiring and retaining talented staff.

    Such anecdotes align with a recent study by Vistage, which revealed that a majority of small and medium-sized business leaders are planning to expand their workforce, with only a small percentage considering downsizing. This marks a change from the trend of large companies facing layoffs, as SME CEOs are hesitant to let go of recently-hired employees, according to Vistage Chief Research Officer Joe Galvin. The survey also highlighted that hiring difficulties are a major concern for these businesses, as they impede their ability to function at optimal capacity. 61% of CEOs surveyed cited hiring challenges as a major concern.

    So that’s CEOs — what about the true experts: HR leaders — what do they believe about hiring and retention as it relates to hybrid work? Well, you won’t be surprised that 95% of HR leaders say that hybrid work offers an effective recruitment tool, according to IWG’s HR Leaders & Hybrid Working Report. 60% also say hybrid work boosts retention, and 80% agree that it helps increase employee satisfaction.

    Related: This Dangerous Judgement Error Could Cost You Your Business

    Hybrid work guidelines: failures and successes

    Well, having poor guidelines and expectations unsurprisingly harms worker engagement, which undermines retention. Consider some examples of what happens in companies with whose leaders I talked to recently.

    In a mid-size IT services company, employees were given the freedom to work from home but with little guidance on how to manage their time or communicate with their colleagues. This led to confusion and resentment among team members, with some feeling overworked and others feeling underutilized. Ultimately, this lack of structure led to high turnover rates and difficulties in attracting top talent.

    Similarly, a large financial services company struggled with a lack of clear guidelines for remote work. Without proper expectations for communication and collaboration, team members found it difficult to stay on the same page and meet deadlines. This led to a decline in productivity and morale, causing top performers to seek employment opportunities elsewhere.

    Moreover, such guidelines are critically important for retention. Consider one of my clients who let me speak about them, the University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute. As a result of a consulting engagement, I helped them develop a robust set of hybrid work guidelines, which they put on their website in the “Join Us” section. Their HR director found it helpful for recruiting talented staff to the institute — and given the demanding market for data scientists, they definitely benefited from having a leg up.

    What should hybrid work guidelines cover?

    These examples illustrate the importance of having formal, written hybrid work guidelines in place. These guidelines should outline expectations for coming to the office, for communication, collaboration and work hours, as well as provide a clear framework for how to handle issues that may arise.

    Effective communication is a key element of hybrid work guidelines. When employees are working remotely, it can be difficult to get a sense of what everyone is working on and how their contributions are impacting the team. Clear communication guidelines, such as regular check-ins and virtual team meetings, can help ensure that everyone is on the same page.

    Effective collaboration is another important aspect of hybrid work guidelines. Collaboration tools like video conferencing and project management software can help facilitate collaboration, but employees need to be trained on how to use them effectively. Additionally, guidelines should establish expectations for how and when team members should be available to work together.

    Finally, effective hybrid work guidelines must consider work hours and time management. Without a clear framework, employees may feel pressure to work longer hours or to be available at all times. This can lead to burnout and resentment, and can negatively impact both productivity and employee satisfaction.

    In addition to the negative impact on retention and recruitment, a lack of clear hybrid work guidelines can also lead to other problems for companies. For example, without clear guidelines for data security and privacy, remote workers may inadvertently expose sensitive company information to cyber threats. This can result in costly data breaches and loss of business.

    Another challenge that companies may face without clear hybrid work guidelines is managing employee engagement. When employees are working remotely, it can be difficult to keep them connected to the company’s mission and goals. Hybrid work guidelines should include strategies for fostering employee engagement, such as virtual team-building activities and regular communication from leadership.

    It’s also important to note that hybrid work guidelines should be flexible and adaptable. As the world continues to change and evolve, so too should the way companies approach hybrid work. Guidelines should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the latest best practices and changing employee needs.

    One way to ensure that hybrid work guidelines are effective is to involve employees in the process of creating them. This can help ensure that guidelines are tailored to the specific needs of the organization and that employees are more likely to buy into them. Additionally, it’s important to provide employees with the necessary training and resources to be successful in a hybrid work environment. This can include things like virtual communication and collaboration tools, as well as training on time management and data security.

    Cognitive biases can also play a role in how companies approach hybrid work guidelines. For example, the sunk cost fallacy can cause leaders to cling to traditional office culture, even when it is no longer effective. The availability heuristic can also lead companies to overestimate the benefits of working in an office and underestimate the benefits of remote work. By being aware of these cognitive biases, leaders can make more informed decisions about how to manage hybrid work.

    Related: How Has Remote Work Impacted Our Relationships With Other Employees? The Findings of This Study Will Surprise You.

    Conclusion

    It’s clear that hybrid work guidelines are essential for effective communication, collaboration and time management. A lack of clear expectations and guidelines can lead to confusion, resentment, and high turnover rates. It can also undermine effective recruitment efforts. By establishing formal, written guidelines – as did the Information Sciences Institute – companies can ensure that their employees have the support and structure they need to be successful in a hybrid work environment. As a leader, it’s important to recognize the importance of hybrid work guidelines and to take steps to establish them within your organization.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Should The Bancorp Make Your Small-Cap Watchlist for 2023?

    Should The Bancorp Make Your Small-Cap Watchlist for 2023?

    [ad_1]

    For many investors, investing during a bear market means staying away from small-cap stocks. That could be a mistake as these stocks are the ones that often lead the way when the market reverses. And…spoiler alert…the market always does turnaround. 


    MarketBeat.com – MarketBeat

    Nevertheless, quality still matters, and it matters even more when investing in companies with a small market cap. With that in mind, The Bancorp (NASDAQ: TBBK) is a small-cap regional bank that appears to be well-positioned for whatever happens in 2023. 

    This article will introduce you to The Bancorp and explain why it may deserve a place on your 2023 watchlist.  

    An Emerging Name Among Regional Banks 

    The Bancorp may not be a household name when it comes to regional banks, but that could be changing. The company operates as the financial holding company for The Bancorp Bank. That bank provides a portfolio of banking products and services made up of fintech solutions, institutional banking, commercial lending, and real estate bridge lending.  

    Although you may not have a credit or debit card with The Bancorp name, chances are that it may underwrite one of the many private label companies you’ve heard about and may get offers from. The company is the number one issuer of prepaid cards in the United States. 

    In August 2022, the Bank Director 2022 Ranking Banking study, ranked The Bancorp Bank as the number one bank among those with assets between $5 billion to $50 billion. The bank’s ranking was measured by its return on equity and assets, asset quality, capital adequacy and total shareholder return. 

    A Profitable Bank That is Showing Growth 

    In its most recent quarter, The Bancorp missed analyst expectations for revenue and earnings. But some context is important. The company has delivered revenue and earnings in the first three quarters that are higher on a year-over-year (YOY) basis. For the first three quarters, the company is ahead of 2021’s revenue pace by 5% and is ahead in terms of earnings per share (EPS) by 10%. 

    TBBK Stock is One for the Watchlist 

    As we get into the home stretch of 2022, it’s a good time to take a critical look at your portfolio. Weeding out underperforming stocks is often the easy part. Replacing them is a different matter altogether. 

    The consensus in the financial media is that there will be a recession of unknown length and severity in 2023. Of course, there are also those that believe we’re already in one. Either way, investors are likely to be dealing with higher interest rates in 2023. This makes financial stocks attractive.  

    But the risk of financial stocks comes from the lending side of the business. That’s another reason to look at The Bancorp. The company has a history of having a loan portfolio with low credit losses 

    TBBK stock is not heavily covered by analysts. However, the two analysts that are tracked by MarketBeat give the stock a buy rating with a price target that gives investors the potential for a 26% upside. That kind of gain, along with a P/E ratio of just around 13x earnings and a forward P/E ratio of around 12x makes up for the lack of a dividend and makes The Bancorp one to have on your 2023 watchlist. 

    [ad_2]

    Chris Markoch

    Source link

  • Ford Revving Up Production Of EV Power Units At U.K. Plant

    Ford Revving Up Production Of EV Power Units At U.K. Plant

    [ad_1]

    Although EV startups such as NIO (NYSE: NIO) and Mullen Automotive (NASDAQ: MULN) are grabbing attention, along with 800-pound gorilla Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), long-established automakers such as Ford (NYSE: F) and General Motors (NYSE: GM) are quickly ramping up EV production and marketing.


    MarketBeat.com – MarketBeat

    Ford said Thursday that it would invest $180 million to increase production of EV power units by 70% at a plant in the U.K. It’s part of the company’s push to bring more EVs to market and transition its products away from internal combustion engines. 

    While, GM’s EVs are in the spotlight for a poignant reason, as a commercial for its models including Volt, Blazer, Equinox, and Silverado is set to “Everywhere,” written by Fleetwood Mac’s Christine McVie, who died on Wednesday, Ford’s announcement is an important signal. 

    Ford’s move is part of the company’s European electrification plan, which is focused on zero-emission cars by 2030, followed by all vehicles five years later. The power units manufactured at the plant, in Halewood, England, will be installed in 70% of Ford EVs sold in Europe by 2026.

    The plant currently makes transmissions for internal combustion vehicles but is transitioning to EV parts manufacturing. The power unit is made there replaces conventional engines and transmissions.

    Slashing AI Spending

    That’s a clear sign that the auto industry is changing at a rapid pace. In October, Ford said it had slashed capital spending on its artificial intelligence-powered Level 4 driver assistance systems.

    In its third-quarter earnings release, the company noted that “large-scale profitable commercialization of Level 4 advanced driver assistance systems will be further out than originally anticipated.

    However, it added that “Development and customer enthusiasm for benefits of L2+ and L3 ADAS warrant dialing up the company’s near-term aspirations and commitment in those areas.”

    The Level 2 and Level 3 driver assist technologies typically include features such as rear-end accident avoidance and lane-centering. Cars currently on the market, even those a few years old, now utilize these technologies. 

    In contrast, Level 4 technologies deliver something closer to a fully self-driving experience. The AI in this case calculates when a crash may be about to occur, and corrects accordingly. It also allows hands-free driving. 

    Although Ford said its partner in the L4 systems, Argo AI, which also had investment from Volkswagen (OTCMKTS: VWAGY), “had been unable to attract new investors.” Ford took an impairment charge in the quarter related to Argo AI’s closure and said it would hire some of Argo AI’s engineers.

    In the third-quarter earnings conference call, Ford chief financial John Lawson emphasized that the company is very bullish on the potential for driver-assisted technologies, despite not seeing “a profitable, scalable business in the L4, L5 space for at least five years. We also see that to get there, it’s going to take billions of dollars.”

    Ford is deploying existing capital and human resources toward the L2+ and our L3 systems. “We believe that addressable market expands our entire product portfolio from our retail customers to our commercial customers,” Lawson said.

    Flat Sales Expected

    Ford is slated to release its November sales figures on Friday. Industry analyst J.D. Power-LMC Automotive forecast industry-wide sales to be flat for the month, as higher vehicle prices and higher interest rates mute demand. 

    Within the automaker’s industry group, Ford’s price performance lags European car makers, including Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (OTCMKTS: BMWYY), commonly known as BMW, as well as Stellantis (NYSE: STLA), whose brand portfolio includes Peugeot, Groupe PSA, Citroën, Opel, Dodge, and Chrysler.

    Ford’s earnings and revenue track records have been erratic. Earnings growth declined in four of the past eight quarters, but there have also been quarters where increases looked good, due to easy comparisons over sluggish sales in 2020, due to pandemic restrictions.

    For the full year, Wall Street sees Ford earning $1.98 per share, an increase of 25% over 2021. That’s seen declining by 11 next year, to $1.76 per share. 

    Ford Motor is a part of the Entrepreneur Index, which tracks some of the largest publicly traded companies founded and run by entrepreneurs.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Stalter

    Source link

  • Should Investors Raise a Glass to Boston Beer Company?

    Should Investors Raise a Glass to Boston Beer Company?

    [ad_1]

    One of the strongest movers on a bullish day for the market is the Boston Beer Company (NYSE:SAM). The company, which is synonymous with its signature Sam Adams beers and Truly Hard Seltzers reported earnings per share (EPS) of $2.21 on revenue of $596.45 million. The top line number exceeded analysts’ estimates for $566.42 million. But the bottom line was lower than the $3.48 that was expected. 


    MarketBeat.com – MarketBeat

    Nevertheless, the EPS was a significant improvement from the prior year when earnings were negative. However, investors may be concerned that the earnings number Is not an improvement over 2019. The $2.21 EPS was 38% lower than 2019. This is even though revenue is up 57% over the same timeframe.  

    Seltzer Sales Remain a Problem 

    Part of the problem is that Boston Beer is trying to find the right product mix. The company overestimated demand for its Truly Hard Seltzer brand. Sales soared during the pandemic, but demand plummeted when consumers went back to bars and restaurants in 2021.  

    This created a situation that is reminiscent of an actual Boston Tea Party. The company had to dispose of millions of cases of unsold inventory. That’s a key reason the company was unprofitable in 2021.  

    The company is, however, seeing strength in its Twisted Tea and Hard Mountain Dew brands that are part of its “Beyond Beer” portfolio. And beer sales themselves remain strong. That was a dynamic that is playing out across the sector this quarter. And to get to the answer for that we can look at the continued strength in travel and entertainment.  

    How Long are the Travel Coattails?  

    When a stock makes such a large move after earnings, it suggests that the results caught people by surprise. But maybe investors shouldn’t have been so surprised. The beer and spirits industry is an adjacent industry to travel and entertainment experiences. The two go together in many cases like peanut butter and jelly.  

    And if, as expected, more people travel for the holidays in 2022 than in either of the past two years, that would likely mean the possibility of another strong quarter for Boston Beer. The question for investors is just how long those coattails are. Because without them, persistent inflation would suggest that many consumers will look to trade down to less expensive brands or forego discretionary alcohol purchases altogether.  

    The Company Lowered its Guidance Again 

    It’s this dynamic that may be causing Boston Beer to once again lower its earnings guidance. The company is now saying full year adjusted earnings will be between $7 and $10. This is a cut on the high end from the range of $6 and $11 it forecast in April. And it’s a significant drop from the initial forecast for $11 and $16.  

    SAM stock is now trading above 2019 levels. And the strong top line numbers may make it worthy of those numbers. I appreciate the company’s candor about supply chain and possible lowered demand. And while I believe that sales tell the ultimate tale, the stock looks more susceptible to heading lower than moving higher.  

    Analysts tracked by MarketBeat give SAM stock a Hold rating with the potential downside risk of 10% for the stock. That may change as analysts weigh in after this earnings report. But there’s nothing that suggests to me that the rating will fundamentally change. This is a case where I like the product more than the stock.  

    [ad_2]

    Chris Markoch

    Source link