ReportWire

Tag: Fraud

  • Melania Trump Used as ‘Window-Dressing’ in Elaborate Memecoin Fraud, Legal Filing Claims

    [ad_1]

    A cryptocurrency promoted in January by US first lady Melania Trump was part of a sophisticated fraud that “leveraged celebrity association and ‘borrowed fame’ to sell legitimacy to unsuspecting investors,” a new legal filing has alleged.

    In April, crypto investors brought a federal class action lawsuit against Benjamin Chow, cofounder of crypto exchange Meteora, and Hayden Davis, cofounder of crypto venture capital firm Kelsier Labs, among other defendants, accusing them of a multimillion-dollar fraud involving a single memecoin, $M3M3.

    Later, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, expanding the allegations to include racketeering activity. They claimed the pair had colluded to rig the market for $LIBRA, a coin promoted by Javier Milei, president of Argentina, which collapsed in value shortly after launch.

    On Tuesday, the plaintiffs sought the court’s permission to file yet another amended complaint, based on alleged information provided by an anonymous whistleblower. With Chow acting as the “commander,” the pair launched, pumped, and dumped at least 15 crypto coins, the proposed second amended complaint alleges, including $MELANIA. The scheme allegedly inflicted millions of dollars in losses on unwitting investors.

    Trump, who is not a named defendant in the lawsuit, was used as “window dressing for a crime engineered by Meteora and Kelsier,” the proposed second amended complaint alleges. The filing further states that the plaintiffs do not allege that Trump or Milei “operated the scheme.”

    “This case could clarify basic expectations for token launches and disclosures in the US. We understand many across the crypto industry and regulatory community are following closely,” says Max Burwick, senior managing partner at Burwick Law, the law firm representing the plaintiffs.

    The White House, Chow, and Davis did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

    By the time Chow and Davis launched $MELANIA in January, they had refined a “repeatable six-step ‘playbook’ for pump-and-dump fraud,” the investors claim.

    According to the proposed second amended complaint, Meteora controls the technical infrastructure, while Kelsier supplies the necessary capital and orchestrates the promotional campaign, leaning heavily on credibility borrowed from public figures or brands. Together, the filing alleges, they effectively control a network of “sniper” crypto wallets that snatch up large quantities of the coins at artificially discounted prices, then dump them on the market as regular investors pile in.

    “Going to try to tell all my buddies early,” Davis told an acquaintance prior to the $MELANIA launch, in a private exchange that features in redacted form as an exhibit in the lawsuit. “I’m about to launch the biggest token ever lol.” (It’s unclear whether Davis was allegedly referring to $MELANIA or $LIBRA.)

    [ad_2]

    Joel Khalili

    Source link

  • South Korea seeks to arrest dozens of online scam suspects repatriated from Cambodia

    [ad_1]

    SEOUL, South Korea — SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Authorities are seeking to formally arrest most of the 64 South Koreans repatriated from Cambodia for allegedly working for online scam organizations in Cambodia, police said Monday.

    The 64 South Koreans were detained in Cambodia over the past several months and were flown to Korea on a charter flight Saturday. Upon arrival in South Korea, they were detained while police investigated whether they voluntarily joined scam organizations in Cambodia or were forced to work there.

    Online scams, many based in Southeast Asian nations, have risen sharply since the COVID-19 pandemic and produced two sets of victims: the tens of thousands of people who have been forced to work as scammers under the threat of violence, and the targets of their fraud. Monitoring groups say online scams earn international criminal gangs billions of dollars annually.

    State prosecutors have asked local courts to issue arrest warrants for 58 of the 64 returnees at the request of police, the Korean National Police Agency said in a statement. Police said the people they are seeking to place under arrest are accused of engaging in online fraud activities like romantic scams, bogus investment pitches or voice phishing, apparently targeting fellow South Koreans at home. The courts are expected to determine whether to approve their arrests in coming days.

    The police agency said that five people have been set free, but it refused to disclose the reasons for their releases, saying investigations are still under way.

    South Korean police said that four of the 64 returnees told investigators that they were beaten while being held in scam centers in Cambodia against their will.

    South Korea faces public calls to take stronger action to protect its nationals from being forced into overseas online scam centers, after one of its nationals was found dead in Cambodia in August. He was reportedly lured by a friend to travel to Cambodia to provide his bank account to be used by a scam organization. Authorities in Cambodia said the 22-year-old university student was tortured.

    Estimates from the U.N. and other international agencies say that at least 100,000 people have been trafficked to scam centers in Cambodia, with a similar number in Myanmar and tens of thousands more in other countries.

    Officials in Seoul estimate that some 1,000 South Koreans are in scam centers in Cambodia, and last week, South Korean authorities imposed a travel ban on parts of Cambodia and sent a government delegation to Cambodia to discuss joint steps.

    Online scam centers were previously concentrated in Southeast Asian countries including Cambodia and Myanmar, with most of the trafficked and other workers coming from Asia. But an Interpol report in June said the past three years have seen victims trafficked to Southeast Asia from distant regions including South America, Western Europe and Eastern Africa and that new centers have been reported in the Middle East, West Africa and Central America.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Santos says he’s humbled but dismisses ‘pearl clutching’ critics

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Freed from the prison where he had been serving time for ripping off his campaign donors, former U.S. Rep. George Santos says he’s humbled by his experience behind bars but unconcerned about the “pearl clutching” of critics upset that President Donald Trump granted him clemency.

    “I’m pretty confident if President Trump had pardoned Jesus Christ off the cross, he would have had critics,” Santos said Sunday in an interview on CNN.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm$2?E@D[ H9@ H@? @77:46 27E6C :?G6?E:?8 2 3@8FD A6CD@?2 2D 2 (2== $EC66E 562=>2<6C[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^86@C86D2?E@DA=624@FCE?6HJ@C<h_fc`5_eg75hc_h_c`h74_75fh36b_44QmA=62565 8F:=EJ E@ 7C2F5k^2m 2?5 :56?E:EJ E967E =2DE J62C 2?5 3682? D6CG:?8 2 fJ62C D6?E6?46 😕 yF=J 2E 2 AC:D@? 😕 }6H y6CD6J] qFE %CF>A @C56C65 9:> C6=62D65 9:> uC:52J 27E6C 96 D6CG65 ;FDE gc 52JD] %CF>A 42==65 $2?E@D 2 “C@8F6[” 3FE D2:5 96 5:5?’E 56D6CG6 2 92CD9 D6?E6?46 2?5 D9@F=5 86E 4C65:E 7@C G@E:?8 #6AF3=:42?]k^Am

    kAm$A62<:?8 @? r}}’D “$E2E6 @7 E96 &?:@?[” $2?E@D D2:5 96 925 “=62C?65 2 8C62E 562=” 2?5 925 “2 G6CJ =2C86 D=:46 @7 9F>3=6 A:6[ :7 ?@E E96 H9@=6 A:6” H9:=6 😕 AC:D@?]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 2A@=@8:K65 E@ 7@C>6C 4@?DE:EF6?ED 😕 9:D }6H *@C< 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 5:DEC:4E[ D2J:?8 96 H2D “:? 2 492@E:4 32== @7 7=2>6” H96? 96 4@>>:EE65 9:D 4C:>6D] $2?E@D 25>:EE65 =2DE J62C E@ 5646:G:?8 5@?@CD 2?5 DE62=:?8 E96 :56?E:E:6D @7 “ A6@A=6 — :?4=F5:?8 9:D @H? 72>:=J >6>36CD]k^Am

    kAmqFE H96? 2D<65 23@FE 76==@H #6AF3=:42?D F?92AAJ E92E %CF>A 7C665 9:> D@ D@@?[ $2?E@D D2:5 @E96C AC6D:56?E:2= 24ED @7 4=6>6?4J 925 366? H@CD6[ 4:E:?8 !C6D:56?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^3:56?D@?9F?E6C492C86DA2C5@?A=6586ac7b__f4a5a7cef72cg6a`334faeadadQmy@6 q:56?’D 564:D:@? E@ A2C5@? 9:D D@?k^2m[ wF?E6C[ 7@C 8F? 2?5 E2I 4C:>6D]k^Am

    kAm“$@ A2C5@? >6 :7 x’> ?@E A2J:?8 E@@ >F49 2EE6?E:@? E@ E96 A62C=4=FE49:?8 @7 E96 @FEC286 @7 >J 4C:E:4D[” $2?E@D D2:5]k^Am

    kAmpD A2CE @7 9:D 8F:=EJ A=62[ $2?E@D 925 28C665 E@ A2J C6DE:EFE:@? @7 Sbfb[fd_ 2?5 7@C76:EFC6 @7 Sa_d[__b] qFE %CF>A’D 4=6>6?4J @C56C 2AA62C65 E@ 4=62C 9:> @7 A2J:?8 2?J 7FCE96C 7:?6D @C C6DE:EFE:@?]k^Am

    kAm$2?E@D D2:5 96 92D 366? 8C2?E65 2 D64@?5 492?46 2?5 :?E6?565 E@ “>2<6 2>6?5D[” 3FE H96? 2D<65 :7 96 :?E6?565 E@ A2J 324< E96 42>A2:8? 5@?@CD 96 925 567C2F565[ 96 D2:5 @?=J :7 96 925 E@]k^Am

    kAm“x7 :E’D C6BF:C65 @7 >6 3J E96 =2H[ J6D] x7 :E’D ?@E[ E96? ?@[” $2?E@D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$2?E@D 2AA62=65 E@ %CF>A 5:C64E=J 7@C 96=A[ 4:E:?8 9:D =@J2=EJ E@ E96 AC6D:56?E’D 286?52 2?5 E@ E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 😕 2 =6EE6C AF3=:D965 ~4E] `b 😕 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^D@FE9D9@C6AC6DD]4@>^DE@C:6D^efdfdegbdD2?E@D:?D@=:E2CJ2A2DD:@?2E6A=62E@AC6D:56?EECF>AQm%96 $@FE9 $9@C6 !C6DDk^2m] qFE 96 D2:5 $F?52J E92E 96 925 ?@ 6IA64E2E:@?D 2?5 =62C?65 @7 9:D 4@>>FE2E:@? 7C@> 76==@H :?>2E6D H9@ D2H E96 ?6HD @? E6=6G:D:@?]k^Am

    kAm#6G6=2E:@?D E92E $2?E@D :?G6?E65 >F49 @7 9:D =:76 DE@CJ DFC72465 ;FDE H666 E96 7:CDE @A6?=J 82J #6AF3=:42? E@ 6=64E65 E@ r@?8C6DD 😕 a_aa]k^Am

    kAm$2?E@D 925 D2:5 H9:=6 42>A2:8?:?8 E92E 96 H2D 2 DF446DD7F= 3FD:?6DD 4@?DF=E2?E H:E9 2 D:K23=6 C62= 6DE2E6 A@CE7@=:@] qFE 96 F=E:>2E6=J 25>:EE65 E@ 6>36==:D9:?8 9:D 3:@8C2A9J] w6 925 ?6G6C 8C25F2E65 7C@> q2CF49 r@==686[ H96C6 96 925 4=2:>65 E@ 36 2 DE2?5@FE A=2J6C @? E96 |2?92EE2? 4@==686’D G@==6J32== E62>] w6 925 ?6G6C H@C<65 2E r:E:8C@FA 2?5 v@=5>2? $249D] w6 5:5?’E @H? AC@A6CEJ]k^Am

    kAmx? ECFE9[ 96 DECF88=65 7:?2?4:2==J[ 925 5C:7E65 E9C@F89 D6G6C2= ;@3D[ :?4=F5:?8 @?6 7@C 2 4@>A2?J 244FD65 @7 CF??:?8 2 !@?K: D496>6[ 2?5 6G6? 72465 6G:4E:@?]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C 364@>:?8 ;FDE E96 D:IE9 A6CD@? E@ 36 6IA6==65 7C@> r@?8C6DD[ $2?E@D >256 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 5@==2CD D6==:?8 A6CD@?2=:K65 G:56@D E@ E96 AF3=:4 @? r2>6@] w6 C6EFC?65 E@ E96 D6CG:46 $F?52J]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • George Santos Says He’s Humbled but Dismisses ‘Pearl Clutching’ Critics

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Freed from the prison where he had been serving time for ripping off his campaign donors, former U.S. Rep. George Santos says he’s humbled by his experience behind bars but unconcerned about the “pearl clutching” of critics upset that President Donald Trump granted him clemency.

    “I’m pretty confident if President Trump had pardoned Jesus Christ off the cross, he would have had critics,” Santos said Sunday in an interview on CNN.

    Santos, who won office after inventing a bogus persona as a Wall Street dealmaker, pleaded guilty to fraud and identity theft last year and began serving a 7-year sentence in July at a prison in New Jersey. But Trump ordered him released him Friday after he’d served just 84 days. Trump called Santos a “rogue,” but said he didn’t deserve a harsh sentence and should get credit for voting Republican.

    Speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Santos said he had “learned a great deal” and had “a very large slice of humble pie, if not the whole pie” while in prison.

    He also apologized to former constituents in his New York congressional district, saying he was “in a chaotic ball of flame” when he committed his crimes. Santos admitted last year to deceiving donors and stealing the identities of 11 people — including his own family members.

    But when asked about fellow Republicans unhappy that Trump freed him so soon, Santos said other presidential acts of clemency had been worse, citing President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter, for gun and tax crimes.

    “So pardon me if I’m not paying too much attention to the pearl-clutching of the outrage of my critics,” Santos said.

    As part of his guilty plea, Santos had agreed to pay restitution of $373,750 and forfeiture of $205,003. But Trump’s clemency order appeared to clear him of paying any further fines or restitution.

    Santos said he has been granted a second chance and intended to “make amends,” but when asked if he intended to pay back the campaign donors he had defrauded, he said only if he had to.

    “If it’s required of me by the law, yes. If it’s not, then no,” Santos said.

    Santos had appealed to Trump directly for help, citing his loyalty to the president’s agenda and to the Republican Party in a letter published Oct. 13 in The South Shore Press. But he said Sunday that he had no expectations and learned of his commutation from fellow inmates who saw the news on television.

    Revelations that Santos invented much of his life story surfaced just weeks after he became the first openly gay Republican to elected to Congress in 2022.

    Santos had said while campaigning that he was a successful business consultant with a sizable real estate portfolio. But he ultimately admitted to embellishing his biography. He had never graduated from Baruch College, where he had claimed to be a standout player on the Manhattan college’s volleyball team. He had never worked at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. He didn’t own property.

    In truth, he struggling financially, had drifted through several jobs, including one for a company accused of running a Ponzi scheme, and even faced eviction.

    After becoming just the sixth person to be expelled from Congress, Santos made hundreds of thousands of dollars selling personalized videos to the public on Cameo. He returned to the service Sunday.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • This U.S. Businessman Who Snapped Up Soccer Teams Was Just Charged With Fraud

    [ad_1]

    Investing in foreign soccer clubs is an increasingly well-worn page in the entrepreneur playbook. Movie star turned business mogul Ryan Reynolds made the move trendy with his 2021 acquisition of the Welsh team Wrexham AFC, but he’s far from the only businessperson to see the beloved sports institutions as a worthwhile investment.

    Earlier this year, for instance, Inc. spoke with the husband-and-wife co-founders of the staffing company Belay and the Inc. 5000-charting beer company NoFo Brew Co—and they, too, had taken stakes in European soccer clubs.

    But if you’re turning to pro soccer as a place to park your money (or build your personal brand), make sure you don’t get the investor equivalent of a red card pulled on you. That’s one lesson from the story of Josh Wander, an American businessman who, according to multiple reports and a statement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, is now being charged with fraud by U.S. prosecutors.

    Wander co-founded 777 Partners, an investment firm that owned or held stakes in multiple different soccer teams in Australia, Brazil and across Europe, the New York Times reports—but the firm collapsed, and Wander now stands accused of fabricating financial documents and misleading lenders and investors in an effort to defraud them of nearly half a billion dollars.

    Miami-based 777 was once “one of the biggest accumulators of European soccer clubs,” the Times reports, but a lender accused it of fraudulent behavior last year and the firm subsequently saw its British business go bankrupt and American business enter limited receivership.

    Starting in 2018, the FBI says in its statement, Wander began investing money from 777’s primary line of business—in which it underwrote and financed structured settlements related to lawsuits or personal injury claims—into other, less reliable sectors, “including streaming platforms, airlines, and professional sports teams such as Sevilla FC and Genoa CFC.”

    “Despite warnings from employees … and contrary to the terms of the credit facilities, Wander directed that restricted funds from 777 Partners’ lenders be used to cover the firm’s acquisitions and expenses,” the FBI continues. That spending led the investment firm to face “significant cash and collateral shortfalls,” which Wander allegedly tried to conceal “by pledging more than $350 million in assets as collateral to certain lenders, knowing that 777 Partners either did not own the collateral or had already pledged the collateral to other lenders.”

    Wander is also accused of telling 777 employees to alter bank statements to reflect “millions of dollars in cash on hand that the firm did not have.”

    Wander’s lawyer called the charges “a business dispute dressed up as a criminal case” in an email to the Times, adding: “We look forward to setting the record straight.”

    [ad_2]

    Brian Contreras

    Source link

  • Trump Organization Expands in India, Where Many of Its Partners Face Accusations

    [ad_1]

    GURUGRAM, India—When the Trump Organization in April announced another luxury real-estate project in India, Eric Trump gave a shout out to his local partners for helping accelerate the brand’s expansion.

    “We’re incredibly excited to launch our second project in Gurgaon,” Eric Trump, who runs day-to-day operations, using the former name for the city near New Delhi. “And even prouder to be doing it once again with our amazing partners.”

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Rory Jones

    Source link

  • Americans are getting 2.5 billion robocalls a month — the highest level in years

    [ad_1]

    Americans receive tens of millions of unsolicited automated calls and texts each day, often intended to dupe them into forking over personal information or money. 

    That’s the thrust of a new report by U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a consumer advocacy organization, which found that scam and telemarketing calls and texts have proliferated across the country, despite safeguards intended to prevent them. (Of the 9,242 phone companies that filed with the FCC as of Sept. 28, 2025, less than half have installed robocall-fighting software.)

    Nationwide, Americans received an average of 2.56 billion robocalls a month from January to September. That’s up from 2.14 billion a month in 2024, and the highest level in six years, according to PIRG’s analysis of data from YouMail, one of the largest robocall-blocking companies. 

    Meanwhile, the volume of automated texts received by Americans has skyrocketed since 2021, when a government crackdown on robocalls led more telemarketers and scammers to shift to texts. Data from PIRG shows that the annual volume of robotexts received in 2024 was roughly 19 billion, nearly triple the approximately 7 billion robotexts received in 2021.

    The predatory messages are a daily nuisance for many. About one-third of Americans say they get at least one scam phone call a day, while one-fifth say they receive one scam text every day, according to the Pew Research Center.

    Types of scams

    Roboscams come in many forms, as detailed in PIRG’s report. Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog director at PIRG, said they usually stem from crime rings or dedicated scam operations whose mission is to extract personal information or get some kind of financial information or actual payment from victims. 

    “The calls and texts are low cost and high reward,” she said in an email. “As long as some percentage keep working, the scammers will keep trying.”

    Examples of some common scams include:

    Impersonating IRS, Banks
    During tax season, bad actors pose as IRS officials or tax preparation companies. Many scammers impersonate banks and credit card companies to steal account information. Another common trap are calls and texts that incite fear about unpaid loan balances or offer dubious debt relief opportunities. 

    Package delivery
    Package delivery scams have become very common, with fraudsters posing as the U.S. Postal Service, FedEx and UPS sending out messages that there was an issue with a delivery. Included in the text is a fake link, leading victims to pay money to ensure the fake package ends up in their hands.

    While some escape the scams unscathed, many don’t. According to Pew, approximately a quarter of Americans say they’ve given up personal information to scammers as a result a predatory phone call, text message or email. 

    How did the problem get so bad?

    Scams are growing more sophisticated and easier to set up, thanks to artificial intelligence. According to PIRG, AI allows bots to send fraudulent texts to thousands of people at a time. 

    “The bad guys always seem to be several steps ahead of the regulators and phone companies,” Murray said.

    Scammers have employed AI voice-cloning tools to trick people into thinking they are talking to a friend, family member or government official.

    Up until late 2023, robocalls had declined considerably, according to Alex Quilici, founder and CEO of YouMail, who is cited in the PIRG report. Over the last two years, however, the number of automated texts and calls has increased along with the cost of related scams for victims. 

    The amount of money lost to phone scams rose 16% from the first half of 2024 to the first half of 2025, according to the Federal Trade Commission. On average, victims lost $3,690 to scam robocalls and $1,452 to scam texts in the first half of 2025, PIRG found. 

    In 2019, Congress passed the TRACED Act, which directed the Federal Communications Commission to require phone companies to implement stricter technology to regulate robocalls, including caller ID authentication. To keep track of compliance, the FCC launched a robocall mitigation database where companies are supposed to detail their efforts to fight illegal robocalls on their networks. 

    But those efforts have been met with mixed success. As of Sept. 28, only 44% of phone companies have completely installed the mandated software and adopted anti-robocall policies, down from 47% in 2024, PIRG found. 

    “You’d think that — given that it’s been more than 15 years since the first federal law to attack spam robocalls — we’d have seen more progress by now,” the PIRG report authors write, “We still don’t know whether to trust our caller ID and may worry we’ll miss an important call if we don’t answer.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Death of kidnapped South Korean student spurs talks with Cambodia to tackle online scams

    [ad_1]

    PHNOM PENH, Cambodia — PHNOM PENH, Cambodia (AP) — South Korean and Cambodian officials met Thursday to coordinate a response to online scams, following the death of a South Korean student who was reportedly trafficked and forced to work in a scam center in Cambodia.

    A South Korean delegation visited the Cambodian capital, Phnom Penh, for talks with officials, including Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet.

    South Koreans have been outraged by Cambodia’s vast online scam industry, which uses trafficked workers from various countries to target victims around the world. Officials estimate that about 200,000 people, including some 1,000 South Koreans, are working at online scam sites in Cambodia.

    In August the body of 22-year-old student Park Min-ho was discovered in a pickup truck in Cambodia’s southern Kampot province. Authorities said he died of a cardiac arrest after being tortured and beaten.

    The South Korean delegation is hoping for the repatriation of its nationals involved in online scams in Cambodia and for the return of Park’s remains, South Korea’s National Security Director Wi Sung-lac told a briefing in Seoul.

    Wi earlier said the body’s return was delayed due to disputes over South Korea’s request for an autopsy by pathologists from both countries. He said the two sides reached agreement and the results of the talks would be announced later on Thursday.

    It wasn’t immediately clear how those 1,000 South Koreans have ended up working in online scam sites in Cambodia. But South Korean officials believe many were lured with promises of high-paying jobs before being forced to work against their will, but some also went there voluntarily.

    In the first eight months of this year alone, there were reports of 330 South Koreans detained in Cambodia, Wi said in an earlier briefing Wednesday, citing reports from victims themselves and their relatives. Wi said that 80% of those cases have been resolved.

    The two sides on Thursday discussed joint efforts to combat transnational crimes including online scams, Hun Manet said on Telegram.

    “Cambodia and the Republic of Korea will continue to strengthen our collaboration to prevent, suppress, and combat online scams more effectively, contributing to the maintenance of peace, public order, and social security,” he said.

    Wi said there would be a limit in South Korea solely dealing with such a transnational online scam industry based in a foreign country. But he said South Korea will mobilize “all available methods” to protect the safety and properties of South Koreans and promote coordination with Cambodia, neighboring countries and international organizations.

    Hun Manet said “Cambodia does not need any neighboring country to carry out such work on its behalf” to address online scam issues and that the two countries can resolve the matter bilaterally without the need for any third-party involvement.

    Wi said South Korea is seeking early repatriations of 60 South Koreans arrested recently in Cambodia on suspicion of involvement in online scams. Once repatriated, they would face investigation and possible legal punishments, depending on the degree of their involvement, Wi said.

    He said South Korea will also strive to locate and bring home South Koreans still listed as missing, including those who are possibly held in online scam centers in Cambodia against their will.

    On Thursday, a South Korean travel ban came into effect for parts of Cambodia including Bokor Mountain in Kampot province, where Park Min-ho was found dead, as well as the towns of Bavet and Poipet, on Cambodia’s border with Vietnam and Thailand.

    The United Nations and other agencies have estimated that cyberscams, most of them originating from Southeast Asia, earn international criminal gangs billions of dollars annually. The cybercriminals pretend friendship or tout phony investment opportunities to cheat their targets around the world.

    Jeremy Douglas, former regional representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific, now current chief of staff for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, said that Southeast Asia — particularly the Mekong Region’s border areas between Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand — is “arguably the most significant global hub for scams and illegal online gaming. And the reason is pretty straightforward – criminals like the conditions, the freedom they have, the ability to make and hide money with little resistance.”

    “It is unclear how governments will respond, but the main thing now is pulling together on a regional solution. The situation can’t simply be ignored,” Douglas said.

    ___

    Kim reported from Seoul, South Korea.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Bid to Stop Scammers After Student Killed in Cambodia

    [ad_1]

    A South Korean government team is in Cambodia seeking to stop South Korean citizens from being kidnapped, violently abused and in at least one case killed by gangs running online scam centers in the Southeast Asian country.

    The task force is part of the urgent measures taken by Seoul following the death in August of a South Korean student at the hands of alleged scammers, who had lured him to the country under the promise of work.

    Why It Matters

    Online scam centers, many of which force people to work in defrauding people online, have mushroomed in some of the more lawless corners of Southeast Asia over recent years and are behind multibillion dollar fraud around the world, as well as human trafficking, kidnapping and violent crime.

    This week, the United States and Britain imposed sweeping sanctions on a Cambodia-based network that they said was responsible for kidnapping and abuse in Cambodia and extensive fraud, in their countries and around the world.

    What To Know

    The South Korean government team arrived in Cambodia late on Wednesday and hopes to meet Prime Minister Hun Manet in their bid to keep South Koreans out of Cambodian scam centers, the Yonhap news agency reported.

    South Korea has become particularly alarmed by the problem in the weeks after the student’s killing in the southern Cambodian province of Kambpot, where scam centers are known to operate. He was said to have been tortured by members of a scam center gang.

    Cambodia says it is cooperating with international efforts to tackle the scam centers and it ordered a crackdown in July.

    The young South Korean man, who authorities have not identified, left home in July, telling his family he was traveling to Cambodia for an exhibition. Cambodian police listed his cause of death as cardiac arrest resulting from torture and pain, Yonhap reported.

    South Korea also wants an investigation into the death of a South Korean woman in her 30s, whose body was found on the Cambodian-Vietnamese border last week, on suspicion she, too, might have run afoul of scam center gangs, Yonhap said.

    South Korea estimates that 1,000 of its citizens are working in scam centers in Cambodia and on Wednesday banned citizens from traveling to parts of that country where the scammers operate.

    South Korea’s action comes as international efforts to stop the scam centers are increasing.

    The U.S. Treasury Department said this week it had taken what it described as the largest action ever in Southeast Asia, targeting 146 people linked to the Cambodia-based Prince Group conglomerate, which it designated a transnational criminal organization.

    Britain also sanctioned six entities and six individuals, including Prince Group’s chairman, Chinese-Cambodian tycoon Chen Zhi, who U.S. prosecutors accused of running forced-labor camps in Cambodia, where people carry out cryptocurrency investment fraud schemes. 

    Chen was indicted on October 8 in a Brooklyn federal court on charges of wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy, according to court papers made public on Tuesday.

    U.S. prosecutors also said they had seized around 127,271 bitcoin, worth about  $14.2 billion, in funds traceable from the crimes. 

    The Prince Group did not respond to a request for comment.

    What People Are Saying

    U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement on Tuesday: “Today’s action represents one of the most significant strikes ever against the global scourge of human trafficking and cyber-enabled financial fraud. By dismantling a criminal empire built on forced labor and deception, we are sending a clear message that the United States will use every tool at its disposal to defend victims, recover stolen assets, and bring to justice those who exploit the vulnerable for profit.”

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement this week: “The rapid rise of transnational fraud has cost American citizens billions of dollars, with life savings wiped out in minutes. Treasury is taking action to protect Americans by cracking down on foreign scammers.”

    What Happens Next

    During previous crackdowns, scam center operators have often gone to ground only to reappear and resume operations elsewhere.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Feds seize $15 billion in bitcoin after busting alleged global crypto scam

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. government has seized $15 billion in bitcoin from a Cambodian business conglomerate charged with running a global cryptocurrency scam.

    Federal prosecutors claim Chen Zhi, the founder and chairman of Prince Holding Group, oversaw a vast criminal network in Cambodia built on forced labor that extracted billions from victims in the U.S. and around the world. 

    The indictment, which was unsealed in a federal court in Brooklyn on Tuesday, charges the 37-year-old Cambodian national with wire fraud and money laundering. 

    “By dismantling a criminal empire built on forced labor and deception, we are sending a clear message that the United States will use every tool at its disposal to defend victims, recover stolen assets and bring to justice those who exploit the vulnerable for profit,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement. 

    The complaint is the largest forfeiture action in the history of the Department of Justice, according to the agency.

    Chen remains at large, according to the Justice Department. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 40 years in prison. 

    “Today the FBI and partners executed one of the largest financial fraud takedowns in history,” FBI Director Kash Patel said in a statement. “This is an individual who allegedly operated a vast criminal network across multiple continents involving forced labor, money laundering, investment schemes, and stolen assets — targeting millions of innocent victims in the process.”

    The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control announced Tuesday that it has coordinated with U.K. officials to impose sweeping sanctions against 146 entities associated with the Prince Group, which has been formally designated a transnational criminal organization by the department.

    Prince Holding Group’s website lists it as one of the largest conglomerates in Cambodia, with businesses focused on real estate development, banking, finance and consumer services. 

    The company did not immediately respond to CBS News’ request for comment. The company has previously denied involvement in scam operations and has not publicly responded to the latest allegations.

    Federal prosecutors described the cryptocurrency fraud allegedly employed by Chen as a “pig butchering” scam, or when scammers dupe a victim into phony investments. 

    The Justice Department alleges the criminal network convinced victims over social media and messaging apps to transfer cryptocurrency based on the false promises that it would be invested. The scammers then stole the funds, laundered them and used the proceeds for luxury travel, entertainment and other extravagant purchases, according to the agency. 

    Allegations of human trafficking

    Federal prosecutors said Prince Group targeted victims around the world with assistance from local networks, including one operated from Brooklyn, New York. To carry out the schemes, the criminal actors allegedly trafficked hundreds of people and forced them to work in a network of compounds across Cambodia. The “violent, forced labor camps” consisted of vast dormitories surrounded by high walls and barbed wire, according to the Justice Department.

    To dodge law enforcement, Chen and Prince Group’s top executives allegedly paid bribes to public officials and used their political influence, the department said. 

    Mark Taylor, who formerly worked on human trafficking issues in Cambodia for the nonprofit Winrock International, said that Chen was embedded in the Cambodian elite and “well protected” by the government, showing “the larger role that Cambodia has played as a safe center for this online scamming to prosper.” Chen was formerly a personal adviser to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet.

    “Cambodia is the physical location where a lot of it operates, but it’s also the money laundering center for the entire region,” Taylor said

    Independent research group Cyber Scam Monitor has documented more than 200 online scamming centers and casinos in Cambodia alone, based on first-hand accounts from former scam workers, field surveys and media reports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suspects kidnapped, tortured woman in cross-country scheme to commit fraud, authorities say

    [ad_1]

    A 28-year-old New York man was arrested outside an outdoor mall in Chino Hills on allegations that he, along with a female partner, kidnapped a 51-year-old woman and drove her across the country to commit fraud to repay debts she owed, according to authorities.

    During the cross-country trek, the suspect, Rahson Govantes, and an unidentified woman are accused of torturing their victim by burning her with cigarettes and a curling iron, according to a San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department news release.

    Deputies discovered the victim, a resident of North Carolina, and Govantes acting suspiciously and loitering outside a Sephora store in Chino Hills on Saturday afternoon, according to deputies.

    Booking photo of Rahson Govantes.

    (San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department)

    Deputies arrested Govantes and booked him on suspicion of aggravated mayhem, torture, kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon, the sheriff’s department said. Detectives are trying to determine whether there are additional victims, and released Govantes’ booking photo. Authorities have not been able to identify the other woman who was allegedly involved in the kidnapping, and she remains at large, according to the sheriff’s department.

    Anyone who may have been victimized by Govantes or anyone with information about the case can contact the Chino Hills Police Department at (909) 364-2000. Anonymous calls can be made to We-Tip Hotline at 1-800-78CRIME (27463) or at www.wetip.com.

    [ad_2]

    Nathan Solis

    Source link

  • How to protect your social media accounts from fraud – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    What is the game here? What are fraud artists trying to accomplish?

    “The premise of social media is that you’re creating and keeping in touch with a circle of trusted contacts,” says Julie Kuzmic, senior compliance officer, consumer advocacy at Equifax Canada. “Your network of contacts is valuable to criminals.”

    3 ways fraudsters use social media to steal your identity

    Social media fraud typically takes one of three forms:

    • The fraudster takes over your account, usually by successfully hacking or guessing your account user ID and password. They can then obtain your list of contacts and do a lot of damage in the time it takes for you to alert the platform and regain control over the account.
    • The fraudster creates a new account in your name, often using a photo of you obtained online, and makes contact with people in your network or even strangers.
    • The fraudster may play a longer game where they set up an account under a fake persona, then reach out to large numbers of other users in the hope of initiating and nurturing digital relationships, including romance scams.

    “I’ve seen situations where somebody starts a conversation as if the recipient already knows them. That person may say, ‘You’ve got the wrong person,’ to which the fraudster responds, ‘Oh, my apologies for making a silly mistake,’” Kuzmic says. That interaction can serve as a foot in the door with an account holder who may be lonely or perceive that they have something in common with the person who initiated the exchange.

    “That seemingly harmless interaction can build over time,” Kuzmic says. “It might be a multi-step process that the fraudster will nurture along to build trust.”

    The fraud artist may start by sharing legitimate information about a great deal on a product on sale. Only later, once a level of trust has built up, they might suggest going in on an investment together or otherwise creating a scenario where they can separate the target from their money.

    Precautions to take on social media

    When criminals take over an account or impersonate a social media user, they often try to recruit more victims. They may also reach out to the user’s contacts, who—because they trust their friends—may be more likely to respond. Contacts may also be reassured by the number of other acquaintances they have in common.

    “It turns into a kind of higher-percentage phishing scam,” Kuzmic says.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    The doors left unlocked to criminals using social media can include easy-to-guess passwords, open privacy settings, and corroborating personal information obtained from other sources.

    For social media users, the best defence against being defrauded includes:

    • Using strong passwords that are different from the ones you use on other platforms.
    • Getting to know each platform’s privacy settings. (They’re not all the same.) Try to limit the visibility of posts and images that contain clues to personal information (such as birthdays and groups you belong to) to just your friends and contacts.
    • Avoiding oversharing even among friends, for example by posting honeymoon photos or naming a pet.
    • Not accepting invitations from people you don’t know, even if you appear to have connections in common.
    • Maintaining a sense of skepticism at all times, including when you receive messages from known contacts.

    Kuzmic notes that simply accepting an invitation usually won’t, in itself, put you in danger. It’s what happens next—fraudsters may ask for help with a financial shortfall, for example.

    “Any time a sense of urgency is attached to the request, that’s a red flag,” she says. “Remember, you can always verify whether a request is genuine; for example, contact the person by phone, via email, or on another social network.”

    sponsored

    Equifax Complete Protection

    Equifax Complete Protection is a credit and cybersecurity protection service designed to help Canadians spot the signs of identity fraud faster.

    • Provides daily credit monitoring and alerts
    • Scans for your personal data on the dark web
    • Social media monitoring by industry leader ZeroFox

    Subscription price: $34.95 per month

    Further lines of defence: Fraud protection from Equifax

    If you think your account has been compromised, contact the social network and follow its recovery protocol. Also alert people on your contact list, preferably through other media, to warn them against approaches by people who claim to be you.

    For an extra level of protection, Canadians can subscribe to Equifax CompleteTM Protection. This credit monitoring and ID protection service is $34.95/month and includes a wide range of features, including social media monitoring that can potentially spot suspicious activity before you do. It uses AI to scan your social media accounts for account impersonation, scams, and malicious or inappropriate content.

    Learn more about Equifax Complete Protection.

    This article is sponsored.

    This is a paid post that is informative but also may feature a client’s product or service. These posts are written, edited and produced by MoneySense with assigned freelancers.

    Read more about fraud and scams:

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.



    About Michael McCullough


    About Michael McCullough

    Michael is a financial writer and editor in Duncan, B.C. He’s a former managing editor of Canadian Business and editorial director of Canada Wide Media. He also writes for The Globe and Mail and BCBusiness.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link

  • The Indictment of Letitia James and the Collapse of Impartial Justice

    [ad_1]

    “One tier of justice for all Americans,” the U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi, wrote Thursday on X, shortly after a federal grand jury in Virginia indicted the New York attorney general, Letitia James, on charges of bank fraud and making false statements. Bondi had made a similar point, two weeks before, after the indictment of the former F.B.I. director James Comey. “No one is above the law,” she proclaimed. This self-satisfied triumphalism misconstrues the danger posed by the prosecutions of James and Comey—and by the other cases that President Donald Trump has demanded be brought against his perceived political enemies, which may soon follow. The issue here, contrary to the Administration’s framing, is not that these individuals had previously evaded accountability for allegedly criminal activity. (Those worried about the powerful being able to skirt the law should refer to Trump v. United States, in which the Supreme Court granted Presidents near-complete immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. Some people, it turns out, actually are above the law.) Rather, the problem with the Trump-directed prosecutions is about a different, and even more pernicious, form of unequal treatment: that this Administration will use the justice system to selectively punish those who incur the President’s wrath. The essence of impartial justice is treating like conduct alike—not identifying the target and then finding the crime.

    Trump’s supporters often insist that Democrats, including James, weaponized the justice system against him first. Indeed, James, while running for attorney general back in 2018, had some intemperate and ill-advised words for Trump. “I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate President,” she vowed. After she was elected, her statements were even more pointed, and even more arguably improper for a law-enforcement official: “As the next attorney general of his home state, I will be shining a bright light into every dark corner of his real-estate dealings.” In office, James delivered. She brought a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump, his children, and his company, accusing them of having inflated the value of their properties to lenders and insurers in order to obtain more favorable terms. The judge who heard the case, Arthur Engoron, sided with James. “The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience,” he wrote in his decision, imposing a fine that, with interest, grew to more than half a billion dollars. (In August, a divided appeals court ruled that the penalty was excessive, but let the fraud conviction stand so that it could be reviewed by a higher court.)

    More to the point, even if James misused her office to go after Trump, the acceptable reaction is not to repeat that offense. Trump may be a self-described counterpuncher, but payback has no place in the “Principles of Federal Prosecution,” the bible that governs how federal prosecutors should conduct themselves. And so the question raised by the indictment of James is: would any other federal prosecutor have brought this case against any other defendant? The indictment is, like the Comey charges, notably lacking in detail—but the answer seems to be a resounding no.

    Given that Trump had publicly demanded that James be prosecuted, her indictment was hardly unexpected. The precise fraud alleged, however, was a surprise. In April, Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, sent the Department of Justice a “criminal referral” that cited James’s 2023 purchase of a house in Norfolk, Virginia. James, Pulte charged, had said on one form that the property would be her “primary residence,” though it was actually for her niece—a fact that James had stated elsewhere. Instead, the indictment focussed on James’s purchase of another house in Norfolk in 2020, for a hundred and thirty-seven thousand dollars. In the process of buying this other property, James had signed a “second-home rider” that, according to the indictment, required her “to occupy and use the property as her secondary residence.” The rider itself, containing standard language from Fannie Mae, stipulated that James would “keep the Property available primarily as a residence for Borrower’s personal use and enjoyment for at least one year.”

    The indictment alleges that James did not use the property as her second home; instead, it asserts, she rented the house to a family of three, although it does not provide specifics. It also states that James’s application for homeowner’s insurance described the property as “owner-occupied,” even though her federal tax forms treated it as “rental real estate.” By obtaining the mortgage for a second home rather than for an investment, according to the indictment, James was able to borrow at a lower rate (three per cent as opposed to 3.815 per cent) and receive a larger seller credit. This “scheme and artifice to defraud” lenders “by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises” resulted in nearly nineteen thousand dollars in “ill-gotten gains” over the life of the loan, the indictment alleges.

    Does all this rise to the level of a crime that federal prosecutors usually pursue? Do these actions constitute “tremendous breaches of the public trust,” as the newly Trump-installed U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, an insurance lawyer with no previous prosecutorial experience, claimed? Federal mortgage-fraud prosecutions are exceptionally rare. In 2024, only thirty-eight people were sentenced for federal mortgage fraud, four more than in the previous year, according to statistics compiled by the United States Sentencing Commission. The amount allegedly at issue in the James case is so paltry that it would not normally draw the attention of federal prosecutors. The fraud that James supposedly committed is seldom prosecuted as a standalone offense. “I do not know of a single instance in which a prosecution was brought based solely on occupancy fraud, much less for renting out a second home,” Adam Levitin, a law professor at Georgetown who specializes in consumer-finance law and mortgage contracts, told me. For example, the former Trump-campaign chair Paul Manafort, was accused of occupancy fraud, after he claimed that his daughter lived in a SoHo condominium in order to obtain a larger mortgage, but it was part of a sprawling twenty-five count indictment. In addition, as Molly Roberts noted on Lawfare, it’s unclear whether James even violated the second-home restrictions; Fannie Mae rewrote the rider language in 2019 to clarify that homeowners can indeed let their properties, even during the first year of ownership. James’s New York State financial-disclosure forms only reported income from the property—between one thousand and five thousand dollars—in a single year, 2020. According to a source familiar with James’s finances, the house was occupied by James’s great-niece, who did not pay rent and has lived there for years.

    Even if prosecutors can show that James violated the terms of the loan, they will also face the hurdle of proving that any such deception was intentional. “An occupancy fraud charge like the one brought against James is very hard to prove standing alone because it requires proving that the borrower never intended to keep the occupancy promise,” Levitin observed. It’s no wonder that Halligan’s predecessor reportedly refused to bring the charges against James, and career prosecutors balked as well. “Bottom line: this is a very, very weak case that looks like prosecutorial misconduct, frankly,” Levitin said. “It’s a case that would never be brought if there were not a political vendetta against James.”

    This case does not reflect “one tier of justice for all Americans.” Prosecutors, who have limited resources, are supposed to exercise discretion, not exact retribution. The “Principles of Federal Prosecution” caution that a “determination to prosecute represents a policy judgment that the fundamental interests of society require the application of federal criminal law to a particular set of circumstances.” The indictment of James serves only one fundamental interest: Trump’s insatiable thirst for revenge. ♦

    [ad_2]

    Ruth Marcus

    Source link

  • Minnesota woman accused of using her position to steal thousands from a charitable foundation

    [ad_1]

    A treasurer of a non-profit in Isanti County, Minnesota is accused of using her position to steal nearly $100,000. 

    The 61-year-old woman was a board member of the Isanti County Sheriff’s Foundation and now faces theft charges, including theft by swindle. 

    Court documents say other board members of the Sheriff’s Foundation were not aware she opened bank accounts and deposited grant money. That grant money totaled $100,000 and was meant to fund Project 612, a program supporting at risk youth in the Twin Cities. 

    “Honestly, I didn’t believe it at first I was like there’s no way that she would do this because I trusted her so much,” said Marshaan Johnson, the founder of Project 612. 

    Johnson says Project 612 was not a non-profit and needed a 501c3 organization to steward a grant meant to support programing for kids for a full year. 

    “I reached out to a friend and was like ‘hey this is what’s going on,’ I was like ‘I have this grant, but I need someone to steward the money for me because I don’t have a 501c3’ she was like ‘my mother does I could talk to her,’” Johnson explained. 

    His friend’s mother was the treasurer of the Isanti County Sheriff’s Foundation. Johnson says for a few months this year, he received the money he expected and programming for the kids was underway. 

    “Then things got a little wonky a check bounced for me, a check bounced for my partner and then questions started floating,” Johnson said. 

    Court documents show a Chisago County investigator found checks from the Sheriff’s Foundation account were written out personally ‘in the amounts of $45,000, $30,000 and $20,000 to the treasurer of the Isanti County Sheriff’s Foundation. 

    “I’m disappointed. I’m hurt,” said Isanti County Sheriff Wayne Sieberlich. “I have no part in the foundation at all it’s a separate entity and that’s by design, it’s a conflict .”

    Sierberlich says the investigation was referred to the Chisago County Sheriff’s office to ensure there would be no conflict of interest. 

    Sierberlich says his wife is a board member of the Isanti County Sheriff’s Foundation and they have family ties to the woman now accused of stealing the money. 

    “Because a friend took advantage of a lot of people there are some people that think there’s a conspiracy or that we were involved in this some how and I just don’t know how to explain to people so that they understand there is no connection,” he said.

    Other board members say the were not aware the woman opened bank accounts and deposited the money meant for Project612. The woman charged in this cause is also facing fraud charges in Pine County.

    [ad_2]

    Ashley Grams

    Source link

  • Trump’s Indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James Stirs Concerns for Black Women Leaders

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The coalition of New York NAACP chapters had just begun its annual state convention when Letitia James, a longtime member and the state’s attorney general, canceled her appearance.

    For the New York convention’s organizers, the moment was alarming and underscored the gathering’s importance, which featured multiple sessions on building political power at the state level in response to what NAACP leaders called federal attacks on social welfare, civil rights and the rule of law.

    “It was through our collective action that a democracy was built,” said NAACP New York State Conference President L. Joy Williams. “What we have to do is not only defend against what is happening now, but we have to push further past where we were before, to build a system to build a better American democracy that we all deserve.”

    The indictment of James, who had previously prosecuted the Trump Organization for business fraud, immediately sparked debate over whether the justice system had been politicized for President Donald Trump’s personal grievances. It also drew many parallels with the recent effort by Trump to remove a Federal Reserve Board governor, Lisa Cook, from her post over similar allegations.


    Claims against James and Cook carry symbolic weight

    Advocates see some of Trump’s recent moves as exceptionally targeted at Black women leaders.

    “This is something that we’ve been grappling with since the start of this administration,” said Shavon Arline-Bradley, president and CEO of the National Council of Negro Women, the country’s oldest civil rights organization for Black women.

    The claims also have symbolic weight to Black families, Arline-Bradley said, where property ownership has historically been restricted by the legal system through outright and implicit discrimination.

    “When you attack someone’s home, you attack their ability to own, you attack their ability to have choice, you have attacked their ability to make a statement about their economic future,” Arline-Bradley said. “This is a consistent pattern that has highlighted what they think is an Achilles’ heel in the Black community.”

    Black women, Arline-Bradley added, “feel very targeted” because of the president’s words and actions, which she said was rooted in “a misunderstanding about the accomplishments and leadership of these women.”


    ‘One tier of justice for all Americans’

    The Trump administration contends its prosecution of James over alleged mortgage fraud is justified and impartial.

    “No one is above the law,” Lindsey Halligan, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said in a statement. “The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust. The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

    And Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote, “One tier of justice for all Americans” shortly after James’ indictment in a post on X.

    Critics of the administration have countered that the administration’s actions amount to political retribution and an attempt to unlawfully consolidate power. Black leaders have further argued that the administration’s actions have come at the expense of trailblazing Black leaders and Black communities.

    “President Trump has made clear through his own public comments against Attorney General James that the goal of this indictment is simply to exact retribution against his political opponents,” Yvette Clark, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said in a statement.

    “The American people see this corrupt prosecution for what it is — a desperate attempt by President Trump to weaponize the justice system. It will not withstand public or legal scrutiny,” she added.


    Case against James ‘very uncommon,’ legal expert says

    In addition to James, the Trump Justice Department has indicted former FBI Director James Comey for making a false statement and obstruction of justice related to a 2020 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony.

    The Justice Department is also investigating Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, for mortgage fraud. Trump has called for Schiff, who was the lead manager of Trump’s first impeachment, to be jailed.

    Experts question the merits and motives of the mortgage fraud inquiries.

    “It is very uncommon for prosecutors to bring these sorts of claims absent a pattern of malicious activity or evidence that the individual has actually harmed the bank by not paying their mortgage or if it’s part of a much larger fraudulent scheme,” said Paul Schiff Berman, a professor of law at the George Washington University School of Law.

    For James, Berman said, “the claim is that she said that the house was going to be used as her second home but she also used it as a rental property sometimes,” which Berman said could be argued as a reasonable use for a second home and likely not in violation of a typical mortgage contract.

    Regardless of the ensuing legal debates, allies of James say they are ready to support her in whatever manner is needed. Organizers at the New York conference say she is welcome to return to the event when ready.

    “While we are responding in this moment, this is also happening to her, and so we want to give her space,” said Williams, the New York NAACP leader. “And the thing about home is you can always go there. So we know she’ll always come back.”

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • New York Attorney General Letitia James indicted for alleged mortgage fraud

    [ad_1]

    This two-count indictment of New York attorney General Letitia James accuses her of bank fraud and of making false statements to *** financial institution. Specifically, it alleges that she intentionally misrepresented *** rental property as her secondary residence to obtain better mortgage terms. James is *** longtime foe of President Donald Trump. Last year she won *** civil lawsuit alleging that the president and his company overstated real estate values. Now the president has publicly urged the Justice Department to prosecute James and other political opponents. In *** video message yesterday, James said this indictment is part of the president’s desperate weaponization of our justice system. These charges are baseless. And the president’s own public statements make clear. That his only goal is political retribution at any cost. Lindsay Halligan, US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, wrote in *** statement, quote, No one is above the law. The charges, as alleged in this case, represent intentional criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust, unquote. Now if convicted, James faces up to 30 years in prison per count. She’s expected to make her first appearance in federal court on October 24th at the White House, I’m Jackie DeFusco.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James indicted for alleged mortgage fraud

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is the latest political foe of President Donald Trump to face federal charges.

    Updated: 8:01 AM EDT Oct 10, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is the latest political foe of President Donald Trump to face federal charges. A federal grand jury indicted James on charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. The indictment accuses her of intentionally misrepresenting an investment property in Norfolk, Virginia, as her secondary residence to obtain better mortgage terms.In a video statement on Thursday, James said the indictment is part of the president’s “desperate weaponization of our justice system.””These charges are baseless. And the president’s own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost,” James said. Trump has publicly urged the Justice Department to prosecute James and other political opponents. In a Truth Social post last month that was directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump alleged his opponents are “guilty as hell” and complained “nothing is being done.” Trump said, “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”Last year, James won a civil lawsuit against the president, alleging that Trump and his companies artificially inflated real estate values. An appeals court later overturned the staggering fine, which had grown to more than half a billion dollars with interest, but upheld the lower court’s finding that Trump committed fraud. Lindsey Halligan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said in a statement Thursday, “No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust.”The statement noted that James faces up to 30 years in prison per count if convicted. Her first court appearance is scheduled for Oct. 24.Halligan, who previously served as a White House aide and Trump’s personal lawyer, is also spearheading the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. She was appointed to the job after the Trump administration removed Erik Siebert, the veteran prosecutor who had overseen both investigations for months and resisted pressure to file charges. On social media last month, Trump wrote, “I withdrew the Nomination of Erik Siebert as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, when I was informed that he received the UNUSUALLY STRONG support of the two absolutely terrible, sleazebag Democrat Senators, from the Great State of Virginia. He didn’t quit, I fired him!”James specifically cited the shakeup as evidence that her prosecution is politically motivated. “His decision to fire a United States attorney who refused to bring charges against me and replaced them with someone who was blindly loyal, not to the law but to the president, is antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country,” James said. Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is the latest political foe of President Donald Trump to face federal charges.

    A federal grand jury indicted James on charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. The indictment accuses her of intentionally misrepresenting an investment property in Norfolk, Virginia, as her secondary residence to obtain better mortgage terms.

    In a video statement on Thursday, James said the indictment is part of the president’s “desperate weaponization of our justice system.”

    “These charges are baseless. And the president’s own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost,” James said.

    Trump has publicly urged the Justice Department to prosecute James and other political opponents. In a Truth Social post last month that was directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump alleged his opponents are “guilty as hell” and complained “nothing is being done.”

    Trump said, “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”

    Last year, James won a civil lawsuit against the president, alleging that Trump and his companies artificially inflated real estate values. An appeals court later overturned the staggering fine, which had grown to more than half a billion dollars with interest, but upheld the lower court’s finding that Trump committed fraud.

    Lindsey Halligan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said in a statement Thursday, “No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust.”

    The statement noted that James faces up to 30 years in prison per count if convicted. Her first court appearance is scheduled for Oct. 24.

    Halligan, who previously served as a White House aide and Trump’s personal lawyer, is also spearheading the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. She was appointed to the job after the Trump administration removed Erik Siebert, the veteran prosecutor who had overseen both investigations for months and resisted pressure to file charges.

    On social media last month, Trump wrote, “I withdrew the Nomination of Erik Siebert as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, when I was informed that he received the UNUSUALLY STRONG support of the two absolutely terrible, sleazebag Democrat Senators, from the Great State of Virginia. He didn’t quit, I fired him!”

    James specifically cited the shakeup as evidence that her prosecution is politically motivated.

    “His decision to fire a United States attorney who refused to bring charges against me and replaced them with someone who was blindly loyal, not to the law but to the president, is antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country,” James said.

    Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Romanian nationals charged with fraud, spent nearly $75K on Red Bull using stolen EBT cards

    [ad_1]

    Two men are charged with fraud after they allegedly used stolen EBT cards to purchase energy drinks they would then sell to gas station owners at a profit.

    Charges filed in Anoka County, Minnesota, on Wednesday say a woman from Colorado called Fridley police to report four fraudulent transactions had occurred at the city’s Sam’s Club and one transaction at the city’s Walmart. Four of the transactions were successful and totaled just over $1,800.

    Police reviewed surveillance footage from the Sam’s Club and Walmart locations and allegedly observed a man, later identified as one of the suspects, using the Colorado woman’s card. Sam’s Club provided membership details to investigators to help them identify the suspect.

    During the course of the investigation, law enforcement identified 203 separate fraudulent transactions in Minnesota happening between July 3 and Sept. 28 for a total of nearly $75,000 in purchases, according to charging documents. The purchases were made across the Twin Cities and used unique EBT cards, identified as belonging to more than 100 victims from California, Colorado, Texas, Utah and Virginia. 

    Investigators learned about an ongoing EBT fraud investigation in Colorado, and law enforcement there was able to identify the suspects using photos taken from surveillance footage. The case in Colorado involves at least $90,000 in fraudulent transactions. In both the Minnesota and Colorado investigations, the suspects were seen purchasing large quantities of Red Bull, charges say. 

    While conducting a search warrant on a Minneapolis storage unit connected to the suspects, police say they found approximately 1,200 cases of Red Bull. 

    Law enforcement spoke with one of the suspects, who allegedly told investigators he would receive the EBT cards from an unknown man and use them to purchase Red Bull and other items. He would then sell the Red Bull to gas station owners and give the sale proceeds to the man who had supplied him with the EBT cards.

    Charges say both suspects are Romanian nationals and pose a significant flight risk. As of Wednesday, both are in custody.

    [ad_2]

    Riley Moser

    Source link

  • What do prosecutors have to prove in the Letitia James case?

    [ad_1]



    What do prosecutors have to prove in the Letitia James case? – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James on two charges. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson joins with analysis.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • School chief indicted for alleged kickback scheme in Illinois school district

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — ATLANTA (AP) — The superintendent of Georgia’s third-largest school district has been indicted on federal charges alleging he ran a kickback scheme and stole money from his previous employer, a smaller school district in suburban Chicago.

    A federal grand jury in Chicago on Wednesday indicted Devon Horton, currently superintendent of the 93,000-student DeKalb County school district, on 17 counts including wire fraud, embezzlement and tax evasion. The indictment alleges the 48-year-old Horton issued more than $280,000 in contracts to three friends and received more than $80,000 in kickbacks from 2020 through 2023 while he was superintendent of the Evanston-Skokie school district. That district had 5,800 students in grades K-8 last year.

    Indicted along with Horton were three other men who prosecutors allege were part of the scheme: Antonio Ross, 48, of Chicago; Samuel Ross, 46 of Berwyn, Illinois; and Alfonzo Lewis, 48, of Chicago.

    A lawyer for Horton, Terry Campbell, said in a statement that Horton “is eager to address his case in court.” He added that the allegations “relate to conduct that is several years old and have nothing whatsoever to do with his very successful work on behalf of the students, families, and teachers in DeKalb County,” citing improved attendance rates, graduation rates and academic achievement in the Georgia district.

    Lawyers for Samuel Ross and Antonio Ross declined to comment. No lawyer was listed for Lewis in court records.

    The DeKalb County school board held an emergency meeting Thursday and suspended Horton with pay, naming Chief of Student Services Norman Sauce as acting superintendent. Board Chairperson Deirdre Pierce said in a statement that operations will “continue as normal” and that the district remains “focused on providing a safe, supportive, and high-quality educational experience for every student.”

    The DeKalb County board had extended Horton’s contract to 2028 in July and raised his salary to $360,000 a year.

    The indictment alleges that the four men created companies and billed for services they didn’t provide in order to bilk money from the Evanston-Skokie and Chicago school districts. In addition to $283,500 from Evanston-Skokie, the indictment alleges that Antonio Ross, then principal of Hyde Park Academy High School in Chicago, issued a fraudulent contract to a Horton-controlled company that netted Horton $10,000.

    Horton tried to hire Antonio Ross after Horton became superintendent in DeKalb County, but Ross declined the job amid questions about the business relationship between the two men. The DeKalb district hired at least four other people whom Horton previously worked with in Illinois or Louisville, Kentucky.

    Horton also faces charges that he stole more than $30,000 from the Evanston-Skokie district in 2022 and 2023 by using his district purchasing card to buy personal meals and gift cards and to pay for personal vehicle and travel expenses. Horton is also charged with tax evasion over allegations that he didn’t report the kickbacks and personal purchases on his income tax returns.

    Because of the large amount of money allegedly stolen and that fact that Horton was a public official, he could face more than 10 years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines if convicted. Prosecutors are also seeking to have all four men forfeit the money in question.

    The leaders of the Evanston-Skokie school board, Sergio Hernandez and Nichole Pinkard, said in a statement that the district “has been aware of the ongoing investigation and has fully supported the process,” keeping it secret at the request of federal authorities.

    “We are deeply troubled and angered by these allegations,” they said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New York Attorney General Letitia James Charged In Fraud Case After Pressure Campaign By Trump – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted Thursday on mortgage fraud charges in a case that President Donald Trump urged his Justice Department to bring after he vowed retribution on his biggest political enemies.

    James, a Democrat who infuriated Trump after his first term with a lawsuit alleging that he built his business empire on lies about his wealth, was charged with bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution in connection with a home purchase in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2020.

    The top federal prosecutor for eastern Virginia, a former Trump aide, personally presented the case to the grand jury weeks after she was thrust into the role amid the administration’s pressure to deliver charges.

    The indictment, two weeks after a separate criminal case charging former FBI Director James Comey with lying to Congress, is the latest indication of the Trump administration’s norm-busting determination to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to pursue the president’s political foes and public figures who once investigated him.

    Both the Comey and James cases followed a strikingly unconventional path toward indictment. The Trump administration last month pushed out Erik Siebert, the veteran prosecutor who had overseen both investigations for months and had resisted pressure to file charges, and replaced him with Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide who has worked as lawyer for Trump but has never previously served as a federal prosecutor.

    Halligan presented the James case to the grand jury herself, as she did in the case against Comey, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. The person was not authorized to discuss the matter by name and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

    In a lengthy statement, James decried the indictment as “nothing more than a continuation of the president’s desperate weaponization of our justice system.”

    “These charges are baseless, and the president’s own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost. The president’s actions are a grave violation of our Constitutional order and have drawn sharp criticism from members of both parties,” she added.

    She called the decision to fire Siebert and replace him with a prosecutor who is “blindly loyal” to the president as “antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country,” and she said she stood by her investigation of Trump and his company as having been “based on the facts and evidence — not politics.”

    Abbe Lowell, James’ lawyer and a prominent attorney representing multiple Trump targets, said James “flatly and forcefully denies these charges.” James is scheduled to make an initial appearance in the federal court in Norfolk, Virginia, on Oct. 24.

    “We are deeply concerned that this case is driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge,” Lowell said in a statement. “When a President can publicly direct charges to be filed against someone — when it was reported that career attorneys concluded none were warranted — it marks a serious attack on the rule of law. We will fight these charges in every process allowed in the law.”

    The indictment pertains to James’ purchase of a house in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2020. During the sale, she signed a standard document called a “second home rider” in which she agreed to various rules, including a requirement that she keep the property primarily for her “personal use and enjoyment for at least one year,” unless the lender agreed otherwise in writing.

    Rather than using the home as a second residence, the indictment alleges, James rented it out to a family of three. According to the indictment, the misrepresentation allowed James to obtain favorable loan terms not available for investment properties.

    In a post on X shortly after the indictment was handed up, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote, “One tier of justice for all Americans.”

    “No one is above the law,” Halligan, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said in a statement. “The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust. The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

    Trump has been advocating charging James for months, posting on social media without citing any evidence that she’s “guilty as hell” and telling reporters at the White House, “It looks to me like she’s really guilty of something, but I really don’t know.”

    Her lawyer has accused the Justice Department of concocting a bogus criminal case to settle Trump’s personal vendetta against James, who last year won a staggering judgment against Trump and his companies in a lawsuit alleging he lied to banks and others about the value of his assets.

    The Justice Department has also been investigating mortgage-related allegations against Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook, using the probe to demand her ouster, and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., whose lawyer called the allegations against him “transparently false, stale, and long debunked.”

    But James is a particularly personal target. As attorney general, she sued the Republican president and his administration dozens of times and oversaw a lawsuit accusing him of defrauding banks by dramatically overstating the value of his real estate holdings on financial statements.

    An appeals court overturned the fine, which had ballooned to more than $500 million with interest, but upheld a lower court’s finding that Trump had committed fraud.

    The indictment comes a day after Comey made his first court appearance in his case, accusing him of lying to Congress in 2020. Comey’s lawyer told the judge that the defense plans to push to have the case dismissed ahead of trial, arguing that it is a vindictive prosecution brought at the direction of the president.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link