ReportWire

Tag: Fraud

  • How to protect your kids from online harm – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    They may reach out, develop trust, and ask seemingly innocent questions like, “Oh, you have a dog? What’s your dog’s name?” Using artificial intelligence tools, they then use permutations of this information in attempts to hack the online accounts of other family members.

    “A child could be an effective channel for a criminal to gain that information,” warns Julie Kuzmic, senior compliance officer, consumer advocacy with credit bureau Equifax Canada.

    A range of harms

    As parents know only too well, children’s exposure to the internet comes with a range of benefits, but also lurking dangers. “There are potential harms to children as young as babies and toddlers all the way up to older teenagers—like 18, 19 years old,” Kuzmic says. Over that span they may be exposed to:

    • Developmental harms. Exposure to screens and to seeing people and hearing voices online affects brain growth from infancy and can crowd out other activities crucial to cognitive development, like unstructured play and human interaction.
    • Harmful content. Age-inappropriate content, misinformation, disinformation, and modified images can all negatively affect the child’s growth, learning, and judgment.
    • Nefarious contact and exploitation. Of particular concern for parents is the potential for online predators to contact and develop relationships with their children for their own pernicious purposes.
    • Privacy breaches and data collection. As in the example described above, criminals might obtain personal information to defraud or assume the identity of adult members of their household or the children themselves.
    • Mental and emotional illness. Excessive social media use in particular has been linked to anxiety, depression, body image issues, sleep deprivation, low physical activity, and stunted social development.

    Don’t assume kids know what they’re doing

    Though they often appear technology-savvy, at times serving as IT support for their befuddled parents, “kids don’t have the life experience to know that not everybody is who they say they are,” Kuzmic says. At other times, they may “have a low awareness of the permanence of what they do online. Things they post and share may be available and visible for the rest of time, effectively, so there can be an impact well on later into their lives.”

    They can be particularly vulnerable in their early teens as they begin to question their parents’ authority, push boundaries, and engage in higher-risk behaviour online. This coincides with the age when they might have their first bank and social media accounts and mobile phone.

    “In an age-appropriate way, it’s important to have an ongoing conversation with your children about guidelines and expectations,” Kuzmic says. “At any age, think of protection as a layered and evolving situation. It’s not something that you talk about once and then it’s fine.”

    Measures to protect kids from online harms

    Safeguarding your offspring online requires a hands-on approach. “Allowing exposure to online activity maybe should come with training wheels, where parents are a little more involved at the start and are learning together with the kids,” Kuzmic says. Some steps she recommends include:

    • Setting rules around internet access and the age at which children are allowed to access social media. Some families write it down as a contract that everybody can see and agree to.
    • Imposing physical limitations, such as no devices after bedtime.
    • Setting up digital limitations such as blocking platforms that screen out potentially undesirable content or a secure virtual private network (VPN).
    • Prioritizing online safety. Explain why your kids should be wary of people who approach them online. Advise them to avoid random links, banner ads, or quizzes designed to lure them into unsafe spaces.
    • Discouraging oversharing of personal information on social media.

    Though bad actors target minors for a variety of malevolent reasons, they all zero in on children’s relative weaknesses, such as a desire to be accepted and befriended. Parents need to be there, Kuzmic says, to remind their kids that what might not appear to them to be a dangerous situation “might actually be a dangerous situation.”

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Digital security from Equifax Complete Protection

    The hard part for parents—especially as their kids become older and increasingly independent—is they can’t be there all the time. For an additional level of online safety, consider Equifax CompleteTM Protection, a monthly subscription service that includes parental controls from Bitdefender to restrict which websites and apps your kids can access.

    Other features of Equifax Complete Protection include: 

    • Daily credit monitoring and alerts to notify you of key changes to your Equifax credit report, such as a new credit card or loan application. 
    • WebScan, which monitors the dark web (hidden websites where criminals buy and sell data) to see if your personal information appears there. 
    • Social media monitoring provided by industry leader ZeroFox, to alert you to suspicious activity on your social media accounts.
    • Online data encryption by NordVPN and online password generation and storage by NordPass 
    • Device protection from Bitdefender to help stop phishing attempts and protect devices from viruses and malware.

    Equifax Complete Protection costs $34.95 per month. To learn more, visit the Equifax website.

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.



    About Michael McCullough


    About Michael McCullough

    Michael is a financial writer and editor in Duncan, B.C. He’s a former managing editor of Canadian Business and editorial director of Canada Wide Media. He also writes for The Globe and Mail and BCBusiness.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link

  • Trump nominates White House aide to be top US prosecutor for office probing Letitia James

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Saturday that he would be nominating senior White House aide Lindsey Halligan to serve as the top federal prosecutor for the Virginia office that was thrown into turmoil when its U.S. attorney was pushed out Friday.

    In a social media post just after he departed the White House for an event at Mount Vernon, Trump wrote he was nominating Halligan as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, writing that she “will be Fair, Smart, and will provide, desperately needed, JUSTICE FOR ALL!”

    The announcement came as Trump pressed Attorney General Pam Bondi to move forward with pursuing cases against some of his political opponents, part of a vow for retribution that has been a theme of his return to the White House.

    The nomination would place one of the president’s legal defenders in charge of an office in tumult over political pressure by administration officials to criminally charge New York Attorney General Letitia James, a longtime foe of Trump, in a mortgage fraud investigation.

    Erik Siebert, who had been the office’s top prosecutor, resigned amid a push by Trump administration officials to bring charges in the investigation, which stems from allegations of paperwork discrepancies on James’ Brooklyn townhouse and a Virginia home.

    The Justice Department has spent months investigating, and there’s been no indication that prosecutors have managed to uncover any degree of incriminating evidence necessary to secure an indictment. James’ lawyers have vigorously denied any allegations and characterized the investigation as an act of political revenge.

    Halligan has been part of Trump’s legal orbit for the last several years, including serving as one of his attorneys in the early days of the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. She has more recently been enlisted in a White House effort to remove what the administration contends is “improper ideology” from Smithsonian properties.

    Earlier Saturday, Trump posted to social media what appeared to be somewhat of an open letter to Bondi, saying he had “reviewed over 30 statements and posts” that he characterized as criticizing his administration for a lack of action on investigations, including the one into James’ dealings. Trump’s message mentioned former FBI Director James Comey, Trump’s longtime foil whom he fired during his first term amid the Russia election interference investigation.

    The FBI acknowledged this summer that it was investigating Comey, who was interviewed by the Secret Service after an Instagram post that Republicans insisted was a call for violence against Trump. Comey has said he did not mean the post as a threat and removed it once he realized how it was being interpreted.

    Asked as he departed the White House if he was criticizing Bondi, Trump said he just wanted action.

    “We have to act fast — one way or the other,” Trump said. “They’re guilty, they’re not guilty — we have to act fast. If they’re not guilty, that’s fine. If they are guilty or if they should be charged, they should be charged. And we have to do it now.”

    In announcing Halligan’s nomination soon after on social media, Trump said that Bondi was “doing a GREAT job.”

    The selection of Halligan came just hours after another conservative lawyer, Mary “Maggie” Cleary, said in an email to staff that she had been named acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, according to a copy viewed by The Associated Press.

    “While this appointment was unexpected, I am humbled to be joining your ranks,” Cleary, a conservative lawyer who has said she was falsely accused of being at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, told employees in the email.

    While Siebert said in an email to colleagues Friday evening that he had submitted his resignation, Trump said in a social media post: “He didn’t quit, I fired him!” Trump noted he was backed by the state’s two Democratic senators, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, adding: “Next time let him go in as a Democrat, not a Republican.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • White House names replacement for acting U.S. attorney in office probing Letitia James

    [ad_1]

    A conservative lawyer who has said she was falsely accused of being at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, has been named to serve as the top federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of Virginia, according to a copy of an email she sent to staff obtained by CBS News. The Virginia office was thrown into turmoil when its acting U.S. attorney was abruptly left on Friday.

    Mary “Maggie” Cleary said in an email to staff on Saturday that she had been named the new acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, according to her email.

    She replaces Erik Siebert, who resigned amid pressure from Trump administration officials to bring criminal charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James in a mortgage fraud investigation.

    “While this appointment was unexpected, I am humbled to be joining your ranks,” Cleary told employees in the email. “The Eastern District of Virginia has a distinguished legacy upon which we will build.”  

    Cleary will take over an office in tumult over political pressure by administration officials to criminally charge James, a longtime foe of President Trump. The investigation stems from allegations that James provided false information on mortgage applications to get better loan rates for a home in Virginia.

    The Justice Department has spent months conducting the investigation but has yet to bring charges, and there’s been no indication that prosecutors have managed to uncover any degree of incriminating evidence necessary to secure an indictment. James’ lawyers have vigorously denied any allegations and characterized the investigation as an act of political revenge.

    In 2022, James sued Mr. Trump for years of alleged financial fraud, claiming Mr. Trump and his family participated in a conspiracy to inflate his net worth by billions of dollars in order to secure better loan rates, among other things. A judge found them liable and ultimately ruled Trump and the Trump Organization must pay $354 million in fines, though the actual total recently climbed to above $500 million due to interest while he appeals.  

    While Siebert said in an email to colleagues Friday evening that he had submitted his resignation, Trump said in a social media post: “He didn’t quit, I fired him!” 

    Cleary recently rejoined the Justice Department as a senior counsel in the criminal division after working as a prosecutor in the Culpepper Commonwealth’s Attorneys Office. She also worked as deputy secretary of public safety in Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s administration and later served in Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares’ office.

    Cleary wrote in an article for The Spectator World earlier this year about being wrongly identified in a photo which allegedly placed her on Capitol grounds during the Jan. 6 riot. Cleary, who at the time was working as a federal prosecutor in the Western District of Virginia, wrote: “Everyone knew I was a conservative. It was all over my resume. I was in leadership in my local Republican Committee. But I had not gone to the Capitol that day.”

    She described being placed on administrative leave and interviewed by agents before later being cleared to return to work.

    “In the last four years, I’ve been somewhat cautious about sharing my experience, but now, while Donald Trump is president, I feel emboldened to finally tell how, I, too, was targeted politically,” Cleary wrote.

    At the time the article was published in May, she was interviewing to serve as U.S. attorney for the Western District of Virginia. Cleary said she wanted that job “to end this type of treatment.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After scammer moves $1,500 out of couple’s savings account, bank denies their fraud claim six times

    [ad_1]

    It’s not always a bad thing when the spouse keeps tabs on the other’s spending, because for David McCarty, his wife’s vigilance might’ve saved them a fortune.

    “She just happened to look at the savings account, which should have no activity,” McCarty explained. “She said, ‘Dave, have you been transferring money using Zelle to Tampa, Florida?’”

    The answer was an emphatic “no”, but the McCartys’ account showed four transfers over several days totaling more than $1,500. When McCarty called Wells Fargo to alert them to the fraud, they found another red flag: the scammer changed the phone number and email address attached to the account.

    “We talked to customer service and they wouldn’t talk to us without us telling them what our email was, and they said it was wrong,” he recalled. “Finally, we talked long enough and we gave them our social security number and they agreed to talk with us, and that’s when we were able to shut things down.”

    Filing the claim then proved to be an even more aggravating experience: according to McCarty, Wells Fargo denied the claim six times.

    “They kept coming back and telling me (I) authorized it or authorized someone else, and we said, ‘There’s no way. We don’t know anyone in Tampa.’ I wasn’t given the trust of being a longtime customer and I was being accused of fraud myself.”

    The experience, while frustrating, also proved revealing in that it showed the difference in consumer protections for bank accounts versus credit cards. 

    “We’ve had fraud on our credit card, and they call us and we get the money reimbursed,” McCarty noted. “Here, Wells Fargo didn’t catch this. I want people to be aware that you’re not protected for your checking and savings accounts.”

    Indeed, credit cards often provide zero liability for fraudulent transactions, as well as notifications for unusual activity. Banks, however, generally require the customer to manually set up those alerts. Protectons are also stronger for credit cards because transactions are more directly linked with the card issuer’s payouts, whereas bank accounts are the sole responsibility of the account holder.

    After more appeals, McCarty did eventually get his money back, and a spokesperson for Wells Fargo told WCCO News McCarty’s experience “does not reflect” the standard of service the bank wishes to provide.

    “We are pleased to have resolved this matter for our customer. At the same time, we sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and worry they experienced during the time it took to complete the resolution process,” the spokesman wrorte. “This does not reflect the level of service we aim to deliver. We remain committed to protecting our customers and stopping criminals from engaging in fraudulent activities. We continue to invest in customer education, employee training and advanced technology to help detect and prevent fraud and scams.”

    Wells Fargo also shared its online security center for customers to become more familiar with potential scams and ways to avoid them. Wells Fargo also posts a Security Brochure with other information to help account holders.

    [ad_2]

    Jonah Kaplan

    Source link

  • Minnesota pool contractor at center of WCCO investigation pleads guilty to fraud

    [ad_1]




































    Pool contractor at center of WCCO investigation admits to scamming families



    Pool contractor at center of WCCO investigation admits to scamming families

    00:42

    The pool contractor at the center of a WCCO investigation admits he executed a fraud scheme to take customers’ money. 

    Charles Workman pled guilty in federal court this week. In court documents, he said he marketed backyard pools, getting customers to pay up front, even though he knew he would complete little to no work.

    WCCO began investigating Workman in 2022 after families contacted us saying they’d been scammed.

    Their backyards were left in ruin or there was no work done at all. More than a dozen families collectively lost more than a million dollars. 

    Workman violated his pre-trial release and will remain in federal custody until sentencing. 

    [ad_2]

    Jennifer Mayerle

    Source link

  • Watch live: U.S. attorney announces charges in housing stabilization fraud

    [ad_1]




































    CBS News Live



    CBS News Minnesota

    Live

    The U.S. attorney in Minnesota on Thursday will “deliver statements regarding housing stabilization fraud charges,” his office said.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson will speak at 11 a.m.


    How to watch the U.S. attorney’s statements on housing stabilization fraud charges

    • What: U.S. Attorney’s Office delivers statements regarding housing stabilization fraud charges 
    • Date: Sept. 18, 2025
    • Time: 11 a.m.
    • Location: United States Courthouse – Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Online stream: Live on CBS News Minnesota in the player above and on your mobile or streaming device.

    Note: Streaming plans are subject to change.  


    Housing Stabilization Services, a Medicaid program under the umbrella of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, is accused of being the target of widespread fraud

    Federal agents in a search warrant outlined a scheme to steal taxpayer money by filing bogus claims that companies stated providers worked with clients when they actually received little or no services.

    When the program started in 2020, the estimate was that it would cost taxpayers about $2.5 million a year. But by 2021, costs reached $21 million, and last year they ballooned to $104 million.

    Eric Grumdahl, the assistant commissioner for homelessness and housing supports for DHS, left the agency on Tuesday. His departure came on the eve of a Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee meeting focused on HSS.

    The reason for Grumdahl’s exit is unclear, as is the subject of Thursday’s statements from Thompson.

    DHS is working to terminate the housing program altogether because it “does not have the necessary controls to stop bad actors.”  

    [ad_2]

    WCCO Staff

    Source link

  • Executive order establishes council to crack down on fraud in Minnesota

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Tim Walz has issued an executive order aimed at cracking down on fraud in Minnesota by utilizing new data-sharing laws passed in the anti-fraud legislative package

    Multiple state agencies are included in the directive, which requires them to look at their data to identify, prevent, or eliminate fraudulent use of state funds, resources, or programs. If any fraud is suspected, they must report it to the Department of Revenue, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the Office of the Legislative Auditor. 

    “We have no tolerance for fraud in the State of Minnesota. Abuse of taxpayer dollars takes resources away from the people who need them most. If you commit fraud in Minnesota, you will be prosecuted and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. While we will continue to urge the legislature to take further action, this executive order gives our agencies additional tools to safeguard taxpayer dollars,” said Walz.

    The four-page document, issued on Wednesday, orders DPS authorities to lead a statewide council made up of various agency representatives with knowledge in program integrity, audit or internal controls. The council is then directed to meet every month and share investigative data and trends, as well as help agencies with auditing as needed. 

    The DHS has also been ordered to “publish information about program integrity actions taken by the agency” for public knowledge on how the agency is preventing fraud, waste and abuse.  

    It goes on to direct Inspector General James Clark to create a review program for Medicaid providers and claims, as well as identify high-risk providers, claims and service patterns through analytics and risk-scoring models. Additionally, Clark is being asked to identify DHS programs that pose a high risk of fraud, waste, and abuse. 

    The order says to disenroll all Minnesota Health Care Program-enrolled providers who haven’t billed Medicaid within the past year, effective immediately, and to ask all state accounts for funds to help “modernize systems to better prevent and detect fraud and waste. The order also says to hire an external consultant “to assess DHS and make recommendations on reorganization.” 

    Meanwhile, the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget has been ordered to create mandatory training on ethics, fraud prevention, waste and abuse for all state employees, do a review of existing state job classifications, lead a work group, create job-specific training and education standards and more. 

    Republican state Rep. Kristin Robbins, chair of the House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, issued a statement after hearing about the order, which she says happened before Wednesday’s hearing in the Minnesota House on fraud prevention and state agency oversight. She said Walz’s order “falls far short of the reforms Minnesotans deserve.”

    “Decades of reports about the failures of internal controls at DHS have demonstrated they cannot police themselves. We need an independent executive branch OIG to hold them accountable,” she added.

    [ad_2]

    Krystal Frasier

    Source link

  • Nigerian man sentenced to six years in prison in crypto romance scheme with Colorado widow

    [ad_1]

    A Nigerian national living in Minnesota has been sentenced to nearly six years in prison — and ordered to pay nearly $1.7 million in restitution — for defrauding a widowed Colorado woman through an elaborate cryptocurrency romance scam, federal authorities announced Tuesday.

    The 37-year-old man, Adetomiwa Seun Akindele, will be deported to Nigeria once he serves his sentence, according to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado.

    Akindele pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering in a scam in which authorities said he posed as a wealthy Italian-American businessman named Frank Labato on a dating website in 2018. Akindele and the woman began exchanging emails and phone calls during which Akindele “provided the victim with additional false details about his personal and work background, images, and photos, to substantiate his fictitious persona of ‘Frank.’”

    [ad_2]

    John Aguilar

    Source link

  • Federal Reserve to announce interest rate cut amid economic slowdown, pressure from President Trump

    [ad_1]

    Federal Reserve to announce interest rate cut amid economic slowdown, pressure from President Trump

    The Federal Reserve is set to announce an interest rate cut this week in response to a slowing economy, making clear it is not surrendering to President Donald Trump’s demands.

    Updated: 7:42 AM PDT Sep 14, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    The Federal Reserve is expected to announce a long-awaited interest rate cut this week, responding to a slowing economy as opposed to yielding to President Donald Trump’s demands. Recent data shows hiring is slowing and unemployment is ticking up, which would normally call for an interest rate cut. Lower interest rates make borrowing money for things like cars and credit cards cheaper. At the same time, inflation remains stubbornly high, which is usually solved by keeping interest rates where they are and leaving costly prices up.With a big decision facing the Fed, added pressure from President Trump isn’t helping. Experts say his repeated calls for the Fed to lower interest rates are damaging the agency’s independence and credibility, spooking investors and the market. “If the Fed is politicized and they’re acting based upon political pressures rather than accurate economic data, that’s going to send messages throughout the economy that maybe what they’re doing isn’t really good for the economy, and maybe it doesn’t come from a solid place of evidence,” political analyst Todd Belt said. “It will introduce even more uncertainty in the economy, and uncertainty is the enemy of business planning.”President Trump’s tariffs have also injected lots of uncertainty in the market, and economists say that, in turn, will further drive up inflation.In a further escalation involving the president and the Fed, last week, a federal judge blocked Trump’s unprecedented attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, alleging mortgage fraud. Now, the administration is appealing and is pushing the courts for an emergency ruling before the Fed’s big interest rate decision this week. But a big twist could undermine the administration’s case, as the Associated Press reports that Cook previously referred to the property in question as a “vacation home,” which would contradict the White House’s accusations of fraud.Watch the latest on the Federal Reserve:

    The Federal Reserve is expected to announce a long-awaited interest rate cut this week, responding to a slowing economy as opposed to yielding to President Donald Trump’s demands.

    Recent data shows hiring is slowing and unemployment is ticking up, which would normally call for an interest rate cut. Lower interest rates make borrowing money for things like cars and credit cards cheaper.

    At the same time, inflation remains stubbornly high, which is usually solved by keeping interest rates where they are and leaving costly prices up.

    With a big decision facing the Fed, added pressure from President Trump isn’t helping. Experts say his repeated calls for the Fed to lower interest rates are damaging the agency’s independence and credibility, spooking investors and the market.

    “If the Fed is politicized and they’re acting based upon political pressures rather than accurate economic data, that’s going to send messages throughout the economy that maybe what they’re doing isn’t really good for the economy, and maybe it doesn’t come from a solid place of evidence,” political analyst Todd Belt said. “It will introduce even more uncertainty in the economy, and uncertainty is the enemy of business planning.”

    President Trump’s tariffs have also injected lots of uncertainty in the market, and economists say that, in turn, will further drive up inflation.

    In a further escalation involving the president and the Fed, last week, a federal judge blocked Trump’s unprecedented attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, alleging mortgage fraud.

    Now, the administration is appealing and is pushing the courts for an emergency ruling before the Fed’s big interest rate decision this week. But a big twist could undermine the administration’s case, as the Associated Press reports that Cook previously referred to the property in question as a “vacation home,” which would contradict the White House’s accusations of fraud.

    Watch the latest on the Federal Reserve:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Scam centers are spreading in East Timor, UN report says

    [ad_1]

    BANGKOK — A suspected scam call operation and a suspicious network of companies was discovered with links to a new free trade zone in East Timor, the U.N. Office of Drugs and Crime said Thursday.

    Scam centers have proliferated across Southeast Asia and spread across the world, and the report highlights the ability of the criminal enterprises to relocate as some governments in the region launch crackdowns.

    Such centers, usually walled compounds in remote areas that conduct computer-enabled scams that are estimated to cost victims tens of billions of dollars per year, have proliferated in recent years, especially in Southeast Asia.

    Scam centers in Laos, Myanmar and Cambodia have drawn global attention for running notorious romance scams, where a worker poses as an attractive young woman to lure targets into making false investments. They are also found in the Philippines and Laos, and UNODC warned in April that scam centers have appeared in Latin America and Africa.

    In East Timor, police raided a suspected scam center in late August in the Special Administrative Region of Oecusse, detaining more than 30 foreigners for working without permission. The people detained came from Indonesia, Malaysia and China, but the UNODC report said it was unclear if they had been trafficked.

    Oecusse is an exclave of East Timor on the Indonesian half of the island the two countries share, and the region’s government opened a free trade zone called Oecusse Digital Centre in December 2024.

    “The scale and nature of the activity we are now seeing — similar to what we were seeing at the earlier stages of Southeast Asia’s scam industry — shows how far things have progressed,” said Benedikt Hofmann, deputy regional representative at UNODC for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. “This is concerning, especially given the boost in connectivity Timor-Leste will be experiencing as part of becoming a full member of ASEAN.”

    The nation of East Timor, also known as Timor-Leste, is one of the poorest in the world, and has a population of 1.3 million. It is due to join the regional association of Southeast Asian nations called ASEAN in October this year.

    The UNODC said other companies with apparent links to scam networks were also found to be active in the region. The agency said one, an online gaming company, is connected with casino networks in Cambodia, owned by a Cambodian businessman with links Wan Kuok-koi, leader of the 14K Triad criminal gang and sanctioned by the United States.

    Across countries in Southeast Asia, free trade zones or special economic zones have been exploited to facilitate cyber-enabled scams, money laundering and other crimes.

    Last year, the Philippines launched a nationwide crackdown in which the government deported thousands of workers found in scam centers. In February, Thailand, Myanmar and China launched a joint action that saw thousands of workers released. However, the centers themselves have continued to operate.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-NYPD officer from Bellerose sentenced to three years in prison for wire fraud scheme: Feds – QNS

    [ad_1]

    A former NYPD officer from Bellerose was sentenced in Brooklyn federal court to three years in prison for defrauding millions of dollars from investors.

    QNS file photo

    A former NYPD officer from Bellerose was sentenced in Brooklyn federal court on Sept. 10 to three years in prison for defrauding over 20 investors out of more than $4 million in a foreign exchange (forex) trading fund.

    Jason Rodriguez, 38, pleaded guilty last November to conspiracy to commit wire fraud related to his role as the chief operating officer of Technical Trading Team LLC, based on a slew of misrepresentations.

    According to court filings and the defendant’s admissions, Rodriguez and his co-conspirator Edwin Carrion founded the Technical Trading Team (TTT) in the spring of 2020. Rodriguez had sole trading authority over the vast majority of the nearly $5 million raised from over 20 individual investors. Rodriguez and Carrion promised investors annual investment returns ranging from 18% to 24% and convinced them to invest based on a number of material misrepresentations. Rodriguez and Carrion promised investors that they were making a safe investment; in reality, Rodriguez disregarded numerous safeguards that he promised investors were in place to protect their investments.

    For example, though Rodriguez and Carrion promised investors that the Technical Trading Team would never expose more than 1% of the Technical Trading Team investors’ funds to market risk at any given time, only to ignore that safeguard as well. Rodriguez also promised investors that TTT would not hold trading positions open overnight, which Rodriguez ignored on multiple occasions, including once holding a trade open from February 2021 until April 2022, resulting in a catastrophic loss of more than $150,000, representing approximately 12.61% of TTT’s assets. Once it became clear to Rodriguez that TTT could not pay its investors their promised returns using trade profits, Rodriguez turned TTT into a Ponzi scheme and began using money from new investors to pay older investors their interest payments and principal redemptions.

    “Today, the defendant received just punishment for defrauding over 20 individual investors out of millions of dollars on hard-earned money,” U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Joseph Nocella said.

    In addition to the term of imprisonment, U.S. District Judge Ramon Reyes ordered Rodriguez to pay a forfeiture money judgment of $748,394 and to pay restitution of $2,305,256.

    “The defendant violated the trust his clients placed in him by falsely promising them a safe investment opportunity,” Nocella said. “Our Office and our law enforcement partners will continue to pursue justice for victims of financial crime who fall prey to individuals like Rodriguez who advance their greedy desires at the expense of others.”

    [ad_2]

    By Bill Parry

    Source link

  • Former executive of Mars candy subsidiary pleads guilty to stealing $28M from company

    [ad_1]

    BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — A former executive for a subsidiary of candymaker Mars Inc. pleaded guilty Thursday to fraud and tax charges in connection with his theft of $28 million from the company, federal prosecutors said.

    Paul Steed, 58, appeared in federal court in Bridgeport, Connecticut. He also agreed to pay $28.4 million in restitution to Mars and owes another $10 million in back taxes to the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Attorney for Connecticut David Sullivan said in a statement.

    Steed, of Stamford, Connecticut, who is free on $5 million bail, did not immediately return messages left at phone numbers and emails listed for him in public records. His lawyer, former U.S. Attorney for Connecticut Deirdre Daly, did not immediately return phone and email messages Thursday.

    A dual U.S. and Argentine citizen, Steed was once a respected sugar market expert for Mars Wrigley, where his last position was global price risk manager. The company is a subsidiary of McLean, Virginia-based Mars Inc., the maker of M&M’s, Snickers, Skittles, Altoids mints and Doublemint gum, as well as other food products and pet food.

    A federal indictment accused him of stealing from Mars beginning in about 2013 through various schemes, including diverting funds to companies he set up. Steed sent the lion’s share of the stolen funds, more than $26 million, to one of his companies, MCNA LLC, which was created to mimic an actual Mars company, Mars Chocolate North America, prosecutors said.

    Authorities say they have seized more than $18 million from Steed’s bank accounts, and Steed has agreed to forfeit the money. The government is also seeking to liquidate a home in Greenwich, Connecticut, that Steed allegedly purchased using $2.3 million of the stolen cash. Prosecutors say Steed sent another $2 million to Argentina, where he has relatives and owns a ranch.

    Steed pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud and one count of tax evasion. Sentencing is set for Dec. 9.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Indictment charges church leaders with swindling millions in military benefits

    [ad_1]

    SAVANNAH, Ga. — Leaders of a Georgia-based church with congregations in five states have been charged by federal prosecutors with swindling millions of dollars in veterans benefits from parishioners serving in the military.

    An indictment unsealed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Savannah charges House of Prayer Christian Churches of America founder Rony Denis and seven other church leaders with conspiring to commit bank fraud and wire fraud, as well as other federal crimes.

    Authorities say church leaders exploited soldiers and other congregation members by enrolling them in seminary programs that drained their G.I. Bill education benefits. They also say church officials used parishioners’ names on fraudulent mortgage applications to buy homes that the church then rented to congregation members.

    “The defendants are accused of exploiting trust, faith, and even the service of our nation’s military members to enrich themselves,” Paul Brown, the agent in charge of the FBI’s Atlanta office, said in a news release.

    Prosecutors say they don’t even know the real name of Denis, alleging he assumed that name after stealing another person’s identity in 1983. He founded House of Prayer roughly two decades ago. The church is headquartered in Hinesville, a southeast Georgia city that is home to thousands of veterans and Army soldiers serving at neighboring Fort Stewart. The congregation there grew to as many as 300 members, the indictment says.

    House of Prayer branched out, opening up to a dozen churches in five states, often near military bases, according to prosecutors. It also established affiliated Bible seminaries in Hinesville as well as Fayetteville, North Carolina; Killeen, Texas; and Tacoma, Washington.

    The indictment says the church focused on recruiting military service members to join their congregations and pressured them to spend their G.I. Bill education benefits on enrollment in its seminary programs.

    The seminaries in all four states earned House of Prayer leaders $23.5 million in G.I. Bill payments for tuition, fees, books and housing costs from 2013 and 2021, according to the indictment.

    Charges against Denis and others stem from just $3.2 million of those benefit payments made to House of Prayer’s two seminaries in Georgia. That is because the programs operated in Georgia under a religious exemption granted by state regulators. Prosecutors say that exemption prohibited the Georgia seminaries from receiving federal funding — including G.I. Bill benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

    The indictment says church officials lied to Georgia regulators in annual forms saying the seminaries received no federal money.

    Steven Sadow, listed in court records as an attorney for Denis, did not immediately return an email message seeking comment Thursday.

    A group called Veterans Education Success wrote to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in 2020, saying former students had complained that the House of Prayer seminaries had drained their benefits while providing them with little education. FBI agents served search warrants on several House of Prayer churches in 2022, according to local news outlets.

    The indictment says church officials also used its members as straw buyers to conceal the leaders’ purchase of rental properties. Prosecutors say church leaders falsified loan applications and closing documents and forged powers of attorney to buy and transfer homes that were rented to congregation members.

    The indictment says House of Prayer received $5.2 million in rent payments between 2018 and 2020, with some of that money being used to pay for Denis’ two homes as well as church leaders’ credit card bills.

    Denis was also charged with helping falsify his federal income tax returns for 2018, 2019 and 2020. On Wednesday, FBI agents and Columbia County sheriff’s deputies arrested the church founder at his mansion in Martinez west of Augusta, WRDW-TV reported.

    In a separate case, federal prosecutors also indicted Bernadel Semexant, a pastor at the House of Prayer church in Hinesville. The indictment unsealed Wednesday charges Semexant with sex abuse of a girl between the ages of 12 and 15. William Joseph Turner, listed in court records as the pastor’s attorney, did not immediately return an email message.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kim Dotcom loses latest bid to avoid U.S. extradition on Megaupload charges

    [ad_1]

    Wellington, New Zealand — A New Zealand court has rejected the latest bid by internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom to halt his deportation to the United States on charges related to his file-sharing website Megaupload.

    Dotcom had asked the High Court to review the legality of an official’s August 2024 decision that he should be surrendered to the U.S. to face trial on charges of copyright infringement, money laundering and racketeering. It was the latest chapter in a protracted 13-year battle by the U.S. government to extradite the Finnish-German millionaire from New Zealand.

    The Megaupload founder had applied for what in New Zealand is called a judicial review, in which a judge is asked to evaluate whether an official’s decision was lawful.

    Internet mogul Kim Dotcom leaves with his girlfriend Elizabeth Donelly following his extradition appeal at the High Court in Auckland, New Zealand, in an Aug. 29, 2016 file photo.

    KATE DWEK/AFP/Getty


    A judge on Wednesday dismissed Dotcom’s arguments that the decision to deport him was politically motivated and that he would face grossly disproportionate treatment in the U.S. In a written ruling, Justice Christine Grice also rejected Dotcom’s claim that New Zealand’s police were wrong to charge his business partners, but not him, under domestic laws – which likely yielded laxer sentences than if the men had been tried in the U.S.

    The latest decision could be challenged in the Court of Appeal, where a deadline for filing is Oct. 8. It wasn’t immediately clear if Dotcom would do so.

    One of his lawyers, Ron Mansfield, told Radio New Zealand that Dotcom’s team had “much fight left in us as we seek to secure a fair outcome,” but he didn’t elaborate.

    Neither Dotcom nor Mansfield responded to a request for comment from The Associated Press on Thursday.

    New Zealand’s government hasn’t disclosed what will happen next in the extradition process or divulged an expected timeline for Dotcom to be surrendered to the United States.

    The saga stretches back to the January 2012 arrest by New Zealand authorities of Dotcom in a dramatic raid on his Auckland mansion, along with other company officers, at the request of the FBI. U.S. prosecutors said Megaupload raked in at least $175 million, mainly from people who used the site to illegally download songs, television shows and movies, before the FBI shut it down earlier that year.

    Lawyers for Dotcom and the others arrested argued that it was the users of the site, founded in 2005, who chose to pirate material, not its founders. But prosecutors said the men were the architects of a vast criminal enterprise, with the Department of Justice describing it as the largest criminal copyright case in U.S. history.

    He has been free on bail in New Zealand since February 2012.

    Interviewed at his sprawling home by 60 Minutes in 2014, Dotcom told correspondent Bob Simon that he was inspired to seek his riches by the James Bond movies, “where, you know, some characters had private islands and super tankers converted into yachts and space stations and underwater homes. So, you know, I got inspired by that.”

    “But you’re not playing James Bond, you’re playing Dr. No,” suggested Simon.

    “That’s what everybody says,” replied the web entrepreneur.

    Dotcom and his business partners fought the FBI’s efforts to extradite them for years, including by challenging New Zealand law enforcement’s actions during the investigation and arrests. In 2021, however, New Zealand’s Supreme Court ruled that Dotcom and two other men could be surrendered.

    Under New Zealand law, it remained up to the country’s justice minister to decide if the extradition should proceed. The minister, Paul Goldsmith, ruled in August 2024 that it should.
       
    But by then, Dotcom was the only person whose fate remained in question. Two of his former business partners, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, pleaded guilty to charges against them in a New Zealand court in June 2023 and were sentenced to two and a half years in jail.

    In exchange, U.S. efforts to extradite them were dropped. Part of Dotcom’s latest legal bid challenged the police decision not to extend a plea deal under New Zealand laws to him, too.

    Grice rejected that, saying the choice to only charge Ortmann and van der Kolk in New Zealand was “a proper exercise of the Police’s discretion.” The jurist also dismissed Dotcom’s claim that Goldsmith’s extradition decision was politically motivated.

    Prosecutors earlier abandoned their extradition bid against a fourth Megaupload officer, Finn Batato, who was arrested in New Zealand. Batato returned to Germany, where he died from cancer in 2022.

    In November 2024, Dotcom said in a post on X that he had suffered a stroke. He wrote on X in July that he was making “good progress” in his recovery but still suffered from speech and memory impairments.

    Goldsmith’s decision that Dotcom should be extradited was made before the stroke. But Grice said the minister had considered other “significant health conditions” Dotcom faced and wasn’t wrong to conclude that these shouldn’t prevent him from being deported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Orleans mayor to appear in court on corruption charges tied to alleged affair

    [ad_1]

    NEW ORLEANS — New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell is scheduled to appear in federal court Wednesday for the first time since the Democrat was indicted on corruption charges stemming from an alleged romantic relationship with her bodyguard.

    She is expected to enter a plea in response to conspiracy, fraud and obstruction charges in what prosecutors described as a yearslong scheme to conceal an affair with her bodyguard as the two traveled, wined and dined together on taxpayers’ dime.

    Cantrell’s bodyguard, Jeffrey Vappie, has already pleaded not guilty to charges of wire fraud and making false statements after he was indicted in July 2024. He is scheduled to appear in court Friday for the additional charges.

    Cantrell, the first female mayor in New Orleans’ 300-year history, was elected twice but now becomes the city’s first mayor to be charged while in office in a state with a reputation for public corruption. She has only four months before she leaves office under term limits.

    The mayor once known for her outspoken persona has kept quiet about the charges in the weeks since the 18-count indictment against her and Vappie was announced in mid-August. She did not acknowledge the indictment during public appearances to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina late last month.

    Cantrell was already receding into the background of city affairs over the past year and offered no apparent resistance to President Donald Trump’s suggestion earlier this month to send the National Guard and federal agents to New Orleans even as other Democrats bristled.

    She’s also been cast as a pariah by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, who announced on Sept. 3 that Cantrell was suspended from involvements in federal transactions with HUD. The City Council issued a statement last week saying it had reassured the Housing Authority of New Orleans and the Office of Community Development that other city officials could sign federal contracts instead.

    At times, she and her allies have said the blowback she is experiencing is tinged by double standards she faces as a Black woman. Cantrell said earlier this year, before to the indictment, that she has faced “very disrespectful, insulting, in some cases kind of unimaginable” treatment.

    Cantrell and Vappie used WhatsApp for more than 15,000 messages, where they professed their love and plotted to harass a citizen who helped expose their relationship, delete evidence, make false statements to FBI agents “and ultimately to commit perjury before a federal grand jury,” acting U.S. Attorney Michael Simpson said. Vappie’s 14 trips with Cantrell cost taxpayers $70,000, not including Cantrell’s own travel costs, according to the indictment.

    In a WhatsApp exchange, the indictment says, Vappie recalled accompanying Cantrell to Scotland in October 2021 on a dreamy trip “where it all started.”

    Cantrell, whose husband died in 2023, has denied having anything more than a professional relationship with Vappie. She lashed out at associates who raised questions about the amount of time she spent with her bodyguard, including on wine-tasting trips and in a city-owned apartment, court records show.

    Cantrell joins the ranks of more than 100 people brought up on corruption charges in Louisiana in the past two decades, said Rafael Goyeneche, a former prosecutor who is president of the Metropolitan Crime Commission, a watchdog group.

    ___

    Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man from Jamaica pleads guilty to defrauding California woman out of $181K

    [ad_1]

    A man from Jamaica has pled guilty to multiple federal charges in connection with a seven-year sweepstakes scam that defrauded a California woman out of more than $180,000, prosecutors said.

    On Monday, the Department of Justice announced that 35-year-old Dwayne Anderson of Hanover, Jamaica pled guilty Friday to federal wire fraud charges in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota.

    Anderson was arrested by Jamaican authorities in July 2024 after being indicted on eight counts of wire fraud and was extradited to the U.S., where he was incarcerated pending trial.

    “The Department of Justice is committed to protecting Americans from the threats posed by transnational criminals and will vigorously pursue them, wherever they are located,” assistant attorney general Brett Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division said in a statement. “Anderson is the latest example in the Department’s ongoing efforts to combat these kinds of foreign based schemes and hold those involved accountable.”

    According to the plea agreement, Anderson admitted to the scheme to defraud the woman, which took place from 2010 to Sep. 2017.

    Anderson admitted he used phony names and contacted the victim via phone, text and emails, falsely saying she had won millions of dollars in a sweepstakes. The victim sent money to pay purported fees and taxes.

    Prosecutors said Anderson repeatedly contacted the victim with additional requests for money, saying she would receive her winnings if she paid the requested money. The victim lost $181,000, but did not receive any purported winnings.

    Authorities did not say where in California the victim was from.

    “Whether it happens in a rural community or a metropolitan area, the Department of Justice will ensure these criminals are held to account for their shameless targeting of vulnerable individuals and their hard-earned savings,” said U.S. Attorney Alison Ramsdell for the District of South Dakota.

    Prosecutors did not announce when Anderson would be sentenced. Officials previously said Anderson faced a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for each count.

    Anyone over the age of 60 who may be a victim of financial fraud is urged to contact the Department of Justice’s National Elder Fraud Hotline at 1-833-FRAUD-11 (1-833-372-8311). 

    [ad_2]

    Tim Fang

    Source link

  • Former executives get prison for nearly $2M defrauding of Arrow Electronics

    [ad_1]

    A former vice president at Colorado-based Arrow Electronics and the CEO of a contractor have been sentenced to federal prison for defrauding Arrow, a global provider of technology services and components, of nearly $2 million.

    Michael Vergato, 52, who worked for Arrow, was sentenced to 46 months in prison. Mark Perlstein, 60, was sentenced to 25 months and fined $15,000.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado said Monday that Vergato was convicted on six counts of wire fraud after a six-day trial in May. Perlstein pleaded guilty to wire fraud in June.

    The men were jointly ordered to make restitution of $1.94 million. Each will serve three years of supervised release after their prison terms.

    Authorities said according to Perlstein’s plea agreement and evidence presented at Vergato’s trial, the two devised a scheme to bill Arrow Electronics, based in Centennial, for performance tuning services. Vergato oversaw performance tuning of Arrow’s Oracle EBS data bases, including work by Perlstein’s company.

    Perlstein and Vergato billed the data management company for services purportedly done by a shell company created by Vergato. The company, Oracle Performance Tuning and Optimization, or OPTO, submitted 21 fraudulent contracts and invoices to Arrow for work that was never performed, according to authorities.

    Perlstein approved the invoices and wired payments to OPTO.

    Nearly $2 million in company funds were funneled to OPTO, authorities said. Perlstein and Vergato divided the proceeds and concealed their involvement by using personal email accounts, other corporate entities, and fake identities.

    Vergato used his stepdaughter’s identity to conduct business on behalf of OPTO, according to authorities. Tax records confirmed OPTO paid no salaries and issued no contractor forms.

    Vergato kept approximately $874,000 of the $1.94 million, spending it on luxury vehicles, credit card payments, retirement accounts, and rent. Perlstein personally received more than $1 million.

    “Corporate fraud of this magnitude undermines confidence in our business community and harms employees, customers, and shareholders alike,” said U.S.Attorney Peter McNeilly. “These sentences send a clear message: executives who abuse their authority for personal gain will be held accountable.”

    U.S. District Judge Nina Y. Wang presided over the sentencing. The FBI investigated the case. The prosecution was handled by assistant U.S attorneys Nicole Cassidy, Bradley Giles and Bob Brown.

    Get more business news by signing up for our Economy Now newsletter.

    Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    Judith Kohler

    Source link

  • Man indicted on international money laundering charge in Feeding Our Future case

    [ad_1]

    The Feeding Our Future fraud scheme continues to grow in Minnesota, as prosecutors have announced charges against a 74th person who is accused of being connected to the largest COVID-19 fraud scheme in the United States

    According to the Department of Justice, the 28-year-old Kenyan man has been indicted with one count of conspiracy to commit international money laundering. Prosecutors allege he helped launder and then send millions of dollars out of the United States from the fraud proceeds for his brother. He also allegedly helped hide fraud proceeds abroad, according to the DOJ, by investing the money into Kenyan real estate and by smuggling cash.

    The real estate included buying a 20% stake in a company, buying an apartment building in a neighborhood next to Nairobi National Park and buying land in a city bordering Somalia and Ethiopia 

    In a 10-page indictment, prosecutors detail conversations between the brothers, including images of more than $130,000 and $200,000 in cash plus a receipt showing a $300,000 money transfer. The document goes on to say a Minnesota woman flew to Nairobi, Kenya, in late December of 2021 and then married the suspect shortly after. She returned to the U.S. in January of 2022, and, according to the document, filed a petition to sponsor his immigration and permanent residency in the United States in June of 2023, listing him as her husband.

    More than a year later, the indictment says the suspect applied to enter the 2026 Diversity Visa lottery, which is run by the Department of State by choosing immigration applicants from countries with low numbers of immigrants. However, on his application, the man said he was unmarried. 

    The man’s brother was sentenced last month to 28 years in prison for his role in the fraud scheme, and still needs to be sentenced for a separate but related case. He has pleaded guilty to charges stemming from an attempted juror bribe during the trial of seven Feeding Our Future defendants. 

    “I share the outrage of my fellow Minnesotans at seeing money meant to feed hungry children converted into fortunes half a world away,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson in part. “It is another window into the many fraud schemes that have seeped into every corner of our state. But we cannot shrink from confronting this crisis. We must come together as Minnesotans and demand that the frauds stop now. We must protect the future of our children and our state.” 

    [ad_2]

    Krystal Frasier

    Source link

  • How to protect your identity – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    It happens every day. People who would never dream of giving out their credit card number after receiving a random call, text, or email give away personal information on social media for free—including birthdates, home addresses, and details often used to answer website security questions. 

    The consequences can be dire. If fraudsters open a credit card, line of credit, or mortgage in your name, for example, you may be held financially liable. Your credit score may be affected, making it very hard for you to get credit—such as a mortgage or car loan—when you need it. 

    “Identity theft is not new, but we are seeing more and more of it,” says Octavia Howell, vice-president and chief information security officer at credit bureau Equifax Canada. “We are seeing more and more scams perpetrated that enable identity theft to happen.”

    In some cases, identity theft is out of your control. Fraudsters may steal personal information through a cyber-attack on a company or government database, for example, or buy it on the dark web (hidden websites where criminals traffic in stolen data). 

    What can Canadians do to protect themselves from identity theft—and, if it happens, minimize the damage?

    6 safety tips to reduce your risk of identity theft

    “You can’t really prevent it,” Howell says, but you can make identity theft more difficult for criminals, causing them to move on to easier targets. Here are some preventative measures:

    • Get to know your digital profile. Google yourself to get a sense of what information about you is readily available on the internet. Then focus on protecting what is not public, such as usernames, passwords, account numbers, and your social insurance number (SIN). If a company or government department you deal with gets hacked, be especially wary. Change your passwords on sensitive accounts.
    • Be vigilant about your financial standing. Check credit card statements and credit reports often for unfamiliar charges. One common tactic is the “salami attack,” where criminals test out a credit card or other account number with a small purchase or transfer, perhaps just for $2. If it works, they’ll take a thicker slice next time. “If you don’t catch it, if you don’t shut it down, it’s just going to continue and in larger amounts,” Howell says.
    • Don’t connect to public wifi, especially when accessing your bank account or inputting credit card information.
    • Be wary when someone asks for personal information. Don’t respond to requests from unfamiliar people, companies or institutions. If the request appears to come from, say, your bank, a friend, or the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), contact them using a different line to check the legitimacy of the request. (Also read: How to protect your CRA account from scams.)
    • Shut down inactive and underused accounts. For example, close a car loan that has been paid off. Untended accounts provide openings for fraudsters.
    • Enable two-factor or multi-factor authentication to access your accounts wherever you can. That way, even if criminals have some personal information on you, they get stopped at this second level of security. “That is the thing that can sometimes protect you,” Howell says.

    Video Social media scams

    A convincing new scam to watch out for

    One kind of scam that’s become common over the past year is the “bank investigator” scam, Howell says. Victims receive a call or a text message from a 1-800 number where the caller poses as an investigator from a financial institution or credit bureau, or even the police. They claim to have detected fraud on your account and ask for authentication codes to access your devices, or even to collect your cards in person at your home. Sometimes there’s a second call from someone pretending to be a lawyer, and they seem to have corroborating information.

    Once they have enough personal details, the fraudsters might use them to take out a car loan or open a cell phone plan, for example, and then never pay for it—and the victim is stuck with the bill. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    What to do if someone has obtained credit in your name

    If you discover someone has used your identity to commit fraud, contact your credit card issuer and both of Canada’s credit bureaus to scrub fraudulent charges from your credit history as soon as possible, Howell emphasizes. Try to determine exactly what information has been compromised. Put fraud monitoring and fraud alerts on the account. Notify the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) and local police, especially if there’s a possibility of a visit to your home.

    If the fraud persists, it can ruin your credit rating. “That can be devastating,” Howell says. It can take months or even years to fully restore control over your identity.

    But the easiest course is prevention. The risk of identity theft is never zero, but you can reduce the odds it will happen to you.

    “You just don’t want to be an easy target,” Howell says. “You want to make it a little bit difficult for fraudsters, because there are easier targets out there.”

    Detect fraud earlier with Equifax’s credit monitoring 

    Equifax CompleteTM Protection is a subscription service that keeps a close on your credit report and can alert you if your identity has been compromised. Features of this service include:

    • Daily credit monitoring and alerts of key changes to your Equifax credit report, such as a new loan or credit card application
    • Social media monitoring by ZeroFox, to alert you to suspicious activity on your social media accounts
    • WebScan, which monitors the dark web for personal information you provide
    • Online data encryption by NordVPN and password management by NordPass
    • Parental controls from Bitdefender to restrict kids’ access to websites and apps
    • Device protection from Bitdefender to help stop phishing attempts and block viruses and malware
    • Support from an Equifax identity restoration specialist, if your identity is stolen
    • Identity theft insurance up to $1 million for out-of-pocket expenses (not available in Quebec)

    Equifax Complete Protection costs $34.95 per month. To learn more, visit the Equifax website.

    sponsored

    Equifax Complete Protection

    Equifax Complete Protection is a credit and cybersecurity protection service designed to help Canadians spot the signs of identity fraud faster.

    • Provides daily credit monitoring and alerts
    • Scans for your personal data on the dark web
    • Social media monitoring by industry leader ZeroFox

    Subscription price: $34.95 per month

    This article is sponsored.

    This is a paid post that is informative but also may feature a client’s product or service. These posts are written, edited and produced by MoneySense with assigned freelancers.

    Read more about fraud and scams:



    About Michael McCullough


    About Michael McCullough

    Michael is a financial writer and editor in Duncan, B.C. He’s a former managing editor of Canadian Business and editorial director of Canada Wide Media. He also writes for The Globe and Mail and BCBusiness.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link

  • How to protect your passwords from fraud and identity theft – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    At least until we are a completely passwordless society, however, usernames and passwords and an additional authentication factor are the best defense we have against the spread of digital fraud and identity theft. It’s worth putting in the effort to come up with and keep track of different passwords for each of our accounts.

    “Enabling strong authentication methods is one thing that I fight with even my own family members about,” says Octavia Howell, vice-president and chief information security officer for credit bureau Equifax Canada.

    Think of usernames, passwords, and multi-factor authentication as more lines of defense for your identity online, she advises. Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of protection by combining different authentication factors, such as something you know, something you have, or something you are. If one of the organizations you deal with suffers a data breach, enabling this extra layer of protection for your online identity can help contain the damage and prevent it from spreading to the other sites and accounts you use. They may help keep you from becoming a victim of identity theft.

    “It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when your information will be compromised. Most of your information is likely already compromised,” Howell says.

    Good authentication practices make it harder for fraudsters to obtain more information about you and assume your identity for the purposes of fraud. Here are Howell’s tips and dos and don’ts.

    Password practices to avoid

    Too many users simply reuse the same username and password across multiple accounts, Howell says. Say criminals gain access to your streaming service account. If you use the same password for an email account, it’s as good as compromised. That may expose more information on you, your friends and your associates.

    Another mistake is to use passwords that are easy to guess, such as your children’s name plus “123” and an exclamation point for a special character. Don’t include a pet’s name or a street address, either. Remember, hackers now get help from artificial intelligence (AI) to try thousands of combinations of these clues to gain access to your accounts. (Learn more about AI and identity theft.)

    Best password practices

    Howell recommends using multiple usernames and different passwords for all your online accounts. Here are some more tips to improve your password hygiene:

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    • Google yourself to get a sense of what information about you is readily available online—and don’t use any of it in your passwords.
    • Use phrases that are meaningful to you but no one else—for example, places, dates, or special numbers and activities that stick in your mind. Rearrange the words and numbers in ways that don’t repeat key phrases found online.
    • Consider using strong passwords provided by the platform, but only if you always access the site from the same device or if you use a password safe, also known as a password manager.
    • Use the strongest passwords for the sites containing the most sensitive information. An optometrist’s portal that just contains your eyeglass prescription need not be as complicated, but your online banking is a different matter. “You want to put the right level of security based on the information on each site,” Howell says.
    • If multi-factor authentication is available, take the time to enable it. This provides the extra layer of protection and can even serve as an early warning sign that your credentials have been compromised. 

    sponsored

    Equifax Complete Protection

    Equifax Complete Protection is a credit and cybersecurity protection service designed to help Canadians spot the signs of identity fraud faster.

    • Provides daily credit monitoring and alerts
    • Scans for your personal data on the dark web
    • Social media monitoring by industry leader ZeroFox

    Subscription price: $34.95 per month

    For extra password protection

    For added protection, consider subscribing to a broader suite of fraud prevention tools that includes a password manager. Equifax Complete Protection is a comprehensive identity protection service that includes credit monitoring, social media monitoring, device protection, and a password manager, among other features.

    Equifax Complete Protection’s password manager keeps track of your usernames and passwords in a safe place not tied to your email or browser. Each time you register a new account or change your password, simply load the keys into the password manager for future reference.

    A subscription to Equifax Complete Protection costs $34.95 per month.

    This article is sponsored.

    This is a paid post that is informative but also may feature a client’s product or service. These posts are written, edited and produced by MoneySense with assigned freelancers.

    Read more about fraud and scams:



    About Michael McCullough


    About Michael McCullough

    Michael is a financial writer and editor in Duncan, B.C. He’s a former managing editor of Canadian Business and editorial director of Canada Wide Media. He also writes for The Globe and Mail and BCBusiness.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link