ReportWire

Tag: Depression

  • “7 Ways to Parent in the Age of Brain Rot”


    Almost without exception, parents tell me the same story: Meltdowns, yelling, and door-slamming the moment their teen is forced to quit their video game, log off TikTok, or otherwise disengage with their preferred form of “brain rot.” The explosive reactions happen again and again, even after conversations and apologies for past transgressions.

    This behavior may look like defiance, but I argue that it’s a sign of dopamine withdrawal. No, that’s not far-fetched. We know that short-form content — think TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels — is carefully engineered to activate the brain’s dopamine centers.1 We also know that excessive consumption of short-form content is linked to poorer attention, depression, anxiety, stress, and loneliness. Difficulty disengaging and regulating emotions offline is a common result.2

    It stands to reason that youth with ADHD, whose brains are wired for novelty and stimulation, and who have difficulty regulating, feel the effects of these digital dopamine hits (and withdrawals) more intensely.

    📱 Read: Why Screens Mesmerize Our Teens — and How to Break the Trance

    So, what can you do to release the latest brain rot’s hold over your child? Once you understand how dopamine drives your child’s reactions, the next step is to guide that chemistry instead of fight it. The strategies below will help your child regain calm and control and build healthier reward patterns.

    1. The Power-Down Countdown

    “Five more minutes” doesn’t mean much to ADHD brains. Visuals say a lot more. Try color-changing timers, countdown apps, or lamps that fade from green to red to signal that it’s almost time to switch away from screens. You can even turn it into a challenge: Log off before the light turns red to earn more allowance.

    2. Dopamine Down Shift

    Abruptly shutting off a heavy stream of dopamine destabilizes ADHD brains. Instead, move your child into a dopamine replacement activity that is short, satisfying, and active. That can be shooting a few baskets, racing around the living room, drawing for five minutes, or solving a short puzzle — anything will do, if it’s a real-world activity that reinforces to kids that stimulation is possible outside of digital realms.

    3. Cool Down Bridge

    To further help your child’s brain transition, try a cool down bridge — a short sensory ritual — to help soften the landing off devices. Some kids pace while listening to a favorite song, others stretch or splash cold water on their face. It doesn’t matter what the in-between activity is, only that it signals to the brain that it is time to switch gears to a calmer state.

    🕹️ Read: An “Ethics Manual” for Your Teen’s Electronics

    4. Collaborative Control Plans

    Chances are that your teen doesn’t want to have meltdowns, either. When your child is calm, invite them to help you come up with a plan to transition away from screens and devices. Ask, “What would help you stop without becoming too upset?” or “How could we make this easier next time?” Ownership builds cooperation.

    5. Dopamine Diversity Days

    Make one day each week a screen-break day. Go hiking, cook together, build something, or play music. Try not to frame the day as a loss, but as something your family is gaining. Say, “We’re giving our brains a different kind of fuel today.”

    6. Reclaim Dopamine Autonomy

    The goal is not to eliminate games, screens, or content from your teen’s life. It is to help them understand what certain forms of content do to their brain, health, and ability to stay in control. You can appeal to your teen’s natural desire for autonomy by talking about digital tactics that are meant to hijack their decision-making:

    “That streak is trying to trick your brain into FOMO.”

    “That timer wants you to log back in.”

    Celebrate when they skip a reward on purpose. Challenge them to see missing a “daily login” as proof of control.

    7. Examine Your Own Brain Rot

    Teen screen use is directly correlated with parental screen use.3 While you may not consume the same content as your child, it’s likely that your screen time could use some work. Set screen-free zones and times, such as during dinner or while doing homework. Try to keep devices out of bedrooms. Use timers and rituals to transition away from devices, too, (and make sure your child sees you doing so). Encourage ongoing, open conversations about screen use, its pros and cons, and its impact on mental health.

    Brain Rot and Teen Screen Time: Next Steps


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    View Article Sources

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • “College Accommodations Are Not a Loophole. They Are a Civil Right.”


    The following is a personal essay that reflects the opinion of its author.

    December 10, 2025

    As a director of disability services in higher education, I am deeply troubled by the framing and assumptions of such services in “Accommodation Nation” an article recently in The Atlantic that positions college accommodations as a burden, casts suspicion on students with disabilities, and erodes decades of progress made by disability advocates who have fought for equal access to education.

    Accommodations Are Not “Easily Gamed”

    It’s true that the number of students seeking accommodations has risen over the years as rates of diagnosed ADHD, anxiety, and other conditions have increased. But this is because diagnostic tools have improved dramatically, leading to increased identification. Increased identification is not a sign of manipulation, as The Atlantic article insinuates. It is the result of better science and long-overdue recognition.

    Yet articles like “Accommodation Nation” use these realities to cast doubt on students’ lived experiences. At my institution, students must go through multiple steps before accommodations are considered. They complete a detailed online application, provide documentation from licensed professionals that identify which major life activities are impacted by their condition(s), and outline specific functional limitations. I regularly follow up with providers to better understand the applicant’s diagnosis. Then I meet with the student to explore their needs, discuss barriers, and determine appropriate accommodations.

    Free Guide: How to Get Accommodations in College

    This is not a casual or “easily gamed” process, as The Atlantic suggests. It is a careful, legally grounded, individualized assessment rooted in education, awareness, and advocacy.

    The Right to Education, Not Exploitation

    What concerns me most about The Atlantic article is how it reinforces the false narrative that students with disabilities are inflating their needs or receiving unearned advantages. Disability services offices are not handing out “perks.” Rather, we are ensuring that students can access the same educational opportunities as their peers. That is the foundation of civil rights laws.

    The disability rights movement began in the 1960s and, before that, many individuals with disabilities were banned from education altogether. Today, that access to education translates to employment, independence, and contributions back to society. Undermining accommodations threatens to send us backward at a moment when the Department of Education itself is being dismantled and national conversations around mental health, ADHD, and neurodivergence are already steeped in stigma.

    Students with disabilities are not a burden. They are welcome at the table of higher education.

    Read: 4 Hallmarks of ADHD-Supportive Colleges

    Accessibility Is Not a Loophole

    One in four Americans lives with a disability. At my small college, roughly 25% of students are registered with disability services; I suspect there are another 10% who would qualify, but choose not to come forward because of stigma. Smaller schools often attract students seeking supportive, high-touch environments, and many students come to our offices only after years of struggling without assistance. For some, college is the first time they have access to health insurance, counseling services, and the availability of diagnostic testing.

    On that note, the Atlantic article also ignores pressing questions about youth mental health. Beyond increased awareness and better diagnostic tools, why are today’s young people experiencing higher rates of trauma  and mental health challenges? Could it have anything to do with the fact that today’s college students — who have grown up with active-shooter drills, unfettered access to largely unregulated social media platforms, and who are entering adulthood in an economically unstable, politically volatile, and rapidly changing world — have endured circumstances no previous cohort has faced?

    Ultimately, “Accommodation Nation” fails to acknowledge that an increase in student support does not signal abuse. It shows that students finally feel safe enough to seek services to bolster their education. It signals progress. At a time when students with disabilities already navigate bias, skepticism, and physical and attitudinal barriers, we do not need narratives that delegitimize their existence or imply their success is suspicious.

    We need investment, compassion, and the understanding that accessibility is not a loophole, but a civil right. We should be examining why students need support, not doubting whether they deserve it. We should be investing in and expanding accessibility, not undermining it. And we should be building universities that see disability not as an inconvenience, but as a natural and valuable part of the human experience.

    Jillian Lillibridge Heilman, Ph.D., CRC, is a disability expert with more than 20 years of experience in disability education and advocacy. She is the Director of Student Accessibility Services at a small New England college and provides training to other colleges and private organizations that seek to better serve individuals with disabilities.

    College Accommodations: More Resources


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • “Stuck in the Upside Down: How Stranger Things Captures Life with ADHD”


    I finally got into Stranger Things. Not because of the terror and gore, but because the show, to my surprise, lays out perfect metaphors for ADHD. Like me, its characters know a great deal about what it means to contend with an invisible force, seemingly of another dimension.

    The Upside Down Is My Normal

    When 12-year-old Will Byers goes missing from the fictional town of Hawkins, Indiana, in 1983, his family and friends don’t realize that he’s actually right there beside them. He’s just in an alternate dimension called the Upside Down, which parallels the real world. The Upside Down is a colder version of home, a world of intense electrical storms, strange bloodthirsty creatures, and darkness.

    Living with ADHD is a lot like being in the Upside Down. I’m amongst people in the real world, but they don’t see what’s in my dimension. While others go smoothly from Point A to Point B, I have fog, toxic quicksand, and squelching monsters that keep me from moving freely.

    Stuck in a Loop

    “Stuckness” appears throughout the show. Sure, there are the characters who become stuck in the Upside Down. But the Upside Down itself is also stuck. Even as time in the show’s world moves ahead, the Upside Down stays in 1983. Then there’s the mother of Eleven (a young girl with psychokinetic abilities) who is stuck in a catatonic state, caught in a mental loop that replays the events leading to her daughter’s kidnapping.

    If my ADHD brain had a dial, “stuck in a loop” would be its default setting. It cycles endlessly through memories of childhood starring young me as a brilliant, shining disappointment. This loop replayed with intensity after I was diagnosed with ADHD in my 20s. I experienced my memories with a fresh set of eyes, mourning all the time I struggled socially and emotionally without understanding why. I become enmeshed in the loop less often these days, but it remains a constant presence.

    ☁️ Read: Getting Unstuck from the Cloud of ADHD Stuck-ness

    The Mind Flayer

    The powerful, massive, spider-like monster of the Upside Down — the show’s antagonist for most of its run — can connect to and command surrounding creatures and entities even as they venture outside the alternate dimension.

    Sometimes, living with ADHD feels like living with a creature that’s flaying my body and mind. It tears through my brain, causing symptoms and challenges I’d rather bypass. But sometimes my ADHD acts like a living, breathing partner. Like when it drives me into hyperfocus and allows me to be extremely, but selectively, productive.

    Vines and Tunnels

    When Will becomes possessed by the Mind Flayer, he begins to erratically draw a series of tunnels and vines. His drawings, initially dismissed, are later discovered to be a map of the Upside Down growing beneath the town. The tunnels twist and turn, and the vines have minds of their own.

    ADHD thinking patterns can operate like the vines and tunnels of the Upside Down. One thought gives birth to another, growing out of hand, spreading until I burn out. Or, without warning, a thought can stop. A brilliant idea becomes a dead end, abandoned.

    💡 Read: The True Value of ADHD Side Quests, Rabbit Holes, and Tangents

    Who’s In Your Party?

    The teen protagonists of the show call themselves the Party, borrowing from a Dungeons & Dragons term for an allied group of players. The party and the entire town unite to confront the forces besieging their home.

    When no one else knows I’m drowning, even those closest to me, I remind myself that the Upside Down is invisible. I need to let them know it’s trapped me. When I do, I have faith they’ll show up and help me fight every scary monster. When we feel broken, we can heal together.

    Life is better with a Party.

    Understanding ADHD: Resources


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • “The Secret to Communicating with Rejection-Sensitive Kids”


    We all have childhood memories of upsetting an adult — of knowing we’re in trouble for disappointing a grown-up in one way or another. We remember the weight of our guilt and feeling like we were bad to the core.

    As much as we remember the sighs, yells, and criticisms, we also remember the moments we were treated with compassion and understanding. The adults in our lives may not have known it, but in those empathetic moments, they were applying the principles of nonviolent communication with us.

    Nonviolent communication (NVC) is an approach that children with ADHD and rejection sensitivity respond especially well to, in my view. As a parent with ADHD raising a child with ADHD, it’s an approach I try to embody every day.

    What Is Nonviolent Communication?

    NVC, created by Marshall Rosenberg, Ph.D., is designed to help people manage conflict (in relationships, work, school, etc.) and express themselves without placing blame, shame, or guilt on others.

    NVC centers on four components:

    • Observation: focusing on what you see or hear, not on evaluations or labels.
    • Feelings: identifying and expressing your actual emotions, not thoughts disguised as feelings.
    • Needs: recognizing that feelings arise from needs being met or unmet.
    • Requests: asking for clear, specific actions to help meet needs.

    [Get This Free Download: How to Respond to Your Child’s Defiance]

    There is much more to NVC, but its most important principle is that it requires us to take off our “adult” hats and become equals with our children. As someone who was raised in a household where children were seen, not heard, I know this is easier said than done. But a child cannot learn respect until they experience respect. And children learn to communicate effectively by being communicated with effectively.

    5 Ways to Practice Nonviolent Communication with ADHD Kids

    Follow these steps to incorporate the principles of NVC into your daily interactions with your child and improve your relationship with them.

    1. Use “I” statements.

    Instead of: Stop leaving your things everywhere! I tripped over your stuff again! Don’t be so lazy!

    Nonviolent reaction: I see your shoes and backpack are on the floor. I feel frustrated when I trip over your things. I also get hurt. Please take the next minute to put your things away.

    2. Avoid hyperbole.

    Try not to exaggerate your child’s behaviors and avoid absolutes like “always” or “never.” Be mindful of thoughts masquerading as feelings.

    Instead of: You always leave the fridge door open and walk away! You never listen to me when I ask you to be more careful. I feel like you just don’t care.

    Nonviolent reaction: I came home today and found the fridge door open. I am annoyed that some of our food is now spoiled, and we need to replace it.

    [Read: Your Positive Parenting Toolkit Has Arrived]

    3. I feel __ because

    Connect your feelings to your needs to help your child see why something matters.

    Instead of: Why are you making so much noise? Can’t you see that I’m trying to work?

    Nonviolent reaction: I feel tense because I need to focus on my work but keep getting distracted by these noises. Would you lower your voice/tablet volume or move to another room so I can finish?

    4. Focus on responsibility, not blame.

    Let’s take it back to the open fridge door example of above.

    Instead of: The food is all spoiled and it’s all your fault.

    Nonviolent reaction: We’ll need to buy fresh food. Can you help by contributing from your allowance?

    This principle is absolutely important for our rejection-sensitive children. Shifting from blame to responsibility reduces paralyzing shame and lets children focus on how they can make things better.

    5. Let your child speak.

    Even if they are whiny or hormonal. Even if they cry and seem irrational. Even if they blame everything else under the sun for their behavior, you must let your child speak. Your job is to listen and validate.

    Instead of: It’s not my fault you don’t get your homework done on time! If you can’t speak to me with respect, then I don’t want to speak to you at all.

    Nonviolent reaction: I hear you saying you forget about your homework and could use a reminder. I also hear you saying that it’s challenging to focus on more work after school. Let’s come up with a plan so you don’t fall behind or feel overwhelmed.

    Paraphrasing your child’s words is extremely important. It calms children when they hear their own words echoed back to them with understanding. It shows them that they are worthy — because they are — of being heard.

    Nonviolent Communication: ADHD Parenting Resources


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • 11 Grounding Techniques That Help Me Regulate

    “Regulation is the foundation of everything, I’ve learned. Though the conditions I live with are about dysregulation to their core, I’ve managed to create a toolkit of grounding techniques and other calming strategies that work for me.”

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • An Ode to Music — My Lifelong ADHD Companion


    “Nothing activates the brain so extensively as music,” said famed neurologist and musicphile Oliver Sacks, M.D. As an avid music fan with ADHD, I have lived this truth from a young age.

    I grew up in a music-obsessed family. I was named after Roberto Carlos, the renowned Brazilian singer. (Another option was “Fernando,” after the ABBA song.) My father was a serious vinyl collector, and rarely was our home silent. My parents instilled in my siblings and me an appreciation for all music, teaching us never to dismiss any artist or song but rather to express, “This music doesn’t speak to me now.”

    I’ll never forget the first time I heard “We Got the Beat” by the Go-Go’s. The opening drum line, fast and strong, flipped a switch in my 10-year-old brain. I had never been instantly hooked like that by anything. Their album, Beauty and the Beat, was the first I ever bought, and it helped carve out my own musical identity. (All these decades later, the magic of this album endures.) From The Cure’s moody sounds and Sinéad O’Connor’s raw vocals to Tito Puente’s vibrant rhythms and Linda Ronstadt’s soulful voice, I listened to it all, and I still love discovering new music.

     

    Fifth-grade me may have been a little dramatic when I wrote this in a school essay: “Music is my religion, my drug, my validation, and my salvation.” Theatrical, but not wrong. As a kid with undiagnosed ADHD, I innately understood that music was more than enjoyable; it was necessary. I gravitated toward it to manage symptoms I later recognized as ADHD.

    I turned facts into songs for better recall. While studying, I drummed on random surfaces, and by test day, I “felt” the rhythm again to recall what I learned. My earliest attempts at writing were supercharged by music. I distinctly remember staring at a blank page, frozen, unable to start my assignment. Something compelled me to play Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust” on my tape recorder. The iconic opening bassline unblocked my brain and lifted me out of paralysis. I am forever grateful to my dad, who could have shut off the music, but believed me when I said it was helping. Sure enough, the essay poured out in minutes. Today, I always have music — sometimes soft, but often loud and cacophonous — playing when I need to focus. In fact, I wrote my dissertation to bands like Green Day and Ministry.

    Looking back, I admire how my parents used music creatively to support me. To keep me from lingering too long in the shower, my mom put a radio in the bathroom and said, “If you listen to more than four songs, then you’re in the shower too long.” My dad, who liked to listen to music in layers, replayed songs so I could focus on different instruments each time. He didn’t know that this way of appreciating music was a form of mindfulness – just what my ADHD brain needed.

    Music has a special place in my life. I firmly believe in its power to connect, heal, and reveal the best in us. I’m passionate about sharing this truth, including with my patients. Whether creating playlists to validate feelings or dancing away social anxiety, I help others lean into music to improve their lives.

    My ask: be an open-minded listener. Try a genre you’ve never explored or revisit a song you once dismissed — it might speak differently to you today. Here’s to discovering the next song that lights up your brain.

    The Power of Music for ADHD: Resources

     


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • The Damage Already Being Done


    The following is a personal essay that reflects the opinion of its author.

    November 24, 2025

    U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has never attended medical school. He has no prior experience in formulating public health policy and no training in neurodevelopmental disorders. His opinions on the causes of autism have no basis in science and have drawn widespread criticism from medical and public health experts for their inaccuracies.

    And Kennedy was wrong last week to order the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to change its website guidance on autism and vaccines. It now claims, without credible evidence, that “scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism,” an alarming reversal of the CDC’s longstanding position based on decades of research.

    The American Academy of Pediatrics, along with 40 other medical, health, and patient advocate groups, responded immediately with a letter chastising the CDC for “promoting the outdated, disproven idea that vaccines cause autism.” For the last 25 years, dozens of rigorous, large-scale studies have found no evidence of an association between childhood vaccines and autism.1, 2, 3 These include a large-scale Danish study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which involved more than 537,000 participants (all the children born in Denmark over a seven-year period)4 as well as a meta-analysis involving cohort and case-control studies and more than 1.2 million children.5

    [News: Anti-Vaccine Activist David Geier (Not a Doctor) Heads HHS Study on Vaccines and Autism Despite Past Censure]

    “There is no link between autism and vaccines,” wrote the Autism Science Foundation on its website last Thursday. “This is consistent across multiple studies, repeated in different countries around the world, with different individuals, at different ages including infancy, and using different model systems. In addition, we know that some biological features of autism can be found prenatally, before any vaccines are administered.”

    We know that autism is a highly heritable neurodevelopmental disorder. More than 100 genes have been associated with the condition, but experts agree that genetics and environmental factors likely both contribute. Controlling for a host of potentially confounding factors — including a high comorbidity rate with ADHD6, 7 — is critical in uncovering causes of autism, and it is difficult to accomplish.

    Meanwhile, untrained and unqualified individuals continue to mistake association with causality when reviewing research studies on autism. For example, President Donald Trump recently claimed that a mother’s Tylenol use in pregnancy causes autism in her offspring, citing a study, co-authored by a Harvard epidemiologist, that found a small association between use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of autism in children. This association, however, was not shown to be causal, a fact explicitly stated by the lead author of the review, Diddier Prada, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

    “We show that acetaminophen is associated with a higher risk, but not causing it. Those are very different things,” Prada said in an interview with The Washington Post.

    [Tylenol and Autism Are Not Causally Linked, Researchers Confirm]

    These false claims about autism, published on the CDC website and broadcast at White House press conferences, have an immediate and profoundly negative impact on autistic people and their loved ones. The damage being done is not theoretical. It is real, it is measurable, and our readers are telling us about it right now. Here are some of their stories.

    “Both my kids, 14 and 16, are autistic. My daughter came home from school crying shortly after the absurd proclamation. She was insistent that I have all references to autism and ADHD stricken from her school and medical records. The more she cried and talked, the clearer the picture became. She was worried that the Trump administration was creating a list of kids with autism, like her and her brother, so they could be rounded up and put into concentration camps. It took a couple of normalizing hours of conversation for her to calm down. As a parent, when you need to hold your 16-year-old until they stop quaking because of something said by the leader of our country, I get closer to the decision that our family needs to leave the U.S. While I consoled my daughter, I went through the gamut of emotions with anger and fear the predominant ones.”

    “We live in Ireland, and even here my autistic child was affected. He asked me, as his mother, ‘Did you do this to me? Did you take a drug that caused my autism?’ He was emotionally dysregulated for days, and very angry toward me as everyone in school was discussing it.”

    “My 8-year-old autistic son was watching a news story about the Tylenol-autism claims. He looked at me and said, ‘Wait, I’m autistic. Do I have a disease?’ I affirmed him the same way I always do when he struggles with one of his diagnoses, telling him he is a gift from God to us.”

    “My son did have questions, as he is 14, and we didn’t get the diagnosis until he was 13. I felt relieved that I didn’t take Tylenol with his pregnancy, and I did with my other two pregnancies. The other two children are not diagnosed with ASD. I don’t think that the statements made by Kennedy and Trump are sound, but that speaks to the fact that mother shaming still exists when children have disabilities. I am a school counselor and I know better, and it is disheartening to think this still goes on. My son was happy I didn’t take Tylenol, however, he was open to me explaining how studies and research works.”

    “Our child is a voracious consumer of science and political videos, plus the autistic kids at her school have a loosely connected network for mutual support. They are smart kids. They just laughed at the stupidity of the pronouncement.”

    “This is my AuDHD daughter’s course of study, so she understands the flawed conflation of causation and correlation. It has been more difficult to speak with relatives about it, especially those who are taking this information at face value. Mostly, I have given up trying to change their minds, but am more vocal with the younger relatives who may become pregnant or have a significant other who may become pregnant on the importance of treating high fever during pregnancy.”

    “We’ve had very animated conversations about this. We are both outraged by this and find it difficult to fathom how someone running a country can say such wildly inaccurate things without any evidence.”

    Anni Layne Rodgers is General Manager at ADDitude.

    View Article Sources

    Anni Layne Rodgers

    Source link

  • What data tells us about antidepressants and mass violence

    No study has shown that antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors — SSRIs — cause people to be violent. 

    But for years, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has floated antidepressants as a potential cause of violence, including mass shootings. 

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “is finally confronting the long-taboo question of whether SSRIs and other psychoactive drugs contribute to mass violence,” Kennedy said in a Nov. 4 X post

    Health officials have long monitored the side effects of such drugs, which millions of people use. Although future research could uncover new findings, existing data points don’t reflect that SSRIs cause mass violence. Here’s what we do know. 

    #1: Nearly 29 million U.S. adults took antidepressants for depression in 2023. 

    SSRIs treat mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brand name drugs such as Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa and Lexapro are all SSRIs. 

    Depression is common, and many people use SSRIs. 

    In 2023, the most recent year for which there’s CDC data, about 11% of U.S. adults took prescription medication for depression. The U.S. Census Bureau estimated about 262.3 million adults lived in the U.S. that year. That means that in 2023, about 28.85 million adults took prescription medication for depression. That number doesn’t include minors who took such medications, or adults who took antidepressants to treat conditions other than depression. 

    #2: Mass violence is rare.

    In the same way there’s no single definition of a mass shooting, there is no one definition of mass violence. 

    Experts who study it, however, say mass shootings are rare. They’re also what Dr. James Knoll, director of forensic psychiatry at SUNY Upstate Medical University and Dr. Ronald Pies, a psychiatry professor at Tufts University School of Medicine, described as “disproportionately an American phenomenon.” SSRI use, in contrast, is not unique to the U.S.

    #3: Since 1988, SSRI use has increased, but violent crime has not. 

    Prozac, the first SSRI available in the United States, launched in 1988. Since then, antidepressant use has increased significantly. From 1988 to 2008, the CDC reported a nearly 400% increase in antidepressant use.

    Although no one factor can explain national crime trends, an increase in SSRI use has not resulted in more violent crime. Violent crime rates rose from 1988 to 1991, but then began a more consistent downward trend

    In 1988, the violent crime rate per 100,000 people was 640.6. In 2023, it was 363.8

    We haven’t seen a massive increase in violent crime in the United States or Europe since SSRIs were introduced, despite millions of people being prescribed the drugs, said forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gwen Adshead. 

    #4: The people most likely to take SSRIs aren’t the most likely to perpetrate mass violence.

    If using SSRIs made a person more likely to commit acts of mass violence, we’d expect the demographics of SSRI users to better correspond with the demographics of people who commit mass violence. 

    That’s not the case. 

    “We have not seen an increase in violent crime by the general population of people with depression and anxiety,” Adshead said. “The demographic of people who kill or commit violent crimes have not changed.” 

    For example: Data shows men are more likely to perpetrate violence, but women are more likely to be prescribed SSRIs.

    “If there was a connection or link, one would expect it to be pronounced, or at least much greater than we are seeing,” Knoll previously told PolitiFact. “Why do we not see increased violence in women? People over 60?”

    If SSRIs were linked to mass violence, Dr. Ragy Girgis, a Columbia University clinical psychiatry professor who studies mass violence, said we’d expect people who perpetrate mass violence to be more likely to be treated with SSRIs than the general population. 

    “The data show that people who perpetrate mass violence are actually less likely to have received treatment with an SSRI,” Girgis said. 

    An analysis of Columbia University’s Mass Murder Database found that about 4% of mass shooting perpetrators in the past 30 years had used antidepressants in their lifetime — a rate below that of the general population.

    #5: Research has not proved SSRIs cause mass violence. 

    Some studies show an association between SSRI use and violence, but association is not the same as causation

    When Knoll and Pies reviewed existing data, they found no evidence establishing a direct causal connection between antidepressants and violence. 

    “Most violence, especially fatal violence, involves a complex interaction between two people,” Adshead said. “Drugs, prescribed or otherwise, can affect people’s mental states and are known to increase violence risk.”

    Some data shows that SSRIs can increase impulsivity for some people while other data has shown SSRIs help reduce it.

    RELATED: RFK Jr. has targeted antidepressants for kids. How do SSRIs work?

    Source link

  • Why A Full Dopamine Detox Isn’t Possible & What To Do Instead

    The terms detox and cleanse can be eye-catching, as their modern definition implies a better, healthier you on the other side of whatever program you’ve signed up for. But are they ever actually more beneficial than simply working on healthier habits one day at a time?

    Source link

  • Eating Nuts May Boost Your Serotonin Levels, Study Finds

    Some of the participants were given pretzels and others were given a mix of tree nuts (almonds, Brazil nuts, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamias, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios, and walnuts). At the end of the study period, the researchers analyzed fecal and blood plasma samples to better understand the effects of the different snacks. 

    Source link

  • Want To Be Happier? Research On Sleep Says To Do This

    As the study’s lead author, Cara Palmer, Ph.D., explains in a news release, “This study represents the most comprehensive synthesis of experimental sleep and emotion research to date, and provides strong evidence that periods of extended wakefulness, shortened sleep duration, and nighttime awakenings adversely influence human emotional functioning.”

    Source link

  • Ideal vs. Normal Cholesterol Levels  | NutritionFacts.org

    Having a “normal” cholesterol level in a society where it’s normal to die from a heart attack isn’t necessarily a good thing.

    “Consistent evidence” from a variety of sources “unequivocally establishes” that so-called bad LDL cholesterol causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease—strokes and heart attacks, our leading cause of death. This evidence base includes hundreds of studies involving millions of people. “Cholesterol is the cause of atherosclerosis,” the hardening of the arteries, and “the message is loud and clear.” “It’s the Cholesterol, Stupid!” noted the editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, William Clifford Roberts, whose CV is more than 100 pages long as he has published about 1,700 articles in peer-reviewed medical literature. Yes, there are at least ten traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis, as seen below and at 1:11 in my video How Low Should You Go for Ideal LDL Cholesterol?, but, as Dr. Roberts noted, only one is required for the progression of the disease: elevated cholesterol.

    Your doctor may have just told you that your cholesterol is normal, so you’re relieved. Thank goodness! But, having a “normal” cholesterol level in a society where it’s normal to have a fatal heart attack isn’t necessarily good. With heart disease, the number one killer of men and women, we definitely don’t want to have normal cholesterol levels; we want to have optimal levels—and not optimal by current laboratory standards, but optimal for human health.

    Normal LDL cholesterol levels are associated with the hidden buildup of atherosclerotic plaques in our arteries, even in those who have so-called “optimal risk factors by current standards”: blood pressure under 120/80, normal blood sugars, and total cholesterol under 200 mg/dL. If you went to your doctor with those kinds of numbers, you’d likely get a gold star and a lollipop. But, if your doctor used ultrasound and CT scans to actually peek inside your body, atherosclerotic plaques would be detected in about 38% of individuals with those kinds of “optimal” numbers.

    Maybe we should define an LDL cholesterol level as optimal only when it no longer causes disease. What a concept! When more than a thousand men and women in their 40s were scanned, having an LDL level under 130 mg/dL left them with atherosclerosis throughout their body, and that’s a cholesterol level at which most lab tests would consider normal.

    In fact, atherosclerotic plaques were not found with LDL levels down around 50 or 60, which just so happens to be the levels most people had “before the introduction of western lifestyles.” Indeed, before we started eating a typical American diet, “the majority of the adult population of the world had LDLs of around 50 mg per deciliter (mg/dL)”—so that’s the true normal. “Present average values…should not be regarded as ‘normal.’” We don’t want to have a normal cholesterol based on a sick society; we want a cholesterol that is normal for the human species, which may be down around 30 to 70 mg/dL or 0.8 to 1.8 mmol/L.

    “Although an LDL level of 50 to 70 mg/dl seems excessively low by modern American standards, it is precisely the normal range for individuals living the lifestyle and eating the diet for which we are genetically adapted.” Over millions of years, “through the evolution of the ancestors of man,” we’ve consumed a diet centered around whole plant foods. No wonder we have a killer epidemic of atherosclerosis, given the LDL level “we were ‘genetically designed for’ is less than half of what is presently considered ‘normal.’”

    In medicine, “there is an inappropriate tendency to accept small changes in reversible risk factors,” but “the goal is not to decrease risk but to prevent atherosclerotic plaques!” So, how low should you go? “In light of the latest evidence from trials exploring the benefits and risks of profound LDLc lowering, the answer to the question ‘How low do you go?’ is, arguably, a straightforward ‘As low as you can!’” “‘Lower’ may indeed be better,” but if you’re going to do it with drugs, then you have to balance that with the risk of the drug’s side effects.

    Why don’t we just drug everyone with statins, by putting them in the water supply, for instance? Although it would be great if everyone’s cholesterol were lower, there are the countervailing risks of the drugs. So, doctors aim to use statin drugs at the highest dose possible, achieving the largest LDL cholesterol reduction possible without increasing risk of the muscle damage the drugs may cause. But when you’re using lifestyle changes to bring down your cholesterol, all you get are the benefits.

    Can we get our LDL low enough with diet alone? Ask some of the country’s top cholesterol experts what they shoot for, “and the odds are good that many will say 70 or so.” So, yes, we should try to avoid the saturated fats and trans fats found in junk foods and meat, and the dietary cholesterol found mostly in eggs, but “it is unlikely anyone can achieve an LDL cholesterol level of 70 mg/dL with a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet alone.” Really? Many doctors have this mistaken impression. An LDL of 70 isn’t only possible on a healthy enough diet, but it may be normal. Those eating strictly plant-based diets can average an LDL that low, as you can see here and at 5:28 in my video.

    No wonder plant-based diets are the only dietary patterns ever proven to reverse coronary heart disease in a majority of patients. And their side effects? You get to feel better, too! Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that more plant-based dietary patterns significantly improve psychological well-being and quality of life, with improvements in depression, anxiety, emotional well-being, physical well-being, and general health.

    For more on cholesterol, see the related posts below.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • The Underrated Nutrients Your Brain Needs For A Better Mood

    If you’ve ever felt your mood dip and wondered whether food could make a difference, the answer might be yes. New research1 suggests that what’s on your plate may play a bigger role in your mental health than you think—not just in terms of energy or longevity, but also for mood resilience.

    Source link

  • “When My Neurodivergent Advocacy Triggers Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria”


    As an autistic woman with ADHD, the horrific recent narratives around autism have left me bereft. I am exhausted, terrified, overstimulated, and vulnerable. My justice sensitivity is through the roof, and I feel uncertain and unsafe.

    When my passion is ignited and my emotions are triggered, writing is my tried-and-true release. Since I first learned about my own ADHD and autism as an adult, I’ve devoted myself to dismantling misinformation about neurodivergence through writing. I share my thoughts on multiple platforms. I amplify other AuDHD voices and spend hours researching and writing, swirling learned information with lived experience. The work has been immensely rewarding, connecting me with community and other AuDHD folks who tell me that my writing has helped them. That, in itself, makes it worth the effort.

    But there’s another side to advocacy that I’ve come to experience more and more in this political climate: rejection sensitive dysphoria (RSD) – the bane of my existence and truly one of the most disabling aspects of my ADHD.

    Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria and Gut-Punch Advocacy

    Fear of rejection and criticism — real or perceived — has always affected me deeply. RSD shows up for me as physical symptoms like nausea and vomiting, sweating, shaking, and extreme restlessness. My nervous system kicks into overdrive. I pace. I obsess. I’m left with little mental capacity for daily tasks. When I’m out of the proverbial woods, I often sob with gratitude, then sleep it off for 24 hours. So, when I say RSD is paralyzing, I am not being hyperbolic.

    My writing on neurodivergence is not terribly controversial or polarizing, but it’s been harshly brought to my attention that some people have problems with me. The number of vitriolic comments I’ve deleted on my Substack is astounding. I’ve endured spiteful attacks and criticism simply for sharing my personal experiences and thoughts as an AuDHD woman. Attacked simply for stating the truth, with sources to back it up. I am consistently startled by the fact that many people really, really hate information. Many people are highly opposed to listening and learning.

     

    I find myself feeling like two distinct people. One is a leader, a fearless and fierce advocate who will stop at nothing to dismantle and correct harmful narratives. The other is a scared little girl crouched in the corner, shaking like a leaf.

    I get dreadful nausea just before hitting the publish button. The fear of criticism from faceless bullies and the very people whose minds I am attempting to change rises in dizzying waves. As reposts and positive comments roll in, the nausea decreases, but one hurtful comment in a sea of praise sends me crawling back to my corner. I cry, I rage. I become consumed with my two selves; the one who insists that I persevere and continue to be a voice for my community, and the one who tells me to run, to hide, to place self-preservation at the top of my list.

    We’ll Make It Through, As We Always Do

    The reality of being AuDHD is that I burn for justice, am sickened by the lack of it, and become inflamed by fallacies. But inextricably woven into that reality is another one: I fear rejection so intense that a single comment can leave me bedridden.

    Friends, I would love to end this post with a solution to quiet RSD so we can advocate tirelessly. Sadly, there is no panacea except to accept these opposing needs. To show myself radical compassion and to honor whatever I’m feeling at any given moment. With this comes the realization that much of the AuDHD community is feeling the same way.

     

    To my community, my message is this: Give yourself grace.

    Write the post. Engage if it feels right. Speak. Scream if you want to. Delete it if that feels safer. Whisper to the tears on your pillow if that’s what you need. Move in silence if that’s what your heart tells you to do.

    It is OK if you need a break from advocacy. It’s OK to block people. As painful as it is to admit, we cannot and will not change the minds of those who are married to their ignorance about neurodivergence. We cannot inspire empathy in people who see no benefit in it. All we can do is speak the truth, be loyal to our own experiences, and give it our best shot. Change isn’t always immediate or quickly visible.

    When RSD feels like a gut punch, remember that there are others who know exactly how it feels. I know it feels like your world is being turned upside down and shaken by the hand of a cruel, callous giant.

    But RSD is not cause for shame. We’ve made it this far — despite every ounce of rejection, and we will continue to make it through one day at a time.

    In dark times, we must remember that there will always be people who uplift and support us. And we always have ourselves, our values, and our non-negotiable truths. We must cling as tightly to this as we can; like-minded community and inner knowing will carry us through.

    This too shall pass. I know that’s a tired platitude, but it’s also true. No state is permanent.

    I realize that positivity can sometimes feel so irritatingly over-simplified, especially in times like these. But the truth is, we have no choice but to take it one day at a time. Tomorrow is a new day. Tomorrow will bring a fresh sky.

    Tomorrow might just be our North Star.

    Neurodivergent Support and Advocacy: Next Steps


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • Special Education Cuts Threaten IDEA Protections for Students


    The following is a personal essay that reflects the opinions and experiences of its author.

    October 16, 2025

    This November marks the 50th anniversary of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), a landmark law that shapes the educational experiences of more than 7.5 million students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) across the United States.

    In exchange for federal funding, states must provide students with disabilities a free and appropriate public education; the IDEA governs this and how an IEP (Individualized Education Program) is structured, built to address a student’s needs, and implemented in the classroom. Central to the IDEA’s effectiveness is federal monitoring of state compliance; however, that enforcement structure is now under serious threat.

    Earlier this week, the Trump administration effectively killed the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) — an office within the U.S. Department of Education (ED) responsible for enforcing IDEA provisions and supporting families — by reducing its workforce to fewer than six employees, a 95% cut since the start of 2025.

    OSEP ensures schools follow the IDEA by setting policy, monitoring state compliance, investigating violations, and intervening when children with disabilities are not receiving their legally mandated services.

    The Trump administration has long threatened to dismantle or drastically reduce the ED. Between layoffs earlier in 2025 and these latest cuts, the office that once held schools accountable is now unable to function.

    [Quiz: How Well Do You Know U.S. Education Law?]

    Importantly, the IDEA remains in effect. Your child’s IEP (Individualized Education Program) continues to be a legally binding document that must be implemented exactly as written and agreed upon. If you disagree with any aspect of the IEP, whether that’s the content or the procedures followed, you still have the right to challenge the district’s decisions or inaction through the administrative review process.

    Additionally, Section 504 Plan protections still exist, and your state education agency is still obligated to ensure compliance. (A Section 504 Plan, which arises under a different federal law that bars discrimination against individuals with disabilities.)

    However, without adequate staffing at the federal level, funding disbursements may be delayed, potentially causing states to face budget crises that leave them unable to pay service providers. The cuts may also halt investigations into complaints filed with OSEP and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which handles disability discrimination complaints under Section 504. If these offices lack the personnel to monitor state compliance with federal law, then enforcement becomes impossible, regardless of what the IDEA or Section 504 requires.

    Caregiver Advocacy Tips

    While these drastic changes and cuts are alarming, there are steps caregivers can take to protect their child’s services and stay informed about changes at the local level.

    1. Gather information from your district. Contact your district’s special education office and ask whether it is anticipating any cuts to special education funding or staffing. Do not assume staffers will provide this information unprompted. Find Your Federal, State, and Local Representatives here.
    2. Monitor services closely. Watch for personnel cutbacks, including special education teachers, related service providers, and paraprofessionals. Track any reductions in services or scheduling changes. Keep a log of anything that may not appear to be compliant with your child’s IEP or 504 Plan, and save all emails and communications about your child’s services.
    3. Be proactive about IEP meetings. Do not wait for an invitation to an annual IEP meeting. Reach out two to three months before it is due to schedule, so that you have time to invite any outside providers or evaluators to the meeting. Remember that you can request an IEP meeting at any time if you have concerns about your child’s progress or services.
    4. Build relationships. Federal policy can feel distant and abstract, but the teachers and providers working with your child every day are your partners. Connect with them regularly, not just when problems arise. Network with other parents facing similar challenges. Collective advocacy is powerful, and connecting with other families can provide insight into systemic issues in your district.
    5. Learn your rights. Familiarize yourself with the IDEA and your state’s specific education laws. Review the procedural safeguards that your school is required to provide and keep them in a safe place so that you are prepared when you need them.

    [Watch: “Are My Students’ ADHD Accommodations in Danger? Fallout from the Department of Education Changes”]

    As the IDEA reaches its 50th anniversary, the responsibility for protecting students’ rights has shifted even more onto the shoulders of parents and state agencies. Staying engaged has never been more crucial.

    Department of Education Cuts: Next Steps

    The law office of Dominic Buchmiller, Esq., is dedicated to ensuring that every child receives the free and appropriate education to which they are entitled. Our mission is to advocate for students and families, securing the services and programming necessary for each child to hit their necessary milestones.


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Melanie Wachsman

    Source link

  • Lose Weight with Cumin and Saffron?  | NutritionFacts.org

    The spice cumin can work as well as orlistat, the “anal leakage” obesity drug.

    In my video Friday Favorites: Benefits of Black Cumin for Weight Loss, I discussed how a total of 17 randomized controlled trials showed that the simple spice could reduce cholesterol and triglyceride levels. And its side effects? A weight-loss effect.

    Saffron is another spice found to be effective for treating a major cause of suffering—depression, in this study, with a side effect of decreased appetite. Indeed, when put to the test in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, saffron was found to lead to significant weight loss, five pounds more than placebo, and an extra inch off the waist in eight weeks. The dose of saffron used in the study was the equivalent of drinking a cup of tea made from a large pinch of saffron threads.

    Suspecting the active ingredient might be crocin, the pigment in saffron that accounts for its crimson color, as shown here and at 0:59 in my video Friday Favorites: Benefits of Cumin and Saffron for Weight Loss, researchers also tried giving people just the purified pigment.

    That also led to weight loss, but it didn’t do as well as the full saffron extract and only beat the placebo by two pounds and half an inch off the waist. The mechanism appeared to be appetite suppression, as the crocin group ended up averaging about 80 fewer calories a day, whereas the full saffron group consumed an average of 170 fewer daily calories, as you can see below and at 1:21 in my video.

    A similar study looked specifically at snacking frequency. The researchers thought that the mood-boosting effects of saffron might cut down on stress-related eating. Indeed, eight weeks of a saffron extract halved snack intake, compared to a placebo. There was also a slight but statistically significant weight loss of about two pounds, as you can see here and at 1:41 in my video, which is pretty remarkable, given that tiny doses were utilized—about 100 milligrams, which is equivalent to about an eighth of a teaspoon of the spice.

    The problem is that saffron is the most expensive spice in the world. It’s composed of delicate threads sticking out of the saffron crocus flower. Each flower produces only a few threads, so about 50,000 flowers are needed to make a single pound of spice. That’s enough flowers to cover a football field. So, that pinch of saffron could cost a dollar a day.

    That’s why, in my 21 Tweaks to accelerate weight loss in How Not to Diet, I include black cumin, instead of saffron, as you can see here and at 2:30 in my video. And, at a quarter teaspoon a day, the daily dose of black cumin would only cost three cents.

    What about just regular cumin? Used in cuisines around the world from Tex-Mex to South Asian, cumin is the second most popular spice on Earth after black pepper. It is one of the oldest cultivated plants with a range of purported medicinal uses, but only recently has it been put to the test for weight loss. Those randomized to a half teaspoon at both lunch and dinner over three months lost about four more pounds and an extra inch off their waist. The spice was found to be comparable to the obesity drug known as orlistat.

    If you remember, orlistat is the “anal leakage” drug sold under the brand names Alli and Xenical. The drug company apparently prefers the term “faecal spotting” to describe the rectal discharge it causes, though. The drug company’s website offered some helpful tips, including: “It’s probably a smart idea to wear dark pants, and bring a change of clothes with you to work.” You know, just in case their drug causes you to poop in your pants at the office.

    I think I’ll stick with the cumin, thank you very much.

    Doctor’s Note

    The video on black cumin that I mentioned is Friday Favorites: Benefits of Black Cumin Seed (Nigella Sativa) for Weight Loss.

    My other videos on saffron are in the related posts below.

    For an in-depth dive into weight loss, see my book How Not to Diet

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • “Does Kissing Feel Like a Sensory Nightmare to You?”


    In everything from teen rom coms to relationship advice columns, kissing is painted as the litmus test for love, desire, and connection. What’s often overlooked is how complicated kissing can be for neurodivergent people, whose brains and bodies process touch, taste, and proximity differently.

    “Why Don’t I Like Kissing?” The ADHD Sensory Block

    For many of my clients with ADHD, kissing isn’t always the warm, intimate act it’s “supposed” to be. Instead, it can feel like a sensory storm.

    There’s too much saliva and not enough breathing. You can taste hints of what your partner ate for lunch earlier. There’s the irritating texture of stubble on their face. And distractions coming from the TV or a buzzing phone. You notice your hair is stuck to your lip. You’re suddenly hyperaware of how close you are to someone’s face.

    ADHD brains are already processing an abundance of sensory input on a good day. Add in an intimate situation with high emotional stakes, and you’ve got a recipe for distraction, discomfort, or shutdown.

    But It’s Not Just Sensory: Kissing and Mental Bandwidth

    Neurotypical intimacy scripts treat kissing as a baseline requirement for intimacy and for building a relationship. But when kissing is uncomfortable or dysregulating, partners can misinterpret that as rejection, lack of attraction, or emotional disconnection.

    Intimacy challenges aren’t always about desire or love, as neurotypical advice would have us believe. Beyond sensory blocks, they are sometimes about the brain’s ability to regulate attention, emotion, and working memory (i.e., executive functions) under real-time, sensory, and social pressure.

    • If you’re spending mental bandwidth on managing discomfort instead of enjoying the moment, that can lead to emotional regulation fatigue.
    • If you have to remember to initiate kissing to keep your partner happy, that’s pressure on working memory.
    • If you’re trying to prevent your partner from feeling rejected, you’re layering in impulse control and social monitoring — hotspots for ADHD burnout.

    Ideas to Feel Close: Alternatives to Kissing

    Kissing is only one of many ways to connect and it’s not automatically the most intimate or sensual.

    Think of intimacy like a playlist: You don’t need to play the same track every time to keep the mood alive. Sometimes you need options.

    • Forehead or temple kisses: gentler contact with less sensory overwhelm.
    • Playful micro touches: a squeeze of the hand, a brush of the fingers, a tap on the hip while passing by.
    • Shared sensory anchors: holding hands under a blanket, sitting with your legs intertwined, leaning shoulder to shoulder during a show.
    • Parallel play intimacy: being together in the same space doing different activities (reading, cooking, gaming) while staying connected through the small glances or shared commentary.
    • Eye contact: short bursts of focused connection without physical touch can sometimes feel more intimate than kissing ever could.

    ADHD and Kissing: Start the Conversation

    If kissing feels like a block for you, the first step is honesty with your partner.

    1. Name the experience without apologizing for it. (“It’s not that I don’t want to be close to you, it’s that kissing can trigger sensory overload for me.”)
    2. Explain what does work for your brain and body.
    3. Make it collaborative by inviting your partner(s) to explore new options together.

    💋 ADHD Kissing and Intimacy: Next Steps


    SUPPORT ADDITUDE
    Thank you for reading ADDitude. To support our mission of providing ADHD education and support, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our content and outreach possible. Thank you.

    Nathaly Pesantez

    Source link

  • Minding Your Mental Health? Light Exposure Matters, Study Says

    Based on the findings, lighting could play more of a role in mental health than we thought, with participants who had increased light exposure at night showing an increased risk of psychiatric disorders like anxiety and depression. Namely, light at night increased risk of depression by 30%, and similar patterns were also seen for self-harm, psychosis, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and PTSD.

    Source link

  • A discredited therapy for gay and trans youth is at the center of a Supreme Court case. Here’s what to know

    (CNN) — The US Supreme Court will hear a case Tuesday that will determine whether a Colorado law that prohibits licensed mental health professionals from providing conversion “therapy” to minors is constitutional.

    Conversion or reparative therapy promises to “convert” people from being gay, lesbian or bisexual to straight, or to change transgender and nonconforming individuals into people who identify with the sex they were labeled at birth. Research has found that the practice doesn’t work and can even be dangerous: It significantly increases a person’s risk of suicide and can cause other long-term health problems, such as depression, anxiety and high blood pressure. Children who undergo conversion therapy are more than twice as likely to run away.

    At least 23 states prohibit licensed providers from offering conversion “therapy” to minors, according to the independent think tank Movement Advancement Project, and leading professional medical and mental health associations disavow it.

    Despite state bans, a 2023 report found more than 1,300 conversion therapy practitioners working in 48 states and the District of Columbia. The report, from the Trevor Project, a suicide prevention organization for LGBTQ+ youth, found 600 practitioners hold active professional licenses and 700 operate in an official religious capacity. The number is likely an undercount since, the report said, because conversion therapy is “increasingly underground and conducted in secret with many practitioners not publicly advertising their services in a way that can be documented.”

    2023 national survey found that 1 in 20 LGBTQ+ young people had been subjected to conversion therapy in the US. Nearly 200,000 people who identify as transgender have gone through some form of conversion therapy, according to a 2019 study published in the American Journal of Public Health.

    Regardless of how the Supreme Court rules, the therapy may become even more common as the Trump administration pushes health care providers to offer a version of this therapy as the only kind of care for children who identify as transgender.

    “The government is paving the way for a lot of harm and a lot of damage,” said Dr. Meera Shah, a family medicine physician in New York and a national board member for the professional group Physicians for Reproductive Health.

    Drew, an ICU nurse in Central Valley, California, who identifies as a trans man, believes that his parents inadvertently brought him to a conversion therapist when he was 9. He asked that CNN not use his last name for his safety.

    When he was old enough to pick his haircut and clothes, Drew said, he knew what his gender identity was but didn’t have the words to explain.
    Choosing cowboy shirts and boots incorrectly signaled to his parents that he struggled with his gender identity.

    “So they put me in therapy to fix that,” Drew said. “I don’t know if my mom understood what she was signing me up for.”

    The experience still traumatizes Drew, he says, although the details of what happened in those sessions remain fuzzy. “Rather, I have traumatic flashbacks instead,” he said.

    What happens in conversion therapy?

    Professionals may have different methods to try to convince someone that they are not LGBTQ+. Some use traditional talk therapy, enforcing the idea that being transgender or being gay/bi is a pathology that can be “cured” and even arguing that peer pressure is to blame.

    Counselors may also use behavioral modification therapy as they frame non-heterosexual or non-stereotypical gendered behavior as an “addiction” or a “compulsion.” They might encourage patients to avoid “triggers” like going to an LGBTQ+-friendly club or wearing a certain outfit and praise them for engaging in stereotypical gendered activity like wearing certain clothing or hairstyles.

    They may also probe a patient’s past to determine whether an underlying issues like unprocessed trauma, abuse, mental illness or autism could have led to gender-nonconforming feelings.

    There’s also a long history of documented aversion practices, including electric shock, ice baths, burning with metal coils or giving nausea-inducing drugs. Using these techniques, some may try to shame the patient about their gender or orientation, pray with them or even use exorcism as a “cure.”

    When Dr. Morissa Ladinsky worked in Alabama, she said, trans patients told her that their parents put them in conversion therapy that tried to “turn the God that they loved against them.”

    The approach was traumatizing, said Ladinsky, a clinical professor of pediatrics at Stanford Medicine. But there was one exception: a patient who said, “the God that I’ve grown to love would never make me this way only to turn around and marginalize me.”

    Risks from conversion therapy

    The process can create lasting damage and may lead to depression, anxiety, sexual problems, substance use, low self-esteem, self-blame and a lifetime of physical health problems, including high blood pressure and increased systemic inflammation, studies show.

    Conversion therapy can also lead to suicideA 2019 study found that trans people who experienced gender identity change efforts were more than twice as likely to have attempted suicide than peers who had other therapy. For children under 10, the relative risk of attempted suicide was four times as high. And trans people were 1.5 times more likely than peers who went through other therapies to experience “severe psychological distress,” the study found.

    A 2020 report from the Williams Institute, a public policy research center focused on sexual orientation and gender identity at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, found that lesbian, gay and bisexual people who experienced conversion therapy were almost twice as likely to think about suicide and attempt suicide compared with peers who hadn’t had undergone such counseling.

    “Conversion therapy – which we know isn’t actually therapy – isolates and harms kids, it scapegoats parents, and it really does divide families through blame and rejection,” said Casey Pick, director of law and policy at the Trevor Project. “No amount of pressure or talk, including conversion practices, can make a transgender person not transgender.

    “This is a debunked, discredited fringe ideology.”

    Ahead of the Supreme Court argument, the Trevor Project, in conjunction with American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and the National Alliance on Mental Illness, filed a friend of the court brief presenting peer-reviewed data on the serious mental health harms that conversion therapy causes LGBTQ+ youth.

    Drew, the California ICU nurse, doesn’t remember much about his therapy sessions. But he does remember sobbing every Monday and Friday when his grandfather picked him up for his appointment at 2 p.m. on the dot.

    Even years later, Drew said, he’d shake uncontrollably when he’d visit his parents and drive past the building where his appointments had been.

    “It took me a long time to recognize why that was,” Drew said, his voice catching and pausing for deep breathing exercises to calm his nerves.

    “The experience was damaging beyond my ability to explain to you,” he said. “It was damaging in ways that, 40 years later, I’m still uncovering and working through with the help of a good therapist who is practicing a kind of therapy that is actually helpful and affirmative for myself as a whole human.”

    Trump administration actions

    The Supreme Court case is unfolding as President Donald Trump’s administration has put a new focus on LGBTQ people.

    US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
    said in a letter to health systems in May that they should not rely on science-based professional guidelines for transgender children but should instead follow a highly controversial HHS review of the evidence on current care practices for pediatric gender dysphoria — a term that mental health professionals use to describe the clinically significant distress that happens when a person’s sense of gender does not match their sex assigned at birth.

    The Trump administration report essentially says the only kind of care that health systems should provide children who identify as transgender are psychotherapeutic approaches including gender exploratory therapy, which discourages gender affirmation in favor of exploring the pathological roots of the young person’s trans identity. The review describes such a practice as “trying to help children and adolescents come to terms with their bodies” and equates the distress they feel related to their gender with normal “discomfort with the sexed body or with societal based expectations is common during puberty and adolescence.”

    Then, at the start of Pride Month in June, the FBI encouraged whistleblowers to report health providers that offered other kinds of care.

    The federal pressure on health systems worked. Among other programs, the Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles announced in July it was shutting down. Children’s National in Washington, D.C, said in August that due to “escalating legal and regulatory risks” it would be “discontinuing the prescription of gender-affirming medications,” but would continue to offer mental health and other support services.

    Research shows that exploratory therapy is far from neutral. The practice views a trans identity as maladaptive, pathological or simply wrong, experts said, and sees a cisgender identity — a gender identity that aligns with the sex assigned at birth — as normative, “healthier, preferable, and superior to a transgender or gender nonbinary identity,” according to the American Psychological Association, which is highly critical of the practice.

    Gender diversity is not pathological, agrees the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, another organization that’s critical of the practice.

    The 400+ page review that Kennedy cited, whose authors remain anonymous, says it “is not intended to serve as a clinical practice guideline and does not aim to issue treatment recommendations,” but it claims that current practices are not safe and lack a scientific basis.

    Evidence about providing therapy alone is “of very low certainty,” the review says, but it lauds countries that use “exploratory” therapy alone and claims this practice is at least a “noninvasive invention” that carries “little risk” and takes a “neutral” stand that may “effectively resolve the condition noninvasively.”

    “The concept of ‘noninvasive’ makes no sense here if we’re looking at mental health. What does that even really mean?” asked Florence Ashley, a Canadian law professor who wrote a book about laws banning transgender conversion practices. “If one of the things that we look at is suicidality, that’s pretty f**king invasive. You’re dead.”

    Dr. Carl Streed, a clinical researcher specializing in LGBTQ+ health and an assistant professor of medicine at Boston University School of Medicine, said it’s hypocritical of the Trump administration to say there isn’t enough evidence to justify the individually tailored care typically provided to transgender youth — which is backed by dozens of medical organizations and may include therapy, social and legal help, and for older patients, hormones or surgery — while acknowledging that therapy alone is “of very low certainty.”

    “The report really provides no other alternative other than conversion therapy, and because it is from the HHS, it is essentially going to be a ‘legitimizing report.’ And it’s going to be used to eventually change policies around the provision of care,” Streed added.

    HHS says in the report that exploratory therapy is not conversion therapy. But because the aim of the practice is to “resolve” the issue of gender rather than resolve the distress the person feels about their gender, experts say it is conversion therapy by a different name.

    “Honestly, whenever anybody says ‘gender exploratory therapy,’ they really are talking about conversion therapy,” Streed said. “They’re not talking about anything that acknowledges people’s full spectrum of gender.”

    In California, Drew said that while he’s still working through the trauma he experienced in conversion therapy, it hasn’t held him back from having a successful career, a happy marriage and kids. And even though it’s difficult to talk about, he wants parents to know about his experience.

    “I don’t want anybody else to go through what I went through, and if another parent out there can hear that conversion therapy will be harmful to their child and consider a different way to move forward, that Is worth any discomfort or pain that I have now talking about it,” Drew said.

    Despite the trauma, he bears no ill will toward his childhood therapist.

    “My parents eventually saw me for who I am, and they accepted me and loved me and had been extremely supportive of me,” Drew said. “So I’d like to give that therapist the grace that perhaps they could have learned and grown as a therapist and understood the harm that they were causing and learn to do better by trans youth.”

    Jen Christensen and CNN

    Source link