ReportWire

Tag: debt

  • Problem office loans are piling up in Chicago and Houston, but not yet in San Francisco

    Problem office loans are piling up in Chicago and Houston, but not yet in San Francisco

    [ad_1]

    Key-card swipes don’t tell the whole story.

    Chicago, Philadelphia and Houston have some of the highest percentages of problem office loans when looking at delinquency rates and other early warnings signs of trouble, according to a new report by Barclays.

    That might come as a surprise, given that San Francisco has been making headlines for its broader commercial real estate woes, technology sector layoffs and struggles getting workers back to the office.

    But so far, it’s other cities like Philadelphia with a 14% rate of office loans at least 30 days delinquent (see chart), or Chicago where 21.2% of its office loans facing imminent default, triggering a transfer of their debt to a “special” loan servicer (Sp. Srv).

    Chicago, Houston and Philadelphia are top cities for trouble office loans


    Trepp, Barclays Research

    Researchers at Barclays based their findings on the performance of commercial property debt in metro areas with at least $2 billion of loans that were packaged into bond deals. They found that, “although there has been much discussion linking issues in the office sector with the very slow pace of return-to-office policies, we see very little correlation between performance of office collateral within various MSAs and Kastle’s weekly occupancy report.”

    Kastle’s most recent Back to Work Barometer showed Houston with a 61.6% rate of physical occupancy, above the 50% 10-city average. San Jose’s rate was pegged at below 39%, while the San Francisco metro area was near 45%, when looking at card swipes at more than 2,000 office buildings in 138 cities.

    But San Jose and Seattle were outperforming, both with no office loan delinquencies, few specially serviced loans or those on a watchlist for potential problems, according to Barclays.

    “Given that tech companies have pulled back from office occupancy and many have embraced remote work, we believe that office delinquencies will continue to rise,” wrote Lea Overby’s credit research team at Barclays, in a Tuesday client note.

    While Wall Street’s bond machine, known as the “commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)” market, isn’t the biggest lender on U.S. office buildings, it’s the most transparent place to track loan performance in commercial real estate, because of its monthly public reporting requirements.

    Another caveat to the findings is that physical occupancy rates aren’t the same as in-place leases, which many companies continued to pay each month throughout the pandemic. Physical occupancy rates, however, can be a sign of tenant demand for future space.

    Higher interest rates, a mountain of maturing property debt and wobbling building prices have been pressuring landlords, with both Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently saying they continue to monitor the sector closely.

    Stocks were lower Tuesday, as investors awaited Chair Powell’s two days of testimony to Congress, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.72%

    off 200 points, or 0.6%, the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.47%

    off 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    -0.16%

    0.2% lower, according to FactSet.

    Related: Blackstone wrote down its stake in this Chicago office building to $0. Now it’s talking with lenders on the debt coming due

    The S&P 500 Office REITs Sub-Industry Index
    SP500.40402040,
    -3.43%

    was down 1.1% Tuesday, but off 21% on the year so far, according to FactSet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What’s behind the EU’s financial aid offer to Tunisia?

    What’s behind the EU’s financial aid offer to Tunisia?

    [ad_1]

    The European Union offers cash-strapped Tunisia more than $1bn in financial aid to help boost the nation’s battered economy.

    Tunisia is cash-strapped and the economy is heading towards a collapse.

    Basic commodities have been in short supply for months. And many Tunisians are struggling with rising living costs.

    The European Union is worried that if the country’s economic crisis gets worse, more migrants could cross the Mediterranean Sea to seek a better life in Europe. It has offered the nation financial help, but what is the bloc asking for in return?

    Elsewhere, the United Kingdom says it has reached a “first of its kind” economic partnership with the United States.

    Plus, China’s youth unemployment hits a record high.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stocks end sharply higher, S&P 500 scores longest win streak since 2021

    Stocks end sharply higher, S&P 500 scores longest win streak since 2021

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks booked big gains on Thursday, a day after the Federal Reserve skipped a June rate hike, but indicated more increases could be on the table this year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +1.26%

    jumped about 430 points, or 1.3%, ending near 34,409, according to preliminary FactSet data, while the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +1.22%

    gained 1.2% to score a sixth session in a row of wins and its longest stretch of straight gains since Nov. 8, 2021, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +1.15%

    closed up 1.2%. The rally for stocks comes in the wake of the S&P 500 emerging from its longest bear market in decades, with shares of big technology companies continuing to lead the index higher on Thursday. Its Communications Services segment rose 1.5% Thursday, while the Information Technology sector gained 1.3%, according to FactSet. Critics of the rally have pointed to exuberance around new advances in artificial intelligence helping lift a select set of seven stocks higher. One of those stocks, Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +3.19%

    rose about 3.5% to $349, per preliminary data, a record close on Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New York Empire State, Philadelphia Fed factory indexes mixed but show signs of optimism

    New York Empire State, Philadelphia Fed factory indexes mixed but show signs of optimism

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: Two U.S. regional gauges of manufacturing sentiment showed signs in June that they may be improving after a rough patch, according to data released Thursday.

    The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s manufacturing index slipped further to a reading of negative 13.7 in June from negative 10.4 in the prior month, but economists had expected a reading of negative 14.8, according to a Wall Street Journal survey of economists. This is the tenth straight negative reading.

    The…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stocks end mostly higher after Fed skips June rate hike but pencils in more this year

    Stocks end mostly higher after Fed skips June rate hike but pencils in more this year

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks finished mostly higher on Wednesday in a choppy session that saw the Fed leave rates steady in June, while penciling in another 50 basis points of potential hikes later this year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA shed about 231 points, or 0.7%, ending near 33,980, according to preliminary FactSet data, or well off the session’s low of 33,783. The S&P 500 index SPX added about 3 points, or 0.1% and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP closed 0.4% higher. “It’s just the idea that were are trying to get this right,” Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said about the potential mixed messaging of holding rates steady in…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why this $6 trillion pile of cash isn’t heading for stocks any time soon

    Why this $6 trillion pile of cash isn’t heading for stocks any time soon

    [ad_1]

    Even with U.S. stocks in a new bull market, investors aren’t showing many signs of backing away from money-market funds and other cash-like investments offering yields of about 5%, the highest in about 15 years.

    Money-market funds hit a record of $5.9 trillion in assets as of Tuesday, signaling a continuing drain out of bank deposits into higher-yielding “cash-like” investments, according to Peter Crane, president and publisher of Crane Data.

    He…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The US wants Europe to buy American weapons; the EU has other ideas

    The US wants Europe to buy American weapons; the EU has other ideas

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    This article is part of the Europe’s strategic impotence Special Report.

    At NATO summit after NATO summit, European leaders get a clear public message from Washington — increase spending on defense.

    In private, there’s another message that’s just as clear — make sure a lot of that extra spending goes on U.S. weapons.

    European leaders are resisting.

    “We must develop a genuinely European defense technological and industrial base in all interested countries, and deploy fully sovereign equipment at European level,” French President Emmanuel Macron said at the GLOBSEC conference in Bratislava last month.

    The decades of cajoling from Washington are paying off. Although most EU countries aren’t yet meeting NATO’s target of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense, the alliance has seen eight years of steady spending increases. In 2022, spending by European countries was up by 13 percent to $345 billion — almost a third higher than a decade ago — much of it a reaction to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Now the question is how that money will be spent.

    The U.S. wants to ensure that European countries — which already spend about half of their defense purchasing on American kit — don’t make a radical switch to spending more of that money at home. 

    Some European leaders are hoping that’s exactly what happens, but it’s an open question whether the Continent’s defense industry can make that happen. 

    “Traditionally, there was a suspicion about a change in Europe’s defense capabilities which dates back more than 25 years,” said Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia, Eurasia Program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. “What direction would the EU go, would it mean the EU would decouple from NATO, what would the impact be on U.S. defense industrial policy?” 

    Buying at home

    The current tensions in Brussels are over whether new EU-wide defense policy should be limited to EU companies — a position driven by Macron and Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, a Frenchman. That confirms suspicions stateside about European protectionism when it comes to allowing U.S. companies to compete for EU contracts. 

    “Our plan is to directly support, with EU money, the effort to ramp up our defense industry, and this for Ukraine and for our own security,” Breton said last month. 

    Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton wants new EU-wide defense policy to be limited to EU companies | Olivier Hoslet/AFP via Getty Images

    But there’s an uncomfortable fact for the backers of European strategic autonomy: When it comes to arms, Europe still depends on the U.S. 

    While European companies have deep expertise in defense — building everything from France’s Rafale fighter to Germany’s Leopard tank and Poland’s man-portable Piorun air-defense system — the scale of the U.S. arms industry, as well as its technological innovation, makes it attractive for European weapons buyers. 

    The most common big-ticket item is Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, at a cost of $80 million a pop. There is also an immediate surge in demand for off-the-shelf items like shoulder-fired missiles and artillery shells.

    “Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, European states want to import more arms, faster,” said a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

    Buying abroad

    The war in Ukraine has underscored the dominance of the U.S. defense industry. 

    A host of European countries are buying Javelin anti-tank missiles produced by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin; Poland this year signed a $1.4 billion deal to buy 116 M1A1 Abrams tanks, as well as another $10 billion agreement to buy High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems produced by Lockheed Martin; Slovakia is buying F-16 fighters, while Romania is in talks to buy F-35s.

    Those deals are raising fears in Europe over whether they can wean themselves off of U.S. defense suppliers. In one example, France and Germany worry about Spain’s intentions as it kicks the tires on F-35s while also being a partner in developing the European Future Combat Air System jet fighter.

    But the need to restock weapons depots and continue shipping materiel to Ukraine is urgent, and after decades of contraction, the Continent’s defense industry is having a difficult time adjusting.

    “Our European allies and partners, they’ve never experienced anything like this,” said a senior U.S. Defense Department official, referring to the spasm of spending brought on by Russia’s invasion. The official was granted anonymity to discuss the situation. “They don’t yet have the defense production authorities they need [to move quickly] and they’ve really been looking to us to try to get a handle on how they can increase production, and I think they’re learning a lot from us.” 

    To help Europe get there, the United States has expanded the number of bilateral security supply arrangements it has with foreign partners since the Russian invasion, signing new agreements with Latvia, Denmark, Japan and Israel since October. These allow countries to more quickly and easily sell and trade defense-related goods and services. 

    The Biden administration also signed an administrative arrangement with the European Union in late April to establish working groups on supply-chain issues, while giving both sides a seat at the table in internal meetings at the European Defence Agency and the Pentagon. 

    But there are limits to how far and how fast both sides are able and willing to go. 

    In the near term, capacity issues and political will means the rhetorical sea change in EU military spending is unlikely to make a huge dent in U.S. military industrial policy. 

    While the past 18 months have seen a huge spike in defense budgets — Germany announced a  special debt-financed fund worth €100 billion after the Russian invasion of Ukraine; Poland’s defense expenditure is set to reach 4 percent of GDP this year — EU-wide projects are facing significant headwinds. European companies say they need longer lead times and long-term contracts to make needed investments. 

    “You need that visibility and certainty to make those investments. We’re in a chicken game between governments and industry — who are the first ones that are putting the money on the table,” said Lucie Béraud-Sudreau, director of the military expenditure and arms production program at SIPRI. 

    Ultimately, the global defense boom means that there should be plenty of military spending to go around, at least in the short term as countries rush to prove their worth to their NATO and EU allies and the Russian threat remains acute.

    Paul McLeary reported from Washington and Suzanne Lynch from Brussels.

    [ad_2]

    Paul McLeary and Suzanne Lynch

    Source link

  • Nasdaq stock dives after deal to buy Adenza for $10.5 billion in cash and stock from Thoma Bravo

    Nasdaq stock dives after deal to buy Adenza for $10.5 billion in cash and stock from Thoma Bravo

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Nasdaq Inc.
    NDAQ,
    +0.28%

    dove 5.1%, enough to pace the S&P 500’s premarket decliners Monday, after the securities trading, clearing and listing company announced an agreement to buy software company Adenza for $10.5 billion in cash and stock from Thoma Bravo. The terms of the deal include $5.75 billion in cash and 85.6 million shares of Nasdaq common stock, which will be issued to the owners of Adenza after closing of the deal, expected to occur within six to nine months. The number of shares represents 17.4% of Nasdaq’s shares outstanding. Nasdaq plans to issue 5.9 billion of debt for the cash portion of the deal. “With Adenza, we will have a more complete suite of essential software and technology solutions that make managing risks and complying with regulations simpler and more efficient for our clients,” said Tal Cohen, president of market platforms at Nasdaq. Adenza is expected to have $590 million of revenue in 2023, with annual recurring revenue growth of 18%. Nasdaq’s stock has lost 5.7% year to date through Friday, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.11%

    has gained 12.0%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How a hawkish Fed could kill a baby bull-market rally in U.S. stocks

    How a hawkish Fed could kill a baby bull-market rally in U.S. stocks

    [ad_1]

    It is the notion that the Federal Reserve could deliver a hawkish jolt to markets even if it refrains from raising rates when its two-day policy meeting ends on Wednesday.

    There are concerns that such an outcome could spark a turnaround in U.S. stocks, especially if an uncomfortably strong reading on May inflation — due this coming Tuesday just as the Fed’s policy meeting is slated to begin — pushes the central bank toward something even more extreme, like delivering a rate increase on Wednesday despite intimating that it plans to abstain.

    The May consumer-price index is forecast to rise 4.0% for the year, down from a rise of 4.9%, while the core index, excluding food and energy prices, is seen easing to a rise of 5.3% from 5.5%.

    On the other hand, signs that the economy has weakened and inflation has continued to fade would help the Fed to justify skipping a rate increase in June — as several senior officials have suggested it will — while signaling that a potential hike at its following meeting in July could be the final increase for the cycle.

    “Softening U.S. data should support calls that a June skip could eventually turn into a July pause. Next week, most of the data is expected to remain weak or little changed: retail sales could be flat m/m, the Fed regional surveys should remain in negative territory, and consumer sentiment will waver,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA, in emailed commentary.

    See: The Fed’s crystal ball on inflation appears off the mark again. Here’s comes another fix.

    Wednesday’s meeting comes at a critical time for the market. U.S. stocks have powered ahead for more than six months, with the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.11%

    having risen more than 20% off its Oct. 12 closing low, according to FactSet. Just this past week, the index exited bear-market territory for the first time in a year.

    The index is up 12% so far in 2023, reversing some of its 19.4% decline from 2022, its biggest calendar-year drop since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    So far this year, highflying tech stocks have helped to paper over weakness in other areas of the market. This has started to change over the past two weeks, as small-cap and value-stocks have lurched suddenly higher, but there are fears that the Fed could hurt the most interest-rate sensitive technology names if Chairman Jerome Powell hints at rates rising higher than investors presently anticipate.

    The so-called “Megacap eight” stocks — a group that includes both classes of Alphabet Inc. stock
    GOOG,
    +0.16%

    GOOGL,
    +0.07%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.47%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +4.06%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.47%
    ,
    Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    +2.60%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.68%
    ,
    Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +0.14%

    — have driven nearly all of the S&P 500’s gains this year, according to Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, who included his analysis in a note to clients.

    But since the beginning of June, the Russell 2000
    RUT,
    -0.80%
    ,
    a gauge of small-cap stocks in the U.S., has risen more than 6.6%, according to FactSet data. The Russell 1000 Value Index
    RLV,
    -0.15%

    has also gained nearly 3.7% in that time. During this period, both have outperformed the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.16%
    ,
    although the Nasdaq remains the market leader, having risen 26.7% since Jan. 1.

    Concerns about the Fed’s plans intensified this week after the Bank of Canada delivered a surprise interest-rate hike, ending a four-month pause. The BOC’s decision followed a similar move by the Reserve Bank of Australia, and partly as a result, U.S. Treasury yields rose and tech-heavy stocks tumbled, with the Nasdaq logging its biggest drop since April 25, according to FactSet.

    While small-caps held up amid the chaos, the reaction stoked fears that something similar might be in store for markets when the Fed delivers its latest decision on interest rates Wednesday.

    Consequences of a ‘hawkish pause’

    Stocks could be in for more turbulence if the Fed signals it plans to follow the BOC and RBA with a hawkish surprise of its own. And it wouldn’t necessarily need to hike rates to pull this off, market strategists said.

    Emerging signs of complacency in the market could complicate its reaction. That the Cboe Volatility Index has fallen back below 15
    VIX,
    +1.32%

    for the first time since before the arrival of COVID-19 is one such sign that investors aren’t worried enough about a potential selloff, said Miller Tabak + Co.’s Chief Market Strategist Matt Maley.

    Another analyst likened the potential fallout from a hawkish Fed to the bad old days of 2022.

    “If the Fed signals that rates will be going up again, the market playbook could read more like 2022 than what we have seen so far in 2023,” said Will Rhind, the founder and CEO of GraniteShares, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Perhaps the biggest wild card is Tuesday’s inflation report. If the numbers come in hot, Powell and his peers could face pressure to hike rates without priming the market first.

    For this reason, Rhind believes investors are underestimating the likelihood of a hike next week, even as Fed funds futures currently see a roughly 70% probability that the central bank will stand pat, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool.

    And Rhind isn’t the only one. Leslie Falconio, chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management, says the Tuesday inflation report could be a make-or-break moment for markets, summing up fears expressed elsewhere on Wall Street in a recent note to clients.

    “We believe another rate increase is on the table, and that the CPI release on 13 June, a day before the Fed decision, will be decisive. In our view, another hike won’t have a material impact on the pace of economic growth,” Falconio said.

    What should investors watch out for?

    Assuming the Fed does forego a hike in June, there are a few key tells that investors should watch for to determine whether a “hawkish pause” is under way.

    Perhaps the most important will be how the Fed handles changes to its closely watched “dot plot.” A modestly higher median dot would send an unmistakable signal to the market that the Fed will continue with its campaign of tightening monetary policy, perhaps to the detriment of the market, said Patrick Saner, head of macro strategy at the Swiss Re Institute.

    “If the Fed skips but wanted to avoid the impression of the hiking cycle being done, it would need to include a revision of the dot plot. They could justify that with a more resilient GDP forecast and a higher inflation outlook. So I think it is the dots and then the statement that will be in focus,” Saner said during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Beyond that, whatever the Fed does or says will likely be viewed through the lens of economic data that is due out next week. In addition to the Tuesday inflation report, a report on May retail sales is due out Thursday, and a on consumer sentiment from the University of Michigan will land on Friday. All these data points could influence investors’ impressions of the state of the U.S. economy, and their expectations for how the Fed will behave as a result.

    See also: Puzzled by the ebb and flow of recession worries? Then the MarketWatch weekly recession worry gauge is for you.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • April U.S. factory orders rise for fourth gain in five months

    April U.S. factory orders rise for fourth gain in five months

    [ad_1]

    Orders for manufactured goods rose 0.4% in April, the Commerce Department said Monday. It is the fourth increase in factory-goods orders in the past five months.

    Economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal were expecting a 0.6% rise.

    The gain was led by transportation equipment. Excluding that sector, orders were down 0.2%.

    Durable-goods orders rose 1.1% in April, unrevised from the initial estimate last week. The advance durable-goods data is always released ahead of the full report. Nondurable-goods orders fell 0.1% in April.

    Orders for nondefense capital goods, excluding aircraft, rose a revised 1.3% in April, down slightly from the prior estimate of a 1.4% increase. The gain was led by computers and machinery.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden signs debt ceiling bill that pulls U.S. back from brink of unprecedented default

    Biden signs debt ceiling bill that pulls U.S. back from brink of unprecedented default

    [ad_1]

    With just two days to spare, President Joe Biden signed legislation on Saturday that lifts the nation’s debt ceiling, averting an unprecedented default on the federal government’s debt.

    The Treasury Department had warned that the country would start running short of cash to pay all of its bills on Monday, which would have sent shockwaves through the U.S. and global economies.

    Republicans refused to raise the country’s borrowing limit unless Democrats agreed to cut spending, leading to a standoff that was not resolved until weeks of intense negotiations between the White House and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

    The final agreement, which was passed by the House on Wednesday and the Senate on Thursday, suspends the debt limit until 2025 — after the next presidential election — and restricts government spending.

    Raising the nation’s debt limit, now at $31.4 trillion, will ensure that the government can borrow to pay debts already incurred.

    “Passing this budget agreement was critical. The stakes could not have been higher,” Biden said from the Oval Office on Friday evening. “Nothing would have been more catastrophic,” he said, than defaulting on the country’s debt.

    See also: ‘We averted an economic crisis’: Biden hails debt-ceiling deal in Oval Office address

    The agreement was hashed out by Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, giving Republicans some of their demanded federal spending cuts but holding the line on major Democratic priorities.

    It raises the debt limit until 2025 — after the 2024 presidential election — and gives legislators budget targets for the next two years in hopes of assuring fiscal stability as the political season heats up.

    “No one got everything they wanted but the American people got what they needed,” Biden said, highlighting the “compromise and consensus” in the deal. “We averted an economic crisis and an economic collapse.”

    Biden used the opportunity to itemize the achievements of his first term as he runs for reelection, including support for high-tech manufacturing, infrastructure investments and financial incentives for fighting climate change.

    He also highlighted ways he blunted Republican efforts to roll back his agenda and achieve deeper cuts.

    “We’re cutting spending and bringing deficits down at the same time,” Biden said. “We’re protecting important priorities from Social Security to Medicare to Medicaid to veterans to our transformational investments in infrastructure and clean energy.”

    Even as he pledged to continue working with Republicans, Biden also drew contrasts with the opposing party, particularly when it comes to raising taxes on the wealthy, something the Democratic president has sought.

    It’s something he suggested may need to wait until a second term.

    “I’m going to be coming back,” he said. “With your help, I’m going to win.”

    Biden’s remarks were the most detailed comments from the Democratic president on the compromise he and his staff negotiated. He largely remained quiet publicly during the high-stakes talks, a decision that frustrated some members of his party but was intended to give space for both sides to reach a deal and for lawmakers to vote it to his desk.

    Biden praised McCarthy and his negotiators for operating in good faith, and all congressional leaders for ensuring swift passage of the legislation. “They acted responsibly, and put the good of the country ahead of politics,” he said.

    Overall, the 99-page bill restricts spending for the next two years and changes some policies, including imposing new work requirements for older Americans receiving food aid and greenlighting an Appalachian natural gas pipeline that many Democrats oppose.

    Some environmental rules were modified to help streamline approvals for infrastructure and energy projects — a move long sought by moderates in Congress.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates it could actually expand total eligibility for federal food assistance, with the elimination of work requirements for veterans, homeless people and young people leaving foster care.

    The legislation also bolsters funds for defense and veterans, cuts back some new money for the Internal Revenue Service and rejects Biden’s call to roll back Trump-era tax breaks on corporations and the wealthy to help cover the nation’s deficits. But the White House said the IRS’ plans to step up enforcement of tax laws for high-income earners and corporations would continue.

    The agreement imposes an automatic overall 1% cut to spending programs if Congress fails to approve its annual spending bills — a measure designed to pressure lawmakers of both parties to reach consensus before the end of the fiscal year in September.

    See also: With debt-ceiling deal, student-loan borrowers will start resuming payments in 3 months — here’s how to prepare

    In both chambers, more Democrats backed the legislation than Republicans, but both parties were critical to its passage. In the Senate the tally was 63-36 including 46 Democrats and independents and 17 Republicans in favor, 31 Republicans along with four Democrats and one independent who caucuses with the Democrats opposed.

    The vote in the House was 314-117.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The 60:40 portfolio is up more than 17%. Why is it doing so much better this year?

    The 60:40 portfolio is up more than 17%. Why is it doing so much better this year?

    [ad_1]

    “Regression to the mean” is a powerful force in the financial markets, so it was a good bet that the 60:40 portfolio would have a much better year in 2023 than in 2022.

    But not as good a year as it has had so far. That’s important to point out, lest retirees start believing that returns like we’re seeing this year are the norm. They’re not.

    The 60:40 portfolio, a default option for many retirees and near-retirees, lost 23.4% last year, assuming the 60% equity portion was invested in the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
    VTI,
    +1.65%

    and the 40% bond portion in the Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
    VGLT,
    -0.94%
    .
    That was the worst calendar-year return for the portfolio since the Great Depression.

    Through the end of May this year, in contrast, this portfolio rose at an annualized pace of 17.6%. That is more than double the average return since 1793 of 7.7% annualized for an annually rebalanced portfolio (according to data compiled by Edward McQuarrie of Santa Clara University).

    Regression to the mean deserves only a minority of the credit for this reversal. That’s because there’s no guarantee that, following a year with as big a loss as 2022’s, the portfolio would produce a gain this year. Strictly speaking, in fact, all that regression to the mean implies for the 60:40 portfolio is that its return this year would be closer to its long-term average than last year’s. A wide range of possible returns are consistent with this implication, of course, including a loss—just so long as that loss is significantly less than 2022’s.

    Rather than thanking mean regression, retirees therefore should thank their lucky stars that the 60:40 portfolio’s year-to-date return is coming in at the upper end of this possible range.

    But I need not remind you that luck is not a strategy.

    It’s also important to remember that regression to the mean cuts both ways. Assuming that the 60:40 portfolio continues performing for all of 2023 at its year-to-date pace, mean regression would imply a smaller return in 2024. That smaller return could still be a gain, of course, but it also could be a loss.

    In any case, it’s worth emphasizing that the 60:40 portfolio is a long-term bet, not a market timing tool. As you can see from the accompanying chart, this portfolio’s most recent trailing 20-year annualized return is almost precisely on top of its two-century average of 7.7% annualized. So no regression to the mean is implied when projecting the portfolio’s long-term future return.

    Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Potent liquidity squeeze’ threatens stock market once debt-ceiling deal is done

    ‘Potent liquidity squeeze’ threatens stock market once debt-ceiling deal is done

    [ad_1]

    Lawmakers and the White House appear set to avert a calamitous U.S. government default, but stock-market investors need to be aware that what comes next could still make for a bumpy ride.

    “Some time in the next several days, markets will trade their last bit of angst over raising the debt ceiling for what was always going to be the real problem — handling the massive fundraise by Treasury,” said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard, in a Wednesday note warning of a “potent liquidity squeeze” ahead.

    For…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As per your politics, debt ceiling plan is good or a ‘disaster’

    As per your politics, debt ceiling plan is good or a ‘disaster’

    [ad_1]

    The reviews are starting to come in as details emerge about the debt ceiling agreement reached by United States President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

    Even before seeing those details, some politicians were criticising the deal as not doing enough to tackle the nation’s debt, while others worried it is too austere and will harm many low-income Americans.

    The legislation will probably need support from a significant number of politicians of both parties to clear the closely divided House of Representatives and gain the 60 votes necessary to advance in the Senate.

    Many legislators said they were withholding judgement until they see the final details, many of which did not come out until Sunday evening. That’s when the 99-page bill that resulted from the Biden-McCarthy negotiations was made public.

    Here’s a look at how the agreement is going over so far:

    Early concerns

    Some of the earliest objections are coming from the most conservative members of Congress, particularly members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus that often clashes with GOP leadership.

    “I think it’s a disaster!” tweeted Matt Rosendale, a Republican from Montana.

    “Fake conservatives agree to fake spending cuts,” tweeted Senator Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky.

    “This ‘deal’ is insanity,” tweeted Representative Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina. “A $4T debt ceiling increase with virtually no cuts is not what we agreed to. Not gonna vote to bankrupt our country. The American people deserve better.”

    GOP leaders knew all along that they would lose some members’ support in any compromise with a Democratic-led White House and Senate. The question has always been whether the deal would pick up enough Democratic support to offset those defections.

    Democrats weigh in

    As much as some Democrats dislike what is roughly a spending freeze on non-defence programmes next year and chafe at work requirements being extended to more food-stamp recipients, initial reaction has been circumspect as they await more details.

    Representative Annie Kuster, a Democrat from New Hampshire and chair of a centre-left group known as the New Dems, which has roughly 100 members, said the group is “confident” that White House negotiators delivered a “viable, bipartisan solution to end this crisis”.

    Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said he believed it was the best deal that could be reached given the demands coming from House Republicans.

    “To my colleagues who have serious misgivings about this deal, I say this is far better than defaulting,” Coons said.

    The likeliest opposition will come from the more liberal members of the caucus. Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat from Washington state, has been voicing opposition to additional work requirements for some of those getting food and cash assistance. She called the debt ceiling agreement a “terrible policy” Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union programme.

    But she said she is also waiting for legislative text to determine the level of exemptions to the work requirements that Biden was able to win for veterans, homeless people and people coming out of foster care.

    “And so what do the numbers look like at the end of the day, I’m not sure,” said Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. “However, it is bad policy. I told the president that directly, when he called me last week on Wednesday, that this is saying to poor people and people who are in need that we don’t trust them.”

    Asked if the Democrats at the White House and in the congressional leadership have to worry about whether the progressive caucus will support the bill, Jayapal said: “Yes, they have to worry.”

    A provision that expedites the approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a natural gas pipeline in West Virginia and Virginia, also adds to the consternation many Democrats will have about the bill. They had succeeded in keeping it out of prior bills, but Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, and other members of the West Virginia delegation prevailed in getting it included in the debt limit bill. Environmental groups were harshly criticising its inclusion Sunday evening.

    Business group backing

    With the nation roughly a week away from the risk of a default that could roil the US and global economy, major business groups have been urging Washington to act quickly on a debt-ceiling increase.

    The Business Roundtable, a group of more than 200 chief executive officers, called on Congress to pass the bill as soon as possible.

    “In addition to raising the debt ceiling, this agreement takes steps towards putting the US on a more sustainable fiscal trajectory,” said the group’s CEO, Joshua Bolten. “This deal also makes a down payment on permitting reform, helping to clear the path for new energy infrastructure projects.”

    The US Chamber of Commerce also urged a “yes” vote and noted that the vote will be included when the group rates or “scorecards” members of Congress based on how they vote on business priorities.

    Economists have been clear that the economy would be roiled with even a short-term breach in the nation’s ability to fully pay its bills as interest rates would rise and financial markets swoon.

    “The gravity of this moment cannot be overstated,” said Suzanne Clark, the US Chamber of Commerce president and CEO.

    Watchdog groups approve

    Some advocacy groups have long warned of the propensity of Congress to enact policy priorities without fully paying for them. Their concerns generally go unheeded. But some see the agreement as a step in the right direction.

    The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted that if the legislation passes, it would be the first major deficit-reducing budget agreement in almost a dozen years.

    “The process was tense, risky and ugly, but in the end, we have a plan to enact savings and lift the debt ceiling, and that is what is needed,” said Maya MacGuineas, the group’s president.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Durable-goods orders get a boost from military spending

    Durable-goods orders get a boost from military spending

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: Orders for manufactured goods jumped 1.1% in April largely because of the military, but business investment also rose sharply in a positive sign for the economy.

    Economists polled by the Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.8% decline. Durable goods are items meant to last a long time.

    Yet orders fell 0.2% if transportation is excluded, the government said Friday. The transportation segment is a large and volatile category that often exaggerates the ups and downs in industrial production.

    The pace of orders has slowed sharply over the past year and is now just slightly positive. Orders rise in an expanding economy and shrink in a contracting one.

    In a good sign, business investment rose a sharp 1.4% after a string of weak readings. Companies invest more when they expect the economy to improve, but it remains to be seen if it’s the blip or the start of a trend.

    Big picture: The industrial side of the economy has largely been sidelined by rising interest rates and a shift in consumer spending away from manufactured goods.

    What has kept the economy afloat is an increase in spending on services such as travel, recreation and hospitality.

    The divide in the economy is likely to persist for while and leave the U.S. more susceptible to a recession.

    Market reaction: The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.11%

    and S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.88%

    were set to open mildly higher in Friday trades.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman economists: U.S. Treasury funds will be exhausted by June 9

    Goldman economists: U.S. Treasury funds will be exhausted by June 9

    [ad_1]

    Goldman Sachs economists Alec Phillips and Tim Krupa say the Treasury’s early June deadline for the debt ceiling looks “very accurate, in our view.” Their calculation is that by June 2, the Treasury’s room under the debt ceiling will barely exceed $30 billion — the minimum cash the Treasury has targeted in prior debt-limit projections — and entirely dry by June 9. They say odds are highest that a deal will be announced late Friday or Saturday. They give an 80% chance to a full-fledged deal, a 10% probability of a short-term patch and a 10% chance Congress doesn’t act in time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Is the U.S. Debt Ceiling? Deadline, Limit, Default Explained | Entrepreneur

    What Is the U.S. Debt Ceiling? Deadline, Limit, Default Explained | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    It’s crunch time. President Joe Biden and the House Republicans have just days to act to prevent the country from defaulting on its debt. In January, the U.S. hit its debt limit of $31.4 trillion, which means the federal government can’t rack up any more tabs (or borrow more money) — so paying the bills on time just got more complicated.

    How will the debt ceiling deadline affect you? It’s a loaded question, so let’s pull back the layers. Here’s what to know.

    What is the debt ceiling?

    The debt ceiling was created by Congress in 1917 and limits how much the U.S. can borrow to fund legal obligations set by lawmakers in the past (social security, tax refunds, military salaries, interest payments on outstanding debt, medicare benefits, and more). In other words, it caps how much debt the U.S. can incur. The current debt ceiling is $31.4 trillion.

    What does hitting the debt ceiling mean?

    Hitting the debt ceiling limit wouldn’t be a hot topic if the country’s revenue exceeded its costs (the government receives money primarily from individual and corporate taxes but also has other sources such as leases of government-owned buildings and land, sale of natural resources, and admission to national parks).

    However, the U.S. hasn’t been in the green since 2001, meaning that for over 20 years, the government has had to borrow money to fund operations. Now that the U.S. has hit its debt limit, there are two options: raise or suspend the limit so the government can pay its bills on time or face a default.

    Raising the debt ceiling would be just what it sounds like (bumping up the limit that the U.S. can borrow). Suspending the debt ceiling means that the Treasury can temporarily override the ceiling and borrow more beyond the current limit. If the U.S. were to default, the country wouldn’t be able to pay its bills on time, and the economic impact would likely be felt immediately.

    Related: Fannie Mae Says a ‘Modest Recession’ Is ‘Expected’ in Second Half of the Year

    When is the deadline to raise or suspend the debt ceiling?

    In a letter sent to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on Monday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that it is “highly likely” that the Treasury will be unable to fulfill its financial obligations if Congress does not raise or suspend the debt ceiling as soon as June 1.

    “I continue to urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting as soon as possible,” she wrote.

    What would happen if the U.S. defaults?

    In March, Moody Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi warned that if the U.S. defaults, it would be “catastrophic” and Americans would likely pay for the default “for generations.”

    For example, government workers and businesses with government contracts might not get paid on time, and social security payments could stop. In a broader sense, it would also trigger “a loss of consumer and business confidence,” said Brookings Institution analysts Wendy Edelberg and Louise Sheiner.

    Would a default cause a recession?

    The default would essentially spark a nationwide economic collapse and induce an “immediate, sharp recession,” the Council of Economic Advisors warned in early May.

    Harry Mamaysky, professor of professional practice at Columbia Business School, told Entrepreneur that the government has “lots of obligations to lots of people.”

    “At some point, when there’s not enough money, they have to begin to prioritize who to pay first,” Mamaysky said. “Someone is not going to get paid the money that they’re owed on time, and that’s going to be disruptive.”

    Related: Bank Failures and Inflation Making You Sweat? Here Are 3 Marketing Moves to Make Your Business Recession-Proof.

    However, the short-term ramifications of default could be nowhere near as damaging as the long-term implications–what Mamaysky calls a “reputational issue” that could call into question the U.S.’s credibility as a smart country to do business with.

    “That’s the biggest risk to me—it isn’t what happens this year or next year, but will the world perceive in five to 10 years the U.S. to be the best country in the world to conduct business?” he said. “It’s not imminent, but if Congress doesn’t watch it, they’re going to erode confidence.”

    On Wednesday, top credit rating agency Finch placed the U.S.’s current “AAA” rating under “rating watch negative,” which means the country’s perfect score might be at risk for a downgrade.

    “The Rating Watch Negative reflects increased political partisanship that is hindering reaching a resolution to raise or suspend the debt limit despite the fast-approaching x date (when the U.S. Treasury exhausts its cash position and capacity for extraordinary measures without incurring new debt),” the company said in a statement.

    How will a default affect small businesses?

    A recent report by Goldman Sachs found that 65% of small business owners would be “negatively impacted” if the U.S. defaults on its debt. Furthermore, 90% said it was “very important” that the government avoid defaulting.

    If the U.S. defaults, businesses with government contracts may not see payments, and shops that have customers who rely on food stamps or social security to pay for necessities may see a drop in spending.

    “If you’re a social security recipient and you owe rent, you may not have the money to pay rent,” Mamaysky added. “And if the landlord owes the utility bill on their building, they may not be able to pay the utility bill because they didn’t get the rent.”

    Related: 7 Savings Strategies for Small Businesses in Uncertain Economic Climates

    What’s more, a 2011 Federal Reserve of New York report said small businesses were hit the hardest during the 2008-2009 recession.

    According to the report, banks become “more selective and risk-averse” when granting loans in a recession, making it more difficult for individuals to get a small business loan.

    “Small firms, which rely more on external financing and tend to be riskier, are more likely to be affected by a credit crunch,” researchers wrote.

    How many times has the debt ceiling been raised or modified?

    Despite the current pressure to raise or suspend the debt ceiling, it’s a relatively routine practice for the U.S. government. Since 1960, Congress has acted 78 times to raise, temporarily extend, or revise the definition of the debt limit to avoid a default—49 times under Republican presidents and 29 times under Democratic presidents, according to the Treasury, adding that “Congressional leaders in both parties have recognized that this is necessary.”

    The most recent increase was in 2021 when the debt ceiling was raised by $2.5 trillion.

    What’s the hold-up to raise or suspend the debt ceiling?

    McCarthy and the Biden administration are negotiating a deal to avoid a federal default. However, the two have differing stances: McCarthy and House Republicans are pushing for $3.6 trillion in cuts and limits to future spending for certain programs (which are not specified in the bill) in exchange for raising the debt ceiling, while the Biden administration is focused on raising the limit and paying bills on time before it agrees to any cuts.

    On Thursday, the House is set to vote on a deal and then recess while negotiators continue to work on an agreement.

    “Following [Thursday’s] votes, if some new agreement is reached between President Biden and Speaker McCarthy, members will receive 24 hours’ notice in the event we need to return to Washington for any additional votes, either over the weekend or next week,” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said, per CNN.

    What is the 14th Amendment, and what does it have to do with the debt ceiling?

    The 14th Amendment covers equal protection and other rights such as citizenship, state taxation, and what Congress can regulate. The fourth section of the Amendment, which covers public debt, states that the “validity of the public debt of the United States … shall not be questioned.”

    Given that the U.S. has hit its debt ceiling and may not be able to pay its bills, there is an argument that, by invoking the 14th Amendment, Biden has the legal authority to bypass Congress (which approves any action to raise or suspend the debt ceiling) and essentially continue to issue more debt through the Treasury and ignore the debt limit.

    Biden has been supportive but cautious about invoking the 14th Amendment as a solution.

    “The question is, could it be done and invoked in time that it would not be appealed, and as a consequence past the date in question and still default on the debt? That is a question that I think is unresolved,” Biden told reporters on Sunday, per The Wall Street Journal.

    Some experts have said that the move would be unconstitutional.

    “The Biden administration even flirting with these ideas really suggests that the administration’s fidelity to the Constitution is questionable or opportunistic,” Philip Wallach, a senior fellow at the center-right think tank American Enterprise Institute, told the Wall Street Journal.

    Others have been slightly more straightforward on their opinion of the idea, Yellen saying it could provoke a “constitutional crisis,” and Representative Chip Roy saying if Biden took the 14th Amendment route, the House Republicans would “blow crap up.”

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Garfinkle

    Source link

  • A debt-ceiling deal will spark a new worry: Who will buy the deluge of Treasury bills?

    A debt-ceiling deal will spark a new worry: Who will buy the deluge of Treasury bills?

    [ad_1]

    When the U.S. debt-ceiling fight finally is resolved, the Treasury is expected to unleash a flood of bill issuance to help refill its coffers run low by the protracted standoff in Washington, D.C., over the government’s borrowing limit.

    Treasury bills are debt issued by the U.S. government that mature in four to 52 weeks. New bill issuance could reach about $1.4 trillion through the end of 2023, with roughly $1 trillion flooding the market before the end of August, according to an estimate from BofA Global strategists.

    They expect the deluge through August to be about five times the supply of an average three-month stretch in years before the pandemic.

    “The good news is that we have a high degree of confidence around who is going to buy it,” said Mark Cabana, rates strategist at BofA Global, in a phone interview with MarketWatch. “The bad news is that it’s not going to be at current levels. Things have to cheapen.”

    Cabana sees a key buyer of bill supply unleashed by a debt-ceiling deal in money-market funds, which have climbed to nearly $5.4 trillion in assets managed since the regional banking crisis erupted in March (see chart).

    So people who yanked billions of dollars in deposits from banks after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March and parked them in money-market funds could end up playing an encore performance in this year’s debt-ceiling drama.

    Money-market funds swell since March, topping $5 trillion in assets


    BofA Global

    Related: Money-market funds swell to record $5.4 trillion as savers pull money from bank deposits

    $2 trillion at Fed repo facility

    Money-market funds have been the main reason why at least $2 trillion consistently sits overnight at the Federal Reserve’s reverse repo facility. The program was last offering a roughly 5% rate, a level Cabana said new Treasury bills might need to exceed by about 10-20 basis points.

    “It’s an unintended consequence of a debt-ceiling deal getting done,” said George Catrambone, head of fixed income Americas at DWS Group, about market expectations for heavy short-term Treasury bill issuance, but he also expects money-market funds, foreign buyers and other institutions auctions to continue as buyers in the market.

    “There’s always buyers. It’s a question of price.”

    President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. met Monday to talk about potential ways to raise the $31.4 trillion borrowing limit and to avoid a “doomsday” scenario in financial markets if the U.S. defaults. As talks resumed Wednesday, McCarthy said, “I think we can make progress today.”

    Congress has struck deals each time U.S. public debt has exceeded its debt ceiling in the past, including by suspending it eight times since 2016 (see chart).

    In the past when the U.S. debt-limit has been violated, Congress extended or suspended it


    Refinitive, RiverFront

    That doesn’t mean financial markets have been sitting by idly. The 1-month Treasury yield
    TMUBMUSD01M,
    5.616%

    rose to 5.6% on Wednesday, while the 3-month yield
    TMUBMUSD03M,
    5.350%

    was 5.3%, according to FactSet. Bill maturing around the “X-date,” which could come as soon as June 1, have even higher yields.

    Read: Debt-ceiling angst sends Treasury bill yields toward 6%

    “Those are obviously pretty heady yields,” Catrambone said. “But it also exemplifies the market having to price in potential market disruptions in the month of June,” even though his team, like many in financial markets, expect that eventually “cooler heads will prevail” in Washington as the debt-ceiling standoff heads down to the wire.

    Stocks were lower Wednesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.75%

    off almost 300 points, or 0.9%, on pace for a fourth day in a row of losses, according to FactSet. The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.83%

    was off 0.9% and the Nasdaq Composite Index was down 0.9%.

    How the money ran out

    The Treasury in January hit its borrowing limit and began operating under “extraordinary measures” to avoid a default.

    Cash balances at the Treasury Department have since dwindled to less than $100 billion, according to economists at Jefferies. Barclays strategists estimate its cash balance may fall below $50 billion between June 5-15.

    “Basically, we are just draining our cash account to fund operations while we wait to figure out the debt ceiling,” said Lindsay Rosner, senior portfolio manager at PGIM Fixed Income.

    But when the battle over the debt limit ends in a resolution, she expects longer-dated Treasury yields to increase, as haven buying on fears of potentially a full U.S. government default and a credit rating downgrade will have been taken off the table.

    “The Armageddon, whatever small probability people were pricing in of catastrophe, remove that,” she said. “And that means the worst economic outcome has been removed.”

    That’s also a reason why Rosner has been avoiding ultrashort Treasurys in the eye of the debt-ceiling fight in favor of 2, 3 or 4-year bonds offering some of the highest yields in years.

    “We’re being afforded good yield, good spread, a couple of years out the curve,” she said. “Play that game.”

    Read next: How will the Fed react to the debt ceiling breach? Here are some plays in the playbook.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debt-ceiling angst sends Treasury bill yields toward 6%

    Debt-ceiling angst sends Treasury bill yields toward 6%

    [ad_1]

    Continued uncertainty about whether a debt-ceiling resolution can come together fast enough to avoid a government default pushed yields on Treasury bills maturing between early and mid-June toward 6% on Tuesday.

    The yield on Treasury bills maturing on June 6 touched that level before slipping slightly to 5.997% Tuesday afternoon, according to Bloomberg data. Meanwhile, the rate on T-bills maturing on June 8 was at 5.905%.

    In addition, the one-year T-bill issued in June 2022 and which matures on June 15 was yielding 6.141%, though analysts said that was likely being impacted by a government auction on Tuesday. That 6.141% yield was the highest of any government obligation maturing within two weeks after the so-called X-date of June 1 — when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the government might be unable to pay all its bills if no action is taken on the debt ceiling.

    The Treasury bill market is where debt-ceiling angst has played out the most and Tuesday brought wild trading as investors questioned whether the government will be forced to miss payments after June 1. At the moment, the T-bill market is in a state of dislocation — one in which yields ranged from as little as 2.924% on the government obligation maturing on May 30 to as high as 6.141% on the 1-year bill maturing in three weeks.

    The higher the yield on a Treasury obligation, the more investors are demanding to be compensated for the risk of holding that bill. Yields also rise when investors are selling off or staying away from the underlying maturity. Tuesday’s moves suggest that investors and traders are factoring in at least some risk that the government could cross the X-date without a debt-ceiling resolution.

    Right now, the market regards bills maturing between June 6 and June 15 as “the most at risk for a delayed payment and no one wants to own” them, said Lawrence Gillum, the Charlotte, N.C.-based chief fixed income strategist at LPL Financial.

    “Ultimately, markets expect something to get done, but money managers who have to own those T-bills are not taking any chances,” he said via phone.

    For much of Tuesday, the broader financial market appeared to be relatively confident that a debt-ceiling agreement could be reached by June 1, a day after President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy each described talks as “productive” on Monday. Then came word of McCarthy telling House Republicans on Tuesday that negotiators were nowhere near a deal yet, with Bloomberg citing Republican Representative Ralph Norman and another unidentified person in the room.

    All three major U.S. stock indexes
    DJIA,
    -0.69%

    SPX,
    -1.12%

    COMP,
    -1.26%

    finished lower, while Treasury yields beyond the 2-year rate slipped toward the end of Tuesday’s New York trading session — a sign of fading optimism in the outlook for the U.S. economy.

    Read: ‘Survival of the strongest’: How pandemic-era shifts may upend market’s recession narrative

    One of the financial market’s favorite indicators of impending U.S. recessions — the difference between the 2- and 10-year Treasury yields — has been persistently inverted since July 5, 2022. That’s the longest such streak since May 1980, and yet no recession has been declared so far by the only arbiters who matter, those at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

    On Tuesday, fed funds futures traders priced in a 28.1% chance of another quarter-point rate hike by the central bank in June, which would take the main policy rate target to between 5.25%-5.5%. They also factored in a slight 5.6% likelihood of another similar-size rate hike in July.

    Gillum and Greg Faranello, head of U.S. rates at AmeriVet Securities in New York, said they see a small chance of no debt-ceiling agreement by June 1. Under such a scenario, the Treasury market would fall into “disarray,” with T-bill yields spiking in a manner reminiscent of last year’s crisis of confidence in the U.K. bond market, they said. It would also make it harder for the Fed to hike rates on June 14, and likely lead to a flight-to-quality trade in longer-term Treasurys as equities sell off.

    See: ‘Doomsday machine’: Here’s what could happen if the debt ceiling is breached

    As of Tuesday, the T-bill market was “definitely showing some signs of stress, there’s no question about it,” Faranello said via phone. Meanwhile, “the economy is doing better than the narrative of recession,” even after the recent turmoil in regional banks, and a move toward 4% in the 10-year rate this year “can’t be ruled out.” However, that could change quickly based on the outcome of the debt-ceiling debate.

    Getting something done on the debt ceiling by June 1 “is going to be a challenge,” Faranello said. The risk of default “is small but not a zero-percent probability,” as is the prospect of chaos if negotiators come too close to the wire and create a period of confusion in the Treasury market.

    “At a minimum, there would be pretty severe economic damage” from a default or any confusion, it “could be chaotic,” and “you would see that impact on risk assets,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fed’s Bullard backs two more interest-rate hikes

    Fed’s Bullard backs two more interest-rate hikes

    [ad_1]

    St. Louis Fed President James Bullard on Monday said he would like to see two more quarter-percentage-point interest-rate hikes this year.

    “I think we’re going to have to grind higher with the policy rate in order to put downward pressure on inflation,” Bullard said in a moderated discussion at the American Gas Association’s Financial Forum in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

    Bullard said that the timing of the rate hikes was uncertain but that he has been an advocate of raising rates “sooner rather than later.”

    “You want to get the downward pressure while you can,” he said.

    The Fed raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to a range of 5%-5.25% at its meeting in May. That matches the median forecast of Fed officials for the peak interest rate in this cycle.

    Officials at the Fed are divided over whether to continue to hike rates at their meeting in mid-June or pausing to see how the economy is affected by lags from the rapid pace of hikes. Some officials don’t like the word “pause” and have described holding rates steady in June as a “skip,” because it underlines that they are not saying they are done raising rates.

    The markets think the Fed is done with rate hikes and have even been pricing in rate cuts later this year.

    Bullard said that the Fed’s forecast of no more hikes was based on its expectations of slower growth and a faster drop in inflation in the first half of the year than has been seen in subsequent data.

    “Inflation is hanging up too high,” Bullard said.

    Stocks
    DJIA,
    -0.24%

    SPX,
    +0.22%

    were set to open slightly higher on Monday, while the yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.716%

    rose to 3.7%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link