ReportWire

Tag: credit

  • The 10 best countries to retire right now—and America didn’t make the cut | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Baby boomers aren’t just flocking down to sunshine states like Florida to kickstart their retirement careers anymore—they’re booking a one-way ticket overseas for a better quality of life. 

    While the United States lacks a formal retirement visa, many other countries offer dedicated programs for retirees to have more affordable living and a new laid-back lifestyle, which is why it’s no surprise the U.S. didn’t make the cut in the Global Citizen Solutions’ 2025 retirement report. 

    For expats ready for cobblestone views and sipping coffee on a sunny terrace, the new report ranks 44 passive income and retirement visa programs. It also evaluated 20 key indicators grouped into six main categories: visa procedures, citizenship and mobility, economic factors, tax benefits, quality of life, and safety and social integration. Each country received a score out of 100. 

    Many of the top-ranked countries were in Europe and South America. Portugal ranked as the best, followed by Mauritius and Spain.

    “The countries dominating our rankings understand that successful retirement migration isn’t just about letting people in, it’s about helping them thrive,” Patricia Casaburi, CEO of Global Citizen Solutions, tells Fortune. 

    Portugal, Mauritius, and Spain top the list, she said, because they truly support new residents with tools to build a life. “They offer language programs, streamlined healthcare registration, and clear pathways from temporary residence to citizenship,” Casaburi explained. “Countries that treat retirees as temporary visitors rather than future citizens consistently underperform.” 

    The 10 best countries to retire abroad in 2025

    1. Portugal
    2. Mauritius
    3. Spain
    4. Uruguay
    5. Austria
    6. Italy
    7. Slovenia
    8. Malta
    9. Latvia
    10. Chile 

    Portugal 

    Coming in at number one was Portugal, where dual citizenship is allowed. The European country offers citizens a D7 Visa, a type of residency visa designed for people who have a stable passive income—making it a popular option for retirees. 

    What matters most to new international citizens is feeling secure and being able to build a real life in their new country, and Portugal excels at letting boomers build a new life without losing their roots. 

    “[Portugal] has institutional frameworks suggesting it will remain stable for the next 20-30 years of your retirement. Before making the move, research the country’s healthcare system rankings, political stability indices, and infrastructure investments. Visit during different seasons and talk to expat communities who’ve been there for 5+ years,” Casaburi added. 

    A single applicant needs about €870 per month in stable passive income. The processing time takes around 12 months. After the initial residency permit is granted and you’ve lived there for at least 5 years, you can apply to be a permanent citizen. Portugal also taxes its citizens on the income they make inside and outside of the country.

    Mauritius 

    Next at number two was the eastern African country, Mauritius. Retirees can obtain a residence permit by demonstrating a minimum monthly income of $1,500, with processing times typically around three months. 

    The permit allows the main applicant to include their spouse or legal partner, as well as dependent children, making it a family-friendly option. Retirees benefit from a territorial tax system, meaning foreign-sourced income is not taxed, and there are no wealth or inheritance taxes. After six years of residency, retirees become eligible to apply for citizenship, and dual citizenship is permitted. 

    Spain 

    Number three was Spain. The Spanish non-lucrative visa (NLV) is designed for non-EU citizens who wish to live in Spain without engaging in any work. To qualify, applicants should have a stable income of at least €2,400 per month. 

    Processing for a visa typically takes around three months. Once approved, residents are subject to Spain’s worldwide tax system and potential inheritance tax. The NLV provides a pathway to Spanish citizenship after 10 years of legal residence, or just 2 years for citizens of select Latin American and other historically connected countries. Dual citizenship is allowed, depending on the laws of the applicant’s country of origin.

    Uruguay 

    Coming in at number four was the South American country Uruguay, where residents need an income requirement of $2,000 of stable passive income a month. Processing time takes about one month. The main applicant can include spouse or legal partner, minor children and dependent adult children, there are no imposed taxes on foreign-sourced income, and no wealth and inheritance tax. Dual citizenship is allowed and the path to citizenship takes about 5 years. 

    Austria 

    Ending the top five was Austria. The country offers an independent residence permit as a pathway for people who can prove they have an income to support themselves while abroad. Processing time takes about 4 months and the main applicant could include a spouse, legal partner and minor children. For tax benefits, they have a worldwide tax system—meaning the country taxes its citizens on all their income, regardless of where it was earned—and no inheritance tax. The path to citizenship is 10 years, with dual citizenship allowed. 

    Are you looking to retire abroad? Fortune wants to hear from you. Contact Jessica.Coacci@fortune.com

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Coacci

    Source link

  • Klarna goes public as 3 in 4 Americans rely on buy-now, pay-later. Experts worry it’s snowballing ‘quickly into a serious financial burden’ | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Swedish fintech firm Klarna just made its highly anticipated debut on the New York Stock Exchange, raising $1.37 billion and locking in a $15 billion valuation. But finance and legal experts are becoming wary of the growing risks associated with the ballooning buy-now, pay later (BNPL) industry. 

    Klarna, known for its short-term, interest-free financing solutions for consumers, has rapidly expanded its user base to more than 100 million globally, partnering with more than 720,000 retailers. The Wednesday IPO is a signal of how large and influential BNPL options have become. According to a survey published Wednesday by LegalShield of more than 2,000 U.S. adults aged 18 to 80, a whopping three-fourths of people rely on BNPL services, which also include products like Affirm, Afterpay, and Sezzle. Even PayPal has a BNPL option.

    Although Klarna and other BNPL services are growing increasingly popular—often replacing credit cards for some younger generations—that doesn’t mean they’re without risks. While the service can allow for consumers to break up large purchases into more digestible payments, if they have too many of these in place, the costs can easily rack up.

    “We’re hearing story after story of people overextending themselves, juggling payments from various loan companies and banks,” Rebecca A. Carter, a LegalShield provider lawyer with Friedman, Framme & Thrush, said in a statement. “What many don’t realize is that if you aren’t disciplined about managing the payment schedules and budgeting, it can snowball quickly into a serious financial burden.”

    Analysts have coined this shift from flexible financing to a “bandage for basics” ahead of the FICO pilot, according to Storyful Intelligence

    And what many people—nearly 40% of consumers, according to LegalShield—also don’t realize is that BNPL will soon impact credit scores for people who use it to buy things like clothing, furniture, concert tickets, takeout food, or even an Airbnb stay. Starting this fall, FICO scores will include BNPL data from consumers.

    “Buy Now, Pay Later loans are playing an increasingly important role in consumers’ financial lives,” Julie May, vice president and general manager of B2B Scores at FICO, said in a statement. “We’re enabling lenders to more accurately evaluate credit readiness, especially for consumers whose first credit experience is through BNPL products.”

    Complex financial tool

    LegalShield also warns 45% of BNPL users have faced legal or contractual disputes from using the financing service, with 62% of those reporting billing errors and 60% forced to pay even after returning items. But many of these customers just give up, LegalShield found, and just pay incorrect charges or don’t know they have the legal right to dispute them.

    “BNPL has evolved from a simple payment option into a complex financial tool that, without proper understanding and legal guidance, can gradually become overwhelming for families,” Carter said. 

    To be sure, not all aspects of BNPL services are bad. They’ve given consumers more purchasing power, an interest-free option for paying off major purchases, and instant gratification for customers who would otherwise have to save up for a long time to make a high-ticket purchase. It’s also been positive for merchants in that they can have increased sales volume and expand to new customer demographics. 

    Personal finance experts have also offered advice to consumers for not getting overwhelmed by BNPL payments—chiefly not spending more than you make. 

    “Credit card debt is a terrible place to be. Interest rates are unbelievable, and if you find yourself in that trap, it can be so hard to get out of,” Allyson Kiel, a private wealth advisor at Synovus Bank, previously told Fortune’s Preston Fore. “If it’s a want and not a need, you should wait.”

    Consumers can also expect more BNPL innovations in the future—particularly in light of Klarna’s IPO.

    “This isn’t the finish line. It’s fuel,” Klarna CEO and cofounder Sebastian Siemiatkowski said in a statement about the IPO. “Fuel for us to keep disrupting, keep innovating, and keep making life easier for millions of people out there.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Sydney Lake

    Source link

  • The Box Secures $12.5M Financing Deal Led by Shorooq

    [ad_1]

    The Box Plans to Further Expand Self-Storage Footprint in the UAE

    Shorooq, the leading multi-dimensional investment firm, renowned for its strategic commitments in the MENA region, leads a $12.5 million financing through its Credit Practice in The Box, a Dubai-based self-storage company addressing modern storage and logistical challenges faced by individuals and businesses. With an aim to expand and develop new flagship storage facilities, The Box is poised to transform the self-storage landscape across the UAE and enhance urban living convenience.

    Against the backdrop of a growing expat-dominated population, demand for flexible storage solutions continues to rise as consumers increasingly seek adaptable, stress-free ways to manage personal and business belongings. The Box is the clear market leader in the UAE, operating a significant portion of self-storage space in the market, designed to accommodate a wide range of personal and business needs. Offering units ranging from small lockers of 25 square feet up to 1,000 square foot rooms, and anything in between, The Box ensures flexible storage solutions tailored to various needs.

    Driving growth remains a core ambition for The Box. This newly raised capital will support the construction of a brand-new self-storage facility in the heart of Dubai, further expanding the company’s already market-leading position. As urbanization accelerates and the self-storage industry responds to the drive towards smart city infrastructure, The Box’s role is becoming even more pivotal.

    The partnership with Shorooq complements The Box’s vision to empower individuals, making room for tomorrow by redefining space management. Acknowledging the partnership’s significance, The Box’s Founder and CEO expressed with enthusiasm, “With Shorooq’s strategic support, we are excited to expand our reach and deliver an exceptional storage experience. We look forward to elevating the standards of the self-storage industry in the region to meet the demands of modern urban living.”

    Shorooq, known for its strategic foresight in investing across fintech, platforms, and deep tech, sees immense potential in The Box’s consumer-oriented model and its alignment with urban growth trends. “The Box signals our commitment to backing transformative industries within the MENA region,” explained Joe Barron, Senior Investment Professional within the Credit Practice at Shorooq. “The Box’s approach matches our ethos of enhancing life through intelligent, responsive solutions, and we are excited to propel them into their next phase of growth with the construction of a new flagship facility in the heart of Dubai.”

    Through this collaboration, both entities are set to champion innovative solutions that cater to today’s fast-paced lifestyle, leveraging Shorooq’s strategic insights to solidify The Box’s position as a leader in self-storage. The anticipated launch of sustainable, state-of-the-art facilities across the region promises to meet the increasing demands for reliable storage solutions.

    Looking ahead, The Box aims to build robust, technology-enhanced spaces that offer seamless access and security, ensuring that every “green door” reveals more than just storage – it unveils a story, representing new opportunities and a new chapter in self-storage innovation.

    Contact Information

    Source: Shorooq

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to fix bad credit history in Canada: 3 steps to boost your score – MoneySense

    How to fix bad credit history in Canada: 3 steps to boost your score – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    1. Review your credit report for errors

    It’s important to review your credit report and score at least once a year, especially when you’re trying to improve it. You can obtain your credit report and score through Canada’s two credit bureaus, a third-party service or your bank’s website or mobile app, as noted above. Doing so will not affect your score.

    Look over the report to see what’s documented and ensure the information is correct. You can remove incorrect information at no charge by filing a dispute directly with the credit bureaus. Errors in your report or instances of identity theft can cause your score to be lower than it should be and addressing these errors could increase it dramatically. Look for things like:

    • Errors related to personal details such as phone number, reported addresses, birth date and full name
    • Incorrect accounts due to identity theft
    • Balances on accounts that have been paid off
    • Unauthorized purchases due to fraud

    It can take time for errors to completely disappear from your credit report, so the sooner you address the issue, the sooner you can start the process of rebuilding your credit.

    Even if there are no mistakes, the report provides an overview of your accounts, offering insights into how to enhance your credit and better manage debt.

    2. Focus on paying down debt

    A history of consistently paying down debts is a good starting point for improving your credit, and it’s something you can immediately take action on. Even if you only have one big bill, it’s important to prioritize paying it down. Paying at least the required miniumum amount, on-time, every time, is crucial for your credit score. And remember that carrying debt is expensive, so you’ll want to try to pay off these debts in full as soon as possible by putting more money towards the outstanding balances.

    You can do this by creating a debt repayment plan using either the avalanche or the snowball repayment methods. Avalanche focuses on paying off the debt with the highest interest rate first. By prioritizing high-interest debt, you save money in the long run and can pay off your debts more efficiently. The Snowball method has you pay off the smallest debt first, which can provide quick wins and keep you motivated with each debt that gets knocked out. Each method has its pros and cons, so pick the one that best fits your financial situation.

    3. Watch out for credit repair scams

    Some companies claim they can fix your credit and solve your debt problems quickly—and you may be tempted to use their services if you have a less-than-perfect credit score. However, you can only rebuild credit—there’s no quick fix. 

    Credit repair companies may say they will fix your credit by removing negative information from your credit report to boost your credit score—for a costly, up-front fee. These companies often take advantage of the fact that many Canadians don’t know you accurate information cannot be removed from a credit report—even if it’s bad. Be cautious of companies offering credit repair services. It’s likely a scam if a company: 

    [ad_2]

    Randolph Taylor

    Source link

  • How to build credit history in Canada – MoneySense

    How to build credit history in Canada – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    How to get a credit card in Canada

    Well, you apply. But make sure you’re applying for the right card and that you have a high chance of being approved. You see, the credit card company will check your credit history, and that can affect your current credit score. So, don’t apply for a bunch and hope for the best, as that could make it look like you are at risk for having access to too much credit. The good news: There are many types of credit cards in Canada, including those for newcomers to Canada, students and even those with bad or no credit. Check out our rankings for the best credit cards in Canada for your situation.

    Once you have a credit card you will want to maintain good credit habits, like paying it off on time and paying more than the required minimum payment. Here are some other articles that will help you navigating your first credit card in Canada.

    Read:

    Why is credit history important?

    Say you want to rent an apartment. Your credit history is vital because most landlords will want to see your credit score and credit report to judge whether you’ll pay your rent on time. If you get the apartment, you’ll want an internet connection—and for this, too, the large providers will query your credit score.

    If you need to buy or lease a car, your credit history will not only determine whether you’re approved for a loan, but also what interest rate you’re offered: the higher your credit score, the lower the interest rate. Insurance companies may check your credit history before providing coverage. And finally, if you want to buy a home, your credit history is key to qualifying for a mortgage, as well as what mortgage interest rates lenders will offer. A lower rate could save you tens of thousands of dollars over the life of your mortgage.

    Read:

    How to build a good credit history when you have no credit history

    Credit history is usually built organically as people start using credit. In Canada, young people who have reached the age of majority (18 or 19, depending on where they live) can apply for a credit card and start building a history of borrowing and repayment.

    If you’re a newcomer to Canada, or if you’re a student, recent grad or young adult who doesn’t have much of a credit history, your credit score may be low—which is a hurdle in getting approved for credit. It’s a frustrating cycle—you need credit history to access credit, and you need credit to build that history. So, what’s the solution? Here are a few steps anybody can take to build their credit history:

    [ad_2]

    Aditya Nain

    Source link

  • Comparing buy now, pay later programs: Are installment plans a budget win or finance fail? – MoneySense

    Comparing buy now, pay later programs: Are installment plans a budget win or finance fail? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Some BNPL providers report your payment history to credit bureaus, which can positively affect your credit score if you make the payments on time. In addition, many BNPL providers only run a soft inquiry on your credit report to determine eligibility. That said, it’s possible that a credit check isn’t done at all. So, in this case, your credit report and credit score won’t be impacted by simply applying for BNPL. 

    There are some potential downsides. BNPL loans often require repayment within a short period, especially for smaller purchases, which might not contribute significantly to building your credit history. In that case, a credit card would be a better option. In addition, not all providers report to credit bureaus, which can create what deHaan calls “phantom debt.” When your credit score goes down, credit card companies can see this and won’t offer or approve you for another card, but that’s not the case with BNPL. This can cause consumers to take on more debt than they can handle. 

    DeHaan explained how it works: “So, I open a BNPL account with one provider, I max it out, I can’t pay it off. I go to the next one, I do the same thing… And before I know it, I’ve got three or four maxed-out credit lines, and the reason I can keep getting them is because there’s no reporting about each other’s maxed-out limits.” 

    Before signing up for any BNPL service, ensure you can comfortably repay your purchases in full. While BNPL can potentially boost your credit score through timely payments, it can also negatively impact your score if you miss any payments, leading to additional debt from late fees and interest charges.

    What’s in it for retailers?

    BNPL options benefit retailers in several ways. It can increase sales by allowing customers to spread out payments, encouraging them to spend more with larger purchases. In addition, BNPL providers typically handle the financial transactions and assume the risk of non-payment, so there’s no risk to the retailers themselves.

    What does a credit counsellor think about buy now, pay later?

    While the convenience of BNPL can be tempting, it’s important for consumers to read and understand the terms and conditions that come with installment plans. If you’re not careful, BNPL may deter you from achieving your financial goals. Like all loans, these plans aren’t without risks. Here are a few to know about.

    BNPL can lead to overspending

    For some, installment plans can encourage impulse spending. Deferred payments are an extremely popular option for many Canadians feeling the pinch of inflation and lifestyle creep. Being able to buy something that was previously unobtainable may tempt you to spend more than you can afford. 

    “When credit is cheap and easy, some might get themselves into trouble by spending beyond their means. With BNPL, many of the users tend to be the most vulnerable [financially], and they might not yet have a credit score,” deHaan said. 

    [ad_2]

    Doris Asiedu

    Source link

  • NYCB lays out revised strategy while warning of more near-term pain

    NYCB lays out revised strategy while warning of more near-term pain

    [ad_1]

    New York Community Bancorp’s new management team has plotted out a path to improved profitability, but they say 2024 will be a “transition year.” It remains to be seen just how rocky the next eight months will be.

    The Long Island-based company, whose apartment-heavy commercial lending portfolio landed it in hot water earlier this year, warned investors Wednesday there will be more pain in coming quarters as it continues to root out troubled loans. Charge-offs and loan-loss provisions will be elevated this year before returning to more normal levels in 2025 and 2026, executives said.

    Borrowers have so far shown “amazing resiliency,” new CEO Joseph Otting, the former top bank regulator, told analysts during the company’s first-quarter earnings call. Still, net charge-offs were $81 million during the quarter, while the provision for loan losses totaled $315 million — far above where both metrics were a year earlier. Nonperforming loans also skyrocketed year over year, totaling $798 million as of March 31.

    The company said it is guiding for $750 million-$800 million in provisions for all of this year. It then expects that figure to drop to $150 million-$200 million next year and in 2026.

    Analysts say there are still a lot of unknowns. One big question: How will New York Community, which has gone through significant turmoil since late January, ultimately close the gap between its current performance metrics and what the management team is aiming to achieve by 2026?

    “I think it’s clearly still in the early stages” of a turnaround, said David Smith, an analyst at Autonomous Research who covers the bank. “They put out a more robust and detailed set of expectations than most investors expected, but it’s still a ‘Prove it’ story.”

    Otting, who has been CEO for about eight weeks, expressed confidence that the new management team and restructured board of directors can get the $112.9 billion-asset company back to profitability. The company reported a $327 million net loss in the first quarter.

    Otting, along with former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, turned around the failed IndyMac Bank and eventually sold it for a large profit. The two teamed up again in the New York Community rescue, which required a $1 billion capital infusion.

    “We’ve done this before,” Otting said on the call. “And we feel we can do it again.”

    Investors seemed to agree, at least a little, driving up the stock price by 30% Wednesday to $3.44 per share.

    New York Community’s troubles began on Jan. 31 when the company reported a sizable fourth-quarter loss, signaled trouble in its commercial real estate loan portfolio and slashed its dividend, sparking a 37% decline in its share price. The sell-off continued in February, in part because of ongoing uncertainty about the company’s loan books. The surprise $1 billion investment, led by Mnuchin, was intended to ease the turmoil and bolster the company’s capital levels.

    The plan laid out Wednesday includes both short-term and medium-term goals.

    In the near term, New York Community, which is the parent company of Flagstar Bank, plans to sell or run off noncore assets, work out problem loans and reduce its operating expenses. Medium-term targets include diversifying the loan portfolio, which is currently dominated by multifamily loans; growing core deposits as a way to improve the company’s funding base; and increasing fee income.

    A deal to sell noncore assets worth about $5 billion may be in the works, management said Wednesday, though they did not provide additional details about the asset class.

    By the fourth quarter of 2026, New York Community aims to achieve a return on average assets of 1% and a return on average tangible common equity of 11%-12%. It is also targeting a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 11%-12%. That ratio was 9.45% in the first quarter.

    Return on average assets was negative 1.13% in the first quarter, while return on average tangible common equity was negative 10.02%.

    “We’ve done this before,” New York Community Bancorp CEO Joseph Otting said Wednesday, in reference to the earlier turnaround of a failed bank that he and former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin engineered. “And we feel we can do it again.”

    Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg

    In recent weeks, the new management team has taken a “deep dive” into the health of the bank’s commercial real estate portfolio, said Craig Gifford, New York Community’s chief financial officer. The review covered both the bank’s $36.9 billion multifamily book and its $3.1 billion office loan portfolio.

    The office portfolio makes up just 4% of the bank’s loans, but it’s part of a sector that’s been suffering a “high degree of stress,” Gifford said. The review of office loans, conducted with the help of an independent party, has thus far covered 75% of that portfolio. 

    Executives have set aside a sizeable chunk of reserves to cover potential stress in their office loans. The bank said that its ratio of reserves to total office loans was about 10%, significantly above most of its peer banks. 

    The comparable figure is significantly smaller for New York Community’s much-larger multifamily loan book, where the allowance for loan losses was 1.3% of the portfolio. The bank has examined its top 250 multifamily loans, but it has yet to take an in-depth look at 64% of the portfolio.

    Given how much of the multifamily loan book still needs to be reviewed, “I think there’s uncertainty there,” Peter Winter, an analyst at D.A. Davidson, said Wednesday.

    The multifamily sector has been hit hard, particularly rent-stabilized buildings in New York City, where landlords’ ability to raise rents has been drastically hampered by a 2019 state law. The new rent restrictions come on top of far stronger eviction protections for nonpaying tenants, along with ballooning maintenance and insurance costs, said Seth Glasser, a New York City multifamily broker at the firm Marcus & Millichap.

    The value of rent-regulated buildings in New York has been “annihilated,” Glasser said, with potential sale prices falling by 50% or more. Few potential buyers want the buildings since they have “no business model,” and few lenders would finance any deal, he added.

    “There’s some really significant distress that continues to emerge,” Glasser said. “It feels like it’s getting worse every month.”

    Otting noted that the buildings’ expenses have risen sharply, but he also said that the limited number of vacant apartments means the buildings have a “pretty solid” revenue stream.

    New York Community believes the probability of defaults is rising, Otting said, but the multifamily portfolio so far “has held up very well” as borrowers keep making their payments. 

    Otting also expressed optimism that multifamily borrowers will remain relatively healthy even as their currently low interest rates reprice upward. So far, borrowers have been able to adjust to higher payments with “almost no delinquencies,” said Gifford, the bank’s CFO.

    New York Community has brought on an experienced hand at managing loans that may fall into trouble. James Simons, who formerly ran loan workouts at U.S. Bank in Minneapolis, joined New York Community as a “special advisor to the CEO” to evaluate the health of its borrowers and whether it needs to set aside more reserves to cover potentially troubled loans, Otting said.

    “The information is available to us,” he said. “We just need to formulate that information in the right way.”

    The medium-term plan is to lower New York Community’s long-standing concentration in commercial real estate. The bank’s former chief executive, Thomas Cangemi, kick-started that journey with the 2022 acquisition of the consumer mortgage heavyweight Flagstar Bancorp in Troy, Michigan.

    Just a few months after it completed the deal for Flagstar, New York Community acquired large portions of the failed Signature Bank. The acquisitions vaulted New York Community over $100 billion of assets, putting it into a category that prompts additional scrutiny from bank regulators. 

    During the lengthy process to acquire Flagstar, the company switched its primary federal regulator from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. On Wednesday, Otting, who formerly led the OCC, said the company was “not ready to be regulated” by that agency.

    “So we have a lot of catching up to do to get our standards up,” Otting said. “But we’re committed to doing that, and we’ve hired the people who understand what that looks like.”

    The company’s diversification plan also covers its deposits. Otting said the bank is focusing on continuing to grow core deposits — part of its ongoing shift away from New York Community’s legacy model of funding multifamily loans with higher-cost certificates of deposit, which has included bringing in new depositors from Flagstar and Signature.

    New York Community has recently lost some bankers to smaller rivals, including Peapack-Gladstone Financial and Dime Community Bancshares, raising the risk that departing bankers will bring customers’ deposits with them. 

    But the company’s deposits have stayed resilient after initial outflows in February, when its sharp stock decline prompted some depositors to leave. The bank started 2024 with $81.5 billion of deposits, a figure that dropped to $76.1 billion on March 7, when Mnuchin’s investment group announced plans to pump in new capital.

    Deposits then fell slightly to $74.9 billion at the end of the first quarter, but they ticked up by $300 million as of April 29, according to company executives.

    [ad_2]

    Polo Rocha

    Source link

  • Barclays to buy retail banking arm of supermarket chain Tesco for £600 million

    Barclays to buy retail banking arm of supermarket chain Tesco for £600 million

    [ad_1]

    Tesco on Friday said it was selling the retailing banking business of Tesco Bank to Barclays for £600 million initially, and then another £100 million after the settlement of certain regulatory capital amounts and after transaction costs.

    The U.K. supermarket chain said it will use majority of a combined £1 billion, which also includes a special dividend previously announced from Tesco Bank, for a share buyback.

    It will retain insurance, ATMs, travel money and gift cards, that on a proforma basis account for roughly £80 million to £100 million in operating profit, and said the deal is mildly accretive to earnings per share.

    Barclays said it’s acquiring credit cards, unsecured personal loans, deposits and the operating infrastructure that includes £8.3 billion of unsecured lending balances with a credit quality consistent with its existing U.K. portfolios. The business it’s buying had an adjusted operating profit of approximately £85 million in the 12 months ended February 2023.

    Barclays also will enter into an exclusive strategic partnership with Tesco for an initial period of 10 years to market and distribute credit cards, unsecured personal loans and deposits using the Tesco brand, paying £50 million per year.

    Tesco
    TSCO,
    +0.89%

    shares have dropped 3% this year while Barclays
    BARC,
    -1.02%

    shares have declined by 7%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Couples and credit scores: How your partner’s credit can affect yours – MoneySense

    Couples and credit scores: How your partner’s credit can affect yours – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Should I get a joint credit card with my partner?

    While your partner’s credit score won’t directly impact your credit score, joint accounts or adding the other as a co-applicant will. The one exception is adding your partner as an authorized user to your credit cards and banking accounts. 

    When added as an authorized user, your partner is able to use the credit card but cannot make any changes to the account. Their credit will also not be impacted in any way. However, when a partner is added as a co-applicant, they have to go through the required credit checks and both partners’ credit is impacted based on usage of the account.

    Joint accounts can be beneficial when both partners are on the same page with money. For example, a joint account can give you access to a larger borrowing limit. It also can simplify your finances and foster feelings of partnership. However, depending on your partner’s money habits, sharing a joint credit card could be a real risk to your money and your credit score.

    If either of you miss a payment on a joint account or run up a large balance, each of your credit scores can take a hit. On the other hand, if you and your partner always make your payments on time, both of you will see improvement in your credit scores as the joint account will show up on both of your credit reports. 

    Getting extra credit through a joint credit card might seem like a good idea, be sure to assess each of your financial situations before doing so as gaining new credit can influence financial behaviours. Be critical about how having more or less credit affects your ability to live within your means and pay off your debt in full each month. If you or your partner have any debt, the focus should be on paying it down. Only consider a new, joint credit card if you have paid off your individual debts first.

    How to maintain healthy credit history (and prevent debt) as a couple

    Before combining finances in any way, such as joint credit cards or loans, it is imperative that you and your partner are in agreement and have the same expectations. To maintain healthy credit and prevent debt, consider the following five things: 

    1. Make sure your partner is someone you can trust to properly budget by having open and transparent conversations about money. 
    2. Set boundaries on how the joint account or loan will be used, as well as spending limits. Some couples ensure they both agree on a purchase beforehand, whereas others may check in at the end of the month to ensure all spends are accounted for—it’s good for catching credit card fraud, too, since you never assume it was the other person.
    3. Agree on who will make payments to ensure they’re made on time.
    4. Decide the amount you each will contribute to shared expenses. Will it be 50/50 or a percentage based on your incomes?
    5. Discuss what happens if one of you can’t make a payment due to income loss or illness. What’s your backup plan?

    Money isn’t worth fighting about—but it’s worth talking about

    Discussions about finances aren’t always easy. They might cause stress, tension and arguments with your partner. But, the more you practice communicating with honesty and intention, it does become easier. 

    None of this is to say your partner having a sub-par credit score should be a deal breaker. In fact, it’s fairly simple to start rebuilding credit. As professionally certified credit counsellors with Credit Canada, we often help couples understand their credit and address debt. If you need additional support, contact us today to book a free credit-building counselling session.

    [ad_2]

    Sandy Daykin

    Source link

  • Trump says Powell is being ‘political’ with interest rates

    Trump says Powell is being ‘political’ with interest rates

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump on Friday criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and said he’s playing politics with interest-rate policy.

    “It looks to me like he’s trying to lower interest rates for the sake of maybe getting people elected,” Trump said, in an interview on the Fox Business Network.

    “I think he’s political,” added Trump, the likely 2024 Republican nominee for president.

    Asked if he would reappoint Powell to a third four-year term, Trump replied “no.”

    Trump said he has a couple of choices in mind to replace Powell, but wouldn’t say who.

    Trump said he thinks lowering interest rates would lead to massive inflation. The conflict in the Middle East is likely to lead to “big inflation” from a spike in oil prices, he added.

    Trump said he thinks lowering interest rates would lead to massive inflation. The conflict in the Middle East is likely to lead to “big inflation” from a spike in oil prices, he added.

    Powell “is not going to be able to do anything,” Trump said.

    On Wednesday, Powell said he wasn’t giving a potential third term any thought. Powell’s current term expires in early 2026.

    Speculation on a third term “is not something I’m focused on,” Powell said.

    “We’re focused on doing our jobs. This year is going to be a highly consequential year for the Fed and monetary policy. We’re, all of us, very buckled down, focused on doing our jobs,” Powell said.

    Analysts say that the Fed will be criticized by both parties in the election year.

    On Sunday, Powell will appear on the CBS News program “60 Minutes” and will likely face more questions about the election.

    Earlier this week, top Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee urged the Fed to cut rates quickly, saying they were too high and hurting the housing market.

    “Keeping interest rates high will be detrimental to American workers and their families and do little to bring down prices or promote moderate economic growth,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, and the chairman of the Banking Committee, in a letter to Powell prior to Wednesday’s Fed meeting.

    At the meeting on Wednesday, the Fed kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged in a range of 5.25%-5.5%.

    Asked about the letter from the Democrats on Wednesday, Powell said Congress has given the Fed the job of stable prices. High inflation hurts people at the lower end of the income spectrum, he added.

    “It’s what society has asked us to do is to get inflation down. The tools we use to do it are interest rates,” he said.

    The Fed has penciled in three rate cuts for 2024. Powell said that a cut at the Fed’s next meeting in March was unlikely. He said the Fed wants to see more good inflation reports so it can have greater confidence that inflation is coming down to the 2% target.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Smaller regionals brush off commercial real estate worries

    Smaller regionals brush off commercial real estate worries

    [ad_1]

    Executives at Cullen/Frost Bankers, Bank OZK and BankUnited have all made favorable comments recently about credit quality in their banks’ commercial real estate portfolios.

    Adobe Stock

    As investors fret about how a downturn in commercial real estate could hurt the U.S. banking sector, several small and midsize lenders with substantial exposure to CRE say not to worry.

    Banks whose commercial real estate portfolios have come under the microscope include Cullen/Frost Bankers in San Antonio, Florida-based BankUnited, Bank OZK in Arkansas, Seattle-based WaFd Inc. and Brookline Bancorp in Boston.

    At all five of those banks, which range in size from roughly $10 billion-$50 billion of assets, executives sought during recent earnings calls to reassure analysts about their commercial real estate books, even as high interest rates and remote work stamp the sector with question marks.

    The executives’ efforts were generally successful. The share prices of all five banks have risen over the last five trading days — though some increased only slightly.

    The largest of the bunch, the $49 billion-asset Cullen/Frost, reported a rise in charge-offs during the fourth quarter. But CEO Phil Green said Thursday that commercial real estate loans, which make up 36% of the bank’s $18.8 billion book, weren’t the source.

    “We saw an increase in problem loans this quarter,” he said during the company’s earnings call, “but it really wasn’t from commercial real estate at all.”

    Nearly half of the Texas bank’s CRE transactions are classified as investor real estate — a category that includes office, multifamily and industrial properties — while the rest are mostly owner-operated properties. The biggest exposure risk on paper relates to multifamily construction, rather than office properties, which have been a sore spot for the industry, Green said in an interview.

    He said that Cullen/Frost, the holding company for Frost Bank, actually had three paydowns of office properties that totaled $95 million.

    During the fourth quarter at Cullen/Frost, credit quality remained above historical levels, but charge-offs still rose year over year to $11 million from $3.8 million. Green said he expects further normalization in 2024.

    Cullen/Frost is hitching its wagon to the relationships it has built with borrowers, as well as the underwriting decisions it has made, Green said in the interview, which occurred after the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call. 

    “The reason I don’t worry about that is because of the types of properties, the locations, the quality of the projects and, most importantly, the quality of the relationships that we have,” Green said.

    “It’s not something I’m really worried about. The reason is not because of anything we’re doing now. You can’t do very much now. It’s about what you’ve done over the last few years as you develop your portfolio.”

    Analysts at Wedbush Securities, which have a neutral rating on Cullen/Frost’s stock, wrote in a research note that positive signs for the company include an elevated level of loan loss reserves. While Cullen/Frost’s stock price fell by 1.8% on Friday, it was still up by 0.4% for the week.

    At Miami Lakes, Florida-based BankUnited, Chairman and CEO Rajinder Singh said Friday that the level of nonperforming loans, including CRE loans, is so low “it will be harder to drive them down further.”

    Fourth-quarter net charge-offs were just 0.09% of average loans, which beat analysts’ expectations.

    Some credit normalization appears headed BankUnited’s way, but the trend will start off a very low base. While criticized commercial loans rose by 15% quarter over quarter to $1.14 billion, nonperforming loans declined by $10 million during the three months ending Dec. 31, finishing last year at 0.52% of total loans.

    “Overall on credit,” Singh said during the company’s quarterly earnings call, “I’m sleeping very well at night.”

    BankUnited’s office building loans are anchored in growing South Florida markets, as well as in Manhattan. In its Manhattan portfolio, the $35.8 billion-asset company is reporting a 96% occupancy rate. “We don’t see much in the way of loss content,” Chief Operating Officer Tom Cornish said on the conference call.

    Shares in BankUnited fell by 0.6% on Friday, but were up 0.5% for the week.

    Similar to Bank United, the $11.4 billion-asset Brookline Bancorp reported linked-quarter declines in both total and CRE nonperforming loans. The latter category ended 2023 at $19.6 million, down 7% from Sept. 30.  Net charge-offs of $7.1 million amounted to an annualized 0.30% of total loans, down from 0.47% on September 30. 

    Laurie Havener Hunsicker, an analyst who covers Brookline for Seaport Research Partners, raised her price target for the company’s shares by $2 to $14, largely on the strength of its credit quality performance.

    “Credit costs continue to normalize, but have been better than our expectations,” Hunsicker wrote Friday in a research note.

    Shares in Brookline, which reported its quarterly earnings on Wednesday, were up 5.5% this week.

    At Bank OZK in Little Rock, Arkansas, nonperforming loans totaled $61 million, or 0.23% of total non-purchased loans on Dec. 31. Bank OZK’s national CRE lending unit reported full-year net charge-offs of $5 million, amounting to three basis points of its $16.9 billion portfolio. 

    Credit quality at the $34.2 billion-asset bank is “relatively benign and limited to a handful of transactions,” Chairman and CEO George Gleason said during a Jan. 19 earnings call.

    Shares in Bank OZK are up 6.4% since it released its earnings report last week.

    At the $22.6 billion-asset WaFd Inc., holding company for Washington Federal Bank, the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.26% for the fourth quarter. Shares in WaFd are up by about 1.5% since it released its quarterly earnings report on Jan. 16.

    At the time, CEO Brent Beardall sounded optimistic about prospects for continued strong credit performance in 2024. He cited a recent decline in long-term interest rates, which should make it easier for commercial real estate borrowers to make their payments.

    “Much has been speculated about the potential downturn of the commercial real estate market, and we don’t know with certainty how or if that will occur, yet we do know that this decline in long-term rates narrows the refinance gap for borrowers and thus lowers credit risk for banks,” Beardall said in a press release earlier this month.

    [ad_2]

    John Reosti

    Source link

  • What Biden’s decision to pause new U.S. LNG exports means for the energy market

    What Biden’s decision to pause new U.S. LNG exports means for the energy market

    [ad_1]

    The Biden administration’s announcement Friday that it’s pausing liquefied natural gas export approvals sparked political backlash, drew cheers from climate activists and stoked uncertainty in energy markets, but is unlikely to see the U.S. give up its title as the world’s top LNG exporter.

    The U.S. will delay its decisions on new LNG exports to non-free trade agreement countries, allowing time for the Energy Department to update the underlying analyses for LNG export authorizations, the White House said.

    Those analyses are roughly five years old and “no longer adequately account for considerations” such as potential cost increases for American consumers and manufacturers or the “latest assessment of the impact of greenhouse gas emissions,” it said.

    The Biden administration likely “realizes the role of LNG in foreign policy, but at the same time it needs to show the Democrat base that it is doing something for climate change,” said Anas Alhajji, an independent energy expert and managing partner at Energy Outlook Advisors, pointing out that the announcement comes during a presidential election year.

    “Delaying one project or stopping it may not be a big deal, but it is a problem if it becomes a trend,” he said in emailed commentary.

    Environmental groups, which have pushed for action, cheered the decision.

    The 12 impacted projects in the U.S. “would spew out as much climate-warming pollution as 223 coal plants per year, and they present explosion risks to the communities where they’re located and emit other health-harming chemicals,” the Sierra Club, an environmental group, said in a statement welcoming the decision.

    Top exporter

    The announcement is particularly important for a nation that became the world’s biggest LNG exporter in the span of less than a decade.

    The U.S. became the world’s largest LNG exporter during the first half of 2022 on the back of increases in LNG export capacity, international natural gas and LNG prices, and global demand, particularly in Europe, according to the Energy Information Administration.

    Less than a decade ago, U.S. LNG exports were negligible. The country had only started exporting LNG from the Lower 48 states in 2016, the EIA said.

    The country’s exports of LNG climbed to a fresh record in November 2023, with the EIA reporting domestic exports of 386.2 billion cubic feet, up from 384.4 bcf a month earlier. Exports in December 2016 were at just 41.8 bcf.

    U.S. LNG exports soared after 2016.


    EIA

    With 90% of U.S. LNG going to non-free trade agreement destinations, withholding licensing effectively “halts project development,” John Miller, managing director, ESG and sustainability policy at TD Cowen wrote in a Friday note.

    Equities

    LNG equities with operating facilities likely won’t benefit from the administration’s announcement, at least not immediately, until the impacts of this pause in export approvals to non-FTA countries becomes more clear, Jason Gabelman, director, sustainability & energy transition at TD Cowen said.

    U.S. companies with government approvals that have not been sanctioned, “could have a higher probability of moving forward this year, albeit modestly” as offtakers may be hesitant to sign up to new U.S. projects with LNG development getting “politicized,” he said. Among those, he pointed out approvals for proposed liquefaction units at NextDecade Corp.’s
    NEXT,
    +2.30%

    Rio Grande LNG export facility project in Brownsville, Texas.

    At the same time, it would not be a surprise if U.S. LNG companies pursuing growth that do not yet have non-FTA approval see downside pressure, said Gabelman.

    LNG projects take around 4 years to build and any delays to project sanctions today will take “multiple years to manifest in the market,” he said.

    Still, the U.S. announcement “introduces the risk of more stringent oversight that could limit new U.S. capacity” more than four years out, Gabelman said.

    Companies that supply equipment to LNG liquefaction projects include Baker Hughes Co.
    BKR,
    +0.59%

    and Chart Industries Inc.
    GTLS,
    -7.54%
    ,
    said Marc Bianchi, a senior energy analyst at TD Cowen.

    Any slowing of approval would create “overhand on order growth,” he said.

    Climate change

    The White House said Friday that its decision will not impact the ability of the U.S. to continue supplying LNG to its allies in the near term but also acknowledged environmental concerns.

    “I think we’ve got to be clear eyed about the challenges that we face. The climate crisis is an existential crisis, and we’ve got to be, I think, really forward leaning into making sure that we’re taking that head on,” said Ali Zaidi, the White House national climate adviser, told reporters Friday.

    He added that given the number of approvals already completed, the number of projects under construction are set to double existing capacity with approvals beyond that set to double capacity yet again.

    “So there’s a long runway here, and we’re taking a step back and thinking, OK, let’s take a hard look before that runway continues to build out,” he said.

    Rob Thummel, senior portfolio manager at Tortoise, argued that U.S. LNG exports actually reduce global carbon emissions as natural gas typically “displaces coal to generate electricity in countries such as China and India.”

    They also improve global energy security as U.S. natural gas is becoming Europe’s primary energy supplier, replacing Russia, he said.

    In a statement Friday, Sen. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat and chairman of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said that if the Biden administration has facts to prove that additional LNG export capacity would hurt Americans, it needs to make that information public. But if the pause is “another political ploy to pander to keep-it-in-the-ground climate activists,” he said he would “do everything in my power to end this pause immediately.

    Manchin plans to hold a hearing on the decision in the coming weeks.

    Market impact

    The U.S. decision to delay new LNG export permits is unlikely to have an impact on domestic natural-gas supplies or prices, said Energy Outlook Advisors’ Alhajji.

    Still, the EIA noted in its Annual Energy Outlook released in March of last year that it remains uncertain as to how LNG export capacity will affect domestic prices, consumption and supply.

    LNG prices and the rate at which new LNG export terminals can be constructed help determine LNG export volumes, the EIA said, and higher LNG exports can result in upward pressure on U.S. natural-gas prices, while lower U.S. LNG exports can pressure prices.

    On Friday, natural gas for February delivery
    NG00,
    +0.23%

    NGG24,
    +0.26%

    settled at $2.71 per million British thermal units, up 7.7% for the week.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. is likely to keep its position as the world’s top LNG exporter, according to Tortoise’s Thummel.

    The U.S. is the currently the largest LNG exporter at almost 12 bcf per day, with Qatar coming in second, he said.

    Qatar is expanding its LNG export capacity and is expected to have the ability to export almost 20 bcf per day by 2028, he said. The EIA reported recently that Qatar has averaged 10.3 bcf per day in exports during the last 10 years.  

    That would mark sizable growth. But the EIA reported in November that LNG export capacity from North America is likely to more than double from around 11.4 bcf per day to 24.3 bcf per day by the end of 2027.

    The EIA said North America’s LNG export capacity is likely to more than double by 2027.


    EIA

    Given expected growth in U.S. LNG export capacity, the U.S. is likely to “remain the largest exporter of LNG in the world” despite the U.S. announcement, said Thummel.

    —Victor Reklaitis contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3 things to know about how the Fed might roll back quantitative tightening

    3 things to know about how the Fed might roll back quantitative tightening

    [ad_1]

    The notion that the Federal Reserve will soon slow, or perhaps even end, its program of quantitative tightening is increasingly being talked about on Wall Street like a foregone conclusion.

    But while investors wait to hear more on the subject from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during next week’s post-meeting press conference, they could be forgiven for asking themselves some questions.

    What might an imminent taper of the Fed’s balance-sheet runoff look like? Why has it suddenly become so urgent? What might it mean for the six or so interest-rate cuts investors are expecting from the Fed this year, as well as for markets more broadly?

    We aim to answer these questions below.

    What inspired talk of tapering QT?

    It wasn’t until the minutes from the Federal Reserve’s December policy meeting were published earlier this month that investors started to take the notion of the Fed declaring “mission accomplished” on QT seriously.

    The minutes revealed that a number of senior Fed officials felt it was nearly time to “begin to discuss” the technical factors that would govern the Fed’s decision to slow the runoff of maturing bonds from its balance sheet.

    Shortly after the minutes’ release, several senior Fed officials came forward to discuss the importance of ending the balance-sheet runoff. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, the first senior Fed official to expand on what was noted in the minutes, said earlier this month that the Fed should start to slow the pace of its balance-sheet shrinkage once assets locked up in the Fed’s reverse-repo facility fell below a certain level.

    According to Logan, senior Fed officials had been unsettled by the drain of $2 trillion in assets from the RRP facility last year.

    But there was another issue that was also likely bothering monetary policymakers heading into the Fed’s December meeting.

    Sudden spikes in overnight repo rates late last year drew uncomfortable comparisons to the repo-market crisis of September 2019, which foreshadowed the end of the Fed’s previous attempt at tapering its balance sheet, according to TS Lombard’s Steve Blitz.

    See: Something strange is happening in the financial plumbing under Wall Street

    See: One of Wall Street’s most important lending rates will stay elevated for weeks, Barclays says

    TS LOMBARD

    What is the Fed’s ‘lowest comfortable level of reserves’?

    A re-run of the repo-market crisis of 2019 is what the Fed is presumably trying to avoid. Economists are so concerned the central bank might accidentally bump up against the lower bound for reserves in the banking system, that they have come up with a name for the concept: They’re calling it the “lowest comfortable level of reserves.”

    According to this idea, strain in overnight-financing markets should emerge once reserves in the banking system retreat below a certain threshold. This would, in turn, likely force the central bank to scale back or even reverse quantitative tightening immediately, according to several economists.

    In order to avoid such a risk, Jefferies economist Thomas Simons said in a note to clients earlier this month that he expects the Fed will announce plans to start tapering QT after its March meeting.

    Across Wall Street, most economists expect the Fed will begin by tapering the pace at which Treasurys are redeemed from its balance sheet — perhaps cutting it in half to start, from $60 billion a month to $30 billion a month. Reducing the pace at which mortgage-backed securities are running off won’t matter as much until prepayments begin to climb.

    Going even further, economists at Evercore ISI said in a report shared with MarketWatch earlier this week that they expect the tapering to begin around the middle of 2024 and continue potentially through 2025, until the Fed has succeeded in reducing the size of its balance sheet to about $7 trillion.

    The balance sheet presently stands at $7.7 trillion, according to data published by the Fed. It peaked at nearly $9 trillion in April 2022.

    However, one key issue may complicate the Fed’s efforts to ascertain the “LCLoR.” According to Jefferies’ Simons, the amount of banking-system reserves counted as liabilities on the Fed’s balance sheet has been more or less steady since the Fed started its latest round of balance-sheet tapering. It stood at roughly $3.3 trillion recently, according to Fed data cited by Jefferies.

    Why stop at $7 trillion if bank reserves haven’t been all that heavily impacted by QT anyway? It’s probably worth noting that, whatever happens, nobody on Wall Street expects the Fed would attempt to shrink the size of its balance sheet back toward pre-crisis levels, when the amount of bonds on its balance sheet was miniscule compared to today.

    Why? Because there is simply too much debt sloshing around the global financial system to justify such a withdrawal of support, according to Steven Ricchiuto, chief economist at Mizuho Americas.

    “The Fed is not in a position to remove all that extra liquidity because now the system needs it just to function,” Ricchiuto said.

    What does this mean for markets?

    Because quantitative tightening is a hawkish policy stance, its rolling back should be bullish for stocks and bonds. But there are other considerations that could impact the outcome, market strategists said.

    Not only would a reduction in the pace of the Fed’s monthly runoff introduce a fresh dovish tilt to the Fed’s monetary policy, but by reducing the amount of bonds it allows to roll off its balance sheet every month, the Fed would become more active in the Treasury market, said James St. Aubin, chief investment officer at Sierra Investment Management, during an interview.

    There are also a few contextual factors that could impact how the equity market reacts. For example, as St. Aubin pointed out, context is equally as important as the nature of the decision itself. Should the Fed decide to end QT abruptly because the U.S. economy is sliding into a recession, then the decision could hurt stocks.

    Another issue, raised by a different market strategist, is the notion that the Fed could decide to start tapering QT in lieu of cutting interest rates — or at least in lieu of cutting them as quickly as investors expect. This could buy the central bank more time to press its battle against inflation while mitigating the risks that it could hurt the economy by keeping policy uncomfortably tight for too long, economists said.

    Ben Jeffery, U.S. interest-rate strategist at BMO, said in a recent note to clients that, based on Logan’s comments from earlier this month, he would lean toward this being the most likely scenario. Additionally, he said, tapering QT could potentially impact the Treasury’s refunding announcement due in May.

    Jeffery calculated that the Fed tapering QT by $20 billion beginning in April would save the Treasury from issuing nearly $250 billion in bonds compared to if the Fed had continued with its balance-sheet runoff apace.

    This should lead to lower Treasury yields, all else being equal. And lower long-dated Treasury yields are typically seen as beneficial for stocks, according to Callie Cox, a U.S. equity strategist at eToro.

    Although, once again, the outcome for markets would likely depend on the specific context.

    “Higher yields probably aren’t a good thing for stock investors these days, but in particular environments, higher yields and less Fed intervention could hint that the economy is healing,” Cox said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What does opening or cancelling a credit card do to my credit score? – MoneySense

    What does opening or cancelling a credit card do to my credit score? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    To close a credit card, the balance is $0. If there’s a substantial balance on the remaining cards, it’s going to increase the credit utilization ratio. And, if the increase is high enough, it will hurt your credit score. This is because the closed card’s unused credit limit no longer provides balance in the relationship between your other credit balances and credit limits. What you owe elsewhere can have a bigger impact than if you had a zero-balance credit card.

    Another thing: Closing an account means the creditor will stop reporting on your behalf your credit history on that card. If the card showed positive credit history, such as responsible usage and making payments on time, that history will gradually fade away and no longer bolster your credit score. 

    The reverse can’t be said. If the card showed negative credit history, closing the account will not erase the negative impact on your score. 

    Generally speaking, cancelling a credit card won’t improve your credit score, and you shouldn’t close a credit card unless you have a good reason, such as not trusting yourself to use the credit responsibly.

    Buyer beware: Welcome offers

    Many credit cards come with a generous sign-up bonus that helps you earn cash back, points, miles or a reduced interest rate. Welcome offers can be a great way to save money, especially if you already had planned on spending the minimum threshold to earn them. However, proceed with caution. 

    Read the fine print. Despite the enticing welcome offer of a credit card, your credit score may drop when you apply for a new card as a hard inquiry will be performed during the application process. Although your credit score will only drop a couple of points and will likely recover after a few months if you make your payments on time, it’s still a hit to your credit.

    Remember that welcome offers are one-time deals. While some credit card sign-up bonuses may save you money up front, the reality is that any rewards you earn aren’t worth incurring additional bills if you’re already struggling with debt. You should only consider a new welcome offer if you have paid off your credit card debt in full. If you have any debt, focus on paying that down—not short-term wins like getting a lower and very temporary interest rate.

    Opening and closing credit cards can impact how you use credit, too. Open multiple new cards, and you may end up with more credit than you can feasibly handle or keep track of. In addition, the allure of welcome offers may distract you from your financial goals. There’s impact on your credit score, and it’s critical to think about how having more or less credit affects your ability to live within your means and pay off your debt in full each month.

    [ad_2]

    Doris Asiedu

    Source link

  • Oaktree Capital calls commercial real estate ‘most acute area of risk’ right now

    Oaktree Capital calls commercial real estate ‘most acute area of risk’ right now

    [ad_1]

    Distressed-debt giant Oaktree Capital sees big opportunities in credit unfolding over the next few years as a wall of debt comes due.

    Oaktree’s incoming co-chief executives Armen Panossian, head of performing credit, and Bob O’Leary, portfolio manager for global opportunities, see a roughly $13 trillion market that will be ripe for the picking.

    Within that realm is high-yield bonds, BBB-rated bonds, leveraged loans and private credit — four areas of the market that have only mushroomed from their nearly $3 trillion size right before the 2007-2008 global financial crisis.

    “Clearly, the most acute area of risk right now is commercial real estate,” the co-CEOs said in a Wednesday client note. “That’s because the maturity wall is already upon us and it’s not going to abate for several years.”

    More than $1 trillion of commercial real-estate loans are set to come due in 2024 and 2025, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

    A retreat in the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y,
    to about 4.1% on Wednesday from a 5% peak in October, has provided some relief even though many borrowers likely will still struggle to refinance.

    Related: Commercial real estate a top threat to financial system in 2024, U.S. regulators say

    “There’s a need for capital, especially for office properties where there are vacancies, rental growth hasn’t materialized, or the rate of borrowing has gone up materially over the last three years. This capital may or may not be readily available, and for certain types of office properties, it absolutely isn’t available,” the Oaktree team said.

    With that backdrop, the firm expects to dust off its playbook from the financial crisis and acquire portfolios of commercial real-estate loans from banks, but also plans to participate in “credit-risk transfer” deals that help lenders reduce exposure.

    Oaktree also sees opportunities brewing in private credit, as well as in high-yield and leveraged loans, where “several hundred” of the estimated 1,500 companies that have issued such debt are likely “to be just fine” even if defaults rise, they said.

    Another area to watch will be the roughly $26 trillion Treasury market, where Oaktree has some concerns “about where the 10-year Treasury yield goes from here” — given not only the U.S. budget deficit and the deluge of supply that investors face, but also how foreign buyers, once the “largest owners in prior years, may be tapped out.”

    Related: Here are two reasons why the 10-year Treasury yield is back above 4%

    U.S. stocks
    SPX

    DJIA

    COMP
    fell Wednesday after strong retail-sales data for December pointed to a resilient U.S. economy, despite the Federal Reserve having kept its policy rate at a 22-year high since July.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hang Seng leads selloff for Asia stocks, with 4% slump after China data

    Hang Seng leads selloff for Asia stocks, with 4% slump after China data

    [ad_1]

    TOKYO (AP) — Asian shares slid Wednesday after a decline overnight on Wall Street and disappointing China growth data, while Tokyo’s main benchmark momentarily hit another 30-year high.

    Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225
    NIY00,
    -0.95%

    reached a session high of 36,239.22, but reverted lower, last down 0.3% to 35,477. The Nikkei has been hitting new 34-year highs, or the best since February 1990 during the so-called financial bubble. Buying focused on semiconductor-related shares, and a cheap yen helped boost exporter issues.

    Don’t miss: Wall Street firms catch up to Buffett enthusiasm on Japan as Nikkei keeps hitting records

    Hong Kong’s Hang Seng
    HK:HSCI
    tumbled 4% to 15,220.72, with losses building after data showed China hitting its economic growth target of 5.2% for 2023, surpassing government expectations, but short of the 5.3% some analysts expected. The Shanghai Composite
    CN:SHCOMP
    shed 2% to 2,833.62.

    Read on: China hit its economic-growth target without ‘massive stimulus,’ boasts Premier Li Qiang

    Australia’s S&P/ASX 200
    AU:ASX10000
    slipped 0.2% to 7,401.30. South Korea’s Kospi
    KR:180721
    dropped 2.4% to 2,435.90.

    Investors were keeping their eyes on upcoming earnings reports, as well as potential moves by the world’s central banks, to gauge their next moves.
    Wall Street slipped in a lackluster return to trading following a three-day holiday weekend.

    See: What’s next for stocks as ‘tired’ market stalls in 2024 ahead of closely watched retail sales

    The S&P 500
    SPX
    fell 17.85 points, or 0.4%, to 4,765.98. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    dropped 231.86, or 0.6%, to 37,361.12, and the Nasdaq
    COMP
    sank 28.41, or 0.2%, to 14,944.35.

    Spirit Airlines
    SAVE,
    -47.09%

    lost 47.1% after a U.S. judge blocked its takeover by JetBlue Airways
    JBLU,
    +4.91%

    on concerns it would mean higher airfares for flyers. JetBlue rose 4.9%.

    Stocks of banks were mixed, meanwhile, as earnings reporting season ramps up for the final three months of 2023. Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    -4.16%

    sank 4.2% after it said a legal matter and a special assessment knocked $535 million off its pretax earnings, while Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    +0.71%

    edged 0.7% higher after reporting results that topped Wall Street’s forecasts.

    Companies across the S&P 500 are likely to report meager growth in profits for the fourth quarter from a year earlier, if any, if Wall Street analysts’ forecasts are to be believed. Earnings have been under pressure for more than a year because of rising costs amid high inflation.

    But optimism is higher for 2024, where analysts are forecasting a strong 11.8% growth in earnings per share for S&P 500 companies, according to FactSet. That, plus expectations for several cuts to interest rates by the Federal Reserve this year, have helped the S&P 500 rally to 10 winning weeks in the last 11. The index remains within 0.6% of its all-time high set two years ago.

    Treasury yields
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    have already sunk on expectations for upcoming cuts to interest rates, which traders believe could begin as early as March. It’s a sharp turnaround from the past couple years, when the Federal Reserve was hiking rates drastically in hopes of getting high inflation under control.

    The Tell: No rate cuts in 2024? Why investors should think about the ‘unthinkable.’

    Easier rates and yields relax the pressure on the economy and financial system, while also boosting prices for investments. And for the past six months, interest rates have been the main force moving the stock market, according to Michael Wilson, strategist at Morgan Stanley.

    He sees that dynamic continuing in the near term, with the “bond market still in charge.”

    For now, traders are penciling in many more cuts to rates through 2024 than the Fed itself has indicated. That raises the potential for big market swings around each speech by a Fed official or economic report.

    Yields rose in the bond market after Fed governor Christopher Waller said in a speech that “policy is set properly” on interest rates. Following the speech, traders pushed some bets for the Fed’s first cut to rates to happen in May instead of March.

    On Wall Street, Boeing fell to one of the market’s sharper losses as worries continue about troubles for its 737 Max 9 aircraft following the recent in-flight blowout of an Alaska Air
    ALK,
    -2.13%

    jet. Boeing
    BA,
    -7.89%

    lost 7.9%.

    In energy trading, benchmark U.S. crude
    CL00,
    -1.55%

    lost 90 cents to $71.75 a barrel. Brent crude
    BRN00,
    -1.37%
    ,
    the international standard, fell 78 cents to $77.68 a barrel.

    In currency trading, the U.S. dollar
    USDJPY,
    +0.44%

    rose to 147.90 Japanese yen from 147.09 yen. The euro
    EURUSD,
    -0.10%

    cost $1.0868, down from $1.0880.

    MarketWatch contributed to this report

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SEC weighing ‘additional measures’ after hacked post on bitcoin ETF approval

    SEC weighing ‘additional measures’ after hacked post on bitcoin ETF approval

    [ad_1]

    The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday said that a social-media post on X falsely stating that it had approved spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds was created after an “unauthorized party” obtained control over the phone number connected with the agency’s account on the platform.

    The markets regulator said its staff would “continue to assess whether additional remedial measures are warranted” in the wake of the breach, which occurred Tuesday and raised questions about cybersecurity at both the agency and the social-media platform, formerly known as Twitter.

    The agency said it was coordinating with law enforcement on the matter, including with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

    “Commission staff are still assessing the impacts of this incident on the agency, investors, and the marketplace but recognize that those impacts include concerns about the security of the SEC’s social media accounts,” the SEC said in a statement.

    The confusion began on Tuesday afternoon, when the hacked post appeared on the SEC’s X account.

    “Today the SEC grants approval for #Bitcoin ETFs for listing on registered national securities exchanges,” the post read. “The approved Bitcoin ETFs will be subject to ongoing surveillance and compliance measures to ensure continued investor protection.”

    A second post appeared two minutes later that simply read “$BTC,” the SEC noted in its statement. The unauthorized user soon deleted that second post, but also liked two other posts by non-SEC accounts, according to the agency. The price of bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    -0.71%

    rose sharply in the wake of the posts, before soon pulling back.

    In response to the hack, SEC staff posted on the official X account of SEC Chair Gary Gensler announcing that the agency’s main account had been compromised, and that it had not yet approved any spot bitcoin exchange-traded products. Staff then deleted the initial unauthorized post, un-liked the liked posts and used the official SEC account to make a new post clarifying the situation, the agency said Friday.

    The SEC also said that it had reached out to X for assistance Tuesday in the wake of the incident, and that agency staff believe the unauthorized access to the SEC’s account was “terminated” later in the day.

    “While SEC staff is still assessing the scope of the incident, there is currently no evidence that the unauthorized party gained access to SEC systems, data, devices, or other social media accounts,” the agency said.

    The following day, the SEC announced that it had, in fact, approved the listing and trading of spot bitcoin ETFs.

    Wednesday’s move marked a breakthrough for the crypto industry, which for years has tried to get such ETFs off the ground in hopes of drawing more traditional investors to the digital-asset space.

    Bitcoin was down 7.6% over a 24-period as of Friday evening.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After Bitcoin ETFs, watch for the next most popular crypto to go the same route

    After Bitcoin ETFs, watch for the next most popular crypto to go the same route

    [ad_1]

    After long-awaited spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds made their debut this week, investors are now weighing the prospects of eventual approval of similar ether ETFs.

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday greenlighted 11 spot bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    -1.58%

    ETFs for the first time. The products, which made its debut trading on Thursday, logged a relatively strong first day

    However, bitcoin fell 6.8% on Friday, leaving it with a 3.2% gain over the past seven days, according to CoinDesk data. It underperformed ether
    ETHUSD,
    +1.82%
    ,
    which rose 17.6% over the past seven days while it declined 1.2% on Friday.  

    The news about bitcoin ETFs was mostly priced in, while investors are now looking past it to a potential approval of ether ETFs, analysts said.

    “I see value in having an ETH ETF,” Larry Fink, chief executive at the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock, told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Friday. BlackRock, which just launched its iShares bitcoin Trust
    IBIT,
    in November filed an application for a spot ether ETF.

    “It’s hard to know exactly what the U.S. regulators would do” about ether ETF applications, said Alonso de Gortari, chief economist at Mysten Labs, an internet infrastructure company.

    However, “I would expect that once you open the door, it becomes easier and I think the industry is very excited about it,” de Gortari said. If bitcoin ETFs see an impressive institutional inflow in the coming months, it could make such products more established and set a good precedent for other crypto ETF applications, he said.

    Read: Vanguard’s decision to shun bitcoin ETFs triggers backlash — with some customers moving to crypto-friendly competitors like Fidelity

    Also see: Why the debut of bitcoin ETFs could be bad news for crypto stocks, futures ETFs

    The enormous competition and huge inflows into bitcoin ETFs will only boost investors’ interests in an ether ETF, according to Paul Brody, EY’s global blockchain leader. “There’s no doubt that ETH is the next big market and has immediately become a priority for financial services companies,” Brody said in emailed comments.

    Compared with bitcoin, the Ethereum blockchain offers more utility and has unique advantages, noted Fadi Aboualfa, head of research at digital assets custodian Copper. 

    Sandy Kaul, head of digital asset and industry advisory services at Franklin Templeton, said she eventually expects the arrival of ETFs that track a basket of cryptocurrencies. Such products, instead of those based on single crypto, would dominate the space if they are approved, she said.  

    “Just like the S&P 500 has 500 stocks in it, right? You don’t have just one stock.” Kaul said in a phone interview. The arrival of a bitcoin ETF, is just a “baby step into really beginning to think about the future market structure of crypto,” Kaul added. 

    However, not everyone is that optimistic. Will McDonough, founder and chairman of Corestone Capital, said the approval of an Ethereum ETF has “a long way to go.” 

    SEC chairman Gary Gensler previously said bitcoin was the only cryptocurrency he was prepared to publicly label a commodity, rather than a security. 

    The agency also went after companies that offered crypto staking, which allows investors to earn yields by locking their coins to secure blockchains such as Ethereum. The SEC shut down crypto exchange Kraken’s staking business in the U.S. last year.  

    One possibility is that “companies will be able to offer an ETH ETF, but they will not be allowed to stake that ETH and earn yield,” noted EY’s Brody.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Grasshopper, Mantl to launch small business product | Bank Automation News

    Grasshopper, Mantl to launch small business product | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Grasshopper Bank is working with account origination solution provider Mantl to make credit more easily available to the bank’s small business clients.   The New York-based digital bank’s clients asked for a simpler way to access credit in “a more efficient, technology-oriented way,” Grasshopper Bank Chief Executive Mike Butler told Bank Automation News.  This year the […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link