A woman in Osceola County says he dog was euthanized an hour after it got loose and was picked up by animal control. What are the rules for holding an animal before it goes up for adoption or is euthanized?Each county is different. Here’s what they say: Osceola County Animal ServicesHolds stray pets for the legal hold period of three working days, after which time they are evaluated for potential adoptionThere could be medical conditions that are serious enough to make adoption inappropriate or impractical and in these cases, animals may be euthanizedMore from the county’s websitePet Alliance of Orlando Does not euthanize for time or space, only for severe medical or behavior issues.More from Pet AllianceSeminole CountyHolds stray pets not microchipped or wearing identification for five business days before they become property of Seminole County. MoreOrange CountyLake County Brevard County
A woman in Osceola County says he dog was euthanized an hour after it got loose and was picked up by animal control.
What are the rules for holding an animal before it goes up for adoption or is euthanized?
Each county is different. Here’s what they say:
Osceola County Animal Services
Holds stray pets for the legal hold period of three working days, after which time they are evaluated for potential adoption
There could be medical conditions that are serious enough to make adoption inappropriate or impractical and in these cases, animals may be euthanized
Investigators in Florida say a double homicide discovered during a well-being check was linked to a shooting rampage hours later in a gated community on the other side of the state, which left five more people dead including the suspected shooter.The suspect had a romantic relationship with one of the Fort Lauderdale victims, who was connected to the victims in the second shooting in Sarasota, but Sarasota County Sheriff’s Office detectives released few other details.“The suspect’s motivation for targeting the Sarasota victims is unknown,” the sheriff’s office said in a statement Wednesday.According to the sheriff’s office, deputies received a call around noon Tuesday reporting an adult male with gunshot wounds in the front yard of a residence in a gated community. That man was taken to a hospital where he died. Deputies entered the residence after neighbors said the man’s wife was likely inside the home.When deputies entered the home, deputies said they found four adult victims, two male and two female, pronounced dead on the scene. One of the male victims was the suspect, 51-year-old Russell Kot.While working to identify Kot, authorities in Sarasota received information from the Fort Lauderdale Police Department advising that they were actively investigating a double homicide, and they believed their suspect was involved in the Sarasota shooting.Fort Lauderdale is more than 200 miles away from Sarasota, on the opposite side of Florida’s main peninsula.Fort Lauderdale provided Sarasota with the suspect’s vehicle information, which can be seen entering the neighborhood around 11:30 a.m. Sarasota deputies said their investigation revealed Kot had been in a previous romantic relationship with one of the victims in the Fort Lauderdale double homicide.That victim was also connected to the four people shot in Sarasota.The suspect’s motivation for targeting the Sarasota victims is unknown, officials said.The victims in the Sarasota shooting were later identified as Olga Greinert, Florita Stolyar, Anatoly Ioffe and Yaroslav Blyudoy.The Associated Press contributed to this report.
SARASOTA, Fla. —
Investigators in Florida say a double homicide discovered during a well-being check was linked to a shooting rampage hours later in a gated community on the other side of the state, which left five more people dead including the suspected shooter.
The suspect had a romantic relationship with one of the Fort Lauderdale victims, who was connected to the victims in the second shooting in Sarasota, but Sarasota County Sheriff’s Office detectives released few other details.
“The suspect’s motivation for targeting the Sarasota victims is unknown,” the sheriff’s office said in a statement Wednesday.
According to the sheriff’s office, deputies received a call around noon Tuesday reporting an adult male with gunshot wounds in the front yard of a residence in a gated community. That man was taken to a hospital where he died.
Deputies entered the residence after neighbors said the man’s wife was likely inside the home.
When deputies entered the home, deputies said they found four adult victims, two male and two female, pronounced dead on the scene. One of the male victims was the suspect, 51-year-old Russell Kot.
While working to identify Kot, authorities in Sarasota received information from the Fort Lauderdale Police Department advising that they were actively investigating a double homicide, and they believed their suspect was involved in the Sarasota shooting.
Fort Lauderdale is more than 200 miles away from Sarasota, on the opposite side of Florida’s main peninsula.
Fort Lauderdale provided Sarasota with the suspect’s vehicle information, which can be seen entering the neighborhood around 11:30 a.m.
Sarasota deputies said their investigation revealed Kot had been in a previous romantic relationship with one of the victims in the Fort Lauderdale double homicide.
That victim was also connected to the four people shot in Sarasota.
The suspect’s motivation for targeting the Sarasota victims is unknown, officials said.
The victims in the Sarasota shooting were later identified as Olga Greinert, Florita Stolyar, Anatoly Ioffe and Yaroslav Blyudoy.
This content is imported from Facebook.
You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Photo provided by the Washington County Sheriffs Office
WASHINGTON COUNTY, Ore. — A 21-year-old Cornelius man has been indicted on dozens of felony charges related to an alleged sexual assault that investigators say began through social media and crossed state lines.
The Washington County Sheriff’s Office said detectives began investigating the case in December 2025 after being notified by the Vancouver Police Department of a reported sexual assault. The victim told medical staff at a Vancouver hospital that the assault occurred in Washington County.
According to investigators, the suspect contacted the victim through the social media application Snapchat and engaged in inappropriate communication before persuading the victim to meet in person. Detectives say the suspect drove from Oregon to Vancouver, Washington, picked up the victim, and then drove them to Cornelius, Oregon, where the sexual assault allegedly occurred on Dec. 24, 2025. The child victim also reported that the man gave them alcohol, marijuana, and other intoxicants during the interaction
On Jan. 26, 2026, detectives located and arrested Alexis Jovanny Leyva-Lopez, 21, of Cornelius. He was lodged in the Washington County Jail.
A Washington County grand jury indicted Leyva-Lopez on Friday, Jan. 30, charging him with three counts each of first-degree rape, second-degree rape, first-degree sodomy and second-degree sodomy; six counts of first-degree sexual abuse; and one count of strangulation.
Investigators said they are concerned there may be additional victims. Anyone who believes they may be a victim or who has information related to the case is urged to contact the Washington County Sheriff’s Office Investigations Division at 503-846-2500 and reference case number 50-25-18247.
The sheriff’s office said Leyva-Lopez’s booking photo is being released under Oregon House Bill 3273 in an effort to identify additional criminal activity.
Southern California Edison sued Los Angeles County, water agencies and two companies including SoCalGas Friday, saying their mistakes contributed to the deadly and destructive toll of last year’s Eaton wildfire.
Edison now faces hundreds of lawsuits by victims of the fire, which claim its transmission line started the devastating fire that killed at least 19 people and destroyed thousands of homes in Altadena. The cost of settling those lawsuits could be many billions of dollars.
Doug Dixon, an attorney who represents Edison in the fire litigation, told the Times that Edison filed the lawsuits “to ensure that all those who bear responsibility are at the table in this legal process.”
The utility’s two legal filings in L.A. County Superior Court paint a picture of sweeping mismanagement of the emergency response on the night of the fire.
Edison blames the county fire department, sheriff’s department and office of emergency management for their failure to warn Altadena residents west of Lake Avenue to evacuate.
The Times revealed last January that west Altadena never received evacuation warnings, and orders to evacuate came hours after flames and smoke threatened the community. All but one of the 19 who died in the Eaton fire were found in west Altadena.
Edison also sued L.A. County for failing to send fire trucks to the community. A Times investigation found that during a critical moment in the fire, only one county fire truck was west of Lake Avenue.
The electric company also filed suit against six water agencies, including Pasadena Water & Power, claiming there were insufficient water supplies available for firefighters.
“Compounding the unfolding disaster, the water systems servicing the areas impacted by the Eaton Fire failed as the fire spread, leaving firefighters and residents with no water to fight the fire,” the lawsuit states.
Another lawsuit aims at SoCalGas. Edison says the company failed to turn off gas lines after the fire started, making the disaster worse.
“SoCalGas did not begin widespread shutoffs for four days—until January 11, 2025—in the area affected by the Eaton Fire,” the complaint states. “In the meantime, the Eaton Fire continued to spread fueled by natural gas.”
“ The risks and deficiencies with SoCalGas’s system that led to it spreading the fire were long known to SoCalGas, and yet it nevertheless failed to adequately account for them in designing, building, and maintaining its system,” the complaint said. “The result was catastrophic.”
Edison also sued Genasys, a company that provides the county with emergency alert software.
In addition, the utility sued the county for failing to remove brush, which it claims made the fire hotter and spread faster, causing more damage.
In March, L.A. County filed suit against Edison, claiming that its transmission line sparked the blaze, requiring the county to incur tens of millions of dollars responding to the fire and its aftermath. The county is seeking compensation for destroyed infrastructure and parks, as well as for cleanup and recovery efforts, lost taxes and overtime for county workers.
Edison’s new cross claims will be heard in the consolidated Eaton fire case in Superior Court, which is also handling the lawsuit that the county and other public agencies have filed against the electric utility.
Officials from the county and water agencies, as well as from the two companies, could not be immediately reached.
The water agencies that Edison sued also include the Sierra Madre City Water Dept., Kinneloa Irrigation District, Rubio Canyon Land & Water Association, Las Flores Water Company and Lincoln Avenue Water Company.
The government investigation into the fire, which is being handled jointly by L.A. County Fire and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, has not yet been released.
Edison has said that a leading theory is that its unused, century-old transmission line in Eaton Canyon somehow became re-energized on the night of Jan. 7, 2025 and sparked the blaze.
The fire roared through Altadena, burning 14,021 acres and destroying more than 9,400 homes and other structures.
Photo provided by the Linn County Sheriff’s Office
A Sweet Home-area man was taken into custody late Tuesday night after allegedly assaulting his spouse and firing multiple rounds during a lengthy standoff with law enforcement, according to the Linn County Sheriff’s Office.
Deputies were called at about 9:20 p.m. to a reported domestic disturbance in the 29200 block of Berlin Road, east of Sweet Home. Sheriff Michelle Duncan said a woman contacted 911 to report that her husband, later identified as 41-year-old James Clair Miller, had assaulted her.
While deputies were en route, the caller told dispatchers she had four children under the age of 10 with her in a vehicle and that Miller had been seen exiting a shop while armed with a firearm. Dispatchers instructed the woman to leave the property with the children.
As they attempted to drive away, Miller allegedly shattered the vehicle’s window and fired shots in an unknown direction. The woman and children then fled on foot down a long driveway, where they encountered responding deputies. Additional gunshots were heard coming from the property as deputies secured the family.
Miller’s location was initially unknown. Authorities said he later began yelling and firing more rounds, prompting deputies to evacuate nearby homes and establish a perimeter. Multiple agencies responded, including Oregon State Police and the Sweet Home Police Department, with assistance from drones due to the rural terrain and limited visibility.
The Linn County Regional SWAT Team and Oregon State Police SWAT were deployed, along with armored vehicles, as Miller continued to move around the property armed with multiple firearms. Deputies reported he fired shots into the air and ignited fireworks, some of which were only visible through drone footage.
At one point, Miller attempted to flee into nearby woods on an ATV but crashed and returned to the residence area. When contacted by law enforcement, he was uncooperative, leading deputies and troopers to use non-lethal force, including sponge rounds and tasers, before taking him into custody. He was treated by medics and transported to the Linn County Jail.
A search warrant was later served on the property, where deputies seized 13 firearms, including handguns, rifles and shotguns, along with live ammunition and spent shell casings scattered throughout the area.
Miller was lodged on charges including reckless endangering, felony assault IV (domestic), menacing, unlawful use of a weapon, contempt of court for violating a restraining order, and first-degree criminal mischief. The investigation remains ongoing.
Sheriff Duncan praised the response, stating that law enforcement personnel exercised restraint and professionalism during the incident. Officials said the use of drones played a key role in monitoring Miller’s movements and resolving the situation without the use of lethal force.
Angelita Minor, photo provided by the Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office
PORTLAND, Ore. — The Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office is asking for the public’s help in locating a 29-year-old woman who is wanted on a felony warrant.
Authorities say Angelina Latisha Minor is wanted on a charge of first-degree manslaughter stemming from a March 2024 traffic crash. Prosecutors allege Minor was driving under the influence of intoxicants at the time of the crash, which resulted in the death of her 4-year-old son.
According to the district attorney’s office, Minor violated the conditions of her supervised release, prompting a judge to issue a warrant for her arrest. Her last known address was in North Portland.
Officials warn the public not to approach Minor. Anyone who sees her or knows her whereabouts is urged to call 9-1-1 immediately.
The case remains under investigation, and Minor is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.
Mortgage rates are the interest you pay to borrow money for *** home. Higher rates mean higher monthly payments because of accrued interest, which costs you more over the life of *** loan. The Federal Reserve set short-term interest rates, which influence how much you owe for things like credit cards and car loans. But according to experts, mortgage rates do not follow the Fed. Instead they follow the 10-year Treasury, which has to do with US government bonds. Right now, the bond market is nervous about inflation. So even with the Fed’s recent Rate cut in December, mortgage rates didn’t budge. Our get the Facts data team dug into the numbers to show us how mortgages have changed over the last decade. Rates remain high, hovering an average of 6% this year, the lowest rates have been in the last decade and came during the COVID pandemic when they bottomed out at 2.65% in January of 2021. But mortgage rates have hovered around 3 to 4% until the start of 2022 when they surpassed 5% and haven’t dropped. Below 6% since September 2022, and these high rates can be painful when buying *** home. Our get the facts data team found the most expensive mortgages were in places like Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Marin Counties, all in California. But Nantucket County in Massachusetts tops the list, with mortgages averaging nearly $10,000 in 2025. The least expensive are mostly in the South or Midwest, like Todd County, South Dakota or Stewart County, Georgia. Where an average mortgage is over $300. If you’re trying to buy *** home, experts tell our data team there are 3 barriers right now, those high mortgage rates, high home prices, and buyers just not wanting to buy *** house right now due to other levels of uncertainty. If you’re curious with how your monthly mortgage rate has changed, our get the Facts data team created *** tool on our website. You just plug in your county, and it calculates how much more or less you’re paying compared to 10 years ago. Reporting in Washington, I’m Amy Lou.
Despite Fed rate cuts, mortgage rates could still rise. Here’s why
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points at its final meeting of 2025, but the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage remained high at 6.22%.
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points at its final meeting of 2025, but an expert says it may not translate into lower mortgage rates. Susan Wachter, a professor of real estate at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, said mortgage rates take their metric cue from the 10-year Treasury.”The two rates are disconnected. The only time the two rates move together is if we’re moving towards a recession,” Wachter said. Mortgage rates are the interest you pay to borrow money to buy a home. Higher mortgage rates raise monthly payments because more interest accrues on the principal mortgage each month.The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.22% as of Dec. 11, 2025. That is below the year-to-date average of 6.62%, but Wachter said rates remain high.”Just a matter of four years ago, mortgage rates were 3 or 4%, so this has a big impact on the overall economy, and we cannot, unfortunately, rely on the Federal Reserve’s action to solve this affordability problem,” Wachter said. National Association of Realtors data, analyzed by the Get the Facts Data Team, shows that monthly principal and interest mortgage payments in the United States have nearly doubled in the last 10 years.See how much your monthly mortgage has changed with our calculator.On average, the monthly cost of owning a home in counties across the United States was $1,424 in 2025, compared with $712 in 2015. That number doesn’t include costs like property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, homeowners association fees and other fees. Nantucket County in Massachusetts saw the monthly cost of owning a home more than double, reaching $9,797 in 2025 compared to $4,691 in 2015. The island, located about 30 miles south of Cape Cod, has a median home listing price of $5.2 million, according to Realtor.com.In California, mortgage rates rose by an average of 89% over the last 10 years. The highest mortgage rates in the state are found in Marin, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.What is driving up mortgage costs?According to Wachter, homebuyers face three barriers: high mortgage rates, high housing prices and a buyer strike.High mortgage rates stem in part from large U.S. budget deficits caused by government borrowing during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, housing prices have risen and many buyers have pulled back. “Buyers are uncertain about their future job prospects, overall economy prospects — even stock market prospects. That uncertainty is keeping buyers on the sidelines, which is why housing prices, even though they’re near all-time highs, are not increasing anymore,” said Wachter.Aside from increasing mortgage costs, the housing market is also seeing a surge in delistings.”The homeowners who are selling are disappointed because their prices are falling, so they’re taking their homes off the inventory. We see that happening more than ever recently,” Wachter said.A recent report from Realtor.com shows that about 6% of listings have been removed from the market by sellers each month since June. That is the highest national delisting rate reported by Realtor.com since it began tracking this metric in 2022. PHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4K
NEW YORK —
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points at its final meeting of 2025, but an expert says it may not translate into lower mortgage rates.
Susan Wachter, a professor of real estate at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, said mortgage rates take their metric cue from the 10-year Treasury.
“The two rates are disconnected. The only time the two rates move together is if we’re moving towards a recession,” Wachter said.
Mortgage rates are the interest you pay to borrow money to buy a home. Higher mortgage rates raise monthly payments because more interest accrues on the principal mortgage each month.
The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.22% as of Dec. 11, 2025. That is below the year-to-date average of 6.62%, but Wachter said rates remain high.
“Just a matter of four years ago, mortgage rates were 3 or 4%, so this has a big impact on the overall economy, and we cannot, unfortunately, rely on the Federal Reserve’s action to solve this affordability problem,” Wachter said.
National Association of Realtors data, analyzed by the Get the Facts Data Team, shows that monthly principal and interest mortgage payments in the United States have nearly doubled in the last 10 years.
See how much your monthly mortgage has changed with our calculator.
On average, the monthly cost of owning a home in counties across the United States was $1,424 in 2025, compared with $712 in 2015. That number doesn’t include costs like property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, homeowners association fees and other fees.
Nantucket County in Massachusetts saw the monthly cost of owning a home more than double, reaching $9,797 in 2025 compared to $4,691 in 2015. The island, located about 30 miles south of Cape Cod, has a median home listing price of $5.2 million, according to Realtor.com.
In California, mortgage rates rose by an average of 89% over the last 10 years. The highest mortgage rates in the state are found in Marin, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.
What is driving up mortgage costs?
According to Wachter, homebuyers face three barriers: high mortgage rates, high housing prices and a buyer strike.
High mortgage rates stem in part from large U.S. budget deficits caused by government borrowing during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, housing prices have risen and many buyers have pulled back.
“Buyers are uncertain about their future job prospects, overall economy prospects — even stock market prospects. That uncertainty is keeping buyers on the sidelines, which is why housing prices, even though they’re near all-time highs, are not increasing anymore,” said Wachter.
Aside from increasing mortgage costs, the housing market is also seeing a surge in delistings.
“The homeowners who are selling are disappointed because their prices are falling, so they’re taking their homes off the inventory. We see that happening more than ever recently,” Wachter said.
A recent report from Realtor.com shows that about 6% of listings have been removed from the market by sellers each month since June. That is the highest national delisting rate reported by Realtor.com since it began tracking this metric in 2022.
Evacuation orders have been lifted in parts of Clackamas County as river levels continue to recede following recent flooding, county officials said.
Residents in low-lying areas near the Molalla River, Pudding River and Butte Creek are now allowed to return home as conditions improve. Officials urged returning residents to proceed with caution, noting that flooding and landslides may have caused damage that is not immediately visible.
Clackamas County Building Services staff have been conducting inspections of homes and other structures in previously evacuated areas. Buildings are being labeled with color-coded safety tags to indicate their condition.
Green tags indicate a structure has no apparent structural hazards and is safe to enter. Yellow tags mean a building has sustained damage and may be unsafe to live in, and residents are advised to use caution and follow instructions posted on the placard. Red tags indicate a structure has been seriously damaged and is unsafe to enter.
County officials said homes that did not receive a tag but show signs of flood damage can request an inspection by contacting County Building Services at 503-742-4240 or by email.
Residents who need help with cleanup, recovery or other unmet needs can contact Clackamas County Coordinated Housing Access at 503-655-8575. Assistance is available Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Officials encouraged residents to continue monitoring county updates at clackamas.us/clackcoalerts and clackamas.us/dm/flooding for the latest information.
Northern California will see a break in the wet weather on Tuesday, but a powerful storm will send several rounds of potentially damaging winds, heavy rain and heavy snow to the region Tuesday night through Thursday. This comes after some places in the Foothills and Sierra measured 6 to 11 inches of rain since Saturday. The KCRA 3 weather team is issuing Alert Days for Wednesday and Thursday, which are issued to indicate conditions that could prove risky to public safety.Friday is expected to be an Impact Day. Showers and mountain snow will likely cause travel delays, but winds will be calmer.Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Sunday night that emergency response teams and equipment are being deployed to nine counties to protect from flooding and severe weather. KCRA 3 reached out to the governor’s office to find out which counties this applies to. The governor’s office responded, saying that El Dorado, Orange, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Colusa, Glenn, Plumas and Nevada counties will be receiving the extra equipment and personnel. The first round of high winds and heavy rain will move across the region between 10 p.m. Tuesday and 4 a.m. Wednesday. Gusts of 40 to 60 mph could cause tree damage in the Valley and Foothills. Scattered power outages are also possible going into Christmas Eve Day. A High Wind Watch was issued by the National Weather Service for the Coastal Hills, Valley and Foothills. It will be in effect from 7 pm Tuesday through 4 am Wednesday.Brief bursts of heavy rain will come with the winds overnight. Most of the daylight hours Wednesday will be calmer with scattered showers in the Valley and steadier rain in the Foothills. Another round of high winds and heavy rain is expected Wednesday night into Thursday morning. The Sacramento Valley could see an additional 1 to 2 inches of rain by Friday. As each band of rain moves east into the Sierra, precipitation will turn into heavy snow. Wednesday’s snow level will be around 6,500 feet. This is low enough for accumulation at the Tahoe area summits. Long delays and chain controls are possible Wednesday.The snow level will drop to 4,500 feet on Thursday and then 4,000 feet on Friday. Check the latest chain control information from Caltrans here.In total, the Tahoe area summits could measure several feet of snow by Friday evening. Drivers should avoid traveling in the mountains Wednesday through Friday if possible. Leer en españolShare your weather photos and videos with us at kcra.com/uploadWatch our latest nowcast here REAL-TIME TRAFFIC MAPClick here to see our interactive traffic map.TRACK INTERACTIVE, DOPPLER RADARClick here to see our interactive radar.DOWNLOAD OUR APP FOR THE LATESTHere is where you can download our app.Follow our KCRA weather team on social mediaMeteorologist Tamara Berg on Facebook and X.Meteorologist Dirk Verdoorn on FacebookMeteorologist Heather Waldman on Facebook and X.Meteorologist Kelly Curran on X.Meteorologist Ophelia Young on Facebook and X.Watch our forecasts on TV or onlineHere’s where to find our latest video forecast. You can also watch a livestream of our latest newscast here. The banner on our website turns red when we’re live.We’re also streaming on the Very Local app for Roku, Apple TV or Amazon Fire TV.
Northern California will see a break in the wet weather on Tuesday, but a powerful storm will send several rounds of potentially damaging winds, heavy rain and heavy snow to the region Tuesday night through Thursday.
This comes after some places in the Foothills and Sierra measured 6 to 11 inches of rain since Saturday.
The KCRA 3 weather team is issuing Alert Days for Wednesday and Thursday, which are issued to indicate conditions that could prove risky to public safety.
Hearst Owned
Wednesday and Thursday are KCRA 3 weather Alert Days. High winds, heavy rain and heavy snow will significantly impact plans for Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
Friday is expected to be an Impact Day. Showers and mountain snow will likely cause travel delays, but winds will be calmer.
Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Sunday night that emergency response teams and equipment are being deployed to nine counties to protect from flooding and severe weather. KCRA 3 reached out to the governor’s office to find out which counties this applies to. The governor’s office responded, saying that El Dorado, Orange, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Colusa, Glenn, Plumas and Nevada counties will be receiving the extra equipment and personnel.
The first round of high winds and heavy rain will move across the region between 10 p.m. Tuesday and 4 a.m. Wednesday. Gusts of 40 to 60 mph could cause tree damage in the Valley and Foothills. Scattered power outages are also possible going into Christmas Eve Day.
A High Wind Watch was issued by the National Weather Service for the Coastal Hills, Valley and Foothills. It will be in effect from 7 pm Tuesday through 4 am Wednesday.
Hearst Owned
A High Wind Watch will be in effect starting at 7 pm Tuesday.
Brief bursts of heavy rain will come with the winds overnight. Most of the daylight hours Wednesday will be calmer with scattered showers in the Valley and steadier rain in the Foothills.
Another round of high winds and heavy rain is expected Wednesday night into Thursday morning. The Sacramento Valley could see an additional 1 to 2 inches of rain by Friday.
As each band of rain moves east into the Sierra, precipitation will turn into heavy snow. Wednesday’s snow level will be around 6,500 feet. This is low enough for accumulation at the Tahoe area summits. Long delays and chain controls are possible Wednesday.
The snow level will drop to 4,500 feet on Thursday and then 4,000 feet on Friday.
In total, the Tahoe area summits could measure several feet of snow by Friday evening. Drivers should avoid traveling in the mountains Wednesday through Friday if possible.
Hearst Owned
Sierra snow will be measured in feet later this week.
During the first days of the January firestorms, Los Angeles became a case study in what can go wrong with emergency alerts and evacuations.
In Pacific Palisades there was chaos Jan. 7 as people in the foothills tried to flee, only to hit traffic gridlock. Then when the Eaton fire erupted in Altadena, evacuation orders did not go out to residents of the west side until five hours after flames began to threaten homes in the area. All but one of the 19 people confirmed dead in the Eaton blaze were on the west side.
Two days later a wireless evacuation warning intended for residents near a new fire near Malibu Canyon mistakenly was blasted out across a metropolitan area of 10 million people. Officials sent out a correction about 20 minutes later, but a stream of erroneous alerts continued to buzz phones throughout the night and following morning, stoking confusion and panic in communities 40 miles from any active fire.
For many Angelenos, the chaos and uncertainty around evacuations and alerts compounded the terror of the deadly fires. But the snafus had a more troubling impact: eroding trust. Some residents turned to unofficial apps like Watch Duty. Others were so shaken they concluded they could not rely on the government at all.
Los Angeles is not the first community to experience life-threatening emergency alert failures during fast-moving fires. In the last decade small towns in California, Tennessee and Hawaii experienced glaring emergency alert shortfalls as climate change has intensified wildfire risks.
But the failures of L.A. County to issue timely and precise evacuation alerts — first to too few people in Altadena and then to too many — shocked emergency management experts across the country. Why was the nation’s most populous county, built on land vulnerable to intense fire, flooding and earthquakes, not more prepared?
“What we’re learning is that, when the chips are down in some of the most dire scenarios, the people and systems responsible for public warnings don’t appear to be up to the task,” said Thomas Cova, a geography professor at the University of Utah who specializes in emergency management. “This would not be that surprising in inexperienced, unprepared, or under-resourced jurisdictions, but it is surprising in L.A. County.”
The McChrystal Group after-action report on the Eaton and Palisades fires found the county operated with “unclear” and “outdated” policies when deciding when to send evacuation alerts, and its emergency staff lacked training and a clear chain of command.
Nearly a year after the fire, however, we still do not know exactly what went wrong in west Altadena.
L.A. County officials have failed to account for why alerts to west Altadena were delayed. And while independent reports have been published, they have shed little light, other than saying there were problems with coordination, staffing and training.
“Without an explanation for west Altadena,” Cova said, “the specific lesson has yet to be learned.”
The delayed alerts may not have been a result of one error.
“Cascading failure is a common theme amongst disasters,” said Michael Gollner, associate professor of mechanical engineering at UC Berkeley who leads its Fire Research Lab.
To prepare for the next wildfire — or any other catastrophic disaster — there are several steps L.A. County and other agencies can take to make sure they alert people in harm’s way.
Improve coordination, situational awareness and training
One of the big takeaways of the Palisades and Eaton fires is county staff lacked basic training and a clear chain of command.
The McChrystal after-action report found the county struggled to adequately monitor events as they unfolded and lacked streamlined coordination tools. Policies and protocols on alerts, it said, were “unclear” and “contradictory” and did not explicitly outline the chain of command for decisions to issue evacuation warning or orders.
The report recommended that the county update its policies and standard operating procedures and make sure that first responders and emergency management clearly understand their roles and responsibilities on evacuation alerts.
It also urged the county to make the Office of Emergency Management, which operates as a subdepartment under the Chief Executive Office, its own department. Shortly after the report was published, the L.A. County Board of Supervisors approved a motion to restructure the OEM into an independent department. Its “lack of autonomy and fragmented authority,” the motion said, “currently undermines its ability to coordinate emergency management effectively.”
To enhance coordination, the report also recommended the county establish a mandatory wildfire and evacuation training program for law enforcement and leverage technology for situational awareness training. OEM, it said, should train more people in essential Emergency Operations Center roles, such as alert and warnings systems and situational awareness.
One way to improve coordination and situational awareness, Cova said, could be to train emergency managers the way air traffic controllers are trained with simulators. Another could be to use some kind of automated or artificial intelligence system to alert emergency managers based on where the fire is and where it is heading.
Invest more funding in emergency management
Many emergency management experts were startled after the January fires to learn that the L.A. County Office of Emergency Management’s annual budget is just $15 million. That lags significantly behind the budgets of similarly sized jurisdictions, such as New York City ($88 million) and Cook County, Ill. ($132 million).
The McChrystal report dubbed L.A. County’s emergency staffing “fundamentally inadequate,” noting it has 37 employees to mitigate risk for around 10 million people.
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors has directed the Chief Executive Office to evaluate OEM’s staffing and funding. The office is expected to issue a report in the next week.
In an October interview with The Times, Kevin McGowan, director of L.A. County’s OEM, suggested that a lack of resources led to “trade-offs” and “coordination and communication challenges.” Boosting his budget and staff, he said, was a key priority.
McGowan said he already started to create six new positions. That would bring L.A. County emergency management staff up to 43, a figure that still lags way behind similarly sized jurisdictions. New York City has more than 200 emergency management staffers serving 8.5 million people.
Training on clearer messages
Even when wireless emergency alerts were sent out during the January firestorms, many were written poorly and did not have enough detail for such a vast metropolitan area, according to Jeannette Sutton, associate professor in the College of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security, and Cybersecurity at the University at Albany who specializes in warnings.
“Almost every single one of them is incomplete,” Sutton said.
The biggest culprit, she said, was the message that echoed all over the county: It referenced a fire “in your area” without specifying a location and did not reference a time. The confusion the message stoked as it echoed throughout the county over the next 24 hours could have been avoided, Sutton said, if it contained more precise information.
“An EVACUATION WARNING has been issued for Calabasas/Agoura Hills,” for example, instead of “An EVACUATION WARNING has been issued in your area.”
Should the state or federal government step in?
California has taken a number of steps over the last decade to improve local alert systems.
But the state guidelines are recommendations, not requirements. State officials — and many local leaders — tend to resist the idea of across-the-board rules. The state’s 58 counties have vastly different geographies, populations and budgets, they argue, so it does not make sense to impose disaster preparedness plans from on high.
Still, many experts say there is a need for a more unified approach to the nation’s patchwork, privatized emergency alert system. Some urge the federal government to step up, noting that problems with alerts are not just a local or state problem — jurisdictions across the nation face similar challenges.
Training around alerts and warnings at a national level is extremely poor, Sutton said. While the Federal Emergency Management Agency operates the Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS), the national system providing emergency public alerts through mobile phones using Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and to radio and television via the Emergency Alert System, she said, its role is limited.
“We do not have an organization that is responsible for delivering training at the national level,” Sutton said. “You might think that that’s the role of FEMA or of the IPAWS program, but they have focused almost entirely on technological capabilities of pushing the button and the message getting out through the broadcast. They do not focus on the messages themselves.”
In May, U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach) published areport onL.A. County’s emergency alert failures and called for more federal oversight of the nation’s emergency alert system. In September, U.S Rep. Kevin Mullin (D-San Mateo) introduced a bipartisan bill, Resilient Emergency Alert Communications and Training (REACT) Act, that would direct FEMA to provide more federal resources and authorize $30 million annually for local emergency officials to improve their alert and warning systems.
But the Trump administration appears to have little appetite to invest in disaster preparedness.
“At the federal level, things have kind of stalled,” Sutton said.
If the Trump administration follows through on its vow to make drastic cuts to FEMA, Sutton said, it’s not clear what will happen to the IPAWS program or whether the federal government will back off entirely from strengthening the nation’s preparedness for disasters.
“Are they going to even focus on preparedness?” Sutton said. “Or are they going to say, ‘Hands off, we’re done.’ I don’t know.”
The Oregon Department of Justice has filed a motion to revoke the conditional release of Melissa Fireside, a former Clackamas County Commissioner, after receiving information that she is no longer living at her listed address in Lexington, Oregon.
State officials believe Fireside may have left the country and taken her nine-year-old son with her. While authorities say the child is not believed to be in danger, ensuring his safety remains their top priority.
“Our top concern right now is the safety and well-being of this child,” said Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield. “We are working closely with law enforcement partners here and at the federal level to locate Ms. Fireside and ensure she is held accountable under Oregon law. No one should be able to evade justice by crossing a border.”
Investigators are coordinating with federal partners to determine Fireside’s whereabouts. If she is confirmed to be outside the United States, the DOJ says extradition could pose additional challenges depending on the country involved.
Fireside was arraigned in March 2025 on several felony charges, including aggravated theft, computer crime, and forgery. She was released under a conditional agreement requiring her to remain in Oregon unless granted court permission to leave. Her jury trial was scheduled for December 2, 2025.
Anyone with information about Fireside’s location is asked to contact the Oregon Department of Justice Criminal Division at (503) 378-6347.
L.A. County supervisors have unanimously approved an $828-million settlement for alleged victims of childhood sexual abuse, finalizing the deal while questions mount over the legitimacy of some claims in a separate multibillion-dollar payout that they agreed to this spring.
The settlement approved Tuesday brings the county’s spending on sex abuse litigation this year to nearly $5 billion, with the bulk of that total coming from a $4-billion deal made in April to resolve thousands of claims filed by people who said they were abused decades ago in county-run juvenile detention centers and foster homes.
The latest settlement involves similar claims brought by 414 clients of three law firms who opted to negotiate separately from the rest. The $4-billion settlement initially covered roughly 6,800 claims, but has ballooned to more than 11,000.
The larger settlement has come under scrutiny after The Times found nine people who said they were paid to sue. Four said they were told to fabricate the claims. All had lawsuits filed by Downtown LA Law Group, which represents more than 2,700 clients in the first settlement.
The firm has denied paying clients to sue and said it has “systems in place to help weed out false or exaggerated allegations.” The firm has asked the court to dismiss three claims on behalf of allegedly fraudulent plaintiffs this month.
Downtown LA Law Group will be required to detail any claims that came to it through recruiters, the county’s top attorney said Tuesday. The firm has denied any wrongdoing.
(Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)
The settlement approved Tuesday involves cases only from Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team, Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, and Panish Shea Ravipudi and has no cases from DTLA. But the firm nevertheless took center stage Tuesday as the supervisors pressed their top attorney on how the lawsuits were vetted.
“What were we doing prior to this article?” said Supervisor Kathryn Barger, referencing The Times’ reporting from earlier this month.
The county was in a tough spot, county counsel Dawyn Harrison explained. Many plaintiff attorneys didn’t want the county interviewing their clients, she said. And a judge had temporarily paused the discovery process, providing the county little insight into the identities of the thousands of people suing.
Harrison said Tuesday that DTLA cases now will be required to go through a “completely new level of review” beyond the standard vetting that was already underway by retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Louis Meisinger. In addition to having a new retired Superior Court judge vet all their cases, DTLA must provide the county with information on plaintiffs acquired through “a recruiter or vendor,” she said.
“DTLA is required to identify every recruiter it used, a list of each plaintiff brought in per recruiter, information about any funds that changed hands, and a declaration under oath by each recruiter identifying what was done, what was said, and any monies paid,” Harrison said.
It’s an unusual request.
California law bans a practice known as capping, in which non-attorneys directly solicit or procure clients to sign up for lawsuits with a law firm.
DTLA has denied knowledge of any of its clients receiving payments to sue and said the firm wants “justice for real victims” of sexual abuse.
“If we ever became aware that anyone associated with us, in any capacity, did such a thing, we would end our relationship with them immediately,” the firm said.
The rush of lawsuits was kicked off by a now-controversial bill known as AB 218, which changed the statute of limitations for victims of sexual abuse and created a new window to sue. The county, which is responsible for the safety of children inside juvenile carceral facilities and foster care, has seen more than 12,000 claims and counting since the law took effect in 2020.
The allegations of fraud that now hover over these cases was the fault of “an unmanageable law,” not the county’s vetting process, Harrison said.
“AB 218 erased those guardrails and allowed decades-old claims that no one can meaningfully vet,” she said.
The county’s lawyers and politicians have become increasingly loud critics of the law, which they say has left them facing a deluge of decades-old claims with no records. Supervisor Hilda Solis said she felt the county had become the “guinea pig” for the bill.
Joe Nicchitta, the county’s acting chief executive officer, estimated that anywhere between $1 billion to $2 billion in county taxpayer money from the settlements will go to attorneys.
“The law had some very noble intentions but it has been … and I’m just going to say what I think, hijacked by the plaintiff’s bar,” he said. “They do all of the vetting, they do all of the intake, they advertise extensively. They’re incentivized to bring as many cases as possible.”
Nicchitta said he’d heard rumors that venture capitalists were poking around Sacramento to find out “whether or not we have enough cash to pay for another settlement, so that they can finance a law firm to bring another round of settlements against us.”
“It’s clear to me the system is ruptured,” he said.
Courtney Thom, who was the lead attorney on cases from Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, said she believed the county was blaming the new state law for the failures of its own lawyers.
“To blame AB 218 and say that’s what enabled the fraud is just a pathetic attempt to deflect responsibility,” Thom said. “Our firm has been saying for two years we’re concerned about fraud.”
Mike Arias, who represents clients in the latest settlement as a partner with Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team, said the three firms involved stopped adding clients more than a year ago.
“That’s a big distinction,” Arias said. “We said, at the time, the number of plaintiffs would not change. Ethically, my view was that’s who we represent and who we’re going to negotiate for.”
Arias said the allocation for the second settlement will be done by retired Orange County Superior Court Judge Gail Andler, who specializes in overseeing sexual abuse litigation. Potential payouts will range between $750,000 and $3.25 million, he said.
Victims say the money represents a sliver of justice for the abuse they say they suffered while confined in county custody — little of which has been criminally prosecuted.
One man, who is part of the settlement and asked not to be identified, said he has no idea what happened to the probation official who he alleges raped him at around 16 while he was asleep in his cell at Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall, knocked out on sleep medication.
“I had no control in that place,” said the man, now 34. “My body hasn’t ever felt the same since.”
The county has launched an “AB 218 fraud hotline” where tipsters can report misconduct related to the flood of sex abuse claims.
(Rebecca Ellis / Los Angeles Times)
The county recently launched an “AB 218 fraud hotline” where tipsters can report misconduct related to the flood of claims. The county says it also plans to start a hotline for victims to safely report allegations of sex abuse in its facilities.
“It is illegal for anyone to file, pay for, or receive payments for making fake claims of childhood sexual abuse,” states a banner now running atop the county website with a hand doling out hundred-dollar bills.
The county also has launched a website that asks people to report if they were offered cash to sue, which law firms were involved, and whether they were coached, among other questions.
Supervisor Holly Mitchell, whose district includes the South Central social services office where seven people told The Times they were paid to sue, said she wanted to see the hotlines advertised as aggressively as the plaintiff attorneys advertised for their cases.
“You couldn’t turn on an urban radio station without hearing a commercial advertising these cases,” Mitchell said. “I certainly hope whatever we use, as we talk about our outreach, that we lean in as hard.”
HAYWARD — Detectives with the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office have uncovered new leads and reopened the case of a homicide that happened more than 30 years ago, the agency said.
Modesto native Zachary Jackson 30, was found shot to death inside his home in an unincorporated part of Hayward on June 17, 1993.
Cold case investigators have discovered “new evidence” in the killing and developed new leads based on that evidence, sheriff’s office spokesperson Capt. Tye Modeste said in a statement released Monday. Modeste said the new information has created “fresh momentum in the investigation.”
“Based on the new leads, detectives believe there are people in the community who have knowledge of those responsible for Jackson’s murder,” Modeste said. “The sheriff’s office is encouraging anyone with information regarding this case to contact us.”
Lead investigator Det. Patrick Smyth can be reached at 510-667-7538, and anonymous tips can be left at 510-667-3636 or by going to alamedasheriff.gov and hitting the “Community” tab.
Fullerton police said they discovered the bodies of four people inside a residence after a friend reported they had overdosed and were not breathing.
Authorities said they were called to an apartment in the 100 block of Wilshire Avenue at 11:01 a.m. on Tuesday and the bodies were discovered.
“There is no immediate threat to the public,” the police said in a statement.
Two women console each other after learning of the deaths of four softball teammates.
(KTLA-TV Channel 5)
Detectives have launched a death investigation. Authorities have not confirmed the identities of the deceased, but a friend of the group told KTLA-TV Channel 5 that they were all part of the same softball team.
Police did not confirm the deaths were a result of a drug overdose and could not immediately be reached for additional comment on Wednesday.
But drug use has become a growing concern in the county in recent years.
In Orange County, the rate of death due to opioid overdose nearly tripled from 2017 to 2021, from 7.9 deaths per 100,000 to 23.2. The largest increase occurred during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the overdose rate rising 88% between 2019 and 2020, according to the Orange County Health Care Agency.
LINCOLN CITY, Ore. – A person died Sunday afternoon after being swept out to sea near the mouth of Siletz Bay, according to North Lincoln Fire & Rescue.
Emergency crews were dispatched around 3:40 p.m. after 911 callers reported someone caught in a strong current and unable to return to shore. Rescue teams from NLFR arrived within minutes and launched two jet skis to search for the victim.
The U.S. Coast Guard assisted in the search with two lifeboats and a helicopter. Lincoln City police deployed a drone to aid in the effort, while the Depoe Bay Fire District provided additional support on scene.
Despite the rapid and coordinated response, the individual was found and pronounced dead. The Oregon State Police is leading the investigation.
In a statement, NLFR extended condolences to the victim’s family and reminded the public to use extreme caution near the ocean.
“Sneaker waves can strike without warning,” the agency said. “Never turn your back on the ocean. If the sand is wet, the water has already reached that point.”
Fesia Davenport, Los Angeles County’s chief executive officer, received a $2-million settlement this summer due to professional fallout from Measure G, a voter-approved ballot measure that will soon make her job obsolete, according to a letter she wrote to the county’s top lawyer.
Davenport wrote in the July 8 letter, which was released by the county counsel through a public record request Tuesday, that she had been seeking $2 million in damages for “reputational harm, embarrassment, and physical, emotional and mental distress caused by the Measure G.”
Under Measure G, which voters approved last November, the county chief executive, who manages the county government and oversees its budget, will be elected by voters instead of appointed by the board. The elected county executive will be in place by 2028.
“Measure G is an unprecedented event, and has had, and will continue to have, an unprecedented impact on my professional reputation, health, career, income, and retirement,” Davenport wrote to county counsel Dawyn Harrison. “My hope is that after setting aside the amount of my ask, that there can be a true focus on what the real issues are here – measure G has irrevocably changed my life, my professional career, economic outlook, and plans for the future.”
The existence of the $2-million settlement, finalized in mid-August, was first reported Tuesday by LAist. It was unclear then what the settlement was for.
Davenport, a longtime county employee, was appointed chief executive in 2021.
Under the terms of the settlement, Davenport cannot sue the county, including for “any claims arising out of the facts and circumstances surrounding the enactment of the ballot proposition known as ‘Measure G.’ ”
Davenport began a medical leave last week and told staff she expects to be back early next year. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the settlement.
Davenport’s Aug. 12 letter stated that other department heads had received significant payments upon departure. She noted the prior chief executive officer, Sachi Hamai, had received $1.5 million. The letter also makes an apparent reference to Mary Wickham and Rodrigo Castro-Silva, mentioning the former county attorneys by their last names.
Wickham received about $449,000 in severance pay and Castro-Silva received $213,000, according to records obtained by The Times.
“My circumstance is different in that I am not seeking to leave, and I have suffered damages, through no fault of my own,” she wrote.
Supervisors Lindsey Horvath and Janice Hahn first announced Measure G in July 2024, branding it as a long-overdue overhaul to the county’s sluggish bureaucracy. Under the charter amendment, the number of supervisors increased to nine and the county chief executive will now be elected.
On Aug. 12, 2024, a few weeks after the announcement, Davenport wrote a letter to Horvath saying the measure had impugned her “professional reputation” and would end her career at least two years earlier than she expected, according to another letter released Tuesday through a public records request.
“This has been a tough six weeks for me,” Davenport wrote in her letter. “It has created uncomfortable, awkward interactions between me and my CEO team (they are concerned), me and other departments heads (they are apologetic), and even County outsiders (they think I am being fired).”
Horvath’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The position of elected CEO was by far the most controversial part of Measure G. Supporters said that making the chief executive elected rather than appointed would bring more accountability to one of the county’s most powerful posts. Opponents warned it would consolidate too much power with one person and bring politics into a fundamentally bureaucratic position.
Strong surf, winds wash out Ponce Inlet jetty walkway months after repairs
THE PONCE INLET JETTY HAS NOW BEEN WASHED AWAY. TAKE A LOOK AT THIS PHOTO THAT SHOWS THE AFTERMATH OF THE ROUGH SURF AND HIGH TIDE ALONG THE VOLUSIA COUNTY COAST. YOU SEE THE ROCKS AND THEN THE WOOD JUST TOSSED ALL AROUND HERE AS WESH TWO SPENCER TRACY EXPLAINS, THIS WASHOUT COMES AFTER MONTHS OF REPAIR. LINDSAY. THE HIGH SURF IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. CHECK OUT THE WAVES, JUST HOW BIG THEY ARE, AND I THINK THE BIGGER PICTURE IS SHOWING THOSE WAVES CRASHING AGAINST THAT JETTY WALKWAY. AND THAT’S WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE DAMAGE TO IT. AND WE’VE HEARD FROM SOME FISHERMEN THAT TELL US IT’S AFFECTING THEIR LIVELIHOOD, THAT THEY’RE NOT ABLE TO GO OUT THERE RIGHT NOW. AT THIS MOMENT, WE KNOW THE COUNTY STAFF BUILT THIS TEMPORARY WOODEN WALKWAY, MUCH TO THE DELIGHT OF THE FISHERMEN WHO FREQUENT THE AREA. A COUNTY SPOKESPERSON SAYS THE WALKWAY WAS DAMAGED RECENTLY AND CLOSED, BUT THESE CONDITIONS HAVE TAKEN THE WHOLE THING. THE COUNTY PLANS TO EXTEND THE CONCRETE JETTY, BUT IT’S A LENGTHY PROCESS REQUIRING FEDERAL APPROVAL FROM THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. IT’S JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS NASTY WEATHER IS IMPACTING THE COAST. WE LIVE IN IN DAYTONA BEACH SHORES ON THE RIVER, AND MY HUSBAND’S BEEN IN THAT HOUSE SINCE THE 70S AND NEVER HAS THE WATER BEEN THAT HIGH. WHEN THERE’S NOT A STORM, A HURRICANE. SO SWIMMING IN THE WATER ALONG VOLUSIA SHORELINE WAS PROHIBITED YESTERDAY AS THE COUNTY WAS UNDER A DOUBLE RED FLAG WARNING. THAT’S ALL BECAUSE OF THE STRONG RIP CURRENTS AND AS WELL AS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DEBRIS. THEY’RE ASKING PEOPLE NOT TO TOUCH SEAWEED THAT WASHES UP, SAYING IT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN RENOURISHMENT. THE COUNTY SAYS ONCE THE WEATHER GETS BETTER, THAT’S WHEN THEY PLAN TO HAVE CREWS GO OUT THERE AND REPAIR THAT JETTY. BUT AS YOU CAN SEE RIGHT NOW, THAT’S DEFINITELY NOT HAPPENING TODAY. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE RIP CURRENTS ARE STILL REALLY STRONG. AND AS WE WERE HEADING INTO THE INLET, OFFICIALS TOLD US THAT RIGHT NOW THEY’RE UNDER A RED FLAG WARNING. SO THEY’RE STILL URGING PEOPLE NOT TO GO IN THE WATER AS IT CAN BE DANGEROUS. I’M COVERING VOLUSIA COUNTY IN PONCE INLET.
Strong surf, winds wash out Ponce Inlet jetty walkway months after repairs
The Ponce Inlet jetty walkway, which reopened in May, was washed out to sea Saturday morning due to high surf and windy weather along the coast.The whole section of the jetty had been getting clobbered by high surf for a few days.It had been closed following Hurricane Milton and reopened in May.The county had finished work on the wooden portion of the walkway in time for Memorial Day, bringing smiles to the faces of fishermen who frequent the area.However, the high surf conditions and wind washed it out to sea Saturday morning.The county said it had been closed since Hurricane Imelda damaged it a little more than a week ago.Many people have been asking why not drive pilings into the ground and make the whole thing concrete?The short answer is that this walkway has always been temporary.The county plans to extend the concrete deck, but has to get plans approved by the Army Corps of Engineers before work can begin.A county spokesperson said staff will be out clearing debris once conditions improve.
PONCE INLET, Fla. —
The Ponce Inlet jetty walkway, which reopened in May, was washed out to sea Saturday morning due to high surf and windy weather along the coast.
The whole section of the jetty had been getting clobbered by high surf for a few days.
It had been closed following Hurricane Milton and reopened in May.
The county had finished work on the wooden portion of the walkway in time for Memorial Day, bringing smiles to the faces of fishermen who frequent the area.
However, the high surf conditions and wind washed it out to sea Saturday morning.
The county said it had been closed since Hurricane Imelda damaged it a little more than a week ago.
Many people have been asking why not drive pilings into the ground and make the whole thing concrete?
The short answer is that this walkway has always been temporary.
The county plans to extend the concrete deck, but has to get plans approved by the Army Corps of Engineers before work can begin.
A county spokesperson said staff will be out clearing debris once conditions improve.
A judge temporarily blocked California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta’s attempt to take over Los Angeles County’s beleaguered juvenile halls on Friday, finding that despite evidence of a “systemic failure” to improve poor conditions, Bonta had not met the legal grounds necessary to strip away local control.
After years of scandals — including frequent drug overdoses and incidents of staff violence against youths — Bonta filed a motion in July to place the county’s juvenile halls in “receivership,” meaning a court-appointed monitor would manage the facilities, set their budgets and oversee the hiring and firing of staff. An ongoing staffing crisis previously led a state oversight body to deem two of L.A. County’s halls unfit to house children.
L.A. County entered into a settlement with the California Department of Justice in 2021 to mandate improvements, but oversight bodies and a Times investigation earlier this year found the Probation Department was falling far short of fixing many issues, as required by the agreement.
On Friday, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Hernandez chastised Bonta for failing to clearly lay out tasks for the Probation Department to abide by in the 2021 settlement. Hernandez said the attorney general’s office’s filings failed to show that a state takeover would lead to “a transformation of the juvenile halls.”
The steps the Probation Department needs to take to meet the terms of the settlement have been articulated in court filings and reports published by the L.A. County Office of the Inspector General for several years. Hernandez was only assigned to oversee the settlement in recent months and spent much of Friday’s hearing complaining about a lack of “clarity” in the case.
Hernandez wrote that Bonta’s motion had set off alarm bells about the Probation Department’s management of the halls.
“Going forward, the court expects all parties to have an ‘all-hands’ mentality,” the judge wrote in a tentative ruling earlier this week, which he adopted Friday morning.
Hernandez said he would not rule out the possibility of a receivership in the future, but wanted more direct testimony from parties, including Probation Department Chief Guillermo Viera Rosa and the court-appointed monitor over the settlement, Michael Dempsey. A hearing was set for Oct. 24.
The attorney general’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“The Department remains fully committed to making the necessary changes to bring our juvenile institutions to where they need to be,” Vicky Waters, the Probation Department’s chief spokesperson, said in a statement. “However, to achieve that goal, we must have both the authority and support to remove barriers that hinder progress rather than perpetuate no-win situations.”
The California attorney general’s office began investigating L.A. County’s juvenile halls in 2018 and found probation officers were using pepper spray excessively, failing to provide proper educational and therapeutic programming and detaining youths in solitary confinement for far too long.
Bonta said in July that the county has failed to improve “75%” of what they were mandated to change in the 2021 settlement.
A 2022 Times investigation revealed a massive staffing shortage was leading to significant injuries for both youths and probation officers. By May of 2023, the California Board of State and Community Corrections ordered Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall in Sylmar shuttered due to unsafe conditions. That same month, an 18-year-old died of an overdose while in custody.
The county soon reopened Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Downey, but the facility quickly became the site of a riot, an escape attempt and more drug overdoses. Last year, the California attorney general’s office won indictments against 30 officers who either orchestrated or allowed youths to engage in “gladiator fights.” That investigation was sparked by video of officers allowing eight youths to pummel another teen inside Los Padrinos, which has also been deemed unfit to house youths by a state commission.
In court Friday, Laura Fair, an attorney from the attorney general’s office, said that while she understood Hernandez’s position, she expressed concern that teens are still in danger while in the Probation Department’s custody.
“The youth in the halls continue to be in grave danger and continue to suffer irreparable harm every day,” she said.
She declined to comment further outside the courtroom. Waters, the Probation Department’s spokesperson, said she was unaware of the situation Fair was describing but would look into it.
Despite the litany of fiascoes over the last few years, probation leaders still argued in court filings that Bonta had gone too far.
“The County remains open to exploring any path that will lead to better outcomes. But it strongly opposes the DOJ’s ill-conceived proposal, which will only harm the youth in the County’s care by sowing chaos and inconsistency,” county lawyers wrote in an opposition motion submitted last month. “The DOJ’s request is almost literally without precedent. No state judge in California history has ever placed a correctional institution into receivership.”
Under the leadership of Viera Rosa, who took office in 2023, the Probation Department has made improvements to its efforts to keep drugs out of the hall, rectify staffing issues and hold its own officers accountable for misconduct, the county argued.
The department has placed “airport-grade” body scanners and drug-sniffing dogs at the entrances to both Nidorf and Los Padrinos in order to stymie the influx of narcotics into the halls, according to Robert Dugdale, an attorney representing the county.
Dugdale also touted the department’s hiring of Robert Arcos, a former high-ranking member of the Los Angeles Police Department and L.A. County district attorney’s office, to oversee security in the facilities.
The motion claimed it was the Probation Department that first uncovered the evidence that led to the gladiator fight prosecutions. Bonta said in March that his office launched its investigation after it reviewed leaked footage of one of the incidents.
Ever since Elijah Maldonado was born at just 29 months, he has needed specialty treatments that his family could afford only with publicly funded healthcare.
Diagnosed with cerebral palsy as an infant, he spent his first three months at a public hospital where the family lives in Orange County.
Now 7, Elijah receives physical and speech therapy among a host of other services paid for through Medicaid. He relies on a wheelchair funded by the government. An assistant paid for with taxpayer dollars makes sure he’s safe on the bus ride to and from school.
Each month, he receives a $957 disability check that helps to cover his and his family’s living expenses.
Josephine Rios wipes her grandson Elijah’s face.
(Juliana Yamada / Los Angeles Times)
Still learning to speak on his own, he uses a Proloquo speech app on an iPad provided by his school to tell his family when he’s hungry, needs to use the restroom or wants to play with his favorite toys.
“It’s his voice — his lifeline,” his aunt and primary caretaker Cassandra Gonzalez says of the app. Her compensation for his in-home care comes from taxpayer dollars too.
Now that lifeline — and much of the government assistance Elijah receives — is at risk of going away.
With hundreds of billions of dollars worth of cuts to Medicaid and food aid kicking in this fall thanks to the passage of the Republican-backed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” — on top of earlier cuts imposed by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency — a host of federally funded healthcare and nutrition programs that serve low-income Americans will be scaled back, revamped with expanded work requirements and other restrictions or canceled altogether if individual states can’t find alternate funding sources.
The budget reduces federal spending on Medicaid alone by about $1 trillion over the next 10 years nationwide, with initial reductions taking effect in the coming weeks.
Gov. Gavin Newsom responded by accusing the Trump administration of “ripping care from cancer patients, meals from children and money from working families — just to give tax breaks to the ultra-rich.”
L.A. public health officials called the cuts devastating for a county where nearly 40% of the population is enrolled in Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program. L.A. County’s Department of Health Services, which oversees four public hospitals and about two dozen clinics, projects a budget reduction amounting to $750 million a year, and federal funding for the Department of Public Health, which inspects food, provides substance-use treatment and tracks disease outbreaks, will drop by an estimated $200 million a year. Spending cuts have prompted hiring freezes and projections of ballooning budget deficits, county health officials said.
Spending reductions, combined with recent changes to the Affordable Care Act and Medicare, could leave an additional 1.7 million people in California uninsured by 2034, according to an analysis by the nonprofit healthcare research organization KFF.
It’s not just that the cuts to these programs are massive by historical standards.
The new rules and restrictions are confusing and states have been given little guidance from the federal agencies that oversee health and nutrition programs on how, or even when, to implement them, experts at the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities wrote in a recent report.
What’s clear, the CBPP said, is that millions of children, older adults, people with disabilities and veterans stand to lose not just Medicaid coverage but federal aid to access the type of healthy foods that could prevent illness and chronic conditions.
More than 5 million California households receive food aid through the state’s CalFresh program and 97% percent of them will see their benefits either slashed or eliminated because of federal spending cuts, changes to eligibility requirements or financial constraints at the state level, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan California Budget Policy Center.
Elijah plays with toy cars outside his aunt’s home in Tustin.
(Juliana Yamada / Los Angeles Times)
In Orange County, where Elijah’s family lives, public health officials were already reeling from federal spending cuts in the months before the budget bill passed, said Dr. Veronica Kelley, director of the OC Health Care Agency. For example, there was the $13.2-million cut to funding for family planning services in the county, and the $4-million reduction in funding to Women, Infants and Children nutrition (WIC).
The agency has worked to prevent mass layoffs by moving public-health workers in canceled programs to other departments or leaving some positions unfilled in order to save jobs elsewhere, and it has sought out nonprofit social service organizations and philanthropies to either take over programs or help fund them, Kelley said.
Now, Kelley is preparing for possible cuts to programs to combat obesity, maintain community gardens, help seniors make better healthcare decisions and reduce the use of tobacco. The agency also has to figure out how to make up for a $4.8-million reduction in federal funds for the county’s SNAP program that takes effect on Wednesday — another casualty of the federal spending bill.
The measures that the agency has leaned on to get through the year are not sustainable, Kelley said. “We can only do that for so long,” she said. “It’s chaotic. In terms of healthcare, it’s devastating… It feels like we’re taking so many steps backward.”
The looming cuts and changes have also set off alarm bells at Kaiser Permanente, California’s largest private healthcare provider with 9.5 million members statewide, 1.1 million of whom are enrolled in Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program.
“Without the ability to pay, newly uninsured people will find themselves having to delay care, leading to more serious and complex health conditions, increasing the use of emergency services and more intensive medical services,” Kaiser Permanente Southern California Regional spokeswoman Candice Lee said in a statement to The Times.
“This will affect all of us as the cost of this uncompensated care leads hospitals and care providers to charge paying customers more to cover their costs. Some hospitals and providers, especially those in rural and underserved areas, will be unable to make up for these unreimbursed costs, and will be financially threatened by these changes.”
Standing in front of her sister Cassandra’s town home in Tustin, a quiet suburban city of 80,000 about 10 miles south of Disneyland, Elijah’s mother, Samantha Rios; grandmother Josephine Rios; and Aunt Cassandra are filled with worry.
Elijah points to a command on his Proloquo speech app, which he uses to communicate his needs.
(Juliana Yamada / Los Angeles Times)
Josephine, a nursing assistant who works at a Kaiser hospital in Orange County, said she hears the panic in patients’ voices when they describe rushing to schedule needed medical procedures in anticipation of losing their Medicaid benefits.
Earlier this year, Josephine joined delegations of unionized California healthcare workers who traveled to Washington with the aim of pressing lawmakers to oppose spending cuts.
Rep. Young Kim, the Republican who represents the Rios family’s district in Congress, was receptive to the delegation’s pleas to vote no on the budget bill, Josephine recalls. The congresswoman ultimately voted for the bill, saying on her official webpage the legislation was good for Californians because it would relieve the tax burden on families, ensure that government dollars are used effectively and “strengthen Medicaid and SNAP for our most vulnerable citizens who truly need it.”
Elijah’s Aunt Cassandra and grandmother Josephine look over his shoulder as he watches a TV show.
(Juliana Yamada / Los Angeles Times)
Now, Josephine looked on as Elijah, seated in his wheelchair, played on his iPad and watched a Disney program on his phone. He can press a tab on the touchscreen to make the tablet say “My name’s Elijah” if he’s feeling unsafe away from home, another to tell his family he needs space when upset.
Watching Elijah enjoy himself, the women said they feel awkward broadcasting their woes to strangers when all they desire is what’s best for him. They don’t need the public’s pity.
The family wants lawmakers and the public to understand how seemingly abstract healthcare decisions involving billions of dollars, and made 2,000-plus miles away in Washington, have brought new financial turmoil to a family that’s already on the edge financially.
Samantha, a single mom, works full time to provide a home for Elijah and his two sisters, ages 10 and 8. A subscription to the Proloquo speech app alone would cost $300 a year out-of-pocket — more than she can afford on her shoestring budget.
Due to changes in household income requirements, Samantha had already lost Medicaid coverage for herself and her two girls, she said, as well as her SNAP food assistance, leaving her at a loss for how to fill the gap. She now pays about $760 a month to cover her daughters and herself through her employer-based health plan.
The cut to food aid has forced her to compensate by getting free vegetables, milk, eggs and chicken from the food pantry at a local school, a reality that she said she was at first too ashamed to disclose even to relatives.
Then came the bad news Samantha recently received about Elijah’s monthly Social Security Insurance for his disability. She was stunned to hear that because of stricter income cut-offs for that type of aid, Elijah would no longer receive those checks as of Oct. 1.
“Before, he was getting $957 a month — obviously that’s grocery money for me,” Samantha said. The money also went to buy baby wipes, as well as knee pads to help him move more comfortably on the floor when not using his wheelchair.
“I don’t get food stamps. I don’t get Medi-Cal for my girls. I don’t get any of that,” Samantha said. “As of Oct. 1, now I’ve got to figure out how am I going to pay my rent? How am I going to buy groceries?”
Luckily, the sisters said, the physical, speech and behavioral-health therapies that Elijah receives are safe — for now.
And the women know they can lean on each other in tough times. The sisters and Josephine all live within minutes of each other in Tustin, close enough for Samantha’s children to eat at someone’s home when their own cupboards are bare.
Every few months, Samantha said, Elijah experiences severe seizures that can last up to 90 minutes and require hospitalization.
Cassandra and Josephine like that they can run over to help if Elijah has a medical emergency. Another sister who lives farther away is on hand when needed too.
“What’s going to happen to other families who don’t have that support system?” Samantha said.
Given the potential for further cuts to programs that pay for home-based healthcare and assistants for people with disabilities, Cassandra wonders what will happen to her own family if she can no longer work as Elijah’s caregiver.
Where would the family get the money to pay a new caregiver who is qualified enough to work with a special-needs child who can speak a few words thanks to speech therapy but who cannot eat, walk or use the restroom without supervision? What if funding is eliminated for the assistant who travels with Elijah to school?
“People think that cutting Medi-Cal, cutting food stamps or whatever isn’t going to affect that many people,” Cassandra said. “It’s affecting my nephew and nieces. It’s affecting my sister. But it’s not just affecting her household. It’s affecting my household.”
“We’re not saying we’re going to Disneyland or going out to eat every day,” Cassandra said. “This is just living. We can’t even live at this point, with things being cut.”
The women offered up principles they feel are in short supply lately in the discourse over the government’s role in public health — among them “morals” and “empathy.” Samantha adds one more word to the list.
The long-awaited report investigating how Los Angeles County officials failed to order timely evacuations for west Altadena as the Eaton fire threatened the community did not assign blame for the botched alerts, instead chalking up the issue to a night of chaos, unprecedented conditions and poor communication.
The 132-page report released Thursday seemed to downplay how early the fire threatened west Altadena — despite 911 calls that reported flames and smoke in the area — and only once mentioned the 19 people who died in the fire, of which all but one were found in the town’s western side.
Instead, it focused on the fire’s “perfect storm,” poor preparation and the fact that the satellite-outlined “fire front” hadn’t entered west Altadena until 5 a.m. after evacuation alerts were issued, though several spot fires were confirmed in the area earlier in the night.
The independent investigation by consulting firm McChrystal Group, released eight months after the Los Angeles area firestorm, came after The Times revealed that the county didn’t issue evacuation alerts in west Altadena until hours after smoke and flames from the Eaton fire threatened the community.
While areas east of Lake Avenue got evacuation orders just after 7 p.m. on Jan. 7, most of west Altadena did not receive any evacuation alerts until 3:30 a.m. Some zones didn’t receive alerts until almost 6 a.m., hours after people began reporting fire in the area to 911.
Officials told the Times that the responsibility to issue evacuation orders was split among three agencies: the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the Los Angeles County Fire Department and the county Office of Emergency Management.
But Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna later downplayed his department’s role, saying firefighters typically take the lead because they are “the experts” in such situations. The Office of Emergency Management, which is in charge of sending out alerts, said there were no technical issues.
Without assigning blame or explaining what went wrong, the report confirmed that between 1 and 3 a.m. on Jan. 8, the county did not send out any evacuation alerts — including to west Altadena. The report said that at that time, “all areas [L.A. county fire officials] believed were directly impacted by or at risk from the Eaton Fire had already received an evacuation warning or order.”
But that was clearly not the case.
The first evacuation order for west Altadena came at 3:25 a.m., after dispatchers received at least 14 reports of fire in the area, according to 911 logs from the Los Angeles County Fire Department obtained by The Times.
The report said that the initial calls for fire did not match the location of destroyed structures, appearing to question the validity of those early calls and the presence of flames. The report claimed that the first 911 call for a fire in west Altadena where the structure was later confirmed damaged came just before 1 a.m. on Jan. 8 — still more than two hours before evacuation orders were issued.
The reports provides two examples of Fire Department staff flagging that the fire may be burning west more than an hour before evacuations alerts went out for west Altadena.
A Fire Department staff member in the field in Altadena said they suggested to Unified Command staff a little before midnight on Jan. 8 that, due to high winds, evacuation orders should go out for the foothills of Altadena, all the way to La Cañada. Unified Command staff said they did not recall this occurring and that the fire front was not moving west at the time.
About two hours later, at 2:18 a.m., a staffer with the county Fire Department radioed in that they saw fire north of Farnsworth Park moving west along the foothills.
Though some officials present in the decision-making process told investigators they had taken notes in the field about evacuation decisions, the notes “were either incomplete, not time-stamped, or not maintained.”
“No official form or documentation was used by LACoFD, LASD or OEM to jointly and formally record which zones should receive evacuation orders or warnings, the time the decision was made, or the time the zones were communicated to OEM staff at the EOC.”
The report also mentioned — without naming specific people or agencies — that the county “had concerns about over-warning” during the fire, worrying about adding confusion, panic or unnecessary traffic issues. State guidelines on alert and warning systems explicitly warn against this, as have experts, repeatedly.
The report said that based on satellite data from the National Guard, the fire front did not cross into western Altadena until around 5 a.m., two hours after evacuation orders had been issued. The report acknowledged that 911 calls were coming in from the area hours before the orders, but categorized those incidents as “spot fires.”
The report repeatedly mentions how conditions created a “perfect storm” for firefighters, while highlighting that there seemed to be a real focus about NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab catching fire, which could release toxic fumes if ignited.
While the fire initially burned eastward, firefighters soon reported that it was spreading “everywhere all at once” with wind gusts between 70-90 MPH.
“Evacuation decisions and messages could not keep pace with the fire,” the report stated.
The report also claims that the fire entered west Altadena as wind speeds increased, describing it as a “more densely populated” area with older homes built with materials that were “more vulnerable to ignition.”
The report found several problems with how the county carries out evacuations. Sometimes, when officials evacuated a zone, they would automatically evacuate the zone next to it. But that practice was not codified and did not happen in western Altadena.
The three agencies in charge also did not have a single platform with which to coordinate communication, exacerbating issues with decision-making across the fire response, the report found. Sheriff’s department staff may not have been aware in real time of which zones were under evacuation warnings or orders, as they were not always side by side with other agencies at unified command, according to the report.
The report was conducted by The McChrystal Group, a consulting firm with experience assessing government response to natural disasters. The report included dozens of interviews with fire and county officials as well as public listening sessions.
Some who attended the sessions said they were cathartic. Others said they were skeptical much would come of the county-funded report.
“I think it’s going to be more hot air to cover the county’s ass,” said Shawna Dawson Beer. whose home burned down in the Eaton Fire. “I don’t expect any real accountability.”
During a May 7 listening session, residents repeatedly told the consultants that their evacuation orders had been dangerously delayed. “None of us really received alerts,” said one woman.
County officials largely declined to answer questions about what went wrong with the delayed evacuation alerts, citing the ongoing probe. The McChrystal Group also did not answer questions, only issuing two updates over the last few months, though neither contained any substantive information.
In 2019, almost a year after the Woolsey fire, a similar report prepared by Citygate Associates detailed how multiple simultaneous fires strained first responders’ ability to prioritize where to send people. The blaze destroyed some 1,600 structures and killed three people.
Similar issues were found with the county’s response this January, according to the 2025 report. Both reports questioned the wisdom of further development in fire-prone areas, given officials’ stated inability to defend the vast number of Californians who live within high risk areas.
A Times investigation also found that most county fire trucks didn’t shift into west Altadena until long after it was ravaged by fire. Many county fire trucks had already been deployed to the Palisades fire and to east Altadena. Marrone said the lack of fire trucks in west Altadena probably boiled down to “human error” by fire officials who decided where the trucks should move.