ReportWire

Tag: Charlie Kirk

  • Maddow Blog | ‘I’m not familiar’: Three months later, the White House struggles with Minnesota killings

    [ad_1]

    Three months ago, a suspected gunman shot and killed Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, at their home in Minnesota. This came immediately after the same suspected shooter tried to kill state Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette.

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said in the immediate aftermath of the attack that it appeared to be a “politically motivated assassination.”

    Republicans at the national level did not exactly respond to the tragedy in a responsible way. Despite that everything we now know about the alleged gunman suggests he was an anti-abortion Trump voter and not a far-left radical, several congressional Republicans labeled the suspect a “Marxist” whose alleged crimes constituted an example of “extreme left” violence.

    This was ridiculous. It was also, in retrospect, the opposite of how Democratic officials responded to the shooting that claimed Charlie Kirk’s life. It happened anyway — though the Republican response to the Minnesota shooting wasn’t perceived as a national scandal and no one was fired for having said dumb things about the shootings.

    In the aftermath of the political violence, Donald Trump said very little about what happened. Indeed, as my MSNBC colleague Zeeshan Aleem explained, “He did not offer a substantial eulogy for her, or deliver an address on political violence, as he did after Kirk’s death. Unlike former President Joe Biden, Trump did not attend the funeral.”

    Three months later, a Fox News host characterized Hortman’s death as a “bulls—” example of political violence. Also on Monday, Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested that the suspect in Minnesota came from the left, not the right, despite all of the available evidence.

    And then, of course, there was the president himself.

    “In retrospect, given all of the moving ways that this White House has paid tribute to Charlie Kirk,” a reporter asked Trump, “do you think it would’ve been fitting to lower the flags to half-staff when Melissa Hortman, the Minnesota House speaker, was gunned down by an assassin as well?”

    The president replied, “I’m not familiar. The who?”

    Reminded of an incident he ought to have been familiar with, Trump said of lowering the flags, “Well, if the governor had asked me to do that, I would’ve done that. But the governor of Minnesota didn’t ask me.”

    For all of Trump’s comments in recent days about political violence, that he appeared to have no idea who Hortman was suggests the president hasn’t exactly done a full accounting of the broader national scourge.

    For that matter, leaders don’t generally wait to be asked to do the right and honorable thing.

    But let’s also not brush past the relevant details: In the aftermath of the political violence in Minnesota, Trump thought it’d be a good idea to lash out publicly at Walz — who might’ve requested lowering flags, but whom the president refused to contact.

    “Why would I call him? I could call and say, ‘Hi, how you doing?’ The guy doesn’t have a clue,” Trump said of Walz at the time. “He’s a mess. So I could be nice and call, but why waste time?”

    The Republican added, “I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out, I’m not calling him.”

    It’s worth appreciating the differences between the president’s reaction to Kirk’s death and how he responded to Hortman and her husband being killed.

    As Aleem concluded, “In a democracy, all political violence should be considered entirely unacceptable, no matter the ideology of the person committing the act or on the receiving end of it. Both the deaths of Hortman and Kirk were terrible tragedies and completely unjustifiable. But in his selective mourning and politicization of their deaths, Trump suggested one tragedy — more importantly, one type of tragedy — mattered more.”

    This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk’s loss is personal. Here’s how he gave me hope and strength

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The news of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University last Wednesday shocked me to the core. It left a profound void in my heart and in the hearts of many others. 

    As the founder of Project H.O.O.D., I mourn not just a conservative titan but a friend, a supporter and a brother in the fight for a better America. The Charlie I knew was more than a political voice — he was a man of action, conviction and a devout Christian whose generosity reached far beyond the headlines.

    I know because I was one of those he blessed with his time and resources. He never sought the public limelight for his good deeds, and I kept silent as well — until now. With his departure from this earth to our Heavenly Father, his good works deserve to be known.

    I first met Charlie, a Chicago native, in the early days of Project H.O.O.D., when both of our visions — his Turning Point USA and my mission to transform the South Side — were just taking root. He was so young then, barely 18, yet his drive and clarity of purpose were undeniable. He knew why he was put on this Earth, and he lived with a passion that touched me, a wiser man two decades older.

    YOUTH LEADERS MOURN ‘THE GODFATHER OF CAMPUS CONSERVATISM’ CHARLIE KIRK FOLLOWING ASSASSINATION

    Charlie didn’t just talk about change — he built it. He saw in Project H.O.O.D. a shared commitment to a better America, and he offered guidance, shared insights and connected us with incredible supporters who believed in our mission to provide opportunity and hope to those society often overlooks.

    His donations to our galas were generous, but it was his personal encouragement — those text messages saying, “Keep going, Pastor, we’re with you” — that meant the world. Charlie had a gift for making you feel seen and valued, no matter how big or small your role in the fight.

    An attendee wearing a U.S. flag joins a candlelight vigil in Seattle for Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who was killed earlier that day at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.  (David Ryder/Getty Images)

    Charlie was set to join us in Washington, D.C., for a major fundraiser, a moment I was very much looking forward to since I hadn’t seen him in a while. He was ready to walk alongside us for that leg of our Walk Across America, to lend his voice and platform to lift up those who need it most. That he was taken from us before that day is a tragedy that cuts deep. His death is a stark reminder of the risks we face when we dare to speak boldly, challenge the status quo and stand for what we believe.

    FOX NEWS PERSONALITIES OFFER EMOTIONAL TRIBUTES TO CHARLIE KIRK: ‘HE LOVED AMERICA SO MUCH’

    As someone in the same arena — fighting for change in a world that can be hostile to truth — I feel Charlie’s loss on a personal level. 

    His killing forces us to confront the growing threats against those who speak out. But Charlie’s life teaches us that fear cannot win. 

    CHARLIE KIRK WAS PROUD CHAMPION OF CHRISTIANITY ON CAMPUSES NATIONWIDE: ‘I’M NOTHING WITHOUT JESUS’

    He faced opposition with courage, never shying away from the hard conversations or the cultural battles that defined his work. He built Turning Point USA into a movement that inspired millions of young people to embrace conservative values, not through fear but through hope, reason and unrelenting passion.

    Charlie Kirk’s killing forces us to confront the growing threats against those who speak out. But his life teaches us that fear cannot win.

    The Bible tells us in John 15:13, “Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.” Charlie may not have chosen to lay down his life, but he lived it in service to others: his family, his country and the countless young people he inspired. 

    His death is a call to action for all of us. We cannot let fear silence us. We cannot let violence dim the light of truth. 

    The casket of Charlie Kirk is removed from Air Force Two

    Charlie Kirk’s casket is removed from Air Force Two at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport on September 11, 2025, in Phoenix, Arizona. (Eric Thayer/Getty Images)

    Charlie’s legacy demands that we press forward, honor him by continuing the work he championed — building communities, fostering hope and standing firm in our convictions.

    When I heard of the shooting, I went to X, and the first thing I saw was a post by his wife, Erika: “Psalm 46:1 — God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” 

    Charlie Kirk with family on Christmas, him and wife Erika smiling at each other, holding two kids

    Charile Kirk and his wife, Erika Lane Frantzve and their two children at Christmas in December 2024. (Charlie Kirk via Facebook)

    In a moment of unimaginable loss, her choice of verse reminds us that even when life feels shattered, God remains a refuge and strength. This emphasizes that in grief, faith does not erase pain but anchors us when everything feels unsteady.

    Charlie Kirk’s death is a call to action for all of us. We cannot let fear silence us. We cannot let violence dim the light of truth. 

    To his wife, Erika, and their two young children, I offer my deepest condolences. Charlie was a devoted husband and father. His family, friends and the Turning Point USA community know that Charlie’s impact will live on through the lives he touched and the movements he built.

    Charlie Kirk and family seen in Utah with nature and mountains in background

    Charile Kirk and his wife, Erika Lane Frantzve and their two children, prior to his assassination on Sept. 10, 2025. (Erika Kirk via Instagram)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    As I reflect on Charlie Kirk’s life, I’m reminded of his unwavering belief in the American Dream, a dream he fought for not just for himself but for all of us. Let us honor him by carrying that dream forward, undeterred by the darkness of this moment. 

    Charlie, we love you, God bless you, and we will keep fighting.

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PASTOR COREY BROOKS

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A taboo worth keeping

    [ad_1]

    Call their employer? “If we want to stop political violence like what happened to Charlie Kirk, we have to be honest about the people who are celebrating it and the people who are financing it,” wrote Vice President J.D. Vance on X, promoting his guest hosting of Kirk’s show, following Kirk’s killing. “When you see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder, call them out. And hell, call their employer,” he said on the program.

    “I’m desperate for our country to be united in condemnation of the actions and the ideas that killed my friend,” Vance added. “I want it so badly that I will tell you a difficult truth. We can only have it with people who acknowledge that political violence is unacceptable.”

    At East Tennessee State University, two faculty members were placed on administrative leave, allegedly due to comments such as “you reap what you sow” and “[Kirk’s killing] isn’t a tragedy. It’s a victory.” Oklahoma’s state superintendent is investigating at least one middle school teacher for her posts (calling Kirk a “racist, misogynist piece of shit,” which seems nasty, but not actually advocating political violence). The Texas Education Agency is reviewing 180 complaints filed against teachers for comments related to Kirk; some of those are surely murder cheerleading, while others are scathing criticism that should probably be tolerated. Four different high school teachers were placed on leave in Massachusetts for their commentary. One elementary school teacher in that same state has been placed on leave for her TikTok video mocking Kirk’s death. Both Delta and American Airlines have axed a few employees each for social media posts on Kirk. Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and the University of Miami’s health care system fired one worker each. An Office Depot worker at a store in Michigan was fired after allegedly refusing to print flyers about a Kirk vigil for a paying customer—which makes an awful lot of sense, given that printing flyers is literally their job. These cases are all different, and some seem like they do actually call for or celebrate political violence, whereas others are just tasteless expressions of hatred for Kirk that don’t violate that norm.

    So let’s back up for a moment. Why did cancel culture of the 2010s strike so many of us as so bad and wrong?

    Some of it surely had to do with proportionality: The punishment rarely fit the “crime” (which was almost always debatable).

    Some of it surely had to do with changing sensibilities and sensitivities, and a sense that the orthodoxy being enforced was invented yesterday, not a reflection of prevailing sentiments. Thus it was unpredictable: You couldn’t really be sure you weren’t running afoul of the new tyrannical enforcers, because the shift in pieties (or language) had happened practically overnight.

    But there was something undergirding it that felt especially stupid: The kids were the enforcers, overthrowing the adults. Not because the adults had exercised bad judgment or shown themselves to be incapable of faithfully executing the roles they’d been given. In some cases, they were canceled as they exercised good judgment: Consider the case of Mike Pesca, a Slate journalist (and, disclosure: my friend) who had been discussing how the publication ought to cover the firing of New York Times writer Donald McNeil, who referred to a racial slur in context on a trip to Peru with high schoolers; could a white person ever write or say nigger in context? Don’t we make a use/mention distinction? Some vocal portion of his workplace apparently disagreed, and he was dismissed after he’d worked there for seven years. It was never about morals, it was never about quality of product being produced; it was about power in the workplace, wrapped up in something that, to the young, resembled morals enough to give them plausible deniability.

    Now, something a little different is happening, for which people are using the same name. Professors, teachers, nurses, and doctors who have celebrated the assassination of Kirk are being purged from their workplaces. It’s conservatives swarming this time, phoning employers, making them aware of the misdeeds, asking for their scalps.

    Most of me thinks it’s wrong and bad on principle—since I don’t ever want to be fired for my own speech (and thus want to maintain a very wide sense of what we societally tolerate)—but also as a strategy, since I don’t believe conservatives gain very much by weeding out the people with dumb beliefs who are in positions of relatively little power and importance. People have little impulse control and use social media like a diary; I’ll never understand the crying-in-a-car TikTok woman genre, but I’m fine living in a society with people who get off on that. (Also: What even is a position of relatively little power and importance? Teachers and professors are entrusted with impressionable minds. Isn’t this extreme power?)

    But a not-that-tiny piece of me sees this as substantively different: Cancel culture grievances were mostly petty and minor, issues that could have been resolved if participants were willing to be 10 percent more charitable toward their perceived opponents, and if bosses were willing to instruct their inferiors to get over themselves. James Damore’s Google memo about heritability of certain traits and brain differences between genders and how to reduce the gender gap among engineers is a good example; anyone who claims to have felt threatened was being an opportunist, looking to amass power and get the hit of collective effervescence that comes from vanquishing an opponent.

    Of course, there were also the “offensive” acts that were not really relevant to the workplace, but that the 2010s cancelers implied indicated something about the tainted souls of the powerful: Adam Rapoport, the Bon Appetit editor in chief, who in 2020 handed in his resignation after colleagues dug up a boricua (Puerto Rican)/durag Halloween costume from 2013. Rapoport’s photo was “just a symptom of the systematic racism that runs rampant within Conde Nast as a whole,” said one chef/editor who worked at the magazine, while others alleged black women had been systemically mistreated under Rapoport’s leadership.

    With Kirk’s killing, the posters who lose their jobs are saying something actually bad, something that society has long seen as beyond a crossed line; we don’t cheer the killing of people with whom we disagree. This isn’t the Cultural Revolution. We don’t flog people. We don’t put them in stocks in the town square. And we don’t get titillated when a bullet flies into their neck and they spurt out blood and crumple to the ground; it’s gruesome and awful and it happened as a thousand impressionable young people looked on. Looked at one way, this was an insane person committing an extrajudicial act of violence. Looked at another, this was a public execution for the crime of being conservative—which is, apparently, judging by their reactions, what a lot of people had been wanting.

    When a working professional can’t manage to exercise self-control and refrain from posting in public about how grateful they are that the assassin had the balls to shoot their shot, you have to wonder about their judgment. It’s perhaps especially odd for professors to say as much. (Don’t they spend their time…speaking their mind…in public?) And is there perhaps some value in maintaining or enforcing a consensus of what types of things lie beyond the pale? I don’t want pedophilia apologists as kindergarten teachers, to use an extreme example; I also probably don’t want a doctor treating me who cheers on the murder of people who think like Kirk.

    In general, I trust that reputable employers have done some amount of quality/maturity/professionalism/judgment vetting. Surely celebrating political violence runs afoul of these basic expectations, and that’s what they’re responding to when they fire someone who posted gleefully about Kirk, which is materially different than the made-up social justice dogma that was being enforced before. (It would be better if employers self-policed rather than succumbing to the demands of angry mobs.) We’ve always had taboos, and the taboo against political violence is a strong one worth keeping, not one we should constantly have to renegotiate.


    Scenes from New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul, a sort of forgettable, generically bad Democrat who inherited the spot when Andrew Cuomo left in a hurry, endorsed Zohran Mamdani; nobody followed her lead. lol.


    QUICK HITS

    • Meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondi is saying utterly wrong things about hate speech. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society…We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.” Does Bondi need a reminder?
    • “President Donald Trump approved a National Guard deployment to Memphis, expanding the federal government’s efforts to crack down on what he has cast as out-of-control crime in Democratic-run cities,” reports Bloomberg. And Chicago will probably be next after Memphis, signaled the president.
    • The U.S. military struck a second boat carrying Venezuelan narcotraffickers, killing at least three. The first strike of this variety was ordered and carried out earlier this month, killing 11. More strikes are planned; congressional approval has not yet been sought.
    • Inside the deal reached between the U.S. and China for the sale of TikTok, courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
    • “Israel unleashed a long-threatened ground assault on Gaza City on Tuesday, declaring ‘Gaza is burning’ as Palestinians there described the most intense bombardment they had faced in two years of war,” reports Reuters. “An Israel Defence Forces official said ground troops were moving deeper into the enclave’s main city, and that the number of soldiers would rise in coming days to confront up to 3,000 Hamas combatants the IDF believes are still in the city.”
    • The Washington Post fired journalist Karen Attiah; Attiah claims it was for her social media posts on Kirk, including one in which she says Kirk once said, “Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a white person’s slot.” This was a botched quote. From Reason‘s Robby Soave: “What he said was that the achievements of four specific black women—former First Lady Michelle Obama, former MSNBC host Joy Reid, Supreme Court Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and former Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D–Texas)—were suspect because of affirmative action; the existence of racial preferences casts a pall over their selections for various positions. One can certainly criticize the point or disagree with how he worded it (Michelle Obama, diversity hire?), but he did not say the words attributed to him by Attiah. And she put it in quotes, which is journalistic malpractice.”

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link

  • Spencer County Elementary to see increased police presence following threat

    [ad_1]

    There will be an increased presence of law enforcement at Spencer County Elementary School on Sept. 16 after the school was notified of a potential threat following an online discussion between two individuals.

    The comments focused on political views after Charlie Kirk, a conservative influencer, was shot while speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Sept. 10.

    Officials with Spencer County Schools said the threat was reported on Sept. 15 to the Taylorsville Police Department, which is now working in collaboration with the Spencer County Sheriff’s Office and school resource officers to handle the incident.

    “We can assure you that the safety of our school children is of the utmost priority,” said officials from both the Spencer County Sheriff’s Office and Taylorsville Police.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    In a Facebook post, Spencer County Schools said local law enforcement will have “an active presence all day” on campus Sept. 16.

    More: Charlie Kirk vigil draws large crowd to University of Louisville

    This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Spencer County Elementary to see increased police after threat

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Suspect in killing of Charlie Kirk likely to face charges Tuesday before first court hearing

    [ad_1]

    Suspect in killing of Charlie Kirk likely to face charges Tuesday before first court hearing

    PROVO, Utah (AP) — Prosecutors are preparing to file a capital murder charge Tuesday against the Utah man who authorities say held a “leftist ideology” and may have been “radicalized” online before he was arrested in the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

    Charges against 22-year-old Tyler Robinson are expected to come ahead of the first court hearing since he was accused last week of shooting Kirk, a conservative activist credited with energizing the Republican youth movement and helping President Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024.

    Investigators have been piecing together evidence, including a rifle and ammunition engraved with anti-fascist and meme culture messaging, found after the shooting Wednesday at Utah Valley University in Orem. Kirk was speaking there on one of his many campus visits where he relished debating just about everyone.

    Prosecutors in Utah County are considering several charges against Robinson, the most serious being aggravated murder because it could bring the death penalty if there is a conviction.

    Once charges are filed, Robinson is scheduled to appear on camera for a virtual court hearing. He has been held without bail since his arrest, and it remained unclear whether he has an attorney.

    While authorities say Robinson hasn’t been cooperating with investigators, they do say his family and friends have been talking. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said over the weekend that those who know Robinson say his politics shifted left in recent years and that he spent a lot of time in the “dark corners of the internet.”

    FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday on the Fox News show “Fox & Friends” that DNA evidence has linked Robinson to a towel wrapped around a rifle found near the Utah Valley campus and a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop where the fatal shot was fired.

    Before the shooting, Robinson wrote in a note that he had an opportunity to take out Kirk and was going to do it, according to Patel.

    Investigators are working on finding a motive for the attack, Utah’s governor said Sunday, adding that more information may come out once Robinson appears for his initial court hearing.

    Cox said Robinson’s romantic partner was transgender, which some politicians have pointed to as a sign the suspect was targeting Kirk for his anti-transgender views. But authorities have not yet said whether that played a role. Kirk was shot while taking a question that touched on mass shootings, gun violence and transgender people.

    Utah Department of Public Safety Commissioner Beau Mason said Monday that Robinson’s partner has been cooperative. He said investigators believe Robinson acted alone during the shooting, but they also are looking at whether anyone knew of his plans beforehand.

    In the days since Kirk’s assassination, Americans have found themselves facing questions about rising political violence, the deep divisions that brought the nation here and whether anything can change.

    Despite calls for greater civility, some who opposed Kirk’s provocative statements about gender, race and politics criticized him after his death. Many Republicans have led the push to punish anyone who they believe dishonored him, causing both public and private workers to lose their jobs or face other consequences at work.

    This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.

    Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

    Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California state Sen. Scott Wiener labels Charlie Kirk ‘a vile bigot who’ normalized ‘dehumanization’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    California state Sen. Scott Wiener described Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist assassinated in Utah last week, as “a vile bigot,” asserting that Kirk normalized “dehumanization.”

    “Charlie Kirk did not deserve to die. Also Charlie Kirk was a vile bigot who did immeasurable harm to so many people by normalizing dehumanization. Yes, having debates on college campuses is a good thing. But dehumanizing people — & persuading others to do so — is horrific,” Wiener wrote in a Monday post on X.

    The RNC Research account on X shared Wiener’s post, writing, “This is the ‘tolerant left.’ Absolutely disgusting.”

    “Pot, meet kettle,” Dean Cain declared when sharing Wiener’s post.

    POTENTIAL PELOSI SUCCESSOR RE-UPS BILL TO BAN ICE FROM OBSCURING IDENTITIES: ‘SHUT THIS MASK S–T DOWN’

    California state Sen. Scott Wiener participates in the 54rd Annual San Francisco Pride Parade on June 30, 2024 in San Francisco, California. (Miikka Skaffari/Getty Images)

    Last week, Wiener, a Democrat, recognized the need to denounce the assassination, but also asserted that the movement Kirk helped to construct had “brainwashed” people with “poison.”

    CHARLIE KIRK VIGILS HELD AT UNIVERSITIES ACROSS AMERICA FOLLOWING ASSASSINATION OF CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST

    “Multiple things can be true: Political violence is toxic & Kirk’s assassination must be condemned. Kirk was exceptionally talented & helped build a movement. That movement brainwashed many young men with bigoted, violent poison. Condemn his murder, but do not lionize him,” Wiener wrote in a September 11 post on X.

    Charlie Kirk

    Charlie Kirk poses at The Cambridge Union on May 19, 2025 in Cambridge, Cambridgeshire. (Nordin Catic/Getty Images for The Cambridge Union)

    The day prior, Wiener had said the slaying was “horrific” and advocated for “basic safeguards” for access to firearms.

    FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL REVEALS DETAILS ABOUT ALLEGED KIRK ASSASSIN’S TEXTS

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Charlie Kirk’s murder is horrific. Political violence is never the answer. It takes lives & makes our political system toxic & dangerous. We need basic safeguards on accessing guns. No one should have to live in fear of being targeted with gun violence,” Wiener wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Commentary: Empathy is the only way forward after Charlie Kirk’s death

    [ad_1]

    It wasn’t the greeting I was expecting from my dad when I stopped by for lunch Wednesday at his Anaheim home.

    ¿Quién es Charlie Kirk?”

    Papi still has a flip phone, so he hasn’t sunk into an endless stream of YouTube and podcasts like some of his friends. His sources of news are Univisión and the top-of-the-hour bulletins on Mexican oldies stations — far away from Kirk’s conservative supernova.

    “Some political activist,” I replied. “Why?”

    “The news said he got shot.”

    Papi kept watering his roses while I went on my laptop to learn more. My stomach churned and my heart sank as graphic videos of Kirk taking a bullet in the neck while speaking to students at Utah Valley University peppered my social media feeds. What made me even sicker was that everyone online already thought they knew who did it, even though law enforcement hadn’t identified a suspect.

    Conservatives blamed liberalism for demonizing one of their heroes and vowed vengeance. Some progressives argued that Kirk had it coming because of his long history of incendiary statements against issues including affirmative action, trans people and Islam. Both sides predicted an escalation in political violence in the wake of Kirk’s killing — fueled by the other side against innocents, of course.

    It was the internet at its worst, so I closed my laptop and checked on my dad. He had moved on to cleaning the pool.

    “So who was he?” Papi asked again. By then, Donald Trump had announced Kirk’s death. Text messages streamed in from my colleagues. I gave my dad a brief sketch of Kirk’s life, and he frowned when I said the commentator had supported Trump’s mass deportation dreams.

    Hate wasn’t on Papi’s mind, however.

    “It’s sad that he got killed,” Papi said. “May God bless him and his family.”

    “Are politics going to get worse now?” he added.

    It’s a question that friends and family have been asking me ever since Kirk’s assassination. I’m the political animal in their circles, the one who bores everyone at parties as I yap about Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom while they want to talk Dodgers and Raiders. They’re too focused on raising families and trying to prosper in these hard times to post a hot take on social media about political personalities they barely know.

    They’ve long been over this nation’s partisan divide, because they work and play just fine with people they don’t agree with. They’re tired of being told to loathe someone over ideological differences or blindly worship a person or a cause because it’s supposedly in their best interests. They might not have heard of Kirk before his assassination, but they now worry about what’s next — because a killing this prominent is usually a precursor of worse times ahead.

    I wasn’t naive enough to think that the killing of someone as divisive as Kirk would bring Americans together to denounce political terrorism and forge a kinder nation. I knew that each side would embarrass itself with terrible takes and that Trump wouldn’t even pretend to be a unifier.

    But the collective dumpster fire we got was worse than I had imagined.

    President Donald Trump shakes hands with moderator Charlie Kirk, during a Generation Next White House forum at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington, Thursday, March 22, 2018.

    (Manuel Balce Ceneta / Associated Press)

    Although conservatives brag that no riots have sparked, as happened after George Floyd’s murder in 2020, they’re largely staying silent as the loudest of Kirk’s supporters vow to crush the left once and for all. The Trump administration is already promising a crackdown against the left in Kirk’s name, and no GOP leaders are complaining. People are losing their jobs because of social media posts critical of Kirk, and his fans are cheering the cancel cavalcade.

    Meanwhile, progressives are flummoxed by the right, yet again. They can’t understand why vigils nationwide for someone they long cast as a white nationalist, a fascist and worse are drawing thousands. They’re dismissing those who attend as deluded cultists, hardening hearts on each side even more. They’re posting Kirk’s past statements on social media as proof that they’re correct about him — but that’s like holding up a sheet of paper to dam the Mississippi.

    I hadn’t paid close attention to Kirk, mostly because he didn’t have a direct connection to Southern California politics. I knew he had helped turn young voters toward Trump, and I loathed his noxious comments that occasionally caught my attention. I appreciated that he was willing to argue his views with critics, even if his style was more Cartman from “South Park” (which satirized Kirk’s college tours just weeks ago) than Ronald Reagan versus Walter Mondale.

    I understand why his fans are grieving and why opponents are sickened at his canonization by Trump, who seems to think that only conservatives are the victims of political violence and that liberals can only be perpetrators. I also know that a similar thing would happen if, heaven forbid, a progressive hero suffered Kirk’s tragic end — way too many people on the right would be dancing a jig and cracking inappropriate jokes, while the left would be whitewashing the sins of the deceased.

    We’re witnessing a partisan passion play, with the biggest losers our democracy and the silent majority of Americans like my father who just want to live life. Weep or critique — it’s your right to do either. But don’t drag the whole country into your culture war. Those who have navigated between the Scylla and Charybdis of right and left for too long want to sail to calmer waters. Turning Kirk’s murder into a modern-day Ft. Sumter when we aren’t even certain of his suspected killer’s motives is a guarantee for chaos.

    I never answered my dad’s question about what’s next for us politically. In the days since, I keep rereading what Kirk said about empathy. He derided the concept on a 2022 episode of his eponymous show as “a made-up, new age term that … does a lot of damage.”

    Kirk was wrong about many things, but especially that. Empathy means we try to understand each other’s experiences — not agree, not embrace, but understand. Empathy connects us to others in the hope of creating something bigger and better.

    It’s what allows me to feel for Kirk’s loved ones and not wish his fate on anyone, no matter how much I dislike them or their views. It’s the only thing that ties me to Kirk — he loved this country as much as I do, even if our views about what makes it great were radically different.

    Preaching empathy might be a fool’s errand. But at a time when we’re entrenched deeper in our silos than ever, it’s the only way forward. We need to understand why wishing ill on the other side is wrong and why such talk poisons civic life and dooms everyone.

    Kirk was no saint, but if his assassination makes us take a collective deep breath and figure out how to fix this fractured nation together, he will have truly died a martyr’s death.

    [ad_2]

    Gustavo Arellano

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk railed against transgender rights. His killing has further fueled the fight

    [ad_1]

    America’s already roiling debate around transgender rights sharply escalated in recent days after Charlie Kirk — one of the nation’s most prominent anti-transgender voices — was fatally shot by a suspect whose life and social circles have been meticulously scrutinized for any connection to the transgender community.

    Taking over Kirk’s podcast Monday, top Trump administration officials suggested they are gearing up to avenge Kirk by waging war on left-leaning organizations broadly, despite law enforcement statements that the shooter is believed to have acted alone. Queer organizations took that as a direct threat.

    Kirk railed against transgender rights in life, and just prior to being shot on a Utah college campus last week was answering a question about the alleged prevalence of transgender people among the nation’s mass shooters — an idea he had personally stoked, despite pushback from statistical researchers.

    Those circumstances seemed to prime the resulting outrage among his conservative base to be hyper-focused on any transgender connection.

    The connection was further stoked when the Wall Street Journal reported on a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives report that suggested — seemingly erroneously — that etchings on bullet casings found with the rifle suspected as being used in the shooting included transgender “ideology.”

    It was further inflamed when Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said that suspect Tyler Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner — who he said was “shocked” by the shooting and cooperating with authorities — is currently transitioning.

    Leading conservative influencers, some with the ear of President Trump, have openly called for a retribution campaign against transgender people and the LGBTQ+ community more broadly. Laura Loomer called transgender people a “national security threat,” said their “movement needs to be classified as a terrorist organization IMMEDIATELY,” and said that Trump should make transitioning illegal.

    LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, meanwhile, have condemned such generalizations and attacks on the community and warned that such rhetoric only increases the likelihood of more political violence — particularly against transgender people and others who have been demonized for years, including by Kirk.

    “The obsession with tying trans people to shootings is vile & dangerous,” state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), one of California’s leading LGBTQ+ voices, wrote on social media. “First they try to say the shooter might be trans & WSJ amplifies that lie. Once that fell apart, they pivot to ‘he lived with a trans person.’ Even if true, who cares? It’s McCarthyism & truly disgusting.”

    Many political leaders have called for calm, and for people to wait for the investigation into the suspect’s motivations before jumping to conclusions or casting blame. Cox has said that Robinson’s political ideology, different from that of his conservative family, appeared to be “part of” what drove him to shoot Kirk, but that the exact motivations for the crime remained unclear.

    “We’re all drawing lots of conclusions on how someone like this could be radicalized,” Cox said on “Meet the Press” on Sunday. “Those are important questions for us to ask and important questions for us to answer.”

    Searching for a connection

    Officials were expected to release charging documents against Robinson on Tuesday that could contain more information about a motive. However, the debate has hardly waited.

    Both the political right and left have searched for evidence connecting Robinson to their opposing political camp.

    One of the first pieces of information to catch fire was the ATF reporting on the bullet etchings including transgender “ideology” — which turned out to be untrue, according to Cox’s later description of those etchings. That reporting immediately inspired condemnations of the entire transgender community.

    “Seems like per capita the radical transgender movement has to be the most violent movement anywhere in the world,” the president’s son Donald Trump Jr. said in a Rumble livestream Thursday.

    On Friday morning, President Trump said “vicious and horrible” people on the left were the only ones to blame for the political violence. “They want men in women’s sports, they want transgender for everyone,” he said on “Fox & Friends.”

    Trump was asked Monday afternoon if he thought the suspect acted alone.

    “I can tell you he didn’t work alone on the internet because it seems that he became radicalized on the internet,” Trump said in the Oval Office. “And he was radicalized on the left, he is a left. A lot of problems with the left and they get protected and they shouldn’t be protected.”

    The ATF declined to comment on the leaked report. The Wall Street Journal published an editor’s note walking back its reporting, noting that Cox’s description of the etchings included no references to the transgender community.

    The Human Rights Campaign, a leading LGBTQ+ advocacy group, responded to the uproar by criticizing the Wall Street Journal for publishing unsubstantiated claims that fueled hateful rhetoric toward the transgender community.

    “This reporting was reckless and irresponsible, and it led to a wave of threats against the trans community from right-wing influencers — and a resulting wave of terror for a community that is already living in fear,” the group said.

    Spreading the narrative

    The debate has heightened existing tensions around transgender rights, which Trump campaigned against and targeted with one of his first official acts — an executive order that said his administration would recognize only “two genders, male and female.”

    He and his administration have since banned transgender people from military service, blocked the issuance of U.S. passports with the gender-neutral X marker, threatened medical providers of gender-affirming care for minors, and sued California for allowing transgender athletes to compete in youth sports.

    In September, the Department of Justice also reportedly began weighing a rule that would restrict transgender individuals from owning firearms — a move that came after a shooter who identified as transgender killed two children and injured 18 others at a Catholic school in Minneapolis.

    That shooting led prominent conservatives, including senior Trump administration officials, to link gender identity to violence. National security advisor Sebastian Gorka claimed that an “inordinately high” number of attacks have been linked to “individuals who are confused about their gender” — a trend he claimed stretched back to at least 2023, when a transgender suspect shot and killed three children and three adults at a Nashville Christian school.

    After that shooting, Trump Jr. had said that “rather than talking about guns, we should be talking about lunatics pushing their gender-affirming bull— on our kids,” and Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, had said that “giving in” to ideas on transgender identities was “dangerous.”

    After it was reported that Robinson’s partner is transitioning, Matt Walsh, a right-wing political commentator, wrote on X that “trans militants” pose a “very serious” threat to the country. Billionaire Elon Musk agreed, saying it was a “massive problem.”

    Many in the LGBTQ+ community have strenuously pushed back against such claims, noting research showing most shootings are committed by cisgender men.

    The Violence Prevention Project at Hamline University has found that the majority of shootings where four or more people were wounded in public were by men, and less than 1% of such shootings in the last decade were by transgender people.

    An analysis by PolitiFact found that data do not show claims that transgender people are more prone to violence, and that “trans people are more likely to be victims of violence than their cisgender peers.”

    A legacy amplified

    Kirk espoused a Christian nationalist worldview and opposed LGBTQ+ rights broadly, including same-sex marriage. He called transgender people “perverted,” the acknowledgment of transgender identities “one of the most destructive social contagions in human history,” and gender-affirming care for young people an “unimaginable evil.”

    Just before he was shot at Utah Valley University, Kirk had said that “too many” transgender people were involved in shootings.

    It was not the first time Kirk had addressed the issue.

    Days after the 2023 shooting in Nashville, Kirk went after then-White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre for unrelated comments denouncing a wave of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in state houses and saying the transgender community was “under attack.”

    “It is the first shooting ever that I’ve seen where the shooter and the murderers get more sympathy than the actual victims,” he said, appearing to blame all transgender people for the attack.

    The idea that liberals generally or members of the LGBTQ+ community specifically should be held accountable for Kirk’s killing has gained momentum in the days since. Vance and Trump advisor Stephen Miller seemed to allude to reprisals against left-leaning groups on Kirk’s podcast Monday, with Miller saying federal agencies will be rooting out a “domestic terror movement” on the left in Kirk’s name.

    LGBTQ+ advocates called such rhetoric alarming — and said they worry it will be used as a pretext for the administration to ramp up its assault on LGBTQ+ rights.

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Rector, Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • Why blaming ‘the left’ is easier than deterring violence after Charlie Kirk’s murder

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump is rejecting suggestions that right-wing extremism is a problem.

    “Well, the problem is on the left,” Trump told reporters outside Air Force One. 

    “The problem is on the left if you look at the problem — it’s not on the right like some people like to say, on the right. The problem we have is on the left. When you look at the agitators, you look at the scum that speaks so badly of our country, the American flag burnings all over the place, that’s the left, that’s not the right.” 

    CHARLIE KIRK’S ALLEGED ASSASSIN ‘TAKEN OVER’ BY LEFTIST IDEOLOGY WHILE FBI PROBES WIDER PLOT: BONGINO

    One reporter asked whether he planned to investigate.

    “They’re already under investigation. They’re already under major investigation. A lot of the people that you would traditionally say are on the left.”

    No matter how the question is framed, Trump sticks to his partisan analysis, as he did on “Fox & Friends”: “Radicals on the left are the problem. and they are vicious and horrible and politically savvy. They want men in women’s sports, they want transgender for everyone, open borders.” 

    The contrast with Utah’s Republican governor, Spencer Cox, could not be starker.

    People hold candles and sing during a memorial and prayer vigil for Charlie Kirk at the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, Sunday, Sept. 14, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)

    Cox, who made the Sunday show rounds, says the country has to find an off-ramp from the current surge in political violence in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder.  There has to be a way to lower the temperature, he said.

    Democrats from Barack Obama on down, to their credit, are denouncing the assassination as unacceptable, even if they disagreed with some or all of what Kirk stood for.

    What’s striking is the ripple effect on everyone else.

    Newsday had to apologize for an abominable cartoon.

    The sketch showed an empty chair, with blood behind it, and the repeated phrase “Prove Me Wrong” — a frequent Kirk saying — with an arrow pointing to Turning Point USA.

    FROM GRIEF TO GROWTH: TURNING POINT USA BECOMES A RALLYING FORCE FOR GEN Z IN BATTLEGROUND ARIZONA

    The Long Island paper called the cartoon “insensitive and offensive…We deeply regret this mistake and sincerely apologize to the family of Charlie Kirk and to all,” saying it’s been deleted online. But how does something that bad get approved?

    Fox News, citing 10 sources, said the White House and Pam Bondi have lost confidence in Kash Patel. The FBI director stumbled in announcing that a suspect was in custody, only to see that person released as the wrong man. Patel says his tweet that the “subject” of the shooting was “in custody,” could have “been worded a little better.”

    There were warning signs when Missouri’s attorney general was brought in with the same rank as Patel’s deputy, Dan Bongino, and Fox says he made clear he would not have left that job to serve as Patel’s number two.

    Kari Lake, who runs the U.S. Agency for Global Media, said at a vigil for Kirk that the college that the accused shooter attended for one semester had “brainwashed” him.

    “I am making a plea to mothers,” said Lake, who twice failed in bids for office in Arizona. “Do not send your children into these indoctrination camps.”

    Charlie Kirk memorial

    A memorial for Turning Point USA CEO and co-founder Charlie Kirk is seen at Utah Valley University, Saturday, Sept. 13, 2025, in Orem, Utah.  (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)

    Lake added that her daughter didn’t go to college, instead working for Kirk.

    Four years ago, the suspect went to Utah State University as a pre-engineering major.

    And he was sufficiently, uh, brainwashed in 2021 that he decided to kill Kirk last week?

    UTAH PROSECUTORS PREPARE POTENTIAL DEATH PENALTY CASE AGAINST CHARLIE KIRK SUSPECT TYLER JAMES ROBINSON

    Look, finger-pointing politics has been going on for a very long time. When President Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh for the Oklahoma City bombing, I wrote the front-page story. When the New York Times blamed Sarah Palin for the wounding of Gabby Giffords (and the death of six others) – because of a political map with crosshairs that the killer never saw – a top editor told me I was wrong but later admitted I’d been right.

    And when the guy who badly wounded Steve Scalise at a Republican baseball practice was revealed to be a regular Rachel Maddow watcher, liberals jumped on that one.

    Tyler Robinson in a pair of mugshot photos, showing his portrait and profile. he has brown hair, hazel eyes, and a clean shave

    The booking photos for Tyler Robinson, 22, the suspect in the Utah assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. (Utah Gov. Spencer Cox)

    So it is with the 22-year-old Kirk murder suspect and the pointless search for motive.

    Is it relevant that the alleged shooter is living with a transgender man who is becoming a woman? Sure. But anyone who would plot to kill Charlie Kirk for political reasons is by definition insane, as are all these nutjob school shooters.

    It’s also true, by the way, that the constant attacks on the president — the survivor of two assassination attempts — as Hitler and worse foster an atmosphere in which another attack is more likely.

    But wait, there’s a final guilt-by-association maneuver going on.

    We see it when Elon Musk immediately tweets “the left is the party of murder.” We see it when Spencer Cox calls social media a “cancer.”

    The social media point may well be true, but we can’t put that genie back in the lamp.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    By blaming “the left,” the X owner and others are depicting everyone who has liberal viewpoints as culpable, even if they never heard of Charlie Kirk, even if they are shocked and appalled by his murder. 

    And that’s just, well, crazy. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WATCH: Clemson student caught on video appearing to mock Charlie Kirk after assassination

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A Clemson University student was caught on camera distributing fliers, dancing and appearing to mock Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk following his assassination last week.

    In the video, posted to X by Jackson Heaberlin, the woman is confronted by a man off camera who asks why she felt the need to make jokes about the incident.

    “Why do you support the public execution of Charlie Kirk? Do you feel proud in your ideology, ma’am? At least look me in the eye and talk about it. I’m open to talking about it,” he says.

    A flyer from a Clemson University student is seen during a video posted online after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. (Jackson Heaberlin via X)

    YOUNG PEOPLE RESTORE CHARLIE KIRK MEMORIAL WITH BIBLE VERSES AFTER VANDALS DEFACE TRIBUTE

    At first the woman refuses to engage, but instead of backing down she eventually begins mocking Kirk’s death.

    “Because he’s a terrible person, and he deserved to die,” the woman said as she made a crying gesture with her hands to mock the man questioning her and Kirk’s supporters.

    clemson woman

    A Clemson student caught on video mocking Charlie Kirk’s death sparked outrage after the clip went viral. (Jackson Heaberlin via X)

    CHARLIE KIRK VIGILS HELD AT UNIVERSITIES ACROSS AMERICA FOLLOWING ASSASSINATION OF CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST

    She then escalates the incident, breaking into a chant-style rap and repeating, “f— yo homie he dead.”

    The video exchange has gone viral since it was posted, with many conservatives criticizing the incident and using it as an example of rising hostility on college campuses toward free speech and political differences.

    clemson university

    Clemson University is an American public, coeducational, land-grant, sea-grant, research university located in Clemson, South Carolina. (Getty Images)

    Kirk, who was brutally murdered last week during a campus event in Utah, was one of the most recognizable conservative activists in America. His memorial service, scheduled for Sunday in Glendale, Ariz., is expected to draw thousands.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital has reached out to Clemson University for comment. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump at first says he is ‘not familiar’ with Minnesota Democrat’s assassination

    [ad_1]

    In response to a question about why he did not order flags lowered to half-staff to honor Melissa Hortman, the Democratic speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives who was assassinated alongside her husband this summer, Donald Trump initially said he was “not familiar” with the case.

    The question came up during a briefing in the Oval Office on Monday, in light of the president’s order last week to lower flags in response to the killing of rightwing activist Charlie Kirk.

    Trump was pressed on why he and Republicans continued cast blame the left for a rise in political violence when elected officials and activists from both parties have been targets.

    Related: Iowa official defies governor’s order to fly flags at half-staff for Charlie Kirk

    The exchange began when the reporter asked about the tributes paid by the White House to Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth activist group Turning Point USA and a close ally of the president and his family.

    “Do you think it would have been fitting to lower the flags to half-staff when Melissa Hortman, the Minnesota house speaker, was gunned down by an assassin as well?” asked Nancy Cordes, the chief White House correspondent for CBS News.

    “I’m not familiar. The who?” Trump replied, leaning in across the Resolute Desk.

    “The Minnesota house speaker, a Democrat, who was assassinated this summer,” she said.

    “Oh,” Trump replied. “Well, if the governor had asked me to do that, I would have done that.”

    Trump did not mention the Minnesota governor Tim Walz – a Democrat and the vice-presidential nominee in 2024 – by name, but suggested that had he made the request, the White House might have obliged.

    “I wouldn’t have thought of that, but I would’ve, if somebody had asked me,” Trump said. “People make requests for the lowering of the flag, and oftentimes you have to say no, because it would be a lot of lowering.”

    At the time, Trump said that speaking to Walz, a close friend of Hortman, would have been a “waste of time”.

    “I could be nice and call, but why waste time?” Trump said then, referring to Walz as “whacked out” and a “mess”.

    Kirk was fatally shot last week while speaking at Utah Valley University. In the wake of his death, Trump and other prominent conservatives have sought to place the blame for political violence squarely on Democrats, vowing to crack down on the left-wing groups and institutions they allege “fund it and support it”.

    As Republicans grieve the loss of Kirk, they have largely ignored the violence against Democrats, including Hortman’s assassination, the arson attack on the home of Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro, the violent assault on Paul Pelosi, the husband of former speaker Nancy Pelosi, and a thwarted plot to kidnap the Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer.

    House Republicans and a handful of Democrats gathered at prayer vigil for Kirk on Capitol Hill on Monday. In brief remarks, Representative Tom Emmer, a Republican from Minnesota, reflected on several recent incidents of political violence, including Hortman’s killing by “another evil coward” who also shot a second Democratic state lawmaker that night.

    Trump, who survived two assassination attempts during the 2024 presidential campaign, denied on Monday that he had blamed just “one side” before accusing the “radical left” of causing “tremendous violence”.

    “The radical left really has caused a lot of problems for this country,” he said. “I really think they hate our country.”

    Earlier on Monday, vice president JD Vance, a close friend of Kirk’s, said he hoped for national “unity” while hosting the slain activist’s podcast. But then he insisted that this was not a “both sides problem” and that Democrats were primarily to blame, despite widespread condemnation of Kirk’s killing by party officials and elected leaders.

    During the lengthy episode, Vance made no reference to Hortman or other acts of political violence, such as the 6 January assault on the US Capitol.

    “Something has gone very wrong with a lunatic fringe – a minority, but a growing and powerful minority on the far left,” he said, and committed to using the levers of the federal government to “dismantle the institutions that promote violence and terrorism in our own country”.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Patel says he doesn’t regret his post about Kirk case that turned out to be wrong

    [ad_1]

    Toward the end of his remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk last Friday, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox warned about the ills of America’s increasingly vitriolic online culture.

    “Social media is a cancer on our society right now,” he said, imploring citizens to “log off, turn off, touch grass, hug a family member and go out and do good in your community.” Standing next to him was a stony-faced FBI Director Kash Patel, a heavy social media user who posts far more frequently than his predecessors in the job, Christopher Wray and James Comey.

    The juxtaposition did not go unnoticed by bureau veterans.

    “You can be a social media influencer, or you can be FBI director,” one recently retired special agent told CBS News. “But you can’t be both.”

    But Patel is both, upending the agency’s cautious communication culture with a steady flow of online observations and updates.

    That clash in cultures has never been more clear than it was last week, when the FBI chief faced intense scrutiny for his handling of the high-profile case. Repeatedly, he turned to social media to tout major developments in the case — in some cases prematurely. Hours after the shooting, he posted to his nearly 2 million followers on X at 6:21 p.m. ET, “The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody.” Then, less than two hours later, at 7:59 p.m., he had to backtrack, posting, “The subject in custody has been released after an interrogation by law enforcement.” Patel sought to address the quick — and misleading — initial post during a Fox News interview Monday.

    “I was being transparent with working with the public on our findings, as I had them,” he said on “Fox and Friends.”

    “I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did and he was released,” Patel told Fox News. “Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not.”

    Asked for comment, the FBI referred CBS News to Patel’s interview on Fox News.

    FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino also defended Patel’s and his own efforts to publish FBI developments as soon as something new to share.

    “We are clinging to transparency,” Bongino said on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” Monday. “The era of Cronkite and Jennings generation is over. New media now is media and we want to be sure we can do everything in our power to share what we can when we can while still balancing the needs of the investigation.”

    Dribbling out information in real time about a highly complex, sensitive and fast-moving investigation is a startling departure from past FBI directors, whose public messaging traditionally has been spare and buttoned-up.

    J. Edgar Hoover’s vaunted publicity machine occupied a whole wing of the bureau dedicated to writing articles, issuing press releases, tending to Hollywood directors and TV producers — all in an effort to buff the reputation of the FBI and its legendary G-man. But according to Yale historian Beverly Gage, Hoover was particularly cautious about publicizing active investigations.

    “Hoover himself was contained and buttoned-down,” said Gage, author of the Pulitzer Prize winning biography “G-Man: J. Edgar Hoover and the Making of the American Century.” “He did everything through elaborate bureaucratic procedure, so it’s very hard to imagine him being unfiltered enough to be on social media in quite this way.”

    Patel is a departure from previous FBI directors. He eschews the standard-issue uniform of past FBI chiefs — conservative suits and spit-polished shoes — in favor of bold ties and European-cut suits. A close friend says he sees himself as a “disruptor” intent on radically changing enforcement priorities — “let cops be cops” is one of his favorite slogans — while shaking up the bureau’s staid culture.

    A former colleague who worked with Patel during the first Trump term says he has a “bias for action,” which may explain his exuberance on social media. “He wants to get s*** done,” this source said.

    Those harboring a less charitable view argue that Patel is an attention seeker who thrives on the spotlight. One former FBI agent pointed to an earlier episode that he said echoes Patel’s rush to post details of the Kirk investigation on social media.

    During his confirmation hearing to be FBI director, a whistleblower told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that when Patel was working for the National Security Council in 2020, he violated government protocols by leaking to a newspaper the details of a hostage deal involving American citizens being held in Yemen. FBI officials were furious at the time, accusing Patel of jeopardizing the lives of the hostages so he could claim credit with the media. At the time, the White House and a source close to Patel denied the allegation.

    Last week, Patel’s social media activity renewed similar concerns.

    “In a sensitive investigation you don’t want to tip your hand to things the public doesn’t already know so that active evidence that is vital to the court process not get or disclosed unnecessarily to hinder the investigation,” said Stephen Laycock, a former executive assistant director at the FBI who retired in 2021.

    Or as a former special agent said, “Being the first to get ‘likes’ or clicks is not beneficial to the investigative process.”

    The eventual arrest of a suspect in the Kirk shooting has staunched some of the initial chatter about Patel’s comments. Still, on Tuesday he is expected to face a grilling from the Senate Judiciary Committee. A Senate source told CBS News that Democrats are preparing to go on the attack. And they believe they’ll have plenty to work with.

    Even before Kirk’s killing, the FBI was reeling from an unprecedented purge of some of the most experienced FBI executives and line agents, depleting the agency of decades of experience, critics say. Mehtab Syed, the highly regarded head of the FBI’s Salt Lake City field office, was among the agents forced out at the end of July. Robert Bohls, the new head of the office that was on the front lines of the shooting investigation, started his job on Sept. 2, days before the Kirk shooting, a source familiar with the Salt Lake City FBI office confirmed.

    Three elite former agents filed a lawsuit last week accusing Patel of summarily firing them at the direction of the White House. The lawsuit highlighted Patel’s focus on social media, arguing the agents’ dismissals came in response to criticism on social media from right-wing influencers. At the same time, according to the complaint, Patel has urged FBI field agents to be more active on social media to tout “FBI wins.”

    One of the fired agents, former Washington field office Assistant Director Steven Jensen, expressed concern about Bongino’s “intense focus on increasing online engagement.” Jensen alleged that the “emphasis Bongino was placing on creating content for his social media feed could risk outweighing more deliberate analyses of investigations.”

    It’s a concern that has been circulating quietly among longtime bureau veterans.

    “You aren’t doing your job or leading an organization for the social media glory,” said Laycock.

    Some officials who have interacted in person with Patel, say the director is misunderstood. As one law enforcement official described it to CBS News, Patel’s brash online personality stands in contrast to a low-key, friendly demeanor that he exhibits in meetings.

    “He’s highly personable and even earnest,” one law enforcement official said of his multiple meetings with Patel.

    Perhaps the most important person evaluating the director’s performance over the past week, however, appeared to approve of it. President Trump made clear he is backing his FBI director.

    “I am very proud of the FBI,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with Fox News Digital on Saturday. “Kash – and everyone else – they have done a great job.”

    La Foce: A Renaissance painting come to life

    “Most difficult time” to judge economy in 40 years as Federal Reserve heads to September meeting

    Investigators focus on possible motive of Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump administration joins Republicans’ campaign to police speech in reaction to Kirk’s murder

    [ad_1]

    By NICHOLAS RICCARDI and KONSTANTIN TOROPIN

    Vice President JD Vance on Monday jumped onto the conservative movement demanding consequences for those who have cheered Charlie Kirk’s killing, calling on the public to turn in anyone who says distasteful things about the assassination of his friend and political ally.

    [ad_2]

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk’s Favorite Influencers Have a Shared Message: Go to Church

    [ad_1]

    When Alex Clark, the podcaster and one of Charlie Kirk’s top deputies at Turning Point USA, found out Kirk had been murdered September 10, the nonstop poster was left with only a few words. On Thursday morning, she shared her memories of Kirk, but added that it was “tempting to want to close up shop.” By Friday, she was making plans for the future. “Yesterday I woke up wanting to die,” she wrote. “Today I woke up ready for war. We can do this. TPUSA will be bigger and bolder than anyone could ever imagine. We cannot and will not stop.”

    She continued by sharing what she thought Kirk would want his followers to do next: “Go to church this Sunday. A solid, Bible teaching church. Keep going,” she added. “Buy the biggest American flag. Put it in your front yard. We will not let him die in vain.”

    This summer, Kirk made headlines for telling young women at TPUSA’s Young Women’s Leadership Summit to put their families first instead of focusing on their careers. Perhaps ironically, he had spent much of the previous decade supporting the careers of female influencers through his organization. Dozens of prominent right-wing influencers got their start at Kirk’s organization, including Clark, Candace Owens, and Representative Anna Paulina Luna. The contrast between Kirk’s public persona as a combative, occasionally insulting podcaster and his private reputation as a good friend to fellow conservatives helps explain the reactions to his death on both sides of the aisle.

    James Meyer of Meriden puts together a poster outside the venue prior to a vigil for Charlie Kirk on Sunday, September 14, 2025.Jim Michaud/Connecticut Post/Getty Images.

    The religious nature of Clark’s response reflects Kirk’s own pivot towards emphasizing Christianity in his public life. In the early years of TPUSA, which Kirk founded in 2012, his message was primarily secular. But in 2019, Kirk began working with megachurch pastor Rob McCoy. Two years later, they founded Turning Point Faith, which brought Kirk in contact with some of the country’s most prominent fundamentalist and charismatic pastors.

    Isabel Brown, another social media personality whose career was supported by Kirk, returned to her YouTube show with a tearful remembrance of her friend. She praised Kirk as a mentor: He “personally handwrote my recommendation letter on my job application for my first job at the White House in 2018,” Brown said. By Friday, she was back to a more regular format, presenting clips of vigils for Kirk on college campuses across the country. Brown also shared a video of a child expressing his sadness about Kirk’s murder before beginning a reading from the Book of Matthew. She also reacted to an Instagram Reel from podcaster and missionary Bryce Crawford, who said that Kirk’s death was a sign that the “devil has overplayed his hand” and would start a religious revival in America. (By September 15, Crawford’s video had more than 8.4 million views.)

    Brown added that she hopes Kirk’s death will inspire more members of Gen Z to embrace Christianity. “What I’ve seen more of—than support for America, support for the conservative movement, support for free speech and conservative politics—is a generational revival of faith, where young people everywhere are picking up our crosses. To bear the weight of this sorrow, but to move forward, to bring God into every fiber of our society again moving forward,” she said. On Monday, Brown continued in the same vein, with an episode titled “Charlie Kirk Was Right: America Is a Christian Nation.”

    [ad_2]

    Erin Vanderhoof

    Source link

  • Dream City Church features AI Charlie Kirk, compares him to Jesus

    [ad_1]

    “First, I want you to know that I’m fine,” said a disembodied voice from the speakers inside Dream City Church in Phoenix on Sunday. It sounded like Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old right-wing activist whose Turning Point USA organization had built such a close relationship with the church…

    [ad_2]

    Wade Sharp

    Source link

  • JD Vance Hints At Crackdown On Mainstream Liberals While Hosting Charlie Kirk’s Podcast

    [ad_1]

    Vice President JD Vance ramped up the divisive rhetoric following the killing of Charlie Kirk as he hosted the late conservative activist’s radio show and podcast.

    Vance took charge of “The Charlie Kirk Show” from the White House on Monday, with administration officials who knew Kirk featuring in a two-hour broadcast that made repeated calls for retribution.

    Among the guests were White House adviser Stephen Miller, who vowed to channel “righteous anger” to go after “left-wing organizations” in the aftermath of Kirk’s death.

    The vice president continued in a similar vein during his outgoing monologue as he made claims about left-wing violence and implied, without evidence, that Kirk’s killer was motivated by far-left ideology.

    In a sign that the Trump administration is preparing for a crackdown on liberal and leftist groups, Vance said unity in America would only emerge “when we work to dismantle the institutions that promote violence and terrorism in our own country.”

    Among many pointed remarks, Vance falsely claimed it was a fact that “people on the left are much likelier to defend and celebrate political violence.”

    “This is not a both-sides problem. If both sides have a problem, one side has a much bigger and malignant problem, and that is the truth,” he said.

    He went on to argue that “while our side of the aisle certainly has its crazies, it is a statistical fact that most of the lunatics in American politics today are proud members of the far left.”

    Vance also attacked The Nation, a progressive magazine, and accused it of misquoting Kirk.

    He blasted the “well-funded, well-respected magazine whose publishing history goes back to the American Civil War. George Soros’ Open Society [Foundations] funds this magazine, as does the Ford Foundation and many other wealthy titans of the American progressive movement.”

    “Charlie was gunned down in broad daylight, and well-funded institutions of the left lied about what he said so as to justify his murder,” Vance claimed.

    Vance noted the Ford Foundation and the nonprofit run by Soros, a Democratic megadonor, receive “generous tax treatment,” suggesting they could be targeted in any crackdown.

    Bhaskar Sunkara, president of The Nation, made clear the magazine is “not funded, not one dime, by Soros or Open Society Foundation.”

    In his broadcast, Vance also asked his followers to identify anyone rejoicing in Kirk’s death to get them fired from their jobs.

    “When you see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder, call them out, and hell, call their employer,” he said. “We don’t believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility.”

    Earlier in the show, Trump aide Miller promised to “use every resource we have” to “identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy” left-wing networks and “make America safe again for the American people.”

    “It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name,” he added.

    Vance: “While our side of the aisle certainly has its crazies, it is a statistical fact that most of the lunatics in American politics today are proud members of the far-Left.” pic.twitter.com/EmNTQ9o0nD

    — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) September 15, 2025

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • White House pushes for $58M security increase in wake of Kirk assassination

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The White House is seeking additional security funds from Congress for the executive and judicial branches as it navigates the aftermath of the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Fox News Digital has learned. 

    The White House has requested an additional $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches from Congress, a spokesperson for the White House’s Office of Management and Budget confirmed Monday to Fox News Digital. 

    The additional security funds would be added to a continuing resolution, the spokesperson said. A temporary spending bill will need to pass by the end of the month to keep the government open or else the government could face a shutdown Sept. 30 when funds expire. 

    SECRET SERVICE UNDER PRESSURE: WHAT KIRK’S ASSASSINATION MEANS FOR TRUMP’S SECURITY

    Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah, prior to his assassination. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

    Punchbowl News was the first to report the security funding request. Additional details on the funds were not immediately available. 

    The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

    Kirk, 31, was killed after he was shot in the neck during a stop on his American Comeback Tour Wednesday at Utah Valley University. The assassination comes roughly a year after two attempts to take President Donald Trump’s life.

    In July 2024, 20-year-old gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire on Trump from a rooftop during a campaign rally. One of the eight bullets shot sliced Trump’s ear. 

    The gunman also shot and killed Corey Comperatore, a 50-year-old firefighter, father and husband attending the rally, and injured two others. 

    Likewise, Ryan Routh was apprehended and charged with attempting to assassinate Trump at his Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, in September 2024. Routh is currently on trial after being charged with attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate, among other things. 

    CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION ROCKS CAPITOL HILL, HEIGHTENS LAWMAKERS’ SECURITY FEARS

    President Donald Trump raises his fist after being shot at a campaign event in Butler, Pennsylvania.

    Then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump pumps his fist as he is rushed offstage by U.S. Secret Service agents after being grazed by a bullet during a rally on July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania.  (Getty Images/Anna Moneymaker)

    Nicholas John Roske, 29, pleaded guilty in April to attempting to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in June 2022, according to the Justice Department. 

    Meanwhile, the U.S. Secret Service is ushering in a series of changes in response to the assassination attempts against the president and already is operating at an incredibly heightened state as a result, according to former agents. 

    “The Secret Service now has to play at a level of enhanced security that they’ve never dreamed of before. I think (Secret Service Director Sean Curran) is doing a good job in leading that effort,” Tim Miller, who served as a Secret Service agent during Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton’s administrations, told Fox News Digital Thursday. “But here’s the bad news for the Secret Service: They don’t have time. This threat is now. Can you imagine — they already shot our president once. Can you imagine if they’re able to kill him?”

    SCRUTINY INTENSIFIES OVER SECURITY LAPSES SURROUNDING THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTING

    Secret Service outside the White House

    The U.S. Secret Service is ushering in a series of changes in response to the assassination attempts against the president.  (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

    Immediate changes to the agency following the Butler, Pennsylvania, assassination attempt included expanding the use of drones for surveillance purposes and introducing greater counter-drone technology to mitigate kinetic attacks, former Secret Service acting Director Ronald Rowe told lawmakers in December 2024. 

    The Secret Service extended its condolences to the Kirk family but declined to comment on any specific changes to Trump’s security detail following Kirk’s death. 

    “The safety and security of our protectees is the U.S. Secret Service’s top priority,” a Secret Service spokesperson told Fox News Digital. “President Trump receives the highest levels of U.S. Secret Service protection and the agency adjusts our protective posture as needed to mitigate evolving threats.  Out of concern for operational security, we cannot discuss the means and methods used for our protective operations.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WIRED Roundup: How Charlie Kirk Changed Conservative Media

    [ad_1]

    Zoë Schiffer: So where does that leave traditional right-wing media, like Fox News, for example? Is this a replacement of that or is it working in tandem?

    Jake Lahut: I think it’s more in tandem. Fox’s programming was dominated by Kirk’s assassination last night. I think that for a lot of the mainstay Fox personalities, people like Charlie Kirk, and I guess in the Turning Point USA broader cinematic universe, these younger figures are really important, actually, for I think a lot of the more established conservative media TV hosts to build that audience and start to introduce themselves to people who are not throwing on the old-school tube on the couch at home every night. And this is also just something interesting, because Democrats have been trying to do versions of this for a while, and like we mentioned earlier, the conventional wisdom had held that Democrats would always have this advantage of younger voters. So I think it’s very interesting to see what Turning Point USA is going to become after this; and then to what extent this door that he opened could be taken up by just a figure with a different kind of profile, a different kind of charisma, maybe more extreme on some issues. So there is a very legitimate, almost a power vacuum that is opened here because he was such a singular figure in this aspect of conservative politics.

    Zoë Schiffer: Absolutely. So creating a new branch of right-wing media geared toward a younger audience is definitely a key part of Kirk’s legacy. And there’s also the legacy that he left in politics at large, like his rhetoric toward trans people, immigrants, his rhetoric on abortion rights. These things really stick out to me. Talk to me about that, that imprint that he might’ve left.

    Jake Lahut: Yeah, I think the imprint has some contradictions that we’re seeing in the aftermath of this horrific incident. There’s certainly this almost saintly way that he’s being painted after his death, and I think part of that is that he was an organizer and not a candidate, so he never got the kind of scrutiny or had to really make hard choices on policy. He was always more in the attention economy realm, the fundraising realm, and the voter turnout area. So I think right now he’s being mostly remembered for his genuine commitment to freedom of debate and wanting to actually have uncomfortable in-person interactions with people who may otherwise never talk to each other or disagree about politics. But then you have a lot of the things that he said about gun control, for example, that effectively it is worth having some amount of gun deaths, to paraphrase what he said here, in order to protect the Second Amendment. He was asked one time if one of his daughters, who at the time was 10 years old, that if she were sexually assaulted and became pregnant, would he want her to carry the pregnancy to term? And he basically said yes, that there would have to be a baby there. The other area where I think he may have made the biggest impact, to add real quickly, is that his view of what college and what young adulthood is for, very different than what we’ve generally heard from younger people involved in politics. He painted a positive vision of going to college for young people. Now, that vision was effectively for women, like you should go to college just to find a husband, and that’s pretty much it. But he was offering this view of like, “Hey, actually you’re told in America that your career and hustling and grinding is most important. I’m actually here to tell you that just have a family and have kids.” And we’ve seen polling that came out recently from NBC News where Gen Z men ranked having children as their number one priority, and no other demographic did. Whereas Gen Z women listed a litany of other issues ahead of that in terms of having a stable career, mental well-being, all those things. So that’s a thread of his legacy that I think is worth keeping track of, because he really was just this one man sensation on the college campuses. And I don’t think anyone’s going to replace that role right away, but if we want to understand how he really changed our politics beyond looking at one election or a series of quotes he gave, I would look to that, that there are a lot of young people who really admire this guy, who you may know a lot of them, but you just haven’t heard from them about it until this happened, and that could very well end up being what the long-term memory of Charlie Kirk is.

    Zoë Schiffer: Jake, thank you so much for joining me today.

    Jake Lahut: Zoë, thanks so much.

    Zoë Schiffer: That’s our show for today. We’ll link to all the stories we spoke about in the show notes. Adriana Tapia produced this episode. Amar Lal at Macrosound mixed this episode. Kate Osborn is our executive producer. Condé Nast head of global audio is Chris Bannon, and Katie Drummond is WIRED’s global editorial director.

    [ad_2]

    Zoë Schiffer, Jake Lahut

    Source link

  • Republicans Have Found A Dubious Place To Blame For Charlie Kirk’s Shooting

    [ad_1]

    After a two-day manhunt last week, authorities arrested a suspect on Friday in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, the CEO and founder of Turning Point USA, a youth-focused right-wing organization.

    There is no clear motive connected to the suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. But that hasn’t stopped certain conservative leaders from identifying a villain in the attack: colleges.

    “You heard the family members say that this man became more political in recent years. What did he do in recent years? He went to college,” Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said Friday during an interview on Fox News. “That is where kids are getting radicalized. Not just online. Our campuses are where a lot of radicalization, hate and intolerance starts from.”

    Robinson attended Utah State University for one semester in 2021 before dropping out, the school said in a statement. He then enrolled in a technical college. Utah Valley University, where the shooting occurred, is about two hours away from Utah State.

    But conservatives have coalesced around the idea that Robinson was radicalized while attending college, and are using the shooting to speak out broadly against higher education. (Although some Republicans, including Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, have said Robinson embraced “leftist ideology,” the suspect’s political beliefs are not clear.)

    “Our universities, in many cases, have become incubators for extremism,” Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, said on a Fox News appearance on Friday. “They have become the equivalent of madrasas for jihadism,” he said, using the Arabic word for educational institutions.

    Kari Lake, a close Trump ally and the senior adviser for the U.S. Agency for Global Media, weighed in at a memorial service for Kirk at the Kennedy Center on Sunday.

    “How does a 22-year-old become so filled with hate?” asked Lake, who has embraced numerous conspiracy theories. “Five years earlier, I was told, he was a Trump supporter, and we send our kids off to college, and they brainwashed them.”

    “I am making a plea to mothers,” she added. “Do not send your children into these indoctrination camps. Do not do it.”

    White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, speaking in Washington on Aug. 29, 2025, called U.S. colleges and universities “the equivalent of madrasas for jihadism” last Friday.

    Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images

    Notably, Kirk himself embraced the idea of using colleges as a place to spread his organization’s message. Turning Point USA, which he founded in 2012 with Bill Montgomery, has 900 campus chapters.

    Kirk was known for going to colleges and setting up “prove me wrong” tables where would engage in debates with college students. The podcaster often advocated for lax gun laws and frequently made incendiary comments about Black people, women, immigrants and his political opponents.

    Kirk was on the first stop of his latest tour across college campuses when he was shot. He was sitting in front of a crowd of about 3,000 people and had just answered a question about mass shootings when gunfire rang out.

    Conservatives aren’t just suggesting college radicalized the suspect; they’re also calling for a dismantling of higher education institutions.

    “Tyler Robinson is every conservative parent’s worst nightmare,” Dinesh D’Souza, a right-wing political commentator and author, said on X on Friday. “Send your kid to college where he is radicalized into a violent ‘antifascist’ by the sly, scheming leftist professors.”

    “We need to put radical academia on trial along with its cherished product, Tyler Robinson,” he wrote.

    Right-wing anti-Islam activist and noted conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer has also advocated for American universities to be punished for Kirk’s death.

    “It’s time to defund American universities. You don’t need to go to college. Charlie Kirk didn’t go to college,” she said on X on Sunday.

    The rush to frame higher education as the culprit in Kirk’s killing is an extension of the right’s war on colleges, which has received a big boost from the Trump administration.

    Since January, the federal government has sought to control the admissions and hiring practices of elite universities.

    In February, Trump signed an executive order saying that all public schools must get rid of their diversity programs. The Department of State revoked international student visas and has subjected foreign college students to extra scrutiny, alleging they are importing dangerous beliefs.

    Trump also demanded that several Ivy League universities, including Harvard and Columbia, prioritize enrolling students who support “American values” and promoting right-leaning professors. Universities that didn’t comply were threatened with loss of federal funding, which would impact scientific research.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NJ town points to state’s flag status after Jets legend’s criticism following Charlie Kirk assassintion

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A New Jersey town that faced criticism for flying an American flag at full staff despite President Donald Trump’s order to lower flags on government buildings to half-staff in honor of Charlie Kirk defended its decision on Monday.

    New York Jets great Nick Mangold may have been the loudest critic as he blasted Madison with a social media post showing the flag at full staff.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

    Retired New York Jets center Nick Mangold looks on before the game against the Cincinnati Bengals at MetLife Stadium on Sept. 25, 2022. (Vincent Carchietta/USA TODAY Sports)

    However, Madison officials wrote in a Facebook post that it was following the state’s directive.

    “Over the weekend, we received questions about the lowering of the American flag in the borough. Madison’s policy is to follow the State of New Jersey’s daily flag status,” the town said in a post with a link to New Jersey’s flag status. “Over the weekend, the status was ‘full staff.’

    “The Borough of Madison condemns all forms of political violence and rejects hate in every form. We remain committed to bringing people together around our shared values and ideals.”

    Mangold, the seven-time Pro Bowl center and two-time All-Pro selection, was among those upset with the town’s decision.

    LIV GOLF STAR PHIL MICKELSON SLAMS ‘DISGUSTING RHETORIC’ AFTER CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION

    The video board shows a tribute to Charlie Kirk prior to a game between the Carolina Panthers and the Arizona Cardinals at State Farm Stadium on Sept. 14, 2025 in Glendale, Arizona.

    The video board shows a tribute to Charlie Kirk prior to a game between the Carolina Panthers and the Arizona Cardinals at State Farm Stadium on Sept. 14, 2025 in Glendale, Arizona. (Chris Coduto/Getty Images)

    “I’m disgusted and saddened by my town (Madison) and my state (New Jersey),” he wrote on X. “This is wrong on so many levels… as an American husband and father was assassinated for expressing his right to free speech.”

    Mangold tagged New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and the two gubernatorial candidates who are fighting to succeed Murphy, state Rep. Mikie Sherrill and Jack Ciattarelli.

    Officials in Bergen County, New Jersey, also came under fire for the same flag decision.

    Trump’s proclamation to have the flags at half-staff came after Kirk was assassinated on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Since then, several remembrances and vigils have been held across the country to honor Kirk. Several NFL teams held moments of silence during Sunday’s games.

    Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link