ReportWire

Tag: Cars

  • Detroit Auto Show opens as industry pares back splashy debuts and leans on test tracks

    DETROIT — The Detroit Auto Show returns this week, offering an opportunity to take a peek at the cars of today and tomorrow and also go for a spin.

    The annual car-fest at a Detroit convention hall features a lineup of 40-plus vehicle brands. At last year’s show, organizers say attendees took more than 100,000 rides in them.

    “That’s what makes the Detroit Auto Show different,” show chairman Todd Szott said. “You can get up close, talk to the people behind the brands and actually experience the vehicles.”

    The Detroit Auto Show once was the place for new model debuts, glitzy displays and scores of journalists from across the globe.

    Automakers since have determined that new models can make a bigger splash when they’re unveiled to a digital audience on a day when they don’t have to share the spotlight with rivals.

    While it has scaled back dramatically from its heyday, it still drew 275,000 attendees a year ago. And it is leaning into interactivity.

    Two tracks offer attendees ride-along experiences in internal combustion engine, hybrid and electric vehicles, while the Camp Jeep and Ford Bronco Built Wild Experience give visitors a chance to climb into the vehicles and tackle some makeshift “mountains.”

    The show gets underway Tuesday evening with vehicle announcements from Ford Motor Co. as part of the media and industry preview days. On Wednesday, the annual North American Car, Truck and Utility Vehicle of the Year will be revealed. The show opens to the public Saturday and runs through Jan. 25.

    Visitors can check out displays under the Alfa Romeo, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Ford, GMC, Jeep, Kia, Lincoln, Ram, Subaru and Toyota nameplates.

    Speakers include Republican U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno from Ohio, and a pair of Democrats — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Pete Buttigieg, the Transportation Secretary under President Joe Biden.

    Source link

  • How to make EV ownership straightforward for busy family schedules – Growing Family

    Collaborative post

    Charging an electric vehicle at home introduces new routines for UK families. Storing, maintaining, and using EV charging cables quickly becomes part of daily life, especially for premium models requiring unfamiliar setups.

    The reality of family life with an electric vehicle involves more than the car itself, including the infrastructure supporting it. The number of public EV charging devices in the UK has been increasing, reflecting a growing interest in home charging setups among households. More families are establishing reliable home charging systems that fit around their schedules instead of causing disruption. Finding the right charging cable that balances durability, safety and ease of use is important for parents juggling responsibilities while maintaining environmental commitments.

    electric car charging socket

    Family-friendly EV charging setup for your home

    Creating a dedicated charging station at home is the first step toward hassle-free EV ownership for busy families.

    The ideal location should be easily accessible yet out of the main traffic flow of your household. For multi-car families, positioning near your electrical supply but with enough cable length to reach different parking spots will provide flexibility when you’re handling school runs and shopping trips.

    Safety remains important, especially with young children around. Cable management solutions like Voldt® EV Cable options keep cords off the ground, preventing trips and falls while protecting cables from damage. These simple additions can make a meaningful difference in daily use and cable lifespan.

    British weather presents unique challenges for outdoor charging setups. Weatherproof cable covers and water-resistant storage boxes will protect your investment from rain, snow and humidity. These protective measures are especially noteworthy for premium vehicles like Audi, where an Audi charging cable represents a considerable investment and should be shielded from harsh weather.

    A well-organised charging space reduces clutter and hazards. For families, using cable tidies in colours that match existing driveway features helps children notice cable positions and avoid trips. Adding motion-sensor lighting to the charging area will improve visibility on dark mornings or evenings.

    Selecting the right charging cable for family use

    Figuring out which charging cable suits your household makes a real difference to everyday life with an EV. The two most common types, Mode 2 and Mode 3, serve different needs for UK families.

    Mode 2 cables plug straight into standard home sockets, making them practical as a backup for unplanned top-ups or emergency use. However, they provide slower charging speeds, so relying on them for daily charging can disrupt routines when a car isn’t ready in time for school runs or work commutes.

    Mode 3 cables connect to dedicated wallboxes, which supply faster charging speeds for households who need regular, quick turnarounds. This arrangement helps ensure cars are ready on time, supporting busy mornings and weekend plans without long wait times.

    Picking the wrong cable type can result in slower charging, trip hazards if extension leads are used incorrectly, or equipment not working with certain EV models.

    a person charging an electric car outside their homea person charging an electric car outside their home

    Smart charging routines that fit around family life

    Building smart charging habits can make EV ownership an easy part of the family routine. Setting up scheduled charging during off-peak hours can help lower electricity costs and ensures your vehicle is ready each morning without active management. Overnight charging is a popular approach, as families aim to benefit from lower tariffs and maximise convenience.

    Smart home integration offers added convenience. Many modern charging systems connect to home WiFi networks, allowing you to monitor and control charging remotely via smartphone apps. This technology can prove very helpful when plans change unexpectedly, letting you adjust charging schedules while away from home.

    Creating clear charging guidelines helps when multiple family members share vehicles. A simple whiteboard near your charging point can track who needs the car when and at what charge level. This visual system prevents morning chaos and makes sure everyone gets where they need to go.

    Involving older children in the charging process can also be helpful and provide a learning opportunity. Teaching teenagers about EV charging safety, cable handling, and energy management gives them new skills while potentially lightening your workload.

    Troubleshooting common family EV challenges

    Cable storage presents a frequent issue for family homes. Wall-mounted cable holders or purpose-built storage boxes help to keep charging equipment organised and reduce tripping hazards. These solutions are especially useful in households with young children or elderly family members who might be more likely to fall.

    Limited driveway space calls for creative approaches. Retractable cable systems or ceiling-mounted reels in garages improve space efficiency while keeping cables tidy. For shared driveways, establishing clear charging schedules with neighbours prevents conflicts and ensures everyone has access when needed.

    Power cuts can interrupt charging routines and cause family stress. Having a backup plan, such as knowing the location of nearby public charging points, is always a good idea.

    For urgent journeys when battery levels are low, rapid charging stations can provide quick top-ups. Keeping a map of local rapid chargers in your car or saved on family phones ensures everyone knows where to go if needed. Teaching family members how to use public charging networks will build confidence and ease anxiety about running out of power.

    EV charging port on a carEV charging port on a car

    Family EV charging safety steps for the home

    Safety forms the basis of every reliable family charging routine. A thorough visual check of the charging cable for wear or damage helps spot issues before they become serious concerns. Keep an eye out for frayed sections or exposed wires.

    Regular maintenance of charging equipment helps keep risks low and can even extend the lifespan of these systems. Wiping down the cable every so often with a damp cloth stops grit, road salt or mud from building up.

    Cleaning regularly helps avoid corrosion, which could eventually affect performance and service life, especially during the wet, muddy months common across the UK. Storing charging cables loosely rather than tightly wrapping them reduces strain on the internal wiring.

    Storage using purpose-designed hooks or boxes helps prevent UV exposure, physical stress from being walked on, and deters curious hands from tampering with cables when left outside.

    Only unplugging the cable after charging is complete allows the electrical current to shut off through built-in safety software. This stops sparking and removes the risk of shock to anyone handling the connector.

    Keeping all electrical connections dry matters, because even small amounts of water near the plugs raise the chance of a short circuit or electric shock. Teach everyone to check the charging area for puddles before connecting cables.

    Families that follow these safety steps are more likely to enjoy equipment that works well through daily routines and unpredictable weather. Careful checks, smart storage and clear ground rules will make EV charging straightforward and stress-free for the whole family.

    Catherine

    Source link

  • At CES, auto and tech companies transform cars into proactive companions

    LAS VEGAS — In a vision of the near future shared at CES, a girl slides into the back seat of her parents’ car and the cabin instantly comes alive. The vehicle recognizes her, knows it’s her birthday and cues up her favorite song without a word spoken.

    “Think of the car as having a soul and being an extension of your family,” Sri Subramanian, Nvidia’s global head of generative AI for automotive, said Tuesday.

    Subramanian’s example, shared with a CES audience on the show’s opening day in Las Vegas, illustrates the growing sophistication of AI-powered in-cabin systems and the expanding scope of personal data that smart vehicles may collect, retain and use to shape the driving experience.

    Across the show floor, the car emerged less as a machine and more as a companion as automakers and tech companies showcased vehicles that can adapt to drivers and passengers in real time — from tracking heart rates and emotions to alerting if a baby or young child is accidentally left in the car.

    Bosch debuted its new AI vehicle extension that aims to turn the cabin into a “proactive companion.” Nvidia, the poster child of the AI boom, announced Alpamayo, its new vehicle AI initiative designed to help autonomous cars think through complex driving decisions. CEO Jensen Huang called it a “ChatGPT moment for physical AI.”

    But experts say the push toward a more personalized driving experience is intensifying questions about how much driver data is being collected.

    “The magic of AI should not just mean all privacy and security protections are off,” said Justin Brookman, director of marketplace policy at Consumer Reports.

    Unlike smartphones or online platforms, cars have only recently become major repositories of personal data, Brookman said. As a result, the industry is still trying to establish the “rules of the road” for what automakers and tech companies are allowed to do with driver data.

    That uncertainty is compounded by the uniquely personal nature of cars, Brookman said. Many people see their vehicles as an extension of themselves — or even their homes — which he said can make the presence of cameras, microphones and other monitoring tools feel especially invasive.

    “Sometimes privacy issues are difficult for folks to internalize,” he said. “People generally feel they wish they had more privacy but also don’t necessarily know what they can do to address it.”

    At the same time, Brookman said, many of these technologies offer real safety benefits for drivers and can be good for the consumer.

    On the CES show floor, some of those conveniences were on display at automotive supplier Gentex’s booth, where attendees sat in a mock six-seater van in front of large screens demonstrating how closely the company’s AI-equipped sensors and cameras could monitor a driver and passengers.

    “Are they sleepy? Are they drowsy? Are they not seated properly? Are they eating, talking on phones? Are they angry? You name it, we can figure out how to detect that in the cabin,” said Brian Brackenbury, director of product line management at Gentex.

    Brackenbury said it’s ultimately up to the car manufacturers to decide how the vehicle reacts to the data that’s collected, which he said is stored in the car and deleted after the video frames, for example, have been processed. “

    “One of the mantras we have at Gentex is we’re not going to do it just because we can, just because the technology allows it,” Brackebury said, adding that “data privacy is really important.”

    Source link

  • At CES, Auto and Tech Companies Transform Cars Into Proactive Companions

    LAS VEGAS (AP) — In a vision of the near future shared at CES, a girl slides into the back seat of her parents’ car and the cabin instantly comes alive. The vehicle recognizes her, knows it’s her birthday and cues up her favorite song without a word spoken.

    “Think of the car as having a soul and being an extension of your family,” Sri Subramanian, Nvidia’s global head of generative AI for automotive, said Tuesday.

    Subramanian’s example, shared with a CES audience on the show’s opening day in Las Vegas, illustrates the growing sophistication of AI-powered in-cabin systems and the expanding scope of personal data that smart vehicles may collect, retain and use to shape the driving experience.

    Across the show floor, the car emerged less as a machine and more as a companion as automakers and tech companies showcased vehicles that can adapt to drivers and passengers in real time — from tracking heart rates and emotions to alerting if a baby or young child is accidentally left in the car.

    Bosch debuted its new AI vehicle extension that aims to turn the cabin into a “proactive companion.” Nvidia, the poster child of the AI boom, announced Alpamayo, its new vehicle AI initiative designed to help autonomous cars think through complex driving decisions. CEO Jensen Huang called it a “ChatGPT moment for physical AI.”

    But experts say the push toward a more personalized driving experience is intensifying questions about how much driver data is being collected.

    “The magic of AI should not just mean all privacy and security protections are off,” said Justin Brookman, director of marketplace policy at Consumer Reports.

    Unlike smartphones or online platforms, cars have only recently become major repositories of personal data, Brookman said. As a result, the industry is still trying to establish the “rules of the road” for what automakers and tech companies are allowed to do with driver data.

    That uncertainty is compounded by the uniquely personal nature of cars, Brookman said. Many people see their vehicles as an extension of themselves — or even their homes — which he said can make the presence of cameras, microphones and other monitoring tools feel especially invasive.

    “Sometimes privacy issues are difficult for folks to internalize,” he said. “People generally feel they wish they had more privacy but also don’t necessarily know what they can do to address it.”

    At the same time, Brookman said, many of these technologies offer real safety benefits for drivers and can be good for the consumer.

    On the CES show floor, some of those conveniences were on display at automotive supplier Gentex’s booth, where attendees sat in a mock six-seater van in front of large screens demonstrating how closely the company’s AI-equipped sensors and cameras could monitor a driver and passengers.

    “Are they sleepy? Are they drowsy? Are they not seated properly? Are they eating, talking on phones? Are they angry? You name it, we can figure out how to detect that in the cabin,” said Brian Brackenbury, director of product line management at Gentex.

    Brackenbury said it’s ultimately up to the car manufacturers to decide how the vehicle reacts to the data that’s collected, which he said is stored in the car and deleted after the video frames, for example, have been processed. “

    “One of the mantras we have at Gentex is we’re not going to do it just because we can, just because the technology allows it,” Brackebury said, adding that “data privacy is really important.”

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – December 2025

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Are end-of-year car deals actually a good time to buy? – MoneySense

    We spoke with Dan Park, CEO of Clutch, which recently released its annual used car pricing report. We wanted to find out what changed with car prices this year and what shoppers should be aware of when trying to get an end-of-year deal. Basically, are you getting a good deal or are the sales a bit of slick marketing?

    The state of used car prices in 2025

    Like most things, the price of used cars went up in 2025, with the average cost of a used vehicle going for $33,718—4.6% higher than the previous year. But there’s a bit more to the price than what you see on the sticker. 

    As the Clutch report shows, many individual models actually declined in price, but other factors pushed the overall used car average up. These factors include a move to bigger vehicles, more higher-end trims, and electric vehicles, all of which can make it harder to detect true discounts.

    If you’ve been holding out till the end of the year for a good deal, be aware that prices have been dipping month by month as the year comes to a close. As Park notes, “The first step [to finding a deal] is comparing the price to similar cars with the same year, make, model, mileage, and condition—not just whether it’s been discounted.”

    Related: Should you buy a new or used car?

    What to consider before heading to a dealership

    It’s easy to feel overwhelmed by options when you set foot on the lot, so reduce the stress that comes with these choices by doing some research. First off, develop a realistic budget and identify models at that price point. It also helps to learn what mileage is reasonable based on a car’s age.

    Some dealerships make key information like pricing context, vehicle history, and inspection details very clear to shoppers, which Park says, “…allows buyers to focus on whether the car itself meets their needs rather than uncovering details later.”

    Compare car insurance quotes and save

    In under five minutes, compare personalized auto insurance quotes from Canada’s top providers.

    As you’re narrowing down options, don’t overlook hidden vehicle costs that can vary significantly. We’re talking insurance premiums, fuel consumption, maintenance needs, and possible repairs for the car you’re interested in.

    Also, it’s easy to forget that securing financing before selecting a car can make the whole process easier. If you shop around for an auto loan and get pre-approval, you’ll be less focused on monthly payments and can instead shop for a car with high overall value.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Improve your credit score
    One of the best things you can do to ensure you walk away with the best deal on a car is to have a stellar credit score. If your score could use some work, focus on paying down debt and making on-time payments in the months before you purchase a vehicle. This way, you’ll get the best possible interest rate when financing a vehicle.

    Money-saving strategies for buying a car

    We’ve already highlighted some simple steps you can take to save money before you head to a dealership, but once you’re there, keep these strategies in mind:

    • Be flexible. Park says, “Being open to different body styles, such as sedans instead of SUVs or trucks, or to variations in trim level, colour, or optional features [which] can lower costs without compromising reliability or performance.”
    • Expand your search beyond where you live. Prices for vehicles can vary widely and inventory levels across dealerships can also fluctuate. You might snag a great deal on a car in a neighboring city that you’d miss out if you were only looking locally.
    • Research common concerns or issues. Before you commit to a car, read up on common complaints or repair issues that the model might be known for. In some cases, these can be minor, but if owners note expensive repairs once the car hits a specific mileage, it can be more cost-effective to choose a different car.
    • Opt for a used car that comes with a warranty. You’re more likely to get a genuinely useful warranty from an automaker, rather than a third-party. So, if you’re considering a used vehicle that still has some of the manufacturer’s warranty, it might save you money down the road.
    • Read contracts carefully. You don’t want to pay for add-ons you didn’t realize you were getting, so take as much time as you need to read the purchasing agreement before signing. If there are things in the contract you don’t want, don’t hesitate to speak up.

    Should you wait for 2026 or buy an end-of-year model?

    We posed this question to Park, who said, “Waiting doesn’t necessarily lead to better outcomes.” After all, car prices have less to do with the calendar and more to do with supply shifts. So, as dealerships try to clear space for new models, you’re likely to catch a good deal.

    Ultimately, if you’re in the market for a vehicle, the best time to buy is when you see a price improvement for the type of car you want to buy. “If it fits your needs and budget, it’s often better to act with confidence than to wait for a perfect moment.” 

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.



    About Jessica Gibson


    About Jessica Gibson

    Jessica Gibson is a personal finance writer with over a decade of experience in online publishing. She enjoys helping readers make informed decisions about credit cards, insurance, and debt management.

    Jessica Gibson

    Source link

  • Ford recalls more than 270,000 electric and hybrid vehicles due to roll-away risk

    Ford is recalling more than 270,000 electric and hybrid vehicles in the U.S. because of a parking function problem that could lead to them rolling away.

    The Detroit automaker said that the recall includes certain 2022-2026 F-150 Lightning BEV, 2024-2026 Mustang Mach-E, and 2025-2026 Maverick vehicles. At issue is the integrated park module, which may fail to lock into the park position when the driver shifts into park.

    Ford said that it will implement a park module software update for free.

    Vehicle owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332 for additional information.

    Source link

  • California threatens Tesla with 30-day suspension of sales license for deceptive self-driving claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — California regulators are threatening to suspend Tesla’s license to sell its electric cars in the state early next year unless the automaker tones down its marketing tactics for its self-driving features after a judge concluded the Elon Musk-led company has been misleading consumers about the technology’s capabilities.

    The potential 30-day blackout of Tesla’s California sales is the primary punishment being recommended to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles in a decision released late Tuesday. The ruling by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox determined that Tesla had for years engaged in deceptive marketing practices by using the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” to promote the autonomous technology available in many of its cars.

    After presiding over five days of hearings held in Oakland, California in July, Cox also recommended suspending Tesla’s license to manufacture cars at its plant in Fremont, California. But California regulators aren’t going to impose that part of the judge’s proposed penalty.

    Tesla will have a 90-day window to make changes that more clearly convey the limits of its self-driving technology to avoid having its California sales license suspended. After California regulators filed its action against Tesla in 2023, the Austin, Texas, company already made one significant change by putting in wording that made it clear its Full Self-Driving package still required supervision by a human driver while it’s deployed.

    “Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue — steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,” said Steve Gordon, the director of the California Department of Motor Vehicles.

    Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

    The automaker has already been plagued by a global downturn in demand that began during a backlash to Musk’s high-profile role overseeing cuts in the U.S. government budget overseeing the Department of Government that President Donald Trump created in his administration. Increased competition and an older lineup of vehicles also weighed on Tesla sales, although the company did revamp its Model Y, the world’s bestselling vehicle, and unveil less-expensive versions of the Model Y and Model X.

    Although Musk left Washington after a falling out with Trump, the fallout has continued to weigh on Tesla’s auto sales, which had decreased by 9% from 2024 through the first nine months of this year.

    Despite the slump and the threatened sales suspension in California, Tesla’s stock price touched an all-time high $495.28 during Wednesday’s early trading before backtracking later to fall below $470. Despite that reversal, Tesla’s shares are still worth slightly more than they were before Musk’s ill-fated stint in the Trump administration — a “somewhat successful” assignment he recently said he wouldn’t take on again.

    The performance of Tesla’s stock against the backdrop of eroding auto sales reflects the increasing emphasis that investors are placing on Musk’s efforts to develop artificial intelligence technology to implant into humanoid robots and a fleet of self-driving Teslas that will operate as robotaxis across the U.S.

    Musk has been promising Tesla’s self-driving technology would fulfill his robotaxi vision for years without delivering on the promise, but the company finally began testing the concept in Austin earlier this year, albeit with a human supervisor in the car to take over if something went awry. Just a few days ago, Musk disclosed Tesla had started tests of its robotaxis without a safety monitor in the vehicle.

    California regulators are far from the first critic to accuse Tesla of exaggerating the capabilities of its self-driving technology in a potentially dangerous manner. The company has steadfastly insisted that information contained in its vehicle’s owner’s manual on its website have made it clear that its self-driving technology still requires human supervision, even while releasing a 2020 video depicting one of its cars purportedly driving on its own. The video, cited as evidence against Tesla in the decision recommending a suspension of the company’s California sales license, remained on its website for nearly four years.

    Tesla has been targeted in a variety of lawsuits alleging its mischaracterizations about self-driving technology have lulled humans into a false of security that have resulted in lethal accidents. The company has settled or prevailed in several cases, but earlier this year a Miami jury held Tesla partly responsible for a lethal crash in Florida that occurred while Autopilot was deployed and ordered the automaker to pay more than $240 million in damages.

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: Trump said weaker gas mileage rules will mean cheaper cars. Experts say don’t bet on it

    DETROIT (AP) — President Donald Trump this week announced plans to weaken rules for how far automakers’ new vehicles need to travel on a gallon of gasoline, set under former President Joe Biden.

    The Trump administration said the rules, known formally as Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards, are why new vehicles are too expensive, and that cutting them will drive down costs and make driving safer for Americans.

    The new standards would drop the industry fleetwide average for light-duty vehicles to roughly 34.5 mpg (55.5 kpg) in the 2031 model year, down from the goal of about 50.4 mpg (81.1 kpg) that year under the Biden-era rule.

    Here are the facts.

    Affordability

    TRUMP: EV-friendly policies “forced automakers to build cars using expensive technologies that drove up costs, drove up prices and made the car much worse.”

    THE FACTS: It’s true that gas mileage standards have played a role in rising vehicle prices in recent years, but experts say plenty of other factors have contributed, and some much more.

    Pandemic-era inventory shortages, supply chain challenges, tariffs and other trade dynamics, and even automakers’ growing investments in their businesses have also sent prices soaring. Average prices have also skewed higher as automakers have leaned into the costly big pickups and SUVs that many American consumers love.

    The average transaction price of a new vehicle hit $49,105 in October, according to car shopping guide Edmunds.

    A Consumer Reports analysis of vehicles for model years 2003 to 2021 — a period in which average fuel economy improved 30% — found no significant increase in inflation-adjusted vehicle prices caused by the requirements. At the same time, it found an average of $7,000 in lifetime fuel savings per vehicle for 2021 model year vehicles compared with 2003. That analysis, done primarily before the coronavirus pandemic, attributed much of the average sticker price increase to the shift toward bigger and more expensive vehicles.

    Cutting the fuel economy standards is unlikely to provide any fast relief on sticker prices, said Jessica Caldwell, Edmunds’ head of insights. And while looser standards may eventually mean lower car prices, their lower efficiency means that those savings could be eaten up by higher fuel costs, she said.

    Ending the gas car?

    TRUMP: Biden’s policies were “a quest to end the gasoline-powered car.”

    THE FACTS: The Biden administration did enact several policies to increase electric vehicle adoption, including setting a target for half of new vehicle sales in the U.S. to be electric by 2030.

    The Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act included tax incentives that gave car buyers up to $7,500 off the price of an EV and dedicated billions of dollars to nationwide charging — funding that Trump tried to stop. The Biden administration increased fuel economy requirements and set stricter tailpipe emissions limits.

    While those moves sought to help build the EV market, there was no requirement that automakers sell EVs or consumers buy them. And gasoline cars still make up the vast majority of the U.S. market.

    EV charging

    TRUMP: “We had to have an electric car within a very short period of time, even though there was no way of charging them.”

    THE FACTS: While many potential EV buyers still worry about charging them, the availability of public charging has significantly improved in recent years.

    Biden-era funding and private investment have increased charging across the nation. There are now more than 232,000 individual Level 2 and fast charging ports in the U.S. As of this year, enough fast charging ports have been installed to average one for every mile (1.6 kilometers) of National Highway System roads in the U.S., according to an AP analysis of data from the Department of Energy.

    However, those fast charging stations aren’t evenly dispersed. Many are concentrated in the far West and the Northeast, where sales of EVs are highest.

    Experts note that most EV charging can be done at home.

    Safety

    TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY SEAN DUFFY: The reduced requirements will make drivers “safer on the roads because of all the great new technology we have that save lives.”

    THE FACTS: Newer vehicles — gas and electric — are full of advanced safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping, collision warnings and more.

    Duffy suggested that consumers will be more likely to buy new vehicles if they are more affordable — meaning fewer old cars on the streets without the safety technology. This assumes vehicle prices will actually go down with eased requirements, which experts say might not be the case. Besides, high tech adds to a vehicle’s cost.

    “If Americans purchased more new vehicles equipped with the latest safety technologies, we would expect overall on-road safety to improve,” Edmunds’ Caldwell said. “However, it’s unclear whether easing fuel-economy standards will meaningfully increase new-vehicle sales.”

    The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an independent automotive research nonprofit, also says electric or hybrid vehicles are as safe as or safer than gasoline-powered cars.

    Another part of safety is public health. Efficiency requirements put into place to address the 1970s oil crisis were also a way to reduce pollution that is harmful to humans and the environment.

    “This rollback would move the auto industry backwards, keeping polluting cars on our roads for years to come and threatening the health of millions of Americans,” said Katherine García, director of the Sierra Club’s Clean Transportation for All campaign. “This dangerous proposal adds to the long list of ways the Trump administration is dismantling our clean air and public health protections.”

    ___

    Associated Press data journalist M.K. Wildeman contributed from Hartford, Connecticut.

    ___

    Follow Alexa St. John on X: @alexa_stjohn and reach her at [email protected]. Read more of AP’s climate coverage.

    ___

    The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    Source link

  • NC law doesn’t ban cellphone use in cars

    A social media account that positions itself as an authority on the North Carolina General Assembly posted false information about the state’s driving laws — triggering a wave of inaccurate news online, and leading to an incorrect artificial intelligence-generated summary on a popular search engine.

    The Facebook page — called “North Carolina Legislature” — posted that “Effective today, December 1, 2025, North Carolina has a new ‘Hands-Free NC Act’ that prohibits the use of wireless communication devices while driving.”

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    The post, shared more than 3,000 times before being deleted, went on to claim: “Drivers cannot hold or use a device for tasks like texting or watching videos, though voice-activated technology and factory-installed navigation systems are allowed for most drivers.”

    Similar claims were subsequently reported by a conservative pundit, a Charlotte-based television station and western North Carolina radio station. On Dec. 2, the day after the post, people who searched “Hands Free NC” on Google were shown an “AI Overview” saying: “‘Hands Free NC’ is the new law that went into effect on December 1, 2025, prohibiting drivers from holding or physically using a wireless device while driving, even at a red light.”

    (Screengrab from Google)

    The problem with these reports? There is no new law banning people from holding their cell phones while driving. And state lawmakers say despite the “North Carolina Legislature” Facebook page’s name, the account isn’t affiliated with the North Carolina legislature. 

    North Carolina law already bans motorists from sending text or email messages while driving. The “Hands Free NC Act,”  a bipartisan bill filed in March, would allow motorists to be on the phone while driving — as long as they aren’t holding a phone in their hand. 

    However, the bill has not become law, nor has it come up for a vote in the state Senate or state House of Representatives.

    Sometimes, legislators take a bill’s contents and put its provisions in a more popular bill that’s on its way to becoming law. That didn’t happen with the “Hands Free” bill’s contents, lawmakers say.

    PolitiFact contacted the offices of Senate Leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell. We also contacted representatives for Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey, whose office oversees auto insurance regulations, and Attorney General Jeff Jackson. Their spokespeople said they were unaware of any new law banning people from holding their phone while driving. 

    “The ‘Hands-Free NC Act’ was never enacted by the General Assembly and is not in effect,” said Demi Dowdy, a spokesperson for Hall. 

    State Sen. Jim Burgin, R-Harnett, introduced the bill and told PolitiFact that he has received several phone calls about the Facebook post. Burgin said he regrets having to inform voters that his proposal never actually became law.

    “Every day that I go back and forth to Raleigh, I see distracted driving,” Burgin said in a phone interview. “At a red light, [when the light turns green] the traffic starts moving and they don’t move and their heads are down — you know what they’re doing. They’re looking at their phone.”

    The North Carolina Alliance for Safe Transportation, a nonprofit organization that advocates policies that make traveling safer, issued a statement about the Facebook post, saying that it was inaccurate.

    “The lesson with this social media post is mistakes happen, which is also the reason motorists should avoid distractions and focus on driving when behind the wheel,” Joe Stewart, the alliance’s board chairman said in a statement.

    A PolitiFact reporter messaged the “North Carolina Legislature” Facebook page, which says it is “managed by unpaid volunteers.” We asked for the source of the page’s claim about the “Hands Free NC Act,” but page administrators didn’t provide an answer. 

    Our ruling

    A Facebook post said the “Hands-Free NC Act” went into effect Dec. 1 and “prohibits the use of wireless communication devices while driving.” 

    The bill never got a vote in the General Assembly and its contents weren’t enacted into law as part of any other bill. We rate this claim False.

    Source link

  • Trump’s Hatred of EVs Is Making Gas Cars More Expensive

    This story originally appeared on Mother Jones and is part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

    As President Donald Trump sees it, environmental regulations that attempt to improve efficiency and address climate change only make products more expensive and perform worse. He has long blamed efficiency regulations for his frustrations with things like toilets and showerheads. He began his second term in office to “unleash prosperity through deregulation.”

    But there’s at least one big way that American companies and households may end up paying more, not less, for the president’s anti-environment policy moves.

    If you’re in the market for a vehicle, you’ve probably noticed: Cars are getting more expensive. Kelley Blue Book reported that the average sticker price for a new car topped $50,000 for the first time in September.

    And they aren’t just getting more expensive to buy; cars are getting more expensive to own. For most Americans, gasoline is their single-largest energy expenditure, around $2,930 per household each year on average.

    While a more efficient dishwasher, light bulb, or faucet may have a higher sticker price up front—especially as manufacturers adjust to new rules—cars, appliances, solar panels, and electronics can more than pay for themselves with lower operating costs over their lifetimes. And Trump’s agenda of suddenly rolling back efficiency rules has simultaneously made it harder for many industries to do business while raising costs for ordinary Americans.

    No one knows this better than the US auto industry, which has whiplashed between competing environmental regulations for over a decade.

    President Barack Obama tightened vehicle efficiency and pollution standards. In his first term, Trump loosened them. President Joe Biden reinstated and strengthened them. Now Trump is reversing course again—leaving the $1.6 trillion US auto industry unsure what turn to take next.

    Regulation Whiplash

    In July, the Environmental Protection Agency began undoing a foundational legal basis that lets the agency limit climate pollution from cars. Without it, the EPA has far less power to require automakers to manufacture cleaner vehicles, which hampers efforts to reduce one of the single biggest sources of carbon emissions.

    Trump’s transportation secretary, Sean P. Duffy, said in a statement over the summer that these moves “will lower vehicle costs and ensure the American people can purchase the cars they want.”

    But in reality, the shift may have the opposite effect. That’s because when the rules change every few years, automakers struggle to meet existing benchmarks and can’t plan ahead. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing companies like Ford, Toyota, and Volkswagen, sent a letter to the EPA in September saying that the administration’s moves and the repeal of incentives for electric cars mean that the current car pollution rules established under Biden and stretching out to 2027 “are simply not achievable.” The Trump administration responded by zeroing out any penalties for violations—but the industry is already planning for a post-Trump world where rules could drastically change yet again.

    Because it takes years and billions of dollars to develop new cars that comply with stricter rules, carmakers would prefer if regulations stayed put one way or the other. Every rule change adds time and expense to the development lifecycle, which ultimately gets baked into a car’s price tag.

    Changing rules are also vexing for electric car makers, whose models are gaining traction both in the US and around the world, even as the Trump administration has ended tax incentives for EVs. Trump is making things even more difficult by pulling support for domestic battery production that would help US car companies build electric cars.

    It all adds up to a huge headache for the industry. “Particularly in the last six months, I think ‘chaos’ is a good word because they’re getting hit from every angle,” said David Cooke, senior associate director at the Center for Automotive Research at Ohio State University.

    And all that uncertainty is making cars more expensive to buy and run, with even more expensive long-term consequences for people’s health and the environment.

    How Trump’s Policies Are Costing Drivers More

    As the government relaxes efficiency targets, progress will stall and car buyers will get stuck with cars that cost more to operate.

    Energy Innovation, a think tank, found that repealing tailpipe standards could cost households an extra $310 billion by 2050, mainly through more spending on gasoline. Undoing the standards would also increase air pollution and shrink the job market for US electric vehicle manufacturing due to lower demand.

    The EPA’s fuel mileage rating of a large SUV.

    Photograph: D. Lentz/Getty Images/iStockphoto

    Even the Trump administration’s own analysis of the effects of undoing the EPA’s greenhouse-gas emission regulations found that his moves would drive up gasoline prices due to more fuel consumption from less efficient vehicles.

    “Repealing these standards in particular would set America back decades,” said Sara Baldwin, senior director for electrification at Energy Innovation.

    Umair Irfan

    Source link

  • Why Are We All Still Carrying Around Car Keys?

    My iPhone Wallet stores theater and transit tickets and all of my credit and debit cards, and it lets me sashay like a boss through my gym’s turnstile. The tech works flawlessly, requiring only my proximity or the merest tilt of the device toward my face. Biometric goodness means I have few worries about security, even accessing my bank accounts.

    So … why am I still opening my EV with a key?

    OK, it’s more than just a metal key; it’s a passive electronic fob with proximity-based radio signaling, which means I don’t have to press anything to unlock my car. But it’s nevertheless a bacteria-rich, easily lost, marque-branded plastic blob that, in truth, I no longer need. And I haven’t needed it for some years.

    BMW 5 Series owners have been using smartphones to unlock, start, and digitally share access to their luxury vehicles since 2021, the year after Apple’s introduced its plainly titled Car Key. Audi, Kia, and Hyundai later implemented support for ‌the feature. During the WWDC 2025 keynote in June, Apple said that 13 additional vehicle brands would “soon” join them, including Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC, and Porsche. “Soon” appears to mean 2026.

    Tesla Model 3 owners have had digital key access since 2017, when the midsize sedan launched without a fob; it could only be opened with a smartphone. Subsequently, digital-native carmakers Rivian and Polestar also enabled digital key use. (“Digital Key has been removed from the upcoming 2025.34 software update for further testing,” noted a recent update from Rivian. The company’s comms team tells WIRED it’ll be available again “soon.”)

    Owners of the latest high-end Ford vehicles can use digital keys. Still, the Dearborn, Michigan, company clearly isn’t ready to ditch fobs—in October it launched the $200 Truckle, an ornate Western-style belt buckle with a cavity to fit the oversized F-150 fob, so it need never get lost or spoil the line of your jeans.

    Courtesy of Ford

    Digital for All

    Phone-as-a-key functionality isn’t just for select luxury cars. The wire-in MoboKey device turns a smartphone into a digital key and can be fitted by an auto electrician to almost any modern car, gas or electric.

    Similarly, KeyDIY, a Chinese smart key maker, sells a USB-powered box of tricks that allows almost any car to operate with a digital key. The box grabs car connectivity signals–Flipper-Zero-style–emulating the rolling codes that key fobs use to foil signal boosting “relay” attacks where criminals use antennas and extenders to capture the signals from a car’s key fob. (Always store your fob in a Faraday cage.) KeyDIY’s box, which lives in the car, is actuated by a device connected momentarily to the vehicle’s onboard diagnostic port.

    The Key to Meaning

    In short, the picture here is that digital key tech is mature and (mostly) secure, and we’re perfectly happy using Bluetooth Low Energy, near-field communication (NFC), and ultra-wideband (UWB) in the rest of our life—unless you’re a conspiracy theorist who clings to cash, that is—so why are so many of us still seemingly so attached to our physical car fobs?

    “Most people are reluctant to go without the physical backup of an actual key,” says Sean Tucker, managing editor of automotive research company Kelley Blue Book. And, he adds, picking up a fob is now an ingrained habit. There are also emotional factors to consider.

    “A car key is full of meaning,” says Stefan Gössling, a professor at Linnaeus University, Sweden, and author of The Psychology of the Car. “Jingling them gives some motorists the opportunity to show off their automobile, even if the car is not close by. Car keys are also comforting to some, a physical reminder that your vehicle is there to take you away; to protect you.”

    Carlton Reid

    Source link

  • Judge rejects reduced prison sentence for participant in Colorado rock-throwing attack

    Alexa Bartell (Provided by Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department)

    A Jefferson County judge refused to reduce the prison sentence for one of the men convicted in the killing of 20-year-old Alexa Bartell during a spree of rock-throwing attacks more than two years ago.

    Nicholas “Mitch” Karol-Chik, 21, was sentenced in May to 45 years in prison for Bartell’s death. She was killed in April 2023 when Karol-Chik and two other teenagers threw a 9.3-pound rock through her windshield as she drove on Indiana Street near the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge. The rock struck Bartell in the head.

    In September, Karol-Chik sought to knock 10 years off his sentence through a post-sentencing review, citing his good behavior in prison. He noted that he’d applied for a 10-year prison education program through which he expects to receive a bachelor’s degree in Christian studies and then work in chaplains’ offices across the prison system.

    First Judicial District Court Judge Christopher Zenisek, who presided over Karol-Chik’s case and imposed the original 45-year prison sentence, opted against holding a hearing to listen to arguments about sentence reduction and instead denied Karol-Chik’s request in a brief Oct. 8 order.

    Source link

  • ‘You’re responsible’: Las Vegas Turo host says customer reported Chevy Tahoe stolen. Then he tracks it down

    If you’ve needed a rental car in the past few years, chances are high that you’ve considered using Turo.

    Originally, Turo launched as an app that allowed people to rent out their cars when they weren’t using them. Over time, however, people began to use the service to create their own rental car fleets, similar to Airbnb hosts owning multiple rentals in which they’ve never lived.

    While many people have positive experiences with the app, there are always occasional horror stories. For example, one woman rented a car on Turo only to discover she was being tracked with an AirTag. Another person rented their own car out on Turo and detailed the miserable time they had trying to get it back.

    In short, life isn’t always easy for someone using Turo. In a recent video from TikTok user Erik Lizar (@erik_lizar_lasvegas), viewers learned another reason why.

    What Went Wrong With These Turo Rentals?

    In Lizar’s video, he explains that some recent rental incidents have left him with an “interesting couple situations.”

    First, he says that a Jeep just came back into his possession, which the renter claimed had three slashed tires.

    “And so, he put the spare on one of them and took two used tires,” Lizar states.

    However, Lizar’s Turo issues didn’t stop there.

    “Now we’ve got another customer that’s messaging me saying that the car was stolen and that they’re on the phone with the police and they need my help to get the car back,” he shares.

    The Turo Owner Searches for the Stolen Car

    In a series of follow-up videos, Lizar details his journey trying to get his “stolen” car back.

    According to Lizar’s first video, the renter tried to get him to be involved in the finding of the car rather than hand the situation over to the police. She also gave a convoluted explanation for what led to the situation, which Lizar suspects is “straight lies.”

    Later, Lizar tracked the car. It took him back to the area from which it was allegedly stolen. Thus, he went to get it. 

    When he arrived, he found the car. While the outside was spotless, the inside had a host of issues, which Lizar went on to describe.

    What Did These Turo Renters Do to This Car?

    After inspecting the car, Lizar discovered that it was now in a sorry state. The interior was filled with cigarette ash and Patron bottles. Additionally, the car had been driven excess miles to what was agreed upon.

    “I guess she thought that if she reported it stolen that she wouldn’t be responsible for all of the post-trip fees,” Lizar speculates.

    Even though she filed a police report—as evidenced by the fact that the police later showed up—she was still on the hook for damages. Consequently, the whole situation ended up being fortuitous for Lizar, as he “tripled the revenue” of the car with the additional fees. Not only that, but he was able to rent the car out again 24 hours after he got it back.

    @erik_lizar_lasvegas Damaged tires and a stolen car. Stay tuned for updates. This could get interesting! #stolencar #vegasturoking #turo #vegas #wow @PresidentialMama ♬ original sound – vegasturoking

    What Should a Turo Host Do In This Situation?

    According to Turo, a host should fully document all alleged damages and issues with relevant photos and screenshots. They should then provide them to the company within 24 hours. 

    From there, Turo will work with the host to come to a resolution. This could involve resolving the situation directly with the guest or filing a claim with Turo directly.

    It’s unclear what one should do if the renter claims the vehicle was stolen, but the host does not believe their claim. In general, Turo states that a host whose vehicle has been stolen should contact a Turo representative and follow their directions. If this results in a police report needing to be filed, Turo says the action must be taken within 24 hours.

    The Mary Sue reached out to Turo via email and Lizar via TikTok direct message and comment.

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Braden Bjella

    Braden Bjella

    Braden Bjella is a culture writer. His work can be found in the Daily Dot, Mixmag, Electronic Beats, Schon! magazine, and more.

    Braden Bjella

    Source link

  • Higher Power Garage distributes 9 vehicles to local families

    JOPLIN, Mo. — With tears in her eyes and a wave, Brittney Perrin drove off in her new 2008 Nissan sedan from the parking lot of Higher Power Garage.

    The vehicle was one of nine provided to nine families through the organization’s Barriers to Work Low-Cost Vehicle Program on Wednesday. Higher Power Garage staff watched as one by one the vehicles left the lot.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 D66 9@A6=6DD?6DD 😕 D@ >2?J @7 E96 72>:=:6D H9@ 4@>6 E9C@F89 96C6[” D2:5 |:<6 v:56@?[ AC6D:56?E @7 w:896C !@H6C v2C286] “(6 7:I E96 42CD[ E92E’D H92E H6 5@[ 3FE @FC AFCA@D6 96C6 😀 E@ 6?4@FC286[ E@ @A6? @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C E96D6 72>:=:6D[ E@ AC2J H:E9 E96> 2?5 D9@H E96> D@>63@5J 42C6D] x’> D@ E92?<7F= 7@C E9:D 52J]”k^Am

    kAmw:896C !@H6C v2C286 😀 2 =@H4@DE 2FE@ C6A2:C D9@A[ H@C<:?8 AC:>2C:=J H:E9 72>:=:6D H9@ 2C6 DECF88=:?8] %96 2FE@ C6A2:C >:?:DECJ AC@G:56D =@H4@DE D6CG:46D 7@C C6A2:C H@C<] %96J 2=D@ 92G6 E96 =@H4@DE G69:4=6 >:?:DECJ E92E 96=AD AC@G:56 72>:=:6D H:E9 2 G69:4=6 7@C EC2?DA@CE2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@8C2> AFED 72>:=:6D :?E@ G69:4=6D E92E E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 367@C6 7@C E96 4@DE @7 Sd__] ~?46 E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 AC@8C2> 2?5 >66E BF2=:7:42E:@?D[ E96J 2C6 AFE @? 2 H2:E:?8 =:DE 7@C 2 G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmr=:6?ED 2=D@ E2<6 E9C66 4=2DD6D E9C@F89 E96 AC@8C2> @? 3F586E:?8[ :?DFC2?46 2?5 32D:4 42C >2:?E6?2?46] v:56@? D2:5 E9@D6 4=2DD6D 2C6 :>A@CE2?E] xE’D ?@E ;FDE 23@FE 7:I:?8 E96:C 42CD 3FE 8:G:?8 E96> E96 E@@=D E@ >@G6 7@CH2C5 😕 =:76]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 @? 2G6C286[ E96J DA6?5 S`[d__ A6C G69:4=6 86EE:?8 E96> C625J 7@C E96:C ?6H @H?6CD] %96 G69:4=6D 2C6 AC@G:565 3J 4@>>F?:EJ 5@?@CD[ 2?5 E96 8@2= 😀 E@ 86E E96 G69:4=6 C6=:23=6 7@C 2E =62DE @?6 J62C @7 >2:?E6?2?46]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? 92D 366? H2:E:?8 7@C E9:D 52J 7@C 2 =@?8 E:>6] $96 7:==65 @FE 2? 2AA=:42E:@? EH@ J62CD 28@[ 2?5 23@FE 6G6CJ b_ 52JD D96 A2E:6?E=J 4964<65 😕 23@FE 2 42C]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 D96 C646?E=J 8@E 96C EH@ 49:=5C6? 324< 9@>6 H:E9 96C[ 2?5 E96J ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 2?5 7C@> D49@@= 2?5 E@ 5@4E@C 2AA@:?E>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 96C ;@3 2E xw~!] $96’D 366? H2=<:?8 23@FE c >:=6D C@F?5 EC:A] }@H H:E9 E96 42C[ D96’D 23=6 E@ AC@G:56 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? 7@C 96CD6=7 2?5 96C 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 E9:D 8:G6D 96C 2 492?46 E@ AC@G:56 2? 6G6CJ52J =:76 H:E9 96C 49:=5C6?[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’== 86E E@ DA6?5 >@C6 E:>6 E@86E96C]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ@?6 96C6 😀 2>2K:?8] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>[” !6CC:? D2:5] “%9:D 😀 8@:?8 E@ 96=A >6 2?5 >J 72>:=J D@ >F49] %9:?8D E92E H6 H6C6?’E 23=6 E@ 5@[ H6 42? 5@ E@86E96C ?@H] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= x H2D 49@D6?]”k^Am

    kAm(65?6D52J H2D 3@E9 2 46=63C2E:@? @7 E96:C 4=:6?ED 2?5 E96 4@>>F?:EJ @C82?:K2E:@?D E92E 92G6 DFAA@CE65 E96 AC@8C2> @G6C E96 J62CD[ v:56@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 A2CE?6CD :?4=F56 &?4@>>@? {:76 r9FC49[ H9:49 92D 366? H:E9 E96 82C286 D:?46 E96 368:??:?8] v:56@? D2:5 E96J’C6 2=D@ 8C2E67F= 7@C 4@?EC:3FE:@?D 7C@> E96 (]#] r@C=6J %CFDE] %9@D6 7F?5D 96=A DFDE2:? E96 82C286 E96 7:CDE D:I >@?E9D :E H2D @A6?] #646?E=J[ (6D 2?5 y2? w@FD6C 82G6 2 8:7E E@ 6DE23=:D9 2? 6?5@H>6?E 7@C E96 >:?:DECJ[ H9:49 v:56@? D2:5 H:== D64FC6 :ED D6CG:46D :?E@ E96 7FEFC6] w6 2=D@ E92?<65 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ] %96 >:?:DECJ 92D H@? 2 8C2?E E9C@F89 E92E @C82?:K2E:@? E9C66 E:>6D[ 2?5 :E 92D AC@G:565 >F49 @7 E96:C D9@A 6BF:A>6?E] x? a_ab[ E96 8C2?E 96=A65 7F?5 E96 q2CC:6CD E@ (@C< AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 😕 a_aa[ E96 82C286 AC@G:565 `_ G69:4=6D] %9C@F89 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ’D 8C2?ED[ :E 6DE23=:D965 2 AC@>@E:@?2= AC@8C2> E@ 86E >@C6 5@?2E65 G69:4=6D 2?5 H2D 23=6 E@ 5:DEC:3FE6 a_ 42CD] $@ 72C E9:D J62C[ :E 92D 5:DEC:3FE65 bg G69:4=6D H:E9 2?@E96C C@F?5 E@ 8@]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4:E65 8C2?ED E9:D J62C 7C@> $49F36C |:E496== w@>6D 2?5 :>A@CE2?E G69:4=6 5@?2E:@?D 7C@> E96 t4@?@>:4 $64FC:EJ r@CA][ r@>>F?:EJ $FAA@CE $6CG:46D 2?5 >2?J 2C62 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 C62==J 8C2E67F= H6 86E E@ 36 A2CE @7 E96 D@=FE:@? E@ @FC 4=:6?ED’ =:G6D[” v:56@? D2:5] “x’G6 C62==J 366? 3=6DD65 😕 >J =:76] x’G6 2=H2JD 925 EC2?DA@CE2E:@?] (96? x D92C6 E96D6 DE@C:6D[ :E C6D@?2E6D 23@FE 9@H 3=6DD65 x 2>] %@ 36 23=6 E@ 8:G6 324< 😀 D@>6E9:?8 x 42?’E 6IA=2:? 9@H :E 27764ED >6]”k^Am

    kAm~? (65?6D52J[ %C6G@C v2CC6EE 3642>6 E96 @H?6C @7 2 a_`a s@586 r2C2G2?] pD E96 72E96C E@ 7@FC J@F?8 3@JD[ H9@ C2?86 7C@> ` E@ e J62CD @=5[ v2CC6EE D2:5 E96 G69:4=6 H:== 8:G6 9:> :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAm“%96J <66A >6 3FDJ[ E92E’D 7@C DFC6[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “}@E 92G:?8 2 G69:4=6[ :E’D E@F89 E@ 86E E96> E@ 2AA@:?E>6?ED 2?5 D49@@=] x 92G6 A6@A=6 H9@ 2C6 96=A:?8 @FE[ 3FE :E’D 8@:?8 E@ 36 ?:46 E@ 5@ :E @? >J @H?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 G69:4=6 92D =@ED @7 C@@> 2?5 😀 6I24E=J H92E 96 ?66565 7@C 9:D <:5D[ v2CC6EE D2:5] {@@<:?8 2C@F?5 5FC:?8 E96 6G6?E[ 96 D2:5 96 H2D 8C2E67F= E@ D92C6 E96 6I4:E:?8 52J H:E9 6:89E @E96C 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAm“x E92?< v@5 6G6CJ 52J[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “%96 A6@A=6 2E w:896C !@H6C v2C286 2C6 2H6D@>6[ 2?5 x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>] |J DA:C:EF2= ;@FC?6J 86EE:?8 4@??64E65 E@ v@5 92D 366? 2 362FE:7F= @?6[ 2?5 E96J’G6 366? 2 3:8 96=A] xE’D 8@@5 E@ D66 A6@A=6 @? E96 D2>6 A2E9]”k^Am

    By Roger Nomer | rnomer@joplinglobe.com

    Source link

  • Higher Power Garage distributes 9 vehicles to local families

    JOPLIN, Mo. — With tears in her eyes and a wave, Brittney Perrin drove off in her new 2008 Nissan sedan from the parking lot of Higher Power Garage.

    The vehicle was one of nine provided to nine families through the organization’s Barriers to Work Low-Cost Vehicle Program on Wednesday. Higher Power Garage staff watched as one by one the vehicles left the lot.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 D66 9@A6=6DD?6DD 😕 D@ >2?J @7 E96 72>:=:6D H9@ 4@>6 E9C@F89 96C6[” D2:5 |:<6 v:56@?[ AC6D:56?E @7 w:896C !@H6C v2C286] “(6 7:I E96 42CD[ E92E’D H92E H6 5@[ 3FE @FC AFCA@D6 96C6 😀 E@ 6?4@FC286[ E@ @A6? @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C E96D6 72>:=:6D[ E@ AC2J H:E9 E96> 2?5 D9@H E96> D@>63@5J 42C6D] x’> D@ E92?<7F= 7@C E9:D 52J]”k^Am

    kAmw:896C !@H6C v2C286 😀 2 =@H4@DE 2FE@ C6A2:C D9@A[ H@C<:?8 AC:>2C:=J H:E9 72>:=:6D H9@ 2C6 DECF88=:?8] %96 2FE@ C6A2:C >:?:DECJ AC@G:56D =@H4@DE D6CG:46D 7@C C6A2:C H@C<] %96J 2=D@ 92G6 E96 =@H4@DE G69:4=6 >:?:DECJ E92E 96=AD AC@G:56 72>:=:6D H:E9 2 G69:4=6 7@C EC2?DA@CE2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@8C2> AFED 72>:=:6D :?E@ G69:4=6D E92E E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 367@C6 7@C E96 4@DE @7 Sd__] ~?46 E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 AC@8C2> 2?5 >66E BF2=:7:42E:@?D[ E96J 2C6 AFE @? 2 H2:E:?8 =:DE 7@C 2 G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmr=:6?ED 2=D@ E2<6 E9C66 4=2DD6D E9C@F89 E96 AC@8C2> @? 3F586E:?8[ :?DFC2?46 2?5 32D:4 42C >2:?E6?2?46] v:56@? D2:5 E9@D6 4=2DD6D 2C6 :>A@CE2?E] xE’D ?@E ;FDE 23@FE 7:I:?8 E96:C 42CD 3FE 8:G:?8 E96> E96 E@@=D E@ >@G6 7@CH2C5 😕 =:76]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 @? 2G6C286[ E96J DA6?5 S`[d__ A6C G69:4=6 86EE:?8 E96> C625J 7@C E96:C ?6H @H?6CD] %96 G69:4=6D 2C6 AC@G:565 3J 4@>>F?:EJ 5@?@CD[ 2?5 E96 8@2= 😀 E@ 86E E96 G69:4=6 C6=:23=6 7@C 2E =62DE @?6 J62C @7 >2:?E6?2?46]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? 92D 366? H2:E:?8 7@C E9:D 52J 7@C 2 =@?8 E:>6] $96 7:==65 @FE 2? 2AA=:42E:@? EH@ J62CD 28@[ 2?5 23@FE 6G6CJ b_ 52JD D96 A2E:6?E=J 4964<65 😕 23@FE 2 42C]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 D96 C646?E=J 8@E 96C EH@ 49:=5C6? 324< 9@>6 H:E9 96C[ 2?5 E96J ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 2?5 7C@> D49@@= 2?5 E@ 5@4E@C 2AA@:?E>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 96C ;@3 2E xw~!] $96’D 366? H2=<:?8 23@FE c >:=6D C@F?5 EC:A] }@H H:E9 E96 42C[ D96’D 23=6 E@ AC@G:56 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? 7@C 96CD6=7 2?5 96C 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 E9:D 8:G6D 96C 2 492?46 E@ AC@G:56 2? 6G6CJ52J =:76 H:E9 96C 49:=5C6?[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’== 86E E@ DA6?5 >@C6 E:>6 E@86E96C]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ@?6 96C6 😀 2>2K:?8] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>[” !6CC:? D2:5] “%9:D 😀 8@:?8 E@ 96=A >6 2?5 >J 72>:=J D@ >F49] %9:?8D E92E H6 H6C6?’E 23=6 E@ 5@[ H6 42? 5@ E@86E96C ?@H] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= x H2D 49@D6?]”k^Am

    kAm(65?6D52J H2D 3@E9 2 46=63C2E:@? @7 E96:C 4=:6?ED 2?5 E96 4@>>F?:EJ @C82?:K2E:@?D E92E 92G6 DFAA@CE65 E96 AC@8C2> @G6C E96 J62CD[ v:56@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 A2CE?6CD :?4=F56 &?4@>>@? {:76 r9FC49[ H9:49 92D 366? H:E9 E96 82C286 D:?46 E96 368:??:?8] v:56@? D2:5 E96J’C6 2=D@ 8C2E67F= 7@C 4@?EC:3FE:@?D 7C@> E96 (]#] r@C=6J %CFDE] %9@D6 7F?5D 96=A DFDE2:? E96 82C286 E96 7:CDE D:I >@?E9D :E H2D @A6?] #646?E=J[ (6D 2?5 y2? w@FD6C 82G6 2 8:7E E@ 6DE23=:D9 2? 6?5@H>6?E 7@C E96 >:?:DECJ[ H9:49 v:56@? D2:5 H:== D64FC6 :ED D6CG:46D :?E@ E96 7FEFC6] w6 2=D@ E92?<65 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ] %96 >:?:DECJ 92D H@? 2 8C2?E E9C@F89 E92E @C82?:K2E:@? E9C66 E:>6D[ 2?5 :E 92D AC@G:565 >F49 @7 E96:C D9@A 6BF:A>6?E] x? a_ab[ E96 8C2?E 96=A65 7F?5 E96 q2CC:6CD E@ (@C< AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 😕 a_aa[ E96 82C286 AC@G:565 `_ G69:4=6D] %9C@F89 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ’D 8C2?ED[ :E 6DE23=:D965 2 AC@>@E:@?2= AC@8C2> E@ 86E >@C6 5@?2E65 G69:4=6D 2?5 H2D 23=6 E@ 5:DEC:3FE6 a_ 42CD] $@ 72C E9:D J62C[ :E 92D 5:DEC:3FE65 bg G69:4=6D H:E9 2?@E96C C@F?5 E@ 8@]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4:E65 8C2?ED E9:D J62C 7C@> $49F36C |:E496== w@>6D 2?5 :>A@CE2?E G69:4=6 5@?2E:@?D 7C@> E96 t4@?@>:4 $64FC:EJ r@CA][ r@>>F?:EJ $FAA@CE $6CG:46D 2?5 >2?J 2C62 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 C62==J 8C2E67F= H6 86E E@ 36 A2CE @7 E96 D@=FE:@? E@ @FC 4=:6?ED’ =:G6D[” v:56@? D2:5] “x’G6 C62==J 366? 3=6DD65 😕 >J =:76] x’G6 2=H2JD 925 EC2?DA@CE2E:@?] (96? x D92C6 E96D6 DE@C:6D[ :E C6D@?2E6D 23@FE 9@H 3=6DD65 x 2>] %@ 36 23=6 E@ 8:G6 324< 😀 D@>6E9:?8 x 42?’E 6IA=2:? 9@H :E 27764ED >6]”k^Am

    kAm~? (65?6D52J[ %C6G@C v2CC6EE 3642>6 E96 @H?6C @7 2 a_`a s@586 r2C2G2?] pD E96 72E96C E@ 7@FC J@F?8 3@JD[ H9@ C2?86 7C@> ` E@ e J62CD @=5[ v2CC6EE D2:5 E96 G69:4=6 H:== 8:G6 9:> :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAm“%96J <66A >6 3FDJ[ E92E’D 7@C DFC6[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “}@E 92G:?8 2 G69:4=6[ :E’D E@F89 E@ 86E E96> E@ 2AA@:?E>6?ED 2?5 D49@@=] x 92G6 A6@A=6 H9@ 2C6 96=A:?8 @FE[ 3FE :E’D 8@:?8 E@ 36 ?:46 E@ 5@ :E @? >J @H?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 G69:4=6 92D =@ED @7 C@@> 2?5 😀 6I24E=J H92E 96 ?66565 7@C 9:D <:5D[ v2CC6EE D2:5] {@@<:?8 2C@F?5 5FC:?8 E96 6G6?E[ 96 D2:5 96 H2D 8C2E67F= E@ D92C6 E96 6I4:E:?8 52J H:E9 6:89E @E96C 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAm“x E92?< v@5 6G6CJ 52J[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “%96 A6@A=6 2E w:896C !@H6C v2C286 2C6 2H6D@>6[ 2?5 x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>] |J DA:C:EF2= ;@FC?6J 86EE:?8 4@??64E65 E@ v@5 92D 366? 2 362FE:7F= @?6[ 2?5 E96J’G6 366? 2 3:8 96=A] xE’D 8@@5 E@ D66 A6@A=6 @? E96 D2>6 A2E9]”k^Am

    By Roger Nomer | rnomer@joplinglobe.com

    Source link

  • Higher Power Garage distributes 9 vehicles to local families

    JOPLIN, Mo. — With tears in her eyes and a wave, Brittney Perrin drove off in her new 2008 Nissan sedan from the parking lot of Higher Power Garage.

    The vehicle was one of nine provided to nine families through the organization’s Barriers to Work Low-Cost Vehicle Program on Wednesday. Higher Power Garage staff watched as one by one the vehicles left the lot.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 D66 9@A6=6DD?6DD 😕 D@ >2?J @7 E96 72>:=:6D H9@ 4@>6 E9C@F89 96C6[” D2:5 |:<6 v:56@?[ AC6D:56?E @7 w:896C !@H6C v2C286] “(6 7:I E96 42CD[ E92E’D H92E H6 5@[ 3FE @FC AFCA@D6 96C6 😀 E@ 6?4@FC286[ E@ @A6? @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C E96D6 72>:=:6D[ E@ AC2J H:E9 E96> 2?5 D9@H E96> D@>63@5J 42C6D] x’> D@ E92?<7F= 7@C E9:D 52J]”k^Am

    kAmw:896C !@H6C v2C286 😀 2 =@H4@DE 2FE@ C6A2:C D9@A[ H@C<:?8 AC:>2C:=J H:E9 72>:=:6D H9@ 2C6 DECF88=:?8] %96 2FE@ C6A2:C >:?:DECJ AC@G:56D =@H4@DE D6CG:46D 7@C C6A2:C H@C<] %96J 2=D@ 92G6 E96 =@H4@DE G69:4=6 >:?:DECJ E92E 96=AD AC@G:56 72>:=:6D H:E9 2 G69:4=6 7@C EC2?DA@CE2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@8C2> AFED 72>:=:6D :?E@ G69:4=6D E92E E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 367@C6 7@C E96 4@DE @7 Sd__] ~?46 E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 AC@8C2> 2?5 >66E BF2=:7:42E:@?D[ E96J 2C6 AFE @? 2 H2:E:?8 =:DE 7@C 2 G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmr=:6?ED 2=D@ E2<6 E9C66 4=2DD6D E9C@F89 E96 AC@8C2> @? 3F586E:?8[ :?DFC2?46 2?5 32D:4 42C >2:?E6?2?46] v:56@? D2:5 E9@D6 4=2DD6D 2C6 :>A@CE2?E] xE’D ?@E ;FDE 23@FE 7:I:?8 E96:C 42CD 3FE 8:G:?8 E96> E96 E@@=D E@ >@G6 7@CH2C5 😕 =:76]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 @? 2G6C286[ E96J DA6?5 S`[d__ A6C G69:4=6 86EE:?8 E96> C625J 7@C E96:C ?6H @H?6CD] %96 G69:4=6D 2C6 AC@G:565 3J 4@>>F?:EJ 5@?@CD[ 2?5 E96 8@2= 😀 E@ 86E E96 G69:4=6 C6=:23=6 7@C 2E =62DE @?6 J62C @7 >2:?E6?2?46]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? 92D 366? H2:E:?8 7@C E9:D 52J 7@C 2 =@?8 E:>6] $96 7:==65 @FE 2? 2AA=:42E:@? EH@ J62CD 28@[ 2?5 23@FE 6G6CJ b_ 52JD D96 A2E:6?E=J 4964<65 😕 23@FE 2 42C]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 D96 C646?E=J 8@E 96C EH@ 49:=5C6? 324< 9@>6 H:E9 96C[ 2?5 E96J ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 2?5 7C@> D49@@= 2?5 E@ 5@4E@C 2AA@:?E>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 96C ;@3 2E xw~!] $96’D 366? H2=<:?8 23@FE c >:=6D C@F?5 EC:A] }@H H:E9 E96 42C[ D96’D 23=6 E@ AC@G:56 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? 7@C 96CD6=7 2?5 96C 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 E9:D 8:G6D 96C 2 492?46 E@ AC@G:56 2? 6G6CJ52J =:76 H:E9 96C 49:=5C6?[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’== 86E E@ DA6?5 >@C6 E:>6 E@86E96C]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ@?6 96C6 😀 2>2K:?8] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>[” !6CC:? D2:5] “%9:D 😀 8@:?8 E@ 96=A >6 2?5 >J 72>:=J D@ >F49] %9:?8D E92E H6 H6C6?’E 23=6 E@ 5@[ H6 42? 5@ E@86E96C ?@H] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= x H2D 49@D6?]”k^Am

    kAm(65?6D52J H2D 3@E9 2 46=63C2E:@? @7 E96:C 4=:6?ED 2?5 E96 4@>>F?:EJ @C82?:K2E:@?D E92E 92G6 DFAA@CE65 E96 AC@8C2> @G6C E96 J62CD[ v:56@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 A2CE?6CD :?4=F56 &?4@>>@? {:76 r9FC49[ H9:49 92D 366? H:E9 E96 82C286 D:?46 E96 368:??:?8] v:56@? D2:5 E96J’C6 2=D@ 8C2E67F= 7@C 4@?EC:3FE:@?D 7C@> E96 (]#] r@C=6J %CFDE] %9@D6 7F?5D 96=A DFDE2:? E96 82C286 E96 7:CDE D:I >@?E9D :E H2D @A6?] #646?E=J[ (6D 2?5 y2? w@FD6C 82G6 2 8:7E E@ 6DE23=:D9 2? 6?5@H>6?E 7@C E96 >:?:DECJ[ H9:49 v:56@? D2:5 H:== D64FC6 :ED D6CG:46D :?E@ E96 7FEFC6] w6 2=D@ E92?<65 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ] %96 >:?:DECJ 92D H@? 2 8C2?E E9C@F89 E92E @C82?:K2E:@? E9C66 E:>6D[ 2?5 :E 92D AC@G:565 >F49 @7 E96:C D9@A 6BF:A>6?E] x? a_ab[ E96 8C2?E 96=A65 7F?5 E96 q2CC:6CD E@ (@C< AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 😕 a_aa[ E96 82C286 AC@G:565 `_ G69:4=6D] %9C@F89 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ’D 8C2?ED[ :E 6DE23=:D965 2 AC@>@E:@?2= AC@8C2> E@ 86E >@C6 5@?2E65 G69:4=6D 2?5 H2D 23=6 E@ 5:DEC:3FE6 a_ 42CD] $@ 72C E9:D J62C[ :E 92D 5:DEC:3FE65 bg G69:4=6D H:E9 2?@E96C C@F?5 E@ 8@]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4:E65 8C2?ED E9:D J62C 7C@> $49F36C |:E496== w@>6D 2?5 :>A@CE2?E G69:4=6 5@?2E:@?D 7C@> E96 t4@?@>:4 $64FC:EJ r@CA][ r@>>F?:EJ $FAA@CE $6CG:46D 2?5 >2?J 2C62 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 C62==J 8C2E67F= H6 86E E@ 36 A2CE @7 E96 D@=FE:@? E@ @FC 4=:6?ED’ =:G6D[” v:56@? D2:5] “x’G6 C62==J 366? 3=6DD65 😕 >J =:76] x’G6 2=H2JD 925 EC2?DA@CE2E:@?] (96? x D92C6 E96D6 DE@C:6D[ :E C6D@?2E6D 23@FE 9@H 3=6DD65 x 2>] %@ 36 23=6 E@ 8:G6 324< 😀 D@>6E9:?8 x 42?’E 6IA=2:? 9@H :E 27764ED >6]”k^Am

    kAm~? (65?6D52J[ %C6G@C v2CC6EE 3642>6 E96 @H?6C @7 2 a_`a s@586 r2C2G2?] pD E96 72E96C E@ 7@FC J@F?8 3@JD[ H9@ C2?86 7C@> ` E@ e J62CD @=5[ v2CC6EE D2:5 E96 G69:4=6 H:== 8:G6 9:> :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAm“%96J <66A >6 3FDJ[ E92E’D 7@C DFC6[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “}@E 92G:?8 2 G69:4=6[ :E’D E@F89 E@ 86E E96> E@ 2AA@:?E>6?ED 2?5 D49@@=] x 92G6 A6@A=6 H9@ 2C6 96=A:?8 @FE[ 3FE :E’D 8@:?8 E@ 36 ?:46 E@ 5@ :E @? >J @H?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 G69:4=6 92D =@ED @7 C@@> 2?5 😀 6I24E=J H92E 96 ?66565 7@C 9:D <:5D[ v2CC6EE D2:5] {@@<:?8 2C@F?5 5FC:?8 E96 6G6?E[ 96 D2:5 96 H2D 8C2E67F= E@ D92C6 E96 6I4:E:?8 52J H:E9 6:89E @E96C 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAm“x E92?< v@5 6G6CJ 52J[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “%96 A6@A=6 2E w:896C !@H6C v2C286 2C6 2H6D@>6[ 2?5 x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>] |J DA:C:EF2= ;@FC?6J 86EE:?8 4@??64E65 E@ v@5 92D 366? 2 362FE:7F= @?6[ 2?5 E96J’G6 366? 2 3:8 96=A] xE’D 8@@5 E@ D66 A6@A=6 @? E96 D2>6 A2E9]”k^Am

    By Roger Nomer | rnomer@joplinglobe.com

    Source link

  • Tokyo auto show highlights technology but Trump’s tariffs loom large

    TOKYO — The Tokyo Mobility Show is highlighting more than just cars or the types of fuel they use from electric to hydrogen, but also various kinds of futuristic transport.

    Think scuttling robotic chairs, like the Uni-One from Honda Motor Co. The Tokyo-based maker of the Accord sedan says it is all about personal mobility as a mode for quick transport by 2035. Just sit on the boxlike machine as it zips around quietly.

    Toyota Motor Corp. showed a helicopter-like aircraft with six propellers, which was still in development in cooperation with U.S. aviation company Joby.

    Such gadgetry, as well as more regular vehicles, are on display at the show, which runs through Nov. 9 at Tokyo Big Sight exhibition space. It was previewed to media Wednesday, ahead of its opening to the public Thursday.

    Looming in the backdrop of the fanfare is the threat of auto tariffs under U.S. President Donald Trump, raised to 15% from 2.5%, although an improvement from the 25% he slapped on initially.

    Trump’s tariffs are expected to erase more than 2 trillion yen ($13 billion) off automakers’ annual operating profits, according to calculations from recent earnings.

    Masahiro Moro, chief executive of Mazda Motor Corp., among the worst hit of the Japanese automakers, said his engineers were developing cars that understood drivers’ emotions, as well as those that contribute to sustainability by reducing carbon emissions the more you drove.

    “We believe the joy of driving has the power to shape the future,” he told reporters.

    Nissan Motor Corp. showed a prototype, or experimental model, of its Sakura electric car, fitted with a solar-system roof that slides out at the top, called “Ao-Solar Extender,” to generate power while the car is parked. The word “ao” means “blue” in Japanese.

    Nissan said the model’s message is about adding value to one’s life, as the generated power can be used for other gadgets around the house as well as work as power stations during disasters. The concept car targets environmentally conscious moms, according to Nissan.

    “Japan is at the center of what we do because we are a Japanese company,” Nissan Chief Ivan Espinosa said on the sidelines of the show.

    While in town earlier this week for talks with new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, Trump also met with the heads of Japan’s businesses, including Espinosa. The exchange of ideas was constructive, according to Espinosa.

    Nissan, as well as Toyota, said they were considering importing their own models made in the U.S. back into Japan as a way to mitigate the trade imbalance.

    The Japanese government has promised to buy Fords and invest $550 billion in the U.S.

    Japanese automakers export more than a million autos to the U.S., while selling 4.4 million vehicles a year in Japan. Only about 16,000 American cars were sold in Japan, a tiny fraction of the Japanese auto market. Japanese cars make up about 40% of the American market, according to Cox Automotive, although much of the vehicles sold there are made at U.S. plants.

    Toyota Chief Executive Koji Sato said customers’ tastes differed by markets, and offerings must be tailored to meet various needs.

    “We want to be an important part of the American auto industry with a long-term perspective,” he told a small group of reporters.

    Toyota showed a still-developing tiny collapsible electric bicycle called Land Hopper that Japan’s top automaker suggests should get packed in the upcoming Land Cruiser FJ, the latest version of the hit recreational vehicle that had its beginnings in 1951 as the Toyota BJ.

    A flagship model, Land Cruiser sales have topped 12 million in 190 countries and regions. Targeting Japanese off-roaders, the new Land Cruiser FJ goes on sale in Japan next year — with a 2.7-liter (1-gallon) gasoline engine.

    Japanese exports to the U.S. have risen in recent months as automakers tried to beat the tariffs. The crunch is expected to hit next year.

    “Automakers will look to increase U.S. production where possible and diversify export destinations to other key markets, such as Australia and Canada,” said Darcey Bowling, auto analyst at BMI.

    “We expect that Japan’s vehicle market will face challenges due to the elevated U.S. tariffs.”

    ___

    Yuri Kageyama is on Threads: https://www.threads.com/@yurikageyama

    Source link

  • The biggest car insurance myths, according to experts – MoneySense

    There are several reasons why insurance myths exist, said Steven Harris, licensed insurance broker and LowestRates.ca expert. “(Insurance contracts) are written in legal terms and it doesn’t always translate into everyday language,”  he said. “There can be a little barrier there.” 

    Harris said people also often assume they’ll be covered against various damages or liabilities, but don’t necessarily know or understand exactly what’s in the policy. A lot of people draw upon personal experiences of friends and family and make decisions based on that, he added.

    Here are some of the most common myths.

    Red vehicles cost more to insure

    The most common question Harris said he comes across is whether owning a red car costs more to insure. The reasons underpinning the misconception are broad, including a red car could make you more noticeable to police, the driver could be more prone to speeding or careless driving or that the colour elicits a negative psychological response from other drivers.

    “There is no meaningful data or correlation to your vehicle colour,”  Harris said. “If your car is a vibrant yellow or a hot red, it’s not going to increase the likelihood that you’ll incur a loss in the form of a collision or even a theft.” 

    Instead, insurers often rely on data such as the make and year of the car and the driver’s track record to determine the insurance rate, he said.

    Comprehensive coverage means full coverage

    Comprehensive coverage insures you against non-collision-related damages only, such as fire, theft, hail, or water damage. It may not include collision insurance. Full coverage encompasses both collision and non-collision damages. “If you only have comprehensive coverage, that means you’re missing the collision piece of coverage,” Harris said.

    Compare car insurance quotes and save

    In under five minutes, compare personalized auto insurance quotes from Canada’s top providers.

    Your personal policy covers ride-share driving

    Rideshare apps such as Uber and Lyft offer a master policy to drivers for the duration the car is being used for business, said Anne Marie Thomas, director of consumer and industry relations at the Insurance Bureau Canada. However, drivers need to understand which insurance applies in which situation.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    “If I am just driving to the grocery store with my car, my own personal car insurance kicks in if I get in an accident,” she said. “If I’m a rideshare driver and have activated the app, that’s when the ride-share policy kicks in.”

    Thomas said it’s important to notify your personal auto insurance provider if you’re going to be using your vehicle for business.

    Moving homes doesn’t affect auto insurance rates

    Morgan Roberts, vice-president at RH Insurance, said people often assume moving homes won’t impact their insurance rate, but it does.

    “Even if you move next door and it just happens to change the postal code, it can affect your rates positively or negatively,” she said. That’s because insurance companies rate risk based on territories and postal codes, which could increase or decrease your premiums. 

    Auto insurance will automatically rise when you make a claim

    It depends on the type of claim, according to Harris. If the driver is at fault, the premium would likely go up. If it’s not the driver’s fault, the rate would typically remain unchanged.

    Comprehensive claims, such as fire or hail damage, also don’t affect the insurance cost, he said. “But like anything, you want to be mindful of how many claims you have,” Harris said.

    Parking tickets increase insurance premiums

    Morgan said people assume that since it’s a ticket, it will affect the insurance premium, but it doesn’t. “It’s just an expensive thing to happen because you still have to pay those tickets,” she said.

    Similarly, a speed camera ticket doesn’t affect your insurance rate, but if a police officer pulls over a driver, it will affect the insurance rate, she said.

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • Police chases in Aurora skyrocket after policy change, injuries more than quintuple

    Police chases increased tenfold in the six months after Chief Todd Chamberlain broadened the Aurora Police Department’s policy to allow officers to pursue stolen vehicles and suspected drunk drivers, a move that made Aurora one of the most permissive large police agencies along the Front Range.

    Aurora officers carried out more chases in the six months after the policy change than in the last five years combined, according to data provided by the police department in response to open records requests from The Denver Post.

    The city’s officers conducted 148 pursuits between March 6 — the day after the policy change — and Sept. 2, the data shows. That’s up from just 14 police chases in that same timeframe in 2024, and well above Aurora officers’ 126 chases across five years between 2020 and 2024.

    The number of people injured in pursuits more than quintupled, with about one in five chases resulting in injury after the policy change, the data shows. That 20% injury rate is lower than the rate over the last five years, when the agency saw 25% of pursuits end with injury.


    Chamberlain, who declined to speak with The Post for this story, has heralded the department’s new approach to pursuits as an important tool for curbing crime. Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman believes the change has already had a “dramatic impact” on crime in the city.

    However, the effect of the increased pursuits on overall crime trends is difficult to gauge, with crime generally declining across the state, including in Denver, which has a more restrictive policy and many fewer police pursuits.

    “You throw a big net out there, occasionally you do catch a few big fish,” said Justin Nix, a criminology professor at the University of Nebraska Omaha. “But you also end up with the pursuit policy causing more accidents and injuries.”

    More people died in police chases in this Denver suburb than in the state’s biggest cities

    Impact of Aurora’s pursuits

    Eighty-seven people were arrested across more than 100 pursuits in Aurora between April and August, according to an Oct. 15 report by the independent monitor overseeing court-ordered reforms at the Aurora Police Department.

    Of those 87 arrestees, 67 had a criminal history, 25 were wanted on active warrants, 18 were on probation and seven were on parole, the monitor found.

    “What we find is that people who steal cars, it’s not a joyriding thing, it’s not a one-off, they tend to be career criminals who use these vehicles to commit other crimes,” Coffman said. “There seems to be a pattern that when we do apprehend a car thief, they tend to have warrants out for their arrest, and we do see the pattern of stealing vehicles to commit other crimes. So we are really catching repeat offenders when we apprehend the driver and/or passengers.”

    The soaring number of pursuits was largely driven by stolen vehicle chases, which accounted for 103 of the 148 pursuits since the policy change, the data shows.

    Auto theft in Aurora dropped 42% year-over-year between January and September, continuing a downward trend that began in 2023. In Denver, where officers do not chase stolen vehicles, auto theft has declined 36% so far in 2025 compared to 2024.

    Denver police officers conducted just nine pursuits between March 6 and Sept. 2, and just 16 so far in 2025, data from the department shows. Four suspects and one officer were injured across those 16 chases.

    “I think there are broader societal factors at work,” Nix said of the decline in crime, which has been seen across the nation and follows a dramatic pandemic-era spike. “When something goes up, it is bound to come down pretty drastically.”

    Aurora officers apprehended fleeing drivers in 53% of all pursuits, and in 51% of pursuits for stolen vehicles between March and September, the police data shows.

    Coffman said that shows officers and their supervisors are judiciously calling off pursuits that become too dangerous. He also noted that every pursuit is carefully reviewed by the police chain of command and called the new policy a “work in progress.”

    “I get that it is not without controversy,” Coffman said. “There wouldn’t be the collateral accidents if not for the policy. So it is a tradeoff. It is not an easy decision and it is going to always be in flux.”

    Thirty-three people were injured in Aurora police chases between March 6 and Sept. 2, up from six injured in that time frame last year. Those hurt included 24 suspects, five officers and four drivers in other vehicles.

    One bystander and one suspect were seriously injured, according to the police data.

    The independent monitor noted in its October report that it was “generally pleased” with officers’ judgments during pursuits, supervisors’ actions and the post-pursuit administrative review process, with “two notable exceptions” that have been “elevated for additional review and potential disciplinary action.”

    The monitor also flagged an increase in failed Precision Immobilization Technique, or PIT, maneuvers during pursuits, which it attributed to officer inexperience. The group recommended more training on the maneuvers, which are designed to end pursuits, and renewed its call for the department to install dash cameras in its patrol cars, which the agency has not done.

    “It sounds reasonable,” Coffman said of the dash camera recommendation. “They are not cheap and we need to budget for it.”

    ‘No magic number’

    It’s up to city leadership to determine if the benefits of police chases outweigh the predictable harms, and there is no “magic number,” Nix said.

    “When you chase that much, bad outcomes are going to happen,” he said. “People are going to get hurt, sometimes innocent third parties that have nothing to do with the chase. You know that is going to be a collateral consequence of doing that many chases. So knowing that, you should really be able to point to the community safety benefit that doing this many chases bring.”

    The majority of large Front Range law enforcement agencies limit pursuits to situations in which the driver is suspected of a violent felony or poses an immediate risk of injury or death to others if not quickly apprehended.

    Among 18 law enforcement agencies reviewed by The Post this spring, only Aurora and the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office explicitly allow pursuits of suspected drunk drivers. The sheriff’s office allows such pursuits only if the driver stays under the posted speed limit.

    Aurora officers pursued suspected impaired drivers 13 times between March and September, the data shows, with five chases ending in injury.


    Omar Montgomery, president of the Aurora NAACP, said he is a “cautious neutral” about the policy change, but would like Aurora police to meet with community members to explain the impact in more detail.

    “People in the community do not want people on the streets who are causing harm to other individuals and who are committing crimes that makes our city unsafe,” he said. “We want them off the streets just as bad as anyone else. We also want to make sure that innocent people who are not part of the situation are not getting harmed.”

    Topazz McBride, a community activist in Aurora, said she has been disappointed by what she sees as Chamberlain’s unwillingness to engage with community members who disagree with him.

    “Do I trust them to use the process effectively and responsibly with all fairness and equity to everyone they pursue? No. I do not trust that,” she said. “And I don’t understand why he wouldn’t be willing to talk about it. Why not?”

    Montgomery also wants police to track crashes that happen immediately after a police officer ends a pursuit, when an escaping suspect might still be speeding and driving recklessly.

    “They are still going 80 or 90 mph and they end up hitting someone or running into a building,” he said. “And now you have this person who that has caused harm, believing that they are still being chased.”

    The police department did not include the case of Rajon Belt-Stubblefield, who was shot and killed Aug. 30 by an officer after he sped away from an attempted traffic stop, among its pursuits this year. Video of the incident shows the officer followed Belt-Stubblefield’s vehicle with his lights and sirens on for just under a minute over about 7/10ths of a mile before Belt-Stubblefield crashed.

    Source link

  • New Rules Could Force Tesla to Redesign Its Door Handles. That’s Harder Than It Sounds

    The issues could cascade beyond the design. The auto manufacturing industry operates on strict production schedules. Though it builds in time to validate and test whatever new features come in each new model, the sudden intro of a design change late in the process could throw off the delicate timetable.

    In this decade, China’s auto industry has shocked the world by racing ahead of legacy automakers, quickly developing, with government support, ever newer, cheaper, and more technologically advanced vehicles on shorter production schedules. The country is the world’s largest automotive market; it’s expected to manufacture a full third of the world’s cars by 2030. Still, quickly complying with new design regulations won’t be easy for domestic Chinese automakers either, says Broglin-Peterson. “Mechncial release requires a mechanical assembly,” she says. “It’s not just, you write some code.”

    Automaker’s door handle trouble likely won’t end in China. The new rules could lead to cascading responses from other global regulators. It’s a now-familiar pattern: China, once a place with lax protections, has forged ahead of the rest of the world in setting guidelines for electric vehicle battery safety and recycling, and autonomous vehicle tech. “This is a classic example of China setting the guardrails early: protecting consumers while quietly shaping global design standards,” Bill Russo, the CEO of Automobility, a Shanghai-based advisory firm, wrote in an email.

    A Handle on Design

    For many years, says Raphael Zammit, the chair of the transportation design department at the College for Creative Studies in Detroit, flush electronic door handles were the stuff of futuristic concept cars. “The fact that Elon Musk and Tesla put it into production was, frankly, pretty amazing,” he says. Their rise was linked with the increasing popularity of electric vehicles; tucking door handles into the doors of cars was meant to reduce their drag coefficient, leading to increased battery efficiency. Or so the theory went: Back-of-the-envelope math suggests the tweak maybe adds a mile of range. Maybe. Either way, the handles became a “demarcation of luxury,” Zammit says.

    Indeed, electronic door handles can be found on many luxury vehicles, including some made by Volkswagen, General Motors, Ford, and Mercedes-Benz. Jake Fisher, the senior director of the Consumer Reports’ Auto Test Center, tested several of those vehicles’ electronic handles. While all had emergency mechanical releases, as the Chinese regulations mandate, some were in places that could be difficult to find in an emergency—on the floor, in shadow, or, as in the rear seats of the 2021 Model Y under investigation by NHTSA, under a slot at the bottom of the rear door pocket. The best emergency mechanical releases, Consumer Reports found, were those that simply needed to be pulled a bit harder than usual to open, an intuitive reaction in an emergency.

    Aarian Marshall

    Source link