ReportWire

Tag: Cars

  • Higher Power Garage distributes 9 vehicles to local families

    JOPLIN, Mo. — With tears in her eyes and a wave, Brittney Perrin drove off in her new 2008 Nissan sedan from the parking lot of Higher Power Garage.

    The vehicle was one of nine provided to nine families through the organization’s Barriers to Work Low-Cost Vehicle Program on Wednesday. Higher Power Garage staff watched as one by one the vehicles left the lot.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“(6 D66 9@A6=6DD?6DD 😕 D@ >2?J @7 E96 72>:=:6D H9@ 4@>6 E9C@F89 96C6[” D2:5 |:<6 v:56@?[ AC6D:56?E @7 w:896C !@H6C v2C286] “(6 7:I E96 42CD[ E92E’D H92E H6 5@[ 3FE @FC AFCA@D6 96C6 😀 E@ 6?4@FC286[ E@ @A6? @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C E96D6 72>:=:6D[ E@ AC2J H:E9 E96> 2?5 D9@H E96> D@>63@5J 42C6D] x’> D@ E92?<7F= 7@C E9:D 52J]”k^Am

    kAmw:896C !@H6C v2C286 😀 2 =@H4@DE 2FE@ C6A2:C D9@A[ H@C<:?8 AC:>2C:=J H:E9 72>:=:6D H9@ 2C6 DECF88=:?8] %96 2FE@ C6A2:C >:?:DECJ AC@G:56D =@H4@DE D6CG:46D 7@C C6A2:C H@C<] %96J 2=D@ 92G6 E96 =@H4@DE G69:4=6 >:?:DECJ E92E 96=AD AC@G:56 72>:=:6D H:E9 2 G69:4=6 7@C EC2?DA@CE2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@8C2> AFED 72>:=:6D :?E@ G69:4=6D E92E E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 367@C6 7@C E96 4@DE @7 Sd__] ~?46 E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 AC@8C2> 2?5 >66E BF2=:7:42E:@?D[ E96J 2C6 AFE @? 2 H2:E:?8 =:DE 7@C 2 G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmr=:6?ED 2=D@ E2<6 E9C66 4=2DD6D E9C@F89 E96 AC@8C2> @? 3F586E:?8[ :?DFC2?46 2?5 32D:4 42C >2:?E6?2?46] v:56@? D2:5 E9@D6 4=2DD6D 2C6 :>A@CE2?E] xE’D ?@E ;FDE 23@FE 7:I:?8 E96:C 42CD 3FE 8:G:?8 E96> E96 E@@=D E@ >@G6 7@CH2C5 😕 =:76]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 @? 2G6C286[ E96J DA6?5 S`[d__ A6C G69:4=6 86EE:?8 E96> C625J 7@C E96:C ?6H @H?6CD] %96 G69:4=6D 2C6 AC@G:565 3J 4@>>F?:EJ 5@?@CD[ 2?5 E96 8@2= 😀 E@ 86E E96 G69:4=6 C6=:23=6 7@C 2E =62DE @?6 J62C @7 >2:?E6?2?46]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? 92D 366? H2:E:?8 7@C E9:D 52J 7@C 2 =@?8 E:>6] $96 7:==65 @FE 2? 2AA=:42E:@? EH@ J62CD 28@[ 2?5 23@FE 6G6CJ b_ 52JD D96 A2E:6?E=J 4964<65 😕 23@FE 2 42C]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 D96 C646?E=J 8@E 96C EH@ 49:=5C6? 324< 9@>6 H:E9 96C[ 2?5 E96J ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 2?5 7C@> D49@@= 2?5 E@ 5@4E@C 2AA@:?E>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ ?66565 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 96C ;@3 2E xw~!] $96’D 366? H2=<:?8 23@FE c >:=6D C@F?5 EC:A] }@H H:E9 E96 42C[ D96’D 23=6 E@ AC@G:56 EC2?DA@CE2E:@? 7@C 96CD6=7 2?5 96C 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAm!6CC:? D2:5 E9:D 8:G6D 96C 2 492?46 E@ AC@G:56 2? 6G6CJ52J =:76 H:E9 96C 49:=5C6?[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’== 86E E@ DA6?5 >@C6 E:>6 E@86E96C]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ@?6 96C6 😀 2>2K:?8] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>[” !6CC:? D2:5] “%9:D 😀 8@:?8 E@ 96=A >6 2?5 >J 72>:=J D@ >F49] %9:?8D E92E H6 H6C6?’E 23=6 E@ 5@[ H6 42? 5@ E@86E96C ?@H] x’> D@ 8C2E67F= x H2D 49@D6?]”k^Am

    kAm(65?6D52J H2D 3@E9 2 46=63C2E:@? @7 E96:C 4=:6?ED 2?5 E96 4@>>F?:EJ @C82?:K2E:@?D E92E 92G6 DFAA@CE65 E96 AC@8C2> @G6C E96 J62CD[ v:56@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 A2CE?6CD :?4=F56 &?4@>>@? {:76 r9FC49[ H9:49 92D 366? H:E9 E96 82C286 D:?46 E96 368:??:?8] v:56@? D2:5 E96J’C6 2=D@ 8C2E67F= 7@C 4@?EC:3FE:@?D 7C@> E96 (]#] r@C=6J %CFDE] %9@D6 7F?5D 96=A DFDE2:? E96 82C286 E96 7:CDE D:I >@?E9D :E H2D @A6?] #646?E=J[ (6D 2?5 y2? w@FD6C 82G6 2 8:7E E@ 6DE23=:D9 2? 6?5@H>6?E 7@C E96 >:?:DECJ[ H9:49 v:56@? D2:5 H:== D64FC6 :ED D6CG:46D :?E@ E96 7FEFC6] w6 2=D@ E92?<65 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ] %96 >:?:DECJ 92D H@? 2 8C2?E E9C@F89 E92E @C82?:K2E:@? E9C66 E:>6D[ 2?5 :E 92D AC@G:565 >F49 @7 E96:C D9@A 6BF:A>6?E] x? a_ab[ E96 8C2?E 96=A65 7F?5 E96 q2CC:6CD E@ (@C< AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAmv:56@? D2:5 😕 a_aa[ E96 82C286 AC@G:565 `_ G69:4=6D] %9C@F89 E96 y@A=:? !9:=2?E9C@A:4 $@4:6EJ’D 8C2?ED[ :E 6DE23=:D965 2 AC@>@E:@?2= AC@8C2> E@ 86E >@C6 5@?2E65 G69:4=6D 2?5 H2D 23=6 E@ 5:DEC:3FE6 a_ 42CD] $@ 72C E9:D J62C[ :E 92D 5:DEC:3FE65 bg G69:4=6D H:E9 2?@E96C C@F?5 E@ 8@]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4:E65 8C2?ED E9:D J62C 7C@> $49F36C |:E496== w@>6D 2?5 :>A@CE2?E G69:4=6 5@?2E:@?D 7C@> E96 t4@?@>:4 $64FC:EJ r@CA][ r@>>F?:EJ $FAA@CE $6CG:46D 2?5 >2?J 2C62 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 C62==J 8C2E67F= H6 86E E@ 36 A2CE @7 E96 D@=FE:@? E@ @FC 4=:6?ED’ =:G6D[” v:56@? D2:5] “x’G6 C62==J 366? 3=6DD65 😕 >J =:76] x’G6 2=H2JD 925 EC2?DA@CE2E:@?] (96? x D92C6 E96D6 DE@C:6D[ :E C6D@?2E6D 23@FE 9@H 3=6DD65 x 2>] %@ 36 23=6 E@ 8:G6 324< 😀 D@>6E9:?8 x 42?’E 6IA=2:? 9@H :E 27764ED >6]”k^Am

    kAm~? (65?6D52J[ %C6G@C v2CC6EE 3642>6 E96 @H?6C @7 2 a_`a s@586 r2C2G2?] pD E96 72E96C E@ 7@FC J@F?8 3@JD[ H9@ C2?86 7C@> ` E@ e J62CD @=5[ v2CC6EE D2:5 E96 G69:4=6 H:== 8:G6 9:> :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAm“%96J <66A >6 3FDJ[ E92E’D 7@C DFC6[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “}@E 92G:?8 2 G69:4=6[ :E’D E@F89 E@ 86E E96> E@ 2AA@:?E>6?ED 2?5 D49@@=] x 92G6 A6@A=6 H9@ 2C6 96=A:?8 @FE[ 3FE :E’D 8@:?8 E@ 36 ?:46 E@ 5@ :E @? >J @H?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 G69:4=6 92D =@ED @7 C@@> 2?5 😀 6I24E=J H92E 96 ?66565 7@C 9:D <:5D[ v2CC6EE D2:5] {@@<:?8 2C@F?5 5FC:?8 E96 6G6?E[ 96 D2:5 96 H2D 8C2E67F= E@ D92C6 E96 6I4:E:?8 52J H:E9 6:89E @E96C 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAm“x E92?< v@5 6G6CJ 52J[” v2CC6EE D2:5] “%96 A6@A=6 2E w:896C !@H6C v2C286 2C6 2H6D@>6[ 2?5 x’> D@ 8C2E67F= E@ E96>] |J DA:C:EF2= ;@FC?6J 86EE:?8 4@??64E65 E@ v@5 92D 366? 2 362FE:7F= @?6[ 2?5 E96J’G6 366? 2 3:8 96=A] xE’D 8@@5 E@ D66 A6@A=6 @? E96 D2>6 A2E9]”k^Am

    By Roger Nomer | rnomer@joplinglobe.com

    Source link

  • Tokyo auto show highlights technology but Trump’s tariffs loom large

    TOKYO — The Tokyo Mobility Show is highlighting more than just cars or the types of fuel they use from electric to hydrogen, but also various kinds of futuristic transport.

    Think scuttling robotic chairs, like the Uni-One from Honda Motor Co. The Tokyo-based maker of the Accord sedan says it is all about personal mobility as a mode for quick transport by 2035. Just sit on the boxlike machine as it zips around quietly.

    Toyota Motor Corp. showed a helicopter-like aircraft with six propellers, which was still in development in cooperation with U.S. aviation company Joby.

    Such gadgetry, as well as more regular vehicles, are on display at the show, which runs through Nov. 9 at Tokyo Big Sight exhibition space. It was previewed to media Wednesday, ahead of its opening to the public Thursday.

    Looming in the backdrop of the fanfare is the threat of auto tariffs under U.S. President Donald Trump, raised to 15% from 2.5%, although an improvement from the 25% he slapped on initially.

    Trump’s tariffs are expected to erase more than 2 trillion yen ($13 billion) off automakers’ annual operating profits, according to calculations from recent earnings.

    Masahiro Moro, chief executive of Mazda Motor Corp., among the worst hit of the Japanese automakers, said his engineers were developing cars that understood drivers’ emotions, as well as those that contribute to sustainability by reducing carbon emissions the more you drove.

    “We believe the joy of driving has the power to shape the future,” he told reporters.

    Nissan Motor Corp. showed a prototype, or experimental model, of its Sakura electric car, fitted with a solar-system roof that slides out at the top, called “Ao-Solar Extender,” to generate power while the car is parked. The word “ao” means “blue” in Japanese.

    Nissan said the model’s message is about adding value to one’s life, as the generated power can be used for other gadgets around the house as well as work as power stations during disasters. The concept car targets environmentally conscious moms, according to Nissan.

    “Japan is at the center of what we do because we are a Japanese company,” Nissan Chief Ivan Espinosa said on the sidelines of the show.

    While in town earlier this week for talks with new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, Trump also met with the heads of Japan’s businesses, including Espinosa. The exchange of ideas was constructive, according to Espinosa.

    Nissan, as well as Toyota, said they were considering importing their own models made in the U.S. back into Japan as a way to mitigate the trade imbalance.

    The Japanese government has promised to buy Fords and invest $550 billion in the U.S.

    Japanese automakers export more than a million autos to the U.S., while selling 4.4 million vehicles a year in Japan. Only about 16,000 American cars were sold in Japan, a tiny fraction of the Japanese auto market. Japanese cars make up about 40% of the American market, according to Cox Automotive, although much of the vehicles sold there are made at U.S. plants.

    Toyota Chief Executive Koji Sato said customers’ tastes differed by markets, and offerings must be tailored to meet various needs.

    “We want to be an important part of the American auto industry with a long-term perspective,” he told a small group of reporters.

    Toyota showed a still-developing tiny collapsible electric bicycle called Land Hopper that Japan’s top automaker suggests should get packed in the upcoming Land Cruiser FJ, the latest version of the hit recreational vehicle that had its beginnings in 1951 as the Toyota BJ.

    A flagship model, Land Cruiser sales have topped 12 million in 190 countries and regions. Targeting Japanese off-roaders, the new Land Cruiser FJ goes on sale in Japan next year — with a 2.7-liter (1-gallon) gasoline engine.

    Japanese exports to the U.S. have risen in recent months as automakers tried to beat the tariffs. The crunch is expected to hit next year.

    “Automakers will look to increase U.S. production where possible and diversify export destinations to other key markets, such as Australia and Canada,” said Darcey Bowling, auto analyst at BMI.

    “We expect that Japan’s vehicle market will face challenges due to the elevated U.S. tariffs.”

    ___

    Yuri Kageyama is on Threads: https://www.threads.com/@yurikageyama

    Source link

  • The biggest car insurance myths, according to experts – MoneySense

    There are several reasons why insurance myths exist, said Steven Harris, licensed insurance broker and LowestRates.ca expert. “(Insurance contracts) are written in legal terms and it doesn’t always translate into everyday language,”  he said. “There can be a little barrier there.” 

    Harris said people also often assume they’ll be covered against various damages or liabilities, but don’t necessarily know or understand exactly what’s in the policy. A lot of people draw upon personal experiences of friends and family and make decisions based on that, he added.

    Here are some of the most common myths.

    Red vehicles cost more to insure

    The most common question Harris said he comes across is whether owning a red car costs more to insure. The reasons underpinning the misconception are broad, including a red car could make you more noticeable to police, the driver could be more prone to speeding or careless driving or that the colour elicits a negative psychological response from other drivers.

    “There is no meaningful data or correlation to your vehicle colour,”  Harris said. “If your car is a vibrant yellow or a hot red, it’s not going to increase the likelihood that you’ll incur a loss in the form of a collision or even a theft.” 

    Instead, insurers often rely on data such as the make and year of the car and the driver’s track record to determine the insurance rate, he said.

    Comprehensive coverage means full coverage

    Comprehensive coverage insures you against non-collision-related damages only, such as fire, theft, hail, or water damage. It may not include collision insurance. Full coverage encompasses both collision and non-collision damages. “If you only have comprehensive coverage, that means you’re missing the collision piece of coverage,” Harris said.

    Compare car insurance quotes and save

    In under five minutes, compare personalized auto insurance quotes from Canada’s top providers.

    Your personal policy covers ride-share driving

    Rideshare apps such as Uber and Lyft offer a master policy to drivers for the duration the car is being used for business, said Anne Marie Thomas, director of consumer and industry relations at the Insurance Bureau Canada. However, drivers need to understand which insurance applies in which situation.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    “If I am just driving to the grocery store with my car, my own personal car insurance kicks in if I get in an accident,” she said. “If I’m a rideshare driver and have activated the app, that’s when the ride-share policy kicks in.”

    Thomas said it’s important to notify your personal auto insurance provider if you’re going to be using your vehicle for business.

    Moving homes doesn’t affect auto insurance rates

    Morgan Roberts, vice-president at RH Insurance, said people often assume moving homes won’t impact their insurance rate, but it does.

    “Even if you move next door and it just happens to change the postal code, it can affect your rates positively or negatively,” she said. That’s because insurance companies rate risk based on territories and postal codes, which could increase or decrease your premiums. 

    Auto insurance will automatically rise when you make a claim

    It depends on the type of claim, according to Harris. If the driver is at fault, the premium would likely go up. If it’s not the driver’s fault, the rate would typically remain unchanged.

    Comprehensive claims, such as fire or hail damage, also don’t affect the insurance cost, he said. “But like anything, you want to be mindful of how many claims you have,” Harris said.

    Parking tickets increase insurance premiums

    Morgan said people assume that since it’s a ticket, it will affect the insurance premium, but it doesn’t. “It’s just an expensive thing to happen because you still have to pay those tickets,” she said.

    Similarly, a speed camera ticket doesn’t affect your insurance rate, but if a police officer pulls over a driver, it will affect the insurance rate, she said.

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • Police chases in Aurora skyrocket after policy change, injuries more than quintuple

    Police chases increased tenfold in the six months after Chief Todd Chamberlain broadened the Aurora Police Department’s policy to allow officers to pursue stolen vehicles and suspected drunk drivers, a move that made Aurora one of the most permissive large police agencies along the Front Range.

    Aurora officers carried out more chases in the six months after the policy change than in the last five years combined, according to data provided by the police department in response to open records requests from The Denver Post.

    The city’s officers conducted 148 pursuits between March 6 — the day after the policy change — and Sept. 2, the data shows. That’s up from just 14 police chases in that same timeframe in 2024, and well above Aurora officers’ 126 chases across five years between 2020 and 2024.

    The number of people injured in pursuits more than quintupled, with about one in five chases resulting in injury after the policy change, the data shows. That 20% injury rate is lower than the rate over the last five years, when the agency saw 25% of pursuits end with injury.


    Chamberlain, who declined to speak with The Post for this story, has heralded the department’s new approach to pursuits as an important tool for curbing crime. Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman believes the change has already had a “dramatic impact” on crime in the city.

    However, the effect of the increased pursuits on overall crime trends is difficult to gauge, with crime generally declining across the state, including in Denver, which has a more restrictive policy and many fewer police pursuits.

    “You throw a big net out there, occasionally you do catch a few big fish,” said Justin Nix, a criminology professor at the University of Nebraska Omaha. “But you also end up with the pursuit policy causing more accidents and injuries.”

    More people died in police chases in this Denver suburb than in the state’s biggest cities

    Impact of Aurora’s pursuits

    Eighty-seven people were arrested across more than 100 pursuits in Aurora between April and August, according to an Oct. 15 report by the independent monitor overseeing court-ordered reforms at the Aurora Police Department.

    Of those 87 arrestees, 67 had a criminal history, 25 were wanted on active warrants, 18 were on probation and seven were on parole, the monitor found.

    “What we find is that people who steal cars, it’s not a joyriding thing, it’s not a one-off, they tend to be career criminals who use these vehicles to commit other crimes,” Coffman said. “There seems to be a pattern that when we do apprehend a car thief, they tend to have warrants out for their arrest, and we do see the pattern of stealing vehicles to commit other crimes. So we are really catching repeat offenders when we apprehend the driver and/or passengers.”

    The soaring number of pursuits was largely driven by stolen vehicle chases, which accounted for 103 of the 148 pursuits since the policy change, the data shows.

    Auto theft in Aurora dropped 42% year-over-year between January and September, continuing a downward trend that began in 2023. In Denver, where officers do not chase stolen vehicles, auto theft has declined 36% so far in 2025 compared to 2024.

    Denver police officers conducted just nine pursuits between March 6 and Sept. 2, and just 16 so far in 2025, data from the department shows. Four suspects and one officer were injured across those 16 chases.

    “I think there are broader societal factors at work,” Nix said of the decline in crime, which has been seen across the nation and follows a dramatic pandemic-era spike. “When something goes up, it is bound to come down pretty drastically.”

    Aurora officers apprehended fleeing drivers in 53% of all pursuits, and in 51% of pursuits for stolen vehicles between March and September, the police data shows.

    Coffman said that shows officers and their supervisors are judiciously calling off pursuits that become too dangerous. He also noted that every pursuit is carefully reviewed by the police chain of command and called the new policy a “work in progress.”

    “I get that it is not without controversy,” Coffman said. “There wouldn’t be the collateral accidents if not for the policy. So it is a tradeoff. It is not an easy decision and it is going to always be in flux.”

    Thirty-three people were injured in Aurora police chases between March 6 and Sept. 2, up from six injured in that time frame last year. Those hurt included 24 suspects, five officers and four drivers in other vehicles.

    One bystander and one suspect were seriously injured, according to the police data.

    The independent monitor noted in its October report that it was “generally pleased” with officers’ judgments during pursuits, supervisors’ actions and the post-pursuit administrative review process, with “two notable exceptions” that have been “elevated for additional review and potential disciplinary action.”

    The monitor also flagged an increase in failed Precision Immobilization Technique, or PIT, maneuvers during pursuits, which it attributed to officer inexperience. The group recommended more training on the maneuvers, which are designed to end pursuits, and renewed its call for the department to install dash cameras in its patrol cars, which the agency has not done.

    “It sounds reasonable,” Coffman said of the dash camera recommendation. “They are not cheap and we need to budget for it.”

    ‘No magic number’

    It’s up to city leadership to determine if the benefits of police chases outweigh the predictable harms, and there is no “magic number,” Nix said.

    “When you chase that much, bad outcomes are going to happen,” he said. “People are going to get hurt, sometimes innocent third parties that have nothing to do with the chase. You know that is going to be a collateral consequence of doing that many chases. So knowing that, you should really be able to point to the community safety benefit that doing this many chases bring.”

    The majority of large Front Range law enforcement agencies limit pursuits to situations in which the driver is suspected of a violent felony or poses an immediate risk of injury or death to others if not quickly apprehended.

    Among 18 law enforcement agencies reviewed by The Post this spring, only Aurora and the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office explicitly allow pursuits of suspected drunk drivers. The sheriff’s office allows such pursuits only if the driver stays under the posted speed limit.

    Aurora officers pursued suspected impaired drivers 13 times between March and September, the data shows, with five chases ending in injury.


    Omar Montgomery, president of the Aurora NAACP, said he is a “cautious neutral” about the policy change, but would like Aurora police to meet with community members to explain the impact in more detail.

    “People in the community do not want people on the streets who are causing harm to other individuals and who are committing crimes that makes our city unsafe,” he said. “We want them off the streets just as bad as anyone else. We also want to make sure that innocent people who are not part of the situation are not getting harmed.”

    Topazz McBride, a community activist in Aurora, said she has been disappointed by what she sees as Chamberlain’s unwillingness to engage with community members who disagree with him.

    “Do I trust them to use the process effectively and responsibly with all fairness and equity to everyone they pursue? No. I do not trust that,” she said. “And I don’t understand why he wouldn’t be willing to talk about it. Why not?”

    Montgomery also wants police to track crashes that happen immediately after a police officer ends a pursuit, when an escaping suspect might still be speeding and driving recklessly.

    “They are still going 80 or 90 mph and they end up hitting someone or running into a building,” he said. “And now you have this person who that has caused harm, believing that they are still being chased.”

    The police department did not include the case of Rajon Belt-Stubblefield, who was shot and killed Aug. 30 by an officer after he sped away from an attempted traffic stop, among its pursuits this year. Video of the incident shows the officer followed Belt-Stubblefield’s vehicle with his lights and sirens on for just under a minute over about 7/10ths of a mile before Belt-Stubblefield crashed.

    Source link

  • New Rules Could Force Tesla to Redesign Its Door Handles. That’s Harder Than It Sounds

    The issues could cascade beyond the design. The auto manufacturing industry operates on strict production schedules. Though it builds in time to validate and test whatever new features come in each new model, the sudden intro of a design change late in the process could throw off the delicate timetable.

    In this decade, China’s auto industry has shocked the world by racing ahead of legacy automakers, quickly developing, with government support, ever newer, cheaper, and more technologically advanced vehicles on shorter production schedules. The country is the world’s largest automotive market; it’s expected to manufacture a full third of the world’s cars by 2030. Still, quickly complying with new design regulations won’t be easy for domestic Chinese automakers either, says Broglin-Peterson. “Mechncial release requires a mechanical assembly,” she says. “It’s not just, you write some code.”

    Automaker’s door handle trouble likely won’t end in China. The new rules could lead to cascading responses from other global regulators. It’s a now-familiar pattern: China, once a place with lax protections, has forged ahead of the rest of the world in setting guidelines for electric vehicle battery safety and recycling, and autonomous vehicle tech. “This is a classic example of China setting the guardrails early: protecting consumers while quietly shaping global design standards,” Bill Russo, the CEO of Automobility, a Shanghai-based advisory firm, wrote in an email.

    A Handle on Design

    For many years, says Raphael Zammit, the chair of the transportation design department at the College for Creative Studies in Detroit, flush electronic door handles were the stuff of futuristic concept cars. “The fact that Elon Musk and Tesla put it into production was, frankly, pretty amazing,” he says. Their rise was linked with the increasing popularity of electric vehicles; tucking door handles into the doors of cars was meant to reduce their drag coefficient, leading to increased battery efficiency. Or so the theory went: Back-of-the-envelope math suggests the tweak maybe adds a mile of range. Maybe. Either way, the handles became a “demarcation of luxury,” Zammit says.

    Indeed, electronic door handles can be found on many luxury vehicles, including some made by Volkswagen, General Motors, Ford, and Mercedes-Benz. Jake Fisher, the senior director of the Consumer Reports’ Auto Test Center, tested several of those vehicles’ electronic handles. While all had emergency mechanical releases, as the Chinese regulations mandate, some were in places that could be difficult to find in an emergency—on the floor, in shadow, or, as in the rear seats of the 2021 Model Y under investigation by NHTSA, under a slot at the bottom of the rear door pocket. The best emergency mechanical releases, Consumer Reports found, were those that simply needed to be pulled a bit harder than usual to open, an intuitive reaction in an emergency.

    Aarian Marshall

    Source link

  • Birds Hate Your Car: The Real Reason Your Ride Keeps Getting Dumped On

    If you’ve ever stood in your driveway, hose in hand, looking up at the sky like you just lost a duel with Mother Nature, this one’s for you.

    Turns out, there’s actual science behind why birds keep turning your car into a Jackson Pollock painting. And no, it’s not bad luck. It’s not karma. It’s color.

    Austin Zidar

    Looks like Screamin’ Scott went home and got his shine box.


    The Myth of the “Dirt-Hiding” Brown Car

    Somewhere along the line, people started believing that brown cars hide dirt better. You know, because brown is the color of dirt. Logical enough, right?

    A new report found that brown vehicles are actually the #1 target for bird droppings. That’s right — the color you picked to disguise grime is basically a neon sign to every pigeon and seagull within a three-mile radius that says, “Empty tank up top! Let ’er rip!”

    After brown, red and black vehicles are next on the avian hit list. Meanwhile, white and silver cars — the ones we thought would show every speck of dust — are the least likely to get bombed.

    So, while you’re out there trying to outsmart biology with a color swatch, the robins are up there running a literal airstrike.


    Birds See the World Differently — and You’re Losing

    Here’s where it gets nerdy: birds can detect ultraviolet light and have color vision that makes our 4K TVs look like Etch A Sketches. To them, dark colors like brown, black, and red pop off the landscape. They’re vivid, shiny, and reflective — kind of like the avian equivalent of a bathroom mirror selfie.

    That shine is a big problem. When certain birds — especially the territorial kind — see their reflection on your car, they think it’s a rival. And what do they do when they see a rival?

    Not with beaks and claws. With their digestive system.

    This explains why you sometimes find a whole constellation of splats in the exact same spot, like the bird just kept coming back to settle the score. It wasn’t random; it was personal.


    The Brands Taking the Most Fire

    If you’re a Ram owner, congrats — you’re number one on the “poop magnet” leaderboard. Whether it’s the height, the surface area, or just an aura of “I can take it,” the birds seem to love your truck.

    Coming in hot behind Ram are Jeep and Chevrolet, followed by Nissan, Dodge, Kia, Tesla, Audi, Ford, and Subaru.

    Now, before you assume birds are anti-domestic or prejudiced against off-roaders, remember: they’re mostly reacting to color and reflection. But it is interesting that Tesla made the list — apparently, autopilot can’t dodge that.


    The $500 Question

    You might laugh this off — until you realize bird poop isn’t just gross; it’s expensive.

    The study found that 24% of Americans spend more than $500 a year dealing with the fallout (or fallout splatter) from birds. That includes car washes, paint repair, and the occasional existential crisis.

    And if you drive a Tesla or BMW, it’s worse — those owners spend the most keeping their cars clean. Because nothing screams “status symbol” like pulling into the valet lane covered in biological warfare from above.


    Why They Always Wait Until You Wash It

    We’ve all been there. You finally detail your ride, maybe even throw in a wax job, and then — within 30 minutes — splat. Right in the middle of the hood.

    That’s not coincidence.

    Researchers say the shiny finish acts like a mirror, which birds interpret as another bird trying to take their territory or steal their mate. So technically, your freshly cleaned car isn’t attracting poop because it’s clean — it’s attracting it because it’s sexy.

    Congratulations. Your ride is hot enough to start a bird feud.


    How to Fight Back

    While you can’t exactly reason with a blue jay, there are a few things you can do to improve your odds:

    • Avoid parking under trees, power lines, or light poles. You’re basically pulling into the avian highway rest stop.
    • Get a car cover. Not glamorous, but effective — like a poncho for your ride.
    • Choose lighter paint colors. White, silver, or beige cars statistically take less damage.
    • Skip the high-gloss finish. Birds love a good reflection; don’t give them one.

    And maybe — just maybe — stop believing that “brown hides dirt.” It doesn’t. It hides nothing. It’s basically a “poop me” sign on wheels.


    The Bottom Line

    Birds are chaotic little geniuses with better eyesight than we’ll ever have, and they’re out there making aesthetic choices we can’t comprehend.

    So the next time you step outside and find your car freshly redecorated, don’t take it personally. Take it scientifically.

    They weren’t targeting you.

    Just your taste in color.

    Jim O&#8217;Brien

    Source link

  • The Corvette E-Ray Is Dynamically Up There With the Best

    A 1.9-kWh lithium-ion battery has been packaged within the car’s already beefy central tunnel, and additional cooling has been added to manage battery temperature. There’s also new software to harmonize all the components.

    The hybrid adds 160 bhp for a total system power output of 645 bhp, which is almost identical to the amount produced by the thunderous ZO6. On top of that, the more overtly aero-oriented comp-inspired car also donates its wide-body look, the previously optional carbon-ceramic brakes are standard, and the tires epically chunky: 275/30ZR-20s at the front, 345/25ZR-21s at the rear. (Specially developed all-season Michelin Pilot Sports are available.)

    Riotous Design

    We’re not sure the car’s visuals are quite equal to the ambition being exercised elsewhere, though. The Corvette’s design trajectory since its 1953 launch is instructive of American automotive design overall, the ’60s C2 Sting Ray and ’80s C4 iterations culturally relative high-points. The latest car is an incoherent riot of competing angles and edges, undeniably dramatic and a crowd-pleaser to judge by the reaction it generates during WIRED’s drive. But still no oil painting.

    Courtesy of Corvette

    It’s unrepentantly expressive inside, too. It’s easy to get in and out of, the doors opening wide, the seats more luxurious in feel and amply cushioned compared to its more minimalist rivals. The steering wheel is one of those fashionably square items, its spars oddly downcast. But the driving position is good, the view ahead helped by fairly slender A pillars. A rear-view camera mirror helps ease reversing anxiety, usually a tricky thing in a mid-engined car.

    Multi-configurable instrument dials lie straight ahead, there’s a crisp Head-Up Display, and an angled touchscreen handles the infotainment. Then there’s that swooping central tunnel, the leading edge of which houses the switchgear that operates the climate control and various other functions. Fearing total ergonomic catastrophe, it’s a surprise to discover that it all actually works well in practice.

    Electric Stealth

    Given that the Corvette’s V-8 is totemic, the E-Ray’s principal hybrid party trick is its “stealth” mode, which does what it says: enables the car to exit your street under near-silent electric-only propulsion. Its range in this mode is barely a few miles, but still, this is briefly an electric, front-drive Corvette. What a novelty.

    Corvette ERay 2026 Review Price Specs Availability

    Courtesy of Corvette

    Jason Barlow

    Source link

  • Ferrari Reveals Its Electric Powerhouse, and What Could Finally Be Real EV Sound

    Palermo says the sound can be reduced when cruising, then amplified during more dynamic driving. Allegedly, it’s even possible to sense when a rear wheel breaks traction, since the rise in revs of that motor would be detected by the accelerometer. He also says how latency—the time between a change in motor revs and the sound reaching the driver’s ear—is “below the threshold of human perception… instantaneous.”

    The sound will also adjust depending on how the driver engages with the steering wheel paddles for regenerative braking and the Torque Shift Engagement system. But, for now, Ferrari refuses to comment on exactly how motor sound is broadcast in the cabin—be it through the car’s sound system, or some other means—and how external sound will be created. Underscoring Ferrari’s commitment to using an authentic drivetrain sound, Palermo adds: “It’s an instrument, not a ringtone.”

    Individually Controlled Wheels

    Remarkably, for a company whose cars are synonymous with theatrical histrionics, Ferrari says during normal driving “silence is preferred to maximize acoustic comfort.” To that end, it has worked hard to illuminate noise, vibration, and harshness (known in the industry as NVH), since there’s no longer a loud engine to drown it all out.

    The Elettrica’s suspension is an evolution of the active system used by Ferrari’s Purosangue SUV and F80 hypercar, which employs 48-volt motors to apply torque to each shock absorber, actively working to eliminate pitch and roll.

    As with other electric cars, a heavy battery pack in the floor helps to lower the center of gravity; in this case, by 80 mm compared to an equivalent non-EV. Although it can’t defy physics, Ferrari claims its suspension trickery and quad-motor setup makes the Elettrica handle as if it were almost 1,000 lbs lighter.

    The result is a car where each wheel has its own individually controlled power, braking, suspension, and steering—with the rear wheels even able to be steered independently of each other, by up to 2.15 degrees in either direction. Each of the four motors can also operate their own regenerative braking, with up to 0.68G of deceleration possible with the most aggressive level of regen. That’s more than half the braking force experienced during an emergency stop in a regular car.

    Alistair Charlton

    Source link

  • Why Are Car Software Updates Still So Bad?

    Despite years of effort and the outlay of billions of dollars, none of the world’s automakers have yet to match Tesla’s prowess in delivering over-the-air (OTA) software updates. Just like with your phone and laptop, these operating system refreshes allow owners to upgrade their cars remotely.

    Tesla introduced OTAs in 2012, but now Elon Musk’s company pumps out these updates like no other automaker. “Tesla once issued 42 updates within six months,” Jean-Marie Lapeyre, Capgemini’s CTO for automotive, tells WIRED. But for many other automakers, says Lapeyre, OTAs ship “maybe once a year.”

    For traditional car companies, software remains, or has been until very recently, merely one bolt-on component among many. In contrast, for Tesla and other digital-native automakers—among them Rivian, Lucid, Polestar, and Chinese brands such as BYD, Xpeng, and Xiaomi—it’s almost the whole shebang.

    Interestingly, GM was actually the first automaker to introduce OTA functionality, two years ahead of Tesla, but it was limited to the OnStar telematics system. OTAs from traditional automakers often add just infotainment tweaks, while OTAs from the digital-first brands can be shape-shifters, increasing range and boosting speed. They often also gift features from the puerile to the genuinely performative: fart noises on demand from Tesla, plusher suspension for Rivian owners, and car unlocking by phone from Polestar.

    Cars have had onboard microprocessors since the 1970s, but until relatively recently traditional automakers made their cars with software designed to remain largely unchanged throughout a vehicle’s 20-year lifespan. Since 2021, the complexity of the latest vehicle software platforms has increased by about 40 percent per year, estimates McKinsey. There are now 69 million OTA-capable vehicles in the US, reckons S&P Global.

    Such software-defined vehicles, or SDVs, would boost car sales, automakers hoped. According to two scorecards measuring SDV progress, Tesla leads the pack. Gartner’s Digital Automaker Index for 2025 places Chinese EV manufacturers Nio and Xiaomi in second and third positions, respectively. Wards Intelligence agrees these are the three to beat. On the other end of the scale, and similar to the Wards analysis, Nissan, Toyota, Mazda, and Jaguar Land Rover wallow at the bottom.

    Saving and Selling

    Done right, OTAs not only freshen a car’s user experience, they can also slash the cost of recalls for automakers. More than 13 million vehicles were recalled in 2024 due to software-related issues, a 35 percent increase over the prior year. Before OTAs, the average cost of an auto recall was about $500 per vehicle. OTAs may be delivered wirelessly, but they are not cost-free, either for the environment or for automakers—Harman Automotive, a supplier of OTA software, estimates that it costs an automaker $66.50 per vehicle to deliver a 1 GB update.

    But it’s usually only the digital natives sending out huge update files, because generally only they are capable of firmware over-the-air (FOTA) updates. These can update powertrains, battery management, and braking systems. FOTA capabilities require cars—usually EVs—to have good, persistent connectivity and significant computing power, much of it left latent for future updates. Lucid’s Gravity electric SUV, for instance, is equipped with the latest Nvidia Orin-X processor, with 512 GB of onboard storage, yet the vehicle’s OS fits on just 100 GB, leaving oodles of room for later OTA refreshes.

    As Western car company revenues fall, automakers are looking to make money from OTA-enabled subscriptions. Give Tesla $2,000 and, with the optional Acceleration Boost, your EV can be unlocked over-the-air to become a tire squeal quicker off the mark. For another $10 a month, Tesla’s “premium connectivity” package adds streaming data, live sentry cams, and other goodies. Want what critics claim is the misleadingly named Full Self Driving (FSD) Supervised feature? It’s yours for an additional $99 a month.

    Carlton Reid

    Source link

  • Tesla reports surprise increase in sales in third quarter

    NEW YORK — Tesla reported a surprise increase in sales in the third quarter as the electric car maker likely benefited from a rush by consumers to take advantage of a $7,500 credit before it expired on Sept. 30.

    The company reported Thursday that sales in the three months through September rose 7% compared to the same period a year ago. The gain follows two quarters of steep declines as people turned off by CEO Elon Musk’s foray into right-wing politics avoided buying his company’s cars and even protested at some dealerships.

    Sales rose to 497,099 vehicles, compared with with 462,890 in the same period last year. Analysts expected sales to fall slightly to 456,000, even with a boost from customers seeking to use the electric vehicle incentive.

    Tesla stock rose nearly 2% to $468.52 in early morning trading on the news.

    Investors have been optimistic about the company in recent weeks, sending the stock up 34% in September alone. They are betting Musk’s planned new cheaper version of his bestselling Model Y will recharge sales. He had promised that car earlier this year. Now the launch is expected in the current quarter or early next year.

    The rise in the stock also reflects Musk success in shifting attention away from car sales to other aspects of the business — the rollout of its driverless robotaxi service planned for several cities and its Optimus robots for factory work and household chores.

    The 7% rise for the third quarter compares with a 13% plunge in the first quarter when Musk led President Donald Trump’s government cost-cutting efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency. In the following three months through June, sales fell again 13%.

    The backlash in Europe against Musk had been also been fierce with sales plunging 40% in more than two dozen countries after he publicly supported far-right politicians there.

    Tesla reports third-quarter earnings later this month. Profits for the previous quarter fell 16% as the company continued to lose market share to European EV makers and the fast-growing Chinese rivals, such as BYD.

    Source link

  • Stellantis Data Breach Affects Millions of Car Buyers: Report | Entrepreneur

    A major automaker just experienced a data breach that could affect tens of millions of customers.

    Stellantis, the carmaker behind Jeep, Fiat, Chrysler, and Dodge, stated on Sunday in a press release that it “recently” uncovered “unauthorized access” to a third-party service platform part of its customer service operations in North America.

    “We are also notifying the appropriate authorities and directly informing affected customers,” Stellantis wrote in the press release. The release notes that while contact information was exposed, financial information was not. The statement did not specify the types of contact information affected.

    Related: Jaguar Land Rover Shuts Down Production After Cyberattack, Costing the Company More than a Billion So Far

    Stellantis, which was created in 2021 following the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group, is the world’s fifth-largest automaker by sales volume.

    The car company did not reveal the number of people impacted by the breach. However, the ShinyHunters cybercriminal group claimed responsibility for the attack and told tech site BleepingComputer on Monday that it had stolen more than 18 million Salesforce records from Stellantis, including names and contact information.

    A 2025 Stellantis Jeep Wrangler, a 2025 Stellantis Ram 1500, and a 2025 Stellantis Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Photographer: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    ShinyHunters has been going after high-profile Salesforce customers since the beginning of the year by using voice phishing attacks to steal data. Google confirmed in June that ShinyHunters was responsible for a data breach affecting one of its own Salesforce databases that contained information about small and medium-sized businesses.

    Related: ‘Largest Data Breach in History’: Apple, Google, and Meta Passwords Reportedly Among 16 Billion Stolen in Massive Hack

    Louis Vuitton and insurance company Allianz Life also experienced data breaches in July that were linked to the ShinyHunters group.

    According to the National CIO Review, ShinyHunters employs a consistent attack strategy: Someone calls a company employee pretending to be IT support and has them download an app, which grants the attacker access to customer data. The attacker then steals information like names, emails, and phone numbers, and demands ransom payments from the company to stop the publication of the data.

    ShinyHunters told BleepingComputer that it had stolen over 1.5 billion Salesforce records from 760 companies in total so far.

    A major automaker just experienced a data breach that could affect tens of millions of customers.

    Stellantis, the carmaker behind Jeep, Fiat, Chrysler, and Dodge, stated on Sunday in a press release that it “recently” uncovered “unauthorized access” to a third-party service platform part of its customer service operations in North America.

    “We are also notifying the appropriate authorities and directly informing affected customers,” Stellantis wrote in the press release. The release notes that while contact information was exposed, financial information was not. The statement did not specify the types of contact information affected.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    Sherin Shibu

    Source link

  • How to Clean a Kid’s Car Seat the Right Way

    Car seats are there for a lot: every traffic-induced meltdown, every spilled juice box, every road trip nap. Most importantly, they save lives. But while it’s tempting to treat them like any other piece of kid gear when messes strike, they’re not just another item you can toss in the wash. They’re precision-built safety devices, and one misstep can compromise the parts designed to protect your child.

    This guide walks you through how to properly clean a car seat, what not to do, and when to call a professional so your child stays protected, no matter how messy the ride gets.

    For more, check out our guides to the Best Car Vacuums, Best Hand Vacuums, and Best Eco-Friendly Cleaning Products. For specific baby gear recommendations, check out our guides to the Best Baby Monitors, Best Breast Pumps, Best Strollers, Best Travel Strollers, Best Bassinets, and Best Baby Carriers.

    Jump to Section

    Why Proper Car Seat Cleaning Matters

    A quick toss in the washing machine may seem harmless, but it can ruin a car seat: “It could degrade the harness webbing itself, so it could weaken it,” says Kyndra Webb, a child passenger safety technician instructor and member of the National Child Passenger Safety Board. A harness is the only thing between your child and physics in a car crash.

    Aggressive cleaning or machine washing can also shrink or distort covers, or strip away protective coatings. “A lot of them have fire retardants,” Webb says. “The more you wash it, the more you degrade some of that safety quality.”

    Even perfect cleaning techniques can be undermined by one deceptively difficult step—putting everything back together. “The biggest thing that I have seen when families come for a car seat check after they’ve washed it, especially if they bought their car seat used, is they’re not assembling it correctly again,” Webb says. A car seat may look pristine and even be properly installed, but if the harness is routed wrong or the clips aren’t in place, it’s not doing its job.

    That said, the stakes are too high to wing it. By sticking to the script of proper cleaning guidelines and manufacturer instructions, your seat can be both sanitary and road-trip ready.

    How to Find a Car Seat Manual

    Before you even think about reaching for those cleaning supplies, break out your car seat’s manual. If you can’t find the booklet that came with the seat, you can likely find it online: Visit your car seat manufacturer’s website, search for your specific model, and look out for links labeled “Manual,” “Instructions,” or “Support.”

    The cleaning guidelines are then usually found in a dedicated section of the manual. “Some car seats even have QR codes now, so you can scan the code to bring you right to their website’s FAQs and their help,” Webb says. “Sometimes it’ll even bring you to their YouTube channel.”

    If all else fails, contact customer service. “A lot of the manufacturers have child passenger safety technicians on staff,” Webb says. “They know their car seats, they know their products.” They’re the experts who can provide specific guidance for your model.

    Nicole Kinning

    Source link

  • The Concept C Is the All-Electric Sports Car Kickstarting Audi’s Design Future

    Car companies love a mission statement. With the arrival of the Concept C, Audi’s new one is crystal clear: “radical simplicity”. An all-electric two-seater with a retractable folding hard-top, the Concept C is a “progressive interpretation” of the company’s legacy, says Audi—and it’s not hard to see the TT has factored pretty heavily in that.

    But as you pick your way through the messaging—key words here are precision and clarity, as well as a re-emphasis on our old friend, “Vorsprung durch Technik”—this feels like a substantial reset after a period of aesthetic drift. This isn’t just a piece of conceptual eye candy, then: it’s Audi engaging combat mode in an industry currently beset with challenges.

    “Our vision is a call to action for the whole company—and is essential for making our brand truly distinctive once again,” Audi’s Chief Creative Officer Massimo Frascella explains. “It is the philosophy behind every decision we make, and we aim to apply its principles across the entire organization. We call it ‘The Radical Next’.”

    Let’s start with the car itself. Although the e-tron GT set the bar high, Audi’s model range has been light on coherence and drama. The Concept C isn’t quite a first-principles machine, but it definitely strips things back and seeks to stoke some good old-fashioned flames of desire. It’s a terrific looking thing in the flesh: stocky, solid, and charismatic. Audi CEO Gernot Döllner, in charge for exactly two years, personally pushed for a new sports car; Frascella used it to push the boundaries in terms of design creativity and manufacturing technique.

    Courtesy of Audi

    It’s also one for marque historians: although there’s nothing explicitly retro here, the Thirties Auto Union Type C Grand Prix car, the early Noughties Rosemeyer concept and more pertinently the original TT are all in the mix, as is Bauhaus and German modernism.

    Frascella, it should be noted, is an Italian who rose to prominence as Head of Design at Jaguar Land Rover, and is credited with the current Range Rover, a universally admired vehicle (though he also worked on the rather more polarising Jaguar Type 00.) A lack of adornment and commitment to what car designers are wont to call “monolithic” surfaces are evidently two of his trademarks.

    That much is certainly apparent here. The Concept C’s taut, machined look suggests something carved from a giant billet of aluminium, and there’s a strong new vertical front grille shape with a slim but powerful light signature that echoes the four-ring logo. We reckon it’s best appreciated from an elevated position above the rear three-quarters, though. There’s no rear window, minimal decoration and slender LED tail-lights, with three slats in the rear deck to suggest a more emotionally charged, mid-engined configuration. We’re told the window-less, slatted look will make production, the new car slated to arrive in 2027.

    The Concept C Is the AllElectric Sports Car Kickstarting Audis Design Future

    Courtesy of Audi

    Jason Barlow

    Source link

  • LA panel and exhibit explores the legacy of Japanese Americans in the import car scene

    Japanese American import cars — and those who work to build, drive, drift or race them — have long been synonymous with Southern California car culture.

    A panel on Saturday, August 30 will explore the world of import tuners and the roots of the import car scene, held at the Japanese American National Museum’s Democracy Center in downtown Los Angeles.

    The panel is part of programming for the museum’s ongoing remote exhibit, “Cruising J-Town: Behind the Wheel of the Nikkei Community,” at the Peter and Merle Mullin Gallery in Pasadena’s ArtCenter College of Design. Admission to the exhibit is free, but ticket reservations, which can be made via janm.org, are recommended.

The exhibit, running through November 12, explores the Japanese American car community in Los Angeles, featuring key players in the scene and car lovers alike. It highlights popular models from hot rods and lowriders, to drift cars and vintage classics, and tells the stories of how Asians and Asian Americans expanded the world of imports in the region.

“Young Asian Americans and Japanese Americans have been at the forefront of championing and legitimizing Japanese imports as popular contemporary cars, within contemporary car culture,” said scholar and author Oliver Wang, who will be moderating Saturday’s panel. Wang curated the “Cruising J-Town” exhibition and wrote its companion book featuring essays and images inspired by the stories and histories found in the display. He had been working on the project for nearly a decade.

“Asian Americans have been such a major part, especially in L.A., of the evolution of car culture within the fabric of American culture and society, and yet this is not deeply acknowledged,” Wang said.

The exhibit and Wang’s book illustrate the history and central role both cars and trucks played in the working lives of Japanese-Americans throughout Los Angeles. Through archival photographs, film and memorabilia, it tells the stories of Nikkei — referring to Japanese emigrants and their descendants — gardeners’ prominence in the local economy, made possible by their work trucks, and fish truck drivers called sakanaya, who brought fresh fish and Japanese goods to the postwar suburbs six days a week. It explores different periods of Japanese American history, from L.A.’s Nikkei car culture history, to WWII, post-war car culture and contemporary movements.

“Cruising J-Town” also features five classic cars: George Nakamura’s 1940s “Meteor” hot rod; Brian Omatsu’s custom 1951 Mercury coupe known as the “Purple Reign;” a 1956 Ford F150 pickup truck owned by Kirk Shimazu; Tod Kaneko’s 1973 Datsun 510, one of the models that launched the import car craze; and a hot pink 1989 Nissan 240SX from professional drift racing driver Nadine Sachiko Toyoda-Hsu.

Iconic L.A. car culture locations — such as the original Ascot Speedway in South L.A., F&K Garage in Little Tokyo, sites of the Mojave dry lake racing scene, Lion’s Drag Strip, and the Irwindale Speedway — are highlighted as well.

At Saturday’s event, panelists will explore how Japanese Americans helped to “legitimize” Japanese import cars to be seen as more “sexy and reliable, popular outside of being utilitarian,” throughout the last four decades, Wang said. Speakers with deep knowledge of import history from the 1970s and on will explore its wide spectrum — from Nikkei community racing and San Gabriel Valley Asians who popularized the Honda Civic and Acura Integra, to the way once-overlooked imports — from manufacturers like Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Acura and Subaru — have transformed into hot sellers with a huge fanbase.

The panel also features Terry Yamaguchi, one of the founders of the Japanese Classic Car Show, which celebrates its 20th anniversary in October.

Panelist Roy Nakano, editor of LACar.com, has personal family and friends’ stories featured in the “Cruising” exhibit. Nakano was excited to tell the story of Doug Endo, who was believed to have owned and built the first tuned Datsun 510 in Gardena, regarded as “the incubator” of that model’s street tuner community.

“There are so many ancillary programs and events that have allowed an opportunity for different segments of the Japanese American car culture to come together — sometimes meeting each other for the first time,” Nakano said. “The ‘Cruising J-Town’ project has really served as a wonderful way for the broad car culture community to meet each other and come together.”

Agreed Wang, “Asian Americans drive — pun intended — this movement, making the import scene what we know today. I hope it might motivate other people and institutions to do similar projects about the ways Asian Americans have been shaped by and laid down their own influence on different areas of popular culture; in the realm of cars, film, music, food, you name it. There are so many blind spots that could have a spotlight on them.”

Saturday’s panel is at the Japanese American National Museum’s Democracy Center, 100 North Central Avenue in Los Angeles, at 2 p.m. Tickets are $5 for general admission, and free for youth and JANM members.

The full “Cruising J-Town” free exhibit is open at the Mullin Gallery at ArtCenter in Pasadena through Nov. 12.

Staff writer Charlie Vargas contributed to this report. 

Allyson Vergara

Source link

  • Ohio hotel worker gets to parking lot to leave. Then she sobs after seeing what Dollar General semi-truck driver did to her car

    One of the worst fears of any car owner is that you’ll come back to where you parked your vehicle, only to find that someone has smashed into it.

    This sort of damage is fairly common. One 2022 survey stated that almost 60 percent of Americans claim that their car has been damaged while parked.

    Whether the result is a minor scrape or a full-on collision, actually resolving an issue like this can prove difficult. Not every parking lot has a security camera, and while some are lucky enough to figure out the perpetrator of their accident, others are left wondering who smashed their vehicle—and questioning whether they’ll be tasked with footing the bill.

    Now, TikToker has shared their own experience coming back to a broken car. Here’s what you should do in this situation.

    What Did a Dollar General Truck do to Her Car?

    In a video with over 91,000 views, TikTok user Jerilynn Gibson (@jerilynngibson) says she left her hotel job to discover that a Dollar General truck smashed her vehicle while it was in the parking lot.

    “I get off of work. We had a Dollar General driver come in in a semi, OK?” she says. “I get off of work, my car’s [expletive]. [Expletive]!” she exclaims.

    “Not only that, but it pushed it up against this [expletive] Jeep,” she continues. “I don’t have the money to replace that. I’m [expletive] broke. I don’t have the money for another car, a rental car, nothing.”

    In a follow-up post, she shows a video of her car being hit by the truck. In another series of posts, she offers viewers a series of updates.

    First, she says that she was the staff member who checked in the person who hit her car into the hotel. According to her, when she confronted the man, he claimed that he “didn’t know that he hit my car.”

    “There’s no [expletive] way that he did not know that he hit my car,” she says. “He just thought it was gonna be another guest car and he wasn’t going to get caught, is my thoughts on the situation.”

    She adds that her whole bumper is now gone, and that she is attempting to solve the issue through both insurance and by contacting Dollar General.

    What Should You Do If Someone Hits Your Parked Car?

    If you return to your parked vehicle to find that someone has crashed into it, don’t panic.

    According to Progressive, there are a few steps that one should follow if they come back to their vehicle and find that someone has hit it. First, one should not move the car or leave the scene. Second, they should try to locate the person who did it and exchange information. Next, the person should take as many photos from as many angles as they can in order to file a police report and a claim with their insurance.

    If you can prove someone else caused the damage, Progressive states that its insurance should cover the damage. If you don’t know who did it, or you can’t prove who did it—but you have collision coverage—your insurance should cover the damage. However, if you don’t have insurance and cannot find the person responsible, chances are high that you’ll have to pay out of pocket.

    @jerilynngibson How’s your night? #fml #car #done ♬ original sound – Jerilynn Gibson

    In the comments section, users shared their thoughts on Gibson’s situation.

    “If he’s so unaware of his surroundings to NOT know he hit your car….. he dang well better lose his CDL,” wrote a user. “I used to always feel so safe driving near semis. Now they terrify me. They are not the same people that used to drive. They are now careless and reckless people driving them.”

    “Oh no he knew exactly what he’d done not even your car but the one next to you he shoved you into . Absolutely ridiculous he isn’t charged with hit an run even in a private lot,” added another. “Call DG corporate.”

    “If you have any car seats in your van . Make sure you claim those too. They need to be replaced. Truck driver’s insurance will cover them,” suggested a third.

    The Mary Sue reached out to Gibson via Instagram and TikTok direct message, and Dollar General via email

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Braden Bjella

    Braden Bjella

    Braden Bjella is a culture writer. His work can be found in the Daily Dot, Mixmag, Electronic Beats, Schon! magazine, and more.

    Braden Bjella

    Source link

  • Automakers Are Hot for Extended-Range EVs. They Hope Buyers Like Them Too

    Automakers Are Hot for Extended-Range EVs. They Hope Buyers Like Them Too

    EREVs have some manufacturing advantages, too, says Steven Ewing, who directs editorial content at Edmunds. Specifics on Scout production are scant, but at least the Ramcharger is using components and technology that Stellantis already puts in other cars. “You’re not introducing this giant new propulsion system,” Ewing says. On the EREV (and PHEV) con side: It’s always going to be expensive to put two powertrains into one vehicle.

    An Emissions Win?

    Some climate advocates, who hope the world transitions quickly to battery electric vehicles to stave off the worst of climate change, say EREVs could be part of a cleaner transportation system, even if the design still uses gasoline.

    “The future is fully electric,” says Kathy Harris, who directs the clean vehicles policy program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group. “But many drivers are worried about going fully electric. While the country continues to build out a robust charging network, EREVs can be a good choice for some of them.”

    EREVs might prove less emissions-intensive than their PHEV cousins because drivers cannot simply choose to skip charging and drive on gasoline alone, a phenomenon that some researchers worry is degrading the real-life emissions output of many plug-ins.

    Other researchers are less convinced by automakers’ “bridge technology” arguments but say EREVs might be helpful anyway. EREVs are showing up on heavy vehicles like trucks and SUVs because those need more battery power to move, especially when they’re hauling or towing. The tech might obviate the complaints of, say, some Ford F-150 Lightning owners, who say they want to use their all-electric trucks to do work and charge tools but can’t get enough done on one charge. Full battery electric might never be a fit for every person.

    “For those drivers who live in rural areas or who have driving patterns where they go long distances every day, a range extender with a very efficient generator may be a great technology,” says Gil Tal, who directs the Electric Vehicle Research Center at UC Davis. “I think that will be the way we get to 100 percent electric.”

    Older Tech, New Interest

    Technically, the Chevrolet Volt, which in 2010 represented General Motors’ first modern foray into EV tech, was an EREV, though it was marketed as a PHEV. Jaguar intended a 2010 concept car, the C-X75, to go into limited production in 2013 but canceled the project amidt the Great Recession. (A C-X75 appeared in the James Bond film Spectre, and a design firm turned out a gas-powered conversion, but otherwise the car never saw the light of day). A few years later, the BMW i3 EV came with a range-extender option, with a very small generator giving drivers a few extra miles to get to a charger, stat. But that choice didn’t prove popular with buyers, according to Edmunds data.

    The EREV story began to change in China. The Chinese automaker Li Auto was a global outlier in 2019 when it unveiled its first model, the Li One, a range-extended SUV. That year, EREVs accounted for 1 percent of all PHEV sales, according to the research firm BloombergNEF. But by 2023, Li Auto had led EREVs to a 28 percent share of PHEV sales—accounting for 9 percent of all electric vehicle sales in China. That’s not a huge share, but the tech has “been transformative in a pretty short amount of time,” says Corey Cantor, an analyst with BloombergNEF who covers electric vehicles. The world might be learning from that experience.

    Aarian Marshall

    Source link

  • Howard Co. father who built go-kart track on property is at the center of controversy over whether he can keep it – WTOP News

    Howard Co. father who built go-kart track on property is at the center of controversy over whether he can keep it – WTOP News

    A father in Maryland built a track on his private property for his son. But issues surrounding permits and noise are now at the center of the controversy.

    The go-kart track that Chris Siperko built on his private property in Highland, Maryland.
    (Courtesy Chris Siperko)

    Courtesy Chris Siperko

    Chris Siperko and his son Achilles
    Chris Siperko and his son Achilles, who races go-karts competitively.
    (Courtesy Chris Siperko)

    Courtesy Chris Siperko

    Achilles races go-karts
    Siperko says he’s spent nearly $200,000 to build a go-kart track for his son on their property.
    (Courtesy Chris Siperko)

    Courtesy Chris Siperko

    Achilles races go-karts
    Permits and noise are at the center of the controversy over whether the family can keep the racetrack.
    (Courtesy Chris Siperko)

    Courtesy Chris Siperko

    A father in Howard County, Maryland, built a go-kart track on his private property for his son. But permits and noise are now at the center of the controversy over whether he can keep it.

    “I just didn’t think it was going to be an issue,” said Chris Siperko, who lives on 11 acres in Highland.

    Siperko said he spent close to $200,000 constructing a go-kart track on his private property for his son Achilles. The track was completed around mid-January, he said.

    The family travels to Florida almost every weekend for Achilles to train as a racer. Siperko said he did some research and didn’t see anything about permits.

    “So I called some paving companies,” Siperko told WTOP. “They came out and they said, ‘Oh, it’s your property. You don’t need a permit, as long as it’s not touching a main road. So as long as it’s not touching the driveway that touches the road or accesses the main road, you don’t need a permit.’”

    Dan O’Leary, chairman of the Greater Highland Crossroads Association, told WTOP that his group is strongly supporting neighbors who object to the track. He called the opposition to the go-kart track “emotional and overwhelming.”

    Siperko said when neighbors saw the construction, they contacted the county. He then received two citations, one for the paving and one for constructing it on wetlands.

    “We are sympathetic that a family has gotten itself in a such financial and emotional situation. Everyone wants to help their children succeed in their aspirations,” O’Leary wrote in a statement. “A simple call to Howard County officials would have confirmed that extensive permissions are required to disturb more than 5,000 Sq. Ft. (about 1/8 acre) of ground.”

    There have been two community meetings on the matter, and Siperko said he is gearing up for hearings with the county on fighting to keep the track.

    A Change.org petition on the issue supporting the Siperko family in keeping the track has received more than 1,700 signatures as of Saturday afternoon.

    “I’ll do everything to try to make it right for the county,” Siperko said. “If he wanted to do basketball, I’d build him up a basketball court. I mean, if he wants to swim, I could build him a pool, but he doesn’t want to do that. He wants to be a racer, so I built him a track.”

    The Greater Highland Crossroads Association represents Highland and rural areas of Fulton, Dayton and Clarksville. The goal of the association is to “see new development evolve in a way which compliments, not compromises, the Highland area,” according to the association’s website.

    In his statement, O’Leary wrote that the go-kart track was not approved and is greatly impacting the neighborhood.

    “The principle objection — other than the environmental damage — was the noise generated by the tires on the EVs, prompting distant neighbors to call the police and the authorities,” he said.

    O’Leary said that the association will “continue until the end to support our neighbors and members. In our experience, this may take around two years if it goes to the District Court.”

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Valerie Bonk

    Source link

  • Model Y Is Getting a Mutt Makeover, Joining the List of Cars Designed for—and by—Dogs

    Model Y Is Getting a Mutt Makeover, Joining the List of Cars Designed for—and by—Dogs

    “No Model Y ‘refresh’ is coming out this year,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk stated earlier this year. “I should note that Tesla continuously improves its cars, so even a car that is six months newer will be a little better.”

    Aside from the constant software updates, expect a substantially updated Model Y to land in Q1 of 2025. Efficiency and performance will be enhanced, and new damping will improve the ride. Inside, more of the primary controls will be moved to the touchscreen—including the gear selector—360-degree acoustic glass will be introduced, and rear passengers will gain entertainment screens for streaming content, gaming, and climate control.

    All of which will be dissected and debated in that manic manner peculiar to Tesla adherents. Not everyone, however, who ends up in a Model Y has a voice. Point of fact, some of them can’t even speak. Yet they’ve exerted a powerful influence on the car’s design, and concerns for their well-being have reportedly contributed to the delay in the car’s rollout.

    The Tesla Model Y is being redesigned with a bigger third row, making it more dog-friendly and thus potentially more popular in China.

    Photograph: Courtesy of Tesla

    Yep, apparently the car’s “cramped third row” is being redesigned to make it more dog-friendly and thus potentially more popular in China, where domestic rivals have roomier interiors. This is an unusual admission and one that raises a question: How many carmakers actively consider canine needs when developing new models?

    Pooch Purchasing Power

    “Our approach is to be function-agnostic. We try to make a great car that people will then find uses for,” says Andrew Wheel, director of production design and quality at Jaguar Land Rover. “We’ve always been cognizant of the fact that versatility and flexibility are key USPs.”

    There isn’t a single carmaker that’s not fixated by its products’ “lifestyle” attributes. Some of this is marketing flimflam, of course, but plenty of us number dogs among the family unit, and the bigger breeds definitely crave space.

    On which basis, there have been some interesting innovations. Tesla offers a “dog mode” that allows owners to maintain a comfortable cabin temperature while owners leave their vehicles. That’s monitored via a mobile app and a live camera feed, while passers-by are mollified by the cabin temperature shown on the car’s main display screen alongside an explanatory graphic. Note that the electric windows won’t work in dog mode, to avoid accidental pressing of the buttons, though that’s taking the idea of canine sentience a bit far.

    Jason Barlow

    Source link

  • Luxury SUV test: Edmunds compares the Lincoln Nautilus and Mercedes-Benz GLC

    Luxury SUV test: Edmunds compares the Lincoln Nautilus and Mercedes-Benz GLC

    While Lincoln’s full-size Navigator is great for big families and towing, the recently redesigned Lincoln Nautilus should have broader appeal for SUV shoppers. It’s a midsize SUV that seats five and boasts distinctive styling, lots of premium features, and an eye-catching curved display that spans the width of the dashboard. So how does this Lincoln measure up to the competition? To find out, the car experts at Edmunds compared it to the Mercedes-Benz GLC, a benchmark for luxury SUV excellence.

    Power and fuel economy

    The Nautilus offers two engines, a turbocharged four-cylinder that produces 250 horsepower and a hybrid version of the same engine that bumps output to 310 horsepower. The non-hybrid engine delivers an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in combined city/highway driving. Opting for the hybrid gets you 30 mpg combined. Those are decent figures for a luxury SUV. Edmunds has found the Nautilus’ acceleration is underwhelming, however. At the Edmunds test track, the hybrid Nautilus accelerated from zero to 60 mph in 7.2 seconds.

    The GLC 300, which is the base version, is also powered by a turbocharged four-cylinder engine. It produces 255 horsepower and gets an estimated 26 mpg combined. It’s also quicker than the Nautilus; it hit 60 mph in a respectable 6.1 seconds. The GLC 350e, which is new for 2025, is a 313-horsepower plug-in hybrid model. The EPA has yet to release its fuel economy estimates as of this writing, but Mercedes says it provides a lengthy 54 miles of all-electric driving before it switches over to operating like a regular hybrid when the battery runs low. Mercedes also offers a high-performance version, the 416-horsepower AMG GLC 43.

    We like that Lincoln offers an available hybrid, but the GLC’s superior acceleration and fuel efficiency help it win this category.

    Winner: GLC

    Interior and tech features

    An expansive dashboard-spanning screen dominates the Nautilus’ interior. It displays the instrument panel and other information like navigation directions and music. It also has a full Google integration that lets you use helpful features like the voice-based Google Assistant while driving. But all this impressive tech is let down by functionality. The center console button layout is confusing, and the lower touchscreen controls almost everything including the air vents. The unlabeled steering wheel controls are also difficult to use.

    The GLC offers a more elegant and luxurious interior thanks to a wide selection of leather upholstery and wood trim. Its display screens are smaller, but the interface they display is much easier to use. The same goes for the GLC’s button layout and navigation and voice assistant systems.

    As for comfort, both luxury SUVs boast very quiet interiors. The GLC provides a smoother ride that absorbs bumps better. Edmunds has found that the Nautilus rides a bit too firmly over rough surfaces.

    Winner: GLC

    Utility

    The Nautilus is the better pick if you have a lot of stuff to haul. Its cargo area offers 36.4 cubic feet of space behind its rear seats. That’s considerably more than the GLC can fit. In addition, the rear seats fold completely flat for more room. Storage for your small personal items is also impressive thanks to a generous storage area under the center console that’s large enough for a purse or bag and sizable door pockets.

    The GLC’s 21.9 cubic feet of cargo space is less than what the Nautilus can hold, though its rear seats also fold nearly flat. Wide door pockets and a decent-sized glove box provide adequate small item storage but it still isn’t as much as what you can fit in the Nautilus.

    Winner: Nautilus

    Pricing and value

    The Nautilus’ base Premiere trim starts at $53,485 (including destination), and the hybrid engine adds $2,000. The Reserve trim adds nearly $10,000, and the top Black Label model balloons to $76,645. If you stick to the Premiere trim, the Nautilus offers plenty of value because it comes loaded with a lengthy list of features including lots of advanced driver aids and BlueCruise, a hands-free highway driving system. But higher trims are pricey, offering less value.

    The GLC 300 starts at $50,400 and the GLC 350e plug-in hybrid model has a starting price of $61,050. The GLC doesn’t come standard with as many features, but if you add most of the optional packages and features to a GLC 300, it will set you back about $65,000, which is about the same price as the midlevel Nautilus Reserve.

    Winner: tie

    Edmunds says

    Lincoln has come out with one of its more compelling SUVs to date with the new Nautilus. It’s worth considering if you want a roomy SUV that’s also stylish. Otherwise, Edmunds thinks the GLC’s superior fuel efficiency, acceleration and ease of use make it the winner of this comparison.

    ____

    This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive website Edmunds.

    Michael Cantu is a contributor at Edmunds.

    Source link

  • Should you buy or lease a new car?

    Should you buy or lease a new car?

    What happens at the end of a car lease

    There can be unpleasant surprises at the end of a leasing term, Wallcraft added. The vehicle will be examined carefully for any damage, and if you exceeded the mileage outlined in the contract, you’ll be hit with fees. “It can be a pretty surprising amount at the end of the whole thing,” Wallcraft said, “and there’s no way to get out of it.”

    When to buy a car in Canada

    When you finance a car to own it, however, you start with negative equity—you owe more on the car than it’s worth to sell—but after a certain amount of time, that equity turns in your favour. “It takes a few years, depending on the length of the financing term,” Wallcraft said. “It takes some time where you’ve paid off enough of the car that you can then sell it for what it’s worth.”

    For car lovers who want a fresh ride every three or four years, financing to own still has merits over leasing, Wiebe said. “Even with purchasing vehicles every three years, you can still come out ahead by purchasing and reselling, because at least you are building some equity by creating ownership of the car that you’re paying for,” he said. 

    “But for most young people, buying and owning for a longer period is going to really free you up to be able to put money elsewhere, especially towards longer-term savings.”

    Pros and cons of leasing an EV

    As for leasing an electric vehicle (EV), Wallcraft called the financial pros/cons analysis “less predictable” in this relatively new market. Residual values of EVs have yet to be fully understood, she said—the value the car holds over time, which lease payments are based on.
    But lease contracts are very hard to break, Wallcraft noted. So if you don’t like the EV lifestyle and all it entails, you’re stuck or punished.

    “I can’t imagine how difficult it would be to try to offload an EV lease and try to find somebody who wants to take that over when there’s really only 10% of the market that’s showing a strong interest in EVs today,” Wallcraft said. “That will change over time, but that would be extremely difficult. Better to finance at a rate you can afford, and then, even if you haven’t fully paid it down, at least the car is yours to make the decision about what to do with it.”

    So who is leasing for?

    Wealthy customers, mostly. There’s less drama with a new vehicle under warranty, Wiebe pointed out. “Let’s say you’re getting into a high-paying profession that demands a lot of your time,” he said. “You’re not having to deal with buying and selling a vehicle. You sign up, have that simple payment, everything’s under warranty, and you kind of take back both the time and having to think about that area of your life.”

    The Canadian Press

    Source link