ReportWire

Tag: Automobiles

  • UAW strike countdown: Union president says targeted strike possible at all Big Three automakers

    UAW strike countdown: Union president says targeted strike possible at all Big Three automakers

    [ad_1]

    United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain said Wednesday that autoworkers and the Big Three automakers are still far apart, although negotiations continue, and that the union may strike all of the Big Three at once.

    “We’re keeping all of our options open. An all-out strike is still a possibility,” Fain said during a webcast with members.

    The UAW and Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +1.53%
    ,
    General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +0.57%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    -0.42%

    have made progress during their talks but were still far apart on the union’s key priorities, though negotiations will continue until the deadline of 11:59 p.m. Eastern on Thursday, Fain said.

    “For the first time in our history, we may strike all of the Big Three at once,” Fain said, adding that he looked at this time as “our defining moment.”

    He said if no deal is reached, there’s also the possibility of doing “standup strikes” at certain plants, designed to keep the companies guessing. These could escalate and spread elsewhere in order to give the union leverage in bargaining. He told UAW members that they should not strike unless their local is called to do so.

    A targeted strike helps the UAW avoid distributing strike pay, set recently at $500 a week per member, to all 150,000 of its members. But it could have a broader effect.

    “It is possible for strikes at critical parts plants to have much wider implications,” Marick Masters, a business professor at Wayne State University in Detroit, said in an interview with MarketWatch on Wednesday. 

    He noted that the 1998 strike against GM, a work stoppage by 9,200 workers at two of that company’s plants in Flint, Mich., resulted in shutdowns that affected more than 150,000 workers. 

    See: These Ford, GM plants are the most likely strike targets

    Jody Calemine, a senior fellow and director of labor and employment policy at the Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, said Wednesday that the union is employing an interesting strategy.

    “It will turn the screws slowly and probe for weaknesses, and try to get as much movement out of companies as possible while keeping the options to escalate,” he said.

    Calemine said Fain has done a “masterful job” of painting the fight as a “real showdown” between working families and the companies. But he added that “the principal danger for the union would be losing the narrative. Other places would continue to work, or get laid off or locked out.”

    That’s reflected in some of the online comments by UAW members who watched Fain’s update. One worker said on Facebook: “Strike us all or none at all.”

    The UAW president quoted scripture, repeated his calls for unity and said the “strike plan is driven by faith that together we can and will move mountains.”

    Fain said the companies have revised some of their offers: On wages, Ford has put forward a 20% increase over the life of the four-year contract, up from its previous offer of 9%, while GM’s latest offer is 18% and Stellantis’s offer is 17.5%. That’s compared to a wage increase of 40% — or 46% when compounded annually — that the union sought originally and later revised to 36%.

    “Their proposals don’t reflect the massive profits that we’ve generated for these companies,” Fain said.

    The union has pointed out that while the Big Three’s profit has risen 65% over the past four years, and the pay of each of the companies’ chief executives have risen 40%, the UAW top wage rate has risen 6% over that time.

    See: Why United Auto Workers are fighting to end a two-tier system for wages and benefits

    A GM spokesperson said Wednesday that the company continues to bargain in good faith and sent a statement that reads in part: “We are making progress in key areas that we believe are most important to our represented team members. This includes historic guaranteed annual wage increases, investments in our U.S. manufacturing plants to provide opportunities for all, and shortening the time for in-progression employees to reach maximum wages.”

    Ford and Stellantis did not immediately return a request for comment.

    The most recent U.S. autoworkers’ strike was at GM in 2019, which lasted for nearly six weeks and involved about 50,000 workers.

    See: Would a United Auto Workers strike provide an opportunity for Tesla — and push up used-car prices?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    [ad_1]

    Investors in index funds have been well rewarded by a high concentration in the largest technology companies over the past decade. But there are also continuing warnings about the risk of such heavy concentrations, even in index funds that track the S&P 500. Solutions are offered to limit this risk, but if you expect Big Tech to continue to drive the broad market returns over the coming years, why not make an even more focused bet?

    Comparisons of three index-fund approaches highlight how successful concentration in the “Magnificent Seven” has been.

    The Magnificent Seven are Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    ,
    Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.27%

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +9.37%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +1.67%
    .
    We have listed them in the order of their concentration within the Invesco S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    which tracks the S&P 500
    SPX.
    The U.S. benchmark index is weighted by market capitalization, as is the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP
    and the Russell indexes.

    SPY is 27.6% concentrated in the Magnificent Seven. One way to play the same group of 500 stocks but eliminate concentration risk is to take an equal-weighted approach to the index, which has worked well for certain long periods. But here, we’re focusing on how well the concentrated strategy has worked.

    Let’s take a look at the group’s concentration in three popular index approaches, then look at long-term performance and consider what happened in 2022 as rising interest rates helped crush the tech sector.

    Here are the portfolio weightings for the Magnificent Seven in SPY, along with those of the Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ,
    which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
    NDX
    and the Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    :

    Company

    Ticker

    % of SPY

    % of QQQ

    % of XLG

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    7.05%

    10.85%

    12.46%

    Microsoft Cor.

    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    6.65%

    9.53%

    11.76%

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    3.30%

    5.50%

    5.84%

    Nvidia Corp.

    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    3.02%

    4.44%

    5.33%

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    -0.27%
    2.17%

    3.12%

    3.83%

    Alphabet Inc. Class C

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    1.88%

    3.11%

    3.32%

    Tesla Inc.

    TSLA,
    +9.37%
    1.79%

    3.10%

    3.17%

    Meta Platforms Inc. Class A

    META,
    +1.67%
    1.77%

    3.60%

    3.12%

    Totals

     

    27.63%

    43.25%

    48.83%

    Sources: Invesco Ltd., State Street Corp.

    The same group of seven companies (eight stocks with two common share classes for Alphabet) is at the top of each exchange-traded fund’s portfolio, although the top seven for QQQ aren’t in the same order as those for SPY and XLG. QQQ’s weighting was changed recently as the underlying Nasdaq-100 underwent a “special rebalancing” last month.

    Here’s a five-year chart comparing the performance of the three approaches. All returns in this article include reinvested dividends.


    FactSet

    QQQ has been the clear winner for five years, but it is also worth noting how well XLG has performed when compared with SPY. This “top 50” approach to the S&P 500 incorporates many stocks that aren’t listed on the Nasdaq and therefore cannot be included in QQQ, which itself is made up of the largest 100 nonfinancial companies in the full Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +0.45%
    .

    Examples of stocks held by XLG that aren’t held by QQQ include such non-tech stalwarts as Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
    BRK.B,
    +0.77%
    ,
    Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.79%
    ,
    Procter & Gamble Co.
    PG,
    +0.94%
    ,
    Home Depot Inc.
    HD,
    -0.12%

    and Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -0.42%
    .

    Now let’s go deeper into long-term performance. First, here are the total returns for various time periods:

    ETF

    3 Years

    5 Years

    10 Years

    15 Years

    20 Years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    40%

    69%

    223%

    370%

    531%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    41%

    113%

    430%

    882%

    1,158%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    41%

    85%

    262%

    404%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each ETF, company or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    There is no 20-year return for XLG because this ETF was established in 2005.

    For five years and longer, QQQ has been the runaway leader, but for 5, 10 and 15 years, XLG has also beaten SPY handily, with broader industry exposure.

    Something else to consider is that during 2022, when SPY was down 18.2%, XLG fell 24.3% and QQQ dropped 32.6%.

    For disciplined long-term investors, the tech pain of 2022 may not seem to have been a small price to pay for outperformance. And it may have been easier to take the pounding when holding SPY or even XLG that year.

    Here’s a look at the average annual returns for the three ETFs:

    ETF

    3 years

    5 years

    10 years

    15 years

    20 years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    11.8%

    11.0%

    12.4%

    10.9%

    9.6%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    12.0%

    16.3%

    18.2%

    16.4%

    13.5%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    12.2%

    13.1%

    13.7%

    11.4%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    So the question remains — do you believe that the largest technology companies will continue to lead the stock market for the next decade at least? If so, a more concentrated index approach may be for you, provided you can withstand the urge to sell into a declining market, such as the one we experienced last year.

    Here is something else to keep in mind. In a note to clients on Monday, Doug Peta, the chief U.S. investment strategist at BCA, made a fascinating point: “The only novel development is that all the heaviest hitters now hail from Tech and Tech-adjacent sectors and are therefore more prone to move together than they were at the end of 2004, when the seven largest stocks came from six different sectors. “

    Nothing lasts forever. Peta continued by suggesting that investors who are tired of big tech taking all the glory “need only wait.”

    “[I]f history is any guide, their time at the top of the capitalization scale will be short,” he wrote.

    Don’t miss: These four Dow stocks take top prizes for dividend growth

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • VinFast loses more than $140 billion in market cap in two weeks after week-long nosedive for EV maker

    VinFast loses more than $140 billion in market cap in two weeks after week-long nosedive for EV maker

    [ad_1]

    Electric-vehicle startup VinFast Auto Ltd. has seen its market capitalization fall more than $140 billion in less than two weeks, weighed down by a six-day losing streak for the company’s stock.  

    Shares of VinFast
    VFS,
    -2.72%

    soared last month after the company went public through a special-purpose acquisition company deal, taking its market cap to an eye-watering $231.3 billion on Aug. 25 — easily surpassing established automakers such as Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +0.57%

    and General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +0.09%
    .

    VinFast is on pace to extend its losing streak to seven days. Shares of the low-float company fell 26.3% Thursday, taking VinFast’s market cap to $85 billion, according to FactSet data. Ford’s market cap is $47.7 billion and GM’s is $44.5 billion, FactSet data show.

    Related: This EV company has a bigger market cap than Ford or GM. But you may not have heard of it.

    The EV maker is a majority-owned affiliate of Vietnamese conglomerate Vingroup, one of the largest publicly traded companies in Vietnam. VinFast said that as of June 30, 2023, the company has delivered close to 19,000 EVs.

    About 99% of VinFast shares are controlled by Vingroup chair and VinFast founder Pham Nhat Vuon, making only a small portion available to investors.

    Related: EV startup VinFast may be worth more than Ford or GM, but there’s a catch

    VinFast is importing its vehicles into the U.S. and is also ramping up its North American presence. In July, the company broke ground on an electric-vehicle manufacturing site within the Triangle Innovation Point in Chatham County, N.C. The startup says the plant will eventually have the capacity to make 150,000 vehicles a year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. factory orders plunge in July after four straight gains

    U.S. factory orders plunge in July after four straight gains

    [ad_1]

    Orders for U.S. manufactured goods fell a sharp 2.1% in July, the Commerce Department said Tuesday. This is the first decline after four straight monthly gains.

    Economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal were expecting a 2.3% fall in July.

    Excluding transportation, orders rose 0.8% in July after a 0.3% gain in the prior month.

    Economists said that higher interest rates are putting pressure on business equipment spending.

    Durable-goods orders fell 5.2 % in July, unrevised from the data that was released on Aug. 24. Non-durable goods orders rose 1.1%. 

    Orders for nondefense capital goods, excluding aircraft, rose 0.1% in July, also unrevised from prior estimate. 

    U.S. stocks
    DJIA

    SPX
    were trading lower on Tuesday following the long holiday weekend.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. consumer confidence retreats markedly in August, close to levels signaling recession

    U.S. consumer confidence retreats markedly in August, close to levels signaling recession

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The index of U.S. consumer confidence dipped to 106.1 in August from a revised 114 in the prior month, the Conference Board said Tuesday.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a modest pullback to 116 from the initial reading of 117, which was the highest level in two years.

    The revised July reading was the highest since December 2021.

    Key details: Part of the survey that tracks how consumers feel about current economic conditions fell to 114.8 this month from 153 in July. 

    A gauge that assesses what Americans expect over the next six months dropped to 80.2 from 88. The August reading is just above to 80 level that historically signals a recession within the next year.

    Big picture: The tight labor market had bolstered confidence in June and July. The decline in August reverses all of those gains. The index is still 10.8 points above the recent cycle low in July 2022.

    Economists think that higher gasoline prices were behind some of the decline in August. The price of a gallon of unleaded gasoline is up 19.6% from the start of the year and over 2% from last month.

    What the Conference Board said: The organization said it still expects a recession before the end of the year.

    “Write-in responses showed that consumers were once again preoccupied with rising prices in general, and for groceries and gasoline in particular,” said Dana Peterson, chief economist at The Conference Board.

    What are they saying?  “The August drop does not definitively end the upward trend in place since last summer, and the expectations index still points to faster growth in real consumption spending. We are not convinced, however, in part because some of the strength in July retail sales was due to boost from Amazon Prime Day, which won’t continue, and because near-real-time indicators of discretionary services spending paint a much less upbeat picture,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.

    Robert Frick, corporate economist with Navy Federal Credit Union, said he didn’t think confidence would rise significantly until inflation falls further.

    Market reaction: Stocks
    DJIA

    SPX
    were trading higher on Tuesday. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    fell to 4.16%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mercedes-Benz plans to open first EV charging stations this fall in Atlanta, China and Germany

    Mercedes-Benz plans to open first EV charging stations this fall in Atlanta, China and Germany

    [ad_1]

    Mercedes-Benz Group AG DE:DAII XE:MBG said Monday it plans to build up a network of 2,000 charging hubs by the end of 2024, starting with three charging stations this fall in Atlanta, Chengdu, China and Mannheim, Germany. The auto maker plans to create more than 10,000 charging points by the end of the decade. The charging stations will be open to all car brands.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla stock falls 3%, on to longest losing run since December

    Tesla stock falls 3%, on to longest losing run since December

    [ad_1]

    Tesla Inc.’s stock
    TSLA,
    -1.70%

    dropped another 3% on Friday, extending its losses to a sixth straight session, its worst streak since a seven-session losing run in December. The stock is also poised to close at its lowest since June 2, when it closed at $213.97. It held on to its outperformance over the broader market, however, up 73% in the year to date compared with an advance of 14% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.01%
    .
    Tesla earlier this week announced cheaper versions of its Model S and Model X luxury EVs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Import prices jump in July by largest amount in more than a year

    Import prices jump in July by largest amount in more than a year

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: The import price index rose 0.4% in July, the Labor Department said Tuesday. This is the biggest gain since May 2022.

    Economists surveyed by the Wall Street were expecting a 0.2% gain.

    Fuel import costs rose 3.6% in July. Higher prices for petroleum and natural gas contributed to the gain.

    Excluding…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How much would a strike cost the Big Three automakers? Wall Street thinks it has an answer.

    How much would a strike cost the Big Three automakers? Wall Street thinks it has an answer.

    [ad_1]

    Wall Street got busy Monday calculating the impact of a strike on the Big Three automakers amid increasingly fraught labor negotiations between union workers and companies, and a  “greater likelihood” of a walkout next month.

    Also on Monday, President Joe Biden weighed in, urging the United Auto Workers and Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +0.49%
    ,
    General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +0.53%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,

    to “to work together to forge a fair agreement.”

    Negotiations so far have been tense, and the contract expires in one month.

    Citi analyst Itay Michaeli estimated that a strike at GM lasting about two weeks impacting roughly about 100,000 vehicles would result in an impact of around $1.3 billion before interest and taxes; a five-week one, impacting about 280,000 vehicles, would result in a $3.4 billion impact EBIT. That would be a similar hit as GM’s 2019 strike, he said.

    Recent headlines are “pointing to increasingly challenging labor negotiations and a greater likelihood of a strike next month,” Michaeli said.

    A longer stoppage would result in shrinking dealer inventory and possibly start to impact sales sometime during the second half of October.

    For Ford, Michaeli calculated an impact of about $1.6 billion EBIT for a two-week strike affecting about 130,000 Ford vehicles, growing to $4 billion in the case of a five-week strike affecting 330,000 Ford cars and trucks. Like GM, sales would be hobbled roughly by mid-October in the case of a longer strike.

    “For both companies, the exact volume impact will in part depend on the extent of any Canada/Mexico downtime, and to that, GM appears somewhat better positioned than Ford due to GM’s higher exposure to Mexico production (including for pickup trucks) and other supply-chain considerations,” the analyst said in his note Monday.

    Both companies likely can keep their guidance intact in the case of a brief, one-week strike, but a strike beyond the two-week mark “likely triggers a [fiscal-year guidance] cut, though it would set 2024 up with reduced inventory and greater volume/price recovery prospects,” Michaeli said.

    A big question is whether a strike targets one specific automaker, as it was the case with GM in 2019, or all three at the same time — with more industry volume loss but also potentially a shorter strike, Michaeli said.

    “To that, Ford is generally viewed to be the least likely to be selected as a target,” he said.

    Deutsche Bank analyst Emmanuel Rosner said in his note Monday that he estimates an impact on earnings of about $400 million to $500 million for every week of production for each automaker, for a total of about $1.4 billion.

    GM’s 2019 strike lasted almost six weeks, with a loss of about $3.6 billion EBIT; GM North America lowered revenue estimates as nearly 300,000 fewer vehicles were delivered.

    Extrapolating the same $13,000 per unit in EBIT hit, Ford, GM and Stellantis could see [$550 million, $480 million, and $400 million] in weekly profit impact, reaching that $1.4 billion-a-week estimate, Rosner said.

    “In a bad-case scenario with 8 weeks of strike against all 3 automakers, which would bring the UAW strike fund to very low levels, this could cause $11.2 billion in lost profits for the [Detroit 3],” Rosner said. “While this is considerable, it would still be considerably less than the impact from the lifetime of the 4-year contract,” which would create “a permanent raise in the OEMs’ cost,” he said.

    The analyst also quantified the cost of UAW’s demands, focusing on the union’s “higher-probability asks” such as converting temporary employees into full-time workers, the elimination of a tiered-wage system, and about 40% base wage increase over the four years of the life of the contract. He left out “unlikely” to be met demands around pensions and post-retirement healthcare benefits.

    “Our analysis suggests accommodating these demands would likely constitute a large but not destructive headwind to OEMs’ earnings in year 1, with incremental costs stepping up even further in subsequent years,” Rosner said in the note.

    If these demands are granted with cost-of-living raises on top, Rosner estimated costs to all three automakers around $3.6 billion in the first year of the contract, amounting to $23 billion in total for the four years, “with highest hit to Stellantis, followed by GM and then Ford.”

    “Specifically, we estimate that the conversion of temporary employees to full-time workers would cost D3 a total of $1.4 billion, not yet factoring in wage increases, with the highest impact to Stellantis given the higher [percentage] of temporary employees used currently relative” to GM and Ford, the analyst said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk vs. Mark Zuckerberg: The stupidest story of the summer appears over

    Elon Musk vs. Mark Zuckerberg: The stupidest story of the summer appears over

    [ad_1]

    The stupidest story of the summer may be over. Finally, mercifully.

    Mark Zuckerberg, billionaire and chief executive of Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -1.34%
    ,
    on Sunday appeared to pull the grown-up card — or at least the less-immature card — to scuttle a cage fight with Elon Musk, the even richer billionaire, Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -1.10%

    CEO and X owner.

    From the start, it was a story that appeared to live mostly in Musk’s imagination. Yet it still sparked a media frenzy, as the prospect of two emotionally stunted billionaires publicly pummeling each other was not without some appeal.

    But the proposed MMA-style fight apparently met its demise the same way it was born — through a lot of online bluster.

    Weeks after proposing the fight, then resorting to multiple delaying tactics while noting how out of shape and unprepared he was, Musk apparently reached out to Zuckerberg over the weekend asking for a “practice bout” first.

    Author and journalist Walter Isaacson — who is currently writing a biography of Musk — tweeted a text exchange Sunday that he said Musk had sent him.

    “Wanna do a practice bout at your house next week?” a text apparently from Musk reads. The reply, purportedly from Zuckerberg: “If you still want to do a real MMA fight, then you should train on your own and let me know when you’re ready to compete. I don’t want to keep hyping something that will never happen, so you should either decide you’re going to do this and do it soon, or we should move on.”

    In real news: Tesla cuts prices for some Model Y versions in China, as price war ramps back up

    Zuckerberg later posted a more public burn on Meta’s Threads — the Twitter/X rival that sparked this whole thing to begin with — saying: “I think we can all agree that Elon isn’t serious and it’s time to move on…If Elon ever gets serious about a real date and official event, he knows how to reach me. Otherwise, time to move on. I’m going to focus on competing with people who take the sport seriously.”

    It was unclear what the two billionaires now plan to do with their spare time, if not fight each other.

    In completely unrelated news, fellow mega-billionaire and Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    -0.11%

    founder Jeff Bezos and his fiancée announced a $100 million donation Friday to Maui wildfire relief efforts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Regulators open floodgates for driverless taxis in San Francisco, whether they’re wanted or not

    Regulators open floodgates for driverless taxis in San Francisco, whether they’re wanted or not

    [ad_1]

    State regulators on Thursday opened the floodgates for more robotaxis on the streets of San Francisco.

    After a contentious, seven-hour meeting, the California Public Utilities Commission — which oversees taxis and autonomous vehicles, among things — approved two resolutions to broadly expand driverless taxi service from Alphabet’s
    GOOG,
    +0.05%

    GOOGL,
    +0.02%

    Waymo and GM’s
    GM,
    -5.79%

    Cruise.

    On a pair of 3-1 votes, regulators approved allowing Waymo and Cruise to offer fared driverless rides across San Francisco, at all hours of the day, with an unlimited number of vehicles.

    While the driverless vehicles are already ubiquitous on city streets, San Francisco is now set to become the first U.S. city with two fleets of robotaxis that will be able to fully compete with taxis and ride-hailing services.

    “Today’s permit marks the true beginning of our commercial operations in San Francisco,” Tekedra Mawakana, co-CEO of Waymo, said in a blog post.  “We’re incredibly grateful for this vote of confidence from the CPUC, and to the communities and riders who have supported our service.” 

    Waymo said it expects “incredibly high demand,” and will be expanding its robotaxi service incrementally.

    Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt said he was “thrilled” by the votes. “It’s a huge milestone for the AV industry, but even more importantly a signal to the country that CA prioritizes progress over our tragic status quo,” he tweeted.

    The expansion was opposed by San Francisco city officials, who say autonomous-driving technology is not ready for prime time, and that the companies need to be more transparent in how they operate. On Wednesday, the city’s fire department released details of 55 incidents so far this year where driverless cars interfered in emergency scenes.

    Read more: Driverless cars are driving San Francisco crazy — ‘They are not ready for prime time’

    That’s just the tip of the iceberg: Jeffrey Tumlin, the head of San Francisco’s transportation agency, told MarketWatch in July that the city was seeing “up to 90 incidents per month … of varying degrees, some are minor, some are major obstructions.” Those included instances of autonomous cars stopping in the middle of traffic, crashes and other driving hazards.

    While acknowledging the positives of driverless technology — which its advocates say is much safer than human drivers — Tumlin said the city would like a more gradual expansion of autonomous cars, with limitations, like the next level of a “learner’s permit.”

    Regulation of autonomous vehicles, however, is up to the state.

    The PUC meeting had been delayed twice, and Thursday’s meeting featured public comment from more than 150 people voicing their opinions on both sides of the issue.

    PUC Commissioner Genevieve Shiroma was the sole dissenter on Thursday’s votes, which were absent one member. She told the hearing that there was no rush to make a decision, and advocated delaying the vote again. She noted that Cruise and Waymo claim to have maintained a good safety record, but that there were discrepancies about the data submitted to regulators. “Passengers should not be endangered, first responders should not be prevented from doing their jobs,” she said.

    Alice Reynolds, the president of the CPUC, argued that this was an incremental approval, echoing comments by Commissioner John Reynolds, a former managing counsel at Cruise who did not recuse himself from voting, that the California DMV has already given the companies a permit to operate.

    “We do expect the autonomous-vehicle companies to engage with first responders,” Reynolds said. “In the meantime the resolutions before us to meet our requirements.”

    Teamsters vice president Peter Finn blasted the decision, saying it was “irresponsible and shows a complete disregard for public safety.”

    “Public safety decisions should not be made by regulatory bodies that are in the pocket of Big Tech,” Finn said in a statement, adding that the Teamsters support pending state legislation that would require a trained human operator in autonomous vehicles weighing over 10,000 pounds, which would include most trucks.

    A number of companies have autonomous cars driving on San Francisco streets, but only Cruise and Waymo had been approved for taxi service, with limitations. Earlier this week, the two companies disclosed how many driverless vehicles they operate in San Francisco: Cruise runs 100 vehicles during the day and 300 at night, while Waymo has 250 robotaxis operating.

    That number could soon grow significantly.

    Cruise’s Vogt said in an earnings call last month that Cruise could add “several thousand” robotaxis to San Francisco in an effort to create a disruptive service resembling Uber.

    Therese Poletti contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivian’s stock flat after EV maker raises production guidance

    Rivian’s stock flat after EV maker raises production guidance

    [ad_1]

    This update corrects EPS numbers for Rivian.

    Rivian Automotive Inc. shares were flat in the extended session Tuesday after the EV maker reported a narrower-than-expected quarterly loss, revenue that beat Wall Street expectations, and called for higher production numbers this year.

    Rivian
    RIVN,
    +2.14%

    stock had dropped immediately after the results but turned direction as company executives spoke on a call with analysts, and closed the after-hours session at $24.80, even with where they ended the regular trading day.

    They highlighted Rivian’s cost-savings steps and the goal of turning a gross profit next year, reassured investors about continued demand for their pricey EVs, and highlighted the higher production outlook for the year. At last check, the stock was up 1% after hours.

    Rivian “achieved meaningful reductions” in its vehicles, including its last-mile electric delivery van, “across key components, including material costs, manufacturing labor, overhead and logistics,” Rivian’s Chief Executive RJ Scaringe said during the call.

    “Maintaining our cost-reduction efforts through consistent focus and collaboration across all levels of the company is a core part of the culture we’re building,” he said.

    Rivian lost $1.2 billion, or $1.88 a share, in the second quarter, compared with a loss of $1.7 billion, or $1.89 a share, a year ago. Adjusted for one-time items, Rivian lost $1.08 a share.

    Revenue rose to $1.12 billion thanks to quarterly sales that exceeded expectations, the company said.

    FactSet consensus called for a loss of $1.43 a share for Rivian on sales of $1.02 billion.

    Rivian bumped its 2023 production outlook to 52,000 vehicles, from a previous expectations of 50,000 vehicles.

    The results were “all-around strong,” Truist Securities analyst Jordan Levy said in a note Tuesday.

    Rivian saw improvements in gross margins, thanks to its production and cost-saving initiatives and that appears “to be driving margin improvements faster than our prior expectations,” Levy said.

    Rivian surprised Wall Street last month by announcing second-quarter deliveries that nearly tripled, and production data that more than tripled from a year ago.

    See also: Rivian’s stock has been rocketing, and this analyst now urges a pause

    Rivian shares have gained 36% so far this year, compared with an advance of about 17% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lucid’s stock rises after EV maker keeps 2023 production guidance intact

    Lucid’s stock rises after EV maker keeps 2023 production guidance intact

    [ad_1]

    Lucid Group Inc. shares rallied in the extended session Monday after the luxury EV maker kept unchanged its 2023 production outlook despite weaker quarterly sales.

    “We’re on track toward achieving our 2023 production target of more than 10,000 vehicles, but we recognize we still have work to do to grow our customer base,” Chief Executive Peter Rawlinson said in a statement.

    Shares rose about 3% in after-hours trading.

    Lucid
    LCID,
    -3.17%

    lost $764 million, or 40 cents a share, in the second quarter, compared with a loss of $220 million, or 33 cents a share, in the year-ago period.

    Revenue rose to $150.9 million, from $97 million a year ago.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Lucid to post an adjusted loss of 34 cents a share on sales of $181.6 million.

    Lucid in July reported production and delivery numbers that disappointed Wall Street, and all eyes were on the yearly guidance.

    Lucid, whose largest shareholder is Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, said it ended the quarter with about $6.25 billion in total liquidity, “which is expected to fund the company into 2025.”

    Lucid raised $3 billion in capital in the quarter, including $1.8 billion from the Saudi fund, the company said.

    Read also: Tesla’s stock drops as CFO steps down

    Lucid earlier Monday slashed prices on its EVs by up to 11.5%

    The price-cut news came “as a surprise to us,” because Lucid didn’t seem to have much room to drop prices amid negative gross margins, Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard said.

    Lucid shares have dropped about 6% this year, compared with gains of around 18% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford revenue jumps 12%, but stock dips as Wall Street spooked by shifting EV production goal

    Ford revenue jumps 12%, but stock dips as Wall Street spooked by shifting EV production goal

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co. late Thursday reported quarterly profit that was about three times higher than last year’s and a 12% increase in its revenue, moving it to raise its outlook for 2023, but the beat-and-raise was overshadowed by a delay in EV production goals.

    Ford stock
    F,
    +0.44%

    initially rose about 3% after the positive results, with Chief Executive Jim Farley telling investors that the company’s goal is to match an “exciting, long-term vision” of itself with “boringly predictable execution quarter after quarter, year after year.”

    Share gains started to fade, however, as investors zeroed in on the shifted production goal, and ended the extended session down 1.2%. Ford said it expects to reach a production rate of 600,000 EVs in 2024; when it reported first-quarter earnings in May it said it would reach that milestone by the end of this year.

    The company’s EV production growth has been “disappointing,” CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson said Thursday.

    Nelson said he was “cautious” on Ford in light of the stock’s run so far this year and the possibility that “higher-for-longer” interest rates would weigh on sales after a strong first half of the year. Looming labor negotiations with the United Auto Workers are another reason for caution, he said.

    Ford earned $1.9 billion, or 47 cents a share, in the second quarter, nearly three times higher than in the year-ago period and a 4% margin, the company said. Adjusted for one-time items, the automaker earned 72 cents a share.

    Revenue rose 12% to $45 billion, Ford said, and its cash and liquidity are “persistently strong.” The revenue increase included a 39% rise for Ford’s EV business.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Ford to report adjusted earnings of 54 cents a share on sales of $43.17 billion.

    Supply-chain “disruptions” have persisted but are now easing, and Ford has “more work to do” to streamline its systems, reduce costs and improve quality, Farley said in the call.

    EV adoption is still in the upswing, Farley said, but the number of companies entering the market is growing even at the higher end of the market. With its varied offers, though, Ford is building EV “loyalists” to its brand, Farley said.

    Ford lifted its EBIT guidance range for the full year to between $11 billion and $12 billion. It also adjusted upward its expectations for 2023 adjusted free cash flow to between $6.5 billion and $7 billion. Capital expenditures would be between $8 billion and $9 billion, the automaker said.

    The guidance presumes “headwinds” including “global economic uncertainty and inflationary pressures, higher industrywide customer incentives and continued EV pricing pressure,” Ford said, as well as increased warranty costs and costs associated with union contract negotiations.

    On the positive side, “tailwinds” accounted for in the guidance included “improved” supply chain, higher industry volumes, upside from the its all-new Ford Super Duty truck and lower commodity costs, Ford said.

    Ford earlier this month surprised Wall Street by cutting the price of its sought-after electric pickup truck, the F-150 Lightning.

    Ford earnings close the cycle for major U.S. automakers, as Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -3.27%

    reported second-quarter earnings last week and General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +1.78%

    earlier this week.

    Shares of Ford have gained 19% so far this year, matching the advance for the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.64%
    .
    The stock holds an outperformance, however, in the past three months, up 19% to the S&P’s 11%.

    See also: GM, Hyundai and other car manufacturers to build 30,000 fast EV chargers in challenge to Tesla

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s why Wall Street has fallen out of love with Tesla — for now

    Here’s why Wall Street has fallen out of love with Tesla — for now

    [ad_1]

    Late on Wednesday, Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -1.10%

    reported that quarterly sales were up 47% from a year earlier. But the stock tumbled 10% on Thursday.

    Tesla’s shares are still up 113% this year. The company is among a group of 13 in the S&P 500 that stand out with high growth expectations for sales, earnings and free cash flow through 2025.

    But less than half of analysts polled by FactSet rate Tesla a buy. Emily Bary explains what they are worried about.

    Traders have placed large short bets against Tesla and two of its rival EV makers — Rivian Automotive Inc.
    RIVN,
    -2.09%

    and Nio Inc.
    NIO,
    +2.52%
    .
    Claudia Assis looks into how well those trades have been working out.

    Cody Willard explains why he remains confident that Tesla and Rivian will dominate the EV market over the long term.

    Related coverage:

    Here’s what may propel U.S. stocks for years.

    Chipotle Mexican Grill is among 14 stocks named by Michael Brush for consideration by investors looking to ride along with long-term improvement of U.S. labor productivity.


    AP

    The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.03%

    has returned 19% this year, following its 18% decline in 2022. On the same basis, with dividends reinvested, the benchmark index is still down 2% since the end of 2021.

    What is going on? Michael Brush believes that a high level of corporate investment in new technology and equipment is setting the stage for a long phase of earnings growth for U.S. companies. He shares four developments behind the coming productivity boom and 14 stocks expected to benefit from it.

    A signal for the stock-market’s health


    Getty Images

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.01%

    is up 6% this year. The venerable index has trailed the S&P 500, but its closing level of 35,255.18 on Thursday was only 4% shy of its record close a 36,799.65 on Jan. 4, 2022. Joseph Adinolfi explains Dow Theory, which according to technical analysts is sending a strong bullish signal for the stock market.

    Other opinions about market sentiment:

    Even if you have resisted the idea of a Roth IRA, you may soon be forced to have one

    This year if you are age 50 or older and are already maxing-out your contribution to a 401(K), 403(B) or other qualified employer-sponsored tax-deferred retirement plan at $22,500, you can make an additional “catch up” tax deductible contribution of $7,500 for a total of $30,000. But starting in 2024, the catch up contribution will no longer be tax deductible if you earn at least $145,000 a year. You can still make the contribution with after-tax money into a Roth 401(K) account that your plan administrator may already have set up for you.

    Alessandra Malito provides more details and news about employers’ efforts to delay the rule’s implementation.

    Beth Pinker writes the Fix My Portfolio column. This week she digs into Roth IRA conversions, through which you can simplify your taxes down the line.

    A hot vote in Spain

    The center of Madrid on July 15, 2023. A brutal heat wave could affect turnout for the country’s general election on July 23.


    Uncredited

    Barbara Kollmeyer reports from Spain about a highly contested election on Sunday, with controversy over the government’s policies during the pandemic, parties’ social policies and the possibility of a coalition government that might rattle financial markets.

    Meta vs. Alphabet

    Shares of Meta Platforms Inc. and Alphabet Inc. trade only slightly higher than the S&P 500 on a forward price-to-earnings bases, while Nvidia Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple Inc. trade much higher.


    FactSet

    Leslie Albrecht looks at Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -2.73%
    ,
    which is Facebook’s holding company and has a hit on its hands with the new Threads social-media platform, and Google holding company Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +0.69%
    ,
    to consider which stock is a better buy.

    Brett Arends: ‘I used to work at Nvidia. The stock I got is now half my portfolio. Should I sell?’

    The Ratings Game

    In The Ratings Game column, MarketWatch reporters track analysts’ thoughts about various stocks. Here’s a sampling of this week’s coverage:

    You don’t know every bad factor causing air travel to be nothing but harassment

    Getting there is half the fun.


    Getty Images

    The U.S. flying scene — from shortages of equipment and labor (and runways) to ill-staffed air-traffic control towers — is a well-known nightmare for U.S. travelers. But there is more to the story. Jeremy Binckes looks into other factors that may surprise you and cause great inconvenience this summer.

    The Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates again next week

    The Federal Open Market Committee will meet next Tuesday and Wednesday, to be immediately followed by a policy announcement. Economists expect the central to raise the federal-funds rate by another quarter point. The question is whether or not this will end the Fed’s inflation-fighting rate cycle.

    More coverage of the Fed:

    How much would you pay for 100% downside protection in the stock market?


    MarketWatch illustration/iStockphoto

    Over the past 30 years, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,

    has returned 1,650%, for an average annual return of 10%, with dividends reinvested, according to FactSet. But it hasn’t been a smooth ride. The ETF, which tracks the benchmark S&P 500, fell 18% last year and 37% during 2008, for example. And there have been even larger declines if the analysis isn’t confined to calendar years.

    But can you ride through market declines? Many studies have shown that most investors who try to time the market sell after a decline has started and buy back in well after a recovery is under way, which means their long-term performance can suffer significantly.

    In this week’s ETF Wrap column (and emailed newsletter), Isabel Wang describes a new buffered fund that can give you 100% downside protection over a two-year period, in return for a cap on your potential gains in the stock market. Here’s the price you would pay for the protection.

    The World Cup games have started

    Hannah Wilkinson scored the home team’s first goal against Norway during the first World Cup game in Auckland, New Zealand, on July 20.


    Getty Images

    The Women’s World Cup began Thursday with an upset victory by New Zealand over Norway.

    James Rogers reports on what is expected to be a much easier environment for FIFA and corporate sponsors than that of last year’s Men’s World Cup in Qatar.

    U.S. Soccer Federation President Cindy Parlow Cone participated in MarketWatch’s Best New Ideas in Money podcast and spoke about the long-term effort to achieve equal treatment for women soccer players.

    More coverage of the World Cup:

    Want more from MarketWatch? Sign up for this and other newsletters to get the latest news and advice on personal finance and investing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla reports 47% rise in sales for its second quarter, but profitability shrinks

    Tesla reports 47% rise in sales for its second quarter, but profitability shrinks

    [ad_1]

    Tesla Inc. late Wednesday reported second-quarter earnings and sales that topped Wall Street’s expectations and kept intact its 2023 goal of making about 1.8 million vehicles this year, but the stock headed lower as results didn’t quite match expectations of a blowout quarter.

    Losses for the shares accelerated after Chief Executive Elon Musk warned investors to expect “slightly” lower production in the current quarter due to factories that need to undergo upgrades. At last check, Tesla shares were down 4.3% in after-hours trading.

    Tesla
    TSLA,
    -0.71%

    earned $2.7 billion, or 78 cents a share, in the quarter, compared with $2.3 billion, or 65 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted for one-time items, the EV maker earned 91 cents a share.

    Revenue rose 47% to $24.9 billion.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Tesla to report adjusted earnings of 80 cents a share on sales of $24.2 billion.

    In a call with analysts after the results, Musk said demand for the Cybertruck, Tesla’s electric pickup expected to be available later this year, “is so off the hook you can’t even see the hook.”

    Musk used the word “turbulent” to describe the global economic background, but said that he has “high confidence in the long-term value of Tesla.”

    Tesla’s bottom-line beat was “fairly sizeable,” CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson said in an interview with MarketWatch. But “this was sort of an uneventful release with no change to prior 2023 volume guidance,” he said.

    “The truth is that the bar had been set pretty high heading into this release given Tesla’s meteoric run-up so far in 2023,” Nelson said. Tesla shares have more than doubled thus far in the year.

    Tesla’s gross margins, another perennial preoccupation for Tesla investors in the face of several price cuts this year, were worse than expected at 18.2%, compared with consensus around 18.8%, and 25% in the second quarter of 2022, he added.

    During the call with analysts, Tesla Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn called the margin drop “modest.”

    The factory upgrades will carry “some amount of factory idle cost,” but Tesla is working to minimize these costs as much as possible, Kirkhorn said.

    Don’t miss: Cathie Wood’s ARK funds shed more Tesla and Coinbase shares, continue Twilio buying spree

    Tesla delivered a “Goldilocks” second quarter, Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a note late Wednesday. Margins were better than feared despite the “aggressive” price cuts, he said.

    Operating margins and revenue dropped to 9.6%, from operating margins of 11% in the first quarter.

    Tesla called them “healthy” even with the price cuts the auto maker went for earlier in the year, and said the margins reflected “ongoing cost reduction efforts”; the production ramp in the Berlin, Germany, and Texas factories; and the “strong performance” of its energy and services businesses.

    Tesla is focusing on “cost reduction, new product development that will enable future growth, investments in R&D, better vehicle financing options, continuous product improvement and generation of free cash flow,” executives said in a letter to shareholders accompanying results.

    “The challenges of these uncertain times are not over, but we believe we have the right ingredients for the long-term success of the business through a variety of high-potential projects,” the letter said.

    Tesla earlier this month reported second-quarter deliveries, its proxy for sales, well above Wall Street expectations, sparking another rally for the stock. Tesla has gained 137% so far this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +0.24%
    .

    Related: Tesla, Rivian are the most shorted stocks in autos, but the trade is far from profitable

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cathie Wood’s ARK funds dump $26 million more in Coinbase stock, shed $13 million more of Tesla shares

    Cathie Wood’s ARK funds dump $26 million more in Coinbase stock, shed $13 million more of Tesla shares

    [ad_1]

    Funds associated with Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment continued to cull shares of Coinbase Global Inc. and Tesla Inc. on Monday, according to recent trade disclosures.

    The ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
    ARKF,
    +1.58%

    dumped 76,788 Coinbase shares
    COIN,
    +0.23%

    on the day, while the ARK Innovation ETF
    ARKK,
    +2.29%

    sold 127,266 and the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
    ARKW,
    +2.23%

    sold 44,784 shares.

    Those were worth $26.3 million based on Coinbase’s Monday closing price of $105.55, and the sales follow ARK’s move to dump about $50 million in Coinbase’s stock Friday.

    Coinbase represents 0.78% of the Fintech Innovation ETF, along with 0.15% of the Innovation ETF and 0.30% of the Next Generation Internet ETF. ARK disclosed the transactions and weightings in the daily trade notifications it posts to its website.

    Read: Coinbase’s spectacular stock surge after Ripple ruling sparks fierce debate

    Meanwhile, the ARK Innovation ETF shed 38,329 Tesla shares
    TSLA,
    +3.20%

    on Monday, while the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF sold 6,855. Those shares were worth $13.1 million based on Tesla’s Monday closing level of $290.38. Tesla represents about 0.12% of both funds as they continue to unload shares.

    Don’t miss: Tesla is looking at its best sales quarter ever

    ARK scooped up 455 shares of Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +0.57%

    within its Next Generation Internet ETF and bought up 3,729 shares within the ARK Innovation ETF. That amounted to $1.3 million worth of stock based on Meta’s $310.62 Monday close.

    Two ARK funds bought a combined $790 million in Robinhood Markets Inc.’s stock
    HOOD,
    +0.89%
    ,
    with the fintech fund scooping up 25,641 shares and the Next Generation Internet ETF buying 37,630 shares. ARK added 4,608 shares of SoFi Technologies Inc.
    SOFI,
    +4.41%

    to the fintech fund, worth $43,683 based on Monday’s close.

    See also: SoFi’s stock catches another downgrade as analyst says it ‘needs to be valued more like a bank’

    ARK was also active in shares of Twilio Inc.
    TWLO,
    -0.63%
    ,
    buying 15,702 within the Fintech Innovation ETF, 133,499 within the Innovation ETF and 22,748 within the Next Generation Internet ETF. That amounted to $11.4 million in Twilio’s stock based on Monday’s $66.47 closing price.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivian stock falls with Tesla’s Cybertruck seen as ‘fundamental and headline risk’

    Rivian stock falls with Tesla’s Cybertruck seen as ‘fundamental and headline risk’

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Rivian Automotive Inc. were being driven toward a third-straight loss Monday, after Tesla Inc.’s first Cybertruck was rolled off the assembly line over the weekend.

    “We see competitive pricing and specs for the Cybertruck as a fundamental and headline risk to [Rivian],” wrote Baird analyst Ben Kallo in a note to clients.

    Rivian’s stock
    RIVN,
    -3.25%

    dropped 2.5% in premarket trading. It has shed 4.2% over the past two sessions, after closing July 12 at a seven-month high.

    Tesla shares
    TSLA,
    +3.38%

    gained 2.0%, putting them on track to open at a 10-month high.

    Rivian’s R1T electric truck has a starting price of $73,000 and the R1S sport-utility vehicle (SUV) starts at $78,000, while reports have the Cybertruck starting at around $40,000.

    Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk said in early 2023 that volume production of the Cybertruck would start in 2024. The Cybertruck was first unveiled in 2019, but faced a number of production delays since then.

    Meanwhile, Baird’s Kallo also said despite Rivian’s (RIVN) strong second-quarter deliveries report, he was “cautious” about Rivian’s stock ahead of second-quarter results, which are due out Aug. 8, given concerns over the costs of the development of the electric vehicle maker’s Georgia facility.

    “As both a positive and a negative, RIVN will need to raise capital in the near to medium term in order to fund the project and note that the recent stock appreciation may create an attractive opportunity for RIVN to execute an equity raise,” Baird wrote.

    Rivian’s stock has run up 80.8% over the past three months through Friday, while Tesla’s stock has run up 50.4% and the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +0.07%

    has gained 7.1%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon on Friday said the U.S. economy was basically doing OK, even if customers were spending “a little more slowly.”

    But with rivals like Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and American Express Co. set to report quarterly results this week, recession agita still prevails.

    For evidence, look no further than JPMorgan’s
    JPM,
    +0.60%

    own quarterly results. The bank’s second-quarter profit blew past expectations, but it set aside $2.9 billion during the second quarter to cover potentially bad loans, amid concerns that more consumers could run into more difficulty paying their bills on time as higher prices manage to stick at stores.

    That figure was well up from $1.1 billion in the same quarter last year, although still far below the billions it stowed away when the pandemic first hit. Similarly, Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    -0.34%

    on Friday set aside $1.7 billion for loan losses in this year’s second quarter, nearly triple what it was a year ago.

    The figures underscore the anxiety over the second half of this year, when many economists expect the economy to tilt into a recession. However, for the 500 companies in the S&P 500 index, Wall Street analysts still expect profit growth.

    Any downturn could be exacerbated by the pressure investors have put on companies, potentially via more layoffs and money-saving technology, to keep prices high and cut costs to replicate the abnormally large profit-margin gains they put up in 2021 and 2022. Businesses have indeed kept prices high, at least for many basic necessities, in an effort to cover their own higher costs and to pad profits.

    When Bank of America
    BAC,
    -1.89%

    reports this week, the results will narrow the lens on lending and spending in the U.S. Results from Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    -0.50%

    and Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -0.76%

    will fill in the gaps on trading and deal-making. American Express
    AXP,
    -0.49%

    will give a more detailed breakdown of what consumers are still spending their money on, after Delta Air Lines Inc.
    DAL,
    -2.35%

    — which has a partnership with AmEx — said that travel demand remained “robust.”

    Banks shoveled more money into their reserve stockpiles in 2020 to bulk up against the pandemic’s shutdown of the economy. A year later, they started releasing those funds as the economy reopened and recovered. FactSet expects the broader banking sector to plump up its cash cushion during this year’s second quarter to account for more late loan payments or potential defaults.

    In a report on Friday, FactSet said the 15 banking-industry companies in the S&P 500 Index tracked by the firm were on pace to set aside $9.9 billion to cover losses from souring loans in the second quarter. That’s more than double the amount set aside a year ago. And if that $9.9 billion figure, based on actual and projected financial figures, ends up as the actual figure at the end of the quarter, it would mark the highest since the beginning of the pandemic and the third highest in five years, according to FactSet data.

    “The U.S. economy continues to be resilient,” Dimon said in a statement on Friday. “Consumer balance sheets remain healthy, and consumers are spending, albeit a little more slowly. Labor markets have softened somewhat, but job growth remains strong.”

    However, he noted difficulties in JPMorgan’s investment banking segment. And he said consumer savings were slowly eroding as inflation endures.

    As the nation’s biggest bank, JPMorgan has flexed its financial muscle this year, swallowing up First Republic after that bank got into trouble. But as it consolidates power and influence, building thicker armor against shocks to the economy, its financial results might not always reflect the struggles of its smaller rivals, where difficulties are likely felt more acutely. Analysts at Raymond James said that while JPMorgan remained a “best in breed” bank, its outlook pointed to “heightened challenges for smaller banks.”

    See also: Jamie Dimon says U.S. consumers are in ‘good shape.’ This evidence may prove otherwise.

    This week in earnings

    For the week ahead, 60 S&P 500 companies, including five from the Dow, will report quarterly results, according to FactSet. Two big oil companies, Halliburton Co.
    HAL,
    -2.28%

    and Baker Hughes Co.,
    BKR,
    -0.95%

    will report, as oil prices fall from levels seen last year. Results from two transportation giants — trucking company J.B. Hunt Transport Services
    JBHT,
    -0.42%

    and railroad operator CSX Corp.
    CSX,
    -0.27%

    — will also be a proxy for how much people are buying things and having them shipped. United Airlines Holdings Inc.
    UAL,
    -3.42%

    and American Airlines Group
    AAL,
    -1.68%

    will also report.

    The call to put on your calendar

    Netflix results: Hollywood shutdown, ‘slow-growth’ expectations. Hollywood’s writers — and now its actors — have gone on strike, and Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    -1.88%

    reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. The streaming platform will likely face questions over how much content it has left in the tank, as the strike upends studio-production schedules and leaves viewers with vast expanses of reruns. Still, Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen said that the production standstill “may ironically drive even more viewers to streaming services.”

    The writers and actors argue that the studio industry — increasingly consolidated, increasingly publicly traded, increasingly oriented around a handful of film franchises — has profited immensely while skimping on things benefits and streaming residuals. But after a decade-long rise, and a recent shift in investor focus from subscriber growth to profit growth, Netflix has emerged as one of the biggest production powerhouses in the business. And after years of flooding customers with new films and shows, it’s trying to squeeze out sales via more boring ways: things like a password-sharing crackdown and ads.

    Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio at Synovus Trust Co., said Netflix still faced a plenty of streaming competition amid “muted” subscriber growth. But Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter said investors should look at Netflix as a profitable, albeit more mature company.

    “We think Netflix is well-positioned in this murky environment as streamers are shifting strategy, and should be valued as an immensely profitable, slow-growth company,” Pachter said in a research note on Friday.

    “Even while the ad-supported tier is not yet directly accretive (we think it will be accretive over time), the ad-tier should continue to reduce churn and draw new subscribers to the service,” he continued.

    The number to watch

    Tesla sales. Electric-vehicle maker Tesla Inc. also reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. And like streaming, some analysts say the fervor for EVs has faded.

    However, they also said that Tesla
    TSLA,
    +1.25%

    had so far been immune from the malaise. And even though Elon Musk remains preoccupied with Twitter — which now faces competition from Meta Platforms Inc.’s
    META,
    -1.45%

    Threads — Tesla’s second-quarter deliveries were far above expectations. Sales are expected to be big. And one analyst said that price cuts, which Tesla has used to capture more of the auto market in China, were likely “fairly minimal” during the second quarter. But some analysts wondered what the blowout delivery figures would mean for margins. And the industry, broadly, has increasingly tested the patience of profit-minded investors.

    “We’ve now seen a market where demand is constrained, capital has been tighter, and there is less tolerance for EV related losses,” Barclays analysts said in a note last week, adding that there was a “step back from EV euphoria.”

    Claudia Assis contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After years of delays, Tesla builds its first Cybertruck

    After years of delays, Tesla builds its first Cybertruck

    [ad_1]

    After years of delays, Tesla Inc.’s first Cybertruck rolled off the assembly line Saturday in Austin, Texas.

    “First Cybertruck built at Giga Texas!” the electric-vehicle maker tweeted Saturday. “Congrats Tesla Team!,” Chief Executive Elon Musk replied on Twitter.

    A prototype of the angular, futuristic-looking pickup was unveiled by Musk in 2019, but production was repeatedly delayed due to what Tesla said were supply-chain issues.

    Earlier this year, Musk said the first Cybertrucks would be made this year, with volume production starting in 2024.

    The Cybertruck will be Tesla’s biggest new-vehicle launch since the Model Y in 2020, and analysts have high expectations that it will help to significantly boost sales.

    Wall Street expects fewer than 10,000 Cybertruck deliveries this year, according to Barron’s, but closer to 100,000 in 2024.

    Read more: With the Cybertruck, Tesla faces its Edsel moment

    Tesla shares
    TSLA,
    +1.25%

    have surged 128% year to date, compared to the S&P 500’s
    SPX,
    -0.10%

    17% gain.

    Updated with the Model Y being the previous major launch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link