ReportWire

Tag: agreement

  • Monaco billionaire strikes deal to grant public access to Big Sur property with breathtaking views

    Monaco billionaire strikes deal to grant public access to Big Sur property with breathtaking views

    [ad_1]

    Drivers and Big Sur visitors will soon gain access to more breathtaking views of the Bixby Bridge and rugged bluffs of Highway 1 along California’s central coast under a recent deal between state regulators and a Monaco billionaire to open an iconic piece of cliff-side property to the public.

    The California Coastal Commission and Rocky Point owner Patrice Pastor landed an agreement last month to open the 2.5-acre seaside parcel to the public in exchange for clearing violations related to unapproved construction and property changes made by the former owners.

    Pastor’s real estate company, Esperanza Carmel, purchased the Big Sur property, most notably the site of the since-shuttered Rocky Point Restaurant, for $8 million in 2021, according to the Mercury News, with plans to open a high-end 166-seat restaurant and 14-room inn with views of some of California’s most beautiful terrain.

    But Pastor inherited a slew of issues with the land, including investigations by the coastal commission into infrastructural changes made to the “environmentally sensitive habitat” by its former owners without approval. The owners also had limited public access to the land with “no trespassing” signs and locked gates, according to the Mercury.

    The cliff-side restaurant, located about 10 miles south of the charming coastal town Carmel-by-the-Sea, boasted panoramic views of the awe-inspiring scenery along Highway 1, where visitors could “catch a glimpse of playful sea-otters, dolphins, seals, and many whales as they migrate up the coast.” It closed in 2020 during COVID.

    The coastal commission agreed to clear violations and any potential fines if Pastor committed to making property improvements and guaranteeing development rights to the surrounding bluffs. He also agreed to replace the “no trespassing” signs with those signaling public access, and said he would improve trail access and add bathrooms and significant parking space. The agreement was signed May 17, the Mercury reported.

    Pastor, a billionaire from Monaco who has in recent years purchased several properties in Carmel, bought the Big Sur land with ambitions to develop the property and open a restaurant, inn and visitor center. The agreement is limited to clearing the violations and guaranteeing public access, but could eventually make it easier for Pastor to earn approval for the redevelopment plans.

    Esperanza Carmel did not return requests for comment.

    The coastal commission is expected to formally approve the agreement during its June 14 meeting in Morro Bay.

    [ad_2]

    Hannah Wiley

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Hays County Commissioners’ Court Approves Three…

    Austin Pets Alive! | Hays County Commissioners’ Court Approves Three…

    [ad_1]


    Hays County Courthouse, San Marcos, TX – The Hays County Commissioners’ Court approved the Professional Services Agreement with Austin Pets Alive! (APA!) to be extended through June 30, 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California State University faculty vote in pay raises and other benefits amid strike

    California State University faculty vote in pay raises and other benefits amid strike

    [ad_1]

    (FOX40.COM) — After a lengthy negotiation process and strikes, the California Faculty Association ratified a vote that adds pay increases and other benefits for California State University instructors to their employment contracts.
    •Video Above: Faculty begins weeklong strike at Sacramento State, other CSU campuses

    “The California State University (CSU) is pleased with the results of the California Faculty Association’s (CFA) ratification vote,” the CSU chancellor’s office said in a statement on Monday.

    The tentative agreement provides a 10 percent general salary increase to all faculty by July. It also includes a raise in salary minimums for the lowest-paid faculty that will result in increases—some as high as 21 percent—for many of them, according to the chancellor’s office.

    It also addresses issues that the CFA identified as “extremely important to its members, such as increased paid family leave from six to 10 weeks and a process for making gender-inclusive restrooms and lactation spaces more easily accessible.”

    “We look forward to the CSU Board of Trustees Committee on collective bargaining ratification of the agreement in March and to continue working in partnership with the CFA and its members to carry out our mission in service to our students and the university,” the CSU chancellor’s office said.

    The CFA went on strike in 2023 and again in January 2024. The most recent strike (January 2024) was planned for the first week of the spring semester. After one day, CSU agreed to negotiate.

    [ad_2]

    Veronica Catlin

    Source link

  • Would you take cash to leave a rent-controlled apartment? Data show it happens often in L.A.

    Would you take cash to leave a rent-controlled apartment? Data show it happens often in L.A.

    [ad_1]

    In 2022, not long after a new owner bought the Highland Park rental home where Ana Lopez, 66, lives with her husband, the tenants began receiving offers to leave. At first it was about $22,000, she said. One of her neighbors took the offer and left. But Lopez, desperate to stay in the rent-controlled home where she has lived for more than two decades and pays $800 a month, repeatedly turned down the offers, even when the amount increased to $100,000.

    After taxes, she felt, the money was not enough to remain long-term in her community, where the average monthly rent is more than $2,000 and the median sale price of a home is more than $1 million.

    She’s felt pressured to go and has been informed that the owner plans to demolish the property. But, she says, “We’re going to keep fighting to stay in our home.”

    Buyout offers — also known as “cash for keys” — have become a frequently used tool for landlords hoping to get tenants to leave rent-controlled apartments without going through a formal eviction process, which can take time, be costly and is governed by strict rules. But it has been difficult to say exactly how often renter buyouts happen across Los Angeles. Last week, data released by City Controller Kenneth Mejia’s office shed some light on the subject, showing that from 2019-23 nearly 5,000 “cash for keys” agreements were filed with the city.

    Neighborhoods in Koreatown, Echo Park and Mid-Wilshire topped the list for the number of agreements. Lopez’s Highland Park neighborhood was also among the top ZIP codes.

    In a statement, Mejia’s office said “tenant buyouts are a tactic that landlords use to compel tenants to move out of RSO (Rent Stabilization Ordinance) units or rent-controlled units, often so landlords can re-rent these units to new tenants at market-rate prices. In many cases, buyout amounts are not enough for tenants to afford continuing to live in the City of Los Angeles long term.”

    Tenant advocates say the numbers reported to the city fall short of fully capturing the extent to which cash for keys is happening across the city. They note that the data include only agreements — not the offers, which often happen informally with a person knocking on the door or making a phone call. Even the agreements themselves, advocates say, may not end up being filed with the city.

    “The number of such notices filed with LAHD is likely a tiny fraction of such agreements,” said Gary Blasi, professor of law emeritus at UCLA School of Law.

    Landlords say the buyout agreements can be a useful tool, giving tenants an incentive to move and creating a win-win for owners, who get their units back, and renters, who leave with some money to help pay for housing going forward. The average amount of a buyout, according to the data was $24,704.

    But tenant advocates say even that amount — or more — is often not enough to allow low-income families to continue living in L.A. neighborhoods where the cost of housing has soared in recent years, especially after taxes.

    “When it comes as a lump sum you think, ‘That’s a lot of money’ but you also need to know what it’s going to cost you to stay housed on the open market,” Blasi said. “What looks to be like a big lump sum windfall could actually leave the tenant in a much worse situation than they are.”

    Tenants and advocates also say that people who turn down the offers are often met with harassment by landlords.

    “We’ve had tenants report that people come by their home every day at dinner banging on the door telling them they really should take the offer, or people who come by really late at night,” said Cynthia Strathmann, executive director for the nonprofit advocacy group Strategic Actions for a Just Economy. “And there’s other kinds of harassment, persistent neglect — a landlord will refuse to fix anything in the apartment and then really insistently offer them cash for keys until the pressure of living in an apartment that’s really in terrible condition will prompt the tenant to move.”

    Strathmann said communities at the top of the controller’s list, like Koreatown and Echo Park, are ones where there’s an especially big difference between the monthly rent paid by a long-term tenant in a rent-controlled unit and what a landlord could command on the current market.

    Chris Gray, president of the property management company Moss & Co., said cash for keys agreements became especially important tools for landlords after the pandemic, when many tenants racked up large amounts of unpaid rent debt.

    “Landlords are in a tough position and all they want to do is get someone into their unit to pay rent,” he said.

    An eviction through the courts can take months and cost tens of thousands of dollars in attorney fees, Gray noted.

    “When you look at a whole picture like that, a landlord would be happy to forgive past rent debt of $30,000, $40,000, or whatever it may be, to get them out and avoid the whole eviction process.”

    The city began regulating buyout agreements and collecting information about them in 2017 after tenant advocates began protesting what they saw as an increasing practice of property owners displacing residents of rent-controlled units without fully informing them of their rights.

    The Tenant Buyout Notification Program requires landlords to provide information to renters when making a buyout offer. They must inform tenants that they are entitled to minimum compensation, which ranges from $9,900 to $24,650, depending on various factors including how long the tenant has lived in the home and whether they are elderly or disabled. Tenants are also told that they have the right to refuse or rescind the offer and to consult with an attorney or the housing department.

    Under the program, landlords are also required to file any agreements with the L.A. housing department. Those filings are the basis for the analysis that was released by the controller’s office.

    According to the data, buyout filings peaked in 2019, when there were 1,209 agreements. Last year there were 789 agreements filed with the city.

    The buyout ordinance allows tenants to “bring a private right of action against a landlord who violates” the rules and to recover damages and a penalty of $500. But that’s a step many low-income residents are unlikely to take, Blasi said.

    “I think the city should look again at the tenant buyout notification program and look to put some teeth into it and do some serious outreach to tenants and landlords about the existence of it,” Blasi said. “That can only help everybody who is operating in good faith.”

    [ad_2]

    Paloma Esquivel

    Source link

  • Content is still king: Landmark deal with ESPN to boost a broad range of NCAA sports

    Content is still king: Landmark deal with ESPN to boost a broad range of NCAA sports

    [ad_1]

    ESPN used its exclusive negotiating window to reach an eight-year, $920-million deal with the NCAA on Thursday, an arrangement that extends a relationship that began when ESPN was launched in 1979 and has proved lucrative for both parties since.

    The new contract — worth $115 million a year — proves that even in a fragmented media landscape, content is king and college sports draw a significant, and growing, television audience on cable and through streaming.

    The agreement is worth roughly three times the annual value of the current deal, and the NCAA said production and marketing costs assumed by ESPN would add another $25 million to $30 million per year. Slightly more than half the money — about $65 million a year — will go to women’s basketball, which despite discussions of the sport cutting its own deal remained in the bundle.

    The largest audience for a women’s college basketball game was last year’s NCAA championship game between LSU and Iowa, and the same was true for the women’s volleyball final in December between Texas and Nebraska. The basketball game drew nearly 10 million viewers on ESPN+.

    The NCAA and ESPN announced that the agreement will take effect Sept. 1, run through 2032 and include 40 NCAA championships — 21 women’s and 19 men’s. Among the increasingly popular sports besides women’s basketball and volleyball are baseball and softball.

    Many of the events will be aired on ABC, which, like ESPN, is owned by Walt Disney Co. More than 2,300 hours of NCAA championships will appear on combined linear and digital platforms annually, ESPN said.

    The NCAA and ESPN moved quickly to come to an agreement before other potential suitors could join the fray. ESPN had exclusive negotiating rights through the summer.

    “The NCAA has worked in earnest over the past year to ensure that this new broadcast agreement provides the best possible outcome for all NCAA championships, and in particular women’s championships,” NCAA President Charlie Baker said in a statement. “Over the past several years, ESPN has demonstrated increased investment in NCAA championship coverage.”

    The negotiations were the first since ESPN and the NCAA agreed to a 12-year, $500-million deal in 2011. A clear strategy for the NCAA was to place as many sports as possible on the same platform. The package includes championships in Division I men’s gymnastics and men’s and women’s tennis, as well as Division II and Division III men’s and women’s basketball and women’s volleyball.

    “Having one multiplatform home to showcase our championships provides additional growth potential along with a greater experience for the viewer and our student-athletes,” Baker said.

    Dealing directly with the NCAA rather than conferences appears to be ESPN’s strategy. The network declined to bail out the Pac-12 with a deal that might have kept the conference from all but disbanding, and also passed on a Big Ten media rights deal, which ultimately was divided among Fox, CBS and NBC.

    An exception is the 10-year deal that ESPN cut with the behemoth SEC in December that made the network the exclusive rights holder of the conference’s football and men’s basketball telecasts. Next up for ESPN could be renewing the rights to the College Football Playoff. The current deal ends in two years.

    Disney executives Jimmy Pitaro and Bob Iger have indicated a desire to partner with one or more tech companies as ESPN transitions into a sports streaming giant. Locking down a broad range of NCAA content might increase the appeal.

    “ESPN and the NCAA have enjoyed a strong and collaborative relationship for more than four decades, and we are thrilled that it will continue as part of this new, long-term agreement,” Pitaro said in a statement. “The ESPN networks and platforms will exclusively present a record number of championships, including all rounds of several marquee events that, together with the NCAA, we have grown over time.”

    Missing from the contract is the most lucrative NCAA tentpole event: the Division I men’s basketball tournament, a.k.a. March Madness. Paramount Global and Warner Bros. Discovery have a deal with the NCAA for the event that extends through 2032 and pays nearly $900 million a year to broadcast the games on CBS and the Turner cable networks.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Henson

    Source link

  • Florida company targeted California homeowners with predatory scheme, state attorney general alleges

    Florida company targeted California homeowners with predatory scheme, state attorney general alleges

    [ad_1]

    The California attorney general has sued a Florida-based real estate firm, alleging it ran a predatory scheme that limited homeowners’ ability to sell and left them vulnerable to owing thousands of dollars.

    The company, MV Realty, has been sued over similar allegations by multiple states. In September, the firm filed for bankruptcy.

    In its lawsuit announced Thursday, the California attorney general’s office alleged MV Realty targeted financially vulnerable California homeowners with deceptive marketing, promising them $300 to $5,000 as long as they gave MV Realty the “opportunity” to be their real estate agent if they sold their house.

    In reality, MV Realty’s Homeowner Benefit Agreement was far more complicated and the company trained its representatives to give misleading responses to consumer questions and to try to provide the full agreement only at the time of signing, which limited the ability of homeowners to review confusing fine print, the lawsuit alleged.

    “MV Realty is a financial predator,” Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said in a statement. “Through its one-sided agreements, the company lined its own pockets at the expense of vulnerable homeowners in California, holding their most valuable assets hostage.”

    MV Realty did not immediately return requests for comment by email and phone.

    According to the attorney general, the MV Realty agreement mandated homeowners use the brokerage if they sell their home in the next 40 years — far longer than typical exclusive listing agreements that last several months, the lawsuit says.

    When a homeowner sells within the four decades, the lawsuit says, MV Realty gets six months to list the property, per the agreement. If the company completes the sale, the homeowner is required to pay MV Realty the greater of 3% of the sales price or 3% of the home’s value at the time the owner signed the benefit agreement, authorities said.

    If MV Realty can’t sell the home within six months, the agreement says homeowners get 60 days to try to sell the home on their own or with another brokerage and must do so at the same price and terms MV Realty offered, according to the lawsuit.

    If homeowners can sell, they owe MV Realty nothing. But if they cannot — which authorities said is likely — homeowners must use MV Realty to sell or pay a fee of 3% of the home’s value to terminate the 40-year agreement, according to the lawsuit. On an average home in L.A. County today, that would be over $25,000.

    That termination fee is typically more than 10 times the upfront fee the homeowner received from MV Realty, the lawsuit says.

    In its lawsuit, the attorney general alleged that the agreement reduces the incentive for MV Realty to provide quality service and that the company violated California law in several ways, including unlicensed activity and improper disclosures.

    According to the attorney general, since early 2022 at least 1,443 California homeowners signed the company’s Homeowner Benefit Agreement. The company “supposedly stopped” signing up California homeowners by November 2022 but still enforces existing agreements, as well as liens that limit the homeowner’s ability to refinance, the lawsuit alleges.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • A fifth hotel has reached a tentative agreement with striking workers

    A fifth hotel has reached a tentative agreement with striking workers

    [ad_1]

    Unite Here Local 11, the union representing hotel workers in Southern California who have been striking on and off for nearly five months, said it has reached a tentative contract agreement with Le Merigot Santa Monica.

    The contract will — once it’s ratified — raise wages, strengthen pensions and increase investments in healthcare for about 100 employees at Le Merigot,union spokesperson Maria Hernandez said.

    Le Merigot, a Marriott hotel, is the fifth property to reach a deal with the union.

    The first was the Westin Bonaventure, which reached a tentative deal just as contracts were set to expire June 30 for more than 15,000 hotel workers at some 60 properties in Los Angeles and Orange counties. The second was the Biltmore in downtown L.A.’s financial district, which announced a deal in September. Last month, the union announced agreements with Loews Hollywood and Laguna Cliffs Marriott in Dana Point.

    “We have now won standard-setting contracts in downtown L.A., Hollywood, Orange County and Santa Monica. There are no excuses for the rest. Workers deserve to share in the prosperity of the tourism industry,” said Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11.

    The union has declined to give specifics on wages and other economic details of the agreements it has reached thus far, and the contracts have not yet been put to a vote by workers.

    Keith Grossman, an attorney representing a group of more than 40 Southern California hotel owners and operators in talks with the union, did not respond to a request for comment.

    Peter Hillan, spokesperson for the Hotel Assn. of Los Angeles, said Le Merigot was not a member of the hotel group. Santa Monica hotels that are part of the coordinated bargaining group include Fairmont Miramar, Le Meridien Delfina, Courtyard by Marriott, Hampton Inn & Suites and the Viceroy, Hillan said.

    The union held a gathering with faith community leaders Thursday to discuss instances of violence against picketing hotel workers as well as the alleged exploitation of unhoused migrant workers brought in to replace striking workers at Le Meridien Delfina in Santa Monica.

    The event, held at St. Augustine By-the-Sea church in Santa Monica was attended by local leaders including former Los Angeles Councilman Mike Bonin and Santa Monica Human Services Commissioner Luis Barrera Castañón, the union said in a news release.

    The union also sent a letter last week to Santa Monica City Attorney Douglas T. Sloan urging the city to investigate possible violations of local laws by Le Meridien Delfina and other hotels that hired migrants as replacement workers.

    The letter notes potential violations of hourly wages below Santa Monica‘s minimum of $19.73 and failures to provide “panic buttons” for workers’ safety and related training.

    The letter cites reporting by The Times that also prompted an investigation by Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón. In the letter, the union said it has also requested that the California labor commissioner investigate the hotels’ and subcontractors’ compliance with state laws regarding itemized wage statements and lunch and rest breaks.

    [ad_2]

    Suhauna Hussain

    Source link

  • 180 Life Sciences Announces an Agreement for a Clinical Pharmacology Study Testing a New Formulation of CBD for Enhanced Oral Uptake – World News Repo… – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    180 Life Sciences Announces an Agreement for a Clinical Pharmacology Study Testing a New Formulation of CBD for Enhanced Oral Uptake – World News Repo… – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    /EIN News/ — PALO ALTO, Calif., Aug. 07, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — 180 Life Sciences Corp. (NASDAQ: ATNF) (“180 Life Sciences” or the “Company”), today announced that an agreement has been reached with Prof. Avi Domb of the Hebrew University, School of Pharmacy, and with Prof. Elyad Davidson, of Hadassah Hospital, to perform a clinical pharmacology (“Pharmacokinetic” or “PK”) study of the uptake of cannabidiol (CBD) in a formulation which can be delivered as a pill orally. The PK study will seek to determine how much CBD is taken up into the blood of volunteers.

    While CBD preparations have previously been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for rare forms of childhood epilepsy, a major problem in working with CBD is its low and unpredictable and variable uptake following the most convenient delivery form, by mouth, as CBD in oil. This has hampered progress and clinical trials seeking potential uses for CBD, such as for the treatment of pain, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), head trauma, and more, where reports have suggested the possibility of benefits. To help try to solve this problem, Prof. Domb and colleagues have developed “ProNanoLipospheres” (PNL), a mixture of components available over-the-counter, which form little droplets and have been shown to be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into blood. The dosage form has been shown in preliminary testing in rats to…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Getting Out of Your Franchise Agreement | Entrepreneur

    Getting Out of Your Franchise Agreement | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Are you a franchisee who’s feeling stuck? Do you want to find a way out of your franchisee agreement? Perhaps the terms and conditions are too restrictive, or maybe the franchise is not performing as well as you had hoped. It’s natural to feel frustrated and unsure of how to move forward, whatever the reason may be.

    If you find yourself in a franchise agreement that is no longer meeting your needs, it may be time to explore your options for getting out. Here, we’re outlining five steps you can take to navigate the process of ending your franchise agreement and moving on to new opportunities.

    Whether you’re looking to sell your franchise or terminate your agreement early, these steps will help you understand your rights and responsibilities and make informed decisions about your next move.

    Related: Is Franchising Right For You? Ask Yourself These 9 Questions to Find Out.

    Review your franchise agreement

    Your franchise agreement is a legally binding contract between you and the franchisor that governs the terms and conditions of your franchise relationship. While franchise agreements can provide many benefits to franchisees — including access to a recognized brand and established business model — they can also be limiting and restrictive with their fees, metrics and operational standards. This can make it difficult for you, as a franchisee, to operate your business as you see fit.

    There may be termination clauses in your franchise agreement, but pay attention to the circumstances under which you can exit. If your agreement includes a buyout or termination fee, be sure to take note of the amount.

    Communicate with your franchisor

    If you’re considering terminating your franchise agreement, it’s important to communicate that to your franchisor early and often. Ideally, you may have regularly scheduled meetings with your franchisor to discuss the business.

    If not, schedule a meeting with your franchisor to discuss your concerns and explore your options. To present your case, you should provide specific examples of how the franchise agreement is impacting your business negatively.

    Some franchisors may be willing to work with you to find a solution that meets both of your needs, as that may save all parties time, money and stress.

    Related: Want to Become a Franchisee? Run Through This Checklist First.

    Negotiate an exit agreement

    If you and your franchisor agree that terminating your franchise agreement is the best option, you’ll need to negotiate an exit agreement.

    This agreement will outline the terms for how the agreement will conclude, including your financial or non-compete obligations. It’s a good idea to consult with an attorney who has franchise law experience to negotiate a fair and reasonable exit.

    Consider a breach of contract claim

    Did your franchisor violate any terms of your agreement? You may have grounds for a breach of contract claim.

    You will likely need to discuss this with an attorney because this type of claim can be complex and time-consuming — but it may be an option if your franchisor has engaged in fraudulent or deceptive practices or if they failed to fulfill their contractual obligations.

    Related: Considering franchise ownership? Get started now and take this quiz to find your personalized list of franchises that match your lifestyle, interests and budget.

    Explore alternative dispute resolution options

    If negotiations with your franchisor are not progressing or are breaking down, you can explore alternative dispute resolution options.

    These could include mediation or arbitration, which can be less expensive and tedious than traditional litigation.

    Again, it’s important to consult with an attorney with franchise law experience to determine whether these options are viable for your situation.

    Explore selling your franchise

    Selling a franchise can be difficult, as you’ll need to find a buyer who is willing to take on the franchise and its associated obligations.

    Here are some factors to consider if you’re looking to sell your franchise and exit your franchise agreement:

    • Does the agreement allow it? Some franchise agreements may have specific requirements around selling the franchise, including approval from the franchisor and transfer fees.

    • Determine the value of your franchise. To determine the value of your franchise, you’ll need to consider factors such as the profitability of the business, the value of the brand, and any assets included in the sale. You can work with a business valuation expert to help you determine a fair price for your franchise.

    • Find a buyer. There are several ways to find potential buyers for your franchise, including advertising the franchise for sale online, reaching out to local business brokers, and leveraging your personal network. You’ll want to ensure that any potential buyer is financially qualified to take on the franchise and has the necessary experience and skills to run the business successfully.

    • Negotiate the terms of the sale. Once you’ve found a potential buyer, you’ll need to negotiate the terms of the sale, including the purchase price, transfer fees, and any other terms outlined in your franchise agreement.

    • Transfer ownership. Once you’ve reached an agreement with the buyer, you’ll need to work with your franchisor to transfer ownership of the franchise. This may involve completing paperwork, paying transfer fees, and attending training sessions with the new owner to ensure a smooth transition.

    Move forward in your journey

    Exiting a franchise agreement is not something to take lightly. Before making a decision, you should carefully consider the financial impact of terminating your franchise agreement and weigh all your options.

    By reviewing your agreement carefully, having open lines of communication with your franchisor and consulting with an attorney, you can exit your agreement and look forward to other ventures.

    Related: 10 Tips to Go From Employee to Boss, From Franchisees Who Did It

    [ad_2]

    Clarissa Buch Zilberman

    Source link

  • Good Friday Agreement & AEH: An Analysis in Biden’s UK & Ireland Visit and its Relevance to Solitary Confinement Reforms – World News Report – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Good Friday Agreement & AEH: An Analysis in Biden’s UK & Ireland Visit and its Relevance to Solitary Confinement Reforms – World News Report – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    Support the Agreement to End Hostilities, 2012, former prison artist Michael D. Russell

    Image depicts the signing of the Good Friday Agreement

    Prime Minister Tony Blair and his Irish counterpart Bertie Ahern sign the Good Friday Agreement on 10 April 1998

    Image depicts the Angela Davis, MinisterKingXPyeface, and others

    MinisterKingXPyeface putting his arm around fellow prison abolitionist Angela Davis.

    Image depicts self portrait of prison artist C-Note

    Self portrait of prison artist C-Note

    Image depicts MinisterKingXPyeface standing in front of an indoors Hamilton play marquee sign

    MinisterKingXPyeface contemplating on his dream to go from the KAGE to the STAGE.

    The Good Friday Agreement of 1998 and the California Prisoner Racial Groups Agreement to End Hostilities of 2012 are examples of successful conflict resolution.

    SILICON VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, April 8, 2023/EINPresswire.com/ — On April 11-12, 2023, US President Joe Biden will travel to the UK and Ireland to mark the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday accord. The Good Friday Agreement (GFA), was signed a quarter century ago, as a US brokered agreement to help end decades of deadly sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.

    Last year, in 2012, marked the 10 year anniversary of the Agreement to End Hostilities (AEH). The AEH was an agreement amongst California prisoners being housed in the most extreme form of long-term solitary confinement, Pelican Bay State Prison’s Short Corridor.

    The AEH was an agreement between the various ethnic groups in the Short Corridor to end racial violence amongst California’s General population housed prisoners,…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Letter from Dr. Jefferson: Properties Update

    Austin Pets Alive! | Letter from Dr. Jefferson: Properties Update

    [ad_1]

    Mar 18, 2022

    I’m excited to let you know that on February 17, 2022, Austin City Council approved a one-year extension on our Town Lake Animal Center (TLAC) license agreement so that we can continue to negotiate the much longer-term license of 75 years. You may recall that we didn’t want a long extension at first, but we now have a more equitable agreement in place which allows us to serve our mission and the City of Austin at the same time while we go into another year of negotiation.

    We are very pleased with this agreement, as it has unrestricted our work for the next 12 months. This means we will be able to help any animal in need and intervene in euthanasia lists, while also committing to our continued partnership with Austin Animal Center and to all the dogs and cats in Austin that need our specialized help. We believe this extension will give us enough time to negotiate the terms of the public-private partnership between APA! and the City of Austin so that it is strong and successful, long into the future.

    While continuing to negotiate with the city the terms of the 75-year agreement to build and operate at our TLAC campus, we will have time to find the right spaces to house our pets during the eventual demolition and rebuild of the TLAC facilities as well as to move the part of our operations that will need more space than the future restricted TLAC site can provide. The APA! Board of Directors has been continuing to work hard using their connections to lead the search for potential properties to support our planned expansion throughout Austin.

    As part of this property search, we are moving ahead on locating land of our own to house a rehabilitation center for dogs who have experienced trauma and provide sanctuary for dogs and cats. This land will also act as a transport hub for animals who are in imminent danger of death in shelters across Texas so that we can connect these cats and dogs with organizations in other states who don’t have enough adoptable pets in shelters to fill the loving, adoptive homes that are available in the northern region of the country.

    Knowing that much of what we do will no longer fit at the future TLAC site, we are also continuing our search for additional facilities in Central Austin for adoptions, clinic, and treatment wards such as parvo and ringworm, as well as exploring properties that would be suitable for foster and clinic services and would make fostering more accessible to all of Austin. Though these centrally-located real estate options are few and far between, we are determined to find the right match for our needs.

    We will continue to update you on our progress toward these exciting possibilities, and let you know how you can help join us as we work to build an even brighter future for pets and people. Thank you so much for caring about APA! and being such an important part of this lifesaving journey.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Letter from Dr. Jefferson: Properties Update

    Austin Pets Alive! | Letter from Dr. Jefferson: Properties Update

    [ad_1]

    Jan 20, 2022

    Hi everyone! And a happy new year! I hope this finds you and yours well. I wanted to reach out today to provide an update on where we stand with our plans for APA!’s campuses, land, and facilities.

    As a reminder, your voices were heard in November as you helped us get the APA! Resolution passed with Austin City Council. In that resolution, the city council directed us to work with the City of Austin staff to determine an intake percentage number based on those animals at risk of euthanasia. We continue those discussions with the city and will have an update to share with you in February.

    While we remain hopeful that we will finally reach a new agreement with city animal services and sign a long term lease to keep a small portion of our operations on our Town Lake Animal Center (TLAC) campus as soon as possible, we are excited to be exploring our expansion regardless of the TLAC outcome.

    The APA! Board of Directors and some other amazing volunteers have been utilizing their connections to help us find Austin properties to purchase and expand our footprint. Right now there are a couple of potential properties we are looking at and because the property is, of course, at a premium in Austin, we are looking at properties with existing buildings we could adjust to fit our programs and services – and also properties with mostly open land. Based on what we find and can afford, the APA! leadership team is working on different solutions with a group of architects to puzzle together which programs and services would fit where and how best to maximize each scenario of property combinations for lifesaving.

    What this means for APA! team members and supporters is that change – but exciting change – is on the horizon very soon. By this time next year, we could potentially have 4 locations, including TLAC and Tarrytown! With this expanding footprint we are making sure that each potential place provides a drastic improvement to what we have now. We know that a shelter needs to serve the purposes it should – not mass housing in uncomfortable kennels but getting each animal who needs us most the care, support and rehabilitation they need to get them ready for a home (whether it be foster or adoptive home) and out of kennel as quickly as possible!

    We will continue to keep you informed of our property progress and your support we’ll need during this exciting time. Thank you as always for being part of this amazing lifesaving community for people and pets.

    Ellen

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | NO KILL AUSTIN IS IN JEOPARDY: Action Needed

    Austin Pets Alive! | NO KILL AUSTIN IS IN JEOPARDY: Action Needed

    [ad_1]

    Sep 15, 2021

    Keep Austin No Kill Safe in Austin: City Council must act now!

    Thank you for following APA!’s story up until now. And now we urgently need your help. Our bold vision for the future of animal welfare is in immediate jeopardy because we haven’t reached an agreement with our partners at the City of Austin for our 75 year formal public-private partnership that keeps Austin No Kill. After four years of negotiations time will run out for changes in October, and the city council must now act to ensure Austin’s No Kill status.

    If not, APA! will be forced to move out of our home and the City of Austin will have NO agreement in place to keep Austin No Kill.

    Please Speak Out:

    1. Call and email your council member today and ask them to sponsor and support the APA! resolution to keep Austin No Kill. To find the Council District you live in, please click here, and send an email or call to your Council office right away. To email all Council Members, please click on the form here.
    2. Join our APA! action team and plan more communication to council with us. Your voice matters, and we need it now more than ever…we will help you to speak up.
    3. Learn more about our bold vision for the future. It is far more likely we will achieve lasting progress if we keep Austin Pets Alive! in Austin. This new agreement is a critical first step.

    Austin is a No Kill community because of your support and work during the past decade. We will ensure No Kill but rely on the council to direct the city manager to finalize a new and more equitable service agreement with APA!. The council must take action in October before the negotiations formally end, so we haven’t a moment to spare!

    Resources:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | Austin Pets Alive! President and CEO Gives…

    Austin Pets Alive! | Austin Pets Alive! President and CEO Gives…

    [ad_1]

    Jul 22, 2021

    The City of Austin’s Animal Advisory Commission recently created a Working Group to focus on Austin Animal Center’s shelter space concerns. The Commission held a Special Called meeting this past Monday to discuss the findings of the Working Group as well as hear APA!’s quarterly report. At Monday’s Animal Advisory Commission, APA! President and CEO, Dr. Ellen Jefferson presented. Below is a summary of her comments to the Commission.

    Austin Pets Alive! is the largest city of Austin Animal Services partner in lifesaving and the largest subsidizer of the city’s budget to serve Austin animals.

    APA! takes animals that have medical and behavioral issues that require a higher cost per animal than the average healthy animal and care. APA! focuses on these animals in an effort to have a measurable effect on the live release rate at Austin Animal Center (AAC).

    In June alone, of all the animals that were transferred from AAC to any partner, APA! took 77% of those animals and over 200 times the number taken by the other brick and mortar shelters in Austin.

    APA!’s cost to care for the animals pulled this past quarter was approximately $500,000 – $750,000. These numbers are currently being validated through an external agency and will be reflected as accurately as possible in future reports.

    APA! receives no funding from the City of Austin but through a license agreement does receive use of the Town Lake Animal Center (TLAC) facility, which on the rental market could reasonably expect to receive about $8 per square foot per year in rent for the use (kennel), the condition its in (deteriorated), and the location it is in which, at best, is $100,000 per quarter. APA! therefore contributed between $400,000-$650,000 last quarter alone to subsidize the city’s budget to serve Austin animals. That is just for the animals we’re taking in from AAC, not for the other work we’re doing in the community.

    APA!’s mission is to eliminate the unnecessary killing of shelter animals. Over the last 10 years of this license agreement, the role of APA’s support at AAC has shifted away from lifesaving and into serving as overflow for Austin Animal Center, which was never the intention of the license agreement that was drafted 10 years ago. That’s what we’ve been trying to re-negotiate for the last five years. What that means is that Austin Pets Alive! is serving many animals that should not be at risk of euthenasia in the city’s publicly-funded shelter.

    AAC has received an increase in budget of more than $10 million since the original license agreement was signed, and many supports have been put in place over the years by the Austin City Council. APA! is 100% committed to continuing to serve as a safety net for animals that cannot be saved through taxpayer dollars and is currently negotiating a license agreement that more accurately reflects the mission of APA! and the responsible utilization of all the funds put towards animals, whether they are donated or taxpayer-funded.

    You can find the complete 2nd Quarter Report from APA! to the Animal Advisory Commission here.

    You can watch the complete meeting here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link