ReportWire

Tag: 2024 elections

  • The New York Congressional-Map Drama Just Won’t End

    The New York Congressional-Map Drama Just Won’t End

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Getty Images/Mint Images RF

    The 2024 election cycle just got a little more complicated for New Yorkers.

    On Monday, Albany lawmakers officially rejected the new congressional map that had been proposed by a bipartisan panel from the the state’s independent redistricting commission, setting the stage for the Legislature to draw its own district lines and potentially shake up some crucial races. The New York State Senate voted 40-17 and the State Assembly voted 99-47 to defeat the map in the latest twist of a yearslong political saga.

    Several members of the Legislature had expressed concerns with the map, which was a slight modification from a 2022 version that had been drawn by a special master after New York’s highest court ruled that Democrats’ original proposal was a gerrymander. Though the redistricting commission’s proposal was not significantly different from the 2022 version, it would likely have shored shore up the districts held by two Hudson Valley incumbents: Congressman Pat Ryan, a Democrat, and Congressman Marc Molinaro, a Republican. It would also would have potentially weakened Congressman Brandon Williams’s electoral prospects by adding more Democratic-friendly territory to his district. State Senator James Skoufis criticized the commission’s decision to split Orange County and said the legislature should reject the new map, calling it “a disgrace.”

    And while U.S. House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who was vocal about his opposition to the the map drawn by the special master in 2022, stopped short of calling for the legislature to redraw the districts, his office said the new map “ignores or exacerbates” many of the problems previously raised.

    By opting to produce its own map, the Democratic-led Legislature has the chance to influence several races ahead of an election cycle where the path to control of the House of Representatives is expected to run through New York — again. As things stand now, the Cook Political Report currently lists four seats held by freshman Republicans seeking reelection as toss-ups, a number that could potentially increase.

    While while this is a prime opportunity to boost their party’s chances in November, Democrats’ efforts could also backfire. If lawmakers attempt a significant gerrymander, they risk the map getting challenged in court by Republicans and potentially even struck down, a repeat of 2022. There is speculation that because of those limitations, the Legislature will opt for only modest changes to the map, not drastic ones.

    Regardless of their final decision, the Legislature will have to act with haste. Ballot petitioning in New York was set to begin on Tuesday, meaning that campaigns will start collecting signatures for their candidates to run in districts that could potentially change within days.

    [ad_2]

    Nia Prater

    Source link

  • Sen. Rand Paul tackles the pandemic in his new book at Reagan Library

    Sen. Rand Paul tackles the pandemic in his new book at Reagan Library

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, discussed his recently released book at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley on Tuesday, February 20.

    In his book “Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up,” released in October and published by Regnery Publishing, Paul slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for misleading the nation about the origins of the pandemic, which he said emerged from a research lab in Wuhan, China.

    Paul is a former physician, was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010, and since then has advocated for limited government and fiscal conservatism among other issues. The author of six books, he graduated from Baylor University and Duke University School of Medicine with a degree in ophthalmology. Paul is also the founder of the Southern Kentucky Lions Eye Clinic, which provides eye exams and surgery to low-income families.

    In April, Paul accused Former Chief Medical Advisor to the President Anthony Fauci of committing “one of the worst judgment errors” in his tackling of the pandemic.

    During Tuesday’s event attended by several hundreds of guests, Paul said that Fauci had funded research at Wuhan Virology Institute in China that eventually caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

    In a report released last year, U.S. intelligence agencies wrote that there was no evidence that the pandemic started from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology. The report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence found that the U.S. intelligence agencies didn’t rule out the possibility that the pandemic originated from the lab. The agency also didn’t pinpoint what had caused the outbreak.

    Christopher Wray, the FBI director, said last year that his agency has studied the origins of the pandemic and found that it stemmed from an incident that happened at the lab in Wuhan. The Chinese government has long denied the claims that it started in their country.

    Asked during the Q&A session what has to happen to military members who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine, Paul said military personnel along with firemen, policemen, nurses, and doctors “should be reinstated with back pay.”

    [ad_2]

    Olga Grigoryants

    Source link

  • Larry Hogan Senate Bid Is Good for Republicans, Bad for No Labels

    Larry Hogan Senate Bid Is Good for Republicans, Bad for No Labels

    [ad_1]

    The Senate GOP’s unlikely champion.
    Photo: William B. Plowman/NBC via Getty Images

    Larry Hogan, who just made a surprise announcement of a 2024 Senate bid, is a bit of a unicorn in today’s MAGA-flavored Republican Party: a relatively centrist politician who has twice won statewide in a deep-blue state while regularly dissing Donald Trump. He’s legitimately a moderate, though no liberal. For example, he opposed restricting abortion in his state before and after the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade, but he also opposed expanding abortion access. And he worked reasonably well with Maryland’s Democratic-controlled legislature — so well, in fact, that virtually no down-ballot Republicans were elected on his coattails.

    Term-limited at the end 2022, Hogan got a lot of media attention for criticizing Trump and was even the subject of some ill-informed speculation that he might run for president in the 2024 Republican primaries. He also became active in that centrist fantasy land, the No Labels organization. And when Hogan stepped down from its board, there was some more ill-informed speculation that he might be preparing a presidential bid as part of a No Labels “unity ticket.” He said “no” to that prospect and then last month endorsed the presidential candidacy of Nikki Haley.

    Perhaps this sign that Hogan wanted to remain within the general confines of the Republican Party signaled his next step, which surprised a lot of people: deciding to run for the Senate seat being vacated by three-term Democratic incumbent Ben Cardin. It’s quite the recruiting coup for Republicans, who last won a U.S. Senate race in Maryland in 1980. And although it’s been obvious for a bit that Hogan wasn’t actually looking in its direction, it’s a blow to No Labels, which has been making noises about wanting a Republican at the top if its “unity ticket” to allay concerns it was secretly or stupidly acting as Trump pawns. There’s really no other Republican in its orbit with the kind of recent electoral credibility Hogan has demonstrated.

    Hogan’s interest in becoming a freshman senator at the age of 68 is a bit of a mystery. Yes, he’d have a shorter commute than most senators and is already a familiar figure to the beltway media types who determine which puffed-up lawmakers get attention in a Capitol crowded with big egos. But it would in other respects represent a demotion. Governors have entire state governments reporting to them and can make news whenever they want, while senators have small staffs mostly composed of children and must fight for headlines and sound bites. But presumably Hogan really wants the job.

    Whether he wins it or not is another subject altogether. Surely Maryland Republican officials in Washington and in Maryland offered their first-borns to Hogan for giving them the best chance to win a Senate seat in the Old Line State in ages in an election cycle where they have high hopes of flipping control of the chamber. But you never know what sort of MAGA opposition might arise: In 2022, Hogan’s hand-picked candidate to succeed him as governor, Kelly Schulz, was waxed by Trump zealot Dan Cox in the GOP primary (Cox went on to lose badly to Democrat Wes Moore in the general election). Assuming he does brush aside intra-party opposition, Hogan will face either ultrawealthy congressman David Trone or Prince George’s county executive Angela Alsobrooks (who holds the same position in that large D.C. suburb as Hogan’s father once occupied back in the day).

    While Hogan has obviously shown he can win a statewide campaign in Maryland, he hasn’t run for a federal office in a presidential year, much less one in a hyperpolarized election year like 2024. He has vowed not to back either Biden or Trump if they are the major-party nominees in November and has also let it be known he did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. In that sense, he is positioned to run as someone who is fiercely independent, but Democratic partisanship will be hard for him to overcome this time around. If nothing else, he’ll force Democrats to spend money in Maryland they’d prefer to spend on crucial Senate races in Ohio or Montana. For that, even Trump-supporting Republicans will be grateful.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Former Gov. Nikki Haley woos Southern California voters as primary ballots go out

    Former Gov. Nikki Haley woos Southern California voters as primary ballots go out

    [ad_1]

    Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley barnstormed Southern California on Wednesday, just as primary ballots are starting to arrive in voters’ mailboxes.

    The former governor and U.N. ambassador is courting voters — and fundraising — while in town.

    She is introducing herself to Southern California voters, highlighting her tenure as the Palmetto State’s former chief executive and her foreign policy experience as a U.N. ambassador. But Haley, 52, is also ramping up her criticisms of former President Donald Trump, the frontrunner in the GOP primary race, saying he begets “chaos” and is focused more on himself than on voters.

    “I voted for Donald Trump twice. I was proud to serve America in his administration, but chaos follows him,” Haley said at the Wild Goose Tavern in Costa Mesa on Wednesday morning. “We can’t be a country in disarray and a world on fire and go through four more years of chaos. We won’t survive it.”

    Pointing to House Republicans knocking down an Israel aid package and an appellate court’s recent ruling that Trump isn’t immune from prosecution for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss, Haley said: “Every bit of it is chaos, and he’s got his fingerprints on every bit of it.”

    “We need someone with executive experience, but we also need someone who knows national security,” Haley said.

    Her message to local voters, Haley told the Southern California News Group in an exclusive interview in Costa Mesa, is: “Let’s make America normal again.”

    “There’s a decision that (voters in Southern California) have to make. Do we go with the same or do we go in a new direction? And more of the same is not just Joe Biden; it’s also Donald Trump,” Haley said. “Are we really going to give them two candidates in their 80s? We can do better than that.”

    Haley has called for term limits and mental competency tests for politicians over the age of 75. She said those views — and others — have fueled Trump’s and his surrogates’ attacks.

    “They don’t like that I’m not interested in being their friends,” she said. “I’m interested in serving the taxpayers of our country. … They can go and say whatever lies they want; my record stands true.”

    The ages of President Joe Biden (81) and Trump (77) should matter to voters, Haley maintains. “We will have a female president. The hard truth is, it’s either going to be me or Kamala Harris.”

    “We need someone who can do eight years of hard, strong discipline to get the job done,” Haley said.

    About 400 people crowded inside the Wild Goose Tavern in Costa Mesa during the drizzly morning — according to crowd estimates from Mario Marovic, a partner in the restaurant — sipping on drinks from the bar and eating passed appetizers like pickled deviled eggs and sweet potato goat cheese fritters. Animal heads, draped with bras, lined the walls; “Haley for President” buttons and signs adorned tables.

    The bar is named for John Wayne’s yacht, said Newport Beach Councilmember Erik Weigand, who introduced Haley at the Orange County event. “We need somebody just like John Wayne who can stand up to bullies … and that is why I like what Nikki Haley brings to the table.”

    In California, the GOP presidential election is considered “closed,” meaning only registered Republican voters will see it on their ballots.

    Stephaney Avital, an Orange County resident, said she’s been a registered Democrat but switched parties to support Haley in the primary.

    “I want to see a change in our country. I don’t want to see the same old circus that we’ve had in the last eight years,” Avital said. “We want to see moderation, we want to see logic, we want to see policies change. We want to see something different than we’ve already had.”

    Haley was met Wednesday morning by a small group of Trump supporters who gathered outside the restaurant. They waved “MAGA” flags and wore “America first” hats, calling Haley a “RINO,” a phrase that stands for “Republican in name only” and is used by the former president and his allies to malign those who are more moderate in the GOP.

    A small group of supporters of former President Donald Trump gathered outside an event for former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in Costa Mesa on Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2024. (Photo by Kaitlyn Schallhorn, Orange County Register/SCNG)
    A small group of supporters of former President Donald Trump gathered outside an event for former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in Costa Mesa on Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2024. (Photo by Kaitlyn Schallhorn, Orange County Register/SCNG)

    Two demonstrators were escorted out of the bar for trying to shout down Haley during the remarks. At least one was a supporter of the former president.

    Haley briefly paused her remarks during the interruptions, using it to highlight her husband’s military experience. Maj. Michael Haley is serving in Africa with the South Carolina Army National Guard. He and other servicemembers, she said, are making sacrifices so Americans can have freedom of speech.

    How Super Tuesday would be super for Haley

    The Southern California trip came on the heels of a big loss in the symbolic presidential primary election in Nevada on Tuesday night. There, voters picked “none of these candidates” ahead of Haley. Trump didn’t participate in the Nevada primary, where no delegates are awarded, and is instead focused on Thursday’s caucus.

    But Haley brushed it off Wednesday morning, calling it a “scam that Trump already had in the bag.” Her campaign, she said, didn’t spend time or money in Nevada, instead focusing on states like South Carolina and Michigan as well as Super Tuesday spots.

    Haley is committed to staying in the race through Super Tuesday, she said.

    “I’m not going anywhere. We have a country to save,” Haley said when asked about how long she’ll stay in the race. “We are determined to outsmart, outwork, outlast until we finish this.”

    Super Tuesday — March 5 this year — is a critical time in the primary election season; it’s the day when the most states vote and candidates can rack up more delegates for the summer’s nominating convention.

    [ad_2]

    Kaitlyn Schallhorn

    Source link

  • First Lady speaks at LA gala championing Black brands and designers

    First Lady speaks at LA gala championing Black brands and designers

    [ad_1]

    First Lady Dr. Jill Biden spoke on the importance of supporting Black businesses and entrepreneurship at a star-studded gala at Paramount Studios on Saturday evening.

    Related: President Biden lands in Los Angeles to woo entertainment leaders

    The event was hosted by the Fifteen Percent Pledge, a nonprofit organization that asks businesses to commit 15 percent of their shelf space to Black-owned brands.

    It was attended by some of the biggest names in Black fashion, beauty and entertainment including including actress Tracee Ellis Ross, comedian Robin Theade and designer Emma Grede.

    The First Lady and President Joe Biden landed in Los Angeles on Saturday afternoon for a brief, one-day trip. She used the gala to highlight the Biden administration’s work to advance economic equity and make it easier for Black companies to receive funding.

    Those efforts included doubling the amount of government loans given to Black owned businesses and investing $12 billion in community lenders to expand access to capital for minority owned businesses.

    “I want you to know that my husband, President Biden, is your partner, he understands that systemic change requires direct action,” she said.

    The First Lady spoke of the powerful reckoning brought on by the murder of George Floyd and the progress made to dismantle institutionalized racism since then. But she said that these advancements are under threat.

    “The real work of lasting change lies in the moments when history zags, when progress seems to ebb, when the marchers have all gone home and the spotlight has receded, when the backlash has swelled and opponents are working harder to erase the hard fought gains that we’ve made,” she said. “We can’t let them prevail.”

    Aurora James, founder of The Fifteen Pledge, also spoke about attacks on the diversity, equity and inclusion movement.

    She launched the nonprofit during the peak of Black Lives Matter movement in 2020. Since then it has directed almost $14 billion worth of revenue to Black owned businesses through partnerships with major brands including Sephora, Nordstrom and Macys.

    James pointed to the Supreme Court’s overruling of affirmative action as an example of where progress has been lost.

    “There are no longer protections in place to ensure that we have an equal shot at an education, a good job, a bank loan, really anything,” she said. “This campaign is coordinated, it’s premeditated and it’s no coincidence that it’s intensifying at a very, very critical election.”

    Both James and Dr. Biden used the evening to call on event attendees — who represent some of the most influential Black voices in America — to help mobilize voters in November.

    Capturing the Black vote will be essential for a Biden path to reelection, many experts say.

    [ad_2]

    Clara Harter

    Source link

  • President Biden lands in Los Angeles to woo entertainment leaders

    President Biden lands in Los Angeles to woo entertainment leaders

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden and First Lady Dr. Jill Biden touched down in Los Angeles on Saturday afternoon to engage in a time-honored campaign tradition: courting celebrities in the hopes of gaining the support of their fans.

    Air Force One touched down at LAX at 3:25 p.m. on Saturday, ahead of schedule, after departing from Philadelphia hours earlier. Biden headed for the airport Saturday morning after speaking to supporters at his campaign headquarters in Delaware. On Friday, Biden and first lady Jill Biden joined grieving families at Dover Air Force Base to witness the return of three American service members killed in last weekend’s drone attack in Jordan.

    During their brief, less than 24-hour L.A. trip, the Bidens planned to meet with Black leaders in the entertainment industry to talk about the important role they can play in the upcoming election, Deadline reported Friday, as well as other campaign-related stops in the Southland.

    The President was greeted on the tarmac by Sen. Alex Padilla and Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Hawthorne. He paused to snap a selfie with Waters’ sister, Karen Waters, and spent about five minutes chatting with Padilla’s 9-year-old son, Diego, before boarding the M1 helicopter and departing for Santa Monica airport around 3:45 p.m.

    The First Lady joined the motorcade and headed to her own event.

    While the visit takes advantage of the even greater-than-normal concentration of entertainers and music’s behind-the-scenes movers and shakers in town for the Grammys, the couple did not plan to attend the ceremony as they depart for a campaign event in Las Vegas on Sunday afternoon.

    “Getting entertainment surrogates is a long held tactic Democrats use in presidential campaigns,” said veteran democratic strategist Michael Trujillo. “And, the base of the Democratic Party is African American voters, so we need the base to turn out to make sure Biden gets reelected.”

    The Biden reelection campaign is likely extra eager to tap into celebrities’ star power — and wallets — as the recent WGA and SAG-AFRA strikes prevented industry leaders from organizing political fundraisers for many months, he added.

    “L.A. is a longtime ATM for presidential candidates,” said Trujillo. “Because of the strikes they (the Bidens) are probably not where they would like to be at in terms of engaging the Hollywood and entertainment types, but they’re actively giving them face time and recruiting them and getting them excited about Joe Biden’s reelection, because I think the alternative is scary.”

    Celebrities hold huge sway over American voters, research indicates.

    A brief Instagram post by Taylor Swift, for example, led to 35,000 new voter registrations in September 2023. The pop sensation has 279 million Instagram followers and endorsed Biden in the 2020 election. A 2024 endorsement would be powerful for the President.

    But Democrats shouldn’t be alarmed that she hasn’t come out swinging, or singing, for Biden just yet, Trujillo said.

    “Between now and November, you’re going to have the dog days of summer and traditionally, once Labor Day comes around, that’s when folks are paying attention to politics,” he said. “Then, I think there’ll be no shortage of celebrities, from the Taylor Swifts to the Tyler Perrys, supporting President Biden.”

    Saturday’s trip marked the President’s first visit to the City of the Angels since his three-day fundraising frenzy in December. Former President Donald Trump last set foot in the Southland in August 2023 when he attended the California GOP’s convention in Anaheim.

    Biden’s Saturday stop also coincides with the first official Democratic primary day of 2024, as voters in South Carolina head to the ballot box. The president is expected to sweep the primaries, facing challenges from minor candidates such as Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips and author and speaker Marianne Williamson.

    Though the nominations are far from official, pollsters project a razor-thin, combative rematch between Biden and Trump in November.

    GOP frontrunner Trump, who leads former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley by a wide margin in the polls, faces a crossroads moment in the nation’s highest court this week.

    A case with the potential to derail Trump’s drive to return to the White House will swing the electoral spotlight on the Supreme Court starting Thursday.

    However, the Supreme Court’s ongoing deliberations over whether the former president engaged in insurrection, has the potential to put a stop to his candidacy.

    Meanwhile, at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting in Las Vegas on Friday,  RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel urged the party to unite around the goal of regaining the White House, AP reported.

    “We Republicans will stick together, as united as the union our party long ago fought to preserve,” McDaniel said, quoting Ronald Reagan, according to people who were in the room and disclosed her remarks on condition of anonymity to discuss a private gathering. “We’ll have our battles ahead of us, but they’re good battles, and they’re worth fighting for.”

    The swing state of Nevada may prove pivotal in the November election. At Sunday’s campaign event in the Historic Westside of Las Vegas, the President will speak directly to voters about the stakes of this election.

    The Associated Press and New York Times contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Clara Harter

    Source link

  • Elections 2024: Rep. Robert Garcia faces 3 challengers for Congressional District 42

    Elections 2024: Rep. Robert Garcia faces 3 challengers for Congressional District 42

    [ad_1]

    Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia, who became the first openly LGBTQ immigrant in U.S. House of Reprentatives last year, will begin his bid to retain California’s 42nd Congressional District seat by coming out on top — or at least the top two — in the March 5 primary election against three other candidates.

    Garcia rose to the national spotlight in 2022 after serving as the first Latino and first openly gay mayor in Long Beach’s history, will face two Democrats, Joaquin Beltran and Nicole Lopez, and Republican John Briscoe — who will likely be his main adversary.

    The top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, will advance to the Nov. 5 general election.

    Garcia is an overwhelming favorite in the primary race, with Briscoe likely to come second, based on results from the 2022 primary and general election. Briscoe surprised political observers with 26% of the vote in that primary.

    Beltran and Lopez, the latter of whom did not respond to requests for comment, also competed in the 2022 primary — though they finished with single-digit percentages.

    Garcia also has more campaign cash on hand than his opponents. He had about $541,109 at the end of 2023, according to the Federal Elections Commission. Briscoe had nearly $250,000 in cash, but that sum was a personal loan from him to his campaign.

    Lopez had 1,231 in cash on hand at the end of the year, according to the FEC, while Beltran did not have any campaign finance documents available.

    The 42nd Congressional District includes Downey, Long Beach, Lakewood, Commerce, Bell Gardens, Bell, Huntington Park, Florence, Cudahy, Maywood, Bellflower, Lakewood, Walnut Park, Signal Hill and Avalon.

    The district had 399,277 registered voters as of Jan. 5, according to the California Secretary of State’s office. Of those, about 54% were registered Democrats, compared to about 17% Republicans. About 21.5% had no party preference. The rest were registered with smaller political parties.

    Rep. Robert Garcia

    Garcia, in a phone interview on Thursday, Feb. 1, said his first year as a congressmember has been a great one. He said he’s honored to represent the same communities he’s worked with regionally for a long time, particularily in the southeast portion of Los Angeles County.

    “Being mayor of one of the largest cities in Califonia has been absolutely beneficial,” Garcia said. “I understand how government works. I feel I know what the community needs and what neighborhoods need.”

    Safety, climate change and infrastructure are some of the most important issues in District 42, Garcia said.

    He’s particularly proud of securing $238 million in federal funds for the Port of Long Beach, which will help create jobs, enhance rail operations and reduce pollution.

    As co-chair of the Congressional Ports Opportunity, Renewal, Trade, and Security Caucus, he’s made the twin ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles a priority, Garcia said.

    Protecting democracy, meanwhile, is high on Garcia’s list of priorities should he win a second term.

    “I’ve taken on some of the most extreme voices in (Washington), D.C.,” Garcia said.

    Garcia was a key leader in expelling George Santos from Congress late last year, after an ethics report revealed the Republican used campaign donations for personal use.

    And in his role as president of the 36 Democratic freshmen congressmembers, Garcia said, he’s also been able to demonstrate his leadership skills.

    He’s a coalition builder, Garcia said, and leadership skills translate to whether you are guiding peers in Washington, D.C., or working with constitiuents.

    “I believe in being honest and in justice for all people,” Garcia said. “The responsibility of government is to help people and people who need help the most.”

    Many people in his district and throughout the country, Garcia said, are still feeling the impacts of a slowly improving economy. Inflation is a factor and the cost of housing is still incredibly high.

    There’s a lot of work left to do, he said, but there is definitely good momemtum in those areas.

    Other priorities for Garcia are continuing to bring back money for health care, pandemic prevention, LGBTQ rights and strenghtening the economy.

    Overall, Garcia said, he loves the opportunity to represent his hometown in Congress.

    “We’re working hard every day to get as much federal support as possible,” Garcia said. “I’m driven by that every day.”

    John Briscoe

    Briscoe, a Republican business owner and youth advocate, described himself as the “antithesis” of Garcia in a phone interview on Tuesday, Jan. 30.

    The incumbent, Briscoe said, is syncophatic toward President Joe Biden and doesn’t veer from the Democratic party line.

    Briscoe is running again because prices are too high, he said, pointing to gas and food costs, though the former has gone down in recent weeks.

    “The real costs are up 30% over the last three years,” Briscoe said. “Nobody got pay increases by that much.”

    Inflation, Briscoe said, is “a nasty, stick the federal finger in your pocketbook and pluck the money out” proposition.

    The Republican challenger is also keen on protecting parental rights, he said. It’s horrible, Briscoe said, that some parents don’t know specifics about what their children are learning in school. And, the longtime Huntington Beach-area school board member said, he believes in public school choice. No matter where you live, he said, you have the right to send children to a school in a good district.

    “All of our teachers are good,” Briscoe said, “all of our schools are good, but they’re not all the same.”

    Briscoe, if elected, would also advocate for family safety, he said. That, he said, “means the homeless problem.”

    “I look over the cesspool of people who are in just deep, dire need of help,” he said of his Long Beach office window, which overlooks people experiencing homelessness.

    To solve the issue, Briscoe said, he would “make an affirmative effort to identify people who are under the influence and go through and do a sweep.” People would be given three choices, he said: pay a $300 fine, go to jail or go to a rehabilitation facility.

    The problem, Briscoe said, is that when President Ronald Reagan reduced funding for mental health institutions in 1981 and “turned everyone out on the street, the money didn’t follow them to give them treatment.”

    Something dramatic has to be done to help people, Briscoe said.

    Briscoe said he’ll focus his campaign on the northern portion of District 42, which includes cities such as Downey, Bellflower and Cudahy.

    His path to victory, he said, is the family man.

    “If it’s true that Hispanic voters are listening a little harder,” Briscoe said, “then my messaging will be heard loudly by those people.”

    The Republican challenger was also characteristically critical of the current Congress, calling them “feckless and spineless” and saying they are “spending like a drunken soldier.”

    Joaquin Beltran

    Beltran is a software and community organizer who said Congress should be funding food, gas, rent and health care instead of financing overseas conflicts.

    He’s running again, he said during a Wednesday, Jan. 31, phone interview, because “there is such urgency to making sure that our future is better than the current politicians are making it out to be.”

    It’s important, he said, for politicians to be direct, have a vision and to have leadership where “people aren’t playing games.”

    Beltran advocated beginning in May 2023 for LA County to bring masks back into health care settings, he said. And in December, the public health department, indeed, brought the rule back.

    Besides prioritizing health care as a priorty, Beltran also said bringing prices down and fixing the economy is important. And those go hand-in-hand. When people are healthier, he said, the economy is healthier.

    “The American dream has, unfortunately, become undone,” Beltran said. “For me, it’s all tied together. It’s a web of health and prosperity. If someone could have a lot of money, they would definitely trade their money to have their health.”

    Beltran, whose parents immigrated from Mexico, stressed they had to work harder to get resources than non-immigrants.

    “Government needs to create an environment for people to thrive,” Beltran said, adding there needs to be better and more accessible health care for all.

    Beltran said he doesn’t think anything has gotten better in District 42 over the last few years. Small business owners are out of business, people can’t afford to pay rent, there are job losses. Unlike career politicians, he said, he’s willing to “be direct, to be clear and to have a stated vision and goals.”

    Many politicians, Beltran said, wait until the timing is right before acting. He wouldn’t do that, he said.

    Beltran wants people to understand how much power the little guy holds, saying “every action they take, no matter how small they think it is, it makes a huge difference.

    “It all adds up,” Beltran said, “and we really need them because we need better people in office.”

    Nicole Lopez

    Lopez is a nonprofit employee who is running on a platform of “Medicare for all,” supporting the Green New Deal and implementing comprehensive immigration reform, according to her campaign website.

    The Democrat did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    But on her website, the challenger wrote that she is fighting for “everyday Americans,” and giving voice to migrant workers and others who have been left out of the decision making rooms on Capitol HIll.

    [ad_2]

    Lisa Jacobs

    Source link

  • Doomed Border-Security Deal Was a Bad Bet for Kyrsten Sinema

    Doomed Border-Security Deal Was a Bad Bet for Kyrsten Sinema

    [ad_1]

    Deal or no deal, Sinema is in trouble.
    Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    Kyrsten Sinema’s claim to fame is that she’s one of those “bipartisan deal-makers” that the Senate periodically produces, particularly in times of divided partisan control of Congress. Some of her Democratic constituents in Arizona tend to believe her wheeling and dealing is a betrayal of the progressive principles she once embraced with wealthy interests the beneficiaries more often than not. It’s no accident that she faced a strong 2024 primary challenge from Congressman Ruben Gallego before changing her partisan self-identification to “independent.”

    Sinema is now approaching various legal and practical deadlines for a 2024 reelection run as an independent. But true to her “brand,” she’s been focused less on Arizona politics than on tense and lengthy Senate negotiations on a border-security deal that has become the condition precedent to passage of a foreign-aid package containing emergency assistance for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. It’s unclear whether she hoped the deal would be a valedictory accomplishment before she retires from the Senate or a trophy that would prove her worth on an issue important to her border state and justify her reelection. If the latter is the case, she may be overestimating voter consciousness of murky inside-the-Beltway machinations, as the Washington Post explains:

    A Republican consultant familiar with the recent internal deliberations within Sinema’s tight-knit circle said that the team’s debate involves one central question: In today’s hyperpartisan environment, do voters value elected officials who bring both sides together to deliver legislation?

    “If she is able to get a border security deal across, do you know she will have accomplished something that hasn’t been done in 30 years as a first-term senator,” the Republican asked. “But do voters even care?”

    Maybe not so much, as limited polling of a projected three-way race showing Sinema trailing Gallego and Republican Kari Lake suggests. Perhaps announcement of a border-security deal could burnish her reputation and remind Arizonans of her rather unique standing in the Senate (with Joe Manchin retiring this year, Sinema really does stand alone in a position between the two parties; she’s always eager to use her leverage no matter how many former allies and current constituents she offends). But the really bad news for this deal-maker is that the deal itself is looking stillborn, as Politico reports:

    As senators returned for a critical two-week sprint in D.C. before a lengthy recess, Republicans are starting to doubt whether the agreement — which would be tied to billions in foreign aid — can pass their chamber. GOP leaders first set out to find a compromise that could win a majority of Republican senators over, but that’s only grown more challenging as conservatives, Speaker Mike Johnson and former President Donald Trump hammer the deal.

    Asked if the agreement appears to be on a path toward passing the Senate, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) replied: “It certainly doesn’t seem like it.”

    “There are a number of our members who say, ‘Well, I’ll join a majority of the Republicans but if it doesn’t enjoy that sort of support, then count me out,’” Cornyn said in an interview. “The whole idea of passing something that the House won’t even take up is another challenge.”

    So Sinema’s investment of precious time in a border-security deal is not going to produce pay dirt, it appears. Theoretically, she could run for reelection not as a regularly successful deal-maker but as a proponent of the spirit of compromise that ought to prevail in Congress but sometimes doesn’t because there just aren’t enough Kyrsten Sinemas in Washington. She has enough cash stored in her campaign account (nearly $11 million) to promote that message, though her fundraising has fallen into a hole and she has made few visible preparations for a tough campaign. Given her past Democratic affiliation and its own strong preference for incumbents, it’s possible Sinema could still get financial and logistical support from the Senate’s Democratic campaign committee, but if (as appears to be the case right now) Gallego looks like a better bet to keep Kari Lake out of the Senate, her former friends in that chamber will drop her decisively.

    No one pretends to know Sinema’s plans for the rest of this year, but Arizona is going to be a red-hot battleground for both parties in the presidential and Senate contests, and her eccentric style of politics could clash with fierce partisan polarization. It’s a bad sign for her that she is dithering about running for reelection and can’t get visible results in the Senate. The odds are good that she will follow Manchin into retirement.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis Still Can’t Defend His Record On Health Care

    Ron DeSantis Still Can’t Defend His Record On Health Care

    [ad_1]

    You might think that two months would be enough time for Gov. Ron DeSantis to think up an answer to an obvious, direct and highly relevant question about his record on health care in Florida.

    Near the end of Wednesday night’s Republican presidential debate ― held in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and broadcast on NewsNation ― moderator Elizabeth Vargas pointed out that “Florida has more uninsured people than almost any other state.”

    Given that record, Vargas said, why should voters trust DeSantis on health care?

    The question was nearly identical to one DeSantis fielded at the Republican debate in late September, when Fox News host Stuart Varney cited the same figures and asked, “Can Americans trust you on this?”

    The question was important because Florida really does have more uninsured residents than almost any other state. And the single biggest reason is that it’s among a handful of Republican-run, mostly southern states that have refused to use funding from the Affordable Care Act ― aka “Obamacare” ― to expand Medicaid.

    DeSantis is among the Florida Republicans who have opposed expansion.

    But instead of defending that position and, more generally, his record on health care, DeSantis in September gave a short monologue about inflation and the rising price of consumer goods, followed by a bland, vague statement: “We have big pharma, big insurance, and big government and we need to tackle that and have more power for the people and the doctor-patient relationship.”

    If anything, the question about health care has become even more important since then, because a full-scale repeal of Obamacare is suddenly part of the political conversation again.

    In late November, former president and current GOP front-runner Donald Trump vowed ― as he did so many times during his first campaign and then his presidency ― to replace Obamacare with something better. DeSantis went on to make a similar promise.

    “Obamacare hasn’t worked,” DeSantis said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We are going to replace and supersede with a better plan.”

    DeSantis admitted that, like Trump, he doesn’t actually have a plan yet. He said he would introduce one, “probably” in the spring. Republicans have been making ― and not fulfilling ― such promises since Obamacare first became law.

    Maybe DeSantis will surprise everybody by actually producing a detailed plan that really offers a better alternative to the Affordable Care Act ― although, to be clear, he’d first have to surprise everybody by getting enough votes to remain a viable presidential candidate past the first few contests.

    For now, voters trying to judge whether he can deliver on health care will have to rely on what he’s done in the past, which means looking closely at his record in Florida ― the one Vargas was asking about. And on Wednesday, as in September, DeSantis didn’t have much to say.

    After acknowledging that Florida hadn’t expanded Medicaid, he implied that was the right decision because the states that had approved and implemented expansion were “struggling financially.”

    He didn’t try to back up the claim and he probably couldn’t: Most states are running surpluses these days, and greater spending on Medicaid, most of which the feds pick up anyway, can mean lower spending on other programs.

    More important, DeSantis never explained how blocking Medicaid would help people get health care when, by all accounts, no expansion means more people without insurance ― in other words, exactly the problem Vargas (like Varney before her) was highlighting.

    DeSantis did follow up that statement with another set of platitudes, including a promise “to hold the pharmaceuticals accountable.”

    It was yet another example of Republican leaders not having concrete ideas on health care ― although in this case, it was a particularly relevant one because there’s somebody running in 2024 who actually has taken action to rein in the drug industry.

    That somebody is President Joe Biden, who worked with Democrats to enact a series of initiatives designed to bring down the price of prescription drugs.

    Among the reforms are a cap on insulin prices for Medicare beneficiaries that the private sector has since extended to non-elderly Americans with private insurance, as well as penalties on drugmakers who raise prices faster than inflation. And then there’s a provision under which the federal government will, for the first time, negotiate the price of some high-cost drugs in Medicare.

    These are all incremental steps and, like the Affordable Care Act, they will not instantly make health care more affordable for the millions who struggle with medical bills today. But they will help.

    If Republicans want to prove they can do more, they’ll have to defend their records and offer concrete alternatives for the future ― two tasks that, at least for DeSantis, seem to be an ongoing challenge.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vivek Ramaswamy Falsely Claims Jan. 6 Was ‘An Inside Job’

    Vivek Ramaswamy Falsely Claims Jan. 6 Was ‘An Inside Job’

    [ad_1]

    “Why am I the only person on this stage at least who can say that Jan. 6 now does look like it was an inside job?” the 2024 candidate said during Wednesday’s GOP debate.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Liz Cheney's Book Makes the Case for a Potential Presidential Run

    How Liz Cheney's Book Makes the Case for a Potential Presidential Run

    [ad_1]

    When a prominent political figure debuts a new book, it often leads to speculation about a subsequent run for office. In Liz Cheney’s case, she’s made that possibility explicit.

    As the former GOP congresswoman promotes her new memoir, “Oath and Honor,” she has made it no secret that she is mulling a presidential bid as a third-party candidate to prevent Donald Trump from returning to the White House. “I think that the situation that we’re in is so grave, and the politics of the moment require independents and Republicans and Democrats coming together in a way that can help form a new coalition, so that may well be a third-party option,” Cheney told USA TODAY on Monday, the day before her memoir arrived on bookshelves.

    One of the most vocal critics of Trump within the Republican party, Cheney was one of just 10 Republicans to back the former President’s second impeachment in 2021 and became one of two Republicans on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol—a deadly day for which she blamed Trump. Being an outspoken critic of the 45th President made her an outcast in her own party and led her to lose her primary in Wyoming last year.

    But in her new memoir, Cheney makes a case for her potential presidential run, reflecting on her political journey as a conservative and crafting an argument for why the direction of her party is at odds with the health of democracy. She argues that Trump’s influence has led the Republican party astray, describing it as caught in the “cult of personality” as Trump holds a significant lead in the Republican primary in another run for the Oval Office.

    “Every American should understand what his enablers in Congress and in the leadership of the Republican Party were willing to do to help Trump seize power in the months after he lost the 2020 presidential election—and what they continue to do to this day,” she wrote. “So strong is the lure of power that men and women who had once seemed reasonable and responsible were suddenly willing to violate their oath to the Constitution out of political expediency and loyalty to Donald Trump.”

    Drawing on text messages and personal conversations with other Republicans, Cheney’s memoir provides a rare and damning look inside the Republican party in the days before and after Jan. 6, when Trump and his allies sought to remain in office after losing the 2020 election. She argues that Trump poses a threat to American democracy and could turn the nation into a dictatorship if reelected. “This is more important than partisan politics,” she writes in the epilogue. “Every one of us — Republican, Democrat, Independent — must work and vote together to ensure that Donald Trump and those who have appeased, enabled, and collaborated with him are defeated. This is the cause of our time.”

    Cheney also argues the GOP is lacking other credible leaders. In the memoir, Cheney reserves particular condemnation for former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and his successor, House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing them of compromising principles in their pursuit of Trump’s favor. She reveals for the first time that McCarthy told her just two days after the 2020 election that he had talked to Trump and that the President had admitted defeat, a revelation that contradicted McCarthy’s subsequent public statements. “He knows it’s over,” McCarthy said of Trump, according to Cheney. “He needs to go through all the stages of grief.” Later that day, McCarthy went on Fox News and said that Trump won the election, and three weeks later paid a visit to Trump at his Florida property. “McCarthy knew that what he was saying was not true,” she wrote.

    Trump responded to Cheney’s book in a post on Truth Social on Monday, calling it “boring,” saying Cheney is “crazy,” and writing that McCarthy visited him at Mar-a-Lago after the 2020 election “to get my support, and to bring the Republican Party together – Only good intentions.”

    Cheney also offered a critical assessment of Johnson, portraying him as particularly susceptible to flattery from Trump and ambitious in seeking proximity to the former President. She recounts how Johnson allegedly pressured Republican members to support an amicus brief aimed at challenging the election results in four states that Trump had lost, even when faced with criticisms of the legal arguments.

    “When I confronted him with the flaws in his legal arguments,” Cheney wrote, “Johnson would often concede, or say something to the effect of, ‘We just need to do this one last thing for Trump.’” She adds: “He would then continue championing his arguments in public or with our colleagues. Worse, he was telling our colleagues he was a constitutional law expert, while advocating positions that were constitutionally infirm.”

    Cheney’s narrative underscores her belief that Johnson, among other so-called Trump “enablers” in the House, pose a significant threat to the democratic process. (She even quotes Rep. Mark Green, a Tennessee Republican, allegedly calling Trump “the Orange Jesus,” a comment he denies making).

    While Cheney is yet to formally declare her candidacy, there is a long history of presidents as authors. Nearly all of the past and current presidential candidates have published some kind of text, from memoirs to political manifestos. Books have, in many ways, become the telltale sign that someone in Washington is serious about running for office. Cheney’s memoir not only adds to this trend but positions itself as a pivotal component in a potential bid for the White House, inviting readers to delve into her reflections on the Trump presidency while laying out her vision for the future.

    The 2024 race has already garnered a few third-party challengers, including Cornel West and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who trail frontrunners President Joe Biden and Trump significantly in polls. But Cheney would potentially face even more significant hurdles if she decides to run. Not only do many Republicans view her actions against Trump as traitorous, but the process for getting on state ballots for an election less than a year out would be enormously expensive and difficult. Small parties often work for years to get ballot access, and Cheney would need to run on the ticket for a third party that already has ballot access or petition for her own place on state ballots. A super PAC backing Kennedy Jr.’s independent presidential candidacy, for example, is planning to spend $10 million to $15 million to get him on the ballot in 10 states.

    Cheney, who faced a defeat in the Wyoming Republican primary last year, told The Washington Post on Monday that in years past she would not have contemplated a third-party candidacy, but expressed concern over the influence of Trump on the Republican party, stating, “I happen to think democracy is at risk at home, obviously, as a result of Donald Trump’s continued grip on the Republican Party, and I think democracy is at risk internationally as well.” But Cheney underscored that she would not take any actions that might take votes away from Biden and aid Trump’s return to power. 

    However unlikely the prospects for Cheney’s potential third-party run, her book offers hints about how she’d govern and attempt to realign the Republican party without Trump.

    “At some point, a genuinely conservative Republican Party—a party that stands for limited government, a strong national defense, and the rule of law—can reemerge and win the presidency,” she writes. “But if Donald Trump is the Republican nominee in 2024, we must do everything we can to defeat him. If Trump is on the ballot, the 2024 presidential election will not just be about inflation, or budget deficits, or national security, or any of the many critical issues we Americans normally face. We will be voting on whether to preserve our republic.”

    [ad_2]

    Nik Popli

    Source link

  • Peter Meijer, Once A Huge Critic Of Donald Trump, Now Not So Sure

    Peter Meijer, Once A Huge Critic Of Donald Trump, Now Not So Sure

    [ad_1]

    Meijer voted for Trump’s impeachment, but now apparently thinks the Democrats have gone too far.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Poll Shows Most U.S. Adults Think AI Will Add to Election Misinformation

    Poll Shows Most U.S. Adults Think AI Will Add to Election Misinformation

    [ad_1]

    (NEW YORK) — The warnings have grown louder and more urgent as 2024 approaches: The rapid advance of artificial intelligence tools threatens to amplify misinformation in next year’s presidential election at a scale never seen before.

    Most adults in the U.S. feel the same way, according to a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.

    The poll found that nearly 6 in 10 adults (58%) think AI tools — which can micro-target political audiences, mass produce persuasive messages, and generate realistic fake images and videos in seconds — will increase the spread of false and misleading information during next year’s elections.

    By comparison, 6% think AI will decrease the spread of misinformation while one-third say it won’t make much of a difference.

    “Look what happened in 2020 — and that was just social media,” said 66-year-old Rosa Rangel of Fort Worth, Texas.

    Rangel, a Democrat who said she had seen a lot of “lies” on social media in 2020, said she thinks AI will make things even worse in 2024 — like a pot “brewing over.”

    Just 30% of American adults have used AI chatbots or image generators and fewer than half (46%) have heard or read at least some about AI tools. Still, there’s a broad consensus that candidates shouldn’t be using AI.

    When asked whether it would be a good or bad thing for 2024 presidential candidates to use AI in certain ways, clear majorities said it would be bad for them to create false or misleading media for political ads (83%), to edit or touch-up photos or videos for political ads (66%), to tailor political ads to individual voters (62%) and to answer voters’ questions via chatbot (56%).

    The sentiments are supported by majorities of Republicans and Democrats, who agree it would be a bad thing for the presidential candidates to create false images or videos (85% of Republicans and 90% of Democrats) or to answer voter questions (56% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats).

    The bipartisan pessimism toward candidates using AI comes after it already has been deployed in the Republican presidential primary.

    In April, the Republican National Committee released an entirely AI-generated ad meant to show the future of the country if President Joe Biden is reelected. It used fake but realistic-looking photos showing boarded-up storefronts, armored military patrols in the streets and waves of immigrants creating panic. The ad disclosed in small lettering that it was generated by AI.

    Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida, also used AI in his campaign for the GOP nomination. He promoted an ad that used AI-generated images to make it look as if former President Donald Trump was hugging Dr. Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease specialist who oversaw the nation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Never Back Down, a super PAC supporting DeSantis, used an AI voice-cloning tool to imitate Trump’s voice, making it seem like he narrated a social media post.

    “I think they should be campaigning on their merits, not their ability to strike fear into the hearts of voters,” said Andie Near, a 42-year-old from Holland, Michigan, who typically votes for Democrats.

    She has used AI tools to retouch images in her work at a museum, but she said she thinks politicians using the technology to mislead can “deepen and worsen the effect that even conventional attack ads can cause.”

    College student Thomas Besgen, a Republican, also disagrees with campaigns using deepfake sounds or imagery to make it seem as if a candidate said something they never said.

    “Morally, that’s wrong,” the 21-year-old from Connecticut said.

    Besgen, a mechanical engineering major at the University of Dayton in Ohio, said he is in favor of banning deepfake ads or, if that’s not possible, requiring them to be labeled as AI-generated.

    The Federal Election Commission is currently considering a petition urging it to regulate AI-generated deepfakes in political ads ahead of the 2024 election.

    While skeptical of AI’s use in politics, Besgen said he is enthusiastic about its potential for the economy and society. He is an active user of AI tools such as ChatGPT to help explain history topics he’s interested in or to brainstorm ideas. He also uses image-generators for fun — for example, to imagine what sports stadiums might look like in 100 years.

    He said he typically trusts the information he gets from ChatGPT and will likely use it to learn more about the presidential candidates, something that just 5% of adults say they are likely to do.

    The poll found that Americans are more likely to consult the news media (46%), friends and family (29%), and social media (25%) for information about the presidential election than AI chatbots.

    “Whatever response it gives me, I would take it with a grain of salt,” Besgen said.

    The vast majority of Americans are similarly skeptical toward the information AI chatbots spit out. Just 5% say they are extremely or very confident that the information is factual, while 33% are somewhat confident, according to the survey. Most adults (61%) say they are not very or not at all confident that the information is reliable.

    That’s in line with many AI experts’ warnings against using chatbots to retrieve information. The artificial intelligence large language models powering chatbots work by repeatedly selecting the most plausible next word in a sentence, which makes them good at mimicking styles of writing but also prone to making things up.

    Adults associated with both major political parties are generally open to regulations on AI. They responded more positively than negatively toward various ways to ban or label AI-generated content that could be imposed by tech companies, the federal government, social media companies or the news media.

    About two-thirds favor the government banning AI-generated content that contains false or misleading images from political ads, while a similar number want technology companies to label all AI-generated content made on their platforms.

    Biden set in motion some federal guidelines for AI on Monday when he signed an executive order to guide the development of the rapidly progressing technology. The order requires the industry to develop safety and security standards and directs the Commerce Department to issue guidance to label and watermark AI-generated content.

    Americans largely see preventing AI-generated false or misleading information during the 2024 presidential elections as a shared responsibility. About 6 in 10 (63%) say a lot of the responsibility falls on the technology companies that create AI tools, but about half give a lot of that duty to the news media (53%), social media companies (52%), and the federal government (49%).

    Democrats are somewhat more likely than Republicans to say social media companies have a lot of responsibility, but generally agree on the level of responsibility for technology companies, the news media and the federal government.

    ____

    The poll of 1,017 adults was conducted Oct. 19-23, 2023, using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, designed to represent the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 4.1 percentage points.

    ____

    O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island. Associated Press writer Linley Sanders in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Ali Swenson and Matt O’Brien / AP

    Source link

  • Trump Vows To Start Online University … Because Trump U. Worked So Well?

    Trump Vows To Start Online University … Because Trump U. Worked So Well?

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump is taking Americans back to school if he’s elected president in 2024, promising a free online university that’s free of “wokeness or jihadism.”

    The former president outlined his plan for “The American Academy” in a Truth Social video Wednesday, saying he’ll fund the federal program by “taxing, fining and suing excessively large private university endowments.” According to Trump, elite schools such as Harvard University have enabled a spike in anti-Israel sentiment, converting coeds into subversives.

    “We spend more money on higher education than any other country, and yet they’re turning our students into communists and terrorists and sympathizers of many, many different dimensions,” Trump said in the clip. “We can’t let this happen.”

    Trump said The American Academy curriculum would be “strictly nonpolitical.”

    “There will be no wokeness or jihadism allowed,” he added.

    Students would be able to earn the equivalent of a bachelor’s degree, he said.

    His campaign team told Politico that the four-times-indicted Trump had not decided who would run The American Academy, but that oversight could come from the private sector, an established government agency or a presidentially appointed board or commission.

    Trump University, a previous undertaking in education, resulted in Trump agreeing to pay $25 million to settle fraud lawsuits brought by former students of the real estate seminar program.

    Trump’s latest plan appears to be responding in part to President Joe Biden’s renewed attempt at student loan forgiveness.

    The proposed American Academy, Trump said, will aim to operate “without adding a single dime to the federal debt.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden’s Primary Challenger Unleashes Bizarre Claim On Why He’s Running For President

    Biden’s Primary Challenger Unleashes Bizarre Claim On Why He’s Running For President

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), who is challenging Joe Biden for the Democratic presidential nomination, told NBC News’ Kristen Welker that he’s not running against the president before the “Meet the Press NOW” host checked him on the assertion Friday.

    “I’m not running against Joe Biden. I’m not running against President Biden. I’m running for the future. Yes, we have some policy differences, but I’m a proud Democrat,” said Phillips after Welker asked if he has “any major policy critiques” for the Biden administration due to how he seemingly always votes with the president.

    Phillips, a distillery heir and one of Congress’ wealthiest members who launched his 2024 presidential bid Thursday, went on to criticize the cost of living in the U.S. before Welker reminded him who he’s running against.

    “Congressman, respectfully, you are literally running against President Biden. So, can you tell voters, what is your major point of difference with President Biden?” asked Welker before Phillips reiterated his “running” remark.

    “I’m not running against President Biden. I’m running for the majority of Americans, who want somebody different. I woke up the morning after the 2016 –,” he said before Welker interjected.

    “But you just announced you’re running for president, aren’t you? That means you’re running against President Biden. That’s literally the definition of what that means,” Welker noted before the congressman said he’s running “because America deserves to have someone listen to them.”

    Phillips, who has expressed concerns about Biden’s age ahead of his campaign announcement this week, has sparked criticism among Democrats who fear the run serves as a means to promote himself.

    The congressman, who has promised to rally behind the eventual Democratic nominee, told Welker that lawmakers “aren’t listening” to Americans who “want change.”

    ″So when I hear people in Washington say that this is a mistake or this is nuts, that is exactly the evidence that everybody needs watching right now that something is terribly wrong,” he said.

    “We are the exhausted majority of this nonsense. People who are so much more focused on preserving and protecting their power than they are protecting American people.”

    You can check out more of Welker’s interview with Phillips in the clip below.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Montana GOP Candidate Benefited From The Same Policy He Rails Against

    Montana GOP Candidate Benefited From The Same Policy He Rails Against

    [ad_1]

    Tim Sheehy, the Montana businessman who is vying to unseat Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, received a $210,000 grant from Democrats’ American Rescue Plan — a federal COVID-19 relief package that Sheehy has repeatedly condemned on the campaign trail.

    Sheehy is the founder of Bridger Aerospace, a Bozeman-based aerial firefighting company that relies almost entirely on federal contracts. In March 2022, Bridger was awarded $210,000 from the American Rescue Plan’s Workforce Training Grant Program, which provides funding to businesses to train employees.

    The grant, part of $1.5 billion in American Rescue Plan funding allocated to Montana, has not been previously reported.

    Since launching his Senate bid in June, Sheehy has repeatedly decried what he views as wasteful spending by the Biden administration, including the $1.9 trillion pandemic stimulus package.

    In an interview with Montana radio station KGVO shortly after announcing his campaign, Sheehy said COVID taught his state that the federal government “is not the solution to our problems.”

    “It’s not the solution to educating our children. It’s not the solution to our health care. It’s not the solution to our economy,” he said. “Because when the government pumps trillions of dollars into the economy, we get inflation, which has had an extremely targeted impact on rural states like Montana.’”

    In an interview with Breitbart News in July, Sheehy slammed Biden’s economic agenda, dubbed “Bidenomics,” which the American Rescue Plan is part of.

    “Luckily, Bidenomics rhymes with bad economics — ‘Badenomics,’ I guess we can call it,” he said. “If we’re going to pump trillions of dollars of government fiat money into the economy, everyone said, ‘Hey, there’s going to be massive inflation on the back end of this. No, there won’t. It’ll be transitory, just a few weeks of it.’ No, it’s going to be a fundamental shift in our interest rate basis, because when you literally pump trillions of dollars of essentially artificial currency into our economy, inflation will follow. And sure enough, it did, because it’s pretty basic math when it comes down to that kind of an economic seesaw model.”

    Sheehy went on to declare that Democratic policies during the pandemic “made it crystal clear what the Democrats want in their utopia, in their perfect world, when they had complete control with their emergency powers we saw what they wanted.” He then aired a long list of right-wing, culture war grievances.

    “Luckily, Bidenomics rhymes with bad economics — ‘Badenomics,’ I guess we can call it.”

    – Tim Sheehy

    Sheehy’s campaign did not address HuffPost’s specific questions about the ARP money, instead providing a statement full of deflection.

    “Montana job creator and decorated combat veteran Tim Sheehy knows that Democrats in Washington like Joe Biden and Jon Tester are bankrupting our children’s future with their out-of-control spending,” a campaign spokesperson said in an email. “While we know the Huffington Post would never ask Jon Tester why he voted for the American Rescue Plan – which didn’t create the 4 million jobs promised by the Biden administration and saddled our country with record high inflation and debt – when Tim Sheehy is in the U.S. Senate, he will be proud to rein in government spending and find areas throughout our bloated bureaucratic budget to slash.”

    (This publication is no longer called The Huffington Post. Its name changed to HuffPost as part of a rebrand in 2017.)

    It is unclear exactly how the money for Bridger is to be used. The contract simply states that the funding is for “new job training activities.” A Montana dashboard for American Rescue Plan funds notes that the $210,000 has been awarded but not yet paid to Bridger Aerospace.

    That Sheehy is benefitting from federal aid that he now argues is driving inflation is just the latest example of him and his company double-dipping on partisan issues.

    As HuffPost previously reported, Bridger has repeatedly promoted itself as a leader in the fight against climate change and planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, securing tens of millions of dollars in federal contracts along the way. Meanwhile, Sheehy has toed the Republican party line on climate, railing against the so-called “climate cult,” “radical environmentalists” and the “disastrous socialist Green New Deal.”

    He also consistently slams the federal government, his company’s biggest client. As HuffPost reported, Bridger reported revenue of more than $46 million last year — 96% of which came from federal contracts. That same year, Sheehy earned nearly $5 million in salary and bonuses as the company’s CEO, and his stock in the company is valued at more than $50 million.

    In an interview with Fox Business in June, the GOP hopeful said “he’s seen the power of the free market” and that Montanans “don’t want more government in their lives, whether it’s state government or federal government.”

    “They want to be left alone to live their lives,” Sheehy said. “The federal government needs to stay in its lane.” He added that government COVID-19 stimulus policies “have really impacted the bedrock of Montana and people are frustrated.”

    But in Sheehy’s case, not frustrated enough to not apply for and receive stimulus money.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Said So Many Crazy Things Today That We Can’t Pick The Strangest

    Trump Said So Many Crazy Things Today That We Can’t Pick The Strangest

    [ad_1]

    Depending on how you feel about Donald Trump, today was either an embarrassment of riches or just an embarrassment.

    The former president was in Derry, New Hampshire, on Monday to hold a rally and to sign up for the New Hampshire presidential primary, The Associated Press reported.

    Trump took the opportunity to make so many bizarre, false statements that it’s hard to choose the wackiest.

    The most newsworthy quote probably came prior to the rally, when a reporter asked Trump if his recent perplexing claim that Sidney Powell was never his attorney (although he’s previously said she was) meant that his interactions with her wouldn’t be covered by attorney-client privilege.

    Trump, who has been indicted four times, responded by making the completely false statement that he was “never indicted.”

    “We did nothing wrong,” Trump said. “This is all Biden’s stuff … I was never indicted. You practically never heard the word.”

    Another strange quote occurred during Trump’s rally when he told his supporters to watch other voters, but not to “worry about voting” themselves.

    “You don’t have to vote, don’t worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes,” he said.

    Trump also remarked that “U.S.” and “us” are spelled the same and noted that he’d “just picked that up.”

    “Has anyone ever thought of that before?” he asked the crowd. “Couple of days, I’m reading, and it said ‘us.’ and I said, you know, when you think about it, us equals U.S. Now if we say something genius, they will never say it.”

    The former U.S. president also apparently confused Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s authoritarian prime minister, with Turkey’s authoritarian president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, while praising Orbán as “one of the strongest leaders anywhere in the world.”

    Trump also promised to keep immigrants who “don’t like our religion” from entering the United States. Of course, the First Amendment establishes that there is no state religion in America.

    He also justified challenging the 2020 election results by saying he doesn’t mind “being Nelson Mandela because I’m doing it for a reason.”

    Trump seems to be on a roll with his bluster and falsehoods.

    Last week, he told reporters outside a New York City courtroom that his Mar-a-Lago estate was the “most expensive house probably in the world” — which it’s not!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Turns Iowa Speech Into Diatribe Against Flies And Fly Paper

    Trump Turns Iowa Speech Into Diatribe Against Flies And Fly Paper

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump said some harsh words against refugees on Monday during a speech in Adel, Iowa, but saved his most damning comments for the flies buzzing around his face.

    The former president told supporters that if reelected, he will begin “ideological screening” for all immigrants and won’t allow anyone who sympathizes with Hamas and Muslim extremists to enter the country.

    However, he got distracted during his diatribe by flies buzzing around his face.

    “I didn’t know you had flies in Iowa,” Trump said while waving his hand in front of his face. “I hate flies!!!”

    After the audience laughed, Trump predicted he’d get in trouble for his comments because of “cruelty to animals.”

    The former president then related an anecdote he claimed happened the other day — however, the people he quoted in the story referred to him as “Sir,” a word some Trump-watchers say has become a “tell” that he’s about to say something that’s probably complete B.S.

    “The other day I was at a place, it was a beautiful place, but they had, like, flies,” Trump narrated. “I said, ‘Get fly paper!’ They said, ‘Sir, they’re not allowed to sell it anymore because of cruelty to animals.’ They actually said that.”

    That portion of Trump’s speech is in the video below.

    Many users of X, formerly known as Twitter, fact-checked Trump’s bizarre and false claim.

    Memorably, during the 2020 vice presidential debate, Trump’s then-VP Mike Pence also managed to attract the attention of one fly that wouldn’t get off his face.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden Soothes, Sinema Flops And 5 More Fundraising Takeaways

    Biden Soothes, Sinema Flops And 5 More Fundraising Takeaways

    [ad_1]

    For the last time before the 2024 election year, federal political candidates had to reveal their fundraising to the Federal Election Commission by Sunday night, giving us a peek at who is successfully filling their coffers and getting a leg up in next year’s House, Senate and presidential contests.

    Here are seven takeaways from third-quarter political fundraising.

    Biden Hopes Fundraising Will Smooth Democratic Nerves, With A Catch

    President Joe Biden announced raising $71 million in the third quarter, a total far greater than former President Donald Trump’s haul. The Biden campaign’s press release boasted he had more cash on hand than every Republican competing for the GOP nomination combined.

    None of this is wrong, but there’s an obvious reason for it. Biden is the de facto nominee of the Democratic Party, and thus has full control of the Democratic National Committee, giving him access to much, much larger donations than the standard maximum donation of $6,600. The maximum donation to Biden’s campaign, after the cash is routed through the DNC and various state parties, is $929,000.

    The Biden campaign, which has faced months of rocky polling and questions about donor and voter enthusiasm, also made sure to highlight the growing number of small-dollar donors to his campaign. The campaign has brought in more than 200,000 donors who didn’t give in 2020 and doubled the number of donors who’ve pledged to give every month to 112,000.

    Kyrsten Sinema’s Fundraising Hits The Skids

    Arizona independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema reported over $10 million in the bank ― an impressive haul that would go a long way if she decides to run for reelection next year in a potentially messy three-way showdown with Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and top GOP election denier Kari Lake, who announced her campaign for Senate earlier this month.

    But Sinema’s pace of fundraising dropped off markedly over the summer, a development that is sure to add to speculation about her political future. Sinema raised only $826,000 in the third quarter, lagging behind every in-cycle Democratic incumbent. After accounting for expenditures on advertising, Sinema ended the quarter with just $41,000 more in her war chest since last quarter.

    Gallego, on the other hand, raised over $3 million, ending the quarter with $5 million cash on hand.

    It Turns Out Being Indicted Has Consequences (If You’re A Democrat)

    Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) raked in $1.17 million in the third quarter, with nearly $1 million in contributions coming in just seven days after he announced a primary bid against indicted Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.). The longtime New Jersey lawmaker is charged with taking bribes and acting as an agent on behalf of a foreign government; many of Menendez’s colleagues have urged him to step down and one even wants him expelled. Compare that to the treatment of Trump, who was rewarded by donations and endorsements by Republicans after his multiple indictments, including over his attempt to overthrow the 2020 election and his alleged mishandling of classified documents.

    Kim actually outraised Menendez, who took in $919,000 in the same period. Still, Menendez ― who has denied the federal charges and vowed to contest them in court ― has nearly $8.6 million cash on hand compared to Kim’s $1.9 million.

    The campaign of Republican presidential candidate and former Vice President Mike Pence has just $1.2 million in the bank.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Image

    The Entire GOP Field — Especially Pence — Trails Trump By… A Lot

    Former Vice President Mike Pence has had trouble getting traction in a party dominated by his coup-attempting former boss, and his third-quarter fundraising numbers tell the story.

    Pence, who stood up to Trump’s attempt to remain in power as an unelected autocrat, enters the key final three months before voting starts with just $1.2 million in the bank and $621,000 in debt, all of it to direct mail firms, after raising a relatively paltry $3.4 million.

    Pence’s meager haul stands in major contrast to that of his former boss, who reported raising $24 million. Trump’s campaign initially said it brought in $45 million across three accounts he controls, but his filings revealed a significantly lower number, suggesting expenses related to fundraising that cut into his net haul. Trump still reported $37.5 million cash on hand to spend in the primary — the number his campaign said to expect in the filings.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who reported raising $15 million with $5 million available to spend against Trump in the primary, took second place in the fundraising race among Republican contenders. Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley raised over $11 million, with $9 million available as of the beginning of the month to spend in the primary.

    Republicans Made Generous Loans To Their Campaigns

    Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy has now spent $22.3 million on his campaign. More than $17 million of that is from himself ($15.25 million technically in the form of loans). He started October with $4.2 million in cash, although that number is kind of meaningless as long as he’s willing to pour his own money into the campaign.

    North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, another long shot candidate, loaned his campaign $2 million last quarter.

    Burgum’s money didn’t all come from his own coffers: He reported raising $3.4 million in individual contributions, which was enough to get him onstage in the first two Republican debates. But that was likely due to a fundraising gimmick the former software executive used to raise small-donor donations: giving $20 gift cards to people who contributed as little as $1 to his campaign. Burgum is currently offering donors the same amount in gas cards.

    Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) says he is running for reelection in spite of a criminal indictment, but has little cash on hand.
    Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) says he is running for reelection in spite of a criminal indictment, but has little cash on hand.

    George Santos Refunded More Than He Took In

    Embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), who faces new federal charges in a superseding indictment that came down last week, ended the quarter having refunded more money than he raised.

    His campaign reported barely $23,000 cash on hand at the beginning of October for what’s guaranteed to be a challenging reelection in a swing district. Primary challengers have already lined up to take him on. Santos maintains that despite the numerous charges against him — which include fraud, conspiracy and identity theft — he is nonetheless running for reelection in New York’s 3rd Congressional District.

    Santos, whose former treasurer pleaded guilty this month in a scheme to defraud donors, ended the quarter with an almost $17,000 net loss in contributions and $750,000 in debt, which includes a $500,000 loan he previously claimed to have given the campaign.

    Potential Senate GOP Headaches Fall Flat

    Senate Republicans have zeroed in on three Democrat-held seats in red states ― West Virginia, Montana and Ohio ― as key to their hopes of winning the Senate in 2024. A potential threat to their plans in West Virginia and Montana, at least, has been weaker (or at least less establishment-friendly) candidates winning GOP primaries.

    The fundraising numbers out of Montana and West Virginia might help D.C. Republicans sleep easier at night. Their preferred candidates, businessman Tim Sheehey in Montana and Gov. Jim Justice in West Virginia, performed better than some of their potential rivals: Justice raised $935,000 and Sheehey raised $2.8 million.

    Meanwhile, Reps. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) and Alex Mooney (R-W.Va.) each raised less than $500,000 in the first quarter, with Mooney bringing in just $410,000 and Rosendale raising a mere $334,000. Both candidates may get a boost from the Club for Growth, a moneyed conservative group, though the group is unsure if it will ultimately back Rosendale, who has yet to officially announce a campaign.

    The Democrats in those states had distinctly different quarters: Sen. Jon Tester of Montana raised $5 million, while Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who has yet to officially decide on a run, raised just $714,000. Both men have impressive cash-on-hand totals: $13 million for Tester and $11.3 million for Manchin.

    The third race Republicans are counting on in their efforts to flip control of the 51-49 Senate is Ohio, where incumbent Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown raised $5.8 million. Republicans don’t have a preferred candidate in the race, though Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose raised $1 million; businessman Bernie Moreno’s campaign raised $4 million, including $3 million of his own money; and State Sen. Matt Dolan matched Moreno, donating $3 million of his own money and raising $4 million overall.

    S.V. Dáte contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nikki Haley Says Trump’s Campaign Sent Her A Birdcage

    Nikki Haley Says Trump’s Campaign Sent Her A Birdcage

    [ad_1]

    Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley suggested Sunday that former President Donald Trump’s campaign sent her a birdcage a couple of days after Trump posted a social media rant calling Haley a “birdbrain.”

    “After a day of campaigning, this is the message waiting for me outside my hotel room,” Haley posted on X, formerly known as Twitter.

    Haley, a 2024 GOP presidential candidate, shared a picture of a birdcage with a note that read: “From: Trump Campaign.” She added the hashtags #PrettyPatheticTryAgain and #YouJustMadeMyCaseForMe.

    Two days before Haley posted the birdcage photo, the former president went on a rant on his Truth Social platform against Haley, who was ambassador to the United Nations under his administration.

    Trump started his social media rant by claiming that Haley once said she’d never run against him because he’d “done an outstanding job” as president.

    “Anyway, Birdbrain doesn’t have the TALENT or TEMPERAMENT to do the job. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,” the former president continued.

    Haley responded Friday on X: “Love this. It means we are in 2nd and moving up fast. Bring it!”

    Trump is the leading GOP candidate and also opted out of the first and second GOP primary debates.

    In the second debate last week, Haley criticized Trump’s China policies.

    “This is where President Trump went wrong,” Haley said onstage. “He focused on trade with China. He didn’t focus on the fact that they were buying up our farmland. He didn’t focus on the fact that they were killing Americans.”

    “I will make sure every American is safe,” Haley continued.

    Neither Trump’s nor Haley’s press offices immediately responded to a request for comment from HuffPost.

    [ad_2]

    Source link