ReportWire

US Judge Tosses Buffalo Wild Wings Lawsuit That Has ‘No Meat on Its Bones’

[ad_1]

NEW YORK, Feb 17 (Reuters) – A ⁠U.S. ⁠federal judge threw out ⁠on Tuesday a lawsuit against Buffalo Wild ​Wings that alleged the restaurant and sports bar chain deceived ‌consumers by selling boneless ‌wings that are not actually de-boned chicken wings. 

Judge ⁠John ⁠Tharp Jr. in Chicago dismissed the proposed class action ​lawsuit brought in 2023 by a man named Aimen Halim who claimed he was misled into purchasing the disputed menu ​item that is essentially a chicken nugget.  

“Halim sued (Buffalo Wild ⁠Wings) over ⁠his confusion, but ⁠his ​complaint has no meat on its bones,” Tharp wrote in his ​ruling.

“Despite his best ⁠efforts, Halim did not ‘drum’ up enough factual allegations to state a claim,” the judge added.

Halim alleged that the marketing and advertising of “boneless wings” is false, duping ⁠consumers in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive ⁠Business Practices Act, among other claims. 

Tharp said reasonable consumers are not deceived into thinking boneless wings are truly made of wing meat. “If Halim is right, reasonable consumers should think that cauliflower wings are made (at least in part) from wing meat. They don’t, though,” the judge added.

Despite granting the chain’s request ⁠to dismiss the case, Tharp gave Halim until March 20 to amend his lawsuit to present any additional facts that would allow the case to ​go ahead.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New ​York; Editing by Saad Sayeed)

Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

[ad_2]

Reuters

Source link