ReportWire

Tag: Zoe Saldana

  • Zoe Saldaña Thinks James Cameron Should Do an ‘Avatar’ Documentary

    [ad_1]

    The decades-long labor of love James Cameron and his Avatar family have put into building out the world of Pandora is a feat his Avatar: The Way of Water leading lady thinks should be chronicled deeply as a testament to the art of performance capture.

    In an interview with musician Alicia Keys for By Design, who notes herself as an Avatar fan, Zoe Saldaña revealed that in time that’s something the legendary director may get to. You know, after whatever follows Avatar: Fire and Ash. Saldaña told Keys, “I’m excited that James Cameron is considering a documentary about the making of Avatar—finally giving us the chance to explain, in a meticulous way, why performance capture is the most empowering form of acting. It gives us the credit, the ability to own 100 percent of our performance on screen. With animation, you might go into the studio for [a few] sessions; that’s as much as they’ll need you for the whole movie. You go into a studio, however you’re dressed, and you lend your voice, right?”

    She continued describing the immense work that goes into an underrecognized art form: “Performance capture means that Avatar wouldn’t exist if Sigourney Weaver, Sam Worthington, Stephen Lang, Kate Winslet, myself, and the entire cast didn’t get up and put those dots on our faces. We put on that little unitard with all those dots on it, and step into a volume—that’s what we call the set—that’s rigged on the ceiling, with all these cameras in measured positions. They’re all pointing into this space that finds us, and feeds that information into the system that is Pandora.”

    Elaborating on the nearly decade-long process in between films, where it’s clear, like stunt work (which is finally getting an Oscar category in 2028), performance capture needs to be given its credit, according to the actress.

    “It takes an average of seven years between [each Avatar film]. From the archery, the martial arts, the free diving, the scuba diving—so that you can hold your breath underwater for longer than five minutes—to the language [Cameron] conceived out of thin air, to physically training with former gymnasts, circus performers, and acrobats so you can learn how to walk like an extraterrestrial human species…”

    Emphasizing the scope of work that Cameron orchestrates on a massive scale with his Avatar ensemble, Saldaña shared, “That’s all us, and a group of incredible stunt actors that make our characters feel bionic. God bless them. With the technology that Jim creates, he gives the artist the power of complete ownership. It’s beautiful. I told him, ‘I wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for Terminator, Aliens, Ellen Ripley, The Abyss.’ At 10 or 11 years old, I would watch [the behind-the-scenes] over and over and over again. I liked the sacrifice that goes into putting something together. It’s art.”

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • Zoe Saldaña Urges James Cameron to Make ‘Avatar’ Doc to ‘Give Us a Chance to Explain’ Why Motion Capture Is the ‘Most Empowering Form of Acting’

    [ad_1]

    Zoe Saldaña said in an interview with Beyond Noise that James Cameron is “considering a documentary about the making” of the “Avatar” movies, which the Oscar-winning actor is keen on because it will “finally give us a chance to explain, in a meticulous way, why performance capture is the most empowering form of acting.”

    “It gives us the credit, the ability to own 100 percent of our performance on screen,” said Saldaña, who has long been a champion of motion capture acting and has been outspoken about award bodies such as the Oscars needing to consider it. “With animation, you might go into the studio for [a few] sessions; that’s as much as they’ll need you for the whole movie. You go into a studio, however you’re dressed, and you lend your voice, right? Performance capture means that ‘Avatar’ wouldn’t exist if Sigourney Weaver, Sam Worthington, Stephen Lang, Kate Winslet, myself, and the entire cast didn’t get up and put those dots on our faces.”

    “We put on that little unitard with all those dots on it, and step into a volume – that’s what we call the set – that’s rigged on the ceiling, with all these cameras in measured positions,” she added. “They’re all pointing into this space that finds us, and feeds that information into the system that is Pandora.”

    Saldaña plays Neytiri in the “Avatar” films, which include 2009’s “Avatar,” 2022’s “Avatar: The Way of Water” and the upcoming “Avatar: Fire and Ash.” Cameron intends to make two more “Avatar” movies.

    “It takes an average of seven years between [each ‘Avatar’ film],” Saldaña said. “From the archery, the martial arts, the free diving, the scuba diving – so that you can hold your breath under water for longer than five minutes – to the language [James] conceived out of thin air, to physically training with former gymnasts, circus performers, and acrobats so you can learn how to walk like an extraterrestrial human species… That’s all us, and a group of incredible stunt actors that make our characters feel bionic. God bless them. With the technology that Jim creates, he gives the artist the power of complete ownership.”

    Saldaña spoke to The Independent last year and called out the Oscars for continuing to snub motion capture performances. Be it the actors in the “Avatar” movies or Andy Serkis’ acclaimed motion capture work as Gollum in “The Lord of Rings” and Caesar in “Planet of the Apes,” motion capture acting has yet to break into the Oscar races.

    “Old habits die hard, and when you have old establishments, it’s really hard to bring forward change,” Saldaña said on the topic. “And I understand that, so I’m not bitter about it, but it is quite deflating when you give 120% of yourself into something. I mean, not winning is ok, not being nominated is ok, but when you’re overlooked and then minimized and completely disregarded…”

    Cameron told Variety as part of a Saldaña cover story last year that the Oscars are overdue to recognize her work as Neytiri in the “Avatar” franchise.

    “I’ve worked with Academy Award-winning actors, and there’s nothing that Zoe’s doing that’s of a caliber less than that,” the director said. “But because in my film she’s playing a ‘CG character,’ it kind of doesn’t count in some way, which makes no sense to me whatsoever. She can go from regal to, in two nanoseconds, utterly feral. The woman is ferocious. She is a freaking lioness.”

    “Avatar: Fire and Ash” opens in theaters Dec. 19 from Disney and 20th Century Studios.

    [ad_2]

    Zack Sharf

    Source link

  • ‘Awards Chatter’ Live Pod: Zoe Saldaña on 25 Years in Biz, Showing Full Range in ‘Emilia Pérez’ and Willingness to Perform Song “El Mal” on Oscars

    ‘Awards Chatter’ Live Pod: Zoe Saldaña on 25 Years in Biz, Showing Full Range in ‘Emilia Pérez’ and Willingness to Perform Song “El Mal” on Oscars

    [ad_1]

    Zoe Saldaña, the guest on this episode of The Hollywood Reporter’s Awards Chatter podcast, which was recorded in front of an audience at the SCAD Savannah Film Festival, has been a screen actress for 25 years. She has been described as “the queen of the film franchise,” having starred in installments of the Avatar, Avengers, Guardians and Star Trek series. (She’s the only person ever to have been part of four films that grossed more than $2 billion.) But this year, with her performance as an attorney recruited to help a cartel leader with a top-secret mission in Jacques Audiard’s unconventional musical Emilia Pérez, she has reminded people that she’s also much more.

    Those who have already seen Emilia Pérez have gone wild for it. It received an 11-minute standing ovation following its world premiere at May’s Cannes Film Festival, where the festival’s jury awarded Saldaña and her principal co-stars — Karla Sofía Gascón, Selena Gomez and Adriana Paz — the best actress prize. And the film and its stars have been garnering acclaim and accolades ever since. Soon, everyone will have the opportunity to see the film: it debuted in select U.S. and Canadian theaters on Nov. 1 en route to a Nov. 13 debut on Netflix in the U.S., Canada and the U.K.

    In the meantime, though, Saldaña has been reflecting on her roller coaster of a journey to this point. As she discusses during this episode, her father was killed in a car crash when she was just nine years old, leading her mother to send her and her sister to live with relatives in the Dominican Republic. There, she fell in love with dance, which led to acting — she sang in local music theater productions and danced in her first film, 2000’s Center Stage. But she wasn’t called upon to sing or dance again until Emilia Pérez. (It’s also the first film in which she has had the opportunity to act in her native language, Spanish.)

    In the intervening years, as she describes it, she nearly quit the biz (after a bad experience on 2003’s Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl), had her faith in it restored (by Steven Spielberg on the set of 2004’s The Terminal) and then, quite by accident, stumbled into “space” thanks to James Cameron, J.J. Abrams and Kevin Feige. In-between her big studio, VFX-heavy projects, she has often returned to smaller-scale art house ventures — among them 2011’s Colombiana, 2013’s Out of the Furnace and 2014’s Infinitely Polar Bear. But it is Emilia Pérez that has reminded others — and Saldaña herself — of the extent of her talent and range.

    In just a few months, she will almost certainly find herself an Oscar nominee for the first time, in the category of best supporting actress, for Emilia Pérez. One of the tunes that she performs in the film, “El Mal,” is, in the category of best original song, also a frontrunner, and Saldaña, upon being asked, confirms that she would be willing to perform it on the Oscars telecast if it is nominated and she is invited to do so. It’s all new and exciting territory for someone who has been around for a long time, if never fully seen and appreciated … until now.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Feinberg

    Source link

  • Lioness season 2 release schedule in full, including timings

    Lioness season 2 release schedule in full, including timings

    [ad_1]

    Lioness season 2’s first episodes have arrived on Paramount+ and we’re already deeply invested. Picking up from last season, Special Ops: Lioness season 2 sees Zoe Saldaña and Nicole Kidman reprising their roles as Saldaña’s character Joe enlists a new Lioness operative to infiltrate a looming threat.

    With the CIA’s fight against terror coming closer to home than ever before and with pressure building from all angles, this season Joe finds herself having to come to terms with the “the profound personal sacrifices she has made as the leader of the Lioness program”, as per the show’s synopsis.

    Inspired by a real-life CIA program, the show’s second season sees Joe’s female CIA operatives of the Lioness program tasked with bringing down terrorist organisations. Clearly, the stakes are high, so we desperately need answers as to what comes next for the Lionesses and we need them soon.

    So when are Lioness season 2 episodes arriving? Here’s what we know about the show’s release schedule for its second season, including the key details we’ve been given about the new episodes so far.

    Viacom International Inc/Paramount

    When are Lioness season 2 episodes released?

    Lioness season 2 will consist of 8 episodes, with new episodes arriving weekly.

    If you’re in the US you can expect these on Sundays at 3am ET/12am PT, while new episodes are released internationally on Mondays, including the UK where new episodes land at 8am BST.

    So what do we know about the upcoming Lioness episodes so far? Well, as per IMDb we

    Episode 1: ‘Beware the Old Soldier’ – October 27/28, 2024

    Joe, Kyle, and the QRF team embark on a timely extraction after a high-ranking government official is kidnapped by a cartel.

    Episode 2: ‘I Love My Country’ – October 27/28, 2024

    After a new Lioness is identified, Joe and her team travel to Iraq to close the asset.

    [ad_2]

    Lian Brooks

    Source link

  • Change Your Gender, (Maybe) Change Your Life: Emilia Pérez

    Change Your Gender, (Maybe) Change Your Life: Emilia Pérez

    [ad_1]

    If some story aspects of Emilia Pérez seem familiar, it’s because writer-director Jacques Audiard was inspired by a particular chapter in Boris Razon’s 2018 novel, Écoute. But if some of the visual aspects seem familiar, it’s no doubt because viewers recognize the style as inherently “Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet.” Right down to the movie poster with its neon heart framing two guns with crosses on the grips. Indeed, Luhrmann’s seminal 1996 movie (almost as seminal as the William Shakespeare play itself) has appeared to have a noticeable influence on pop culture lately, if one is to go by the aesthetic of Emilia Pérez and the recently cancelled Netflix series, Kaos. The latter even goes so far as to use the same storytelling “shtick” by updating something “ancient” to fit into a modern (therefore, more resonant) context. With plenty of cheeky attitude.

    Emilia Pérez marks Audiard’s twenty-fifth film as a screenwriter and his eleventh film as writer-director (a dual role he started to take on in 1994 with See How They Fall). And it’s clear that he’s never been more confident and secure in his abilities—not just because this is the first time he’s written a script without a co-writer credited, but because he took a chance on experimenting with the musical genre (which, as audiences saw this year, didn’t work out so well for a movie like Joker: Folie à Deux). Or, more precisely, an opera libretto. And yet, perhaps because of some of the more “absurd” elements of the story, a musical is the best way to diffuse the audience’s potential incredulity. Within the genre of a musical, anything goes—because everything feels inherently more fantastical within this type of world.

    Cue Zoe Saldaña as Rita Mora Castro, an overlooked yet indispensable lawyer who defends the guilty-as-sin dregs of society with grudging skill, singing a song like “La Vaginoplastia.” A little ditty about all the different parts and procedures that go into switching genders. She engages in this back and forth with doctors in milieus that include Bangkok and Tel Aviv (this movie being made before choosing to get gender transformation surgery was an undeniable political affront). All on behalf of Juan “Manitas” Del Monte (Karla Sofía Gascón), the jefe of a Mexican drug cartel who briefly has her kidnapped to tell her that he can no longer live this life. Not because he’s trying to avoid arrest or even because he has some sort of moral compunction about the things he’s done, but because he needs to exist in the body he was always meant to. To live his life, as it is said, “authentically.” And obviously, he’s got the money required to make that change, forking a good chunk of it over to Rita to be his go-between as she eventually settles on the Israeli surgeon, Dr. Wasserman (Mark Ivanir), to realize Manitas’ dream. The catch? She must deal with his “highly emotional” (always a euphemism for “woman”) wife, Jessi Del Monte (Selena Gomez, sporting a terrible Spanish accent that’s slightly less noticeable when she’s singing).

    It’s all part of the lead-up toward faking Manitas’ death so that Emilia Pérez can emerge. This is the identity that Manitas has been waiting to step into for years, having already started the process of taking hormones long ago. He is thus ready to “kill” Manitas, and Rita is the key to unlocking his previously unfulfilled wish—even though he knows that, in exchange, he must give up his family. Not just his wife, but their two children. The latter relinquishment being the most painful aspect of all. And yet, Manitas maintains, not as painful as continuing to exist as a man. Let alone such a brutal, often cruel one. It is in this sense that Emilia Pérez proffers the black-and-white notion that to become a woman is to stamp out the ruthlessness inherent in being a man. Not a radical idea, but likely one that still causes offense amongst both genders. Not to mention certain critics of the film—case in point, the Little White Lies assessment: “Any time Emilia ‘reverts’ to her ‘old ways,’ Gascon lowers her vocal register as if to equate masculinity with evil and femininity with good.” Well, if the vocal register fits…

    Not to say, of course, that women can’t be just as malicious and terrible (in their own unique ways) as men. But the likelihood is, let’s say, much slimmer. And so, after Manitas becomes Emilia, there is a certain veracity to the mantra “change your gender, change your life.” And maybe even your entire personality. For, all of the sudden, Emilia becomes a beneficent philanthropist/activist. A person committed to helping undo some of the harm she caused while acting as the leader of a violent cartel by tirelessly working to find the location of missing persons (usually just their bodies) kidnapped by the cartels. This is where yet another “leading woman” enters frame: Epifanía (Adriana Paz). And yes, her name is a bit on the nose, with Emilia seeming to have the “epiphany” that she’s fallen in love for the first time as her authentic self. The same seems to go for Epifanía. And so, it can be said that Emilia’s bodily transition has had a ripple effect/significant impact on the more metaphorical/emotional transitions of the three primary women in her life.

    By this point in the movie (when Epifanía enters the mix), it’s also abundantly clear that Audiard has taken more than a dash of inspo out of the Pedro Almodóvar playbook (for example, The Skin I Live In) via-à-vis convoluted melodrama. But Almodóvar’s more personal connection to the queer and transgender community is what Audiard lacks in terms of carrying off the “authenticity” that he wants to…or rather, that certain viewers want him to. But that doesn’t negate the emotional response that Emilia Pérez can evoke. As it did for Madonna (who has worked with the movie’s choreographer, Damien Jalet, on her own projects, including select songs from The Celebration Tour). Indeed, her reaction left such a mark on Gascón that she told The Guardian, “Madonna was crying so much after the screening in New York. She told me: ‘You’re amazing!’ She was crying and crying. I said: ‘Madonna, please. It’s only a film. Be happy!’” The same thing one of the actors in Romeo + Juliet might have said to an audience member who reacted particularly viscerally to the well-known ending of Shakespeare’s tragedy.

    And, like Romeo + Juliet, Emilia Pérez isn’t exactly being praised by everyone (side note: who could forget The New York Times’ shade-drenched review title of R + J that read, “Soft! What Light? It’s Flash, Romeo” or Roger Ebert giving it one of his worst reviews of a movie ever). Least of all the trans community. In fact, despite Gascón being transgender, not everyone sees the movie as a positive representation. Just another cartoonish one that wields tired tropes. A PinkNews review summed up the movie as “having no nuance when it comes to trans identity.” But maybe it does show some nuance in terms of how, no matter what gender you are, it’s still possible to be neither wholly “good” or “bad,” but filled with numerous contradictions as varied as life itself. As Gascón put it, “You can be LGBTQ+. You can be a man, a woman, an astronaut, an electrician. But if you are stupid, you are stupid.”

    And those that want to ignore the many layers of Emilia Pérez based on criticisms rooted in literalness, not understanding/appreciating the nature of opera and musical theatricality or simply insisting that the transgender element is “offensive” (though surely not more offensive than Gomez and her “Spanish”) are missing the film’s brilliance. Not least of which is the undercutting theme of how living in a patriarchal society begets violence among all genders, all colors.

    Gascón distilled it down to this: “There has always been an explicit violence toward others in parts of male heterosexuality, and that has also been taken up by a part of women’s feminism to crush a certain section of the population.” Whether that crushing will be allowed to further thrive in the aftermath of the U.S. election in November remains to be seen. But one certainty is this: changing gender is not necessarily the key to changing one’s mentality. That would take decades of deprogramming for many people. Especially women who have been conditioned to be misogynists themselves.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Zoe Saldaña Would Do Things Differently With Gamora if Given the Chance

    Zoe Saldaña Would Do Things Differently With Gamora if Given the Chance

    [ad_1]

    It’s become a bit of a pastime for Marvel fans worldwide to daydream about how they would change, alter, or flesh out various narrative threads in the blockbuster franchise’s cinematic universe. While many of these musings tend to lean toward what-if scenarios not unlike Marvel’s aptly titled What If?  Disney+ show, Guardians of the Galaxy actor Zoe Saldaña has come forward with her post-snap epiphany for the universe’s deadliest assassin, Gamora.

    In a recent Variety YouTube video, where she was tested on her knowledge of lines from her extensive portfolio of popular films, Saldaña reflected on her role as Gamora and expressed a desire to delve deeper into her character. Specifically, Saldaña felt somewhat rudderless in how she was to portray Gamora in the later Avengers movies and wished she had explored more aspects of the character in Avengers: Endgame.

    “I wish I could go back and reshoot what Gamora was going through in the Avengers movies,” Saldaña told Variety. “I don’t think I was quite understanding what the Russo Brothers [were doing].”

    Saldaña’s confusion with Gamora’s character arc is completely understandable considering her character not only met her demise after being flung from a cliffside by her father, Thanos, but also continued to exist through an alternate timeline version of herself. This decision retroactively led director James Gunn to sort out the pieces with Guardians of the Galaxy 3 by ostensibly making do with her development being undone. Having had time away from the whole experience, Saldaña wishes she could reverse time and explore Gamora and Thanos’ tumultuous family ties.

    “I wish that I could go back and redo it so that I can push a little harder, because it was such a great opportunity to play a daughter having issues with a dad,” she said. “And whether or not she’s having this opportunity to reconciliate or to heal or to repair or simply just walk away from this person—that would have been a great opportunity had I been a little more aware of it back then.”

    She continued: “I wish I could go back in time and just try so many more things for her,” she said. “[Gamora] was a really fun character to play, but also a really deep character… I know it’s a Marvel movie and we don’t like to use words like ‘deep’ and ‘Marvel’ in the same sentence, but I like to and I take great pride in knowing that I was a part of great films that cater to a younger audience, that inspires a younger audience.”

    Rather than harp on what could’ve been and hem and haw over where her character ended up at the culmination of Guardians 3, Saldaña expressed gratitude for her experience working with Gunn and transforming its characters from deep-cut Marvel mythos to household names.

    “We were supposed to be these rejects that came with childhood traumas and disabilities and mental issues,” Saldaña said. “And he gave these characters space to be loved, to learn about self-love, to love each other, to find a family within their friendship. It was actually a really important film now that I look back at it.”

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    Zoe Saldana is the first actor to star in four movies that each grossed over $2 billion at the box…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zoe Saldaña Has Arrived for Her Oscar Moment in the Best Picture Contender ‘Emilia Pérez’

    Zoe Saldaña Has Arrived for Her Oscar Moment in the Best Picture Contender ‘Emilia Pérez’

    [ad_1]

    For nearly 20 years, Zoe Saldaña has starred in some of the most financially successful films in history, including “Avatar” and “Avengers: Endgame.” You’d think an actress with such an impressive résumé would have scripts and prominent roles constantly coming her way. Yet, in Jacques Audiard’s “Emilia Pérez,” where Saldaña plays Rita Moro Castro, she sings and dances, and in one high-energy number, “El Mal,” she shows the ferocity that shows the depth of her talent. It was a moment that left me incredibly frustrated with Hollywood. Despite her box office success, Saldaña has rarely been allowed to showcase the full range of her abilities. Why are we only learning about this now?

    I expressed these sentiments to Telluride executive director Julie Huntsinger during an interview with Variety, and she confidently replied, “That all stops now.”

    Read: You can see all Academy Award predictions in all 23 categories on one page on the Variety Awards Circuit: Oscars.

    The Latina star is likely to be at the forefront of the Oscar race, depending on where she ultimately decides to campaign as either lead or supporting actress. Saldaña’s performance in “Emilia” harks back to the moment we watched Catherine Zeta-Jones’s portrayal of Velma Kelly in “Chicago” (2002), which led to an Oscar win. There’s a sense that Saldaña could follow a similar path this awards season.

    But the compelling musical crime film isn’t just about Saldaña.

    Writer, director, and producer Audiard received the Silver Medallion Tribute at Telluride on Friday evening, launching Netflix’s quest to nab the auteur his long overdue Oscar nom. Sometimes described as the “French Martin Scorsese,” the 72-year-old has won the Palme d’Or twice but has never been nominated for an Academy Award. This year, that could also change, as Audiard may find himself in the running for best picture, director or screenplay. He would become the latest triple crown recipient which has netted wins for The Daniels (“Everything Everywhere All at Once”) and nominations for Christopher Nolan (“Oppenheimer”), who won two out of three.

    The ensemble cast includes Karla Sofía Gascón in the titular role, Selena Gomez, and Adriana Paz. Along with Saldaña, the four shared the best actress prize at Cannes, making them strong contenders for Academy recognition.

    Gascón aims to make history as the first trans woman nominated for best actress. Her presence on the circuit will help propel her in the lead actress race, which is sure to be overflowing with well-known artists and former nominees and winners, including Saoirse Ronan, who will also be honored at Telluride for her performance in “The Outrun.”

    Emilia Perez
    Netflix

    Gomez’s arrival in Telluride on Thursday didn’t go unnoticed by her fans. A neon orange sign stapled to a pole on Main Street, addressed to Gomez, read, “Please sing the National Anthem at one of [the] home games: Friday (6 p.m.) and Saturday (1 p.m.)” and was signed by the Telluride High School volleyball team. Whether Gomez has seen the sign or plans to surprise the team remains unknown, but with Audiard’s tribute during the Friday slot, Saturday might be their only hope.

    However, the team may have to forgive her as the Emmy-nominated actress from “Only Murders in the Building” is likely to be busy schmoozing at the festival. As Jessi Del Monte, Emilia’s wife, Gomez has two standout moments, particularly with the song “El Camino,” that could have the Academy responding to her work. She’ll need to continue putting herself out there, shaking hands and mingling with voters, as campaigning can make a difference. Notable, the supporting actress category has had two Oscar nominees from the same movie approximately 33% of the time. That could push Gomez into the lineup alongside her co-star.

    In a year filled with musicals, including “Better Man,” “Piece by Piece,” “The End” and the upcoming “Wicked,” Audiard’s film stands out. Netflix acquired the film at Cannes and is going full throttle, hoping to snag its first best picture Oscar with this unique drama.

    Expect “Emilia Pérez” to be an across-the-board contender at the Oscars, with potential nominations for cinematography (Paul Guillaume), editing (Juliette Welfing), and music by the composing duo Clément Ducol and Camille.

    The Spanish-language film is also vying to be France’s official selection in this year’s international feature race. It’s been over 30 years since France, once a source of Oscar winners, last won the category. After two consecutive years of controversial selections — “Titane” over “Happening” and “The Taste of Things” over “Anatomy of a Fall”— Netflix remains hopeful that the selection committee will recognize the potential of “Emilia Pérez” to bring the victory back to France.

    As the weekend continues, we’ll see how attendees respond to the film as it begins its long trek on the awards circuit and, possibly, to the 97th Academy Awards.

    [ad_2]

    Clayton Davis

    Source link

  • Inside the AFI Awards Gala Honoring Nicole Kidman

    Inside the AFI Awards Gala Honoring Nicole Kidman

    [ad_1]

    Nicole Kidman and Reese Witherspoon. Getty Images for AFI

    On a balmy April evening in Hollywood, the stars aligned to honor one of cinema’s most acclaimed talents: Nicole Kidman. At the iconic Dolby Theatre, the Australian actress reached rarified air, becoming only the 49th recipient of the prestigious American Film Institute (AFI) Life Achievement Award in its nearly 50-year history. Kidman is the first Australian, and one of the youngest, to receive this highest honor.

    The festivities began back in November 2022, when it was announced Kidman would join the ranks of previous AFI honorees like Bette Davis, Alfred Hitchcock, Sidney Poitier and Tom Hanks. After postponement due to the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, the ceremony finally took place on April 27. The televised tribute, airing on TNT on June 17, celebrated Kidman’s career through film clips and testimonials from her co-stars.

    In the days preceding this grand convocation, Kidman stoked anticipation by sharing intimate behind-the-scenes shots on Instagram alongside some of the illustrious presenters—her dear friends and frequent collaborators Meryl Streep, Reese Witherspoon, Morgan Freeman and Naomi Watts. “Just a few of the people I can’t wait to see again on Saturday,” the actress teased in the heartwarming snaps, whetting appetites for the emotional reunions to come.

    On the Dolby red carpet, Kidman stunned in a gold Balenciaga gown with a five-inch train, accessorized solely with gold rings and a one-of-a-kind 26mm De Ville Mini Trésor watch from Omega in Moonshine Gold, pavéd with glittering diamonds and emerald hour markers. She was joined by husband Keith Urban and daughters Sunday and Faith, marking their first public appearance with the actress.

    Keith Urban, Faith Margaret Urban, Sunday Rose Kidman-Urban, Sybella Hawley and Nicole Kidman. Variety via Getty Images

    The evening’s festivities kicked off with 2011 AFI honoree Morgan Freeman setting the tone in a video spoof of Kidman’s infamous AMC Theatres “we make movies better” ad. His quip, “Nicole Kidman. She makes movies better,” resonated with everyone who took the stage to honor the actress that night. A lineup of celebrities paid tribute, including Zac Efron, Zoe Saldana and a disguised Mike Myers, who slinked onstage donning one of the eerie orgy masks from Eyes Wide Shut. In a recorded Zoom segment, fellow Aussies Cate Blanchett and Hugh Jackman engaged in cheeky banter with Jimmy Fallon, collectively praising Kidman while playfully joshing that Blanchett should have been the first Australian honored.

    The most emotional highlights came from Kidman’s loved ones. Her husband brought her to tears saying she showed him “what love in action really looks like” when his substance abuse issues arose shortly after their 2006 wedding. “Nic pushed through every negative voice, I’m sure even some of her own, and she chose love. And here we are, 18 years later.”

    Nicole Kidman accepts the AFI Lifetime Achievement Award from Meryl Streep. Getty Images

    Big Little Lies co-star Witherspoon lauded Kidman’s collaborative talents as a producer, recalling how their hit show materialized from their shared desire to bring it to life. “Instead of fighting it out in court or some televised Las Vegas boxing match, we decided to team up. Because there’s one thing Nicole knows very, very well—there’s power in collaboration and even more power in sisterhood,” Witherspoon explained, adding, “That’s why I’m here tonight, sister. I want to thank you for being a friend and the best colleague ever.”

    Streep, who presented Kidman with the Life Achievement Award after receiving it herself in 2004 for The Hours, poked fun at being “incessantly called the greatest actress of my generation.” She revealed the hardest part is facing someone “really, really, really, really, really, really great” like Kidman, who did things Streep couldn’t on Big Little Lies. Still, Streep assured Kidman her best work lies ahead.

    Miles Teller, Reese Witherspoon, Lee Daniels, Nicole Kidman, Meryl Streep and Zac Efron. Getty Images for AFI

    In her speech, Kidman expressed gratitude to the directors, living and late, who enabled her unconventional roles, name-checking Stanley Kubrick, Lars von Trier, Baz Luhrmann, Jane Campion, Yorgos Lanthimos and Sydney Pollack. “It is a privilege to make films. And glorious to have made films and television with these storytellers who allowed me to run wild and be free and play all of these unconventional women,” she said, adding, “Thank you for making me better at my craft and giving me a place, however temporary, in this world.”

    Miles Teller and Morgan Freeman. Variety via Getty Images

    As Hollywood royalty congregated to enshrine Kidman’s legacy, it was clear this revered actress’s cinematic journey has reached immortal heights. Just as opening speaker Morgan Freeman serenaded the radiant star with a line from one of her most beloved musical roles in Moulin Rouge!, prophetically intoning: “How wonderful life is, now you’re in the world.” For this cinematic luminary, the brightest adventures still lie ahead.

    Inside the AFI Awards Gala Honoring Nicole Kidman

    [ad_2]

    Paul Jebara

    Source link

  • Crossroads and Britney Spears As Unwilling Method Actor

    Crossroads and Britney Spears As Unwilling Method Actor

    [ad_1]

    Of all the films Britney Spears could have “gone all Method” for, a “frothy” (but actually fundamentally deep) teen road movie called Crossroads probably wouldn’t have seemed worth it to most “serious” actors. Or even “serious” moviegoers. And Spears would likely tell you that her sudden “morphing” into Lucy Wagner on and off the set had nothing to do with acting, so much as “what acting did to [her] mind.” As Spears retells it in The Woman in Me, “I think I started Method acting—only I didn’t know how to break out of my character. I really became this other person. Some people do Method acting, but they’re usually aware of the fact that they’re doing it. But I didn’t have any separation at all.” 

    Spears’ unwitting (and unwilling) commitment to the “character” (not so far off from herself if the dancing to Madonna in her underwear scene is an indication), however, was not very appreciated by critics. Most of whom panned the project as shallow, insipid teen girl bullshit that served as a thinly-veiled puff piece for Spears. They even went so far as to deride her positive messaging about a girl finding her voice amid a world of oppressive patriarchal figures, with one female critic insisting, “…the film’s mealy-mouthed messages about feminine empowerment will almost certainly fall on deaf ears, since even eleven-year-olds know Spears’ power resides largely in her taut torso.” Indeed, Crossroads was lumped together with the badness of another film starring a pop star around the same time: Glitter. But at least Brit’s movie had the benefit of being released several months after 9/11, instead of just ten days later (with its soundtrack also being released on 9/11). And yes, both movies are, to this day, often shown as a campy double bill. But that’s not really fair to Crossroads. Because Spears’ performance does offer an emotional intelligence that Carey’s simply does not (despite her having “lived the tale” of a sob story childhood and subsequent breaking into the music business with the help of a possessive producer…in this case, Timothy Walker [Terrence Howard], before the plot becomes more A Star Is Born when another producer, Julian “Dice” Black [Max Beesley], enters the picture). And while, like Carey’s film project, there are similarities between Spears and the lead character (including an oppressive father steering the course of her life and keeping her from doing normal “teen girl things” or how Lucy spells “dryer” as “drier”), the difference is that one can see Spears isn’t relying on their similarities as her sole crutch for playing this part. 

    In fact, what she relied on for the role appears to be something far closer to the divine. Laugh as movie critics might at such an assessment. But when Spears writes, “This is embarrassing to say, but it’s like a cloud or something came over me and I just became this girl named Lucy,” there’s no arguing that something more mystical was involved. Even if that “mysticism” related to her mind’s power. Spears continued, “When the camera came on, I was her, and then I couldn’t tell the difference between when the camera was on and when it wasn’t. I know that seems stupid, but it’s the truth. I took it that seriously. I took it seriously to the point where Justin [Timberlake] said, ‘Why are you walking like that? Who are you?’” Yet another small anecdote that makes Justin come across like kind of an asshole for basically making fun of her uncontrollable commitment to the part in a movie that found room for her to show support for Justin’s goddamn boy band. All simply by placing “Bye Bye Bye” at the center of a light-heartedly contentious scene over what music her and her friends want to listen to while their driver/Lucy’s budding love interest, Ben Kimble (Anson Mount), keeps trying to change the station back to his “angsty rock” music (this, by the way, was the crux of warring musical identities in the late 90s and early 00s). 

    And though detractors would also argue that Spears does little to stretch her acting abilities in a role that finds her character auditioning for a record contract, the character biography Spears herself took pains to write in Britney Spears’ Crossroads Diary wouldn’t have been so thorough in spelling out the differences if she didn’t feel intrinsically separate from this person. Specifically, she states, “I play Lucy, an only child who lives with her dad, Pete, in a small town in Georgia. Lucy’s parents got divorced when she was much younger, and her mom lives out in Arizona. They don’t communicate. Lucy is the kind of girl who doesn’t make waves. She’s spent her whole life following the path her dad has laid out for her. She’s smart and gets good grades: she’s planning to be a doctor. But she really loves to sing and to write. She’s a poet and is kind of obsessive about her journal.” While it can be pointed out that, in many regards, Spears, too, was a girl who didn’t make waves, always listening to “the adults” and doing what she was told despite being the true agent of her success (Spears herself admits in The Woman in Me, “I was committed to not rocking the boat, and to not complaining even when something upset me”), Lucy is more overtly obedient and, yes, virginal. In fact, that’s the word one of her ex-friends, Kit (Zoe Saldana), hurls at her as an insult in the hallway of the school. In contrast to Spears, who played with that persona of being virginal via more sexually-tinged irony, Lucy is someone who wants her first time to be special, even though her high school lab partner, Henry (Justin Long), desperately wants her to keep her word that they’ll lose their virginity to one another so as not to go off to college all “naive.” 

    Lucy’s naïveté is also something that sets her apart from Spears, who, by age twenty in 2001 (the year the movie was being made and the Britney album was released), was already plenty worldly—and about to get even more so in the wake of Justin’s imminent portrayal of her as a “harlot” to his “golden boy” in the 2002 song (and video), “Cry Me A River.” The Diane Sawyer interview of 2003 would turn that worldliness into all-out jadedness. That all of this happened after Crossroads seemed cruelly poetic in that the film is about a teenage girl coming to terms with the terrifying responsibilities and potential landmines of womanhood. But what Spears endured was above and beyond the conventional horrors of becoming a woman. Lucy was lucky that, as a civilian (at least in the story we get to see before she potentially lands a record deal), she would never have to know what it was to be scrutinized not just over her body, but over every minute detail of her personal life. Besides, Lucy’s sartorial style isn’t exactly in keeping with Spears’, who also commented on that in Britney Spears’ Crossroads Diary by saying, “[My assistant,] Fe calls [Lucy’s clothes] ‘casual frumpy’—jeans, sneakers, cotton button-down shirt under a sweatshirt. Accessorized with a yellow canvas pocketbook and a bucket cap. They’re the opposite of what I usually wear.” To be sure, even when Spears’ was “off-duty,” she was always fond of low-rise, midriff-baring ensembles. 

    And then there was Lucy’s inherent knowledge of all things automotive thanks to her dad (Dan Aykroyd) being a mechanic. As Spears is sure to call out in her diary, “Me? Let’s just say that on a recent road escapade with Felicia, it took the two of us twenty minutes to figure out how to put gas in the car!” So yes, there are many nuanced differences between the two women, ones that ultimately overtook Spears’ own spirit for quite some time. 

    It was, apparently, CVS that cured her. Or rather, buying some makeup there with a friend. As Spears recalls, “After the movie wrapped, one of my girlfriends from a club in LA came to visit me. We went to CVS. I swear to God, I walked into the store, and as I talked to her while we shopped, I finally came back to myself. When I came outside again I was cured of the spell that movie had cast. It was so strange. My little spirit showed back up in my body. That trip to buy makeup with my friend was like waving some magic wand.” Undeniably, this is what would be called a symptom of psychosis. Schizophrenia even. And yes, Spears’ tendency to bisect her personality as a defense mechanism came into play early on here. With her portrayal of Lucy, Spears tapped into that precarious split between thinking, memory, personality and perception. As such, Spears put it best when she said, “All I can say is it’s a good thing Lucy was a sweet girl writing poems about how she was ‘not a girl, not yet a woman,’ and not a serial killer. I ended up walking differently, carrying myself differently, talking differently. I was someone else for months while I filmed Crossroads.”

    This was something she seemed to notice and give voice to even at the time of filming, with one entry in her diary noting, “I’m doing another one of those really hard scenes. I’m crying and talking to Anson (Ben). It’s very emotional. I couldn’t pick my spirits up afterward.” The scene in question happens after Lucy’s mother (played by Kim Cattrall, though, at the time, there were rumors Madonna would do it—as if!) tells her that she never wanted her in the first place—that her father “made her” have a baby. Meanwhile she appears perfectly happy with her new set of children in Tucson. Spears describes getting into character for the emotionalism of that scene, explaining, “How did I do it? I remembered things that made me sad, but mostly I just put myself in Lucy’s place. I thought about how I’d feel if my mom didn’t love me, and I just hurt for her. Feeling the way Lucy would feel brought on the tears.” Tragically enough, it can presently be argued that maybe Lynne Spears really didn’t love Britney all that much to allow what happened to her with the conservatorship. Not just allow it, but help conspire to make it happen. 

    While Lynne made plenty of appearances on the set, it was, as usual, Spears’ assistant, Felicia, who was the most ever-present. It was she who prompted Spears to write, “She told me that she can see me getting more confident about acting. It’s true, I’m less worried about all this movie stuff—sometimes I even feel like an old pro!” That seemed to be true enough when, soon after Crossroads, she auditioned for the role of Allie in The Notebook. It came down to her and Rachel McAdams, with the latter obviously winning out. A result Spears was pleased with, commenting, “…I’m glad I didn’t do it. If I had, instead of working on my album In the Zone I’d have been acting like a 1940s heiress night and day. “Although Spears was briefly hoping to make a “proper go” of becoming a singer/actress, in The Woman in Me, she concludes of that profession, “I hope I never get close to that occupational hazard again. Living that way, being half yourself and half a fictional character, is messed up. After a while you don’t know what’s real anymore.”

    Funnily enough, Spears could just as easily be describing the bifurcation between her stage persona and her real self or, during her early Instagram days when the conservatorship was still not being questioned, her social media self and her real self. Thus, the great search for “the real Britney” has been a decades-long one.

    As for Crossroads and what she sacrificed emotionally for it, it obviously still means something to Spears. Not only because she goes into such detail about it in her memoir, but because it was the only attempt at promoting the book Spears offered up: rereleasing Crossroads in theaters (in addition to a special edition of the soundtrack…with NSYNC’s “Bye Bye Bye” still noticeably missing). Once again, however, it went unappreciated. Audiences just can’t seem to appropriately embrace or honor Spears’ uncontrollable Method acting abilities. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • F Is For Fascism, Not Freedom: Amsterdam Shows That, When It Comes to the Many Incongruities of U.S. Politics, History Repeats

    F Is For Fascism, Not Freedom: Amsterdam Shows That, When It Comes to the Many Incongruities of U.S. Politics, History Repeats

    [ad_1]

    Considering David O. Russell is the type of person who would write his college thesis on the United States intervention in Chile, his commitment to “being political” (when he’s not being philosophical) in the majority of his films is par for the course. What annoyed conservatives would call the usual “Hollywood liberal bullshit.” But Amsterdam is by far Russell’s most grandiose statement on American politics. Particularly as it pertains to the recent attempt at a coup on January 6, 2021. And this could likely be part of the reason why Americans seemed so averse to watching it, as the film has now notoriously bombed at the box office (costing the studio roughly one hundred million dollars in losses—but it’s not like they’re not good for it, right?).

    With a fresh release in Europe, however, perhaps the movie will have slightly better odds at attracting a more open and understanding audience. An ilk that can see the U.S. and its government objectively for what it is: positively villainous. And yes, for a movie called Amsterdam, very little of the plot actually takes place there. Most of the stage, in fact, is set in New York, where Russell opens the timeline in 1933—better known as: the height of the Great Depression. An economic circumstance that provided plenty of opportunity for demagogues around the world to take power (including, obviously, Hitler). As well as the rich financial backers who would want such a thing to occur in order to influence and control that power.

    Ah, but before all that, there was “the war to end all wars.” A real laugh of a tagline for World War I. But nonetheless, simps who trusted in their government went to battle without question for that war. Men like Burt Berendsen (Christian Bale) and Harold Woodsman (John David Washington). The former is a doctor essentially forced to use his skills overseas by his Park Avenue parents-in-law who think this is what will make him respectable in the eyes of their peers. The latter is among the many Black men forced to wear French uniforms while fighting against the enemy because the white men don’t want to be seen sharing the same fatigues, as they represent the “real” America. And oh, how they do with that “logic.” This blatant form of racism that the white soldiers still find time to employ despite being, you know, up against death every day is something that upsets General Bill Meekins (Ed Begley Jr.) greatly. And it’s part of why he asks Burt to step in as the doctor for the Black soldiers, being that he doesn’t seem too prone to discrimination a.k.a. just leaving them to bleed out because they’re Black.

    So it is that an unbreakable bond is formed between Burt and Harold. One that transmogrifies into a triangular bond with a nurse named Valerie (Margot Robbie), who takes care of both of them when they end up shrapnel-filled in her hospital. Shrapnel that, as she eventually shows them, she turns into art (one of the most charming and Wes Anderson meets Jean-Pierre Jeunet details of Amsterdam). This comes after also revealing that she’s not actually French, though she has been speaking it the entire time (for it’s easy to fool non-French speaking Americans of one’s “authenticity”). But that’s just one of the many “kooky quirks” of Valerie, in addition to her knowing a man who can help Burt pin down a decent glass eye—having lost his while “fighting for democracy,” or something.

    The British Paul Canterbury (Mike Meyers, who likes to play characters with “eye things,” if View From the Top is an indication) knows all about the nuances of the eye. Accordingly, he offers Burt a quality glass one for his trouble of coming all the way to Amsterdam, where Valerie has ferried him and Harold. In Paul’s company is an American named Henry Norcross (Michael Shannon), another man using glass eye manufacturing as a front for intelligence gathering. Valerie has done some of her own for them in the past, and knows that things work quid pro quo. That, one day, they’ll call upon the trio for something in return.

    But, for now, this period in Amsterdam is what Valerie calls “the dream.” Whatever comes after will be horrible, which is why she’s adamant to Burt that they shouldn’t break up their Bande à Part ways (not that she uses that term—since said movie wouldn’t come out until the 60s) just so he can go back home to his wife, Beatrice (Andrea Riseborough). A wife that so obviously doesn’t give a shit about him, especially not now that he’s “mangled.” Cast out of Park Avenue, Burt goes rogue on practicing medicine, specializing solely in the specific pains of veterans. Those who, in addition to the presence of his own constant physical pain, have inspired him to cook up various chemical compounds commonly referred to as “drugs.” Ones he says need to be created because what’s out there ain’t cuttin’ the mustard in terms of catering to the level of agony veterans have.

    This is back in the New York of 1933, when fifteen years have passed since that glorious Amsterdam blip that allowed Valerie and Harold to love each other freely, without the tarring and feathering of U.S. racism. Once Burt breaks up the triad, however, it all dismantles. For Valerie is asked by Harold to pull some strings with her mysterious, but powerful family—the one she ran away from—to get Burt out of jail. Because of course that’s where he would find himself for his ribald, experimental ways upon returning to the Land of the Subjugated and Repressed. Alas, once Valerie does that, it means her family will know where she is, and demand her return. So it is that she pulls the “I’ll leave you before you leave me” maneuver on Harold, departing from Amsterdam soon after she calls in the favor without forewarning him.

    With all of this packed into the first hour, Russell has already woven a complicated web to land us in “present-day” 1933, where we first encountered Burt, and where Bill Meekins’ daughter, Elizabeth (Taylor Swift), has enlisted the services of Harold and Burt to perform an autopsy on her father. Incidentally, that autopsy leads to a budding romance for Burt when he meets the attending medical examiner, Irma St. Clair (Zoe Saldaña). In any case, Liz doesn’t believe her dad simply “died”—she’s convinced he was murdered on his way back from Europe. On a side note, Swift herself might be deemed part of the box office bombing of Amsterdam, being that she’s somewhat illustrious for only acting in doomed projects (ahem, Cats). Indeed, it’s surprising that Swift agreed to be in the movie at all when taking into account her fixation with being “aboveboard” vis-à-vis her squeaky-clean persona. This includes not working with people who have been accused of sexual harassment or violence—a.k.a. David O. Russell and Christian Bale.

    Those critical of certain people’s continued ability to “separate the artist from the work” would likely accuse Swift and co. of “following the wrong god”—a phrase used throughout Amsterdam to refer to how Burt followed the wrong god home from the war. The god of false love. Other men, powerful men, continued to follow the god of power. Stopping at nothing to get more of it, sort of like Prescott Bush. But the Business Plot that Amsterdam centers its events around is not the core of the film. Ultimately, the crux of it is a simple message that has been repeated to deaf ears though the ages: love is more potent than hate. The latter always being the “wrong god.” Something that General Gil Dillenbeck (Robert De Niro) is particularly aware of with his vast experience in war.

    Of all the characters—and there are a great many—in Amsterdam, Dillenbeck is the only one based on a real person, specifically Smedley Butler. The man tapped by a cabal of rich businessmen to influence veterans to stage a coup against the “cripple” president, Franklin Roosevelt. Indeed, the eugenics “philosophy” that was very in vogue at the time (leading to the most extreme version of it in the form of concentration camps) also features prominently in Amsterdam.

    As for the statement Russell is making on the nefarious machinations of the “elite” (only deemed as such because of their endlessly deep pockets and not their character), it’s a resonant theme that has only become more pronounced in the twenty-first century. To boot, it seems no coincidence that one of Sinclair Lewis’ most famed novels, It Can’t Happen Here, was released in 1935—just two years after the Business Plot. Regardless of many still believing that Butler was either a quack or blowing the “plot” out of proportion, the fact remains that even a casual conversation among the rich about wanting to manufacture a government like one of their products is not to be taken lightly.

    Regarding the coterie of unique and memorable characters Russell came up with to weave a tapestry around this historical event, he described it best when he said, “For me as I think of this guy [that Bale plays], I always like outsiders. I always like people on the edges, on the fringes.” Thanks to Amsterdam, Russell might fully become that person in Hollywood. But maybe he’s not too bent out of shape about it, so long as the same Santa Monica diners where he thought up the script for Amsterdam with Bale allow him to keep coming. And dreaming. Those diners being almost like what Amsterdam was to the thick-as-thieves trio in the film. For it was only outside the diner, when the film was made and released, that the dream got crushed.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • ‘Avatar: The Way Of Water’ Trailer Goes Deep Into The Jaw-Dropping World Of Pandora

    ‘Avatar: The Way Of Water’ Trailer Goes Deep Into The Jaw-Dropping World Of Pandora

    [ad_1]

    The first teaser for “Avatar: The Way of Water,” James Cameron’s long-awaited sequel, made less of a splash and more of a dribble when it arrived last month with only a glimpse at the return to Pandora.

    But the film’s official trailer, which was released on Wednesday, reveals the wonders that await in their full glory and dives deep into the world last seen over a decade ago in the Academy Award-winning and record-breaking first film of the series.

    Arriving in theaters Dec. 16, “Avatar: The Way of Water” picks up with Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldana) as parents raising their children in the lush greenery and awe-inspiring oceans on the planet during a period of peacetime.

    “Dad, I know you think I’m crazy, but I feel her,” their teenage daughter Kiri, played by returning star Sigourney Weaver, says in the trailer about her connection to the planet. “But I feel her. I hear her heartbeat. She’s so close.”

    “So what does her heartbeat sound like?” Sully asks. She responds, “Mighty.”

    With a reported runtime of over three hours, however, conflict must ensue. The sequel tells the story of the family and the “trouble that follows them, the lengths they go to keep each other safe, the battles they fight to stay alive, and the tragedies they endure,” per the official synopsis.

    While the threat of humankind looms as large as ever (how quickly we forget about unobtanium), tensions arise between the land dwellers and the ocean tribe Metkayina, who sternly tell the group that they “cannot let you bring your war here.”

    But war indeed comes, as the trailer flashes between intense underwater battle sequences and fiery explosions that put the family’s bonds to the test.

    “I need you to be strong,” Sully tells Neytiri as Pandora burns around them. “Strong heart.”

    Stephen Lang, Kate Winslet, Joel David Moore, Jemaine Clement, CCH Pounder, Michelle Yeoh and Edie Falco also star in the sequel ― the first of four “Avatar” installments to arrive in the coming years.

    Watch the official trailer for “Avatar: The Way of Water” below.

    [ad_2]

    Source link