ReportWire

Tag: Zionist

  • Opinion | The New Right’s New Antisemites

    Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation flounders in the Tucker Carlson-Nick Fuentes fever swamps.

    The Editorial Board

    Source link

  • ‘Are you a Zionist?’ Checkpoints at UCLA encampment provoked fear, debate among Jews

    ‘Are you a Zionist?’ Checkpoints at UCLA encampment provoked fear, debate among Jews

    Eilon Presman was about 100 feet from the UCLA Palestinian solidarity encampment when he heard the screams: “Zionist! Zionist!”

    The 20-year-old junior, who is Israeli, realized the activists were pointing at him.

    “Human chain!” they cried.

    A line of protesters linked arms and marched toward him, Presman said, blocking him from accessing the heart of UCLA’s campus. Other activists, he said, unfurled kaffiyeh scarves to block his view of the camp.

    “Every step back that I took, they took a step forward,” Presman said. “I was just forced to walk away.”

    Pro-Palestinian activists demonstrate in UCLA’s Bruin Plaza after arrests were made at the Westwood campus Monday.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    It’s been a week since police swarmed the UCLA campus and tore down the pro-Palestinian camp, arresting more than 200 people. But the legacy of the encampment remains an issue of much debate, particularly among Jewish students, who make up nearly 8% of the university’s 32,000 undergraduates.

    In the days leading up to April 30 — when pro-Israel counterprotesters attacked the camp with fists, bats and chemical spray, and police took hours to stop the violence — frustration had swelled among many Jews: Viral videos showed activists restricting the passage of students they targeted as Zionists.

    Some Jewish students said they felt intimidated as protesters scrawled graffiti — “Death 2 Zionism” and “Baby Killers” — on campus buildings and blocked access with wooden pallets, plywood, metal barricades and human walls.

    The pro-Palestinian student movement includes various strains of activism, including calls for a cease-fire in Gaza, support for Hamas and demands that universities divest from firms doing business with Israel. But on campuses across the country, no word has become more charged than “Zionist.”

    Two hands, one with a wristband bearing the Star of David, peel slivers of a sticker from a sign

    A pro-Israel activist peels a pro-Palestinian sticker off a sign on May 2 as a protest encampment was dispersed.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    In its most basic definition, a Zionist is somebody who believes that the Jewish people have a right to statehood in their ancestral homeland as a place of refuge from centuries of persecution — in other words, that Israel, established as a Jewish state in the wake of the Holocaust, has a right to exist.

    Using that definition, the Anti-Defamation League considers anti-Zionism a form of antisemitism. But protesters — including many Jews — draw a sharp distinction, arguing that it is Zionism that fuels Israel’s right-wing government and the assault on Gaza that they say amounts to genocide against Palestinians.

    Some of the Jewish students who took part in the encampment played a role in excluding Zionists.

    Members of Jewish Voice for Peace at UCLA, a small but rapidly growing group on campus, argue they had a moral responsibility to pressure university officials to divest from Israel.

    A UCLA worker carrying a large bag, with police officers in the background and the word "Intifada" scrawled on a barrier

    UCLA facilities employees clean up and dismantle the pro-Palestinian encampment on campus May 2.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    The camp and its checkpoints, they said, were not hostile to Jews. Restricting fellow students from entering was just a pragmatic move to protect protesters inside from physical, verbal or emotional abuse.

    “We are committed to keeping each other safe,” said Agnes Lin, 22, a fourth-year art and art history student and member of Jewish Voice for Peace. Anyone who agreed to the UC Divest Coalition’s demands and community guidelines, she said, was welcome.

    “What is not welcome is Zionism,” she added. “Or anyone who actively adheres to a very violent, genocidal political ideology that is actively endangering people in Gaza right now.”

    In practice, students who supported the existence of Israel were kept out — even if they opposed Israel’s right-wing government and its bombardment of Gaza.

    Senior Adam Thaw, 21, said activists blocked him and others from accessing a public walkway to Powell Library.

    After telling him they were not letting anyone through, a male activist eyed his Star of David necklace: “If you’re here to espouse that this is antisemitism, then you can leave.”

    UCLA senior Adam Thaw standing outside Kaplan Hall

    Senior Adam Thaw is on UCLA’s student board of Hillel, the largest Jewish campus organization in the world.

    (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)

    “Who are you to tell me where I can and cannot go?” said Thaw, who is on UCLA’s student board of Hillel, the largest Jewish campus organization in the world.

    As complaints from Jewish students mounted, UCLA declared the encampment “unlawful.” In an April 30 statement, Chancellor Gene Block said most activists had been peaceful, but the tactics of some were “shocking and shameful.”

    “Students on their way to class,” he said, “have been physically blocked from accessing parts of the campus.”

    ::

    The campus was dark and hushed when Sabrina Ellis joined dozens of activists at 4 a.m. to set up the encampment on the lawn of Dickson Court.

    After pitching tents and erecting barricades of wooden pallets and sheets of plywood, Ellis, a 21-year-old international student from Brazil, took shifts guarding the entrance.

    Ellis didn’t call it a checkpoint. The goal was to exclude and physically block “agitators” — anyone who might be violent, record students or disagree with the cause.

    “Our top priority isn’t people’s freedom of movement,” Ellis said. “It is keeping people in our encampments physically and emotionally safe.”

    The longtime member of Jewish Voice for Peace — who wore a large Star of David over her T-shirt and a kaffiyeh wrapped around her shoulders — said the camp “was not profiling based on religion.”

    But as activists blocked Zionist students from public campus space, they faced charges that they engaged in viewpoint discrimination.

    UCLA student Sabrina Ellis wearing a Star of David necklace and a shirt reading "Jewish Voice for Peace"

    Sabrina Ellis, a junior and a member of Jewish Voice for Peace at UCLA, was part of the pro-Palestinian encampment from the beginning.

    (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

    Before allowing anyone in, Ellis said, a protester read the demands of the encampment, which included calling for UC and UCLA to divest all funds from companies “complicit in the Israeli occupation,” boycott all connections with Israeli universities, sever ties with the Los Angeles Police Department and demand a permanent cease-fire.

    Then, activists ran through their safety guidelines: Ask before taking a photo or video; wear a mask to limit the spread of COVID; do not post identifying information or photos; and no engagement with counterprotesters.

    If students didn’t agree, “we would just kindly tell them that they’re not allowed to come in,” Ellis said.

    Some Jewish students were shaken by the experience, arriving at Hillel upset and even crying.

    “They were genuinely going about their day and couldn’t get access as protesters asked them, ‘Are you a Zionist?’ or looked at their necklace,” said Daniel Gold, executive director of Hillel at UCLA.

    ::

    For pro-Palestinian activists who are Jewish, the camp was a peaceful space to promote justice, a welcoming interfaith community with therapist-led processing circles and candlelit prayer services.

    Blue tarps and blankets were put down in the middle of the lawn for Islamic prayers and a Passover Seder and a Shabbat service.

    On the first evening, about 100 activists, many Jewish, sat in a circle to pray, sing, drink grape juice and eat matzo ball soup, matzo crackers and watermelon.

    “It was really beautiful,” said Lin, the art major. “We were trying to hold these spaces to show that Judaism goes beyond Zionism.”

    An encampment of tents on a lawn outside UCLA's Dickson Plaza

    An encampment of pro-Palestinian demonstrators at UCLA’s Dickson Plaza on April 29.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    Other Jewish students were more wary as they navigated the camp.

    Presman, who moved to the U.S. when he was 12 and identifies as a Zionist, was alarmed when he scanned the quad on the first day. He saw signs saying “Israelis are native 2 HELL,” he said, and banners and graffiti showing inverted red triangles, a symbol used in Hamas propaganda videos to indicate a military target.

    “Do people know what that means?” he wondered.

    Tucking his Star of David under his T-shirt, Presman said, he entered and approached activists, introducing himself as an Israeli citizen.

    “Maybe we can find common ground,” he said, asking, “one human being to the other?”

    Some students put their hands up, he said, blocking him as they walked away. Others treated the conversation as a joke. One protester, he said, told him that everything Hamas did was justified.

    Presman said he had one good conversation: An activist who identified as anti-Zionist admitted not being 100% educated on what Zionism was, but agreed that Israel should exist. They came to the conclusion the activist was a Zionist.

    Two protesters wearing masks move a wood panel painted with the colors of the Palestinian flag

    Pro-Palestinian encampment participants reinforce the camp barriers at UCLA on May 1.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    But most of Presman’s exchanges, he said, ended negatively when activists realized he was defending Zionism. He said he was called a “dirty Jew” and “white colonizer.”

    Other students — even those who did not fully support the encampment — said they did not experience such slurs.

    Rachel Burnett, a senior who described herself as a non-Zionist Jew, disagreed with the call for divestment and academic boycotts, especially of UCLA’s Nazarian Center, an educational center for the study of Israeli history, politics and culture.

    Entering the camp after a classmate vouched for her, Burnett was disturbed by anti-Israeli signs and graffiti that named Abu Ubaida, the spokesperson for the military wing of Hamas. But she also bonded with protesters, including a woman in a hijab.

    “Of course, some protesters deny Oct. 7 or condone violence as long as it can be put under the guise of decolonial resistance, which is obviously horrific,” Burnett said. “But that’s not the case of many students inside the encampment.”

    Environmental portrait of UCLA student Rachel Burnett

    Rachel Burnett, a senior who described herself as a non-Zionist Jew, disagreed with the call for divestment and academic boycotts, especially of UCLA’s Nazarian Center, an educational center for the study of Israeli history, politics and culture.

    (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

    Burnett contrasted what she saw as a peaceful, friendly mood inside the camp with the pro-Israel counterprotests where people held up benign slogans, such as “Bring the Hostages Home,” but engaged in hostile behavior.

    As counterprotesters converged for a Sunday rally, she said, a pro-Israel activist spat on her and told she should have been slaughtered in the kibbutzim on Oct. 7.

    Just as some pro-Palestinian activists demonized all Zionists as evil and pro-genocide — ignoring the wide range of viewpoints within the Zionist community — Burnett thought some pro-Israel counterprotesters were dehumanizing student activists in the encampment and spreading a “mass hysteria narrative.”

    As the encampment expanded — and organizers set up entrance points near Royce Hall and Powell Library — some Jewish students took videos that swiftly went viral.

    “It’s time to go,” a protester wearing a yellow safety vest and kaffiyeh told a student in one video as he guarded an entrance near Powell Library. “You don’t have a wristband.”

    A standoff ensued.

    “Are you a Zionist?” the protester asked.

    “Of course I’m Zionist,” the student replied.

    “Yeah, we don’t let Zionists inside.”

    Jenny Jarvie

    Source link

  • Pro-Palestinian protesters take down U.S. flag replace it with Palestine flag on UNC quad

    Pro-Palestinian protesters take down U.S. flag replace it with Palestine flag on UNC quad

    CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (WTVD) — Pro-Palestinian protesters removed the American flag from UNC’s quad on Tuesday afternoon and replaced it with the Palestinian one in what was the latest disruptive incident on campus.

    Interim Chancellor Lee Roberts responded by personally walking out to the quad and helping to restore the U.S. flag to its prominent position on campus to chants from supporters of “USA. – USA.”

    However, not long after the U.S. flag had been restored, it came down again. This time it was folded into its traditional triangle shape and taken away for safe keeping.

    The flag pole on UNC’s quad was then left empty and many of the protesters who had gathered around the area dispersed.

    UNC announced on Tuesday afternoon that classes and other “mandatory operations” were suspended for the day.

    All of this comes after a clash between protesters and law enforcement officers in the same area earlier Tuesday.

    At about 5:30 a.m., protesters were warned they had to vacate by 6 a.m. or they may face arrest and other consequences. UNC officials previously told protesters that pitching tents on campus violated university policy.

    In a statement released Tuesday by UNC Interim Chancellor Roberts and Provost Clemen before police began removing protesters, they said if protesters fail to vacate the area, it could result in consequences. This includes possible arrest, suspension from campus and expulsion from the university, which may prevent students from graduating.

    Police detained 30 people who refused to leave, according to UNC officials. Protesters then attempted to block the UNC Police vehicles by standing in front of them and throwing items at officers.

    Some of those arrested were transferred by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to the detention center.

    The encampment in Polk Place was cleared in 45 minutes.

    After the area was cleared, UNC officials said protestors attempted to enter South Building. They refused to comply with requests from facilities and UNC police.

    One Duke student who was detained described her arrest.

    “(The police) were very violent, very rough,” she said. “I’m not a big person, and I had two grown men grab me very viciously…it was not kindly done.”

    According to the student, she was charged with a second-degree misdemeanor for trespassing.

    In the statement from Roberts and Clemens, it read:

    “For the last several months, we have spoken regularly and respectfully with the demonstrators on our campus, consistently supporting their right to assemble and express their views. We have also clearly communicated the University’s long-standing policies on the use of shared public spaces. We have been clear that students and community members can assemble and make their voices heard, but University policies must be followed.

    During events in recent weeks, the student demonstrators abided by our policies. That changed Sunday evening when protesters – including outside activists – backtracked on their commitment to comply with these policies, including trespassing into classroom buildings overnight. This group has now made it clear they will no longer even consider our requests to abide by University policies and have ended our attempts at constructive dialogue.

    We must consider the safety of all of our students, faculty and staff, as well as visitors to this campus. Our students are preparing for final exams and end-of-year activities, including graduation, and we will continue to promote an educational environment where they can do so safely and without disruption.”

    On Monday, ABC11 spoke with Orange County District Attorney Jeff Nieman about the potential legal fallout from the intensifying protests.

    “That is where we could get into sort of a higher level debate that actually could find its way into the courtroom where we’re debating whether or not the policy being enforced is a reasonable infringement on First Amendment rights,” he said.

    Nieman did say that protesters would be prosecuted by his office – should they find the law was fairly and appropriately applied in the course of any potential arrests that are made.

    “I have heard that there are some offices that have made sort of more categorical statements that they just aren’t interested in prosecuting protest-related offenses,” he said. “And that’s just not our view of it. We would look at a case-by-case basis. And if it meets that standard, then we would go forward with a prosecution.”

    Copyright © 2024 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    WTVD

    Source link

  • Joe Biden’s “Zionist” declaration sparks backlash

    Joe Biden’s “Zionist” declaration sparks backlash

    Joe Biden has been met with criticism and support alike after reaffirming his commitment to Zionism.

    The president held a Hannukah reception for some 800 people at the White House on Monday night to celebrate the eight-day Jewish festival, which this year began on December 7 and is observed with a nightly lighting of a menorah.

    There, he pledged to continue supporting Israel in its war with Hamas and said that a “surge of antisemitism” around the globe “is sickening.”

    On October 7, Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel, which prompted the Israelis to carry out extensive airstrikes and a ground offensive against the militants in Gaza. Incidences of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim hate alike have since increased.

    President Joe Biden waves after speaking during a Hanukkah reception in the East Room of the White House on December 11, 2023 in Washington, DC. The President reaffirmed his support for Israel during a White House Hannukah reception.
    Photo by Jacquelyn Martin – Pool/Getty Images

    Biden said he was a Zionist, defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “an international movement originally for the establishment of a Jewish national or religious community in Palestine and later for the support of modern Israel,” adding: “You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist and I’m a Zionist.”

    He was met by loud cheers in the room in response.

    While he doesn’t always agree with Israel’s policies, he added: “Were there no Israel, there would not be a Jew in the world who is safe.”

    “We continue to provide military assistance until they get rid of Hamas but we have to be careful,” Biden said. “The whole world, public opinion can shift overnight. We can’t let that happen.”

    After his remarks were reported, people on X, formerly Twitter signaled their disagreement.

    Newsweek has contacted representatives for Biden by email to comment on this story.

    One X user, Joel Fischer, wrote: “Good. Maybe he should go live in Israel and leave us alone.”

    Another wrote: “A United States president openly declared he is a Zionist publicly is baffling to me.”

    The president also received support, with one X user writing: “So am I, Mr. President and proud of it too.”

    Another wrote: “Love my President.”

    The sense of division on social media reflects wider division over Biden’s response to the war in Israel.

    The U.S. has long been an ally of Israel and, following the attack, Biden reiterated Washington’s support. He said that Israel has the right to defend itself, proposing $14 billion in aid and providing weapons. He has also resisted calls for a ceasefire.

    But in a letter first obtained by NBC News, more than 40 interns who work at the White House and other branches of the executive office called for Biden to support a ceasefire, accusing him of having “ignored” the “pleas of the American people” by not calling for an end to the war.

    However, a poll published by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research earlier this month showed that fifty-nine percent of Democrats now approve of Biden’s approach to the conflict, up from 50 percent in November.