ReportWire

Tag: warner bros discovery

  • Netflix backs out of bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, giving studios, HBO, and CNN to Ellison-owned Paramount | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    In a flurry of deal offers in the high tens of billions of dollars, the bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery is over. David Ellison-owned Paramount will acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

    On Thursday, Warner Bros. Discovery announced that Paramount Skydance’s newest offer of $31 a share was a “superior proposal,” giving Netflix four business days to counter. Netflix then said it would not raise its $82.7 billion all-cash bid for the legacy studio, and would walk away from the deal.

    “The transaction we negotiated would have created shareholder value with a clear path to regulatory approval,” said Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters in a statement Thursday. “However, we’ve always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive, so we are declining to match the Paramount Skydance bid.”

    Per the terms of the original deal, Warner Bros. Discovery will have to pay a $2.8 billion termination fee to Netflix to end the existing agreement. Paramount’s renewed offer — backed by the world’s sixth-richest person, Oracle’s executive chair, and David Ellison’s father, Larry Ellison — includes paying that breakup fee.

    The new deal will see Paramount, which was bought just last year by Ellison’s Skydance Media with heavy financial backing from his father, acquiring the entirety of Warner Bros. Discovery, including its studios, HBO, its streaming service, its games and entertainment divisions, and linear television networks like CNN, TBS, TNT, Discovery, and HGTV.

    Ellison, whose Paramount already owns major studios, entertainment, and news businesses, has warned of significant job cuts. His ownership of news network CBS has also attracted controversy and has largely been seen as a sympathetic turn toward the Trump administration, with reporting critical of the administration shelved or facing increased scrutiny by Ellison and CBS’s editor-in-chief, the conservative provocateur Bari Weiss. Larry Ellison is a major donor and supporter of President Trump.

    Netflix had announced its intent to acquire WBD in December, offering nearly $83 billion for its studios and streaming service alone. Despite several hostile takeover bids by Paramount, Warner Bros. Discovery reaffirmed to shareholders its belief that Netflix’s offer was superior to Paramount’s, which offered $108 billion for the full company including its linear television networks. Paramount’s newest bid, of $31 a share, values WBD at about $111 billion.

    Techcrunch event

    Boston, MA
    |
    June 9, 2026

    Paramount will take on the about $33 billion in debt held by Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the deal. Larry Ellison, whose net worth is $201 billion, according to Bloomberg, has agreed to supply the additional equity to fulfill Paramount’s bid. Paramount’s market cap is about $12 billion.

    The deal is also being financed by a $57.5 billion debt commitment from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citi, and Apollo Global Management.

    Netflix shares jumped as much as 10% in after-hours trading in New York. Shares in Paramount were up 4.5%.

    [ad_2]

    Graham Starr

    Source link

  • Warner Bros. officially deems Paramount’s bid ‘superior’ and Netflix withdraws | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. Discovery has formally declared Paramount Skydance’s latest takeover proposal a “superior” offer to its existing deal with Netflix, escalating one of the most dramatic bidding wars Hollywood has seen in years. The determination prompted Netflix to withdraw from the bidding, handing the victory to Paramount.

    In a statement Thursday, Warner Bros. Discovery said its board concluded that Paramount’s revised all‑cash offer to buy the entire company qualifies as a “Company Superior Proposal” under the terms of its merger agreement with Netflix. The bid values Warner Bros. Discovery at around $111 billion, or $31 a share, up from Paramount’s earlier $30‑per-share proposal and well above the economics of Netflix’s $83‑billion pact announced in December.

    Warner Bros. Discovery notified Netflix that Paramount’s offer is now deemed superior, formally triggering a contractual window during which Netflix could submit changes to its deal in an attempt to reclaim that status.

    Richer price, heavier protections

    Paramount’s bid stands out not just on headline price but on the protections it has offered to reassure Warner Bros. Discovery and its investors. The package includes a $7 billion reverse termination fee if regulators block the transaction, a commitment to pay Warner Bros. Discovery’s multibillion‑dollar breakup fee owed to Netflix if that agreement is terminated, and a “ticking fee” of 25 cents per share per quarter if closing drags beyond the fall.

    Paramount has also stripped away earlier conditions tied to the performance of Warner Bros. Discovery’s cable portfolio and pledged to inject additional equity if needed to satisfy lenders, moves intended to reduce execution risk. Backed by David Ellison and a financing package combining roughly $45 billion–$46 billion in equity with more than $57 billion of debt, the bid represents an aggressive push to seize one of Hollywood’s crown jewel studios outright.

    Netflix investors had expressed concern about the size, strategic fit, and regulatory overhang of the Warner Bros. Discovery transaction. Seen by the market as a “deal stock,” as S&P Global’s Melissa Otto previously told Fortune, Netflix stock has actually been trading up since Paramount raised its bid, as investors cheered the prospect of Netflix losing the deal and not saddling itself with legacy Hollywood assets.

    Regulatory risk looms large over Paramount’s offer, structured as a more traditional studio‑and‑networks consolidation, but it would still create a media giant that rivals Disney and Comcast’s NBCUniversal in scale.

    The battle has also attracted political attention, with President Donald Trump at first saying he would be involved while praising Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos as a “fantastic man,” then saying he wouldn’t be involved, and recently angry about stray comments made by former Obama official and Netflix board member Susan Rice. The Ellison family, meanwhile, is reportedly close to Trump at the moment, although he insisted in December that he would hate to see his enemies if the Ellisons are to be considered his friends.

    This report has been updated with news of Netflix’s withdrawal.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Lichtenberg

    Source link

  • Get Your AI Off Our ‘Stranger Things’ & ‘KPop Demon Hunters,’ Netflix Tells ByteDance In Latest Hollywood Cease & Desist Letter

    [ad_1]

    Netflix “will not stand by and watch ByteDance treat our valued IP as free, public domain clip art,” the streamer told the TikTok owner tonight. In a short and stern cease and desist letter over Seedance 2.0, Netflix want generated AI videos of Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters, Squid Game and Bridgerton shut down now.

    With their two-page correspondence and potential legal action to follow, Netflix have linked arms and attorney arsenals with Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount (their rivals to buy WBD), and the still Bob Iger-run Disney to stop the user created content that has been bastardizing their top shows, films and other moneymakers. While Amazon, Apple, Sony and Comcast-owned Universal have yet to join the party, it is clear now with the Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters-led Netflix in the C&D house, this is serious stuff.

    How serious?

    Well, Netflix litigation chief Mindy LeMoine isn’t making as personal as WBD’s Wayne M. Smith did earlier Tuesday with his predecessor and now ByteDance Global General Counsel John Rogovin. Then again, LeMoine does cut to the chase with very specific citations:

    “Current forensic evidence indicates that Seedance is being used to generate unauthorized derivative works including, but not limited to:

    Bridgerton: Unauthorized depictions of Season 4 content, specifically featuring characters in a masquerade ball setting. These outputs mirror specific, narratively important costumes like Sophie Baek’s “Lady in Silver” gown. ByteDance has even promoted this content using #Bridgerton tags via its own official social media channels, such as @BytePlusGlobal.

    Stranger Things: High-fidelity reboots of the series finale, which feature detailed reproductions of the iconic cast as well as the monsters from the series, including Demogorgons and the Mindflayer.

    Squid Game: Seedance has generated recreations of the “Red Light, Green Light” sets and the iconic Young-hee doll. These include unauthorized crossovers, such as inserting real-world figures like Elon Musk into the Squid Game environment.

    KPop Demon Hunters: Seedance has reproduced the specific visual style and character designs from our animated musical feature, including the lead character Rumi.”

    ‘KPop Demon Hunters’

    Netflix

    The C&D letter goes on to state: “Netflix has never authorized ByteDance to use our content to generate these images or videos. ByteDance’s activities are willful, and constitute direct and secondary copyright infringement. The use of copyrighted works to create a competing commercial product, especially one that regurgitates the original, is not protected by fair use.”

    Unlike Disney, Paramount and WBD, Netflix are in full FAFO-mode here and give the Chinese tech company three days to set things straight. This comes one day after ByteDance swore they are “taking steps to strengthen current safeguards as we work to prevent the unauthorised use of intellectual property and likeness by users.” 

    Netflix isn’t buying it.

    “To avoid immediate litigation, Netflix demands that ByteDance:

    1. Cease Generative Output: Immediately implement technological guardrails to prevent Seedance from generating any content that resembles Netflix’s protected characters, titles, or settings.

    2. Remove Infringing Content: Remove all unlawfully obtained Netflix-owned content from training datasets, and also scrub all existing Seedance-generated videos featuring Netflix IP from all ByteDance-controlled platforms.

    3. Identify All Infringements: Provide an accounting of all instances where Seedance has generated content based on prompts related to Netflix’s IP.

    4. Revoke Third-Party Access: Revoke access for any commercial partners or API users currently utilizing Seedance to generate unauthorized Netflix derivative works.”

    So, as Netflix awaits ByteDance’s response later this week, will it be Amazon, Apple, Sony or Universal sending the next letter? Stay tuned.

    [ad_2]

    Dominic Patten

    Source link

  • Best Animated Superhero Movies on HBO Max (January 2026)

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. was once famed for their animation department. While originally devoted to theatrical shorts, the animators began devoting more time to television and film productions. These included superhero movies set in the DC Universe. Today, many of these films are available for streaming on HBO Max.

    What are the best animated superhero movies on HBO Max?

    Unfortunately, the full library of animated superhero movies made by Warner Bros. Animation is not freely available on HBO Max. In recent years, the streaming service has become infamous for cutting costs by not hosting the full Warner Archive. Despite this, there are still some great animated DC Comics movies available.

    Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993)

    There is considerable debate among superhero fans as to which of the many Batman movies is the best. Whenever these discussions happen, there is one dark horse candidate that some argue against purely because it is animated. That movie is Batman: Mask of the Phantasm.

    Ten years after beginning his war on crime, Batman encounters a new vigilante who doesn’t share his code against killing. This Phantasm begins targeting the gangsters of Gotham City, leading the Dark Knight to seek a common link. The trail leads to businessman Carl Beaumont, who is recently returned to Gotham City after a decade abroad. It also leads Bruce Wayne to reconnect with Beaumont’s daughter, Andrea, who almost got him to give up the superhero life before breaking their engagement without explanation.

    Produced by the same creative team behind Batman: The Animated Series, Mask of the Phantasm plays out like an extended episode of the show. The same moody orchestral music is on-hand, along with the series’ trademark Art Deco backgrounds painted on black paper. It is the script and the voice acting, however, that truly make the movie a classic.

    Kevin Conroy delivered many classic performances as the Dark Knight, but Mask of the Phantasm was his first truly great one. The scene in which Bruce Wayne pleads at his parents’ grave during a thunderstorm was truly groundbreaking for the time. Both in terms of portrayals of Batman and superhero animation aimed at adults.

    Dana Delaney also earned accolades for her performance as Andrea Beaumont. Many believe her work here led to her being cast as Lois Lane in Superman: The Animated Series. And unsurprisingly, Mark Hamill delivers a perfect performance as The Joker.

    Green Lantern: Emerald Knights (2011)

    For ages untold, the Green Lantern Corps has protected the universe. Now, the sun of their home base on the planet Oa is under attack by forces from the Anti-Matter universe. As the Corps prepare for the greatest battle in their history, a new recruit named Arisia questions her worthiness to be a Green Lantern. However, her spirits are boosted by veteran Lanterns Hal Jordan and Sinestro, who tell her tales of the challenges faced by other members of the Corps.

    There have been quite a few animated movies based upon the Green Lantern comics. However, Green Lantern: Emerald Knights is easily the best. Part of this is due to the anthology format, which allows it to tell several stories within the frame of the larger conflict.

    The best of these is adapted from a comic by Watchmen creators Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons. It concerns an evil warrior known as Bolphunga the Unrelenting, who hunts the mightiest warriors in the universe. He seeks out a legendary Green Lantern called Mogo, and ultimately learns just why Mogo is respected and feared in equal measure.

    Green Lantern: Emerald Knights also boasts one of the most impressive voice casts of any animated superhero movie. Elisabeth Moss of The Handmaid’s Tale plays Arisia, while Jason Isaacs lends his voice to Sinestro. Henry Rollins plays the Green Lantern drill sergeant Killowog, while Bolphunga the Unrelenting is voiced by wrestling legend and They Live star Roddy Piper. It is Nathan Fillion’s performance as Hal Jordan, however, which anchors the film. It also led to Fillion recreating the role of Hal Jordan for the DC Animated Movie Universe, from 2013 to 2020.

    Justice League: Doom (2012)

    The immortal Vandal Savage has schemed to take over the world for millennia. His latest plan involves two elements. First, a Legion of Doom made up of the greatest enemies of the Justice League. Secondly, an attack from within using plans designed by Batman to stop his superhero allies should they ever get out of control.

    The villains divide and conquer, putting their archenemies in dire straits. The only thing that might save them is the efforts of Cyborg, the new recruit who was overlooked in Savage’s plans. But even if the superheroes save the day, will the Justice League recover from the revelation that it was Batman’s plans that almost killed them?

    Justice League: Doom is not set in the DC Animated Universe. This is made clear by the presence of Nathan Fillion as Green Lantern Hal Jordan and the absence of Hawkgirl. It also features a dramatically different animation style.

    However, the film was scripted by Justice League Unlimited producer Dwayne McDuffie and adapted from the classic Justice League storyline ‘Tower of Babel.’ The movie also featured many voice actors from the DC Animated Universe, including Kevin Conroy as Batman and Tim Daly as Superman. This gives Justice League: Doom a familiar feeling, despite the darker tone and art direction. It also features some intense action scenes, such as The Flash reenacting the movie Speed on-foot, after being tagged with a velocity-sensitive bomb.

    The Lego Batman Movie (2017)

    The Lego Movie was a surprise smash when it was released in 2014. However, the film’s version of Batman, voiced by Will Arnett, was far and way the film’s breakout character. Three years later, he reprised the role in The Lego Batman Movie.

    The film finds Batman in a panic, as new Police Commissioner Barbara Gordon plans to restructure the GCPD so they don’t need Batman. This leads him to go over the edge to prove his worth and accidentally enable Joker’s jail-break from the Phantom Zone. However, with the help of his new adopted son, Robin, a new Batgirl, and his butler Alfred, Batman may learn the value of family and that he doesn’t need to do everything on his own.

    The Lego Batman Movie contains more of the same jokes about Lego figures from The Lego Movie. However, it also features a number of Easter eggs involving the DCU and DC Comics. Throw in a great ensemble including Michael Cera as Robin and Zach Galifianakis as Joker, and you have a movie that is as touching as it is funny.

    Justice League Dark: Apokolips War (2020)

    Knowing the threat Darkseid poses to Earth, the Justice League and Teen Titans join forces to stop him once and for all. They fail. Most of the superheroes are killed in the battle or enslaved by the armies of Apokolips.

    Two years later, a depowered Superman tries to rebuild what was lost and save the Earth. With the aid of Lois Lane, Raven, Robin, and John Constantine, he will build a new superhero team. They will even draw upon the Suicide Squad in Earth’s darkest hour. However, it may be too late to save their universe, much less the Earth.

    Justice League Dark: Apokolips War was a coda for the first chapter of the DC Animated Movie Universe. It was also proof that WB Animation could produce adult superhero anime and do it well. Again, the movie featured a stunning script and a talented voice ensemble. The stand-out, however was Matt Ryan, recreating the role of John Constantine after playing him in live-action in the Arrowverse.

    How we picked the best animated superhero movies on HBO Max in 2026

    Beyond the question of whether it was available on HBO Max or not, three criteria informed this list. First, is the movie well-regarded and historically important? Second, is it adapted from a notable comic book story? Finally, does it feature great voice acting?

    [ad_2]

    Matt Morrison

    Source link

  • Netflix Shows David Zaslav the Money

    [ad_1]

    Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos and Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav, as spotted at this month’s Golden Globes.
    Photo: Neilson Barnard/Getty Images

    Netflix is taking its Warner Bros. Discovery fight to Paramount. On the heels of a splashy Times interview last week meant to reassure skeptics of its theatrical intentions, the streaming giant has amended its bid for Warner Bros.’s streaming and studios business into an all-cash offer — one meant to counter Paramount’s hostile push to take over the company. Netflix’s ticket price that won the original bidding war for WBD still stands unchanged at $82.7 billion (or $27.75 per share), but the tweaked offer “provides enhanced certainty around the value WBD stockholders will receive at closing, eliminating market-based variability,” Netflix and WBD said in a joint statement.

    One of the risks of Netflix’s earlier cash-and-stock offer was that a remainder of the final payout to shareholders could fluctuate when WBD was ultimately sold. Netflix’s change eliminates that concern and brings its bid more in line with Paramount’s $108.4 billion bid (or $30 per share), which seeks to buy not just Warner’s streaming and studios business but its declining cable assets known as Discovery Global. Netflix tweaked its offer in one other way, according to a proxy statement filed to the SEC this morning by WBD: It will reduce the debt load on Discovery Global by about $260 million, “in light of the stronger than previously anticipated 2025 cash flow performance of Discovery Global.”

    Netflix is putting its money where its mouth is, in other words. The adjustment was expected after Paramount CEO David Ellison launched a hostile-takeover bid and proxy fight, suing WBD for info about how it valued the cable assets. Netflix’s amended bid landed in inboxes the morning ahead of its latest quarterly earnings report, covering the tail end of 2025, and its timing feels strategic in another way: Though any victor in this war will have to pass regulatory hurdles, WBD and Netflix’s joint statement touts a “faster path to a stockholder vote” expected by April 2026. Is it an acknowledgment that everyone’s tired of talking about this?

    [ad_2]

    Eric Vilas-Boas

    Source link

  • Warner Bros rejects takeover offer from Paramount, tells shareholders to stick with Netflix bid

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. again rejected Paramount’s latest takeover bid and told shareholders Wednesday to stick with a rival offer from Netflix.Warner’s leadership has repeatedly rebuffed Skydance-owned Paramount’s overtures — and urged shareholders just weeks ago to back the sale of its streaming and studio business to Netflix for $72 billion. Paramount, meanwhile, has sweetened its $77.9 billion offer for the entire company and gone straight to shareholders with a hostile bid.Warner Bros. Discovery said Wednesday that its board determined Paramount’s offer is not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. It again recommended shareholders support the Netflix deal.Late last month Paramount announced an “irrevocable personal guarantee” from Oracle founder Larry Ellison — who is the father of Paramount CEO David Ellison — to back $40.4 billion in equity financing for the company’s offer. Paramount also increased its promised payout to shareholders to $5.8 billion if the deal is blocked by regulators, matching what Netflix already put on the table.The battle for Warner and the value of each offer grows complicated because Netflix and Paramount want different things. Netflix’s proposed acquisition includes only Warner’s studio and streaming business, including its legacy TV and movie production arms and platforms like HBO Max. But Paramount wants the entire company — which, beyond studio and streaming, includes networks like CNN and Discovery.If Netflix is successful, Warner’s news and cable operations would be spun off into their own company, under a previously-announced separation.A merger with either company will attract tremendous antitrust scrutiny. Due to its size and potential impact, it will almost certainly trigger a review by the U.S. Justice Department, which could sue to block the transaction or request changes. Other countries and regulators overseas may also challenge the merger.

    Warner Bros. again rejected Paramount’s latest takeover bid and told shareholders Wednesday to stick with a rival offer from Netflix.

    Warner’s leadership has repeatedly rebuffed Skydance-owned Paramount’s overtures — and urged shareholders just weeks ago to back the sale of its streaming and studio business to Netflix for $72 billion. Paramount, meanwhile, has sweetened its $77.9 billion offer for the entire company and gone straight to shareholders with a hostile bid.

    Warner Bros. Discovery said Wednesday that its board determined Paramount’s offer is not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. It again recommended shareholders support the Netflix deal.

    Late last month Paramount announced an “irrevocable personal guarantee” from Oracle founder Larry Ellison — who is the father of Paramount CEO David Ellison — to back $40.4 billion in equity financing for the company’s offer. Paramount also increased its promised payout to shareholders to $5.8 billion if the deal is blocked by regulators, matching what Netflix already put on the table.

    The battle for Warner and the value of each offer grows complicated because Netflix and Paramount want different things. Netflix’s proposed acquisition includes only Warner’s studio and streaming business, including its legacy TV and movie production arms and platforms like HBO Max. But Paramount wants the entire company — which, beyond studio and streaming, includes networks like CNN and Discovery.

    If Netflix is successful, Warner’s news and cable operations would be spun off into their own company, under a previously-announced separation.

    A merger with either company will attract tremendous antitrust scrutiny. Due to its size and potential impact, it will almost certainly trigger a review by the U.S. Justice Department, which could sue to block the transaction or request changes. Other countries and regulators overseas may also challenge the merger.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warner Bros. Decides Buyer – Los Angeles Business Journal

    [ad_1]

    Netflix Inc. has forged ahead of Paramount Skydance Corp. in bid for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.

    Warner Bros. Discovery’s board of directors rejected Paramount’s $108.4 billion hostile takeover bid Dec. 17. The Burbank-based legacy film studio’s board called Paramount’s offer “inadequate” and “illusory” – even said it “poses significant risk” to its shareholders. The board raised questions about Paramount Chief Executive David Ellison and his billionaire father Larry Ellison’s commitment to back the deal. The latest Paramount offer includes a $40.65 billion equity funding, which would come from a revocable trust fund.

    In a letter to shareholders, the board pointed out that assets could be taken out of the “unknown and opaque” trust fund at any point, in which case Warner Bros. Discovery will have no recourse.

    “This offer once again fails to address key concerns that we have consistently communicated to Paramount,” said Samuel A. Di Piazza Jr., chair of the Warner Bros. Discovery board of directors. “We are confident that our merger with Netflix represents superior, more certain value for our shareholders and we look forward to delivering on the compelling benefits of our combination.”

    In the letter, Warner Bros. Discovery board called out the dozens of calls and meetings with Paramount, including four in-person meetings and meals between Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive David Zaslav and the Ellisons. Paramount was given “multiple opportunities” to offer a superior proposal but never did.

    “PSKY has consistently misled (Warner Bros. Discovery) shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family. It does not, and never has,” the board wrote.

    Warner Bros. Discovery also raised concerns about the timeline. It could take a year or more to jump over regulatory hurdles, and the time-consuming process could impact business operations. Bloomberg News reported that Paramount is not giving Warner Bros. Discovery enough flexibility to manage its business or its balance sheet.

    Ellison, however, isn’t giving up easily and plans to “move forward” in presenting his offer.

    “Our proposal clearly offers (Warner Bros. Discovery) shareholders superior value and certainty, a clear path to close, and does not leave them with a heavily indebted sub-scale linear business,” Ellison said in a statement. He added that he’s “encouraged by the feedback” his company has received from some Warner Bros. shareholders and this his proposal “is in the best interest of (Warner Bros. Discovery) shareholders, consumers, and the creative industries.”

    Ellison has previously presented six offers to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. Paramount said the company has refused to engage in any negotiating session or provide mark-ups of transaction documents since the first offer was made in September. Jared Kushner’s investment fund Affinity Partners under A Fin Management also backed out of the deal, CBS News reported.

    “With ​two ​strong competitors ​vying to secure ​the future ​of this ​unique American ​asset, ​Affinity ​has ​decided no longer to pursue ​the opportunity,” said an Affinity spokesperson in a statement. “The dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

    Netflix’s stock has declined by 0.6% to close at $94 a share Dec. 18 since the announcement, while Warner Bros. Discovery’s dropped by 4% to close at $27.61. Paramount’s stock also dropped by 6% to close at $13.01.

    Ellison has been determined to close the deal since his company issued in September an unsolicited offer to buy Warner Bros. Discovery at $19 a share. That price has since climbed to $30 a share for its entire business in his latest all-cash hostile bid to take the deal from Netflix, and Paramount has indicated that’s not the final price it’s willing to pay.

    Netflix, on the other hand, offered $27.75 a share for Warner Bros. Studios’ streaming and studio division, totaling $72 billion in equity value. The global networks division would be separated into a publicly traded division named Discovery Global next year. The offer gives Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders $23.25 in cash, $4.5 in shares of Netflix common stock and retained equity in Discovery Global, valued at approximately $3 to $4 per share by analysts. That would put Netflix’s offer just over $30 per share, outbidding Paramount.

    Some Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders have been in talks with the hedge fund Standard General about acquiring all or part of Warner Bros. Discovery’s network assets including CNN, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

    Many within the industry voiced concerns over the deal, from iconic actors like Jane Fonda to “The Office” producer Mike Schur. Some worried over Netflix’s proposed shortening of the exclusive theatrical release windows, which Co-Chief Executive Ted Sarandos previously criticized as not “consumer friendly.” He has apparently changed his mind.

    “Netflix and Warner Bros. complement each other, and we’re excited to combine our strengths with their theatrical film division, world-class television studio, and the iconic HBO brand, which will continue to focus on prestige television,” Sarandos said in a statement. “We’re also fully committed to releasing Warner Bros. films in theaters, with a traditional window, so audiences everywhere can enjoy them on the big screen.”

    Sarandos and Co-Chief Executive Greg Peters also addressed concerns about “the end of Hollywood” in a memo to Netflix staff, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “This deal is about growth: Warner Bros. brings businesses and capabilities we don’t have, so there’s no overlap or studio closures,” the two wrote. “We see this as a win for the entertainment industry, not the end of it.”

    [ad_2]

    staff-author

    Source link

  • Canal+ Boss Celebrates Netflix For “Convincing France To Pay” For Television As Ted Sarandos Reaffirms Commitment To Theatrical Post Warner Deal

    [ad_1]

    Ted Sarandos made a surprise appearance at last night’s Canal+ content showcase. Having been showered with praise for the streamer’s impact in France, he shed more light on Netflix‘s plans for Warner Bros.’s theatrical releasing if that deal goes through.

    Maxime Saada, Canal+ Chair and CEO, who has been a consistent supporter of Netflix’s management and strategy, said the streamer had been “very good” for his company. Netflix launched in France in September 14 to a hostile audience who culturally were more inclined to watch free-TV channels or go to the cinema.

    “Before you showed up, we had approximately 30% of French people willing to pay [to watch] TV,” said Saada. “Netflix showed up in France with your proposition and user experience, and you convinced the French to pay, and now the penetration of paid television is 75%. You have basically doubled the market size in France, so thank you for that.”

    Sarandos responded that Netflix knew it “had to make television worth paying for” and “good enough that consumers would be glad to pay for it.”

    Theatrical commitment

    Sarandos was asked about the rationale for buying Warner Bros. for $83B, and he chose to respond by outlining where Netflix lacked as an entertainment operation and once again confirming Netflix’s commitment to releasing studio movies in the cinema.

    “It’s hard to imagine we’ve only been doing original programming for 12 years,” he said. “We’ve been moving very fast, building a library as fast as we can. We have made everything we have greenlit so it’s not a very deep development pool. Our library only extends back a decade whereas Warner Bros. stretches back a hundred years. They know a lot about things we haven’t ever done like theatrical distribution.

    “Our intentions when we buy Warner Bros. will be to continue to release Warner Bros, studio movies in theaters with the traditional windows. Those movies will flow through the Canal+ output deal. We never got into it before because we never owned a theatrical distribution mechanism. We were monetizing movies through our own subscription because that’s how we were growing the business the fastest.”

    In France, theatrical releasing rules are complex, with Netflix and Canal+ among those whio have sought to reduce long windows that hold theatrical movies back from TV screens. Currently, Netflix has to wait 15 months before it can stream films in the country.

    Saada questioned whether Netflix would continue its relationship with Canal+ post the Warner deal, which he described as “80% partners and maybe 20% competitors” – particularly in terms of sports rights.

    Sarandos responded that Netflix would only compete for “eventized” and “specialized” sports such as the upcoming Anthony Joshua vs Jake Paul boxing match or Christmas Day American football. “Our primary mission is film and television,” said Sarandos. “I don’t see us flipping from 80-20 to 20-80.”

    Netflix is battling out to acquire Warner with Paramount also interested via a hostile takeover bid. The Financial Times reported this morning that Warner is set to rebuff Paramount’s offer.

    [ad_2]

    Jesse Whittock

    Source link

  • Netflix, Warner, Paramount and antitrust: Entertainment megadeal’s outcome must follow the evidence, not politics or fear of integration | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Last week, Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) announced plans to sell Warner Bros. Pictures, DC Studios and streaming service HBO Max to Netflix, following a bidding war that also ended with a hostile takeover bid by Paramount. The planned sale would create a mammoth streaming and production giant with intellectual property rights to beloved franchises including Batman and Harry Potter. It’s also sure to draw scrutiny from antitrust enforcers at the Department of Justice (DOJ).

    Is this a step toward more viewer-friendly competition, or toward entertainment monopolization? What about Paramount’s bid? Even President Trump is concerned about the situation. But the answers aren’t obvious.

    The merging parties argue that Netflix subscribers could benefit from an expanded content library and bundled services with HBO Max at lower prices. They also expect “at least $2-3 billion of cost savings per year by the third year” and combined resources that could foster more content and allow for bigger creative risks.

    Importantly, the deal could create a stronger competitor against other diversified media giants including Amazon and AppleTV, which are subsidized by their respective e-commerce and mobile/computing platforms. Recent antitrust verdicts recognize the importance of such scale for competitiveness in digital markets. A 2023 U.S. District Court decision approved Microsoft’s merger with gaming studio Activision Blizzard, as it allowed games to reach a wider audience while creating a stronger competitor against market leader Sony.

    Disney+ recently announced a foray into AI tools allowing users to generate and share their own content using proprietary characters and worlds. Combining Netflix’s user-targeting algorithms with WBD’s intellectual properties could create a comparable alternative. The new company may develop AI models and tools without risking the types of copyright infringement claims that have already ended in expensive settlements and licensing deals.

    Yet there are potential concerns. Netflix is known for exclusive content and disfavoring theatrical releases outside of narrow, award-show-timed windows. WBD is America’s third-largest theatrical content supplier and shares content with other streaming services. Netflix could presumably restrict content for both rival streaming services and theaters and possibly raise prices without losing customers.

    All of this is speculatory. The merger violates antitrust law if it’s likely to lead to less quality and innovation or higher prices, and if these harms to consumers won’t be offset by benefits — subject, of course, to the interpretation of enforcers and judges.

    The DOJ would find it easier to block the merger if it can persuade a court that Netflix-WBD would corner 30% of its market, making the deal presumptively anticompetitive and forcing the companies to rebut this claim.

    Expect enforcers to define a market of “video-on-demand” subscription streaming services, including Amazon, Hulu, HBO Max, Netflix, Paramount+, Disney+, Apple TV, Peacock and others. Based on recent decisions, market share will likely be measured by viewing hours. This puts Netflix (20%) and HBO Max (15%) at an estimated 35%.

    Netflix and WBD may suggest a broader entertainment market where subscription streaming, ad-supported video (like YouTube), social media and video games compete for user dollars and eyeballs, netting a much lower market share.

    Based on the recent FTC v. Meta decision, the court could opt for something in between. Meta successfully argued that consumers readily switch and substitute between apps like Facebook, Instagram, Youtube and Tiktok for video content. But some services are more likely than others to be seen as substitutes for Netflix and HBO Max content.

    Regardless, courts must still consider the merger’s effect on competition. Netflix-WBD could try settling with the DOJ by making contractual assurances, such as committing to theatrically release future WBD content. These agreements can be costly to monitor and can lead to future disputes over firms keeping their commitments, as the 2010 Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger demonstrates. But they can also preserve competitive benefits, mitigate potential harms and save the DOJ the trouble and costs of uncertain litigation.

    Alternatively, WBD’s shareholders may yet consider Paramount’s offer for their entire business at a higher share price. Backed by the president’s son-in-law, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, it would raise some political controversy. But this combined entity’s lower market share (26%) and Paramount’s historical support for theatrical releases may smooth some antitrust hurdles.

    In the end, consumers will win if courts and enforcers act based on evidence. If consumer behavior and other economic and real-world data show that a merger will limit vigorous competition and result in higher prices and less quality or innovation, the government is entitled to act. If not, enforcers should acknowledge that in rapidly evolving digital media markets, scale means being able to stay competitive and make bold investments that herald the next generation of entertainment innovation.

    In more ways than one, we’ll be watching.

    The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

    [ad_2]

    Satya Marar

    Source link

  • Paramount goes hostile in bid for Warner Bros., challenging a $72 billion offer by Netflix

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Paramount on Monday launched a hostile takeover offer for Warner Bros. Discovery, initiating a potentially bruising battle with rival bidder Netflix to buy the company behind HBO, CNN and a famed movie studio along with the power to reshape much of the nation’s entertainment landscape.

    Emerging just days after top Warner managers agreed to Netflix’s $72 billion purchase, the Paramount bid seeks to go over the heads of those leaders by appealing directly to Warner shareholders with more money — $77.9 billion — and a plan to buy all of Warner’s business, including the cable business that Netflix does not want.

    Paramount said its decision to go hostile came after it made several earlier offers that Warner management “never engaged meaningfully” with following the company’s October announcement that it was open to selling itself.

    In its appeal to shareholders, Paramount noted its offer also contains more cash than Netflix’s bid — $18 billion more — and argued that it’s more likely to pass scrutiny from President Donald Trump’s administration, a big concern given his habit of injecting himself in American business decisions.

    Over the weekend, Trump said the Netflix-Warner combo “could be a problem” because of the size of the combined market share and that he planned to review the deal personally.

    For its part, Netflix says it is confident Warner will reject the Paramount bid and that regulators, and Trump, will back its deal, citing multiple conversations that co-CEO Ted Sarandos has had with him about the streaming company’s expansion and hiring.

    “I think the president’s interest in this is the same as ours, which is to create and protect jobs,” Sarandos said Monday at an investor conference.

    Battle draws political attention in Washington

    The fight for Warner drew strong reaction in Washington, with politicians from both major parties weighing in on the likely impact on streaming prices, movie theater employment and the diversity of entertainment choices and political views.

    Paramount, run by David Ellison, whose family is closely allied with Trump, said it had submitted six proposals to Warner over a 12-week period before the latest offer.

    “We believe our offer will create a stronger Hollywood. It is in the best interests of the creative community, consumers and the movie theater industry,” the Paramount CEO said in a statement. Ellison added that his deal would lead to more competition in the industry, not less, and more movies in theaters.

    A regulatory document released Monday suggested another possible Paramount advantage to win over Trump: An investment firm run by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner would be investing in the deal, too.

    Also participating would be funds controlled by the governments of three unnamed Persian Gulf countries, widely reported as Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Qatar. Trump’s family company has struck deals this year for buildings and resorts that bear his name in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, partnering in the former with a company closely tied to the government and in the latter with the government fund itself.

    Also possibly in Paramount’s favor are recent changes at CBS News since its October purchase of the news and commentary website The Free Press. The site’s founder, Bari Weiss, who has a reputation for fighting “woke” culture, was then installed as editor-in-chief in a signal Ellison intended to shake up the storied network of Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather and “60 Minutes,” long viewed by many conservatives as the personification of a liberal media establishment.

    Trump is a wild card

    Still, Trump is a wild card given his tendency to make decisions based on gut and his personal mood.

    On Monday, he lashed out at Paramount for allowing “60 Minutes” to interview his ally-turned-enemy Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, writing on social media that “THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN THE OLD OWNERSHIP.”

    The drama surrounding control of Warner began Friday when Netflix made the surprise announcement that it had struck a deal with its management to buy the Hollywood giant behind “Harry Potter,” HBO Max and DC Studios.

    The cash and stock proposal was valued at $27.75 per Warner share, giving it a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion, including debt that will be assumed in the deal. By contrast, the Paramount offer is for $30 per Warner share, and worth $108 billion, included assumed debt. Paramount’s offer is set to expire on Jan. 8 unless it’s extended.

    But comparing the two deals is complicated because they are not buying the same thing. The Netflix offer, if it goes through, will only close after Warner completes its previously announced separation of its cable operations. Not included in the deal, which is unlikely to close for at least a year, are networks such as CNN and Discovery.

    The federal government has the authority to kill any big media deals if it has antitrust concerns, but such matters are usually left to experts at the Department of Justice. In his decision to get involved personally, Trump has decided, as he has with other government norms, to make a sharp break with precedent.

    That worries Usha Haley, a Wichita State University specialist in international business strategy, who noted that Ellison is the son of longtime Trump supporter Larry Ellison, the world’s second-richest person.

    “He said he’s going to be involved in the decision. We should take him at face value,” Haley said of Trump. “For him, it’s just greater control over the media.”

    But others are uncertain how big a role Trump will play.

    John Mayo, an antitrust expert at Georgetown University, said the scrutiny will be serious whichever offer is approved by shareholders and goes before the DOJ, and that he thinks experts there will keep partisanship out of their decisions despite the politically charged atmosphere.

    “That may affect at least the rhetoric that occurs in the press,” he said, “though I doubt it will affect the analysis that occurs at the Department of Justice.”

    Shares of Paramount surged 9% on Monday while Netflix fell 3.4%, and Warner Bros. closed up 4.4%.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Matt Sedensky, David Bauder and Charles Sheehan in New York and Michael Liedtke in San Francisco contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Video: The Battle for Warner Bros. Discovery

    [ad_1]

    new video loaded: The Battle for Warner Bros. Discovery

    Nicole Sperling, a Times reporter who covers Hollywood and the streaming revolution, breaks down the competing bids from Netflix and Paramount to buy Warner Bros. Discovery.

    By Nicole Sperling, Edward Vega, Laura Salaberry, Jon Hazell and Chris Orr

    December 9, 2025

    [ad_2]

    Nicole Sperling, Edward Vega, Laura Salaberry, Jon Hazell and Chris Orr

    Source link

  • Paramount Stock Soars 10% After Skydance Merger

    [ad_1]

    Following David Ellison’s acquisition of Paramount, the company’s first earnings report since the merger sent shares soaring 10% on Tuesday

    On Monday, Paramount issued a letter to shareholders announcing that merger-related cost savings are now expected to total $1 billion more than previously forecast, while outlining Ellison’s ambitions for the newly formed Paramount Skydance.

    The letter defined these ambitions as the company’s “North Star priorities”: investing in growth businesses, expanding globally, and driving efficiency with a focus on “long-term free cash flow generation.” Paramount also projected total revenue of $30 billion for next year, supported in part by plans to raise Paramount+ subscription prices in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2026.

    A major theme of the letter centered on efforts to “optimize the workforce for the future.” Ellison has made aggressive budget cuts a cornerstone of his leadership, including substantial workforce reductions, most recently with the elimination of 1,000 positions nationwide last month.

    Less than a month after the merger, employees were notified that a five-day in-office workweek would become mandatory starting in January. Those unwilling to return were offered buyouts; according to the letter, about 600 employees chose to leave the company rather than return to full-time office work.

    Ellison’s broader philosophy has been described as “cutting down to build up.” In pursuit of that vision, he has made three unsuccessful bids to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. 

    When asked about these attempts on Monday, Ellison declined to elaborate, “I think it’s important to know there’s no must-haves for us,” he said. “We really look at this as buy versus build, and we absolutely have the ability to build to get to where we want to go.”

    [ad_2]

    Anastasia Van Batenburg

    Source link

  • Netflix ‘Actively Exploring’ Warner Bros. Discovery Bid, Hires Bank to Put Together M&A Offer (Report)

    [ad_1]

    Could Netflix become the future home of the DC Universe’s Superman and Batman superhero films, the Harry Potter and Barbie film franchises — and owner of a trove of classics like “Casablanca,” “Bonnie and Clyde,” “Goodfellas,” “Unforgiven” and “The Shining”?

    The streaming powerhouse is “actively exploring” some type of acquisition bid for Warner Bros. Discovery and has retained investment bank Moelis & Co. to put together a prospective offer, according to a new report from Reuters, citing anonymous individuals. Moelis was the financial adviser to David Ellison’s Skydance Media in its takeover of Paramount Global to former Paramount Skydance.

    Warner Bros. Discovery’s board last week announced that it had received in-bound M&A interest from “multiple parties” and has commenced a process to review such offers. Per the Reuters report, WBD has granted Netflix access to its financials as part of assembling a prospective M&A offer. It’s not clear if a Netflix bid would also include Warner Bros. Discovery’s HBO Max business.

    Warner Bros. Discovery declined to comment. Reps for Netflix and Moelis did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.

    Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos told investors on its Q3 earnings interview last week that the company has “no interest in owning legacy media networks,” indicating that an acquisition of WBD in its entirety — including networks like CNN, TBS, HGTV and Food Network — is off the table. Sarandos did say Netflix can be “choosy” about its M&A targets, but he added: “Nothing is a must-have for us to meet our goals that we have for the business.”

    Netflix’s reported active interest in buying perhaps some of WBD’s assets comes as Paramount Skydance’s Ellison has made aggressive overtures — with three escalating bids for the entire company. WBD has rejected all three as too low, including Ellison’s most recent one for $23.50/share.

    Comcast also is said to be looking at a potential bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, although, like Netflix, seemingly just for the studios and/or streaming side of the house. Mike Cavanagh, Comcast co-CEO, told analysts during Comcast’s Q3 earnings call Thursday morning that “the bar is high” for the company to consider a major merger of acquisition. But he didn’t rule anything out — and suggested that Comcast’s ability to secure federal approval for any transaction would improve once the spinoff of its linear cable channels (other than Bravo) into Versant is completed later this year.

    Cavanagh said that “what we’d be looking for and what we’re going to look like post-Versant spin, I think more things are viable than maybe some of the public commentary that’s out there.”

    Box-office hits in 2025 for Warner Bros.’s film studios, in a turnaround from past years, have included James Gunn’s “Superman,” “A Minecraft Movie,” Ryan Coogler and Michael B. Jordan’s “Sinners,” “Final Destination Bloodlines,” Brad Pitt’s “F1: The Movie,” and “Weapons.” In 2024, the studios segment’s highlights were “Dune: Part Two,” “Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice” and “Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire” on the film side.

    Meanwhile, Warner Bros. Television has produced shows for Netflix including “Running Point,” “You” and “Maid.” Other top-rated shows from WB Television include “Abbott Elementary,” “Shrinking” and “The Voice.”

    Pictured top: James Gunn’s 2025 “Superman”

    [ad_2]

    Todd Spangler

    Source link

  • Like All of Us, the WGA Dislikes Another Warner Bros. Merger

    [ad_1]

    Just when we’d all gotten used to (and tired of) Warner Bros.’ merger with Discovery, we learned the company’s open to having another owner. The news of yet another potential merger has drawn a lot of negative reactions, and now the Writers Guild of America has its own take on the matter. Spoiler: they don’t like it.

    In a joint statement from its east and west branches, the WGA said to combine Warner Bros. with any of the major studios would be “a disaster for writers, for consumers, and for competition. Merger after merger in the media industry has harmed workers, diminished competition and free speech, and wasted hundreds of billions of dollars better invested in organic growth.”

    To date, Paramount is the studio most chomping at the bit to acquire Warner Bros. It was first hinted at back in 2023, and the desire’s only grown now that the Transformers studio has gone and merged with Skydance, whose owner David Ellison is the son of one Larry Ellison, head of Oracle and one of Donald Trump’s most powerful supporters. Back in September, reports indicated Ellison was making a play for all of WB, including its cable networks and movie studio.

    Outside of Paramount, other potential candidates looking to nab Warner Bros. include streamers Amazon, Netflix and Apple. Whichever studio makes a real play to acquire it, the two WGA branches have vowed to “work with regulators to block the merger.”

    [via Variety]

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • The Looney Tunes are Killing It Over on Tubi

    [ad_1]

    This past August, Warner Bros. Discovery punted nearly 800 Looney Tunes shorts—with nearly 200 locked away due to “cultural sensitivities“—over to free streaming service Tubi. What seemed like an insult to one of the most well-known cartoon properties has, funnily enough, been a blessing in disguise.

    According to a recent Vulture report, Tubi’s acquisition head Samuel Harowitz called the Tunes “a huge win for us.” In terms of total viewing time, it’s in the Top 10 best-performing series and very popular across generations and demographics. Much of this is in part due to how popular older animation like Looney Tunes is: Tom & Jerry, The Flinstones, and the 1996 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles series are also on Tubi, and Harowitz called those classic cartoons “one of the biggest fandoms we serve on the platform.”

    If Tubi has its way, the Looney Tunes aren’t going anywhere. The company is in “active negotiations” with WBD to ensure it can keep the cartoons there “for quite a while, likely years.” It’s also open to licensing new Looney content or becoming the streaming home for Coyote vs. Acme, but there’s no conversations about either yet. As is, the episodes on Tubi are in non-chronological order with ads playing only in between shorts, which is a bummer, but at least they look quite good in HD.

    You can thank animation historian Jerry Beck for that, whose restorations were also used for the physical releases. These restored versions “look day-one brand new, as the Looney Tunes should,” he told Vulture. In addition to “taking delight” when people notice the restorations, he’s just glad Tubi’s doing right by the Tunes. “I’m kind of glad [WBD] took them off HBO Max and allowed other networks to use them so we can all see them.”

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Warner Bros. Discovery is Officially Considering a Sale – LAmag

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. Discovery, the owner of Warner Bros. movie studio, HBO, and CNN, just announced they are open to a sale. If sold, it would mark the largest media transaction since Disney acquired 21st Century Fox in 2019.

    In a statement released Tuesday morning, Warner Bros. Discovery said it is considering a variety of deals, mentioning things like the spinoff of some assets or even the sale of the entire company in response to interest from various potential buyers.

    This announcement is likely to set off a bidding war for one of Hollywood’s most influential companies. Whether it is a complete or partial sale, it would reshape the industry. This decision and stands to increase or greatly minimize could potentially minimize the number of major companies fighting for consolidation over Hollywood.

    Prior to the announcement of being open to sales, Warner Bros said they were planning to split their streaming and studio business from their cable networks business. This is intended to separate the most promising parts of the company, such as HBO Max, from parts of the company with lower profit, like CNN.

    The decision to divide the company proves to be a great call as they consider selling. Warner Bros. Discovery executives mentioned that they expect its streaming services to be the biggest draw for potential buyers, hoping to see offers from companies like Netflix and Apple, with some analysts saying that more companies are likely to jump in as a result of Paramount’s interest.

    As of now, Paramount is a buyer to watch, as David Ellison, the chief executive, has been seeking out acquisitions left and right. Acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery would add another layer of influence, potentially making Paramount one of the most powerful companies in Hollywood.

    Beyond Paramount, Comcast has expressed interest as well as Amazon, in purchasing either the entire company or distinct parts.

    While Warner Bros. Discovery did not name any specific companies, they said in a statement, “While we aren’t going to get into the specifics of who has expressed interest, it is safe to assume it is multiple parties,” hinting that Paramount isn’t the only company with its eye on it. 

    An analyst at the Bank of America said in an interview that Warner Bros. Discovery has a value of roughly $50 billion and that “These are assets that can’t be duplicated.”

    [ad_2]

    Amaya Arnic

    Source link

  • At Least One ‘Batgirl’ Star Still Hopes It’ll Come Out

    [ad_1]

    This past August, we passed the three-year anniversary of Warner Bros. Discovery cancelling Batgirl as a tax write-off. Since then, there’s been no motion on reviving the film, but its directors and stars haven’t lost hope luck will come their way.

    While doing press for his latest film Maintenance Required, actor Jacob Scipio—who was to play Gotham mob boss Antony Bressi—told The Direct he thought the chances of Batgirl’s return have slightly gone up in the wake of Coyote vs. Acme’s similar cancellation and big screen revival for August 2026. “I got the chance to watch it, and it was a phenomenal film,” he said. “It was great that they saved [Coyote]…there’s always hope. Hollywood’s a funny place, and I think if enough people want it, it can happen.”

    At the time, Batgirl’s cancellation garnered a lot of bad press for WB from fans, press, and even led to several United States lawmakers contacting the Department of Justice asking it to reconsider its approval of the WBD merger. There’ve been plenty of high-profile cancellations since then, which further tarnished the studio’s reputation with audiences and filmmakers up until fairly recently with hits like Sinners and Weapons.

    Could Batgirl make a comeback, despite being apparently so “unreleasable” it would’ve damaged the DC brand? That’s…a little tricky; the biggest roadblock is Batman: Michael Keaton would’ve played an older version of the character, similar to what he did for 2023’s The Flash, which WB seriously bet the farm on back then. Between the new DC Films universe and Matt Reeves’ own cinematic world, he’s a big question mark other adjacent movies are currently working around, which may not be possible here. Even so, it deserves a chance: like Scipio said, Coyote’s getting a fair shake, so why not this?

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. $WBD Shares Sold by Blair William & Co. IL

    [ad_1]

    Blair William & Co. IL decreased its holdings in Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (NASDAQ:WBDFree Report) by 27.5% in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 56,936 shares of the company’s stock after selling 21,612 shares during the quarter. Blair William & Co. IL’s holdings in Warner Bros. Discovery were worth $652,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

    Several other large investors have also recently bought and sold shares of WBD. WPG Advisers LLC purchased a new stake in Warner Bros. Discovery during the first quarter worth $26,000. Financial Gravity Asset Management Inc. purchased a new stake in Warner Bros. Discovery during the first quarter worth $27,000. North Capital Inc. purchased a new stake in Warner Bros. Discovery during the first quarter worth $28,000. Smallwood Wealth Investment Management LLC purchased a new stake in Warner Bros. Discovery during the first quarter worth $29,000. Finally, Golden State Wealth Management LLC boosted its position in Warner Bros. Discovery by 448.0% during the first quarter. Golden State Wealth Management LLC now owns 2,877 shares of the company’s stock worth $31,000 after purchasing an additional 2,352 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 59.95% of the company’s stock.

    Insiders Place Their Bets

    In related news, Director Anton J. Levy purchased 250,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, August 11th. The shares were acquired at an average price of $10.90 per share, with a total value of $2,725,000.00. Following the acquisition, the director owned 874,000 shares in the company, valued at approximately $9,526,600. This trade represents a 40.06% increase in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink. Also, insider Bruce Campbell sold 289,322 shares of Warner Bros. Discovery stock in a transaction on Thursday, September 11th. The shares were sold at an average price of $16.48, for a total value of $4,768,026.56. Following the sale, the insider directly owned 402,464 shares in the company, valued at $6,632,606.72. The trade was a 41.82% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold a total of 970,115 shares of company stock valued at $17,818,490 in the last quarter. Insiders own 1.90% of the company’s stock.

    Warner Bros. Discovery Price Performance

    WBD stock opened at $18.29 on Friday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.92, a quick ratio of 1.04 and a current ratio of 1.04. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. has a 1 year low of $7.25 and a 1 year high of $20.24. The firm has a market cap of $45.28 billion, a P/E ratio of 60.97, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.25 and a beta of 1.73. The stock has a 50-day simple moving average of $15.38 and a 200-day simple moving average of $11.99.

    Warner Bros. Discovery (NASDAQ:WBDGet Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, August 7th. The company reported $0.63 earnings per share for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of ($0.16) by $0.79. Warner Bros. Discovery had a return on equity of 2.14% and a net margin of 2.00%.The firm had revenue of $9.81 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $9.73 billion. During the same quarter last year, the firm earned ($4.07) EPS. Warner Bros. Discovery’s quarterly revenue was up 1.0% on a year-over-year basis. On average, equities analysts predict that Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. will post -4.33 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

    Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades

    Several analysts have recently issued reports on the company. Moffett Nathanson upped their price objective on Warner Bros. Discovery from $14.00 to $23.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, September 22nd. Sanford C. Bernstein upped their price objective on Warner Bros. Discovery from $13.00 to $16.00 and gave the company a “market perform” rating in a research report on Monday, September 22nd. KeyCorp restated a “sector weight” rating on shares of Warner Bros. Discovery in a research report on Friday, September 26th. Guggenheim upped their price objective on Warner Bros. Discovery from $14.00 to $22.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, October 8th. Finally, Benchmark restated a “buy” rating and issued a $18.00 price objective on shares of Warner Bros. Discovery in a research report on Monday, July 14th. One analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, seven have given a Buy rating and sixteen have assigned a Hold rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $17.00.

    View Our Latest Analysis on WBD

    Warner Bros. Discovery Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc operates as a media and entertainment company worldwide. It operates through three segments: Studios, Network, and DTC. The Studios segment produces and releases feature films for initial exhibition in theaters; produces and licenses television programs to its networks and third parties and direct-to-consumer services; distributes films and television programs to various third parties and internal television; and offers streaming services and distribution through the home entertainment market, themed experience licensing, and interactive gaming.

    Featured Stories

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Warner Bros. Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD)



    Receive News & Ratings for Warner Bros. Discovery Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Warner Bros. Discovery and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Warner Bros. Discovery Rejected Paramount Skydance Acquisition Offer of $20 per Share as Too Low (Report)

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. Discovery rejected a takeover offer of “around” $20 per share from David Ellison’s Paramount Skydance in recent weeks as “too low,” Bloomberg News reported Saturday, citing anonymous sources.

    WBD shares closed at $17.10/share Friday, up more than 36% since news broke Sept. 11 of Ellison’s interest in bidding for the rival just weeks after closing Skydance’s deal to acquire Paramount Global. Warner Bros. Discovery, parent of HBO/HBO Max, Warner Bros. Entertainment, CNN, TNT, TBS and more, has a market cap of $42.3 billion. The Bloomberg story did not indicate whether Paramount’s bid included the assumption of WBD’s total debt (which as of June 30 was $35.6 billion).

    Paramount Skydance has been in talks with Apollo Global Management, the asset management firm that had previously bid for Paramount Global, about joining its bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, Bloomberg reported. Larry Ellison, the billionaire Oracle founder who is David’s father, fronted most of the money for Skydance’s $8 billion deal for Paramount Global.

    Reps for Paramount, WBD and Apollo did not respond to requests for comment Sunday.

    Ellison, speaking last week at L.A.’s Bloomberg Screentime conference, did not confirm that Paramount Skydance has bid for WBD. But he went on to explain why he thinks Paramount needs to bolt on more content-producing engines to achieve sustainable growth in today’s streaming-centric world and cited WBD chief David Zaslav’s comments that the industry needs more consolidation.

    “I do think there’s a lot of [M&A] options out there that in terms of what actually might be actionable in the near future,” Ellison said at the conference. “You actually need more content to yield more engagement. And so we would actually want to be in the business, through whatever lens we’re looking at” to produce “more movies, more television series” to get more scale and engagement. Ellison declined to name potential takeout targets.

    Paramount Skydance’s bid for Warner Bros. Discovery would be for WBD in its entirety, as first reported by the Wall Street Journal. The M&A overture comes ahead of WBD’s plans to split into two separate companies next spring (Warner Bros., comprising studios and streaming, and Discovery Global, including TV networks and Discovery+).

    [ad_2]

    Todd Spangler

    Source link

  • David Ellison Could Make a Move on Warner Bros. Discovery

    [ad_1]

    Following Paramount Skydance’s $8 billion merger, Ellison is said to be weighing a potential cash bid for Warner Bros. Discovery as speculation grows over Hollywood’s next major deal

    There could be another shake-up for Hollywood soon.

    With Warner Bros. Motion Picture chairs Michael De Luca and Pam Abdy signing new contracts, Deadline reports that David Zaslav runs Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) could soon become the next addition for David Ellison and Paramount Skydance.

    No formal offer has been made yet, but Ellison, whose company recently completed an $8 billion merger with Paramount, is said to be weighing a potential cash bid. Backed by his father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, the Skydance chief is reportedly eager to avoid the kind of drawn-out process that defined the Paramount deal.

    According to reports from Deadline, there appears to be little room for Zaslav in a merged studio. At most, he could be offered a board seat or adversity role, however, his long-term involvement seems unlikely. 

    Reports also note that Zaslav has been seeking alternative buyers like Netflix, but analysts doubt the streamer would pay between $75 billion and $100 billion for WBD, citing the company’s cable assets and complex distribution structure.

    For now, speculation centers around whether Ellison will move before WBD completes its planned split of the linear and streaming divisions. This is a change that could raise the price tag. With few competitors able to match Ellison’s resources, the prospect of a Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery union remains a high possibility.

    [ad_2]

    Melissa Houston

    Source link