ReportWire

Tag: WAR

  • U.S. fighter in Ukraine details horrors of war

    U.S. fighter in Ukraine details horrors of war

    [ad_1]

    U.S. fighter in Ukraine details horrors of war – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A volunteer fighter from Tennessee described what it was like fighting in Ukraine. He claimed he repeatedly saw Russia using white phosphorus munitions. Holly Williams reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia holds nuclear drills amid

    Russia holds nuclear drills amid

    [ad_1]

    Russia holds nuclear drills amid “dirty bomb” claim – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Russian President Vladimir Putin said the “risk of world conflict” is high as he oversaw the start of nuclear military excersises. He also repeated the claim that Ukraine may be planning a “dirty bomb” attack. Holly Williams is following developments from Kyiv.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside the hospitals that concealed Russian casualties

    Inside the hospitals that concealed Russian casualties

    [ad_1]

    CNN Special Report

    October 25, 2022

    Vilnius, Lithuania — As his daughters dozed off in the back seat, his wife filmed him driving, eyes narrowed, focused on the dark road ahead. Andrei, a doctor, had been plotting their escape from Belarus since 2020, when the Kremlin-backed regime cracked down on a popular uprising, sending the country spiraling deeper into authoritarian rule and engulfing it in a climate of fear.

    When Russia launched its assault on Ukraine from Belarus’ southern doorstep, getting out suddenly felt more urgent. His family watched from the windows of their apartment block as helicopters and missiles thundered through the sky. Within days, Andrei — whose name has been changed for his safety — said he found himself being forced to treat Russian soldiers injured in Moscow’s botched assault on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. Then, at the end of March, he was jailed on trumped-up corruption charges. After his release in May, and carefully weighing the risks, he decided it was time to leave.

    So as not to spark any suspicion, Andrei asked one of their neighbors to sneak the family’s suitcases, filled with legal documents, a few clothes and a photo album, out of their building and stash them in a car. Late one Friday evening in August, after he had finished his shift at the hospital, they met in a parking lot without any security cameras to pick up their bags. Then the family set off.

    They stopped on a rural, dirt road and Andrei kissed his wife and girls goodbye. All being well, they would cross through the official border checkpoint and reunite with him in Lithuania, where he planned to claim asylum. Inside one of his daughter’s toys, Andrei had hidden a USB flash drive carrying evidence of what he had witnessed — dozens of X-rays of wounded Russian soldiers. He told them he loved them, turned and walked into the woods.

    Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko allowed his close ally Russia in February to use the country, which shares a 674-mile border with Ukraine, as a staging ground for its invasion. With his permission, Russian President Vladimir Putin treated Belarus as an extension of Moscow’s territory, sending equipment and around 30,000 troops ostensibly for joint military exercises — the biggest deployment to the former Soviet state since the end of the Cold War. Russia erected temporary camps and hospitals in Belarus’ frozen fields, dispatching military hardware, artillery, helicopters and fighter jets near the border.

    Belarusian and Russian forces performing live fire exercises in Belarus, near the Ukrainian border, on February 17, a week before the war began. Belarusian Ministry of Defense/CNN/Pool
    Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko reaffirms his support for Russia on February 17, saying the two countries have “practically formed a united army.” Belarusian Ministry of Defense/CNN/Pool

    When Putin declared his “special military operation” in a pre-dawn televised address on February 24, he sent missiles, paratroopers and a huge armored column of soldiers rolling south from Belarusian soil, setting in motion what was intended to be a lightning strike to decapitate the government in Kyiv. But as Russia’s advance stalled and setbacks mounted, Moscow began to spirit wounded soldiers back across the border to Belarus for treatment in several civilian hospitals, a CNN investigation has revealed. The doctors working there were drafted into a war that they didn’t sign up for, unwittingly enlisted as quasi-combat medics and obliged by their hippocratic oath to provide life-saving care.

    Many were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements, told not to speak about what they saw. Some, like Andrei, later fled. From their operating tables, Belarusian medical workers gained perhaps the clearest sense of the scale of casualties suffered by Russia in the early weeks of the war — describing young, shell-shocked soldiers who thought they were being sent for exercises only to find themselves losing a limb in a war they were ill-prepared to fight. While Lukashenko admitted that Belarus was providing medical aid to Russian military personnel, little is known about what happened in the hospitals where they were taken, which were kept under strict surveillance. In interviews with Belarusian doctors, members of the country’s medical diaspora, human rights activists, military analysts and security sources, CNN examined the role Belarus played in treating Russian casualties, while the Kremlin sought to conceal them. Their testimonies and documentation — including medical records — offer insights into the Belarusian government’s complicity in the Ukraine war, as fears mount that the country might be sucked further into the fight.

    Exactly how many Russian soldiers have been killed or wounded in Ukraine remains a mystery to all but a few inside the Kremlin. The Russian defense ministry said on March 2 that early casualties amounted to 498 Russian soldiers killed and nearly 1,600 injured in action. But US and NATO estimates around the same time put the number of dead significantly higher: between 3,000 and 10,000. Seven months into the war, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu revised the official tally, saying nearly 6,000 Russian soldiers had died. The Pentagon said in August that it believed the true toll was much more: as many as 80,000 dead or wounded.

    Belarus’ stranglehold on information — Lukashenko’s regime has put independent news media under severe pressure, restricted free speech and introduced new legislation extending the death penalty for “attempts to carry out acts of terrorism” — has provided useful cover for Russia in repressing details about its injured and dead. In recent months, a number of people have been arrested for filming Russian military vehicles, according to Viasna, a Belarusian human rights organization whose imprisoned founder was recently awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

    In spite of the repressive environment, hints of Moscow’s troop losses have emerged on social media and local reports. In late February, the Belarusian Hajun project, an activist monitoring group that tracks military activity in the country, started sharing images on Telegram of Russian medical vehicles ferrying fighters across the border from the frontline. Drawing on a network of trusted local sources, the group posted footage of green, Soviet-era “PAZ” buses marked with red crosses and a white letter “V” — a symbol believed to stand for “Vostok”, or east — and armored ambulances in Gomel region.

    “We can confirm they (Russians) used Belarusian infrastructure, including medical buildings and field hospitals. They also used morgues … and they used train stations or airbases to transport dead people or injured people, we have photos of that,” Anton Motolko, a Belarusian blogger who fled Minsk in 2020 and founded Belarusian Hajun project, told CNN. Motolko said his sources told him that morgues in the area were overflowing, and that a steady stream of wounded soldiers had arrived at Mazyr City Hospital, where Andrei worked.

    In mid-February, Andrei watched in horror as his hometown of Mazyr seemingly turned into a sprawling military base — armored tanks rolled down the streets, Russian soldiers roamed local shops and got drunk at bars downtown. He and his family no longer felt safe, and avoided being outside after dark. Soon they began to suspect that Russia was preparing for war. As the military drills were due to wrap up on February 20, Andrei said his hospital administration extended a directive to treat Russian soldiers free of charge until March 10. “They must have thought the war would end by then,” Andrei said, adding that, two days later, Russian officers from the field hospital outside Mazyr cleaned out the city’s blood bank reserves.

    On the morning of February 24, the first day of fighting, Andrei recalled a hospital official gathering all of the doctors into a meeting room, ordering them to keep 250 beds free for Russian casualties, stop all planned surgeries and send what Belarusian patients they could home. “Then they warned us that we were not allowed to share any information about Russian soldiers. We had to sign a non-disclosure form, forbidding us to share any photos, documents,” Andrei said. “They told us that we were being watched by the Russian Federal Security Services (FSB), that they had ways of monitoring our phones.” While he didn’t see any Russian FSB, Andrei said he did notice local Belarusian State Security Committee (KGB) agents stalking the halls of the hospital. CNN has reached out to Mazyr City Hospital for comment.


    “They warned us that we were not allowed to share any information about Russian soldiers. We had to sign a non-disclosure form, forbidding us to share any photos, documents.”

    – Andrei, a doctor from Mazyr, Belarus


    Aliaksandr Azarau, head of ByPol, an organization set up by ex-Belarusian police and security service members, told CNN that Mazyr authorities went to great lengths to keep information about the number of wounded Russian soldiers, and the types of injuries they sustained, under wraps. Azarau said that the KGB departments for Mazyr, along with the region’s department of internal affairs, put Mazyr City Hospital “under round-the-clock surveillance” while ”warning the staff of personal responsibility for disclosing information about military personnel undergoing treatment in the hospital.”

    Still, Andrei managed to secretly photocopy the X-rays of dozens of troops treated at Mazyr City Hospital, which he shared with CNN. “What I took with me, that part of the archive, could have gotten me into legal trouble for espionage,” he said, adding that he had taken the risk to provide evidence of a side of the war that has so far gone unseen, smuggling them out of Belarus in his daughter’s toy cellphone. The scans included the names and ages of the soldiers, many of whom were between 19 and 21 years old, capturing their injuries in stark black and white.

    Andrei said he saw the biggest wave of casualties arrive at Mazyr hospital en masse in the early hours of February 28. After receiving a call that the soldiers were incoming, the doctors assembled at the entrance to the emergency room around midnight, waiting. Soon, busloads of injured troops began to pour in. Russian soldiers carted them inside on stretchers, dumping them at the front doors, Andrei said.

    In reality, the hospital was full of soldiers, Andrei said. Some were missing eyes, others required amputations — having arrived with gangrenous, shattered limbs — a few were paralyzed, one had lost part of his brain, another his lower jaw. Several had been wearing tourniquets for days to staunch the blood, their bodies peppered with bullets and shrapnel, the X-rays showed. “There were more wounded, in need of an operation, than we had operating tables,” Andrei said. “The Russians just gave us their injured [soldiers], and didn’t give a damn about them.”

    Many of the Russians had been fighting in areas outside of Kyiv — in Hostomel, where they suffered major losses at a key airfield, in Bucha and Borodianka, suburbs that they terrorized for weeks, and in Chernobyl, where their forces were exposed to radiation in the highly toxic zone known as the “Red Forest.” Andrei said he treated Russian paratroopers and special forces injured in the botched assault on Hostomel airfield, where they told him their helicopter came under attack. “They were professional killers. We had to treat them, that was our job. I felt disgusted by the whole thing. But, as a doctor, I am not really allowed to feel disgusted,” he said. Russian Major General Sergei Nyrkov, who suffered a severe abdominal injury in Chernobyl, was also treated at Mazyr hospital, according to his X-ray, which was among those Andrei smuggled out.

    But the majority of the injured were young, inexperienced soldiers and conscripts from remote parts of Russia, Andrei said. CNN has reached out to the Russian Ministry of Defense about these allegations, as well as accusations it has co-opted Belarus to carry out an “act of aggression” against Ukraine, in violation of international law.

    On March 1, at a meeting of Belarus’ Security Council, Lukashenko acknowledged that hospitals were providing Russian soldiers with life-saving treatment. “We treat them and will continue treating these guys – in Gomel, Mazyr, and I think in some other district capital when they are transported to us. What’s wrong with that? Injured people have always received medical treatment during any war,” he said, before dismissing reports that Russia had suffered huge losses as fake news.

    “Our self-exiled opposition and the rest shout about thousands of injured [Russian military personnel] delivered to Gomel. Nothing like that. We’ve treated about 160-170 injured in this entire period,” Lukashenko added.

    But Andrei and other medical professionals in the region tell a different story. In early March, 40 to 50 Russian casualties were brought to Mazyr City Hospital every day, shuttled in and out again like a “conveyor belt,” Andrei said. Most arrived in the dark of night, or early in the morning, in green Russian military buses and ambulances. “We, the doctors at the hospital, thought that maybe they were worried about security, so they brought them under the cover of the night. They were afraid of road traffic to see the red cross on their vehicles. People would know,” Andrei said. The Russians also tried to bring the dead to the hospital, he said, adding: “They didn’t know what to do with them.”

    A metal bullet on white medical gauze dotted with blood stains.
    Andrei secretly photographed a bullet he said he removed from a Russian soldier’s neck on March 8. Obtained by CNN

    Anna Krasulina, spokeswoman for exiled Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, told Ukrainian parliamentary TV channel “Rada” in March that the morgues in Mazyr were flooded with the bodies of dead Russian soldiers. In April, Tsikhanouskaya met with members of the US State Department in Washington, DC, handing over evidence of Lukashenko’s involvement in the war in Ukraine. The documents, seen by CNN, detail how Belarus provided key infrastructure to Russia, including missile launch positions, railway lines, and medical assistance.

    Citing open source information, Franak Viačorka, Tsikhanouskaya’s chief political adviser, told CNN that Russians were using hospitals in both the Gomel and Brest regions between the start of the war and April, but that there were also “many cases when doctors refused to take Russian soldiers,” describing this as grassroots resistance. He added that Russians have not been using infrastructure like hospitals in Belarus since April.


    “There were more wounded, in need of an operation, than we had operating tables.”

    – Andrei


    Mazyr was one of at least three hospitals in Gomel region that treated Russian casualties, according to medical and security sources, who estimated that the facilities collectively cared for hundreds of soldiers. Mikalai, a doctor who left the region and whose name has also been changed for his safety, said that the Regional Clinical Hospital and the Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology were among those providing treatment, but that the latter was largely operating with Russian medical staff brought in for the war.

    After receiving a patient transferred from the Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Mikalai said that he had been curious about how the hospital was operating. So, late one night, he drove slowly past the complex. “I saw when it started getting dark, military medical buses coming to the hospital … green-colored ‘PAZ’ vehicles, with their windows covered with white cloth,” he said.

    Azarau, the head of ByPol, said that the Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology was used to treat Russian servicemen who took part in the assault on the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, some of whom showed signs of radiation poisoning. The hospital was originally built in the early 1990s to provide specialized medical care to the local population affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

    Mikalai said it was no surprise that the Belarusian and Russian authorities went to great lengths to keep the reality of what was happening behind closed doors in these hospitals a secret. “A great number of wounded young soldiers is a dirty, dirty stain that does not correlate with the idea of this great Russian invasion,” he said, adding that the authorities wanted to give the impression that the situation was under control and reports of a huge number of casualties were fake. “But this is the bad truth … they tried to hide it.”

    Unpicking the role that Belarus has played in the Ukraine war has taken on new urgency since Lukashenko announced in October that Russian soldiers would deploy to the country to form a new, “regional grouping” and carry out joint exercises with Belarusian troops, raising fears that he might draw the country more directly into the conflict.

    “The fact is that Belarus long ago ceded its sovereignty in significant ways to Russia,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a briefing on October 12, responding to a question about Belarus’ posturing, which the United States is monitoring closely. “The fact that President Putin has been able to use what should be sovereign Belarusian territory as a staging ground, the fact that brutal attacks against the people of Ukraine have emanated from a sovereign third country, Belarus in this case, it is another testament to the fact that the Lukashenko regime does not have the best interests of its people at heart.”

    Not only has Russia infringed on Belarus’ sovereignty, it has also posed a serious challenge to NATO — three members of the alliance share a border with Belarus. Putin has been laying the groundwork to transform Belarus into a vassal state for some time. After a rigged presidential election in 2020 cemented Lukashenko’s long reign, triggering widespread pro-democracy protests, he clung to power with the help of Putin. Russia backed the ruthless crackdown on demonstrations, and gave Belarus a $1.5 billion lifeline to evade the brunt of sanctions, but it came with strings attached. Beholden to the Kremlin, Lukashenko has supported Russia’s military actions from the sidelines, so far avoiding sending his own troops into the fray. But he may be forced to shift his position, as Putin racks up losses.

    “As far as our participation in the special military operation in Ukraine is concerned, we are participating in it. We do not hide it. But we are not killing anyone,” Lukashenko said in early October. “We offer medical aid to people. We’ve treated people if necessary,” he added.

    Still, many in Belarus are terrified that might change. A majority of Belarusians do not want their country to take part in the war, according to a recent Chatham House poll conducted online, which found that only 5% favored sending troops to support Russia. Andrej Stryzhak, a Belarusian human rights activist and founder of BySol, an initiative that supports victims of political persecution in Belarus, who himself faces politically motivated charges for “funding extremist formations,” said that the organization saw a surge in requests for help when the invasion started. The group set up a Telegram channel with advice on how to flee abroad, for people who don’t support the war or were afraid of being mobilized themselves. “We took more than 10,000 consultations … and now we have a Telegram channel with 30,000 subscribers,” Stryzhak said, adding: “It’s very intensive work for us.”

    Andrei reached out to BySol for help getting out of the country, but in late August, with the borders to Ukraine and Russia largely impassible, they were unable to assist him. In the end, he was aided by an informal network of Belarusian dissidents living in exile in Lithuania, who identify potential crossing points. They said they too have seen a surge in the number of Belarusian men fleeing for fear they will be forced to fight in Ukraine.

    Video: Watch CNN’s interview with a Belarusian doctor who treated Russian casualties

    Having seen the havoc that the war has wrought first hand, Andrei said he was concerned that he might be sent into Ukraine as a combat medic. In Russia, doctors are increasingly coming under pressure. Earlier this month, Russian state-run news agency Tass reported that physicians in St. Petersburg received letters from authorities telling them not to leave the country for “security reasons,” and Russia’s parliament said around 3,000 doctors could be called up as part of Putin’s “partial mobilization” of troops.

    In late March, Andrei was arrested alongside dozens of other Belarusian doctors, many of whom specialized in surgery, on charges of corruption and receiving bribes, which he denies. After being jailed in the Belarusian capital Minsk for a month and a half, Andrei said he got the sense that their detention may have been an intimidation tactic — to make them think twice before leaving the country. When he was released, he said he was contacted by his local military branch and told to enlist in the army. “I was asked to come to the military enlistment office with my documents … Of course, I didn’t go there,” Andrei said. He fled the country shortly after.

    Now settled in another European country with his family, Andrei is relieved to no longer be wondering when or if he might be sent to war. Instead, he’s focused on sitting national medical exams so he can start to practice again in his new home.

    “Ukraine is very dear to me. I was worried about my close friends and family living there,” he said, adding that Belarus’ complicity in the war was unbearable. “We wrote to each other ‘Slava Ukraini,’ saying that Ukraine was going to win. My relatives said that we would all outlive all of this. And yet the bombs were being launched at them from the territory where I lived.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Can Putin’s ‘Butcher of Syria’ save Russia from another rout?

    Can Putin’s ‘Butcher of Syria’ save Russia from another rout?

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Russia’s General Sergei Surovikin is no stranger to mass murder and spreading terror.

    In Chechnya, the shaven-headed veteran officer, who has the physique of a wrestler and an expression to match, vowed to “destroy three Chechen fighters for every Russian soldier killed.” And he’s remembered bitterly in northern Syria for reducing much of the city of Aleppo to ruins.

    The 56-year-old air force general also oversaw the relentless targeting of clinics, hospitals and civilian infrastructure in rebel-held Idlib in 2019, an effort to break opponents’ will and send refugees fleeing to Europe via neighboring Turkey. The 11-month campaign “showed callous disregard for the lives of the roughly 3 million civilians in the area,” noted Human Rights Watch in a scathing report.

    Now he is repeating his Syrian playbook in Ukraine.

    Two weeks ago, Vladimir Putin appointed Surovikin as the overall commander of Russia’s so-called special military operation, to the delight of Moscow’s hawks. Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov praised Surovikin as “a real general and a warrior.” He will “improve the situation,” Kadyrov added in a social media post.

    But reversing a series of stunning battlefield Ukrainian victories and shifting the tide of the war may be beyond even the ruthless Surovikin. Ukrainians have shown throughout the year they’re made of stern stuff and aren’t going to be intimidated by war crimes — and they’ve endured bombing and bombardments before by equally unscrupulous Russian generals.

    But Western military officials and analysts note there are already signs of more tactical coherence than was seen under his predecessor General Alexander Dvornikov. “His war tactics totally breach the rules of war but unfortunately they proved effective in Syria,” a senior British military intelligence officer told POLITICO.  “As a war strategist he has a record of effectiveness — however vicious,” the officer added. 

    Surovikin and other officials point to the targeting of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure with a massive wave of attacks the past week. Strikes at the weekend resulted in power outages across the country leaving more than a million households without electricity, the deputy head of the Ukrainian presidency, Kyrylo Tymoshenko, said Saturday.

    “These are vile strikes on critical objects,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly video address. “The world can and must stop this terror,” he said. “The geography of this latest mass strike is very wide,” Zelenskyy added. “Of course we don’t have the technical ability to knock down 100 percent of the Russian missiles and strike drones. I am sure that, gradually, we will achieve that, with help from our partners. Already now, we are downing a majority of cruise missiles, a majority of drones.”

    Intercepting a majority of what’s being fired by the Russians at Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, though, isn’t enough to halt the disruption Surovikin is endeavoring to provoke with the strikes. The scale of the damage caused to Ukraine’s power system at the weekend exceeded what was inflicted in the first wave of strikes on energy infrastructure on October 10, according to a Telegram post by Ukrenergo, the state grid operator.

    Cheap shots

    Around a third of the country’s power stations have been destroyed since the attacks started, Ukrainian authorities say.

    And for Russia the cost of the aerial assault is cheap, relying as it does on Iran’s Shahed-136 unmanned aerial vehicles, basically flying bombs nicknamed “kamikaze drones” because they are destroyed on impact.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin with then-PM Dmitry Medvedev and Sergei Surovikin in 2017 | Pool photo by Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images

    The drones, which have a flying range of 2,500 kilometers, loiter over a target until ordered to attack. With a wingspan of 2.5 meters they can be difficult to identify on radar and cost only an estimated €20,000 to make, compared, say, to cruise missiles costing up to €2 million to produce.

    Last week the White House said Iranian drone experts — trainers and tech support workers — have been deployed on the ground in Russia-annexed Crimea to help launch attacks on Ukraine. “Tehran is now directly engaged on the ground, and through the provision of weapons that are impacting civilians and civilian infrastructure in Ukraine,” said national security spokesman John Kirby.

    But turning to Iran for assistance also demonstrates a Russian weakness, says a Pentagon adviser. That they are using Iranian drones suggests they really are running out of missiles. “I don’t think their capabilities are anyway as good as they claim. I’ve always thought that the Russians were a bit of a hollow force. They don’t have depth in range with capabilities and they can’t really apply them very effectively. The fact that they’re going to Iranians for drone technology, that’s a pretty sad statement about the once vaunted Russian military-industrial or Soviet military-industrial complex,” the adviser told POLITICO.

    And while the drones are helping to cause considerable damage, their light explosive payloads at 36 kilograms present the Russians with a problem – they are not powerful enough to cause “decommissioning” damage to big power stations and so are being aimed at smaller sub-stations instead. Eventually, too, Western and Ukrainian experts will find ways to jam the GPS system the drones depend on to shift them off target. So, they may have a short shelf life of effectiveness, say Western officials.

    Not having sufficient depth in terms of capabilities isn’t the only problem facing Russian generals. One of the most debilitating problems for the Russians has been the lack of small-unit leadership and competent supervision on the battlefield.

    Ukrainian servicemen and police officers stand guard in a street after a drone attack in Kyiv on October 17, 2022 | Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images

    The Ukrainians since 2014 have been steeped in U.S. military doctrine and training, which focuses on building a professional corps of corporals and sergeants who understand the big picture and are given the delegated authority to make decisions on the battlefield as they lead their units, according to John Barranco, an analyst at the Atlantic Council who oversaw the U.S. Marines’ initial operations in Afghanistan after the 9/11 terror attacks and served in Iraq.

    The failure of the Russians to build up such a cadre has plagued them in Ukraine and it isn’t a deficiency Surovikin has time to rectify. In fact, the situation is likely to worsen with the Kremlin now throwing into inadequately battle-trained conscripts from Putin’s partial mobilization order.

    Russian retreat

    After just a handful of days’ training, conscripts are already dying. And draftees are being sent to what is now the crucial front in this stage of the war — the southern port city of Kherson — where Russian authorities have ordered all residents to leave ahead of a closing advance by Ukrainian troops.

    Kherson city is the only regional capital Russia has managed to seize since the invasion began. It was a key prize in establishing a land bridge between Crimea and Ukraine’s south, as well as opening the way for a potential assault on the major Black Sea port of Odesa.

    But a Ukrainian counteroffensive that started in the summer is now bearing down on Kherson city. Russia’s tactical position in the area is highly compromised, with units of paratroopers dug in on the west bank of the Dnieper River, where they are highly vulnerable. “From a battlefield geometry point of view, it is a terrible position for the Russians,” Jack Watling, a land warfare expert at Britain’s Royal United Services Institute, told POLITICO.

    Watling, who’s been conducting operational analysis with Ukraine’s general staff, says the Russians on the west bank are among their most capable troops but can’t be resupplied reliably “at the scale needed to make them competitive” and they won’t be able to counterattack.

    “The Ukrainians have the initiative and can dictate the tempo,” Watling said. “From a purely military point of view, the Russians would be much better off withdrawing from Kherson city and focusing on holding the river [from the east bank] and then putting the bulk of their forces on the Zaporizhzhia axis, but for political reasons they have been slow to do that and seem to ready to fight a delaying action.”

    A view taken on October 19, 2022 shows a road sign reading “Kherson” in the town of Armyansk in the north of Moscow-annexed Crimean peninsula bordering the Russian-controlled Kherson region in southern Ukraine | AFP via Getty Images

    That seems in line with what Ukraine’s general staff reported at the weekend. Russian troop movements have been occurring in the Kherson region with some units preparing for urban combat, while others have been withdrawing.

    In short, Surovikin is being forced to try to pull off one of the most difficult of military maneuvers — an orderly retreat to reposition forces, including draftees with scant training and units that have no cohesion. When more experienced Russian troops tried the same move near Kharkiv in northeast Ukraine last month, they suffered a rout.

    Thuggery alone won’t save Russian conscripts from motivated and agile Ukrainian forces. Whether Surovikin has the tactical skills to navigate a dangerous retreat will be what counts.

    [ad_2]

    Jamie Dettmer

    Source link

  • Liberal U.S. lawmakers withdraw Ukraine letter after blowback

    Liberal U.S. lawmakers withdraw Ukraine letter after blowback

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, Oct 25 (Reuters) – A group of liberal U.S. Democrats withdrew a letter to the White House urging a negotiated settlement to the war in Ukraine, the group’s chairperson, Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal, said on Tuesday, after blowback from within their own party.

    “The Congressional Progressive Caucus hereby withdraws its recent letter to the White House regarding Ukraine,” Jayapal said in a statement. She added: “The letter was drafted several months ago, but unfortunately was released by staff without vetting.” read more

    The letter signed by 30 caucus members became public on Monday, leaving some other Democrats feeling blindsided just two weeks before Nov. 8 mid-term elections that will determine which political party controls Congress. And it appeared just as Republicans face concerns that their party might cut back military and humanitarian aid that has helped Ukraine since Russia invaded in February.

    Several members of the Progressive Caucus issued statements expressing support for Ukraine, noting that they had joined other Democrats in voting for billions of dollars in aid for Ukraine.

    Some said they had signed the letter months earlier and that things had changed. “Timing in diplomacy is everything. I signed this letter on June 30, but a lot has changed since then. I wouldn’t sign it today,” Representative Sara Jacobs said on Twitter.

    Representative Jamie Raskin, who also signed, said in a statement he was glad to learn it had been withdrawn and noted “its unfortunate timing and other flaws.”

    Ukraine’s troops have been waging a successful counteroffensive, with forces advancing into Russian-occupied Kherson province and threatening a major defeat for Moscow.

    ‘BLANK CHECK’

    The letter drew immediate pushback, including from within the Progressive Caucus. “Russia doesn’t acknowledge diplomacy, only strength. If we want Ukraine to continue as a free and democratic country that it is, we must support their fight,” Democratic Representative Ruben Gallego, a caucus member, said in a written comment.

    Representative Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, told Punchbowl News in an interview this month that there would be no “blank check” for Ukraine if Republicans take over. That fed speculation that Republicans might stop aid to Kyiv, although many members of the party said that was not their intention.

    In her statement withdrawing the letter, Jayapal said that, because of the timing, the letter was being conflated as being equivalent to McCarthy’s remark.

    “Nothing could be further from the truth. Every war ends with diplomacy, and this one will too after Ukrainian victory. The letter sent yesterday, although restating that basic principle, has been conflated with GOP opposition to support for the Ukrainians’ just defense of their national sovereignty. As such, it is a distraction at this time and we withdraw the letter,” Jayapal’s statement said.

    State Department spokesperson Ned Price said both Democrats and Republicans support continued assistance for Ukraine and he did not think the letter would put U.S. support into question.

    “In recent days, we’ve heard from Democrats, we’ve heard from Republicans, that they understand the need to continue to stand with Ukraine, to stand for the principles that are at play here,” he told a news briefing.

    Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting by Richard Cowan and Doina Chiacu; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Cynthia Osterman

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iran will not remain indifferent if proven Russia using its drones in Ukraine – official

    Iran will not remain indifferent if proven Russia using its drones in Ukraine – official

    [ad_1]

    DUBAI, Oct 24 (Reuters) – Iran will not remain indifferent if it is proven that its drones are being used by Russia in the Ukraine war, the Iranian foreign minister said on Monday, amid allegations the Islamic Republic has supplied drones to Moscow to attack Ukraine.

    “If it is proven to us that Iranian drones are being used in the Ukraine war against people, we should not remain indifferent,” state media cited Hossein Amirabdollahian as saying.

    However, Amirabdollahian said defence cooperation between Tehran and Moscow will continue.

    Britain, France and Germany on Friday called for a United Nations probe of accusations Russia has used Iranian-origin drones to attack Ukraine, allegedly violating a U.N. Security Council resolution.

    Citing diplomats and officials, Reuters reported last week that in addition to more drones, Iran had promised to provide Russia with surface-to-surface missiles.

    Writing by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Alex Richardson and Jonathan Oatis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. 101st Airborne Division deployed near Ukraine’s border

    U.S. 101st Airborne Division deployed near Ukraine’s border

    [ad_1]

    U.S. 101st Airborne Division deployed near Ukraine’s border – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The 101st Airborne Division from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, now headquartered in Europe for the first time since World War II. Charlie D’Agata joined America’s most forward troops near Ukraine’s border.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sunday, October 23. Russia’s War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine

    Sunday, October 23. Russia’s War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Dispatches from Ukraine. Day 242.

    As Russia’s attack on Ukraine continues and the war rages on, reliable sources of information are critical. Forbes gathers information and provides updates on the situation.

    By Polina Rasskazova

    On the night of October 23, the Russian army again attacked the south of Ukraine with kamikaze drones. Eleven Russian drones were destroyed by the forces of Ukraine’s Operational Command “South” in the Mykolaiv region, three more Shahed-136s were shot down by other units of the Defense Forces of the South of Ukraine. The Ukrainian parliament informed about cooperating with the companies supplying drone components to Iran in order to stop that. “At the same time, we are working with Iran’s neighbors to stop or delay the supply of drones to Russia,” the member of the parliament said.

    Mykolaiv Region. At night, the Russian military fired S-300 missiles at one of the districts of the city. As a result of shelling, three civilians were injured. According to the Head of the Mykolaiv Regional State Administration, Vitaliy Kim, one of the rockets hit a five-story residential building, completely destroying an apartment on the fifth floor.

    Zaporizhzhia. Tonight, the Russian military launched an attack on the city of Zaporizhia with “Shahed-136” kamikaze drones, as well as surrounding towns, using S-300 missiles. “One of the drones hit an administrative building in the regional center. According to preliminary information, there are no victims,” reported the head of the Zaporizhzhia Regional State Administration. As a result of rocket fire in one of the villages of the Zaporizhzhia district, private houses and a school were damaged.

    Dnipropetrovsk Region. In the morning, the Russians again attacked the city of Nikopol with artillery or missiles. Six people were injured: four men and two women. According to the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, as a result of the attack, residential houses, a kindergarten and three private enterprises were damaged in the city.

    Donetsk Region. 20 strikes were carried out by Russian troops on the cities of the Donetsk region in Eastern Ukraine. The Russian army fired with the BM-27 Uragan, the BM-21 Grad, and artillery, the National Police of Ukraine reports. As a result of the attack, 14 civilian objects were destroyed and damaged—10 residential buildings, a kindergarten, and a store. Three people were killed as a result of night shelling of Kurdyumivka in the Toretsk community. “Artillery shells destroyed two houses. A couple died under the debris of the house, and a man died as a result of the fire,” the head of Donetsk, Ova Pavlo Kyrylenko, wrote in the Telegram channel. Also, Kyrylenko called on the residents of the region to evacuate immediately so as not to “turn themselves into a target for the Russians.”

    [ad_2]

    Katya Soldak, Forbes Staff

    Source link

  • Face The Nation: Kreb, Swisher, Hochstein, Williams, D’Agata

    Face The Nation: Kreb, Swisher, Hochstein, Williams, D’Agata

    [ad_1]

    Face The Nation: Kreb, Swisher, Hochstein, Williams, D’Agata – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Missed the second half of the show? The latest on the role of disinformation and threats ahead of the midterms; a focus group of “Pressured parents” and their midterm priorities; Biden’s adviser on the strategic release of more oil from reserve if needed; Ukrainian forces push counteroffensive against Russian troops; and U.S. troops bolster NATO allies bordering Ukraine.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia defense chief makes unfounded claims of Kyiv ready to use ‘dirty bomb’

    Russia defense chief makes unfounded claims of Kyiv ready to use ‘dirty bomb’

    [ad_1]

    Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu on Sunday had telephone calls with his French, British and Turkish counterparts in which he made unfounded claims that Ukraine might be preparing to use a “dirty bomb,” according to Russian readouts of the conversations.

    The conversations took place after Russian President Vladimir Putin recently raised the prospect of using nuclear weapons in the war he launched against Ukraine. And after Shoigu faced intensifying political pressure over a series of disorderly retreats in Ukraine.

    The calls came as Russia continues a mass evacuation of civilians from occupied Kherson in southern Ukraine and defense analysts believe that the movement of people is setting the scene for Moscow to withdraw its troops from a significant part of the region. But among EU diplomats, there are fears that Moscow is only setting the scene for things to get worse.

    During the call with French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu, they discussed the situation in Ukraine, “which is rapidly deteriorating,” according to the Russian readout of the call. And Shoigu conveyed “his concerns about possible provocations by Ukraine with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’,” the Russian ministry said without giving any further detail.

    The same content of the readout was provided on the call with Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar.

    The Russian readout of the call with U.K. Defense Minister Ben Wallace talks only about the risk of a “dirty bomb.” However, in none of the readouts does Moscow provide any evidence for its claims.

    The U.K. said that “Shoigu alleged that Ukraine was planning actions facilitated by Western countries, including the U.K., to escalate the conflict in Ukraine,” according to a U.K. statement. “The Defense Secretary refuted these claims and cautioned that such allegations should not be used as a pretext for greater escalation,” it said.

    No statement on the call was immediately made available by the defense ministries of France and Turkey.

    On Friday, Shoigu spoke with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin for the first time since May, and, according to a Pentagon readout, in the call “Austin emphasized the importance of maintaining lines of communication amid the ongoing war against Ukraine.”

    Shoigu spoke with Austin again on Sunday, according to the Russian defense ministry. In this case, the Russian readout says only that “they discussed situation in Ukraine.”

    A dirty bomb is a bomb that combines conventional explosives, such as dynamite, with radioactive materials. For Dara Massicot, an analyst at U.S. research company Rand Corporation, “this reads like Russian false flag groundwork.”

    [ad_2]

    Jacopo Barigazzi

    Source link

  • Russian fighter jet crashes into building in Siberia, killing 2 pilots

    Russian fighter jet crashes into building in Siberia, killing 2 pilots

    [ad_1]

    Moscow — A Russian warplane crashed into a residential building in the Siberian city of Irkutsk Sunday, killing both crewmembers — the second incident in less than a week in which a combat jet has crashed in a residential area. 

    The accidents appeared to reflect the growing strain that the fighting in Ukraine has put on the Russian air force.
     
    Irkutsk Gov. Igor Kobzev said the Su-30 fighter jet came down on a private, two-story building housing two families. There were no casualties on the ground.

    Irkutsk, a major industrial center of more than 600,000 in eastern Siberia, is home to an aircraft factory producing the Su-30s.
     
    The Su-30 is a supersonic twin-engine, two-seat fighter that has been a key component of the Russian air force and also has been used by China, India and many other countries.
     
    The United Aircraft Corporation, a state-controlled conglomerate of Russian aircraft-making plants, said in a statement that the plane came down during a training flight before its delivery to the air force. The jet carried no weapons during the flight.
     
    The cause of the crash wasn’t immediately known and an official probe has started.

    A surveillance cam video posted on Russian social networks showed the fighter coming down in a nearly vertical dive. Other videos showed the building engulfed by flames and firefighters deployed to extinguish the blaze.

    Russian military plane crashes into residential building in Irkutsk
    Firefighters work at a site of a plane crash into a residential building in the city of Irkutsk, Russia, on Oct. 23, 2022.

    Russian Emergencies Ministry/Handout via Reuters


    The crash came less than a week after another Russian warplane crashed near an apartment building in the Sea of Azov port of Yeysk and exploded in a giant fireball, killing 15 and injuring another 19.

    Sunday’s crash was the 11th reported noncombat crash of a Russian warplane since Moscow sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24. Military experts have noted that as the number of Russian military flights increased sharply during the fighting, so did the crashes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s Starlink internet satellite units used by Ukraine face funding issues

    Elon Musk’s Starlink internet satellite units used by Ukraine face funding issues

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s Starlink internet satellite units used by Ukraine face funding issues – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Elon Musk said his company SpaceX cannot keep paying for the Starlink Internet satellite units used in Ukraine. Officials say the service is crucial for commanding troops on the battlefield. CBS News correspondent Holly Williams has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian Troops Could Cause A Lot Of Damage And Death As They Flee Southern Ukraine

    Russian Troops Could Cause A Lot Of Damage And Death As They Flee Southern Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    The Russian army is retreating from Kherson. It’s poised to leave behind it a lot of destruction and dead bodies.

    Kherson, a port at the mouth of the Dnipro River on the Black Sea, was one of Russia’s biggest prizes as its forces rolled into Ukraine in late February, widening a war that began eight years ago with Russia’s illegal annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.

    In Macth, disorganized Ukrainian forces gave up Kherson, with its strategic port and railyard and prewar population of 300,000, without much of a fight. For the next seven months, Kherson anchored Russian positions on the southern front.

    As summer turned to fall, liberating Kherson was a top priority for Kyiv. Holding on to the city was one of Moscow’s top priorities. In May, the Ukrainian army—recently rearmed with new American-made howitzers and rocket-launchers—began striking Russian supply lines around Kherson, and even holed the Antonovskiy Bridge, the city’s main span across the Dnipro.

    The 49th Combined Arms Army and other Russian forces in Kherson Oblast frayed. The Kremlin shifted from the east to the south to bolster the 49th CAA, but that left gaps in Russian lines in the east—gaps the Ukrainian army exploited with a counteroffensive starting in early September.

    Ukrainian troops in the south counterattacked at the same time. The southern counteroffensive faced more resistance than the eastern counteroffensive did, but it still made swift progress east of Kherson.

    A regiment of Russian coastal troops shattered. A Russian mountain brigade retreated as a Ukrainian mountain brigade advanced. A Russian airborne division briefly held off a Ukrainian marine brigade as desperate Russians fled south toward Beryslav, where a dam across the Dnipro offers a durable escape route out of Kherson Oblast north of the river.

    Gen. Sergei Surovikin, the recently appointed commander of Russian forces in Ukraine, on Tuesday told Russian media “a difficult situation has emerged” in Kherson.

    The escape began two weeks ago and accelerated this week. “Russian forces continue to reinforce crossing points over the Dnipro River, and have completed a barge bridge alongside the damaged Antonovskiy Bridge in Kherson,” the U.K. Defense Ministry said.

    More and more Russian troops—and their civilian support personnel—crossed the Dnipro, sometimes under Ukrainian bombardment. Russian occupation authorities even ordered civilians in Kherson to cross the Dnipro. It’s not clear many will obey.

    As Ukrainian brigades and the wet Ukrainian winter approach, the Kremlin is prepared to give up Kherson. On its way out, it’s going to inflict as much pain as possible—on its own forces and the Ukrainians. There are reports the Russian army is forcing recent draftees, who nearly to a man are unfit and untrained, to fight a rearguard action in order to buy time for better troops to reach Beryslav.

    Meanwhile, Russian occupation officials are opening the dam, sending more water downriver toward Kherson and the river delta adjacent to the city. The flooding could complicate Ukrainian operations.

    There’s an apocalyptic option. Once they’ve brought across the river all their best troops—and whatever loot they can grab—the Russians could blow the dam. Flood waters would inundate Kherson and even creep north toward the nearby free city of Mykolaiv, a major base of operations for Ukrainian forces in the south.

    The clock is ticking. The weather is getting colder and wetter and the mud is getting deeper. Most units on both sides of the conflict aren’t ready to wage war in the mud. The Russian retreat, and the Ukrainian offensive, both are likely to slow in the coming weeks.

    If the Russians are going to blow the dam, they’re probably going to do it soon. Ukrainian commanders know this, and they’re not without options to limit the damage.

    They could land special operations forces on the dam. They could speed up the pace of their operations, aiming to liberate Beryslav and Kherson before the Russians do their worst. If the Ukrainians move faster, Russia’s retreat could turn into a rout. “Russian forces likely intend to continue that withdrawal over the next several weeks,” the Institute for the Study of War in Washington, D.C., said Friday, “but may struggle to withdraw in good order if Ukrainian forces choose to attack.”

    Follow me on TwitterCheck out my website or some of my other work hereSend me a secure tip

    [ad_2]

    David Axe, Forbes Staff

    Source link

  • Russia unleashes barrage of missiles in Ukraine

    Russia unleashes barrage of missiles in Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Russia unleashes barrage of missiles in Ukraine – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Russia​ unleashed a barrage of missiles in Ukraine overnight. Ukrainian officials confirmed at least half a dozen regions were targeted, including the capital city, Kyiv.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Friday, October 21. Russia’s War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine

    Friday, October 21. Russia’s War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Dispatches from Ukraine. Day 240.

    As Russia’s attack on Ukraine continues and the war rages on, reliable sources of information are critical. Forbes gathers information and provides updates on the situation.

    By Polina Rasskazova

    Since the beginning of Russia’s the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the amount of damage caused to the infrastructure of Ukraine has reached more than $127 billion, according to a report from the “Russia Will Pay” project of the KSE Institute. In the period from February 24 to September 1, 2022, the largest share in the total amount of losses belongs to residential buildings at $50.5 billion. In second place in terms of the amount of losses is the sphere of infrastructure at $35.3 billion.

    Cumulative direct losses from destruction and damage to public sector objects (social objects and institutions, educational, scientific and health care institutions, cultural buildings, sports facilities, administrative buildings, etc.) amounts to about $11.6 billion. Losses of business assets are minimal at $9.9 billion and growing rapidly.

    The armed forces of Ukraine continue to liberate territories captured earlier this year by Russia. The Deputy Head of the Office of the President, Kyrylo Tymoshenko, reported that as of today, 551 settlements have been de-occupied in the Kharkiv region. “Since the beginning of de-occupation measures, 1,685 war crimes have been registered in the region.”

    There is still no power supply in the liberated territories, but a reserve of equipment and fuel for alternative energy sources will be developed, Tymoshenko added. The head of the Department of Emergency Services in the Kharkiv region reported that since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the bodies of 265 people were recovered from the rubble of destroyed buildings, and 302 people were rescued.

    Also, 88 settlements with 11,827 civilians have been liberated in the Kherson region. Work on de-mining the area continues. “A total of 156 war crimes have been documented since the beginning of the de-occupation of the Kherson region.”z

    Zaporizhzhia. On the morning of October 21, the Russian military attacked the regional center of the city with S-300 missiles. Six explosions were heard in different areas of the city. According to the head of the Zaporizhzhia Regional State Administration, five people were injured, including policemen, “who were returning from an assignment.” A residential building and infrastructure facilities were destroyed.

    As a result of the attack, a fire broke out in a residential high-rise building and the gas system was damaged. According to the Zaporizhia Regional Military Administration, the Russians also fired shells at a school in one of the districts of Zaporizhia, damaging the roof and breaking the windows.

    Kharkiv Region. In the morning, Kharkiv was shelled with S-300 missiles. As a result of the Russian attack, six people were injured. The missiles struck industrial infrastructure in one of the city districts. One of the Kharkiv large enterprises was attacked, according to the mayor of the city, Ihor Terekhov.

    Donetsk Region. Attacks on the eastern part of Ukraine are ongoing. At night, Russian troops shelled several communities in the region along the front lines. Residential buildings, power lines and civilian sectors of were damaged by artillery shelling. In the city of Bakhmut, as a result of an attack on the civilian sector, two people died, one was injured and seven houses were damaged, according to the information of the head of the Donetsk Regional State Administration. At least one person died, one more was injured in the Lysychansk direction.

    [ad_2]

    Katya Soldak, Forbes Staff

    Source link

  • Ukraine faces rolling blackouts after Russian strikes

    Ukraine faces rolling blackouts after Russian strikes

    [ad_1]

    Ukraine faces rolling blackouts after Russian strikes – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Ukrainian government is warning of rolling blackouts after Russian strikes destroyed 30% of the country’s power stations in just over a week. In addition, the U.S. said it has information that Iranian troops are on the ground supporting Russian drone attacks in Ukraine. Holly Williams has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. says Iranian troops

    U.S. says Iranian troops

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The White House said Thursday that the U.S. has evidence that Iranian troops are “directly engaged on the ground” in Crimea supporting Russian drone attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure and civilian population.

    National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters that Iran has sent a “relatively small number” of personnel to Crimea, a part of Ukraine unilaterally annexed by Russia in contravention of international law in 2014, to assist Russian troops in launching Iranian-made drones against Ukraine.

    Members of a branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps were dispatched to assist Russian forces on how to use the drones, according to a British government statement.

    “The information we have is that the Iranians have put trainers and tech support in Crimea, but it’s the Russians who are doing the piloting,” Kirby said.

    He added that the Biden administration was looking at imposing new sanctions on Tehran and would look for ways to make it harder for Tehran to sell such weapons to Russia.

    The U.S. first revealed this summer that Russia was purchasing Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles to launch against Ukraine. In a contentious closed-door U.N. Security Council meeting late Wednesday, the U.S., U.K. and France accused Iran of selling drones to Russia in violation of a U.N. Security Council ban against their transfer. Iran and Russia both denied the sale of the munitions.

    U.S. officials believe that Iran may have deployed military personnel to assist the Russians in part because of the Russian’s lack of familiarity with the Iran-made drones. Declassified U.S. intelligence findings showed that Russians faced technical problems with the Iranian drones soon after taking delivery of the weapons in August.

    “The systems themselves were suffering failures and not performing to the standards that apparently the customers expected,” Kirby said. “So the Iranians decided to move in some trainers and some technical support to help the Russians use them with with better lethality.”

    The Biden administration released further details about Iran’s involvement in assisting Russia’s war in Ukraine at a sensitive moment. The administration has levied new sanctions against Iran over the government’s brutal crackdown on antigovernment protests in recent weeks spurred by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who died in Iranian security custody.

    Morality police had detained Amini last month for not properly covering her hair with the Islamic headscarf, known as the hijab, which is mandatory for Iranian women. Amini collapsed at a police station and died three days later.

    Her death and the subsequent unrest have come as the administration tries to bring Iran back into compliance with the nuclear deal that was brokered by the Obama administration and scrapped by the Trump administration.

    But Kirby said that the administration has little hope for reviving the Iran nuclear deal soon.

    “We’re not focused on the on the diplomacy at this point,” Kirby said. “What we are focused on is making sure that we’re holding the regime accountable for the way they’re treating peaceful protesters in their country and supporting those protesters.”

    The White House spoke out about Iranian assistance to Russia as Britain on Thursday announced new sanctions on Iranian officials and businesses as the Russians use the drones to bombard civilian infrastructure.

    “These cowardly drone strikes are an act of desperation,” British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said in a statement. “By enabling these strikes, these individuals and a manufacturer have caused the people of Ukraine untold suffering. We will ensure that they are held to account for their actions.”

    Among the individuals hit with asset freezes and travel bans by the British were Major General Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, chairman of the armed forces general staff overseeing the army branches supplying Russia with drones; Brigadier General Seyed Hojjatollah Qureishi, a key Iranian negotiator in the deal;. and Brigadier General Saeed Aghajani, the head the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Aerospace Force UAV Command.

    Shahed Aviation Industries, the Iranian manufacturer of the drones being used by Russia, was also hit by an asset freeze.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Putin declares martial law in annexed regions

    Putin declares martial law in annexed regions

    [ad_1]

    Putin declares martial law in annexed regions – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Russian President Vladimir Putin is doubling down in Ukraine by declaring martial law in the four regions it illegally annexed. Russian troops are relocating up to 60,000 people in Kherson as they prepare for an expected Ukrainian counteroffensive. Holly Williams reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. accuses Iran of selling drones to Russia in violation of U.N. ban

    U.S. accuses Iran of selling drones to Russia in violation of U.N. ban

    [ad_1]

    In a contentious closed-door U.N. Security Council meeting late Wednesday, the U.S., U.K. and France accused Iran of selling drones to Russia in violation of a U.N. Security Council ban against the transfer of drones. Russia has used drones in a series of devastating attacks on Ukrainian cities this past week.

    Both Russia and Iran claimed to reporters that Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones, were not sold by Iran to Russia, and not used in conflict.

    Nate Evans, spokesperson and communications director for the U.S. Mission to the U.N., called for an “expert briefing” in the Security Council “on recent evidence that Russia illegally procured Iranian UAVs that it is using in its war on Ukraine.”

    Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s U.N. ambassador, wrote a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres Tuesday requesting U.N experts visit Ukraine to inspect the recovered UAVs which have been used to attack Ukrainian cities. The attacks have caused about 30% of Ukraine’s power to shut down.

    In his letter, Kyslytsya noted that the drones used in the attacks meet the requirements under U.N. Security Council resolution 2231, passed in 2015, which bans the transfer of drones which are capable of traveling more than 300 kilometers.

    Kyiv drone attack Ukraine
    People clear blast debris outside a house on Oct. 19, 2022 in Kyiv, Ukraine, where a couple was killed in a Russian drone strike two days beforehand. Recent Russian attacks around Kyiv and across Ukraine have targeted power plants and killed civilians.

    Ed Ram/Getty Images


    “The United States began warning in July that Iran was planning to transfer UAVs to Russia for use in Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine, and we now have abundant evidence that these UAVs are being used to strike Ukrainian civilians and critical civilian infrastructure,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a statement following the meeting.

    Russia’s Deputy U.N. Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy said that the 15-nation Security Council had no authority to send inspectors, an issue that will be taken up on Friday in an open Security Council meeting on Ukraine.

    Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s U.N. ambassador, denied that Iran transferred drones to Russia for use in the war.

    James Kariuki, U.K.’s deputy ambassador to the U.N., tweeted Wednesday that “Iran has obligations not to export these weapons.”

    On Wednesday, kamikaze drones launched by Russia struck power plants, and forced Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to convene an emergency meeting to avoid what he called a “breakdown of [Ukraine’s] energy system.”

    Beginning about a week ago, Russia launched a flurry of attacks using Iranian-made kamikaze drones packed with explosives.

    Since the first kamikaze drone was launched last month, Ukraine claims it has shot down 223 of them. U.S. officials estimate Ukraine has a roughly 50% success rate, which would mean Russia has launched nearly 450 drones.

    — David Martin contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Europe’s looming Ukraine fear: What happens if the US pulls back?

    Europe’s looming Ukraine fear: What happens if the US pulls back?

    [ad_1]

    Europe is waking up to a troubling reality: It may soon lose its NATO benefactor in Ukraine. 

    With conservatives poised to make gains in the upcoming U.S. elections, NATO’s most generous donor to Ukraine’s war effort may suddenly seem much more parsimonious in 2023.

    The possibility has put the spotlight on the gap between American and European aid.

    Already, it’s been a tough sell to get all of Europe’s NATO members to dedicate 2 percent of their economic output to defense spending. Now, they are under increasing pressure from the U.S. to go even further than that. And that comes amid an already tough conversation across Europe about how to refill its own dwindling military stockpiles while simultaneously funding Ukraine’s rebuild. 

    Still, the mantra among U.S. Republicans — whom polls show are favored to take control of one of two chambers of Congress after the November elections — has been that Europe needs to step up. 

    “Our allies,” said Tim Burchett, a Tennessee Republican who sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, “need to start addressing the problem in their own backyard before they ask us for any more involvement.” 

    While European governments have opened their wallets and military stockpiles to Ukraine at record levels, Washington’s military assistance to Kyiv still dwarfs Europe’s efforts. It’s a disparity Republicans are keen to highlight as they argue Russia’s war in Ukraine is a much greater threat to Europe than it is to the U.S.

    The result could be a changing tenor out of Washington if Congress falls into conservative control.

    “It’s horrible what the Russians are doing,” Burchett added, but said he sees China and drug cartels as “more threatening to the United States of America than what’s going on in Ukraine.”

    2 percent becomes the baseline

    Since Moscow launched its assault on Ukraine, European capitals have pledged over €200 billion in new defense spending. 

    NATO allies pledged in 2014 to aim to move towards spending 2 percent of GDP on defense within a decade, and an increasing number of governments are taking this promise seriously. But the Biden administration wants them to go even further.

    The 2 percent benchmark is just “what we would expect” from allies, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said earlier this month. “We would encourage countries to go above that 2 percent because we’re gonna have to invest more in expanding industrial bases and making sure that we’re doing the right things to replace” some of what was provided to Ukraine.

    Washington’s recently released “National Security Strategy” codified those expectations. 

    “As we step up our own sizable contributions to NATO capabilities and readiness,” the document says, “we will count on our Allies to continue assuming greater responsibility by increasing their spending, capabilities, and contributions.”

    It’s an aspiration that will be hard for many European policymakers, who themselves face economic woes at home. The U.K., for instance, has committed to hitting a 3 percent defense spending target but recently acknowledged the “shape” of its increase could change as recent policy changes roil the economy.

    The Biden administration has taken a path of friendly encouragement toward Europe, rather than haranguing its partners. 

    But Republicans are not as keen to take such a convivial tone. And if they take control of Congress, Republicans will have more of a say over the U.S. pursestrings — and the tone emerging from Washington. 

    “I think people are gonna be sitting in a recession and they’re not going to write a blank check to Ukraine,” House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy told Punchbowl news earlier this week. 

    “There’s the things [the Biden administration] is not doing domestically,” he added. “Not doing the border and people begin to weigh that. Ukraine is important, but at the same time it can’t be the only thing they do and it can’t be a blank check.”

    US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said earlier this month that the benchmark of 2 percent of GDP spent on defense is what is expected from allies | Omar Havana/Getty Images

    Republicans are likely eyeing the polls, which show a slim but growing chunk of Americans saying the U.S. is providing too much support to Ukraine. The figure has risen from 7 percent in March to 20 percent in September, according to a Pew Research Center poll. And it now stands at 32 percent among Republican-leaning voters. 

    So while President Joe Biden continues to ask Congress to approve more Ukraine aid packages, observers say there could be more skepticism in the coming months. 

    “It’s becoming harder because the sense is that we’re doing it all and the Europeans aren’t,” said Max Bergmann, director of the Europe Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

    And while noting that “in some ways, that’s unfair” due to the economic cost of the war to Europe, he said that on the military side aid for Ukraine and spending on defense industrial capacity is now “the new 2 percent.”

    In European capitals, policymakers are watching Washington closely. 

    “For Europeans, the idea that U.S. politics matters — that what happens in the midterm election will have implications for what will be expected of us from [our] U.S. ally — is something that is taken more and more seriously,” said Martin Quencez, a research fellow at the German Marshall Fund’s Paris office. 

    The Brussels view

    But back in Brussels, some officials insist there’s little reason for worry.

    “There is broad, bipartisan support for Ukraine,” said David McAllister, chair of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee. 

    Indeed, while the more Donald Trump-friendly wing of the Republican Party is opposed to continuing aid to Ukraine, more traditional Republicans have actually supported Biden’s aid for Kyiv.

    “If there was a Republican majority in congressional committees, I expect an impact on debates about which weapons to supply to Ukraine, for example,” McAllister said in an email. “Ultimately, though, the president maintains considerable control over foreign policy.”

    McAllister, a member of Germany’s conservative Christian Democratic Union, said Europe is already increasing its defensive investments and aid to Kyiv, pointing to an EU initiative to train Ukrainian soldiers and a recent bump up for an EU fund that reimburses countries for military supplies sent to Ukraine. 

    Polish MEP Witold Waszczykowski, the Foreign Affairs Committee’s vice chair, also said in an email that he doesn’t expect a Republican-dominated Congress to shift Ukraine policy — while urging Washington to put more pressure on Europe. 

    “Poland and other Eastern flank countries cannot persuade Europeans enough to support Ukraine,” said Waszczykowski, a member of the conservative ruling Law and Justice party.  

    The “smell of appeasement and expectations to come back to business as usual with Russia,” the Polish politician said, “dominates in European capitals and European institutions.” 

    Cristina Gallardo contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Lili Bayer

    Source link