ReportWire

Tag: war powers resolution

  • U.S. Senate moves to limit Trump’s war powers

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators have joined other Democrats and a handful of Republicans in passing a war powers resolution to limit President Donald Trump’s military action in Venezuela, as the U.S. House of Representatives prepares to vote on a similar measure.

    The Senate voted 52-47 Thursday to approve a resolution that prohibits further U.S. military action in Venezuela, unless Congress authorizes it. The move comes after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were brought to New York to face drug trafficking and weapons charges.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmq@E9 @7 E96 DE2E6’D &]$] D6?2E@CD[ s6>@4C2ED t=:K236E9 (2CC6? 2?5 t5 |2C<6J[ G@E65 😕 72G@C @7 E96 C6D@=FE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D ‘6?6KF6=2 E@52J 2?5 :E 4@F=5 36 rF32 @C vC66?=2?5 E@>@CC@H[” |2C<6J A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2] “(6 >FDE 5C2H E96 =:?6] }@ >@C6 H2CD 7@C @:=]”k^Am

    kAm%96 $6?2E6 2AAC@G2= @7 E96 >62DFC6 <:46C:42? 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

    kAm&]$] #6A] y:> |4v@G6C?[ 2 (@C46DE6C s6>@4C2E[ 92D 7:=65 2?@E96C H2C A@H6CD C6D@=FE:@? E92E 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 36 E2<6? FA 3J E96 w@FD6 ?6IE H66<] %96 AC@A@D2= 😀 324<65 3J 2== ?:?6 >6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E w@FD6 56=682E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“(6 42??@E =6E E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 5C28 FD :?E@ 2?@E96C 7@C6G6C H2C[” &]$] #6A] $6E9 |@F=E@?[ 2 $2=6> s6>@4C2E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6[ E9C@F89 E96:C 6=64E65 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D[ 564:56 H96? H6 8@ E@ H2C — 2?5 E96J 5@ ?@E H2?E H2C 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2]”k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2ED D2J %CF>A’D 2EE24< @? ‘6?6KF6=2 H2D :==682= 2?5 F?2FE9@C:K65] %CF>A 2C8F6D E96 >@G6 H2D ;FDE:7:65 E@ DE@A E96 7=@H @7 :==682= 5CF8D :?E@ E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 7C@> ‘6?6KF6=2 2?5 6I6CE &]$] 9686>@?J @G6C E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E =2D965 @FE 2E E96 7:G6 $6?2E6 #6AF3=:42?D[ :?4=F5:?8 |2:?6 $6?] $FD2? r@==:?D[ H9@ G@E65 H:E9 s6>@4C2ED @? %9FCD52J[ D2J:?8 E96J D9@F=5 ?@E 36 C66=64E65]k^Am

    kAm“#6AF3=:42?D D9@F=5 36 2D92>65 @7 E96 $6?2E@CD E92E ;FDE G@E65 H:E9 s6>@4C2ED 😕 2EE6>AE:?8 E@ E2<6 2H2J @FC !@H6CD E@ 7:89E 2?5 5676?5 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D @7 p>6C:42[” %CF>A A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2] “%9:D ‘@E6 8C62E=J 92>A6CD p>6C:42? $6=7 s676?D6 2?5 }2E:@?2= $64FC:EJ[ :>A65:?8 E96 !C6D:56?E’D pFE9@C:EJ 2D r@>>2?56C 😕 r9:67]”k^Am

    kAmx7 2AAC@G65 3J E96 $6?2E6[ E96 C6D@=FE:@? H@F=5 DE:== ?665 E@ C6EFC? E@ E96 w@FD6 7@C 2 7:?2= G@E6[ 2?5 :E 7246D 2 =:<6=J G6E@ 7C@> %CF>A] xE’D F?4=62C :7 6:E96C 492>36C H@F=5 92G6 E96 EH@E9:C5D >2;@C:EJ ?66565 E@ @G6CC:56 E96 AC6D:56?E’D G6E@]k^Am

    kAm%96 :DDF6 @7 D6EE:?8 =:>:ED @? E96 AC6D:56?E’D H2C A@H6CD 92D 364@>6 2 42>A2:8? :DDF6 😕 E96 &]$] $6?2E6 AC:>2CJ C246[ H:E9 |@F=E@? 4C:E:4:K:?8 |2C<6J 62C=:6C E9:D H66< @G6C 9:D DFAA@CE 7@C H2C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 😕 xC2B[ >@C6 E92? EH@ 564256D 28@ H96? 96 H2D 2 w@FD6 =2H>2<6C]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@?[ 2 7@C>6C |2C:?6 42AE2:?[ D6CG65 7@FC 4@>32E E@FC 5FE:6D 😕 xC2B 27E6C r@?8C6DD 2FE9@C:K65 >:=:E2CJ 24E:@? 😕 E96 |:55=6 t2DE6C? 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

    kAmw6 D2:5 E96 C6D@=FE:@? “H:== 7@C46 2 G@E6 E@ 9@=5 E96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 244@F?E23=6 7@C :ED 24E:@?D[ 2?5 AC6G6?E 2 H2C E92E E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 5@ ?@E H2?E 2?5 r@?8C6DD 5:5 ?@E 2AAC@G6]”k^Am

    kAm“pD D@>6@?6 H9@ 92D D66? 7:CDE92?5 E96 4@DE @7 CFD9:?8 :?E@ 4@?7=:4E 7@C E96 HC@?8 C62D@?D[ x 6C:42’D D@?D 2?5 52F89E6CD :?E@ 92C>’D H2J[” 96 D2:5] “x H:D9 >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 925 ?@E 235:42E65 E96:C C6DA@?D:3:=:EJ 29625 @7 E96 :?G2D:@? @7 xC2B]”k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Moulton hits Markey over prior support for war authorization

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — An expected vote by the U.S. Senate on a war powers resolution to restrict U.S. military action in Venezuela has become a campaign issue in the Democratic primary race between incumbent U.S. Sen. Ed Markey and challenger U.S Rep. Seth Moulton.

    The Senate on Thursday is poised to vote on a war powers resolution, filed by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, to halt President Donald Trump’s use of military force against Venezuela. The move comes after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were brought to New York to face drug trafficking and weapons charges.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms6>@4C2ED D2J %CF>A’D 2EE24< @? ‘6?6KF6=2 H2D :==682= 2?5 F?2FE9@C:K65] %CF>A 2C8F6D E96 >@G6 H2D ;FDE:7:65 E@ DE@A E96 7=@H @7 :==682= 5CF8D :?E@ E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 7C@> ‘6?6KF6=2 2?5 6I6CE &]$] 9686>@?J @G6C E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@?[ 2 7:G6E6C> s6>@4C2E D66<:?8 E@ F?D62E |2C<6J 😕 E96 $6AE6>36C AC:>2CJ[ 😀 2>@?8 E96 s6>@4C2ED 2?5 >:=:E2CJ G6E6C2?D 😕 r@?8C6DD FC8:?8 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 $6?2E6 E@ 2AAC@G6 C6DEC:4E:@?D @? E96 FD6 @7 >:=:E2CJ 7@C46 😕 E96 $@FE9 p>6C:42? 4@F?ECJ H96? :E 4@>6D FA 7@C 2 G@E6]k^Am

    kAmqFE |@F=E@? 2=D@ D66D E96 FA4@>:?8 G@E6 2D 2? @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ 9:89=:89E 9:D A@=:E:42= C:G2=’D DFAA@CE 7@C E96 H2C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 3J r@?8C6DD >@C6 E92? EH@ 564256D 28@[ H9:49 =625 E@ 9:D 56A=@J>6?E E@ xC2B 2D 2 J@F?8 |2C:?6 42AE2:?]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 G:56@ A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2[ |@F=E@? A@:?ED @FE E92E |2C<6J — 2D 2 >6>36C @7 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D — G@E65 😕 a__a E@ DFAA@CE C6D@=FE:@?D 2FE9@C:K:?8 E96 FD6 @7 7@C46 xC2B] |@F=E@? D6CG65 7@FC 4@>32E E@FCD @7 5FEJ 😕 xC2B]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4C:E:4:K65 |2C<6J 7@C G@E:?8 E@ 4@?7:C> 7@C>6C u=@C:52 $6?] |2C4@ #F3:@ 7@C $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6] %CF>A 92D C6A@CE65=J AFE #F3:@[ 2 =@?8E:>6 |25FC@ 4C:E:4[ 😕 492C86 @7 @G6CD66:?8 E96 &]$] >:=:E2CJ @A6C2E:@?D 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2]k^Am

    kAm“t5 |2C<6J G@E65 7@C E96 xC2B H2C 32D65 @? 2 =:6[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “%96? 96 2AA2C6?E=J =62C?65 ?@E9:?8 2?5 G@E65 E@ CF336C DE2>A |2C4@ #F3:@[ H9@ 😀 D6?5:?8 EC@@AD :?E@ ‘6?6KF6=2 32D65 @? 2 =:6]”k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 92D 42==65 %CF>A’D F?:=2E6C2= :?4FCD:@? 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 “xC2B a]_” 2?5 😀 2>@?8 s6>@4C2ED H9@ 2C8F6 E92E E96 4@?7=:4E 😀 23@FE D6:K:?8 E96 4@F?ECJ’D @:= C6D6CG6D[ ?@E 5CF8 EC277:4<:?8 @C E6CC@C:D>]k^Am

    kAm“(6’G6 8@EE2 DE@A DFAA@CE:?8 E9:D #6AF3=:42? H2C >@?86C:?8] xE’D ?@E E96 <:?5 @7 =6256CD9:A E92E H6 ?665[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “p?5 x 5@?’E E9:?< $6?2E@C |2C<6J F?56CDE2?5D E96 DE2<6D 7@C J@F?8 A6@A=6 =:<6 >JD6=7 H9@ 2C6 D6?E E@ 7:89E 2?5 5:6 😕 E96D6 H2C E92E H6 5@?’E ?665]”k^Am

    kAmx? C6DA@?D6[ |2C<6J’D @77:46 :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E A@:?E:?8 @FE E92E E96 G6E6C2? =2H>2<6C 324<65 2 D:>:=2C H2C A@H6CD C6D@=FE:@? E92E 42>6 FA 7@C 2 G@E6 😕 E96 $6?2E6 😕 }@G6>36C[ H9:49 “H@F=5 92G6 3=@4<65 s@?2=5 %CF>A 7C@> 2FE9@C:K:?8 >:=:E2CJ DEC:<6D @? ‘6?6KF6=2]” %96 C6D@=FE:@? 72:=65 E@ A2DD 2>:5 #6AF3=:42? @AA@D:E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“(96? $6?2E@C z2:?6 3C:?8D 9:D C6D@=FE:@? E@ E96 $6?2E6 7=@@C 7@C 2 G@E6 E9:D H66<[ $6?2E@C |2C<6J H:== DFAA@CE :E 282:?[” E96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5] “#6AF3=:42?D H:== 92G6 2 492?46 E@ 8@ @? C64@C5i 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C s@?2=5 %CF>A’D H2C 7@C @:= @C 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C A6246 7@C E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6n $6?2E@C |2C<6J 49@@D6D E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 6G6CJ E:>6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6>6?E 5:5?’E 255C6DD |@F=E@?’D 4C:E:4:D> @7 E96 D6?2E@C 7@C 9:D AC6G:@FD G@E6D @? E96 xC2B H2C C6D@=FE:@?D]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 2?5 @E96C 4C:E:4D D2J E96 4=2:> 3J !C6D:56?E v6@C86 (] qFD9’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@?E92E xC2B 925 H62A@?D @7 >2DD 56DECF4E:@? 29625 @7 E96 ~4E@36C a__a G@E6D E@ 2FE9@C:K6 7@C46 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H2D 32D6=6DD] }62C=J d[___ &]$] EC@@AD H6C6 <:==65 😕 E96 H2C] xC2B: 562E9D H6C6 6DE:>2E65 😕 E96 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D]k^Am

    kAmx? a_ab[ E96 E96?s6>@4C2E:4=65 $6?2E6 A2DD65 2 3:A2CE:D2? 3:== E@ C6A62= E96 `hh` 2?5 a__a H2C A@H6CD 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 7@C xC2B 😕 2 DJ>3@=:4 >@G6 2:>65 2E 6?5:?8 5632E6 @G6C E96 =682= ;FDE:7:42E:@? 7@C E96 H2CD] qFE E96 3:== DE2==65 😕 E96 v~!4@?EC@==65 w@FD6 2?5 72:=65 E@ C6249 E96?!C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?’D 56D<]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Rubio and Hegseth brief congressional leaders as questions mount over next steps in Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other top officials briefed leaders in Congress late Monday on the striking military operation in Venezuela amid mounting concerns that President Donald Trump is embarking on a new era of U.S. expansionism without consultation of lawmakers or a clear vision for running the South American country.Republican leaders entered the closed-door session at the Capitol largely supportive of Trump’s decision to forcibly remove Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro from power, but many Democrats emerged with more questions as Trump maintains a fleet of naval vessels off the Venezuelan coast and urges U.S. companies to reinvest in the country’s underperforming oil industry.A war powers resolution that would prohibit U.S. military action in Venezuela without approval from Congress is heading for a vote this week in the Senate.“We don’t expect troops on the ground,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., afterward.He said Venezuela’s new leadership cannot be allowed to engage in narcoterrorism or the trafficking of drugs into the U.S., which sparked Trump’s initial campaign of deadly boat strikes that have killed more than 115 people.“This is not a regime change. This is demand for a change in behavior,” Johnson said. “We don’t expect direct involvement in any other way beyond just coercing the new, the interim government, to get that going.”Johnson added, “We have a way of persuasion — because their oil exports, as you know, have been seized, and I think that will bring the country to a new governance in very short order,” he said.But Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged saying, “There are still many more questions that need to be answered.”“What is the cost? How much is this going to cost the United States of America?” Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said afterward.Lawmakers were kept in the darkThe briefing, which stretched for two hours, came days after the surprise military action that few, if any, of the congressional leaders knew about until after it was underway — a remarkable delay in informing Congress, which has ultimate say over matters of war.Administration officials fielded a range of questions — from further involvement of U.S. troops on the ground to the role of the Venezuelan opposition leadership that appeared to have been sidelined by the Trump administration as the country’s vice president, Maduro ally Delcy Rodriguez, swiftly became the country’s interim president.Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, who brought drug trafficking charges against Maduro, all joined the classified session. It was intended for the called “gang of eight” leaders, which includes Intelligence committee leadership as well as the chairmen and ranking lawmakers on the national security committees.Asked afterward if he had any more clarity about who is actually running Venezuela, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said, “I wish I could tell you yes, but I can’t.”Leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee — Republican chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and ranking Democrat Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois — said they should have been included in the classified briefing, arguing they have oversight of the Justice Department under Bondi.Earlier in the day, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer warned that Trump’s action in Venezuela is only the beginning of a dangerous approach to foreign policy as the president publicly signals his interests in Colombia, Cuba and Greenland.“The American people did not sign up for another round of endless wars,” Schumer said.Afterward, Schumer said the briefing, “while extensive and long, posed far more questions than it answered.”Republicans hold mixed views reflective of the deepening schism within Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement as the president, who vowed to put America first, ventures toward overseas entanglements many lawmakers in both parties want to avoid — particularly after the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.No clarity on what comes nextNext steps in the country, and calls for elections in Venezuela, are uncertain.The Trump administration had been in talks with Rodríguez, who took the place of her ally Maduro and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Trump has been dismissive of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who last month won the Nobel Peace Prize for her struggle to achieve a democratic transition in her nation. Trump has said Machado lacks the “support” or “respect” to run the country.But Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., a staunch Trump ally, said he plans to speak soon with Machado, and called her “very popular if you look at what happened in the last election.”“She eventually, I think, will be the president of Venezuela,” Scott said. “You know, this is going to be a process to get to a democracy. It’s not easy. There’s a lot of bad people still there, so it’s going to take time. They are going to have an election, and I think she will get elected.”Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been a leading critic of the Trump campaign of boat strikes against suspected drug smugglers, said there are probably a dozen leaders around the world who the U.S. could say are in violation of an international law or human rights law.“And we have never gone in and plucked them out the country. So it sets a very bad precedent for doing this, and it’s unconstitutional,” Paul told reporters. “There’s no way you can say bombing a capital and removing the president of a foreign country is not an initiation of war.”__Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this story.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other top officials briefed leaders in Congress late Monday on the striking military operation in Venezuela amid mounting concerns that President Donald Trump is embarking on a new era of U.S. expansionism without consultation of lawmakers or a clear vision for running the South American country.

    Republican leaders entered the closed-door session at the Capitol largely supportive of Trump’s decision to forcibly remove Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro from power, but many Democrats emerged with more questions as Trump maintains a fleet of naval vessels off the Venezuelan coast and urges U.S. companies to reinvest in the country’s underperforming oil industry.

    A war powers resolution that would prohibit U.S. military action in Venezuela without approval from Congress is heading for a vote this week in the Senate.

    “We don’t expect troops on the ground,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., afterward.

    He said Venezuela’s new leadership cannot be allowed to engage in narcoterrorism or the trafficking of drugs into the U.S., which sparked Trump’s initial campaign of deadly boat strikes that have killed more than 115 people.

    “This is not a regime change. This is demand for a change in behavior,” Johnson said. “We don’t expect direct involvement in any other way beyond just coercing the new, the interim government, to get that going.”

    Johnson added, “We have a way of persuasion — because their oil exports, as you know, have been seized, and I think that will bring the country to a new governance in very short order,” he said.

    But Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged saying, “There are still many more questions that need to be answered.”

    “What is the cost? How much is this going to cost the United States of America?” Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said afterward.

    Lawmakers were kept in the dark

    The briefing, which stretched for two hours, came days after the surprise military action that few, if any, of the congressional leaders knew about until after it was underway — a remarkable delay in informing Congress, which has ultimate say over matters of war.

    Administration officials fielded a range of questions — from further involvement of U.S. troops on the ground to the role of the Venezuelan opposition leadership that appeared to have been sidelined by the Trump administration as the country’s vice president, Maduro ally Delcy Rodriguez, swiftly became the country’s interim president.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, who brought drug trafficking charges against Maduro, all joined the classified session. It was intended for the called “gang of eight” leaders, which includes Intelligence committee leadership as well as the chairmen and ranking lawmakers on the national security committees.

    Asked afterward if he had any more clarity about who is actually running Venezuela, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said, “I wish I could tell you yes, but I can’t.”

    Leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee — Republican chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and ranking Democrat Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois — said they should have been included in the classified briefing, arguing they have oversight of the Justice Department under Bondi.

    Earlier in the day, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer warned that Trump’s action in Venezuela is only the beginning of a dangerous approach to foreign policy as the president publicly signals his interests in Colombia, Cuba and Greenland.

    “The American people did not sign up for another round of endless wars,” Schumer said.

    Afterward, Schumer said the briefing, “while extensive and long, posed far more questions than it answered.”

    Republicans hold mixed views reflective of the deepening schism within Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement as the president, who vowed to put America first, ventures toward overseas entanglements many lawmakers in both parties want to avoid — particularly after the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    No clarity on what comes next

    Next steps in the country, and calls for elections in Venezuela, are uncertain.

    The Trump administration had been in talks with Rodríguez, who took the place of her ally Maduro and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Trump has been dismissive of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who last month won the Nobel Peace Prize for her struggle to achieve a democratic transition in her nation. Trump has said Machado lacks the “support” or “respect” to run the country.

    But Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., a staunch Trump ally, said he plans to speak soon with Machado, and called her “very popular if you look at what happened in the last election.”

    “She eventually, I think, will be the president of Venezuela,” Scott said. “You know, this is going to be a process to get to a democracy. It’s not easy. There’s a lot of bad people still there, so it’s going to take time. They are going to have an election, and I think she will get elected.”

    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been a leading critic of the Trump campaign of boat strikes against suspected drug smugglers, said there are probably a dozen leaders around the world who the U.S. could say are in violation of an international law or human rights law.

    “And we have never gone in and plucked them out the country. So it sets a very bad precedent for doing this, and it’s unconstitutional,” Paul told reporters. “There’s no way you can say bombing a capital and removing the president of a foreign country is not an initiation of war.”

    __

    Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link