ReportWire

Tag: Wall Street

  • Bond-market crash leaves big banks with $650 billion of unrealized losses as the ghost of SVB continues to haunt Wall Street

    Bond-market crash leaves big banks with $650 billion of unrealized losses as the ghost of SVB continues to haunt Wall Street

    [ad_1]

    Bank of America shares have fallen 14% this year.Spencer Platt/Getty Images

    • Big banks are sitting on $650 billion of unrealized losses, Moody’s has estimated.

    • It’s a sign even Wall Street’s best-known names are feeling the heat from the Treasury-market rout.

    • Crashing bond prices sank Silicon Valley Bank earlier this year, and there may be more chaos to come.

    Crashing bond prices sank Silicon Valley Bank in March — and there’s reason to believe that what triggered the California lender’s collapse may be haunting Wall Street again.

    The brutal Treasury-market meltdown has hit some of the largest financial institutions hard, dragging down the share prices of big names such as Bank of America and fueling fears that the turmoil triggered by SVB’s bankruptcy may not be over just yet.

    Here’s everything you need to know about unrealized losses, including why they’re dragging on bank stocks and whether they could trigger another financial crisis.

    Unrealized losses

    Treasury bonds — debt instruments the government issues to fund its spending — have been on a nightmarish run since the onset of the pandemic, with investors fretting about rising interest rates and the long-term viability of the US’s massive deficit.

    BlackRock’s iShares 20+ Year Treasury fund, which tracks longer-duration debt prices, has plunged 48% since April 2020. Meanwhile, 10-year Treasury yields, which move in the opposite direction to prices, recently spiked above 5% for the first time in 16 years.

    As a result of that sell-off, some of the US’s biggest banks are now sitting on unrealized, or “paper,” losses worth hundreds of billions of dollars. That means the value of their bond holdings has plunged, but they’ve chosen to hold on rather than offload their investments.

    Moody’s estimated last month that US financial institutions had racked up $650 billion worth of paper losses on their portfolios by September 30 — up 15% from June 30. The ratings agency’s data still doesn’t account for a hellish October where the longer-term collapse in bond prices spiraled into one of the worst routs in market history.

    These “losses” are not the same as debt, however, which describes actual borrowings that need to be repaid.

    Bank of America is the big lender worst affected by the crash in bond prices, having disclosed a potential $130 billion hole in its balance sheet last month.

    The other “Big Four” banks — Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo — have also racked up unrealized losses in the tens of billions, according to their second- and third-quarter earnings reports.

    Another SVB-style crisis?

    Silicon Valley Bank failed in March after disclosing a $1.8 billion loss on its own bond portfolio, triggering a run on deposits. Similarly, big banks’ huge unrealized losses are also sparking concern among Wall Street doom-mongers.

    “‘Higher for longer’ is absurd baloney,” the market vet Larry McDonald said in a post on X Sunday, referring to the Fed signaling it would hold interest rates at about their current level well into 2024 in a bid to kill off inflation. “A 6% + Fed funds and Bank of America is near insolvency.”

    It’s important to remember that BofA’s $130 billion losses are still unrealized. Unlike SVB, it isn’t officially in the red yet because it has not sold its bond holdings.

    The bank’s chief financial officer, Alastair Borthwick, shrugged off the market’s worries on last month’s earnings call, pointing out that most of the bank’s fixed-income portfolio was low-risk government bonds it planned to hold until the debt expires.

    “All of these are unrealized losses are on government-guaranteed securities,” he told reporters. “Because we’re holding them to maturity, we will anticipate that we’ll have zero losses over time.”

    There’s still a possibility that spooked BofA customers will pull their money en masse, as they did with SVB — but that hasn’t happened. In fact, deposits are up after registering about 200,000 new accounts in the third quarter.

    Some analysts also believe the worst of the Treasury-market rout is now over, with the Federal Reserve starting to signal that its tightening campaign is nearly done. Ten-year yields have softened in recent weeks, falling from 5% to 4.6% as of Tuesday.

    Banks under pressure

    That doesn’t mean the Big Four banks can afford to just dismiss the bond rout.

    In a paper published earlier this year, researchers for the Kansas City Fed concluded that paper losses could still drag down a bank’s share price: “Unrealized losses can increase equity costs as investors’ perceptions of financial health deteriorate.”

    That’s been happening this year, with three of the big four banks’ stocks sliding. Predictably, Bank of America has been worst affected, with its stock down 24% over the past year and 14% year-to-date.

     

    “Worries over unrealized losses on sovereign bond holdings are also weighing on the US lenders, to again reflect concerns over rising interest rates and whether the US Federal Reserve will ultimately tighten policy by too much for too long,” AJ Bell’s Russ Mould said in a note last week.

    Unrealized losses may not be about to trigger another financial crisis — but as long as bank stocks are down, they’ll remain a concern for Wall Street’s biggest names.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UBS CEO ‘positively surprised’ by quick return of client inflows

    UBS CEO ‘positively surprised’ by quick return of client inflows

    [ad_1]

    UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti discusses the Swiss banking giant's third-quarter earnings — its first full quarter since completing the takeover of stricken domestic rival Credit Suisse.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UBS shares rise 3% as market focuses on strong underlying profit

    UBS shares rise 3% as market focuses on strong underlying profit

    [ad_1]

    A logo of Swiss bank UBS is seen in Zurich, Switzerland March 29, 2023. 

    Denis Balibouse | Reuters

    UBS shares climbed on Tuesday morning after the Swiss banking giant resoundingly beat expectations for underlying profit.

    The bank recorded an underlying operating profit before tax of $844 million, well ahead of consensus expectations. UBS shares were up 3.2% by mid-afternoon in Europe.

    Factoring in $2 billion in expenses related to the integration of fallen rival Credit Suisse, UBS posted a bigger-than-expected third-quarter net loss attributable to shareholders of $785 million. Analysts polled by Reuters had anticipated a quarterly net loss of $444 million in a company-compiled poll.

    Here are some other highlights:

    • Total group revenues were $11.7 billion, up 23% from $9.54 billion in the second quarter.
    • CET1 capital ratio, a measure of bank liquidity, was 14.4%, unchanged from the previous quarter.
    • Credit Suisse Wealth Management generated positive net new money inflows for the first time since the first quarter of 2022, contributing to inflows of $22 billion for UBS Global Wealth Management.

    “You could see that, sequentially, we improved the underlying performance across Wealth Management, Asset Management and our Personal and Corporate banking in Switzerland. They both grew on a quarter-on-quarter basis,” UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti told CNBC on Tuesday.

    “The IB [investment bank] has been facing more challenging market conditions, particularly when you look at our business model and the fact that we have been onboarding resources from Credit Suisse. But it was a very solid quarter, and we made very good progress in our integration plans, and at the same time we saw very strong inflows from clients.”

    A ‘good set of results’

    Analysts at Citi highlighted on Tuesday that the $844 million underlying profit before tax figure was “notably ahead of prior company guidance (of break-even), treble consensus expectations and 6% ahead of our above-consensus forecast.”

    “As we expected the beat is driven by better opex [operating expense], 7% below consensus, with revenues also 1% ahead. This is then slightly offset by heavier provisions,” they noted, adding that the acceleration of Wealth Management net new money inflows in September was also “encouraging.”

    In Italy, banks and the government have a 'common target,' says Intesa Sanpaolo CEO

    UBS is also in the process of fully integrating Credit Suisse’s Swiss banking unit — a key profit center — and is expected to cut a hefty proportion of the legacy bank’s workforce.

    UBS reported net new deposits of $33 billion across its Global Wealth Management and Personal and Corporate Banking (P&C) divisions, with $22 billion coming from Credit Suisse clients and positive deposit inflows for P&C in September, the month after UBS announced the decision to integrate the domestic bank.

    The bank also announced earlier this year that it is targeting gross cost savings of at least $10 billion by 2026, when it hopes to have completed the integration all of Credit Suisse Group’s businesses.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs says the Israel-Hamas war could have major implications for Europe’s economy

    Goldman Sachs says the Israel-Hamas war could have major implications for Europe’s economy

    [ad_1]

    Armoured vehicles of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are seen during their ground operations at a location given as Gaza, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas continues, in this handout image released on November 1, 2023. 

    Israel Defense Forces | Reuters

    The Israel-Hamas war could have a significant impact on economic growth and inflation in the euro zone unless energy price pressures remain contained, according to Goldman Sachs.

    The ongoing hostilities could affect European economies via lower regional trade, tighter financial conditions, higher energy prices and lower consumer confidence, Europe Economics Analyst Katya Vashkinskaya highlighted in a research note Wednesday.

    Concerns are growing among economists that the conflict could spill over and engulf the Middle East, with Israel and Lebanon exchanging missiles as Israel continues to bombard Gaza, resulting in massive civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian crisis.

    Although the tensions could affect European economic activity via lower trade with the Middle East, Vashkinskaya highlighted that the continent’s exposure is limited, given that the euro area exports around 0.4% of the GDP to Israel and its neighbors, while the British trade exposure is less than 0.2% of the GDP.

    She noted that tighter financial conditions could weigh on growth and exacerbate the existing drag on economic activity from higher interest rates in both the euro area and the U.K. However, Goldman does not see a clear pattern between financial conditions and previous episodes of tension in the Middle East

    The most important and potentially impactful way in which tensions could spill over into the European economy is through oil and gas markets, Vashkinskaya said.

    “Since the current conflict broke out, commodities markets have seen increased volatility, with Brent crude oil and European natural gas prices up by around 9% and 34% at the peak respectively,” she said.

    Goldman’s commodities team assessed a set of downside scenarios in which oil prices could rise by between 5% and 20% above the baseline, depending on the severity of the oil supply shock.

    “A persistent 10% oil price increase usually reduces Euro area real GDP by about 0.2% after one year and boosts consumer prices by almost 0.3pp over this time, with similar effects observed in the U.K.,” Vashkinskaya said.

    “However, for the drag to appear, oil prices must remain consistently elevated, which is already in question, with the Brent crude oil price almost back at pre-conflict levels at the end of October.”

    Gas price developments present a more acute challenge, she suggested, with the price increase driven by a reduction in global LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports from Israeli gas fields and the current gas market less able to respond to adverse supply shocks.

    “While our commodities team’s estimates point to a sizeable increase in European natural gas prices in case of a supply downside scenario in the range of 102-200 EUR/MWh, we believe that the policy response to continue existing or re-start previous energy cost support policies would buffer the disposable income hit and support firms, if such risks were to materialize,” Vashkinskaya said.

    Nobody knows the endgame of the Israel-Hamas war, says former Italian ambassador to Iraq

    Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey told CNBC on Thursday that knock-on effects of the conflict on energy markets posed a potential risk to the central bank’s efforts to rein in inflation.

    “So far, I would say, we haven’t seen a marked increase in energy prices, and that’s obviously good,” Bailey told CNBC’s Joumanna Bercetche. “But it is a risk. It obviously is a risk going forward.”

    Oil prices have been volatile since Hamas launched its attack on Israel on Oct. 7, and the World Bank warned in a quarterly update on Monday that crude oil prices could rise to more than $150 a barrel if the conflict escalates.

    General consumer confidence is the final potential channel for spillover affects, according to the Wall Street bank, and Vashkinskaya noted that the euro area experienced a substantial deterioration in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in March 2022.

    The same effect has not been historically observed alongside outbreaks of elevated tensions between Israel and Hamas, but Goldman’s news-based measure of conflict-related uncertainty reached record highs in October.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • One paycheck not enough: Digital bank Current finds almost half its customers have multiple jobs

    One paycheck not enough: Digital bank Current finds almost half its customers have multiple jobs

    [ad_1]

    The need for second — and often third — incomes is mounting, according to a top digital bank executive.

    Current CEO Stuart Sopp finds almost half of the firm’s payment customers have more than one job.

    “If you’re having a paycheck over the past year, 20, 25% of paycheck depositors have at least one extra job. A further 20% incremental from there have two jobs,” Sopp told CNBC’s “Fast Money” on Thursday. “They’re trying to make that money go further because of inflation.”

    From DoorDash to Shopify to side businesses, Sopp finds the number is higher than prior years because money doesn’t go as far.

    “Wage inflation is moderating quite substantially,” he said. “America has a sort of tail of two cities right now. Two groups: The wealthy and less affluent.”

    Sopp launched Current, which provides mobile banking without monthly fees and offers secured credit cards, in 2015. It originally focused on helping medium to lower income customers. His company Current reports almost five million members.

    He’s particularly concerned about less affluent consumers spiraling into debt to pay for basic necessities.

    “They’re being forced into risks like risky credit cards,” noted Sopp, a former Morgan Stanley trader. “Unsecured credit cards… are not suitable for everyone.”

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York found credit card debt topped $1 trillion for the first time ever in the second quarter.

    “It’s going to be way bigger this year,” Sopp said.

    Disclaimer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Wolf of Wall Street: Why the S&P 500 Index is still the ticket to riches

    The Wolf of Wall Street: Why the S&P 500 Index is still the ticket to riches

    [ad_1]

    Jordan Belfort, the author of the new book “The Wolf of Investing,” has some salty things to say about Wall Street.

    For starters, he described it as a “giant, bloodsucking monster … the Wall Street fee machine complex atop the entire global financial system — extracting excess fees and commissions and creating general financial mayhem.”

    Average investors, he added, lose all the time because they are baited by the latest stock tip they hear from a friend or read about on TikTok. There’s more: “Depending on who’s been advising you, there’s an excellent chance that a significant portion of your annual returns are being unnecessarily cannibalized by fees, commissions, and pumped-up annual performance bonuses,” he told me.

    You may already be familiar with Belfort. His best-selling autobiography, “The Wolf of Wall Street,” is the basis for the 2013 Oscar-winning film of the same name starring Leonardo DiCaprio. Belfort, a former broker, made loads of dough by peddling shady sales of penny stocks — and turned around and blew it away on drugs, sex, and other debauchery.

    Belfort served 22 months in jail for securities fraud relating to his activities in the 1980s and ’90s with his brokerage firm Stratton Oakmont.

    This time out of the gate, Belfort’s take on Wall Street is far less titillating and decidedly more conventional, but “you can thank me when you’re ready to retire, and you have a giant nest egg waiting for you,” he wrote.

    Recently, Belfort discussed with Yahoo Finance his simple investing advice like sticking to an S&P 500 index fund, which so far this year is up 7.75% and has gained about 10.7% on average annually since it was introduced in 1957.

    Sure it sounds boring, but there are some hot tech stocks along with proven stalwarts in the S&P 500 Index, which includes Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Tesla, Meta, and Berkshire Hathaway.

    Edited excerpts:

    Oh boy, Jordan, let’s jump right into it. Rage against the machine aside, what’s the overall thesis of your book?

    It’s about long-term investing. Picking individual stocks or bonds and trying to beat the market, so to speak, has historically proven to be extremely difficult. People have trouble wrapping their heads around how even a small amount of money over time through long-term compounding, reinvesting dividends, and making small contributions along the way to your portfolio can amount to a truly massive amount of money. You don’t need to make massive returns every single year to have a very, very rich portfolio when you retire.

    Jordan Belfort, known for his best-selling autobiography,

    Jordan Belfort, known for his best-selling autobiography, “The Wolf of Wall Street.” (Jordan Belfort)

    What makes you crazy about the way Wall Street works, or doesn’t, for the average investor?

    It is this two-headed monster. It’s got the useful part where they create massive value and they serve a vital mission function to the US economy. Then they have the not-so-good part.

    You’re a huge fan of the S&P 500 Index, quite a leap from your broker days. What’s the magic there?

    Here’s why I love it. The S&P index of 500 stocks is this perfect mouse trap capturing the value of the US economy and also the global economy because a great portion of these companies do 34% of their business overseas. You’re getting global exposure to the creation of wealth with the best managers.

    Vanguard created this amazing vehicle for the average person anywhere in the world to get all the best out of the value that Wall Street creates and not get sucked into the disastrous allure of short-term trading in the next shiny object. The fact is that human beings, including me, are lousy stock pickers by nature. We sell when we should be buying and buy when we should be selling. The way to protect against this sort of human nature of doing the wrong thing and selling into fear is through indexing.

    The S&P 500 Index has been a great investment historically. Over 20 years, it always makes money and it balances out to an annual return of 10.5% give or take a percentage. As you get older, you want to start shifting more into more index bond funds in your portfolio percentage-wise because you want to have less exposure to risk.

    How would you advise someone who is stashing away funds for retirement?

    Generally speaking, if I were in my thirties or forties, I would have 80% of my money in the S&P 500 Index and maybe 20% in a total bond market index. As you get older, you could start bringing that down to 70/30 and ultimately to 60/40.

    Of course, there are other things like your general risk tolerance to consider. But I really love index funds because they take away the guesswork. They protect you from your own worst impulses, which is to trade for the short term and try to pick stocks that are winners. And that’s just really, really hard to do.

    Automatically check the box to reinvest your dividends and keep putting money into your funds every month or every quarter as you can, whatever the amount is, whether it’s $25, $50 a month, $100, $500, $1,000, whatever you could afford to do, just keep putting more money into the funds along the way at regular intervals. Don’t even consider the prices you are paying. And ignore if the market is up, down, or sideways.

    Jordan, admit it, it’s fun to invest in individual company stocks…

    It’s great to take a small percentage of your capital and set it aside for healthy speculation, if you like that stuff, right? It’s fun, and it’s empowering, and it’s great to do that. I just think that you have to set aside a certain amount of capital for that, stick to it, and be ready to lose it.

    What’s the investing trap for people?

    They think if they only have a small amount to invest that they are never going to get rich. ‘I need to go buy a penny stock where I can hopefully go up a thousand percent and I could make a big hit.’ That’s the trap. They try to time buying a growth stock. ‘I want to buy the next Apple because that’s the only way I’m gonna get rich,’ they say. ‘I’m not gonna get rich buying the S&P 500.’

    The answer is it does work out through long-term compounding. But you have to wait until this late stage threshold, which starts at 23, 24 years, and then suddenly you are like, whoa, this stuff actually works. It’s math.

    A parting thought?

    The Wall Street fee machine con is out there, and it’s very obvious once you recognize what’s going on with these advertisements and propaganda that basically leads people to make decisions that go against their best self-interest.

    It’s this wild sort of circus that’s convincing people to stay in this game, this casino, which is really tilted heavily against you. The odds are stacked against you on so many levels.

    By the way, if any one of Wall Street’s newfangled ideas hits, guess what? It becomes part of the S&P 500, and you’ll make money.

    Kerry Hannon is a Senior Reporter and Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a workplace futurist, a career and retirement strategist, and the author of 14 books, including “In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in The New World of Work” and “Never Too Old To Get Rich.” Follow her on Twitter @kerryhannon.

    Click here for the latest personal finance news to help you with investing, paying off debt, buying a home, retirement, and more

    Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jamie Dimon’s stock-moving trades show why investors should track CEOs’ buying and selling

    Jamie Dimon’s stock-moving trades show why investors should track CEOs’ buying and selling

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co. says the new U.K. government should be “given the benefit of the doubt.”

    Al Drago | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    For the first time in nearly two decades running JPMorgan Chase, CEO Jamie Dimon will voluntarily sell stock in the bank.

    The disclosure, in a securities filing Friday, detailed next year’s planned sales — pressuring JPMorgan (JPM) shares and the Dow Jones Industrial Average and highlighting why tracking trades made by executives involving the companies they lead should be an important part of every investor’s homework.

    Dimon is setting up the trades through a predetermined plan that executives at publicly traded companies use to protect against insider trading accusations. It will mark the first time that the 67-year-old CEO has offloaded shares of JPMorgan for non-technical reasons, such as exercising options.  

    The planned sales – amounting to roughly 12% of the JPMorgan stock owned by Dimon and his family – are being done for tax planning and personal wealth diversification reasons, the bank said. Both are common reasons for executives to sell stock in their firms. The bank also said Dimon continues to believe JPMorgan’s prospects are “very strong,” and his planned trades are not related in any way to succession. Such sales are often seen when CEOs get close to retirement.

    As you can see, making sense of insider transactions can sometimes be a tall task.

    When they buy, it’s generally seen as an encouraging sign by Wall Street — and there is, perhaps, no better example of this than another move by Dimon in 2016, when he purchased JPMorgan stock.

    Fears of a weakening global economy sent stocks into a tailspin in early 2016, driving shares of JPMorgan down nearly 20% and the S&P 500 down more than 10% at their lows.

    But that weakness didn’t last long.

    The trajectory of the market changed just six weeks into the new year. That’s when Dimon disclosed — after the closing bell on Feb. 11, 2016 — that he bought 500,000 shares of the bank, worth about $26 million at the time.

    Dimon’s stock purchase, intended to show confidence in the financial sector, has become legendary on Wall Street. It ultimately coincided with — or perhaps was the reason for — the closing lows for not only shares of JPMorgan in 2016 but also the S&P 500 overall.

    Jim Cramer has since dubbed Feb. 11, 2016: “The Jamie Dimon Bottom.” JPMorgan finished up 30% that year, while the S&P 500 ended more than 9% higher — both huge turnarounds.

    While executive stock sales — such as Dimon’s planned transactions next year — are not universally red flags, they can get complicated.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The US’s massive debt pile is fueling the bond-market crash. These 4 charts tell the story.

    The US’s massive debt pile is fueling the bond-market crash. These 4 charts tell the story.

    [ad_1]

    US President Joe Biden discussing student debt relief at the White House in August 2023.Alex Wong/Getty Images

    • The US’s ballooning debt burden is sparking concern on Wall Street.

    • The country is one of just 21 worldwide whose debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 100%.

    • Concerns about deteriorating public finances have contributed to a meltdown in Treasury-bond prices the past few weeks.

    The Treasury-bond rout that’s rattled US markets this month is forcing investors to zero in on the government’s spiraling debt.

    The accelerated increase in America’s indebtedness has already sparked concern for investors in 2023, with lawmakers only narrowly avoiding a catastrophic default in June thanks to President Joe Biden and then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy brokering an 11th-hour deal to raise the federal borrowing limit.

    Now, some of Wall Street’s best-known names are raising the possibility that so-called “bond vigilantes” – who dump fixed-income assets in a bid to stymie what they see as imprudent policymaking – have helped fuel the meltdown in Treasurys that’s driven benchmark yields to 16-year highs.

    These four charts show why the US’s massive debt burden is a source of concern, and how it’s already impacting markets.

    The US debt mountain keeps growing

    Since the end of the Second World War, the government has borrowed more and more money to fund its spending programs.

    According to historical Treasury Department data, national debt has ballooned from under $300 billion in June 1946 to a staggering $33 trillion by September 2023 – meaning the US’s liabilities now dwarf the size of the Chinese, Japanese, German, Indian, and British economies combined.

    Reagan-Bush era tax cuts, the massive increase in size of the Treasury-bond market, and flash points like the invasion of Iraq and the 2008 financial crisis have all contributed to the huge run-up in debt, according to economists.

    The government’s ever-growing repayment obligations have also opened up a divide in Washington, with high-profile, hard-right Republicans like Florida governor Ron DeSantis and Rep. Matt Gaetz speaking out against May’s compromise on the debt ceiling and opposing the Biden administration’s student-loan relief efforts.

    The US’s debt-to-GDP ratio has passed a key threshold

    It’s not just the top-line amount of debt that’s gone up over the past few decades.

    The deficit level relative to the overall size of the US economy, as measured by the country’s debt-to-GDP ratio, has also ticked up steadily since 2000 and passed 100% for the first time in 2019, according to data from the International Monetary Fund.

    That threshold marks the point where a country might have to start worrying about its budget deficit dragging on overall growth, according to Capital Group economist Darrell Spence.

    “Will there instantly be problems when debt outstanding surpasses 100% of GDP? Probably not… That said, US debt dynamics are evolving in a way that requires attention,” he wrote in a research note last week, warning that taking on more debt could force the government to raise taxes, fuel further bond sell-offs, and lead to higher interest rates.

    The US is one of just 21 countries worldwide where the size of the deficit exceeds total GDP, per IMF data – putting it on a list of economies that includes Greece, Sri Lanka, and war-torn Sudan.

    Meanwhile, the US’s debt-to-GDP ratio has also risen at a faster rate than most of the G7 economies over the past two decades. Italy and Japan are the only two members of the group whose governments hold more debt relative to their total GDP.

     

    ‘Bond vigilantes’ could be fueling the Treasury-market meltdown

    There’s still a debate ongoing as to whether any of this actually matters.

    For some, the US government can just carry on racking up as much debt as it likes, safe in its knowledge that it’ll be shielded by the economy’s status as the world’s largest and the dollar‘s position as the global reserve currency.

    But the events of the past few weeks have suggested that investors’ faith that the US will always pay its debts might be waning.

    The price of Treasurys has collapsed in one of the worst routs in market history, sending yields on 10-year notes and 30-year bonds soaring above 5% for the first time since 2007.

    Investors’ fear that the Federal Reserve will keep borrowing costs high well into 2024 in a bid to kill off inflation have driven the sell-off – because when interest rates are higher, bonds’ low-risk but fixed returns become less appetizing.

    But some on Wall Street believe the market meltdown is also being driven by bond vigilantes, activist traders who try to tank Treasury prices in a bid to encourage Congress to reform its borrowing habits.

    “Ever since the government debt was downgraded on August 1, people have been focusing on the deficit issue,” veteran analyst Ed Yardeni, who coined the vigilantes term in the 1980s, said in September.

    “I think we’re going to have a real problem, and my friends, the bond vigilantes, may need to come into force to convince politicians we’ve got to do something more fundamental about reducing the long-term outlook for the deficit,” he added.

    PIMCO co-founder Bill Gross, a so-called “bond king” who’s made billions of dollars trading the asset class, is also backing the vigilante hypothesis, saying earlier this month that a group of retail traders had likely held the market captive and driven yields toward 5%.

    If debt can contributed to a period of such trouble for the market, it’s a sign investors should be worried – and with the deficit expected to carry on rising by trillions of dollars a year, don’t expect Wall Street to stop fretting anytime soon.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suze Orman: ‘Big mistake if you park your money forever in bonds’

    Suze Orman: ‘Big mistake if you park your money forever in bonds’

    [ad_1]

    Suze Orman has a warning for investors relying too heavily on bonds.

    The personal finance expert believes the draw of high interest rates and an aversion to risk taking are preventing too many people from taking a “lifetime opportunity” in the stock market.

    “Some of these stocks — how do you pass them up? I mean, you have to go into them. Now, do you go into them with everything that you have? No. Do you dollar-cost average into them, and take advantage of [down] days? … Yes,” the “Women & Money” podcast host told CNBC’s “Fast Money” this week. “You’ll be making a big mistake if you park your money forever in bonds.”

    Orman, who is also co-founder of emergency fintech company SecureSave, notes long-term investors should have the stomach for the stock market’s twists and turns.

    ‘I want to buy a stock, and I hope it goes down’

    “I have some serious losers at this point. However, I don’t care,” said Orman. “I want to buy a stock, and I hope it goes down. And I hope it goes further down and down so I can accumulate more.”

    She does recommend keeping some money in fixed income to mitigate risks in a volatile environment.

    At the same time, she still sees a role for bonds in portfolios. She likes the three– and six-month Treasurys and is ready to start looking longer term.

    “The play may start to be in long-term Treasurys. So, I’ve started to dip my toe in. Every time the 30-year [yield] crosses five percent, I buy,” said Orman.

    The 30-year Treasury yield is still near 2007 highs. It traded above 5% as of Friday’s close.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley just picked its new CEO. Here’s our take on the succession news

    Morgan Stanley just picked its new CEO. Here’s our take on the succession news

    [ad_1]

    iStock Editorial | Getty Images

    Morgan Stanley (MS) has finally named a successor to longtime CEO James Gorman — removing a big question mark for investors like us.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank shares surge 7% after net profit beats expectations

    Deutsche Bank shares surge 7% after net profit beats expectations

    [ad_1]

    Deutsche Bank shares popped on Wednesday, after the lender slightly beat expectations with its thirteenth straight profitable quarter and said it would increase and accelerate shareholder pay-outs.

    Third-quarter net profit was 1.031 billion euros ($1.06 billion), above an analyst consensus of quarterly net profit attributable to shareholders of 997 million euros, according to LSEG data.

    Shares were 7% higher at 8:33 a.m. London time.

    The bank’s third-quarter net profit was down 8% on the previous year and up 35% on the quarter, amid ongoing struggles in the lender’s investment unit.

    For the same period in 2022, the German lender recorded a net profit of 1.115 billion euros on the back of higher interest rates and increased market volatility that boosted its fixed income and currencies trading business.

    The bank said it was expecting revenues of around 29 billion euros for the full year, at the top end of prior estimates.

    It also said it had scope to release up to an additional 3 billion euros in capital and would increase and accelerate shareholder distributions.

    It delivered a strong performance in its corporate banking business — which benefits from the higher interest rate environment — where revenues rose 21% year-on-year to 1.89 billion euros.

    However, it continued to see a slowdown in its investment arm, where net revenues fell 4% year-on-year to 2.27 billion euros and are down 12% in the first nine months of the year to 7.3 billion.

    Deutsche Bank CFO James von Moltke told CNBC’s Silvia Amaro that the investment banking unit’s performance is “pretty much in line with the market” on an underlying basis.

    “What’s going on is the normalization of fixed income and currency revenues that we called for, especially in the macro businesses, so rates, foreign exchange and emerging markets, which benefited last year from the very high levels of volatility,” von Moltke said.

    There has been a rotation of the bank’s activity focusing onto other products, notably credit and financing, which have seen strength, he said.

    Other highlights for the quarter:

    • Total revenues stood at 7.13 billion euros, up from 6.92 billion in the third quarter of 2022.
    • The provision for credit losses was 200 million euros, compared to 350 million in the same quarter of last year.
    • Common equity tier one CET1 capital ratio, a measure of financial resilience, was 13.9% versus 13.8% at the end of the second quarter and 13.3% in the third quarter of 2022.
    • Return on tangible equity stood at 7.3%, up from 5.4% the previous quarter.

    Analysts at UBS said Deutsche Bank had delivered a “major improvement in capital” and “robust operational performance,” flagging that pre-tax profit of 1.723 billion euros was 9% above consensus.

    Numerous challenges remain for the bank, including a weakening European business environment, macro uncertainty and IT issues at two of its retail units.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3M beats on the top and bottom lines. Here’s what the pros are saying

    3M beats on the top and bottom lines. Here’s what the pros are saying

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Barclays narrowly beats profit forecasts on strong consumer, credit card business

    Barclays narrowly beats profit forecasts on strong consumer, credit card business

    [ad_1]

    A view of the Canary Wharf financial district of London.

    Prisma by Dukas | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

    LONDON — Barclays on Tuesday reported a net profit of £1.27 billion ($1.56 billion) for the third quarter, slightly ahead of expectations as strong results in its consumer and credit card businesses compensated for weakening investment bank revenues.

    Analysts polled by Reuters had produced a consensus forecast of £1.18 billion, down from £1.33 billion in the second quarter and £1.51 billion for the same period in 2022.

    Here are other highlights for the quarter:

    • CET1 ratio, a measure of banks’ financial strength, stood at 14%, up from 13.8% in the previous quarter.
    • Return on tangible equity (RoTE) was 11%, with the bank targeting upwards of 10% for 2023.
    • Group total operating expenses were down 4% year-on-year to £3.9 billion as inflation, business growth and investments were offset by “efficiency savings and lower litigation and conduct charges.”

    Barclays CEO C.S. Venkatakrishnan said the bank “continued to manage credit well, remained disciplined on costs and maintained a strong capital position” against a “mixed market backdrop.”

    “We see further opportunities to enhance returns for shareholders through cost efficiencies and disciplined capital allocation across the Group.”

    Barclays will set out its capital allocation priorities and revised financial targets in an investor update alongside its full-year earnings, he added.

    Barclays’ corporate and investment bank (CIB) saw income decrease by 6% to £3.1 billion, with the bank citing reduced client activity in global markets and investment banking fees.

    This was mostly offset by a 9% revenue increase in its consumer, cards and payments (CC&P) business to £1.4 billion, reflecting higher balances on U.S. cards and a transfer of the wealth management and investments (WM&I) division from Barclays U.K.

    The bank did not announce any new returns of capital to shareholders after July’s £750 million share buyback announcement.

    Barclays hinted at substantial cost cutting that will be announced later in the year, mentioning in its earnings report that the group is “evaluating actions to reduce structural costs to help drive future returns, which may result in material additional charges in Q423.”

    The cost-income ratio in the third quarter was 63%, but the bank has set a medium-term target of below 60%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The ‘No. 1 question’ Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood gets on her website

    The ‘No. 1 question’ Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood gets on her website

    [ad_1]

    The most popular question on Ark Invest’s website has nothing to do with investing in the U.S., according to the firm’s CEO and Chief Investment Officer Cathie Wood.

    “The No. 1 question on our website as we track these questions is: Why can’t we buy your strategies in Europe?” the tech investor told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.

    Wood’s firm expanded its exposure to Europe last month by acquiring the Rize ETF Limited from AssetCo.

    “We found this little gem of a company inside of AssetCo, which philosophically and from a DNA point-of-view, is very much like Ark,” Wood said. “They know what’s in their portfolios. They’re very focused on the future, thematically oriented. They do have a sustainable orientation, which is absolutely essential in Europe.”

    She speculates 25% of total demand for Ark’s research strategies comes from Europe.

    “We’re terribly impressed with the quality of their [Rise ETF] own research and due diligence,” Wood said. “We saw it during the deal, and I think we’re going to hit the ground running if the regulators approve our strategies there. And, of course, we’d like to distribute their strategies throughout the world including the US.”

    Wood’s firm has around $25 billion in assets under management, according to the firm. As of Sept. 30, FactSet reports Ark’s top five holdings are Tesla, Coinbase, UiPath, Roku and Zoom Video.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley shares fall 5% as wealth management results disappoint

    Morgan Stanley shares fall 5% as wealth management results disappoint

    [ad_1]

    Morgan Stanley Chairman and Chief Executive James Gorman speaks during the Institute of International Finance Annual Meeting in Washington, October 10, 2014.

    Joshua Roberts | Reuters

    Morgan Stanley posted third-quarter results Wednesday that topped profit estimates on better-than-expected trading revenue.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings per share: $1.38, vs. $1.28 estimate from LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv
    • Revenue: $13.27 billion, vs. expected $13.23 billion

    Profit fell 9% to $2.41 billion, or $1.38 a share, from a year ago, the New York-based bank said in a statement. Revenue grew 2% to $13.27 billion, essentially matching expectations.

    The bank’s shares fell more than 5% in early trading.

    Morgan Stanley’s trading operations helped offset revenue misses elsewhere at the firm. The bank’s bond traders produced $1.95 billion in revenue, roughly $200 million more than the StreetAccount estimate, while equity traders brought in $2.51 billion in revenue, $100 million more than expected.

    But the bank’s all-important wealth management division generated $6.4 billion in revenue, below the estimate by more than $200 million, as compensation costs in the division rose.

    Investment banking accounted for another miss in the quarter, producing $938 million in revenue, below the $1.11 billion estimate, as the company cited weakness in mergers and IPO listings. The bank’s investment management division essentially met expectations with $1.34 billion in revenue.

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    Morgan Stanley shares have been under pressure this year.

    CEO James Gorman cited a “mixed” environment for his businesses and acknowledged that the firm’s wealth management division gathered fewer new assets than in recent quarters. That’s because surging interest rates have made money market funds and Treasuries attractive, he told analysts Wednesday. The wealth management business was still tracking to hit his three-year goal of generating $1 trillion in new assets, he added.

    “When people have a choice of making a 4%, 5% return by doing nothing, they’re not going to be trading in the markets,” Gorman said.

    ‘Clean slate’

    Led by Gorman since 2010, Morgan Stanley has managed to avoid the turbulence afflicting some rivals lately. While Goldman Sachs was forced to pivot after a foray into retail banking and as Citigroup struggles to lift its stock price, the main question at Morgan Stanley is about an orderly CEO succession.

    In May, Gorman announced his plan to resign within a year, capping a successful tenure marked by massive acquisitions in wealth and asset management. Morgan Stanley’s board has narrowed the search for his successor to three internal executives, he said at the time.

    Gorman reiterated his desire to hand over the CEO position to a successor within months.

    “This firm is in excellent shape notwithstanding the geopolitical and market turmoil that we find ourselves in,” Gorman said. “My hope and expectation is to hand over Morgan Stanley with as clean a slate as possible and deal with a few of our outstanding issues in the next couple of months.”

    Last week, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for third-quarter profit, helped by low credit costs. Goldman Sachs and Bank of America also beat estimates on stronger-than-expected bond trading results.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank of America tops profit estimates on better-than-expected interest income

    Bank of America tops profit estimates on better-than-expected interest income

    [ad_1]

    Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America

    Heidi Gutman | CNBC

    Bank of America topped estimates for third-quarter profit on Tuesday on stronger-than-expected interest income.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings per share: 90 cents vs. expected 82 cent estimate from LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv
    • Revenue: $25.32 billion, vs. expected $25.14 billion

    Profit rose 10% to $7.8 billion, or 90 cents per share, from $7.1 billion, or 81 cents a share, a year earlier, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank said in a release. Revenue climbed 2.9% to $25.32 billion, edging out the LSEG estimate.

    Bank of America said interest income rose 4% to $14.4 billion, roughly $300 million more than analysts had anticipated, fueled by higher rates and loan growth.

    CEO Brian Moynihan said the bank continued to add clients despite economic pressures. While consumer banking deposits were down 8% in the quarter, the segment posted a 6% increase in revenue to $10.5 billion, according to the company.

    “We did this in a healthy but slowing economy that saw U.S. consumer spending still ahead of last year but continuing to slow,” he said in an earnings release.

    Bank of America was supposed to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of higher interest rates this year. Instead, the company’s stock has been the worst performer among its big-bank peers in 2023. That’s because, under CEO Brian Moynihan, the lender piled into low-yielding, long-dated securities during the pandemic. Those securities lost value as interest rates climbed.

    That’s made Bank of America more sensitive to the recent surge in the 10-year Treasury yield than its peers — and more similar to some regional banks that are also nursing underwater bonds. Bank of America had more than $100 billion in paper losses on bonds at midyear.

    The situation has pressured the bank’s net interest income, or NII, which is a key metric that analysts will be watching this quarter. In July, the bank’s CFO, Alistair Borthwick, affirmed previous guidance that NII would be roughly $57 billion for 2023.  

    Bank of America shares were up about 1% in premarket trading Tuesday. The stock bad fallen 18% this year through Monday, trailing the 10% gain of rival JPMorgan Chase.

    Last week, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for third-quarter profit, helped by better-than-expected credit costs. Morgan Stanley posts results Wednesday.  

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs is set to report third-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    Goldman Sachs is set to report third-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., at the Goldman Sachs Financial Services Conference in New York, Dec. 6, 2022.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings before the opening bell Tuesday.

    Here’s what Wall Street expects:

    • Earnings: $5.31 a share, according to LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv
    • Revenue: $11.19 billion
    • Trading revenue: fixed income $2.8 billion, equities $2.73 billion, per StreetAccount
    • Investment banking revenue: $1.48 billion

    Is Wall Street deal-making on the mend?

    Among its big bank peers, Goldman Sachs is the most reliant on investment banking and trading revenue.

    While it’s made efforts under CEO David Solomon to diversify its revenue stream, first in an ill-fated retail banking push and later as it emphasized growth in asset and wealth management, it is Wall Street that powers the company. Last quarter, trading and advisory accounted for two-thirds of Goldman’s revenue.

    That’s been a headwind as mergers, initial public offerings and debt issuance all have been muted this year as the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates to slow the economy down. With signs that activity has picked up lately, analysts will be eager to hear about Goldman’s pipeline of deals.

    At the same time, Goldman has taken hits from two areas: Its strategic retrenchment away from retail banking has saddled the firm with losses as it finds buyers for unwanted operations, and its exposure to commercial real estate has resulted in write-downs as well.

    Last week, Goldman said that its sale of lending business GreenSky will result in a 19 cents per share hit to third-quarter results.

    Analysts will be keen to hear Solomon’s view on the investment banking outlook, as well as how the remaining parts of its consumer effort — mainly, its Apple Card business — fit in the latest iteration of Goldman Sachs.

    Goldman shares have dropped 8.4% this year through Monday, a better showing than the 21% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    Last week, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for third-quarter profit, helped by better-than-expected credit costs. Morgan Stanley posts results Wednesday.  

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley says the average stock is breaking down, S&P 500 to fall to 3,900 by year-end

    Morgan Stanley says the average stock is breaking down, S&P 500 to fall to 3,900 by year-end

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Miracle drug’ euphoria: Experts warn widespread use of weight loss medicine faces major hurdles

    ‘Miracle drug’ euphoria: Experts warn widespread use of weight loss medicine faces major hurdles

    [ad_1]

    Two experts see major challenges facing the adoption of new obesity drugs.

    Dr. Kavita Patel, a physician and NBC News medical contributor, believes fresh data from Novo Nordisk on Ozempic’s ability to delay the progression of chronic kidney disease is among the strongest supporting evidence for secondary uses of the drug.

    However, she considers data supporting the use of obesity drugs for other conditions including Alzheimer’s and alcohol addiction as underdeveloped.

    “Those trials … are nowhere near as robust as the data we have on [Novo Nordisk trial] FLOW, on sleep apnea, cardiovascular risks, on diabetes control — double-blind placebo, randomized controlled trials that are incredible,” she told CNBC’s “Fast Money” on Wednesday. “We have a long way to go for that. I’ve seen a lot of miracle drugs before.”

    Novo Nordisk halted FLOW on Tuesday. According to the company’s press release, it happened more than a year after an interim analysis showed that Ozempic could treat chronic kidney disease in Type 2 diabetic patients.

    As of Friday’s close, Novo Nordisk is up 9.82% since its announcement. Its obesity drug maker competitor Eli Lilly is up 5.16% in the same period.

    Patel believes efficacy is just one of the major hurdles the medication needs to clear before it can be approved for uses outside of diabetes management.

    “We know this drug works really well in diabetics. But there are so many barriers to getting there —including cost, adherence, prescriber rate,” said Patel, who also served as a White House Health Policy Director under President Obama.

    Patients opting to use GLP-1 drugs — a group of medications initially designed to control diabetes — for weight management often must pay out-of-pocket.

    “Right now, we are seeing active employers, entire states that are declining to cover on the weight loss indication,” Patel said.

    What other industries could weight loss drugs disrupt?

    If the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves Ozempic for use in Type 2 diabetics with chronic kidney disease, which Patel believes will happen, it could force the hand of insurance companies to expand their coverage of the drug.

    “We’ll see a final package of data that will just be so compelling, that it would be wrong not to cover this, because it should be superior to what we have available to us,” she noted. “That is something that I think the insurance companies will have a difficult time [with].”

    Mizuho Health Care Sector Strategist Jared Holz also expects challenges related to insurance coverage as more patients begin taking GLP-1 drugs, which could limit overall adoption.

    “The payers, at some point, are going to be saying, ‘We get it, but we cannot pay for these at this volume without seeing the benefit, which may be 10 years from now, 20 years from now, 30.’ We have no idea when the offset is going to be,” he also told CNBC’s “Fast Money.”

    Holz also pointed out the divide emerging in the health care sector between Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and their pharmaceutical peers.

    “We haven’t seen this kind of valuation disconnect between the peer group, maybe in the history of the sector,” he said.

    The growth trend may not be sustainable for Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, based on current supply constraints that have left patients unable to secure dosages.

    “The companies can’t make enough, I don’t think, to actually put out revenue that’s going to appease investors, given where the stocks are trading,” said Holz.

    A Novo Nordisk spokesperson did not offer a comment due to the company’s quiet period ahead of earnings. Eli Lilly did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Risk-taker’s market? Why it may be practical to take chips off the table

    Risk-taker’s market? Why it may be practical to take chips off the table

    [ad_1]

    It may be a risk-taker’s market.

    Investor and personal finance author Ric Edelman believes it’s a practical strategy to take chips off the table right now.

    “It comes down to behavioral finance. It comes down to human emotion,” the Edelman Financial Engines founder told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “Do you have the stomach? Does your spouse have the stomach to hang in there if things get ugly like they did in ’01, ’08, 2020? Can you hang in there?”

    Edelman added there’s a “laundry list of reasons” to be cynical right now. He includes struggles in the real estate market, high interest rates, government shutdown risks and the Israel-Hamas war.

    “It’s easy to be negative and that can cause you to say, ‘Why do I want to put myself in a position of maybe losing another 20% or 30% of my money when I’ve already amassed an awful lot of money and I am already in my ’60s or ’70s and I need the safety and protection and by the way get five percent in my bonds or U.S. Treasury or my bank CD? Why don’t I just park it? Earn 5%. Call it a day,’ he said.

    Edelman acknowledges the strategy could be less profitable, but he suggests it’s important to sleep better at night.

    “I’m not sure everybody in the investment world is acting logically as opposed to emotionally. You’ve got to know yourself,” said Edelman.

    The Capital Group’s Holly Framsted is also seeing investors de-risk, and her firm is trying to cater to them by offering a new batch of exchange-traded funds focused on fixed income.

    “We’re seeing increased interest in short-duration fixed income,” said the firm’s head of global product strategy and development.

    Framsted speculates the investors are making the move to short-duration funds in response to the volatility of today’s market.

    “[The Capital Group Core Bond ETF] was among the original six funds that we launched,” Framsted said. “We’re seeing interest among our client base who tend to be longer-term oriented in nature across the full spectrum. But certainly, a lot of conversations in the short-duration space given the environment that we’re in.”

    The firm’s bond ETF is virtually flat since its Sept. 28 launch. The Capital Group managed more than $2.3 trillion as of June 30, according to the firm’s website.

    [ad_2]

    Source link