ReportWire

Tag: Voting

  • Voter lookup page on State Board of Elections website down, days ahead of Election Day

    [ad_1]

    The North Carolina State Board of Elections’ voter registration search tool appears to be down, days before elections in some cities and towns.

    When searching for voter records, an error appears with a message saying “The web function you were interacting with has encountered an error,” with a message saying to send an email to the SBOE’s help page for assistance.

    The North Carolina Democratic Party said on X that it heard the tool was down in 94 of the state’s 100 counties, adding that it is “impacting poll workers’ ability to quickly identify and register votes.”

    Election day is on Tuesday, Nov. 4, for general elections and runoffs for various municipalities, including Durham and Fayetteville.

    It is unclear how many counties are affected by the outage. While it is unclear what caused the outage, Clayton blamed the state’s Republican Party.

    “When Dave Boliek first took over the Board of Elections he removed career election professionals to fill his leadership with inexperienced, partisan appointees,” said Anderson Clayton, head of the North Carolina Democratic Party, in a statement provided to WRAL News.

    “Now, on the last day of early voting before our municipal elections, the NCSBE Voter Search tool went down in 94 out of 100 counties.”

    Boliek, a Republican, was given authority over the elections board after Republican state lawmakers changed state law following the 2024 elections to shift control of elections from the governor to the auditor. The change came days after Democrat Josh Stein won the race for governor and Boliek won the race for state auditor.

    “It’s clear that Republicans were wrong when they said that making Boliek the only State Auditor in the country that controls elections would not impact voting or the quality of our systems, ” Clayton said.

    WRAL News has asked the NCGOP to confirm if they are aware of the issue, and also reached out to the State Board of Elections to confirm the outage’s severity.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From the subway to social media, NYC mayoral candidates make their closing arguments to voters

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — In his final ad of the New York City mayoral race, Andrew Cuomo opens on a dour note: “Life in New York is tough right now.”

    Then comes a dig at Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee who the former governor has argued is too inexperienced to lead the city: “Candidates who need on-the-job training can’t fix it,” he says.

    In their last days on the campaign trail before Election Day on Tuesday, Cuomo, Mamdani and Republican Curtis Sliwa are offering their closing arguments to voters.

    For Cuomo, 67, it’s a message that voters must stop Mamdani from leading the city into ruin, casting himself as the only one who can keep the city safe and move it forward.

    Meanwhile, Mamdani is trying to keep riding the wave of progressive excitement that carried him to victory in June’s primary — while weathering the final barrage of attacks from Cuomo and other critics wary of giving a 34-year-old democratic socialist the reins to America’s biggest city.

    With early voting concluding Sunday, he’s shaking hands with everyone form social media influencers to airport taxi drivers as he urges his supporters not to grow complacent. “People say ‘We got this. It’s over. Cuomo is cooked,’” he says in one of his many popular online videos. “Do not believe it.”

    And Sliwa is running an aggressive ground-level campaign of his own, hitting the city’s subways and streets with his public safety-focused pitch and a warning that his Democratic opponents are “two sides of the same coin.”

    Cuomo, a Democrat on the ballot as an independent, has spent the final stretch working to convince Republicans he is a more viable candidate than Sliwa.

    He has met with Jewish and Muslim leaders. There have been an array of media hits on traditional news channels but also appearances on shows hosted by YouTuber-turned-boxer-turned-pro wrestler Logan Paul as well as Stephen A. Smith, a commentator on sports and politics.

    Much of the former governor’s pitch has been marked by dark warnings of social and economic collapse if Mamdani were to win, along with assurances that his record as governor makes him a more suitable choice.

    In an interview this week on Fox Business, Cuomo said Mamdani, who was born in Uganda to parents of Indian descent but grew up in New York City, “doesn’t understand the New York culture.”

    “Republicans, there are two choices, me or Mamdani. Don’t waste your vote,” Cuomo said.

    Former New York Gov. David Paterson, who has campaigned for Cuomo, said Cuomo has amped up the negativity because previous jabs on Mamdani’s inexperience and agenda haven’t slowed his momentum.

    “Normally, I would say, ‘Ease up.’ You’re both running for mayor. You both care about the city, so you know, just state your message,” Paterson said. “In this case, the reason he’s doing it is that that message hasn’t filtered in yet.”

    Sliwa, 71, has returned to the place where he gained fame as the creator of the Guardian Angels anti-crime patrols: the city’s subways.

    He’s held near daily news conferences across the transit network, hammering home his message that he’ll make the trains safer.

    As a rainstorm Thursday caused localized flooding in parts of the city, Sliwa filmed a video for social media as cars drove through a small pond that had developed on one intersection, decrying the state of the city’s sewer system.

    It’s reflective of the local quality-of-life issues the longtime talk-radio host has kept central to his colorful campaign.

    President Donald Trump has repeatedly dismissed Sliwa’s candidacy — and mocked his passion for rescuing cats — but Sliwa has waved off the criticism.

    “Homeless people, emotionally disturbed, veterans we don’t take care of — we don’t need a tough guy to be mayor. We need a compassionate, considerate, concerned person,” Sliwa said in an interview on CNN. “And that’s Curtis Sliwa.”

    By contrast, he said, Cuomo is “cold-hearted” and “angry.”

    “Nobody votes for anger,” Sliwa said.

    Sliwa wore his signature red beret to cast his ballot on the first day of early voting, but did not bring a cat with him as he did when he ran against Mayor Eric Adams in 2021.

    Mamdani, a state assemblymember, has tried to stay on the offensive.

    Last weekend, he packed out a stadium in Queens with more than 10,000 people for a rally alongside U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — playing to a friendly crowd receptive to his platform of using government programs to lower the high cost of living in New York.

    But he said he “will not allow myself to become complacent” while his army of volunteers knocks on doors.

    He set up a news briefing with social media influencers, appeared on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show” with Jon Stewart, won an endorsement from an association of bodega owners and held a midnight news conference in Queens after canvassing night shift workers at a nearby hospital and airport.

    The everywhere-all-at-once approach appeared to help him secure at least one undecided voter at a recent stop.

    Dr. Rita Bellevue, a retired physician, seemed pleasantly surprised when Mamdani and his coterie of news cameras approached her at a midtown Manhattan bus stop. Afterward, she said she had been deliberating whether to vote for him or for Cuomo.

    “I think I just decided,” she said with a smile before hurrying to catch her bus.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Jennifer Peltz contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal judge blocks Trump order requiring citizenship proof on federal voter registration forms

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot enforce an executive order requiring documented proof of U.S. citizenship on federal voter registration forms — a decision the administration defends as a lawful effort to protect election integrity.

    U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., on Friday found the requirement unconstitutional, writing that the president “lacks the authority to direct such changes.”

    “The first question presented in these consolidated cases is whether the president, acting unilaterally, may direct changes to federal election procedures,” Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her opinion. “Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes.”

    CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS LAUNCH VOTER ID BALLOT PUSH, NEED 875K SIGNATURES BY DEADLINE

    President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, July 29, 2025, in Washington. A federal judge ruled Friday that the Trump administration cannot enforce an executive order requiring documented proof of U.S. citizenship on federal voter registration forms. (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)

    However, a spokesperson for the White House told Fox News Digital that Trump acted within his legal powers.

    “President Trump has exercised his lawful authority to ensure only American citizens are casting ballots in American elections,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital in an email. “This is so commonsense that only the Democrat Party would file a lawsuit against it.”

    She added, “We expect to be vindicated by a higher court.”

    The judge sided with the plaintiffs — including the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the Democratic National Committee and the League of Women Voters Education Fund — arguing that the Constitution “assigns no direct role to the president in either domain.”

    NEARLY ALL REPUBLICAN AGS ADD FIREPOWER TO TRUMP’S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP PUSH

    A voting booth

    FILE PHOTO: Voting booths are pictured here. In March, President Trump signed an executive order mandating that anyone registering to vote provide government-issued proof of U.S. citizenship. (PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images)

    The ruling says the U.S. Election Assistance Commission is permanently blocked from adding the requirement to the federal voter form, according to the Associated Press.

    The lawsuit will continue as the judge examines other parts of Trump’s order, according to the Associated Press.

    In March, President Trump signed an executive order mandating that anyone registering to vote provide government-issued proof of U.S. citizenship.

    The order also directed the attorney general to enter into information-sharing agreements with state election officials to identify cases of election fraud or other election law violations and conditioned federal election-related funds on states complying with federal election integrity measures.

    TRUMP ADMIN BLOCKS CITIZENSHIP FOR NON-CITIZEN VOTERS

    I voted stickers

    FILE PHOTO: ‘I Voted’ stickers are pictured at a polling place. The lawsuit will continue as the judge examines other parts of Trump’s order, according to the Associated Press. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    “There are other steps that we will be taking in the coming weeks,” Trump said just before signing the order. “We think we’ll be able to end up getting fair elections.”

    Kollar-Kotelly had previously issued a preliminary injunction in April, and another federal judge blocked the same March 25 executive order in June following a separate challenge brought by Democratic state attorneys general, the Associated Press reported.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

    Fox News’ Louis Casiano, Shannon Bream and Bill Mears contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal Judge Rules Trump Can’t Require Citizenship Proof On The Federal Voting Form – KXL

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump’s request to add a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form cannot be enforced, a federal judge ruled Friday.

    U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., sided with Democratic and civil rights groups that sued the Trump administration over his executive order to overhaul U.S. elections.

    She ruled that the proof-of-citizenship directive is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, dealing a blow to the administration and its allies who have argued that such a mandate is necessary to restore public confidence that only Americans are voting in U.S. elections.

    “Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her opinion.

    She further emphasized that on matters related to setting qualifications for voting and regulating federal election procedures “the Constitution assigns no direct role to the President in either domain.”

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link

  • New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani rallies voters with support from Bernie Sanders and AOC

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani rallied supporters Sunday with heavyweight support from U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as the race enters its final stretch, telling a raucous crowd that his campaign is a “movement of the masses.”

    Mamdani, the Democratic nominee, took the stage at a small stadium in Queens where he and two of the nation’s leading progressives pitched his candidacy as a force to take on billionaires and “oligarchs” who have thrown money and support behind his opponents.

    “When you insist on building a coalition with room for every New Yorker, that is exactly what you create: a tremendous force,” Mamdani said. “This, my friends, was your movement, and it always will be.”

    As the crowd chanted his name, Mamdani reiterated plans to hire thousands of new teachers, renegotiate city contracts, freeze rent for low-income residents, build more affordable housing and provide universal child care.

    With early voting underway ahead of Election Day on Nov. 4, Mamdani, a democratic socialist, is in an increasingly caustic race with former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent candidate after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani, and Republican Curtis Sliwa, who campaigned Sunday in Queens.

    Cuomo has sought to cast Mamdani, a 34-year-old state assemblymember, as a naive candidate whose agenda would damage the city. In a radio interview Sunday morning, Cuomo argued that he is the real Democrat in the race while saying Mamdani’s democratic socialism would result in an exodus of residents and businesses.

    “The socialists want to take over the Democratic Party. That’s what Bernie Sanders is all about. That’s what AOC is all about,” Cuomo said, adding, “He wins, book airline tickets for Florida now.”

    Cuomo resigned as governor in 2021 following a barrage of sexual harassment allegations that he denies. Mamdani has often pressed Cuomo over the allegations, and on Sunday he told the crowd that it is time to leave behind the former governor’s “playbook of the past.” But he urged supporters not to take his lead in the polls for granted and to turn out to vote.

    “We cannot allow complacency to infiltrate this movement,” Mamdani said.

    Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have supported his campaign for months including before the Democratic primary in June. On Sunday they cast Mamdani as an antidote to what they called the creeping authoritarianism of President Donald Trump’s administration.

    Ocasio-Cortez, whose district includes Queens, said a victory for Mamdani will send a message nationally that a progressive message can prevail.

    “It is not a coincidence that the very forces that Zohran is up against in this race mirrors what we are up against nationally … an authoritarian, criminal presidency fueled by corruption and bigotry, and an ascendant right-wing extremist movement,” she said.

    Sanders said a Mayor Mamdani would represent “not the billionaire class” but working families.

    “In the year 2025, when the people on top have never, ever had so much economic and political power, is it possible for ordinary people, for working class people, to come together and defeat those oligarchs?” Sanders said. “You’re damn right we can.”

    Under the slogan “New York Is Not For Sale,” the rally featured rousing speeches from religious and labor leaders along with state elected officials including Gov. Kathy Hochul, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie. The event was emceed by Sarah Sherman of “Saturday Night Live.”

    Mamdani recently received an endorsement from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a moderate New York Democrat. Jeffries, in a statement, said he has disagreements with Mamdani but supports him as the nominee, adding that the party should unify against Republicans and Trump.

    Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams abandoned his reelection campaign and endorsed Cuomo.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Early voting in New Jersey starts Saturday: What to know

    [ad_1]

    With just weeks to go in New Jersey’s closely watched gubernatorial elections, voters are gearing up to make their voices heard.

    Since 2021, New Jersey has allowed in-person early voting thanks to legislation.

    The idea behind the law is to make then state “even more voter-friendly and strengthens our democracy by expanding opportunities to exercise your right to vote,” according to the New Jersey Division of Elections.

    Thanks to early voting, voters can cast their ballot in person for both the Primary Election and General Election during a specific time frame before Election Day, allowing for more flexibility for registered voters to make their voices heard.

    WHEN AND WHERE IS EARLY VOTING?

    Ahead of the General Election, every county in the state designates in-person early voting locations that will be open during the early voting period.

    This year, the early voting period is from Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025 through Sunday, Nov. 2, 2025.

    Hours will be Monday through Saturday, 10 a.m.–8 p.m. and Sunday, 10 a.m.–6 p.m. It’s important to know that any registered New Jersey voter can go and vote since no appointment is necessary.

    GENERAL ELECTION IN-PERSON EARLY VOTING POLL LOCATIONS

    Check the county where you are registered as a voter and live to see your early voting poll locations.

    Atlantic County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Bergen County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Burlington County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Camden County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Cape May County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Cumberland County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Essex County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Gloucester County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Hudson County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Hunterdon County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Mercer County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Middlesex County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Monmouth County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Morris County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Ocean County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Passaic County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Salem County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Somerset County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Sussex County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Union County Early Voting Poll Locations

    Warren County Early Voting Poll Locations

    IF YOU ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE-BY-MAIL….

    If you are registered to vote by mail, you are allowed to cast a provisional ballot during early in-person voting or on Election Day, which you can get at your early voting location or polling place.

    But remember, if you choose to vote by provisional ballot during early in-person voting or on Election Day, you should NOT complete and return your mail-in ballot because your provisional ballot will be rejected.

    It’s also important to note that mail-in ballots cannot be returned to your early voting site or polling place.

    [ad_2]

    NBC New York Staff

    Source link

  • Early voting in NYC starts Saturday: What to know

    [ad_1]

    The months leading up to New York City’s General Election have caused a lot of buzz.

    Political analysts across the country are keeping a close eye on the outcome, seeing them as a litmus test — specifically the race for mayor, where a self-described socialist democrat, Zohran Mamdani, is facing-off against former New York governor, Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent, and Curtis Sliwa, who is running under the Republican Party.

    Even though the mayoral race is the most talked-about race in the city’s general elections, there are other races taking place, including that for city comptroller, public advocate, a few city council seats and district attorney, among others.

    With this in mind, registered voters should know that, while Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 4, early voting period runs from Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025 to Sunday, Nov. 2, 2025.

    Below you will find the early voting days and hours, according to the NYC Board of Elections.

    Early Voting Dates Early Voting Hours
    Saturday, October 25, 2025 9AM to 5PM
    Sunday, October 26, 2025 9AM to 5PM
    Monday, October 27, 2025 9AM to 5PM
    Tuesday, October 28, 2025 10AM to 8PM
    Wednesday, October 29, 2025 10AM to 8PM
    Thursday, October 30, 2025 9AM to 5PM
    Friday, October 31, 2025 8AM to 4PM
    Saturday, November 1, 2025 9AM to 5PM
    Sunday, November 2, 2025 9AM to 5PM

    Registered voters can find their assigned early voting poll site via the NYC Board of Elections’ poll site locator.

    [ad_2]

    NBC New York Staff

    Source link

  • 7 charged in 2024 Pennsylvania voter registration fraud that prosecutors say was motivated by money

    [ad_1]

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — A yearlong investigation into suspected fraudulent voter registration forms submitted ahead of last year’s presidential election produced criminal charges Friday against six street canvassers and the man who led their work in Pennsylvania.

    The allegations of fraud appeared to be motivated by the defendants’ desire to make money and keep their jobs and was not an effort to influence the election results, said Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday, a Republican.

    Guillermo Sainz, 33, described by prosecutors as the director of a company’s registration drives in Pennsylvania, was charged with three counts of solicitation of registration, a state law that prohibits offering money to reach registration quotas. A message seeking comment was left on a number associated with Sainz, who lives in Arizona. He did not have a lawyer listed in court records.

    The six canvassers are charged with unsworn falsification, tampering with public records, forgery and violations of Pennsylvania election law. The charges relate to activities in three Republican-leaning Pennsylvania counties: York, Lancaster and Berks.

    “We are confident that the motive behind these crimes was personal financial gain, and not a conspiracy or organized effort to tip any election for any one candidate or party,” Sunday said in a news release. Prosecutors said the forms included all party affiliations.

    In a court affidavit filed with the criminal charges on Friday, investigators said Sainz, an employee of Field+Media Corps, “instituted unlawful financial incentives and pressures in his push to meet company goals to maintain funding which in turn spurred some canvassers to create and submit fake forms to earn more money.”

    The chief executive of Field+Media Corps, based in Mesa, Arizona, said last year the company was proud of its work to expand voting but had no information about problematic registration forms. A message seeking comment was left Friday for the CEO, Francisco Heredia. The Field+Media Corps website did not appear to be operative.

    Field+Media was funded by Everybody Votes, an effort to improve voter registration rates in communities of color. The affidavit said Everybody Votes “fully cooperated” with the investigation and noted its contract with Field+Media prohibited payments on a per-registration basis.

    “The investigation confirmed that we hold our partners to the highest standards of quality control when collecting, handling and delivering voter registration applications,” Everybody Votes said in a statement e-mailed by a spokesperson.

    Sainz, who managed Pennsylvania operations from May to October 2024, is accused of paying canvassers based on how many signatures they collected. The police affidavit said Sainz told agents with the attorney general’s office earlier this month he was unaware of any canvassers paid extra hours if they reached a target number of forms.

    “Sainz had to be asked the question multiple times before he stated he was not aware of this and that ‘everyone was an hourly worker,’ ” investigators wrote.

    One canvasser said she created fake forms to boost her pay and believed others did, too, according to the police affidavit. Another told investigators that most of the registration forms he collected were “not real.” A third reported that when she realized she was not going to reach a daily quota, “she would make up names and information,” police wrote, “due to fear of losing her job.”

    The investigation began in late October 2024, when election workers in Lancaster flagged about 2,500 voter registration forms for potential fraud. Authorities said they appeared to contain false names, suspicious handwriting, questionable signatures, incorrect addresses and other problematic details.

    The suggestion of criminal activity related to the election came as the battleground state was considered pivotal to the presidential election, and then-candidate Donald Trump seized on the news. At a campaign event, he declared there was “cheating” involving “2,600” votes. The actual issue in Lancaster was about 2,500 suspected fraudulent voter registration forms, not ballots or votes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Start Where You Stand: Why Local Politics Is the Most RadicalKind of Hope

    [ad_1]

    Some mornings, it feels like the news is designed to make us lose faith.

    Another headline about dysfunction in Washington. Another reminder that systems built to serve people are too tangled in partisanship to help them. It’s exhausting and it’s easy to start believing that nothing we do matters.

    But lately, I’ve been finding hope in smaller places.

    In a Saturday morning park clean-up where neighbors laugh more than they complain. In a school board meeting where parents debate passionately because they care.

    In a quiet moment at my community garden, where greens push through soil that once felt hard and dry.

    That’s where real politics lives. Not in the Capitol or the news crawl, but in the spaces where people still believe they can change something. When federal politics feels like chaos, turning local isn’t giving up, it’s coming home.

    We talk about politics like it’s something distant. Something that happens “up there.”

    But the truth is, most of the decisions that shape our everyday lives are made right here, at home.

    Who decides whether the lot down the street becomes a park or a parking deck?

    Who decides if our public schools get new playgrounds, or if our neighborhoods have sidewalks and trees? Who decides if housing stays aJordable, or if our water stays clean?

    Not Congress. Not the President. Not anyone you’ll see on a debate stage.

    Those decisions belong to local governments. These are our city councils, county commissions, school boards, zoning committees. And yet, most of us barely know their names.

    According to the Center for Civic Innovation’s “VoteATL: Voter Analysis Report”, voter turnout for local elections in Atlanta is alarmingly low compared to state and federal elections. In 2021, Atlanta’s municipal election had a 25% turnout rate. That means in a

    room of four people, one person decided how our neighborhoods grow, what our kids

    learn, and how our tax dollars are spent. The rest of us are living with decisions we didn’t even know were being made.

    And that’s exactly what those in power count on, our distraction. The sense that local politics is too small to matter. But that’s the biggest myth of all. The smaller it feels, the closer the power actually is.

    Atlanta has always been a city of motion. From the civil rights marches on Auburn Avenue to the organizing happening now in community centers, classrooms, and church basements, this is a city that has never stopped pushing. But even here, where movement is in our DNA, local engagement is quietly slipping away.

    This moment matters.

    With major development projects and the 2026 World Cup on the horizon, Atlanta is at a crossroads. We can either continue to let these changes happen tous or we can shape what happens for us.

    That starts with local politics.

    It’s not glamorous. It won’t trend. But it’s where justice begins to take form.

    When national politics feels too heavy to hold, there’s something healing about turning to what’s near. Tending to the things we can touch like soil, getting a street sign, or painting a mural becomes a form of resistance. It’s not just civic engagement. It’s a kind of care work. Because when you focus on what’s nearest to you, you get to see progress in real time. You get to see the sidewalk repaired, the park cleaned, the student succeed. You get to feel the impact of your own hands and voice.

    In a world where national politics often feels like watching a storm you can’t stop, local engagement gives you back the feeling of control and that’s powerful for our wellbeing and our mental health.

    It reminds us that hope isn’t naive. Hope is a practice. And it begins right outside our front door.

    If you’ve ever felt burned out by politics, you’re not alone.

    But here’s what I know: disengagement is exactly what systems of power depend on. If we turn away, they get to move quietly. So instead of tuning out, what if we tuned in? Closer, smaller, and deeper?

    If you’re not sure where to start, try this:

    • Look up who represents your district on the city council, school board, and county commission.
    • Attend one local meeting, just one, and listen.
    • Join a park clean-up, a PTA, a voter drive, or a neighborhood association.
    • Ask your neighbors what they care about and how you can help.
    • VoteintheNovember4thelection.

    Those might seem like small acts, but they’re actually the most radical kind of politics. They remind us that democracy isn’t a performance, it’s a practice.

    Federal politics may always feel out of reach, but the closest kind of change and sometimes the most powerful thing we can do for ourselves is to start where we stand.

    [ad_2]

    Mckenzie Rae

    Source link

  • Scammers target retirees with election tricks and fake polling updates ahead of Nov 4 vote

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Election season should be about casting your vote and making your voice heard. But for scammers, it’s an opportunity to trick retirees into handing over personal details, money or even their vote itself.

    What many don’t realize is that public voter registration data is one of the biggest tools fraudsters use. With elections coming up on Nov. 4, scammers are already scraping these records and using them to create targeted scams. If you’re a retiree or helping a parent or loved one prepare to vote, here’s how to stay safe.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter 

    Why voter records are public and risky

    HOW SCAMMERS TARGET YOU EVEN WITHOUT SOCIAL MEDIA

    Every state in the U.S. keeps voter registration lists. These include personal details like:

    • Full name
    • Home address
    • Phone number (in some states)
    • Political party affiliation
    • Voting history (whether you voted, not who you voted for).

    Scammers are targeting retirees with fake election messages and calls. (Getty Images)

    While these lists are meant for transparency, they’re often made available online or sold in bulk. Data brokers scoop them up, combine them with other records and suddenly scammers have a detailed profile of you: your age, address and voting habits. For retirees, this exposure is especially dangerous. Why? Because seniors are less likely to know that this information is floating around, making scams seem more convincing.

    You can easily check where your personal information is exposed with a free data exposure scanner. 

    Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: Cyberguy.com

    Scams targeting retirees before Nov. 4

    Here are the most common election-season cons fraudsters are already running:

    1) Fake “polling place” updates

    You might get a call, text or email saying your polling location has changed. Scammers may then direct you to a fake site that asks for your Social Security number or ID details “to confirm eligibility.”

    2) “Voter ID update” messages

    Since some states require voter ID, scammers will pose as election officials, claiming your ID is “out of date” or that you must upload personal documents. These go straight into the wrong hands.

    RETIREES LOSE MILLIONS TO FAKE HOLIDAY CHARITIES AS SCAMMERS EXPLOIT SEASONAL GENEROSITY

    3) Donation scams

    Criminals set up fake political donation sites with names resembling real campaigns. Retirees who are politically active or generous with causes are prime targets here.

    4) Absentee ballot phishing

    Scammers know many seniors vote by mail. They’ll send emails offering to “help” with requests or track your ballot while stealing your personal data in the process.

    Red flags to watch out for

    Woman casting a ballot.

    Public voter data can make it easy for fraudsters to create convincing scams. (CyberGuy.com)

    Scammers use clever tricks to make their messages seem urgent and official. Here are the warning signs that should make you pause before responding.

    • Urgency: “Act now or lose your right to vote.” Scammers use deadlines to scare you.
    • Unusual payment requests: No legitimate election office will ever ask for payment to vote or register.
    • Strange links: If you’re asked to click on a link from a text or email, stop. Always go directly to your state’s official election website instead.
    • Requests for sensitive info: Election officials don’t need your Social Security number or bank account details.

    How retirees can stay safe this election season

    Protecting yourself doesn’t mean opting out of civic life. It means taking a few smart steps:

    1) Reduce your data footprint

    This one matters most. The less personal data available about you, the fewer opportunities scammers have to trick you during election season. When they can view your age, address and even your voting history, they can craft messages that sound alarmingly real. The good news is you can take control and limit what’s out there.

    Reaching every voter data broker or people-search site on your own is nearly impossible, and most make the process intentionally difficult. That’s why data removal services can help. They automatically send removal requests to hundreds of data-broker sites and keep monitoring to ensure your information doesn’t return. The result is fewer scam calls, fewer phishing emails and far less risk this election season.

    While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is really a smart choice. They aren’t cheap, and neither is your privacy. These services do all the work for you by actively monitoring and systematically erasing your personal information from hundreds of websites.  It’s what gives me peace of mind and has proven to be the most effective way to erase your personal data from the internet. By limiting the information available, you reduce the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information they might find on the dark web, making it harder for them to target you.

    REMOVE YOUR DATA TO PROTECT YOUR RETIREMENT FROM SCAMMERS

    Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com

    Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: Cyberguy.com

    2) Confirm only through official sources

    If you get a message about your polling place, ignore any links and call your local election office directly. Each state also has an official website you can trust.

    3) Sign up for ballot tracking

    Many states offer secure ballot tracking online. Use only the official election site, not third-party services.

    4) Freeze your credit

    Since scammers use voter data to impersonate you, a credit freeze stops them from opening new accounts in your name. Retirees who don’t need frequent new credit are especially good candidates for this protection.

    A person types on a computer.

    Taking steps to remove your personal info online helps keep your vote and data safe. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    5) Be wary of political donation sites

    If you want to donate, type the campaign’s official website into your browser instead of clicking a link in an email or social media ad.

    Kurt’s key takeaway

    Voting is one of the most important rights we have. But this year, scammers will use public voter data to exploit retirees like never before. Don’t let them steal your peace of mind. By spotting the red flags, sticking to official election sources and removing your personal data from the web, you can protect yourself and your vote.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Have you or someone you know received a suspicious message about voting or donations? How did you realize or suspect that it was a scam? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas finds thousands of illegal immigrants registered to vote on state voter rolls

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A Texas election review has identified thousands of illegal immigrants on the state’s voter rolls, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Monday.

    Nelson said a crosscheck of state voter records found that more than 2,700 possible illegal immigrants were registered on the voter rolls, leading to an eligibility review across the 254 counties.

    The data came from a full comparison of Texas’s 18 million registered voters against federal citizenship records in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ SAVE database, according to the Secretary of State’s office.

    “Only eligible United States citizens may participate in our elections,” Nelson said. “The Trump Administration’s decision to give states free and direct access to this data set for the first time has been a game changer, and we appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.”

    TRUMP ADMIN BLOCKS CITIZENSHIP FOR ILLEGAL MIGRANT VOTERS

    A voter wearing a protective mask and gloves signs a document at a drive-thru mail ballot hand delivery center in Austin, Texas. (Sergio Flores/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The investigation showed after running the SAVE crosscheck, that state officials could identify 2,724 potential noncitizens whose voter files have been sent to local counties to be further investigated.

    This process falls under Chapter 16 of the Texas Election Code, which requires counties to verify each voter’s eligibility and remove confirmed noncitizens from the rolls.

    Nelson said the review is part of an effort to maintain an accurate voter list and to safeguard election integrity ahead of the 2026 election cycle.

    “Everyone’s right to vote is sacred and must be protected,” Nelson said. “We encourage counties to conduct rigorous investigations to determine if any voter is ineligible – just as they do with any other data set we provide.”

    Each flagged voter will receive a notice from their county registrar giving them 30 days to provide proof of U.S. citizenship. If a voter does not respond, their registration will be canceled, though it can be reinstated immediately once proof of citizenship is provided. 

    Nelson’s statement said confirmed noncitizens who voted in previous Texas elections will be referred to the Attorney General’s Office for further review and potential prosecution. 

    The announcement comes amid growing national scrutiny of voter rolls as several states – including Georgia, Arizona, and Florida – have conducted similar audits of voter eligibility.

    Republican Governor Greg Abbott said that since Senate Bill 1 was signed into law, Texas has removed more than one million ineligible or outdated registrations from the state’s voter rolls, calling the effort essential to safeguard Texans’ right to vote.

    ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS POTENTIALLY COUNTED IN US CENSUS TAKE CENTER STAGE IN REDISTRICTING BATTLE

    Voters in Texas head to the polls

    Texas has confirmed noncitizens who voted in previous elections will be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for further review and potential prosecution. (Getty Images)

    “These reforms have led to the removal of over one million ineligible people from our voter rolls in the last three years, including noncitizens, deceased voters, and people who moved to another state,” Abbott said. “The Secretary of State and county voter registrars have an ongoing legal requirement to review the voter rolls, remove ineligible voters, and refer any potential illegal voting to the Attorney General’s Office and local authorities for investigation and prosecution. Illegal voting in Texas will never be tolerated. We will continue to actively safeguard Texans’ sacred right to vote while also aggressively protecting our elections from illegal voting.”

    Abbott has called the initiative proof that Texas is “leading the nation in election integrity.”

    A breakdown of the information was released by the Secretary of State’s office showing Harris County with the largest number of potential noncitizens at 362, followed by Dallas County (277), Bexar County (201), and El Paso County (165).
    Smaller counties, including Andrews, Llano, and Cooke, reported fewer than ten flagged registrations.

    In total, all 254 Texas counties were included in the SAVE database review. Counties began sending verification notices this week as part of the 30-day review process. 

    In June, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson announced that she had referred to the Office of Attorney General to investigate the names of 33 potential noncitizens who voted in the November 2024 General Election. 

    The statement released by Nelson said the referral came within weeks of Texas gaining access to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s SAVE Database.  

    “Gaining access to this database has been a game-changer. Not only have we been able to identify individuals who should not have voted in the last election, we have also been able to confirm naturalization of dozens more,” Secretary Nelson said. 

    The crosscheck was made possible after the Trump Administration granted states direct and free access to the federal SAVE database for the first time.

    The tool allows election officials to confirm voter citizenship against immigration and naturalization records.

    The statement also said Texas was among the first states to join a pilot program with DHS, USCIS, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to improve the database’s functionality. 

    CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “We are in the early stages of this pilot program, but we already see promising results. This may be the most current and accurate data set there is when it comes to citizenship verification,” Secretary Nelson said.  

    County registrars are expected to complete their investigations by early December, with official removals and potential referrals to follow.

    The Secretary of State’s office said the review will continue with periodic checks against federal databases to ensure accuracy. 

    “The SAVE database has proven to be a critically important data set and one of many that we will continue to use in Texas to ensure that only qualified voters cast a ballot in our elections,” Nelson said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Political crisis in France eases for now as prime minister survives no-confidence vote

    [ad_1]

    PARIS — PARIS (AP) — France’s latest political crisis eased — for now — when Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu survived two consecutive no-confidence votes on Thursday, averting another government collapse and giving President Emmanuel Macron a respite before an even tougher fight over the national budget.

    The immediate danger may have receded but the core problem is still very much center stage. The eurozone’s second-largest economy is still run by a minority government in a splintered parliament where no single bloc or party has a majority.

    Every major law now turns on last-minute deals, and the next test is a spending plan that must pass before the end of the year.

    On Thursday, lawmakers in the 577-seat National Assembly rejected a no-confidence motion filed by the hard-left France Unbowed party. The 271 votes were 18 short of the 289 needed to bring down the government.

    A second motion from the far-right National Rally also failed.

    Had Lecornu lost, Macron would have faced only unpalatable options: call new legislative elections, try to find yet another prime minister — France’s fifth in barely a year — or perhaps even resign himself, which he has ruled out.

    Macron’s decision to dissolve the National Assembly in June 2024 backfired on him, triggering legislative elections that stacked the powerful lower house with opponents of the French leader but producing no outright winner.

    Since then, Macron’s minority governments have sought to barter support bill by bill and have fallen in quick succession.

    That collides with the architecture of the Fifth Republic, founded in 1958 under Charles de Gaulle.

    The system was built for a strong presidency and stable parliamentary majorities, not for coalition horse-trading or a splintered house.

    With no single bloc near an absolute majority of 289 seats, the machinery is grinding against its design, turning big votes into cliffhangers and raising existential questions about the governance of France.

    For French voters and observers, it’s jarring. France, once a model of eurozone stability, is now stumbling from crisis to crisis, testing the patience of markets and allies.

    To peel away opposition votes, Lecornu offered to slow the rollout of Macron’s flagship 2023 pension law, which raises the retirement age from 62 to 64.

    The proposed slowdown could push the law back roughly two years, easing near-term pressure on people nearing retirement while leaving the end goal intact.

    The government puts the short-term cost of the delay at 400 million euros ($430 million) for next year and 1.8 billion euros ($1.9 billion) for 2027, saying it will find offsets.

    For many in France, pensions touch a nerve — the 2023 law triggered massive protests and strikes that left heaps of trash rotting on Paris streets.

    The government then used Article 49.3 — a special constitutional power that lets a prime minister push a law through without a parliamentary vote. But the backlash only hardened.

    With Thursday’s reprieve, Macron’s government has some breathing room. It shifts the battle to the 2026 budget, with a debate opening on Oct. 24.

    Lecornu has vowed not to use Article 49.3 to pass a budget without a vote — which means no shortcuts: every line must win support in a fractured chamber.

    The government and its allies hold fewer than 200 seats. For a majority, they need opposition support.

    That math makes the Socialists, with 69 lawmakers, and the conservative Republicans, with 50, both potential swing blocs. But their backing isn’t a given, even though they both lent support to Lecornu against Thursday’s no-confidence motions.

    The Socialists say the budget draft still lacks “social and fiscal justice.”

    France’s deficit sits near 5.4% of GDP. The plan is to bring it to 4.7% next year with spending restraint and targeted tax changes while trying to protect growth.

    The left is preparing a renewed push for a wealth-side measure aimed at ultra-high fortunes.

    The government rejects that path and prefers narrower, lower-yield steps, including measures on holding companies.

    Analysts predict hard bargaining over benefit freezes, higher medical deductibles and savings demanded of local authorities — each concession risking votes on one flank even as it gains them on another.

    The clock is ticking: Against a year’s end budget deadline, the government must show how it will pay for the pension slowdown and negotiate, in parallel, with the Socialists and conservatives over taxes and spending.

    For the president, success would mean proving that France can pass a credible budget and start to rein in its deficit without extraordinary procedural force.

    If the talks crack — on pensions, taxes or spending — the risks of Lecornu’s government collapsing return, and at the end of the year, France could find itself back where it started: deadlocked.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Philly renters will get voter registration information when signing a new lease

    [ad_1]

    Upon signing a new lease in Philadelphia, renters soon will receive information explaining how they can register to vote or update their existing voter registrations.

    A new bill unanimously approved by City Council on Thursday updates the city’s handbook on good housing to include a link to the How to Register page on the City Commissioner’s website. Landlords are required to provide new tenants with a copy of this handbook and a certificate stating the property is suitable to live in. The update to the handbook is intended to ensure residents vote at the polling places connected to their new addresses.


    MORE: Philly’s only rape crisis center receives financial relief to stay afloat after layoffs


    Tenants must sign a form saying that they’ve received a copy of the handbook. The How to Register page provides information on how to register, check one’s registration status and register to vote by mail. Residents must have lived in their election districts for at least 30 days prior to Election Day before they can vote using their new addresses. 

    Approximately 47% of housing in Philadelphia is renter-occupied and the city saw a 2.5% increase in renters from 2010 to 2020, the Economy League reported. But Councilmember Nina Ahmad, who introduced the legislation, said renters often move multiple times, neglect to update their addresses and “fall off the voter rolls.”

    “The bill meets people where they are and makes updating registration easy when people move in the city,” Ahmad said during Thursday’s meeting. 

    The legislation takes effect Nov. 16. The city’s handbook will be updated with the new information before that deadline. 

    According to the Philadelphia Commissioner’s Office, 1.062 million of Philadelphia’s 1.6 million residents are registered to vote. However, turnout remains an issue. Only 65% of registered voters took part in the November 2024 election, down 1.3% from the 2020 election, the Inquirer reported. 

    [ad_2]

    Michaela Althouse

    Source link

  • One Republican Now Controls a Huge Chunk of US Election Infrastructure

    [ad_1]

    The news last week that Dominion Voting Systems was purchased by the founder and CEO of Knowink, a Missouri-based maker of electronic poll books, has left election integrity activists confused over what, if anything, this could mean for voters and the integrity of US elections.

    The company, acquired by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican Party operative and election director in Missouri before founding Knowink, said in a press release that he was rebranding Dominion, which has headquarters in Canada and the United States, under the name Liberty Vote “in a bold and historic move to transform and improve election integrity in America” and to distance the company from false allegations made previously by President Donald Trump and his supporters that the company had rigged the 2020 presidential election to give the win to President Joe Biden.

    The Liberty release said that the rebranded company will be 100 percent American owned, that it will have a “paper ballot focus” that leverages hand-marked paper ballots, will “prioritize facilitating third-party auditing,” and is “committed to domestic staffing and software development.” The press release provided no details, however, to explain what this means in practice.

    Dominion, the second leading provider of voting machines in the US, whose systems are used in 27 states—including the entire state of Georgia—has developed its software in Belgrade, Serbia and Canada for two decades. A search on LinkedIn shows numerous programmers and other workers in Serbia who claim to be employed by the company.

    The Liberty statement does not say whether the company plans to re-write code developed by these foreign workers—which would potentially involve rewriting hundreds of thousands of lines of code—or whether the company will move foreign developers to the US or replace them with American programmers. (Dominion already has a US headquarters in Colorado.) A Liberty official, who agreed to speak on the condition that they not be named, told WIRED only that Leiendecker “is committed to 100 percent … domestic staffing and software development.” An unnamed source told CNN, however, that Liberty will continue to have a presence in Canada, where its machines are used across the country.

    Philip Stark, professor of statistics at UC Berkeley and longtime election-integrity advocate, says that Liberty’s assurance about domestic-only workers is a red herring. “If the claim is that this is somehow a security measure, it isn’t. Because programmers based in the US also … may be interested in undermining or altering election integrity,” he tells WIRED.

    With regard to third-party audits mentioned in the press release, a Liberty official told WIRED this means the company will conduct a “third-party, top-to-bottom, independent review of [Dominion] software and equipment in a timely manner and will work closely with federal and state certification agencies and report any vulnerabilities” to give voters assurance in the machines and the results they produce. The company didn’t say when this review would occur, but a Liberty representative told Axios it would happen ahead of next year’s midterm elections, and the company would “rebuild or retire” machines as needed.

    [ad_2]

    Kim Zetter

    Source link

  • Did Virginia’s gubernatorial debate change voters’ minds before Election Day? – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Interruptions dominated the one and only Virginia gubernatorial debate between Republican Winsome Earle-Sears and Democrat Abigail Spanberger Thursday night.

    Interruptions dominated the one and only Virginia gubernatorial debate between Republican Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic candidate Abigail Spanberger Thursday night.

    With less than a month remaining before the general election, independent voters are gravitating toward Spanberger and her campaign, David Ramadan, a professor at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, told WTOP.

    “She’s talking about affordability, talking about education, talking about people losing jobs,” Ramadan said. “That’s resonating with the independent voter.”

    After an “exhausting” debate, Ramadan, a former Republican member of the Virginia House of Delegates, said the interruptions did not give the public a chance to learn real information, possibly resulting in no changes in support for either candidate.

    However, if there was a winner, Ramadan said Spanberger’s strategy of sticking to “kitchen table issues” throughout her campaign and the debate helped sway independent voters. Before the debate, a Washington Post/Schar School poll found Spanberger ahead of Earle-Sears by 12% among likely voters.

    “It’s the independent voter that any candidate who wants to win needs to attract,” he said. “It’s obvious that Spanberger’s message is resonating with (the) independent voter.”

    Spanberger largely avoided addressing her Republican opponent directly, opting for a more sterile and bipartisan tone.

    Ramadan called the decision not to engage with Earle-Sears smart, especially when it came to the emergence of attorney general candidate Jay Jones’ 2022 text messages to a colleague about shooting former House Speaker Todd Gilbert.

    “Concentrating on your own campaign versus others that you cannot control is a smart way of running a debate and running a campaign, especially when you’re only four weeks away,” Ramadan said.

    Ramadan said Earle-Sears bringing up Gilbert’s text messages during the debate may sway voters on their choice for attorney general, “but it’s not going to sway voters on who are they going to vote for governor and for lieutenant governor.”

    “In Virginia, even though there are two parties, and there are three people from each party running. They all run individually and independently. There’s no tickets that are in there. The voter doesn’t walk in and cast one vote for three candidates. You cast one vote per candidate,” Ramadan said.

    Earle-Sears’ strategy

    In her campaign ads, Earle-Sears highlighted transgender and social issues, which echo what Gov. Glenn Youngkin ran on four years ago. Ramadan said that these may not be resonating for Earle-Sears, however, “because she is anywhere between seven to 12 points behind.”

    Ramadan said Earle-Sears’ debate strategy did not work.

    “I guess the tactic was to try to derail Congresswoman Spanberger from sticking to her talking points that are resonating and by interrupt, interrupt. And it did not work,” Ramadan said.

    While it’s a long shot for any candidate, not just Earle-Sears, to come back from being 7 to 12 points behind, Ramadan said informing the public about some of the policies Earle-Sears would be supporting could help, but he’s doubtful it’s enough to close the gap.

    “(Earle-)Sears, to the best of my knowledge, does not even have any policy on her website,” Ramadan said.

    Spanberger, however, has talked about Virginians being out of work due to DOGE cuts and the recent government shutdown, which Ramadan said is working for Spanberger. While Earle-Sears, Ramadan said, had “a couple of mishaps,” including when she commented, amid the height of DOGE cuts earlier this year, that job loss was a common experience.

    There’s also her support of President Donald Trump’s administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which Ramadan said was not resonating in Northern Virginia.

    Ramadan said to win any statewide race, candidates need a hefty margin in Northern Virginia.

    “The DOGE and the federal cuts are better issues for Democrats and better issues for Spanberger than they are for Earle-Sears and Republicans,” he said.

    With fewer than 30 days until the general election, Spanberger needs to stay the course and keep focusing on the kitchen table issues that are winning topics for her, Ramadan said.

    The size of her victory could indicate what’s to come nationwide during the midterms.

    “If it’s a small margin, the case then becomes, ‘OK, that was good for Virginia, it doesn’t mean it’s going to work for the rest of the country,’” Ramadan said. “If the margin ends up a big margin, as we’re seeing in today’s polls and last week’s polls, then this is a teaching lesson in a bellwether moment for the entire country for the 2026 elections.”

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jose Umana

    Source link

  • Supreme Court hears arguments in mail-in ballot case

    [ad_1]



    Supreme Court hears arguments in mail-in ballot case – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a lawsuit challenging an Illinois mail-in voting law. CBS News legal reporter Katrina Kaufman has more.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Campaign delays push to expand Medicaid in Florida until 2028, citing new state law

    [ad_1]

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A campaign to expand Medicaid in Florida is delaying its push to get the issue on the ballot until 2028, citing a new state law restricting the process to get constitutional amendments before voters.

    The group Florida Decides Healthcare had been working to get the measure on the 2026 ballot, while challenging the law in a federal court. That case is slated to go to trial in January.

    On Thursday, the campaign said that by passing the new law known as H.B. 1205, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the GOP-controlled Legislature “changed the ballot initiative rules mid-campaign” in a way that “deliberately undermined” the group’s push to gather enough petition signatures from Florida voters to get the measure on the 2026 ballot.

    “HB 1205 imposed roadblocks that made signature gathering nearly impossible on a 2026 timeline,” the campaign said in a statement.

    Representatives for DeSantis did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The law signed by DeSantis in May sets new limits on how many petitions Florida voters can collect in their effort to get a constitutional amendment on the ballot, a provision punishable by a felony if voters violate it. The measure also bars non-U.S. citizens and non-Florida residents from gathering signed petitions for ballot initiatives.

    The Florida Legislature pushed the changes months after a majority of the state’s voters supported ballot initiatives to protect abortion rights and legalize recreational marijuana, though the measures fell short of the 60% needed to pass. Lawmakers argued that the restrictions are needed to reform a process they claim has been tainted by fraud.

    “HB 1205 wasn’t about transparency, it was sabotage aimed directly at citizen-led ballot initiatives. This law may have delayed us until 2028, but it will not stop us,” said Mitch Emerson, executive director of Florida Decides Healthcare.

    Nearly 150 bills were introduced across 15 state legislatures this year seeking to make it harder for initiatives to qualify for the ballot or win approval by voters — nearly double the amount of just two years ago, according to the Fairness Project, a progressive group that has backed dozens of ballot initiatives in states. Voting rights advocates say the trend betrays the promise of direct democracy.

    ___

    Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Record number of requested Minneapolis mail-in ballots sent out on first day of early voting

    [ad_1]




































    Despite Kirk assassination, Turning Point tour to continue at U of M, and more headlines



    Despite Kirk assassination, Turning Point tour to continue at U of M, and more headlines

    03:20

    Minneapolis officials sent over 12,600 requested mail-in ballots to residents for the first day of early voting on Friday, a record number for a municipal election, the city said.

    An additional 351 people completed a ballot at the Early Vote Center on Hennepin Avenue on Friday.

    The city said that it mailed out 3,736 ballot requests on the first day of early voting ahead of the 2021 municipal election. 

    Voters who applied to receive a mail-in ballot should allow up to seven days for it to arrive, and the same number of days for returning a completed ballot, according to the city. 

    Mail-in ballots need to be received by election day on Nov. 4, and cannot be dropped off at polling places that day.

    The last day to vote early in person is Monday, Nov. 3.   

    Minneapolis residents can learn more about voting early in person here, and Minnesota residents can find out more about the 2025 general election at the secretary of state’s website.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Lentz

    Source link

  • Missouri judge strikes down ballot summary for anti-abortion measure backed by Republican lawmakers

    [ad_1]

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A Missouri judge has struck down a ballot summary for an anti-abortion amendment backed by Republican state lawmakers while concluding that it presented an unfair and insufficient description to voters.

    Cole County Circuit Judge Daniel Green ruled Friday that the ballot summary must be rewritten, but he rejected a request by abortion-rights advocates to block the proposed constitutional amendment from going to voters.

    The judge said the summary prepared by Republican lawmakers failed to inform voters that the new measure would repeal an abortion-rights amendment adopted by voters last year. He directed the secretary of state’s office to write a new summary.

    The ruling marks the latest in a series of twists and turns in Missouri’s abortion policies over the past three years.

    When the U.S. Supreme Court ended a nationwide right to abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, that triggered a Missouri law to take effect banning abortions “except in cases of medical emergency.” But abortion-rights activists then gathered initiative petition signatures to put their own measure on the ballot.

    Last November, Missouri voters narrowly approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a right to abortion until fetal viability, generally considered sometime past 21 weeks of pregnancy. That measure, known as Amendment 3, also allows later abortions to protect the life or health of pregnant women and creates a “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” that includes birth control, prenatal and postpartum care and “respectful birthing conditions.”

    In May, the Republican-led Legislature shut down Democratic opposition and approved a new referendum that would repeal Amendment 3 and instead allow abortions only for a medical emergency or fetal anomaly, or in cases of rape or incest up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. That proposed amendment also would prohibit gender transition surgeries, hormone treatments and puberty blockers for minors, which already are barred under state law.

    Abortion-rights advocates had argued in a lawsuit that the entire measure should be stricken, alleging that the combination of abortion and transgender policies violated a constitutional requirement that amendments contain only one subject. But Green agreed with Republican lawmakers that both topics fit under the measure’s title of “reproductive health care.”

    The court order provided both sides an opportunity to claim victory.

    Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway’s office said in a statement that the court upheld “the central constitutional issues.”

    Tori Schafer, director of policy and campaigns at the ACLU of Missouri, said abortion-rights advocates are “pleased that the judge saw through the legislature’s deceitful language” in the ballot summary.

    Both the attorney general’s office and Republican state Rep. Brian Seitz, who championed the latest measure, said they are confident in Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins’ ability to revise the ballot summary.

    If it’s a simple wording change, “I think we would be fine with that, because we do want the Missouri voters to know what they are voting on,” Seitz said Friday.

    The proposed amendment will appear on the November 2026 ballot, unless Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe schedules the vote for sooner. The new measure is slated to be listed as Amendment 3 — the same number as the original abortion amendment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Justice Department Says It’s Suing Oregon And Maine As It Seeks Voter Data In Multiple States – KXL

    [ad_1]

    PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The Justice Department said Tuesday that it has sued Oregon and Maine for failing to turn over their voter registration lists, marking the first lawsuits the department has brought against states in its wide-ranging effort to get detailed voter data.

    The department said the states were violating federal law by refusing to provide electronic copies of state voter registration lists and information regarding ineligible voters. It added that Oregon also did not provide information on how it maintains its voter list.

    Oregon and Maine are among at least 26 states that the department has asked for voter registration rolls in recent months, according to an Associated Press tally.

    “States simply cannot pick and choose which federal laws they will comply with, including our voting laws, which ensure that all American citizens have equal access to the ballot in federal elections,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a news release.

    Spokespeople for the secretary of state’s offices in Oregon and Maine said Tuesday they had not yet received notice of the lawsuit. A message left with the Justice Department requesting a copy of the court filing was not immediately returned.

    Some states have declined or demurred on the voter registration data requests, citing their own state laws or the Justice Department’s failure to fulfill federal Privacy Act obligations. Federal officials have followed up by sending additional letters demanding the voter data on short deadlines.

    Several states have sent redacted versions of their voter lists that are available to the public, but the Justice Department has on multiple occasions expressly demanded copies that contain personally identifiable information, including voter names, birth dates, addresses and driver’s license numbers or partial Social Security numbers.

    The department also threatened to sue Minnesota and California.

    Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has been among the most vocal secretaries of state to decline to share the information. The Justice Department issued a second request for the state’s voter data in August after she declined its initial request, her office said last week in a statement.

    “Maine has some of the best elections in the nation,” Bellows said Tuesday in a statement. “It is absurd that the Department of Justice is targeting our state when Republican and Democratic Secretaries all across the country are fighting back against this federal abuse of power just like we are.”

    Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read had similar comments Tuesday.

    “If the President wants to use the DOJ to go after his political opponents and undermine our elections, I look forward to seeing them in court,” he said in a statement. “I stand by my oath to the people of Oregon, and I will protect their rights and privacy.”

    The Justice Department’s outreach has raised alarm among some election officials because the agency doesn’t have the constitutional authority to run elections. That power is granted to states and Congress. Federal law also protects the sharing of individual data with the federal government.

    The department has said it needs to access detailed voter data to ensure election officials are following federal election laws. Election officials have disputed that and raised concerns that federal officials are trying to use the sensitive data for other purposes, such as searching for potential noncitizens on the rolls.

    In a separate request, the Justice Department in August requested access to voting machines used in the 2020 election in Missouri. It’s not clear why the department made the inquiry, but it came just two months after President Donald Trump called for a special prosecutor to investigate that year’s election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

    More about:


    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link