ReportWire

Tag: Voting

  • Democrats are hopeful again. But unresolved questions remain about party’s path forward

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — For a day, at least, beleaguered Democrats are hopeful again. But just beneath the party’s relief at securing its first big electoral wins since last November’s drubbing lay unresolved questions about its direction heading into next year’s midterm elections.

    The Election Day romp of Republicans stretched from deep-blue New York and California to swing states Georgia, Pennsylvania and Virginia. There were signs that key voting groups, including young people, Black voters and Hispanics who shifted toward President Donald Trump’s Republican Party just a year ago, may be shifting back. And Democratic leaders across the political spectrum coalesced behind a simple message focused on Trump’s failure to address rising costs and everyday kitchen table issues.

    The dominant performance sparked a new round of debate among the party’s establishment-minded pragmatists and fiery progressives over which approach led to Tuesday’s victories, and which path to take into the high-stakes 2026 midterm elections and beyond. The lessons Democrats learn from the victories will help determine the party’s leading message and messengers next year — when elections will decide the balance of power in Congress for the second half of Trump’s term — and potentially in the 2028 presidential race, which has already entered its earliest stages.

    “Of course, there’s a division within the Democratic Party. There’s no secret,” Sen. Bernie Sanders told reporters at a Capitol Hill press conference about the election results.

    Sanders and his chief political strategist pointed to the success of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as a model for Democrats across the country. But Rep. Suzan Del Bene, who leads the House Democrats’ midterm campaign strategy, avoided saying Mamdani’s name when asked about his success.

    Del Bene instead cheered the moderate approach adopted by Democrats Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill in successful races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey as a more viable track for candidates outside of a Democratic stronghold like New York City.

    “New York is bright blue … and the path to the majority in the House is going to be through purple districts,” she told The Associated Press. “The people of Arizona, Iowa and Nebraska aren’t focused on the mayor of New York.”

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a likely Democratic presidential prospect who campaigned alongside Democrats in several states leading up to Tuesday’s elections, noted the candidates hit on a common issue that resonated with voters, regardless of location.

    “All of these candidates who won in these different states were focused on peoples’ everyday needs,” Shapiro said. “And you saw voters in every one of those states and cities showing up to send a clear message to Donald Trump that they’re rejecting his chaos.”

    Intraparty criticism

    Amid Democrats’ celebratory phone calls and news conferences, members of the party’s different wings had some sharp critiques for each other.

    While Shapiro cheered the party’s success during a Wednesday interview, he also acknowledged concerns about Mamdani in New York.

    Shapiro, one of the nation’s most prominent Jewish elected leaders, said he’s not comfortable with some of Mamdani’s comments on Israel. The New York mayor-elect, a Muslim, has described Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks as “genocide” against the Palestinian people and has been slow to condemn rhetoric linked to anti-Semitism.

    “I’ve expressed that to him personally. We’ve had good private communications,” Shapiro said of his concerns. “And I hope, as he did last night in his victory speech, that he’ll be a mayor that protects all New Yorkers and tries to bring people together.”

    Meanwhile, Sanders’ political strategist, Faiz Shakir, warned Democrats against embracing “cookie cutter campaigns that say nothing and do nothing” — a reference to centrist Democrats Spanberger and Sherrill.

    Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat who defeated democratic socialist Omar Fateh to win a third term, said at a news conference Wednesday that “we have to love our city more than our ideology.”

    “We need to be doing everything possible to push back on authoritarianism and what Donald Trump is doing,” Frey said. “And at the same time, the opposite of Donald Trump extremism is not the opposite extreme.”

    Democrats win everywhere

    Despite potential cracks in the Democratic coalition, it’s hard to understate the extent of the party’s electoral success.

    In Georgia, two Democrats cruised to wins over Republican incumbents in elections to the state Public Service Commission, delivering the largest statewide margins of victory by Democrats in more than 20 years.

    In Pennsylvania, Democrats swept not only three state Supreme Court races, but every county seat in presidential swing counties like Bucks and Erie Counties, including sheriffs. Bucks County elected its first Democratic district attorney as Democrats there also won key school board races and county judgeships.

    Maine voters defeated a Republican-backed measure that would have mandated showing an ID at the polls. Colorado approved raising taxes on people earning more than $300,000 annually to fund school meal programs and food assistance for low-income state residents. And California voters overwhelmingly backed a charge led by Gov. Gavin Newsom to redraw its congressional map to give Democrats as many as five more House seats in upcoming elections.

    Key groups coming back to Democrats

    Trump made inroads with Black and Hispanic voters in 2024. But this week, Democrats scored strong performances with non-white voters in New Jersey and Virginia that offered promise.

    About 7 in 10 voters in New Jersey were white, according to the AP Voter Poll. And Sherrill won about half that group. But she made up for her relative weakness with whites with a strong showing among Black, Hispanic and Asian voters.

    The vast majority — about 9 in 10 — of Black voters supported Sherrill, as did about 8 in 10 Asian voters.

    Hispanic voters in New Jersey were more divided, but about two-thirds supported Sherrill; only about 3 in 10 voted for the Republican nominee, Jack Ciattarelli.

    The pattern was similar in Virginia, where Spanberger performed well among Black voters, Hispanic voters and Asian voters, even though she didn’t win a majority of white voters.

    Democrats will soon face a choice

    The debate over the party’s future is already starting to play out in key midterm elections where Democrats have just begun intra-party primary contests.

    The choice is stark in Maine’s high-stakes Senate race, where Democrats will pick from a field that features establishment favorite, Gov. Jan Mills, and Sanders-endorsed populist Graham Platner. A similar dynamic could play out in key contests across Massachusetts, New York, Texas and Michigan.

    Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who is aligned with the progressive wing of the party, said the people he speaks to are demanding bold action to address their economic concerns.

    “Folks are so frustrated by how hard its become to afford a dignified life here in Michigan and across the country,” he said.

    “I’m sure the corporate donors don’t want us to push too hard,” El-Sayed continued. “My worry is the very same people who told us we were just fine in 2024 will miss the mandate.”

    ___

    Associated Press reporter Mike Catalini in Newark and Joey Cappelletti in Washington contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • OK registration trend continues shift from Dem to GOP, independent

    [ad_1]

    An area trend in party affiliation over the past 14 years shows a dramatic shift in registered voters, including an increase in folks voting independent.

    Cherokee County Election Board Secretary Tiffany Rozell shared the data with Tahlequah Daily Press, which shows that over this time span, the number of Republicans increased from 5,833 in 2011 to 12,924 by October 2025. Registered Democrats in 2011 numbered 14,768, and by 2025, the number registered in that party has decreased to 9,313.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmr96C@<66 r@F?EJ H2D @?46 @4C2E:4 DEC@?89@=5] x? `hgd[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %s! C6A@CED 2E E92E E:>6[ >@C6 E92? g_T @7 E96 4@F?EJ H2D C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2E:4]k^Am

    kAmw@H6G6C[ G@E6CD H9@ 92G6 AF==65 2H2J 7C@> C68:DE6C:?8 H:E9 6:E96C @7 E96 EH@ >2:? A2CE:6D 2?5 C68:DE6C:?8 :?56A6?56?E ?F>36C65 a[bbg 😕 a_“[ H:E9 2? :?4C62D6 E@ d[fb_ 😕 a_ad] s2E2 @? C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD 😕 E96 {:36CE2C:2? !2CEJ 3682? 36:?8 4@==64E65 😕 a_`e[ H:E9 ch ?@E65[ 2?5 😕 a_ad[ E96 ?F>36C 92D :?4C62D65 E@ ae`]k^Am

    kAm$6G6C2= :?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 4@?E24E65 7@C :?AFE @? E9:D E@A:4[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 ?2E:@?2= 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ] %H@ C6DA@?565i E96 DE2E6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ 2?5 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 492:C]k^Am

    kAm{2FC6? rC2:8[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 5@H?H2C5 EC6?5 😕 C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED DE2CE65 😕 a_`c[ H96? E9@D6 49@@D:?8 E@ G@E6 :?56A6?56?E 6IA6C:6?465 2 5C2>2E:4 C:D6]k^Am

    kAmx? ~<=29@>2[ :?56A6?56?E G@E6CD 42? @?=J AF== 2 s6>@4C2E:4 32==@E 7@C 2 AC:>2CJ] %96 ~<=29@>2 $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6’D @77:46 @77:4:2==J D6E E96 52E6 E@ 368:? 4@==64E:?8 D:8?2EFC6D @? $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe 7@C ~4E] ah[ 2?5 E92E AC@46DD >FDE 36 4@>A=6E65 😕 h_ 52JD]k^Am

    kAmx7 A2DD65[ $E2E6 “F6DE:@? gbe H@F=5 6?5 ~<=29@>2UCDBF@jD 4=@D65[ A2CE:D2? AC:>2C:6D 2?5 C6A=246 E96> H:E9 @A6? AC:>2C:6D] x? E96 @A6? AC:>2CJ DJDE6> AC@A@D65 3J $” gbe[ 2== G@E6CD U?52D9j C682C5=6DD @7 A2CEJ U?52D9j H@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 42DE 32==@ED 😕 2 D:?8=6 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ 😕 H9:49 2== 42?5:52E6D 2AA62C @? @?6 32==@E 2=@?8 H:E9 E96:C A2CEJ C68:DEC2E:@?] %96 E@A EH@ G@E686EE6CD H@F=5 >@G6 @?E@ 2 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] %9:D :?7@C>2E:@? H2D E2<6? 7C@> E96 H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^G@E6J6Dgbe]4@>QmG@E6J6Dgbe]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E 36=:6G6 E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 @FC G@E6CD 2C6 8@:?8 #6AF3=:42?[ 3FE E@ :?56A6?56?E[ H9:49 😀 2 ?2E:@?2= EC6?5[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 EFC?@FE C2E6 7@C s6>@4C2ED 😀 72C =6DD E92? E9@D6 C68:DE6C65[ 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 2 9:896C A6C46?E286 @7 7@=A2C65 E@ #6AF3=:42?D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 3:886DE C62D@? H9J G@E6CD 5@?’E EFC? @FE 😀 =24< @7 C6AC6D6?E2E:@? 😕 E96 A2CEJ[” rC2:8 D2:5] “$@ >2?J 8@ 4@>A=6E6=J F?492==6?865 2?5 AC:>2C:6D >2J ?@E 6G6? 92G6 42?5:52E6D]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 @7 E96 3:886C >@E:G2E:@?D 😕 ~<=29@>2 😀 E@ G@E6 😀 7@C =@42= C246D[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 E@A 😀 8@G6C?@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E[ 3FE DEF5:6D D9@H G@E6CD 2C6 >@C6 =:<6=J E@ D9@H FA 7@C 2 4@>>F?:EJ A@D:E:@?[” rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?8=6:DDF6 32==@ED 2C6 2 AC@3=6>[ =:<6 AFEE:?8 6=64E:@?D 😕 E96 >:55=6 @7 E96 42=6?52C[ rC2:8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|@DE 2DD@4:2E6 6=64E:@?D H:E9 E96 v6?6C2= q2==@E[” rC2:8 D2:5] “(96? H6 AFE E9:?8D @? 2 =@42= 32==@E – 2?5 :E 4@DED 2 =@E @7 >@?6J E@ AFE @? E96D6 6=64E:@?D – E96? A6@A=6 5@?’E D9@H FA] %96 4@DE 😀 E96 D2>6[ 3FE E96 C6EFC? @? 2? 6=64E:@? 😀 ?@E E96C6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 D:?8=6:DDF6 D2=6D E2I 6=64E:@? 7@C E96 $EC66ED 2?5 $:56H2= @? $6AE] h[ @?=J `[_fd G@E65 @FE @7 “[ffa C68:DE6C65 E@ G@E6 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E]k^Am

    kAmw2G:?8 2 3@?5 G@E65 @? @FED:56 @7 2 3:886C 6=64E:@? 42?[ 9@H6G6C[ 36 36?67:4:2=[ rC2:8 D2:5] xE AC6G6?ED D@>6 @7 E96 C96E@C:4 2?5 >@?6J :DDF6D 4@?7FD:?8 E96 G@E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 D9@F=5 36 DE2?52C5:K:?8 2?5 D:>A=:7J:?8 @FC 6=64E:@?D[” rC2:8 D2:5] “p?5 :7 2 A6CD@? >@G6D 4:EJE@4:EJ[ E96J 92G6 E@ =62C? :E 2== @G6C 282:? 😕 6249 ?6H E@H?]”k^Am

    kAmr2C@= $?665y2=36CE[ 492:C @7 E96 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 E96 4@F?EJ 92D 567:?:E6=J D66? 2 D9:7E]k^Am

    kAm“*6D[ 96C6 😕 r96C@<66 r@F?EJ[ H6 92G6 D66? 2 D9:7E 😕 A6@A=6 DH:E49:?8 7C@> @?6 A2CEJ E@ 2?@E96C[” $?665y2=36CE D2:5] “%96 52E2 D9@HD A6@A=6 96C6 2C6 C68:DE6C:?8 >2:?=J 2D #6AF3=:42?D]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Lee Guthrie | lguthrie@tahlequahdailypress.com

    Source link

  • Speaker faces unruly House as lawmakers return for shutdown vote

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — After refusing to convene the U.S. House during the government shutdown, Speaker Mike Johnson is recalling lawmakers back into session — and facing an avalanche of pent-up legislative demands from those who have largely been sidelined from governing.

    Hundreds of representatives are preparing to return Wednesday to Washington after a nearly eight-week absence, carrying a torrent of ideas, proposals and frustrations over work that has stalled when the Republican speaker shuttered the House doors nearly two months ago.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:CDE H:== 36 2 G@E6 E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?FA52E6g_67f4252f3b4_ddh242bggge675g7h_QmC6@A6? E96 8@G6C?>6?Ek^2m] qFE E92E’D ;FDE E96 DE2CE] (:E9 677@CED E@ C6=62D6 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6ADE6:?>2IH6==4@?8C6DD;FDE:4656A2CE>6?EECF>Ab6_5a`ce46_45_7e464223_`hgc_a24fQmy677C6J tADE6:? 7:=6Dk^2m 2?5 E96 DH62C:?8 😕 @7 pC:K@?2’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^256=:E28C:;2=G2DH62C4@?8C6DD6ADE6:?7:=6Dadebe764`5hhhe_2d73“d_`24ge44ehQm#6A]6=64E p56=:E2 vC:;2=G2[k^2m E96 F?7:?:D965 3FD:?6DD H:== A@D6 2 7C6D9 E6DE E@ y@9?D@?’D 8C:A @? A@H6C 2?5 AFE 2 C6?6H65 7@4FD @? 9:D =6256CD9:A]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D 6IEC2@C5:?2CJ[” D2:5 |2EE96H vC66?[ 2 AC@76DD@C 2E E96 A@=:E:4D 56A2CE>6?E 2E %96 r2E9@=:4 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 p>6C:42]k^Am

    kAm“(92E $A62<6C y@9?D@? 2?5 #6AF3=:42?D 2C6 5@:?8[ J@F 92G6 E@ 8@ 324< 564256D E@ 7:?5 2? 6I2>A=6 H96C6 E96 w@FD6 — 6:E96C 492>36C — 564:565 ?@E E@ >66E]”k^Am

    kAm(96? E96 w@FD6 82G6=D 324< :?E@ D6DD:@?[ :E H:== 4=@D6 E9:D C6>2C<23=6 492AE6C @7 y@9?D@?’D E6?FC6 H96? 96 D9@H65 9:>D6=7 E@ 36 2 =6256C H9@ 😀 BF:6E=J[ 3FE 3C2K6?=J[ H:==:?8 E@ FA6?5 :?DE:EFE:@?2= ?@C>D 😕 AFCDF:E @7 9:D 3C@256C DEC2E68J[ 6G6? 2E E96 C:D< @7 5:>:?:D9:?8 E96 w@FD6 :ED6=7]k^Am

    kAm#2E96C E92? FD6 E96 :>>6?D6 A@H6CD @7 E96 DA62<6C’D @77:46 E@ 7@C467F==J DE66C E96 5632E6 😕 r@?8C6DD[ 2D 2 4@6BF2= 3C2?49 @7 E96 8@G6C?>6?E @? A2C H:E9 E96 6I64FE:G6 2?5 E96 4@FCED[ y@9?D@? D:>A=J 4=@D65 FA D9@A — 2==@H:?8 E96 w@FD6 E@ 364@>6 F?FDF2==J 5676C6?E:2=[ A2CE:4F=2C=J E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^5@?2=5ECF>AQm!C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>Ak^2m]k^Am

    kAm~G6C E96D6 A2DE H6636C 92D D:56DE6AA65 :ED 32D:4 C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D[ 7C@> A2DD:?8 C@FE:?6 =68:D=2E:@? E@ 4@?5F4E:?8 @G6CD:89E] %96 D:=6?4:?8 @7 E96 DA62<6C’D 82G6= 92D 366? 3@E9 F?FDF2= 2?5 DFCAC:D:?8 😕 2 DJDE6> @7 8@G6C?>6?E H96C6 E96 7@F?56CD 6?G:D:@?65 E96 3C2?496D H@F=5 G:8@C@FD=J AC@E64E E96:C :?DE:EFE:@?2= AC6C@82E:G6D]k^Am

    kAm“*@F 42? D66 :E 😀 AC6EEJ 6>AEJ 2C@F?5 96C6[” y@9?D@?[ #{2][ D2:5 @? 52J E9C66 @7 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AD9FE5@H?D?2AG@=F?E66C675hefac4c`g6b`7e44he4hfc32d5a`dQmD9FE5@H?k^2m[ E@FC 8C@FAD ?@ =@?86C 4C@H5:?8 E96 92==D]k^Am

    kAm“(96? r@?8C6DD 564:56D E@ EFC? @77 E96 =:89ED[ :E D9:7ED E96 2FE9@C:EJ E@ E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49] %92E 😀 9@H :E H@C:?8 s6>@4C2ED[ H:E9 E96:C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^D9FE5@H?962=E9E2I4C65:ED277@C523=642C624Ea3d26bed`77`efgb2__6__54`46aec37Qm7:89E @G6C 962=E9 42C6 7F?5Dk^2m[ 7@C E96 4=@DFC6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 DA62<6C 92D 5676?565 9:D 564:D:@? E@ D9FEE6C E96 w@FD6 5FC:?8 H92E’D ?@H E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?=@?86DEECF>A56>@4C2EDD6?2E67:=:3FDE6C`7`cffce223dg52775g2g43dfg57_3g`Qm=@?86DE 8@G6C?>6?E D9FE5@H?k^2m 😕 &]$] 9:DE@CJ] w6 2C8F65 E92E E96 492>36C[ F?56C E96 v~! >2;@C:EJ[ 925 2=C625J 5@?6 :ED ;@3 A2DD:?8 2 DE@A82A 7F?5:?8 3:== 😕 $6AE6>36C] xE H@F=5 36 FA E@ E96 $6?2E6 E@ 24E[ 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm(96? E96 $6?2E6 72:=65 @G6C 2?5 @G6C E@ 25G2?46 E96 w@FD6 3:==[ >@C6 E92? 2 5@K6? E:>6D[ 96 C67FD65 E@ 6?E6C E2=AC@>:D6] y@9?D@? 2=D@ 6?4@FC2865 %CF>A E@ 42?46= 2? :?:E:2= D:E5@H? H:E9 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 =6256CD k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^492C=6DD49F>6CQm$6?] r9F4< $49F>6Ck^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^92<66>;677C:6DQm#6A] w2<66> y677C:6Dk^2m E@ 2G@:5 2 3C@256C ?68@E:2E:@? H9:=6 E96 8@G6C?>6?E H2D DE:== 4=@D65]k^Am

    kAmx?DE625[ E96 DA62<6C[ H9@D6 ;@3 😀 @FE=:?65 😕 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?[ D64@?5 😕 =:?6 @7 DF446DD:@? E@ E96 AC6D:56?4J[ 96=5 2=>@DE 52:=J AC6DD 4@?76C6?46D @? 9:D D:56 @7 E96 r2A:E@=[ 2 H66<=J 4@?76C6?46 42== H:E9 v~! =2H>2<6CD[ 2?5 AC:G2E6 E2=A] w6 ;@:?65 E96 AC6D:56?E 7@C $F?52J’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A?7==:@?D4@>>2?56CD4a4e6d“_daedb6fc36_25ff63d`45ecQm}u{ (2D9:?8E@? r@>>2?56CDk^2m 82>6 2D E96 $6?2E6 H2D D=@88:?8 E9C@F89 2 H66<6?5 D6DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm“!6@A=6 D2J[ H9J 2C6?’E J@F ?68@E:2E:?8 H:E9 $49F>6C 2?5 y677C:6Dn x BF:E6 =:E6C2==J 92G6 ?@E9:?8 E@ ?68@E:2E6[” y@9?D@? D2:5 2E @?6 A@:?E]k^Am

    kAm“pD x’G6 D2:5 E:>6 2?5 E:>6 282:?[ x 5@?’E 92G6 2?JE9:?8 E@ ?68@E:2E6 H:E9[” 96 D2:5 @? 52J `b @7 E96 D9FE5@H?] “(6 5:5 @FC ;@3] (6 925 E92E G@E6]”k^Am

    kAmp?5 36D:56D 96 D2:5 @7 E96 v~! =2H>2<6CD[ “%96J 2C6 5@:?8 D@>6 @7 E96:C 36DE H@C< 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E[ 96=A:?8 E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED ?2G:82E6 E9:D 4C:D:D]”k^Am

    kAmx? >2?J H2JD[ y@9?D@? 92D 364@>6 2 DFCAC:D:?8=J 67764E:G6 =6256C[ 2? 244:56?E2= DA62<6C H9@ H2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^9@FD6DA62<6CC6AF3=:42?D6>>6C>442CE9Jdcbda2ec36_c`45ccd352g57ag3ac7_bQm6=64E65 E@ E96 ;@3k^2m 3J 9:D 4@==628F6D 27E6C 2== @E96CD 72:=65 E@ H:? :E] w6 92D ?@H =2DE65 >@C6 E92? EH@ J62CD[ =@?86C E92? >2?J @?46 6?G:D:@?65]k^Am

    kAm%9:D J62C[ H:E9 %CF>A’D C6EFC? E@ E96 (9:E6 w@FD6[ E96 DA62<6C 92D 4@>>2?566C65 9:D D=:> v~! >2;@C:EJ 2?5 A2DD65 =68:D=2E:@? :?4=F5:?8 E96 AC6D:56?E’D D@42==65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:?D:56ECF>AC6AF3=:42?DA6?5:?83:==AC@G:D:@?D56E2:=D_e63`_325c75a2f62a24abe6edbd6e`5Qm“@?6 3:8 362FE:7F= 3:==”k^2m @7 E2I 3C626 =2H E9:D DF>>6C]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D D9FE5@H? DEC2E68J 2=D@ =2C86=J 249:6G65 9:D 8@2=[ 7@C4:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?g56>@4C2ED6gb`g_4_3eheca2__2abc4acc5h62fe6Qm$6?2E6 s6>@4C2ED E@ 3C62< C2?6?E H:E9@FE E96 6IE6?D:@? @7 962=E9 42C6 DF3D:5:6D E96J H6C6 56>2?5:?8 E@ 96=A 62D6 E96 DE:4<6C D9@4< @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^D9FE5@H?962=E9E2I4C65:ED277@C523=642C624Ea3d26bed`77`efgb2__6__54`46aec37QmC:D:?8 :?DFC2?46 AC6>:F> 4@DEDk^2m H:E9 E96 p77@C523=6 r2C6 p4E]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D 2AAC@249 😀 D66? 2D @?6 E92E >2?286D FA — 96 DE2JD 4=@D6 E@ %CF>A 2?5 D2JD E96J DA62< @7E6? — 2?5 2=D@ 92>>6CD 5@H?[ :>A@D:?8 2 C:8:5 4@?EC@= @G6C E96 52JE@52J D4965F=6 @7 E96 w@FD6[ 2?5 :ED =2H>2<6CD]k^Am

    kAm&?56C 2 w@FD6 CF=6D 492?86 E9:D J62C[ y@9?D@? H2D 23=6 E@ <66A E96 492>36C D9FEE6C65 :?567:?:E6=J @? 9:D @H?[ H:E9@FE E96 FDF2= C6BF:C65 G@E6] %9:D J62C 9:D =6256CD9:A E62> 92D 2==@H65 76H6C @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C 2>6?5>6?ED @? =68:D=2E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 C646?E E2==J] ~E96C 492?86D 92G6 4FCE2:=65 E96 w@FD6’D 23:=:EJ E@ AC@G:56 2 C@3FDE 4964< @? E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 @G6C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^4@?8C6DDECF>AE2C:77D49:?2dad5edadch27a736ahb`72df2622ba6eQm%CF>A’D E2C:77Dk^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A42CE6=DH2CA@H6C4@?8C6DDa4g4ch`7gggbeachg_`3e3`d3`ha`f3dQmFD6 @7 H2C A@H6CDk^2m]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D C67FD2= E@ DH62C:? vC:;2=G2 😀 2 C6>2C<23=6 7=6I @7 E96 DA62<6C’D A@H6C[ =625:?8 E@ 4@>A2C:D@?D H:E9 $6?2E6 v~! {6256C |:E49 |4r@??6==’D 564:D:@? ?@E E@ 4@?D:56C !C6D:56?E q2C24< ~32>2’D $FAC6>6 r@FCE ?@>:?66[ D2:5 s2G:5 #2A2==@[ 2? 2DD@4:2E6 AC@76DD@C 2?5 5:C64E@C @7 E96 u656C2= {68:D=2E:@? r=:?:4 2E v6@C86E@H? &?:G6CD:EJ {2H r6?E6C] pC:K@?2 92D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^256=:E28C:;2=G2DH62C:?4@?8C6DD6ADE6:?7:=6D2563h6f_caa_3ed4h26`bh6ddf4fabg`QmDF65k^2m E@ D62E 96C]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By LISA MASCARO – AP Congressional Correspondent

    Source link

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton sues Latino voter group Jolt for allegedly registering illegal immigrants

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing a nonprofit group dedicated to increasing Latino participation in civic engagement, accusing them of registering illegal immigrants to vote. 

    In court documents, Paxton’s office said Jolt Initiative is “systematically subverting the election process and violating Texas election law by recruiting, training, and directing individuals to submit false, or otherwise unlawful, voter registration applications.”

    “The left constantly tries to cheat and rig elections because they know they can’t win honestly. Any organization attempting to register illegals, who are all criminals, must be completely crushed and shut down immediately,”Paxton said in a statement. “JOLT is a radical, partisan operation that has, and continues to, knowingly attempt to corrupt our voter rolls and weaken the voice of lawful Texas voters. I will make sure they face the full force of the law.”

    TEXAS AG LAUNCHES UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS TO INFILTRATE ‘LEFTIST TERROR CELLS’ ACROSS THE STATE

    FILE – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton spoke at the Supreme Court building in Washington, June 9, 2016. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

    The lawsuit asks a court to dissolve Jolt’s charter and revoke its ability to do business in Texas.

    In response, Jolt has sued Paxton and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against him, accusing their attorney general of engaging in a retaliatory campaign aimed at revoking the organization’s corporate charter.

    The group said Paxton’s lawsuit is “direct retaliation for Jolt’s protected First Amendment activities, including its voter registration drives and its previous federal lawsuit challenging an intrusive document demand from the Attorney General’s office.”

    “Let the record show that the Texas Attorney General is using the power of his office to silence Latino voters,” said Jackie Bastard⁩, Jolt’s executive director. “After we challenged his first unconstitutional attempt to intimidate us, he escalated his attack by moving straight to the corporate ‘death penalty’, seeking to revoke our ability to exist. The state’s quo warranto petition is explicitly retaliatory, citing our voter registration activity and prior lawsuit as a reason for its filing.”

    TEXAS GOP SEEKS TO ‘DOMESTICATE’ ROGUE DEMS FOR BREAKING QUORUM THROUGH NATIONWIDE CIVIL ARREST WARRANTS

    ROSENBERG, TEXAS - MARCH 1: Voters stand in line to cast their ballots inside Calvary Baptist Church March 1, 2016 in Rosenberg, Texas. Voters in 12 states go to the polls in today's Super Tuesday. (Photo by Erich Schlegel/Getty Images)

    Voters stand in line to cast their ballots inside Calvary Baptist Church March 1, 2016 in Rosenberg, Texas.  (2015 Getty Images)

    Paxton said an investigation by his office found that JOLT members were stationed outside Texas Department of Motor Vehicles locations, where they provided instructions that directly violated provisions of the Texas Election Code.

    JOLT and its Volunteer Deputy Registrars allegedly coordinated the scheme to recruit and solicit individuals to submit unlawful voter registration applications, which could be designed to register illegal aliens who lack proper identification. 

    In the lawsuit, Paxton’s office said Jolt does not attempt to verify if a voter registration applicant is eligible to vote and has induced people to submit false statements in their voter registration applications. 

    Jolt said the lawsuit is part of a campaign by Paxton to suppress the vote of young Latinos in Texas. 

    Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton (left) has launched an investigation into 33 potential noncitizens allegedly voting in the 2024 general election.

    Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton (left) has launched an investigation into 33 potential noncitizens allegedly voting in the 2024 general election. (Justin Lane/Reuters and AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, File)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “We refuse to be bullied. We are asking the federal court to intervene immediately to protect our First Amendment right to speak, associate, and petition the government, and to ensure we can continue our vital work of civic engagement,” said Maria Tolentino, director of programs at Jolt.

    Paxton’s office launched an investigation last year into Jolt and other groups over similar claims. Paxton demanded documents and information from Jolt, which sued the state over concerns about placing its workers and volunteers in harms way.

    In October, a Texas election review identified thousands of illegal immigrants on the state’s voter rolls, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said. Nelson said a cross-check of state voter records found that more than 2,700 possible illegal immigrants were registered on the voter rolls, leading to an eligibility review across the 254 counties.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Voters’ anger at high electricity bills and data centers looms over 2026 midterms

    [ad_1]

    Voter anger over the cost of living is hurtling forward into next year’s midterm elections, when pivotal contests will be decided by communities that are home to fast-rising electric bills or fights over who’s footing the bill to power Big Tech’s energy-hungry data centers.

    Electricity costs were a key issue in this week’s elections for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, a data center hotspot, and in Georgia, where Democrats ousted two Republican incumbents for seats on the state’s utility regulatory commission.

    Voters in New Jersey, Virginia, California and New York City all cited economic concerns as the top issue, as Democrats and Republicans gird for a debate over affordability in the intensifying midterm battle to control Congress.

    Already, President Donald Trump is signaling that he’ll focus on affordability next year as he and Republicans try to maintain their slim congressional majorities, while Democrats are blaming Trump for rising household costs.

    Front and center may be electricity bills, which in many places are increasing at a rate faster than U.S. inflation on average — although not everywhere.

    “There’s a lot of pressure on politicians to talk about affordability, and electricity prices are right now the most clear example of problems of affordability,” said Dan Cassino, a professor of politics and government and pollster at Fairleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey.

    Rising electric costs aren’t expected to ease and many Americans could see an increase on their monthly bills in the middle of next year’s campaigns.

    Higher electric bills on the horizon

    Gas and electric utilities are seeking or already secured rate increases of more that $34 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, consumer advocacy organization PowerLines reported. That was more than double the same period last year.

    With some 80 million Americans struggling to pay their utility bills, “it’s a life or death and ‘eat or heat’ type decision that people have to make,” said Charles Hua, PowerLines’ founder.

    In Georgia, proposals to build data centers have roiled communities, while a victorious Democrat, Peter Hubbard, accused Republicans on the commission of “rubber-stamping” rate increases by Georgia Power, a subsidiary of power giant Southern Co.

    Monthly Georgia Power bills have risen six times over the past two years, now averaging $175 a month for a typical residential customer.

    Hubbard’s message seemed to resonate with voters. Rebecca Mekonnen, who lives in the Atlanta suburb of Stone Mountain, said she voted for the Democratic challengers, and wants to see “more affordable pricing. That’s the main thing. It’s running my pocket right now.”

    Now, Georgia Power is proposing to spend $15 billion to expand its power generating capacity, primarily to meet demand from data centers, and Hubbard is questioning whether data centers will pay their fair share — or share it with regular ratepayers.

    Midterm battlegrounds in hotspots

    Midterm elections will see congressional battlegrounds in states where fast-rising electric bills or data center hotspots — or both — are fomenting community uprisings.

    That includes California, Georgia, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas.

    Analysts attribute rising electric bills to a combination of forces.

    That includes expensive projects to modernize the grid and harden poles, wires and substations against extreme weather and wildfires.

    Also playing a role is explosive demand from data centers, bitcoin miners and a drive to revive domestic manufacturing, as well as rising natural gas prices, analysts say.

    “The cost of utility service is the new ‘cost of eggs’ concern for a lot of consumers,” said Jennifer Bosco of the National Consumer Law Center.

    In some places, data centers are driving a big increase in demand, since a typical AI data center uses as much electricity as 100,000 homes, according to the International Energy Agency. Some could require more electricity than cities the size of Pittsburgh, Cleveland or New Orleans.

    While many states have sought to attract data centers as an economic boon, legislatures and utility commissions were also flooded with proposals to try to protect regular ratepayers from paying to connect data centers to the grid.

    Meanwhile, communities that don’t want to live next to one are pushing back.

    It’s on voters’ minds

    An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll from October found that electricity bills are a “major” source of stress for 36% of U.S. adults.

    Now, as falls turns to winter, some states are warning that funding for low-income heating aid is being delayed because of the federal government shutdown.

    Still, the impact is still more uneven than other financial stressors like grocery costs, which just over half of U.S. adults said are a “major” source of stress.

    And electric rates vary widely by state or utility.

    For instance, federal data shows that for-profit utilities have been raising rates far faster than municipally owned utilities or cooperatives.

    In the 13-state mid-Atlantic grid from Illinois to New Jersey, analysts say ratepayers are paying billions of dollars for the cost to power data centers — including data centers not even built yet.

    Next June, electric bills across that region will absorb billions more dollars in higher wholesale electricity costs designed to lure new power plants to power data centers.

    That’s spurred governors from the region — including Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro, Illinois’ JB Pritzker and Maryland’s Wes Moore, all Democrats who are running for reelection — to pressure the grid operator PJM Interconnection to contain increases.

    High-rate states vs. lower-rate rates

    Drew Maloney, the CEO of the Edison Electric Institute, a trade association of for-profit electric utilities, suggested that only some states are the drivers of higher average electric bills.

    “If you set aside a few sates with higher rates, the rest of the country largely follows inflation on electricity rates,” Maloney said.

    Examples of states with faster-rising rates are California, where wildfires are driving grid upgrades, and those in New England, where natural gas is expensive because of strained pipeline capacity.

    Still, other states are feeling a pinch.

    In Indiana, a growing data center hotspot, the consumer advocacy group, Citizens Action Coalition, reported this year that residential customers of the state’s for-profit electric utilities were absorbing the most severe rate increases in at least two decades.

    Republican Gov. Mike Braun decried the hikes, saying “we can’t take it anymore.”

    ___

    Associated Press reporter Jeff Amy in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California Republicans sue over new US House map approved by voters

    [ad_1]

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Republicans filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday to block a new U.S. House map that California voters decisively approved at the ballot.

    Proposition 50, backed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, is designed to help Democrats flip as many as five congressional House seats in the midterm elections next year. The lawsuit claims the map-makers improperly used race as a factor to favor Hispanic voters “without cause or evidence to justify it,” and asks the court to block the new boundaries ahead of the 2026 elections. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, is funded by the National Republican Congressional Committee.

    The Supreme Court has ruled that “states may not, without a compelling reason backed by evidence that was in fact considered, separate citizens into different voting districts on the basis of race,” the lawsuit says.

    There have been two analyses showing there were no voting rights problems that warranted the redrawing of the map, it adds.

    The complaint was filed by The Dhillon Law Group, the California-based firm started by Harmeet Dhillon, who is now an assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice.

    The lawsuit also alleges that state lawmakers and a mapmaking consultant admitted in public statements that they intentionally redrew some districts to have a Latino majority. In one of the press releases from state Democrats, lawmakers said that the new map “retains and expands Voting Rights Act districts that empower Latino voters” while making no changes to Black majority districts in the Oakland and Los Angeles areas, the lawsuit says.

    “The map is designed to favor one race of California voters over others,” Mike Columbo, whose plaintiffs include a state Republican lawmaker and 18 other voters, said at a news conference Wednesday. “This violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law, and the right under the 15th Amendment.”

    The mapmaking consultant Paul Mitchell declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation.

    Newsom’s office said on a social media post that the state hasn’t reviewed the lawsuit but is confident the challenge will fail.

    “Good luck, losers,” the post reads.

    Democrats said the measure is their best chance to blunt Texas Republicans’ move to redraw their own maps to pick up five GOP seats at Trump’s urging.

    It’s unclear whether a three-judge panel convened to hear such cases would grant a temporary restraining order before Dec. 19, the date when candidates can start collecting voter signatures to qualify for the ballot. It’s essentially the first step in officially running in the 2026 midterm elections. Columbo said he’s hoping to get a decision in the upcoming weeks and predicted the case to reach the Supreme Court.

    Republicans have filed multiple lawsuits in California to block Democrats’ plan with little success so far.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From Bollywood to bodegas, Mamdani’s mayoral campaign found visual inspiration in unlikely corners

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — The vivid blue campaign signs with bold orange lettering were impossible to miss as Zohran Mamdani made his historic and improbable run for New York City mayor this summer.

    On storefront windows and telephone poles from Queens to the Bronx, the “Zohran for New York City” signs stood out from the standard red, white and blue campaign fodder. The lettering was seen by many as an intentional reference to old-school Bollywood posters — a subtle nod to Mamdani’s Indian heritage.

    But Aneesh Bhoopathy, the Philadelphia-based graphic designer behind the visuals, said the campaign also drew from the vibrant primary colors that help bodegas, yellow cabs, hot dog vendors and other small businesses stand out amid the city bustle.

    The stylized font — with its drop shadow effect and vintage comic book look — was meant to evoke the old school, hand-painted signs that can still be found in some neighborhoods, he said.

    “Succinctly, it’s New York,” said Bhoopathy, who previously lived in New York and helped on past campaigns for Mamdani and the Queens chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America.

    It was also trendsetting.

    Mamdani’s main adversary, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, even rebranded midcampaign. The Democrat initially launched his mayoral run using a red, white and blue color scheme and a decidedly unfussy font, reminiscent of bumper stickers used by President John F. Kennedy in 1960.

    But after his defeat to Mamdani in the June Democratic primary, Cuomo kicked off his general election run as an independent candidate by rolling out a new logo featuring the silhouette of the Statue of Liberty’s crown and a new color scheme: blue and orange — Mamdani’s colors, but also the colors of the Knicks and Mets.

    Mamdani, who will be the city’s first Muslim and South Asian mayor, is the son of two prominent Indian American luminaries, Columbia University professor Mahmood Mamdani and filmmaker Mira Nair, who is known for “Monsoon Wedding” and other Hollywood films.

    The campaign’s aesthetic wasn’t merely stylistic, observed David Schwittek, a professor of digital media and graphic design at Lehman College, a city-owned college in the Bronx.

    “They evoke the working-class fabric of New York City: the bodegas, taxi cabs, and halal carts that not only sustain the city but also reflect its cultural richness,” he said.

    The decidedly retro vibe also likely helped foster “positive associations to happier political times,” at least among Democratic voters, suggested Gavan Fitzsimons, a business professor at Duke University who studies the impact of branding on voters and consumers.

    “It has the feel of something from a prior era, an earlier time when politics was less divisive and the Democrats were perhaps more organized, more successful,” he said.

    The branding was reminiscent of the distinctive campaign font that became a calling card for U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, another youthful liberal New Yorker who shot to political fame, said Richard Flanagan, a political science professor at the College of Staten Island.

    The Democrat’s posters during her stunning 2018 victory over U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley for a seat representing parts of Queens and the Bronx similarly drew on her heritage and working class New York.

    The brightly-colored, upward slanting lettering reminded some of prewar labor union designs and others of Mexican “Lucha libre” flyers, particularly since it incorporated the inverted exclamation mark used in written Spanish.

    Court Stroud, a marketing professor at New York University, said it’s difficult to quantify how much the campaign visuals contributed to Mamdani’s success, but they certainly made him recognizable and memorable in an initially crowded field of mayoral hopefuls.

    “The playfulness of his campaign design created a brand that supporters wanted to wear and share,” he said. “Mamdani’s team showed how using visual design as a secret handshake can make politics feel real and community driven.”

    Campaign experts said it’s also too early to say whether Mamdani’s campaign designs will ultimately have the same staying power nationally as Ocasio-Cortez’s distinctive look, which has since become a staple of progressive candidate branding.

    “It’s still rare for candidates to move away from the tried and true red, white, and blue,” said Lisa Burns, a professor of media studies at Quinnipiac University in Connecticut. “I don’t see that changing any time soon.”

    The popularity of Mamdani’s designs were certainly felt during the New York City mayoral race, helping inspire off-beat, viral campaigns such as the “Hot Girls for Zohran” merch worn by model Emily Ratajkowski and other young celebs.

    Schwittek said the key takeaway from Mamdani’s visual coup was that effective branding isn’t generic or safe, but specific and deliberate.

    “In a sea of sanitized political messaging, Mamdani’s visuals stand out because they mean something,” he said. “That’s the lesson.”

    Good campaign design should also still ring true to the candidate, added Bhoopathy.

    “None of the boldness and vibrancy here works without a candidate that is as energetic and full of life as the city that raised him,” he said.

    ___

    Follow Philip Marcelo at https://x.com/philmarcelo

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zohran Mamdani and London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, have much in common, but also key differences

    [ad_1]

    LONDON (AP) — He’s the left-leaning Muslim mayor of the country’s biggest city, and U.S. President Donald Trump is one of his biggest critics.

    London’s Sadiq Khan has a lot in common with New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani — but also many differences.

    Khan, who has been mayor of Britain’s capital since 2016, welcomed Mamdani’s victory, saying New Yorkers had “chosen hope over fear, unity over division.”

    Khan’s experience holds positive and negative lessons for Mamdani, the 34-year-old Democrat who beat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa in Tuesday’s election.

    Khan has won three consecutive elections but routinely receives abuse for his faith and race, as well as criticism from conservative and far-right commentators who depict London as a crime-plagued dystopia.

    Trump has been among his harshest critics for years, calling Khan a “stone cold loser,” a “nasty person” and a “terrible mayor,” and claiming the mayor wants to bring Sharia, or Islamic law, to London.

    Khan, a keen amateur boxer, has hit back, saying in September that Trump is “racist, he is sexist, he is misogynistic and he is Islamophobic.”

    Khan told The Associated Press during a global mayors’ summit in Brazil on Wednesday that it’s “heartbreaking” but not surprising to see Mamdani receiving the same sort of abuse he gets.

    “London is liberal, progressive, multicultural, but also successful — as indeed is New York,” he said. “If you’re a nativist, populist politician, we are the antithesis of all you stand for. ”

    Attacked for their religion

    Mamdani and Khan regularly receive abuse and threats because of their Muslim faith, and London’s mayor has significantly tighter security protection than his predecessors.

    Both have tried to build bridges with the Jewish community after being criticized by opponents for their pro-Palestinian stances during the Israel-Hamas war.

    Both say their political opponents have leaned into Islamophobia. In 2016, Khan’s Conservative opponent, Zac Goldsmith, was accused of anti-Muslim prejudice for suggesting that Khan had links to Islamic extremists.

    Cuomo laughed along with a radio host who suggested Mamdani would “be cheering” another 9/11 attack. Mamdani’s Republican critics frequently, falsely call him a “jihadist” and a Hamas supporter.

    Mamdani vowed during the campaign that he would “not change who I am, how I eat, or the faith that I’m proud to call my own.”

    Khan has said he feels a responsibility to dispel myths about Muslims, and answers questions about his faith with weary good grace. He calls himself “a proud Brit, a proud Englishman, a proud Londoner and a proud Muslim.”

    Very different politicians

    Mamdani is an outsider on the left of his party, a democratic socialist whose buzzy, digital-savvy campaign energized young New Yorkers and drove the city’s biggest election turnout in a mayoral election in decades.

    Khan, 55, is a more of an establishment politician who sits in the broad middle of the center-left Labour Party.

    The son of a bus driver and a seamstress from Pakistan, Khan grew up with seven siblings in a three-bedroom public housing apartment in south London.

    He studied law, became a human rights attorney and spent a decade as a Labour Party lawmaker in the House of Commons, representing the area where he grew up, before being elected in 2016 as the first Muslim leader of a major Western capital city.

    Mamdani comes from a more privileged background as the son of an India-born Ugandan anthropologist, Mahmood Mamdani, and award-winning Indian filmmaker Mira Nair. Born in Uganda and raised from the age of 7 in New York, he worked as an adviser for tenants facing eviction before being elected to the New York State Assembly in 2020.

    Similar big-city problems

    Khan and Mamdani govern huge cities with vastly diverse populations of more than 8 million. Voters in both places have similar worries about crime and the high cost of living – big issues that many mayors struggle to address.

    Khan was won three straight elections, but he’s not an overwhelmingly popular mayor. As Mamdani may also find, the mayor gets blamed for a lot of problems, from high rents to violent crime, regardless of whether they are in his control, though Mamdani made freezing rents a pillar of his campaign.

    Mamdani campaigned on ambitious promises, including free child care, free buses, new affordable housing and city-run grocery stores.

    “Winning an election is one thing, delivering on promises is another,” said Darren Reid, an expert on U.S. politics at Coventry University. “The mayor of New York definitely does not have unlimited power, and he is going to have a very powerful enemy in the current president.”

    The mayor of London controls public transit and the police, but doesn’t have the authority of New York’s leader because power is shared with the city’s 32 boroughs, which are responsible for schools, social services and public housing in their areas.

    Khan can point to relatively modest achievements, including free school meals for all primary school pupils and a freeze on transit fares. But he has failed to meet other goals, such as ambitious house-building targets.

    Tony Travers, a professor at the London School of Economics who specializes in local government, said one lesson Mamdani might take from Khan is to pick “a limited number of fights that you can win.”

    Khan, who is asthmatic, has made it one of his main missions to clean up London’s air — once so filthy the city was nicknamed the Big Smoke. He expanded London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone, which charges the drivers of older, more polluting vehicles a daily fee to drive in the city.

    The measure became a lightning rod for criticism of Khan, spurring noisy protests and vandalism of enforcement cameras. Khan staunchly defended the zone, which research suggests has made London’s air cleaner. His big victory in last year’s mayoral election appeared to vindicate Khan’s stance on the issue.

    Travers said that beyond their shared religion and being the targets of racism, both mayors face the conundrum of leading dynamic, diverse metropolises that are “surprisingly peaceful and almost embarrassingly successful” — and resented by the rest of their countries for their wealth and the attention they receive.

    He said London is “locked in this strange alternative universe where it is simultaneously described by a number of commentators as sort of a hellhole … and yet on the other hand it’s so embarrassingly rich that British governments spend their lives trying to level up the rest of the country to it. You can’t win.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Eléonore Hughes in Rio de Janeiro contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: New York City ballots do not show proof of election fraud

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — For many years, New York voters have found candidates listed twice, three times or even more on their ballots when they go to the polling booth.

    It isn’t an error — it’s a practice known as fusion voting that allows candidates to appear under multiple political parties.

    But such intentional duplications on the New York City ballot this year, along with other layout choices, have some outside observers around the country wondering whether they are seeing evidence of rigged voting in Tuesday’s widely-watched mayoral race.

    Billionaire X owner Elon Musk, who briefly served as a top advisor to President Donald Trump, was among those criticizing the ballots.

    “The New York City ballot form is a scam!” he wrote in an X post. “No ID is required. Other mayoral candidates appear twice. Cuomo’s name is last in bottom right.”

    But there is nothing amiss about the ballots, which are in keeping with New York’s voting laws.

    Here’s a closer look at the facts.

    CLAIM: New York City ballots are proof of election fraud because some candidates appear twice and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is listed low in the order.

    THE FACTS: This is false. Candidates may appear more than once on ballots in New York if they are nominated by multiple political parties — a practice called fusion voting. Cuomo is in the eighth spot because he filed to run as an independent later in the process.

    New York, along with Connecticut, is one of few states where fusion voting is legal and commonly used. The practice has existed in New York since at least the mid-20th century. It is also legal in Oregon, Vermont and Mississippi.

    “This occurs pretty frequently and it enables the Democratic candidate to get the votes of people who don’t normally vote for Democrats and Republicans to get the vote of people who don’t vote Republican etc.,” said Richard Briffault, an expert on election administration and a professor at Columbia Law School, said of fusion voting in New York.

    Two mayoral candidates appear twice this year on New York City ballots. Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani is also the nominee of the Working Families Party, while Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa is also the candidate for the independent “Protect Animals” party.

    Fusion voting does not allow candidates to receive more than one vote from the same voter, as voters may only vote for a candidate under one party.

    Cuomo is a Democrat, but is running as an independent under a new party he created called “Fight and Deliver” after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani in June.

    Under state law, there are currently four official parties on the ballot in New York — Democratic, Republican, Conservative and Working Families Party — based on the number of votes their candidate received in the most recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. That vote count also determines the order they appear on the next ballot, from highest to lowest.

    Candidates must file a petition to run as an independent. Boards of elections determine the ballot order of independent parties, which must appear below the official parties.

    “In the case of the New York City Board of Elections, this is determined by the date and time stamp when the independent nominating petition was filed with that board,” said Kathleen McGrath, a spokesperson for the New York State Board of Elections.

    According to McGrath, Cuomo’s “Fight and Deliver” party was the fourth out of five independent parties to submit a nominating petition, meaning that Cuomo is listed eighth on the ballot.

    Mamdani is listed first under the Democratic Party and fourth under the Working Families Party. Sliwa appears second under the Republican Party and fifth under the “Protect Animals” party. Two other candidates running as independents — incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and attorney Jim Walden — dropped out of the race too late to be taken off the ballot.

    “In short, Cuomo is only listed once because he was only nominated once, and he is low in the order because no recognized political party nominated him,” said Mark Lindeman, policy and strategy director at Verified Voting. “Surely Elon Musk has people who could have looked this up for him.”

    New York City does not require voters to show ID to vote unless they did not provide identification with their registration. The nation’s multilayered election processes provide many safeguards that keep voter fraud generally detectable and rare, the AP has reported.

    Representatives for Musk did not respond to a request for comment.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kansas mayor hit with criminal charges for allegedly voting as noncitizen in several elections

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Kansas leaders brought criminal charges Wednesday against Joe Ceballos, the mayor of a small city in rural Kansas, alleging he voted in several elections but is not a U.S. citizen.

    Kansas Secretary of State Scott Schwab and Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, both elected Republicans, announced they filed six charges in Comanche County against Ceballos, a lawful permanent resident from Mexico, for voting in elections in 2022, 2023 and 2024.

    Ceballos is the mayor of Coldwater and previously served as a city councilman.

    MAINE VOTERS DEFEAT VOTER ID BALLOT INITIATIVE, APPROVE ‘RED FLAG’ GUN RESTRICTIONS

    States are required by law to have mechanisms in place to regularly clean voter registration lists, also known as voter rolls. The process includes using external databases to screen for noncitizens, which Kobach, a longtime immigration hawk and ally of President Donald Trump, said is not error-proof.

    “Noncitizen voting is a real problem. It is not something that happens once in a decade. It is something that happens fairly frequently,” Kobach said, echoing the broader sentiments of Republicans who say voter fraud is a pressing issue.

    Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach speaks at a rally with President Donald Trump at the Kansas Expocenter Oct. 6, 2018, in Topeka, Kan. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    Ceballos’ charges, which include perjury and voting without being qualified, according to the complaint reviewed by Fox News Digital, carry a maximum penalty of more than five years in prison. Ceballos did not respond to a request for comment.

    Kobach, who previously served as Kansas secretary of state, has a long history of pushing for tougher immigration enforcement and stricter voter ID laws. In 2018, he lost a high-profile federal lawsuit after attempting to enforce a state law that required voters to provide physical documentation of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.

    A court found it exceeded the necessary requirements to confirm citizenship, in violation of federal election laws.

    CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS LAUNCH VOTER ID BALLOT PUSH, NEED 875K SIGNATURES BY DEADLINE

    Michigan Ballot Box with person putting envelope in.

    A voter inserts an absentee voter ballot into a drop box. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File)

    The court said at the time that the state law could not “be justified by the scant evidence of noncitizen voter fraud before and after the law was passed.”

    Kobach did not detail how state officials came to learn that the mayor and former city councilman is allegedly a noncitizen, but he said investigators had “unassailable evidence” against Ceballos.

    Citizens for Voter ID at the Nebraska Capitol building

    Boxes of signatures are displayed after a conference hosted by Citizens for Voter ID at the Nebraska Capitol building July 7, 2022, in Lincoln, Neb. (Noah Riffe/Lincoln Journal Star via AP)

    Kobach said city officials, such as mayors, are also required by law to be U.S. citizens, which the attorney general said was “worth noting” but not a criminal offense. Ceballos was on the ballot for re-election on Election Day, but the official results have not been certified yet.

    “In large part, our system right now is based on trust, trust that when the person signs the registration or signs the poll books saying that he is a qualified elector or that he is a United States citizen, that the person is telling the truth,” Kobach said. “In this case, we allege that Mr. Ceballos violated that trust.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Kobach and Schwab said they recently began taking advantage of a federal government database that helps cross-check voter rolls with immigration records that they expect will lead them to identify more voting violations.

    Ceballos’ first court appearance is Dec. 3. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats are hopeful again. But unresolved questions remain about party’s path forward

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — For a day, at least, beleaguered Democrats are hopeful again. But just beneath the party’s relief at securing its first big electoral wins since last November’s drubbing lay unresolved questions about its direction heading into next year’s midterm elections.

    The Election Day romp of Republicans stretched from deep-blue New York and California to swing-states Georgia, Pennsylvania and Virginia. There were signs that key voting groups, including young people, Black voters and Hispanics who shifted toward President Donald Trump’s Republican Party just a year ago, may be shifting back. And Democratic leaders across the political spectrum coalesced behind a simple message focused on Trump’s failure to address rising costs and everyday kitchen table issues.

    The dominant performance sparked a new round of debate among the party’s establishment-minded pragmatists and fiery progressives over which approach led to Tuesday’s victories, and which path to take into the high-stakes 2026 midterm elections and beyond. The lessons Democrats learn from the victories will help determine the party’s leading message and messengers next year — when elections will decide the balance of power in Congress for the second half of Trump’s term — and potentially in the 2028 presidential race, which has already entered its earliest stages.

    “Of course, there’s a division within the Democratic Party. There’s no secret,” Sen. Bernie Sanders told reporters at a Capitol Hill press conference about the election results.

    Sanders and his chief political strategist pointed to the success of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as a model for Democrats across the country. But Rep. Suzan Del Bene, who leads the House Democrats’ midterm campaign strategy, avoided saying Mamdani’s name when asked about his success.

    Del Bene instead cheered the moderate approach adopted by Democrats Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill in successful races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey as a more viable track for candidates outside of a Democratic stronghold like New York City.

    “New York is bright blue … and the path to the majority in the House is going to be through purple districts,” she told The Associated Press. “The people of Arizona, Iowa and Nebraska aren’t focused on the mayor of New York.”

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a likely Democratic presidential prospect who campaigned alongside Democrats in several states leading up to Tuesday’s elections, noted the candidates hit on a common issue that resonated with voters, regardless of location.

    “All of these candidates who won in these different states were focused on peoples’ everyday needs,” Shapiro said. “And you saw voters in every one of those states and cities showing up to send a clear message to Donald Trump that they’re rejecting his chaos.”

    Amid Democrats’ celebratory phone calls and news conferences, members of the party’s different wings had some sharp critiques for each other.

    While Shapiro cheered the party’s success during a Wednesday interview, he also acknowledged concerns about Mamdani in New York.

    Shapiro, one of the nation’s most prominent Jewish elected leaders, said he’s not comfortable with some of Mamdani’s comments on Israel. The New York mayor-elect, a Muslim, has described Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks as “genocide” against the Palestinian people and has been slow to condemn rhetoric linked to anti-Semitism.

    “I’ve expressed that to him personally. We’ve had good private communications,” Shapiro said of his concerns. “And I hope, as he did last night in his victory speech, that he’ll be a mayor that protects all New Yorkers and tries to bring people together.”

    Meanwhile, Sanders’ political strategist, Faiz Shakir, warned Democrats against embracing “cookie cutter campaigns that say nothing and do nothing” — a reference to centrist Democrats Spanberger and Sherrill.

    Despite potential cracks in the Democratic coalition, it’s hard to understate the extent of the party’s electoral success.

    In Georgia, two Democrats cruised to wins over Republican incumbents in elections to the state Public Service Commission, delivering the largest statewide margins of victory by Democrats in more than 20 years.

    In Pennsylvania, Democrats swept not only three state Supreme Court races, but every county seat in presidential swing counties like Bucks and Erie Counties, including sheriffs. Bucks County elected its first Democratic district attorney as Democrats there also won key school board races and county judgeships.

    Maine voters defeated a Republican-backed measure that would have mandated showing an ID at the polls. Colorado approved raising taxes on people earning more than $300,000 annually to fund school meal programs and food assistance for low-income state residents. And California voters overwhelmingly backed a charge led by Gov. Gavin Newsom to redraw its congressional map to give Democrats as many as five more House seats in upcoming elections.

    Trump made inroads with Black and Hispanic voters in 2024. But this week, Democrats scored strong performances with non-white voters in New Jersey and Virginia that offered promise.

    About 7 in 10 voters in New Jersey were white, according to the AP Voter Poll. And Sherrill won about half that group. But she made up for her relative weakness with whites with a strong showing among Black, Hispanic and Asian voters.

    The vast majority — about 9 in 10 — of Black voters supported Sherrill, as did about 8 in 10 Asian voters.

    Hispanic voters in New Jersey were more divided, but about two-thirds supported Sherrill; only about 3 in 10 voted for the Republican nominee, Jack Ciattarelli.

    The pattern was similar in Virginia, where Spanberger performed well among Black voters, Hispanic voters and Asian voters, even though she didn’t win a majority of white voters.

    The debate over the party’s future is already starting to play out in key midterm elections where Democrats have just begun intra-party primary contests.

    The choice is stark in Maine’s high-stakes Senate race, where Democrats will pick from a field that features establishment favorite, Gov. Jan Mills, and Sanders-endorsed populist Graham Platner. A similar dynamic could play out in key contests across Massachusetts, New York, Texas and Michigan.

    Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who is aligned with the progressive wing of the party, said the people he speaks to are demanding bold action to address their economic concerns.

    “Folks are so frustrated by how hard its become to afford a dignified life here in Michigan and across the country,” he said.

    “I’m sure the corporate donors don’t want us to push too hard,” El-Sayed continued. “My worry is the very same people who told us we were just fine in 2024 will miss the mandate.”

    ___

    Associated Press reporter Mike Catalini in Newark and Joey Cappelletti in Washington contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California voters approve new US House map to boost Democrats in 2026

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — California voters approved new congressional district boundaries Tuesday, delivering a victory for Democrats in the state-by-state redistricting battle that will help determine which party wins control of the U.S. House in 2026 and, with it, the power to thwart or advance President Donald Trump’s agenda.

    The approval of Proposition 50 gives Democrats a shot at winning as many as five additional seats, just enough to blunt Texas Republicans’ move to redraw their own maps to pick up five GOP seats at Trump’s urging. Texas’ move and California’s response have kicked off a flurry of redistricting efforts around the country, with Republican states appearing to have an edge. Deeply blue California is Democrats’ best opportunity to make up seats.

    Midterm elections typically punish the party in the White House, and Trump is fighting to maintain his party’s slim House majority. Republicans hold 219 seats to Democrats’ 213.

    Tuesday’s results mark a political victory for Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who cast the measure as an essential tool to fight back against Trump and protect American democracy.

    Speaking to reporters in Sacramento, Newsom cast the California vote as part of a broader national rejection of Trump’s policies that saw Democratic governors elevated in New Jersey and Virginia. But he warned the more consequential battle would come next year.

    If Democrats win the House majority, they can “end Donald Trump’s presidency as we know it,” Newsom said. “It is all on the line, a bright line, in 2026.”

    California’s Proposition 50 asked voters to suspend House maps drawn by an independent commission and replace them with rejiggered districts adopted by the Democratic-controlled Legislature. Those new districts would be in place for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections.

    The recast districts aim to dilute Republican voters’ power, in one case by uniting rural, conservative-leaning parts of far northern California with Marin County, a famously liberal coastal stronghold across the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco.

    The measure was spearheaded by Newsom, who threw the weight of his political operation behind it in a major test of his mettle ahead of a potential 2028 presidential campaign. Former President Barack Obama urged voters to pass it as well.

    “Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years,” Obama said in one ad. “You can stop Republicans in their tracks.”

    Critics said two wrongs don’t make a right. They urged Californians to reject the measure, even if they have misgivings about Trump’s moves elsewhere.

    Among the most prominent critics was Arnold Schwarzenegger, the movie star and former Republican governor who pushed for the creation of the independent commission, which voters approved in 2008 and 2010. It makes no sense to fight Trump by becoming him, Schwarzenegger said in September, arguing that the proposal would “take the power away from the people.”

    “I don’t want Newsom to have control,” said Rebecca Fleshman, a 63-year-old retired medical assistant from Southern California, who voted against the measure. “I don’t want the state to be blue. I want it to be red.”

    After an early burst of TV advertising, opponents of the plan struggled to raise cash in a state with some of the nation’s most expensive media markets.

    The campaign followed an unusual trajectory. A handful of Republican congressmen who will see their districts dramatically reshaped – and their jobs endangered — mostly stayed away from the campaign spotlight. With opponents short on cash, Newsom and his supporters dominated TV screens in the critical closing weeks.

    Total spending on broadcast and cable ads topped $100 million, with more than two-thirds of it coming from supporters. Newsom told people to stop donating in the race’s final weeks.

    The GOP congressmen — Reps. Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Doug LaMalfa — will see right-leaning voters reduced and left-leaning voters boosted in their respective districts in a shift that would make it likely a Democratic candidate would prevail in each race.

    Issa issued a defiant statement, saying: “I’m not going anywhere. I’ll continue to represent the people of California regardless of their party or where they live.”

    Calvert said Newsom engineered a “power grab” while housing costs, gas prices and taxes continue to strain family budgets. “I am determined to keep fighting for the families I represent,” he said in an email.

    Proposition 50 won a swift and decisive victory, as the AP declared a winner when polls closed statewide. Early returns were strongly in favor of the measure, as were preliminary results from the AP Voter Poll, an expansive survey of more than 4,000 voters in California.

    Roughly 7 in 10 California voters said party control of Congress was “very important” to them, and those voters overwhelmingly supported the measure, according to the AP Voter Poll.

    About 8 in 10 California voters who supported the ballot measure said it was necessary to counter the changes made by Republicans in other states, while only about 2 in 10 said they supported it because it was the best way to draw maps, AP Voter Poll found.

    Trump, who overwhelmingly lost California in his three presidential campaigns, largely stayed out of the fray. A week before the election, he urged voters in a social media post not to vote early or by mail — messaging that conflicted with that of top Republicans in the state who urged people to get their ballots in as soon as possible.

    In a post Tuesday on his social media platform, the president called the state’s voting process “RIGGED” and warned that it was “under very serious legal and criminal review. STAY TUNED!” Secretary of State Shirley Weber called that “another baseless claim.”

    Congressional district boundaries are typically redrawn every 10 years to reflect population shifts documented in the census. Mid-decade redistricting is unusual, absent a court order finding fault with the maps in place.

    Beyond Texas, Republicans expect to gain one seat each from new maps in Missouri and North Carolina, and potentially two more in Ohio. Five other GOP-led states are also considering new maps: Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana and Nebraska.

    On the Democratic side, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York and Virginia have proposals to redraw maps, but major hurdles remain.

    A court has ordered new boundaries be drawn in Utah, where all four House districts are represented by Republicans, but it remains to be seen if the state will approve a map that makes any of them winnable for Democrats.

    Siddhartha Deb, 52, has lived in the U.S. since he was 7 years old but he just became a citizen Tuesday. Immediately afterward he registered to vote at San Francisco City Hall and cast his ballot in favor of Newsom’s measure.

    “I don’t like the way the Republican Party is basically trying to rig elections by gerrymandering,” Deb said. “And this is the only way, to fight fire with fire.”

    ___

    Cooper reported from Phoenix and Nguyen from Sacramento, California. Associated Press writers Amy Taxin in Norco, California, and Terry Chea in San Francisco contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election Day marked by bomb threats in NJ, Trump warnings for Calif.

    [ad_1]

    Bomb threats to New Jersey polling stations, a voter roll mishap in Pennsylvania potentially affecting thousands of voters and warnings by President Donald Trump against California’s mail balloting system marked the final day of voting in an off-year election with several nationally prominent races.

    Voting otherwise appeared to go smoothly Tuesday across the U.S. as voters cast ballots in the first significant election since Trump won the White House for a second time.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96J H6C6 564:5:?8 8@G6C?@C’D C246D 😕 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>:<:6D96CC:==;24<4:2EE2C6==:?6H;6CD6J8@G6C?@Ccc27hcgh`c55a4e736f33_egf4dc7hh5Qm}6H y6CD6Jk^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G:C8:?:27:CDE76>2=68@G6C?@C62C=6D62CDDA2?36C86C_`7hgdc2hc7523e6df`h_heeec66h36`Qm’:C8:?:2k^2m[ 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>2>52?:4F@>@D=:H2?J4>2J@C27g3hfh_6f43c6_ab5_hgc2_a_f43442Qm>2J@C’D C246k^2m 😕 }6H *@C<[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A6??DJ=G2?:2DFAC6>64@FCE6=64E:@?dd6a777ae23`f6e7_a7h6cg_gchfdgf4Qm$FAC6>6 r@FCE 6=64E:@?Dk^2m 😕 !6??DJ=G2?:2[ 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G@E6C:5?@?4:E:K6?G@E:?8>2:?6E6I2D2a_h564a4g37hae`dcbc33__57f2f26`QmG@E:?8k^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>2:?66=64E:@?8F?DC657=28=6H:DE@?D9@@E:?8e`6ch4_63`5f5366ac73g47b273dc_gcQm8F? 4@?EC@=k^2m >62DFC6D 😕 |2:?6] p k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42=:7@C?:2C65:DEC:4E:?8AC@Ad_82G:??6HD@>gbh`hb374a2g`f_ge2442fbedb`d7ae7QmC65:DEC:4E:?8 :?:E:2E:G6k^2m 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 E92E H2D 2 C6DA@?D6 E@ %CF>A’D AFD9 E@ C65C2H 4@?8C6DD:@?2= =:?6D 😕 v~!4@?EC@==65 DE2E6D 29625 @7 ?6IE J62C’D >:5E6C> 6=64E:@?D 92D 366? @7 A2CE:4F=2C :?E6C6DE E@ E96 #6AF3=:42? AC6D:56?E]k^Am

    kAmw:D s6A2CE>6?E @7 yFDE:46 D6?E 6=64E:@? >@?:E@CD E@ 7:G6 4@F?E:6D 😕 r2=:7@C?:2[ 2 DE2E6 %CF>A 92D =@DE E9C66 E:>6D 2?5 H9@D6 >2:= 32==@E:?8 DJDE6> 96 92D @7E6? 4C:E:4:K65 56DA:E6 ?@ 6G:56?46 @7 2?J H:56DAC625 7C2F5 @C @E96C G@E:?8C6=2E65 AC@3=6>D] x? 2 A@DE %F6D52J @? 9:D D@4:2= >65:2 A=2E7@C>[ E96 AC6D:56?E 42==65 E96 DE2E6’D G@E:?8 AC@46DD “#xvvts” 2?5 H2C?65 E92E :E H2D “F?56C G6CJ D6C:@FD =682= 2?5 4C:>:?2= C6G:6H] $%p* %&}tsP”k^Am

    kAmr=2:>D @7 6=64E:@? C:88:?8 2C6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>Aa_ac6=64E:@?=:6DG@E6C7C2F53:56?7b7beh`4a62_eef25ehc6b366dff5g_aQm2=>@DE C@FE:?6 7@C %CF>Ak^2m 😕 E96 CF?FA E@ 6=64E:@?D 2?5 D@>6E:>6D @? E96 52J @7 G@E:?8 :ED6=7] ~? t=64E:@? s2J =2DE J62C[ 367@C6 96 H2D 564=2C65 E96 H:??6C[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6=64E:@?a_acG@E:?8EFC?@FE6=64E:@?52J2g26aa7bcc`f5452_e_3cb_524gh3534Qm96 4=2:>65k^2m H:E9@FE AC@G:5:?8 2?J 56E2:=D @C 6G:56?46 E92E E96C6 H2D “E2=< 23@FE >2DD:G6 4962E:?8 😕 !9:=256=A9:2” 2?5 D2:5 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E H2D @? E96 H2J] w6 4@?E:?F6D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^42A:E@=C:@EECF>A6=64E:@?=:6D6IA=2:?6Cg`e2cb65hec6e5bd7_b3_hb_6e6de4ganFE>0D@FC46l9@>6A286U2>AjFE>0>65:F>l#6=2E65$E@C:6DU2>AjFE>042>A2:8?lA@D:E:@?0_bQmE@ =:6k^2m 23@FE k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6=64E:@?4=2:>D3:56?H@?6IA=2:?6535db3`c46gf`c`a3cea43b76a4deb7`gQm9:D =@DDk^2m 😕 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^32CC?@H:56DAC6256=64E:@?7C2F53`7`cggfhe4h2hg4c3`2h_e`2e4f7ch5Qma_a_ AC6D:56?E:2= 6=64E:@?k^2m]k^Am

    kAmr2=:7@C?:2 v@G] v2G:? }6HD@>[ H9@ 92D 366? 492>A:@?:?8 E96 C65:DEC:4E:?8 :?:E:2E:G6[ C6DA@?565 E@ %CF>A H:E9 9:D @H? D@4:2= >65:2 A@DE 42==:?8 E96 AC6D:56?E “p E@E2==J F?D6C:@FD A6CD@? DAC625:?8 72=D6 :?7@C>2E:@? 😕 2 56DA6C2E6 2EE6>AE E@ 4@A6 H:E9 9:D 72:=FC6D]” $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 $9:C=6J (636C 42==65 :E “2?@E96C 32D6=6DD 4=2:>]”k^Am

    kAm“%96 3@EE@> =:?6 😀 r2=:7@C?:2 6=64E:@?D 92G6 366? G2=:52E65 3J E96 4@FCED[” D96 D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “r2=:7@C?:2 G@E6CD H:== ?@E 36 5646:G65 3J D@>6@?6 H9@ 4@?D:DE6?E=J >2<6D 56DA6C2E6[ F?DF3DE2?E:2E65 2EE6>AED E@ 5:DDF256 p>6C:42?D 7C@> A2CE:4:A2E:?8 😕 @FC 56>@4C24J]”k^Am

    kAmx? }6H y6CD6J[ =2H 6?7@C46>6?E 2?5 6=64E:@? @77:4:2=D 24E65 DH:7E=J 2D G@E:?8 3682? E@ D64FC6 A@==:?8 A=246D 7@==@H:?8 2 D6C:6D @7 3@>3 E9C62ED]k^Am

    kAm{E] v@G] %296D92 (2J[ H9@ 2=D@ D6CG6D 2D E96 DE2E6’D E@A 6=64E:@? @77:4:2=[ D2:5 E96 E9C62ED 925 366? 6>2:=65 E@ D6G6? 4@F?E:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 !2DD2:4[ 2 <6J DH:?8 4@F?EJ] xE 2=D@ 😀 E96 @?=J 4@F?EJ @FED:56 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 yFDE:46 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^5@;6=64E:@?>@?:E@CD?6H;6CD6J42=:7@C?:2G@E:?8b_5bdd2h465hh_a`gffa6677`3eeca3bQm925 D6?E 6=64E:@? >@?:E@CDk^2m[ 😕 3@E9 42D6D 2E E96 C6BF6DE @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? A2CE:6D 😕 6249 DE2E6]k^Am

    kAm“{2H 6?7@C46>6?E 92D 56E6C>:?65 E92E E96C6 2C6 ?@ 4C65:3=6 E9C62ED 2E E9:D E:>6[” (2J D2:5] “(6 2C6 5@:?8 6G6CJE9:?8 😕 @FC A@H6C E@ AC@E64E G@E6CD 2?5 A@== H@C<6CD 2?5 4@@C5:?2E6 4=@D6=J H:E9 DE2E6[ =@42= 2?5 7656C2= A2CE?6CD E@ 6?DFC6 2 D>@@E9 2?5 D276 6=64E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm{2E6C 😕 E96 52J[ 2FE9@C:E:6D 2CC6DE65 2 ;FG6?:=6 DFDA64E 😕 4@??64E:@? H:E9 D@>6 @7 E96 3@>3 E9C62ED] %96 A@E6?E:2= 492C86D H6C6 ?@E :>>65:2E6=J C6=62D65]k^Am

    kAm%96 E9C62ED 42>6 2D E96 7:?2= 52J @7 G@E:?8 3682? 😕 }6H y6CD6J’D 4=@D6=JH2E4965 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>:<:6D96CC:==;24<4:2EE2C6==:?6H;6CD6J8@G6C?@Ccc27hcgh`c55a4e736f33_egf4dc7hh5QmC246 7@C 8@G6C?@Ck^2m 2?5 2 J62C 27E6C 2 D6C:6D @7 3@>3 E9C62ED k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6=64E:@?a_acG@E:?8EFC?@FE6=64E:@?52J2g26aa7bcc`f5452_e_3cb_524gh3534Qm5:DCFAE65 G@E:?8k^2m 5FC:?8 =2DE J62C’D AC6D:56?E:2= 6=64E:@?[ >@DE=J 😕 32EE=68C@F?5 DE2E6D] q@>3 E9C62E 9@2I6D 2=D@ 4:C4F=2E65 😕 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^3@>3E9C62EDDAC:?87:6=5@9:@563F?<654=2:>D92:E:2?D`57bfde`a_c55ffbb53c2ecdh6gf6ac4Qm$AC:?87:6=5[ ~9:@k^2m[ =2DE J62C 27E6C s@?2=5 %CF>A 5FC:?8 E96 42>A2:8? 2>A=:7:65 72=D6 4=2:>D @7 w2:E:2? :>>:8C2?ED E96C6 235F4E:?8 2?5 62E:?8 A6ED]k^Am

    kAm%96 E9C62ED %F6D52J :?G@=G65 ?62C=J EH@ 5@K6? A@==:?8 A=246D 😕 q6C86?[ tDD6I[ |6C46C[ |:55=6D6I[ |@?>@FE9[ ~462? 2?5 !2DD2:4 4@F?E:6D[ }6H y6CD6J pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= |2EE96H !=2E<:? D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] $@>6 A@==:?8 A=246D C6@A6?65 BF:4<=J[ 96 D2:5[ H9:=6 G@E6CD 2E @E96CD H6C6 5:C64E65 E@ ?62C3J =@42E:@?D E@ 42DE E96:C 32==@ED]k^Am

    kAm“{2H 6?7@C46>6?E @77:46CD 92G6 C6DA@?565 2E 6249 27764E65 A@==:?8 A=246[ 2?5 E96J 92G6 H@C<65 DH:7E=J E@ D64FC6 E96D6 A@==:?8 =@42E:@?D 2?5 6?DFC6 E96 D276EJ @7 6G6CJ G@E6C[” !=2E<:? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 uqx’D }6H2C< @77:46 D2:5 :E H2D 2H2C6 @7 E96 C6A@CED 2?5 H2D 2DD:DE:?8 E96 DE2E6 2?5 =@42= 286?4:6D] “%9:D s6AE] @7 yFDE:46 😀 4@>>:EE65 E@ 7C66[ 72:C 2?5 D276 6=64E:@?D[” &]$] pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= !2> q@?5: D2:5 😕 2 D@4:2= >65:2 A@DE C6=2E65 E@ E96 3@>3 E9C62E :?G6DE:82E:@?]k^Am

    kAm!2DD2:4 r@F?EJ C646:G65 E9C66 E9C62ED 2?5 C65:C64E65 D@>6 27764E65 G@E6CD E@ @E96C =@42E:@?D 62C=J %F6D52J[ 4@F?EJ DA@<6DA6CD@? {:?5D2J #665 D2:5 😕 2? 6>2:=] ~?6 =@42E:@?[ 2 D49@@= 3F:=5:?8[ H2D 4=62C65 2?5 G@E:?8 C6DF>65]k^Am

    kAmx? !6??DJ=G2?:2[ ?62C=J a_T @7 G@E6CD 😕 r96DE6C r@F?EJ H6C6 =67E @FE @7 E96 A@== 3@@@4C2E[ :?4=F5:?8 E9@D6 C68:DE6C65 H:E9 E96 vC66? @C {:36CE2C:2? A2CE:6D @C :?56A6?56?ED H:E9 ?@ A2CEJ 277:=:2E:@?] %96 42E68@CJ :?4=F56D 23@FE fd[___ C68:DE6C65 G@E6CD @FE @7 C@F89=J bgd[___ 4@F?EJH:56]k^Am

    kAmt=64E:@? @77:4:2=D 😕 E96 s6>@4C2E:4=62?:?8 4@F?EJ =@42E65 23@FE e_ >:=6D H6DE @7 !9:=256=A9:2 3642>6 2H2C6 @7 E96 AC@3=6> ;FDE 27E6C A@==:?8 A=246D @A6?65 2?5 925 AC@G:565 DFAA=6>6?E2= A@== 3@@2= C6G:6H]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By JULIE CARR SMYTH and HANNAH FINGERHUT – Associated Press

    Source link

  • New York has safeguards against casting multiple ballots

    [ad_1]

    As Election Day approached, social media users shared a video of a man who said he planned to vote multiple times in New York City. 

    “I’m here in New York about to illegally vote for Zohran Mamdani six times,” the man in the TikTok video reshared on X says as he walks down a city street. 

    The caption of the Nov. 2 X post says, “VOTER FRAUD ALERT!! This guy just admitted he was on his way to ILLEGALLY vote for Mamdani six times! I live in (New York state) & there’s no ID requirement, you just sign your name. He could just lie about his address & vote in multiple precincts!”

    This video, shared widely, is misleading. It was originally published Oct. 29 on TikTok by a punk rock band member who wrote in the comments that he was “purposefully (spreading) misinformation over the internet.”

    Voter ID is required to register to vote in New York. State law prohibits people from voting more than once. A law that permits registered voters to cast ballots without showing their IDs at the polling site does not change that. 

    Mamdani, a New York State assemblymember and Democratic Socialist, won the Democratic primary election in the New York City mayoral race. He faces former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a longtime Democrat who is running as an independent after losing to Mamdani in the primary, and Republican Curtis Sliwa, a Republican, in the Nov. 4 election.

    Who can vote in the New York general election?

    Before people can cast a ballot, they must register to vote. That involves providing identification, such as a New York driver’s license number or a Social Security number, and attesting that the information they are providing is correct. The state’s voter eligibility laws require that a person:

    • Be a U.S. citizen.

    • Be at least 18 years old.

    • Be a resident of the state, county, city or village for at least 30 days before the election.

    • Not be in prison for a felony conviction.

    • Not be adjudged mentally incompetent by a court.

    • Not claim the right to vote elsewhere, meaning that the person is not registered to vote in another state, county or municipality in the U.S.

    Kathleen McGrath,a New York State Board of Elections spokesperson, told PolitiFact in a Nov. 3 email that sometimes a person who didn’t meet verification requirements while seeking to register shows up at a poll site seeking to vote. In those instances, elections officials require the person to present valid identification on site.

    All voters must provide their signatures when voting as a means of voter ID, under the New York State Constitution Article II, Section 7. Poll workers confirm a voter’s identity by matching their signature to official records. 

    The County Board of Elections, which conducts local elections, operates voting sites and maintains voter registration lists, uses electronic pollbooks to check in voters at poll sites. The poll books are updated in real time as people cast ballots. If a voter has checked in at a poll site, they would be unable to check-in at another poll site during the same election.

    Erica Smitka, executive director of the League of Women Voters of New York State, told PolitiFact in a Nov. 4 email that because voting records are constantly changing, all voter list maintenance is conducted by bipartisan teams to ensure the process is fair, accurate, and transparent.

    “Another person cannot just say a voter’s name and vote on their behalf,” McGrath said. 

    Doing so would also require forging the voter’s signature. 

    “That action would be a felony,” McGrath said.

    McGrath said that if a voter has requested a mail ballot, they will be unable to cast a ballot in person on a machine and must complete a provisional ballot. Post-election, the County Board of Elections conducts an audit to ensure all ballots cast via affidavit are not from voters who have already cast another ballot.

    If people are not registered to vote, they will be turned away. 

    Donald Trump encountered some of these safeguards first-hand in 2004, years before he ran for president. “Access Hollywood” followed him as he sought to vote in New York City. The show captured him being turned away from various polling sites because poll workers said he wasn’t registered to vote at those locations. Access Hollywood said Trump ultimately filled out a provisional ballot in the backseat of a car, after learning that his issues related to his son Donald Trump Jr.’s change of address.

    McGrath said voting fraud is a rare occurrence because of the Boards of Elections record keeping. 

    “Because Boards of Elections keep permanent, individualized records of which elections a person participates in, the probability of detection after the fact is exceedingly high,” McGrath said. She said this is likely why there is little evidence in the U.S. of voter fraud-related crimes. 

    Our ruling

    An X post said, New York state has “no ID requirement” to vote, and people could lie about their address and “vote in multiple precincts.”

    New York voters are not required to present ID when voting, but they are required to present valid ID to register to vote. State law includes numerous safeguards to prevent anyone from casting more than one ballot in an election — and doing so is a felony. Poll workers confirm voters’ identities by matching their signatures to official records. 

    The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it  Mostly False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    [ad_1]

    California voters have one big ballot measure to consider this year. Here’s what you need to know about Proposition 50 and how it would impact the state. What is Proposition 50? If passed, it would change California’s congressional district map. Normally the map is drawn by an independent commission, but state Democrats drew *** new map to try and get more members of their party elected to Congress. It’s *** direct response to Texas changing their congressional maps in favor of electing more Republicans. *** yes vote would support changing the maps. The congressional districts will get redrawn in *** way that spreads out likely Democratic voters into areas that are normally solved Republican spots. *** no vote would keep the current maps in place. What are people saying about Prop 50? Well, supporters say it is *** crucial step in keeping President Trump’s power in check and counter his push to get other states to redraw their maps. Governor Gavin Newsom is behind this move. Because Republicans hold the majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives, supporters of this measure say it would limit President Trump and his ability to pass items on his agenda. Opponents who are mostly members of the Republican Party say this is just *** power grab by the Democratic Party that would undermine *** fair election. 5 districts are likely to change from red to blue if Proposition 50 passes. District 1, currently represented by Doug LaMalfa. District 3 is represented by Kevin Kiley. District 22 is represented by David Valadaa. District 41 is currently held by Ken Calver. Lastly, District 48, which is held by Darrell Issa. Election day is November 4th, and ballots have already been mailed out. They must be returned or mailed in by that date for your vote to count.

    Special Election Day in Northern California: The latest on voting for Prop 50 redistricting measure

    See updates on Election Day.

    Updated: 12:01 AM PST Nov 4, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Election Day has arrived for the special election. On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.(Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot. We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results. What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot. Here’s how to track your ballot. Here’s a look at early voter turnout across the state.Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.Find out how to check here.Still need to learn more about Prop 50? Here’s everything to know.For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California. For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Election Day has arrived for the special election.

    On Tuesday, Californians will decide whether to temporarily adopt new congressional district maps statewide, as Democratic leaders push to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Proposition 50, or Prop 50 for short, is part of a larger national fight in which Republicans and Democrats are trying to gerrymander their congressional districts to determine which party controls Congress halfway through President Trump’s term. The proposed maps target five California Republicans in an attempt to offset the five Republicans Texas is aiming to add.

    (Video Above: What to know about California’s Prop 50)

    Some communities in Northern California also have other measures or local races to weigh in on, including some measures in El Dorado County and the town of Truckee and races in Plumas County.

    All polling locations will open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. If you’re still in line when polls close, you should be able to cast your ballot.

    We’ll continue to update this page with updates from Election Day. Make sure to download our app for the latest breaking news updates with election results.

    What to know before polls open at 7 a.m.

    While voters can cast their ballot in person on Election Day, millions of California voters have already mailed in or dropped off their ballot.

    Before heading out the door to vote, check if you are heading to the correct or closest voting location.

    Still need to learn more about Prop 50?

    For those eager to head to the polls, make sure you know what you can and can’t do when it comes to voting in California.

    For example, you cannot wear pins, hats, shirts or other visible items that display a candidate’s name, image, logo or information about supporting or opposing a ballot measure. Here are more Election Day dos and don’ts.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What’s on the ballot in the first general election since Donald Trump became president

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — One year after Donald Trump retook the White House and set into motion a dramatic expansion of executive power, the Republican president figures prominently in state and local elections being held Tuesday.

    The results of those contests — the first general election of Trump’s second term — will be heralded by the victors as either a major repudiation or resounding stamp of approval of his second-term agenda. That’s especially true in high-profile races for Virginia and New Jersey governor, New York City mayor and a California proposition to redraw its congressional district boundaries.

    More than half of the states will hold contests on Tuesday. Here’s a look at some of the major statewide and local races on the ballot:

    In New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli are the nominees to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Sherrill is a four-term U.S. representative and former Navy helicopter pilot. Ciattarelli is a former state Assemblyman backed by Trump. In 2021, Ciattarelli came within about 3 percentage points of toppling Murphy.

    In Virginia, Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger look to replace term-limited Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. While Spanberger has made some efforts to focus on topics other than Trump in stump speeches, the president remained a major topic of conversation throughout the campaign, from comments Earle-Sears made about him in 2022 to some of his more polarizing policies, such as the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending cut measure and the widespread dismissal of federal workers, many of whom live in northern Virginia.

    Trump was scheduled to participate in telephone rallies for the candidates on Monday night.

    As the only gubernatorial races held in the year following a presidential election, the contests have long served as the first major test of voter sentiment toward the party holding the White House. In every race for governor since 1973, one or both states have elected a governor from a party different than that of the sitting president.

    The race to lead the nation’s largest city features Democratic state legislator Zohran Mamdani, independent candidate and former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa.

    Mamdani’s comfortable victory over Cuomo in the June primary generated excitement from the party’s more progressive wing and apprehension among the party establishment. Party leaders like Gov. Kathy Hochul and U.S. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries eventually endorsed the self-described democratic socialist months after he won the nomination.

    The winner will replace outgoing Mayor Eric Adams, who initially sought renomination as a Democrat. After losing the primary Adams opted to run as an independent, but dropped out of the race in September and eventually endorsed Cuomo. In February, the Trump Justice Department asked a court to drop corruption charges against Adams because the case impeded Trump’s “ immigration objectives.” Trump later said he’d like to see both Adams and Sliwa drop out of the race in an effort to defeat Mamdani.

    California voters will decide a statewide ballot measure that would enact a new congressional map that could flip as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats to Democratic control.

    Proposition 50, championed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, is in response to a new Texas map that state Republicans enacted in August as part of Trump’s efforts to keep the U.S. House under Republican control in the 2026 midterms. The Texas plan, which could help Republicans flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats, has sparked an escalating gerrymandering arms race among states to pass new maps outside of the regular once-a-decade schedule.

    Control of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will be at stake when voters cast Yes or No votes on whether to retain three justices from the high court’s 5-2 Democratic majority.

    Partisan control of the court could have major implications for the 2028 presidential race, since justices might be asked to rule on election disputes, as they did in 2020. Spending on Tuesday’s contests is on track to exceed $15 million as Republicans have campaigned to end the majority and Democrats have responded.

    If all three justices are ousted, a deadlock in the confirmation process to replace them could result in a court tied at 2-2. An election to fill any vacant seats for full 10-year terms would be held in 2027.

    VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL: Republican incumbent Jason Miyares seeks a second term against Democrat Jay Jones. Much of the fall campaign has focused on text messages suggesting violence against political rivals that Jones sent in 2022.

    TEXAS-18: Sixteen candidates hope to fill a vacant congressional seat previously held by the late Democratic U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner.

    STATE LEGISLATURES: Control of the Minnesota Senate and Virginia House of Delegates is at stake, while New Jersey Democrats defend their 52-28 General Assembly majority.

    BALLOT MEASURES: Maine voters will decide statewide questions on voting and a “red flag” law aimed at preventing gun violence. Texas’ 17 ballot measures include constitutional amendments on parental rights and limiting voting to U.S. citizens. Colorado and Washington also have statewide measures on the ballot.

    MAYORS: Detroit, Pittsburgh, Jersey City and Buffalo will elect new mayors, while incumbents in Atlanta, Minneapolis and Cincinnati seek another term.

    ___

    Follow the AP’s coverage of the 2025 election at https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2025/.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election Day in Minnesota 2025: What to know before heading to the polls

    [ad_1]

    Tuesday is Election Day and voters will head to the polls to cast their ballots.

    While many might consider this an off-election year, many important races will be decided across the state. 

    Here’s what you need to know about the 2025 Minnesota elections: 

    Registering to vote 

    The most important thing you can do before you actually vote is to register. You can fill out a voter registration form by clicking here or you can register at your polling place on Election Day.

    Where to find your polling place

    Every voter is assigned a specific location to cast their ballot on Election Day. It’s usually it’s near your home address. Click here to find your local polling place.

    Note that not all areas of Minnesota will have elections this year.

    When are polling places open?

    Polling places are typically open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., though you should check your specific polling place’s hours before going to vote. Several polling locations may not open until 10 a.m. 

    If you are in line by 8 p.m., you will be allowed to vote by law.

    What’s on my ballot?

    To make sure you know who will be on the ballot before casting your vote, the Secretary of State’s office has put together a sample ballot. Click here to see what is on your ballot.

    Key races 

    Minneapolis incumbent mayor Jacob Frey is running for a third term. He faces opposition from several other mayoral hopefuls, including state Sen. Omar Fateh, Rev. Dewayne Davis and Jazz Hampton. The three have formed a pact to encourage voters to not rank the incumbent and instead rank each other as second- and third-place votes, a strategy that could cost Frey his reelection.

    “Here we see really the battle within the Democratic Party over whether it’s going to be a socialist party that is really pushing the edge, challenging the status quo, or if it’s going to try to work within the system and try to provide alternatives, but alternatives that can be broadly appealing,” Larry Jacobs, political science professor with the University of Minnesota, said about the Minneapolis mayoral race.

    All 13 city council seats in Minneapolis are also up for reelection.

    Melvin Carter, in St. Paul, is seeking his third term, facing a challenge from state Rep. Kaohly Her, who has represented St. Paul in the legislature since 2019. Her worked as a policy director for Carter for nearly four years. Carter earned 62% of first-choice votes when he ran for reelection in 2021.

    St. Paul ballot questions

    There are two yes/no questions on St. Paul voters’ ballots. 

    City Question 1 asks voters if the city’s charter should be amended to allow the city council to give out fines for ordinance violations. St. Paul is currently only allowed to pursue criminal charges if an ordinance is violated.

    If approved by voters, the city council would be able to implement fines within 90 days and determine the fine for each violation separately.

    School District Question 1, if passed by voters, would increase St. Paul Public Schools’ operating levy, generating an additional $37.2 million in revenue for the district annually.

    If passed, property tax increases in St. Paul could total 14.2%. Voters can see their estimated tax impact using an online calculator

    School districts ask for funding

    Across Minnesota, there are eight dozen referendum requests before voters that include funding measures ranging from money for cybersecurity upgrades to new gymnasiums and fitness centers.

    Shakopee, Big Lake, Owatonna, Monticello and roughly three dozen more districts join St. Paul with similar measures seeking to boost help with everyday costs.

    St. Michael-Albertville wants approval of a $21 million bond referendum to, among other things, enhance school security systems. A $60 million capital levy request in Roseville would support cybersecurity, software replacement, tech training and more.

    Where can I find election results?

    You can find the latest election results on WCCO’s Election Results page by checking wcco.com/results.



    Early voters in Minneapolis flock to the polls ahead of Election Day

    02:03

    [ad_2]

    WCCO Staff

    Source link

  • Voter ID measure violates California law, appeals court says

    [ad_1]

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California appeals court ruled Monday that a Huntington Beach measure requiring voter identification at the polls violates state law.

    The Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana determined that the measure passed by voters in the seaside city of 200,000 people should be struck down because it conflicts with state election law, said Lee Fink, a lawyer for Huntington Beach resident Mark Bixby, who challenged the city’s measure. California Attorney General Rob Bonta also sued over the Huntington Beach law contending it would disenfranchise voters.

    “Voting is the fundamental right from which all other rights flow, and no matter where threats to that right come from — whether from Washington D.C. or from within California — we will continue holding the line,” Bonta said in a statement. “California’s elections are already fair, safe, and secure.”

    Corbin Carson, a Huntington Beach spokesperson, said the city is reviewing the appeals court’s ruling.

    Residents of Huntington Beach voted last year to let local officials require voter identification at the polls starting in 2026. The measure also allows the city to increase in-person voting sites and monitor ballot drop boxes in local elections.

    Bonta filed a lawsuit saying the measure conflicts with state law and could make it harder for poor, non-white, young, elderly and disabled voters to cast ballots. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, then signed into state law a measure barring local governments from establishing and enforcing laws that require residents provide identification to vote in elections.

    Huntington Beach, which is known as “Surf City USA” for its scenic shoreline dotted with surfers, has a history of sparring with state officials over the measures it can take under its city charter on issues ranging from immigration to housing. The GOP is dominant in Huntington Beach with nearly 57,000 registered voters versus 41,000 Democrats, county data shows.

    [ad_2]

    Source link