ReportWire

Tag: VOTE

  • Harris and Trump campaigns appeal to right-leaning, religious voters

    Harris and Trump campaigns appeal to right-leaning, religious voters

    [ad_1]

    Both the Harris and Trump campaigns are intensifying their efforts in battleground states with just two weeks left until Election Day.Former President Donald Trump will campaign for a second straight day in North Carolina after making his pitch to Christian voters a day prior. He postponed a speech at a gun rights conference in Georgia and scheduled a last-minute rally in the Tar Heel state Tuesday as some polling suggests Harris is gaining support there.In a rally before faith leaders in the battleground state, Trump touched on culture war issues, including transgender and parental rights.”Christians will not be safe with Kamala Harris as president,” Trump warned. “Your religious liberty will be gone. Your free speech will be gone, your Second Amendment will be gone, and parental rights will be gone forever.”Earlier, Trump surveyed storm damage and repeated false claims about FEMA misusing taxpayer money.”They spent a lot of money on having illegal people come into our country,” Trump said.Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris made her pitch to Trump-hesitant voters in three “Blue wall” states Monday.In separate events in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, she campaigned alongside a familiar but unlikely ally, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, (R) Wyoming. Both aimed their messages at Trump-wary voters in counties that could decide the election.”We might not agree on every issue but she is somebody you can trust,” Cheney said. “You can vote your conscience and never have to say a word to anybody. There will be millions of Republicans who do that on November 5th.”While Harris will not hold public events, she will sit for an interview that will air Tuesday night on NBC Nightly News.In her place, former President Barack Obama and running mate Tim Walz will host a rally in Wisconsin where in-person, early voting kicks off.Republicans are also holding events to encourage early voting in favor of Trump. His campaign is pushing for all forms of voting, including by mail and in-person, to maximize votes. Trump lost Wisconsin by just under 21,000 votes in the 2020 election.

    Both the Harris and Trump campaigns are intensifying their efforts in battleground states with just two weeks left until Election Day.

    Former President Donald Trump will campaign for a second straight day in North Carolina after making his pitch to Christian voters a day prior. He postponed a speech at a gun rights conference in Georgia and scheduled a last-minute rally in the Tar Heel state Tuesday as some polling suggests Harris is gaining support there.

    In a rally before faith leaders in the battleground state, Trump touched on culture war issues, including transgender and parental rights.

    “Christians will not be safe with Kamala Harris as president,” Trump warned. “Your religious liberty will be gone. Your free speech will be gone, your Second Amendment will be gone, and parental rights will be gone forever.”

    Earlier, Trump surveyed storm damage and repeated false claims about FEMA misusing taxpayer money.

    “They spent a lot of money on having illegal people come into our country,” Trump said.

    Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris made her pitch to Trump-hesitant voters in three “Blue wall” states Monday.

    In separate events in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, she campaigned alongside a familiar but unlikely ally, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, (R) Wyoming. Both aimed their messages at Trump-wary voters in counties that could decide the election.

    “We might not agree on every issue but she is somebody you can trust,” Cheney said. “You can vote your conscience and never have to say a word to anybody. There will be millions of Republicans who do that on November 5th.”

    While Harris will not hold public events, she will sit for an interview that will air Tuesday night on NBC Nightly News.

    In her place, former President Barack Obama and running mate Tim Walz will host a rally in Wisconsin where in-person, early voting kicks off.

    Republicans are also holding events to encourage early voting in favor of Trump. His campaign is pushing for all forms of voting, including by mail and in-person, to maximize votes. Trump lost Wisconsin by just under 21,000 votes in the 2020 election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • LGBTQ+ voter education town hall held tonight in Los Angeles

    LGBTQ+ voter education town hall held tonight in Los Angeles

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES – As the world gets a little warmer and we settle into the Spring season, the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation is proud to announce the return of our Youth Baseball and Softball Leagues for the Spring 2023 season.

    BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ARE BACK!

    Sign up for our Spring Sports Leagues, Coming to an LA County Parks Near You!

    REGISTER FOR YOUTH SPORTS LEAGUES TODAY!

    YOUTH BASEBALL 

    Photo Credit: County of Los Angeles

    Baseball season is right around the corner, now’s the perfect time to sign up your young athletes for our Youth Baseball Leagues! Our Baseball Leagues will provide an emphasis on learning fundamentals of Baseball, skill development, sportsmanship, teamwork, and fun. League will run for 10 weeks and consist of one weekday practice and one game every Saturday. Game score and league standing will be kept. Rules will be enforced. Registration fee will include uniform, award, and umpire. Qualifying teams will advance and participate in the playoffs.  

    Divisions & Dates:
    D3-D6: April 15 – June 12

    AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING PARKS
    Divisions 3 – 6

    NORTH AGENCY

    Castaic Sports Complex: 31230 N. Castaic Rd., Castaic 91384  | (661) 775 8865

    George Lane Park: 5520 W. Avenue, L-8, Quartz Hill, 93534 | (661) 722 7780

    Jackie Robinson Park: 8773 E. Avenue R, Littlerock, 93543 | (661) 944 2880

    Stephen Sorensen Park: 16801 E. Avenue P, Lake Los Angeles, 93591 | (661) 264 1249

    El Cariso: 13100 Hubbard Street, Sylmar, 91342 | (818) 367 5043

    Loma Alta: 3330 North Lincoln Avenue, Altadena, 91001 | (626) 398 5451

    Pearblossom Park: 33922 North 121st St East, Pearblossom, 93553 | (661) 944 2988

    Val Verde Park: 30300 Arlington St Castaic,  91384 | (661) 257 4014

    EAST AGENCY

    Arcadia Park: 405 S. Santa Anita Ave. Arcadia 91006 | (626) 821 4619

    Allen Martin Park: 14830 E. Giordano St. La Puente 91744 | (626) 918 5263

    Bassett Park: 510 Vineland Ave. Bassett | (626) 333 0959

    Charter Oak Park: 20261 E. Covina Blvd. Covina, 91723 | (626) 339 0411

    Dalton Park: 18867 E. Armstead St., Azusa, 91702 | (626) 852 1491

    Manzanita Park: 1747 S. Kwis Ave., Hacienda Heights, 91745 | (626) 336 6246

    Pathfinder Park: 18150 Pathfinder Rd., Rowland Heights, 91748  (562) 690 0933

    Pamela Park: 2236 Goodall Ave. Duarte, 91010 | (626) 357 1619

    Rimgrove Park: 747 North Rimgrove Dr. La Puente 91744 | (626) 330 8798

    Rowland Heights Park: 1500 Banida Ave. Rowland Heights, 91748 | (626) 912 6774

    San Angelo Park: 245 S. San Angelo Ave. La Puente 91746 | (626) 333 6162

    Sunshine Park: 515 S. Deepmead Ave. La Puente, 91744  | (626) 854 5559

    Steinmetz Park: 1545 S. Stimson Ave. Hacienda Heights, 91748 | (626) 855 5383

    Valleydale Park: 5225 N. Lark Ellen Ave., Azusa, CA 91702 – (626) 334-8020

    SOUTH AGENCY

    Amigo Park: 5700 Juarez Ave. Whittier, 90606 | (562) 908-4702

    La Mirada Park: 13701 South Adelfa Ave. La Mirada, 90638 | (562) 902-5645

    Mayberry Park: 13201 East Meyer Rd, Whittier, 90605 | (562) 944-9727

    Sorenson Park: 11419 Rosehedge Dr. Whittier, 90606 | (562) 908-7763


    GIRLS SOFTBALL 

    Girl’s Softball League will provide an emphasis on learning fundamentals of Softball, skill development, sportsmanship, teamwork, and fun. League will run for 10 weeks and consist of one weekday practice and one game every Saturday. Game score and league standing will be kept. Softball rules will be enforced. Registration fee will include uniform, award, and umpire. Qualifying teams will be advance and participate in the playoffs.

    Divisions & Dates

    D3 – D6: April 15 – June 12

    AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING PARKS
    DIVISIONS 3 – 6

    NORTH AGENCY

    George Lane Park: 5520 W. Avenue, L-8, Quartz Hill, 93534 | (661) 722 7780

    Jackie Robinson Park: 8773 E. Avenue R, Littlerock, 93543 | (661) 944 2880

    Stephen Sorensen Park: 16801 E. Avenue P, Lake Los Angeles, 93591 | (661) 264 1249

    El Cariso: 13100 Hubbard Street, Sylmar, 91342 | (818) 367 5043

    Loma Alta: 3330 North Lincoln Avenue, Altadena, 91001 | (626) 398 5451

    Pearblossom Park: 33922 North 121st St East, Pearblossom, 93553 | (661) 944 2988

    Val Verde Park: 30300 Arlington St Castaic,  91384 | (661) 257 4014

    EAST AGENCY

    Arcadia Park: 405 S. Santa Anita Ave. Arcadia 91006 | (626) 821 4619

    Allen Martin Park: 14830 E. Giordano St. La Puente 91744 | (626) 918 5263

    Bassett Park: 510 Vineland Ave. Bassett | (626) 333 0959

    Charter Oak Park: 20261 E. Covina Blvd. Covina, 91723 | (626) 339 0411

    Dalton Park: 18867 E. Armstead St., Azusa, 91702 | (626) 852 1491

    Manzanita Park: 1747 S. Kwis Ave., Hacienda Heights, 91745 | (626) 336 6246

    Pathfinder Park: 18150 Pathfinder Rd., Rowland Heights, 91748  (562) 690 0933

    Pamela Park: 2236 Goodall Ave. Duarte, 91010 | (626) 357 1619

    Rimgrove Park: 747 North Rimgrove Dr. La Puente 91744 | (626) 330 8798

    Rowland Heights Park: 1500 Banida Ave. Rowland Heights, 91748 | (626) 912 6774

    San Angelo Park: 245 S. San Angelo Ave. La Puente 91746 | (626) 333 6162

    Sunshine Park: 515 S. Deepmead Ave. La Puente, 91744  | (626) 854 5559

    Steinmetz Park: 1545 S. Stimson Ave. Hacienda Heights, 91748 | (626) 855 5383

    Valleydale Park: 5225 N. Lark Ellen Ave., Azusa, CA 91702 | (626) 334 8020

    SOUTH AGENCY

    Adventure Park: 10130 Gunn Ave. Whittier, CA – (562) 698 7645

    Amigo Park: 5700 Juarez Ave. Whittier, 90606 | (562) 908 4702

    Mayberry Park: 13201 East Meyer Rd, Whittier, 90605 | (562) 944 9727

    Sorenson Park: 11419 Rosehedge Dr. Whittier, 90606 | (562) 908 7763


    Photo Credit: County of Los Angeles

    Through an exciting partnership with the Dodgers Foundation, Dodgers Dreamteam (formerly Dodgers RBI) brings the sport of Baseball and Softball at a lower price! The goal of DDT is to provide an inclusive, barrier-free sports-based youth development program for communities that have historically been left out of consideration. 

    Divisions & Dates:

    April 15 – June 12

    Divisions 3 – 6

    AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING PARKS

    EAST AGENCY

    Belvedere Park: 4914 E. Cesar Chavez Ave. Los Angeles, 90022 |  (323) 260 2342

    Obregon Park: 4021 E. 1st St., Los Angeles, CA 90063 | (323) 260 2344

    Salazar Park: 3864 Whittier Blvd. Los Angeles, 90023 | (323) 260 2330

    Saybrook Park: 6250 E. Northside Dr. Los Angeles, 90022 | (323) 724 8546

    SOUTH AGENCY

    Alondra Park: 3850 W. Manhattan Beach Blvd. Lawndale, 90260 | (310) 217-8366

    Athens Park: 12603 S. Broadway Los Angeles, 90061 | (323) 241 6700 

    Bethune Park: 1244 E. 61st St. Los Angeles, 90001 | (323) 846 1895

    Bodger Park: 14900 S. Yukon Ave. Hawthorne, 90250 | (310) 676 2085

    Campanella Park: 14812 S Stanford Ave, Compton, 90220 | (310) 603 3720

    Carver Park: 1400 E 118th St, Los Angeles, 90059 | (323) 357 3030

    Del Aire Park: 12601 Isis Ave, Hawthorne, 90251 | (310) 643 4976

    Helen Keller Park: 12521 Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, 90044 |  (323) 241-6702

    Lennox Park: 10828 Condon Ave, Lennox, 90304 | (310) 419 6712

    Mona Park: 2291 E 121st St, Compton, 90222 | (310) 603 3729

    Franklin D. Roosevelt Park 7600 Graham Ave. Los Angeles, 90001 | (323) 586 5888

    Ted Watkins Park: 1335 E 103rd St Los Angeles, 90002 | (323) 357 3032

    Victoria Park: 419 M.L.K. Jr. St, Carson, 90746 | (310) 217 8370


    REGISTER NOW!

    For questions, contact LA County Parks at [email protected] or (626) 588-5364.

    [ad_2]

    Gisselle Palomera

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris’ candidacy shakes up presidential race 100 days from election

    Kamala Harris’ candidacy shakes up presidential race 100 days from election

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign is shaking up the presidential race in the final stretch as both sides race to redefine the likely Democratic nominee.With exactly 100 days to go until Election Day, Democrats say Harris is injecting new energy into the campaign while Republicans are ramping up attacks. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump tested new talking points at a series of events this weekend. Just short of one week since President Joe Biden ended his re-election bid, the Harris campaign reported recruiting more than 170,000 new volunteers and raising $200 million.Harris added to the cash haul on Saturday with her first fundraiser since taking over the Democratic ticket. Her campaign announced the event in Pittsfield, Massachusetts was expected to bring in more than $1.4 million, exceeding the original goal set before President Biden’s departure by $1 million. Harris is also working to expand support with key parts of the Democratic base that appeared to be eroding under Biden, including people of color and young voters. “We know young voters will be key and we know your vote cannot be taken for granted, it must be earned and that is exactly what we will do,” the Vice President said in a video message Saturday at the Voters of Tomorrow Summit in Atlanta, Georgia. Social media is a growing part of that strategy, with Harris launching a new TikTok account in recent days. Her latest post features NSYNC’s Lance Bass asking Harris, “What are we going to say to Donald Trump in November?” as the boy band’s hit song “Bye, Bye, Bye” plays in the background. There are some early signs the Harris playbook may be working. A new Emerson College/The Hill poll suggests she’s closing the gap in five swing states, though Trump maintains a slight lead in most of them. “Harris has recovered a portion of the vote for the Democrats on the presidential ticket since the fallout after the June 27 debate,” wrote Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling. “Young voters have shifted toward Harris: her support compared to Biden increased by 16 points in Arizona, eight in Georgia, five in Michigan, 11 in Pennsylvania, and one in Wisconsin since earlier polling this month.”Another new survey from Fox News finds Harris and Trump are tied in the key swing states of Pennsylvania and Michigan. Trump leads by one point in battleground Wisconsin. “I think what she does is put all the states that Biden won last time back into play,” said Peter Loge, director of George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs. ‘As polls tighten, Trump spoke at a Bitcoin conference in Nashville, Tennessee on Saturday, followed by a campaign rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Trump’s attacks towards Harris ranged from personal to political. He said he is running against a “low IQ individual” and that she will be “the most extreme radical liberal president in American history.” Trump is also seeking to tie Harris to Biden’s record on inflation and immigration, both weaknesses for Democrats according to polling. “Under ‘Border Czar Harris’, millions of migrants are pouring across our border,” Trump told the crowd in Minnesota. It’s a message that’s flooding the airwaves. An analysis from The Associated Press published earlier this week found Trump and his allies are outspending Harris’ team 25-to-1 on television and radio advertising. In her first campaign ad, Harris positioned herself as a defender of freedom, from reproductive rights to the “freedom to be safe from gun violence.” “There are some people who think we should be a country of chaos, of fear, of hate. But us? We choose something different. We choose freedom,” Harris says in the ad. The national Democratic Party is expected to begin a virtual voting process to nominate its ticket this week. Harris could be approved as the nominee as early as Aug. 1st and she’s expected to choose a running mate by Aug. 7.

    Vice President Kamala Harris‘ campaign is shaking up the presidential race in the final stretch as both sides race to redefine the likely Democratic nominee.

    With exactly 100 days to go until Election Day, Democrats say Harris is injecting new energy into the campaign while Republicans are ramping up attacks. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump tested new talking points at a series of events this weekend.

    Just short of one week since President Joe Biden ended his re-election bid, the Harris campaign reported recruiting more than 170,000 new volunteers and raising $200 million.

    Harris added to the cash haul on Saturday with her first fundraiser since taking over the Democratic ticket. Her campaign announced the event in Pittsfield, Massachusetts was expected to bring in more than $1.4 million, exceeding the original goal set before President Biden’s departure by $1 million.

    Harris is also working to expand support with key parts of the Democratic base that appeared to be eroding under Biden, including people of color and young voters.

    “We know young voters will be key and we know your vote cannot be taken for granted, it must be earned and that is exactly what we will do,” the Vice President said in a video message Saturday at the Voters of Tomorrow Summit in Atlanta, Georgia.

    Social media is a growing part of that strategy, with Harris launching a new TikTok account in recent days. Her latest post features NSYNC’s Lance Bass asking Harris, “What are we going to say to Donald Trump in November?” as the boy band’s hit song “Bye, Bye, Bye” plays in the background.

    There are some early signs the Harris playbook may be working.

    A new Emerson College/The Hill poll suggests she’s closing the gap in five swing states, though Trump maintains a slight lead in most of them.

    “Harris has recovered a portion of the vote for the Democrats on the presidential ticket since the fallout after the June 27 debate,” wrote Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling. “Young voters have shifted toward Harris: her support compared to Biden increased by 16 points in Arizona, eight in Georgia, five in Michigan, 11 in Pennsylvania, and one in Wisconsin since earlier polling this month.”

    Another new survey from Fox News finds Harris and Trump are tied in the key swing states of Pennsylvania and Michigan. Trump leads by one point in battleground Wisconsin.

    “I think what she does is put all the states that Biden won last time back into play,” said Peter Loge, director of George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs. ‘

    As polls tighten, Trump spoke at a Bitcoin conference in Nashville, Tennessee on Saturday, followed by a campaign rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota.

    Trump’s attacks towards Harris ranged from personal to political. He said he is running against a “low IQ individual” and that she will be “the most extreme radical liberal president in American history.”

    Trump is also seeking to tie Harris to Biden’s record on inflation and immigration, both weaknesses for Democrats according to polling.

    “Under ‘Border Czar Harris’, millions of migrants are pouring across our border,” Trump told the crowd in Minnesota.

    It’s a message that’s flooding the airwaves. An analysis from The Associated Press published earlier this week found Trump and his allies are outspending Harris’ team 25-to-1 on television and radio advertising.

    In her first campaign ad, Harris positioned herself as a defender of freedom, from reproductive rights to the “freedom to be safe from gun violence.”

    “There are some people who think we should be a country of chaos, of fear, of hate. But us? We choose something different. We choose freedom,” Harris says in the ad.

    The national Democratic Party is expected to begin a virtual voting process to nominate its ticket this week. Harris could be approved as the nominee as early as Aug. 1st and she’s expected to choose a running mate by Aug. 7.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A look inside UNC governing boards: who are the leaders targeting diversity?

    A look inside UNC governing boards: who are the leaders targeting diversity?

    [ad_1]

    OPINION AND COMMENTARY

    Editorials and other Opinion content offer perspectives on issues important to our community and are independent from the work of our newsroom reporters.

    Andrew Tripp, General Counsel for the UNC System, speaks during a meeting of the UNC System Board of Governors’ University Governance committee on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, in Winston-Salem, N.C.

    Andrew Tripp, General Counsel for the UNC System, speaks during a meeting of the UNC System Board of Governors’ University Governance committee on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, in Winston-Salem, N.C.

    kmckeown@newsobserver.com

    The UNC System Board of Governors will vote Thursday on a policy that would gut diversity, equity and inclusion efforts at public universities across North Carolina. It’s a move that’s necessary, they say, in order to uphold a deep-rooted commitment to diversity of thought.

    “Our universities will support intellectual freedom, not promote a particular ideology … North Carolina is a diverse state, and our public universities belong to everyone,” Ramsey wrote in a statement following last month’s initial committee vote.

    But as the board weighs important decisions about diversity-related matters, it’s also holding up a mirror to itself. The governing board of North Carolina’s public university system is woefully lacking in ideological diversity, and its members are far more reflective of the Republican leaders who appoint them than of the state and system they ought to represent.

    The Board of Governors, which oversees all 17 UNC System campuses, has 24 members. The General Assembly appoints all 24 members. Of the 23 current members, just two are registered Democrats. Sixteen members — two-thirds of the board — are registered Republicans. The remaining five members are registered as unaffiliated, though several of them have donated significant sums to Republican candidates. The board has one vacancy, as Lee Roberts resigned from his role in January to serve as UNC-Chapel Hill’s interim chancellor.

    Many members also have political backgrounds. Harry Brown, who was appointed in 2023, is a former Republican lawmaker who served as Senate majority leader for a decade. Also appointed in 2023: Woody White, another former Republican senator. And in 2020, the General Assembly appointed Art Pope, one of the most influential Republican donors in North Carolina, to the board.

    Chris Marsicano, assistant professor of educational studies at Davidson College, noted that North Carolina is one of only two states that has the legislature appoint the governing board. In most cases, the governor makes the appointments.

    He said that in 2005, the BOG had eight Republicans and 22 Democrats, but by 2013 there was not a single Democrat. Now there are two.

    “They went from having some Republicans to almost exclusively Republican and Republican-leaning members within 15 years,” he said.

    That’s not for lack of trying by Democrats. State Sen. Gladys Robinson, a Greensboro Democrat and former member of the Board of Governors, said that nominees she has proposed have not been considered by the Senate. Even when Democrats were in the majority, Robinson said, they were committed to having diversity by having the minority party appoint members. She noted that House Speaker Tim Moore was appointed to the Board of Governors in 1997 when he was chairman of the Cleveland County Republican Party.

    “Very seldom have we gotten any support, regardless of the caliber of nominees,” she said. “We’ve put forward some of the best leaders that North Carolina has, but the Senate refuses to appoint them.”

    State Sen. Dan Blue, a Wake County Democrat and the Senate’s minority leader, said people who could make strong contributions to the board don’t want to enter the nominating process.

    “Multiple people told me, ‘Why go through all this knowing it’s not going anywhere?’” he said.

    Instead, Robinson said, Republican lawmakers are appointing people “who are their friends and who have made contributions to their campaigns. It has nothing to do with the resumes of these people.”

    Indeed, many members of the Board of Governors have made hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions to Republican candidates for state and federal office, including Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger.

    Diversity among UNC-Chapel Hill trustees

    The UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, which recently voted to shift UNC’s DEI funding to public safety and police, is similarly homogeneous. There are 14 voting members, and more than 75% of them are registered Republicans. There is not a single registered Democrat on the board. There are three former lawmakers on the board, one of whom is now a registered lobbyist. Also on the board is Jim Blaine, Berger’s former chief of staff and one of the state’s most prominent political consultants. The board’s former chair, Dave Boliek, who still sits on the board, is the Republican nominee for state auditor in November’s general election.

    Trustees, however, have spoken at length about the importance of diversity of thought, and how conservative voices are stifled in favor of liberal ones in Chapel Hill. That commitment to ideological diversity was the purported motivation for fast-tracking the development of a School of Civic Life and Leadership, intended to be a haven of sorts for conservative thought on campus. Boliek, for instance, told Fox News that the school is an “effort to remedy” the lack of right-of-center views on campus.

    Roger Perry, a Chapel Hill developer who chaired the Board of Trustees from 2007 to 2009, said the makeup of the board has become more political.

    During his era, the governor and Board of Governors appointed trustees. Since then, the governor has been cut out and trustees are appointed by the Board of Governors, the speaker of the House and the Senate president pro tempore.

    To be appointed now, Perry said, “I’m sure there’s a political litmus test, or you have holy water put on you by the Senate president pro tem or the speaker.”

    Before Republicans took control of the legislature, Perry said, trustees would recommend new members based on their volunteer service to the university, regardless of their political affiliations.

    “The qualifications that were necessary 15 years ago are totally different from the qualifications today,” Perry said. “On my board, I couldn’t tell you who was registered one way or the other.”

    “That is not to say all 12 members on the Board of Trustees haven’t paid their dues in terms of service. There are several who have, but most have not,” he said.

    Perry said the tight political control reflects Republican lawmakers’ desire to alter the university’s prevailing progressive culture and its effect on students.

    “I think they do fear that the university turns out people who vote against them,” Perry said. “That’s true, but it’s not because they get indoctrinated, it’s because they get educated.”

    Little appetite for change

    The boards don’t appear eager for people to know much about them. A list is available on the Board of Governors website, but the page doesn’t appear with a simple Google search and can be difficult to navigate. On the Board of Trustees website, some biographies appear incomplete. For example, one member’s biography does not mention the term he served as a state lawmaker, and Blaine’s biography greatly understates the extent of his ties to Berger and the legislature. Yet these people are tasked with making significant decisions about North Carolina’s prized university system, a massive public expenditure and one of the state’s largest employers.

    Former UNC System President Tom Ross served as co-chairman of the Governor’s Commission on the Governance of Higher Education in North Carolina, which Gov. Roy Cooper created in 2022 to assess and recommend changes to the governance structure of the UNC System. In 2015, a Republican-dominated Board of Governors pushed Ross out of office. No reason was given, but Ross was apparently removed because he is a Democrat.

    His co-chair on the commission was the Republican who replaced him as the UNC System president: former U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. The commission, Ross said, “tried to set out areas where we felt having people representative of North Carolina is important. The university is for everybody.”

    Republican state lawmakers say they — and by extension, their appointees — are representative of North Carolina because voters have put them in power.

    But Ross said Republicans “didn’t get 100 percent of the vote and they don’t have 100 percent of the legislature.”

    Republican legislative leaders opposed the creation of the governor’s commission and ignored its recommendations on how to make the university’s governing boards more representative of the state’s political racial and geographic diversity.

    “I’m disappointed there wasn’t more willingness to engage and discuss. [The commission] was a bipartisan group,” Ross said. “Most of us realized it wasn’t going to be embraced with open arms by the legislature, but we did hope they would pay some attention to it.”

    Ultimately, the insular political makeup of UNC’s governing boards makes its purported commitments to ideological diversity appear hollow and hypocritical. But it also hurts the strength of the entire UNC System and the institutions that are a part of it.

    “I worry that a lack of diversity on these boards is reducing the possibility of true game-changing academic initiatives,” Marsicano, the Davidson professor who co-authored a brief for the Governor’s Commission on the boards’ diversity, said. “Having a diversity of viewpoints allows for a greater ability to maximize the strengths of the university.”

    Most critically, though, it jeopardizes the long-held principle that North Carolina’s universities belong to everyone. System leaders say they want more ideological diversity on campus, but without a commitment to diversity within their own ranks, it appears as if the only ideology they really want on campus is their own.

    Related stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    [ad_2]

    the Editorial Board

    Source link

  • Students kept out of building where UNC System board voted on DEI changes. Is that legal?

    Students kept out of building where UNC System board voted on DEI changes. Is that legal?

    [ad_1]

    A group of students from UNC-Chapel Hill wait outside of the Alex Ewing Performance Place building on the campus of UNC School of the Arts after a meeting of the UNC System Board of Governors’ University Governance committee went into closed session on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, in Winston-Salem, N.C.

    A group of students from UNC-Chapel Hill wait outside of the Alex Ewing Performance Place building on the campus of UNC School of the Arts after a meeting of the UNC System Board of Governors’ University Governance committee went into closed session on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, in Winston-Salem, N.C.

    kmckeown@newsobserver.com

    Students from UNC-Chapel Hill say they were kept out of the building where the UNC System Board of Governors — a public body — met Wednesday, raising questions about whether the board potentially violated the state’s open meetings law.

    The board’s University Governance committee unanimously voted Wednesday afternoon to approve a policy targeting diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, jobs and efforts at all public universities in North Carolina. That committee, along with several other board committees, met throughout the day in a theater at the Alex Ewing Performance Place on the UNC School of the Arts campus in Winston-Salem.

    The UNC students who attempted to attend the governance committee’s meeting Wednesday afternoon said they were told by Ed Purchase, the UNC System’s director of university public safety operations, that the meeting room was full and all of the seats available to the public were filled. Purchase did not allow the students to enter any portion of the building where the meeting was held, they said.

    North Carolina law states that “any person is entitled to attend” meetings of public bodies, including the Board of Governors and its committees.

    UNC System spokesperson Andy Wallace told The N&O Wednesday that some members of the public were unable to enter the meeting room because of a lack of available seats and because the open-session portion of the meeting, in which the vote on the DEI policy took place, lasted for such a short time. By the time system staff could have made accommodations to let more people in, Wallace said, the meeting had gone into closed session, in which members of the public are not allowed.

    Raleigh attorney Mike Tadych said the UNC System’s actions Wednesday in keeping the students out of the meeting seemed “dubious,” but said it was “not black and white” to him whether those actions violated state law. Tadych said public bodies, including the Board of Governors, are required “to take reasonable measures to provide access to public meetings.”

    UNC student Samuel Scarborough said he and other members of the Southern Student Action Coalition (SSAC), a progressive student-activist group, and TransparUNCy, a group dedicated to shining a light on political influences on North Carolina higher education, wanted to attend the meeting “to make our voices heard” and “be present in the room” as the vote on the DEI policy took place.

    “We were not given this opportunity,” Scarborough said.

    Asked by The N&O via email Thursday if the UNC System believed it had followed state law on open meetings by keeping students from entering the building, Wallace replied Friday with this statement: “All UNC Board of Governors committee and full board meetings are livestreamed and available to the public via PBS NC. Chancellors, campus staff, UNC System staff, PBS NC technical staff and the Board itself are present in the room to attend the meetings. Seats are reserved for the media. Any open seats are available to the general public on a first-come, first-served basis.”

    Students say they were kept out of meeting

    Though the Board of Governors typically meets at the UNC System office in Raleigh, the board meets twice a year at one of the system’s 17 campuses. The board’s meetings are open to the public, though it can enter closed session and meet without the public present for reasons that are outlined in state law.

    The board held its April meetings at the UNC School of the Arts, with the Catawba Theatre inside the Alex Ewing Performance Place functioning as its meeting room for all of its committee meetings on Wednesday and its full-board meeting on Thursday.

    Scarborough was one of about 10 students from SSAC and TransparUNCy who attempted to attend the board’s University Governance committee meeting Wednesday, which began at 3:45 p.m.

    Wallace described the following chain of events to The N&O Wednesday when a reporter asked why the students were kept out: Fred Sellers, the system’s vice president for safety and emergency operations, “was made aware there were four members of the public that wanted in,” Wallace said, but there were only three seats available. One of the four said they would watch the meeting via the live-stream made available by the system on its website, Wallace said, and the other three people were allowed inside. Sellers then heard that more people wanted to enter the meeting, Wallace said, but by that time, the board was entering closed session.

    The open-session portion of the meeting, in which the vote on the DEI policy took place, lasted roughly five minutes.

    Alexander Denza, another student with the groups, said students arrived to the doors of the Alex Ewing Performance Place before the committee meeting began. Denza provided to The N&O a video of the students’ encounter with Purchase, the UNC System public safety director, which Denza said was filmed beginning at 3:40 p.m. — five minutes before the meeting began, and 10 minutes before the meeting was closed to the public for the closed-session portion of the meeting.

    In the video, Purchase is seen standing in front of the main doors to the building answering questions from the students. Purchase told the students that there were “three seats for the public” available at the meeting, noting that all of the other seats were all filled by university chancellors, their guests and other attendees. The three seats had been filled by faculty and staff of the School of the Arts, Purchase told the students.

    Purchase told the students that the meeting was being streamed online and that they could watch it through that platform.

    Asked by a student in the video how many people had been turned away, Purchase answered that he hadn’t “turned anybody away.”

    “You guys are the first,” Purchase told the group.

    Asked by another student if there was a larger space where the meeting could have been held to accommodate more people, Purchase said he did not know. Purchase also said that he did not know how many seats in the theater were occupied by university staff.

    Toward the end of the roughly four-minute video, Purchase is seen telling the students: “If you guys are going to hang out, maybe you could hang out over there, if that’s alright.” It is unclear exactly where Purchase was gesturing, but he told students they were blocking the entry to the building “a little bit.” At separate points in the video, one person is seen being able to access the doors to leave the building, while two other people are seen entering the building.

    Denza told The N&O that neither he, nor any of the other students he was with, was let inside the meeting room or the building by system staff at any time Wednesday afternoon.

    Did the board violate open meetings law?

    Both Wallace, speaking to The N&O, and Purchase, as seen speaking to the students on the video, said all of the seats available to the public were full, citing that as the reason that the students were not allowed inside the meeting room.

    It is unclear whether exceptions to the state law on open meetings are made when a room reaches its capacity. The Catawba Theatre has signs posted outside of its doors stating that “occupancy by more than 210 persons is dangerous and unlawful.” It is also unclear whether that occupancy was met Wednesday.

    At a morning committee meeting Wednesday, additional seats were added to accommodate meeting attendees after the seats that were initially available were all filled. Denza also noted that other public bodies have allowed attendees to stand in the meeting room when seats are not available, pointing to photos of attendees lining the walls of a June 2021 meeting of the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees that involved discussions of whether journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones would be offered tenure to teach at the university.

    Asked by The N&O Wednesday whether the room was filled to a point at which a fire code or other regulations would make the room unsafe, Wallace said only that the room was full.

    Tadych, the attorney, said that court rulings on a related issue indicates public bodies, such as the Board of Governors, must take “reasonable measures” to not completely exclude members of the public from the meeting. Such measures could include streaming the meeting through video or audio for attendees in an overflow meeting space, Tadych said.

    In one court case Tadych cited, “the public was excluded only to overflow space and not permitted to enter the meeting room for the convenience of the body.” The body also instituted a ticketing policy for admission to the meeting, which was found to be “unreasonable as it was instituted without notice to the public.”

    Two courts found “that the public body’s use of streaming and overflow rooms where the meeting could be viewed via audio/visual feeds were reasonable,” Tadych said.

    While Board of Governors meetings are live-streamed, it does not appear that overflow space to view the stream was made available for the students Wednesday when the room became filled. Tadych said he was not sure whether only providing a live-stream of the meeting, but not a space to view it, would be considered an attempt to provide reasonable access to the meeting.

    The state law on open meetings states that any person can seek a judgment from superior court on whether a public body violated the law. If the court were to find that the body did violate the law, the court could rule that actions taken during the body’s meeting are “null and void.”

    Denza told The N&O that the students plan to file a complaint with the North Carolina attorney general’s office about not being let into the meeting. That office “issues opinions reminding government entities of their obligations under these laws and how to comply,” according to its website.

    NC Reality Check is an N&O series holding those in power accountable and shining a light on public issues that affect the Triangle or North Carolina. Have a suggestion for a future story? Email realitycheck@newsobserver.com

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Korie Dean covers higher education in the Triangle and North Carolina for The News & Observer. She was previously part of the paper’s service journalism team. She is a graduate of the Hussman School of Journalism and Media at UNC-Chapel Hill and a lifelong North Carolinian.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Institutions vote for ICICI Securities-ICICI Bank merger, retail investors resist

    Institutions vote for ICICI Securities-ICICI Bank merger, retail investors resist

    [ad_1]

    Shareholders of ICICI Securities have, on March 27, approved the proposal for the company’s merger with parent ICICI Bank. However, a majority of retail shareholders voted against the proposal.

    The result showed that 71.89 per cent of shareholders voted for the delisting. While 83.8 per cent of institutional investors voted in favour of the delisting, only 32 per cent of non-institutional retail shareholders favoured it.

    For the delisting and merger of a subsidiary with its holding company, regulations mandate at least two-third votes in favour of the proposal.

    As per the proposed agreement, every 100 shares of ICICI Securities will fetch 67 shares of ICICI Bank. Following the merger, ICICI Securities will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICICI Bank, which currently holds 75 per cent stake.

    Foreign and domestic institutional investors account for 16.68 per cent of ICICI Securities’ share capital, while non-institutional public shareholders hold 8.55 per cent stake, as of December 2023.

    The go-ahead comes amid complaints by retail shareholders that ICICI Bank employees were allegedly ‘canvassing’ incessantly for their votes on social media, besides using repeated calls and messages to “influence the voting decision”.

    ‘Loss for minority shareholders’

    In a recent note, Quantum Mutual Fund — a shareholder in both ICICI Securities and ICICI Bank —had said it would vote against the delisting as the swap ratio was detrimental to the interests of minority shareholders. It estimated the loss for unit holders across two schemes at ₹6.08 crore.

    “The current swap ratio values ICICI Securities at a 30-77 per cent discount to its other listed peers based on consensus earnings forecast for fiscal year ending March 2024,” the fund house had said, adding that, with the IPO price as benchmark, the share swap ratio would have been 1.9 shares of ICICI Bank for every share of ICICI Securities, at a premium of 183 per cent to the current offer.

    Reacting to the shareholder approval, shares of ICICI Securities fell over 3 per cent in early trade today at ₹719.20. On March 27, the stock had closed at ₹741.70.

    Shares of ICICI Securities listed on April 4, 2018, at ₹432, at a 17 per cent discount to the IPO price of ₹520. A reverse merger at that time would have entailed a swap ratio of 1.65 ICICI Bank shares for every share of ICICI securities, at a premium of 146 per cent to the current offer.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tenant rights lawyer Ysabel Jurado pulls ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León in L.A. election

    Tenant rights lawyer Ysabel Jurado pulls ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León in L.A. election

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles City Council candidate Ysabel Jurado didn’t have any big-money backers spending lavishly on her behalf.

    The Highland Park resident didn’t mail out glossy campaign mailers either, opting instead for an estimated 3,000 postcards, which were less expensive and personally handwritten.

    What Jurado, a tenant rights attorney, did have was a supercharged canvassing operation. According to her campaign, she sent 20 paid staffers and about 250 volunteers to 85,000 doors across the 14th District, which stretches from Boyle Heights and downtown north to Eagle Rock and El Sereno.

    That strategy is paying dividends. On Tuesday, she pulled ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León, who had been leading in the eight-way race to represent his Eastside district, according to the latest election results. Now in first place and likely headed to a runoff, Jurado is yet another example of the electoral might being wielded by the city’s political left.

    Jurado, in an interview, said she’s not certain who her opponent will be in the Nov. 5 runoff election, since votes are still being counted. She portrayed her campaign as a lean operation, one focused on supporting renters, fighting gentrification and “uplifting the voices of those who haven’t been heard.”

    “We don’t have an office. We haven’t sent mailers. We are talking to voters one-to-one,” she said. “Everything involved in building this campaign has been an uphill battle.”

    Jurado’s first-place showing was revealed Tuesday as part of the latest daily election update from the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk since the March 5 primary. Jurado had 24.5% of the vote, compared with 23.5% for De León — a difference of 318 ballots.

    On Tuesday, Assemblymember Miguel Santiago was 730 votes behind De León, with 21.2% of the vote.

    Election officials say an estimated 126,000 ballots are left to be processed countywide. Up until now, each of the county’s daily updates has broken in Jurado’s favor.

    On Friday, Jurado pulled into second place, securing more votes than Santiago. Four days later, she was leading the pack.

    De León, who is seeking a second four-year term, will face some serious challenges if he makes the second round. A former state lawmaker, he was at the center of the 2022 scandal over leaked racist remarks that spurred the resignations of former Council President Nury Martinez and Ron Herrera, former head of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor.

    De León repeatedly apologized for his remarks during that conversation, and for failing to put a stop to those made by others. He resisted calls to step down from a wide array of politicians, including President Biden, showing up at meetings where he was frequently jeered by audience members.

    Less than a fourth of voters opted to keep De León in office, according to the results so far.

    If he and Jurado end up in the top two, voters in the 14th District will have a clear choice on several of the city’s most contested issues.

    De León voted last year for Mayor Karen Bass’ budget, which called for the hiring of 1,000 police officers. Jurado said she would have voted against the spending plan, pushing for funds to be allocated to social services instead.

    De León also voted for a four-year package of police raises, which Jurado opposed. In addition, De León is a supporter of Municipal Code 41.18, which bars homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools, day-care centers and “sensitive” locations designated by the council, such as senior centers and freeway overpasses.

    Jurado has called for 41.18 to be repealed, saying it has led to the criminalization of homelessness.

    On Tuesday, a De León representative made clear that his candidate would highlight some of those differences in a runoff against Jurado.

    “The voters have a clear choice in November between an experienced, results-driven elected official and someone who has promised to undo some of the progress we’ve made in housing Angelenos and cleaning up sidewalks,” said David Meraz, a De León spokesperson.

    Meraz pointed out that 18 months ago, in the wake of the audio leak scandal, many political groups called for De León to step down. The results so far show that “the community makes the choice of the candidate, not outside organizations,” he said.

    Jurado has been running to push the council to the left, expanding the size of the council’s ultra-progressive bloc if she wins. She would be the first Filipino American to serve on the council, representing a district that is 61% Latino, 16% white and nearly 15% Asian, according to a demographic breakdown posted by the city in 2021.

    De León, who was born in Los Angeles, is of Mexican, Guatemalan and Chinese descent, Meraz said. During the campaign, De León highlighted his own efforts to reduce homelessness, aid renters and halt gentrification in downtown L.A. and Boyle Heights.

    Brian VanRiper, a political consultant who does not have any clients in the race, said Jurado is in a strong position to prevail in the runoff. Still, he offered a word of caution for the Jurado camp, noting that the district has a “history of forgiving” incumbents with major political baggage.

    District voters reelected Councilmember Jose Huizar in 2015, even after he was sued by a former staffer who alleged that he had sexually harassed her. In that contest, Huizar easily defeated former County Supervisor Gloria Molina, a political “titan” who had been in office for about three decades.

    “[Huizar] doubled down on constituent services and making the case that he delivered for the district,” VanRiper said. “It seems like Kevin de León is following that playbook.”

    Huizar was later charged in a sweeping federal corruption case and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. De León was elected to the seat in 2020.

    In recent months, many of the groups that supported De León four years ago lined up behind other candidates. The Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, Western States Regional Council of Carpenters and other groups spent a combined $687,000 on efforts to elect Santiago, the state lawmaker who was in third place.

    A consultant for Santiago did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Jurado, for her part, has secured endorsements from an array of politicians and community groups, many of them at the left end of the political spectrum.

    Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, City Controller Kenneth Mejia and former mayoral candidate Gina Viola have been campaigning for Jurado. Volunteers from the Democratic Socialists of America-Los Angeles, Ground Game LA and Boyle Heights Vota — formerly known as Boyle Heights for Bernie — have knocked on doors for her.

    Caleb Elguezabal, who lives in Eagle Rock and is a member of the DSA, said the district has not “had the best representation” over the last decade.

    Elguezabal, who volunteered on Jurado’s campaign, said he expects her to bring change to City Hall with a new approach to homelessness, fighting for a tax on vacant residential units and helping renters purchase their apartment buildings.

    “Having someone with integrity would be a massive sea change,” he said.

    Times staff writer Angie Orellana Hernandez contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    David Zahniser

    Source link

  • Full list of Republicans who voted to advance Ukraine-Israel-Taiwan aid

    Full list of Republicans who voted to advance Ukraine-Israel-Taiwan aid

    [ad_1]

    The Senate in a procedural vote on Thursday advanced a $95.34 billion foreign funding package that would give aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, with the help of 17 Republicans.

    The aid package includes $61 billion for Ukraine in its war with Russia, $14 billion for Israel as it fights Hamas in Gaza, and $4.83 billion to help America’s allies in the Indo-Pacific region, which includes Taiwan. The package will also give $9.15 billion in humanitarian aid to conflict zones like Gaza, the West Bank and Ukraine.

    The package advanced to debate with a 67 to 32 vote. The 17 Republicans who voted to advance the package are:

    • Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia
    • Bill Cassidy of Louisiana
    • Susan Collins of Maine
    • John Cornyn of Texas
    • Joni Ernst of Iowa
    • Chuck Grassley of Iowa
    • John Kennedy of Louisiana
    • Mitch McConnell of Kentucky
    • Jerry Moran of Kansas
    • Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
    • Mitt Romney of Utah
    • Mike Rounds of South Dakota
    • Dan Sullivan of Alaska
    • John Thune of South Dakota
    • Thom Tillis of North Carolina
    • Roger Wicker of Mississippi
    • Todd Young of Indiana.

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said that Thursday’s vote is “a good first step.”

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol Building on February 6, 2024, in Washington, D.C. The Senate voted to advance a $95.34 billion foreign funding package that would…


    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    Andrew Desiderio, a senior congressional reporter for Punchbowl News wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Thursday that there is “still a long way to go” but that “this is a small win for Schumer and McConnell.”

    McConnell, the Senate minority leader, has tried to get Ukraine funding passed for months but faced roadblocks with dwindling support for the country among his GOP colleagues.

    Newsweek reached out to McConnell’s and Schumer’s offices via email for comment.

    The vote to advance the aid package comes after the Senate failed to pass a deal that would have included foreign aid along with an additional $20 billion to secure the U.S.-Mexico border and policy changes to America’s immigration system.

    The Senate came up 11 votes shy of the 60 needed for the border and foreign aid deal to move forward. The final vote was 50 to 49.

    Republicans in Congress took issue with the original deal because of the border legislation in it. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, called it a “bad bill” on Fox Business’ Varney & Company on Thursday. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said the bill was “even worse than we expected” when the language of it was released.

    Although GOP members of Congress did not like the deal, they say they still wanted to address the situation at the southern border, which they have called a crisis.

    Cruz told Newsweek before the vote for the aid package on Thursday that he would “not vote for additional funding to secure Ukraine’s border until we secure our own borders.”

    Critics accused Republicans in Congress of opposing the border deal because they say former President Trump, who is the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination, wants to campaign on the situation at the southern border.

    If the foreign aid package is eventually passed in the Senate, it is unclear how the House will vote. While Johnson has tried and failed to pass funding for Israel for months, dozens of GOP members in the House, particularly MAGA (Make America Great Again) Republicans who have close ties with Trump, have voted against Ukraine aid. Johnson is one who has opposed more funding for Ukraine.

    Newsweek reached out to Johnson’s office via email for comment.