[ad_1]
Bessent Says ‘Tenfold’ Growth in Stablecoins Will Lift Demand for Treasurys
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Bessent Says ‘Tenfold’ Growth in Stablecoins Will Lift Demand for Treasurys
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday said that a social-media post on X falsely stating that it had approved spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds was created after an “unauthorized party” obtained control over the phone number connected with the agency’s account on the platform.
The markets regulator said its staff would “continue to assess whether additional remedial measures are warranted” in the wake of the breach, which occurred Tuesday and raised questions about cybersecurity at both the agency and the social-media platform, formerly known as Twitter.
The agency said it was coordinating with law enforcement on the matter, including with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
“Commission staff are still assessing the impacts of this incident on the agency, investors, and the marketplace but recognize that those impacts include concerns about the security of the SEC’s social media accounts,” the SEC said in a statement.
The confusion began on Tuesday afternoon, when the hacked post appeared on the SEC’s X account.
“Today the SEC grants approval for #Bitcoin ETFs for listing on registered national securities exchanges,” the post read. “The approved Bitcoin ETFs will be subject to ongoing surveillance and compliance measures to ensure continued investor protection.”
A second post appeared two minutes later that simply read “$BTC,” the SEC noted in its statement. The unauthorized user soon deleted that second post, but also liked two other posts by non-SEC accounts, according to the agency. The price of bitcoin
BTCUSD,
rose sharply in the wake of the posts, before soon pulling back.
In response to the hack, SEC staff posted on the official X account of SEC Chair Gary Gensler announcing that the agency’s main account had been compromised, and that it had not yet approved any spot bitcoin exchange-traded products. Staff then deleted the initial unauthorized post, un-liked the liked posts and used the official SEC account to make a new post clarifying the situation, the agency said Friday.
The SEC also said that it had reached out to X for assistance Tuesday in the wake of the incident, and that agency staff believe the unauthorized access to the SEC’s account was “terminated” later in the day.
“While SEC staff is still assessing the scope of the incident, there is currently no evidence that the unauthorized party gained access to SEC systems, data, devices, or other social media accounts,” the agency said.
The following day, the SEC announced that it had, in fact, approved the listing and trading of spot bitcoin ETFs.
Wednesday’s move marked a breakthrough for the crypto industry, which for years has tried to get such ETFs off the ground in hopes of drawing more traditional investors to the digital-asset space.
Bitcoin was down 7.6% over a 24-period as of Friday evening.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
After long-awaited spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds made their debut this week, investors are now weighing the prospects of eventual approval of similar ether ETFs.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday greenlighted 11 spot bitcoin
BTCUSD,
ETFs for the first time. The products, which made its debut trading on Thursday, logged a relatively strong first day.
However, bitcoin fell 6.8% on Friday, leaving it with a 3.2% gain over the past seven days, according to CoinDesk data. It underperformed ether
ETHUSD,
which rose 17.6% over the past seven days while it declined 1.2% on Friday.
The news about bitcoin ETFs was mostly priced in, while investors are now looking past it to a potential approval of ether ETFs, analysts said.
“I see value in having an ETH ETF,” Larry Fink, chief executive at the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock, told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Friday. BlackRock, which just launched its iShares bitcoin Trust
IBIT,
in November filed an application for a spot ether ETF.
“It’s hard to know exactly what the U.S. regulators would do” about ether ETF applications, said Alonso de Gortari, chief economist at Mysten Labs, an internet infrastructure company.
However, “I would expect that once you open the door, it becomes easier and I think the industry is very excited about it,” de Gortari said. If bitcoin ETFs see an impressive institutional inflow in the coming months, it could make such products more established and set a good precedent for other crypto ETF applications, he said.
Also see: Why the debut of bitcoin ETFs could be bad news for crypto stocks, futures ETFs
The enormous competition and huge inflows into bitcoin ETFs will only boost investors’ interests in an ether ETF, according to Paul Brody, EY’s global blockchain leader. “There’s no doubt that ETH is the next big market and has immediately become a priority for financial services companies,” Brody said in emailed comments.
Compared with bitcoin, the Ethereum blockchain offers more utility and has unique advantages, noted Fadi Aboualfa, head of research at digital assets custodian Copper.
Sandy Kaul, head of digital asset and industry advisory services at Franklin Templeton, said she eventually expects the arrival of ETFs that track a basket of cryptocurrencies. Such products, instead of those based on single crypto, would dominate the space if they are approved, she said.
“Just like the S&P 500 has 500 stocks in it, right? You don’t have just one stock.” Kaul said in a phone interview. The arrival of a bitcoin ETF, is just a “baby step into really beginning to think about the future market structure of crypto,” Kaul added.
However, not everyone is that optimistic. Will McDonough, founder and chairman of Corestone Capital, said the approval of an Ethereum ETF has “a long way to go.”
SEC chairman Gary Gensler previously said bitcoin was the only cryptocurrency he was prepared to publicly label a commodity, rather than a security.
The agency also went after companies that offered crypto staking, which allows investors to earn yields by locking their coins to secure blockchains such as Ethereum. The SEC shut down crypto exchange Kraken’s staking business in the U.S. last year.
One possibility is that “companies will be able to offer an ETH ETF, but they will not be allowed to stake that ETH and earn yield,” noted EY’s Brody.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Updated Jan. 11, 2024 3:06 pm ET
Bitcoin’s trip to Main Street just took a detour.
Vanguard said Thursday it won’t offer the new spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds on its brokerage platform.
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
On Wednesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the first time greenlighted several exchange-traded funds investing directly in bitcoin.
But the 24 hours leading up to that approval were chaotic, to say the least.
The SEC approved the launch of 11 bitcoin
BTCUSD,
ETFs, according to a filing posted on the regulatory agency’s website. The ETFs are due to start trading on Thursday.
On Tuesday, however, the SEC’s official account on X, formerly known as Twitter, published what the agency described as an “unauthorized” post indicating that it had approved the spot bitcoin ETFs. In reality, the regulator had not approved any such ETFs as of Tuesday and its X account had been “compromised,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said on the social-media platform. The SEC subsequently deleted the unauthorized post.
The agency found “there was unauthorized access to and activity on” the its X account by “an unknown party,” an SEC spokesperson said on Tuesday, adding that the “unauthorized access has been terminated” and that the SEC would work with law enforcement to investigate the matter.
Bitcoin’s price briefly shot 2% higher after the unauthorized tweet went out on Tuesday before soon pulling back.
Then on Wednesday, shortly before the U.S. stock market closed for the day, the SEC posted an actual approval order of bitcoin ETFs on its website — but the link was soon broken, leading to an “error 404” page. The same filing was later reposted by the SEC.
It is unclear why the first link was broken. A SEC spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment on the matter.
The events of the past 24 hours have proven “a bit embarrassing” for the SEC, especially as the agency has stressed that cryptocurrencies are exceptionally risky and vulnerable to market manipulation, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata.
Despite those warnings, Magadini said he doesn’t expect investors to be deterred from investing in the bitcoin ETFs.
Bitcoin has actually seen lower volatility on Tuesday and Wednesday than options traders had priced in, Magadini said. The crypto was up about 0.4% over the past 24 hours to around $46,400 on Wednesday evening, according to CoinDesk data.
Investors have been pricing in $1 to $2 billion of initial flows into the bitcoin ETFs.
Read: Bitcoin in spotlight as SEC approves new ETFs, ether rallies. Here’s why.
Steven Lubka, head of private clients and family offices at Swan Bitcoin, echoed Magadini’s point, noting that the hiccups on the way to SEC approval are unlikely to impact investor interest in the funds.
“Ultimately, the SEC is not the one that launches the ETFs,” Lubka said in a call. “If anything, it shows how much attention is on these ETF products.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Updated Jan. 10, 2024 5:56 pm ET
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission voted Wednesday to allow mainstream investors to buy and sell bitcoin as easily as stocks and mutual funds, a decision hailed by the industry as a game changer.
The SEC decision clears the way for the first U.S. exchange-traded funds that hold bitcoin to be sold to the public. Expectations of U.S. regulatory approval for such funds drove the price of bitcoin to the highest level in about two years. The digital currency fell to just below $46,000 late Wednesday, up from $17,000 in January 2023.
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Bitcoin has extended its rally on Friday, rising to the loftiest level since May 2022, pushing its yearly gain up to over 130%, on pace to be one of the best performing assets this year.
The crypto
BTCUSD,
rose about 2.5% over the past 24 hours to around $38,676 Friday afternoon, as excitement about the potential approval of bitcoin exchange-traded funds continues to build. Bitcoin is still 44% down from its all-time high in 2021.
Risk assets in general performed well in November, as concerns eased around several pressure points, including the surge in long-term Treasury yields and inflation, analysts at Grayscale Research wrote in a Friday note.
Despite outperforming many major assets year-to-date, bitcoin underperformed long-term Treasurys and the S&P 500 in November on a volatility-adjusted basis, gaining 9% for the month.
Sam Callahan, market analyst at Swan Bitcoin, said he expects bitcoin to trade between $36,000 and $40,000 by the end of the year, “provided that the macroeconomic environment doesn’t take a turn for the worse, and barring any significant positive development, such as the approval of a Spot Bitcoin ETF or the adoption of Bitcoin by a major corporation, sovereign-wealth fund, or nation-state.”
Despite bitcoin’s rally so far this year, December has historically been a particularly volatile month for the crypto, since it was created in 2009. It rose seven out of 13 times in December, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
In years when bitcoin gained more than 100% through November, the digital asset saw an average gain of 20% in December, rising four of the six times it occurred, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
To be sure, bitcoin has a relatively short history and was particularly volatile during its early years.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Ever since the collapse of crypto currencies last year, the lawsuits have been flying.
But a series of class-action suits targeting celebrity endorsers of crypto exchanges like FTX and Binance have been piling up in federal court in Miami, all filed by the same group of south Florida lawyers.
The latest suit names global soccer superstar Cristiano Ronaldo for allegedly promoting “the mass solicitation of investments in unregistered securities” sold by Binance, the crypto exchange that was hit with a $4 billion fine last week after pleading guilty to violating the bank secrecy act.
The suit was filed in federal court in the southern district of Florida this week and centered around Ronaldo’s role in a global marketing campaign launched in 2022 for a series of Binance NFTs — or non-fungible tokens, a form of blockchain-backed art works that were, for a brief time, wildly popular.
A representative for Ronaldo didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
The filing against Ronaldo on Monday came alongside similar class action suits naming Major League Baseball, Formula 1 racing, Mercedes Benz and the advertising giants Dentsu and Wasserman, who created much of FTX’s global promotion campaign.
Messages left with representatives for MLB, Formula 1, Mercedes Benz, Dentsu and Wasserman weren’t immediately returned.
Those suits are the latest in a series of similar class action suits starting last year against celebrity endorsers of failed crypto exchanges such as Voyager and FTX, in which customers lost billions of dollars in deposits.
Over the past 18 months, a group of south Florida lawyers led by Adam Moskowitz have brought the suits on behalf of investors who lost money in last year’s crypto collapse, against paid celebrity endorsers including Shaquille O’Neal, Mark Cuban, Tom Brady, Gisele Bundchen, Shohei Ohtani, Larry David, Steph Curry and Naomi Osaka.
“All of these celebrities were paid hundreds of millions of dollars taken directly from customer deposits,” Moskowitz said in a statement. “Some of the most famous and wealthiest groups in the world may now be held responsible for the dramatic $20 billion dollar crypto collapse and biggest financial scandals in U.S. history.”
Moskowitz, who has been joined in the suits by lawyers with the firms Mark Migdal & Hayden and Boies Schiller and Flexner, headed by famed litigator David Boies, is seeking at least $5 billion in damages from those who helped promote the crypto exchanges.
The cases from last year are ongoing and each of the celebrities named have been fighting the suits in court.
Moskowitz, who specializes in class-action lawsuits, says issues revolving around crypto first got his attention more than two years ago, before the entire market crashed, when he came to believe that the special tokens each exchange was minting amounted to an unregistered security.
He first filed a lawsuit against Voyager early last year, before the exchange collapsed and the Securities and Exchange Commission began filing suits against many in the industry accusing them of dealing in unregistered securities.
“Right then what we were doing started to gain traction,” he said.
A series of favorable court rulings have allowed his cases to gain steam, he said, and has allowed to him to take the lead in such actions.
In another class action suit filed earlier this year, Moskowitz and his partners sued a group of YouTube financial influencers for their role in promoting FTX, accusing them of taking cash for uncritically singing the exchange’s praises.
Moskowitz said several of those suits have been settled but that others have continued.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Crypto bulls are eyeing $40,000 as bitcoin’s next level, with the recent rally sending the crypto to a new high for the year, as the market shakes off the news that Binance’s co-founder Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty on Tuesday to criminal charges related to violating U.S. anti-money-laundering laws, and stepped down as head of the company.
The largest crypto BTCUSD on Friday rose to as high as $38,294, the loftiest level since May 2022, according to CoinDesk data. It climbed over 3% over the past 24 hours.
Bitcoin…
Already a subscriber?
Log In
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The Securities and Exchange Commission charged cryptocurrency trading platform Kraken with operating as an unregistered securities exchange.
The charges are the latest effort by regulators to crack down on crypto companies, some of which the SEC views as illegally selling securities without registering with the commission.
Kraken didn’t immediately…
Already a subscriber?
Log In
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Federal prosecutors on Monday sought to chip away at FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s credibility, pointing to discrepancies between his public comments and actions taken behind the scenes as the company collapsed.
In a steady drumbeat of questions, Assistant U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon tried to paint Bankman-Fried, the 31-year-old former wunderkind of the crypto world, as someone who lied to his customers about the safety of their investments, while secretly raiding their accounts to fund his own risky investments, luxury real estate purchases, costly celebrity endorsements and political contributions.
In his second day of testimony before a jury in his criminal fraud trial in Manhattan’s federal court, Bankman-Fried repeatedly said he couldn’t remember exactly what he had said in numerous media interviews in the days and weeks after FTX had declared bankruptcy and $8 billion in customer deposits had vanished.
He also sought to distance himself from decision-making at FTX’s sister investment firm, Alameda Research, whose risky bets helped bring the crypto trading platform down.
Sassoon pointed to multiple public comments by Bankman-Fried in which he claimed FTX’s risk management protocols made it safer than other crypto currency trading platforms, while the company allowed its own investment arm, Alameda Research to make risky bets without limit.
FTX ultimately collapsed largely as a result of the billions in loans it had extended to Alameda, which prosecutors allege was done using customer money.
Federal prosecutors have alleged that Alameda was effectively granted carte blanche to use FTX customer money to make risky bets. One key element was that certain risk-management systems that FTX used to to liquidate customer accounts that had entered into negative territory were disabled for Alameda, allowing it unfettered ability to make high-risk moves.
Throughout his testimony, Bankman-Fried claimed he had limited visibility as to what was happening at Alameda, which he founded and mostly owned, but which had ceased running day-to-day in 2021, when his ex-girlfriend Caroline Ellison took over as CEO.
He said he only became aware of how bad a liquidity issue Alameda faced well after a financial crisis began sweeping through the crypto industry in the summer of 2022. Bankman-Fried said he had told Ellison, who had pleaded guilty and testified against him, that she should have taken hedge positions earlier to lessen the company’s risk.
But he said he continued to believe up until just days before the companies collapsed, that both Alameda and FTX were on firmer financial footing.
“I viewed Alameda as solvent and FTX as solvent and decently liquid,” he testified. “Had that analysis come up any other way, I would have been in full on crisis mode. But in my view at the time that wasn’t the case.”
Bankman-Fried did admit that he consulted frequently with Ellison about moves that Alameda made and even signed off on several billion-dollar investments.
“I think a few billion of them were my decision,” he said when asked about several large investments made by Alameda in 2021 and 2022.
Bankman-Fried is expected back in court for further cross examination on Tuesday. The judge in the case said he expected the case may go to the jury as early as Friday.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Bitcoin surged over 10% on Monday, briefly surpassing $34,500, on continued optimism that an exchange-traded fund investing directly in the cryptocurrency will soon be approved in the U.S.
The largest cryptocurrency
BTCUSD,
by market cap on Monday reached as high as $34,616, the loftiest level since May 2022, according to CoinDesk data, before falling to around $33,021 by Monday evening. Other major cryptocurrencies also rose, with ether up 5.8% over the past 24 hours to $1,763.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has repeatedly rejected bitcoin ETF applications in the past, citing risks of market manipulation. But crypto-industry participants are expecting that to change soon.
Read more: Bitcoin climbs above $30,000 for first time since August as hopes for ETF approval intensify
A U.S. Appeals court on Monday issued a mandate, putting into effect its ruling in August, which overturned the SEC’s rejection of Grayscale Investments’ application to convert its Bitcoin Trust product
GBTC
into an ETF. The final ruling on Monday confirmed Grayscale’s win in court.
Meanwhile, BlackRock’s proposed bitcoin ETF has been listed on the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. While it doesn’t mean that the ETF is guaranteed to be approved, it shows another step closer for BlackRock to bring the fund to the market.
If bitcoin ETFs are approved, the crypto may see “historical price increases,” with a crypto bull market coming, according to Alex Adelman, chief executive and co-founder of Lolli. “Bitcoin ETFs will give institutional and retail investors new ways to gain exposure to bitcoin within established regulations,” Adelman said.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sent to jail Friday to await trial after a bail hearing for the fallen cryptocurrency wiz left a judge convinced that he had repeatedly tried to influence witnesses against him.
U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered Bankman-Fried’s bail revoked after prosecutors said he’d tried to harass a key witness in his fraud case last month when he showed a journalist her private writings and in January when he reached out to the general counsel for FTX with an encrypted communication.
His lawyers insisted he shouldn’t be jailed for trying to protect his reputation against a barrage of unfavorable news stories.
Kaplan said he had concluded there was probable cause to believe Bankman-Fried had tried to “tamper with witnesses at least twice” since his December arrest.
A defense lawyer said an appeal of the incarceration order would be filed and asked for an immediate stay of the order.
The 31-year-old has been under house arrest at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, California, since his December extradition from the Bahamas on charges that he defrauded investors in his businesses and illegally diverted millions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency from customers using his FTX exchange.
Bankman-Fried’s $250 million bail package severely restricts his internet and phone usage.
Two weeks ago, prosecutors surprised Bankman-Fried’s attorneys by demanding his incarceration, saying he violated those rules by giving The New York Times the private writings of Caroline Ellison, his former girlfriend and the ex-CEO of Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency trading hedge fund that was one of his businesses.
Prosecutors maintained he was trying to sully her reputation and influence prospective jurors who might be summoned for his October trial.
Ellison pleaded guilty in December to criminal charges carrying a potential penalty of 110 years in prison. She has agreed to testify against Bankman-Fried as part of a deal that could lead to a more lenient sentence.
Bankman-Fried’s lawyers argued he probably failed in a quest to defend his reputation because the article cast Ellison in a sympathetic light. They also said prosecutors exaggerated the role Bankman-Fried had in the article.
They said prosecutors were trying to get their client locked up by offering evidence consisting of “innuendo, speculation, and scant facts.”
Since prosecutors made their detention request, Kaplan has imposed a gag order barring public comments by people participating in the trial, including Bankman-Fried.
David McCraw, a lawyer for the Times, had written to the judge, noting the First Amendment implications of any blanket gag order, as well as public interest in Ellison and her cryptocurrency trading firm.
Ellison confessed to a central role in a scheme defrauding investors of billions of dollars that went undetected, McGraw said.
“It is not surprising that the public wants to know more about who she is and what she did and that news organizations would seek to provide to the public timely, pertinent, and fairly reported information about her, as The Times did in its story,” McGraw said.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has filed an application for a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund.
There are currently no such products in the U.S. The SEC approved several bitcoin BTCUSD futures-based ETFs in the past, but has yet to greenlight anything that is backed by bitcoin itself.
BlackRock BLK will tap Coinbase Global…
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday asked a judge to grant a temporary restraining order to freeze assets tied to Binance.US. The agency on Monday charged Binance Holdings Inc. and its founder Changpeng Zhao with 13 securities law violations. The suit alleged that Binance created U.S.-only trading arms, BAM Trading and BAM Management US Holdings Inc., to avoid having its main exchanges, which were outside the U.S., fall under U.S. regulatory scrutiny. Representatives at Binance.US didn’t immediately return requests for comments.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Popular crypto exchange Coinbase
COIN,
late Monday asked a federal court to force the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to respond yes or no to its petition from July 2022 to make formal rules around digital-asset regulation.
Coinbase’s petition requested that the “Commission propose and adopt rules to govern the regulation of securities that are offered and traded via digitally native methods, including potential rules to identify which digital assets are securities.”
In March, Coinbase was hit with a Wells notice from the SEC, identifying potential violations of securities laws that might spur it to take legal action. The notice came after nine months of back-and-forth between the SEC and Coinbase, CEO Brian Armstrong said in March.
Coinbase was expected to respond to the notice by the end of April, but Monday’s filing reveals that Coinbase believes the SEC’s approach doesn’t provide enough regulatory guidance for crypto companies in the U.S. to operate.
“The SEC at a minimum must set forth how those inapt and inapposite requirements are to be adapted to digital assets. But the SEC has refused to do even that,” the filing says. “It has not conducted any rulemaking to provide the regulatory clarity and process that companies need to determine which digital asset products and services to register and how to make the registration that the SEC now demands.”
Coinbase shares slid more than 7% on Monday but are up 55% year to date. Still, the stock is down nearly 60% over the past 12 months. In comparison, the S&P 500
SPX,
is up nearly 8% in 2023 and has declined almost 4% over the past year.
[ad_2]