ReportWire

Tag: View from the C-Suite

  • Hoping AI will give you more work-life balance in 2026? Fortune 500 CEOs warn otherwise | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Workers may be hoping that AI can finally take over their drudge work in the new year—ease their loads and shorten the workweek, or at least make more space for life outside the office. 

    And it’s something young people in particular are eager to have: 74% of Gen Z rank work-life balance as a top consideration when choosing a job in 2025—the highest of any generation—according to Randstad. And in the more than 20 years of producing its Workmonitor report, it’s the first time work-life balance outranked pay as the top factor for all workers.

    But as AI has reshaped corporate structures and enhanced productivity levels, many executive leaders are working harder than ever—and expecting everyone else to follow.

    From pushing return to office mandates to praising around-the-clock availability, CEOs are modeling a culture where the lines between work and life blur. Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang, for example, said he worked seven days a week this year—including holidays. Zoom’s CEO Eric Yuan conceded simply: “work is life.” 

    And looking toward 2026, it’s unclear whether dreams of work-life balance will come true.

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang

    As the leader of the world’s most valuable company, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has a lot on his mind. Relaxation, however, does not appear to be part of the plan.

    His work schedule is nothing short of rigorous—beginginng from from the moment he wakes up until he’s back on the pillow—seven days a week, including holidays. It’s a grind fueled not only by the intensity of the AI race, but by a lingering fear of what happens if he ever lets up.

    “You know the phrase ’30 days from going out of business,’ I’ve used for 33 years,” Huang said on an episode of The Joe Rogan Experience released in December. “But the feeling doesn’t change. The sense of vulnerability, the sense of uncertainty, the sense of insecurity—it doesn’t leave you.”

    That mindset extends beyond Huang himself. His two children, who both work at Nvidia, follow in his footsteps and work every day for the semiconductor giant. For the Huang family, work isn’t just a job—it’s a way of life.

    Zoom CEO Eric Yuan

    Video communications giant Zoom has had one of the biggest indirect impacts on the work-life balance debate, thanks to making it possible for workers to log on from the comfort of a bed, beach, or anywhere in between. 

    However, the journey to scaling the company to over $25 billion in market capital has revealed to Zoom CEO Eric Yuan that work-life balance is a farce.

    “I tell our team, ‘Guys, you know, there’s no way to balance. Work is life, life is work,’” Yuan said in an interview with the Grit podcast over the summer.

    Yuan even admitted that he doesn’t have hobbies, with everything he does dedicated to “family and Zoom.” However, when there’s a clash and he has to choose between the two, the 55-year-old gives life some slack: “Whenever there’s a conflict, guess what? Family first. That’s it.”

    TIAA CEO Thasunda Brown Duckett

    Thasunda Brown Duckett, the CEO of financial services company TIAA, has long not been a fan of the term “work-life balance”—often calling it an outright “lie”—and this year was no exception.

    On a Mother’s Day social media post this past spring, Duckett doubled down on the assessment once more.

    “Let’s drop the work-life balance charade,” she wrote. “The truth? Balance suggests perfect—and that’s a trap.”

    “Instead, think of your life like a diversified portfolio. You only have 100% to give, and many places to allocate. So give with intention. If motherhood gives 30% today, make it a powerful, present 30%,” she added.

    For Duckett, having a constant evaluation of how much time to dedicate to everything needing attention in her life is what true a healthy relationship between work and life looks like.

    “Some days you won’t feel like the best mom, leader, partner, or friend. But over time, when you lead with purpose—you’re more than enough.”

    Palantir CEO Alex Karp

    This year has been a breakout year for Palantir, with its stock price up some 140%. 

    For young people looking to get their careers off the ground, CEO Alex Karp sent a word of warning this year: skip out on some of life’s superfluous things if you want a shot at success.

    “I’ve never met someone really successful who had a great social life at 20,” Karp said at the Economic Club of Chicago in May.

    “If that’s what you want, that’s what you want, that’s great, but you’re not going to be successful and don’t blame anyone else.”

    While Karp’s comments might sting for Gen Z—especially since they are the generation who place the most value on work-life balance, Karp believes that if you put in the time when you’re young, it’ll all be worth it when you’re older and have a more cushy job.

    “Most people have something they’re talented at and enjoy. Focus on that. Organize your whole life around that,” Karp added. “Don’t worry so much about the money—that sounds like hypocrisy now, but I never really did—and stay off the meth and you’ll do very well.”

    Former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos

    Jeff Bezos may no longer run Amazon day to day, but he remains deeply involved as board chair—while also growing Blue Origin and backing new AI ventures.

    Like several of his peers, Bezos has long taken issue with the idea of balance itself.

    “I don’t love the word ‘balance’ because it implies a tradeoff,” Bezos said at Italian Tech Week in October. “I’ve often had people ask me, ‘How do you deal with work-life balance?’ And I’ll say ‘I like work-life harmony because if you’re happy at home, you’ll be better at work. If you’re better at work, you’ll be better at home.’ These things go together. It’s not a strict tradeoff.”

    It’s not the first time Bezos has expressed his grievances with the concept of work-life balance. In 2018, Bezos called it a “debilitating phrase” because it implied that one has to give, in order for the other to thrive. Instead, he likes to use the word “harmony” and likened the concept to a “circle.”

    Jamie Dimon has been one of Wall Street’s most outspoken champions of full-time, in-office work. Early this year, he called most of JPMorgan’s 300,000 employees back in-person and capped the push by opening the bank’s new $3 billion Manhattan headquarters.

    Yet even as Dimon has taken a hard line on where work gets done, he has long argued that maintaining balance is ultimately an individual responsibility—not a corporate one.

    “It is your job to take care of your mind, your body, your spirit, your soul, your friends, your family, your health. Your job, it’s not our job,” he said in a clip originally from 2024 that resurfaced this year.

    [ad_2]

    Preston Fore

    Source link

  • Chanel exec started in teaching—she fell into luxury after a failed exam forced her back to school. Her career advice for Gen Z? Get out of their dorms | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Claire Isnard can trace her 40‑year career—including 17 years at fashion house Chanel—back to one bad exam. Had she passed, she’d likely still be in a classroom, grading essays on Italian literature.

    Looking back, in her first-ever sit-down interview ahead of her retirement, Isnard says she feels like she’s come full circle. Despite having zero HR qualifications, she wound up as Chanel’s chief people and chief organization officer. “When you draw my story back, the first compelling and meaningful thing that would end up spread across everything I’ve done is helping people become who they didn’t think they can become,” she told Fortune.

    “For me, teaching was not about the speciality of French or Italian, it was about helping those young people—especially the ones who were having difficulty unleashing their skill set and couldn’t find themselves internally, I could help them become larger, bigger than what they thought,” she said. “And I loved it very much.”

    At the time, Isnard took that career plan “very, very seriously” and was giving language lessons to teenagers in both Italy and France while studying, which made the final exam failure that would have cemented a lifelong academic career all the more confusing.

    “Not only I failed,” Isnard said, “but I didn’t know what I wanted to do. I had no clear path ahead of me. I had no clear goal.” 

    With no plan B, she went back to school and threw herself into student forums and networking events. It led to a chance encounter that would drag her from the classroom into consulting—and eventually, right into Chanel’s corner office.

    Gen Z: Failure might be your lucky break—but not if you don’t get out

    40 years later, Isnard still remembers how crushing that first experience of failure was—but she refuses to let younger generations see similar setbacks as the end of the story.

    Now, the lesson she reminds her millennial children (who are 30 and 33) is that failure is simply “a roadblock on the road, not the end of the road.” 

    “It hurts, it’s very uncomfortable,” Isnard said. “It can be very frustrating because you worked hard. Although it may not feel like it in the moment, this pause could be a blessing in disguise.”

    Isnard recommends using failure as an opportunity to reassess the direction you’re going down—as well as whether you’re even enjoying it. 

    “There is a signal here that either you’ve not worked enough—if you really want to do it again, work harder, and you will get it—or maybe there was something that was not for you,” she said. “Look at what you enjoyed in doing that, but also look at the thing you don’t enjoy, and go where your passion is… I’m really convinced that we cannot be good at something we don’t like doing.”

    Of course, passion alone is not enough to land a big break after a failure. It doesn’t matter how much you love talking about luxury brands or coding—if you don’t get out of your comfort zone and show them, no one will know. That’s why Isnard recommends Gen Zers simply get out into the world.

    “If you stay in your room, or behind your computer, you just don’t get those moments of connection that spark a different conversation, or open your mind to possibility, or let you meet someone who finds something interesting in you,” she said. 

    She would know. Just one “lucky” conversation with the founder of a boutique consultancy at a student forum turned into a two-decade career in the industry, including climbing up Aon Hewitt’s ranks (formerly known as Hewitt Associates) to managing director.

    “I was present in all forums, in all networks, where I could meet people that I would not meet otherwise, and it was a series of encounters that brought me to the woman who hired me,” she said. “So I really believe in connection. I really believe in going outside of your comfort zone—open that door, be curious, meet with people, enter the conversation.”

    Isnard says you don’t need a slick five-year plan, or even a full-to-the-brim contacts book—just the courage to start up conversation in a room full of strangers. 

    “Everyone knows someone,” she said. “So I didn’t hesitate to say, I’m hungry for work and I would like to do something that has to do with writing, thinking and being helpful to others.”

    The brutally honest answer that got her poached by Chanel

    Being courageous worked out in Isnard’s favour when Chanel was a client of hers. Soon after the company had hired its first-ever global CEO, Maureen Shekels, she directly asked Isnard one tough-to-answer question: Do I have what I need to act as a global CEO?

    The answer, Isnard gave her, was brutally honest: No. 

    For eight years, she had partnered with the fashion brand on “different, strategic problems.” And that proximity became vital when its new boss asked her to carry out a no‑nonsense diagnosis of her leadership and how to bring the luxury brand out of an outdated, fragmented structure.

    “So we designed together a global model for the future,” Isnard said. “It’s easier for a consultant to tell [the harsh truth] because you have objectivity, you don’t have the emotion of being inside. I was not losing anything; I was helping my client to see through what she needed for the future.”

    But what Isnard perhaps didn’t expect was to get poached by the CEO herself, just two years later in 2008: “I was very surprised, because I’ve never been an HR in my life before,” Isnard recalled, before adding she didn’t think twice before accepting despite feeling a mixture of honoured, intimidated, and frankly, a bit scared.

    “I had to move with my family to New York from France,” she said. “I had to learn how to be an insider—I knew everybody, all the leaders, but from the outside. I had to build a team. There was no global team in HR. I had to do everything from scratch.”

    Despite her lack of formal HR credentials, Chanel’s global footprint has expanded dramatically over the past two decades. Today, the brand operates in roughly 70 countries worldwide with over 600 boutiques. Under Isnard’s watch, its workforce has more than tripled, growing to 38,400 employees worldwide.

    “It’s another story of someone placing trust in you,” she added. “Take risk, pivot, but do it with people you trust—who trust you too. And check that you have the passion for what is to come.” 

    What comes after Chanel’s corner office?

    Now, as she prepares to step down after over 17 years as Chanel’s chief people and organization officer, Isnard faces a familiar uncertainty—the same feeling she had after that first failed exam. Only this time, she’s looking forward to it.

    “The next chapter for me is to be invented, which is also back to the first conversation, how will I take risk—or not? Am I going to meet with other people? It’s all about the new possibilities that will unfold.” 

    The outgoing exec, who says she’s been reflecting on what her purpose is and will take some more time to ponder, already knows she wants to “continue being contributive,” even in retirement. 

    “The worst is if you feel lost and you feel abandoned. But I think the other worst is that you get another kind of frenetic, but it has no meaning. It’s just a bunch of activities for the sake of not being by yourself. These are the things that I want to absolutely avoid,” she said.

    In the end, she hints she may just go back to where it all began: In teaching, some way or another.

    [ad_2]

    Orianna Rosa Royle

    Source link

  • Inside CVS and Walgreens’ downturn: How misguided M&A damaged America’s drugstores

    Inside CVS and Walgreens’ downturn: How misguided M&A damaged America’s drugstores

    [ad_1]

    Last week, CVS Health CEO Karen Lynch was pushed out of a role that had made her the most powerful woman in American business for years, atop a company with 2023 revenue of $358 billion.

    The company’s poor financial performance last quarter and weak profit forecast proved to be the last straw for the CVS board. It had tired of her inability to successfully bring together the different business components of a company that, through a slew of expensive M&A deals, had become a Frankenstein.

    Three days earlier, CVS’s archrival Walgreens Boots Alliance announced it would close 1,200 U.S. stores in a tough environment for prescription fulfillment and weak retail sales. Many of those soon-to-be-closed locations were part of the 2,186 Rite Aid stores Walgreens had bought in 2018 in a $5.2 billion consolation prize deal after failing to buy its smaller rival outright. (At their peaks, CVS and Walgreens had store fleets of nearly 10,000 locations. CVS has also been closing hundreds of stores.)

    Like its two much larger rivals, Rite Aid also has some M&A egg on its face. A year ago, Rite Aid filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection choking under debt, some $3 billion of it originally stemming from a 2006 acquisition of the Eckerd and Brooks chains. At the time, the big chains were trying to make land grabs to emerge as national leaders in a sector long dominated by independents and small regional chains but hefty interest expenses stymied Rite Aid’s investment in stores and ability to build out its health services.

    All this M&A-fueled empire building has ultimately failed, and caused the Drugstore Big Three to divert attention away from their core business: operating stores. The underinvestment in drugstores has led them to become unappealing (that’s made worse now, with half of what you want from the front of the store behind lock and key) and dated, and with many Americans opting to get their medication via mail or the drive-thru. And that in turn ultimately damaged all three companies’ efforts to use their thousands of stores as hubs to create broader health care business. Retail sales at all three chains have been weak for years. “Both CVS and Walgreens have been guilty of chasing healthcare dreams at the expense of retail. That shortsightedness is now hitting them hard,” says GlobalData managing director Neil Saunders. In a comment to Fortune, CVS said its stores were thriving.

    Let’s take CVS. Its transformation from the Chain Value Store drugstore chain founded in 1963 to the sixth-largest company on the Fortune 500 began in earnest in 2007, when it bought pharmacy benefits manager Caremark for $21 billion. While that deal proved beneficial to CVS, notably by helping to build a larger mail-order pharmacy and making it a big player in the booming pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) market, later deals were too costly and made CVS too unwieldy to manage effectively. In 2018, CVS paid $68 billion for Aetna (where Lynch had been for years) at a 73% premium. It followed that up with a $10.5 billion deal last year for Oak Street Health, owner of over 200 centers in 25 states providing care for the elderly, and it also acquired Signify Health, a health care analytics provider, for $8 billion. (To be fair, deals like the one to buy Target’s pharmacy business in 2015 have worked out well.)

    Although Lynch had come from Aetna, acquiring it was not in fact her idea. The plan was hatched by the CEO before her, Larry Merlo, who handpicked her as his successor. But she bought into the strategy full-on. Her idea was to make CVS a one-stop shop for pharmacy services and basic care, thanks to hands-on, data-driven management from its in-house insurer that reminded folks to refill prescriptions and get their annual physical.

    Walgreens, in contrast, doubled down too much on physical drugstores for years. In 2014, Walgreens finalized buying British druggist Boots for $22 billion in a bid to create the first international drugstore operator. The architect of that deal, Stefano Pessina, later became CEO and then pushed in 2015 to buy Rite Aid for $17 billion. Two years later, after intense regulatory scrutiny, Pessina scaled down the Rite Aid deal and Walgreens bought 2,000 of its 5,000 stores, many of which overlapped with existing Walgreens and were rather shabby. 

    Walgreens’ more recent M&A veered away from traditional drugstores but was still not a success. In 2021, it took a majority stake in primary-care clinic chain VillageMD for some $5 billion, only to write down much of that earlier this year after Walgreens decided to scale back the business.

    And now Walgreens is closing many of the Rite Aid locations it bought, meaning that deal was akin to setting a good chunk of that $5.2 billion on fire. (Walgreens has also failed to sell off Boots, which had once been thriving but has struggled more recently.) The result of Walgreens’ M&A activity in the last decade is that shares are down 85% from their highs in 2015 when Pessina became CEO.

    And now leaders at these chains have to figure out what to make of the haphazard assets they have been left with. At CVS, activist shareholders fed up with the weak stock performance have an idea: Ironically, they are pushing for the company to consider breaking itself up, undoing much of the M&A that took up the last 18 years.

    [ad_2]

    Phil Wahba

    Source link