ReportWire

Tag: video footage

  • Critics blast Detroit police video ordinance as weak and full of exemptions – Detroit Metro Times

    [ad_1]

    A coalition of Detroit activists is denouncing a proposed city ordinance that would require some police footage to be made public, saying the measure would still protect officers who engage in misconduct. 

    A divided Detroit Public Health and Safety Committee held a public hearing Monday on an ordinance that would set rules for how the Detroit Police Department releases video involving serious use of force, including when officers fire their weapons or cause “great bodily harm.” If approved by the full Detroit City Council, police would have up to 30 days to release video on a publicly accessible website. 

    But activists said the ordinance is riddled with exemptions that would give police plenty of opportunities to deny a video’s release. For example, the footage can be withheld if it involves a joint task force, violates the police union contract, or if city lawyers decide it could hurt Detroit in a civil lawsuit. The proposal also excludes any video shielded under Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act and permits redactions, giving city officials broad discretion to decide what the public gets to see, activists argued at the meeting. 

    Jacob Smith, a member of the Detroit Alliance Against Racial and Political Repression, urged council members to strengthen the ordinance. 

    “It’s not even a good ordinance,” Smith said. “It has more holes than a fishing net.”

    He added, “Let me be clear: We do not trust you [the police] so you need to send this ordinance back to the drawing board and come up with something that allows for less loopholes.”

    Other critics said the ordinance should include alleged incidents of stop-and-frisk, racism, and sexual harassment or assault that causes less than “great bodily harm.”

    Councilwoman Angela Whitfield Calloway, who drafted the video requirement, said she’s satisfied with the measure but acknowledged it may need to be amended. 

    “Everyone is not going to be happy with all of the ordinances we pass in the city of Detroit,” Calloway said. “I get it. But we have to start somewhere. It’s not a perfect document. Our Constitution was written in 1787 and has been amended 27 times. This is one of those documents that I do believe is ripe for amendment.”

    Councilwoman Gabriela Santiago-Romero said she doesn’t support the ordinance as it’s written and believes more public input is needed. 

    In a letter to Calloway, the Coalition for Police Transparency and Accountability said Calloway’s version is written to protect police and city officials, not the public’s right to know. The coalition points to the numerous exemptions in the ordinance. 

    “These stipulations make the release of imagery pointless,” the coalition wrote. “We further object to the exclusion of CPTA from any discussions in crafting this ordinance. We shared with you a well-researched, comprehensive ordinance that would have provided greater transparency in policing. Nothing of the ordinance we provided is reflected in your version.”

    Calloway, who has often cast herself as a reform-minded councilmember critical of police secrecy, claimed some of the critics aren’t happy with any changes. 

    “We just have regular, habitual complainers,” Calloway said. “I’m used to it.”

    During the public hearing, former Detroit Police Commissioner William Davis said the ordinance “can and should be stronger,” noting that police released body-cam footage of a shooting to commissioners “in less than six hours” about five years ago. Davis also worries about the editing process before the video is released.

    “When they do these edits, someone impartial needs to be in the room,” Davis said. “This still makes it easier for them to cover up and hide stuff. We could do a better job.”

    Victoria Camille, who is running for a seat on the Detroit Board of Police Commissioners, said Detroit residents are entitled to unedited footage. 

    “Police video footage belongs to Detroiters as taxpayers, and the police department should not get a privileged seat to shape a narrative in advance of the public getting a full view of the unedited video,” Camille said. “It’s one thing to blur the faces of witnesses, but chopping up timelines and/or reducing the frame that it shows is unacceptable.”

    She added, “We’ve had three people shot by DPD in the last month. This is extremely important.”

    On Sunday, Detroit police shot a woman who refused to comply after a traffic stop. It was the third police-involved shooting in five weeks. 

    Deputy Police Chief Michael Parish responded to critics, saying the videos would only be edited to redact the faces of victims or witnesses.   

    Community activist Tahira Ahmad said 30 days is too long for the release of a video. She is also worried that more Black residents will be targeted as the police department hires more white suburban officers. 

    “We’ve seen the police department get whiter and whiter,” Ahmad said. “The people who are white are having a racial problem with Black people. If our police departments are getting more and more undiverse, then we are going to have problems, and we want you to release it faster than 30 days.”

    The CPTA’s version of the ordinance would require the city to publicly release all unedited video, audio, and police reports related to any use of force or pursuit that causes or could cause injury within seven days. The city also could delay for up to 30 days, but only if prosecutors or investigators give a written public explanation citing specific legal reasons. The footage would remain permanently accessible on a website managed by the Board of Police Commissioners, not the police department. 

    In addition, the coalition’s proposal would require notifying families and allowing them to view the footage before it’s released to the public. 

    “The people of the City have an undeniable, and in some cases paramount, interest in being informed, in a timely fashion based on the most accurate information possible, about how their police department conducts its business, especially where the use of force by the police results in death of, or bodily harm to, a civilian,” the coalition wrote. 

    [ad_2] Steve Neavling
    Source link

  • Someone made a ‘camera’ that can shoot at two billion frames per second

    [ad_1]

    Brian Haidet, a scientist creating videos on YouTube under the handle AlphaPhoenix, showed off a camera in a new video that can capture footage of a laser pointer at the speed of light. The camera is an update on a previous design that could capture footage at one billion frames per second, but it comes with a major caveat: it can only shoot one pixel at a time.

    Haidet’s camera is made from a gimbal-mounted mirror, two tubes, a simple lens, a light sensor and some Python code to tie it all together. Pointed at a laser pointer, the camera’s able to capture a beam of light at two billion frames per second, showing it smoothly traveling between mirrors, with speeds that vary depending on where the camera is in relation to the laser pointer. “Light moves about six inches, or 15 centimeters, per frame of this video,” Haidet says. “This beam of light is traveling at the Universe’s speed limit. Light in any reference frame will never move any faster or any slower than this speed.”

    Pixels had to be tiled together to create what looks like normal video footage.

    (Brian Hadet)

    While it’s theoretically possible to create a more traditional camera that can capture footage at two billion frames per second, as Haidet explains, you can’t do it with the tools most people have in their garage. His solution was to capture one pixel at a time, and then tile that footage together to create something viewable. According to Haidet, “if all these videos are synchronized and we take many, many, many, one pixel videos, we can tile these videos next to each other and play them all back at the exact same moment and give something that looks like a video.”

    While it’s not the same thing as a true two billion frames-per-second camera, “that’s just a significantly more expensive way to do it,” Haidet says, “and it really wouldn’t get us any better of a result.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Off-duty officer shoots man inside NYC’s busy Penn Station, police say

    [ad_1]

    Off-duty officer shoots and wounds man inside New York City’s busy Penn Station, police say

    Updated: 10:07 AM EDT Sep 25, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    An off-duty police officer shot and wounded a man inside Pennsylvania Station, the main intercity railroad station in New York City and the busiest station in the U.S., authorities said.Police responded to a 911 call at 7 p.m. Wednesday reporting a 32-year-old man had been shot inside the portion of the midtown Manhattan station, a complex that includes Penn Station, a police spokesperson said.The unidentified man was transported to a hospital and was in stable condition, police said.No additional information about the shooting was immediately released, including what led up to it.Video showed a large police presence at a section of the station that serves the Long Island Rail Road.People should avoid the area because of the investigation, police said, warning of delays and traffic.The railroad station underneath Madison Square Garden can serve roughly 600,000 passengers daily via Amtrak, the New York subway system, and two regional rail lines — the Long Island Rail Road and New Jersey Transit.In April, President Donald Trump’s administration announced it would take control of the planned $7 billion reconstruction of the aging station, sidelining the city’s mass transit agency.

    An off-duty police officer shot and wounded a man inside Pennsylvania Station, the main intercity railroad station in New York City and the busiest station in the U.S., authorities said.

    Police responded to a 911 call at 7 p.m. Wednesday reporting a 32-year-old man had been shot inside the portion of the midtown Manhattan station, a complex that includes Penn Station, a police spokesperson said.

    The unidentified man was transported to a hospital and was in stable condition, police said.

    No additional information about the shooting was immediately released, including what led up to it.

    Video showed a large police presence at a section of the station that serves the Long Island Rail Road.

    People should avoid the area because of the investigation, police said, warning of delays and traffic.

    The railroad station underneath Madison Square Garden can serve roughly 600,000 passengers daily via Amtrak, the New York subway system, and two regional rail lines — the Long Island Rail Road and New Jersey Transit.

    In April, President Donald Trump’s administration announced it would take control of the planned $7 billion reconstruction of the aging station, sidelining the city’s mass transit agency.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sabrina Cervantes’ attorneys release video footage from crash, encounters with Sacramento police

    [ad_1]

    Ten days after a California state lawmaker announced legal action against the city of Sacramento over DUI claims, an attorney representing her released video of the crash and excerpts from bodycam footage of her interaction with officers. State Sen. Sabrina Cervantes got into a crash on May 19 at 14th and S streets while on her way to work at the Capitol. The Sacramento Police Department initially said that Cervantes showed signs of intoxication, which led to her being cited. A toxicology report later came back negative. Since then, Cervantes has filed a government claim, which is the first step toward a civil lawsuit. She claims that police arrested her without probable cause in violation of state and federal protections against unlawful search and seizure.On May 30, the police department said it would release bodycam footage but later said it would not do so because it was part of an investigation. However, an attorney representing Cervantes released a heavily edited and narrated video that went into further details about the crash, police reports and the lawmaker’s arrest. The video is part of a supplemental letter sent to the attorneys by the city of Sacramento.The roughly 15-minute video begins with surveillance footage of the crash, showing a gray vehicle not coming to a complete stop before crossing the intersection and eventually colliding with Cervantes’ state-owned vehicle.Next, the video text narrative states a police affidavit claims Cervantes had an “unsteady gait,” showing a part of the report that has that wording. A clip of Cervantes walking is shown next, and she can be heard telling officers, “My back is starting to really get to me.”In the following clip, an officer is heard asking her what hurts, and she can be heard saying her back and spine. But then video text claims police did not disclose her injuries when they requested a warrant from a judge, citing the “unsteady gait.”Another part of the police report is shown, with X marks under “slurred speech” and “slow speech.”More bodycam footage is shown, with an officer asking Cervantes to perform a “horizontal gaze” field sobriety test.”So I guess the question is, can’t I just do a blood test, though?” Cervantes said in response.”I could,” the officer said.As the officer responded to Cervantes’ request for a blood test, text on the screen reads “Perjury by officer,” with the video later revealing part of the report claiming that Cervantes refused requests to do a blood test.Bodycam from an Officer Foster is shown next, where he appears to be taking a phone call, in which he at some point said Cervantes was acting defensive. The clip ends with an audible click and video text claiming Foster had just turned off his bodycam.The video cuts to black and text that reads, “Missing 5 minutes of footage – body cam appears to be turned off.”Following that statement, bodycam from an Officer Williams is played next. He can be heard saying that Cervantes sounded “a little lethargic” but that he could not smell alcohol on her breath.”If I had to, you know, make a wild guess, there is a possibility — I have a reasonable suspicion that she has something on board that’s causing impairment,” Williams said in the video.The video narrative then alleges that officers treated the other driver, who was not named, better compared to Cervantes when interviewing her, stating that she was asked a minimal number of questions.According to the video, the woman was not asked to exit her vehicle or perform a field sobriety test. She is also heard saying she did not have her driver’s license or insurance when asked.After being asked if she has any complaints of pain, the officer is heard concluding his interview with the woman with the following four questions:If she was on her phoneIf she had her seatbelt onIf the airbags deployedIf she was drinkingShe said no to all of those questions.Bodycam footage from three days after shows an officer calling the other driver back with follow-up questions from the crash.”There’s body camera footage of us and things that are written in the report that are slightly different,” the officer said in the video.He asks the woman about Cervantes’ demeanor after the crash, to which she said that she appeared shaken up.The officer then repeatedly asked if Cervantes appeared to have any injuries or signs of blood. The woman again said no to those questions.Video text afterward reads, “Attempts to suggest Senator Cervantes was somehow suspicious for calling for help from inside her vehicle.”The officer noted multiple times that Cervantes was in her vehicle for a while after the crash.Following that phone call, video text states that four days after the crash, Officer Williams filed a report to the DMV that Cervantes refused to do a blood test after her arrest.An excerpt from the report shows “Chemical Test Refusal” is marked with an X. The entire video highlights much of why Cervantes is seeking legal action, alleging false sworn police statements for her arrest warrant, false sworn statements to the DMV and the leaking of false claims to news outlets that she was driving under the influence.The senator also alleges that police retaliated against her “due to her introduction of legislation to curb abuse by police of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) systems and due to bias related to her identity as an openly LGBTQ+ Latina elected official.”You can watch the entire video here.Cervantes’ attorneys told KCRA 3 they would not release the raw footage. Asked about how much was edited, they said: “The video has been edited for privacy purposes to protect clients, patients, and others.”KCRA 3 has issued a public records request for the raw footage, which police denied. Police declined again to release the full footage when asked on Thursday.A police representative said that KCRA 3’s public records request did not meet the criteria for mandatory to release to the media, and cited a California code for investigatory records exemption, 7923.600 (a) and related provisions.Police said they would not comment on the case due to pending litigation. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Ten days after a California state lawmaker announced legal action against the city of Sacramento over DUI claims, an attorney representing her released video of the crash and excerpts from bodycam footage of her interaction with officers.

    State Sen. Sabrina Cervantes got into a crash on May 19 at 14th and S streets while on her way to work at the Capitol.

    The Sacramento Police Department initially said that Cervantes showed signs of intoxication, which led to her being cited. A toxicology report later came back negative.

    Since then, Cervantes has filed a government claim, which is the first step toward a civil lawsuit. She claims that police arrested her without probable cause in violation of state and federal protections against unlawful search and seizure.

    On May 30, the police department said it would release bodycam footage but later said it would not do so because it was part of an investigation.

    However, an attorney representing Cervantes released a heavily edited and narrated video that went into further details about the crash, police reports and the lawmaker’s arrest. The video is part of a supplemental letter sent to the attorneys by the city of Sacramento.

    The roughly 15-minute video begins with surveillance footage of the crash, showing a gray vehicle not coming to a complete stop before crossing the intersection and eventually colliding with Cervantes’ state-owned vehicle.

    Next, the video text narrative states a police affidavit claims Cervantes had an “unsteady gait,” showing a part of the report that has that wording. A clip of Cervantes walking is shown next, and she can be heard telling officers, “My back is starting to really get to me.”

    In the following clip, an officer is heard asking her what hurts, and she can be heard saying her back and spine. But then video text claims police did not disclose her injuries when they requested a warrant from a judge, citing the “unsteady gait.”

    Another part of the police report is shown, with X marks under “slurred speech” and “slow speech.”

    More bodycam footage is shown, with an officer asking Cervantes to perform a “horizontal gaze” field sobriety test.

    “So I guess the question is, can’t I just do a blood test, though?” Cervantes said in response.

    “I could,” the officer said.

    As the officer responded to Cervantes’ request for a blood test, text on the screen reads “Perjury by officer,” with the video later revealing part of the report claiming that Cervantes refused requests to do a blood test.

    Excerpt from Sabrina Cervantes police report

    Bodycam from an Officer Foster is shown next, where he appears to be taking a phone call, in which he at some point said Cervantes was acting defensive. The clip ends with an audible click and video text claiming Foster had just turned off his bodycam.

    The video cuts to black and text that reads, “Missing 5 minutes of footage – body cam appears to be turned off.”

    Following that statement, bodycam from an Officer Williams is played next. He can be heard saying that Cervantes sounded “a little lethargic” but that he could not smell alcohol on her breath.

    “If I had to, you know, make a wild guess, there is a possibility — I have a reasonable suspicion that she has something on board that’s causing impairment,” Williams said in the video.

    The video narrative then alleges that officers treated the other driver, who was not named, better compared to Cervantes when interviewing her, stating that she was asked a minimal number of questions.

    According to the video, the woman was not asked to exit her vehicle or perform a field sobriety test. She is also heard saying she did not have her driver’s license or insurance when asked.

    Footage of crash involving Sabrina Cervantes

    After being asked if she has any complaints of pain, the officer is heard concluding his interview with the woman with the following four questions:

    • If she was on her phone
    • If she had her seatbelt on
    • If the airbags deployed
    • If she was drinking

    She said no to all of those questions.

    Bodycam footage from three days after shows an officer calling the other driver back with follow-up questions from the crash.

    “There’s body camera footage of us and things that are written in the report that are slightly different,” the officer said in the video.

    He asks the woman about Cervantes’ demeanor after the crash, to which she said that she appeared shaken up.

    The officer then repeatedly asked if Cervantes appeared to have any injuries or signs of blood. The woman again said no to those questions.

    Video text afterward reads, “Attempts to suggest Senator Cervantes was somehow suspicious for calling for help from inside her vehicle.”

    The officer noted multiple times that Cervantes was in her vehicle for a while after the crash.

    Following that phone call, video text states that four days after the crash, Officer Williams filed a report to the DMV that Cervantes refused to do a blood test after her arrest.

    An excerpt from the report shows “Chemical Test Refusal” is marked with an X.

    The entire video highlights much of why Cervantes is seeking legal action, alleging false sworn police statements for her arrest warrant, false sworn statements to the DMV and the leaking of false claims to news outlets that she was driving under the influence.

    The senator also alleges that police retaliated against her “due to her introduction of legislation to curb abuse by police of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) systems and due to bias related to her identity as an openly LGBTQ+ Latina elected official.”

    You can watch the entire video here.

    Cervantes’ attorneys told KCRA 3 they would not release the raw footage. Asked about how much was edited, they said: “The video has been edited for privacy purposes to protect clients, patients, and others.”

    KCRA 3 has issued a public records request for the raw footage, which police denied. Police declined again to release the full footage when asked on Thursday.

    A police representative said that KCRA 3’s public records request did not meet the criteria for mandatory to release to the media, and cited a California code for investigatory records exemption, 7923.600 (a) and related provisions.

    Police said they would not comment on the case due to pending litigation.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • An Adorable Way to Study How Kids Get Each Other Sick

    An Adorable Way to Study How Kids Get Each Other Sick

    [ad_1]

    At the start of 2022, as the Omicron variant of the coronavirus blazed across the United States, Seema Lakdawala was in Pittsburgh, finalizing plans to open a brand-new day care. She had found the perfect facility and signed the stack of paperwork; she had assembled a hodgepodge of plushies, puzzles, and toys. It was the perfect setup, one that “I’ve been dreaming about for years,” Lakdawala, a virologist at Emory University, told me. She couldn’t help but swell with pride, later that spring, when she ushered in her establishments’ first attendees: five young ferrets—including one deliberately infected with the flu.

    Over the next several months, Lakdawala and her colleagues watched several cohorts of ferrets ping-pong flu viruses back and forth as they romped and wrestled and frolicked inside of a shared playpen. The researchers meticulously logged the ferrets’ movements; they took note of the surfaces and other animals that each one touched. Their early findings, now being prepared for publication in a scientific journal, could help researchers figure out how flu viruses most efficiently spread in group settings—not just among ferrets, but among human kids.

    Aerosols, droplets, face-to-face contact, contaminated surfaces—there are plenty of ways for flu viruses to spread. But the nitty-gritty of flu transmission remains “pretty much a black box,” says Aubree Gordon, an epidemiologist at the University of Michigan. Despite decades of research, “we really don’t know the relative importance of each potential route.” Now, though, ferrets in playpens could help researchers to tease out those dynamics—and even, someday, to design flu-blocking measures for bona fide day cares.

    Ferrets have long been the “gold standard for influenza infection and transmission,” says Nicole Rockey, an environmental engineer at Duke University who led the experiments with Lakdawala. The animals’ airway architecture is uncannily similar to ours, and unlike most lab mice, ferrets are vulnerable to catching and passing on flu viruses—even developing the same coughy, sniffly symptoms that so many humans do. But most flu-transmission experiments in ferrets remain limited to artificial circumstances: pairs of animals in tiny cages with dividers between them, where scientists ogle them inhaling each other’s air for days or even weeks. That’s not how animals catch one another’s infections in the wild, and it’s certainly not how human outbreaks unfold. “We don’t interact with each other for 48 hours straight through a perforated wall,” Rockey told me.

    A giant playpen outfitted with toys, air samplers, and video cameras isn’t exactly a natural habitat for a ferret. But the setup does tap into many of the animals’ impish instincts. Domesticated by humans over thousands of years, ferrets “are a very playful species, and they love to be social,” says Alice Dancer, an animal-welfare researcher at the University of London’s Royal Veterinary College. That makes them great models for not just flu transmission, but flu transmission among kids, who are thought to be major drivers of outbreaks. In their day care, the ferrets squabble over toys, clamber up play structures, and canoodle plush snakes; they chase one another around, and nap in big piles when they get tuckered out; they exchange affectionate nuzzles, bonks, and little play bites. Every interaction represents a potential transmission event; so, too, do the surfaces they touch, and the shared pockets of air from which they all breathe.

    Already, the researchers have collected some results that, Lakdawala told me, are “changing the way I think about transmission a little bit.” In one early experiment, involving an infected animal cavorting with four uninfected ones, they were surprised to find that the ferret with the least direct contact with the flu “donor” was the only “recipient” in the room who got sick. It seemed counterintuitive, Lakdawala told me, until video footage revealed that the newly sickened recipient had been copying everything that the donor did—chewing the toys it chewed, rolling the balls it rolled, swiping the surfaces it swiped. It was as if the first ferret was leaving a trail of infectious breadcrumbs for the second one to snarf. If that finding holds up in other experiments, which the researchers are analyzing now, it could suggest that contaminated surfaces, or fomites, are playing a larger-than-expected role in passing the virus around, Rockey told me.

    Another of the team’s early findings points to a similar notion. When the researchers cranked up the ventilation in their ferret day cares, hoping to clear virus particles out of the air, they found that the same proportion of uninfected ferrets ended up catching the virus. This was disappointing, but not a total shock given how paws-on ferrets—and kids, for that matter—are with one another and their surroundings. It didn’t matter if the air in the room was being exchanged more than once every three minutes. Whenever the ferrets had their run of the room, the researchers would find virus particles smeared on the toys, the snack station, and the playpen walls.

    Ventilation wasn’t totally useless: More air exchanges, the team found, did seem to reduce the concentration of flu genetic material in the air, and the ferrets who got infected under those conditions were slower to start shedding the virus—a hint, Lakdawala thinks, that they might have taken in a lower infectious dose. Among humans, that might translate into less severe cases of disease, Gordon told me, though that would need to be confirmed.

    Whatever upshots Rockey and Lakdawala’s ferret findings might have for human day cares won’t necessarily apply to other venues. In offices, hospitals, and even schools for older kids, people are generally a lot less tactile with one another, and a lot better versed on hygiene. Plus, adult bodies just aren’t built like kids’, says Cécile Viboud, an epidemiologist at the Fogarty International Center at the National Institutes of Health. Their airways are bigger, stronger, and more developed—and some experiments suggest that, for at least some respiratory viruses, the older and larger people are, the more infectious aerosols they might expel. For adults, ventilation may matter all the more.

    Lakdawala and her colleagues are still mulling some other interventions that might work better for ferrets, and eventually kids: humidifiers, air purifiers, targeted cleaning, maybe even keeping individuals from crowding too closely into a portion of the playpen. (They don’t plan to experiment with handwashing or masking; imagine the difficulty of strapping an N95 to a ferret’s face.) Lakdawala is also mulling whether surfaces made of copper—which her team has shown can render flu viruses inactive within minutes—could play a protective role.

    But everything that happens in the ferrets’ playpens will still come with caveats. “It’s still an animal model, at the end of the day,” Viboud told me. For all the similarities between the ferret airway and ours, the way their little noses and snouts are shaped could affect how they cough and sneeze. And the researchers haven’t yet studied spread among ferrets with preexisting immunity to flu, which some day-care attendees will have. Ferrets are also more inclined to bite, wrestle, and defecate wherever they please than the average (potty-trained) kid.

    Still, for the most part, Lakdawala delights in how childlike the ferrets can be. They’re affectionate and mischievous; they seem to bubble with energy and glee. After discovering that the air-sampling robot stationed in the center of their day care was mobile, several of the ferrets began to take it for rides. In watching and sharing the footage at conferences, Lakdawala has received one piece of feedback, over and over again: Oh yeah, parents tell her. My kids do that too.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link