ReportWire

Tag: VEEV

  • Needham & Company LLC Boosts Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEV) Price Target to $355.00

    Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEVFree Report) had its price target lifted by Needham & Company LLC from $300.00 to $355.00 in a research note released on Thursday morning,Benzinga reports. They currently have a buy rating on the technology company’s stock.

    A number of other analysts have also recently weighed in on VEEV. KeyCorp boosted their price target on Veeva Systems from $285.00 to $325.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Monday, July 14th. Wells Fargo & Company boosted their price target on Veeva Systems from $300.00 to $326.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Tuesday. Stifel Nicolaus boosted their price target on Veeva Systems from $272.00 to $295.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, May 29th. UBS Group boosted their price objective on Veeva Systems from $250.00 to $285.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Thursday, May 29th. Finally, Piper Sandler boosted their price objective on Veeva Systems from $255.00 to $325.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Thursday, May 29th. Sixteen investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating, seven have given a Hold rating and two have assigned a Sell rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, Veeva Systems currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $298.68.

    Check Out Our Latest Report on Veeva Systems

    Veeva Systems Price Performance

    Shares of NYSE:VEEV opened at $272.51 on Thursday. Veeva Systems has a fifty-two week low of $200.30 and a fifty-two week high of $296.72. The business has a 50-day moving average of $282.59 and a two-hundred day moving average of $253.79. The stock has a market capitalization of $44.53 billion, a P/E ratio of 55.96, a P/E/G ratio of 2.33 and a beta of 0.95.

    Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEVGet Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, May 28th. The technology company reported $1.97 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.74 by $0.23. Veeva Systems had a return on equity of 14.19% and a net margin of 27.29%.The company had revenue of $759.04 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $728.38 million. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm earned $1.50 earnings per share. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 16.7% compared to the same quarter last year. As a group, research analysts expect that Veeva Systems will post 4.35 EPS for the current fiscal year.

    Insider Activity at Veeva Systems

    In related news, SVP Jonathan Faddis sold 720 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, July 10th. The stock was sold at an average price of $285.62, for a total transaction of $205,646.40. Following the transaction, the senior vice president directly owned 7,902 shares in the company, valued at $2,256,969.24. The trade was a 8.35% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this link. Also, Director Timothy S. Cabral sold 315 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, June 6th. The shares were sold at an average price of $289.72, for a total value of $91,261.80. Following the transaction, the director owned 5,500 shares in the company, valued at $1,593,460. This represents a 5.42% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 1,378 shares of company stock worth $394,217 over the last three months. Company insiders own 10.30% of the company’s stock.

    Hedge Funds Weigh In On Veeva Systems

    Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the business. Abound Financial LLC bought a new position in shares of Veeva Systems during the 1st quarter worth about $25,000. ORG Partners LLC bought a new position in shares of Veeva Systems during the 1st quarter worth about $26,000. Trust Co. of Toledo NA OH bought a new stake in shares of Veeva Systems in the 2nd quarter valued at approximately $29,000. Golden State Wealth Management LLC grew its stake in shares of Veeva Systems by 152.9% in the 1st quarter. Golden State Wealth Management LLC now owns 129 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $30,000 after purchasing an additional 78 shares during the period. Finally, Wayfinding Financial LLC bought a new stake in shares of Veeva Systems in the 1st quarter valued at approximately $32,000. 88.20% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

    About Veeva Systems

    (Get Free Report)

    Veeva Systems Inc provides cloud-based software for the life sciences industry. It offers Veeva Commercial Cloud, a suite of software and analytics solutions, such as Veeva customer relationship management (CRM) that enable customer-facing employees at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies; Veeva Vault PromoMats, an end-to-end content and digital asset management solution; Veeva Vault Medical that provides source of medical content across multiple channels and geographies; Veeva Crossix, an analytics platform for pharmaceutical brands; Veeva OpenData, a customer reference data solution; Veeva Link, a data application that allows link to generate real-time intelligence; and Veeva Compass includes de-identified and longitudinal patient data for the United States.

    Featured Articles

    Analyst Recommendations for Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEV)



    Receive News & Ratings for Veeva Systems Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Veeva Systems and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Remembering the startups we lost in 2023 | TechCrunch

    Remembering the startups we lost in 2023 | TechCrunch

    Not every startup collapse is an FTX or Theranos. They don’t all burn so brightly and explode so spectacularly. More often than not, there won’t be some high-profile court case and prison time. Amanda Seyfried isn’t going to play you in the made for Hulu movie.

    The story of most startup failures is far less exciting. The timing isn’t right, funding dries up, runways run out. Of late, a lot of macroeconomic factors have come into play, as well. These past few years have been especially brutal for startup land. According to a recent PitchBook survey, “approximately 3,200 private venture-backed U.S. companies have gone out of business this year.”

    Combined, those companies raised north of $27 billion. Even more starkly, it’s a figure that doesn’t include companies that failed after going public or were able to find a buyer. That, after all, would really be stretching the definition of a “startup.”

    It’s worth noting, too, that “failure” is subjective. Does bankruptcy qualify? It’s certainly not a good sign with regard to your company’s health, but plenty of companies have managed to bounce back to some degree. This particular question has been cause for plenty of discussion around the old TechCrunch virtual watercooler.

    For the sake of a piece titled “The Startups We Lost,” I’ve opted to limit the list to those startups that — to the best of our knowledge — have hit the point of no return. Pushing up daisies. Pining for the fjords.

    As the final days fall off the calendar, let’s take a moment to remember some of the startups that didn’t make it.

    Braid

    Founded 2019
    $10 million raised

    Image Credits: Braid

    In October, Braid, a four-year-old startup that aimed to make shared wallets more mainstream among consumers, announced it had shut down. Founded in January 2019 by Amanda Peyton and Todd Berman (who left in 2020), San Francisco-based Braid set out to offer friends and family an FDIC-insured, multiuser account that was designed to make it easy “to pool, manage and spend money together.” Braid raised a total of $10 million in funding “over multiple rounds” from Index Ventures, Accel and others.

    What was refreshing about this closure was Peyton’s candor about what led to Braid’s demise. In a blog post, Peyton said that Braid had closed its doors in September, and outlined her experiences — and mistakes — in building the company, ultimately realizing that it wasn’t going to be a viable business venture. An estimated 91% of startups fail. If more founders shared their experience like Peyton did so others could learn from them, maybe that number would go down.

    CloudNordic

    Founded 2007

    a screenshot of CloudNordic's status page that reads, "Unfortunately, it has proved impossible to recreate more data, and the majority of our customers have thus lost all data with us."

    Image Credits: TechCrunch (screenshot)

    CloudNordic might not be a household name, but a destructive ransomware attack on its systems propelled the company into the limelight — and its ultimate demise. The Danish cloud host provider shut down this year after close to two decades of operation following a ransomware attack that wiped out the company’s systems and destroyed all of its customers’ data. The company said it didn’t have the money to pay the hackers, and wouldn’t even if it did. With no options left, the company closed its doors.

    Convoy

    Founded 2015
    More than $1 billion raised

    Convoy trucking

    Image Credits: Convoy

    The digital freight broker abruptly closed in October 2023, just eight months after the Seattle-based company raised $260 million in fresh funding that pushed its valuation to $3.8 billion. Convoy, founded by former Amazon and Google exec CEO Dan Lewis and CTO Grant Goodale, will live on — sort of.

    Supply chain logistics platform Flexport acquired the assets of the shuttered digital freight network with plans to restore Convoy’s trucking logistics services for customers. Flexport didn’t acquire the business or any of its liabilities, but its CEO said it did plan to retain “a small group of team members from their core product and engineering team.”

    Daylight

    Founded 2020
    $20 million raised

    Image Credits: Daylight

    In May 2023, Daylight, an LGBTQ+ banking platform that had raised $20 million in funding, announced it would be shutting down and ceasing operations on June 30. The announcement came months after NY Magazine published an explosive feature on the neobank. The article honed in on Daylight, whose seed and Series A fundraises TechCrunch had covered here and here, respectively. NY Mag’s piece detailed a lawsuit brought on by three former employees as well as alleged fabrications and inappropriate behavior on the part of co-founder and CEO Rob Curtis.

    In a blog published in May, Curtis said he felt like “now is the right time to exit this market.” We heard in October that the suits had been dismissed by a federal court and that Daylight was acquired, but Curtis declined to comment further when we reached out. It was a disappointing outcome but one that highlighted the challenges of neobanks that target specific demographics. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw a flurry of such startups raising money, but since then, things have been relatively quiet. Part of the challenge is providing differentiated services that are actually unique to a certain community. Since Daylight’s closure, Curtis has moved on to a tequila-related venture.

    Fuzzy

    Founded 2016
    $80 million raised

    Image Credits: Fuzzy

    Some startups die long, protracted deaths. Not Fuzzy. The pet care telehealth startup was here one day and gone the next. In February, the firm was reportedly hyping its growth on internal Zoom calls. Within months, the company had closed up shop. Fuzzy’s site was taken down without any warning issued to customers.

    From the sound of things, even some top execs were left wondering precisely what had happened to the startup. That certainly hasn’t stopped the competition from attempting to capitalize on Fuzzy’s demise.

    IRL

    Founded 2016
    $200 million raised

    irl logo

    Image Credits: IRL

    IRL’s meltdown was a hot mess. In 2022, the event organizing social app laid off one-quarter of its 100 or so employees. Co-founder and CEO Abraham Shafi put the blame on an extremely volatile market, while stating that the company’s cash runway would last at least until 2024. Then it shut down this June.

    No social network is completely devoid of bots, but an internal investigation by its board of directors found that such accounts constituted around 95% of its 20 million active monthly users. In a lawsuit filed last month, IRL’s co-founders accused their investors of falsifying that figure in order to sabotage the firm, which was previously valued at $1.17 billion.

    IronNet

    Founded 2014
    $400 million raised

    Keith Alexander on stage speaking to Matt Burns at TechCrunch Disrupt in 2017

    IronNet founder Keith Alexander at TechCrunch Disrupt in 2017. Image Credits: Noam Galai / Getty Images

    IronNet, founded by former NSA director Keith Alexander, was a once-promising cybersecurity startup, which at its peak raised more than $400 million in funding. But in the end, IronNet was no match for market forces (and poor leadership). After a bumpy ride going public and rounds of layoffs, Alexander departed as CEO in July and was replaced with the chairperson of the company’s largest investor. IronNet scrambled to stay afloat, but lasted only a few weeks longer before it laid off everyone else and filed for bankruptcy.

    Mandolin

    Founded 2020
    $17 million raised

    Plenty of startups struggled through the pandemic. Others thrived. Founded in June 2020, the concert livestreaming platform was the right startup at the right time. After all, it had only been a few months since venues across the U.S. closed their doors indefinitely. Mandolin’s subsequent rise was swift, taking on big name events with artists ranging from Lil’ Wayne to the Lumineers.

    A year after its founding, the Indianapolis-based firm raised a $12 million Series A, following a $5 million seed round the previous October. In 2022, it seemed as though the platform was still thriving, even as venues across the country had re-opened. Mandolin diversified into other aspects of the live music experience, including venue partnerships and merchandizing.

    This April, however, the startup announced on Instagram that it was closing up shop. “After 3 incredible years,” it noted, “we are sad to announce that Mandolin will no longer be offering the digital fan experiences you’ve come to love.”

    Veev

    Founded 2008
    $597 million raised

    Veev raises $400M

    Image Credits: Veev

    Veev, a real estate developer turned tech-enabled prefab homebuilder, as of November was on the verge of shuttering after reaching unicorn status last year, according to multiple reports. Calcalist reported on November 26 that the company — which raised a staggering $600 million in total, $400 million of which was secured in March of 2022 — was going to have to close up shop after an “abrupt cancellation of a capital-raising initiative.” Later that week, it was reported that Veev was “undergoing liquidation.”

    It was a bit of a shocking turn of events considering just how much money the company had raised not even two years prior. The closure was not the first startup failure for Veev co-founders Heller and Ami Avrahami. Another one of their proptech ventures, Reali, began a shutdown in August of 2022 after raising more than $290 million in debt and equity funding. Zeev Ventures was an investor in both companies.

    ZestMoney

    Founded 2015
    $121 million raised

    ZestMoney founders

    ZestMoney founders resign as Goldman Sachs-backed fintech struggles to raise funds. Image Credits: ZestMoney

    In mid-May, Manish reported on the fact that founders of ZestMoney had resigned from the startup. The Indian fintech, whose ability to underwrite small ticket loans to first-time internet customers, once drew the backing of many high-profile investors, including Goldman Sachs. By December, Manish had reported that ZestMoney was shutting down following unsuccessful efforts to find a buyer.

    The Bengaluru-headquartered startup — which also identified PayU, Quona, Zip, Omidyar Network and Ribbit Capital among its backers — employed about 150 people and had raised over $130 million in its eight-year journey.

    Zume

    Founded 2015
    $445 million raised

    Image Credits: Zume

    “Pizza was our prototype,” co-founder and CEO Alex Garden told me in 2018. Three years after its founding, Zume made a major pivot. While it will forever be remembered as the pizza robot startup (that’s a hard identity to shake), the Southern Californian company cast a wider net. First it was exploring non-pizza delivery trucks. Two years later, it pivoted into sustainable food packaging.

    Throughout its many lives, one certainly can’t pin Zume’s ultimate demise on a failure to adapt. Nor was it a lack of funding, as the company raised nearly half-a-billion in its eight-year history. That includes a 2018 SoftBank round of $325 million that valued the company at north of two billon.

    Zume liquidated its assets in early June.

    Brian Heater

    Source link

  • VEEV Stock Price | Veeva Systems Inc. Cl A Stock Quote (U.S.: NYSE) | MarketWatch

    VEEV Stock Price | Veeva Systems Inc. Cl A Stock Quote (U.S.: NYSE) | MarketWatch

    Veeva Systems Inc. Cl A

    Veeva Systems, Inc. engages in the provision of industry cloud solutions for the global life sciences industry. Its solutions enable pharmaceutical and other life sciences companies to realize the benefits of modern cloud-based architectures and mobile applications for their most critical business functions, without compromising industry-specific functionality or regulatory compliance. The firm’s customer relationship management solutions enable its customers to increase the productivity and compliance of their sales and marketing functions. Its regulated content management and collaboration solutions enable its customers to more efficiently manage regulated, content-centric processes across the enterprise. The company’s customer master solution enables customers to more effectively manage complex healthcare provider and healthcare organization data. The company was founded by Mark Armenante, Peter P. Gassner, Doug Ostler, Mitch Wallace and Matthew J. Wallach on January 12, 2007, and is headquartered in Pleasanton, CA.

    Source link